房地产投资信托基金投资者权利保护研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
房地产业是我国国民经济的重要支柱之一,改革开放以来随着我国国民经持续高增长以及国家住房商品化进程的推进,房地产行业未来仍然具有持续高增长态势。但是长期以来制约房地产业发展的一个瓶颈就是其融资渠道单一,严重依赖银行贷款。从开发商到建筑商、乃至于终端用户的按揭购房无不与银行系统密切关联。于是信贷风险过度积聚在银行系统,一旦房市和资本市场出现问题甚至可能危及一国经济安全。REITs作为创新的房地产金融工具,被认为是房地产业最先进生产力的代表,我国引入REITs乃是势在必行,然而欲使其能够顺畅运作,对REITs投资者权利保护是不容忽视的关键一环。
     但是,由于REITs对我们毕竟是一个新事物,国内目前学术领域关于其探讨大多停留在对国外这一整体制度的介绍上,以及我国引进REITs存在哪些制度上的障碍,或者我国未来本土化REITs的发展路径选择等等,还鲜有专门研究REITs投资者权利保护的问题。本文立足于国外REITs不同组织模式下投资者权利保护比较分析,以及对我国目前相关房地产投资信托投资者权利保护之疏漏之把握,期望能够为未来我国REITs立法提供点滴参考。
     除引言外本文框架结构大体分为四部分:
     第一部分:房地产投资信托基金投资者权利保护概述。主要介绍了有关REITs投资者的基础理论,然后试图从经济学方面探究房地产投资信托基金投资者权利保护的理论根据。该章主要包括:1、房地产投资信托基金投资者的内涵界定;2、房地产投资信托基金投资者权利保护的理论根据。
     第二部分:介绍了目前我国房地产投资信托基金投资者权利保护的现状,着重阐释了我国房地产投资信托基金投资者权利保护的立法概况以及相关法规当中对房地产投资信托基金投资者权利保护存在的主要问题。该章主要包括:1、我国房地产投资信托基金投资者权利保护法律现状;2、我国房地产投资信托基金投资者权利保护不足。
     第三部分:通过对国外房地产投资信托基金投资者权利保护模式的比较借鉴,为我国未来构建房地产投资信托基金投资者权利保护模式提供经验和启示。该章主要包括:1、国外契约型房地产投资信托基金投资者权利保护模式;2、国外公司型房地产投资信托基金投资者权利保护模式;3、国外房地产投资信托基金投资者权利保护经验对我国的启示。
     第四部分:笔者认为应当加快我国房地产投资信托基金立法完善及法律监管,从而更好的保护其投资者权利。该章主要包括:1、完善房地产投资信托基金投资者权利流转若干规则:2、建立房地产投资信托基金投资者保护基金;3、强化房地产投资信托基金管理人忠实、注意义务之履行;4、完善房地产投资信托基金托管人监督机制;5、严格房地产投资信托基金信息披露;6、加强房地产投资信托基金基础资产评估。
The real estate industry is one of our national economic props, with the reform and opening policy our national economy has been growing fast as well as the national housing commercialization advancement, the real estate industry will continues to grow higher in the future. But what restricts the development of the real estate industry is the unitary financing channel, up to now the real estate corporations rely on the bank loan seriously. The developer and the construction business as well as the terminal buyer's are all closely linked with the banking mortgage system. Therefore the credit risk excessively agglomerates in the banking system, once the housing market and the capital market encountered with crisis it may endanger the whole country's economic security. REITs, stands as the innovative finance tool in the real estate field, is considered as the most advanced productive forces representative of real estate industry, our country introduces REITs is imperative, however if we wants to enable its operation smoothly, we had better pay attention to the REITs investor right protection.
     But, REITs to us is almost a new thing, the domestic scholars' learning to it mostly pauses on the discussion to the overseas' overall system introduction, as well as in what barriers our introduction to the REITs mechanism, or our own future localization for REITs development and so on, however there is rarely special study on the REITs investors' right protection. This article bases under the study of overseas' different REITs organizations' investor right protection comparative analysis, it is also connected presently to our country assurance of oversight of the real estate investment trust investor right protection, expected will be able to provide the intravenous drip reference for the future our country REITs legislation.
     But from the introduction this article portal frame construction roughly divides into four parts:
     Part one:Real estate investment trusts investor right protection outline. Mainly introduced the related REITs investor's basic theory, then attempts from the economic and the jurisprudence two aspects inquires into the real estate investment trusts investor right protection the theory basis. This chapter mainly includes:1,real estate investment trusts investor's connotation limits;2,real estate investment trusts investor right protections the theory basis
     Part two:Introduced the present our country real estate investment trusts investor right protection present situation, has emphatically explained our country real estate investment trusts investment mold right protection in the legislation as well as the shortcoming and the insufficiency which exists to its investor right protection legal supervising and managing aspect. This chapter mainly includes:1, our country real estate investment trusts investor right protection law present situation; 2, our country real estate investment trusts investor right protection insufficiency.
     Part three:Through to the overseas real estate investment trusts investor right protected mode comparison model, will future construct the real estate investment trusts investor right protected mode for our country to provide the experience and the enlightenment. This chapter mainly includes:1,overseas contract real estate investment trusts investor right protected mode; 2,overseas company real estate investment trusts investor right protected modes; 3,overseas real estate investment trusts investor right protection experience to our country's enlightenment
     Part four:the author thinks that should speed up the legislative perfection of the Chinese real estate investment trust funds and legal supervision, so as to better protect their rights of investors. The chapter main including:1, and perfect real estate investment trust fund investment who rights circulation several rules; 2, and established real estate investment trust fund investors protection fund; 3, and strengthening real estate investment trust fund management people faithful, and note obligations of fulfill; 4, and perfect real estate investment trust fund managed people supervision mechanism; 5, and strictly real estate investment trust fund information disclosure; 6, and strengthening real estate investment trust fund Foundation assets assessment.
引文
①李雅萍.不动产投资信托的法律分析与立法建议[D].华东政法大学2007年博士学位论文:2
    ①仁纪军.房地产投资基金—组织、模式与策略[M].经济管理出版社,2006.23-24
    ①佟胜奇.证券投资基金法律制度研究[D].2009:26
    ①李胜胜.我国房地产信托基金中不动产评估的意义[J].科技资讯,2010,(16):232
    ①朱向峰.论契约型证券投资基金持有人利益的法律保护[D].2009:29
    ①周玉华.投资信托基金法律应用[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2000.338-341
    ②朱成刚.证券投资基金持有人利益保护法律机制研究[D].2006:21
    ③方嘉麟.信托法之理论与实务[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1994.168
    ①郭锋,陈复等.证券投资基金法导论[M].北京:中国法律出版社,2008.88-89
    ①刘俊海.我国《公司法》移植独立董事制度的思考[J].2003(3).
    ②高海清.美国共同基金独立董事制度主要原则及其借鉴意义[J].中国证券报,2002.
    ①王彦国.投资基金论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2002:86-87
    ①田英伟.试论证券投资基金信息披露法律制度之完善——以开放式证券投资基金信息披露为中心[D].华东政法学院硕士学位论文.2007:41
    [1]张兴.房地产投资信托运营[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2009.
    [2]徐德顺.投资基金概论[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2010.
    [3]朱大旗.金融法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007.
    [4]徐孟洲.信托法学[M].北京:中国金融出版社,2004.
    [5]奚正刚.金融创新与房地产[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2006.
    [6]张健.财富永续—房地产金融实务[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2007.
    [7]文杰.投资信托法律关系研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2006.
    [8]朱小川.营业信托法律制度比较研究——以受托人信用为中心[M].北京:法律出版社,2007.
    [9]赵振华.证券投资基金法律制度研究[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2005.
    [10]张路,罗旭,郭晓靖编译.中美英投资基金法比较与实务(中英文对照).北京:法律出版社,2007.
    [11]周玉华.投资信托基金法律应用[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2000.
    [12]李智.房地产投资信托(REITs)法律制度研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2008.
    [13]钟瑞栋,陈向聪.信托法[M].厦门:厦门大学出版社,2004.
    [14]陈向聪:信托法律制度研究[M].北京:中国检察出版社,2007.
    [15]雇纪华,张桂龙.中华人民共和国信托法条文释义[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2001.
    [16]谢哲胜.财产法专题研究(三)[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004.
    [17]杨晓军.证券投资基金治理的制度安排[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,2003.
    [18]刘金凤,许丹,何燕婷等.海外信托发展史[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,2009.
    [19]苏伟..REITs本土化的模式及其法律障碍研究[A].楼建波.房地产法前沿(第二卷第1辑)[C].北京:中国法制出版社,2008.
    [20]樊振华.美国房地产投资信托股东(投资者)权利保护法律问题研究[D].北 京:北京大学,2007.
    [21]王熙喜.房地产投资信托(REITs)法律问题研究—写在本土REITs中国大陆之前(硕士学位论文)[D].上海:华东政法大学,2007.
    [22]朱宇.信托业2006年回眸及2007年展望[J].金融时报,2007(02).
    [23]曹元芳.发展我国房地产投资基金的可行性及模式选择[J].上海金融,2006(01)
    [24]陆一.REITs对中国意味着什么[J].中国证券期货,2006(01)
    [25]毛志荣.房地产投资信托基金研究报告[R].深圳:深圳证券交易所综合研究所,2004.
    [26]张民安,王迎春.有限合伙法律制度研究[J].中国商法年刊,2006(12)
    [27]任佩.美国房地产投资信托(REIT)的模式及其对我国的启示[J].商业研究,2003(22)
    [28]陈锡贵.我国发展房地产投资信托基金的障碍及其路径选择[J].济南金融,2007(5),29-30.
    [29]任纪军.发展上市房地产投资信托的路径选择[J]..中国房地产,2005(9)
    [30]黄蕾.中国商业地产投资信托基金(REITs)模式研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2009.
    [31]朱春叶.房地产投资信托之投资者保护[D].上海:华东政法大学,2008.
    [32]闰岩.房地产投资信托法律制度研究[D].北京:北方工业大学,2009.
    [33]郭亚力.房地产投资信托研究[D].厦门:厦门大学,2006.
    [34]薛潇.我国房地产投资信托基金投资者利益保护—以契约型房地产投资信托基金为研究对象[D].厦门:厦门大学,2009.
    [35]卢映西.契约型投资基金法律关系评析[J].南京经济学院学报,2003(2)
    [36]COOTER, ROBER.&FREED MANBRADLEYJ An Economic Model of the Fiduciary, Duty of Loyalty[J]. Tel Aviv university Studies in Law,1991(10).
    [37]CORNELL, CHADWICKM-REITs and Up REITs:pushing the Crate Law Envelope Pe[J]. University of Pennsylvania Law Review,1997(145)
    [38]HANSMANN, HENRY& MAFTEIUGO. The Functions of Trust Law:A Comparative Legal and Economies Analysis[J]New York University Law, 11998(5).
    [39]National Trade Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts. Historical Market Capitalizations:1972-2003[R]. https://www.nareit.com/
    [40]Uniform Prudent Investor Act(1995.2.14) http://www.law.upenn.edu/bll/archives/ulc/fnact99/1990s/upia94.pdf

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700