基于生心理因素的沥青路面性能关键参数研究
|
摘要
驾驶安全性与乘坐舒适性是路表服务质量的主要体现。路面抗滑性能与路面平整度是影响驾驶安全和乘坐舒适性的最主要的路面参数。世界各国为了控制道路路面的服务质量,分别对两个参数建立了相应的评定验收标准。
通过对沥青路面平整度评定验收标准制定之初及后续修订及使用过程中的文献资料进行分析研究,发现沥青路面平整度评价标准均基于专家打分法制定。专家打分法来源于测试人员的主观打分,分值受打分人员性别、年龄、身体状况、情绪状态等诸多因素影响,结果差异较大,难以客观定量地界定沥青路面的服务质量。乘坐舒适性的本质是乘员对路面不平度引起的乘坐振动的生心理反应,本文在人文理念全球化普遍提高的大前提下,在对大量相关领域研究成果分析梳理的基础上,对乘员的生心理指标与沥青路面平整度间的关系展开了大量试验研究。
沥青路面抗滑标准制定之初和后续修订均直接或间接来源于雨天交通事故与路面抗滑摩擦力之间的统计分析。不可否认,雨天交通事故与路面抗滑力间存在密切联系,但是雨天交通事故数据采集困难且数据分析更加困难,很难界定事故的诱因是否因路面抗滑力不足所致。驾驶员作为人——车——路系统中的主观能动因素,对交通事故的产生负有较大责任。路面抗滑力不足将导致驾驶员紧张感增加,影响驾驶员的判断和操纵能力,从而产生交通事故。为了从驾驶员的感知角度定量描述路面的抗滑性能,本文对驾驶员的生心理指标与路面抗滑指标间的关系展开了大量研究。
论文研究依托2006年国家自然科学基项目(GM: 50522201)“道路路面性能与交通安全的互动关系研究”。研究工作以大量的室内模拟试验和现场试验为基础,以采集到的高速公路沥青路面平整度数据相辅助,运用符合道路、生心理信号及振动信号等物理量特点与规律的统计分析关键技术展开。
研究得出的主要结论有:1)提出了基于IRI(International Roughness Index)平均值、偏度值和峰度值三个指标的RQI(Riding Quality Index)评价体系,即当路面平整度的3个指标同时位于同一个RQI等级时,才能判定RQI为该质量等级的服务水平。当3个指标处于不同RQI等级时,按最不利情况进行评定。2)在对气候、结构构造、材料及施工工艺等影响因素进行专业分析的基础上,提出了单一因素的区域性沥青路面抗滑性能的衰变趋势模型。3)提出了人体心电是可以用来定量评价沥青路面平整度对乘员乘坐舒适性的影响的指标,在此基础上提出了基于心电指标的沥青路面平整度舒适性阈值。4)提出了人体皮电是可以用来定量评价沥青路面抗滑性能对驾驶员紧张情绪的影响的指标,在此基础上提出了基于皮电指标的沥青路面抗滑性能安全性阈值。5)提出了以时间序列和傅利叶转换理论为基础的人体生心理数据的处理方法。
目前国内外还没有建立在驾乘人员生心理因素上的沥青路面性能评价与养护标准,以人因作为路面性能评定养护阈值的决定因素,不仅开创了路面性能研究的新领域,而且体现了道路路面性能评价中的人文理念,为保障并促进路面建设的持续协调发展提供了有利的技术支持和理论依据。
Traffic safety and driving comfort are the key performances to reflect pavements service quality, and they are respectively determined by skid-resistance performance and roughness of asphalt pavements. In the world, in order to control road service quality, standards for acceptance and evaluation of the two parameters are accordingly established.
Through analyzing literature associated with evaluation standards of asphalt pavement roughness from the original to the present revision as well as the utilize process of standards, it is found that asphalt pavement roughness evaluation criteria are developed based on expert scoring. Although expert scoring originates from testers' subject feelings, the scoring is strongly affected by personal factors, such as sex, age, physical condition, emotional state and many other factors, and then the findings are quite different between different testers. So it is difficult to describe asphalt pavements' service quality objectively and quantitatively. In fact, the essence of riding comfort is the crew's physiological and psychological reactions to the riding vibration caused by road surface roughness. With the globalization increase of the humanities philosophy and the acquired research results and findings at related areas, an experimental study on the relationship between physiological and psychological indicators of the crew and asphalt pavement roughness is intensively carried on in this dissertation.
Anti-sliding standards of asphalt pavement from the beginning to the follow-up amendments are all directly or indirectly derived from the statistical analysis results between rainy traffic accidents' number and skid-resistance friction capacity. It is undeniable that rainy road traffic accidents are close related with skid-resistance capacity, but the rainy traffic accidents data is difficult to be collected and it is more difficult to define whether the incentive for the accident is due to insufficient pavement skid-resistance capacity. As the subjective factors, drivers have greater responsibilities in traffic accidents in the man-vehicle-road system, and driver's perceptions to pavement anti-slide performance affect driver's judgments and manipulation capabilities. In order to quantitatively describe pavement anti-slide performance by driver's perception, it is necessary to study the relationship between driver's physiological and psychological indicators and pavement skid-resistance capacity.
This dissertation is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China project (GM: 50522201):“Research on interaction between road surface performance and traffic safety”. Based on a large number of indoor simulation experiments and field trials and with the assistance of the collected expressway asphalt pavements roughness data, research work has been carried on by the aid of the statistical analysis methods which are fit in the characteristics and rules of road data, physiological and psychological signal and vibration signal.
The main conclusions are: 1) A new RQI (Riding quality index) evaluation system comprised of three indicators, such as IRImean(Mean of International Roughness Index), skewness value and kurtosis value, is put forward, that is, when the three indicators of road surface roughness lie in the same RQI rating range, the RQI score of the road can be determined by this rating level. When the three indicators lie at various RQI rating ranges, the RQI score is determined according to the most adverse condition. 2) An univariate anti-sliding performance decay trend curve of asphalt pavement is acquired based on such similar factors as climate, construction, materials and construction technique etc. 3) It is proposed that asphalt pavement roughness has an effect on human ECG(Electrocardiogram), and then a comfort threshold of asphalt pavement roughness is acquired based on human ECG indicators. 4) It is proposed that asphalt pavement anti-slide performance has an effect on human transcutaneous electricity, and then a driving safety threshold of asphalt pavement skid-resistance performance is acquired based on human EDA(Electrodermal Activity)indicators. 5) An analysis method of human physiology and psychology data is put forward based on the theory of time-series and Fourier transform.
At present, no evaluation and maintenance standards of asphalt pavement performance have been built based on occupants' physiological and psychological indicators. In the process of establishing pavement evaluation and maintenance threshold, taking human factor as a determinant factor not only opens up a new research area of pavement performance, but also reflects human philosophy hid in pavement performance evaluation. So this research will promote sustainable development of road-building and provide it a favorable technical support and a theoretical basis.
通过对沥青路面平整度评定验收标准制定之初及后续修订及使用过程中的文献资料进行分析研究,发现沥青路面平整度评价标准均基于专家打分法制定。专家打分法来源于测试人员的主观打分,分值受打分人员性别、年龄、身体状况、情绪状态等诸多因素影响,结果差异较大,难以客观定量地界定沥青路面的服务质量。乘坐舒适性的本质是乘员对路面不平度引起的乘坐振动的生心理反应,本文在人文理念全球化普遍提高的大前提下,在对大量相关领域研究成果分析梳理的基础上,对乘员的生心理指标与沥青路面平整度间的关系展开了大量试验研究。
沥青路面抗滑标准制定之初和后续修订均直接或间接来源于雨天交通事故与路面抗滑摩擦力之间的统计分析。不可否认,雨天交通事故与路面抗滑力间存在密切联系,但是雨天交通事故数据采集困难且数据分析更加困难,很难界定事故的诱因是否因路面抗滑力不足所致。驾驶员作为人——车——路系统中的主观能动因素,对交通事故的产生负有较大责任。路面抗滑力不足将导致驾驶员紧张感增加,影响驾驶员的判断和操纵能力,从而产生交通事故。为了从驾驶员的感知角度定量描述路面的抗滑性能,本文对驾驶员的生心理指标与路面抗滑指标间的关系展开了大量研究。
论文研究依托2006年国家自然科学基项目(GM: 50522201)“道路路面性能与交通安全的互动关系研究”。研究工作以大量的室内模拟试验和现场试验为基础,以采集到的高速公路沥青路面平整度数据相辅助,运用符合道路、生心理信号及振动信号等物理量特点与规律的统计分析关键技术展开。
研究得出的主要结论有:1)提出了基于IRI(International Roughness Index)平均值、偏度值和峰度值三个指标的RQI(Riding Quality Index)评价体系,即当路面平整度的3个指标同时位于同一个RQI等级时,才能判定RQI为该质量等级的服务水平。当3个指标处于不同RQI等级时,按最不利情况进行评定。2)在对气候、结构构造、材料及施工工艺等影响因素进行专业分析的基础上,提出了单一因素的区域性沥青路面抗滑性能的衰变趋势模型。3)提出了人体心电是可以用来定量评价沥青路面平整度对乘员乘坐舒适性的影响的指标,在此基础上提出了基于心电指标的沥青路面平整度舒适性阈值。4)提出了人体皮电是可以用来定量评价沥青路面抗滑性能对驾驶员紧张情绪的影响的指标,在此基础上提出了基于皮电指标的沥青路面抗滑性能安全性阈值。5)提出了以时间序列和傅利叶转换理论为基础的人体生心理数据的处理方法。
目前国内外还没有建立在驾乘人员生心理因素上的沥青路面性能评价与养护标准,以人因作为路面性能评定养护阈值的决定因素,不仅开创了路面性能研究的新领域,而且体现了道路路面性能评价中的人文理念,为保障并促进路面建设的持续协调发展提供了有利的技术支持和理论依据。
Traffic safety and driving comfort are the key performances to reflect pavements service quality, and they are respectively determined by skid-resistance performance and roughness of asphalt pavements. In the world, in order to control road service quality, standards for acceptance and evaluation of the two parameters are accordingly established.
Through analyzing literature associated with evaluation standards of asphalt pavement roughness from the original to the present revision as well as the utilize process of standards, it is found that asphalt pavement roughness evaluation criteria are developed based on expert scoring. Although expert scoring originates from testers' subject feelings, the scoring is strongly affected by personal factors, such as sex, age, physical condition, emotional state and many other factors, and then the findings are quite different between different testers. So it is difficult to describe asphalt pavements' service quality objectively and quantitatively. In fact, the essence of riding comfort is the crew's physiological and psychological reactions to the riding vibration caused by road surface roughness. With the globalization increase of the humanities philosophy and the acquired research results and findings at related areas, an experimental study on the relationship between physiological and psychological indicators of the crew and asphalt pavement roughness is intensively carried on in this dissertation.
Anti-sliding standards of asphalt pavement from the beginning to the follow-up amendments are all directly or indirectly derived from the statistical analysis results between rainy traffic accidents' number and skid-resistance friction capacity. It is undeniable that rainy road traffic accidents are close related with skid-resistance capacity, but the rainy traffic accidents data is difficult to be collected and it is more difficult to define whether the incentive for the accident is due to insufficient pavement skid-resistance capacity. As the subjective factors, drivers have greater responsibilities in traffic accidents in the man-vehicle-road system, and driver's perceptions to pavement anti-slide performance affect driver's judgments and manipulation capabilities. In order to quantitatively describe pavement anti-slide performance by driver's perception, it is necessary to study the relationship between driver's physiological and psychological indicators and pavement skid-resistance capacity.
This dissertation is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China project (GM: 50522201):“Research on interaction between road surface performance and traffic safety”. Based on a large number of indoor simulation experiments and field trials and with the assistance of the collected expressway asphalt pavements roughness data, research work has been carried on by the aid of the statistical analysis methods which are fit in the characteristics and rules of road data, physiological and psychological signal and vibration signal.
The main conclusions are: 1) A new RQI (Riding quality index) evaluation system comprised of three indicators, such as IRImean(Mean of International Roughness Index), skewness value and kurtosis value, is put forward, that is, when the three indicators of road surface roughness lie in the same RQI rating range, the RQI score of the road can be determined by this rating level. When the three indicators lie at various RQI rating ranges, the RQI score is determined according to the most adverse condition. 2) An univariate anti-sliding performance decay trend curve of asphalt pavement is acquired based on such similar factors as climate, construction, materials and construction technique etc. 3) It is proposed that asphalt pavement roughness has an effect on human ECG(Electrocardiogram), and then a comfort threshold of asphalt pavement roughness is acquired based on human ECG indicators. 4) It is proposed that asphalt pavement anti-slide performance has an effect on human transcutaneous electricity, and then a driving safety threshold of asphalt pavement skid-resistance performance is acquired based on human EDA(Electrodermal Activity)indicators. 5) An analysis method of human physiology and psychology data is put forward based on the theory of time-series and Fourier transform.
At present, no evaluation and maintenance standards of asphalt pavement performance have been built based on occupants' physiological and psychological indicators. In the process of establishing pavement evaluation and maintenance threshold, taking human factor as a determinant factor not only opens up a new research area of pavement performance, but also reflects human philosophy hid in pavement performance evaluation. So this research will promote sustainable development of road-building and provide it a favorable technical support and a theoretical basis.
引文
1. Deming, W.E. Out of crisis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts,1986
2. Juran, J.M. Juran on leadership for quality. The Free Press, Maxwell Macmillan Canada, Toronto, Ontario, 1998
3. 1999 Status of the Nation's Highways, Bridges, and Transit: Conditions and Performance. Report to Congress. Federal Highway Administration. Report : FHWA/PL-08/017. Washington D.C., 2001. Available at:http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/1999cpr/index. htm
4.裴玉龙.道路交通安全.人民交通出版社.北京,2004
5.李江等.交通工程学.人民交通出版社.北京,2002
6.任福田,刘小明,荣建.交通工程学.人民交通出版社,北京,2003
7.马璐.道路因素对道路交通安全的影响分析.长安大学硕士学位论文.2005(7):1~8
8.基于交通安全的道路线形分析.http://www.lqgcs.com/jishu/qita/200905/301137_3.html
9.路面与行车安全. Available online at: http://course.cug.edu.cn/21cn/%E4%BA%A4%E9%80%9A%E5%AE%89%E5%85%A8%E
5%B7%A5%E7%A8%8B/classroom/6defence-policy/3daolu/19lumian.htm
10.公安部交通管理局.中华人民共和国道路交通事故统计年报(2006年度).公安部交通管理科学研究所出版,2007,(5):44
11. Executive Summary Conditions and Performance Report : Safety. Available online at:http://www.fhwa.dot.gov///////policy/1999cpr/es/cpes_09.htm
12.杜连柱,王斌.向交通事故无死亡目标迈进一一瑞典开展智能速度适性实验.道路交通与安全,2000(1): 45
13.矫成武.公路交通安全系统性分析与评价方法及改善策略研究.吉林大学博士学位论文.2004
14.国家高速公路网规划.交通部规划研究院, 2004(9):48. Available online at:http://www.chinahighway.com/fujian/guojiagasu.pdf
15. Kevan S., Fred M., Linda P. A statistical analysis of factors associated with driver-perceived road roughness on urban highways. Research Report: Highway Roughness, Research Project T1803, Task 28, 2002.
16.孙立军.沥青路面结构行为理论.人民交通出版社,北京,2005
17. Carey, W. N. and Irick, P. E. The pavement serviceability performance concept. Highway Research Board Bulletin 250, 1960.
18. AASHO Road Test. Available online at: http://training.ce.washington.edu/wsdot/Modules/06_structural_design/aasho_road_test.htm
19. Coopers and Lybrand L.L.P. National Highway User survey. National Quality Initiative, Federal Highway Administration,www.nqi.org,1996
20. Hiersche, E.-U. Optimization of road-surface characteristics: A concept for a research program in the Federal Republic of Germany——Surface characteristics of roadways. International Research and Technologies, ASTM STP 1031, Philadelphia, 1990, pp: 505~511.
21. Decima research incorporated, market research report-1999 CPCA Awareness Study, Cement Association of Canada,Ottawa,Ontario,1999
22. Liljedahl, J.B., Carleton, W.M., Turnquist, P.K. and Smith, D.W. Tractors and their power units. 3rd edition. New york,USA: John Wiley &Sons Inc., 1979
23. Haas, R., Hudson, W. R., Zaniewski, J. Modern pavement management. Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, Florida, 1994.
24. Sayers, M., and S.M.Karamihas. The little book of profiling: Basic information about measuring and interpreting road profiles. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, :http:// www.umtri.umich.edu/roughness/lit_book.PDF,1997
25. Terminology relating to vehicle-pavement systems. American Society of Testing and Materials(ASTM) Standard E867-06
26. Hudson, W.R. Generalized Roughness Index. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.,1978
27. Pavement design and management guide. Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, Canada, 1997
28. Sayers, M.W., Gillespie, T.D., and W.D.O. Paterson. Guidelines for conducting and calibrating road roughness measurements .World Bank Technical Paper Number 46, 1986.
29. Janoff, M.S. Pavement roughness and rideability: A state-of-the-art review. Transportation Engineering Journal, 1982,108 (6): 662~675
30. Sayers M. W., Gillespie T. D., Queiroz C. A. V. The international road roughness experiment: Establishing correlation and calibration standard for measurements. World Bank Technical Paper, Washington D.C., 1986
31. Gillespie, T.D. Everything you always wanted to know about IRI, but were afraid to ask!”Presented at the road profile users group meeting, Limcoln, Nebraska, 1992
32. Wei Hong. Development of profiler rideability specification for flexible pavement, Ph.D., University of South Carolina. 2005
33. Christopher Martin Raymond. An investigation of roughness trends in asphalt pavement overlays, Ph.D., University of Waterloo, Canada.2001
34. Papagiannakis,A.T., Raveendran,B. International standards organization-compatible index for pavement roughness.Transportation Research Record 1643:110~115
35.彭旭东,谢友柏,郭孔辉.轮胎摩擦学的研究与发展.中国机械工程,1999,10(2):215~219
36.王野平.论轮胎与路面间的摩擦.汽车技术.1999(2):10~14
37.余鑫毅.路面滑溜研究综述及PSFCT-1型路面横向摩擦系数测量装置简介.中南公路工程,1987(2):6~18
38.曾凡奇,王复明,王晓冉等.公路工程现场测试新技术.人民交通出版社,北京,2006: 139~142
39. Standard Test Method for Measuring Surface Frictional Properties Using the British Pendulum Tester. ASTM E303-93(2008)
40. Standard Test Methods for Evaluating Wet Braking Traction Performance of Passenger Car Tires on Vehicles Equipped with Anti-Lock Braking Systems. ASTM F1649-96(2003)
41.姚思国.国外路面抗滑标准(建议)综述.公路.1986(3):23~30
42.初秀民,李永,严新平等.基于微观形貌特征的沥青路面抗滑性能评价研究进展.交通与计算机.2007 (1):61~64
43.周晓青,孙立军,颜利.路面平整度评价发展及趋势.公路交通科技.2005.10
44. Lu,J.J , Zhu,C., Pernia,J. Performance evaluation of roughness measuring devices to measureride number and international roughness index [R]. Tallahassee: Florida Department of Transportation, 2003.
45.沈卫生.路面平整度指标和平整度测定[D].上海:同济大学, 1988
46. American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHO) Highway Research Board's Special Report 61A, 1961
47. Paterson, W.D. Road deterioration and maintenance effects: Models for planning and management. The highway design and maintenance series, The John Hopking University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 1987
48. Al-Omari, B., M.I.Darter. Relationships between IRI and PSR. Transportation Research Record 1435, Washington, D.C., 1994
49. Standard Guide for Conducting Subjective Pavement Ride Quality Ratings. ASTM E1927-98(2003)
50. Smith, K.L., K.D.Smith, L.D.Evans, et al. Smoothness specification for pavement.NCHRP Report Number 1-31. Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C., 1997
51. Schmitt, R.L., Russell, J.S., Hanna, A.S., et al. Summary of current quality. Transportation Research Record 1632, Washington.D.C., 1998
52. Clark, T. M., and McGhee, K. K. VDOT's IRI-Based Ride Quality Specification: From Inception to 2001——Constructing Smooth Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Pavements, ASTM STP 1433, West Conshohocken, PA, 2003
53.周晓青,孙立军,颜利.各国路面平整度验收规范.中外公路,2006,26(1):52~56
54. Zaniewski, J.P., and M.S.Mamlouk. Preventive maintenance effectiveness preventive maintenance treatments, instructor's guide. Report No.FHWA-SA-96-028, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 1996
55. Pavement research technical guidelines. Canadian Strategic Highway Research Program (C-SHRP), Transportation Association of Canada,Ottawa,Ontario,1989
56. Al-Omari, B., M.I. Darter. Effect of pavement deterioration types on IRI and rehabilitation. Transportation Research Record 1505, pp:57~65, Washington, D.C.,1995
57. Hein, D.K., M.H.Mackay. Analysis of runway roughness. Transportation Development Centre publication TP9718E, Transport Canada,Ottawa,Canada,1989
58. Paterson, W. International roughness index: relationship to other measures of roughness and riding quality. Transportation Research Record 1084, Washington, D.C.,1986
59. Hajek, J.J., T.J.Kazmierowski and G.Musgrove.“International roughness index as a measure of customer satisfaction”, Proceedings of the 1995 annual conference of the transportation association of Canada, Victoria, British Columbia,1995
60. Perera, R.W., C.Byrum, C.D.Kohn.Investigation of development of pavement roughness, Report FHWA-RD-97-147, FHWA, U.S.Department of Transportation,1997
61. Christopher, M.R. An investigation of roughness trends in asphalt pavement overlays [D] .Waterloo,Ontario,Canada,2001
62.王清池.国外路面抗滑技术的发展.中外公路,1981(1):35~39,50
63. Ktjmmer, H. W., Meyer, W. E. Measurement of Skid Resistance.ASTM STP326-EB, Philadelphia, 1962.
64. C. G. Giles, B. E. Sabey, K. H. F. Cardew. Development and Performance of the Portable Skid-Resistance Tester. ASTM STP326-EB, Philadelphia, 1962
65. Augustin, H. Skid Resistance, Road-Surface Texture. Surface Characteristics of Roadways. International Research and Technologies, ASTM STP 1031, Philadelphia, 1990, pp:5~13
66. Measurement, Construction, and Maintenance of Skid-Resistant Airport Pavement Surfaces. Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. AC No.: 150/5320-12C, pp:22
67. Kevan Shafizadeh, Fred Mannering, Linda Pierce.A statistical analysis of factors associated with driver-perceived road roughness on urban highways. Research Report: Highway Roughness, Research Project T1803, Task 28.FHWA, 2002
68. Keever, D.B., K.E. Weiss, R.C. Quarles. Moving ahead: The American public speaks on roadways and transportation in communities. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Report: FHWA-OP-01-017. Washington, D.C., 2001
69.马场功生等.路面管理系统中心生理评价指标的适应性(日文).日本土木学会第57届年会学术会议论文集,pp:103~104,2002
70.奥津大树等.关于考虑心生理评价的路面平整度评价方法的研究(日文).日本土木学会第57届年会学术会议论文集,pp:109~120,2005
71.福山贵子等.道路行车舒适性指标的测定和评价(日文).日本土木学会第56届年会学术会议论文集,pp:82~83,2001
72.王国林,魏领军,王启康等.路面平整度主观评价方法及其试验验证.中外公路.2009,29(1):40~42
73. Conditions and Performance Report:Appendix F—Federal Highway Safety Lanning and Improvement Programs. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov///////policy/1999cpr/ap_f/cpxf_1.htm
74.刘清泉,陈学文,王耀明.高速公路路面抗滑力与交通事故的模糊分析.广西交通科技,2003,28(2):1~5
75.文斌,曹东伟.高速公路路面抗滑力与交通事故的统计分析.公路交通科技.2006,23(8):72~75
76. Moore, A. B. ,Humphreys, J. B. High Speed Skid Resistance and the Effects of Surface Texture on the Accident Rate, Skid Resistance of Highway Pavements, ASTM STP 530, 1973, pp: 91~100
77. B.Φ.巴布可夫[苏],景天然译.道路条件与交通安全.同济大学出版社,上海,1990
78. G. Farah, D.J. Hewson, J. Duche?ne. Surface electromyography as a tool to assess the responses of car passengers to lateral accelerations. Part I: Extraction of relevant muscular activities from noisy recordings. Electromyography and Kinesiology, 2006 (16): 669~676. Availble on line at:www.sciencedirect.com
79. G. Farah, C. Petit-Boulanger, D.J. Hewson, J. Duche?ne. Surface ectromyography as a tool to assess the responses of car passengers to lateral accelerations. Part II: Objective comparison of vehicles. Electromyography and Kinesiology, 2006 (16): 677~684. Availble on line at:www.sciencedirect.com
80. International Organization for Standardization ISO 2631——1(1997). Mechanical vibration and shock-evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration-PartⅠ: General requirements
81. Tatsuo Shirakawa et al. Experimental Study on the Influence of Sidewalk Pavement Material on Wheelchair Use. Proceedings of 3rd China-Japan workshop on Pavement Technologies , 2005
82.郑柯.基于驾驶员心理生理反应的高速公路线性研究.北京工业大学博士学位论文,2003
83.乔建刚.基于驾驶员因素的山区双车道公路关键参数研究.北京工业大学博士学位论文,2006
84. Wambold, J. C, Henry, J. J., Hegmon, R. R. Skid Resistance of wet-weather accident sites, The Tire Pavement Interface. ASTM STP 929, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1986, pp: 47~60
85.张丽娟,刘丽敏,谢燕,虞芬,张茂先.定量体育运动后心率变异性指标的变化特征.中国临床康复. 2005, 9(8): 138~139
86.谢燕,刘丽敏,虞芬.太极拳运动中心率变异性指标的检测及意义.中国临床康.2004,8(12): 2336~2337
87.张湘兰,鲁端.心率变异性的临床应用评价.医学综述.1995, 1(5):195~197
88.章淑慧.心理生理学——意识的调节与生理活动的控制.湖南人民出版社,长沙,2006
89. Neumann, E. ,Blanton, R.The early history of electrodermal research.Psychophy,1970(6):453~458
90.阳洪.交感神经皮肤电临床研究进展.疑难病杂志. 2003,2(6): 371~373
91.傅根跃,陈吕凯,缭伟等.测谎问题中的“情绪成分”对皮肤电反应的影响.中国临床心理学杂志. 2005, 13(3):321~323
92. Maurizio, C.,Vera, F.,Magant, M.B. Repetitive picture processing: autonomic and cortical correlates. Brain Research (in press), 2006
93.李德慧,胡江碧,荣建等.驾驶行为研究模拟舱实验整体方案.交通与计算机. 2006,
24(5):9~11, 15
94.人体全身振动暴露的舒适性降低界限和评价准则(GB/T 13442—92).国家技术监督局1992-04-25批准,1992-12-01实施
95. Tateki I., Akira K., Kazuya T. Quantitative Evaluation of Ride Comfort Using a Driving Simulator. Available:TRB 2008 Annual Meeting CD-ROM
96.潘红宇.时间序列分析.对外经贸易大学出版社,北京,2006
97.王济,胡晓.MATLAB在振动信号处理中的应用.中国水利水电出版社,北京, 2005
98. MATLAB Help Document. The Mathworks.Inc.,2008
99. Jones, D.L., Parks, T.W. A resolution comparison of several time-frequency representations. IEEE Trans on signal processing, 1992,40(2):413~420
100.陈亚勇等. Matlab信号处理基础.人民邮电出版社,北京,2001
101.程佩青.数字信号处理教程(第三版).清华大学出版社,北京,2007
102.刘建华.路面抗滑性能检测与评价技术研究.郑州大学博士学位论文,2002
103.赵战利,张争奇,胡长顺.集料级配对沥青路面抗滑性能的影响.长安大学学报.2005,25(1):6~9
104. Ludema, K. C. An analysis of the literature on tire-road skid resistance. American Society for Testing and Materials Special Technical Publication 541, Philadelphia.1973
105. Heaton, B. S., Emery, J. J., and Camel, N. Prediction of Pavement Skid Resistance Performance. Australian Road Research Board Proceedings, 1978(9): 121~126
106. Emery, J. J., Lee, Camel, M. A. N. Skid Resistance Predictive Models for Asphalt Concrete Surface Courses, Pavement Surface Characteristics and Materials, ASTM STP 763. American Society for Testing and Materials, 1982, pp: 61~72
107. M.-T. Do, M. Kane, Z. Tang, F. de Larrard. Physical model for the prediction of pavement polishing. http://www.elsevier.com/locate/wear
108. Bob A., Paul P., David W., Alan Woodside. Prediction of UK surfacing skid resistance using whner schulze and PSV. http://www.saferroads.org.uk/2008papers.pdf
109. Zhang Jinxi, Cui Yaping, et al. Analysis of Present Condition of Beijing's Expressway. Sino-Netherlands seminar Proceedings. Beijing,China,2005
110. Karan,M.A., Christison, T.J., Cheetham, A., Berdahl, G. Development and implementation of Alberta's pavement information and needs system. Transportation Research Record 938, pp: 11~20, Washington, D.C., 1983.
111. Paterson, W.D.O., B.Attoh-Okine. Summary models of paved road deterioration based on HDM-Ⅲ.Transportation Research Record 1344, Washington, D.C., 1992.
112. Mrawira, D., and Wile, C.S. Load and climate factors in pavement roughness prediction model based on historical profilometric data in New Brunswick. Proceedings of the 3rd transportation specialty conference of the Canadian society for civil engineering, pp: 17~24, London, Ontario, 2000
113. GripTester与同类设备的对比. http://www.dynatestchina.com/Help/gtduibi.htm
114. Tateki I., Tatsuo S., Akira K., et al. Using the KIT Driving Simulator to Evaluate Road Surface Roughness. Available at:TRB 2007 Annual Meeting CD-ROM
115. Dong P. J., In Y. K., Sang W. N., et al. Analysis of physiological response to two virtual environments: driving and flying simulation. Cyberpsychology & Behavior.2002,5(1):11~18
116.马庆国.应用统计学:数理统计方法、数据获取与SPSS应用.科学出版社,北京,2005
117. [日]小林明主编.汽车工程手册(第一分册).汽车工程手册编译委员会译.中国标准出版社,北京,1971
118. Perera R., Kohn S. Effect of variation of simulation speed of quarter car in the IRI. TRB 83rd Annual Meeting, Washington D C, 2004.
119. Heart Rate Variability Standards of Measurement, Physiological Interpretation, and Clinical Use. Circulation. 1996, 93:1043-1065. American Heart Association: Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology the North American Society of Pacing electrophysiology. http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/93/5/1043#T5
2. Juran, J.M. Juran on leadership for quality. The Free Press, Maxwell Macmillan Canada, Toronto, Ontario, 1998
3. 1999 Status of the Nation's Highways, Bridges, and Transit: Conditions and Performance. Report to Congress. Federal Highway Administration. Report : FHWA/PL-08/017. Washington D.C., 2001. Available at:http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/1999cpr/index. htm
4.裴玉龙.道路交通安全.人民交通出版社.北京,2004
5.李江等.交通工程学.人民交通出版社.北京,2002
6.任福田,刘小明,荣建.交通工程学.人民交通出版社,北京,2003
7.马璐.道路因素对道路交通安全的影响分析.长安大学硕士学位论文.2005(7):1~8
8.基于交通安全的道路线形分析.http://www.lqgcs.com/jishu/qita/200905/301137_3.html
9.路面与行车安全. Available online at: http://course.cug.edu.cn/21cn/%E4%BA%A4%E9%80%9A%E5%AE%89%E5%85%A8%E
5%B7%A5%E7%A8%8B/classroom/6defence-policy/3daolu/19lumian.htm
10.公安部交通管理局.中华人民共和国道路交通事故统计年报(2006年度).公安部交通管理科学研究所出版,2007,(5):44
11. Executive Summary Conditions and Performance Report : Safety. Available online at:http://www.fhwa.dot.gov///////policy/1999cpr/es/cpes_09.htm
12.杜连柱,王斌.向交通事故无死亡目标迈进一一瑞典开展智能速度适性实验.道路交通与安全,2000(1): 45
13.矫成武.公路交通安全系统性分析与评价方法及改善策略研究.吉林大学博士学位论文.2004
14.国家高速公路网规划.交通部规划研究院, 2004(9):48. Available online at:http://www.chinahighway.com/fujian/guojiagasu.pdf
15. Kevan S., Fred M., Linda P. A statistical analysis of factors associated with driver-perceived road roughness on urban highways. Research Report: Highway Roughness, Research Project T1803, Task 28, 2002.
16.孙立军.沥青路面结构行为理论.人民交通出版社,北京,2005
17. Carey, W. N. and Irick, P. E. The pavement serviceability performance concept. Highway Research Board Bulletin 250, 1960.
18. AASHO Road Test. Available online at: http://training.ce.washington.edu/wsdot/Modules/06_structural_design/aasho_road_test.htm
19. Coopers and Lybrand L.L.P. National Highway User survey. National Quality Initiative, Federal Highway Administration,www.nqi.org,1996
20. Hiersche, E.-U. Optimization of road-surface characteristics: A concept for a research program in the Federal Republic of Germany——Surface characteristics of roadways. International Research and Technologies, ASTM STP 1031, Philadelphia, 1990, pp: 505~511.
21. Decima research incorporated, market research report-1999 CPCA Awareness Study, Cement Association of Canada,Ottawa,Ontario,1999
22. Liljedahl, J.B., Carleton, W.M., Turnquist, P.K. and Smith, D.W. Tractors and their power units. 3rd edition. New york,USA: John Wiley &Sons Inc., 1979
23. Haas, R., Hudson, W. R., Zaniewski, J. Modern pavement management. Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, Florida, 1994.
24. Sayers, M., and S.M.Karamihas. The little book of profiling: Basic information about measuring and interpreting road profiles. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, :http:// www.umtri.umich.edu/roughness/lit_book.PDF,1997
25. Terminology relating to vehicle-pavement systems. American Society of Testing and Materials(ASTM) Standard E867-06
26. Hudson, W.R. Generalized Roughness Index. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.,1978
27. Pavement design and management guide. Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, Canada, 1997
28. Sayers, M.W., Gillespie, T.D., and W.D.O. Paterson. Guidelines for conducting and calibrating road roughness measurements .World Bank Technical Paper Number 46, 1986.
29. Janoff, M.S. Pavement roughness and rideability: A state-of-the-art review. Transportation Engineering Journal, 1982,108 (6): 662~675
30. Sayers M. W., Gillespie T. D., Queiroz C. A. V. The international road roughness experiment: Establishing correlation and calibration standard for measurements. World Bank Technical Paper, Washington D.C., 1986
31. Gillespie, T.D. Everything you always wanted to know about IRI, but were afraid to ask!”Presented at the road profile users group meeting, Limcoln, Nebraska, 1992
32. Wei Hong. Development of profiler rideability specification for flexible pavement, Ph.D., University of South Carolina. 2005
33. Christopher Martin Raymond. An investigation of roughness trends in asphalt pavement overlays, Ph.D., University of Waterloo, Canada.2001
34. Papagiannakis,A.T., Raveendran,B. International standards organization-compatible index for pavement roughness.Transportation Research Record 1643:110~115
35.彭旭东,谢友柏,郭孔辉.轮胎摩擦学的研究与发展.中国机械工程,1999,10(2):215~219
36.王野平.论轮胎与路面间的摩擦.汽车技术.1999(2):10~14
37.余鑫毅.路面滑溜研究综述及PSFCT-1型路面横向摩擦系数测量装置简介.中南公路工程,1987(2):6~18
38.曾凡奇,王复明,王晓冉等.公路工程现场测试新技术.人民交通出版社,北京,2006: 139~142
39. Standard Test Method for Measuring Surface Frictional Properties Using the British Pendulum Tester. ASTM E303-93(2008)
40. Standard Test Methods for Evaluating Wet Braking Traction Performance of Passenger Car Tires on Vehicles Equipped with Anti-Lock Braking Systems. ASTM F1649-96(2003)
41.姚思国.国外路面抗滑标准(建议)综述.公路.1986(3):23~30
42.初秀民,李永,严新平等.基于微观形貌特征的沥青路面抗滑性能评价研究进展.交通与计算机.2007 (1):61~64
43.周晓青,孙立军,颜利.路面平整度评价发展及趋势.公路交通科技.2005.10
44. Lu,J.J , Zhu,C., Pernia,J. Performance evaluation of roughness measuring devices to measureride number and international roughness index [R]. Tallahassee: Florida Department of Transportation, 2003.
45.沈卫生.路面平整度指标和平整度测定[D].上海:同济大学, 1988
46. American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHO) Highway Research Board's Special Report 61A, 1961
47. Paterson, W.D. Road deterioration and maintenance effects: Models for planning and management. The highway design and maintenance series, The John Hopking University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 1987
48. Al-Omari, B., M.I.Darter. Relationships between IRI and PSR. Transportation Research Record 1435, Washington, D.C., 1994
49. Standard Guide for Conducting Subjective Pavement Ride Quality Ratings. ASTM E1927-98(2003)
50. Smith, K.L., K.D.Smith, L.D.Evans, et al. Smoothness specification for pavement.NCHRP Report Number 1-31. Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C., 1997
51. Schmitt, R.L., Russell, J.S., Hanna, A.S., et al. Summary of current quality. Transportation Research Record 1632, Washington.D.C., 1998
52. Clark, T. M., and McGhee, K. K. VDOT's IRI-Based Ride Quality Specification: From Inception to 2001——Constructing Smooth Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Pavements, ASTM STP 1433, West Conshohocken, PA, 2003
53.周晓青,孙立军,颜利.各国路面平整度验收规范.中外公路,2006,26(1):52~56
54. Zaniewski, J.P., and M.S.Mamlouk. Preventive maintenance effectiveness preventive maintenance treatments, instructor's guide. Report No.FHWA-SA-96-028, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 1996
55. Pavement research technical guidelines. Canadian Strategic Highway Research Program (C-SHRP), Transportation Association of Canada,Ottawa,Ontario,1989
56. Al-Omari, B., M.I. Darter. Effect of pavement deterioration types on IRI and rehabilitation. Transportation Research Record 1505, pp:57~65, Washington, D.C.,1995
57. Hein, D.K., M.H.Mackay. Analysis of runway roughness. Transportation Development Centre publication TP9718E, Transport Canada,Ottawa,Canada,1989
58. Paterson, W. International roughness index: relationship to other measures of roughness and riding quality. Transportation Research Record 1084, Washington, D.C.,1986
59. Hajek, J.J., T.J.Kazmierowski and G.Musgrove.“International roughness index as a measure of customer satisfaction”, Proceedings of the 1995 annual conference of the transportation association of Canada, Victoria, British Columbia,1995
60. Perera, R.W., C.Byrum, C.D.Kohn.Investigation of development of pavement roughness, Report FHWA-RD-97-147, FHWA, U.S.Department of Transportation,1997
61. Christopher, M.R. An investigation of roughness trends in asphalt pavement overlays [D] .Waterloo,Ontario,Canada,2001
62.王清池.国外路面抗滑技术的发展.中外公路,1981(1):35~39,50
63. Ktjmmer, H. W., Meyer, W. E. Measurement of Skid Resistance.ASTM STP326-EB, Philadelphia, 1962.
64. C. G. Giles, B. E. Sabey, K. H. F. Cardew. Development and Performance of the Portable Skid-Resistance Tester. ASTM STP326-EB, Philadelphia, 1962
65. Augustin, H. Skid Resistance, Road-Surface Texture. Surface Characteristics of Roadways. International Research and Technologies, ASTM STP 1031, Philadelphia, 1990, pp:5~13
66. Measurement, Construction, and Maintenance of Skid-Resistant Airport Pavement Surfaces. Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. AC No.: 150/5320-12C, pp:22
67. Kevan Shafizadeh, Fred Mannering, Linda Pierce.A statistical analysis of factors associated with driver-perceived road roughness on urban highways. Research Report: Highway Roughness, Research Project T1803, Task 28.FHWA, 2002
68. Keever, D.B., K.E. Weiss, R.C. Quarles. Moving ahead: The American public speaks on roadways and transportation in communities. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Report: FHWA-OP-01-017. Washington, D.C., 2001
69.马场功生等.路面管理系统中心生理评价指标的适应性(日文).日本土木学会第57届年会学术会议论文集,pp:103~104,2002
70.奥津大树等.关于考虑心生理评价的路面平整度评价方法的研究(日文).日本土木学会第57届年会学术会议论文集,pp:109~120,2005
71.福山贵子等.道路行车舒适性指标的测定和评价(日文).日本土木学会第56届年会学术会议论文集,pp:82~83,2001
72.王国林,魏领军,王启康等.路面平整度主观评价方法及其试验验证.中外公路.2009,29(1):40~42
73. Conditions and Performance Report:Appendix F—Federal Highway Safety Lanning and Improvement Programs. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov///////policy/1999cpr/ap_f/cpxf_1.htm
74.刘清泉,陈学文,王耀明.高速公路路面抗滑力与交通事故的模糊分析.广西交通科技,2003,28(2):1~5
75.文斌,曹东伟.高速公路路面抗滑力与交通事故的统计分析.公路交通科技.2006,23(8):72~75
76. Moore, A. B. ,Humphreys, J. B. High Speed Skid Resistance and the Effects of Surface Texture on the Accident Rate, Skid Resistance of Highway Pavements, ASTM STP 530, 1973, pp: 91~100
77. B.Φ.巴布可夫[苏],景天然译.道路条件与交通安全.同济大学出版社,上海,1990
78. G. Farah, D.J. Hewson, J. Duche?ne. Surface electromyography as a tool to assess the responses of car passengers to lateral accelerations. Part I: Extraction of relevant muscular activities from noisy recordings. Electromyography and Kinesiology, 2006 (16): 669~676. Availble on line at:www.sciencedirect.com
79. G. Farah, C. Petit-Boulanger, D.J. Hewson, J. Duche?ne. Surface ectromyography as a tool to assess the responses of car passengers to lateral accelerations. Part II: Objective comparison of vehicles. Electromyography and Kinesiology, 2006 (16): 677~684. Availble on line at:www.sciencedirect.com
80. International Organization for Standardization ISO 2631——1(1997). Mechanical vibration and shock-evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration-PartⅠ: General requirements
81. Tatsuo Shirakawa et al. Experimental Study on the Influence of Sidewalk Pavement Material on Wheelchair Use. Proceedings of 3rd China-Japan workshop on Pavement Technologies , 2005
82.郑柯.基于驾驶员心理生理反应的高速公路线性研究.北京工业大学博士学位论文,2003
83.乔建刚.基于驾驶员因素的山区双车道公路关键参数研究.北京工业大学博士学位论文,2006
84. Wambold, J. C, Henry, J. J., Hegmon, R. R. Skid Resistance of wet-weather accident sites, The Tire Pavement Interface. ASTM STP 929, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1986, pp: 47~60
85.张丽娟,刘丽敏,谢燕,虞芬,张茂先.定量体育运动后心率变异性指标的变化特征.中国临床康复. 2005, 9(8): 138~139
86.谢燕,刘丽敏,虞芬.太极拳运动中心率变异性指标的检测及意义.中国临床康.2004,8(12): 2336~2337
87.张湘兰,鲁端.心率变异性的临床应用评价.医学综述.1995, 1(5):195~197
88.章淑慧.心理生理学——意识的调节与生理活动的控制.湖南人民出版社,长沙,2006
89. Neumann, E. ,Blanton, R.The early history of electrodermal research.Psychophy,1970(6):453~458
90.阳洪.交感神经皮肤电临床研究进展.疑难病杂志. 2003,2(6): 371~373
91.傅根跃,陈吕凯,缭伟等.测谎问题中的“情绪成分”对皮肤电反应的影响.中国临床心理学杂志. 2005, 13(3):321~323
92. Maurizio, C.,Vera, F.,Magant, M.B. Repetitive picture processing: autonomic and cortical correlates. Brain Research (in press), 2006
93.李德慧,胡江碧,荣建等.驾驶行为研究模拟舱实验整体方案.交通与计算机. 2006,
24(5):9~11, 15
94.人体全身振动暴露的舒适性降低界限和评价准则(GB/T 13442—92).国家技术监督局1992-04-25批准,1992-12-01实施
95. Tateki I., Akira K., Kazuya T. Quantitative Evaluation of Ride Comfort Using a Driving Simulator. Available:TRB 2008 Annual Meeting CD-ROM
96.潘红宇.时间序列分析.对外经贸易大学出版社,北京,2006
97.王济,胡晓.MATLAB在振动信号处理中的应用.中国水利水电出版社,北京, 2005
98. MATLAB Help Document. The Mathworks.Inc.,2008
99. Jones, D.L., Parks, T.W. A resolution comparison of several time-frequency representations. IEEE Trans on signal processing, 1992,40(2):413~420
100.陈亚勇等. Matlab信号处理基础.人民邮电出版社,北京,2001
101.程佩青.数字信号处理教程(第三版).清华大学出版社,北京,2007
102.刘建华.路面抗滑性能检测与评价技术研究.郑州大学博士学位论文,2002
103.赵战利,张争奇,胡长顺.集料级配对沥青路面抗滑性能的影响.长安大学学报.2005,25(1):6~9
104. Ludema, K. C. An analysis of the literature on tire-road skid resistance. American Society for Testing and Materials Special Technical Publication 541, Philadelphia.1973
105. Heaton, B. S., Emery, J. J., and Camel, N. Prediction of Pavement Skid Resistance Performance. Australian Road Research Board Proceedings, 1978(9): 121~126
106. Emery, J. J., Lee, Camel, M. A. N. Skid Resistance Predictive Models for Asphalt Concrete Surface Courses, Pavement Surface Characteristics and Materials, ASTM STP 763. American Society for Testing and Materials, 1982, pp: 61~72
107. M.-T. Do, M. Kane, Z. Tang, F. de Larrard. Physical model for the prediction of pavement polishing. http://www.elsevier.com/locate/wear
108. Bob A., Paul P., David W., Alan Woodside. Prediction of UK surfacing skid resistance using whner schulze and PSV. http://www.saferroads.org.uk/2008papers.pdf
109. Zhang Jinxi, Cui Yaping, et al. Analysis of Present Condition of Beijing's Expressway. Sino-Netherlands seminar Proceedings. Beijing,China,2005
110. Karan,M.A., Christison, T.J., Cheetham, A., Berdahl, G. Development and implementation of Alberta's pavement information and needs system. Transportation Research Record 938, pp: 11~20, Washington, D.C., 1983.
111. Paterson, W.D.O., B.Attoh-Okine. Summary models of paved road deterioration based on HDM-Ⅲ.Transportation Research Record 1344, Washington, D.C., 1992.
112. Mrawira, D., and Wile, C.S. Load and climate factors in pavement roughness prediction model based on historical profilometric data in New Brunswick. Proceedings of the 3rd transportation specialty conference of the Canadian society for civil engineering, pp: 17~24, London, Ontario, 2000
113. GripTester与同类设备的对比. http://www.dynatestchina.com/Help/gtduibi.htm
114. Tateki I., Tatsuo S., Akira K., et al. Using the KIT Driving Simulator to Evaluate Road Surface Roughness. Available at:TRB 2007 Annual Meeting CD-ROM
115. Dong P. J., In Y. K., Sang W. N., et al. Analysis of physiological response to two virtual environments: driving and flying simulation. Cyberpsychology & Behavior.2002,5(1):11~18
116.马庆国.应用统计学:数理统计方法、数据获取与SPSS应用.科学出版社,北京,2005
117. [日]小林明主编.汽车工程手册(第一分册).汽车工程手册编译委员会译.中国标准出版社,北京,1971
118. Perera R., Kohn S. Effect of variation of simulation speed of quarter car in the IRI. TRB 83rd Annual Meeting, Washington D C, 2004.
119. Heart Rate Variability Standards of Measurement, Physiological Interpretation, and Clinical Use. Circulation. 1996, 93:1043-1065. American Heart Association: Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology the North American Society of Pacing electrophysiology. http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/93/5/1043#T5