美国国家层面的科学教师专业标准探析
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
出于提高国民科学素养、培养杰出科学家和发展国家竞争力等多方面的考虑,美国一直将科学教育放在重要议事日程上,重视科学教师专业标准。作为联邦制国家,美国各州有各自不同的科学教育政策和科学教师标准,但不少优秀学术团体研制出的有效科学教师专业标准在国家层面上发挥了积极的导向作用。这些标准除了对科学教师队伍和科学教育质量产生积极正面的影响之外,更是符合了美国国情,体现了实践价值。本文旨在通过对美国国家科学教师专业标准的系统分析以获得进一步比较深入的了解,从中获取值得借鉴之处。
     本文共分五个部分,即绪论、美国科学教育与美国科学教师专业标准、美国国家层面的科学教师专业标准概览、不同专业发展阶段的美国国家科学教师专业标准以及总结。
     绪论部分首先介绍了该研究的背景和意义、现状以及思路和方法,为之后的具体研究做出铺陈。第二章定义了本文中的重要概念,陈述了美国科学教育现状,并从提高科学教育质量这一角度入手引出美国国家科学教师专业标准及其与科学教育的关系。第三章是对美国国家科学教师专业标准的概述,阐述了以科学本质、科学探究和终身学习为核心的标准理念基础,在整体性的层面上简要介绍了美国国家科学教师专业发展体系(职前、入职和在职),重点分析了具有转折点意义的《国家科学教育标准》中的科学教学标准和科学教师专业发展标准两个部分,从美国国情和实践性出发解析了本文研究对象所具有的重要意义。第四章具体呈现和分析了前一章所提及的标准体系的三个主要组成部分(基于教师专业发展的不同阶段),分别包括美国国家科学教师协会制定的《科学教师教育标准》、州际新教师评估与支持委员会制定的《新科学教师认证与发展标准》和美国国家专业教学标准委员会制定的《优秀科学教师专业标准》,并比较了上述标准之间的不同之处。第五章则归纳总结了上述体系中三个美国国家科学教师专业标准所共同强调和重视的地方,这也是值得我们学习和借鉴的经验。
America is always attaching much important to science education, which is closely related with its citizens' science literacy, the cultivation of scientists and the national competitive power. This leads to the popularity of and attention to American science teacher professional standards especially at the national level. As the federal system, different states in America has different science education policy and of course science teacher professional standards. However, a lot of outstanding relevant academic institutions, facing the whole country, have developed some effective standards. These are suitable for the situation of America and are given a kind of practical value, which produces positive influence on the quality of science teacher and science education. This paper intends to get further learning and understanding of the national science teacher professional standards through the systematic analysis of them.
     This paper includes five parts: introduction, American science education and teacher professional standards, an overview of American science teacher professional standards at the national level, national science teacher professional standards at different professional development stages and conclusion.
     Introduction states the background, significance and methods of this paper and the status quo of its relevant research. In the second chapter, some important concepts are defined and the present situation of American science education is introduced. Meanwhile, science teacher standards are regarded as an effective way to improve the quality of science education. The third chapter gives a general overview of the American science teacher professional standards at the national level from three parts: its conceptual basis (nature of science, science inquiry, lifelong learning), brief portray of the national science teacher standard system (highlight "National Science Education Standards"), the significance of these standards combined with American conditions and practice. In the fourth chapter, the three parts of this standard system ("Standards for Science Teacher Preparation by NSTA", "Model Standards in Science for Beginning Teacher Licensing and Development" by INTASC, "NBPTS Science Standards" by NBPTS) are introduced and compared. The fifth chapter do a conclusion on the common places of the three national science teacher standards, which is worthy of our learning.
引文
1 苏开源.一份扭转乾坤的科学报告[J].世界科学,2005(8):41.
    2 王晓阳.简述当前美国科学教育[J].基础教育参考,2006(12):22.
    1 张人杰.教师专业化:亟需更深入研究的若干问题[J].比较教育研究,2005(9):47.
    2 张璐,朱海晨.2061计划与美国科学教育改革[J].外国中小学教育,2000(1):29.
    1 National Research Council.National Science Education Standards[EB/OL].Washington,D.C.:National Academy Press,1996[2008-09-10].http://www.nap.edu/catalog/4962.html.
    2 NBPTS.What Teachers Should Know and Be Able to Do?[EB/OL].1989[2008-9-20]:3-4.http://www.citadel.edu/education/ncate_accreditation/nbpts_matrix.doc.
    1 辞海编辑委员会.辞海[M].上海:上海辞书出版社.1979:1746.
    2 陈琴,庞丽娟.论科学的本质与科学教育[J].北京大学教育评论,2005(2):70.
    3 李佳颖.论科学教育与教师科学素质的培养[J].新疆职业大学学报,2008(1):46.
    4 徐学福.跨世纪的美国中小学科学教育改革[J].广西师范大学学报,2000(3):67.
    5 中华人民共和国教育部.科学(7~9)课程标准[EB/OL].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2003[2008-11-6].http://www.being.org.cn/ncs/sci/m/sci-m.htm.
    1 辞海编辑委员会.辞海[M].上海:上海辞书出版社.1979:1280.
    1 U.S.Department of Education.Answering the Challenge of a Changing World:Strengthening Education for the 21st Century[EB/OL],2006[2008-9-12]:9.http://www.ed.gov/about/inits/ed/competitiveness/strengthening/strengthening.pdf.
    2 Domestic Policy Council.American Competitiveness Initiative[EB/OL].2006[2008-10-2]:2.http://www.ostp.gov/pdf/1pger_aci.pdf.
    1 葛霆.科学教育的美国模式[J].教育决策,2002(10):26.
    1 葛霆.科学教育的美国模式[J].教育决策,2002(10):27.
    2 吴根洲.战后美国科学教育目的的演变[J].临沂师范学院学报,2004(1):129-131.
    1 National Research Council.National Science Education Standards[EB/OL].Washington,D.C.:National Academy Press,1996[2008-09-10]:19.http://www.nap.edu/catalog/4962.html.
    1 王强.美国国家层面教师专业标准述评[J].教师教育研究,2006(7):71-72.
    2 郭元捷.提高教师质量:美国教育改革的下一个工作重心[N].中国教育报,2007-3-12(8).
    3 林长春.时代呼唤我国设置科学教育本科专业[J].教师教育研究,2003(6):14-18.
    1 U.S.Department of Education.Answering the Challenge of a Changing World:Strengthening Education for the 21st Century[EB/OL],2006[2008-9-12]:11.http://www.ed.gov/about/inits/ed/competitiveness/strengthening/strengthening.pdf.
    1 American Association of the Advancement of Science(AAAS).Science for All Americans[M].New York:Oxford University Press,1990.
    1[美]国家研究理事会.国家科学教育标准.北京:科学技术文献出版社,1999:30.
    2 陈琴,庞丽娟.论科学的本质与科学教育[J].北京大学教育评论,2005(2):71.
    1 许明.美国教师教育专业标准概述[J].课程·教材·教法.2002(11):64.
    2 NCTAF,What Matters Most:Teaching for America's Future[EB/OL].1996[2008-9-15]:29.http://www.nctaf.org/documents/WhatMattersMost.pdf.
    1 李帅军.美国教育行政管理体制的考察与分析[J].外国中小学教育,2003(6):12.
    1 Indiana Department of Education.Professional Teacher Standards(Teachers of Science)[EB/OL].[2009-2-1].http://www.d(?)e.in.gov/dps/standards/Scienceteachersapproved4_28_04_2.html.
    1 California Department of Education.National Board Certification Incentive Program[EB/OL].[2009-2-3].http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/sr/nb/programdesc.asp.
    2 California Department of Education.Candidate Subsidy Program[EB/OL].[2009-2-3].http://www.cde.ca.gov/pd/ps/te/nbptscsp.asp.
    1 National Science Teachers Association.Standards for Science Teacher Preparation[EB/OL],2003[2008-9 15].http://www.nsta.org/pdfs/NSTAstandards2003.pdf.
    1 National Science Teachers Association.Standards for Science Teacher Preparation[EB/OL],2003[2008-9-15]:18-19.http://www.nsta.org/pdfs/NSTAstandards2003.pdf.
    1 National Science Teachers Association.Standards for Science Teacher Preparation[EB/OL],2003 [2008-9-15]:25.http://www.nsta.org/pdfs/NSTAstandards2003.pdf.
    1 NCATE,NSTA.Recognized Programs by NSTA[EB/OL].2008[2008-12-15]:1-2.http://www.nsta.org/pdfs/NCATE_NSTARecognizedPrograms.pdf.
    1 INTASC.Model Standards in Science for Beginning Teacher Licensing and Development:A Resource for State Dialogue[EB/OL].2003[2009-10-20]http://www.ccsso.org/content/pdfs/corestrd.pdf.
    1 National Research Council.National Science Education Standards[EB/OL].Washington,D.C.:National Academy Press,1996[2008-09-10]:104.http://www.nap.edu/catalog/4962.html.
    1 NBPTS.NBPTS Science Standards(Early Adolescence)[EB/OL].2003[2008-12-2].http://www.nbpts.org/userfiles/File/easciencestandards.pdf.
    1 NBPTS.NBPTS Science Standards(Early Adolescence)[EB/OL].2003[2008-12-2]:1.http://www.nbpts.org/userfiles/File/ea_science_standards.pdf.
    1 NBPTS.What Teachers Should Know and Be Able to Do?[EB/OL].1989[2008-9-20]:1.http://www.citadel.edu/education/ncate_accreditation/nbpts_matrix.doc.
    2 NBPTS.What Teachers Should Know and Be Able to Do?[EB/OL].1989[2008-9-20]:3-4.http://www.citadel.edu/education/ncate_accreditation/nbpts_matrix.doc.
    3 NBPTS.55,000 Reasons to Believe:The Impact of National Board Certification on Teacher Quality in America[EB/OL].2007[2008-12-3]:3.http://www.nbpts.org/UserFiles/File/55000_reasons.pdf.
    4 Frank Serafini.Possibilities and Challenges—The National Board for Professional Teaching Standards[J].Journal of Teacher Education,2002,53(4):316-327.
    1 杨玉梅,薛春霞.科学教育综合化特征在科学课程中的体现[J].科技信息,2008(8):29.
    1 王越英.打造学习共同体,促进教师的专业发展[J].上海教育科研,2004(3):41.
    2 周成海,衣庆泳.专业共同体:教师发展的组织基础[J].教育科学,2007(2):52.
    1.陈琴,庞丽娟.论科学的本质与科学教育[J].北京大学教育评论,2005(2).
    2.辞海编辑委员会.辞海[M].上海:上海辞书出版社.1979年.
    3.郭元婕.美国科学教师专业标准[N].中国教育报,2008-1-14(8).
    4.郭元捷.提高教师质量:美国教育改革的下一个工作重心[N].中国教育报,2007-3-12(8).
    5.葛霆.科学教育的美国模式[J].教育决策,2002(10).
    6.何善亮.美国科学教育师资培训的研究与启示[J].比较教育研究,2006(2).
    7.教育部师范教育司.教师专业化的理论与实践[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2002.
    8.李方,钟祖荣.教师专业标准与发展机制[M].北京:北京出版社,2004.
    9.李红婷,鲁统峰.美国科学教育案例及启示[J].科学教育研究,2006(9).
    10.李红.美国科学教育的过去、现在和未来[J].中学生物教学,2005(11).
    11.李佳颖.论科学教育与教师科学素质的培养[II].新疆职业大学学报,2008(1).
    12.李帅军.美国教育行政管理体制的考察与分析[J].外国中小学教育,2003(6).
    13.联合国教科文组织.学会生存——教育世界的今天和明天[M].北京:科学教育出版社,1996.
    14.林长春.时代呼唤我国设置科学教育本科专业[J].教师教育研究,2003(6).
    15.[美]国家研究理事会.国家科学教育标准.北京:科学技术文献出版社,1999.
    16.苏开源.一份扭转乾坤的科学报告[J].世界科学,2005(8).
    17.王强.美国国家层面教师专业标准述评[J].教师教育研究,2006(7).
    18.王琳.从美国加州新任教师专业标准看我国新任教师专业标准的建设[J].基础教育参考,2005(5).
    19.王晓阳.简述当前美国科学教育[J].基础教育参考,2006(12).
    20.王越英.打造学习共同体,促进教师的专业发展[J].上海教育科研,2004(3).
    21.吴根洲.战后美国科学教育目的的演变[J].临沂师范学院学报,2004(1).
    22.谢美彬,许明.美国高中优秀科学教师标准概述[J].教学与管理,2004(3).
    23.许明.美国教师教育专业标准概述[J].课程·教材·教法.2002(11).
    24.徐学福.跨世纪的美国中小学科学教育改革[J].广西师范大学学报,2000(3).
    25.袁锐愕,易轶.试析NBPTS优秀教师认定的标准与程序[J].比较教育研究,2004(12).
    26.姚文峰.美国教师质量伙伴研究及其政策影响[J].外国教育研究,2006(9).
    27.杨玉梅,薛春霞.科学教育综合化特征在科学课程中的体现[J].科技信息,2008(8).
    28.中华人民共和国教育部.科学(7~9)课程标准[EB/OL].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2003[2008-11-6].http://www.being.org.cn/ncs/sci/m/sci-m.htm.
    29.周成海,衣庆泳.专业共同体:教师发展的组织基础[J].教育科学,2007(2).
    30.周南照.教师教育改革与教师专业发展[M].华东师范大学出版社,2007(7).
    31.周青,杨妙霞等.美国科学教师专业发展标准及其启示[J].高等教育研究,2005(5).
    32.张璐,朱晨海.206l计划与美国科学教育改革[J].外国中小学教育,2000(1).
    33.张敏婕.关于影响美国科学教育课程标准实施的问题研究[J].辽宁行政学院学报,2006(5).
    34.张广武,许立新等.《美国国家教师专业教学标准》述评[J].教师教育,2004(6).
    35.张人杰.教师专业化:亟需更深入研究的若干问题[J].比较教育研究,2005(9).
    1.American Association of the Advancement of Science(AAAS).Science for All Americans[M].New York:Oxford University Press,1990.
    2.California Department of Education.National Board Certification Incentive Program[EB/OL].[2009-2-3].http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/sr/nb/programdesc.asp.
    3.California Department of Education.Candidate Subsidy Program[EB/OL].[2009-2-3].http://www.cde.ca.gov/pd/ps/te/nbptscsp.asp.
    4.Carol L.Fletcher.National Standards in Science Education:Teacher Perception on Utilization[EB/OL].1998[2008-10-3]. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accn o=ED418866.
    5. Lawrence Ingvarson. Development of A National Standards Framework for the Teaching Profession [J/OL]. ACER Policy Briefs, 2002 [2008-9-6].http://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1007&context=teaching_st andards.
    6. Domestic Policy Council. American Competitiveness Initiative [EB/OL]. 2006 [2008-10-2]. http://www.ostp.gov/pdf/lpger_aci.pdf.
    7. Frank Serafini. Possibilities and Challenges——the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards [J]. Journal of Teacher Education, 2002, 53(4).
    8. Indiana Department of Education. Professional Teacher Standards (Teachers of Science) [EB/OL]. [2009-2-1].http://www.doe.in.gov/dps/standards/Scienceteachersapproved4_28_04_2.html.
    9. INTASC. Model Standards in Science for Beginning Teacher Licensing and Development: A Resource for State Dialogue [EB/OL]. 2003 [2009-10-20].http://www.ccsso.org/content/pdfs/corestrd.pdf.
    10. National Research Council. National Science Education Standards [EB/OL].Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1996 [2008-09-10].http://www.nap.edu/catalog/4962.html.
    11. National Science Teachers Association. Standards for Science Teacher Preparation [EB/OL], 2003 [2008-9-15]. http://www.nsta.org/pdfs/NSTAstandards2003.pdf.
    12. New Jersey Department of Education. New Jersey Professional Standards for Teachers and School Leaders [EB/OL]. 2004 [2008-11-15].http://www.nj.gov/education/profdev/profstand/standards.pdf.
    13.NBPTS. NBPTS Science Standards (Early Adolescence) [EB/OL]. 2003 [2008-12-2]. http://www.nbpts.org/userfiles/File/ea_science_standards.pdf.
    14. NBPTS. 55,000 Reasons to Believe: The Impact of National Board Certification on Teacher Quality in America [EB/OL]. 2007 [2008-12-3].http://www.nbpts.org/UserFiles/File/55000jreasons.pdf.
    15.NBPTS.What Teachers Should Know and Be Able to Do?[EB/OL].1989[2008-9-20].http//www.citadel.edu/education/ncate_accreditation/nbpts_matrix.doc.
    16.NCTAF.What Matters Most:Teaching for America's Future[EB/OL].1996[2008-9-15].http://www.nctaf.org/documents/WhatMattersMost.pdf.
    17.NCATE,Professional Standards for the Accreditation of Schools,Colleges and Departments of Education[EB/OL],2001[2009-2-3].http://www.ncate.org/2000/2000stds.pdf.
    18.NCATE,NSTA.Recognized Programs by NSTA[EB/OL].2008[2008-12-15].http://www.nsta.org/pdfs/NCATE-NSTARecognizedPrograms.pdf.
    19.Paul Morris.Teacher Education in the Asia-Pacific Region:A Comparative Study [M].New York:Falmer press,2000.
    20.Stephen M.Marlette.Implementation of the Kansas Science Education Standards:A Principal/Teacher Perspective[EB/OL].2003[2008-11-20].http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accn o=ED474532.
    21.Oregon Department of Education.Science Teaching and Learning to Standards [EB/OL].2005[2009-2-1].http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/results/?id=246.
    22.Sandra Feldman,Standards Are Working[EB/OL].American Federation of Teachers,2000[2008-11-6].www.aft.org.
    23.Andrea Livingston,MPR,Inc.The Condition of Education 2008 in Brief.National Center for Education Statistics(NCES)[EB/OL],2008[2009-2-10].http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2008032.
    24.Wendy McColskey,etc.Teacher Effectiveness,Student Achievement and National Board Certified Teachers[EB/OL].2005[2009-2-5].http://www.education-consumers.com/articles/W-M%20NBPTS%20certified%20r eport.pdf.
    25.U.S.Department of Education.Answering the Challenge of a Changing World:Strengthening Education tbr the 21st Century[EB/OL],2006[2008-9-12].http://www.ed.gov/about/inits/ed/competitiveness/strengthening.pdf.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700