摘要
气候变化所引发的自然灾害越来越成为影响我国国民经济和社会生活发展不可或缺的因素,“洪灾—条线、旱灾—大片”,据近20年的资料统计,我国洪涝灾害年均经济损失超过1000亿元,约占全国GDP的1%-3%,每年因洪涝灾害死亡人口上千人,全国农作物年均因旱受灾面积约26000公顷,年均因旱饮水困难人口约2900万人,水旱灾害的威胁将长期存在’。2009-2010年我国西南地区发生了特大旱灾,而西南地区的水资源与全国来比却是相当丰富的。在水资源相对丰富的西南地区发生百年一遇的特大旱灾的原因是什么?从深层次因素讲,除了气候变化、水资源时空分布不均、人们的经济活动的影响外,因产权不清而导致的农业水利设施建设严重滞后(特别供给主体缺位),水资源开发利用率低,工程性缺水严重是造成地区性大旱的重要原因。西南大旱等全国性的旱灾使我们进一步认识到了投资农业水利设施的必要性和紧迫性。水利历来是农业的命脉,因其对泄洪抗旱、农田灌溉、保障粮食增产、丰收及其安全和提高农业竞争力具有战略意义。
迄今为止,有关农业水利设施的相关研究可谓汗牛充栋,从现有的已掌握的文献资料来看,对农业水利设施产权安排的研究主要集中在对小型农业(田)水利设施产权制度的现状和存在的问题上,对产权制度创新与效率分析的研究已经有所涉及,但对效率的分析仅仅局限于传统的投如——产出方面,相对缺乏从制度成本和制度收益方面对制度绩效的研究;对农业水利设施投融资体制机制的研究,从笔者目前梳理的文献来看,大都集中在如下几个方面:一是对农业水利设施投融资机制的研究;二是对农业水利设施管理体制的研究;三是对农业水利设施运行机制的研究。这些学者的理论成果无疑成为了农业水利设施投融资理论、管理理论与实践进一步发展的理论基础,但从现有的研究成果来看,从明确的利益角度分析农业水利设施投融资问题的研究还相对缺乏。特别是与产权安排相一致的投融资机制的研究经笔者文献检索还未曾发现。
本研究将在前人已有的研究基础上来进行。农业是国民经济的基础,农业稳则天下稳,农业兴则国家兴。水利是国民经济重要的基础设施和基础产业,是农业的命脉。日益严峻的干旱情况的出现迫使我们不得不回过头来重新审视农业水利建设及其绩效。从现实和长远来看,如果不能解决缺水背后的制度因素,不能在全国尤其是缺水地区建立一套有效的资源配置方式,进而形成一个节水型的经济发展模式的话,很难解决我国当前的水资源短缺问题,因旱而灾将继续恶化和扩大。为此,本文基于阿兰·斯密德教授所提出的“状态(Situation)——结构(Structure)——绩效(Performance)"即SSP范式,试图探寻影响农业水利设施绩效差异的本源性因素,并援用相关经济学理论加以分析论证,以揭示农业水利设施绩效差异之根源就在于其自身特性不同,即农业水利设施的状态不同决定了各农业水利设施的制度选择的不同,从而导致绩效不同,以期为我国农业水利设施建设提供一个可操作的理论分析框架和制度创新安排。
本文共分7章。第1章为导论,对本文的研究背景、研究的目的和意义、主要研究方法、本文研究范围的界定、本文的研究内容和技术路线以及可能的创新点和局限性做了较为详尽的介绍。
第2章为文献综述和理论基础。对相关研究文献进行了简单的回顾,重点对农业水利设施的产权安排的相关研究和农业水利投融资机制的已有研究成果进行了简要的梳理并进行了评述,同时针对本文的需要,对产权理论、公共物品理论、制度变迁理论、投融资理论和“多中心治理”理论等相关理论基础进行了简要的介绍。
第3章在前一章的基础上,构建了一个分析中国农业水利设施的产权安排与投融资机制的理论分析框架,即以“SSP”分析范式为基础,建立了“物品特性——主体的权利结构——特定产权选择——产权安排与投融资机制契合机理——绩效分析”的研究框架。
第4章分析了农业水利设施投融资的主体结构及其权利划分,详细探讨了我国农业水利设施的五大投融资主体结构,分别为政府、村民委员会、合作组织、私人资本投资者以及农户。从历史的角度考察了农业水利设施投入的政府间的权利变化、财政体制的变迁与政府财力的变化、政府间事权的变化以及投融资机制的演进历程,并从实证的角度,对财政体制变迁对地方政府财力变动的影响进行了分析。
第5章通过对产权的类型和变迁的分析,论述了农业水利设施的产权选择原则,即提高农业水利设施综合利用率的原则、有利于加强维护和保养、降低监督成本的原则、调控多方利用关系、兼顾多方利益的原则、实现水资源的可持续利用原则,并在此基础上,构建了我国农业水利设施的具体产权模式,即股份合作制度安排、农户独资制度安排、拍卖、租赁和承包等制度安排,并辅之以案例来加以左证。在此基础上,论述了我国农业水利设施特定产权安排与投融资机制的契合机理。
第6章从计量与逻辑层面对农业水利设施投融资的绩效进行了实证分析,本文对绩效分两大块来进行实证分析,首先对农业水利投入的经济效率进行了实证检验,肯定了我国农业水利设施投入所获得的效益,其次对中国农业水利设施的制度绩效从制度成本、制度收益、机会主义到制度绩效进行了逻辑推理证明分析。
第7章首先作为简要的结语,对本文研究所得到的结论进行了归纳总结,其次探讨了我国农业水利设施的产权安排及投融资机制的创新问题,从小型农业水利设施产权创新的六大诱导因素入手,分析了我国小型农业水利设施产权安排与投融资机制创新的可能性,提出了小型农业水利设施产权安排创新的模式,构建了与产权安排创新相一致的投融资机制。在此基础上,对农业水利设施的产权安排与投融资机制提出了相应的政策建议。
基于对上述内容的研究,本文得到几个重要结论和几点政策启示。主要结论有如下几个:(1)农业水利设施具有特殊的属性。第一是它的自然属性,农业水利设施具有无法准确计量分割的物品,即具有整体性、不可分割性;第二是水利设施的外部性;第三是公共物品特性。(2)产权制度的改革和创新,为各类农业水利设施明晰了产权主体归属,有利于明确责权利之间的关系,有利于拓宽投融资渠道,但并不必然带来绩效,不能彻底地解决农业水利设施供给不足的状况。由于农业水利设施是一种公共池塘资源,不具有排他性与可竞争性的特点,即使是在一个封闭的资源边界和受益者边界中人们都有搭便车的机会主义动机,更何况可以让外来人免费享用这个资源。因此,我国进行的市场化改革、产权改革,只是解决了设施的归属问题,但由于设施的复杂性,以及农民集体行动困境的存在,加上小农基础上带来的巨大制度成本却相对较小的制度收益,使得这一项制度安排并不必然带来预期的绩效。(3)在现行的制度框架下,政府间财权和事权划分的“逆向化”是造成农业水利设施整体供给不足的制度根源。通过对农业水利设施建设中政府财权和事权的历史变迁的分析可以知道,我国伴随着财政体制改革和农村税费改革的深入展开,政府间明显存在财权上移但事权却下移的趋势。这种逆向化,使得中央政府因“甩包袱”而退出,地方政府因财力有限而无法进行投入,农民因“原子化”而缺乏建设的激励机制。(4)农业水利设施建设必须上升到国家战略高度,将产权安排与投融资机制契合起来,才能从根本上解决问题。站在国家的角度,农业水利具有战略性,因为它关系到粮食生产安全,关系到国计民生、关系到生态安全,它非单纯的经济问题,本质上是政治问题。既然对国家来说,农业水利设施是个政治问题,就应该按照政治问题的治理来对待,在宏观层面要上升到战略高度,在微观层面要构建体制机制,在操作层面,要把农业水利设施的建设由现在的应急管理转化为风险管理。(5)重塑新型的农村合作组织。农村合作组织是农业水利设施建设管理的基础。传统的集体经济组织无论是从经济角度,还是从社会角度和文化角度来看,都已经很难发挥它应有的功效了,因此重构新型的农村合作组织势在必行。(6)农业水利设施的投融资机制需在国家、市场和农户之间寻求最佳结合方式。我国农村各地情况千差万别,这就意味着不能只有一种制度安排。在进行制度思考时,既要跳出单一的或国家、或市场、或农户的简单化臆想,又要避免抽象地将国家、市场、农户三者笼统地合在一起,而必须从农业水利设施的特性、农村社会的性质、国家的稳定以及市场经济这些基本前提出发,在国家、市场、农户三者中寻找最佳的结合方式。我国农业水利设施建设历史欠账太多,投资规模非常巨大,单纯的依靠某一单一的投融资渠道已不能适应农村经济社会发展的需要,因此,在保证政府投资起主导作用的情况下,在不同的地区,寻求国家、集体和农户的最佳结合方式,是解决农业水利设施资金来源的最佳途径。
几点政策建议:(1)健全农业水利设施投融资机制,完善政府投入稳定增长机制。一是制定法律法规,增加政府主导性投入,确保资金来源;二是拓宽融资渠道,有效运用资本市场,建立灵活有效的融资机制。(2)完善农业水利设施产权体制改革,构建新的投入增长机制。农业水利设施产权制度改革以明晰产权为核心,以保障农民群众的合法权益为根本,以保证农业水利设施的安全运行为前提,放开建设权、出让资产权、转换经营权、盘活存量资产、优化资产组合、充分调动广大农民群众和社会各界参与农业小型水利设施建设和管理的积极性,发挥好农村小型水利设施效益,促进农村经济持续、快速、健康发展。(3)转变政府职能,优化投融资环境。一是转变观念,将农业水利设施由应急管理转向风险管理;二是制定并发布中长期农业水利发展规划;三是制定水利投融资相关政策、法规和制度;四是加强农业水利设施建设全过程监管。(4)切实用好“一事一议”政策。(5)借鉴“多中心治理理论”构建与产权安排相一致的农业水利设施投融资体制。
本文的创新之处在于:(1)研究视角和理论分析框架的创新。利用阿兰·斯密德教授的SSP范式对中国农业水利设施的产权安排和投融资机制进行全面和系统的理论分析,不仅是本文在研究方法上的一种创新,更是本文研究的一大特色。(2)揭示了农业水利设施整体不足的制度根源。长期以来,我国城乡二元结构突出,农业水利设施供给主体单一;改革开放以来,由于农业水利设施市场化改革,加上财政体制变迁过程中造成的政府间“财权”和“事权”的“逆向化”,从而出现政府在农业水利设施投入上缺位、农户在农业水利设施投入上乏力、社会资本在农业水利设施投入上动力不足的局面。本文利用SSP范式,通过对农业水利设施的产权安排和投融资机制等制度安排进行深入分析,揭示了农业水利设施整体投入不足的制度根源。
(3)构建了与农业水利设施“状态”相一致的产权安排和投融资机制。农业水利设施种类繁多,“状态”各异,不同农业水利设施的“状态”对应有不同的产权安排,从而对应有不同的投融资机制。
Caused by climate change, natural disasters has increasingly impacted the development of our national economy and an indispensable element of social life. "A line of floods and a range of droughts." According to statistics nearly 20 years, average annual economic losses of flood disaster in China more than 100 billion yuan, accounting for about 1% of GDP, a 3% deaths each year thousands of people, flooding the average crop area of about 26,000 hectares affected, the average annual drinking water population of about 2900 people, the threat of flood and drought in southwest China in 2010 was a serious drought, and water resources in southwest China and the country is quite rich. Relatively rich in water resources in the southwest regions, what are the reasons for severe drought? Deeper factors, in addition to climate change, stresses water resources, uneven temporal and spatial distribution, the impact of people's economic activities, the result of unclear property rights resulting from the construction of water conservancy facilities which is seriously lagging behind agriculture (in particular the absence of main supply), low water resources development, severe water shortage which is caused by construction of a regional drought of important reasons. Southwest drought and other national drought lead us to further recognize the need for investment in agricultural water conservancy facilities and urgency. Water has always been the lifeblood of agriculture; because of the flood drought, irrigation, protection of food production, harvest and safety improve the competitiveness of agriculture which is of strategic significance.
So far, the agricultural water conservancy facilities and research can be described as voluminous, which has been acquired from the existing literature point of view, the arrangements of property rights on agricultural water conservancy facilities studies have focused on small-scale agriculture (field) in current situation of water conservancy facilities and existing property rights system issues, innovation and efficiency of the system of property rights research has been involved, but the analysis of efficiency is only limited to the traditional input-output, with the relative lack of benefits from the system in terms of cost and system efficiency of the system; on agriculture and irrigation facilities, institutional mechanisms for financing research, the author is currently combing the literature from the point of view, mainly focused on the following aspects: First, infrastructure investment and financing mechanisms for agriculture and irrigation research; Second, agricultural research management system of water conservancy facilities; three irrigation facilities for agriculture operation mechanism. Theoretical results of these scholars will undoubtedly become the theory of investment and financing of agricultural water conservancy facilities, management theory and practice of the theoretical basis for further development, but existing research point of view, a clear benefit from the perspective of agriculture and irrigation facilities, the issue of financing is also relatively scarce. In particular, the arrangements are consistent with the property investment and financing mechanism literature search by the author have not yet discovered.
The study will be based on studies which have been conducted. Agriculture is the foundation of national economy; agriculture is conducive to the world steadiness. Water is the first national infrastructure and basic industry, the lifeblood of agriculture. The growing emergence of severe drought conditions have forced us to come back to re-examine the performance of agriculture and water conservancy construction. From a practical and long-term, if the system can not solve the underlying factors of water, not in the country, especially in dry regions to establish an effective resource allocation, thereby forming a water-saving model of economic development, it is hard to solve the current water shortages, Yin Han and disaster will continue to worsen and expand. Therefore, this article based on Professor Alan Smith's "Situation-Structure-Performance" the SSP paradigm, attempts to explore the impact of agriculture and irrigation facilities in the derived factors of performance differences, and to invoke Economic theory related to analysis and demonstration, agriculture and irrigation facilities in order to reveal the root causes of performance differences in their own different characteristics; namely, the state of agricultural water facilities in different agricultural irrigation facilities determines the choice of different systems in order for our agriculture and irrigation facilities provide a workable analytical framework and theoretical basis.
This article is divided into 7 chapters. Chapter 1 is Introduction. Chapter 2 is literature review and theoretical basis. Research on a simple review of the literature, focusing on agriculture and irrigation facilities, property arrangements, research and agricultural investment and financing mechanism for water research results have been a brief and carding, while the need for the article on property rights theory, public goods theory, institutional change theory and the theory of investment and financing and other related theoretical basis of a brief introduction. Chapter 3 on the basis of the previous chapter, carries out an analysis of building water conservancy facilities in Agricultural Investment and Financing Mechanism of property rights arrangements and theoretical framework; that is, "SSP" analytical paradigm as the basis to establish a "goods characteristics--the right of the main structure--Choose a specific property--performance analysis "of the framework. Chapter 4 analyzes the financing of agricultural water conservancy facilities and rights of the principal structure of division, from a historical perspective of the investment in the agricultural water conservancy facilities, the right to change the intergovernmental, governmental fiscal system changes and changes in financial resources, changes in inter-governmental powers and the evolution process of investment and financing mechanisms. Chapter 5 on property type and analysis discusses the property rights of agricultural irrigation facilities selection principle, and on this basis, build water conservancy facilities, agricultural property rights model. In Chapter 6 from the micro level investment in irrigation facilities in agriculture the economic performance of an empirical study on the performance of agricultural inputs of water conservancy facilities were affirmed, and the water conservancy facilities in Agricultural Systems in the cost from the system, the system proceeds to the system of opportunism performance is analyzed. Chapter 7 as a brief conclusion--that of this research were summarized at first,studies property rights from the agriculture and irrigation facilities, the possibility of innovative analysis of the induction factors and start to build water conservancy facilities, agricultural innovation index system of property rights, and made arrangements with the property investment and innovative financing mechanisms consistent. on agriculture and irrigation facilities, investment and financing mechanism of property rights arrangements and policy recommendations.
Based on the above study, several important conclusions are obtained in this paper and some policy implications. Main conclusions are:(1) agriculture and irrigation facilities have special properties. The first is its natural properties, agriculture and irrigation facilities have separate items can not be accurately measured, that has integrity, indivisibility; the second is the externality of water conservancy facilities; the third is a public good characteristics. (2) property rights reform and innovation, agriculture and irrigation facilities for all types of clear ownership of the property rights is conducive to a clear relationship among responsibility, rights and interests is conducive to broadening the investment and financing channels, but does not necessarily bring performance, can not be completely Agricultural irrigation facilities to solve the situation of insufficient supply. As agricultural irrigation facilities is a common-pool resources, with exclusive insurance can be a competitive advantage and, even in a closed border and the beneficiaries of the resources that people have a free ride in the border opportunistic motives, let alone allow outsiders Free access to this resource. Therefore, our country's market reforms, property rights reform, but to resolve the ownership of the facility, but because of the complexity of the facilities, as well as the plight of the existence of collective action of farmers, with small farmers on the basis of the enormous costs are smaller system of revenue, making it an institutional arrangement does not necessarily bring the expected performance. (3) Under the framework of the existing system, government financial authority and division of powers between the "reverse" of agriculture and irrigation facilities is caused by the inadequacy of the source of the overall supply. Agriculture and irrigation facilities by the Government in the history of financial authority and powers of analysis can change that, along with China's financial reform and the rural tax and fee reform started, the Government clearly exists between the property right move but the powers it down trend. The reverse, making the central government due to "cast it" and quit, the local government due to limited financial resources that can not be put into the farmers because of "atomization" and the lack of building incentives. (4) Agriculture and irrigation facilities must be raised to the national strategic level, in order to fundamentally solve the problem. On the national point of view, agriculture and irrigation strategic, as it relates to food safety, related to people's livelihood is related to ecological security, it is not simply an economic issue, are essentially political problems. As for countries, agriculture and irrigation facilities is a political issue, it should be in accordance with the political issues of governance to deal with, at the macro level to rise to a strategic height, at the micro level to build institutional mechanisms at the operational level, should agriculture and irrigation facilities building from the current emergency management into risk management. (5) Remodeling new rural collective organization on the basis of collective management of agricultural water facilities. Traditional collective economic organizations both from the economic point of view, or from the social point of view and cultural point of view, have been very difficult to play its due effect, so the reconstruction of a new type of rural collective organizations is imperative. (6) Agriculture and irrigation facilities, investment and financing mechanisms required at the national, social, and between farmers find the best combination of methods. Rural local conditions vary widely, which means not only a system arrangement. Conducting system of thinking, it is necessary to jump out of a single or country, or market, or farmers simplistic imagination, but also to avoid the abstract to state, market, farmers in general terms the three together, but must be from the agricultural water conservancy facilities characteristics, the nature of rural society, the country's stability and a market economy these basic premise, in the state, market, farmers find the best combination of three ways. Coupled with the history of agriculture and irrigation facilities are too many debts, the scale of investment is huge, simply relying on a single investment and financing channels can not meet the needs of rural economic and social development, therefore, play a leading role to ensure that government investment in the case of in different areas, for the state, collectives and farmers the best combination of methods to solve the source of funds for agriculture and irrigation facilities, the best way.
Some policy recommendations:(1) investment mechanism and improve the agricultural water conservancy facilities, improve the mechanism of steady growth in government investment. First, make laws and regulations; increase the government-led investment, to ensure that sources of funding. Second, broaden the financing channels, the effective use of capital market, and establish flexible and effective financing mechanisms. (2) Improve agriculture and irrigation facilities, property rights reform, and investment in building new growth mechanism. Agriculture and irrigation facilities, reform of property rights to the core of clear property rights to protect the legitimate interests of farmers as the fundamental, in order to ensure the safe operation of agricultural irrigation facilities as a precondition, the right to release the building, transfer of assets, rights, conversion management rights and revitalize the stock of assets optimize the portfolio to fully mobilize the broad masses of peasants and community participation in agricultural construction and management of small water conservancy facilities, the enthusiasm to play good efficiency small water conservancy facilities in rural areas, promote rural economic sustained, rapid and healthy development. (3) To transform government functions, optimize investment environment. First, change concepts of the agriculture and irrigation facilities from the emergency management to risk management. The second is to develop and publish long-term agricultural water development planning. Third, develop investment and finance-related policies, regulations and systems. Fourth is to strengthen the whole process of agricultural water control facilities. (4) Effective use of good "thing" policy. (5) Refer to the "theory of multi-center management," Construction of the water conservancy facilities of agricultural investment and financing system.
The innovations of this paper are:(1) research perspectives and theoretical frameworks of innovation. Germany by Professor Alan Smith·SSP paradigm of Chinese agriculture and irrigation facilities, property arrangements and investment and financing mechanism for a comprehensive and systematic theoretical analysis, this paper is not only an innovative research method, this study is a major characteristic. (2). Reveal the overall lack of irrigation facilities in agriculture causes the system. A long time, highlight the urban-rural dual structure, a single main supply of agricultural water conservancy facilities; reform and opening up, due to agriculture and irrigation facilities, market-oriented reforms, coupled with the financial system caused by changes in the intergovernmental process of "property rights" and "powers" and "reverse "and thus give rise to government investment in agriculture on the absence of irrigation facilities, farmers invest in agriculture and irrigation facilities in the pan on the force is inadequate investment in agriculture and irrigation facilities, the importance of the overall system of roots. (3) Agricultural irrigation facilities constructed "state" consistent with the investment and financing mechanisms. Different agricultural irrigation facilities of the "state" correspond to a different property rights arrangement thus corresponds to a different investment and financing mechanisms.
引文
1水利部人事劳动教育司编:《水利概论》第28-29页,南京,河海大学出版社,2002
2张含英:《中国水利史稿》序言,《中国水利史稿》,北京,水利电力出版社,1979
3罗兴佐.治水:国家介入和农民合作[D]华中师范大学政治学研究院博士论文,2005年
1小型农业水利设施通常是指灌溉面积]万亩、除涝面积3万亩、库容在10万至1千万立方米之间的水库、渠道流量1立方米每秒以下的工程(冯广志,2001)
1高德步.经济学中的历史学派和历史方法[J].中国人民大学学报,1998, (5):1-6.
1龙冠海.社会学[M].台北:台湾三民书局,1966:63.
2[德]马克思,[德]恩格斯.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.马克思恩格斯全集_第19卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1963:131.
3林义.制度分析及其方法论意义[J].经济学家,2001(4):79-85.
4[德]威廉·罗雪尔.朱绍文译.历史方法的国民经济学讲义大纲[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997年:12.
5[美]道格拉斯·C·诺斯.制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].上海:三联书店出版社,1994.
1何树贵.比较经济体制学[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2001:24-27.
2[德]马克思,[德]恩格斯.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.马克思恩格斯全集,第19卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1963:131.
3[德]马克思,[德]恩格斯.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.马克思恩格斯全集,第20卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1971:571.
4[苏]列宁.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.列宁全集_第8卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1959:423.
1陈国强.简明文化人类学词典fz].杭州:浙江人民出版社,1990:25.
2景天魁.现代社会科学基础(定性与定量)[M]北京:中国社会科学出版社,1994:67.
3朱成全.经济学方法论[M]沈阳:东北财经大学出版社,2003:195.
4苏共中央马克思列宁主义研究院.胡尧等译.回忆马克思恩格斯[M]北京:人民出版社,1957:73.
5[德]马克思、[德]恩格斯.中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译.马克思恩格斯全集_第20卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1971:357.
6欧阳康,张明仓.社会科学研究方法[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2001:214.
1 J.Mabry, Canals and Communities.Small-scale Irrigation Systems[M], Edited by University of Arizona Press,1996:273.
2 Meinzen-Diek, R.1996.Groundwater Markets in Pakistan:Participation and productivity, Research RePorts105, Intemational Food Polic yResearch Institute, Washington, D,C.
3 Ashutosh Sarker. Design principles in long-enduring institutions of Japanese Irrigation common-pool resources[J].Agricultural Water Management,2001,48:89-102
1 Murat Yercan, Management turning-over and participatory managemeng of irrigation schemds.a case study of the Gediz River Basin in Turkey[J]..Agrieultural Water Management.2003, (62):205-214
1黄忠全、施国庆.国外水利投融资模式及其对我国的启示[J].江苏商论,2006(8)
1王伟.中外水投融资综述[J].北京水利,2001(1)
1王伟.中外水利投融资政策的比较[J],水利经济,2001(06)
1吴易风、关雪凌等著《产权理论与实践》,中国人民大学出版社,2010年3月
2详见《列宁选集》第二版,第2(1984年)、6(1986年)、29(1985年)卷,北京,人民出版社
3详见《斯大林选集》,下卷,北京,人民出版社,1979
1科斯:《企业、市场与法律》,芝加哥大学出版社,1988,第169页
2[美]H.诺思:《经济史中的结构与变迁》,上海三联书店,1991,第12页
1[美]H.德姆塞茨:《关于产权的理论》,《美国经济评论》1967年5月号,上海三联书店,1994年,第97页。
2余汉明:《中国农民土地持有产权制度新论》,2008年,社会科学文献出版社
3 Pejorich,S.,The Economic of Property Right:towards a theory or comparative systems,Kluwer Academic Publishers,p.27
1 Samuelson.PA.,1954, The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure, Review of Economics and Statistics, November.
1阎坤、王进杰.公共支出理论前前沿[M],中国人民大学出版社,2004年9月
2吴伟.公共物品有效提供的经济学分析[M],经济科学出版社,2008年4月
3孔祥智、涂圣伟.新农村建设中农户对公共物品的需求偏好与及影响因素研究-以农田水利设施为例[J],农业经济导刊.2007(1)
4周业安,宋紫峰《公共品的自愿供给机制:一项实验研究》《经济研究》2008年第7期
1蓝新光、孟献浩、郭亮《中国转型期公共品供给机制创新研究——基于实验经济学方法》[J],理论研究,2007年4月(下)
2吴凡罕、张四海、徐敏、王煦法《公共品实验中社会规范形成的研究及仿真》《计算机工程与应用》2006.15
1参见:[美]A·阿兰·斯密德著,黄祖辉等译,《财产、权利和公共选择——对法和经济学的进一步思考》,上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,1999年版。
1汪希成,西部地区农村公共品投入保障机制研究[M],中国农业出版社,2008,第78页
1从农业水利设施的投入来看,主要指中央政府、地方政府、社会组织(协会)和农户之间的财权和事权的划分。
1周晓平,刘秀红.我国农田水利工程性质分析和管理模式探讨[J].人民黄河,2007,(3)
1林毅夫、蔡昉、李周著:《中国的奇迹:发展战略与经济改革》,上海人民出版社,1999
2张恒龙、孟添:中国财政体制(1949-2004)变迁的实证研究—基于财政压力与竞争的视角[J],经济体制改革,2007,(04)。
1数据来自1980年和1992年的《中国统计年鉴》
2根据《中国统计年鉴(1999)》(中国统计出版社)计算得出
1主要是指长江三峡水利枢纽续工程、小浪底、万家寨、江娅、飞来峡、观音阁、桃林口、引黄(河)入卫(河)、引碧(碧流河)入连(大连)、引大(大通河)入秦(秦王川)、治淮(河)、治太(湖)、洞庭湖治理等
1万里.水利产权制度改革理论与实务[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,1998:10,97.
2德姆塞茨.产权理论探讨,1967年
1青木昌彦,钱颖一.转轨经济中的公司治理结构.北京:中国经济出版社,1995
1刘铁军.新时期小型农田水利设施投资主体研究[J],水利发展研究,2004(7)
1本部分内容参考了沈满洪:论水权交易与交易成本[J],人民黄河,2004(7)
2盛洪:分工与交易[M],上海三联书店、上海人民出版,1994.
1李琴:利益主体博弈与农村公共品供给的困境[J],农业经济问题,,2005(4)
1桂华:小型农田水利设施产权改革之路不可行。三农中国http://www.snzg.cn
1裴宏志.小型水利工程产权制度改革研究[M].中国水利水电出版社,2005
1刘成玉.产权改革:理顺农田水利设施管护体制的突破口[J].农村经济,2006,(11).
2胡继连.产业组织制度与中国农业发展研究[M].北京:中国农业出版社.2002
3材料来源:《江西省水利志1991-2000年》[M],江西省水利厅编,2005年
1王浩.阮本清.沈大军等.面向可持续发展的水价理论与实践[M].北京:科学出版社,2003.130.
2裴宏志.小型水利工程产权制度改革研究[M].中国水利水电出版社,2005,第59页
1刘方强,周心愿:RCP项目融资模式解析[J],建筑经济,2008(3)
1宋贤卓:加大我国农田水利基本建设投资刻不容缓[J].中国集体经济,2009(4)
2笔者认为此处的条件主要是指①产权是分散的:②符合规模经济和技术发展的要求。
1甘琳、张仕廉:农村水利基础设施现状与融资模式偏好[J],改革,2010(70)
[1]资本论.第1-3卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1975.
[2]刘伟,平新乔.现代西方产权理论与企业行为分析[J].经济研究,1989(1):3-12.
[3]哈罗德·德姆塞茨,银温泉.关于产权的理论[J].经济社会体制比较,1990(6):49-55.
[4]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集[M].北京:中国广播电视出版社,1992.
[5]段毅才.西方产权理论结构分析[J].经济研究,1992(8):72-80.
[6]莱斯特·C·梭罗.中国的基础设施建设问题[J].经济研究,1997(1).
[7]刘建基,于振俊.对水利投融资的探讨[J].山东水利,1999(9):43-44.
[8]石玉波,周志军.利用资本市场建立多元化的水利投融资体制[J].水利经济,1999(4).
[9]黄明东.农业投资困境:政府与农民的博弈分析[J].农业经济问题,2000(4):36-40.
[10]张连君,唐庆亮,李兴田.从夏津县水利工程产权制度改革看水利投融资机制[J].山东水利,2001(11):10-11.
[11]麦卡利,红云周.大坝经济学[M].北京:中国发展出版社,2001.
[12]王国生.过渡时期地方政府与中央政府的纵向博弈及其经济效应[J].南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学版),2001(1):110-117.
[13]田国强.一个关于转型经济中最优所有权安排的理论[J].经济学(季刊),2001(1):45-70.
[14]刘海虹,元英.一个最佳融资结构的理论模型[J].财贸经济,2001(1):51-54.
[15]王伟.中外水利投融资政策的比较[J].水利经济,2001(6):18-21.
[16]王伟.中外水利投融资政策综述[J].北京水利,2001(1):34-35.
[17]胡和平,王亚华.加入WTO对我国农村水利建设的影响分析[J].中国水利,2002(10):133-136.
[18]张弘力.论体制转轨时期我国财政政策与经济发展[D].东北财经大学,2002.
[19]郑垂勇.水利基本建设项目融资方式研究(上)[J].水利经济,2002(5):1-5.
[20]陈红艳,蒲华.PFI:水利融资新机制[J].水利经济,2003(4):23-25.
[21]张志铭.公共财政下的水利投入机制探讨[J].山西水利,2003(4):54-55.
[22]姜斌,刘蓓,梁宁.国外水利投融资经验及其启示[J].水利发展研究,2003(11):42-45.
[23]章国富.积极探索水利投融资体制改革[J].水利天地,2003(2):16-17.
[24]辛长爽,郝介江.加强水利投融资能力对策研究[J].水利发展研究,2003(12):37-38.
[25]李锐.农村公共基础设施投资效益的数量分析[J].农业技术经济,2003(2):5-9.
[26]李燕琼.我国小型农田水利建设的制度创新与实践[J].经济体制改革,2003(4):82-84.
[27]赵海林,赵敏,毛春梅,等.中外水权制度比较研究与我国水权制度改革[J].水利经济,2003(4):5-8.
[28]沈满洪.论水权交易与交易成本[J].人民黄河,2004(7):19-22.
[29]葛久研,严濛濛,葛亦姜.水利投入对国民经济增长拉动的数学模型[J].水利经济,2004(1):36-37.
[30]田圃德.水权制度与水权市场研究[D].河海大学,2004.
[31]刘贵书.税费改革后农村水利建设融投资对策[J].湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2004(1):18-19.
[32]黄颖.图书馆治理的比较制度分析[D].中国科学院研究生院(文献情报中心),2004.
[33]薛卫国.我国财政体制变迁的新制度经济学思考[J].西安财经学院学报,2004(4):68-72.
[34]刘铁军,郭洁,董晓绘.小型农田水利设施投资主体缺位原因分析[J].东北水利水电,2004(8):57-58.
[35]陶建平.长江中游平原农业洪涝灾害风险管理研究[D].华中农业大学,2004.
[36]阿兰,斯密德.制度与行为经济学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004.
[37]朱卫东.综合利用水利工程经济特征分析及管理体制研究[D].河海大学,2004.
[38]吴松娟,廖小刚.对发展我国水利建设投资基金问题的探索[J].水利经济,2005(3):25-27.
[39]唐忠,李众敏.改革后农田水利建设投入主体缺失的经济学分析[J].农业经济问题,2005(2):34-40.
[40]黄若君.广西农田水利投入不足的原因分析与增加投入的有效途径[J].广西商业高等专科学校学报,2005(2).
[41]张晋武,李华.集权与分权:基于中央政府的财政体制变迁分析[J].河北经贸大学学报,2005(5).
[42]李炳炎.马克思产权理论与我国现代产权制度建设[J]学习论坛,2005(1):10-15.
[43]刘俊浩.农村社区农田水利建设组织动员机制研究[D].西南农业大学,2005.
[44]穆贤清.农户参与灌溉管理的制度保障研究[D].浙江大学,2005.
[45]翟浩辉.水利建设:提高农业综合生产能力的基本保障[J].求是,2005(8):41-43.
[46]李栋,褚春超.我国水利投融资方式及体制改革研究[J].水利水电技术,2005(4):26-27.
[47]杜威漩.中国农业水资源管理制度创新研究[D].浙江大学,2005.
[48]任海龙.中国农业投融资问题研究[D].东北农业大学,2005.
[49]孔庆雨,郑垂勇.财政农田水利投入的取向研究[J].南方农村,2006(5):15-18.
[50]刘成玉,孙小燕.产权改革:理顺农田水利设施管护体制的突破口[J].农村经济,2006(11):3-5.
[51]殷志红.从财政体制变迁看中央与地方的关系[J].中国国情国力,2006(9):11-12.
[52]胡永法.公共财政在水利建设中发挥主导作用的必要性研究[J].水利经济,2006(4):76—77.
[53]谢元鉴.构建中小型水利设施农民参与式管理体制研究[D].厦门大学,2006.
[54]徐家贵,徐雪红.国内外典型水利投融资模式及启示[J].水利经济,2006(1):47-49.
[55]王晓东,黄河,姜楠.建设社会主义新农村需要建立农村水利投入新机制[J].水利发展研究,2006(3):11-15.
[56]尹德洪.马克思产权理论和现代西方产权理论比较[J].石家庄经济学院学报,2006(6):798-800.
[57]孔庆雨,郑垂勇,陈洪转.农村水利财政投入的目标选择与策略研究[J].中国农村水利水电,2006(9):71-73.
[58]张磊.农民参与水利建设和管理探讨[J].中国农村水利水电,2006(4):23-24.
[59]唐传义,张曼志,张明君,等.农田水利建设的新思路新方法新突破[J].中国水利,2006(1):44-46.
[60]徐东.我国基础设施资产证券化合约经济分析[D].同济大学,2006.
[61]李梅华.我国农村小型水利设施融资模式研究[J].农业经济,2006(5):12-13.
[62]张汉亚.我国水利投资和运行机制研究[J].中国水利,2006(1):20-24.
[63]汤正春.我国水利投资及其改革的对策研究[D].安徽大学,2006.
[64]周晓平,陈岩.小型农田水利工程建设和管理中参与主体的博弈分析[J].安徽农业科学,2006(20):5447-5448.
[65]顾斌杰.小型水利政策体系建设的回顾及其展望[J].中国农村水利水电,2006(6):4-7.
[66]苏朗中.长江流域水利投资效益研究[D].华中科技大学,2006.
[67]刘铁军.产权理论与小型农田水利设施治理模式研究[J].节水灌溉,2007(3):50-53.
[68]杨美丽,张建英,林枢昊.对构建和谐农村水利产权关系的理论探讨[J].科学与管理,2007(6):84-86.
[69]傅奇蕾,陈炳山.对我国小型水利设施产权制度改革的探讨[J].枣庄学院学报,2007(4):88-90.
[70]申端锋.二十世纪农民合作逻辑的演变——从罗兴佐《治水:国家介入与农民合作》谈起[J].调研世界,2007(7):7-10.
[71]傅奇蕾.聊城市小型水利设施产权制度改革研究[D].山东农业大学,2007.
[72]王文华,陈文.马克思产权理论与现代西方产权理论比较分析[J].理论月刊,2007(6):16-18.
[73]周杰.农村水利参与式管理机制研究[D].浙江大学,2007.
[74]刘欣.农村水利公共设施的供给与需求分析[J].中国农村水利水电,2007(7):131-134.
[75]姚刚.农村税费改革对农田水利基本建设的影响和建立新机制的建议[J].安徽农学通报,2007(10):6-7.
[76]刘力,谭向勇,寇荣.农村税费改革前中国农田水利建设投入模式历史分析[J].新疆农垦经济,2007(4):1-9.
[77]蒋明建,黄建英,王松.农村小型水利工程产权制度改革探讨[J].农村经济,2007(7):14-16.
[78]邢新友.农村小型水利工程产权制度改革现状及对策[J].陕西水利,2007(5):22-24.
[79]孔庆雨,郑垂勇.贫困地区农村水利发展面临的突出问题及对策[J].中国农村水利水电,2007(2):3-5.
[80]关伟.区域水资源与经济社会耦合系统可持续发展的量化分析[J].地理研究,2007(4):685-692.
[81]刘肖军.山东省农田水利建设发展战略研究[D].山东大学,2007.
[82]覃琼霞,江涛.市场化改革与市场结构:一个农田水利基础设施建设的制度框架[J].南方经济,2007(2):3-10.
[83]叶晓明.水利建设投融资机制问题的思考[J].湖南水利水电,2007(4):89-90.
[84]金旸.水利融资的战略管理研究[D].河海大学,2007.
[85]陈建兵.私有产权社会化:解读现代西方产权理论的一种新视角[J].当代经济研究,2007(12):18-21.
[86]张作哈.完善长效机制推进农田水利发展[J].中国水利,2007(23):8-9.
[87]杨朔,王辽卫.我国农村水利设施供给主体多元化探析[J].安徽农业科学,2007(7):2094-2095.
[88]费振国.我国农业基础设施融资研究[D].西北农林科技大学,2007.
[89]周晓平.小型农田水利工程治理制度与治理模式研究[D].河海大学,2007.
[90]蒋伟.小型水利工程产权制度改革探讨[J].节水灌溉,2007(4):55-58.
[91]李雪松.新农村建设中的水利设施产权制度改革与创新[J].中国农村水利水电,2007(3):122-124.
[92]赵珊.中国农业水利基本建设资金配置的实证研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2007(3):44-49.
[93]彭小兵,刘冀娜.总成本最小化下的最优水利规模:以重庆为例[J].科技与管理,2007(5):50-52.
[94]王广深,王金秀.促进小型农田水利建设的财政支出政策研究[J].环境保护,2008(4):12-15.
[95]罗兴佐.对当前若干农田水利政策的反思[J].调研世界,2008(1):13-15.
[96]毛燕玲.非营利性农村基础设施融资机制研究[D].南昌大学,2008.
[97]黄忠全,施国庆.国外水利投融资模式及其对我国的启示[J].江苏商论,2008(6):169-171.
[98]乔根平,王瑜,张康波.宏观经济政策下的水利投融资策略分析[J].中国水利,2008(12):55-56.
[99]胡学良,李燕妮.湖南省小型农田水利工程管理与建设现状及对策[J].中国农村水利水电,2008(10):58-60.
[100]王学渊.基于前沿面理论的农业水资源生产配置效率研究[D].浙江大学,2008.
[101]文政.基于中央与地方政府间关系的财政支出事权划分模式研究[D].重庆大学,2008.
[102]余利丰.农田水利基础设施建设与农业发展关系研究[J].法制与社会,2008(27):279-280.
[103]马培衢.农业水资源有效配置的经济分析[D].华中农业大学,2008.
[104]谢瑞其.社会主义新农村建设中的投融资机制创新研究[D].湖南农业大学,2008.
[105]葛俊.我国大型水电建设项目融资战略研究[D].重庆大学,2008.
[106]曲永芳.我国农村农田水利供给问题研究[D].山东大学,2008.
[107]赵珊.我国小型农业水利设施产权制度创新理论探析[J].农村经济,2008(7):19-22.
[108]周波.我国政府间事权财权划分——历史考察、路径依赖和法治化体系建设[J].经济问题探索,2008(12):6-16.
[109]汪希成.西部地区农村公共品投入保障机制研究[D].西南财经大学,2008.
[110]汪本富,李家珍.小型农村水利改革思路[J].中国水运(下半月),2008(1):170-172.
[111]段艳,范静波,张晶.小型水利工程产权制度创新评估指标体系研究[J].水利经济,2008(2):50-54.
[112]钟高峥,曾康华.财政体制变迁对地方政府财力变动的影响[J].中央财经大学学报,2009(7):11-15.
[113]吴智峰.财政体制变迁与经济增长[D].江西财经大学,2009.
[114]张会恩,曹莉.川汇区小型农田水利基础设施问题探讨[J].河南水利与南水北调,2009(8):31-33.
[115]李敏.非经营性与经营性水利项目投资建设模式分析[J].广东水利水电,2009(2):74-76.
[116]刘涛.干旱半干旱地区农田灌溉节水治理模式及其绩效研究[D].南京农业大学,2009.
[117]乔恒利.基础设施项目多元投融资模式选择研究[D].上海交通大学,2009.
[118]杨帆,王晓鸣,彭建勋.基于SSP范式的房地产经济制度可拓分析[J].华中科技大学学报(城市科学版),2009(1):89-93.
[119]陈洪转,郑垂勇,张之艳.基于群决策DEA的农村水利投入产出研究[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2009(2):245-248.
[120]孙津,杨科.加大天津市农村水利建设投入体制机制研究[J].海河水利,2009(4):52-53.
[121]赵予新,宋璟璟,陈元姣.粮食核心生产区中小型农田水利设施建设融资问题研究[J].农村经济与科技,2009(10):67-68.
[122]何丹.论我国政府间事权划分的进一步完善[J].金卡工程(经济与法),2009(10):152.
[123]甘琳,张仕廉.农村水利基础设施现状与融资模式偏好[J].改革,2009(7):125-130.
[124]杜明军.农田水利基础设施中的利益关系探析[J].黄河科技大学学报,2009(5):55-58.
[125]张洪艳,刘吉双,徐梅.农业基础设施投资政策分析[J].商业研究,2009(8):101-103.
[126]黄力.水利建设投融资体制探究[J].水利科技与经济,2009(8):659-662.
[127]宋贤卓.我国农田水利设施投资的制度思考[J].新东方,2009(6):36-39.
[128]张冬青.我国水利工程投资运行市场化改革的探讨[J].审计与理财,2009(11):42.
[129]李明.我国小水电项目的资产证券化模式探讨[J].水利水电科技进展,2009(2):66-70.
[130]郭峰,舒灵智,廖博.西部公益型水利建设项目应用RCP融资模式的探析[J].科技进步与对策,2009(21):18-21.
[131]袁汝华,孔德财.应用生产函数对水利科技进步贡献率的研究[J].科技管理研究,2009(11):155-157.
[132]王克冰.中国地方政府投融资问题研究[D].天津大学,2009.
[133]姜涛.中国农村基础设施公共投资与农业增长研究[D].华中科技大学,2009.
[134]杜明军.中国农田水利设施体制机制研究的综述与展望[J].水利天地,2009(11):15-18.
[135]刘颖.中国少数民族地区政府投融资体制改革研究[D].中央民族大学,2009.
[136]王广深,侯石安.中外农田水利建设补贴政策比较研究[J].内蒙古社会科学(汉文版),2009(4):74-78.
[137]陈金.2010年云南春季干旱原因分析及对策建议[J].科协论坛(下半月),2010(8):137.
[138]贾娜.产权理论研究综述[J].法制与社会,2010(21):18-30.
[139]吴易风,关雪凌.产权理论与实践[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010.
[140]温铁军.从西南大旱反思我国农村水利投入方式[J].中国合作经济,2010(4):8-9.
[141]梁晓伟,李胜斌,吴继轩.从西南地区旱情看建设农业水利基础设施的紧迫性[J].经济导刊,2010(4):11-12.
[142]付全高.从西南旱灾看农田水利建设存在的问题[J].安徽农学通报(上半月刊),2010(11):27-28.
[143]郑风田.大旱反思治水模式[J].农经,2010(4):15.
[144]杨忠礼.大力加强水利基础设施建设全面改善农村生产生活条件[J].水利天地,2010(9):19.
[145]王海伦,张立军,张丽华.东营市农村水利基础设施建设有关问题的思考[J].山东水利,2010(10):57-58.
[146]李宗才,韦春生.对农村小型农田水利设施建设的思考[J].合肥师范学院学报,2010(5):30-33.
[147]刘汉勇,武迪.对小型农田水利建设的若干思考[J].农业与技术,2010(3):16-18.
[148]朱陈松,章仁俊,张晓花.多元化水利融资体制研究[J].中国水利,2010(10):21-22.
[149]张旺.关于水利投融资机制的探索和创新[J].中国水利,2010(14):18-21.
[150]宋润冬,吴国蔚.基于SSP范式的清洁发展机制交易成本分析[J].中国物价,2010(7):26-28.
[151]刘凤荣,张祥敏,李洪娟,等.加强水利基础设施建设中的问题分析[J].黑龙江水利科技,2010(5):156-157.
[152]司劲松.借鉴以色列经验促进我国节水农业发展[J].宏观经济管理,2010(11):67-69.
[153]吴国峻.临夏州农村水利建设存在的主要问题及对策[J].甘肃水利水电技术,2010(10):4344.
[154]吴冰.论农田水利基本建设存在的问题与对策[J].今日科苑,2010(15):145.
[155]周望.迈向协作性公共服务:跨界公共事务的治理之道,中国北京,2010[C].
[156]韩发旺,韩俊芳,李守业.农村水利工作的发展方向及措施[J].河南水利与南水北调,2010(4):26-27.
[157]张静.农村水利可持续发展研究[J].科技传播,2010(16):16-18.
[158]杨明月,陈宝峰,任金政.农户和村干部的农村基础设施投资需求分析[J].农业经济,2010(3):6-8.
[159]蒋邦全.农田水利基础设施建设现状及困境探讨[J].现代商贸工业,2010(2):67.
[160]鲁仕宝,黄强,王义民,等.农业水利基础设施建设投资主体的信用风险评估[J].系统工程理论与实践,2010(7):1299-1304.
[161]李蓉.农业水利设施投入问题探析[J].中国商界(下半月),2010(8):31-33.
[162]刘珉,唐忠.平原地区林权制度绩效研究:农户行为角度[J].林业经济,2010(8):59-62.
[163]郝丰玉,张莉,张淑芬.栖霞市小型农田水利工程建设与管理模式探讨[J].山东水利,2010(Z1):92-93.
[164]黄宝成,梁德山.浅谈农田水利基本建设的现状及改进措施[J].林业科技情报,2010(3):127-128.
[165]程璐,张福俊.浅析农业基础设施建设中存在的问题[J].农家之友,2010(7):49-51.
[166]郑培玲.厦门市翔安区农田水利设施调研现状及对策研究[J].中国农村水利水电,2010(11):98-100.
[167]王明利.提高农村水利基础设施建设的科技水平[J].中国科技产业,2010(6):90-91.
[168]周刁婵,冯永军,姜海峰.天津市农田水利基础设施建设管理存在问题及对策探讨[J].水利发展研究,2010(7):50-51.
[169]程喜林,霍泽学,崔文刚.完善建管并重长效机制促进村级水利基础设施建设[J].中国水利,2010(5):17-18.
[170]张淑欣.完善农田水利基础设施建设的财税政策选择[J].地方财政研究,2010(12):34-39.
[171]宋耳昌.我国农村中小型水利设施管理体制探析[J].黑龙江科技信息,2010(6):235.
[172]陈璇敏,李锦宏.我国农地产权制度绩效评价体系设计[J].中共贵州省委党校学报,2010(6):40-42.
[173]叶荣芳.我国农田水利发展中存在的问题及解决建议[J].价值工程,2010(4):104.
[174]陈贵华.我国农田水利建设取得成就的制度分析[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2010(1):110-114.
[175]江文涛.我国水利公共投资影响因素分析[J].中国水利,2010(12):7-9.
[176]张旺,范卓玮.我国水利投融资探索和创新[J].水利发展研究,2010(8):53-56.
[177]孙金林.小型农田水利设施的民间供给体制探析[J].科技资讯,2010(9):134.
[178]高春菊.新农村水利基础设施建设刍议[J].现代农村科技,2010(13):30-31.
[179]王冠军,陈献,柳长顺,等.新时期我国农田水利存在问题及发展对策[J].中国水利,2010(5):10-14.
[180]席嘉瑨,孙远.亚太地区水利基础设施建设与可持续发展[J].水利水电快报,2010(2):23-26.
[181]王学龙,王乐声.制度绩效审计初探[J].开发研究,2010(6):158-160.
[182]梁穗东.中国农地制度绩效分析与创新[J].农村农业农民(A版),2010(5):30.
[183]杨永华.对我国农田水利建设滞后的原因透视及立法思考[J].农业经济,2011(1):3-5.
[184]张元教.上市公司融资结构与公司治理[D]河海大学博士论文,20041
[185]R.科斯,A.阿尔钦.财产权利与制度变迁—产权学派与新制度学派译文集[M],上海:三联书店,上海人民出版社,1996.
[186]裴宏志等.小型水利工程产权制度改革研究[M],中国水利水电出版社,2005,12.
[187]Samuelson, Paul A. The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure [J].The Review of Economics and Statistics,1954(36),387-389.
[188]Buchanan, James M. An Economic Theory of Clubs [J].Economica, New Sereis,1965,32(2),1-14.
[189]Ostrom, Elinor.Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms [J].The Journal of Economic Perspectives,2000,14(3):137-158.
[190]Ostrom, Elinor and Gardner, Roy.Coping with Asymmetries in the Commons:Self—Governing Irrigation systems Can Work[J]. he Journal of Economic Perspectives,1993(7),93-112.
[191]Bruce P. Chadwick. Transaction costs and the clean development mechanism Natural Resources Forum[D].2006.
[192]J.Mabry:Canas and Cotnmunities. Small-scale Irrigation Systems[M].Edited by University of ArizonsPress,1996:273.
[192]Miehelsen, A.M.etal.Expectations in water-rights prices[J], Water Resourees Development, Vol.16(2).
[193]Winpenny, J.Managing Water as an Eeonomic Resource, Routledge, London,1994.
[194]United Nations, Effieiency and Distributional Equity in the Use and Treatment of Water:Guidelines for Pricing and Regulations, Natural Resources/Water Series No.8.United Nations:NewYork,1980.
[195]Chang, C.and GriffinR.Water Marketing as a Reallocative Institution in Texas., Water Resources Researeh.1992(28):879-890.
[196]Bromley, D.W.The commons, common Property and environmental Policy[J]Environment and Resource Eeonomics 1992(2):1-17.
[197]Hardin, G.The Tragedy of the Commons[J].Seienee,1968,162(13): 1243-1248.
[198]Hunt, Robert.Appropriate Social Organization? Water User Associations in Bureancratic Canal Irrigation Systems[J].Human Orgnization,1989,1(10):79-90.
[199]Badhan.P.Analytics of the institutions of informal cooperation in rural development,1993,21(4):633-639.