滇楸优树及其子代苗期性状遗传变异研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
为选育适应于西南高山地区栽培的良种,探究滇楸(Catalpa fargesii Bur. f. duclouxii(Dode) Gilmour)的群体遗传多样性、优良种源、家系和无性系的选育,在贵州、云南滇楸资源集中分布的区域,进行滇楸群体遗传多样性的取样调查,对优良的种质进行选择收集评价、对优树进行苗期子代测定,按照良种选育程序通过遗传参数估算选育优良的家系和无性系。通过以上研究获得以下主要研究结果:
     一、滇楸群体表型性状的变异类型非常丰富,遗传多样性水平高。17个种群花部的表型性状在种群间及种群内差异均显著。种群间变异系数为19.88%~35.75%,性状平均表型分化系数(VST)为28.26%,分化幅度为18.91%~42.15%,表型频率分化系数(Pst)为0.5147,Shannon-Weaver多样性指数值(H')在1.3490~2.5225之间,滇楸花部表型性状的重复力高,最高值花下萼唇长平均为0.685,花性状中花上萼唇长、下萼唇长和花径性状的稳定性强。花部性状与地理变异有明显的相关性,其中花上萼唇长、下萼唇长、花径与纬度呈极显著相关,花枝长度与经度显著相关并与海拔呈极显著负相关。
     滇楸果实8个表型性状在滇楸的种群间及种群内均表现极显著差异。种群间的变异系数为31.03%(24.53%~39.28%),性状表型分化系数VST分别为22.81%(10.53%~39.28%),果实平均多样度系数Lst、Ls和Pst分别为0.0359、0.755和0.0453,Shannon-Weaver多样性指数(H')在1.6184~2.3617之间。果实性状间重复力平均值为0.543,变化幅度在0.399~0.694之间。相对花的重复力较低。对来自不同省份的9个种群果实性状进行UPGMA聚类,结果表明滇楸果实的表型变异并没有依地理距离而聚类,与花部性状聚类结果一致。
     二、滇楸不同气候区、种源、家系种子发芽性状遗传变异。滇楸的种子质量和播种品质在气候区、种源、家系间及家系内性状间变异系数的差异十分明显。其种子千粒重、场圃发芽率、发芽势、发芽指数等4个性状变异系数的变化范围分别为2.41%~20.57%、3.67%~28.89%、8.92%~30.82%和8.75%~34.13%之间。种子千粒重与7月均温和有效积温均显著的负相关,相关系数R值为-0.593和-0.662。
     三、滇楸家系子代苗期生长性状变异十分丰富。一、二年生苗木的苗高、地径等性状方差分析显示,在气候区类型、种源、家系三个层次上的差异显著。一年生苗高、地径差异均达到极显著水平,二年生苗性状在不同家系间除苗高、地径在气候类型区间差异不显著外,其余的差异均达到极显著水平。苗期生长性状的相关分析表明,一、二年生地径生长与产地七月均温均呈显著相关(R=0.672,和R=0.595),二年生地径与经度呈显著负相关(R=-0.589),苗高与地径生长量在一、二年均呈极显著正相关。一年生苗高、地径的家系遗传力分别为0.805和0.664,二年生苗高、地径的家系遗传力分别为0.837和0.603。一、二年生家系间苗高、地径的遗传变异系数分别为18.798%、11.053%和10.141%、6.589%;一、二年生家系间苗高、地径的表型变异系数分别为39.477%、28.461%和28.818%、35.408%;一二年生的遗传增益最高分别为24.96%和35.32%。对二年生苗木按I值选出最优家系31个,他们分别来源于兴仁、盘县和瓮安等10个种源。
     四、滇楸优良无性系的选择。无性系生长性状、叶部性状、木材材性性状在无性系间差异显著。无性系高、叶柄长、叶面积、基本密度、胞壁率、纤维实际长和双壁厚性状的重复力分别为0.921、0.960、0.946、0.842、0.872、0.792和0.725。无性系木材基本密度与解剖性状胞壁率、双壁厚、弦向胞腔直径、弦向中央直径分别显著相关。纤维实际长与各性状间相关不显著。通过遗传参数、相关分析、主成分、聚类分析和综合评分方法等,生长性状与叶部性状结合,筛选出7个优良无性系;联合生长、木材解剖与力学性状,选出生长量大,解剖结构好,木材物理性状稳定的5个优良无性系。
For selecting and breeding improved varieties that are suitable for cultivate in southwestmountain, genetic diversity of populations, heredity and variation of germplasm provenances,and families and clones breeding are studied in Catalpa fargesii Bur. f. duclouxii (Dode)Gilmour. In according to the procedure to estimate the superior families by genetic parameters,in Guizhou and Yunnan where Catalpa fargesii distribute concentrately, genetic diversity ofpopulation were investigated, excellent germplasm were selected, collected and evaluated, aswell as progeny test of the collecting excellent tree were conducted. The above researchobtains main results as following:
     Firstly, variation of phenotypic traits was vary rich, and its genetic diversity was high levelin population of Catalpa fargesii. Floral phenotypic differences were significantly big within17populations and among17populations. Variation coefficient among population is19.88%~35.75%, the mean phenotypic differentiation coefficient of characters (VST) was28.26%, therange of change was18.91%~42.15%. Differentiating coefficient of phenotype frequency(Pst) is0.5147. Shannon-Weaver diversity index (H') varies was1.3490~2.5225. Repeatabilityof floral phenotypic traits in catalpa fargesii was high, its highest value was the flower calyx,namely0.685on average. Morethan, length of flower calyx lip, length of calyx lip anddiameter of flower traits has strong stability. There was a significant correlation between floraltraits and geographic factors, and length of flower calyx lip, length of calyx lip, flowerdiameter was significantly correlated with the latitude and longitude, squid length wassignificant negatively correlated with altitude.8fruit phenotypic traits differentiatesignificantly among populations and within populations in Catalpa fargesii. The variationcoefficient among populations was31.03%(24.53%~39.28%), Phenotypic differentiationcoefficient VSTwas22.81%(10.53%~39.28%), Lst, Ls and Pst of the average fruit diversitycoefficient were0.0359,0.755and0.0453respectively, Shannon-Weaver diversity index (H') was in1.6184~2.3617. Mean value of repeatability in the fruit characters was0.543, variationrange was in0.399~0.694, it was lower than flower characters. By UPGMA cluster of fruitcharacters in9populations from different provinces, the result showed that the fruit phenotypicvariation in Catalpa fargesii was not in accordance with the geographical distance, but was inaccordance with the results of floral traits cluster.
     Secondly, seed germinating variation of different climate, provenance, family in Catalpafargesii. Variation coefficient of seed quality and sowing quality in Catalpa fargesii has veryobvious difference in climate, provenances, families. Range of variation coefficient in the seedweight, germination rate, germination potential, and germination index were2.41%~20.57%,3.67%~28.89%,8.92%~30.82%and8.75%~34.13%respectively. Seed weight weresignificantly negative correlation with mean tempreture in July and effective accumulatedtemperature, R value of the correlation coefficient was-0.593and-0.662.
     Thirdly, growth traits variating of family progeny was very rich in Catalpa fargesii. Byvariance analysis for one or biennial s, traits of the height and ground diameter showsignificant differences in climate types, provenance and family. Difference of height andground diameter for one year old reached significant level, and2year old height andground diameter of different families had no significant difference in climate types, but otherdifference reached significant level. Correlation analysis of showed that one or biennialdiameter growth were significant (R=0.672and0.595) with July temperature in origin. thebiennial diameter showed a significant negative correlation with longitude (R=-0.589).Family heritability of height, ground diameter for one year old were0.805and0.664respectively. Family heritability of height, ground diameter for two year old were0.837and0.603respectively. One or biennial family genetic variation coefficients of height and grounddiameter were18.798%,11.053%and10.141%,6.589%respectively; the phenotypic variationcoefficients of height and ground diameter of family for one or biennial year were39.477%,28.461%and28.818%,35.408%. Genetic gain of one or two years was up to24.96%and35.32%respectively. Acording to I value,31superior families were selected from seedings for two year old, that distributed in10provenances, eg: XingRen county, Pan county and Wengancounty so on.
     Fourthly, superior clones selecting in Catalpa fargesii. There were significant differencesin growth traits, leaf characters and wood properties of clone among clones. Repeatability ofheight, footstalk length, leave area, basic density, cell wall percentage, fiber length and doublewall thickness were respectively0.921,0.960,0.946,0.842,0.872,0.792and0.725in clones.Wood basic density of clones were significantly related to anatomical characters of plant cellwall, double wall thickness, ratio of diameter to chord, cellular tangential diameter. It was notsignificant correlation between actual fiber length and other traits. According to the geneticparameters, correlation analysis results, physical mechanics indexes, superior clones ingrowing rapidly, good anatomical structure and stable physical properties of wood werecollected during early selection of clones. By genetic parameter, correlating analysis, study ofprincipal component, cluster analysis, and method of synthetical score so on,7superior cloneswere selected using growth traits and leaf characters. Combining growing traits withanatomical structure and mechanics traits of wood,5superior clones were selected that weregrowing rapidly, anatomical structure well, steady physical behavior of wood.
引文
[1]乔勇进,夏阳,梁慧敏,等.试论楸树的生物生态学特性及发展前景[J].防护林科技,2003,NO.4(sum.NO.57):23-24.
    [2]张锦,田菊芬.优良乡土树种楸树种质资源及发展策略[J].安徽农业科学,2003,31(6):1012-1013.
    [3]余丽云.滇楸的染色体核型分析[J].西南林学院学报,1991,11(1):29-32.
    [4]樊汝汶,吴琼美,邹惠渝.滇楸(Catalpa fargesii f. duc1ouxii (Dode) Gilmour)的胚胎学研究[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),1980,2(2):67-80.
    [5] Rong C, Yang F C. Genetic consequences of in situ and ex situ conservation of forest trees[J]. For Chr,1992,68(6):720-729.
    [6]王明庥.林木遗传育种学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2000,5-13.
    [7]佘跃辉.小豆种质资源研究[D].四川农业大学博士学位论文,2005,19-21.
    [8]沈熙环.林木育种学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1990,52-59.
    [9]姚庆渭,黄鹏成.东亚和北美楸树属和肥皂荚属的种类及其系统[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),1980,2(1):123-125.
    [10]姚庆渭,黄鹏成.江苏省珍贵用材树种的研究—楸树属[J].热带林业,1978,(3):22-33.
    [11]张锦.安徽楸树资源及发展利用前景[J].安徽林业科技,2001,(4):17-19.
    [12]吴丽华,王军辉,林娟.楸树植物资源的研究概况[J].上海交通大学学报(农业科学版),2010,28(1):91-96.
    [13]石欣,李亚,杨如同,等.中国楸树(Catalpa bungei)种质资源遗传多样性的ISSR分析[J].农业学报,2011,27(3):634-639.
    [14]贾继文,麻文俊,王军辉,等.几种梓属植物花粉形态及分类学意义[J].林业科学,2012,48(7):182-185.
    [15] LI JH. Phylogeny of Catalpa (Bignoniaceae) inferred from sequences of chloroplast ndhF and nuclearribosomal DNA [J]. Journal of Systematics and Evolution,2008,46(3):341-348.
    [16]樊汝汶,黄金生.梓树属两个种花柱发育的细胞形态学比较研究[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),1988,9(3):33-38.
    [17]樊莉丽.楸树生殖生物学特性的研究[D].南京林业大学博士论文,2012,36-42.
    [18]贾继文,王军辉,张金凤,等.梓树属花粉生活力的研究[J].西北植物学报,2009,29(5):945-950.
    [19]王改萍,彭方仁,徐涛,等.几种不同楸树花粉萌发率的测定及花粉超低温保存方法[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2008,137(5):123-126.
    [20]王改萍,杨红宁,倪果果,等.楸树等4种梓属树种花粉离体培养条件的研究[J].植物资源与环境学报,2009,137(2):123-126.
    [21]王改萍,鲁丹,彭方仁,等.不同梓属树种花器官蛋白电泳分析[J].林业科技开发,2012,26(3):54-57.
    [22]郭从俭,张新胜.楸树采种期与种子品质的关系[J].河南农业大学学报,1990,24(2):227-231.
    [23]赵曦阳,王军辉,张金凤,等.梓树属4个种种子表型性状和发芽特性的研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2008,36(12):149-154.
    [24]秦霞,杨红芳,张威,等.不同光照条件对楸树种子发芽率的影响[J].河南科技学院学报,2010.38(1):33-35.
    [25]马英,夏玲,刘卫东. GA3、6-BA、Mn(2+)对楸树种子发芽的影响[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(13):40-46.
    [26]陈维.楸树埋根、扦插、嫁接三种繁殖方法生长对比试验[J].安徽林业科技,2009,36(2):16-17.
    [27]梁有旺,彭方仁,王顺才.楸树嫩枝扦插试验初报[J].林业科技开发,2006,20(1):67-69.
    [28]韩恩贤,罗伟祥,赵辉,等.楸树育苗造林技术的研究[J].西北林学院学报,2002,17(1):19-23.
    [29]王良桂,杜旭华,王顺财,等.不同楸树品种(类型)嫩枝扦插生根能力及扦插繁殖技术[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2008,32(5):127-130.
    [30]华宏,杜旭华,王顺财,等.楸树扦插生根过程中插条保护酶与丙二醛动态变化[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2008,32(6):128-132.
    [31]张博,兰再平,马可,等.不同激素处理和基质配方对楸树嫩枝扦插生根的影响[J].林业科学研究,2011,24(6):749-753.
    [32]王华荣,王海亭,张国立,等.楸树不同嫁接方法对苗木成活率和生长量的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35(30):95-99.
    [33]陈丛梅,李淑梅,申艳普,等.楸树嫁接育苗与梓砧培育技术[J].林业实用技术,2007,(11):22-23
    [34]叶培忠,刘玉莲.促进楸树结实的研究[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),1980,2(1):116-121.
    [35]郭从俭,张新胜.楸树开花结实习性观察研究[J].河南林业科技,1991,11(2):1-4,18.
    [36]王小艳赵鲲赵牧峰,等.楸树杂交育种初报[J].河南林业科技,2008,28(2):16-18.
    [37]郝明灼,彭方仁,王改萍,等.楸树人工杂交授粉试验及种实分析[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2008,32(5):131-134.
    [38]贾继文,王军辉,张金凤,等.楸树与滇楸种间杂交的初步研究[J].林业科学研究,2010,23(3):382-386.
    [39]张锦,罗宁,李同顺,等.楸树播种育苗技术[J].林业科技开发,2007,21(5):83-84.
    [40]孟永红,李燕玲,杜克久.楸树植株再生体系的建立[J].河北林果研究,2004,19(2):101-104.
    [41]傅玉兰,费鹏飞,刘小云.楸树试管丛生芽继代增殖影响因素的研究[J].林业科技开发,2009,23(1):95-98.
    [42]王军辉,吴丽华,林娟.生长素对楸树不定芽的诱导和增殖培养影响的研究[J].林业科技开发,2011,36(1):1-4.
    [43]任莺,彭方仁,杨燕,等.楸树不同类型胚性和非胚性愈伤组织的细胞学观察[J].林业科技开发,2011,25(5):43-45.
    [44]江荣翠,彭方仁,谭鹏鹏,等.楸树体细胞胚胎发生的研究[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2010,34(2):15-18.
    [45]韩创举,杨培华,樊军锋,等.楸树组培技术研究[J].西北林学院学报,2006,21(1):80-81.
    [46]于永明,王军辉,张宋智,等.二次回归正交设计在楸树离体生根培养中的应用[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2011,35(4):47-50.
    [47]江荣翠,彭方仁,谭鹏鹏.楸树体细胞胚胎发生研究[J].林业科技开发,2010,24(1):88-90.
    [48]江荣翠.滇楸体细胞胚胎发生及机理研究[D].博士论文,2010.
    [49]邱明光,段安安,叶宏谋.滇楸引种简结[J].陕西林业科技,1988,02:16-18.
    [50]王俊青,赵天宇,代新平,等.楸树半同胞家系苗期测定与选择[J].湖北林业科技,2012,(6):5-7+90.
    [51]张瑾,草力满.7种园林植物在新疆库尔勒市的引种栽培[J].绿色科技,2012,(7):95-96.
    [52]王秋霞,翟文继,王平,等.南阳楸树优良家系苗期对比试验[J].湖北林业科技,2010,(3):27-29.
    [53]马雪范,王秋霞,翟文继,等.南阳楸树优良家系和优良无性系收集保存与利用研究[J].河南林业科技,2010,30(1):4-5.
    [54]郭从俭,张新胜,张万钦.气孔性状对楸树生长及早期选择的影响[J].河南农业大学学报,1996,30(1):65-71.
    [55]熊贵来,杨建学,赵坤,等.楸树优良无性系主要生长性状相关分析[J].河南林业科技,1994,14(4):20-22+29.
    [56]郭凌,赵鲲,焦云德,等.楸树杂种无性系幼林期选择研究[J].河南林业科技,2010,30(2):28-29+32.
    [57]郭从俭,张新胜,赵北林,等.楸树自然变异与良种选择[J].河南农业大学学报,1994,28(4):292-297.
    [58]赵进文,赵鲲,焦云德,等.灰楸无性系苗期测定与选择[J].河南林业科技,2009,29(3):11-13.
    [59]翟文继,麻文俊,王秋霞,等.楸树苗期优良家系及单株的配合选择[J].西北林学院学报,2012,27(3):68-71.
    [60]麻文俊,张守攻,王军辉,等.1年生楸树无性系苗期生长特性[J].林业科学研究,2012,25(5):657-663.
    [61]杨安敏,姚淑均,许杰,等.滇楸半同胞家系子代苗期性状的遗传变异[J].种子,2010,29(3):89-90+93.
    [62]焦永刚,韩建会.石家庄地区速生楸树品种筛选[J].河北农业科学,2008,12(2):47-48.
    [63]郭从俭,张新胜,赵北林,等.愀树自然变异与良种选择[J].河南农业大学学报,1994,28(3):292-297.
    [64]郭从俭,张新胜,王华荣,等.愀树优良无性系选择初报[J].河南林业科技,1994,14(4):7-8.
    [65]郭从俭,张新胜,杨保森,等.愀树优良无性系一窄冠l号的选择[J].河南农业大学学报,1994,28(2):189-194.
    [66]郭从俭,张新胜,张万钦,等.愀树无性系测定报告[J].河南林业科技,1994,14(4):9-10.
    [67]麻文俊,王军辉,张守攻,等.楸树良种宛楸8401[J].林业科学,2012,48(9):186.
    [68]麻文俊,王军辉,张守攻,等.楸树良种宛楸8401[J].林业科学,2012,48(11):150.
    [69]郭从俭,张新胜.揪树造林密度及其效应的研究[J].河南林业料技,1994,14(4):11-14.
    [70]郭从俭,张新胜,王华荣,等.愀树无性系造林试验[J].河南林业科技,1994,14(4): l8-l9.
    [71]郭从俭,张新胜.愀树速生丰产技术研究[J].河南林业科技,1996,16(1):8-15.
    [72]郭从俭.愀树速生丰产技术研究的现状与展望[J].河南林业科技,1996,16(1): l-3.
    [73]张新胜,郭从俭.愀树幼林施肥效应及营养诊断模型的研究[J].河南农业大学学报,1996,30(4):376-383.
    [74]熊贵来,杨建学,潘庆凯,等.愀树优良无性系生产力稳定性和适应性评价[J].河南农业大学学报,1995,29(4):410-415.
    [75]王恒明.干旱山区地堰不同保墒措施与树木生长的试验分析[J].山东气象,2001,21(2):29-30.
    [76]杨士平,厉林吉.梯田地堰不同栽植模式的研究[J].山东林业科技,1994,(1):6-9.
    [77]麻文俊,王军辉,张守攻,等.楸树无性系苗期氮素分配和氮素效率差异[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2011,17(5):1256-1261.
    [78]麻文俊,张守攻,王军辉,等.楸树无性系苗期N素利用差异和高产无性系选择[J].林业科学,2012,48(10):157-162.
    [79]王力朋,李吉跃,王军辉,等.指数施肥对楸树无性系幼苗生长和氮素吸收利用效率的影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2012,34(6):55-62.
    [80]王力朋,晏紫伊,李吉跃,等.氮素指数施肥对3个楸树无性系光合特性的影响[J].林业科学研究,2013,26(1):46-51.
    [81]傅本重,杨敏,伍建榕,等.滇楸叶斑病病原菌鉴定及生物学特性(中国植物病理学会2011年学术年会论文集).
    [82]付常良,尹学顺.楸梢螟的生活史及习性观察[J].山东林业科技,1985(2):13-16.
    [83]朱龙粉,何雅萍,毛华方,等.徐晓杰楸梢螟发生规律与防治方法研究初报[J].中国植保导刊,2008,(6):34-35.
    [84]徐晓杰,张凤华,吴科军,等.苏南楸梢螟发生规律与防治方法初探[J].上海农业科技,2008,(6):103-104.
    [85]刘传银,祁成进,吴衍德,等.楸梢螟防治技术的研究[J].山东林业科技,1989,(2):34-37.
    [86]明广增,王丹青,魏洪涛,等.楸蠹野螟发生及防治试验研究[J].植物医生,2006,3(3):33-34.
    [87]张云美,张振玲.楸树根结线虫病及其病原线虫的初步研究[J].山东大学学报(理学版),1989,24(3):74-86.
    [88]吴玉柱,洪瑞芬,季延平,等.楸树根结线虫病药剂防治试验[J].森林病虫通讯,1994,(4):26-28.
    [89]洪瑞芬,吴玉柱,季延平,等.楸树根结线虫病化学防治研究[J].林业科技通讯,1994,(4):15-16.
    [90]沈伯葵,童瑞华,甘福康,等.克线磷、巴丹防治楸树根结线虫病害[J].中国森林病虫,1991,10(4):9.
    [91]王如岩,于水强,张金池,等.干旱胁迫下接种菌根真菌对滇柏和楸树幼苗根系的影响[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2012,36(6):23-27.
    [92]岑显超,彭方仁,陈隆升,等.楸树品种间水分特征曲线主要参数比较与抗旱性评价[J].浙江林学院学报,2006,25(6):760-764.
    [93]何建平,王军辉,麻文俊,等.多效唑提高楸树抗旱性的效应[J].光谱实验室,2011,(2):3334-3337.
    [94]宋露露,熊耀国,赵丹宁.利用细胞膜透性测定3种阔叶树耐旱性的探讨[J].林业科技通讯,1993,(4):19-21.
    [95]刘国志,王新建,崔俊昌,等.干旱胁迫对楸树嫁接苗部分生理生化指标的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(18):7546-7548.
    [96]王良桂,张春霞,彭方仁,等.干旱胁迫对几种楸树苗木叶片荧光特性的影响[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2008,32(6):119-122.
    [97]王臣,虞木奎,张翠,等.盐胁迫下3个楸树无性系光合特征研究[J].林业科学研究,2010,23(4):537-543.
    [98]王臣,虞木奎,王宗星,等.9个楸树无性系对盐胁迫的差异响应[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2011,35(2):20-24.
    [99] Alekseev A A, Matorin D A, Osipov V A, et al. Moscow University Biological Sciences Bulletin.Allerton Press Inc,2007,62(4):164-170.
    [100] Kimura K, Okuda T, Takano T. Studies on the cons t itu ents of Catalpaovata G. Don. I. Activeprinciples of fruits[J]. Yakuz aig aku,1962,83(6):635-638.
    [101] Kanai E, Machida K, Kikuchi M. Studies on the constituents of Catalpa species I. Iridoids fromCatalpa fructus[J]. Chem Pharm Bull,1996,44(8):1607-1609.
    [102] Machida K, Yaoit K. Studies on the constituents of Catalpa species Ⅵ. Monoter peneglycosides fromthe fallen leaves of Catalpaoata G. Don[J]. Chem Pharm Bull,2001,49(6):732-736.
    [103] Nozaka T, Watanabe F, Ishin M. A mutagenic new iridoid in the water extract of Catalpa Fructus[J].Chem Pharm Bull,1989,37(10):2838-2840.
    [104]王奇志,梁敬钰.梓实化学成分研究[J].中草药,2005,28(1):15-17.
    [105]王奇志,管福琴,孙浩,等.梓苷的抗肿瘤活性研究[J].中成药,2012,34(12):2381-2384.
    [106]王奇志,梁敬钰.梓属植物化学成分研究进展[J].中草药,2003,26(7):99-101.
    [107]昝丽霞,赵勇,孙文基.楸树种子中梓醇的分离与含量测定[J].中药材,2005,28(1):26-27.
    [108]秦雪梅,郝闽晋,张忠鹏.梓树与楸树果实的生药鉴别[J].山西医学院学报,1993,44(4):470-473.
    [109]宫玉婷,阿不都拉·阿巴斯.梓树果实有效成分的初步研究[J].食品科学,2008,3(5):205-207.
    [110]宫玉婷.梓树果实中黄酮类化合物及花中挥发性成分的研究[D].新疆大学硕士学位论文,2009.
    [111] Wilson E O. The Biological diversity crisis[J]. Bio scienee,1985,35(11):700-706.
    [112] Magurran A E. Ecological diversity and its measurement[M]. New Jersey: Prineeto University Pres,1988.
    [113]施立明.遗传多样性及其保存[J].生物科学信息,1990,2(4):155-164.
    [114]陈灵芝,马克平.生物多样性科学原理与实践[M].上海科学技术出版社,2001.
    [115]钱迎倩,马克平.生物多样性研究的原理与方法[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1994.
    [116] Barbier E B, Schulz C E. Wild life biodiversity and trade[J]. EnviornL mentand DevelpomentEeonomies,1997,2(2)145-172.
    [117] Ingrouille M. Diversity evolution of plants[M]. London: ChaPman&Hall,1992.
    [118] A.E. Ecological diversity and its measurement[M]. Princeton University Press,1988.
    [119] Ayala F, Valentine J. The theory and progress of organic evolution. Menlo Pork Benjamin Cummings,1991.
    [120] Soltis S, MeCoueh S. Unlocking Genetic Potential From the Wild[J]. Science,1997,(277):1063-1066.
    [121] Millar C, Libby W. Strategies for conserving ciinal, ecotypic, and DIS junet population diversity inwide spread species[M]. In Falk D A and Holsinger K E Genetics and Conservation of rareplants.NewYork: Oxford University Press,1991,149-170.
    [122]王洪新,胡志昂.植物的繁育系统、遗传结构和遗传多样性[J].生物多样性,1996,4(2):92-96.
    [123]文亚峰,韩文军,吴顺.植物遗传多样性及其影响因素[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2010,30(12):80-87.
    [124]阎爱民,陈文新.苜蓿、草木樨、锦鸡儿根瘤菌的表型多样性分析[J].生物多样性,1999,7(2):112-118.
    [125]葛颂,洪德元.遗传多样性及其检测方法[M]∥中国科学院生物多样性委员会.生物多样性研究的原理和方法.北京:中国科学技术出版社,1994:123-140.
    [126] Xie C Y, Ying C C. Genetic architecture and adaptive landscape of interior lodgepole pine(Pinuscontorta ssp. Latifolia)in Canada[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,1995,25:2010-2021.
    [127] Volis S, Mendlinger S, Whittaker L O, et al. Phenotypic variation and stress resistance in core andperipheral populations of Hordeum spontaneum[J]. Biodiversity and Conservation,1998,7:799-813.
    [128] Jenczewski E, Prosperi J M, Ronfort J. Evidence for gene flow between wild and cultivated Medicagosativa (Leguminosae) based on all ozyme markers and quantitative traits[J]. American Journal ofBotany,1999,86:677-687.
    [129]Daehler C C, Yorkston M, Sun W, et al. Genetic variation in morphology and growth characters ofAcacia koa in the Hawaiian Islands[J]. International Journal of Plant Science,1999,160(4):767-773.
    [130] Jonas C S, Geber M A. Variation among populations of Clarkia unguiculata (Onagraceae)alongaltitudinal and latitudinal gradients[J]. American Journal of Botany,1999,86:333-343.
    [131]曾杰,郑海水,甘四明,等.广西西南桦天然居群的表型变异[J].林业科学,2005,41(12)59-65
    [132] STAUB J E, STAUB J E, SEROYEN F C, MCCREIGHT J D. Genetic diversityin cucumber(Cucumis sativus L.) Ⅲ: an evaluation of Indiagermplasm[J]. Genetic Resources and CropEvolution,1997,44:315-326.
    [133]陈光,杜雄明.我国陆地棉基础种质表型性状的遗传多样性分析[J].西北植物学报,2006,26(8):1649-1656.
    [134] Han S U, Choi S K. Change of herit abilities and correlations for height growth in open-pollinatedprogenies of Pinus densiflora [J]. Research Report of the Institute of Forest Genetics,1989,25:65-70.
    [135] Magnussen S, Yeatman C W. Predictions of genetic gain from various selection methods in openpollinated pinus banksiana progeny trials[J]. Silvae Genetica,1990,39(4):140-153.
    [136] Wyk G V. Genetic improvement of timber yield and wood quality in Eucalyptus grandis MaidenPart I.Genetic parameters of growth characteristics[J]. South African Forestry Journal,1990,153(1):1-11.
    [137]涂忠虞,黄敏仁.阔叶树遗传改良[M].科学技术出版社,1991.
    [138]涂忠虞,沈熙环.中国林木遗传育种进展[M].科学技术出版社,1993.
    [139]孙晓梅.日本落叶松纸浆材优良家系选择及家系生长模型研究[D].博士论文,2003.
    [140]马常耕.无性系林业与无性系育种[J].湖南林业科技,1986,17(3):1-8.
    [141]王琦,朱之悌.林木无性系育种若干遗传参数估算的研究进展[J].林业科学,1995,31(2):169-176.
    [142]高之仁.数量遗传学[M].四川大学出版社,1986.
    [143]明石孝辉.日本柳杉基础参数的研究[J].林试研报,1987,34(9):1-7.
    [144]单保山.遗传力的概念及其发展I关于遗传力的几个问题[J].河北农大学报,1988,11(1):39-44.
    [145]单保山.遗传力的概念及其发展Ⅱ遗传力概念的发展[J].河北农业大学学报,1988,11(2):130-135.
    [146]任宪威.树木学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1997:473-474.
    [147] Schaal A B, et al. Comparison of for assessing genetic variation in plant conservation biology. In FalkD.A and K.E Holsinger, eds. Genetics and conservation of rare plants. New York: Oxford Universitypress.1991,:123-124.
    [148] Baeilieri R, Ducousso A, Kremer A.Genetic, morphological, ecological and phenologicaldifferentiation between Quercus petraea(Matt.)Liebl.and Quercus robur L.in a mixed stand ofnorthwest of France[J]. Silvae Genetica,1995,44(1):1-10.
    [149]STICH B, HAUSSMANN B I G, PASAM R, et al.Patterns of molecular and phenotypic diversity inpearl millet〔Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.〕from West and Central Africa and their relation togeographical and environmental parameters[J]. BMC Plant Biology,2010,10:216-225.
    [150]CHRISTINE S J, MONICAAG.Variation among populations of Clarkia unguiculata (Onagraceae)along altitudinal and latitudinal gradients[J]. American Journal of Botany,1999,86(3):333-343.
    [151] Maughan P J, Saghai M A, Buss G R.Microsatellite and amplified sequence length polymorphisms incultivated and wild soybean[J]. Genome,1999,(38):715-723.
    [152]刘萌娟,李鸣雷,石引刚等.陕西大豆初选核心种质的代表性分析[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2006,34(9):135-140.
    [153]顾万春著.统计遗传学[M].科学出版社,2005.
    [154]续九如著.林木数量遗传学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2004,55-60.
    [155]李斌,顾万春,卢宝明.白皮松天然居群种实性状表型多样性研究[J].生物多样性研究,2002,10(2):181-188.
    [156]葛颂,王明麻,陈岳武.用同工酶研究马尾松居群的遗传结构[J].林业科学,1988,24(4):399-409.
    [157]刘永红,杨培华,韩创,等.油松不同种源种实性状的变异分析[J].浙江林学院学报,2008,25(2):163-168.
    [158]顾万春等.森林遗传资源学概论[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1998.
    [159]曾杰,郑海水,甘四明,等.广西西南桦天然居群的表型变异[J].林业科学,2005,41(2):59-65.
    [160]高秀琴,兰进好,穆平,等.小麦遗传多样性研究进展[J].山东农业科学,2007,39(3):33-36.
    [161]刘宝.表观遗传变异与作物遗传改良[J].吉林农业大学学报,2008,30(4):386-393.
    [162] Stebbins G L. Variation and evolution in plant[M]. New York: ColumbiaUniversity Press,1950.
    [163] LinhartY, GrantM C.Evolutionary significance of localgenetic differentiation in plants[J].AnnualReview of Ecology and Systematics,1996,27():237-277.
    [164]刘林德,祝宁,申家恒,等刺五加、短梗五加的开花动态及繁育系统的比较研究[J].生态学报,2002,22(7):1041-1048.
    [165] ECKHART V M. The effecs of floral display on pollina or visiaion vary among populaions ofPhac-elia linearis (Hydro phyllaceae)[J]. Evolutionary Ecology,1991,5(4):370-384.
    [166] GROSS C L, BART IER F V, MULL IG AN D R. Florals rucure, breeding sysem and frui-seedin he hrea ened sub-shrub Tetratheca juncea Smith (Tre-mandraceae)[J]. Annals of Botany,2003,92(6):771-777.
    [167]郭宁,杨树华,葛维亚,等.新疆天山山脉地区疏花蔷薇天然居群表型多样性分析[J].园艺学报,2011,38(3):495-502.
    [168]明军,顾万春.紫丁香表型多样性研究[J].林业科学研究,2006,19(2):199-204.
    [169]李全健,王彩霞,田敏等.浙江扇脉杓兰野生居群的表型性状变异及其与地理-土壤养分因子的相关性[J].植物资源与环境学报,2012,21(2):45-52.
    [170]陈香波,叶文国,田旗,等.夏腊梅天然群体表型变异及分布特征[J].北京林业大学学报,2010,32(2):133-140.
    [171]穆绘莉,游晓会,石超,等.胭脂花野生群体表型多样性研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2012,34(3):97-102.
    [172]张强英,张启翔,程堂仁.榆叶梅野生群体表型多样性的研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2012,32(5):155-160.
    [173] Daniel L H andG C Andrew.Principles of Population Genetics.Sinauer Associates,USA.1989,1-670.
    [174]王丹,庞春华,高亚卉,等.茶条槭不同海拔种群的表型多样性[J].云南植物研究,2010,32(2):117-125.
    [175]刘玉皎,宗绪晓.青海蚕豆种质资源形态多样性分析[J].植物遗传资源学报,2008,9(1):79-83.
    [176]张礼凤,李伟,王彩洁,等.山东大豆种质资源形态多样性分析[J].植物遗传资源学报,2006,7(4):450-454.
    [177] Ayala F J, Kiger J A. Modern Genetics(2ndedn)[M]. California: Ben jam in Cummings Publishing Co.1984.
    [178] Silva-Montellano A, E guiarte L E. Georpaphic patterns in the reproductive ecolo-gy of Agave lechuguill a in the Chihuahuan Desert. II. Genet icvariation, differ-en tiation and inbreedin gestimates
    [J]. American Journal of Botany,2003,90:700-706.
    [179] Nybom H. Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers forest imating in tras pecif icgenet icdiversityin plants[J]. Molecular Ecology,2004,13:1143-1155.
    [180] Van Droogenbroeck B, Kyndt T, Rom eijn-Peet ers E, et al.Evidence of natural hybridization and introgression between Vasconcel leaspecies (Caricaceae) from southern Ecuador revealed bychloroplast, mitoch on drial and nuclear DNA markers[J]. Annals of Botany,2006,97:793-805.
    [181] Barzdajn W(1996).An assessment of diagnostic value of morphological traits of Norway spruce(Piceaabies(L.)Karst.)cones for discrimination of spruce rovenances. Sylwan,140,61-75.
    [182] Roche L.1969.A genecological study of the genus Picea in British Columbia.New Phytol,68:505-55.
    [183]王海英.川西变叶海棠生物学特性及其水分利用格局研究[D].中国林业科学研究院硕士论文,2010.
    [184]吴远伟.川西云杉天然群体表型遗传多样[D].四川农业大学硕士学位论文,2008.
    [185]罗建勋.云杉天然群体遗传多样性研究[D].中国林业科学研究院博士论文,2004.
    [186]郑健,郑勇奇,宗以尘.等.花楸树天然群体种实多样性研究[J].植物遗传资源学报,2009,10(3):385-391.
    [187]王式安等.数理统计方法及应用模型[M].北京科学技术出版社,1992.
    [188]罗建勋.云杉天然群体表型多样性研究[J].林业科学,2005,41(2):66-73.
    [189]王娅丽,李毅.祁连山青海云杉天然群体的种实性状表型多样性[J].植物生态报,2008,32(2):355-362.
    [190]辜云杰,罗建勋,吴远伟,等.川西云杉天然种群表型多样性[J].植物生态学报,2009,33(2):291-301.
    [191]丛桂芝,何琼,车风斌,等.新疆伊犁野生樱桃李表型多样性的聚类分析及优良品系的形态特征[J].东北林业大学学报,2007,35(12):13-14+24.
    [192]张睿鹂,贾茵,张启翔.滇北球花报春天然群体表型变异研究[J].生物多样性,2008,16(4):362-368.
    [193]康永祥,赵宝鑫.毛梾天然群体种实表型多样性研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2011,39(9):107-117.
    [194]冯毅,王朱涛,蔡应君,等.川西北地区康定柳天然群体表型多样性研究[J].西南林学院学报,2010,30(4):11-20.
    [195] Yeh F C and Y A El-Kassaby.Enzyme variations in natural populations of Silka Spruce.Canadianjournal of Forest Research.1980,(10):415-422.
    [196] El-Kassaby Y A,Sziklai O.Genetic variation of allozyme and quantitative traits in a selectedDouglas-fir population [J]. Forestry Ecology and Menagement,1982(4):115-126.
    [197]葛颂,王明庥,陈岳武.用同工酶研究马尾松群体的遗传结构[J].林业科学,1988,24(4):399-409.
    [198]冯毅,罗建勋,杜波.川渝地区乌桕天然群体种子性状表型多样性研究[J].四川林业科技,2011,32(6):19-27.
    [199]辜云杰,王启和,罗建勋.四川桤木天然群体果实表型多样性研究[J].四川林业科技,2009,30(2):19-22.
    [200]兰彦平.皂荚表型多样性及其扩繁技术研究.中国林科院博士后出站报告,2003,17-41.
    [201]程诗明.苦楝聚合群体遗传多样性研究与核心种质构建[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2005.
    [202]李文英.蒙古栎天然群体表型多样性研究[J].林业科学,2005,41(1):49-56.
    [203]罗建勋,和献峰,辜云杰.攀枝花地区麻疯树天然群体表型多样性研究[J].西南林学院报,2008,28(6):31-35.
    [204]柳新红,李因刚,赵勋等.白花树天然群体表型多样性研究[J].林业科学研究,2011,24(6):694-700.
    [205] Miebelle R L.Westby M and Jurado E.Correlates of seed size variation:a comparison am-ong five temperate floras.J. of Eco.1995,83,517~530.
    [206] Greipsson S&LDavy A J.Seed massandger mination behaviour in populations of the dune-buiding grass Leymus arenarius Ann.of Botany,1995,76,493~501.
    [207]蔡永立,王希华,宋永昌,等.中国东部亚热带青冈果实形态变异的研究[J].生态学报,1999,19(4):581-586.
    [208]周正贤等.贵州森林[M].贵州:贵州科技出版社1992.
    [209]王军辉,顾万春,万军,等.桤木不同种源球果及种子性状的遗传变异[J].东北林业大学学报,2006,34(2):1-4(17).
    [210] Michelle R L,Westoby M and Jurado E.Correlates of seed size variation:acomparison among fivetemperate flo-ras.J.of Eco.1995,83:517-530.
    [211] McKean S.E.Optimum age for family selection for growth in genetic tests of loblollypine.For.Sic.1988,34:400-411.
    [212] Wolff R D.Seed size variation in Desmodium paniculatumⅡ:effects on growth and physiologicalperformance.J.of Ecol.,1986,74:99-114.
    [213] Juian Evans long-term productivity of forest plantation status in1990, IUFRO19tn world congressproceedings,1990Division.
    [214]赵天锡.美洲黑杨及其杂种在世界和我国杨树栽培中的地位和作用[J].世界林业研究,1992,19(1):74-81.
    [215]刘代亿,李根前,李莲芳,等.云南松优良家系及优良个体苗期选择研究[J].西北林学院学报,2009,24(4):67-72.
    [216]朱翔,杨传平,李忠,等.2年生白桦种源的地理变异[J].东北林业大学学报,2001,29(6):7-10.
    [217]李因刚,周志春,金国庆,等.乳源木莲苗生长和形态的地理种源分化[J].林业科学研究,2007,20(1):35-39.
    [218]齐明.我国杉木无性系选育的成就、问题和对策[J].世界林业研究,2007, l20(6):50-55.
    [219] Lambeth C C,et al.Early selection is effective in20-year-old genetic test of loblollypine.Silvaegenetic,1983(36):189~194.
    [220]金明洙,崔永林,朴光日.无性系林业的实用化现状[J].延边大学农学学报,2004,26(1):20-26.
    [221]王明庥.论无性系林业—概念和应用[J].桉树科技,1991,(1):6-9.
    [222]朱之悌.毛白杨三倍体新品种及其良种繁育与栽培技术[J].国家林业局.林业十项重点推广技术.北京:中国林业出版社,1998.
    [223]田青,曹致中,张睿.基于数码相机和AntocAD软件测定园林植物叶面积的简便方法[J].草原与草坪,2008,29(3):25-28.
    [224] Kumar A. Growth performance and variability in different clones of Gmelina arborea(ROXB.)[J].Silvae Genetica,2007,56(1):32-36.
    [225]斐鑫德.多元统计分析及应用[M].北京:北京农业大学出版社,1991.
    [226]王克胜,韩一凡,佟永昌,等.杨树无性系生长和材性的遗传变异及多性状选择.见张守攻主编.中国青年绿色论坛.北京:中国林业出版社,1995.50-53.
    [227]任建中,王宗汉.综合评分法选育杨树纸浆材优良无性系探讨[J].东北林业大学学报,1996,24(4):69-73.
    [228]任建中等.杨树纸浆材优良无性系选择方法的研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2010,32(2):133-140.
    [229]季孔庶,毛桃,康建诚,等.马尾松材性遗传改良研究进展[J].林业科技开发,2011,25(5):1-6.
    [230] Robinson J F. Van Buijitenen J P.Correlation of seed weight and nurserybed traits with5-,10-,and15-year volumes in a loblolly Pine Progeny test.Forest Seience,1979,25(4):591~596.
    [231] Zobel B,Talbert J.Applied Forest Tree Improvement.John Wiley&Sons,Inc.1984.
    [232] Zobel,B.J.and Van Buijtenen.. Wood variation-its cause and control,1989.
    [233]马常耕,周天相,徐金良.杉木无性系生长的遗传控制和早期选择初探[J].林业科学,2000,36(1)62-69.
    [234] Zobel B J,Van Buijtenen J P.Wood variation:its causes and control.Springer-Verlag,Berlin,1989,393pp.
    [235]秦国峰,周志春,李光荣,等.马尾松造纸材的变异、遗传和选择育种策略[J].林业科学研究,1995,8(5):506~513.
    [236]周志春,金国庆,周世水.马尾松自由授粉家系生长和材质的遗传分析及联合选择[J].林业科学研究,1994,7(3):323~328.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700