篮球可供性知觉与投篮准确性的关系研究
|
摘要
研究目的
（1）探讨篮球可供性知觉和投篮准确性的关系
（2）探索篮球可供性知觉的影响因素
（3）探讨篮球可供性知觉的学习途径
研究方法
1,文献资料法：通过上海体育学院图书馆查阅和环境可供性相关的文献资料，了解此方面的研究现状及动态；同时阅读生理学、心理学、训练学等方面的专著，为本研究提供理论依据和实践支撑。
2,实验法：根据实验目的，选取不同的实验对象，通过实验设计、实验程序、实验条件控制等手段得出实验结果。
3,数理统计法：采用spss20.0统计软件对实验数据进行处理，根据不同实验目的进行统计分析，包括重复方差测量分析、相关分析等。
研究结果
实验一的研究结果：新手通过拍球（动力性接触）感知篮球可供性和投篮准确性之间不存在显著性相关,专家型篮球运动员通过动力性接触感知篮球可供性和投篮准确性之间存在显著性相关。
新手的篮球感知偏好重复测量方差分析：材质的主效应显著，超级纤维材质篮球、pvc材质篮球、橡胶材质篮球相互之间有显著性差异。比较不同材质篮球的感知偏好均值，超级纤维材质篮球感知偏好分值最大，pvc材质篮球次之，橡胶材质篮球最小。重量的主效应显著，7号篮球、6号篮球、5号篮球相互之间有显著性差异。比较不同重量的篮球的感知偏好均值，6号篮球感知偏好得分最大，7号篮球次之，5号篮球最小。新手的投篮命中率统计结果表明，材质和重量的主效应都不显著，材质和重量无交互效应。
专家型篮球运动员的篮球感知偏好重复测量方差分析：材质和重量的主效应显著。材质上，超级纤维材质篮球、pvc材质篮球、橡胶材质篮球之间存在显著性差异。比较不同材质篮球的感知偏好均值，超级纤维材质篮球感知偏好分值最大，pvc材质篮球次之，橡胶材质篮球最小。重量上，7号篮球和6号篮球不存在显著性差异，7号篮球和5号篮球以及6号篮球和5号篮球之间存在显著性差异。比较不同重量的篮球的感知偏好均值，7号篮球感知偏好分值最大，6号篮球次之，5号篮球最小。
专家投篮命中率重复测量方差分析：材质和重量的主效应都显著。材质上，超级纤维材质篮球和pvc材质篮球不存在显著性差异，超级纤维材质篮球和橡胶材质篮球以及pvc材质篮球和橡胶材质篮球都存在显著性差异。从不同材质篮球的投篮命中率均值可知，超级纤维材质篮球投篮命中率最高，pvc材质篮球次之，橡胶材质篮球最低。重量上，7号篮球与6号篮球之间不存在显著性差异，7号篮球与5号篮球以及6号篮球与5号篮球之间存在显著性差异。从不同重量的篮球投篮命中率均值可知，7号篮球投篮命中率最高，6号篮球次之，5号篮球最低。
实验二的研究结果：从男女篮球运动员的不同材质篮球感知偏好均值来看，他们的篮球感知偏好次序相同，超级纤维材质篮球感知偏好分值最大，pvc材质篮球次之，橡胶材质篮球最小；重量和性别存在交互作用，固定性别因素，考察重量在不同性别水平上的差异。男性水平上，不同重量的篮球感知偏好存在显著性差异，7号篮球感知偏好分值最大，6号篮球次之，5号篮球最小。女性水平上，不同重量的篮球感知偏好存在显著性差异。6号篮球感知偏好分值最大，7号篮球次之，5号篮球最小。对于男子篮球运动员，偏好更重的7号篮球，而对于女子篮球运动员，偏好更轻的6号篮球。
重量x材质x性别存在交互作用。在超级纤维7号篮球水平上，男女篮球运动员感知偏好存在显著性差异，男子篮球运动员的感知偏好分值大于女子篮球运动员的感知偏好分值。在超级纤维5号篮球、pvc6号篮球、pvc5篮球、橡胶6号篮球水平上，男女篮球运动员感知偏好存在显著性差异，男子篮球运动员的感知偏好分值小于女子篮球运动员的感知偏好分值。
男女篮球运动员投篮命中率主体间效应检验：性别间投篮命中率存在显著性差异。男子篮球运动员通过动力性接触感知篮球可供性和投篮命中率之间存在显著性相关；女子篮球运动员通过动力性接触感知篮球可供性和投篮命中率之间存在显著性相关。
实验三的研究结果：投篮前，随着任务难度（距离增加）增大时，篮球可供性知觉分值变小，但是在每个投篮位置，知觉判断最适合投篮的篮球都是6号篮球。在投篮后的篮球可供性知觉中，随着任务难度（距离增加）增大，篮球可供性知觉分值变小，但是在每个投篮位置上所选择最佳篮球都是6号篮球。
在投篮阶段，随着距离的增加，投篮命中率降低，但是投篮命中率并没有随着篮球重量减少而提高。
篮球可供性知觉和投篮命中率相关性分析，投篮前，在4.25m投篮位置，三种篮球可供性知觉和投篮命中率都存在显著性相关；在5.25m投篮位置，7号、6号篮球可供性知觉和投篮命中率存在显著性相关，而6号篮球可供性知觉和投篮命中率之间相关系数更大；在6.25m投篮位置，只有6号篮球可供性知觉和投篮命中率存在显著性相关。投篮后，在4.25m投篮位置，7、6号篮球可供性知觉与投篮命中率之间存在显著性相关，而5号篮球可供性知觉与投篮命中率之间不存在显著性相关；在5.25m投篮位置，7号、6号篮球可供知觉和投篮命中率之间存在显著性相关，但是6号篮球可供性知觉和投篮命中率相关系数更大；在6.25m投篮位置，只有6号篮球可供性知觉和投篮命中率之间存在显著性相关。比较投篮前后篮球可供性知觉和投篮命中率的相关性，投篮后，随着距离的增加，篮球可供性知觉和投篮命中率的相关系数变小，从4.25m到6.25m，最后只有6号篮球可供性知觉和投篮命中率存在显著性相关。
实验四的研究结果：篮球初学者经过8周投篮练习，投篮命中率显著提高，其拍球（动力性接触）感知篮球可供性和投篮命中率之间存在显著性相关。比较投篮练习前后被试的篮球可供性知觉，其感知偏好发生变化。尽管投篮练习前后超级纤维7、6、5号篮球的感知偏好存在显著性差异，但是比较投篮练习前后篮球感知偏好均值，练习后篮球感知偏好均值增大。Pvc7号篮球、橡胶7号篮球感知偏好不存在显著性差异，但是比较练习前后感知偏好均值，篮球感知偏好分值在训练后变小。而pvc6号篮球、pvc5号篮球、橡胶6号篮球、橡胶5号篮球在训练前、后存在显著性差异，投篮练习前后感知偏好比较，投篮后篮球感知偏好分值变小。
研究结论
（1）具有篮球专项经验的运动员感知篮球可供性与投篮准确性之间存在正相关；篮球初学者感知篮球可供性与投篮准确性之间不存在正相关。具有篮球运动经验的运动员感知越适合的篮球投篮越准确。
（2）拍球是感知篮球可供性知觉的探索行为，篮球的重量和材质是篮球运动员感知篮球可供性的关键信息。
（3）篮球可供性知觉差异受到有无训练背景、不同性别以及任务难度变化的影响。
（4）投篮练习过程包含篮球可供性知觉学习，即投篮练习有助于篮球可供性知觉的习得。在篮球可供性知觉学习过程中，练习者通过不断练习投篮，逐渐习得哪些篮球更适合投篮。
Objective
1, Discussing the relationship between the basketball affordance perception andshooting accuracy.
2, Exploring influence factors of basketball affordance perception.
3, Exploring the way of basketball affordance perception learning.
Methods
1Literature: understanding the research status and dynamic by the Shanghaisports university library about topics related to affordance study literature, At thesame time, reading the aspects of physiology, psychology, sports training book,looking for theory and practice basis for this study.
2Experiment: according to the experiment purpose, selecting different subjects,experimental results are obtained through the experiment design, experimentprocedure and experimental condition control.
3Mathematical statistics: adopting spss20.0statistical software to deal with theexperimental data according to different experimental purposes, including therepetitive measurement of variance, correlation analysis, etc.
Results
Experiment one results: The novice’s affordance perception by dynamictouch and shooting accuracy are not positive correlation, there is positivecorrelation between expert athlete’s affordance perception, by dynamic touch, andshooting accuracy.
The repetitive measure analysis of variance at novice’s perception preferenceresults: there are basketball material including super fiber, pvc, rubber impactingon novice’s perception preferences, which are very significant differences eachother. The super fiber basketball preference’s score is the biggest, the pvcbasketball is second, the rubber basketball is the smallest. Weight affect novice’sperception preferences, there is significant difference among the number7,6,5basketball. The number6basketball preference score is the biggest, the number7basketball is the second, the number5basketball is the smallest. The statisticalresults of novice’s shooting accuracy show that the main effects of the materialand weight are not significant.
The repetitive measure variance analysis of perception reference results: Thematerial and weight affect expert’s perception preference. There are basketball material including super fiber, pvc, rubber impact on expert basketball perceptionpreferences, which are very significant differences each other. The super fiberbasketball preference score is the biggest, the pvc basketball preference score issecond, the rubber basketball is the smallest. Weight affect experts perceptionpreferences, there is significant difference between the number7and5basketball.,Also between the number6and the number5basketball. The number7basketballpreference scores is the biggest, the number6basketball is second, the number5basketball is the smallest.
The repetitive measure variance analysis of expert’s basketball shootingpercentage results: the main effects of material and weight are significant,material and weight influence on expert’s shooting percentage. There is nosignificant difference between the super fiber and pvc basketball, the super fiberand rubber basketball exist significant differences, also the pvc and rubberbasketball. From different material basketball shooting percentage, the super fibershooting percentage is the highest, the pvc basketball is second, the rubberbasketball is the lowest. There is no significant difference between the number7and number6basketball, there is significant between the number7and number5basketball, also the number6and number5basketball. The number7basketball’sshooting percentage is the highest, the number6basketball is second, thenumber5basketball is the lowest.
Experiment two results: from the mean value of perception preferenceabout material, the male’s basketball athlete and female's basketball athlete’sperception preference order are same. The super fiber basketball’s perceptionpreference value is the biggest, the pvc basketball is second, the rubber basketballis the smallest. Weight and gender exists interaction, fixed gender factors, weightthat is in levels of gender are different. at male level, the basketball weight ‘sperception preferences exist significant difference, the number7basketball’sperception preference value is the biggest, the number6basketball is second, thenumber5basketball is the smallest. At Woman level, the basketball weight’sperception preference exist significant difference. The number6basketball’sperception preference value is the biggest, the number7basketball is second, thenumber5basketball is the smallest. The male's basketball players prefer theheavier basketball, the female's basketball athletes prefer the lighter basketball.
The main effects of material and weight are significant, material and weight influence on shooting percentage. The super fiber and pvc basketball are nosignificant different, the super fiber and rubber basketball exists significantdifferences, also the pvc and rubber basketball. The super fiber basketball’sshooting percentage is the highest, the pvc basketball is second, the rubberbasketball is the lowest. There is no significant difference between the number7and number6basketball, there are significant differences between the number7and the number6basketball, also the number6and number5basketball. Thenumber7basketball shooting percentage is the highest, the number6basketball issecond, the number5basketball is the lowest.
The shooting percentage between the male basketball athletes and the femalebasketball athletes is not significant difference. The male basketball athletesperception preference and shooting percentage are positive correlation, the femaleperceive preferences and shooting percentage are significant positive correlation.
Experimental three results: before shooting, with increased task difficultyincrease (distance increase), the basketball’s affordance perception is reduced, butat the end of each distance shooting location, the number6basketball is perceivedthe most suitable for shooting. After shooting, as the task difficulty increases(distance increases), the basketball’s affordance perception is reduced, but thebest ball chosen is the number6basketball in each distance shooting location.
At shooting stage, with distance increase, the shooting percentage is reduced,but the shooting percentage does not increase with basketball weight reduction.
Correlation analysis of the affordance perception and shooting percentagebefore shooting, at4.25m shooting location, there is significant positivecorrelation about affordance perception and shooting percentage of three kindbasketball; at5.25m shooting location, there is significant positive correlationabout affordance perception and shooting percentage between the number7andthe number6basketball, the number6correlation coefficient is larger. At6.25mshooting location, there is significant positive correlation only about the number6basketball affordance perception and shooting percentage. At4.25m shootinglocation, there is significant correlation of number7,6basketball’s affordanceperception and shooting percentage, there is no significant correlation aboutaffordance perception and shooting percentage in the number5basketball. At5.25m shooting location, the number7,6basketball is positively correlated toaffordance perception and shooting percentage, but the number6basketball affordance and shooting percentage’s correlation coefficient is more larger; At6.25m shooting location, there is a positive correlation between affordanceperception and shooting percentage in the number6basketball. The correlationbetween affordance perception and shooting percentage before and aftercomparison, with the increase of distance, affordance perception and shootingpercentage’s correlation, only the number6basketball’s affordance and shootingpercentage is significant.
Experiment four results: the novice’s perception preference and shootingpercentage is positive correlation. After8weeks shooting training, theparticipant’s shooting percentage gets significantly higher. The participant’sperception preference also produces change, although the super fiber7,6,5basketball’s perception preference is no significant difference, compared beforeand after training, the perception preference value enlarges after training. The pvc7and rubber7number basketball’s preference value are no significant difference,but after training, the preference value decrease. And the pvc6, pvc5, rubber5,rubber6basketball have a statistically significant difference, compared before andafter the training, basketball perception preference values decrease.
Conclusions
1, There is a positive correlation between basketball affordance perception andshooting accurate for basketball player with basketball experience, there is anegative correlation between basketball affordance perception and shootingaccurate for novice with no basketball affordance. The basketball is perceivedmore suitable, it is shot more accurate for the basketball players with experience.
2, Beating the basketball is exporing action of basketball affordance perception,the weight and the material of basketball are the key information of affordanceperception,of basketball.
3, Sport experience, gender and task difficulty influence on the basketballaffordance perception differences.
4, The basketball shooting’s practice process contains affordance perceptuallearning. In process of basketball affordance’s perceptual learning, throughconstant practice learners gradually learn which basketball is more suitable forshooting.
（1）探讨篮球可供性知觉和投篮准确性的关系
（2）探索篮球可供性知觉的影响因素
（3）探讨篮球可供性知觉的学习途径
研究方法
1,文献资料法：通过上海体育学院图书馆查阅和环境可供性相关的文献资料，了解此方面的研究现状及动态；同时阅读生理学、心理学、训练学等方面的专著，为本研究提供理论依据和实践支撑。
2,实验法：根据实验目的，选取不同的实验对象，通过实验设计、实验程序、实验条件控制等手段得出实验结果。
3,数理统计法：采用spss20.0统计软件对实验数据进行处理，根据不同实验目的进行统计分析，包括重复方差测量分析、相关分析等。
研究结果
实验一的研究结果：新手通过拍球（动力性接触）感知篮球可供性和投篮准确性之间不存在显著性相关,专家型篮球运动员通过动力性接触感知篮球可供性和投篮准确性之间存在显著性相关。
新手的篮球感知偏好重复测量方差分析：材质的主效应显著，超级纤维材质篮球、pvc材质篮球、橡胶材质篮球相互之间有显著性差异。比较不同材质篮球的感知偏好均值，超级纤维材质篮球感知偏好分值最大，pvc材质篮球次之，橡胶材质篮球最小。重量的主效应显著，7号篮球、6号篮球、5号篮球相互之间有显著性差异。比较不同重量的篮球的感知偏好均值，6号篮球感知偏好得分最大，7号篮球次之，5号篮球最小。新手的投篮命中率统计结果表明，材质和重量的主效应都不显著，材质和重量无交互效应。
专家型篮球运动员的篮球感知偏好重复测量方差分析：材质和重量的主效应显著。材质上，超级纤维材质篮球、pvc材质篮球、橡胶材质篮球之间存在显著性差异。比较不同材质篮球的感知偏好均值，超级纤维材质篮球感知偏好分值最大，pvc材质篮球次之，橡胶材质篮球最小。重量上，7号篮球和6号篮球不存在显著性差异，7号篮球和5号篮球以及6号篮球和5号篮球之间存在显著性差异。比较不同重量的篮球的感知偏好均值，7号篮球感知偏好分值最大，6号篮球次之，5号篮球最小。
专家投篮命中率重复测量方差分析：材质和重量的主效应都显著。材质上，超级纤维材质篮球和pvc材质篮球不存在显著性差异，超级纤维材质篮球和橡胶材质篮球以及pvc材质篮球和橡胶材质篮球都存在显著性差异。从不同材质篮球的投篮命中率均值可知，超级纤维材质篮球投篮命中率最高，pvc材质篮球次之，橡胶材质篮球最低。重量上，7号篮球与6号篮球之间不存在显著性差异，7号篮球与5号篮球以及6号篮球与5号篮球之间存在显著性差异。从不同重量的篮球投篮命中率均值可知，7号篮球投篮命中率最高，6号篮球次之，5号篮球最低。
实验二的研究结果：从男女篮球运动员的不同材质篮球感知偏好均值来看，他们的篮球感知偏好次序相同，超级纤维材质篮球感知偏好分值最大，pvc材质篮球次之，橡胶材质篮球最小；重量和性别存在交互作用，固定性别因素，考察重量在不同性别水平上的差异。男性水平上，不同重量的篮球感知偏好存在显著性差异，7号篮球感知偏好分值最大，6号篮球次之，5号篮球最小。女性水平上，不同重量的篮球感知偏好存在显著性差异。6号篮球感知偏好分值最大，7号篮球次之，5号篮球最小。对于男子篮球运动员，偏好更重的7号篮球，而对于女子篮球运动员，偏好更轻的6号篮球。
重量x材质x性别存在交互作用。在超级纤维7号篮球水平上，男女篮球运动员感知偏好存在显著性差异，男子篮球运动员的感知偏好分值大于女子篮球运动员的感知偏好分值。在超级纤维5号篮球、pvc6号篮球、pvc5篮球、橡胶6号篮球水平上，男女篮球运动员感知偏好存在显著性差异，男子篮球运动员的感知偏好分值小于女子篮球运动员的感知偏好分值。
男女篮球运动员投篮命中率主体间效应检验：性别间投篮命中率存在显著性差异。男子篮球运动员通过动力性接触感知篮球可供性和投篮命中率之间存在显著性相关；女子篮球运动员通过动力性接触感知篮球可供性和投篮命中率之间存在显著性相关。
实验三的研究结果：投篮前，随着任务难度（距离增加）增大时，篮球可供性知觉分值变小，但是在每个投篮位置，知觉判断最适合投篮的篮球都是6号篮球。在投篮后的篮球可供性知觉中，随着任务难度（距离增加）增大，篮球可供性知觉分值变小，但是在每个投篮位置上所选择最佳篮球都是6号篮球。
在投篮阶段，随着距离的增加，投篮命中率降低，但是投篮命中率并没有随着篮球重量减少而提高。
篮球可供性知觉和投篮命中率相关性分析，投篮前，在4.25m投篮位置，三种篮球可供性知觉和投篮命中率都存在显著性相关；在5.25m投篮位置，7号、6号篮球可供性知觉和投篮命中率存在显著性相关，而6号篮球可供性知觉和投篮命中率之间相关系数更大；在6.25m投篮位置，只有6号篮球可供性知觉和投篮命中率存在显著性相关。投篮后，在4.25m投篮位置，7、6号篮球可供性知觉与投篮命中率之间存在显著性相关，而5号篮球可供性知觉与投篮命中率之间不存在显著性相关；在5.25m投篮位置，7号、6号篮球可供知觉和投篮命中率之间存在显著性相关，但是6号篮球可供性知觉和投篮命中率相关系数更大；在6.25m投篮位置，只有6号篮球可供性知觉和投篮命中率之间存在显著性相关。比较投篮前后篮球可供性知觉和投篮命中率的相关性，投篮后，随着距离的增加，篮球可供性知觉和投篮命中率的相关系数变小，从4.25m到6.25m，最后只有6号篮球可供性知觉和投篮命中率存在显著性相关。
实验四的研究结果：篮球初学者经过8周投篮练习，投篮命中率显著提高，其拍球（动力性接触）感知篮球可供性和投篮命中率之间存在显著性相关。比较投篮练习前后被试的篮球可供性知觉，其感知偏好发生变化。尽管投篮练习前后超级纤维7、6、5号篮球的感知偏好存在显著性差异，但是比较投篮练习前后篮球感知偏好均值，练习后篮球感知偏好均值增大。Pvc7号篮球、橡胶7号篮球感知偏好不存在显著性差异，但是比较练习前后感知偏好均值，篮球感知偏好分值在训练后变小。而pvc6号篮球、pvc5号篮球、橡胶6号篮球、橡胶5号篮球在训练前、后存在显著性差异，投篮练习前后感知偏好比较，投篮后篮球感知偏好分值变小。
研究结论
（1）具有篮球专项经验的运动员感知篮球可供性与投篮准确性之间存在正相关；篮球初学者感知篮球可供性与投篮准确性之间不存在正相关。具有篮球运动经验的运动员感知越适合的篮球投篮越准确。
（2）拍球是感知篮球可供性知觉的探索行为，篮球的重量和材质是篮球运动员感知篮球可供性的关键信息。
（3）篮球可供性知觉差异受到有无训练背景、不同性别以及任务难度变化的影响。
（4）投篮练习过程包含篮球可供性知觉学习，即投篮练习有助于篮球可供性知觉的习得。在篮球可供性知觉学习过程中，练习者通过不断练习投篮，逐渐习得哪些篮球更适合投篮。
Objective
1, Discussing the relationship between the basketball affordance perception andshooting accuracy.
2, Exploring influence factors of basketball affordance perception.
3, Exploring the way of basketball affordance perception learning.
Methods
1Literature: understanding the research status and dynamic by the Shanghaisports university library about topics related to affordance study literature, At thesame time, reading the aspects of physiology, psychology, sports training book,looking for theory and practice basis for this study.
2Experiment: according to the experiment purpose, selecting different subjects,experimental results are obtained through the experiment design, experimentprocedure and experimental condition control.
3Mathematical statistics: adopting spss20.0statistical software to deal with theexperimental data according to different experimental purposes, including therepetitive measurement of variance, correlation analysis, etc.
Results
Experiment one results: The novice’s affordance perception by dynamictouch and shooting accuracy are not positive correlation, there is positivecorrelation between expert athlete’s affordance perception, by dynamic touch, andshooting accuracy.
The repetitive measure analysis of variance at novice’s perception preferenceresults: there are basketball material including super fiber, pvc, rubber impactingon novice’s perception preferences, which are very significant differences eachother. The super fiber basketball preference’s score is the biggest, the pvcbasketball is second, the rubber basketball is the smallest. Weight affect novice’sperception preferences, there is significant difference among the number7,6,5basketball. The number6basketball preference score is the biggest, the number7basketball is the second, the number5basketball is the smallest. The statisticalresults of novice’s shooting accuracy show that the main effects of the materialand weight are not significant.
The repetitive measure variance analysis of perception reference results: Thematerial and weight affect expert’s perception preference. There are basketball material including super fiber, pvc, rubber impact on expert basketball perceptionpreferences, which are very significant differences each other. The super fiberbasketball preference score is the biggest, the pvc basketball preference score issecond, the rubber basketball is the smallest. Weight affect experts perceptionpreferences, there is significant difference between the number7and5basketball.,Also between the number6and the number5basketball. The number7basketballpreference scores is the biggest, the number6basketball is second, the number5basketball is the smallest.
The repetitive measure variance analysis of expert’s basketball shootingpercentage results: the main effects of material and weight are significant,material and weight influence on expert’s shooting percentage. There is nosignificant difference between the super fiber and pvc basketball, the super fiberand rubber basketball exist significant differences, also the pvc and rubberbasketball. From different material basketball shooting percentage, the super fibershooting percentage is the highest, the pvc basketball is second, the rubberbasketball is the lowest. There is no significant difference between the number7and number6basketball, there is significant between the number7and number5basketball, also the number6and number5basketball. The number7basketball’sshooting percentage is the highest, the number6basketball is second, thenumber5basketball is the lowest.
Experiment two results: from the mean value of perception preferenceabout material, the male’s basketball athlete and female's basketball athlete’sperception preference order are same. The super fiber basketball’s perceptionpreference value is the biggest, the pvc basketball is second, the rubber basketballis the smallest. Weight and gender exists interaction, fixed gender factors, weightthat is in levels of gender are different. at male level, the basketball weight ‘sperception preferences exist significant difference, the number7basketball’sperception preference value is the biggest, the number6basketball is second, thenumber5basketball is the smallest. At Woman level, the basketball weight’sperception preference exist significant difference. The number6basketball’sperception preference value is the biggest, the number7basketball is second, thenumber5basketball is the smallest. The male's basketball players prefer theheavier basketball, the female's basketball athletes prefer the lighter basketball.
The main effects of material and weight are significant, material and weight influence on shooting percentage. The super fiber and pvc basketball are nosignificant different, the super fiber and rubber basketball exists significantdifferences, also the pvc and rubber basketball. The super fiber basketball’sshooting percentage is the highest, the pvc basketball is second, the rubberbasketball is the lowest. There is no significant difference between the number7and number6basketball, there are significant differences between the number7and the number6basketball, also the number6and number5basketball. Thenumber7basketball shooting percentage is the highest, the number6basketball issecond, the number5basketball is the lowest.
The shooting percentage between the male basketball athletes and the femalebasketball athletes is not significant difference. The male basketball athletesperception preference and shooting percentage are positive correlation, the femaleperceive preferences and shooting percentage are significant positive correlation.
Experimental three results: before shooting, with increased task difficultyincrease (distance increase), the basketball’s affordance perception is reduced, butat the end of each distance shooting location, the number6basketball is perceivedthe most suitable for shooting. After shooting, as the task difficulty increases(distance increases), the basketball’s affordance perception is reduced, but thebest ball chosen is the number6basketball in each distance shooting location.
At shooting stage, with distance increase, the shooting percentage is reduced,but the shooting percentage does not increase with basketball weight reduction.
Correlation analysis of the affordance perception and shooting percentagebefore shooting, at4.25m shooting location, there is significant positivecorrelation about affordance perception and shooting percentage of three kindbasketball; at5.25m shooting location, there is significant positive correlationabout affordance perception and shooting percentage between the number7andthe number6basketball, the number6correlation coefficient is larger. At6.25mshooting location, there is significant positive correlation only about the number6basketball affordance perception and shooting percentage. At4.25m shootinglocation, there is significant correlation of number7,6basketball’s affordanceperception and shooting percentage, there is no significant correlation aboutaffordance perception and shooting percentage in the number5basketball. At5.25m shooting location, the number7,6basketball is positively correlated toaffordance perception and shooting percentage, but the number6basketball affordance and shooting percentage’s correlation coefficient is more larger; At6.25m shooting location, there is a positive correlation between affordanceperception and shooting percentage in the number6basketball. The correlationbetween affordance perception and shooting percentage before and aftercomparison, with the increase of distance, affordance perception and shootingpercentage’s correlation, only the number6basketball’s affordance and shootingpercentage is significant.
Experiment four results: the novice’s perception preference and shootingpercentage is positive correlation. After8weeks shooting training, theparticipant’s shooting percentage gets significantly higher. The participant’sperception preference also produces change, although the super fiber7,6,5basketball’s perception preference is no significant difference, compared beforeand after training, the perception preference value enlarges after training. The pvc7and rubber7number basketball’s preference value are no significant difference,but after training, the preference value decrease. And the pvc6, pvc5, rubber5,rubber6basketball have a statistically significant difference, compared before andafter the training, basketball perception preference values decrease.
Conclusions
1, There is a positive correlation between basketball affordance perception andshooting accurate for basketball player with basketball experience, there is anegative correlation between basketball affordance perception and shootingaccurate for novice with no basketball affordance. The basketball is perceivedmore suitable, it is shot more accurate for the basketball players with experience.
2, Beating the basketball is exporing action of basketball affordance perception,the weight and the material of basketball are the key information of affordanceperception,of basketball.
3, Sport experience, gender and task difficulty influence on the basketballaffordance perception differences.
4, The basketball shooting’s practice process contains affordance perceptuallearning. In process of basketball affordance’s perceptual learning, throughconstant practice learners gradually learn which basketball is more suitable forshooting.
引文
[1]Berthelet, A.,&Chavaillon, J. The use of tools in human and non human primates[M].Oxford,England:Clarendon.1993.
[1]张力为、毛志雄.运动心理学[M].华东师范大学出版社,2003.
[2]卢亮球.陈树华.对篮球运动员球感的理论分析[J].广州体育学院学报,1994,14(2):67-70.
[1]易芳.生态心理学的理论审视[D].南京师范大学博士学位论文,2004.
[1]秦晓利.生态心理学[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2006.
[1]http://baike.baidu.com/view/86539.htm
[2]易芳.生态心理学的理论审视[D].南京师范大学博士学位论文,2004.
[1]王斌.运动直觉研究[M].武汉:华中师范大学出版社,2005.
[2]王斌.运动直觉研究[M].武汉:华中师范大学出版社,2005.
[3]王斌.运动直觉研究[M].武汉:华中师范大学出版社,2005.
[4]秦晓利.生态心理学[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2006.
[1]马明伟.个体早期动作发展研究述评[J].心理科学,2010,32(2):387-389.
[1]M.W.艾森克等.认知心理学[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社.
[2]易芳.生态心理学的理论审视[D].南京师范大学博士学位论文,2004.
[2]易芳.生态心理学的理论审视[D].南京师范大学博士学位论文,2004.
[1]秦晓利.生态心理学[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2006.
[2]Gibson,J.J.The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception[M],Houghton Mifflin Company,1979.
[3]Anthony Chemero.An Outline of a Theory of Affordances[J].Ecological Psychology,2003,15(2):181-195.
[4]马明伟.个体早期动作发展研究述评[J].心理科学,2010,32(2):387-389.
[5]Turvey,M.T. Affordances and prospective control: An outline of the ontology[J].Ecological Psychology,1992,4,173-187.
[6]Stoffregen,T.A. Affordances as properties of the animal-environment system[J].Ecological Psychology,2003,15,115-134.
[7]Michaels,C.F.Affordances: Four points of debate[J].Ecological Psychology,2003,15,13-148.
[1]Fajen BR,Riley MA,Turvey MT.Information,affordances,and the control ofaction in sport[J].Journal Sport Psychology,2009,40(1):79-107.
[2]秦晓利.生态心理学[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2006.
[1]Fajen BR,Riley MA,Turvey MT.Information,affordances,and the control ofaction in sport[J].Journal Sport Psychology,2009,40(1):79-107.
[1]Wagman,J.B.,&Taylor,K.R. Perceiving affordances for Aperture Crossing for The person-plus-object system[J].Ecological Psychology,2005,17,105-130.
[2]Chih-hui Chang, Michael G. Wade, Thomas A.Stoffregen.Perceiving affordance for aperturepassage in an Environment-Person-person system[J].Journal of Motor Behavior,2009,41（6）:495-500.
[3]Lee,D.N. Visuo-motor coordination in space-time[M].In G.Stelmach&J.Requin (Eds.),Tutorials in motor Behavior,1980.
[4]Pufall, P. B.,&Dunbar, C. Perceiving whether or not the world affords stepping ontoand over: A developmental study[M]. Ecological Psychology,1992,4,17-38.
[1]Konczak,J.,Meeuwsen,H.J,&Cress,M.E. Changing Affordances in stair climbing:The perception of maximum climbability in young and older adults[J].Journalof Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance,1992,18,691-697.
[2]Burton,G.Nonvisual judgment of the crossability of path gaps.Journal of ExperimentalPsychology:Human Perception and Performance,1992,18,698-713.
[1]Kinsella Shaw, Perceiving walk-on-able slopes[J]. Ecological Psychology,1992,4,223-239.
[2]Paula Fitzpatrick and Claudia carello.Hapic and Visual Perception of an Affordance forUpright Posture[J].ecological psychology,1994,6(4):265-287.
[3]Oudejans,R.R D., Michaels,C.F.,Bakker,F.C.,&Dolne, M. A. The relevance of action inperceiving affordances: Perception of catchableness of fly balls[J].Journal ofExperimental Psychology,Human Perception and Performance,1996,22(4):879-891.
[4]Fajen, B. R. The scaling of information to action in visually guided braking[J]. Journalof Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,2005,31(5):56-61.
[1]Ramenzoni,V.C.,Riley,M.A.,Davis,T.,&Snyder,J.Perceiving whether or not another personcan use a step to reach an object[M].Studies in perception and action, Mahwah,NJ:Erlbaum.2005.
[2]Zaff,B Perceiving affordances for oneself and others: Studies in reaching and Grasping[D]Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University,Columbus,Ohio.1989.
[3]Rochat,P Perceived reachability for self and for others by3-to5-year-old childrenand adults.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,1995,59,317-333.
[4]Stoffregen,T.A. Gorday,K.M.,Sheng,Y.,&Flynn, S. B. Perceiving affordances for anotherperson’s actions[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception andPerformance,1999,25,120-136.
[5]Ramenzoni,V.C.,Riley M.A.,Shockley,K.,&Davis, T. An information-based approach toaction understanding[M].Manuscript submitted for publication.2006.
[6]Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L.,&Baron, R. M. Judging and actualizing intrapersonaland interpersonal affordances[J]. Journal of experimental psychology: Human Perceptionand Performance,2007,33,845-859.
[1]Lee,D.N.A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision[J].Perception,1976,5,437-459
[2]Zago,M.,&Lacquaniti,F. Visual perception and interception of falling objects: are viewof evidence for an internal model of gravity[J]. Journal of Neural Engineering,2005,2,
198-208.
[3]Runeson S. On visual perception of dynamic events[M]. Acta Universit atis Upsaliensis:Studia Psychologica Upsaliensia,1983.
[4]Ramenzoni VC, Riley MA, Davis T, et al. Tuning in to another person’s action capabilities:perceiving maximal jumping-reach height from walking kinematics[J]. ExperimentalPsychology Human Perception Performance,2008,34(4):919-928.
[5]Weast JA,Shockley K,Riley MA. The influence of athletic experience and kinematicinformation on skill-relevant affordance perception[J]. Experimental Psychology,2011,64(4):689-706.
[1]Aglioti SM,Cesari P,Romani M, Urgesi C. Action anticipation and motor resonance in elitebasketball players[J]. Nature Neuroscience,2008,11(9):1109-1116.
[2]Gibson,J.The senses considered as perceptual systems[J].Boston: Houghton Mifflin.1966.
[3]Turvey,M.T.&Carello,C.Dynamic touch[M].In W Epstein&S.Rogers(Eds),Handbook ofPerception and cognition: Perception of space and motion.New York:A cademic Press.1995,401-490.
[4]Gibson,J.J.The theory of affordances[J].In R.E.Shaw&J. Bransford (Eds.),Perceiving,acting and knowing:Toward an ecological psychology.Hillsdale,NJ:Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates,Inc.1977,67-82.
[5]Pagano,C C. Fitzpatrick, P&Turvey, M. T. Tensorial basis to the constancy of perceivedobject extent over variations of dynamic touch[J]. Perception&Psychophysics,1993,54,43-54.
[1]Turvey,M.T.&Carello,C.Dynamic touch[J].In WEpstein&S.Rogers(Eds.),Hand book ofperception and cognition Perception of space and motion New York: Academic.1995,5,401-490.
[2]Turvey,M.T.,Burton,G.,Amazeen,E.L. Butwill, M., Carello,C.,Perceiving the width andheight of a hand-held object by dynamic touch[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology: HumanPerception and Performance,1998,24,35-48.
[3]Solomon,H.Y.&Turvey, M.T. Haptically perceiving the distance reachable withhand-held objects[J].Journal of Experiment al Psychology: Human Perception andPerformance,1988,14,404-427.
[4]Carello,C.,Thuot,S.,Andersen,K,L.,＆Turvey,M.T. Perceiving the sweet spot[J].Perception,1999,28,307-320.
[5]Wagman,J.B.,&Carello,C.Affordances and inertial constraints on tool use[J].EcologicalPsychology,2001,13,173-195.
[6]Wagman,J.B.,&Carello,C.Haptically creating affordances:The user-tool interface[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,2003,9,175-186.
[1]Wagman,J.B.,&Taylor,K.R.Chosen striking location and the user-tool-environmentsystem[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology:Applied,2004,10,267-280.
[2]Eleanor J. Gibson. Perceptual Learning in Development:Some Basic Concepts[J].Ecological Psycology,2000,12(4)295-302.
[3]Gibson,J.J.The theory of affordances[M].In R.E.Shaw&J.Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving,acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology. Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates,1977.
[4]Michaels, C. F.,&de Vries, M. M.Higher order and lower order variables in the visualperception of relative pulling force[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology: HumanPerception and Performance,1998,24,526-546.
[5]Jacobs D.M.,&Michaels C.F.Lateral interception I: Operative optical variables,attunement and calibration[J].Journalof Experimental Psychology: Human Perception andPerformance,2006,33,443-458.
[6]Thomas A.Stoffregen, Chih-Mei Yang. Affordance judgments and nonlocomotor bodymovement[J], Ecological Psychology,2005,17(2):75-104.
[1]Jacobs,D.M.,Michaels,C.F.,&Runeson, S. Learning to perceive the relative mass ofcolliding balls: The effects of ratio-scaling and feedback[J]. Perception&Psychophysics,2000,62,1332-1340.
[2]Gibson, E.J. The world is so full of a number of things: On specification and perceptuallearning[J]. Ecological Psychology,2004,15,283-288.
[3]Gibson,E.J.,&Pick,.An ecological approach to perceptual learning and development[M].New York: Oxford University Press.2000.
[1]Adolph,K.E.Learning to keep balance[J].In R.Kail(Ed.),Advances in child developmentand behavior,Amsterdam:Elsevier,2002,30,11-40.
[2]列衍玲.青少年上肢力量的加强与提高投篮命中率的关系[J].广州体育学院学报,2002,2,82-84.
[3]郭永波等.不同负荷量对投篮准确性响的研究[J].山东体育科技,19955,3,32-34.
[4]杨海平等.不同定量运动负荷对篮球运动员感受性变化及投篮准确性影响的研究[J].西安体育学院学报,2006,23(2):87-90.
[1]陈健.篮球投篮中球的旋转及瞄准点选择的力学分析[J].杭州师范学院学报(自然科学版).2005,4(5):389-392.
[2]周兴龙、赵芳.篮球急停跳投的运动生物力学分析[J].北京体育大学学报,1999,22(1):30-33.
[3]马昆.用可变径篮圈对提高跳投训练效果的实验研究[D].西安体育学院硕士毕业论文,2010.
[1]李可可.我国女篮运动员投篮中某些感知特征的研究[J].武汉体育学院学报,1991,2,52-54．
[2]韩晓玲.论肌肉本体感觉对罚球命中率的影响[J].山西师大体育学院学报,1999,14(2):66-68.
[3]杨海平对不同级别篮球运动员12项感知觉指标的测试与分析[J].北京体育大学学报,2005,6,52-54.
[4]杨海平、张婕.不同位置篮球运动员及优秀投手感知觉特征的研究[J].广州体育学院学报,2006,25(6):52-55.
[1]程利群.加重球在原地单手肩上投篮技术教学中的作用[J].浙江师范大学学报,1995,18(4):39-42.
[2]杨玉伟.论设置不同高度球篮对篮球教学和谐环境的影响[J].沈阳体育学院学报,1998,3,53-54.
[3]马昆.用可变径篮圈对提高跳投训练效果的实验研究[D].西安体育学院硕士毕业论文,2010.
[4]吴志刚.抗干扰训练对提高投篮命中率的实验研究[J].哈尔滨体育学院学报,2004,22(4):111-112.
[1]王斌.运动直觉研究[M],武汉:华中师范大学出版社,2005.
[1]邱宏等.水迷宫重复测量数据的方差分析及其在SPSS中的实现[J].中西医结合学报,2007,
5(1):101-104.
[1]Runeson,S.On the possibility of "smart" perceptual mechanisms[J]. Scandinavian Journalof Psychology,1977,18,172-170.
[2]Bingham,G P. Schmidt,R.C.&Rosenblum,L.D. Hefting for a maximum distance throw: A smartperceptual mechanism[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception andPerformance,1989,15,507-528.
[3]Zhu,Q.,&Bingham,G.P.Investigating the information used to detect an affordance formaximum distance throws[M].In J. Wagman&C. Pagano (Eds.), Studies in perception and actionX.LLC: Taylor and Francis Group.2009.
[1]王妍,吴斯一.触觉传感:从触觉意象到虚拟触觉[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2011,13(5)93-98.
[2]Song A iguo, Morris Dan,Colgate JEdward,et a.l Real time stiffness display interfacedevice for perception of virtual soft object[M]. Inter Confon Intelligent Robots and System.Edmonton,Canada,2005.
[1]Carello,C.,Thuot,S.,Andersen,K,L.,＆Turvey,M.T. Perceiving the sweet spot[J].Perception,1999,28,307-320.
[2]Hove P, Riley MA, Shockley K. Perceiving affordances of hockey sticks by dynamic touch[J].EcologicalPsychology;2006,18(3):163-189.
[3]Weast JA, Shockley K, Riley MA.The influence of athletic experience and kinematicinformation on skill-relevant affordance perception.Experimental Psychology2011,64(4):689-706.
[1]Justin I, Strojnik V, arabon N. The effect of increased maximum strength of elbowextensors on the ability to shoot accurately in darts and the three-point shot inbasketball[J].Sport,2006.
[2]Pitts BG, Semenick D. Using anthropometric variables to determine basketball size andbasket height for females to maximize performance of the dunk[J]. The Journal of AppliedResearch in Coaching and Athletics,1988,3(1):27-47.
[3]Nissen G.Iowa women sarchives. Retrieved April20,2011,from http://sdrc.lib.uiowa.edu/iwa/findingaids/html/IAcornets.ts.htm1997.
[1]Cauna N.Nerve supply and nerve endings in Meissner′s corpuscles[J].Am J Anat,1956,99(2):315-350.
[1]Eleanor J.Gibson.Perceptual Learning in Development:Some Basic Concepts[J]. EcologicalPsychology.2000,12(4),295-302.
[1]Jacobs,D.M.,&Michaels,C.F.Lateral interception I:Operative optical variables,attunement,and calibration[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception andPerformance,2006,32,443-458.
[2]Smith,M.R.,Flach,J.M.,Dittman,S.M.,&Stanard,T.Monocular optical constraints oncollision control[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,2001,27,395-410.
[3]Hove P, Riley MA, Shockley K. Perceiving affordances of hockey sticks by dynamic touch[J].Ecological Psychology2006,18(3):163-189.
[4]Aglioti SM, Cesari P, Romani M, Urgesi C. Action anticipation and motor resonance inelite basketball players[J]. Nature Neuroscience,2008,11(9):1109-1116.
陈健.篮球投篮中球的旋转及瞄准点选择的力学分析[J].杭州师范学院学报(自然科学版),2005,4(5):389-392.
程利群.加重球在原地单手肩上投篮技术教学中的作用[J].浙江师范大学学报,1995,18(4):39-42.
柴娇.学习理论研究进展与不同性质运动技能的学习原理探析[J].东北师范大学学报,2010,3,220-224.
柴娇.开放式运动技能学习原理及其在篮球教学中的应用[J].体育学刊,2010,17(9):65-68.
陈耕春.高水平运动技能训练中的运动知觉心理训练取向[J].西安体育学院学报,2007,24(3):9-12.
郭永波等.不同负荷量对投篮准确性响的研究[J].山东体育技,1995,3,32-34.
黄滨.从时空的视角谈篮球运动[J].体育学刊,2008,15(12)86-88.
何小军.篮球意识概念的理论误区及其界定[J].天津体育学院学报,2010,25(23):249-252.
韩晓玲.论肌肉本体感觉对罚球命中率的影响[J].山西师大体育学院学报,1999,14(2):66-68.
芦军志等.论降低女子篮球篮筐高度的可行性[J].山东体育学院学报,2012,28(1):92-95.
李可可.我国女篮运动员投篮中某些感知特征的研究[J].武汉体育学院学报,1991,2,52-54．
李军.目标数量对篮球运动员视觉追踪表现的影响[J].天津体育学院学报,2012,27(2):133-137．
李金辉.“身体”体现:一种触觉现象学的反思[J].江海学刊,2012,1:63-67．
罗安民.综合力量训练对中国女子篮球运动员腰、膝、踝等速力量的影响[J].中国体育科技,2012,48(2):35-40.
卢亮球.陈树华.对篮球运动员球感的理论分析[J].广州体育学院学报,1994,14(2):67-70
马明伟.个体早期动作发展研究述评[J].心理科学,2010,32(2):387-389.
马昆.用可变径篮圈对提高跳投训练效果的实验研究[D].西安体育学院硕士毕业论文,2010.
马启伟,张力为.体育运动心理学[M].杭州:浙江教育出版社,1996.
邱红武.场地变化对篮球运动技战术的影响[J].体育科学研究,2012,16(2):63-65.
邱红武.篮球比赛场地演变对中锋技术、战术影响的研究[J].南京体育学院学报,2011,10(5):73-75.
邱宏等.水迷宫重复测量数据的方差分析及其在SPSS中的实现[J].中西医结合学报,2007,5(1):101-104.
齐春燕.篮球运动员跳投肌电及足底压力的同步研究[J].天津体育学院学报,2010,25(5):422-424.
秦晓利.生态心理学[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2006.
孙民治等.篮球运动高级教程[M]北京:人民体育出版社,2000.
滕朝阳.现代男子篮球运动发展的新动向[J].成都体育学院学报,2009,35(2):57-59.
谭嘉辉.注意焦点对运动技能学习影响的元分析研究[J].北京体育大学学报,2012,35(4):81-86.
范文杰.运动技能内隐认知与外显认知协同化研究[J].体育文化导刊,2011,4(4):81-86.
吴志刚.抗干扰训练对提高投篮命中率的实验研究[J].哈尔滨体育学院学报,2004,22(4):111-112.
王斌.运动直觉研究[M],武汉:华中师范大学出版社,2005.
王妍,吴斯一.触觉传感:从触觉意象到虚拟触觉[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2011,13(5)93-98.
王建伟.身体协调功能与篮球运动的竞技战术能力[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2009,13(7):1371-1374.
肖熙然.不同竞赛角色篮球运动员的大脑机能能力及其特性[J].上海体育学院学报,2009,33(6):55-57.
许博.篮球运动员核心稳定性对跳投命中率的影响[J].沈阳体育学院学报,2010,29(6):113-116.
许博.中国竞技篮球滑坡现象及其发展对策研究[J].北京体育大学学报,2010,33(11):125-127.
邢尊明.运动技术教学与训练中的“技术环境”理论探索[J].北京体育大学学报,2010,33(5):101-104.
王家宏.中国竞技篮球运动风格发展的反思与把握[J].上海体育学院学报,2009,33(6):83-86.
王瑞元.运动生理学[M].北京:人民体育出版社,2002.
易芳.生态的理论审视[D].南京师范大学博士学位论文,2004.
余芳.本体感觉与运动训练研究[J].运动,2010,09(13:)37-38.
杨海平等.不同定量运动负荷对篮球运动员感受性变化及投篮准确性影响的研究[J].西安体育学院学报,2006,23(2):87-90.
杨海平.对不同级别篮球运动员12项感知觉指标的测试与分析[J].北京体育大学学报,2005,6,52-54.
杨海平、张婕.不同位置篮球运动员及优秀投手感知觉特征的研究[J].广州体育学院学报,2006,25(6):52-55.
杨玉伟.论设置不同高度球篮对篮球教学和谐环境的影响[J].沈阳体育学院学报,1998,3,53-54.
杨宁.动作和运动在儿童早期心理发展中的作用[J].体育刊.2005,12(2):43-46.
叶国雄.篮球研究必读[M].北京:人民体育出版社,1998.
周兴龙、赵芳.篮球急停跳投的运动生物力学分析[J].北京体育大学学报,1999,22(1):30-33.
赵诚民.对跳投技术生物力学特征之探析[J].西安体育学院学报.1994,11(3):68-70.
郑磊.特质性心理因素对我国青年男子篮球运动员身体对抗能力的影响[J].天津体育学院学报,2010,25(1):26-29.
张力为、毛志雄.运动心理学[M].华东师范大学出版社,2003.
张斌.亚、欧洲男子篮球技术战术特点研究[J].北京体育大学学报,2010,33(7):137-141.
张俊青.用系统论的观点探析现代篮球运动战术[J].北京体育大学学报,2010,33(2):132-134.
张烨.视觉系统中类别信息加工区的特异性[J].心理科学发展.2011,19(1):42-49.
王树明.知觉运动技能训练的国外研究进展[J].上海体育学院学报.2005,29(3):60-64.
Aglioti SM, Cesari P, Romani M, Urgesi C. Action anticipation and motorresonance in elite basketball players[J]. Nature Neuroscience,2008,11(9):1109-1116.
Adolph, K. E. Learning to keep balance[J]. In R. Kail (Ed.), Advances in childdevelopment and behavior, Amsterdam: Elsevier,2002,30,1-40.
Anthony Chemero. An Outline of a Theory of Affordances[J]. Ecological Psychology,2003,15(2):181-195.
Berthelet,A.,&Chavaillon,J.The use of tools in human and non humanprimates[M].Oxford, England: Clarendon,1993.
Bingham, G. P., Schmidt, R. C.,&Rosenblum, L. D. Hefting for a maximumdistance throw: A smart perceptual mechanism[J]. Journal of Experiment,1989,15,507-528.
Burton,G..Nonvisual judgment of the crossability of path gaps[J]. Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,1992,18,698–713.
Bongers,R.M.An action perspective on tool use and its development[M].Enschede, The Netherlands: PrintPartners Ipskamp BV,2001.
Burton, G.,&Turvey, M. T. Perceiving the lengths of rods that are held but notwielded[J]. Ecological Psychology,1990,2,295-324.
Carello,C.,Thuot,S.,Andersen,K,L.,＆Turvey,M.T. Perceiving the sweet spot[J].Perception,1999,28,307-320.
Carello, C. Grosofsky,A., Reichel, F. D., Solomon,H. Y.,&Turvey,M.T.Visually perceiving what is reachable[J]. Ecological Psychology,1989,1,27-54.
Chih-hui Chang, Michael G. Wade, Thomas A.Stoffregen.Perceiving affordancefor aperture passage in an Environment-Person-person system[J].Journal ofMotor Behavior,2009,9(41):495-500.
Cornus, S., Montagne, G.,&Laurent, M. Perception of a stepping acrossaffordance[J]. Ecological Psychology,1999,11,249-267.Eleanor J. Gibson.Perceptual Learning in Development: Some Basic
Concepts[J].Ecological Psychology.2000,12(4):295-302.
Fajen BR,Riley MA,Turvey MT.Information,affordances, and the control ofaction in sport[J]. Int J Sport Psychol2009,40(1):79-107.
Fajen,B.R..The scaling of information to action in visually guided braking[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,2005,31(5):56-61.
Fitzpatrick, P., Carello, C., Schmidt, R. C.,&Corey, D. Haptic and visualperception of an affordance for upright posture[J]. Ecological Psychology,1994,6,265-287.
Gibson, J. J. The senses considered as perceptual systems[M]. Boston: HoughtonMifflin.1966.
Gibson, J. J. The theory of affordances[J]. In R. E. Shaw&J. Bransford (Eds.),
Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology. Hillsdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,Inc.1977,67-82.
Gibson,J.J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception[M].Houghton MifflinCompany,1979.
Gibson, E. J. The world is so full of a number of things: On specification andperceptual learning[J].Ecological Psychology,2004,15,283-288.
Gibson,E.J.,&Pick,. An ecological approach to perceptual learning and develop–ment[M].New York: Oxford University Press.2000.
Hove P,Riley MA,Shockley K. Perceiving affordances of hockey sticks bydynamic touch[J]. Ecological Psychology2006,18(3):163-189.
HUSTON,R.L.&GRAU,C.A.Basketball shooting strategies-the free throw,directshot and lay up[J]. Sports Engineering,2003,6,49-64.
Jacobs,D.M.,&Michaels,C.F.Lateral interception I: Operative optical variables,attunement, and calibration[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology:HumanPerception and Performance,2006,32,443-458.
Jacobs,D.M., Michaels,C.F.,&Runeson, S. Learning to perceive the relativemass of colliding balls: The effects of ratio-scaling and feedback[J]. Perception&Psychophysics,2000,62,1332-1340.
Jacobs, D.M.,&Michaels,C. F. Lateral interception I: Operative optical variables,attunement and calibration[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: HumanPerception and Performance,2006,33,443-458.
Justin I, Strojnik V, arabon N. The effect of increased maximum strength ofelbow extensors on the ability to shoot accurately in darts and the three-pointshot in basketball[M]. Sport,2006.
Katz,D.The world of touch [M].Hillsdale,NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum A associates,1989.
Kinsella-Shaw.Perceiving walk-on-able slopes[J]. Ecological Psychology,1992,4,223-239.
Konczak, J., Meeuwsen, H. J.,&Cress, M. E. Changing Affordances in stairclimbing:The perception of maximum climb ability in young and older adults[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,1992,18,691–697.
Lee, D. N. A theory of visual control of braking based on information abouttime-to-collision[J]. Perception,1976,5,437-459.
Lee,D.N.Visuo-motor coordination in space-time[J]. In G. Stelmach&J.Requin(Eds.),Tutorials in motor Behavior.Amsterdam:North Holland.1980,281-293.
Mark,L.S. Eye-height scaled information about affordances: A study of sittingand stair climbing[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perceptionand Performance,1987,13,360-370.
Mark,L.S.,Balliett,J.A.,Craver,K.D.,Douglas,S.D.,&Fox,T.What an actor mustdo in order to perceive the affordance for sitting[J]. Ecological Psychology,1990,2,325-366.
Mark, L. S., Nemeth, K., Gardner, D., Dainoff, M. J., Paasche, J., Duffy, M.,&Grandt, K.Postural dynamics and the preferred critical boundary for visuallyguided reaching[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception andPerformance,1997,23,1-15.
Michaels, C. F.,&de Vries, M. M.Higher order and lower order variables in thevisual perception of relative pulling force[J]. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology: Human Perception and Performance,1998,24,526-546.
Michaels,C.F. Affordances: Four points of debate[J]. Ecological Psychology,2003,15,13-148.
Neisser.cognition and reality[M]. San Francisco: Freeman.1976.
Nissen G. How a women sarchives. Retrieved April20,2011, from http://sdrc.lib.uiowa.edu/iwa/findingaids/html/IACornets.htm1,997.
Oudejans, R. R. D., Michaels, C. F., Bakker, F. C.,&Dolne, M. A. The relevance of action in perceiving affordances: Perception of catchableness of flyballs[M].Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception andPerformance,1996,22(4):879-891.
Okazaki VHA, Rodacki ALF. Changes in basketball shooting coordination inchildren performing with different balls[J]. Federation Internationaled’Education Physique,2005,75(2):368-371.
Pagano,C.C., Fitzpatrick, P&Turvey, M. T. Tensorial basis to the constancy ofperceived object extent over variations of dynamic touch[J]. Perception&Psychophysics,1993,54,43-54.
Paula Fitzpatrick and Claudia carello. Hapic and Visual Perception of anAffordance for Upright Posture[J]. ecological psychology,1994,6(4):265-287.
Pepping G. J.,&Li, F. X. Perceiving action boundaries in the volleyballblock[M]. In S.M.A. Schmuckler&J. M. Kennedy (Eds.), Studies in perceptionand action Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.1997.
Pitts BG, Semenick D. Using anthropometric variables to determine basketballsize and basket height for females to maximize performance of the dunk[J]. TheJournal of Applied Research in Coaching and Athletics,1988,3(1):27-47.
Pufall, P. B.,&Dunbar, C. Perceiving whether or not the world affords steppingonto and over: A developmental study[J]. Ecological Psychology,1992,4,17–38.
Ramenzoni, V. C., Riley, M. A., Davis, T.,&Snyder, J. Perceiving whether ornot another person can use a step to reach an object[M]. In H. Heft&K.L.
Marsh (Eds.), Studies in perception and action VIII (pp.15-18). Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.2005.
Ramenzoni V.C., Riley,M.A.,Shockley, K.,&Davis, T. An information basedApproach to action understanding[M].Manuscript submitted forpublication.2006.
Ramenzoni VC, Riley MA, Davis T, et al. Tuning in to another person’s actioncapabilities: perceiving maximal jumping-reach height from walkingkinematics[J]. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform,2008,34(4):919-928.
Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L.,&Baron, R. M. Judging and actualizing intra-personal and interpersonal affordances[J]. Journal of experimental psychology:Human Perception and Performance,2007,33,845-859.
Rochat, P. Perceived reachability for self and for others by3to5-year-oldchildren and adults[J]. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,1995,59,317-333.
Rochat,P.,&Wraga,M. An account of the systematic error in judging what isreachable[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception andPerformance,1997,23,199-212.
Runeson, S. On the possibility of "smart" perceptual mechanisms[J].Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,1977,18,172-170.
Runeson S. On visual perception of dynamic events[M]. Acta Universit atisUpsaliensis: Studia Psychologica Upsaliensia (Serial No.9);1983.
Runeson, S., Juslin, P.,&Olsson, H. Visual perception of dynamic properties:Cue heuristic versus direct-perceptual competence[J].Psychological review,2000,107,525-555.
Sedgwick, H. A.. The geometry of spatial layout in pictorial representation[J]. InM.Hagen (Ed.), The perception of pictures VI.1980,New York: AcademicPress.
Sherwood DE, Schmidt RA, Walter CB. The force/force variability relationshipunder controlled temporal conditions[J]. J Motor Behaver,1988,20:106-116.
Sklery k BN, Bedingfield EW. Ball size and performance[M]. Unpublished work,1985.
Smith,M.R.,Flach,J.M.,Dittman,S.M.,&Stanard,T.Monocular optical constraintson collision control[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perceptionand Performance,2001,27,395-410.
Solomon, H. Y.,&Turvey, M.T. Haptically perceiving the distance reachablewith hand-held objects[J]. Journal of Experiment al Psychology: HumanPerception and Performance,1988,14,404-427.
Song A iguo, Morris Dan, Colgate JEdward, et a.l Real time stiffness displayinterface device for perception of virtual soft object[M]./P roc IEEE/RSJ InterConfon Intelligent Robots and System. Edmonton, Canada,2005.
Stoffregen, T. A., Gorday, K. M., Sheng, Y.,&Flynn, S. B. Perceiving affordances for another person’s actions[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: HumanPerception and Performance,1999,25,120-136.
Stoffregen,T.A. Affordances as properties of the animal-environment,System[J].Ecological Psychology,2003,15,115-134.
Tang WT, Shung HM. Relationship between isokinetic strength and shootingaccuracy at different shooting ranges in Taiwanese elite high school basketballplayers[J]. Isokinet Exerc Sci,2005,13,169-174.
Thomas A.Stoffregen, Chih-Mei Yang. Affordance judgments and nonlocomotorbody movement[J]. Ecological Psychology,2005,17(2):75-104.
Turvey,M.T.,&Carello,C. Dynamic touch[J]. In WEpstein&S. Rogers(Eds.),Hand book of perception and cognition. Perception of space and motion NewYork,1995,5,401-490.
Turvey, M. T., Burton,G., Amazeen, E. L., Butwill, M., Carello,C.,Perceivingthe width and height of a hand-held object by dynamic touch[J]. Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,1998,24,35-48.
Turvey, M. T.,&Carello, C. Dynamic touch[M]. In W. Epstein&S. Rogers(Eds.),Handbook of Perception and cognition: Perception of space and motion.New York: A cademic Press.1995,401-490.
Turvey,M.T.Affordances and prospective control: An outline of the ontology[J].Ecological Psychology,1992,4,173-187.
Vander Kamp,J.,Savelsbergh,G.J.,&Smeets,J.Multiple information sources ininterceptive timing[J].Human Movement Science,1997,16,787-821.
Vander Meer, A. L. H. Visual guidance of passing under a barrier[J]. EarlyDevelopment and Parenting,1997,6,149-157.
Wagman, J. B.,&Taylor, K. R.. Perceiving affordances for Aperture Crossingfor The person-plus-object system[J]. Ecological Psychology,2005,17,105–130.
Wagman,J.B.,&Carello,C.Affordances and inertial constraints on tool use[J].Ecological Psychology,2001,13,173-195.
Wagman,J.B.,&Carello,C.Haptically creating affordances:The user-toolinterface[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,2003,9,175-186.
Wagman, J. B.,&Taylor, K. R. Chosen striking location and the user-tool-environment system[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology:Applied,2004,10,267-280.
Wagman,J.B.,Shockley,K.,Riley,M.A.,&Turvey, M. T. Attunement, calibration,and exploration in fast haptic perceptual learning[J].Journal of Motor Behavior,2001,33,323-327.
Warren, W. H. Perceiving affordances: Visual guidance of stair climbing[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance1984,10,683-703.
Warren, W. H.,&Whang, S. Visual guidance of walking through apertures:Body-scaled information for affordances[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance,1987,13,371-383.
Weast JA, Shockley K, Riley MA. The influence of athletic experience andkinematic information on skill-relevant affordance perception[J].ExperimentlPsychology2011,64(4):689-706.
White,E.,&Shockley,K.Perceiving pass-under-ability while walking andsitting[M]. Paper presented at the13thInternational Confeence on Perceptionand Action, Monterey,2005.
Withagen, R.,&Michaels, C. F.Transfer of calibration in length perception bydynamic touch[J]. Perception&Psychophysics,2004,66,1282-1292.
Withagen, R.,&Michaels, C. F. Transfer of calibration between length andsweet-spot perception by dynamic touch[M]. Manuscript submitted forpublication.2005.
Wraga, M. The role of eye height in perceiving affordances and objectdimensions[J]. Perception&Psychophysics,1999,61,490-507.
Zaff, B. Perceiving affordances for oneself and others: Studies in reaching andGrasping[D].Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University,Columbus, Ohio.1989.
Zago, M.,&Lacquaniti, F. Visual perception and interception of falling objects:are view of evidence for an internal model of gravity[J]. Journal of NeuralEngineering,2005,2,198-208.
Zhu,Q.,&Bingham,G.P.Investigating the information used to detect anaffordance for maximum distance throws[M]. In J. Wagman&C. Pagano (Eds.),Studies in perception and action X. LLC: Taylor and Francis Group.2009.
[1]张力为、毛志雄.运动心理学[M].华东师范大学出版社,2003.
[2]卢亮球.陈树华.对篮球运动员球感的理论分析[J].广州体育学院学报,1994,14(2):67-70.
[1]易芳.生态心理学的理论审视[D].南京师范大学博士学位论文,2004.
[1]秦晓利.生态心理学[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2006.
[1]http://baike.baidu.com/view/86539.htm
[2]易芳.生态心理学的理论审视[D].南京师范大学博士学位论文,2004.
[1]王斌.运动直觉研究[M].武汉:华中师范大学出版社,2005.
[2]王斌.运动直觉研究[M].武汉:华中师范大学出版社,2005.
[3]王斌.运动直觉研究[M].武汉:华中师范大学出版社,2005.
[4]秦晓利.生态心理学[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2006.
[1]马明伟.个体早期动作发展研究述评[J].心理科学,2010,32(2):387-389.
[1]M.W.艾森克等.认知心理学[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社.
[2]易芳.生态心理学的理论审视[D].南京师范大学博士学位论文,2004.
[2]易芳.生态心理学的理论审视[D].南京师范大学博士学位论文,2004.
[1]秦晓利.生态心理学[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2006.
[2]Gibson,J.J.The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception[M],Houghton Mifflin Company,1979.
[3]Anthony Chemero.An Outline of a Theory of Affordances[J].Ecological Psychology,2003,15(2):181-195.
[4]马明伟.个体早期动作发展研究述评[J].心理科学,2010,32(2):387-389.
[5]Turvey,M.T. Affordances and prospective control: An outline of the ontology[J].Ecological Psychology,1992,4,173-187.
[6]Stoffregen,T.A. Affordances as properties of the animal-environment system[J].Ecological Psychology,2003,15,115-134.
[7]Michaels,C.F.Affordances: Four points of debate[J].Ecological Psychology,2003,15,13-148.
[1]Fajen BR,Riley MA,Turvey MT.Information,affordances,and the control ofaction in sport[J].Journal Sport Psychology,2009,40(1):79-107.
[2]秦晓利.生态心理学[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2006.
[1]Fajen BR,Riley MA,Turvey MT.Information,affordances,and the control ofaction in sport[J].Journal Sport Psychology,2009,40(1):79-107.
[1]Wagman,J.B.,&Taylor,K.R. Perceiving affordances for Aperture Crossing for The person-plus-object system[J].Ecological Psychology,2005,17,105-130.
[2]Chih-hui Chang, Michael G. Wade, Thomas A.Stoffregen.Perceiving affordance for aperturepassage in an Environment-Person-person system[J].Journal of Motor Behavior,2009,41（6）:495-500.
[3]Lee,D.N. Visuo-motor coordination in space-time[M].In G.Stelmach&J.Requin (Eds.),Tutorials in motor Behavior,1980.
[4]Pufall, P. B.,&Dunbar, C. Perceiving whether or not the world affords stepping ontoand over: A developmental study[M]. Ecological Psychology,1992,4,17-38.
[1]Konczak,J.,Meeuwsen,H.J,&Cress,M.E. Changing Affordances in stair climbing:The perception of maximum climbability in young and older adults[J].Journalof Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance,1992,18,691-697.
[2]Burton,G.Nonvisual judgment of the crossability of path gaps.Journal of ExperimentalPsychology:Human Perception and Performance,1992,18,698-713.
[1]Kinsella Shaw, Perceiving walk-on-able slopes[J]. Ecological Psychology,1992,4,223-239.
[2]Paula Fitzpatrick and Claudia carello.Hapic and Visual Perception of an Affordance forUpright Posture[J].ecological psychology,1994,6(4):265-287.
[3]Oudejans,R.R D., Michaels,C.F.,Bakker,F.C.,&Dolne, M. A. The relevance of action inperceiving affordances: Perception of catchableness of fly balls[J].Journal ofExperimental Psychology,Human Perception and Performance,1996,22(4):879-891.
[4]Fajen, B. R. The scaling of information to action in visually guided braking[J]. Journalof Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,2005,31(5):56-61.
[1]Ramenzoni,V.C.,Riley,M.A.,Davis,T.,&Snyder,J.Perceiving whether or not another personcan use a step to reach an object[M].Studies in perception and action, Mahwah,NJ:Erlbaum.2005.
[2]Zaff,B Perceiving affordances for oneself and others: Studies in reaching and Grasping[D]Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University,Columbus,Ohio.1989.
[3]Rochat,P Perceived reachability for self and for others by3-to5-year-old childrenand adults.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,1995,59,317-333.
[4]Stoffregen,T.A. Gorday,K.M.,Sheng,Y.,&Flynn, S. B. Perceiving affordances for anotherperson’s actions[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception andPerformance,1999,25,120-136.
[5]Ramenzoni,V.C.,Riley M.A.,Shockley,K.,&Davis, T. An information-based approach toaction understanding[M].Manuscript submitted for publication.2006.
[6]Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L.,&Baron, R. M. Judging and actualizing intrapersonaland interpersonal affordances[J]. Journal of experimental psychology: Human Perceptionand Performance,2007,33,845-859.
[1]Lee,D.N.A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision[J].Perception,1976,5,437-459
[2]Zago,M.,&Lacquaniti,F. Visual perception and interception of falling objects: are viewof evidence for an internal model of gravity[J]. Journal of Neural Engineering,2005,2,
198-208.
[3]Runeson S. On visual perception of dynamic events[M]. Acta Universit atis Upsaliensis:Studia Psychologica Upsaliensia,1983.
[4]Ramenzoni VC, Riley MA, Davis T, et al. Tuning in to another person’s action capabilities:perceiving maximal jumping-reach height from walking kinematics[J]. ExperimentalPsychology Human Perception Performance,2008,34(4):919-928.
[5]Weast JA,Shockley K,Riley MA. The influence of athletic experience and kinematicinformation on skill-relevant affordance perception[J]. Experimental Psychology,2011,64(4):689-706.
[1]Aglioti SM,Cesari P,Romani M, Urgesi C. Action anticipation and motor resonance in elitebasketball players[J]. Nature Neuroscience,2008,11(9):1109-1116.
[2]Gibson,J.The senses considered as perceptual systems[J].Boston: Houghton Mifflin.1966.
[3]Turvey,M.T.&Carello,C.Dynamic touch[M].In W Epstein&S.Rogers(Eds),Handbook ofPerception and cognition: Perception of space and motion.New York:A cademic Press.1995,401-490.
[4]Gibson,J.J.The theory of affordances[J].In R.E.Shaw&J. Bransford (Eds.),Perceiving,acting and knowing:Toward an ecological psychology.Hillsdale,NJ:Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates,Inc.1977,67-82.
[5]Pagano,C C. Fitzpatrick, P&Turvey, M. T. Tensorial basis to the constancy of perceivedobject extent over variations of dynamic touch[J]. Perception&Psychophysics,1993,54,43-54.
[1]Turvey,M.T.&Carello,C.Dynamic touch[J].In WEpstein&S.Rogers(Eds.),Hand book ofperception and cognition Perception of space and motion New York: Academic.1995,5,401-490.
[2]Turvey,M.T.,Burton,G.,Amazeen,E.L. Butwill, M., Carello,C.,Perceiving the width andheight of a hand-held object by dynamic touch[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology: HumanPerception and Performance,1998,24,35-48.
[3]Solomon,H.Y.&Turvey, M.T. Haptically perceiving the distance reachable withhand-held objects[J].Journal of Experiment al Psychology: Human Perception andPerformance,1988,14,404-427.
[4]Carello,C.,Thuot,S.,Andersen,K,L.,＆Turvey,M.T. Perceiving the sweet spot[J].Perception,1999,28,307-320.
[5]Wagman,J.B.,&Carello,C.Affordances and inertial constraints on tool use[J].EcologicalPsychology,2001,13,173-195.
[6]Wagman,J.B.,&Carello,C.Haptically creating affordances:The user-tool interface[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,2003,9,175-186.
[1]Wagman,J.B.,&Taylor,K.R.Chosen striking location and the user-tool-environmentsystem[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology:Applied,2004,10,267-280.
[2]Eleanor J. Gibson. Perceptual Learning in Development:Some Basic Concepts[J].Ecological Psycology,2000,12(4)295-302.
[3]Gibson,J.J.The theory of affordances[M].In R.E.Shaw&J.Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving,acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology. Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates,1977.
[4]Michaels, C. F.,&de Vries, M. M.Higher order and lower order variables in the visualperception of relative pulling force[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology: HumanPerception and Performance,1998,24,526-546.
[5]Jacobs D.M.,&Michaels C.F.Lateral interception I: Operative optical variables,attunement and calibration[J].Journalof Experimental Psychology: Human Perception andPerformance,2006,33,443-458.
[6]Thomas A.Stoffregen, Chih-Mei Yang. Affordance judgments and nonlocomotor bodymovement[J], Ecological Psychology,2005,17(2):75-104.
[1]Jacobs,D.M.,Michaels,C.F.,&Runeson, S. Learning to perceive the relative mass ofcolliding balls: The effects of ratio-scaling and feedback[J]. Perception&Psychophysics,2000,62,1332-1340.
[2]Gibson, E.J. The world is so full of a number of things: On specification and perceptuallearning[J]. Ecological Psychology,2004,15,283-288.
[3]Gibson,E.J.,&Pick,.An ecological approach to perceptual learning and development[M].New York: Oxford University Press.2000.
[1]Adolph,K.E.Learning to keep balance[J].In R.Kail(Ed.),Advances in child developmentand behavior,Amsterdam:Elsevier,2002,30,11-40.
[2]列衍玲.青少年上肢力量的加强与提高投篮命中率的关系[J].广州体育学院学报,2002,2,82-84.
[3]郭永波等.不同负荷量对投篮准确性响的研究[J].山东体育科技,19955,3,32-34.
[4]杨海平等.不同定量运动负荷对篮球运动员感受性变化及投篮准确性影响的研究[J].西安体育学院学报,2006,23(2):87-90.
[1]陈健.篮球投篮中球的旋转及瞄准点选择的力学分析[J].杭州师范学院学报(自然科学版).2005,4(5):389-392.
[2]周兴龙、赵芳.篮球急停跳投的运动生物力学分析[J].北京体育大学学报,1999,22(1):30-33.
[3]马昆.用可变径篮圈对提高跳投训练效果的实验研究[D].西安体育学院硕士毕业论文,2010.
[1]李可可.我国女篮运动员投篮中某些感知特征的研究[J].武汉体育学院学报,1991,2,52-54．
[2]韩晓玲.论肌肉本体感觉对罚球命中率的影响[J].山西师大体育学院学报,1999,14(2):66-68.
[3]杨海平对不同级别篮球运动员12项感知觉指标的测试与分析[J].北京体育大学学报,2005,6,52-54.
[4]杨海平、张婕.不同位置篮球运动员及优秀投手感知觉特征的研究[J].广州体育学院学报,2006,25(6):52-55.
[1]程利群.加重球在原地单手肩上投篮技术教学中的作用[J].浙江师范大学学报,1995,18(4):39-42.
[2]杨玉伟.论设置不同高度球篮对篮球教学和谐环境的影响[J].沈阳体育学院学报,1998,3,53-54.
[3]马昆.用可变径篮圈对提高跳投训练效果的实验研究[D].西安体育学院硕士毕业论文,2010.
[4]吴志刚.抗干扰训练对提高投篮命中率的实验研究[J].哈尔滨体育学院学报,2004,22(4):111-112.
[1]王斌.运动直觉研究[M],武汉:华中师范大学出版社,2005.
[1]邱宏等.水迷宫重复测量数据的方差分析及其在SPSS中的实现[J].中西医结合学报,2007,
5(1):101-104.
[1]Runeson,S.On the possibility of "smart" perceptual mechanisms[J]. Scandinavian Journalof Psychology,1977,18,172-170.
[2]Bingham,G P. Schmidt,R.C.&Rosenblum,L.D. Hefting for a maximum distance throw: A smartperceptual mechanism[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception andPerformance,1989,15,507-528.
[3]Zhu,Q.,&Bingham,G.P.Investigating the information used to detect an affordance formaximum distance throws[M].In J. Wagman&C. Pagano (Eds.), Studies in perception and actionX.LLC: Taylor and Francis Group.2009.
[1]王妍,吴斯一.触觉传感:从触觉意象到虚拟触觉[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2011,13(5)93-98.
[2]Song A iguo, Morris Dan,Colgate JEdward,et a.l Real time stiffness display interfacedevice for perception of virtual soft object[M]. Inter Confon Intelligent Robots and System.Edmonton,Canada,2005.
[1]Carello,C.,Thuot,S.,Andersen,K,L.,＆Turvey,M.T. Perceiving the sweet spot[J].Perception,1999,28,307-320.
[2]Hove P, Riley MA, Shockley K. Perceiving affordances of hockey sticks by dynamic touch[J].EcologicalPsychology;2006,18(3):163-189.
[3]Weast JA, Shockley K, Riley MA.The influence of athletic experience and kinematicinformation on skill-relevant affordance perception.Experimental Psychology2011,64(4):689-706.
[1]Justin I, Strojnik V, arabon N. The effect of increased maximum strength of elbowextensors on the ability to shoot accurately in darts and the three-point shot inbasketball[J].Sport,2006.
[2]Pitts BG, Semenick D. Using anthropometric variables to determine basketball size andbasket height for females to maximize performance of the dunk[J]. The Journal of AppliedResearch in Coaching and Athletics,1988,3(1):27-47.
[3]Nissen G.Iowa women sarchives. Retrieved April20,2011,from http://sdrc.lib.uiowa.edu/iwa/findingaids/html/IAcornets.ts.htm1997.
[1]Cauna N.Nerve supply and nerve endings in Meissner′s corpuscles[J].Am J Anat,1956,99(2):315-350.
[1]Eleanor J.Gibson.Perceptual Learning in Development:Some Basic Concepts[J]. EcologicalPsychology.2000,12(4),295-302.
[1]Jacobs,D.M.,&Michaels,C.F.Lateral interception I:Operative optical variables,attunement,and calibration[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception andPerformance,2006,32,443-458.
[2]Smith,M.R.,Flach,J.M.,Dittman,S.M.,&Stanard,T.Monocular optical constraints oncollision control[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,2001,27,395-410.
[3]Hove P, Riley MA, Shockley K. Perceiving affordances of hockey sticks by dynamic touch[J].Ecological Psychology2006,18(3):163-189.
[4]Aglioti SM, Cesari P, Romani M, Urgesi C. Action anticipation and motor resonance inelite basketball players[J]. Nature Neuroscience,2008,11(9):1109-1116.
陈健.篮球投篮中球的旋转及瞄准点选择的力学分析[J].杭州师范学院学报(自然科学版),2005,4(5):389-392.
程利群.加重球在原地单手肩上投篮技术教学中的作用[J].浙江师范大学学报,1995,18(4):39-42.
柴娇.学习理论研究进展与不同性质运动技能的学习原理探析[J].东北师范大学学报,2010,3,220-224.
柴娇.开放式运动技能学习原理及其在篮球教学中的应用[J].体育学刊,2010,17(9):65-68.
陈耕春.高水平运动技能训练中的运动知觉心理训练取向[J].西安体育学院学报,2007,24(3):9-12.
郭永波等.不同负荷量对投篮准确性响的研究[J].山东体育技,1995,3,32-34.
黄滨.从时空的视角谈篮球运动[J].体育学刊,2008,15(12)86-88.
何小军.篮球意识概念的理论误区及其界定[J].天津体育学院学报,2010,25(23):249-252.
韩晓玲.论肌肉本体感觉对罚球命中率的影响[J].山西师大体育学院学报,1999,14(2):66-68.
芦军志等.论降低女子篮球篮筐高度的可行性[J].山东体育学院学报,2012,28(1):92-95.
李可可.我国女篮运动员投篮中某些感知特征的研究[J].武汉体育学院学报,1991,2,52-54．
李军.目标数量对篮球运动员视觉追踪表现的影响[J].天津体育学院学报,2012,27(2):133-137．
李金辉.“身体”体现:一种触觉现象学的反思[J].江海学刊,2012,1:63-67．
罗安民.综合力量训练对中国女子篮球运动员腰、膝、踝等速力量的影响[J].中国体育科技,2012,48(2):35-40.
卢亮球.陈树华.对篮球运动员球感的理论分析[J].广州体育学院学报,1994,14(2):67-70
马明伟.个体早期动作发展研究述评[J].心理科学,2010,32(2):387-389.
马昆.用可变径篮圈对提高跳投训练效果的实验研究[D].西安体育学院硕士毕业论文,2010.
马启伟,张力为.体育运动心理学[M].杭州:浙江教育出版社,1996.
邱红武.场地变化对篮球运动技战术的影响[J].体育科学研究,2012,16(2):63-65.
邱红武.篮球比赛场地演变对中锋技术、战术影响的研究[J].南京体育学院学报,2011,10(5):73-75.
邱宏等.水迷宫重复测量数据的方差分析及其在SPSS中的实现[J].中西医结合学报,2007,5(1):101-104.
齐春燕.篮球运动员跳投肌电及足底压力的同步研究[J].天津体育学院学报,2010,25(5):422-424.
秦晓利.生态心理学[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2006.
孙民治等.篮球运动高级教程[M]北京:人民体育出版社,2000.
滕朝阳.现代男子篮球运动发展的新动向[J].成都体育学院学报,2009,35(2):57-59.
谭嘉辉.注意焦点对运动技能学习影响的元分析研究[J].北京体育大学学报,2012,35(4):81-86.
范文杰.运动技能内隐认知与外显认知协同化研究[J].体育文化导刊,2011,4(4):81-86.
吴志刚.抗干扰训练对提高投篮命中率的实验研究[J].哈尔滨体育学院学报,2004,22(4):111-112.
王斌.运动直觉研究[M],武汉:华中师范大学出版社,2005.
王妍,吴斯一.触觉传感:从触觉意象到虚拟触觉[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2011,13(5)93-98.
王建伟.身体协调功能与篮球运动的竞技战术能力[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2009,13(7):1371-1374.
肖熙然.不同竞赛角色篮球运动员的大脑机能能力及其特性[J].上海体育学院学报,2009,33(6):55-57.
许博.篮球运动员核心稳定性对跳投命中率的影响[J].沈阳体育学院学报,2010,29(6):113-116.
许博.中国竞技篮球滑坡现象及其发展对策研究[J].北京体育大学学报,2010,33(11):125-127.
邢尊明.运动技术教学与训练中的“技术环境”理论探索[J].北京体育大学学报,2010,33(5):101-104.
王家宏.中国竞技篮球运动风格发展的反思与把握[J].上海体育学院学报,2009,33(6):83-86.
王瑞元.运动生理学[M].北京:人民体育出版社,2002.
易芳.生态的理论审视[D].南京师范大学博士学位论文,2004.
余芳.本体感觉与运动训练研究[J].运动,2010,09(13:)37-38.
杨海平等.不同定量运动负荷对篮球运动员感受性变化及投篮准确性影响的研究[J].西安体育学院学报,2006,23(2):87-90.
杨海平.对不同级别篮球运动员12项感知觉指标的测试与分析[J].北京体育大学学报,2005,6,52-54.
杨海平、张婕.不同位置篮球运动员及优秀投手感知觉特征的研究[J].广州体育学院学报,2006,25(6):52-55.
杨玉伟.论设置不同高度球篮对篮球教学和谐环境的影响[J].沈阳体育学院学报,1998,3,53-54.
杨宁.动作和运动在儿童早期心理发展中的作用[J].体育刊.2005,12(2):43-46.
叶国雄.篮球研究必读[M].北京:人民体育出版社,1998.
周兴龙、赵芳.篮球急停跳投的运动生物力学分析[J].北京体育大学学报,1999,22(1):30-33.
赵诚民.对跳投技术生物力学特征之探析[J].西安体育学院学报.1994,11(3):68-70.
郑磊.特质性心理因素对我国青年男子篮球运动员身体对抗能力的影响[J].天津体育学院学报,2010,25(1):26-29.
张力为、毛志雄.运动心理学[M].华东师范大学出版社,2003.
张斌.亚、欧洲男子篮球技术战术特点研究[J].北京体育大学学报,2010,33(7):137-141.
张俊青.用系统论的观点探析现代篮球运动战术[J].北京体育大学学报,2010,33(2):132-134.
张烨.视觉系统中类别信息加工区的特异性[J].心理科学发展.2011,19(1):42-49.
王树明.知觉运动技能训练的国外研究进展[J].上海体育学院学报.2005,29(3):60-64.
Aglioti SM, Cesari P, Romani M, Urgesi C. Action anticipation and motorresonance in elite basketball players[J]. Nature Neuroscience,2008,11(9):1109-1116.
Adolph, K. E. Learning to keep balance[J]. In R. Kail (Ed.), Advances in childdevelopment and behavior, Amsterdam: Elsevier,2002,30,1-40.
Anthony Chemero. An Outline of a Theory of Affordances[J]. Ecological Psychology,2003,15(2):181-195.
Berthelet,A.,&Chavaillon,J.The use of tools in human and non humanprimates[M].Oxford, England: Clarendon,1993.
Bingham, G. P., Schmidt, R. C.,&Rosenblum, L. D. Hefting for a maximumdistance throw: A smart perceptual mechanism[J]. Journal of Experiment,1989,15,507-528.
Burton,G..Nonvisual judgment of the crossability of path gaps[J]. Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,1992,18,698–713.
Bongers,R.M.An action perspective on tool use and its development[M].Enschede, The Netherlands: PrintPartners Ipskamp BV,2001.
Burton, G.,&Turvey, M. T. Perceiving the lengths of rods that are held but notwielded[J]. Ecological Psychology,1990,2,295-324.
Carello,C.,Thuot,S.,Andersen,K,L.,＆Turvey,M.T. Perceiving the sweet spot[J].Perception,1999,28,307-320.
Carello, C. Grosofsky,A., Reichel, F. D., Solomon,H. Y.,&Turvey,M.T.Visually perceiving what is reachable[J]. Ecological Psychology,1989,1,27-54.
Chih-hui Chang, Michael G. Wade, Thomas A.Stoffregen.Perceiving affordancefor aperture passage in an Environment-Person-person system[J].Journal ofMotor Behavior,2009,9(41):495-500.
Cornus, S., Montagne, G.,&Laurent, M. Perception of a stepping acrossaffordance[J]. Ecological Psychology,1999,11,249-267.Eleanor J. Gibson.Perceptual Learning in Development: Some Basic
Concepts[J].Ecological Psychology.2000,12(4):295-302.
Fajen BR,Riley MA,Turvey MT.Information,affordances, and the control ofaction in sport[J]. Int J Sport Psychol2009,40(1):79-107.
Fajen,B.R..The scaling of information to action in visually guided braking[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,2005,31(5):56-61.
Fitzpatrick, P., Carello, C., Schmidt, R. C.,&Corey, D. Haptic and visualperception of an affordance for upright posture[J]. Ecological Psychology,1994,6,265-287.
Gibson, J. J. The senses considered as perceptual systems[M]. Boston: HoughtonMifflin.1966.
Gibson, J. J. The theory of affordances[J]. In R. E. Shaw&J. Bransford (Eds.),
Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology. Hillsdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,Inc.1977,67-82.
Gibson,J.J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception[M].Houghton MifflinCompany,1979.
Gibson, E. J. The world is so full of a number of things: On specification andperceptual learning[J].Ecological Psychology,2004,15,283-288.
Gibson,E.J.,&Pick,. An ecological approach to perceptual learning and develop–ment[M].New York: Oxford University Press.2000.
Hove P,Riley MA,Shockley K. Perceiving affordances of hockey sticks bydynamic touch[J]. Ecological Psychology2006,18(3):163-189.
HUSTON,R.L.&GRAU,C.A.Basketball shooting strategies-the free throw,directshot and lay up[J]. Sports Engineering,2003,6,49-64.
Jacobs,D.M.,&Michaels,C.F.Lateral interception I: Operative optical variables,attunement, and calibration[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology:HumanPerception and Performance,2006,32,443-458.
Jacobs,D.M., Michaels,C.F.,&Runeson, S. Learning to perceive the relativemass of colliding balls: The effects of ratio-scaling and feedback[J]. Perception&Psychophysics,2000,62,1332-1340.
Jacobs, D.M.,&Michaels,C. F. Lateral interception I: Operative optical variables,attunement and calibration[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: HumanPerception and Performance,2006,33,443-458.
Justin I, Strojnik V, arabon N. The effect of increased maximum strength ofelbow extensors on the ability to shoot accurately in darts and the three-pointshot in basketball[M]. Sport,2006.
Katz,D.The world of touch [M].Hillsdale,NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum A associates,1989.
Kinsella-Shaw.Perceiving walk-on-able slopes[J]. Ecological Psychology,1992,4,223-239.
Konczak, J., Meeuwsen, H. J.,&Cress, M. E. Changing Affordances in stairclimbing:The perception of maximum climb ability in young and older adults[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,1992,18,691–697.
Lee, D. N. A theory of visual control of braking based on information abouttime-to-collision[J]. Perception,1976,5,437-459.
Lee,D.N.Visuo-motor coordination in space-time[J]. In G. Stelmach&J.Requin(Eds.),Tutorials in motor Behavior.Amsterdam:North Holland.1980,281-293.
Mark,L.S. Eye-height scaled information about affordances: A study of sittingand stair climbing[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perceptionand Performance,1987,13,360-370.
Mark,L.S.,Balliett,J.A.,Craver,K.D.,Douglas,S.D.,&Fox,T.What an actor mustdo in order to perceive the affordance for sitting[J]. Ecological Psychology,1990,2,325-366.
Mark, L. S., Nemeth, K., Gardner, D., Dainoff, M. J., Paasche, J., Duffy, M.,&Grandt, K.Postural dynamics and the preferred critical boundary for visuallyguided reaching[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception andPerformance,1997,23,1-15.
Michaels, C. F.,&de Vries, M. M.Higher order and lower order variables in thevisual perception of relative pulling force[J]. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology: Human Perception and Performance,1998,24,526-546.
Michaels,C.F. Affordances: Four points of debate[J]. Ecological Psychology,2003,15,13-148.
Neisser.cognition and reality[M]. San Francisco: Freeman.1976.
Nissen G. How a women sarchives. Retrieved April20,2011, from http://sdrc.lib.uiowa.edu/iwa/findingaids/html/IACornets.htm1,997.
Oudejans, R. R. D., Michaels, C. F., Bakker, F. C.,&Dolne, M. A. The relevance of action in perceiving affordances: Perception of catchableness of flyballs[M].Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception andPerformance,1996,22(4):879-891.
Okazaki VHA, Rodacki ALF. Changes in basketball shooting coordination inchildren performing with different balls[J]. Federation Internationaled’Education Physique,2005,75(2):368-371.
Pagano,C.C., Fitzpatrick, P&Turvey, M. T. Tensorial basis to the constancy ofperceived object extent over variations of dynamic touch[J]. Perception&Psychophysics,1993,54,43-54.
Paula Fitzpatrick and Claudia carello. Hapic and Visual Perception of anAffordance for Upright Posture[J]. ecological psychology,1994,6(4):265-287.
Pepping G. J.,&Li, F. X. Perceiving action boundaries in the volleyballblock[M]. In S.M.A. Schmuckler&J. M. Kennedy (Eds.), Studies in perceptionand action Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.1997.
Pitts BG, Semenick D. Using anthropometric variables to determine basketballsize and basket height for females to maximize performance of the dunk[J]. TheJournal of Applied Research in Coaching and Athletics,1988,3(1):27-47.
Pufall, P. B.,&Dunbar, C. Perceiving whether or not the world affords steppingonto and over: A developmental study[J]. Ecological Psychology,1992,4,17–38.
Ramenzoni, V. C., Riley, M. A., Davis, T.,&Snyder, J. Perceiving whether ornot another person can use a step to reach an object[M]. In H. Heft&K.L.
Marsh (Eds.), Studies in perception and action VIII (pp.15-18). Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.2005.
Ramenzoni V.C., Riley,M.A.,Shockley, K.,&Davis, T. An information basedApproach to action understanding[M].Manuscript submitted forpublication.2006.
Ramenzoni VC, Riley MA, Davis T, et al. Tuning in to another person’s actioncapabilities: perceiving maximal jumping-reach height from walkingkinematics[J]. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform,2008,34(4):919-928.
Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L.,&Baron, R. M. Judging and actualizing intra-personal and interpersonal affordances[J]. Journal of experimental psychology:Human Perception and Performance,2007,33,845-859.
Rochat, P. Perceived reachability for self and for others by3to5-year-oldchildren and adults[J]. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,1995,59,317-333.
Rochat,P.,&Wraga,M. An account of the systematic error in judging what isreachable[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception andPerformance,1997,23,199-212.
Runeson, S. On the possibility of "smart" perceptual mechanisms[J].Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,1977,18,172-170.
Runeson S. On visual perception of dynamic events[M]. Acta Universit atisUpsaliensis: Studia Psychologica Upsaliensia (Serial No.9);1983.
Runeson, S., Juslin, P.,&Olsson, H. Visual perception of dynamic properties:Cue heuristic versus direct-perceptual competence[J].Psychological review,2000,107,525-555.
Sedgwick, H. A.. The geometry of spatial layout in pictorial representation[J]. InM.Hagen (Ed.), The perception of pictures VI.1980,New York: AcademicPress.
Sherwood DE, Schmidt RA, Walter CB. The force/force variability relationshipunder controlled temporal conditions[J]. J Motor Behaver,1988,20:106-116.
Sklery k BN, Bedingfield EW. Ball size and performance[M]. Unpublished work,1985.
Smith,M.R.,Flach,J.M.,Dittman,S.M.,&Stanard,T.Monocular optical constraintson collision control[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perceptionand Performance,2001,27,395-410.
Solomon, H. Y.,&Turvey, M.T. Haptically perceiving the distance reachablewith hand-held objects[J]. Journal of Experiment al Psychology: HumanPerception and Performance,1988,14,404-427.
Song A iguo, Morris Dan, Colgate JEdward, et a.l Real time stiffness displayinterface device for perception of virtual soft object[M]./P roc IEEE/RSJ InterConfon Intelligent Robots and System. Edmonton, Canada,2005.
Stoffregen, T. A., Gorday, K. M., Sheng, Y.,&Flynn, S. B. Perceiving affordances for another person’s actions[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: HumanPerception and Performance,1999,25,120-136.
Stoffregen,T.A. Affordances as properties of the animal-environment,System[J].Ecological Psychology,2003,15,115-134.
Tang WT, Shung HM. Relationship between isokinetic strength and shootingaccuracy at different shooting ranges in Taiwanese elite high school basketballplayers[J]. Isokinet Exerc Sci,2005,13,169-174.
Thomas A.Stoffregen, Chih-Mei Yang. Affordance judgments and nonlocomotorbody movement[J]. Ecological Psychology,2005,17(2):75-104.
Turvey,M.T.,&Carello,C. Dynamic touch[J]. In WEpstein&S. Rogers(Eds.),Hand book of perception and cognition. Perception of space and motion NewYork,1995,5,401-490.
Turvey, M. T., Burton,G., Amazeen, E. L., Butwill, M., Carello,C.,Perceivingthe width and height of a hand-held object by dynamic touch[J]. Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,1998,24,35-48.
Turvey, M. T.,&Carello, C. Dynamic touch[M]. In W. Epstein&S. Rogers(Eds.),Handbook of Perception and cognition: Perception of space and motion.New York: A cademic Press.1995,401-490.
Turvey,M.T.Affordances and prospective control: An outline of the ontology[J].Ecological Psychology,1992,4,173-187.
Vander Kamp,J.,Savelsbergh,G.J.,&Smeets,J.Multiple information sources ininterceptive timing[J].Human Movement Science,1997,16,787-821.
Vander Meer, A. L. H. Visual guidance of passing under a barrier[J]. EarlyDevelopment and Parenting,1997,6,149-157.
Wagman, J. B.,&Taylor, K. R.. Perceiving affordances for Aperture Crossingfor The person-plus-object system[J]. Ecological Psychology,2005,17,105–130.
Wagman,J.B.,&Carello,C.Affordances and inertial constraints on tool use[J].Ecological Psychology,2001,13,173-195.
Wagman,J.B.,&Carello,C.Haptically creating affordances:The user-toolinterface[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,2003,9,175-186.
Wagman, J. B.,&Taylor, K. R. Chosen striking location and the user-tool-environment system[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology:Applied,2004,10,267-280.
Wagman,J.B.,Shockley,K.,Riley,M.A.,&Turvey, M. T. Attunement, calibration,and exploration in fast haptic perceptual learning[J].Journal of Motor Behavior,2001,33,323-327.
Warren, W. H. Perceiving affordances: Visual guidance of stair climbing[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance1984,10,683-703.
Warren, W. H.,&Whang, S. Visual guidance of walking through apertures:Body-scaled information for affordances[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance,1987,13,371-383.
Weast JA, Shockley K, Riley MA. The influence of athletic experience andkinematic information on skill-relevant affordance perception[J].ExperimentlPsychology2011,64(4):689-706.
White,E.,&Shockley,K.Perceiving pass-under-ability while walking andsitting[M]. Paper presented at the13thInternational Confeence on Perceptionand Action, Monterey,2005.
Withagen, R.,&Michaels, C. F.Transfer of calibration in length perception bydynamic touch[J]. Perception&Psychophysics,2004,66,1282-1292.
Withagen, R.,&Michaels, C. F. Transfer of calibration between length andsweet-spot perception by dynamic touch[M]. Manuscript submitted forpublication.2005.
Wraga, M. The role of eye height in perceiving affordances and objectdimensions[J]. Perception&Psychophysics,1999,61,490-507.
Zaff, B. Perceiving affordances for oneself and others: Studies in reaching andGrasping[D].Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University,Columbus, Ohio.1989.
Zago, M.,&Lacquaniti, F. Visual perception and interception of falling objects:are view of evidence for an internal model of gravity[J]. Journal of NeuralEngineering,2005,2,198-208.
Zhu,Q.,&Bingham,G.P.Investigating the information used to detect anaffordance for maximum distance throws[M]. In J. Wagman&C. Pagano (Eds.),Studies in perception and action X. LLC: Taylor and Francis Group.2009.