经济全球化条件下的垄断寡占市场结构及其效率、政策研究
摘要
现代经济中,一国的产业组织和市场结构是国民经济结构的重要组成部分。其中在市场结构类型中,垄断寡占市场结构是重要的组成部分,是现代市场经济下的主导市场结构。在经济全球化条件下,垄断寡占市场结构的效率表现出新特质,因此有必要进行研究。另一方面,经济全球化条件下,生产国际化成为最显著的特征。在全球经济中已形成了以跨国公司为主体的国际生产体系,跨国公司在全球范围内进行国际化生产经营,其中最重要的国际化生产经营方式就是对外直接投资。跨国公司投资不仅深化了国际生产,同时,FDI还会产生市场结构效应,FDI使得投资国一国范围内的垄断寡占市场结构跨越国界,向东道国和世界市场传导。因此,垄断结构向东道国市场的跨国传导和跨国公司的跨国垄断成为经济全球化条件下垄断市场结构的重要特征。因此,经济全球化条件下的垄断市场结构,表现为两个层面,一方面是一国范围内的垄断市场结构,一方面是从跨国市场角度表现出来的跨国公司的国际化生产经营所形成的垄断结构的跨国传导。本论文要研究经济全球化条件下的垄断寡占市场结构,需要围绕这两个层面来展开。
在内容安排上,论文将遵循产业组织理论的结构、行为、绩效分类方法,对经济全球化条件下垄断的研究,主要内容也分为经济全球化条件下的垄断寡占市场结构研究和对垄断寡占市场结构的效率、政策研究两部分来展开。
论文第一部分为结构研究,研究经济全球化条件下的垄断寡占市场结构。不仅要研究一国范围内的垄断结构,还要从跨国市场角度研究垄断结构的跨国传递。分为两个章节来展开。
第一章研究发达国家一国范围内的市场结构的集中趋势和垄断寡占市场结构的形成。随着生产力发展,科技进步,发达国家的市场结构有趋于集中的趋势,现代市场经济条件下,垄断寡占市场结构已成为发达国家主导的市场结构。论文从总体市场结构或一般市场结构角度分析了垄断寡占结构的形成机制,指出生产的社会化程度、企业追求价值增值、追求资本扩张的内在动机以及企业的外在竞争压力,共同作用,促成了市场的集中与垄断结构的形成。并指出并购是市场趋于集中的有效途径,最后,通过分析西方发达国家的几次并购浪潮,分析了发达国家垄断寡占结构的形成与发展。
第二章研究经济全球化条件下垄断结构的跨国传递。经济全球化下,跨国公司的国际化生产经营,使得发达国家一国范围内的垄断结构,跨越国界,向东道国和世界市场传递。这种传递效应主要通过跨国公司FDI对东道国的市场结构集中效应表现出来的。由于FDI新建投资和跨国并购投资的市场效应有所不同,论文对新建投资和跨国并购投资的对东道国的市场结构效应分别进行了研究。并购投资的市场结构集中效应更直接、更显著。除了FDI外,跨国公司还有其他的国际化生产经营方式,如跨国许可协议、跨国战略联盟等,这些经营方式也不同程度上促进了东道国的市场集中。最后,对世界市场的集中化趋势也进行了介绍。
论文第二部分则展开效率与政策研究。根据第一部分的结构研究可知,不论是一国范围内的垄断结构,还是在跨国市场垄断结构的跨国传递,垄断结构成为经济生活中的重要组成部分。有必要对其经济效率进行分析,并在效率分析基础上对相关经济政策提出指导性意见。这部分仍然分一国市场与跨国市场两方面来展开。
一方面,从一般市场角度分析一国范围内垄断市场结构的效率与政策。传统经济学对垄断结构的效率分析主要是新古典经济学的福利分析法,认为垄断结构损害了社会福利,损害了资源配置效率,是低效率的。这种静态分析忽视了垄断结构在动态的技术创新效率上的优势。随着经济学理论的发展,产业组织理论芝加哥学派认为,竞争中形成的垄断结构是企业追求效率的结果。垄断结构效率性的一面越来越被经济学界所承认。经济全球化与知识经济条件下,垄断结构呈现出新特质,即垄断结构的竞争性更强,是富有竞争性的垄断结构。同时经济全球化条件下,国际竞争日趋激烈,国内的大垄断厂商在国际市场上有较强的竞争力,垄断结构具有国际竞争方面的效率性。因此经济全球化条件下垄断寡占结构表现出更高的效率性。相应的,各国对垄断结构的反垄断规制越来越放松,反垄断法从“结构主义”向“行为主义”转变。同时,为了国际竞争的需要,各国对企业并购的规制也出现了前所未有的放松。
另一方面,则从跨国市场角度分析了FDI对东道国市场结构的集中效应所产生的正、反两方面影响。正面影响体现为:针对东道国原有的过度分散市场结构,跨国公司FDI的市场集中效应,一定程度上促进了东道国市场结构的优化,其对进入壁垒的提高,有利于淘汰掉东道国低效率企业,使整个产业效率提高。负面效应则表现为:跨国公司FDI对东道国的集中效应,形成了跨国公司在东道国的跨国垄断,可能会带来跨国公司的垄断行为,也可能会造成跨国公司对东道国经济的控制,形成经济安全问题。因此东道国的外资政策必须考虑正反两方面不同影响,制定灵活多样的外资政策。同时针对跨国垄断行为,实施反垄断法加以规制。
论文最后一部分则是把前述章节中的分析结果用于对中国市场的指导。由于我国传统计划经济惯性作用,政府仍普遍对经济进行干预,行政垄断结构较为普遍。另一方面,地方政府的地区封锁、重复投资,使我国呈现出低集中、分散型市场结构。可见我国市场结构的形成一直都有政府干预的影子。因此,政策选择上首先需要反行政垄断,政企分开。其次则要促进市场集中,以富有效率的适度集中的垄断寡占结构作为我国的目标市场结构。
综上,本论文系统、全面地分析了经济全球化条件下垄断结构的形成、跨国传递、垄断结构的效率性与非效率性、以及相关政策的讨论等。
论文的主要创新之处:
1、研究角度与论文结构的创新。论文以“经济全球化条件下的垄断结构”为切入点,将垄断放在开放经济环境下来研究,在研究角度上有创新性。同时在“经济全球化条件下的垄断结构”这一框架下,将“一国范围内的垄断结构”和“全球化条件下垄断结构的跨国传导”两部分内容有机地融合在一起。构成了论文的两个主要层面。因此,在论文结构上有创新。
2、研究内容的创新:
(1)在研究一国范围内垄断结构的效率分析方面:受传统经济学影响,对垄断结构负面效应的研究较多。对正面效应的研究较少,并且比较零散,缺乏系统分析。本文则试图收集研究垄断结构效率性一面的相关观点,做一较为全面的总结概括。
(2)在研究FDI对东道国的市场结构效应方面:全球化条件下,东道国对FDI的宏观经济效应的研究较多,从中观角度,研究FDI的市场结构效应的则较少。同时,这方面研究针对具体产业的多,针对中国市场的多,作一般规律性分析的较少。本文则尝试建立一个比较全面的分析框架,从一般规律性分析FDI的市场结构效应。具体来说,这一部分的主要创新点,表现在:在研究FDI与市场结构的双向作用时,分析了FDI的产业结构,用以说明母国垄断结构对FDI发生的促进作用;建立了规模经济壁垒模型,来说明跨国公司对进入壁垒的突破;分析了跨国公司其他跨国经营方式中跨国许可协议对东道国的市场结构效应。等等。
In modern economy, industrial organization and market structure are important components of one country’s national economy structure. Among the types of market structure, monopoly oligopoly market structure is a significant component and has been becoming the dominant market structure in modern market economy. Under the condition of economic globalization, new traits in the efficiency of monopoly oligopoly market structure appear, so it is necessary to conduct a study about that. Moreover, internationalization of production is one of the most obvious characteristics under the conditions of economic globalization. International production system mainly constituting of multinational companies has been formed in the global economy. Transnational corporations globally conduct internationalization of production and operation, of which the most important international production and operation mode is foreign direct investment (FDI). Transnational corporations’investment deepens international production. Meanwhile, FDI has market structure effects, leading to monopoly oligopoly market structure in the home country spanning across national boundaries to the host country and to the world market. Therefore, the monopoly market structure under the conditions of economic globalization consists of the two dimensions. One is the monopoly market structure within the scope of a country. The other is the monopoly structure’s cross-border transmission formed by transnational corporations’international production and operation and reflected from the perspective of cross-border market. This dissertation will study the monopoly oligopoly market structure under the conditions of economic globalization and focus on these two dimensions.
As to the arrangement of its content, this dissertation will follow industrial organization theories’classification on its structure, act, and performance to study monopoly under the conditions of economic globalization. Its main body is composed by the study of monopoly oligopoly market structure under the conditions of economic globalization and the study of monopoly oligopoly market structure’s efficiency and policy.
The first part of this dissertation introduces the monopoly oligopoly market structure under the conditions of economic globalization. It studies not only monopoly structure within the scope of one country, but also monopoly structure’s cross-border transmitting from the perspective of cross-border market. And it consists of two chapters.
The first chapter studies the concentration of market structure within the scope of a developed country and the formation of an oligopoly market structure. With the development of productive forces and the progress in science and technology, the market structure in developed countries has tended to be concentrated. In modern market economy, monopoly oligopoly market structure has become the dominant market structure in developed countries. This dissertation, analyzing the formation mechanism of monopoly oligopoly market structure from the perspective of the overall market structure or general market structure, points out that the degree of social production, corporate intrinsic motivation----pursuing value added and capital expansion, and corporate external competitive pressures conduct cooperatively, resulting in the concentration of the market structure and the formation of monopolies. It also proposes that mergers and acquisitions (M&A) is an effective approach leading to market concentration. Then through the analysis of several waves of mergers and acquisitions in western countries, it analyzes the formation and the development of monopoly oligopoly structure in developed countries.
The second chapter discusses monopoly structure’s cross-border transmitting under the conditions of economic globalization. In economic globalization, the international production and operation in transnational corporations leads to the monopoly structure within the scope of a developed countries crossing border and transmitting to the host country and to the world market. The transmitting effect is mainly reflected in the concentration effect in host country market structure causing by multinational corporate FDI. The market effect of FDI is different from that of cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Therefore, this dissertation studies the effect of new investment and of cross-border M & A on market structure of the host country, respectively. M & A make a more direct and more obvious effect on market structure concentration. In addition to FDI, transnational corporations apply other internationalization methods of production and operation, such as cross-licensing agreement and cross-border strategic alliances, which promote the host country's market concentration to varying degrees. Finally, the trend of concentration in the world market has also been introduced.
The second part of this dissertation analyzes efficiency and policy. According to structure study in the first part, it can be drawn that the monopoly structure has become an important component of economy whether within the scope of a country’monopoly structure or in the cross-border market structure’s cross-border transmission. It is necessary to analyze its economic efficiency and to propose relevant economic policy guidance based on efficiency analysis. This part will also study from the two dimensions---- within one country market and cross-border market.
On the one hand, it will analyze efficiency and policy of monopoly market structure within the scope of one country from the perspective of general market. The traditional economic analysis on efficiency of monopolistic structure mainly reflected in the welfare analysis of neo-classical economics, maintains that monopolistic structure undermines social welfare, damages the efficiency of resource allocation, and is inefficient. That static analysis ignores the advantages of monopoly structure in dynamic technological innovation efficiency. With the development of economic theory, industrial organization theory of the Chicago School holds that monopolistic structure formed in competition is the outcome of corporate pursuit of efficiency. The efficiency of monopolistic structure is increasingly being recognized in economic circles. Under the conditions of economic globalization and knowledge-based economy, new characteristics in monopolistic structure appear, namely, the monopoly structure being more competitive. Meanwhile, under the conditions of economic globalization, the international competition becomes increasingly fierce. Larger domestic monopoly manufacturers tend to be more competitive in international competition with monopoly structure’s efficiency in international competition. Therefore, under the conditions of economic globalization monopoly oligopoly structure shows its high efficiency. Accordingly, anti-monopoly regulations on monopolistic structure gradually slacken in many countries, anti-monopoly law following the change from the“structuralism”to“behaviorism”. At the same time, for the need of international competition, many countries unprecedentedly relax their regulation on mergers and acquisitions.
On the other hand, it will study FDI’s positive and negative impacts on the concentration of host country’s market structure from the perspective of
cross-border market. Positive impacts are as follows: for the host country’s extremely decentralized market structure, the market concentration effect of FDI from multinational companies, to some extent, promotes the optimization of the host country market structure. Raising barriers to entry in the host country will help host country eliminate its inefficient enterprises and promote efficiency of the entire industry. Negative effects goes as follows: the impacts of multinational companies’FDI on the concentration of host country’s market structure leads to the formation of transnational corporations’transnational monopoly in host countries, which may bring out transnational corporations’monopolistic practices or help multinational companies control the host country's economy threatening host country’s economic security. Therefore, the host country must take into account the different effects of both positive and negative impact to establish flexible and diversified foreign policy. At the same time it is necessary to implement anti-monopoly law against the acts of transnational monopoly. The last part of this dissertation applies results of the aforementioned analysis to guide Chinese market. Owing to the inertia in China's traditional planned economy, government still intervenes in the economy generally, existing common administrative monopoly structure. Moreover, the local government’s regional blockade and duplication of investment form the decentralized market structure with comparatively low concentration in our country. Then it can be drawn that the formation of market structure in China has been under the shadow of government intervention. Therefore, firstly, it is necessary to choose policy focusing on anti-administrative monopoly and separating the government from enterprises. Secondly, it is critical to promote market concentration and to efficiently select appropriate monopoly oligopoly structure as the structure of our target markets.
To sum up, this dissertation systematically and comprehensively analyzes the formation of monopoly structure, the cross-border transmission of that, the efficiency and non-efficiency of that, as well as discussion about related policy under the conditions of economic globalization.
Innovation of this dissertation goes as follows
1. Innovation in selection of the study perspective and arrangement of the study structure. This dissertation, starting with“monopoly structure under the condition of economic globalization”, studies the monopolization in an open economic environment, which embodies the innovation in the study perspective. Meanwhile, in the framework of“monopoly structure under the condition of economic globalization”, the main two dimensions of this dissertation----“the monopoly structure within the scope of one country”and“the international transmitting of the monopoly structure under the condition of economic globalization”---- are closely connected, which reflects the innovation in the structure of this dissertation.
2. Innovation in the content of this dissertation
As to the efficiency analysis on the monopoly structure within the scope of one country: Under the impact of traditional economics, there are numerous researches on the negative effect of monopoly structure, while the positive influence of that is comparatively sparse and scattered, lacking of systematic analysis. This dissertation manages to collect relevant viewpoints on the efficiency of monopoly structure and to make comprehensive summery of them.
As to the impact of FDI on market structure of host country: Under the condition of globalization, there are abundant studies about the influence of FDI on the host country’s macro economy. However, seldom there are researches analyzing the impact of FDI on host country’s market structure via the intermediate perspective. Meanwhile, many researches aim to the specific industries, or to Chinese market, and hardly to general regularity analysis. This dissertation attempts to establish a comparatively comprehensive framework to analyze the influence of FDI on market structure via general regularity analysis. Specifically, the key innovation of this part is shown as follow: discussing the two-way roles between FDI and market structure and analyzing industry structure of FDI to illustrate home country’s monopoly structure can promote FDI, establishing barriers to economies of scale model to demonstrate transnational corporation’s breaking through barriers to entry, and analyzing the impact of other transnational management manners conducted by transnational corporations on host country’s market structure.
在内容安排上,论文将遵循产业组织理论的结构、行为、绩效分类方法,对经济全球化条件下垄断的研究,主要内容也分为经济全球化条件下的垄断寡占市场结构研究和对垄断寡占市场结构的效率、政策研究两部分来展开。
论文第一部分为结构研究,研究经济全球化条件下的垄断寡占市场结构。不仅要研究一国范围内的垄断结构,还要从跨国市场角度研究垄断结构的跨国传递。分为两个章节来展开。
第一章研究发达国家一国范围内的市场结构的集中趋势和垄断寡占市场结构的形成。随着生产力发展,科技进步,发达国家的市场结构有趋于集中的趋势,现代市场经济条件下,垄断寡占市场结构已成为发达国家主导的市场结构。论文从总体市场结构或一般市场结构角度分析了垄断寡占结构的形成机制,指出生产的社会化程度、企业追求价值增值、追求资本扩张的内在动机以及企业的外在竞争压力,共同作用,促成了市场的集中与垄断结构的形成。并指出并购是市场趋于集中的有效途径,最后,通过分析西方发达国家的几次并购浪潮,分析了发达国家垄断寡占结构的形成与发展。
第二章研究经济全球化条件下垄断结构的跨国传递。经济全球化下,跨国公司的国际化生产经营,使得发达国家一国范围内的垄断结构,跨越国界,向东道国和世界市场传递。这种传递效应主要通过跨国公司FDI对东道国的市场结构集中效应表现出来的。由于FDI新建投资和跨国并购投资的市场效应有所不同,论文对新建投资和跨国并购投资的对东道国的市场结构效应分别进行了研究。并购投资的市场结构集中效应更直接、更显著。除了FDI外,跨国公司还有其他的国际化生产经营方式,如跨国许可协议、跨国战略联盟等,这些经营方式也不同程度上促进了东道国的市场集中。最后,对世界市场的集中化趋势也进行了介绍。
论文第二部分则展开效率与政策研究。根据第一部分的结构研究可知,不论是一国范围内的垄断结构,还是在跨国市场垄断结构的跨国传递,垄断结构成为经济生活中的重要组成部分。有必要对其经济效率进行分析,并在效率分析基础上对相关经济政策提出指导性意见。这部分仍然分一国市场与跨国市场两方面来展开。
一方面,从一般市场角度分析一国范围内垄断市场结构的效率与政策。传统经济学对垄断结构的效率分析主要是新古典经济学的福利分析法,认为垄断结构损害了社会福利,损害了资源配置效率,是低效率的。这种静态分析忽视了垄断结构在动态的技术创新效率上的优势。随着经济学理论的发展,产业组织理论芝加哥学派认为,竞争中形成的垄断结构是企业追求效率的结果。垄断结构效率性的一面越来越被经济学界所承认。经济全球化与知识经济条件下,垄断结构呈现出新特质,即垄断结构的竞争性更强,是富有竞争性的垄断结构。同时经济全球化条件下,国际竞争日趋激烈,国内的大垄断厂商在国际市场上有较强的竞争力,垄断结构具有国际竞争方面的效率性。因此经济全球化条件下垄断寡占结构表现出更高的效率性。相应的,各国对垄断结构的反垄断规制越来越放松,反垄断法从“结构主义”向“行为主义”转变。同时,为了国际竞争的需要,各国对企业并购的规制也出现了前所未有的放松。
另一方面,则从跨国市场角度分析了FDI对东道国市场结构的集中效应所产生的正、反两方面影响。正面影响体现为:针对东道国原有的过度分散市场结构,跨国公司FDI的市场集中效应,一定程度上促进了东道国市场结构的优化,其对进入壁垒的提高,有利于淘汰掉东道国低效率企业,使整个产业效率提高。负面效应则表现为:跨国公司FDI对东道国的集中效应,形成了跨国公司在东道国的跨国垄断,可能会带来跨国公司的垄断行为,也可能会造成跨国公司对东道国经济的控制,形成经济安全问题。因此东道国的外资政策必须考虑正反两方面不同影响,制定灵活多样的外资政策。同时针对跨国垄断行为,实施反垄断法加以规制。
论文最后一部分则是把前述章节中的分析结果用于对中国市场的指导。由于我国传统计划经济惯性作用,政府仍普遍对经济进行干预,行政垄断结构较为普遍。另一方面,地方政府的地区封锁、重复投资,使我国呈现出低集中、分散型市场结构。可见我国市场结构的形成一直都有政府干预的影子。因此,政策选择上首先需要反行政垄断,政企分开。其次则要促进市场集中,以富有效率的适度集中的垄断寡占结构作为我国的目标市场结构。
综上,本论文系统、全面地分析了经济全球化条件下垄断结构的形成、跨国传递、垄断结构的效率性与非效率性、以及相关政策的讨论等。
论文的主要创新之处:
1、研究角度与论文结构的创新。论文以“经济全球化条件下的垄断结构”为切入点,将垄断放在开放经济环境下来研究,在研究角度上有创新性。同时在“经济全球化条件下的垄断结构”这一框架下,将“一国范围内的垄断结构”和“全球化条件下垄断结构的跨国传导”两部分内容有机地融合在一起。构成了论文的两个主要层面。因此,在论文结构上有创新。
2、研究内容的创新:
(1)在研究一国范围内垄断结构的效率分析方面:受传统经济学影响,对垄断结构负面效应的研究较多。对正面效应的研究较少,并且比较零散,缺乏系统分析。本文则试图收集研究垄断结构效率性一面的相关观点,做一较为全面的总结概括。
(2)在研究FDI对东道国的市场结构效应方面:全球化条件下,东道国对FDI的宏观经济效应的研究较多,从中观角度,研究FDI的市场结构效应的则较少。同时,这方面研究针对具体产业的多,针对中国市场的多,作一般规律性分析的较少。本文则尝试建立一个比较全面的分析框架,从一般规律性分析FDI的市场结构效应。具体来说,这一部分的主要创新点,表现在:在研究FDI与市场结构的双向作用时,分析了FDI的产业结构,用以说明母国垄断结构对FDI发生的促进作用;建立了规模经济壁垒模型,来说明跨国公司对进入壁垒的突破;分析了跨国公司其他跨国经营方式中跨国许可协议对东道国的市场结构效应。等等。
In modern economy, industrial organization and market structure are important components of one country’s national economy structure. Among the types of market structure, monopoly oligopoly market structure is a significant component and has been becoming the dominant market structure in modern market economy. Under the condition of economic globalization, new traits in the efficiency of monopoly oligopoly market structure appear, so it is necessary to conduct a study about that. Moreover, internationalization of production is one of the most obvious characteristics under the conditions of economic globalization. International production system mainly constituting of multinational companies has been formed in the global economy. Transnational corporations globally conduct internationalization of production and operation, of which the most important international production and operation mode is foreign direct investment (FDI). Transnational corporations’investment deepens international production. Meanwhile, FDI has market structure effects, leading to monopoly oligopoly market structure in the home country spanning across national boundaries to the host country and to the world market. Therefore, the monopoly market structure under the conditions of economic globalization consists of the two dimensions. One is the monopoly market structure within the scope of a country. The other is the monopoly structure’s cross-border transmission formed by transnational corporations’international production and operation and reflected from the perspective of cross-border market. This dissertation will study the monopoly oligopoly market structure under the conditions of economic globalization and focus on these two dimensions.
As to the arrangement of its content, this dissertation will follow industrial organization theories’classification on its structure, act, and performance to study monopoly under the conditions of economic globalization. Its main body is composed by the study of monopoly oligopoly market structure under the conditions of economic globalization and the study of monopoly oligopoly market structure’s efficiency and policy.
The first part of this dissertation introduces the monopoly oligopoly market structure under the conditions of economic globalization. It studies not only monopoly structure within the scope of one country, but also monopoly structure’s cross-border transmitting from the perspective of cross-border market. And it consists of two chapters.
The first chapter studies the concentration of market structure within the scope of a developed country and the formation of an oligopoly market structure. With the development of productive forces and the progress in science and technology, the market structure in developed countries has tended to be concentrated. In modern market economy, monopoly oligopoly market structure has become the dominant market structure in developed countries. This dissertation, analyzing the formation mechanism of monopoly oligopoly market structure from the perspective of the overall market structure or general market structure, points out that the degree of social production, corporate intrinsic motivation----pursuing value added and capital expansion, and corporate external competitive pressures conduct cooperatively, resulting in the concentration of the market structure and the formation of monopolies. It also proposes that mergers and acquisitions (M&A) is an effective approach leading to market concentration. Then through the analysis of several waves of mergers and acquisitions in western countries, it analyzes the formation and the development of monopoly oligopoly structure in developed countries.
The second chapter discusses monopoly structure’s cross-border transmitting under the conditions of economic globalization. In economic globalization, the international production and operation in transnational corporations leads to the monopoly structure within the scope of a developed countries crossing border and transmitting to the host country and to the world market. The transmitting effect is mainly reflected in the concentration effect in host country market structure causing by multinational corporate FDI. The market effect of FDI is different from that of cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Therefore, this dissertation studies the effect of new investment and of cross-border M & A on market structure of the host country, respectively. M & A make a more direct and more obvious effect on market structure concentration. In addition to FDI, transnational corporations apply other internationalization methods of production and operation, such as cross-licensing agreement and cross-border strategic alliances, which promote the host country's market concentration to varying degrees. Finally, the trend of concentration in the world market has also been introduced.
The second part of this dissertation analyzes efficiency and policy. According to structure study in the first part, it can be drawn that the monopoly structure has become an important component of economy whether within the scope of a country’monopoly structure or in the cross-border market structure’s cross-border transmission. It is necessary to analyze its economic efficiency and to propose relevant economic policy guidance based on efficiency analysis. This part will also study from the two dimensions---- within one country market and cross-border market.
On the one hand, it will analyze efficiency and policy of monopoly market structure within the scope of one country from the perspective of general market. The traditional economic analysis on efficiency of monopolistic structure mainly reflected in the welfare analysis of neo-classical economics, maintains that monopolistic structure undermines social welfare, damages the efficiency of resource allocation, and is inefficient. That static analysis ignores the advantages of monopoly structure in dynamic technological innovation efficiency. With the development of economic theory, industrial organization theory of the Chicago School holds that monopolistic structure formed in competition is the outcome of corporate pursuit of efficiency. The efficiency of monopolistic structure is increasingly being recognized in economic circles. Under the conditions of economic globalization and knowledge-based economy, new characteristics in monopolistic structure appear, namely, the monopoly structure being more competitive. Meanwhile, under the conditions of economic globalization, the international competition becomes increasingly fierce. Larger domestic monopoly manufacturers tend to be more competitive in international competition with monopoly structure’s efficiency in international competition. Therefore, under the conditions of economic globalization monopoly oligopoly structure shows its high efficiency. Accordingly, anti-monopoly regulations on monopolistic structure gradually slacken in many countries, anti-monopoly law following the change from the“structuralism”to“behaviorism”. At the same time, for the need of international competition, many countries unprecedentedly relax their regulation on mergers and acquisitions.
On the other hand, it will study FDI’s positive and negative impacts on the concentration of host country’s market structure from the perspective of
cross-border market. Positive impacts are as follows: for the host country’s extremely decentralized market structure, the market concentration effect of FDI from multinational companies, to some extent, promotes the optimization of the host country market structure. Raising barriers to entry in the host country will help host country eliminate its inefficient enterprises and promote efficiency of the entire industry. Negative effects goes as follows: the impacts of multinational companies’FDI on the concentration of host country’s market structure leads to the formation of transnational corporations’transnational monopoly in host countries, which may bring out transnational corporations’monopolistic practices or help multinational companies control the host country's economy threatening host country’s economic security. Therefore, the host country must take into account the different effects of both positive and negative impact to establish flexible and diversified foreign policy. At the same time it is necessary to implement anti-monopoly law against the acts of transnational monopoly. The last part of this dissertation applies results of the aforementioned analysis to guide Chinese market. Owing to the inertia in China's traditional planned economy, government still intervenes in the economy generally, existing common administrative monopoly structure. Moreover, the local government’s regional blockade and duplication of investment form the decentralized market structure with comparatively low concentration in our country. Then it can be drawn that the formation of market structure in China has been under the shadow of government intervention. Therefore, firstly, it is necessary to choose policy focusing on anti-administrative monopoly and separating the government from enterprises. Secondly, it is critical to promote market concentration and to efficiently select appropriate monopoly oligopoly structure as the structure of our target markets.
To sum up, this dissertation systematically and comprehensively analyzes the formation of monopoly structure, the cross-border transmission of that, the efficiency and non-efficiency of that, as well as discussion about related policy under the conditions of economic globalization.
Innovation of this dissertation goes as follows
1. Innovation in selection of the study perspective and arrangement of the study structure. This dissertation, starting with“monopoly structure under the condition of economic globalization”, studies the monopolization in an open economic environment, which embodies the innovation in the study perspective. Meanwhile, in the framework of“monopoly structure under the condition of economic globalization”, the main two dimensions of this dissertation----“the monopoly structure within the scope of one country”and“the international transmitting of the monopoly structure under the condition of economic globalization”---- are closely connected, which reflects the innovation in the structure of this dissertation.
2. Innovation in the content of this dissertation
As to the efficiency analysis on the monopoly structure within the scope of one country: Under the impact of traditional economics, there are numerous researches on the negative effect of monopoly structure, while the positive influence of that is comparatively sparse and scattered, lacking of systematic analysis. This dissertation manages to collect relevant viewpoints on the efficiency of monopoly structure and to make comprehensive summery of them.
As to the impact of FDI on market structure of host country: Under the condition of globalization, there are abundant studies about the influence of FDI on the host country’s macro economy. However, seldom there are researches analyzing the impact of FDI on host country’s market structure via the intermediate perspective. Meanwhile, many researches aim to the specific industries, or to Chinese market, and hardly to general regularity analysis. This dissertation attempts to establish a comparatively comprehensive framework to analyze the influence of FDI on market structure via general regularity analysis. Specifically, the key innovation of this part is shown as follow: discussing the two-way roles between FDI and market structure and analyzing industry structure of FDI to illustrate home country’s monopoly structure can promote FDI, establishing barriers to economies of scale model to demonstrate transnational corporation’s breaking through barriers to entry, and analyzing the impact of other transnational management manners conducted by transnational corporations on host country’s market structure.
引文
1、杨公朴、夏大慰,《产业经济学教程》,上海财经大学出版社1998年版。
2、刘志彪,安同良,王国生,《现代产业经济分析》,南京大学出版社,2001
3、王俊豪,《现代产业组织理论与政策》,中国经济出版社,2000.
4、斯蒂格勒,《产业组织和政府管制》,三联书店上海分店,1989。
5、植草益,《日本的产业组织---理论与实证的前沿》,经济管理出版社,2000
6、泰勒尔,《产业组织理论》,中国人民大学出版社,1997.
7、张伯伦,《垄断竞争理论》,北京商务印书馆,1965.
8、琼.罗宾逊,《琼.罗宾逊经济学论文选》,北京商务印书馆,1984
9、《马克思恩格斯全集》,第1卷,人民出版社
10、《列宁选集》第二卷,人民出版社1995年版
11、《政治经济学》,西南财经大学出版社,1998.
12、小艾尔弗雷德.D.钱德勒,《看得见的手》,商务印书馆1997年版
13、小艾尔弗雷德.D.钱德勒,《企业规模与范围经济》,中国社会科学出版社,1999.
14、《新帕尔格雷夫经济学大辞典》第三卷,经济科学出版社1996年版
15、联合国贸易与发展会议(UNCTAD),《世界投资报告》,1997--2004
16、《中国统计年鉴》(1990—2005)
17、杜传中:《20世纪90年代以来西方国家工业集中度趋势》
18、高峰,《发达资本主义经济中的垄断与竞争----垄断资本理论研究》,南开大学出版社1996年版
19、龚维敬,《美国垄断资本集中》,人民出版社,1986.4
20、梁爱云,《发达资本主义国家的寡头垄断市场结构》,当代资本主义经济的新发展,2001.10
21、杨挺,《经济全球化背景下国际垄断问题研究》,武汉理工大学硕士学位论文,2004.
22、F.M.谢勒尔,《产业市场结构与经济绩效》.
23、R.B.杜博夫,《积累与权力》,1989年英文版.
24、邵万钦,《美国企业并购浪潮》,中国商务出版社2005年1月版.
25、姚战旗,《跨国并购对市场结构变动及国际资本流动的影响》,中国社科院博士学位论文,2003.
26、唐要家、唐春晖,《序列市场结构与纵向并购的经济效应》,产业经济评论,2008.1.
27、刘毓,《国有上市公司横向并购的市场结构效应研究》,证券市场导报,2008.5.
28、李燕,《论跨国并购中的垄断问题及规制》,华东政法学院硕士学位论文,2004.
29、何为民,《并购、集中与市场经济发展》,厦门大学博士学位论文,2002.
30、张纪康,《直接投资与市场结构效应》,上海财经大学出版社,1999年版.
31、唐晓鹏,《外商直接投资与东道国市场结构研究》,山东大学博士学位论文,2007.
32、杨镭,《跨国并购与政府规制》,社科院博士学位论文,2003.
33、张宏,《跨国公司与东道国市场结构》,经济科学出版社,2006.
34、沈芳,《经济理论对美国反垄断政策的影响》,上海师范大学学报,2008.2.
35、蒋殿春,《跨国公司与市场结构》,商务印书馆1998年版.
36、杜传忠,《寡头垄断市场结构与经济效率》,经济科学出版社,2003.
37、张维迎,《博弈论与信息经济学》,上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,1996.
38、张纪康,《直接投资:进入、壁垒和效应》,山西经济出版社,1998.
39、江小涓,《中国外资经济----对增长、结构升级和竞争力的贡献》,中国人民大学出版社,2002.
40、马建堂,《结构与行为:中国产业组织研究》,中国人民大学出版社,1993.
41、戚聿东,《中国垄断经济学》,经济管理出版社,1999.
42、藤维藻、陈荫枋,《跨国公司概论》,人民出版社,1992.
43、王惠炯,《产业组织与有效竞争---中国产业组织的初步研究》,中国经济出版社,1991.
44、魏后凯,《市场竞争、经济绩效与产业集中》,经济管理出版社,2003.
45、姜睿,《产业结构-市场结构与外国直接投资》,华东师范大学博士学位论文,2004.
46、易小佳,《跨国公司投资对我国市场结构效应研究》,湖南大学硕士学位论文,2006.
47、陈爱贞,《中国三元市场结构的垄断与竞争博弈分析》,厦门大学博士学位论文,2006.
48、张晖,《FDI对中国制造业市场结构的影响》,复旦大学博士学位论文,2005.
49、戚聿东,《资源优化配置的垄断机制》,经济研究,1997.2.
50、陈素琼,《知识经济条件下技术创新与垄断结构关系研究》.
51、沈芳,《经济理论对美国反垄断政策的影响》,上海师范大学学报,2008.2.
52、唐要家唐春晖,《美国反托拉斯法的新发展与我国反垄断法的效率原则指向》,产业经济研究,2003.4.
53、龚维敬,《垄断经济学》,上海人民出版社,2007.2.
54、邓俊荣,《网络经济视角下寡头垄断效率分析》,河北经贸大学学报,2005.5.
55、戚聿东,《垄断的资源配置效应分析》,学习与探索,2000.1.
56、陈华,《垄断与反垄断理论的最新发展》,经济学家,2006.5.
57、周绍东朱乾龙,《网络经济下垄断的动态效率探析》,南方经济,2006.11.
58、沈蕾,《跨国竞争对反垄断的抑制作用》,中国工业经济,2003.6.
59、贾小龙、王炜敏,《反垄断法的域外适用探究》,社科纵横,2005.5.
60、朱峰,《WTO与国际反垄断规则统一化趋势》,商业经济与管理,2003.3
61、王磊,《中国反垄断法的亮点、挑战与对策》,中国工商管理研究,2008.4
62、肖彦山,马绍峰,《中国反垄断法的成功与缺陷》,石家庄经济学院学报,2008.5
63、盖葳,《新经济形势下我国出台《反垄断法》及其得失》,吉林工商学院学报,2008.1
64、赵进华,王太金,《针对中国反垄断立法的几点建议》,东北大学学报,2007.3
65、路军奉,《关于中国反垄断立法的几点思考》,湖南公安高等专科学校学报,2008.5
66、刘茂松、曹虹剑,,中国工业经济,《论经济全球化时代跨国公司垄断结构》,2004.9
67、曹虹剑,《论经济全球化时代跨国公司垄断结构》,湖南师范大学硕士学位论文,2005.
68、杜传忠,《网络型寡占市场结构与中国产业的国际竞争力》,中国工业经济,2003.6.
69、冯丽、李海舰,《从竞争范式到垄断范式》,中国工业经济,2003.9.
70、李海舰,《外资进入与国家经济安全》,《中国工业经济》,1997.8
71、臧旭恒、裴春霞,《中国产业组织结构分析及展望》,财经研究,2001.2
72、魏后凯,《市场竞争、经济绩效与产业集中》,经济管理出版社,2003年版.
73、《中国产业发展报告》,华夏出版社2004年版.
74、丁启军,伊淑彪,《中国行政垄断行业效率损失研究》,山西财经大学学报,2008.12.
75、李霞,《行政性垄断浅析》,成都理工大学学报(社会科学版),2005.1.
76、胡鞍钢,《反垄断是一场深刻的社会经济变革》北京观察,2001.10
77、吕晓萍,《对我国行政垄断现状的分析》,当代经济研究,2002.3.
78、胡鞍钢,《中国挑战腐败》浙江人民出版社,2001.
79、《中国汽车工业年鉴》1993-2000年.
80、《中国产业发展蓝皮书》,华夏出版社2003年版.
81、《中国企业跨国发展研究报告》,中国社会科学出版社2005年版.
82、王洛林,《2000中国外商投资报告---大型跨国公司在中国的投资》,中国财政经济出版社,2000年版.
83、江小涓:《利用外资领域的理论研究》,经济学动态,2001.3
84、陈素琼,《知识经济条件下技术创新与垄断结构关系研究》,湖南师范大学硕士学位论文,2006.
85、柳青,《中、日、韩反垄断比较分析》,武汉理工大学硕士学位论文,2006.
86、J.S.Bain,Barriers to New Competition,Harvard University Press,1956.
87、William G. Shepherd.“The Economics of Industrial Organization (forth edition)”,Prentice Hall press.
88、Peter.Nolan,China and the Global Economy,Palgrave,2001.
89、Saronovitch,Sawyer.并购发展与市场集中[N].牛津经济报,伦敦麦克米伦出版社,1976.
90、National Industrial Conference Board,1929,Mergers and Law.
91、Moody,John,1904,“The Truth about the Trusts”,New Youk,Moody publishing Company.
92、Fortune,August,2,1999.
93、Hymer.S.,The International Operation of National Firms—A Study of Direct Foreign Investment,Cambridge,Mass,MIT Press,1960.
94、Kindleberger.C.P.,American Business Abroad:Six Lectures on Direct Investment(New Haven,Yale Universtiy Press,1969.
95、Dunning,J.H.,Economic Analysis and the Multinational Enterprise.New York,Praeger.1974.
96、J. Connor,The Market Power of Multinationals,New York,Praeger.1977.
97、Arrow,K(1962),“Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resourse for Inventive”,The Rate and Direction of 98、Inventive Activity, Princeton University Press.
98、Fortune,2000—2006.
99、Vernon,R.,The Location of Economic Activity,1974.
100、Knicherbocker.F.T.,Oligopolistic Reaction and Multinational Interprise Cambridge,Mass:Harvard University.
101、Caves.R.E.,Cause of direct investment,Review of Economies and Statistics,1974.
102、National Industrial Conference Board,1929,Mergers and Law.
103、J.Moody,The Truth about the Trust,New York,1904,P487.
104、Fortune,August,2,1999.
105、Eredericl.Pryor,News from the Monopoly Front:Changes in Industrial Concentration,1992—1997,Review of Industrial Organization 20,2002.
106、L.Pryor, New Trends in U.S. Industrial Concentration,Review of Industrial Organization 18,2001.
107、Adams,Walter,The Structure of American Industry,Prentice Hall Inc,New York,2001.
108、Bade,Robin,Foundations of Microeconomics,Pearson Education Inc,2004.
109、Federal Trade Commission,Burean of Economics,Statistical Report on Mergers and Acquisitions,Washington,1980—1990.
110、Domhoff,G..William,Power Structure Research,California Beverly Hills,1980.
111.Fine,B and Murfin, Macroeconomics and Monopoly Capitalism,Brighton,Wheatsheaf,1984.
112、Dunning,J.H.,Globalization,Trade and Foreign Direct Investment,Elsevier science Ltd.1998.
113、Fishwick,F., Multinational Companies and Economics Concentration in Europe,Aldershot:Gower Publishing Company.1982.
114、Demsetz,H.,Industrial Structure ,Market Rivalry and Public Policy, Journal of Iaw Economics.1973.
115、Buckly,P.J. and Casson,M,The Future of the Multinatiional Enterprise,London Macmillan..1976.
116、Tayler,John B.,Economics ,Houghton Mifflin Co.Boston,2005.
117、Sutton,John, Technology and Market Structure:Theory and History, The MIT Press,1998.
118、Frank,Robert H,Microeconomics and Behavior,The McGraw-Hill Co.Inc.2003.
119、Lin,Y.Joseph,Oligopoly and Vertical Intergration,American Economic Review.1988.
1《马克思恩格斯全集》第4卷,人民出版社1958年版,P178
1 Dunning,J.H.,Economic Analysis and the Multinational Enterprise.New York,Praeger.1974.
1 Vernon,R.,The Location of Economic Activity,1974.
2 Knicherbocker.F.T.,Oligopolistic Reaction and Multinational Interprise Cambridge,Mass:Harvard University.
1 Caves.R.E.,Cause of direct investment,Review of Economies and Statistics,1974.
1 J.S.Bain,Barriers to New Competition,Harvard University Press,1956,p3.
2斯蒂格勒,《产业组织和政府管制》,三联书店上海分店,1989,P69.
3 J.S.Bain,《产业组织》,转引自杨公朴、夏大慰主编《产业经济学教程》,上海财经大学出版社1998年版,P137.
1《马克思恩格斯全集》,第1卷,人民出版社,P141.
1斯蒂格勒,《产业组织和政府管制》,三联书店上海分店,1989,P3.
1杜传忠,《寡头垄断市场结构与经济效率》,经济科学出版社,P177.
2斯蒂格勒,《产业组织和政府管制》,三联书店上海分店,1989,P10.
1刘志彪,安同良,王国生,《现代产业经济分析》,南京大学出版社,2001,P410.
2 J.S.Bain,Barriers to New Competition,Harvard University Press,1956.
1梁爱云,《发达资本主义国家的寡头垄断市场结构》,当代资本主义经济的新发展,P471.
2 William G. Shepherd.“The Economics of Industrial Organization (forth edition)”,Prentice Hall press.P72.
3 Peter.Nolan,China and the Global Economy,Palgrave,2001
4 Saronovitch,Sawyer.并购发展与市场集中[N].牛津经济报,伦敦麦克米伦出版社,1976,(3).
1 National Industrial Conference Board,1929,Mergers and Law.
2 J.Moody,The Truth about the Trust,New York,1904,P487.
3 F.M.谢勒尔,《产业市场结构与经济绩效》,转引自高峰著《发达资本主义经济中的垄断与竞争—垄断资本理论研究》,南开大学出版社1996年版,P53
1斯蒂格勒,《产业组织和政府管制》,三联书店出版,1989,P12.
1 R.B.杜博夫,《积累与权力》,1989年英文版,P170.
1邵万钦,《美国企业并购浪潮》,中国商务出版社2005年1月版,P109..
2 Fortune,August,2,1999.
3梁爱云,《发达资本主义国家的寡头垄断市场结构》,当代资本主义经济的新发展,P493.
1 Eredericl.Pryor,News from the Monopoly Front:Changes in Industrial Concentration,1992—1997,Review of Industrial Organization 20,2002.
1 R.B.杜博夫,《积累与权力》,1989年英文版,P170
2 L..Pryor, New Trends in U.S. Industrial Concentration,Review of Industrial Organization 18,2001.
1资料来源:根据《1997--2007年世界投资报告》整理,UNCTAD.
1张纪康,《直接投资与市场结构效应》,上海财经大学出版社,1999年版,P71.
1Hymer.S.,The International Operation of National Firms—A Study of Direct Foreign Investment,Cambridge,Mass,MIT Press,1960.
2Kindleberger.C.P.,American Business Abroad:Six Lectures on Direct Investment(New Haven,Yale Universtiy Press,1969,转引自唐晓鹏,《外商直接投资与东道国市场结构研究》,P21.
1唐晓鹏,《外商直接投资与东道国市场结构研究》,P22..
1 Dunning,J.H.,Economic Analysis and the Multinational Enterprise.New York,Praeger.1974.
2姜睿,《产业结构-市场结构与外国直接投资》,华东师范大学,2004..
1唐晓鹏,《外商直接投资与东道国市场结构研究》,P53.
2联合国贸易与发展会议(UNCTAD),《1997世界投资报告》,对外经济贸易大学出版社,P241.
1张纪康,《直接投资与市场结构效应》,上海财经大学出版社,1999年版,P104.
2 J. Connor,The Market Power of Multinationals,New York,Praeger.1977.
1资料来源:根据《1997—2007年世界投资报告》整理,UNCTAD.
1杨镭,《跨国并购与政府规制》,社科院博士学位论文,2003,P49.
1 UNCTAD,《2000年世界投资报告》。
1张宏,《跨国公司与东道国市场结构》,经济科学出版社,2006,P82.
1 UNCTAD,《1997年世界投资报告》,P49.
1 UNCTAD,《1997年世界投资报告》,P52.
1 UNCTAD,《1997年世界投资报告》,P52.
1据Fortune,Augest2,1999有关资料统计。
2杜传中:《20世纪90年代以来西方国家工业集中度趋势》
1转引自:邓俊荣,《网络经济视角下寡头垄断效率分析》,河北经贸大学学报,2005.05.
2小艾尔弗雷德。D。钱德勒,《企业规模经济与范围经济》。转引自张宏,《跨国公司与东道国市场结构》,经济科学出版社,2006,P92.
1张宏,《跨国公司与东道国市场结构》,经济科学出版社,2006.7 .P93.
1龚维敬,《垄断经济学》,上海人民出版社,2007.2,P326.
1 Arrow,K(1962),“Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resourse for Inventive”,The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton University Press.
1转引自戚聿东,《资源优化配置的垄断机制》,经济研究,1997.2
1杜传忠,《寡头垄断市场结构与经济效率》,经济科学出版社,2006.7.P96.
2陈素琼,《知识经济条件下技术创新与垄断结构关系研究》,P24.
1沈芳,《经济理论对美国反垄断政策的影响》,上海师范大学学报,2008第2期。
1唐要家唐春晖,《美国反托拉斯法的新发展与我国反垄断法的效率原则指向》,产业经济研究,2003.4.
1蒋殿春,《跨国公司与市场结构》,商务印书馆1998年版,P134.
1金明路柴志贤,《跨国公司垄断行为及防范对策》,浙江学刊,2002.2
1蒋殿春,《跨国公司与市场结构》,商务印书馆1998年版,P109.
1王习农,《开放经济中企业跨国并购研究》,2004,P206
1易小佳,《跨国公司投资对我国市场结构效应研究》,湖南大学硕士学位论文,2006
1臧旭恒、裴春霞,《中国产业组织结构分析及展望》,财经研究,2001.2.
2杜传忠,《寡头垄断市场结构与经济效率》,经济科学出版社,2003,P218.
1魏后凯,《市场竞争、经济绩效与产业集中》,经济管理出版社,2003年版。P98.
2《中国产业发展报告》,华夏出版社2004年版。P106.
3龚维敬,《垄断经济学》,上海人民出版社,2007.
1龚维敬,《垄断经济学》,上海人民出版社,2007. P590.
2臧旭恒、裴春霞,《中国产业组织结构分析及展望》,财经研究,2001.2
1丁启军,伊淑彪,《中国行政垄断行业效率损失研究》,山西财经大学学报,2008.12.
1李霞,《行政性垄断浅析》,成都理工大学学报(社会科学版),2005.1.
1杜传忠,《寡头垄断市场结构与经济效率》,经济科学出版社,2003,P268.
1张宏,《跨国公司与东道国市场结构》,经济科学出版社,2006.7,P177.
2、刘志彪,安同良,王国生,《现代产业经济分析》,南京大学出版社,2001
3、王俊豪,《现代产业组织理论与政策》,中国经济出版社,2000.
4、斯蒂格勒,《产业组织和政府管制》,三联书店上海分店,1989。
5、植草益,《日本的产业组织---理论与实证的前沿》,经济管理出版社,2000
6、泰勒尔,《产业组织理论》,中国人民大学出版社,1997.
7、张伯伦,《垄断竞争理论》,北京商务印书馆,1965.
8、琼.罗宾逊,《琼.罗宾逊经济学论文选》,北京商务印书馆,1984
9、《马克思恩格斯全集》,第1卷,人民出版社
10、《列宁选集》第二卷,人民出版社1995年版
11、《政治经济学》,西南财经大学出版社,1998.
12、小艾尔弗雷德.D.钱德勒,《看得见的手》,商务印书馆1997年版
13、小艾尔弗雷德.D.钱德勒,《企业规模与范围经济》,中国社会科学出版社,1999.
14、《新帕尔格雷夫经济学大辞典》第三卷,经济科学出版社1996年版
15、联合国贸易与发展会议(UNCTAD),《世界投资报告》,1997--2004
16、《中国统计年鉴》(1990—2005)
17、杜传中:《20世纪90年代以来西方国家工业集中度趋势》
18、高峰,《发达资本主义经济中的垄断与竞争----垄断资本理论研究》,南开大学出版社1996年版
19、龚维敬,《美国垄断资本集中》,人民出版社,1986.4
20、梁爱云,《发达资本主义国家的寡头垄断市场结构》,当代资本主义经济的新发展,2001.10
21、杨挺,《经济全球化背景下国际垄断问题研究》,武汉理工大学硕士学位论文,2004.
22、F.M.谢勒尔,《产业市场结构与经济绩效》.
23、R.B.杜博夫,《积累与权力》,1989年英文版.
24、邵万钦,《美国企业并购浪潮》,中国商务出版社2005年1月版.
25、姚战旗,《跨国并购对市场结构变动及国际资本流动的影响》,中国社科院博士学位论文,2003.
26、唐要家、唐春晖,《序列市场结构与纵向并购的经济效应》,产业经济评论,2008.1.
27、刘毓,《国有上市公司横向并购的市场结构效应研究》,证券市场导报,2008.5.
28、李燕,《论跨国并购中的垄断问题及规制》,华东政法学院硕士学位论文,2004.
29、何为民,《并购、集中与市场经济发展》,厦门大学博士学位论文,2002.
30、张纪康,《直接投资与市场结构效应》,上海财经大学出版社,1999年版.
31、唐晓鹏,《外商直接投资与东道国市场结构研究》,山东大学博士学位论文,2007.
32、杨镭,《跨国并购与政府规制》,社科院博士学位论文,2003.
33、张宏,《跨国公司与东道国市场结构》,经济科学出版社,2006.
34、沈芳,《经济理论对美国反垄断政策的影响》,上海师范大学学报,2008.2.
35、蒋殿春,《跨国公司与市场结构》,商务印书馆1998年版.
36、杜传忠,《寡头垄断市场结构与经济效率》,经济科学出版社,2003.
37、张维迎,《博弈论与信息经济学》,上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,1996.
38、张纪康,《直接投资:进入、壁垒和效应》,山西经济出版社,1998.
39、江小涓,《中国外资经济----对增长、结构升级和竞争力的贡献》,中国人民大学出版社,2002.
40、马建堂,《结构与行为:中国产业组织研究》,中国人民大学出版社,1993.
41、戚聿东,《中国垄断经济学》,经济管理出版社,1999.
42、藤维藻、陈荫枋,《跨国公司概论》,人民出版社,1992.
43、王惠炯,《产业组织与有效竞争---中国产业组织的初步研究》,中国经济出版社,1991.
44、魏后凯,《市场竞争、经济绩效与产业集中》,经济管理出版社,2003.
45、姜睿,《产业结构-市场结构与外国直接投资》,华东师范大学博士学位论文,2004.
46、易小佳,《跨国公司投资对我国市场结构效应研究》,湖南大学硕士学位论文,2006.
47、陈爱贞,《中国三元市场结构的垄断与竞争博弈分析》,厦门大学博士学位论文,2006.
48、张晖,《FDI对中国制造业市场结构的影响》,复旦大学博士学位论文,2005.
49、戚聿东,《资源优化配置的垄断机制》,经济研究,1997.2.
50、陈素琼,《知识经济条件下技术创新与垄断结构关系研究》.
51、沈芳,《经济理论对美国反垄断政策的影响》,上海师范大学学报,2008.2.
52、唐要家唐春晖,《美国反托拉斯法的新发展与我国反垄断法的效率原则指向》,产业经济研究,2003.4.
53、龚维敬,《垄断经济学》,上海人民出版社,2007.2.
54、邓俊荣,《网络经济视角下寡头垄断效率分析》,河北经贸大学学报,2005.5.
55、戚聿东,《垄断的资源配置效应分析》,学习与探索,2000.1.
56、陈华,《垄断与反垄断理论的最新发展》,经济学家,2006.5.
57、周绍东朱乾龙,《网络经济下垄断的动态效率探析》,南方经济,2006.11.
58、沈蕾,《跨国竞争对反垄断的抑制作用》,中国工业经济,2003.6.
59、贾小龙、王炜敏,《反垄断法的域外适用探究》,社科纵横,2005.5.
60、朱峰,《WTO与国际反垄断规则统一化趋势》,商业经济与管理,2003.3
61、王磊,《中国反垄断法的亮点、挑战与对策》,中国工商管理研究,2008.4
62、肖彦山,马绍峰,《中国反垄断法的成功与缺陷》,石家庄经济学院学报,2008.5
63、盖葳,《新经济形势下我国出台《反垄断法》及其得失》,吉林工商学院学报,2008.1
64、赵进华,王太金,《针对中国反垄断立法的几点建议》,东北大学学报,2007.3
65、路军奉,《关于中国反垄断立法的几点思考》,湖南公安高等专科学校学报,2008.5
66、刘茂松、曹虹剑,,中国工业经济,《论经济全球化时代跨国公司垄断结构》,2004.9
67、曹虹剑,《论经济全球化时代跨国公司垄断结构》,湖南师范大学硕士学位论文,2005.
68、杜传忠,《网络型寡占市场结构与中国产业的国际竞争力》,中国工业经济,2003.6.
69、冯丽、李海舰,《从竞争范式到垄断范式》,中国工业经济,2003.9.
70、李海舰,《外资进入与国家经济安全》,《中国工业经济》,1997.8
71、臧旭恒、裴春霞,《中国产业组织结构分析及展望》,财经研究,2001.2
72、魏后凯,《市场竞争、经济绩效与产业集中》,经济管理出版社,2003年版.
73、《中国产业发展报告》,华夏出版社2004年版.
74、丁启军,伊淑彪,《中国行政垄断行业效率损失研究》,山西财经大学学报,2008.12.
75、李霞,《行政性垄断浅析》,成都理工大学学报(社会科学版),2005.1.
76、胡鞍钢,《反垄断是一场深刻的社会经济变革》北京观察,2001.10
77、吕晓萍,《对我国行政垄断现状的分析》,当代经济研究,2002.3.
78、胡鞍钢,《中国挑战腐败》浙江人民出版社,2001.
79、《中国汽车工业年鉴》1993-2000年.
80、《中国产业发展蓝皮书》,华夏出版社2003年版.
81、《中国企业跨国发展研究报告》,中国社会科学出版社2005年版.
82、王洛林,《2000中国外商投资报告---大型跨国公司在中国的投资》,中国财政经济出版社,2000年版.
83、江小涓:《利用外资领域的理论研究》,经济学动态,2001.3
84、陈素琼,《知识经济条件下技术创新与垄断结构关系研究》,湖南师范大学硕士学位论文,2006.
85、柳青,《中、日、韩反垄断比较分析》,武汉理工大学硕士学位论文,2006.
86、J.S.Bain,Barriers to New Competition,Harvard University Press,1956.
87、William G. Shepherd.“The Economics of Industrial Organization (forth edition)”,Prentice Hall press.
88、Peter.Nolan,China and the Global Economy,Palgrave,2001.
89、Saronovitch,Sawyer.并购发展与市场集中[N].牛津经济报,伦敦麦克米伦出版社,1976.
90、National Industrial Conference Board,1929,Mergers and Law.
91、Moody,John,1904,“The Truth about the Trusts”,New Youk,Moody publishing Company.
92、Fortune,August,2,1999.
93、Hymer.S.,The International Operation of National Firms—A Study of Direct Foreign Investment,Cambridge,Mass,MIT Press,1960.
94、Kindleberger.C.P.,American Business Abroad:Six Lectures on Direct Investment(New Haven,Yale Universtiy Press,1969.
95、Dunning,J.H.,Economic Analysis and the Multinational Enterprise.New York,Praeger.1974.
96、J. Connor,The Market Power of Multinationals,New York,Praeger.1977.
97、Arrow,K(1962),“Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resourse for Inventive”,The Rate and Direction of 98、Inventive Activity, Princeton University Press.
98、Fortune,2000—2006.
99、Vernon,R.,The Location of Economic Activity,1974.
100、Knicherbocker.F.T.,Oligopolistic Reaction and Multinational Interprise Cambridge,Mass:Harvard University.
101、Caves.R.E.,Cause of direct investment,Review of Economies and Statistics,1974.
102、National Industrial Conference Board,1929,Mergers and Law.
103、J.Moody,The Truth about the Trust,New York,1904,P487.
104、Fortune,August,2,1999.
105、Eredericl.Pryor,News from the Monopoly Front:Changes in Industrial Concentration,1992—1997,Review of Industrial Organization 20,2002.
106、L.Pryor, New Trends in U.S. Industrial Concentration,Review of Industrial Organization 18,2001.
107、Adams,Walter,The Structure of American Industry,Prentice Hall Inc,New York,2001.
108、Bade,Robin,Foundations of Microeconomics,Pearson Education Inc,2004.
109、Federal Trade Commission,Burean of Economics,Statistical Report on Mergers and Acquisitions,Washington,1980—1990.
110、Domhoff,G..William,Power Structure Research,California Beverly Hills,1980.
111.Fine,B and Murfin, Macroeconomics and Monopoly Capitalism,Brighton,Wheatsheaf,1984.
112、Dunning,J.H.,Globalization,Trade and Foreign Direct Investment,Elsevier science Ltd.1998.
113、Fishwick,F., Multinational Companies and Economics Concentration in Europe,Aldershot:Gower Publishing Company.1982.
114、Demsetz,H.,Industrial Structure ,Market Rivalry and Public Policy, Journal of Iaw Economics.1973.
115、Buckly,P.J. and Casson,M,The Future of the Multinatiional Enterprise,London Macmillan..1976.
116、Tayler,John B.,Economics ,Houghton Mifflin Co.Boston,2005.
117、Sutton,John, Technology and Market Structure:Theory and History, The MIT Press,1998.
118、Frank,Robert H,Microeconomics and Behavior,The McGraw-Hill Co.Inc.2003.
119、Lin,Y.Joseph,Oligopoly and Vertical Intergration,American Economic Review.1988.
1《马克思恩格斯全集》第4卷,人民出版社1958年版,P178
1 Dunning,J.H.,Economic Analysis and the Multinational Enterprise.New York,Praeger.1974.
1 Vernon,R.,The Location of Economic Activity,1974.
2 Knicherbocker.F.T.,Oligopolistic Reaction and Multinational Interprise Cambridge,Mass:Harvard University.
1 Caves.R.E.,Cause of direct investment,Review of Economies and Statistics,1974.
1 J.S.Bain,Barriers to New Competition,Harvard University Press,1956,p3.
2斯蒂格勒,《产业组织和政府管制》,三联书店上海分店,1989,P69.
3 J.S.Bain,《产业组织》,转引自杨公朴、夏大慰主编《产业经济学教程》,上海财经大学出版社1998年版,P137.
1《马克思恩格斯全集》,第1卷,人民出版社,P141.
1斯蒂格勒,《产业组织和政府管制》,三联书店上海分店,1989,P3.
1杜传忠,《寡头垄断市场结构与经济效率》,经济科学出版社,P177.
2斯蒂格勒,《产业组织和政府管制》,三联书店上海分店,1989,P10.
1刘志彪,安同良,王国生,《现代产业经济分析》,南京大学出版社,2001,P410.
2 J.S.Bain,Barriers to New Competition,Harvard University Press,1956.
1梁爱云,《发达资本主义国家的寡头垄断市场结构》,当代资本主义经济的新发展,P471.
2 William G. Shepherd.“The Economics of Industrial Organization (forth edition)”,Prentice Hall press.P72.
3 Peter.Nolan,China and the Global Economy,Palgrave,2001
4 Saronovitch,Sawyer.并购发展与市场集中[N].牛津经济报,伦敦麦克米伦出版社,1976,(3).
1 National Industrial Conference Board,1929,Mergers and Law.
2 J.Moody,The Truth about the Trust,New York,1904,P487.
3 F.M.谢勒尔,《产业市场结构与经济绩效》,转引自高峰著《发达资本主义经济中的垄断与竞争—垄断资本理论研究》,南开大学出版社1996年版,P53
1斯蒂格勒,《产业组织和政府管制》,三联书店出版,1989,P12.
1 R.B.杜博夫,《积累与权力》,1989年英文版,P170.
1邵万钦,《美国企业并购浪潮》,中国商务出版社2005年1月版,P109..
2 Fortune,August,2,1999.
3梁爱云,《发达资本主义国家的寡头垄断市场结构》,当代资本主义经济的新发展,P493.
1 Eredericl.Pryor,News from the Monopoly Front:Changes in Industrial Concentration,1992—1997,Review of Industrial Organization 20,2002.
1 R.B.杜博夫,《积累与权力》,1989年英文版,P170
2 L..Pryor, New Trends in U.S. Industrial Concentration,Review of Industrial Organization 18,2001.
1资料来源:根据《1997--2007年世界投资报告》整理,UNCTAD.
1张纪康,《直接投资与市场结构效应》,上海财经大学出版社,1999年版,P71.
1Hymer.S.,The International Operation of National Firms—A Study of Direct Foreign Investment,Cambridge,Mass,MIT Press,1960.
2Kindleberger.C.P.,American Business Abroad:Six Lectures on Direct Investment(New Haven,Yale Universtiy Press,1969,转引自唐晓鹏,《外商直接投资与东道国市场结构研究》,P21.
1唐晓鹏,《外商直接投资与东道国市场结构研究》,P22..
1 Dunning,J.H.,Economic Analysis and the Multinational Enterprise.New York,Praeger.1974.
2姜睿,《产业结构-市场结构与外国直接投资》,华东师范大学,2004..
1唐晓鹏,《外商直接投资与东道国市场结构研究》,P53.
2联合国贸易与发展会议(UNCTAD),《1997世界投资报告》,对外经济贸易大学出版社,P241.
1张纪康,《直接投资与市场结构效应》,上海财经大学出版社,1999年版,P104.
2 J. Connor,The Market Power of Multinationals,New York,Praeger.1977.
1资料来源:根据《1997—2007年世界投资报告》整理,UNCTAD.
1杨镭,《跨国并购与政府规制》,社科院博士学位论文,2003,P49.
1 UNCTAD,《2000年世界投资报告》。
1张宏,《跨国公司与东道国市场结构》,经济科学出版社,2006,P82.
1 UNCTAD,《1997年世界投资报告》,P49.
1 UNCTAD,《1997年世界投资报告》,P52.
1 UNCTAD,《1997年世界投资报告》,P52.
1据Fortune,Augest2,1999有关资料统计。
2杜传中:《20世纪90年代以来西方国家工业集中度趋势》
1转引自:邓俊荣,《网络经济视角下寡头垄断效率分析》,河北经贸大学学报,2005.05.
2小艾尔弗雷德。D。钱德勒,《企业规模经济与范围经济》。转引自张宏,《跨国公司与东道国市场结构》,经济科学出版社,2006,P92.
1张宏,《跨国公司与东道国市场结构》,经济科学出版社,2006.7 .P93.
1龚维敬,《垄断经济学》,上海人民出版社,2007.2,P326.
1 Arrow,K(1962),“Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resourse for Inventive”,The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton University Press.
1转引自戚聿东,《资源优化配置的垄断机制》,经济研究,1997.2
1杜传忠,《寡头垄断市场结构与经济效率》,经济科学出版社,2006.7.P96.
2陈素琼,《知识经济条件下技术创新与垄断结构关系研究》,P24.
1沈芳,《经济理论对美国反垄断政策的影响》,上海师范大学学报,2008第2期。
1唐要家唐春晖,《美国反托拉斯法的新发展与我国反垄断法的效率原则指向》,产业经济研究,2003.4.
1蒋殿春,《跨国公司与市场结构》,商务印书馆1998年版,P134.
1金明路柴志贤,《跨国公司垄断行为及防范对策》,浙江学刊,2002.2
1蒋殿春,《跨国公司与市场结构》,商务印书馆1998年版,P109.
1王习农,《开放经济中企业跨国并购研究》,2004,P206
1易小佳,《跨国公司投资对我国市场结构效应研究》,湖南大学硕士学位论文,2006
1臧旭恒、裴春霞,《中国产业组织结构分析及展望》,财经研究,2001.2.
2杜传忠,《寡头垄断市场结构与经济效率》,经济科学出版社,2003,P218.
1魏后凯,《市场竞争、经济绩效与产业集中》,经济管理出版社,2003年版。P98.
2《中国产业发展报告》,华夏出版社2004年版。P106.
3龚维敬,《垄断经济学》,上海人民出版社,2007.
1龚维敬,《垄断经济学》,上海人民出版社,2007. P590.
2臧旭恒、裴春霞,《中国产业组织结构分析及展望》,财经研究,2001.2
1丁启军,伊淑彪,《中国行政垄断行业效率损失研究》,山西财经大学学报,2008.12.
1李霞,《行政性垄断浅析》,成都理工大学学报(社会科学版),2005.1.
1杜传忠,《寡头垄断市场结构与经济效率》,经济科学出版社,2003,P268.
1张宏,《跨国公司与东道国市场结构》,经济科学出版社,2006.7,P177.