基于吸收能力的中国铝业改进式创新研究
|
摘要
技术创新正在成为企业参与竞争并在竞争中获得优势方面发挥显著贡献的因素。由于行业特性的不同,在不同的行业之间,技术创新的模式呈现出不同的特征和路径。其中,在冶金、采矿、机械等具有某些共性特征的行业中,基于我国资源和技术基础的特性,“引进—吸收—创新”模式成为我国制造业技术创新的常见模式。以我国铝业氧化铝生产工艺的持续创新历程来看,基于吸收能力的改进式创新,是技术引进和自主创新相结合的重要方式,是在合理处置自主创新与技术引进的关系后,我们所提出的一个更为合适我国国情的创新样式。本研究试图通过把握技术引进和自主创新的界限和特性,以及企业技术创新行为与过程的特点及其管理缺失的问题,构建一个基于吸收能力的我国铝业企业技术创新治理框架,并通过实证来分析解释和说明我们看到的铝业企业技术创新的成功实例,以便为我国“引进—吸收—改进”式的技术创新问题提供指导,为企业引进技术和实现技术的超越领先提供启发性建议。
论文回顾了吸收能力研究的理论基础,对吸收能力的分析模式、测量指标进行了介绍;归纳了典型的创新类型以及技术创新的行为与过程;对吸收能力在技术创新中的地位、吸收能力对企业创新绩效的预测作用以及吸收能力与技术创新的实证研究进行了归纳。
对Cohen&Levinthal及Zahra & George的吸收能力理论观点进行了对比和整合,并提出了一个四维度的吸收能力分析框架,构建了以吸收能力为核心,包含权威执行力,组织间合作以及制度保障等关键影响因素的改进式创新分析模式,对各因素之间的关系提出了假设。
用实证研究和案例研究相结合的研究方法。对相关铝行业企业的访谈设计调查问卷,经问卷测试、发放问卷、收集数据,对相关变量进行度量和分析。在内容上将从研究样本及指标选择、变量及其指标选择、信度、效度分析及统计分析方法及程序等方面对实证研究方法进行阐述。
对相关数据和变量的信度和效度进行分析,对概念模型进行了多元线性回归分析,并采用结构方程模型的方法,确认了权威执行力、组织间合作、制度保障对吸收能力的影响及其之间的相互作用。
对中国铝业公司河南分公司技术创新实例的简介和分析,进一步说明本文研究的实践性和实用性。
研究结果显示,基于吸收能力的改进式创新是适合我国铝行业实情的技术创新模式。权威执行力、组织间合作、制度保障作为影响我国铝行业企业技术创新实情的要素,相互作用进而影响企业技术吸收能力的高低,决定了技术引进和自主创新的绩效。
Technologic innovation(TI) is becoming an important factor that contributes the chances to participate and obtain advantages in competition to enterprises.Between the different industrys,the characteristic of them is different.So TI's model obtains the different path and symbol.Particularly,among certain industry owned common properity, e.g.metallurgy industry,mine exploration industry and mechanics industry,based on the ordinary properity of our country's material resource and technology basement, "Input-Absorption-Innovation" is the usual model of the manufacture industry'TI. Review the experiment of the oxygen-alumnium manufacture procedure on our country'aluminium industry,the improved innovation based on absorptive capacity(AC) is the significant way that refers both technology input and indepent innovation.This improved innovation based on absorptive capacity(AC) disposes properly the relationship between technology input and indepent innovation,and is applicable for the reality of our country' industry.First of all,our study clarity the characteristic and properity of technology input and indepent innovation,the behavior and prcess of TI and the absent of TI management.And then we propose a government framework of enterprise technology innovation based on absorptive capacity.Finally,we analyst, intercept and instruct the success of our state-own enterprise'TI sample.From this study,we hope to instruct our state-own enterprise how to solve the problem embedded in the model of "Input-Absorption-Innovation" and enlight the way that our state-own enterprise exceed the advanced foreign competitor.
The paper reviews the basic theory of AC and introduces the analysis model and measure indicator.On the other hand,this part summarizes the typical innovation style,the behavior and process of TI.The theorical summary also includes the position of AC in the TI'process,the forecast—AC on the performance of TI and the empirical study between AC and TI performance.
Compares and integrates the concept of AC origined from cohen & Levinthal and Zahra & George.This part propose the five-demension analyst framework and the improved innovation model that includes a conception core—AC and certain significant factors--the authority execution,co-operation between organization and regulation of institution.Finally,this part come out to several hypothesises on those facters above.
Adopt the empirical study and sample analyst.The main tools are the questionnaire and the interview.We obtain the information from the analysis of the questionnaire feedback.According with the data origined from the questionnaire,we measure and analyst the referred variable.The routine of the empirical study includes the selection of the sample and the referred indicator,the selection of the variable and the referred indicator,the analyst of the data's validity & reliability and the method of statistics.
Based on the outcome of the data and variable's validity & reliability.The main method includes the multi-agent linear statistical regression analyst and structural equition modeling(SEM).From our analyst,we confirm that the authority execution, co-operation between organization and regulation of institution affect mainly the level of AC.At the same time,they affect each other.
Introduces and analysts the sample of the Henan Branch of China GreatWall Aluminium Corp..Foremore,this part illustrate that our study is practice.Chapter summarize our whole study and forecast the future study on the referred domain.
Our study result shows that the improved innovation based on AC is uniformed with our state-owned manufacture industry'TI.The authority execution,co-operation between organization and regulation of institution are the important factors which affect TI.The reciprocal effection among three factors above adopts deeply the level of AC.So they decide the TI performance.
论文回顾了吸收能力研究的理论基础,对吸收能力的分析模式、测量指标进行了介绍;归纳了典型的创新类型以及技术创新的行为与过程;对吸收能力在技术创新中的地位、吸收能力对企业创新绩效的预测作用以及吸收能力与技术创新的实证研究进行了归纳。
对Cohen&Levinthal及Zahra & George的吸收能力理论观点进行了对比和整合,并提出了一个四维度的吸收能力分析框架,构建了以吸收能力为核心,包含权威执行力,组织间合作以及制度保障等关键影响因素的改进式创新分析模式,对各因素之间的关系提出了假设。
用实证研究和案例研究相结合的研究方法。对相关铝行业企业的访谈设计调查问卷,经问卷测试、发放问卷、收集数据,对相关变量进行度量和分析。在内容上将从研究样本及指标选择、变量及其指标选择、信度、效度分析及统计分析方法及程序等方面对实证研究方法进行阐述。
对相关数据和变量的信度和效度进行分析,对概念模型进行了多元线性回归分析,并采用结构方程模型的方法,确认了权威执行力、组织间合作、制度保障对吸收能力的影响及其之间的相互作用。
对中国铝业公司河南分公司技术创新实例的简介和分析,进一步说明本文研究的实践性和实用性。
研究结果显示,基于吸收能力的改进式创新是适合我国铝行业实情的技术创新模式。权威执行力、组织间合作、制度保障作为影响我国铝行业企业技术创新实情的要素,相互作用进而影响企业技术吸收能力的高低,决定了技术引进和自主创新的绩效。
Technologic innovation(TI) is becoming an important factor that contributes the chances to participate and obtain advantages in competition to enterprises.Between the different industrys,the characteristic of them is different.So TI's model obtains the different path and symbol.Particularly,among certain industry owned common properity, e.g.metallurgy industry,mine exploration industry and mechanics industry,based on the ordinary properity of our country's material resource and technology basement, "Input-Absorption-Innovation" is the usual model of the manufacture industry'TI. Review the experiment of the oxygen-alumnium manufacture procedure on our country'aluminium industry,the improved innovation based on absorptive capacity(AC) is the significant way that refers both technology input and indepent innovation.This improved innovation based on absorptive capacity(AC) disposes properly the relationship between technology input and indepent innovation,and is applicable for the reality of our country' industry.First of all,our study clarity the characteristic and properity of technology input and indepent innovation,the behavior and prcess of TI and the absent of TI management.And then we propose a government framework of enterprise technology innovation based on absorptive capacity.Finally,we analyst, intercept and instruct the success of our state-own enterprise'TI sample.From this study,we hope to instruct our state-own enterprise how to solve the problem embedded in the model of "Input-Absorption-Innovation" and enlight the way that our state-own enterprise exceed the advanced foreign competitor.
The paper reviews the basic theory of AC and introduces the analysis model and measure indicator.On the other hand,this part summarizes the typical innovation style,the behavior and process of TI.The theorical summary also includes the position of AC in the TI'process,the forecast—AC on the performance of TI and the empirical study between AC and TI performance.
Compares and integrates the concept of AC origined from cohen & Levinthal and Zahra & George.This part propose the five-demension analyst framework and the improved innovation model that includes a conception core—AC and certain significant factors--the authority execution,co-operation between organization and regulation of institution.Finally,this part come out to several hypothesises on those facters above.
Adopt the empirical study and sample analyst.The main tools are the questionnaire and the interview.We obtain the information from the analysis of the questionnaire feedback.According with the data origined from the questionnaire,we measure and analyst the referred variable.The routine of the empirical study includes the selection of the sample and the referred indicator,the selection of the variable and the referred indicator,the analyst of the data's validity & reliability and the method of statistics.
Based on the outcome of the data and variable's validity & reliability.The main method includes the multi-agent linear statistical regression analyst and structural equition modeling(SEM).From our analyst,we confirm that the authority execution, co-operation between organization and regulation of institution affect mainly the level of AC.At the same time,they affect each other.
Introduces and analysts the sample of the Henan Branch of China GreatWall Aluminium Corp..Foremore,this part illustrate that our study is practice.Chapter summarize our whole study and forecast the future study on the referred domain.
Our study result shows that the improved innovation based on AC is uniformed with our state-owned manufacture industry'TI.The authority execution,co-operation between organization and regulation of institution are the important factors which affect TI.The reciprocal effection among three factors above adopts deeply the level of AC.So they decide the TI performance.
引文
[1] Amabile, T.M., Conti R. & Coon, H.L.J., et al. Assessing the work environment for Creativity [J]. Academy of Management Journal.1996, 39(5): 1154-1184
[2] Anderson, J. C. and Gerbing, D. W., Structure equation modeling in practice: A.review and recommended two step approach[J].Psychological Bulletin, 1988, 103,411-423.
[3] Andrea Fosfuri, Josep A. ,Exploring the antecedents of potential absorptive capacity and its impact on innovation performance [J].The International Journal of Management Science ,2006 :173-187
[4] Andrews,F. M. Construct validity and Error Components of Survey Measures: A structuralmodeling Approach. [J] Public Opinion Quarterly, 1984, Vol. 48,409-442.
[5] Archibugi, D. Patenting as an Indicator of Technological Innovation: A Renew [J] Science and Public Policy, 1992, Vol. 6: 357-358.
[6] Arrow, K.. The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1962,Vol, 29, No.80, 155-73
[7] Aruhdel, A.and Kabla, J. What percentageof innovations are patented?Experimental estimates in European firms[J]. Research Policy. 1998. Vol.27:127-142.
[8] Barney, J . B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage [J]. Journal of Management, 1991 , 17 (1): 99 -120.
[9] Bell M., Pavitt K.Technological Accumulation and Industrial Growth: Contrasts between Developed and Developing Countries [J].World Development. 1993. 27(9):1715-1734.
[10] Brouwer, E. and Kleinknecht, A. Innovative output and a firm's propensity to patents: An exploration of CIS micro data. [J] Research Policy. 1999. Vol.28:615-624
[11] Bosch, R.A., Balthasar, H.U., Menke, M.M. Quantifying and Forecasting Exploratory Research Success [J]. Research Management. 1999,22 (5): 14-21
[12] Bower, Gordon H. , and Ernest R. Hilgard. Theories of Learning [M].Englewood Cliffs , NJ : Prentice - Hall. 1981
[13] Bwke, W. W. Organization Change: Theory and Practice [M]. Sage Publications,Inc, 2001
[14] Cassiman B., Veugeler R. In search of complementarity in the innovation strategy: internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition[J]. Management Science 2006;52(1):68-82
[15] Cardinal, L. B. Technological innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: the use of organizational control in managing research and development [J].Organizational Science, 2001, 12: 19-36
[16] Churchill, G., A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs. [J] Journal of Marketing Research, 1979, Vol. 16(1): 64-73
[17] Coase, R. .The Nature of the Firm[J].Economica 1937(4), 386 - 405.
[18] Cockburn. I., Henderson. R. Absorptive capacity. Co-authoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery.[J] Journal of Industrial Economics,1998, Vol.46: 157-183.
[19] Cohen. W. M., & Levinthal. D, A Absorptive Capacity : A new perspective on learning and innovation [J].Administrative science Quarterly ,1990 ,(35) :128-152
[20] Cooke, P. and Clifton, N. Social Capital, and Small and Medium Enterprise Performance in the United Kingdom, Entrepreneurship in the Modern Space-economy: Evolutionary and Policy Perspectives[J].Tinbergen Institute,Keizersgracht 482, Amsterdam, 2002.
[21] Crossan, M.M., Iris Berdrow. Organizational learning and strategic renewal[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2003, 24(11):1087-1105.
[22] Crossan M.M., Lane H.W., White R.E. An organizational learning framework:from intuition to institution[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1999,24(3):522-537.
[23] Damanpour, F. Organizational innovation:a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 1991, Vol.34(2):555-590.
[24] Damanpour, F., & Gopalakrishnan, S. The dynamics of the adoption of product and process innovations in organizations[J]. Journal of Management Study,2001.38 (1): 45-65.
[25] Dess, G.& Picken, J. Changing roles: leadership in the 21 st century [J].Organizational Dynamics, 2000, 28(3): 18-34
[26] Devinney, T. M.How well do patents measure new product activity?[J].Economic Letters, 1993, 41, 447-450.
[27] M. Dodgson.Technology Collaboration in Industry: Strategy, Policy and Internationalization in Innovation [M]. Routledge, 1993
[28] Dore R.Technology in a World of National Frontiers [J]. World Development,1939, 17(1):1665-1675.
[29] Dosi, G. Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation [J] Journal of Economic Literature, 1988, Vol.26: 1120-1171.
[30] Dunn, S. C, Seaker, R. F., et al. Latent Variable in Business Logistics Research:Scale Development and Validation [J] . Journal of Business Logistics, 1994,Vol15(2): 145-172.
[31] Ettlie, T. E. & Reza, E. M. Organizational Integration and Process Innovation. [J] Academy of management Journal, 1992, Vol. 35: 795-827.
[32] Figueroa, E., Conceicao, P. Rethinking the innovation process in large organizations: a case study of 3M [J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 2000, 17: 93-109.
[33] Fiol, C. Marlene and Marjorie A. Lyles.Organizational Learning[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1985(10), Iss.4, pp.803-813.
[34] Forrest, J. E. Models of the Process of Technological Innovation Technology [J],Analysis & Strategic Management, 1991, 3(4):439-453.
[35] Fowler, F. J. Survey Research Methods [M] . Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1988.
[36] Fukuyama, F. Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity [M]. New York: Free Press, 1995, 62-81.
[37] Gadde, Lars-Erik. Activity coordination and resource combing in distribution networks-implications for relationship involvement and relationship atmosphere [J]. Journal of Marketing Management, 2004, 20: 157-184.
[38] Galy, E. The mediating role of organzational learning between absorptive capacity and performance in companies employing enterprise resource planning software [D]. Proquest information and learning company, December, 2003
[39] Gardner, W. L. & Avolio, B. J. The charismatic relationship: a dramaturgical perspective [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23(1): 32-58
[40] Garvin, David A. Building a Learning Organization [J]. Harvard Business Review, 1993 July/August, pp.78-91.
[41] Giannoccaro. I., Pontrandolfo, P. Supply chain coordination by revenue sharing contracts [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2004, 89: 131-139.
[42] Gilbert, S.M., Cvsa, V. Strategic commitment to price to stimulate downstream innovation in a supply chain [J]. Journal of European Operation Management.2003, 150:617-639.
[43] Gittell, J.H. Coordinating mechanisms in care provider groups: Relational coordination as a mediator and input uncertainty as a moderator of performance effects [J]. Management Science. Linthicum, 2002, 48(11): 1408-1437.
[44] Gittell, J.H., Weiss, L. Coordination networks within and across organizations: a multi-level framework [J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2004, 41(1):127-152.
[45] Gooley, T.B. On the front lines [J]. Logistics Management, 1997, June 1: 39-42.
[46] Granovetter, M., The strength of weak ties [J].American Journal of Sociology,1973, Vol.78: 1360-1380.
[47] Gresham, M.T. A study of Organizational Capability Management as a Mediator of Successful Innovation Implementation and Innovation Problems[D]. Doctoral Dissertation. The Ohio State University, 1999
[48] Haeckel, S. Hand R. L. Nolan .Managing by Wire[J]. Harvard Business Review,1999,Vol.71, No.S, pp.122-132.
[49] Hagedoorn, J. and Cloodt, M. Measuring Innovative Performance: Is there an Advantage in Using Multiple Indicators?[J] Research Policy, 2003, Vol. 32:1365-1379
[50] Hansen, M. T., The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits [J] Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, Vol.44: 82-111.
[51] He ZL, Wong PK. Exploration vs. exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organize Science 2004;15(4):481-94
[52] Heeley, A. Appropriating rents from external knowledge: The impact of absorptive capacity on firm sales growth and research productivity[M]. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Babson Park, MA: Babson College, 1997
[53] Helen, L.R. Does your supply chain deliver value [J]. Transportation & Distribution, 2003, 3: 41-58.
[54] Helfat CE, Raubitschek RS. Product sequencing: co-evolution of knowledge, capabilities and products[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000,21(10) : 961 -979.
[55] Henderson, R. M., Clark K. B. Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firm [J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35: 9-30.
[56] Hopkins, D. S., Bailey, E. L. New product pressure [R]. Conference Board Record, 1981, June, 16-24.
[57] Huber. O rga n iza t io n a 1 learning: The contributing processes and the literatures [J]. O rganizationScience, 1991, (2) : 88 - 115.
[58] Ibrahim, S., Fallah, M. H. Drivers of Innovation and Influence of Technological Clusters [J]. Engineering Management Journal, 2005, 17( 3): 33-42.
[59] Ikujiro Nonaka, Ryoko Toyama, Noboru Konno, SECI, Ba and Leadership:a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledbe Creation.[J] Long Range Planning, 2000,Vol. 33: 5-34
[60] Jansen. J. J. P., Bosch. F. A. J. V. D. et al. Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? [J] Forthcoming,2004.
[61] Jansen. J. J. P., Bosch. F. A. J. V. D. et al.. Managing potential and realized aborptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? forthcoming,2004.
[62] John Seely, B. The next frontier of innovation [J]. Mckinsey Quarterly, 2005, 3:82-91.
[63] Jones, O., Beckinsale, M. Analysing the innovation process: networks,micropolitics and structural change [J], Aston Business School Research Papers,1999, 7: 1-33.
[64] Kabter, R.M. When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation inorganizations [J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1998, 10: 123-167.
[65] Kabter, R.M. When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations [J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1998, 10: 123-167.
[66] Kanter, R. M. From Spare Change to Real Change [J]. Harvard Business Review,1999,77(3): 122-133.
[67] Kanter R M. When a Thousand Flowers Bloom: Structural, Collective, and Social Conditions For Innovation in Organization [J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1988,10:169-211
[68] Kassicieh, S., Walsh, S., Cummings, J., et al. Factors differentiating the commercialization of disruptive and sustaining technologies [J]. IEEE, 2002, 49(4): 375-387.
[69] Katz, R., Tushman, M.L. Communication patterns project performance, and task characteristics [J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1979, 23:139-162.
[70] Kaufmann, D. Corruption: the facts [J]. Foreign Policy, 1997, 107: 114-131.
[71] Khan, J.H., Ghani, J.A. Clusters and entrepreneurship: implications for innovation in a developing economy [J]. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 2004, 9(3): 221-238.
[72] Kim, B. Coordination an innovation in supply chain management [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2000, 123: 568-584.
[73] Kim, L. Crisis Construction and Organizational Learning: Capability Building In Catching-up at Hyundai Motor [J]. Organization Science, 1998, (9):506-521.
[74] Kishton, J. M. and Widaman, K. F., Unidimensional versus domain representative parceling of questionnaire items: An empirical example[J].Educational&Psychological Measurement. 1994. 54, 3,757-765.
[75] Knight, K. E. A descriptive model of the intra-firm innovation process [J]. The Journal of Business, 1967, 478-496.
[76] Knight, L., Harland, C. Managing supply networks: organzational roles in network management [J]. European Management Journal, 2005, 23(3): 281-292.
[77] Kusunoki, K, & Nonaka, I. Organizational capabilities in product development of Japanese firms: A conceptual framework and empirical findings[J].Organization Science, 1998, Vol.9 (6): 699-719.
[78] Kogut, B. & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology[J]. Organization Science, 3: 383-397.
[79] Kogut, B. & Zander, U. 1996. What do firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning[J]. Organization Science, 7: 502-518.
[80] Landry, R., Amara, N., et al., Does social capital determine innovation? To what extent?[J]. Technological Forecasting&Social Change, 2002, 69, 681-701.
[81] Lane, P. J., Koka, B., et al. A thematic analysis and critical assessment of absorptive capacity research [P]. Academy of Management Proceedings 2002,BPS M 1-M6.
[82] Lawrence, P. R&Lorsch J. W.Organization and Environment [M]. Boston: Harvard University Business School, Division of Research, 1967
[83] Levitt, Barbara and James G. March . Organizational Learning[J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 1998(14), 319-340.
[84] Lindsay, Peter H. , and Donald A. Norman. Human Information Processing [M].Orlando,FL : Academic Press ,1977
[85] Lofstrom, S.M. Absorptive capability in strategic alliance: Investigating the effects of individuals' social and human capital on inter-firm learning[P]. Paper presented at the Organization Science Winter Conference, keystone Co. 2000.
[86] Mariano Nieto ,From R&D management to Knowledge management :An overview of studies of innovation management ,Technological Forecasting and Social Change [J]. 2003 135-161
[87] Marsden, P. and Campbell, K. Measuring tie strength [J]. Social Forces. 1984,Vol.83: 482-501.
[88] Marsh, H. W., Confirmatory factor analysis of multitrait-multimethod data: Many problems and a few solutions[J]. Applied Psychological Measurement,1989,13,335-361.
[89] Mayer, R., Davis, J, et al, An integrative model of organizational trust[J].Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20, 709-734.
[90] McFadyen, M. A. and Cannella, J. A. A., Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminshing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships [J] .Academy of Management Journal, 2004, Vol.47 (5): 735-746.
[91] Mowery, D.C., Oxley. J.E., et al. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge and interfirm knowledge transfer [J] .Strategy Management Journal. 1996. Vol.17:77-91.
[92] Mumford, M. D., Feldman,J. M. &Hein, M.B.,et al.Tradeoffs between ideas and structure: individual versus group performance in creative problem-solving [J].Journal of Creative Behavior, 2001, 35:1-23
[93] Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage.[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1998, Vol. 23:242-266.
[94] Nelson, Richard R.. The Simple Economics of Basic Research[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1959(67):297-306.
[95] Nevis, E. C, DiBella, A. J. and Gould, J. M.Understanding Organizations as Learning Systems, Sloan Management Review [M]. Winter, pp.73-85.
[96] Nichollw-Nixon and Charlene, L., Absorptive capacity and technology sourcing: Implications for responsiveness of established firms[C]. Purdue University,1993.
[97] Nieto, M. From R&D management to knowledge management: an overview of studies of innovation management [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2003, 70: 135-161
[98] Nonaka, I. A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge-creation. [J] Organization Science, 1994, Vol.5: 14-37.
[99] Nunnally, J. C. and Bernstein, I. H., Psychometric theory[M],New York,McGraw-Hill. Inc., 1994.
[100]Papinniemi, J. Creating a model of process innovation for reengineering of business and manufacturing Int. [J]. Production Economics, 1999, Vol.60:95-101.
[101]Peter J. L., Balajikore, Seemantini Pathak. A thematic analysis and critical assessment of absorptive capacity research. Academy of Management Proceedings[J] 2002.
[102]Prescott, J. E. Environments as moderators of the relationship between strategy and performance [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1986, 29: 329-346
[103]Reddy P. New Trends in Globalization of Corporate R&D and Implications for Innovation Capability in Host Countries: a Survey from India [J]. World Development, 1996, 25 (11):1821-1837.
[104] Sanchez, C.M., & Mckinley, W. Environmental Regulatory Influence and Product Innovation: The Contingency Effects of Organizational Characteristics. [J] Journal of Engineering Technology Management, 1998, Vol.15: 257-278.
[105]Schruijer, S. G. L. & Vansina, L. S. Leadership and Organizational Change:An Introduction [J]. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology,1999,8(1): 135-138
[106]Sekaran. 企业研究方法论 [M], 北京:清华大学出版社, 2005
[107] Senge Peter M.The Leader's New work: Building Learning Organizations, Sloan Management Review [J]. fa11,1990
[108] Simon, H. A. Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning. [J] Organization Science, 1991, Vol. 2(1): 125-134.
[109] Stata, R. Organizational Learning-The Key to Management Innovation [J]. Sloan Management Review, 1989, Spring: 63-74.
[110] Stock, G. N., Greis, N. P., et al. Absorptive capacity and new product development[J] Journal of High Technology Management Research, 2001,Vol.12: 77-91
[111]Strambach, S. Change in the Innovation Process: New Knowledge Production and Competitive Cities—The Case of Stuttgart European [J]. Planning Studies,2002, 10(2): 215-231.
[112]Szulanski ,G. Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, (17) :27-43.
[113]Tsai W. . Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network positional absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance[J].Academy of Management, 2001, 44(5):996-1006
[114]Tsai, W. and Ghoshal, S., Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks[J] Academy of Management journal, 1998, Vol.41(4):464-476.
[115]Teece,D. J . , G. Pisano ,A. Shuen. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management [J]. Strategic Management Journal ,1997 , (18) :509 - 533.
[116]Tornatzky, L. G. & Klein, K. J. Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption implementation: A meta analysis of findings [J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1982, 29: 28-45
[117]Upadhyayula, R. S. and Kumar, R.. Social capital as an antecedent of absorptive capacity of firms. DRUID Summer Conference 2004 on Industrial dynamics, innovation and development[C]. Elseriver, Denmark,2004.
[118]Uzzi, B., The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations [J]. American Sociology Review, 1996, Vol.61:674-698.
[119] Van Den Bosch F.A.J., Volberda H.W., Co-evolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: organizational forms and combinative capabilities[J]. Organizational Sccience,1999(10) :551-568
[120] Van Wijk, R., Van de Bosch, F., & Volberda, H. The impact of knowledge depth and breadth of absorptive knowledge on levels of exploration and exploitation.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management [M] .Washington, DC. 2001
[121] Veugelers, R., Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing [J] Research Policy, 1997, Vol.26: 303-315.
[122] Wayne. S., Liden, R., et al., The role of upward influence tactics in human resource decisions[J]. Personnel Psychology. 1997. 50. 4. 979-1007.
[123] Williamson, O.. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism[M]. New York: Free Press. 1985
[124] Winter, S. The salisficing principle in capability learning[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21:981-996.
[125]Winter,S.Deliberate learning and the evolutionof dynamic capabilities[J].Organization Science,2002,13:339-351.
[126]Yli-Renko,H.,Autio,E.,et al.,Social capital,knowledge acquisition,and knowledge exploitation in,young technology-based firms[J]Strategy Management Journal,2001,Vol.22:587-613.
[127]Zahra & George,G.Absorptive capacity:A review,reconceptualization and extension[J].Academy of Management Review,2002,27(2):185-203
[128]Zahra,S.A.,Neubaum,D.O.,& Huse,M.Entrepreneurship in medium-size companies:Exploring the Effects of ownership and Governance system.[J]Journal of Management,2000,Vol.26(5):947-977.
[129]Zollo,M.,Winter,S.Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities[J].Organization Science,2002(13):339-351.
[130]陈劲.从技术引进到自主创新的学习模式[J].科研管理,1994(2):31-34
[131]陈劲,郑刚.企业技术创新管理:国内外研究现状与展望[J].管理学报,2004(1):119-124
[132]刀克建.烧结法氧化铝生产脱硅技术研究与应用[D].中南大学硕士论文,2005
[133]笛德等.创新管理:整合技术、市场和组织变革[M].金马工作室译.清华大学出版社,2004,45-60,101-160,315-398.
[134]付兴贺.氧化铝生产分解过程计算机控制系统的设计及开发[D].东北大学硕士论文,2006
[135]高建.中国企业技术创新分析[M].北京,清华大学出版社,1997.
[136]高展军,李垣.企业吸收能力研究阐述[J].科学管理研究2005(6):66-70
[137]何晓群,刘文卿.应用回归分析[M].北京,中国人民大学出版社,2001.
[138]侯杰泰,温忠麟.结构方程模型及其应用[M].北京,教育科学出版社,2004.
[139]候用兴,李旺兴,吕子剑.管道化溶出一水硬铝石型铝土矿的工业实践[J].轻金属,2000.10:23-26
[140]获本龙.中国长城铝业公司中洲铝厂强化烧结法新工艺产业化技术改造[D].东北大学硕士论文,2001
[141]蒋涛.六万吨拜耳法溶出车间技术改造的研究[D].东北大学硕士,2003
[142]金鳞洙.从模仿到创新-韩国技术学习的动力(中译本)[M].新华出版社,1998
[143]刘常勇,谢洪明.企业知识吸收能力的主要影响因素[J].科学学研究,200321(3):307-310
[144]鲁宾费尔德,丹.L.,平狄克罗.S.,计量经济模型与经济预测[M].北京,机械业出版社,1999年中文版.
[145]骆静,聂鸣.创新集群及其分类研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2003,3:27-30
[146]马庆国.管理统计:数据获取、统计原理、SPSS工具与应用研究,北京,科学出版社,2002.
[147]马庆国.中国管理科学研究面临的几个关键问题[J].管理世界,2002,Vol.8:105-115
[148]王重鸣.心理学研究方法[M],北京:人民教育出版社,1990
[149]吴明隆.SPSS统训应用实务.北京,科学出版社,2003.
[150]曾召海,吕子剑,路军.关于管道化溶出技术的消化与吸收.有色冶金节能2001(5):14-17
[151]张方华.知识型企业的社会资本与技术创新绩效的关系研究,浙江大学博士论文,2004
[152]周小虎.企业社会资本战略[M].北京:人民出版社,2005
[2] Anderson, J. C. and Gerbing, D. W., Structure equation modeling in practice: A.review and recommended two step approach[J].Psychological Bulletin, 1988, 103,411-423.
[3] Andrea Fosfuri, Josep A. ,Exploring the antecedents of potential absorptive capacity and its impact on innovation performance [J].The International Journal of Management Science ,2006 :173-187
[4] Andrews,F. M. Construct validity and Error Components of Survey Measures: A structuralmodeling Approach. [J] Public Opinion Quarterly, 1984, Vol. 48,409-442.
[5] Archibugi, D. Patenting as an Indicator of Technological Innovation: A Renew [J] Science and Public Policy, 1992, Vol. 6: 357-358.
[6] Arrow, K.. The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1962,Vol, 29, No.80, 155-73
[7] Aruhdel, A.and Kabla, J. What percentageof innovations are patented?Experimental estimates in European firms[J]. Research Policy. 1998. Vol.27:127-142.
[8] Barney, J . B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage [J]. Journal of Management, 1991 , 17 (1): 99 -120.
[9] Bell M., Pavitt K.Technological Accumulation and Industrial Growth: Contrasts between Developed and Developing Countries [J].World Development. 1993. 27(9):1715-1734.
[10] Brouwer, E. and Kleinknecht, A. Innovative output and a firm's propensity to patents: An exploration of CIS micro data. [J] Research Policy. 1999. Vol.28:615-624
[11] Bosch, R.A., Balthasar, H.U., Menke, M.M. Quantifying and Forecasting Exploratory Research Success [J]. Research Management. 1999,22 (5): 14-21
[12] Bower, Gordon H. , and Ernest R. Hilgard. Theories of Learning [M].Englewood Cliffs , NJ : Prentice - Hall. 1981
[13] Bwke, W. W. Organization Change: Theory and Practice [M]. Sage Publications,Inc, 2001
[14] Cassiman B., Veugeler R. In search of complementarity in the innovation strategy: internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition[J]. Management Science 2006;52(1):68-82
[15] Cardinal, L. B. Technological innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: the use of organizational control in managing research and development [J].Organizational Science, 2001, 12: 19-36
[16] Churchill, G., A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs. [J] Journal of Marketing Research, 1979, Vol. 16(1): 64-73
[17] Coase, R. .The Nature of the Firm[J].Economica 1937(4), 386 - 405.
[18] Cockburn. I., Henderson. R. Absorptive capacity. Co-authoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery.[J] Journal of Industrial Economics,1998, Vol.46: 157-183.
[19] Cohen. W. M., & Levinthal. D, A Absorptive Capacity : A new perspective on learning and innovation [J].Administrative science Quarterly ,1990 ,(35) :128-152
[20] Cooke, P. and Clifton, N. Social Capital, and Small and Medium Enterprise Performance in the United Kingdom, Entrepreneurship in the Modern Space-economy: Evolutionary and Policy Perspectives[J].Tinbergen Institute,Keizersgracht 482, Amsterdam, 2002.
[21] Crossan, M.M., Iris Berdrow. Organizational learning and strategic renewal[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2003, 24(11):1087-1105.
[22] Crossan M.M., Lane H.W., White R.E. An organizational learning framework:from intuition to institution[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1999,24(3):522-537.
[23] Damanpour, F. Organizational innovation:a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 1991, Vol.34(2):555-590.
[24] Damanpour, F., & Gopalakrishnan, S. The dynamics of the adoption of product and process innovations in organizations[J]. Journal of Management Study,2001.38 (1): 45-65.
[25] Dess, G.& Picken, J. Changing roles: leadership in the 21 st century [J].Organizational Dynamics, 2000, 28(3): 18-34
[26] Devinney, T. M.How well do patents measure new product activity?[J].Economic Letters, 1993, 41, 447-450.
[27] M. Dodgson.Technology Collaboration in Industry: Strategy, Policy and Internationalization in Innovation [M]. Routledge, 1993
[28] Dore R.Technology in a World of National Frontiers [J]. World Development,1939, 17(1):1665-1675.
[29] Dosi, G. Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation [J] Journal of Economic Literature, 1988, Vol.26: 1120-1171.
[30] Dunn, S. C, Seaker, R. F., et al. Latent Variable in Business Logistics Research:Scale Development and Validation [J] . Journal of Business Logistics, 1994,Vol15(2): 145-172.
[31] Ettlie, T. E. & Reza, E. M. Organizational Integration and Process Innovation. [J] Academy of management Journal, 1992, Vol. 35: 795-827.
[32] Figueroa, E., Conceicao, P. Rethinking the innovation process in large organizations: a case study of 3M [J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 2000, 17: 93-109.
[33] Fiol, C. Marlene and Marjorie A. Lyles.Organizational Learning[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1985(10), Iss.4, pp.803-813.
[34] Forrest, J. E. Models of the Process of Technological Innovation Technology [J],Analysis & Strategic Management, 1991, 3(4):439-453.
[35] Fowler, F. J. Survey Research Methods [M] . Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1988.
[36] Fukuyama, F. Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity [M]. New York: Free Press, 1995, 62-81.
[37] Gadde, Lars-Erik. Activity coordination and resource combing in distribution networks-implications for relationship involvement and relationship atmosphere [J]. Journal of Marketing Management, 2004, 20: 157-184.
[38] Galy, E. The mediating role of organzational learning between absorptive capacity and performance in companies employing enterprise resource planning software [D]. Proquest information and learning company, December, 2003
[39] Gardner, W. L. & Avolio, B. J. The charismatic relationship: a dramaturgical perspective [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23(1): 32-58
[40] Garvin, David A. Building a Learning Organization [J]. Harvard Business Review, 1993 July/August, pp.78-91.
[41] Giannoccaro. I., Pontrandolfo, P. Supply chain coordination by revenue sharing contracts [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2004, 89: 131-139.
[42] Gilbert, S.M., Cvsa, V. Strategic commitment to price to stimulate downstream innovation in a supply chain [J]. Journal of European Operation Management.2003, 150:617-639.
[43] Gittell, J.H. Coordinating mechanisms in care provider groups: Relational coordination as a mediator and input uncertainty as a moderator of performance effects [J]. Management Science. Linthicum, 2002, 48(11): 1408-1437.
[44] Gittell, J.H., Weiss, L. Coordination networks within and across organizations: a multi-level framework [J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2004, 41(1):127-152.
[45] Gooley, T.B. On the front lines [J]. Logistics Management, 1997, June 1: 39-42.
[46] Granovetter, M., The strength of weak ties [J].American Journal of Sociology,1973, Vol.78: 1360-1380.
[47] Gresham, M.T. A study of Organizational Capability Management as a Mediator of Successful Innovation Implementation and Innovation Problems[D]. Doctoral Dissertation. The Ohio State University, 1999
[48] Haeckel, S. Hand R. L. Nolan .Managing by Wire[J]. Harvard Business Review,1999,Vol.71, No.S, pp.122-132.
[49] Hagedoorn, J. and Cloodt, M. Measuring Innovative Performance: Is there an Advantage in Using Multiple Indicators?[J] Research Policy, 2003, Vol. 32:1365-1379
[50] Hansen, M. T., The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits [J] Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, Vol.44: 82-111.
[51] He ZL, Wong PK. Exploration vs. exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organize Science 2004;15(4):481-94
[52] Heeley, A. Appropriating rents from external knowledge: The impact of absorptive capacity on firm sales growth and research productivity[M]. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Babson Park, MA: Babson College, 1997
[53] Helen, L.R. Does your supply chain deliver value [J]. Transportation & Distribution, 2003, 3: 41-58.
[54] Helfat CE, Raubitschek RS. Product sequencing: co-evolution of knowledge, capabilities and products[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000,21(10) : 961 -979.
[55] Henderson, R. M., Clark K. B. Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firm [J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35: 9-30.
[56] Hopkins, D. S., Bailey, E. L. New product pressure [R]. Conference Board Record, 1981, June, 16-24.
[57] Huber. O rga n iza t io n a 1 learning: The contributing processes and the literatures [J]. O rganizationScience, 1991, (2) : 88 - 115.
[58] Ibrahim, S., Fallah, M. H. Drivers of Innovation and Influence of Technological Clusters [J]. Engineering Management Journal, 2005, 17( 3): 33-42.
[59] Ikujiro Nonaka, Ryoko Toyama, Noboru Konno, SECI, Ba and Leadership:a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledbe Creation.[J] Long Range Planning, 2000,Vol. 33: 5-34
[60] Jansen. J. J. P., Bosch. F. A. J. V. D. et al. Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? [J] Forthcoming,2004.
[61] Jansen. J. J. P., Bosch. F. A. J. V. D. et al.. Managing potential and realized aborptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? forthcoming,2004.
[62] John Seely, B. The next frontier of innovation [J]. Mckinsey Quarterly, 2005, 3:82-91.
[63] Jones, O., Beckinsale, M. Analysing the innovation process: networks,micropolitics and structural change [J], Aston Business School Research Papers,1999, 7: 1-33.
[64] Kabter, R.M. When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation inorganizations [J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1998, 10: 123-167.
[65] Kabter, R.M. When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations [J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1998, 10: 123-167.
[66] Kanter, R. M. From Spare Change to Real Change [J]. Harvard Business Review,1999,77(3): 122-133.
[67] Kanter R M. When a Thousand Flowers Bloom: Structural, Collective, and Social Conditions For Innovation in Organization [J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1988,10:169-211
[68] Kassicieh, S., Walsh, S., Cummings, J., et al. Factors differentiating the commercialization of disruptive and sustaining technologies [J]. IEEE, 2002, 49(4): 375-387.
[69] Katz, R., Tushman, M.L. Communication patterns project performance, and task characteristics [J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1979, 23:139-162.
[70] Kaufmann, D. Corruption: the facts [J]. Foreign Policy, 1997, 107: 114-131.
[71] Khan, J.H., Ghani, J.A. Clusters and entrepreneurship: implications for innovation in a developing economy [J]. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 2004, 9(3): 221-238.
[72] Kim, B. Coordination an innovation in supply chain management [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2000, 123: 568-584.
[73] Kim, L. Crisis Construction and Organizational Learning: Capability Building In Catching-up at Hyundai Motor [J]. Organization Science, 1998, (9):506-521.
[74] Kishton, J. M. and Widaman, K. F., Unidimensional versus domain representative parceling of questionnaire items: An empirical example[J].Educational&Psychological Measurement. 1994. 54, 3,757-765.
[75] Knight, K. E. A descriptive model of the intra-firm innovation process [J]. The Journal of Business, 1967, 478-496.
[76] Knight, L., Harland, C. Managing supply networks: organzational roles in network management [J]. European Management Journal, 2005, 23(3): 281-292.
[77] Kusunoki, K, & Nonaka, I. Organizational capabilities in product development of Japanese firms: A conceptual framework and empirical findings[J].Organization Science, 1998, Vol.9 (6): 699-719.
[78] Kogut, B. & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology[J]. Organization Science, 3: 383-397.
[79] Kogut, B. & Zander, U. 1996. What do firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning[J]. Organization Science, 7: 502-518.
[80] Landry, R., Amara, N., et al., Does social capital determine innovation? To what extent?[J]. Technological Forecasting&Social Change, 2002, 69, 681-701.
[81] Lane, P. J., Koka, B., et al. A thematic analysis and critical assessment of absorptive capacity research [P]. Academy of Management Proceedings 2002,BPS M 1-M6.
[82] Lawrence, P. R&Lorsch J. W.Organization and Environment [M]. Boston: Harvard University Business School, Division of Research, 1967
[83] Levitt, Barbara and James G. March . Organizational Learning[J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 1998(14), 319-340.
[84] Lindsay, Peter H. , and Donald A. Norman. Human Information Processing [M].Orlando,FL : Academic Press ,1977
[85] Lofstrom, S.M. Absorptive capability in strategic alliance: Investigating the effects of individuals' social and human capital on inter-firm learning[P]. Paper presented at the Organization Science Winter Conference, keystone Co. 2000.
[86] Mariano Nieto ,From R&D management to Knowledge management :An overview of studies of innovation management ,Technological Forecasting and Social Change [J]. 2003 135-161
[87] Marsden, P. and Campbell, K. Measuring tie strength [J]. Social Forces. 1984,Vol.83: 482-501.
[88] Marsh, H. W., Confirmatory factor analysis of multitrait-multimethod data: Many problems and a few solutions[J]. Applied Psychological Measurement,1989,13,335-361.
[89] Mayer, R., Davis, J, et al, An integrative model of organizational trust[J].Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20, 709-734.
[90] McFadyen, M. A. and Cannella, J. A. A., Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminshing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships [J] .Academy of Management Journal, 2004, Vol.47 (5): 735-746.
[91] Mowery, D.C., Oxley. J.E., et al. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge and interfirm knowledge transfer [J] .Strategy Management Journal. 1996. Vol.17:77-91.
[92] Mumford, M. D., Feldman,J. M. &Hein, M.B.,et al.Tradeoffs between ideas and structure: individual versus group performance in creative problem-solving [J].Journal of Creative Behavior, 2001, 35:1-23
[93] Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage.[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1998, Vol. 23:242-266.
[94] Nelson, Richard R.. The Simple Economics of Basic Research[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1959(67):297-306.
[95] Nevis, E. C, DiBella, A. J. and Gould, J. M.Understanding Organizations as Learning Systems, Sloan Management Review [M]. Winter, pp.73-85.
[96] Nichollw-Nixon and Charlene, L., Absorptive capacity and technology sourcing: Implications for responsiveness of established firms[C]. Purdue University,1993.
[97] Nieto, M. From R&D management to knowledge management: an overview of studies of innovation management [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2003, 70: 135-161
[98] Nonaka, I. A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge-creation. [J] Organization Science, 1994, Vol.5: 14-37.
[99] Nunnally, J. C. and Bernstein, I. H., Psychometric theory[M],New York,McGraw-Hill. Inc., 1994.
[100]Papinniemi, J. Creating a model of process innovation for reengineering of business and manufacturing Int. [J]. Production Economics, 1999, Vol.60:95-101.
[101]Peter J. L., Balajikore, Seemantini Pathak. A thematic analysis and critical assessment of absorptive capacity research. Academy of Management Proceedings[J] 2002.
[102]Prescott, J. E. Environments as moderators of the relationship between strategy and performance [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1986, 29: 329-346
[103]Reddy P. New Trends in Globalization of Corporate R&D and Implications for Innovation Capability in Host Countries: a Survey from India [J]. World Development, 1996, 25 (11):1821-1837.
[104] Sanchez, C.M., & Mckinley, W. Environmental Regulatory Influence and Product Innovation: The Contingency Effects of Organizational Characteristics. [J] Journal of Engineering Technology Management, 1998, Vol.15: 257-278.
[105]Schruijer, S. G. L. & Vansina, L. S. Leadership and Organizational Change:An Introduction [J]. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology,1999,8(1): 135-138
[106]Sekaran. 企业研究方法论 [M], 北京:清华大学出版社, 2005
[107] Senge Peter M.The Leader's New work: Building Learning Organizations, Sloan Management Review [J]. fa11,1990
[108] Simon, H. A. Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning. [J] Organization Science, 1991, Vol. 2(1): 125-134.
[109] Stata, R. Organizational Learning-The Key to Management Innovation [J]. Sloan Management Review, 1989, Spring: 63-74.
[110] Stock, G. N., Greis, N. P., et al. Absorptive capacity and new product development[J] Journal of High Technology Management Research, 2001,Vol.12: 77-91
[111]Strambach, S. Change in the Innovation Process: New Knowledge Production and Competitive Cities—The Case of Stuttgart European [J]. Planning Studies,2002, 10(2): 215-231.
[112]Szulanski ,G. Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, (17) :27-43.
[113]Tsai W. . Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network positional absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance[J].Academy of Management, 2001, 44(5):996-1006
[114]Tsai, W. and Ghoshal, S., Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks[J] Academy of Management journal, 1998, Vol.41(4):464-476.
[115]Teece,D. J . , G. Pisano ,A. Shuen. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management [J]. Strategic Management Journal ,1997 , (18) :509 - 533.
[116]Tornatzky, L. G. & Klein, K. J. Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption implementation: A meta analysis of findings [J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1982, 29: 28-45
[117]Upadhyayula, R. S. and Kumar, R.. Social capital as an antecedent of absorptive capacity of firms. DRUID Summer Conference 2004 on Industrial dynamics, innovation and development[C]. Elseriver, Denmark,2004.
[118]Uzzi, B., The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations [J]. American Sociology Review, 1996, Vol.61:674-698.
[119] Van Den Bosch F.A.J., Volberda H.W., Co-evolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: organizational forms and combinative capabilities[J]. Organizational Sccience,1999(10) :551-568
[120] Van Wijk, R., Van de Bosch, F., & Volberda, H. The impact of knowledge depth and breadth of absorptive knowledge on levels of exploration and exploitation.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management [M] .Washington, DC. 2001
[121] Veugelers, R., Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing [J] Research Policy, 1997, Vol.26: 303-315.
[122] Wayne. S., Liden, R., et al., The role of upward influence tactics in human resource decisions[J]. Personnel Psychology. 1997. 50. 4. 979-1007.
[123] Williamson, O.. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism[M]. New York: Free Press. 1985
[124] Winter, S. The salisficing principle in capability learning[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21:981-996.
[125]Winter,S.Deliberate learning and the evolutionof dynamic capabilities[J].Organization Science,2002,13:339-351.
[126]Yli-Renko,H.,Autio,E.,et al.,Social capital,knowledge acquisition,and knowledge exploitation in,young technology-based firms[J]Strategy Management Journal,2001,Vol.22:587-613.
[127]Zahra & George,G.Absorptive capacity:A review,reconceptualization and extension[J].Academy of Management Review,2002,27(2):185-203
[128]Zahra,S.A.,Neubaum,D.O.,& Huse,M.Entrepreneurship in medium-size companies:Exploring the Effects of ownership and Governance system.[J]Journal of Management,2000,Vol.26(5):947-977.
[129]Zollo,M.,Winter,S.Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities[J].Organization Science,2002(13):339-351.
[130]陈劲.从技术引进到自主创新的学习模式[J].科研管理,1994(2):31-34
[131]陈劲,郑刚.企业技术创新管理:国内外研究现状与展望[J].管理学报,2004(1):119-124
[132]刀克建.烧结法氧化铝生产脱硅技术研究与应用[D].中南大学硕士论文,2005
[133]笛德等.创新管理:整合技术、市场和组织变革[M].金马工作室译.清华大学出版社,2004,45-60,101-160,315-398.
[134]付兴贺.氧化铝生产分解过程计算机控制系统的设计及开发[D].东北大学硕士论文,2006
[135]高建.中国企业技术创新分析[M].北京,清华大学出版社,1997.
[136]高展军,李垣.企业吸收能力研究阐述[J].科学管理研究2005(6):66-70
[137]何晓群,刘文卿.应用回归分析[M].北京,中国人民大学出版社,2001.
[138]侯杰泰,温忠麟.结构方程模型及其应用[M].北京,教育科学出版社,2004.
[139]候用兴,李旺兴,吕子剑.管道化溶出一水硬铝石型铝土矿的工业实践[J].轻金属,2000.10:23-26
[140]获本龙.中国长城铝业公司中洲铝厂强化烧结法新工艺产业化技术改造[D].东北大学硕士论文,2001
[141]蒋涛.六万吨拜耳法溶出车间技术改造的研究[D].东北大学硕士,2003
[142]金鳞洙.从模仿到创新-韩国技术学习的动力(中译本)[M].新华出版社,1998
[143]刘常勇,谢洪明.企业知识吸收能力的主要影响因素[J].科学学研究,200321(3):307-310
[144]鲁宾费尔德,丹.L.,平狄克罗.S.,计量经济模型与经济预测[M].北京,机械业出版社,1999年中文版.
[145]骆静,聂鸣.创新集群及其分类研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2003,3:27-30
[146]马庆国.管理统计:数据获取、统计原理、SPSS工具与应用研究,北京,科学出版社,2002.
[147]马庆国.中国管理科学研究面临的几个关键问题[J].管理世界,2002,Vol.8:105-115
[148]王重鸣.心理学研究方法[M],北京:人民教育出版社,1990
[149]吴明隆.SPSS统训应用实务.北京,科学出版社,2003.
[150]曾召海,吕子剑,路军.关于管道化溶出技术的消化与吸收.有色冶金节能2001(5):14-17
[151]张方华.知识型企业的社会资本与技术创新绩效的关系研究,浙江大学博士论文,2004
[152]周小虎.企业社会资本战略[M].北京:人民出版社,2005