不同刚度圈梁对排桩支护结构力学性状的影响
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
高层建筑的日益发展给岩土工程界不断带来新的挑战,深基坑支护工程就是其中的一个方面。基坑支护工程的优劣,直接影响到工程的造价和施工的进度,因而受到广泛的重视。
     基坑支护结构的种类有很多,排桩支护结构是最常见的一种。在当前的设计与施工中,桩顶圈梁的作用未引起足够的重视,普遍将其视为安全储备,而将排桩与圈梁的整体支护结构视为悬臂梁来计算的,这样的计算结果显然过于保守不尽合理。本文所开展的试验研究工作即是针对基坑支护结构中圈梁的刚度对整体支护结构的性状影响。
     本文试验是以尼龙棒模拟支护桩,以扁钢模拟桩项圈梁,采用砂土填筑地基,通过变换圈梁的截面尺寸及堆载进行了八组试验。试验结果表明,圈梁和排桩的协同作用使得桩身内力与变位明显不同于无圈梁情况。圈梁与桩的刚度比为2~3为最佳,有圈梁时桩的入土深度可以考虑占总桩长的30%,但需要根据具体的土层性质和桩的类型斟酌而定。本文编制的计算程序对于试验分析和工程设计有重要参考价值,解决了许多复杂的计算问题。
     圈梁可以有效地控制桩顶位移,可以起到维持基坑周围建筑物稳定的作用。圈梁的抗弯刚度与桩的刚度比对桩身弯矩特别是坑底附近的最大弯矩值也有很大影响。坑底以上桩侧土压力采用梯形分布模式,计算结果与砂土地基的矩形分布实测土压力符合较好。
     笔者认为,今后应在以下方面做进一步的探讨与研究工作。全面考虑影响排桩—圈梁整体支护结构协同作用的各种因素,加强各种工况的模拟与研究,以求得到整体支护结构的最佳效果;需要不断改进测试和分析的方法,获得真实可靠的试验数据,提高分析结果的可靠性;改善对周围地面变形计算方法的精确度,保证基坑周围建筑物的安全;考虑基坑支护框架结构的“空间效应”,做出更加符合基坑空间型体的模型。
New challenges have constantly been turned up by the development of tall buildings in the field of civil engineering. One of them is the retaining and protecting engineering for deep excavation. Now people have laid stress on the quality of retaining and protecting engineering because it has influenced the cost of engineering and process of construction.
    It has many types of the retaining and protecting engineering for excavation. Piles in row are one of the most common retaining and protecting structures. The affect of top ring beam has not been thought highly at presenti which has been regarded as the safety measure. The whole retaining and protecting structure of piles in row and top ring beam is calculated by the method of cantilever beam, and the result is not reasonable obviously. It is the effect of ring beam in retaining and protecting mechanics properties for excavation that this paper focuses on.
    In this paper, there are eight groups tests. It is on condition of the retaining and protecting piles imitated by nylon sticks, the top ring beam imitated by steel board, the foundation wadded by sandy soil, and the sectional size and extra load changed. The test result makes known that ring beam and piles in row working as a whole is different from the state having no ring beam. It is best that the stiffness ratio of ring beam to pile is 2 to 3. We think over burying depth of piles is 30% of the whole length when ring beam existing. But it is necessary to decide according to the quality of soil layers and types of piles. The computer program of this paper has the important reference value on test analysis and engineering design. It resolves many complicated questions of calculating.
    Ring beam may control the top displacement of piles validly. It has affect on keeping buildings stabling around foundation pit. The stiffness ratio of ring beam to pile affects the maximum value of moment near the bottom of excavated pit. The earth pressure over the pit bottom calculated by the trapezoid mode, and the result is better according with the rectangle mode of sandy foundation.
    The author proposes making further research work in the following
    
    
    
    respects. It will has well-considered factors on the common affect of piles in row and ring beam whole retaining and protecting structure. We need the best results through enhancing imitating and researching the various situations. It should improve the methods of measure and analysis for enhancing the reliability. It will find the accurate calculating method on deflection of soil body so as to ensure the safety of buildings near the pit. Considering the space effect of retaining and protecting frame structure, it will has a space model fitting excavated pit.
引文
[1]赵锡宏,陈志明,胡中雄等.高层建筑深基坑围护工程实践与分析.同济大学出版社,1996:172-183
    [2]杭州市建筑业管理局,杭州市土木建筑学会.深基坑支护工程实例.中国建筑工业出版社,1996:32-55
    [3]余志成,施文华.深基坑支护设计与施工,中国建筑工业出版社,1997:15-28
    [4]吕美华,朱军.上海高层建筑基坑开挖支护结构造价分析.上海铁道学院学报.1995,16(3):81-87
    [5]杨旭东、杨国忠、岳建伟.深基坑开挖支护现状分析及其对策.河南大学学报(自然科学版).1999,29(3):24-27
    [6]陈善緼.卢肇钧院士科技论文选集.中国建筑工业出版社,1997:174-178
    [7]建筑法规全书编委会.建筑法规全书,地震出版社,1995:387-726
    [8]刘国彬,侯学渊,黄院雄.基坑工程发展的现状与趋势.地下空间.1998,18(5):400-405
    [9]秦惠民,叶政青.深基础施工实例.中国建筑工业出版社,1992:1-18
    [10]崔江余,梁仁旺,建筑基坑工程设计计算与施工.中国建筑工业出版社,1999:173-179
    [11]陈仲颐,叶书麟.基础工程学.中国建筑工业出版社,1990:15-19
    [12]杨雪强、刘祖德.论深基坑支护的空间效应,岩土工程学报,1998,20(2):74-78
    [13]龚晓南、高有潮.深基坑工程设计施工手册.中国建筑工业出版社,1998:1-15
    [14]张旷成、深基坑护坡桩设计中一些问题的讨论.第五届工程勘察学术交流会议论文集.兵器工业出版社,1995:11-18
    [15]李钧民.深基坑悬臂式支护桩设计计算的改进.岩土工程技术.1999,(1):9-12
    
    
    [16]钟宇彤、陈树坚.深基坑支护结构的计算及设计.暨南大学学报(自然科学版).1999,20(1):67-73
    [17]王宇、倪安斌.超高层建筑深基坑支护研究.四川联合大学学报(工程科学版).1999,3(2):20-25
    [18]Geotechnical Engineering Practice in Deep Foundation,G.S.Hsiung,Proceedings of the Third International Conference On Tall Buildings,1O-15 December 1984,Hong Kong & Guangzhou,Edited by Y.K.Cheung P.K.K.Lee
    [19]高印立.考虑圈梁空间效应支护桩的简化计算,岩土力学.1999,20(2):76-80
    [20]沈保汉.深基坑工程技术讲座(10),建筑技术开发.1998,25(1):48-54
    [21]曹俊坚、平扬、朱长歧、汪稔.考虑圈梁空间作用的深基坑双排桩支护计算方法研究.岩石力学与工程学报.1999,18(6):709-712
    [22]Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Deep Excavations,by Chang-Yu Ou,Associate Member,ASCE,Dar-Chang Chiou,and Tzong-Shian Wu,Journal of Geotechnical Engineering/May,1996/337
    [23]黄强.建筑基坑支护技术规程应用手册,中国建筑工业出版社,1999:7-8
    [24]沈保汉.深基坑工程技术讲座(11),建筑技术开发.1998,25(2):47-50
    [25]Analysis of Deep Excavation in Boston,by Andrew J.Whittel,Asso-ciate Member,ASCE,Youssef M.A.Hashash,Student Member,ASCE,and Robert V.Whitman,Fellow,ASCE,Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,Vol.119,No.1,Jan.,1993
    [26]Behavior of Laterally Loaded Bored Piles in Cemented Sands,by Nabil F.Ismael,Member,ASCE,Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,Vol.116,No.11,Nov.,1990
    [27]Piles Response Due to Excavation-Induced Lateral Soil Movement,by H.G.Poulos,and L.T.Chen(1997),Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    [28]张钦喜、孙家乐、刘柯.深基坑锚拉支护体系变形控制设计理论与应用.岩土工程学报.1999,21(2):161-165
    
    
    [29]章杨松、罗国煜.深基坑支护结构分析的共同变形法.高校地质学报.1999,5(3):283-289
    [30]邹冰.深基坑支护体系的空间变形性状分析.科技通报.2000,16(6):416-420
    [31]孙钧.市区基坑开挖施工的环境土工问题.地下空间,1999,19(4):257-266
    [32]黄宏伟、熊祚森、叶邦庆.基坑开挖施工中围护结构动态行为的预报.地下空间.1998,19(5):383-388
    [33]杨林得、钟才根、曾进伦.基坑支护位移和安全性监测的动态预报.土木工程学报.1999,32(2):9-13
    [34]毕湘利、廖全燕、周顺华、凌国石、吴海平.灌注桩围护结构内力的现场观测与分析.上海铁道大学学报.1998,19(10):51-54
    [35]周顺华、余绍锋、吴海平.水泥土-灌注桩基坑围护结构的试验与现场实测.岩土工程学报.1998,20(2):51-54
    [36]柴华友、贺怀建、唐念慈.桩土相互作用模型及模型实验.岩土力学.1993,14(2):75-84
    [37]何建明、白世伟.深基坑排桩-圈梁支护结构协同作用研究.岩土力学.1997,18(3):41-46
    [38]张贵平.软土中考虑圈梁作用的深基坑支护计算方法.土工基础.2000,14(2);54-56
    [39]高大钊,陈忠汉,程丽萍.深基坑工程.机械工业出版社,1999:55-56
    [40]王元湘.深基坑挡土结构的受力分析.土木工程学报.1998,31(2):12-20
    [41]茜平一、冯国栋、张路.软弱地基深挖基坑中桩的受力分析.岩土工程学报.1993,15(1):
    [42]沈保汉.深基坑工程技术讲座(14).建筑技术开发.1998,25(5):45-49
    [43]潘泓、曹华先、吴世明、骆雯.深基坑开挖中圆形支护结构性状分析.工业建筑.1999,29(5):1-4
    [44]高文华.深基坑支护墙体受力变形分析的粘弹性地基厚板理论.岩石力学与工程学报.1999,18(6):718-719
    [45]杨敏、冯又全、王瑞祥.深基坑支护结构的力学分析及与实测结果的比较.建筑结构学报.1999,20(2):68-78
    
    
    [46]李永盛.上海博物馆基坑围护结构的受力与变形.岩土工程学报.1996,18(3):55-61
    [47]The Response Of Flexible Piles to Lateral Loading,by M.F.Randolph(1981),Geotechnique,Vol.31,No.2,247-259
    [48]左名麒、刘永超、孟庆文.基础工程设计与地基处理.中国铁道出版社,2000:217-218
    [49]刘建航,侯学渊.基坑工程手册.中国建筑工业出版社,1997:108-114
    [50]何颐华、杨斌、金宝森、李瑞茹、谭永坚、王铁宏.深基坑护坡桩土压力的工程测试及研究.土木工程学报.1997,30(1):16-24
    [51]杨晓军、龚晓南.基坑开挖中考虑水压力的土压力计算.土木工程学报.1997,30(4):58-62
    [52]高大钊.软土深基坑支护技术中的若干土力学问题.岩土力学.1995,16(3):1-6
    [53]陈愈炯、温彦锋.基坑支护结构上的水土压力.岩土工程学报.1999,21(2):139-143
    [54]徐士良.FORTRAN常用算法程序集(第二版).清华大学出版社,1995:1-4
    [55]李克钏,基础工程.中国铁道出版社,1995,84-94
    [56]罗河炎.基坑支护计算m法应用探讨.工程勘察.1998,(6):16-18
    [57]尉希成.支挡结构设计手册.中国建筑工业出版社,1995:169-179
    [58]工程建设标准规范分类汇编,建筑地基基础设计规范(GBJ7-89),中国建筑工业出版社,1997:1-6-8
    [59]林天健.深基坑开挖支护体系理论及其应用评述.力学与实践.1996,18(2):1-9
    [60]曾庆义、刘明成.支护桩圈粱的作用机理与计算分析.岩土力学.1995,16(2):74-82
    [61]熊巨华、裴健勇、杨敏.考虑桩顶冠梁效应的水泥土挡墙变形计算方法.岩土力学.1999,20(1):84-86

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700