民主的社会基础:利普塞特政治发展理论研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
利普塞特(Seymour Martin Lipset,1922-2006)是20世纪美国著名政治学、社会学家,他学术论著的要旨在于:西方政治社会情境中现代民主政治发展的多维度理论探讨;他的学术渊源可以追溯到亚里士多德、托克维尔、马克斯·韦伯等人的优良的学术传统中去.其政治发展理论的学术背景可以追溯到早期政治发展理论;他在政治社会过程民主化与国家权威理性化的双向观照之下理解现代民主国家建构的论题,并在“竞争”与“包容/吸纳”的双重原则下理解民主,而其政治发展理论主题是求解现代稳定的民主政体的多元社会基础。
     他所论释的稳定的民主政体所需的多元的社会基础包括:经济发展所奠定的物质基础——在工业化、城市化、社会财富增长、教育与大众传媒发展等物质基础之上促使现代政治社会变迁,并推动有利于民主的政治文化与政治社会结构的形成,进而维续民主政体的稳定;民主政体的政治文化基础——在一致与冲突取向两相平衡的政治文化之中、在多元的价值取向之中,在传统型、卡里斯玛型、法理型的合法性的建构过程中,使得政治人能够对话、讨论、调适、宽容,走出囚徒困境并相互合作,进而维续民主政体的稳定;稳定民主政体的政治社会结构基础——在政治国家与公民社会的一体平衡结构中使得权力与权利合理连接,在公民社会之中使政治人更趋于成熟、理性,避免“政治操纵”,形成明智的政治抉择,构筑交叉隶属关系与交叉压力,型塑“人际信任”的社会资本,在政党的桥梁作用下形成政治国家与公民社会的良性互动,在法治的社会结构中使得政治国家与公民社会的一体平衡结构被规范化,进而维续民主政体的稳定。
     利普塞特所论释的拥有多元社会基础的稳定的民主政体,是在开放的学术视界之下所描述的开放社会的政治社会情境的规范性图景;他透过多重政治社会变量要素的解构与联结/重构、比较历史的研究视角,使他的研究呈现出缜密的学术思维、清醒而审慎的学术逻辑、“全景”式的学术建构的理路。他的政治发展理论使我们从经验理论的视角之下理解民主;而对于中国民主政治发展的论题而言,他的理论可以启发我们展开一种综合的研究,并使我们看到建构民主政治所需的多元的社会基础对于中国民主社会主义民主政治发展的重要性。
Seymour Martin Lipset(1922-2006),who's the renowned scholar of political science and sociology in the 20~(th) century of the U.S.A.,centered his academic concern on political development of modern democracy in western political and social contexts,which was discussed in multi-dimensional theoretical angles.His academic origins can be traced back to an excellent academic tradition of Aristotle,Tocqueville,Max Weber and others.Moreover,his academic background can be traced back to the early stage political development theory.Lipset,who combined the two aspects,the democratization of political and social process and the rationalization of state authorty together to understand the task of construction of modern democratic state,and defined democracy under the two principles of "competitive" and "inclusive",made the theme of his political development theory as delineating the plural social bases of modern stable democratic polities.
     The plural social bases of stable democratic polities that discussed in Lipset's political development theory include the material basis build in economic development,the basis of political culture of democracy,and the basis of political and social structure of democracy.During the process of economic development,that is the development of industrialization,urbanization,growth of social wealth,education and mass media etc.,the material basis can be build up,which leads to the political and social transition forging the advantageous political culture,political and social structure,and will finally sustain the stability of democracy.In the political culture of the balance of consensus and conflict,pluralistic value-orientations,in the construction of political legitimacy through the accumulation of traditional,Charismatic and legal-rational legitimacy,political men can break out of Prisoners' Dilemma and cooperate through dialogue, discussion,adaptation and tolerance,which can in the end be of avail to the stability of democracy.The stability of democracy can also be sustained in the integrating and balancing structure of political state and civil society,by which the rational relationship of power and right can be defined,and in civil society which makes political men more mature and rational to avoid "political manipulation" and make wise political choices,constructs cross-cutting relations and pressures,shapes the social capital of inter-personal trust,and also in the bridging role of political party which leads to the positive interaction of political and civil society,and also in the social structure of the rule of law,by which the integrating and balancing structure of political state and civil society can be normalized.
     Under an open academic vision,the stable democracy of plural social bases that illustrated by Lipset is a normatively academic picture of a politically and socially open society.Lipset presented his rigorous academic thinking,academic logic of consciousness and deliberation,and his way of panoramic style of academic construction in his academic perspective of multi-variate deconstruction and link/reconstruction and comparative history.In his political development theory,we can understand democracy from an academic perspective of empirical theory, which also provide us a way of synthesized study on the theme of political development of democracy in China,and reveals the importance of the plural social bases needed in democratic polities to political development of socialism democracy in China.
引文
[1]Adam Przeworski,Michael Alvarez,Jos é Antonio Cheibub,and Fernando Limongi,"What Makes Democracy Endure?"[J].Journal of Democracy 7(January 1996,pp.39-55).
    [2]Adam Przeworski,Michael Alvarez,Joe é Antonio Cheibub,and Fernando Limongi,Democracy and Development:Political Institutions and Well-being in the World,1950-1990[M].Cambridge University Press,2000.
    [3]Adam Przeworski,Some Problems in the Study of the Transition to Democracy,in Guillermo O' Donnell,Philippe Schmitter and Laurence Whitehead(eds.),Transitions From Authoritarian Rule.Comparative Perspectives[C].(Baltimore,Md.:The Johns Hopkins University Press,1986).pp.47-63.
    [4]Archie Brown & Jack Brown(eds.),Political Culture and Political Change in Communist States[C].New York:Holmes and Meier,1977.
    [5]Arend Lijphart,Presidentialism and Majoritarian Demoracy:Theoretical Observations,in Juan J.Linz and Arturo Valenzuela(eds.),The Failure of Presidential Democracy[C].Johns Hopkins University Press,,pp.91-105.
    [6]Byron E.Shafer,American Exceptionalism[J].Annual Reviews of political Science,1999-2,pp.445-462.
    [7]Caries Boix,Democracy,Development,and the Public Sector[J].American Journal of Political Science,Vol.45,No.1,(Jan.,2001),pp.1-17.
    [8]Daniel Lerner,The Passing of Traditional Society:Modernizing the Middle East[M].New York:The Free Press,1958.
    [9]Darryl Baskin,Reviewed work(s):Revolution and Counterrevolution:Change and Persistence in Social Structures by Seymour Martin Lipset [J]. The Western Political Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 4 (Dec, 1968), pp. 752-754
    [10] David D. Laitin, Wither Political Science? Reflections on Professor Sartori's Claim That "American-type Political Science — is Going Nowhere. It is an Ever Growing Giant With Feet of Clay" [J]. Political Science, October, 2004, pp. 789-791.
    [11] David Plotke, Building a Democratic Political Order: Reshaping American Liberalism in the 1930s and 1940s [M]. New York, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
    [12] G. B. Jr. Powell, Contemporary Democracies: Participation, Stability and Violence [M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.
    [13] G. E. Cumper, Non-economic Factors Influencing Rural Development Planning, in H. Bernstein (ed.), Underdevelopment and Development [C]. Penguin Harmondsworth, 1973.
    [14] Gabriel A. Almond & James S. Coleman, (eds.), The Politics of the Developing Areas [C]. Princeton University Press, 1960.
    [15] Gabriel A. Almond and G. Bingham Powell, Jr., Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach [M]. Boston, 1966.
    [16] Gabriel A. Almond, Comparative Political Systems[J]. The Journal of. Politics, Vol. 18, No. 3. (Aug., 1956), pp. 391-409.
    [17] Gary Marks & Larry Diamond, Seymour Martin Lipset and the Study of Democracy [J]. American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 35 No. 4/5, March/June 1992, pp. 352-362.
    [18] Geoffrey Evans, The End of Class Politics? [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999;
    [19] Georg Simmel, Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations [M]. Glencoe: The Free Press, 1956.
    [20] H. Bernstein (ed.), Underdevelopment and Development [C]. Penguin Harmondsworth,1973.
    [21]Harold J.Laski,Democracy,in the gncyclopedia of Social Sciences [C].(New York:Macmillan,1937),Vol.Ⅴ.pp.76-85
    [22]Harry Eckstein,Division and Cohesion in Democracy:A Study of Norway[M].Princeton University Press,1966.
    [23]Howard J.Wiarda,Is Comparative Politics Dead? Rethinking the field in the Post-Cold War era.[J].Third World Quarterly,1998,Col.19,No.5,pp.935-949.
    [24]Howard J.Wiarda,Rethinking Political Development:A Look Backward over Thirty Years,And a Look Ahead[J].Studies in Comparative International Pevelopment,Winter 1989-90,Vol.24,no.4,pp.65-82.
    [25]Immanuel Wallerstein,The Modern World System,New York:Academic Press,1976.
    [26]Irving Louis Horowitz,editor.Civil Society and Class politics:essays on the political sociology of Seymour gartin Lipset[C].New Brunswick,N.J.:Transaction Publishers,2004.
    [27]Irving Louis Horowitz,Three worlds of Development,in Frank Tachau(ed.),The Developing Nations:What Path to Modernization?[C].Dodd,Mead & Company,New York,1972,pp.51-58.
    [28]J.Marquette,Social Change and Political Mobilization in the United States:1870-1960[J].the American Political Science Review,No.68,(1974),pp.1058-1074.
    [29]J.P.Nettl,Strategies in the Study of Political Development,in Colin Leys(ed.),Politics and Chang in Developing Countries,Studies in the Theory and Practice of gevelopment[C].Cambridge University Press,1969,pp.13-34.
    [30]James A.Robison,Economic Development and Democracy[J].Annual Review of Political Science,2006,pp.503-527.
    [31]James Harrington,The political Writings of James Harrington:Representative Selections[C].Ed.By BLITZER,C.New York:The Bobbs-Merrill Company,1955.
    [32]James R.Kurth,Industrial Change and Political Change:an European Perspective,in David Collier(ed.),the New Authoritarianism in Latin America[C].Princeton,NJ.:Princeton University Press,1979.
    [33]Jes u s Velasco G.,Seymour Martin Lipset:Life and work[J].Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie,Vol.29,No.4.(Autumn,2004),00.583-601.
    [34]John Myles,Reviewed Work(s):Continental Divide:The Values of the gaited States and Canada by Seymour Martin Lipset,European Sociological Review,Vol.7,No.2.(Sep.,1991),pp.179-181.
    [35]Juan J.Linz,"The Perils of Presidentialism,"[J].Journal of Democracy 1(Winter 1990a):51-69.
    [36]Juan J.Linz,"The Virtues of Parliamentarism,"[J].Journal of Democracy 1(Fall 1990b):84-91.
    [37]Juan J.Linz,Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy:Does it Make a Difference?,in Juan J.Linz and Arturo Valenzuela(eds.),The Failure of Presidential Democracy[C].Johns Hopkins University Press,,pp.3-90.
    [38]Karl W.Deutsch,Social Mobilization and Political Development[J].The American Political Science Review,Vol.55,No.3.(Sep.,1961),pp.493-514.
    [39]Kenneth A.Bollen & Robert W.Jackman,Economic and Nonecomomic Determinants of Political Democracy in the 1960s'[J].Research in Political Sociology,No.1,(1985),pp.27-48.
    [40]Kenneth Jowitt,An Organizational Approach to the Study of Political Culture in Marxist-Leninist System[J].American Political Science Review 68,1974,pp.1171-1191.
    [41]Kevin Kallaugher,An odd bunch[J].Economist,1/13/2007,Vol.382Issue 8511,p32-32.
    [42]Larry Diamond,Economic Development and Democracy Reconsidered,in Reexamining Democracy:Essays in Honor of Seymour Martin Lipset [C].Edited by Garry Marks & Larry Diamond,Newbury Park,Calif.:Sage Publications,c1992,pp.93-139.
    [43]Leon Hurwitz,Contemporary Approaches to Political Stability[J].Comparative Politias,Vol.5,No.3,April 1973,p.449-463.
    [44]Leonard Binder(at al),Crisis and Sequences in Political Development[C].Princeton,Princeton University Press,1971.
    [45]Lipset,S.M.,Consensus and Conflict-Essays in Political Sociology.[M].New Brunswick-Oxford:Transaction Books,1985.
    [46]Lipset,Seymour Martin & Earl Raab,Jews and the New American Scene [M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1995a.
    [47]Lipset,Seymour Martin & Earl Raab,The Politics of Unreason:Right-Wing Extremism in America,1790-1977[M].Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,1978.
    [48]Lipset,Seymour Martin & Everett Carll Ladd,the Divided Academy:Professors and Politics[M].New York:McGraw-Hill,1975.
    [49]Lipset,Seymour Martin & Everett Carll Ladd,the Politics of American Political Scientists[J].PS(Spring 1971b),pp.105-134.
    [50]Lipset,Seymour Martin & Gary Marks,It Didn't Happen Here:Why Socialism Failed in the United States[M].Yew York:W.W.Norton &Company,Inc.,2000.
    [51]Lipset,Seymour Martin & Jason M.Lakin,The Democratic Century [M].Norman:University of Oklahoma Fress,2004.
    [52]Lipset,Seymour Martin & John H.M.Laslett(eds.),Failure of a Dream? Essays in the History of American Socialism[M].Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.
    [53] Lipset, Seymour Martin & Jr. Everett Carll Ladd, The Myth of the "Conservative" Professor: A Reply to Michael Faia [J]. Sociology of Education, Vol. 47, No. 2. (Spring, 1974), pp. 203-213.
    [54] Lipset, Seymour Martin 4 Reinhard Bendix, Social Mobility in Industrial Society [C]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967.
    [55] Lipset, Seymour Martin & Stein Rokkan (eds.), Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives, New York: the Free Press, 1967b.
    [56] Lipset, Seymour Martin 4 William Schneider, Political Sociology, in Neil J. Smelser ed. Sociology: an introduction [C]. New York, John Wiley 4 Sons, Inc. 1973, pp. 399-491.
    [57] Lipset, Seymour Martin 4 William Schneider, The Confidence Gap [M]. New York: The Free Press, 1983a.
    [58] Lipset, Seymour Martin 4 William Schneider, The Confidence Gap during the Reagan Years, 1981-1987, [J]. Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 102, No. 1. (Spring, 1987), pp. 1-23.
    [59] Lipset, Seymour Martin 4 William Schneider, The Decline of Confidence in American Institutions [J]. Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 98, No. 3. (Autumn, 1983c), pp. 379-402.
    [60] Lipset, Seymour Martin and Everett Carll Ladd, Jr., The Politics of American Sociologists [J]. The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 78, No. 1, Varieties of Political Expression in Sociology (Jul., 1972), pp. 67-104.
    [61] Lipset, Seymour Martin, "Working-Class Authoritarianism" : A Reply to Miller and Rissman [J]. The British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 12, No. 3. (Sep., 1961), pp. 277-281.
    [62] Lipset, Seymour Martin, A Sociologist Looks at History [J]. Pacific Sociological Review, 1(1958), pp. 13-17.
    [63] Lipset, Seymour Martin, Agrarian Socialism: the Cooperative Commonwealth Federation in Saskatchewan [M]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971a.
    [64] Lipset, Seymour Martin, American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword [M]. New York, W. W. Norton and Company, 1996b.
    [65] Lipset, Seymour Martin, Democracy and Working-Class Authoritarianism, American Sociological Review, Vol. 24, No. 4. (Aug., 1959b), pp. 482-501.
    [66] Lipset, Seymour Martin, editor in chief, Encyclopedia of democracy [C] Washington, D. C. : Congressional Quarterly,1995b.
    [67] Lipset, Seymour Martin, Kyoung-Ryung Seong & John C. Torres, A Comparative Analysis of the Social Requisites of Democracy [J]. International Social Science Journal, 136 (May) 1993, pp. 155-175.
    [68] Lipset, Seymour Martin, Larry Diamond & Juan J. Linz, Democracy in Developing Countries Vol. 2 [C]. Africa, London: Adamantine Press, 1988.
    [69] Lipset, Seymour Martin, Larry Diamond & Juan J. Linz, Democracy in Developing Countries Vol. 3 [C]. Boulder (Colorado): Lynne Rienner/ London: Adamantine Press Limited, 1989.
    [70] Lipset, Seymour Martin, Larry Diamond & Juan J. Linz, Politics in Developing Countries Vol.3 [C]. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1990b.
    [71] Lipset, Seymour Martin, Martin A. Trow & James Coleman, Union Democracy: the International Politics of the International Typographical Union [M]. New York, The Free Press, 1977a.
    [72] Lipset, Seymour Martin, Political Man——the Social Bases of Politics.(Expanded Edition) [M]. The Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore, Maryland, 1981.
    [73]Lipset,Seymour Martin,Radicalism or Reformism:The Sources of Working-Class Politics[J].The American Political Science Review,Vol.77,No.1.(Mar.,1983b),pp.1-18.
    [74]Lipset,Seymour Martin,Rebellion in the University[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1976.
    [75]Lipset,Seymour Martin,Revolution and Counterrevolution:Change and Persistence in Social Structures[M].New York:Basic Books,Inc.,1968.
    [76]Lipset,Seymour Martin,Some Social Requisites of Democracy:Economic Development and Political Legitimacy[J].The American Political Science Review,Vol.53,No.1.(Mar.,1959a),pp.69-105.
    [77]Lipset,Seymour Martin,Steady Work:An Academic Memoir[J].Annual Review of Sociology,Vol.22.(1996a),pp.1-27.
    [78]Lipset,Seymour Martin,The First New Nation:The United States in Historical and Comparative Perspective[M].Doubleday & Co.,Inc.Garden City,New York,1967a.
    [79]Lipset,Seymour Martin,The Social Requisites of Democracy Revisited:1993 Presidential Address[J].American Sociological Review,Vol.59,No.1.(Feb.,1994),pp.1-22.
    [80]Lipset,Seymour Martin,The Value Patterns of Democracy:A Case Study in Comparative Analysis[J].American Sociological Review,Vol.28,No.4.(Aug.,1963),pp.515-531;pp.515-516;p.517.
    [81]Lipset,Seymour Martin,Why no socialism in the United States?,in Bialer,S.,Sluzar,S.(Eds),Sources of Contemporary Radicalism [C].Boulder:Westview press,1977b,pp.31-149.
    [82]Lipset,Seymour Martin,Continental Divide:The Values of the United States and Canada.New York and London:Routledge,1990a.
    [83]Lowell Dittmer,Political Culture and Political Symbolism:Toward a Theoretical Synthesis[J].World Politics 29,1977,pp.552-583.
    [84]Lucian W.Pye & Sidney Verba(eds.),Political Culture and Political Development[C].Princeton:Princeton University Press,1965.
    [85]Lucian W.Pye,Aspects of Political Development[M].Boston:Little,Brown And Company,1966.
    [86]Lucian W.Pye,The Concept of Political Development[J].Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,Vol.358,New Nations:The Problem of Political Development.(Mar.,1965),pp.1-13.
    [87]Lucian W.Pye,The Legitimacy Crisis,in Leonard Binder(et al),Crises and Sequences in Political Development[C].Princeton,New Jersey:Princeton University Press,1971,pp.135-158.
    [88]Lyle W.Shannon,Is Level of Development Related to Capacity for Self-Government? An Analysis ofthe Economic Characteristics of Self-Governing and Non-Self-Governing Areas[J].American Journal of Economics and Sociology,Vol.17,No.4.(Jul.,1958),pp.367-381.
    [89]M.E.Olsen,Multivariate Analysis of National Political Development[J].American Sociological Review,35,(1968),pp.699-712.
    [90]M.Russet,Trends in World Politics[M].New York:Macmillan,1965.
    [91]Mark Kesselman,Review:Order or Movement?:The Literature of Political Development as Ideology[J].World Politics,Vol.26,No.1.(Oct.,1973),pp.139-154.
    [92]Max Weber,General Economic History[M].Glcncoe:The Free Press.
    [93]Michael Hout,Clcm Brooks,and Jeff Manza,The Persistence of Classes in Post-Industrial Societies[J].International Sociology,1993,8(3):259-277;
    [94]Michael Rogin,Ronald Reagan:The Movie and Other Episodes in Political Demonology[M].Los Angeles,University of California Press, 1987.
    [95]Myron Weiner & Samuel P.Huntington ed.,Understanding Political Development[C].Little Brown And Company,1987.
    [96]Neil J.Smelser ed.Sociology:an introduction[C].New York,John Wiley & Sons,Inc.1973.
    [97]P.Cutright,National Political Development:Measurement and Analysis[J].American Sociological Review,28,(1963),pp.253-264.
    [98]R.S.Milne,Review:The Overdeveloped Study of Political Development[J].Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique,Vol.5,No.4.(Dec.,1972),pp.560-568.
    [99]Reinhard Bendix,Max Weber:an Intellectual Portrait[M].New York:Doubleday & Co.,Inc.,1960.
    [100]Richard A.Higgott,Political Development Theory-The Contemporary Debate[M].ST.Martin's Press New York,1983.
    [101]Robert A.Dahl,A Preface to Democratic Theory[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1956.
    [102]Robert C.Bartlett,On The Decline of Contemporary Political Development Studies[J].The Review of Politics,Vol.58,No.2(Spring,1996),pp.269-298.
    [103]Robert J.Jackson and Michael B.Stein(eds.),Issues in Comparative Politics:A Text With Readings[C].New York:St.Martin's Press,1971.
    [104]Robert W.Jackman,On the Relation of Economic Development to Democratic Performance[J].American Journal of Political Science,No.17,(1973),pp.611-621.
    [105]Roger Smith,Beyond Tocqueville,Myrdal and Hartz:The Multiple Tradition in America,The American Political Science Review,Vol.87,No.3(Sep.,1993),pp.
    [106]Ronald Inglehart Values,Economic Development and Political Change,in Bernard E.Brown(ed.) Comparative Politics:Notes and Readings,Beijing:Peking University Press,2003,pp.66-91.
    [107]Roy Macridis,The Study of comparative Government[M].New York:Random House,1955.
    [108]S.Banks,Modernization and Political Change:the Latin American and Amer-European Nations[J].Comparative Political Studies,No.2,(1970),pp.405-418.
    [109]S.M.Miller,Frank Riessman,'Working-Class Authoritarianism':A Critique of Lipset,The British Journal of Sociology,Vol.12,No.3.(Sep.,1961),pp.263-276.
    [110]Samuel Heilman,Review:Jews and the New American Scene.by Seymour Martin Lipset;Earl Raab Source,Contemporary Sociology,Vol.25,No.3,(May,1996),pp.341-342
    [111]Samuel Lubell,Review of Political Man,New York Times Book Review Section,January 10,1960,p.4.
    [112]Samuel P.Huntington,Political Development and Political Decay [J].World Politics,Vol.17,No.3.(Apr.,1965),pp.386-430.
    [113]Samuel P.Huntington,The Change to Change:Modernization,Development,and Politics[J].Compnrntive Politics,Vol.3,No.3.(Apr.,1971),pp.283-322.
    [114]Samuel P.Huntington,Will More Countries Become Democratic?[J].Political Science Quarterly,99,(1984),pp.193-218.
    [115]Stephen Chilton,Grounding Political Development[M].Boulder and London,Lynne Rienner Publishers,Inc.,1991.
    [116]Sven H.Steinmo,American Exceptionism Reconsidered:Culture or Institutions?,in Lawrence C.Dodd & Calvin Jillson(eds.),The Dynamics of American Politics:Approaches and Interpretations[C].Boulder,Westview Press,1994.
    [117]Talcott Parsons,Max Weber:Reviewed work(s):Max Weber:An Intellectual Portrait by Reinhard Bendix[J].American Sociological Review,Vol.25,No.5,(Oct.,1960),pp.750-752.
    [118]Ted Robert Gurr,Persistence and Change in Political Systems,1800-1971[J].The American Politicsl Scieace Review,Vol.68,No.4,(Dec.,1974),pp.1482-1504.
    [119]Tom Truman,A Critique of Seymour M.Lipset's Article,"Value Differences,Absolute of Relative:The English-Speaking Democracies",Canadian Journal or Political Science,Vol.4,No.4.(Dec.,1971),pp.497-525.
    [120]Vernon W.Ruttan,What Happened to Political Development?[J].Economic Development sad Cultural Change,Vol.39,No.2(Jan.,1991),pp.265-292.
    [1][加]A.布来顿等著,《理解民主--经济的与政治的视角》[C].毛丹等译,上海,学林出版社,2000;
    [2][美]C.E.布莱克著,《现代化的动力--一个比较史的研究》[M].景跃进、张静译,杭州,浙江人民出版社,1989;
    [3][美]G·萨托利著,《政党与政党体制》[M].王明进译,北京,商务印书馆,2006;
    [4]Richard Rose & Doh Chull Shin,《反向民主化:第三波民主化的问题》[J].王正绪等译,开放时代,2007年第3期,95-114页;
    [5][以]S.N.艾森斯塔德著,《现代化:抗拒与变迁》[M].张旅平等译,北京,中国人民大学出版社,1988;
    [6][以]S.N.艾森斯塔特著,《反思现代性》[M].旷新年、王爱松译,北京,生活·读书·新知三联书店,2006;
    [7][美]W.W.罗斯托著,《经济增长的阶段:非共产党宣言》[M].郭熙保、王松茂译,北京:中国社会科学出版社,2001;
    [8][美]W.菲利普斯·夏夫利著,《政治科学研究方法》[M].新知译,上海人民出版社,2006;
    [9][美]阿尔蒙德、鲍威尔著,《比较政治学:体系、过程和政策》[M].曹沛霖等译,上海,上海译文出版社,1987;
    [10][美]阿列克斯·英克尔斯、戴维·H.施密斯著,《从传统人到现代人--六个发展中国家中的个人变化》[M].顾昕译,北京,中国人民大学出版社,1992;
    [11][法]埃米尔·涂尔干著,《社会分工论》[M].渠东译,北京,生活·读书·新知三联书店,2000;
    [12][英]艾瑞克·霍布斯鲍姆著,《极端的年代》(上、下卷)[M].郑明萱译,南京,江苏人民出版社,1999;
    [13][美]爱德华·W.萨义德(Edward W.Said)著,《知识分子论》[M].单德兴译,北京,生活·读书·三联书店,2002:
    [14][美]安东尼·奥罗姆著,《政治社会学导论》[M].张华青、何俊志、孙嘉明等译,上海,世纪出版集团,上海人民出版社,2006;
    [15][英]安东尼·吉登斯著,《现代性的后果》[M].田禾译,南京:译林出版社,2000;
    [16][美]巴林顿·摩尔著,《民主和专制的社会起源》[M].拓夫等译,北京,华夏出版社,1987;
    [17][古希腊]柏拉图著,《理想国》[M].郭斌和、张竹明译,北京,商务印书馆,1986;
    [18][美]布莱思·巴利,《社会学家、经济学家和民主》[M].舒小昀等译,南京,江苏人民出版社,2007;
    [19][美]布鲁斯·布恩诺·德·梅斯奎塔、希尔顿·L.鲁特编,《繁荣的治理之道》[M].叶娟丽、王鑫等译,北京,中国人民大学出版社,2007;
    [20]陈鸿瑜著,《政治发展理论》[M].台北,桂冠图书股份有限公司,1987;
    [21]陈剩勇、钟冬生,《论阿尔蒙德的政治发展理论》[J].《浙江大学学报》(人文社会科学版)2007年第5期,70-79页。
    [22]陈新民著,《德国公法学基础理论》(上、下册)[M].济南,山东人民出 版社,2001;
    [23][英]戴维·赫尔德著,《民主的模式》[M].燕继荣等译,北京,中央编译出版社,2004;
    [24][英]戴雪著,《英宪精义》[M].雷宾南译,北京:中国法制出版社,2001;
    [25]邓正来、[英]J.C.亚历山大编,《国家与市民社会:一种社会理论的研究路经》[C].北京,中央编译出版社,2002;
    [26]邓正来编,《布莱克维尔政治学百科全书》[c].北京,中国政法大学出版社,2002;
    [27]邓正来著,《法律与立法的二元观--哈耶克法律理论的研究》[M].上海,上海三联书店,2000年;
    [28]邓正来著,《研究与反思--关于中国社会科学自主性的思考》(增订版)[C].北京,中国政法大学出版社,2004;
    [29]邓正来著,《中国法学向何处去--建构“中国法律理想图景”时代的论纲》[M].北京,商务印书馆,2006;
    [30]冯钢著,《文化轨迹与社会变迁》[C].杭州,浙江大学出版社,1999;
    [31][美]佛兰西丝·哈葛扁,《重访发展政治学》[J].王正绪等译,开放时代,2006年第4期,90-109页;
    [32][美]弗朗西斯·福山著,《国家构建--21世纪的国家治理与世界秩序》[M].黄胜强、许铭原译,北京,中国社会科学出版社,2007:
    [33][英]弗里德里希·冯·哈耶克著,《自由秩序原理》[M].邓正来译,北京,生活·读高歌,《从制度巩固到观念巩固--1989年后中东欧国家政治发展的理论分析》[J].《俄罗斯中亚东欧研究》,2006年第1期,30-38页;
    [34]高洪涛著,《政治文化论》[M].北京,中国广播电视出版社,1990;
    [35]高力克,《陈独秀晚年的民主观》[J].《二十一世纪》2001年6月号,33-41页;
    [36]高力克著,《五四的思想世界》[M].上海,学林出版社,2003;
    [37]格林斯坦、波尔斯比编,《政治学手册精选》(上、下卷)[C].竺乾威等译,北京,商务印书馆1996;
    [38][日]谷口安平著,《程序的正义与诉讼》[M].王亚新、刘荣军译,北京: 中国政法大学出版社,1996;
    [39]顾准著,《顾准文集》[M].贵阳,贵州人民出版社,1994;
    [40][德]哈贝马斯著,《公共领域的结构转型》[M].曹卫东等译,上海,学林出版社,1999;
    [41][德]哈贝马斯著,《在事实与规范之间--关于法律和民主法治国的商谈理论》[M].童世骏译,北京,生活·读书·新知三联书店,2003;
    [42][美]哈罗德·D.拉斯韦尔著,《政治学--谁得到什么?何时和如何得到?》[M].杨昌裕译,北京,商务印书馆,1992;
    [43][美]汉密尔顿、杰伊、麦迪逊著,《联邦党人文集》[M].程逢如、在汉、舒逊译,北京,商务印书馆,1980;
    [44][美]亨廷顿著,《第三波--20世纪后期民主化浪潮》[M].刘军宁译,上海,上海三联书店,1998;
    [45][美]胡安·J.林茨、阿尔弗莱德·斯泰潘著,《民主转型与巩固的问题:南欧、南美和后共产主义欧洲》[M].孙龙译,杭州,浙江人民出版社,2008;
    [46][美]华勒斯坦等著,《开放社会科学》[M].刘锋译,北京,生活·读书·新知三联书店,1997;
    [47][英]霍布斯著,《利维坦》[M].黎思复、黎庭弼译,北京,商务印书馆,1985;
    [48][美]霍华德·威亚尔达编,《非西方发展理论--地区模式与全球趋势》[M].董正华、昝涛、郑振清译,北京,北京大学出版社,2006;
    [49][美]霍华德·威亚尔达编,《民主与民主化比较研究》[C].榕远译,北京,北京大学出版社,2004;
    [50][美]霍华德·威亚尔达著,《比较政治的新趋向》[C].李培元译,台北,韦伯文化事业出版社,2000;
    [51][美]霍华德·威亚尔达著,《比较政治学导论:概念与过程》[M].娄亚译,北京,北京大学出版社,2005a;
    [52][美]霍华德·威亚尔达著,《新兴国家的政治发展--第三世界还存在吗?》[M].刘青牛译,北京,北京大学出版社,2005b;
    [53][意]加埃塔诺·莫斯卡著,《政治科学要义》[M].任军锋、宋国友、包军 译,上海:上海人民出版社,2005。
    [54][美]加布里埃尔·A.阿尔蒙德、西德尼·维伯著,《公民文化--五个国家的政治态度和民主制》[M].马殿君、黄素娟等译,杭州,浙江人民出版社,1989;
    [55][美]加布里埃尔·A.阿尔蒙德、西德尼·维伯著,《公民文化--五个国家的政治态度和民主制》[M].徐湘林译,北京:华夏出版社,1984;
    [56][美]卡尔·J.弗里德里希著,《超验正义--宪政的宗教之维》[M].周勇等译,北京,生活·读书·新知三联书店,1997;
    [57][英]卡尔·波普尔著,《开放社会及其敌人》(第一卷)[M].陆衡等译,北京,中国社会科学出版社,1999;
    [58][德]柯武刚、史漫飞著,《制度经济学》[M].韩朝华译,北京:商务印书馆,2000;
    [59][美]科恩著,《论民主》[M].聂崇信、朱秀贤译,北京,商务印书馆,1988;
    [60][美]克莱德·克鲁克洪等著,《文化与个人》[C].高佳、何红、何维凌等译,杭州,浙江人民出版社,1986;
    [61][联邦德国]克劳斯·冯·柏伊姆著,《当代政治理论》[M].李黎译,北京:商务印书馆,1990;
    [62]孔德元著,《政治社会学导论》[M].北京,人民出版社,2001;
    [63][法]孔德著,《实证哲学教程》,载《现代西方哲学论著选辑》(上册)[C].北京,商务印书馆,1993;
    [64][美]莱因哈特·本迪克斯著,《马克斯·韦伯思想肖像》[M].刘北城等译.上海,上海人民出版社,2007;
    [65]郎友兴、韩志明编,《政治学基础文献选读》[M].杭州,浙江大学出版社,2008;
    [66][法]雷蒙·阿隆著,《知识分子的鸦片》[M].吕一民、顾杭译,南京,译林出版社,2005;
    [67]李笃武著《政治发展与社会稳定》[M].上海,学林出版社,2006;
    [68]李红波、颜佳华,《国内政治发展理论研究综述》[J].《云南社会科学》2006年第2期,26-30页;
    [69]李景鹏著,《中国政治发展的理论研究纲要》[M].哈尔滨,黑龙江人民出版社,2000;
    [70]李泽厚、刘再复著,《告别革命--回望二十世纪中国》[M].香港,天地图书有限公司,1995;
    [71][美]利普塞特著,《政治人》[M].刘刚敏等译,北京,商务印书馆,1993;
    [72]梁治平编,《法律的文化解释》[C].北京,生活·读书·新知三联书店,1994;
    [73][美]列奥·施特劳斯著《政治哲学史》(上、下)[M].李天然译,石家庄,河北人民出版社,1993;
    [74][美]列奥·施特劳斯著《自然权利与历史》[M].彭刚译,北京,生活·读书·三联书店,2003;
    [75]刘军宁、李林编,《新权威主义--对改革理论纲领的论争》[C].北京,北京经济学院出版社,1989;
    [76]刘军宁编,《民主与民主化》北京,商务印书馆,1999;
    [77]刘军宁等编,《直接民主与间接民主》[C].北京,生活·读书·新知三联书店,1998a;
    [78]刘军宁等编,《自由与社群》[C].北京,生活·读书·新知三联书店,1998b;
    [79][法]卢梭著,《论人类不平等的起源和基础》[M].李常山译,北京,商务印书馆,1962;
    [80][法]卢梭著,《社会契约论》[M].何兆武译,北京,商务印书馆,2003;
    [81]吕磊著,《美国的新保守主义》[M].南京,江苏人民出版社,2004;
    [82][美]罗伯特·A.达尔著,《多元主义民主的困境--自治与控制》[M].周军华译,北京,东方出版社,2006;
    [83][美]罗伯特·A.达尔著,《美国宪法的民主批判》[M].佟德志译,北京,东方出版社,2007;
    [84][美]罗伯特·A.达尔著,《现代政治分析》[M].王沪宁、陈峰译,上海,上海译文出版社,1987;
    [85][美]罗伯特-达尔著,《多头政体--参与和反对》[M].谭君久、刘惠荣译,北京,商务印书馆,2003;
    [86][美]罗伯特·达尔著,《论民主》[M].李柏光等译,北京,商务印书馆,1999a;
    [87][美]罗伯特·达尔著,《民主理论的前言》[M].顾昕、朱丹译,北京,生活·读书·三联书店,1999b;
    [88][德]罗伯特·米歇尔斯著,《寡头统治铁律--现代民主制度中的政党社会学》[M].任军锋等译,天津,天津人民出版社,2003;
    [89][英]洛克著,《政府论--论政府的真正起源、范围和目的》(下)[M].叶启芳、瞿菊农译,北京,商务印书馆,1964;
    [90][德]马克思《政治经济学批判一书序言》,《马克思恩格斯文选》(两卷本,第1卷)[C].北京,人民出版社,1958:339-343;
    [91][德]马克斯·韦伯著,《经济与历史;支配的类型》[M].康乐等译,桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2004c;
    [92][德]马克斯·韦伯著,《社会科学方法论》[M].韩水法、莫茜译,北京:中央编译出版社,2002;
    [93][德]马克斯·韦伯著,《社会科学方法论》[M].朱红文等译,北京:中国人民大学出版社,1992;
    [94][德]马克斯·韦伯著,《社会学的基本概念》[M].顾忠华译,桂林,广西师范大学出版社,2005;
    [95][德]马克斯·韦伯著,《新教伦理与资本主义精神》[M].康乐等译,桂林,广西师范大学出版社,2007;
    [96][德]马克斯·韦伯著,《学术与政治》[M].康乐等译,桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2004a;
    [971[德]马克斯·韦伯著,《支配社会学》[M].康乐等译,桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2004b;
    [98]毛寿龙著,《政治社会学》[M].北京,中国社会科学出版社,2001;
    [99][法]孟德斯鸠著,《论法的精神》(上册)[M].张雁深译,北京,商务印书馆,1959;
    [100][美]米尔顿·弗里德曼著,《资本主义与自由》[M].张瑞玉译,北京,商务印书馆,1986;
    [101][法]莫里斯·迪韦尔热著,《政治社会学--政治学要素》[M].杨祖功、王大东译,北京,华夏出版社,1987;
    [102]潘一禾著,《观念与体制:政治文化的比较研究》[M].上海,学林出版社,2002;
    [103][英]齐格蒙·鲍曼著,《立法者与阐释者:论现代性、后现代性与知识分子》[M].洪涛译,上海,上海人民出版社,2000;
    [104][美]乔·萨托利著,《民主新论》[M].冯克利、阎克文译,北京,东方出版社,1998;
    [105][美]塞缪尔·p.亨廷顿著,《变化社会中的政治秩序》[M].汪冠华等译,北京,生活·读书·新知三联书店,1989;
    [106][美]塞缪尔·亨廷顿、劳伦斯·哈里森编,《文化的重要作用--价值观如何影响人类进步》[C].程克雄译,北京,新华出版社,2002;
    [107][美]塞缪尔·亨廷顿、琼·纳尔逊著,《难以抉择--发展中国家的政治参与》[M].汪晓寿、吴志华、项继权译,北京,华夏出版社,1989;
    [108]石元康著,《从中国文化到现代型:典范转移》[M].北京,生活·读书·新知三联书店,2000;
    [109][美]斯蒂芬·L.埃尔金、卡罗尔·艾德华·索坞坦编,《新宪政论--为美好的社会设计政治制度》[M].周叶谦译,北京,生活·读书·新知三联书店,1997;
    [110]孙景珊,《政治发展研究述要》[J].《理论界》2007年第1期,145-147页。
    [111]唐光华著,《政治文化的沉思者:白鲁恂》[M].台北,允晨文化实业股份有限公司,1982;
    [112][美]唐纳德·坦嫩鲍姆、戴维·舒尔茨著,《观念的发明者--西方政治哲学导论》[M].叶颖译,北京,北京大学出版社,2008;
    [113][法]托克维尔著,《论美国的民主》(上、下卷)[M].董果良译,北京,商务印书馆,1988;
    [114][英]托马斯·潘恩著,《潘恩选集》[M].马清槐译,北京,商务印书馆,1981;
    [115]汪晖,《当代中国的思想状况与现代性问题》[J].《天涯》,1997年第5期,133-150页;
    [116]王乐理著,《政治文化导论》[M].北京,中国人民大学出版社,2000;
    [117]王绍光著,《安邦之道:国家转型的目标与途径》[C].北京,生活·读书·新知三联书店,2007;
    [118]王书明、宋玉玲,《从“增长优先”到“发展文化”--联合国发展思想的演进历程》[J].《世界经济与政治》1999年第2期,47-52、80页;
    [119]王孝勇、周莹冰,《西方政治发展理论的生成、发展与批判》[J].《前言》2008年第1期,35-37页。
    [120]王宗礼,《论建构中国特色的政治发展理论》[J].《探索》2004年第6期,48-51页。
    [121][奥]维特根斯坦著,《哲学研究》[M].李步楼译,北京,商务印书馆1996;
    [122]吴文程著,《政治发展与民主转型--比较政治理论的检视与批判》[M].长春,吉林出版集团有限责任公司,2008;
    [123][美]西里尔·E.布莱克编,《比较现代化》[C].杨豫等译,上海译文出版社,1996;
    [124][美]西摩·马丁·李普塞特、宋庆仁、约翰·查尔斯·托里斯,《对民主政治的社会条件的比较分析》,收录于,中国社会科学杂志社编,《民主的再思考》[C].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000年12月第1版,页72-110;
    [125][美]西摩·马丁·李普塞特著,《一致与冲突》[M].张华青等译,上海人民出版社,1995;
    [126][美]西摩·马丁·李普塞特著,《政治人》[M].张绍宗译,上海人民出版社,1997;
    [127]萧功秦,《从发展政治学看中国转型体制》[J].《浙江学刊》2005年第5期,100-107页。
    [128]萧功秦著,《中国的大转型--从发展政治学看中国变革》[M].北京,新星出版社,2008;
    [129]萧新煌编,《低度发展与发展--发展社会学选读》[C].台北,巨流图书公司,1985;
    [130]徐大同主编,《当代西方政治思潮--20世纪70年代以来》[C].天津人民出版社,2001;
    [131]徐湘林,《从政治发展理论到政策过程理论--中国政治改革研究的中层理论建构探讨》[J].《中国社会科学》2004年第3期,108-120页。
    [132]徐宗华著,《现代化的政治文化维度》[M].北京,人民出版社,2007;
    [133]许纪霖、罗岗等著,《启蒙的自我瓦解:1990年代以来中国思想文化界重大论证研究》[C].长春,吉林出版集团有限责任公司,2007;
    [134]许纪霖、宋宏编,《史华慈论中国》[M].北京,新星出版社,2006;
    [135][美]亚当·普泽沃斯基(Adam Przcworski)著《民主与市场--东欧与拉丁美洲的政治经济改革》[M].包雅钧、刘忠瑞、胡元梓等译,北京,北京大学出版社,2005;
    [136][古希腊]亚里士多德著,《政治学》[M].吴寿彭译,北京,商务印书馆,1965;
    [137]燕继荣,《民主政治与经济自由--现代民主对市场经济的依赖关系》[J].《经济社会体制比较》1994年第1期,第41-44页;
    [138]燕继荣主编,《发展政治学:政治发展研究的概念与理论》[M].北京,北京大学出版社,2006;
    [139]杨龙,《发展政治学的学科地位与结构框架》[J].《武汉大学学报》(哲学社会科学版)2004年第2期,250-253页。
    [140]杨龙著,《发展政治学》[M].北京,高等教育出版社,2006;
    [141]姚建宗,《国外政治发展研究述评》[J].《政治学研究》1999年第4期,78-89页。
    [142]姚尚建,《发展政治学的中国视野》[J].《学习论坛》2006年第4期,47-50页。
    [143]叶娟丽著,《行为主义政治学方法论研究》[M].武昌,武汉大学出版社,2005;
    [144][美]伊曼努尔·华勒斯坦等著,《自由主义的终结》[M].郝名玮等译,北京,社会科学文献出版社,2002;
    [145][英]以赛亚·伯林著,《自由及其背叛》[M].赵国新译,南京:译林出版 社,2005;
    [146][英]以赛亚·伯林著,《自由论》[M].胡传胜译,南京:译林出版社,2003;
    [147][德]于尔根·哈贝马斯著,《现代性的哲学话语》[M].曹卫东等译,南京,译林出版社,2004;
    [148][美]约翰·罗尔斯著,《正义论》[M].何怀宏、何包钢、廖申白译,北京,社会科学出版社,1988;
    [149][美]约翰·罗尔斯著,《作为公平的正义》[M].姚大志译,上海,上海三联书店,2002;
    [150][美]约瑟夫·熊皮特著,《资本主义、社会主义与民主》[M].吴良健译,北京,商务印书馆,1999;
    [151]岳世平,《当代西方政治发展理论述评》[J].《学术界》2006年第4期,281-285页。
    [152]曾昭耀著,《政治稳定与现代化--墨西哥政治模式的历史考察》[M].北京,东方出版社,1996;
    [153]张法、张熙武、王一川,《从“现代性”到“中华性”》[J].《文艺争鸣》1994年第2期,10-20页;
    [154]张灏著,《幽暗意识与民主传统》[M].北京,新星出版社,2006;
    [155]张静编,《国家与社会》[C].杭州,浙江人民出版社,1998;
    [156]张晓东,《试论当代中国的政治发展理论》[J].《陕西社会主义学院学报》2001年第1期,24-26页。
    [157]邹谠著,《二十世纪中国政治:从宏观历史与微观行动的角度来看》[C].香港,香港牛津出版社,1994;

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700