嫁接西瓜对根结线虫和温度逆境的抗性机理研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本研究主要通过探讨温室内根结线虫对嫁接西瓜生长发育的影响,根结线虫侵染后西瓜的生理生化变化,进而阐明嫁接西瓜对根结线虫的抗性生理机制;探讨温度逆境对西瓜嫁接苗生长发育的影响,温度逆境下西瓜嫁接苗的生理生化变化及其机理。试验以金星和春秀为接穗,以博大嫁接王、青砧1号、黑籽南瓜、黑南瓜、瓠瓜、大葫芦12号、白籽丝瓜、全能铁甲、莱砧1号、圣砧1号为砧木,主要研究结果如下。
     1、西瓜嫁接砧木的筛选
     通过对砧木嫁接后嫁接苗成活率、生长势和果实性状指标的数据综合分析,从10个砧木材料中筛选出莱砧1号、黑籽南瓜、全能铁甲、大葫芦12号、圣砧1号5个综合表现较好的砧木。
     2、根结线虫对西瓜嫁接苗的影响
     西瓜嫁接苗接种根结线虫后,根系PAL、TAL、PPO、O2-.含量、SOD活性、CAT活性及总酚含量均是嫁接苗高于自根苗,不同砧木接穗组合略有差异;而POD活性自根苗高于嫁接苗,全能铁甲/春秀高于大葫芦12号/春秀。根结线虫侵入后根系MDA含量持续增加,但以自根苗为高;根结线虫侵染西瓜60 d后,嫁接苗根结指数低于自根苗,线虫危害较轻,而葫芦/春秀嫁接苗根结指数低于全能铁甲/春秀;根结线虫侵染会导致西瓜株高、叶片数、叶面积下降,单果重、总糖、VC、游离氨基酸含量下降,可溶性蛋白含量升高。
     3、西瓜根系分泌物对线虫卵孵化的影响
     不接种根结线虫时,西瓜自根苗及嫁接苗根系分泌物对线虫卵孵化的影响不是很大。从整个孵化过程来看,接种根结线虫后自根苗根系分泌物对根结线虫卵孵化具有显著的刺激作用,而嫁接苗的根系分泌物则对线虫卵孵化具有抑制作用。
     4、温度逆境对西瓜嫁接苗的影响
     在本试验中高温胁迫下,接穗相同而砧木不同的嫁接苗耐热能力,从大到小依次为圣砧1号/金星>莱砧1号/金星>黑籽南瓜/金星>大葫芦12号/金星>全能铁甲/金星>金星;圣砧1号/春秀>黑籽南瓜/春秀>大葫芦12号/春秀>莱砧1号/春秀>全能铁甲/春秀>春秀。低温胁迫下,接穗相同而砧木不同的嫁接苗耐寒能力从大到小依次为全能铁甲/金星>莱砧1号/金星>黑籽南瓜/金星>圣砧1号/金星>大葫芦12号/金星>金星;全能铁甲/春秀>莱砧1号/春秀>圣砧1号/春秀>黑籽南瓜/春秀>大葫芦12号/春秀>春秀。综合考虑采用莱砧1号砧木嫁接对不同接穗而言均可较好的改善其对温度逆境的抵抗能力。
In this reserch, the impact of root-knot nematodes and temperature stress for greenhouse grafted watermelon were studied. In order to clarify the root-knot nematode resistance mechanism, the grafted watermelon growth index and its physiological and biochemical changes were measured after nematode infection in greenhouse. The grafted watermelon growth index and its physiological and biochemical changes after temperature stress were also measured in order to clarify the temperature stress resistance mechanism. Two watermelon varieties,“jinxing”and“chunxiu”, were used as scion in this experiment;“bodajiajiewang”,“qingzhenyihao”,“black seed pumpkin”,“black pumpkin”,“bottle gourd”,“bigcalabash 12hao”,“baizisigua”,“quanengtiejia”,“laizhenyihao”and“shengzhenyihao”were used as rootstock. The main conclusions are as follows.
     1 Screening of watermelon rootstocks
     As rootstock, laizhenyihao, black seed pumpkin, quannengtiejia, big calabash12hao and shengzhenyihao had better performance after a comprehensive analysis of the grafted survival, growth potential and fruit traits.
     2 Effects of root-knot nematode infection on grafted watermelon seedlings
     After root-knot nematode infection, PAL activity, TAL activity, PPO, O2-.content, SOD and CAT activity and total phenol of grafted watermelon root were higher than self-root seedlings. Slightly difference were found in different rootstock scion combinations. After root-knot nematode infection, MDA content in root tissue continued to increase, but the increment of self-root seedlings was highest. In the 60 days after root-knot nematode infectted, gall index of grafted-root seedlings was lower than self-root seedlings. Nematode infection can lead to plant height, leaf number, leaf area, fruit weight, total sugar, VC and free amino acid content decreased; soluble protein content increased in watermelon.
     3 Effects of watermelon root exudates on root-knot nematode eggs hatching
     Non-vaccinated nematode, the impact of self-rooted and grafted watermelon root exudates on root-knot nematode eggs hatching cuold be ignored. The root exudates of self-rooted watermelon, with root-knot nematode infection, had a clear stimulation to root-knot nematode eggs hatching. The root exudates of grafted watermelon, with root-knot nematode infection, had a significant inhibition to root-knot nematode eggs hatching.
     4 Effects of temperature stress on grafted watermelon seedlings
     After heat stress, different scion and rootstock combinations showed different heat resistance capacity. In this study the sequence from high to low were shengzhenyihao/jinxing > laizhenyihao/jinxing > black seed pumpkin/jinxing>bigcalabash12hao/jinxing> quannengtiejia /jinxing > jinxing; shengzhenyihao/chunxiu > black seed pumpkin/chunxiu > big calabash12hao/chunxiu>laizhenyihao/chunxiu>quannengtiejia/chunxiu>chunxiu.After low temperature stress, different scion and rootstock combinations showed different cold resistance capacity. In this study the sequence from high to low were quannengtiejia/jinxing >laizhenyihao/jinxing>blackseedpumpkin/jinxing>shengzhenyihao/jinxing>bigcalabash12hao/jinxing>jinxing,quannengtiejia/chunxiu>laizhenyihao/chunxiu>shengzhenyihao/chunxiu>black seed pumpkin/chunxiu>big calabash12hao/chunxiu>chunxiu. The“laizhenyihao”was the best rootstock in this study through a comprehensive consideration. It can better improve the grafted watermelon resistance capacity to temperature stress.
引文
[1]于贤昌,邢禹贤,马红,等.不同砧木与接穗对黄瓜嫁接苗抗冷性的影响[J].中国农业科学, 1998, 31(2): 41-47.
    [2]莫云彬,冯春梅,陈海平,等.抗枯萎病西瓜嫁接砧木的筛选及应用[J].浙江农业科学, 2005, (3): 216-217.
    [3]冯春梅,莫云彬,潘晓飚,等.不同砧木嫁接对西瓜抗病性及主要经济性状的影响[J].中国农学通报, 2006, 22(2): 289-291.
    [4]陈润兴,汪惠芳,张法权,等.不同砧木品种嫁接西瓜对其品质及抗病性的影响[J].现代农业科技, 2006, (17): 21-23.
    [5]吴凤芝,赵凤艳,刘元英.设施蔬菜连作障碍原因综合分析与防治措施[J].东北农业大学学报, 2000, (3): 241-247.
    [6]郑高飞,赵天才.我国西瓜嫁接栽培现状与发展前景[M].中国园艺学会第九届学术年会论文集, 2006: 324-330.
    [7]刘慧英,朱祝军,吕国华,等.低温胁迫下西瓜嫁接苗的生理变化与耐冷性关系的研究[J].中国农业科学, 2003, 36(11): 1325-1329.
    [8]于凤鸣,闫立英.砧木对嫁接西瓜的生理影响[J].河北职业技术师范学院学报, 2002, 16(4): 34-36.
    [9]张娥珍,樊学军.嫁接对薄皮甜瓜叶片生理效应及果实可溶性蛋白质、总糖含量的影响[J].西南农业学报, 2009, 22(5): 1310-1313.
    [10]房伟民,郭维明,陈俊愉.嫁接提高菊花耐高温与抗氧化能力的研究[J].园艺学报, 2009, 15(9): 1327-1332.
    [11]韩志平,郭世荣,朱国荣,等.砧木对嫁接西瓜生长发育、产量和品质的影响[J].中国蔬菜, 2006, (2): 22-23.
    [12]俞更才.日光温室的西瓜嫁接效应研究[J].甘肃科学学报, 2002, 14(6): 66-69.
    [13]常高正,张慎璞,杨红丽,等.不同砧木嫁接对西瓜生长发育及产量的影响[J].湖北农业科学, 2009, 48(10): 2466-2468.
    [14]樊勇,陶承光,刘爱群.不同砧木嫁接黄瓜盛瓜期光合特性研究[J].西北农业学报, 2009, 18(5): 253-257.
    [15]郑阳霞,李焕秀,严泽生.嫁接对茄子光合特性的影响[J].中国蔬菜, 2009, (16): 56-60.
    [16]凌志杰,田与光,于爱民.不同砧木对西瓜生长、结实和抗枯萎病的影响[J].中国西瓜甜瓜, 1996, (4): 18-20.
    [17]周长勇.西瓜嫁接砧木品种筛选试验研究[J].蔬菜, 2006, (7): 41-42.
    [18]林焱,杨喻斌,朱正斌.不同嫁接方法对早佳嫁接西瓜产量的影响[J].上海蔬菜, 2005, (3): 74-75.
    [19]李长生,夏晗,卢金东,等.利用嫁接提高花生离体再生或转基因苗成活率的研究[J].中国农学通报, 2009, 25(20): 63-67.
    [20]万群,熊维全.不同砧木、嫁接方法和遮光处理对黄瓜嫁接苗的影响[J].江苏农业科学, 2009, (4): 185-186.
    [21]郑高飞,刘崇怀.西瓜砧木及嫁接栽培研究概况[J].长江蔬菜, 1996, (11): 1-3.
    [22]钱伟.西瓜甜瓜嫁接亲和生理的研究[D].杭州:浙江农业大学, 1994. 18-23.
    [23]文廷刚,刘凤淮,杜小凤,等.根结线虫病发生与防治研究进展[J].安徽农学通报, 2008, 14(9): 183-184.
    [24]刘维志.植物病原线虫学[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2000:15-20.
    [25]刘纪霜.罗汉果抗南方根结线虫的品种筛选及抗病机制初探[D]. 2007:12.
    [26] Sasser J N, Eisenback J D, Carter C C, et al. The international Meloidogyne project-its goals and accomplishments[J]. Annual Review Phytopathology, 1983, 21: 271-288.
    [27] Montes M, Lopez-Brana I, Delibes A. Root enzyme activities associated with resistance to Heterodera avenaeconferred by gene Cre7 in a wheat/Aegilops triuncialis introgression line[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2004, 161(4): 493-495.
    [28] Zacheo G, Zacheot B. Involvement of superoxide dismutase and superoxide radicals in the susceptibility and resistance of tomato plants to Meloidogyne incognita attack[J]. Physiological and Molecular Plant pathology,1988,32(2):313-322.
    [29] Hasan N, Saxena S K, Mahadevan(ed). Effect of inoculating tomato with root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita on the phenolic content and polyphenol oxidase activity,physiology-of-host-pathogen-interaction[J]. Current trends in life sciences, 1979,6: 199-203.
    [30] Zacheo G, Molinari S, Pacoda D. Hydroxyproline-rich proreins and peroxidases in tomato roots infested by root-knot nematode[J]. Nematologia Mediterranea, 1988, 16(2): 235-237.
    [31]刘维志.植物病原线虫学[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2000, 215.
    [32]郝玉金,翟衡,王寿华.山定子感染南京毛刺线虫后几种生理生化物质的变化[J].植物病理学报, 1999, 29(1): 82-85.
    [33] Chylinska K M, Knypl J S. Decreased phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and ribonuclease activity in side roots of carrot infested with the northern root-knot nematode[J]. Nematologica, 1975, 21(2): 129-133.
    [34]颜清上,王连铮,陈品三.中国小黑豆抗源对大豆胞囊线虫4号生理小种抗病的生化反应[J].作物学报, 1997, 23(5): 529-537.
    [35]陈洁敏,韩效国.孢囊线虫对大豆生理生化特性的影响[J].莱阳农学院学报, 1996, 13(2): 84-87.
    [36]许艳丽,韩晓增主编.大豆重迎茬研究[M].哈尔滨工程大学出版社, 1995b: 73-77.
    [37] Sikora E J, Noel G R. Hatch and emergence of Heterodera glycines in root leachate from resistant and susceptible soybean cultivars[J]. Journal of nematology, 1996, 28(4): 501-509.
    [38]刘维志,刘晔,段玉玺.抗病品种对大豆胞囊线虫的选择作用[J].植物保护学报, 1993, 20(2): 135-137.
    [39]张志忠,吴著华,黄碧琦,等.茄子耐热性苗期筛选指标的研究[J].中国蔬菜, 2004, (2): 4-7.
    [40]王炳天.茄子高产栽培[M].北京:金盾出版社, 1992, 10-12.
    [41]张志忠.茄子耐热机理及苗期抗热性筛选指标的研究[D].福州:福建农林大学, 2001: 4-9.
    [42]刘英新,文国吉.三系杂交棉花粉育性对高温和低温胁迫的反应[J].作物学报, 2009, 35(11): 2085-2090.
    [43]吴国胜,曾婉红,王永健,等.细胞膜热稳定性及保护酶和大白菜耐热性的关系[J].园艺学报, 1995, 22(4): 353-358.
    [44]马德华,庞金安,霍振荣,等.黄瓜对不同温度逆境的抗性研究[J].中国农业科学, 1999, 32(5): 96-99.
    [45]何亚丽,刘友良,陈权,等.水杨酸和热锻炼诱导的高羊茅幼苗的耐热性与抗氧化关系[J].植物生理与分子生物学学报, 2002, 28(2): 89-95.
    [46]朱诚,刘非燕.表油菜素内脂对幼苗热激忍耐和抗氧化代谢的关系[J].浙江农业大学学报, 1996, 22(3): 284-288.
    [47]王邦锡,孙莉,黄久常.渗透胁迫引起的膜损伤与膜脂过氧化和某些自由基的关系[J].中国科学, 1992, 35(4): 35-37.
    [48]陈少裕.膜脂过氧化对植物逆境胁迫[J].植物学通报, 1989, 6(4): 211-217.
    [49]司家钢,孙日飞,吴飞燕.高温胁迫对大白菜耐热性相关生理指标的影响[J].中国蔬菜, 1995, (4): 4-6.
    [50]刘维信,曹寿椿.高温对不结球白菜细胞膜透性、过氧化物酶活性等的影响[J].南京农业大学学报, 1992, (3): 115-127.
    [51]陈火英,张建华,汪隆植.萝卜幼苗耐热性与过氧化物酶和超氧物歧化酶关系的研究[J].上海交通大学学报, 1990, 8(4): 265-265.
    [52]吴国胜,王永健.大白菜热害发生规律及耐热性筛选方法的研究[J].华北农学报, 1995, 10(l): 111-115.
    [53]孟焕文,张彦峰,程智慧,等.黄瓜幼苗对热胁迫的生理反应及耐热鉴定指标筛选[J].西北农业学报, 2000, 9(1): 96-99.
    [54] Zelitch . Factors affecting expression of enhanced catalase activity in a tobacco mutant with O2-. resistant photosynthesis[J]. Plant Physiology, 1992, 98(4): 1330-1335.
    [55] Arrigoni O, Garal D, Tommasi F, et al.Changes in the ascorbate system during seed development of Vicia faba L.[J]. Plany Physiology, 1992, 99: 235-238.
    [56] Ranney T G, Peet M M. Heat tolerance of five taxa of birch(Betula): physiological responses to supraoptimal leaf temperatures[J]. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 1994, 119(2): 243-248.
    [57] Bowler C, Montagu M V, Inze D. Superoxide dismutase and stress tolerance[J]. Annu Rev Plant Physiology, 1992, 43: 83-106.
    [58] Fujita S, Binsaari N, Maegawa M, et al. Purification and properties of polyphenol oxidase from cabbage(Brassica olerace L. )[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1995, 43(5): 1138-1142.
    [59]张雅,何勇,朱祝军.不同茄子品种幼苗耐热性研究[J].中国蔬菜, 2009, 24: 30-35.
    [60]邵玲,刘光玲,李芸瑛,等.高温下花红苋和绿叶苋叶片生理特性变化的比较[J].热带亚热带植物学报, 2009, 17(4): 378-382.
    [61]许详明,叶和春,李国凤.脯氨酸代谢与植物抗渗透胁迫的研究进展[J].植物学通报, 2000, 17(6): 536-542.
    [62] Aloni B, Karni L, Zaidman Z. The susceptibility of pepper (Capsicum annuum) to heat induced flower abscission: possible involvement of ethylene[J]. Journal of Horticultural Science, 1994, 69(5): 923-928.
    [63]吕俊,张蕊,宗学凤,等.水杨酸对高温胁迫下水稻幼苗抗热性的影响[J].中国生态农业学报, 2009, 17(6): 1168-1171.
    [64]谭伟,李庆亮,罗音,等.外源CaCl2预处理对高温胁迫烟草叶片光合作用的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2009, 42(11): 3871-3879.
    [65]田婧,郭世荣,刘香娥,等.外源亚精胺对高温下黄瓜幼苗叶片抗氧化系统的影响[J].西北植物学报, 2009,29(11): 2261-2267.
    [66]万正林,罗庆熙,李立志.水杨酸诱导番茄幼苗抗高温效果[J].中国蔬菜, 2009(24): 36-42.
    [67] Graves W R. Urban soil temperature and their potential impact on tree growth[J]. Journal of Arboriculture, 1994, 20(1): 24-27.
    [68] Santarius K A, Exner M, Thebud L R. Effects of high temperture on the photosynthetic apparatus in isolated mesophyll protoplasts of Valerianella locusta (L.)[J]. Betacke Photosythetica, 1991, 25(1): 17-26.
    [69] Havaux M. Stress tolerance of photosystem II in vivo Antagonistic effects of water, heat, and photoinhibition stresses[J]. Plant Physiology, 1992, 100: 424-432.
    [70] Nansah G O, Ito T. Relationship between some physiological characters and yield of heat-tolerant, non-tolercan, and tropical tomato cultivars grown at high temperature[J]. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticulture Science, 1994, 62(4): 781-788.
    [71]冯立国,俞菊,陶俊,等.高温胁迫对一品红光合作用与叶绿素荧光的影响[J].扬州大学学报,2009, 30(3): 71-74.
    [72] Shila R, Raghavan V. Control of heat-shock response of young gametophytes of the sensitive fern is at the translational level[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1994, 45(4): 477-483.
    [73]李太贵,沈波.低温—常温下水稻幼叶胁变和恢复过程的分析[J].生态学杂志, 1995, 4: 63-66.
    [74]王孝宣,李树德,东慧如,等.低温胁迫对番茄苗期和开花期脂肪酸的影响[J].园艺学报, 1997, 24(2): 161-164.
    [75] Baid V W. Low temperature and drought regulated gene expression in Bermudagrass[J]. Turfgrass and Envirionmental Research Summary, 1994: 32-33.
    [76]刘慧英,王祯丽,王玉华.不同品种辣椒种子发芽和苗期耐冷性差异的研究[J].石河子大学学报, 2002, 6(1): 23-26.
    [77]郑东虎,葛晓光,张宪政,等.冷胁迫对番茄膜脂过氧化与抗氧化酶系统的影响[J].北方园艺, 2003(4): 46-47.
    [78]艾琳,张萍,胡成志.低温胁迫对葡萄根系膜系统和可溶性糖及脯氨酸含量的影响[J].新疆农业大学学报, 2004, 27(4): 47-50.
    [79]王华,王飞,陈登文,等.低温胁迫对杏花SOD活性和膜脂过氧化的影响[J].果树学报, 2000, 17(3): 197-201.
    [80]杨春祥,李宪利,高东升.钙对低温胁迫下油桃花果膜脂过氧化和保护酶活性的影响[J].落叶果树, 2004(6): 1-3.
    [81]潘晓云,曹琴东,王根轩.膜脂过氧化作为扁桃品种抗寒性鉴定指标研究[J].生态学报, 2002, 22(11): 1902-1911.
    [82]张燕,方力,李天飞,等.低温胁迫下PEG对烟草幼苗膜脂过氧化作用的影响[J].西南农业大学学报, 2001, 23(6): 549-552.
    [83]杨盛昌,谢潮添,张平,等.低温胁迫下弓葵幼苗膜脂过氧化及保护酶活性的变化[J].园艺学报, 2003, 30(1): 104-106.
    [84]邹志荣,陆帼一.低温对辣椒幼苗膜脂过氧化和保护酶系统变化的影响[J].西北农业学报, 1994, 3(3): 51-56.
    [85]余数文,汤章城主编.植物生理与分子生物学[M].北京科学出版社, 1998: 721-738.
    [86]曾韶西,王以柔,刘鸿先,等.低温光照下与黄瓜子叶叶绿素降低有关的酶促反应[J].植物生理学报, 1991, 17(2): 177-182.
    [87]齐代华,李旭光,王力,等.模拟低温胁迫对活性氧代谢保护酶系统的影响—以长叶竹(Podocarpus flueryi Hickel)幼苗为例[J].西南农业大学学报, 2003, 25(5): 385-388, 399.
    [88]岳青,范三红,苗如意,等.低温锻炼及致害低温对黄瓜叶片两种酶活性的影响[J].山西师范大学学报, 2002, 3(16): 61-63.
    [89]冯炘,于贤昌,郭恒俊,等.低温胁迫对黄瓜嫁接苗和自根苗保护酶活性的影响[J].山东农业大学学报, 2002, 33(3): 302-304.
    [90]胡文海,李晓红.低温弱光对番茄叶片和根系中抗氧化酶系统的影响[J].井冈山师范学院学报,2003, 24(5): 19-22.
    [91]任华中,黄伟,张福墁.低温弱光对温室番茄生理特性的影响[J].中国农业大学学报, 2002, 7(1): 95-101.
    [92]周玉丽,舒英杰.低温弱光对茄子幼苗膜脂过氧化和细胞膜保护酶系的影响[J].安徽技术师范学院学报, 2004, 18(3): 9-12.
    [93]陈杰忠,徐春香,梁立峰.低温对香蕉叶片中蛋白质及脯氨酸的影响[J].华南农业大学学报, 1999, 20(3): 54-58.
    [94] Bruggemann W, Dauborn B. Long-term chilling of young tomato plants under low light 6 differential chilling sensitivity of ribulose-1,5-bisphate carboxylase oxygenase is linked to the oxidation of cysteine residuses[J]. Plant and cell physiology, 1995, 36(4): 1251-1257.
    [95]李建设,耿广东,程智慧.低温胁迫对茄子幼苗抗寒性生理生化指标的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报, 2003, 1: 91-96.
    [96]王孝宣,李树德,东惠茹,等.番茄品种耐寒性与ABA和可溶性糖含量的关系[J].园艺学报, 1998, 25(1): 56-60.
    [97]周碧燕,李宇彬,陈杰忠,等.低温胁迫和喷施ABA对荔枝内源激素和成花的影响[J].园艺学报, 2002, 29(6): 577-578.
    [98]简令成,孙德兰,孙龙华.甘蔗愈伤组织超低温保存中一些因素的研究[J].植物学报, 1987, 29: 123-131.
    [99]刘祖琪,张石城.植物抗性生理学[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 1994, 14, 43-44.
    [100]马尧,杨国会,王春兰,等.在干旱和低温胁迫下薏苡幼苗抗逆性研究[J].农业与技技术, 2002, 20(5): 41-42, 45.
    [101]王毅,杨宏福,李树德.园艺植物冷害和抗冷性的研究-文献综述[J].园艺学报, 1994, 21(3): 239-244.
    [102]沈漫,王明麻,黄敏仁.植物抗冷机理研究进展[J].植物学通报, 1997, 14(2): 1-8.
    [103] Thomashow M F. Plant cold acclimation: freezing tolerance genes and regulatory mechanisms[J]. Annual Rev Plant Physiology Plant Mol Biology, 1999, 50: 571-599.
    [104]杜晓莉,尚新江,焦书生,等.瓜根结线虫病的发生与防治[J].现代农业科技, 2008(4): 85.
    [105]李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].高等教育出版社, 2003, 164-165.
    [106]邹琦.植物生理生化实验指导[M].中国农业出版社, 1998, 97-98.
    [107]赵世杰,史国安,董新纯.植物生理学指导[M].中国农业科技出版社, 2000, 46-48, 100, 123.
    [108] Barker KR. Nematode extraction and bioassays[A]. In: Barker KR. Ed. An Advanced Trearise on Meloidogyne. Methodology[M].Raleigh:North Carolina State Univ.Graphics.1985, 2: 19-35.
    [109]中国科学院上海植物生理研究所,上海市植物生理学会.现代植物生理学实验指南[M].上海科学技术出版社, 1999, 302-322.
    [110]王爱国,罗广华.植物的超氧物自由基与羟胺反应的定量关系[J].植物生理学通讯, 1990, 6: 55-57.
    [111]林植芳,李双顺,张东林.采后荔枝果皮色素、总酚及有关酶活性的变化[J].植物学报, 1988, 30(1): 40-45.
    [112] Boiteux L S, Charchar J M. Genetic resistance to root-knot nematode ( Meloidogyne javanica) in eggplant(Solanum melongena) [J]. Plant Breeding, 1996, 115(3): 198-200.
    [113]邹金环,张爱萍.根结线虫对日光温室黄瓜生长和品质的影响[J].北方园艺, 2007(11): 197-199.
    [114]马德华,庞金安,李淑菊,等.温度逆境锻炼对高温下黄瓜幼苗生理的影响[J].园艺学报, 1998, 25(4): 350-355.
    [115]邵世勤,马青枝,党俊梅,等.甜菜抗(耐)丛根病生理基础的研究(IV)--氨基酸与甜菜抗丛根病的关系[J].内蒙古农业大学学报, 2000, 21(2): 33-40.
    [116] Kathiresan T, Mehta U K. Effect of Pratylenchus zeae infection on the expression of isozyme activities in resistant and susceptible sugarcane clones[J]. Nematology, 2005, 7: 677-688.
    [117]董金皋,韩建民.植物与病原物互作中的活性氧代谢及其作用[J].沈阳农业大学学报, 2000, 31(5): 427-431.
    [118] Molinari S. Changes of catalase and SOD activities in the early response of tomato to Meloidogyne incognita attack[J]. Nematologia Mediterranea, 1998, 26: 167-172.
    [119]吴慧平,解宜林,杨荣铮.水稻潜根结线虫侵染后寄主细胞膜丙二醛含量和外渗电导率的改变[J].安徽农业大学学报, 1997, 24(2): 115-118.
    [120] Tefft P M, Bone L W. Plant-induced Hatching of Eggs of Soybean Cyst Nematode Heterodera glycines[J]. Journal of Nematology. 1985, 17(3): 275-279.
    [121]许艳丽.土壤环境对大豆胞囊线虫卵孵化影响及线虫分子诊断研究[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学, 2004,146.
    [122]殷昭平.大葱品种耐热、抗寒性鉴定与筛选[D].泰安,山东农业大学, 2008: 16.
    [123]沈征言.植物抗寒性及抗热性的生理指标及其方法测定[J].中国蔬菜, 1983(1): 48-50.
    [124]范双喜,谷建田,韩莹琰.园艺植物高温逆境生理研究进展[J].北京农学院报, 2003, 18(2): 14.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700