家庭资产组合选择研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
随着家庭理财意识的强化和金融产品的丰富,家庭资产组合选择问题重新进入学术视野,尤其是在家庭金融实践比较发达的欧美国家,家庭资产组合理论发展很快,成为与资产定价、公司金融等传统金融研究方向并立的一个新的独立研究方向。
     家庭金融研究具有其特有的复杂性,主要表现在:每个家庭都必须在长期且有限的期限内进行财务规划;每个家庭都拥有像劳动收入这样不可交易的资产;每个家庭都持有类似于房产这样的非流动性资产;每个家庭都面临着不同的借贷约束。而且不同家庭在资产组合配置方面有巨大的差异性,大量的家庭既没有参与股票投资也没有进行其他风险性资产投资,而有些家庭即使参与股票市场或投资其他风险性资产,资产组合也是千差万别。
     本文研究的主要目的,就是在借鉴中外经济学者已有研究成果的基础上,运用实证分析和规范分析相结合的方法就家庭资产组合选择进行系统分析。考察不同因素对家庭“持股之谜”现象的解释,对家庭参与投资风险性金融资产、风险性非金融资产和包括前两者在内的风险性资产的影响,以及不同因素对家庭持有各种风险性资产投资比重的影响。这些因素主要包括财富、风险性非金融资产投资,也被称为背景风险因素的房地产投资和实业投资、劳动收入、人口统计特征(年龄、受教育程度、职业、婚姻状况)。
     对美国家庭资产组合选择行为进行实证研究发现:家庭参与风险性金融资产投资的可能性和持有风险性金融资产比重会随着财富的增加而上升,财富效应明显。劳动收入的提高也会增加家庭投资概率和投资比例。风险性非金融资产投资,也被称为背景风险因素的房地产投资和实业投资对家庭参与风险性金融资产投资的可能性以及家庭持有风险性金融资产具有明显的“挤出”效应,会降低参与风险性金融资产的投资意愿,减少持有风险性金融资产的比重。家庭风险性资产参与和投资比例的生命周期效应也比较显著,家庭参与风险性资产的可能性和持有比例会随着年龄先上升,在退休前后达到最高点,然后开始下降。户主受教育程度高、职业稳定、已婚的家庭持有风险性金融资产的概率和比重相对更高。
     本文还考察了美国家庭股票投资对家庭参与风险性非金融资产和投资比例的影响,研究表明美国家庭参与股票投资或持有股票资产会对家庭风险性非金融资产产生“挤出”效应。此外,不同因素对家庭参与风险性资产和投资比例的影响也得到了检验,研究结果与对风险性金融资产的研究结果基本一致。
     本文通过国际比较,归纳总结出欧美各国家庭资产组合选择的规律和差异。然后根据我国宏观经济金融总量数据和12个城市家庭资产组合调查问卷数据,通过统计分析对我国家庭资产组合选择行为进行研究。研究发现,在我国高学历、高收入、年龄较大的家庭参与各项资产的投资更积极,家庭房地产投资仍是家庭主要的投资项目,占家庭总资产的比重最高。
     本文的创新主要体现在以下几个方面:
     第一,采用美国联邦储备委员会最新公布的SCF2007数据,运用离散选择模型(DCM,Discrete Choice Model)中的二元Probit选择模型和限值因变量模型(LDVM,Limited Dependent Variable Model)中的Tobit模型,考察不同因素对家庭参与股票市场投资和资产组合中股票持有比重的影响。
     第二,实证研究家庭风险性非金融资产,即家庭房地产投资和实业投资对家庭风险性金融资产选择和配置的影响。
     第三,以往的研究只考虑了风险性金融资产的影响因素,本文创新的考察了家庭投资风险性金融资产对家庭风险性非金融资产配置的影响,从而研究了风险性金融资产和风险性非金融资产的相互作用。
With the improvement of household financing knowledge and enrichment of financial products, the problem of household portfolio choice has attracted much interest in academia. Theories of household portfolio achieved great progress, especially in America and European countries where the household financial practice is well developed. Household finance has already become a new research field which is paralleled with traditional research fields of asset pricing and corporate finance.
     Household financial problems have many special features that give the field its own character. Households must plan over long but finite horizons; they have important nontraded assets, notably their human capital; they hold illiquid assets, notably housing; they face constraints on their ability to borrow. Moreover, households show considerable heterogeneity in portfolio allocations. The majority of households hold neither common stock nor other risky assets. Others invest in stock almost exclusively. The extent to which risky asset holdings are diversified also varies greatly.
     The goal of this paper is to conduct systematic analysis of household portfolio with positive and normative methods by learning from the existed Chinese and foreign research works. The main task is to examine explanations of "Stockholding Puzzle" with different factors. Furthermore, effect on participation and holdings of risky financial assets, risky nonfinancial assets and risky asset by factors is to be examined. These factors include wealth, risky nonfinancial assets or back ground risk factors which are real estate and business equity, labor income and demographic characteristics which consist of age, education, occupation and marital status.
     Empirical results on American household portfolio show that there are strong positive effects of wealth, income and education on participation and holding shares of risky financial assets. Labor income also increases ownership and holding shares of risky financial assets. The life-cycle effect is hump-shaped, reflecting younger households are less likely to participate in investment of risky financial assets. It is worthwhile to notice that background risk factors "crowd out" household investment in risky nonfinancial assets. Also as expected, both ownership and share rise with married or employed-by-others households.
     The effect of stock investment on risky nonfmancial assets is investigated in chapter five. Results show that households will invest a lower proportion of its wealth in risky nonfmancial asset, if households hold stocks. Empirical consequences of household ownership and shares of risky assets are similar to those of research on risky financial assets.
     Through international comparison, the similarities and difference in household portfolio choice of various countries are summarized. Then according to macro economic and financial data and micro data of China, statistical analysis on household portfolio choice is conducted.Results show that households with higher education, higher income and prime age are more likely to invest in each asset. Real estate is the major investment item, which accounts for the largest proportion in household total assets.
     The main contributions of this paper include:
     Firstly, different factors' effects on household stock participation and share of stocks in portfolio are examined with recently published the Federal Reserve Board's Survey of Consumer Finances for 2007 by using discrete choice model and limited dependent variable model.
     Secondly, empirical research on household risky nonfmancial asset is conducted in this paper.
     Thirdly, this paper extends previous studies by considering interdependent relationship of household risky financial assets and risky nonfinancial asset.
引文
[1] Bucks, B.K., et al., Changes in US Family Finances from 2004 to 2007: Evidence from the Survey of Consumer Finances. Federal Reserve Bulletin[J], 2009: A1-A55.
    [2] Haliassos, M. and C.C. Bertaut, Why do so few hold stocks? The Economic Journal[J], 1995,105:1110-1129.
    [3] Mehra, R. and E. Prescott, The equity risk premium: A puzzle. Journal of Monetary Economics[J], 1985,15(2): 145-161.
    [4] Markowitz, H., Portfolio Selection. Journal of Finance[J], 1952, 7(1): 77-91.
    [5] Tobin, J., Liquidity Preference as Behavior Towards Risk. Review of Economic Studies[J],1958, 25(2): 65-86.
    [6] Sharpe, W.F., Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk.Journal of Finance[J], 1964,19(3): 425-442.
    [7] Merton, R.C., Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: the continuous-time case. Review of Economics and Statistics[J], 1969, 51(3): 247-257.
    [8] Merton, R.C., Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a time-continuous world. Journal of Economic Theory[J], 1971, 3: 373-413.
    [9] Bodie, Z., R.C. Merton, and W. Samuelson, Labor supply flexibility and portfolio choice in a life-cycle model. NBER Working Paper[J], 1992, 3954.
    [10] Heaton, J. and D. Lucas, Portfolio choice and asset prices: The importance of entrepreneurial risk. Journal of Finance[J],2000b,(3): 1163-1198.
    [11] Bertaut, C. and M. Starr-McCluer, Household Portfolios in the United States. SSRN Working Paper[J], 2000: 1-41.
    [12] Guiso, L., M. Haliassos, and T. Jappelli, Household Portfolios[M]. 2002: MIT Press.
    [13] Gentry, W.M. and R.G. Hubbard, Entrepreneurship and household saving. NBER Working Paper[J], 2000.
    [14] Heaton, J. and D. Lucas, Portfolio Choice in the Presence of Background Risk. The Economic Journal[J], 2000a, 110(460): 1-26.
    [15] Campbell, J.Y., Household Finance. The Journal of Finance[J], 2006, 61(4): 1553-1604.
    [16] Farhi, E. and S. Panageas, Saving and investing for early retirement: A theoretical analysis.Journal of Financial Economics[J], 2007, 83(1): 87-121.
    [17] Campbell, J. and L. Viceira, Who Should Buy Long-Term Bonds? American Economic Review[J],2001, 91: 99-127.
    [18] Guiso, L., T. Jappelli, and D. Terlizzese, Income Risk, Borrowing Constraints and Portfolio Choice. American Economic Review[J], 1996, 86(1): 158-172.
    [19] Hochguertel, S., R. Alessie, and A. van Soest, Saving Accounts versus Stocks and Bonds in Household Portfolio Allocation. Scandinavian Journal of Economics[J], 1997, 99(1):81-97.
    [20] Gakidis, H., Stocks for the old? Earnings uncertainty and life-cycle portfolio choice. MIT Working Paper[J], 1998.
    [21] Alessie, R., S. Hochguertel, and A. Van Soest, Household portfolios in the Netherlands, in Household portfolios. 2000.
    [22] Arrondel, L., Risk Management, Liquidity Constraints, and the Demand for Risky Assets in France. Delta Working Paper[J], 2000: 1-21.
    [23] Heaton, J. and D. Lucas, Market Frictions, Savings Behavior and Portfolio Choice. Macroeconomic Dynamics[J], 1997a, 1(01): 76-101.
    [24] Koo, H.K., Consumption and portfolio selection with labor income:a continuous time model.Mathematical Finance[J], 1998,(5): 49-65.
    [25] Viceira, L.M., Optimal portfolio choice for long-horizon investors with nontradable labor income. Journal of Finance[J], 2001, 56(2): 433-470.
    [26] Letendre, M.A. and G.W. Smith, Precautionary saving and portfolio allocation: DP by GMM.Journal of Monetary Economics[J], 2001, 48(1): 197-215.
    [27] Campbell, J.Y. and L.M. Viceira, Strategic asset allocation: portfolio choice for long-term investors[M]. 2002: Oxford University Press.
    [28] Pelizzon, L. and G. Weber, Are Household Portfolios Efficient? An Analysis Conditional on Housing. NBER Working Paper[J], 2006.
    [29] Brueckner, J.K., Consumption and investment motives and the portfolio choices of homeowners. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics[J], 1997, 15(2):159-180.
    [30]Arrondel,L.and B.Lefebvre,Behavior of Household Portfolios in France:the Role of Housing.The Review of Income and Wealth[J],2001 b,47(4):489-514.
    [31]Flavin,M.and T.Yamashita,Owner-Occupied Housing and the Composition of the Household Portfolio.American Economic Review[J],2002,92(1):345-362.
    [32]Curcuru,S.,et al.,Heterogeneity and Portfolio Choice:Theory and Evidence.Handbook of Financial Econometrics[J],2004.
    [33]Grossman,S.J.and G.Laroque,Asset pricing and optimal portfolio choice in the presence of illiquid durable consumption goods.Econometrica[J],1990,58(1):25-51.
    [34]Cauley,S.D.,A.D.Pavlov,and E.S.Schwartz,Homeownership as a constraint on asset allocation.The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics[J],2007,34(3):283-311.
    [35]Cocco,J.F.,Portfolio Choice in the Presence of Housing.Review of Financial Studies[J],2004,18(2):535-567.
    [36]Yao,R.and H.H.Zhang,Optimal Consumption and Portfolio Choices with Risky Housing and Borrowing Constraints.Review of Financial Studies[J],2005,18(1):197-239.
    [37]Faig,M.and P.Shum,Portfolio choice in the presence of personal illiquid projects.Journal of Finance[J],2002,57(1):303-328.
    [38]Polkovnichenko,V.,Life-Cycle Portfolio Choice with Additive Habit Formation Preferences and Uninsurable Labor Income Risk.Review of Financial Studies[J],2007,20(1):83.
    [39]吴卫星和齐天翔,流动性、生命周期与投资组合相异性.经济研究[J],2007,(2):97-110.
    [40]King,M.A.and J.I.Leape,asset accumulation,Information,and the life cyle.NBER Working Paper[J],1987:1-38.
    [41]Bertaut,C.C.and M.Haliassos,Precautionary portfolio behavior from a life-cycle perspective.Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control[J],1997,21 (8-9):1511-1542.
    [42]Heaton,J.,Savings Behavior and Portfolio Choice:Which Risks Matter? Unpublished paper,Northwestern University[J],1997b.
    [43]Poterba,J.M.and A.A.Samwick,Household Portfolio Allocation Over the Life Cycle.NBER Working Paper[J],1997:1-29.
    [44]Hochguertel,S.,R.Alessie,and A.van Soest,Household Portfolios in the Netherlands.NBER Working Paper[J],2000.
    [45] Barber, B.M. and T. Odean, Boys Will be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment~*. Quarterly Journal of Economics[J], 2001,116(1): 261-292.
    [46] Constantinides, G.M., Capital market equilibrium with transaction costs. The Journal of Political Economy[J], 1986,94(4): 842-862.
    [47] Agell, J. and P.A. Edin, Marginal taxes and the asset portfolios of Swedish households.Scandinavian Journal of Economics[J], 1990, 92(1): 47-67.
    [48] Vissing-Jorgensen, A., Towards an explanation of household portfolio choice heterogeneity:Nonfinancial income and participation cost structures. NBER Working Paper[J], 2002a.
    [49] Paiella, M., Limited financial market participation: a transaction cost-based explanation IFS Working paper[J], 2001, W01/06
    [50] Paxson, C, Borrowing Constraints and Portfolio Choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics[J],1990, 105(2): 535-543.
    [51] Koo, H.K., Consumption and portfolio selection with labor income I: The life cyclepermanent income hypothesis. Working Paper[J], 1991.
    [52] Marcet, A. and K. Singleton, Optimal consumption and savings decisions and equilibrium asset prices in a model with heterogeneous agents subject to portfolio constraints.Macroeconomic Dynamics[J], 1991.
    [53] Haliassos, M. and C. Hassapis, Borrowing Constraints, Portfolio Choice, and Precautionary Motives: Theoretical Predictions and Empirical Complications. University of Cyprus mimeo[J], 1998.
    [54] Haliassos, M. and A. Michaelides, Portfolio Choice and Liquidity Constraints. International Economic Review[J], 2003, 44(1): 143-177.
    [55] Dreze, J.H. and F. Modigliani, Consumption decisions under uncertainty. Journal of Economic Theory[J], 1972, 5(3): 308-335.
    [56] Elmendorf, D.W. and M.S. Kimball, Taxation of labor income and the demand for risky assets.International Economic Review[J], 2000, 41(3): 801-832.
    [57] Kimball, M.S., Standard risk aversion. Econometrica[J], 1993, 61(3): 589-611.
    [58] Koo, H.K., Consumption and portfolio selection with labor income I: Evaluation of human capital. Unpublished paper, Washington University[J], 1995.
    [59] Gollier, C. and J.W. Pratt, Risk vulnerability and the tempering effect of background risk. Econometrica[J],1996,64(5):1109-1123.
    [60]Eeckhoudt,L.,C.Gollier,and H.Schlesinger,Changes in background risk and risk taking behavior.Econometrica[J],1996,64(3):683-689.
    [61]Norton,W.I.and W.T.Moore,Entrepreneurial risk:have we been asking the wrong question? Small business economics[J],2002,18(4):281-287.
    [62]Cramer,J.S.,et al.,Low risk aversion encourages the choice for entrepreneurship:an empirical test of a truism.Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization[J],2002,48(1):29-36.
    [63]Segal,G.,D.Borgia,and J.Schoenfeld,The motivation to become an entrepreneur.International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research[J],2005,11 (1):42-57.
    [64]Grable,J.E.and R.H.Lytton,Assessing the concurrent validity of the SCF risk tolerance question.Financial Counseling and Planning[J],2001,12(2):43-52.
    [65]Gomes,F.and A.Michaelides,Optimal life-cycle asset allocation:Understanding the empirical evidence.Journal of Finance[J],2005:869-904.
    [66]黄家骅,中国居民投资行为研究[M].1997:中国财政经济出版社.
    [67]吴晓求,冯巍,和李志玲,我国居民收入资本化趋势的实证分析.金融研究[J],1999,1:35-42.
    [68]臧旭恒,居民资产与消费选择行为分析[M].2001:上海三联书店上海人民出版社.
    [69]史代敏和宋艳,加强区域性居民金融资产结构的研究.西南金融[J],2002,(009):38-39.
    [70]程兰芳,中国城镇居民家庭的消费模式分析.统计与决策[J],2004,(004):53-54.
    [71]刘楹,家庭金融资产配置行为研究[M].2007:社会科学文献出版社.
    [72]汪红驹和张慧莲,资产选择,风险偏好与储蓄存款需求.经济研究[J],2006,41(006):48-58.
    [73]陈学彬,傅东升,和葛成杰,我国居民个人生命周期消费投资行为动态优化模拟研究.金融研究[J],2006,(002):21-35.
    [74]Markowitz,H.M.,Portfolio Selection:Efficient Diversification of Investments[M].1959:Yale University Press,New Haven.
    [75]Samuelson,P.A.,Lifetime Portfolio Selection By Dynamic Stochastic Programming.Review of Economics and Statistics[J],1969,51 (3):239-246.
    [76] Hakansson, N.H., On Optimal Myopic Portfolio Policies with and without Serial Correlation of Yields. Journal of Business[J], 1971, 44(3): 324-334.
    [77] Fama, E.F., Multiperiod consumption-investment decisions. American Economic Review[J],1970, 60(1): 163-174.
    [78] Kraus, A. and R.H. Litzenberger, Market equilibrium in a multiperiod state preference model with logarithmic utility. Journal of Finance[J], 1975, 30(5): 1213-1227.
    [79] Lucas Jr, R.E., Asset prices in an exchange economy. Econometrica[J], 1978, 46(6):1429-1445.
    [80] Epstein, L.G. and S.E. Zin, Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: A theoretical framework. Econometrica[J], 1989, 57(4):937-969.
    [81] Epstein, L.G. and S.E. Zin, Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: An empirical analysis. Journal of Political Economy[J],1991, 99(2): 263-286.
    [82] Cocco, J.F., F.J. Gomes, and P.J. Maenhout, Consumption and Portfolio Choice over the Life Cycle. Review of Financial Studies[J], 2005, 18(2): 491-533.
    [83] Canner, N., N.G. Mankiw, and D.N. Weil, An asset allocation puzzle. The American Economic Review[J], 1997: 181-191.
    [84] Montalto, C.P. and J. Sung, Multiple Imputation In The 1992 Survey Of Consumer Finances.Financial Counseling and Planning[J], 1996, 7: 133-147.
    [85] Agnew, J., P. Balduzzi, and A. Sunden, Portfolio choice and trading in a large 401 (k) plan.American Economic Review[J], 2003, 93(1): 193-215.
    [86] Odean, T., Do investors trade too much? American Economic Review[J], 1999, 89(5):1279-1298.
    [87] Barber, B.M. and T. Odean, Trading is hazardous to your wealth: The common stock investment performance of individual investors. Journal of Finance[J], 2000, 55(2):773-806.
    [88] Ameriks, J. and S.P. Zeldes, How do household portfolio shares vary with age. Working Paper[J], 2000.
    [89] Shum, P. and M. Faig, What explains household stock holdings? Journal of Banking and Finance[J],2006,30:2579-2957.
    [90]Guiso,L.and T.Jappelli,Household portfolios in Italy,in Household Portfolios.2002,MIT press.p.251-287.
    [91]彭志龙,居民金融资产与国民经济发展:当前居民金融资产增长对国民经济发展影响的分析.统计研究[J],1998,(002): 35-39.
    [92]史代敏和宋艳,居民家庭金融资产选择的实证研究.统计研究[J],2005,10:43-49.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700