腐植酸缓释钾肥对甘薯钾素吸收利用的影响
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本研究于2008年5月-2009年10月,在山东农业大学农学实验站进行,选用济薯22为试验材料。采用池栽试验的方法,对腐植酸缓释钾肥提高甘薯钾素吸收利用的不同因素做了系统的研究。主要结果如下:
     1腐植酸缓释钾肥对甘薯钾素吸收利用的影响
     施用腐植酸缓释钾肥,提高了甘薯植株中的钾素积累量,最终提高了钾肥吸收利用效率。与混施处理和钾肥处理相比,腐植酸缓释钾肥的钾肥吸收利用率分别提高16.39%、20.12%;钾肥农学利用率分别提高20.68%、39.84%。
     2腐植酸缓释钾肥对肥料钾素释放的影响
     与硫酸钾相比,腐植酸缓释钾肥的钾素释放峰值降低,前期释放速率低于硫酸钾,而后期释放速率则高于硫酸钾。腐植酸缓释钾肥的钾素积累释放速率曲线较为平缓,对钾素释放具有较好缓释效果。
     3腐植酸缓释钾肥对甘薯生长的激发效应
     施用腐植酸缓释钾肥,促进甘薯生长发育,提高了甘薯的生物产量。施钾和施用腐植酸均可提高鲜薯产量和干物质量。同时,施用钾肥可促进地上部干物质转运,提高了干物质在地下部的分配比例,其中腐植酸钾缓释肥处理效果最为显著。
     与混施处理和钾肥处理相比,腐植酸缓释钾肥的叶片叶绿素含量提高;施钾和施用腐植酸均可有效提高叶片光合作用,其中缓释钾肥处理光合作用提高最明显。施用钾肥和腐植酸均能提高植株叶片中SOD、POD酶活性,降低MDA含量,施用缓释肥处理效果最明显;与混施处理相比,缓释钾肥处理提高了前中期叶片中可溶性蛋白含量,及后期SOD、POD活性。
     各施肥处理均提高了甘薯块根膨大初期吸收根的根系活力;与其它施肥处理相比,施用缓释肥可更有效的提高吸收根的根系活力,同时促进更多根系向块根分化。
     腐植酸缓释钾肥与钾肥处理及腐植酸与钾肥混施处理相比,提高了甘薯植株在前期(栽秧后60-80天)地上部的N/K值,而降低了在中后期甘薯地上部的N/K值。
     4腐植酸缓释钾肥对土壤中钾素含量的影响
     腐植酸缓释钾肥处理,在前期土壤速效钾含量要低于腐植酸与钾肥混施处理,而在中后期则要高于混施处理;腐植酸处理与空白对照相比,混施处理和缓释钾肥处理与钾肥对照相比,土壤中速效钾含量降低。
     在甘薯生育期中,三个施用腐植酸处理土壤有效性钾含量呈显著上升趋势,其中腐植酸缓释钾肥处理的表现最明显;而速效钾肥处理的土壤有效钾含量变化不大。相对于空白对照,施用腐植酸的处理土壤中缓效钾含量降低,而钾肥处理土壤缓效钾含量则有所上升。
This experiment was carried out at the experimental station of Shandong Agricultural University from May 2008 to October 2009. The different factors of HA-K fertilizer on the absorption and utilization of potassium in sweet potato have been done a systematic study. The main results were as follows:
     1 Effect of HA-K fertilizer on the absorption and utilization of potassium in sweet potato
     HA-K fertilizer treatment increased the potassium accumulation of sweet potato and increased the absorption and utilization of potassium at last. Comparing with mixed HA and K fertilizer treatment and H_2SO_4 treatment, the recovery efficiency of potassium fertilizers of HA-K fertilizer treatment were increased 16.39%, 20.12%; the efficiency of potassium fertilizers were increased 20.68%, 39.84%.
     2 Effect of HA-K fertilizer on the slow release of potassium fertilizer
     Comparing with H_2SO_4, the potassium release peak of HA-K fertilizer was reduced. The potassium release rate of HA-K was lower than that of H_2SO_4 in the early, but it is higher in the late. The potassium accumulation release rate curve was smoother than that of H_2SO_4, have a good effect on the slow release of potassium release results.
     3Effect of HA-K fertilizer on stimulate the growth of sweet potato
     HA-K fertilizer treatments promote the growth of sweet potato, improve the biomass yield of sweet potato. Potassium or HA could increased the fresh yield and dry matter. Potassium fertilizer promoted the transfer of shoot dry matter and increased distribution proportion of dry matter in subterranean part, and the HA-K fertilizer treatment had the best effect on that.
     Comparing with H_2SO_4 treatment and mixed HA and K treatment, the HA-K fertilizer treatment was increased chlorophyll content. Potassium fertilizer treatments and HA fertilizer treatments improved photosynthesis, and the HA-K fertilizer treatment had the best effect on that. Potassium fertilizer treatments and HA fertilizer treatments increased superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD) activity, decreased malondiadehyde (MDA) content. Comparing with mixed HA and K fertilizer treatment, HA-K fertilizer treatment increased soluble protein content in early and medium time, and SOD, POD activity in the late.
     The fertilization treatments increased root activity early enlargement of sweet potato storage roots. Comparing with other fertilization treatments, HA-K fertilizer treatment could more effective to improve the root activity, and improve absorbing root more differentiated storage root.
     Comparing with H_2SO_4 treatment and mixed HA and K fertilizer treatment, HA-K fertilizer treatment increased N/K ratio of sweet potato at early time, and decreased it at the last.
     4 Effect of HA-K fertilizer on different forms of potassium of soil
     Rapidly available potassium content in soil of HA-K fertilizer treatment was lower than mixed HA and K treatment at early time, but it is higher at last. Comparing with non-fertilizer, HA fertilizer treatment decreased rapidly available potassium content soil, comparing with H_2SO_4 treatment, mixed HA and K treatment and HA-K fertilizer treatment had the same case.
     During growth of sweet potato, the available potassium content in soil of HA fertilizer treatments had a marked increasing trend, and HA-K fertilizer treatment most marked, but that of H_2SO_4 treatment had no marked change. Comparing with non-fertilizer treatment, slowly available potassium in soil of HA fertilizer treatments were decreased, but that of H_2SO_4 treatment was increased.
引文
[1]边文骅,彭立凤.腐植酸类液肥的生物活性检验方法初探[J].河北师范大学学报(自然科学版),1999,23(4):551-552.
    [2]陈荣峰.葡萄多效增糖灵的研制及其应用效果的研究[J].江西腐植酸,1986,1:26.
    [3]成绍鑫,武丽萍,李丽.腐植酸与速效磷肥的作用及HA-P的农化效应[J].腐植酸,2001,6(03):32-35.
    [4]成绍鑫,武阴萍,柳玉琴,等.腐植酸-脲络合物的工艺开发[J].腐植酸,1994,(4):29-32.
    [5]程夫玖等.腐植酸对小麦抗旱性的生理效应[J].应用生态学报,1995,6(4):363-367.
    [6]丁广洲,王晓为,侯静,马凤鸣.氧解腐殖酸与磷素混施影响大豆磷吸收的机制研究[J].中国油料作物学报,2007,29(2):73-77.
    [7]董少卿,周锦,安慧珠.腐植酸对玉米幼根生长及活力的影响[J].哈尔滨师范大学自然科学版,1991,(7)3:100-102.
    [8]高灵旺,谢文闻.腐植酸类物质与农业生态系统健康[J].腐植酸,2004,(6):5-113.
    [9]郭永兵,李峰.腐植酸对盾叶薯蓣种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J].腐植酸,湖北农业科学,2007,(46)2:256-258.
    [10]郭志平,夏更寿.施钾肥对马铃薯产量及相关生理指标的贡献作用[J].上海交通大学学报(农业科学版),2008,4(26):146-148.
    [11]黄云等.腐植酸盐对油白菜产量、品质效应的研究[J].腐植酸,1994,1:23-26.
    [12]黄琛,周霞萍,袁海平.高活性生化腐植酸对酶催化活性的影响[J].2007,1:32-35.
    [13]何建平,陶启珍,易平.腐植酸液体叶面肥对马铃薯产量和品质的影响[J].腐植酸,2004,1:25-26.
    [14]李兆君,马国瑞.腐殖酸尿素的制造及其增产作用机理的研究近况[J].土壤通报,2004(35)6:24-27
    [15]李兆君,马国瑞.腐殖酸尿素的制造及其增产作用机理的研究近况[J].土壤通报.2004(35)6:799-801.
    [16]李绪行,邵莉楣,等.黄腐酸和汪平酸对小麦萌发与幼苗生长及绿豆下胚轴生根的影响[J].植物学通报,1991,8(3):51-55.
    [17]李淑婕,郑平.腐植酸结构与植物刺激作用[J].江西腐植酸,1981.4:6-12.
    [18]李丽,武丽萍,成绍鑫.腐植酸钾与速效磷肥结合形态对磷的有效性影响[J].土壤肥料,2000(3):7-9.
    [19]李丽,武丽萍,成绍鑫.腐植酸磷肥的开发及其作用机理研究进展[J].磷肥与复肥,1999,3:58-61.
    [20]李京淑等.用3H-腐植酸研究植物对腐植酸的吸收[J].江西腐植酸,1985,3:15-18.
    [21]廖铁军.活性泥炭、氮、磷对甘蔗产量和品质的影响[J].腐植酸,1990: 2:23-25.
    [22]李绪行等.黄腐酸增强小麦抗旱能力和生理生化机制初探[J].植物学通报,1992, 9(2) :44-46.
    [23]梁太波,王振林,等.腐植酸尿素对生姜产量及氮素吸收、同化和品质的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2007,13(5):903-909.
    [24]梁宗存,成绍鑫,武丽萍.煤中腐植酸与尿素相互作用机理的研究[J].燃料化学学报,1999,4(27):176-180.
    [25]刘波,张辉,姜文勇,肖玉梅.风化煤硝基腐植酸促进植物生长活性研究[J].腐植酸,2000,2:20-24.
    [26]刘方春,邢尚军,等.褐煤腐植酸对钾的吸附特性研究[J].农业工程学报,2006(22)8:27-31.
    [27]刘增祥,毛希平.喷施腐植酸提高哈密瓜品质试验研究[J].江西腐植酸,1985,3:52-54.
    [28]刘增祥等.新疆哈密瓜喷施黄腐酸示范及试验研究[J].江西腐植酸,1986,2:27-30.
    [29]罗奇祥,涂枕梅.煤类腐植酸对土壤钾素有效性的影响[J].江西腐植酸,1984,2:31-36.
    [30]林葆.中国肥料[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1994:11-12..
    [31]陆力光,杨正申.黄腐酸在旱地烤烟上的应用研究[J].中国烟草,1994,(4):12-20.
    [32]陆欣等.新型脲酶抑制剂的试验研究[J].土壤学报,1997,(4):461-466.
    [33]马瑞昆等.黄腐酸在冬小麦节水栽培上的应用及其生理基础初探[J].腐植酸,1989, 2:35.
    [34]马志军,杨旭升,郭春景.腐植酸生物活性影响植物根系发育的研究[J].腐植酸,2004,01:16-20.
    [35]梅慧生,杨玉明,张淑远,曹家巽.腐植酸对植物生长的刺激作用[J].植物生理学报,1980,6(2):133-139.
    [36]麻生末雄,武长助宏.腐植物质的生理效应[J].江西腐植酸,1981,2:41-48.
    [37]潘启中,汪宗大.腐植酸对磷肥增效的研究与肥效试验[J].腐植酸,2000,1:21-23.
    [38]彭正萍,门明新,薛世川等.腐植酸复合肥对土壤养分转化和土壤酶活性的影响[J].河北农业大学学报,2005,(28)4:1-4.
    [39]彭正萍,门明新,薛世川.腐植酸复合肥对油菜氮素利用与后效的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2007,3(15):51-53,
    [40]钱惠祥等.腐植酸包裹型长效尿素肥效机理初步研究[J].土壤肥料,2002,(1):34-36
    [41]任守让,王瑞霞,赵贵彬.不同来源腐植酸对土壤微生物区系及其活性的影响[J].吉林农业科学,1985,2: 65-69.
    [42]孙明强,王为民,成绍鑫.腐植酸尿素的分解释放机理与应用研究报告[J].腐植酸,2003,03:12-18.
    [43]孙志梅,薛世川,等.HA复合肥的养分释放运移特点与土壤培肥效应研究[J].河北农业大学学报,2002,(25)3:19-22.
    [44]孙焕顷,苏长青.腐植酸钾对黄冠梨土壤肥力的影响[J].北方园艺,2009,(7):100-101.
    [45]陶启珍,杨端等.腐植酸盐对作物刺激作用的研究—腐植酸盐对提高薯类作物产量和品质的效果[J].江西腐植酸,1982,3:17-22.
    [46]王宏韬,吕品.黑龙江省主要腐植酸原料资源的性质及生物活性研究[J].国土与自然资源研究,2002,2:34-35.
    [47]王天立.黄腐酸的农业应用[J].腐植酸,1992,1:14.
    [48]王雄,李洛娜,蔡琦.腐植酸拌种及覆膜对春小麦水分利用率的影响[J].腐植酸,2006,04:14-17.
    [49]王一鸣.黄腐酸简易有效的抗旱剂[J].腐植酸,1991,1:24-26.
    [50]王瑞霞.腐植酸与土壤酶活性[J].腐植酸,1988,3:27-29.
    [51]王瑞霞,赵贵彬.不同来源腐植酸对土壤微生物区系及其活性的影响[J].吉林农业科学,1985,2:65-69.
    [52]王艳群,张笑归,等.风化煤与微肥配施对茼蒿生物量及品质的影响[J].中国农学通报,2008,(24)1:293-296.
    [53]王奇书,王拴柱,王天立.腐植酸类物质及对植物的生理作用[J].腐植酸,2001,1:33-39.
    [54]王国旗,薛世川,等.腐植酸的养分增效作用与机理[J].腐植酸,2004,4:13-16.
    [55]王汝娟,王振林等.腐植酸钾对食用甘薯品种钾吸收、利用和块根产量的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2008,14(3):520-526.
    [56]武志杰.腐植酸复合肥在春小麦上的增产效果[J].腐植酸,1997.3:23-26.
    [57]魏朝富,谢德体,李保国等.土壤有机无机复合体的研究进展[J].地球科学进展,2003,18(2):221-227.
    [58]武丽萍,成绍鑫.关于腐植酸对尿素增效作用研究与产品开发状况及发展趋势[J].腐植酸,2000,(1):1-3.
    [59]薛世川,孙志梅,彭正萍,杜会英.腐植酸复合肥的养分释放规律与控释机理研究[J].腐植酸,2001,1:30-32.
    [60]许旭旦,诸涵素,杨德兴等.叶面喷施腐植酸对小麦临界期干旱的生理调节作用的初步研究[J].植物生理学报,1983,9(4):367-373.
    [61]阎书春.腐植酸复合肥料的制取和它对增加甜菜含糖率的作用[J].江西腐植酸,1987,4:38-39.
    [62]杨志福.腐植酸类物质在农业生产中应用的试验研究[J].江西腐植酸,1986,3:7-10.
    [63]杨安民,刘漫道,唐保善,夏志明.腐植酸钾在棉花上应用效果研究[J].中国棉花,1999,26(7):12-14.
    [64]杨云马,薛世川,夏风召等.腐植酸复合肥对土壤微生物量的影响[J].华北农学报,2007,22:187-189.
    [65]于志民,吕品,沈光.腐植酸制剂防治棚菜硝酸盐污染技术研究[J].东北农业大学学报,2007,(38)6:750-752.
    [66]张建平,孙芳,李玉中.腐植酸对冬小麦种子的生理调节作用[J].中国农业气象, 2005,26(3):174-176.
    [67]张国华.中低分子量腐植酸农用试验示范初报[J].新疆农业科技,1992,3:24-25.
    [68]张辉,姜文勇,刘波.不同来源腐植酸促进植物生长活性及作用机理研究[J].腐植酸,2000,1:9-14.
    [69]张建平,孙芳,李玉中.腐植酸对冬小麦种子的生理调节作用[J].中国农业气象. 2005,26(3):174-176.
    [70]张建平,孙芳,李玉中.腐植酸对冬小麦种子的生理调节作用[J].中国农业气象,2005,26(3):174-176.
    [71]张爱君,李洪民,唐忠厚等.长期不施钾肥对甘薯产量的影响[J].安徽农业大学学报,2010,37(1):22-25.
    [72]张继舟,袁磊,马献发.腐植酸对设施土壤的养分、盐分及番茄产量和品质的影响研究[J].腐植酸,2008,3:19- 22.
    [73]张宏伟,龙明杰,曾繁森.腐植酸接枝共聚物对土壤物理性能的影响研究初报[J].广东农业科学,2001,1:33- 35.
    [74]张宏伟,陈港等.腐植酸共聚物对土壤酶活性的影响[J].土壤通报,2003,(34)1:30-32.
    [75]赵春山,张辉,郭宗文.硝基腐植酸生产工艺及其生物活性的研究[J].哈尔滨理工大学学报,2003,(8)6:70- 72.
    [76]赵瑞英,廖彩恢,刘开树.不同来源腐植酸对红壤改土效果的研究[J].江西农业大学学报,1986(8)3:48- 52.
    [77]郑平.煤炭腐植酸的生产和应用.化学工业出版社[M].北京.1991:1-5.
    [78]朱京涛,高宝珍,朱通顺.不同来源黄腐酸性质性能的研究[J].腐植酸.1999.3:23-24.
    [79]朱遐龄,甘吉生,王雁,等.抑制蒸腾剂-黄腐酸对冬小麦抗寒生理的影响[J].北京农业科学,1995,13(4):20- 21.
    [80]周忠平,王安立,刘志先.腐植酸微肥对小麦蛋白质含量的影响[J].腐植酸.2000,1:34-35.
    [81] Adani F, Genevini P, Zaccheo P, Zacchi G,. The effect of commercial humic acid on tomato plant growth and mineral nutrition[J]. J Plant Nutr, 1998,21( 3):561-575.
    [82] Ayuso M, Hernandez T, Garcia C. Effect of humic fractions from urban wastes and other more evolved organic materials on seed germination [J]. J Sci Food Agric, 1996a,71(4):461-468.
    [83] Ayuso M, Hernandez T, Garcia C, Pascual J A. A comparative study of the effect on barley growth of humic substances extracted from municipal wastes and from traditional organic materials [J]. J Sci Food Agric, 1996b, 72(4):493-500.
    [84] Concheri G, Nardi S, Reniero F, Dell Agnola G. The effects of humic substances the orizon of a calcic luvisol on morphological changes related to invertase and peroxidase activities on wheat roots [J]. Plant Soil,1996,179(1):65- 72.
    [85] Cooper R J, Liu C H. Influence of humic substances on rooting and nutrient content of creeping bent grass[J]. Crop Sci, 1998, 38(6):1639~1644.
    [86] David P P, Nelson P V, Sanders D C. A humic acid improves growth of tomato seedling in solution culture[J]. J Plant Nutr,1994,17(1):173- 174.
    [87] De Kock P C. Influence of humic acids on plant growth[J]. Science, 1995,121: 473- 474
    [88]De Kreij C, Basar H. Effect of humic substances in nutrient film technique on nutrient uptake [J]. Plant Nutr, 1995, 18(4):793- 802.
    [89] Fagbenro, J A, Agboola A A. Effect of different levels of humic acid on the growth and nutrient of teak seedlings[J]. Plant Nutr 1993,16 (8)1465-1483.
    [90] Goenadi D H, Sudharama I M. Shoot initiation by humic acids of selected tropical crops grown on tissue culture [J]. Plant Cell Reports, 1995, 15(1-2):59- 62.
    [91] Lee Y S, Bartlett R, J. Stimulation of plant growth by hurnic substances [J]. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 1976,40: 876-879.
    [92] Linehan D J. Some effects of a fulvic acid component of soil organic matter on the growth of cultured excised tomato roots [J]. Soil Boil Biochem 1976, 8:511-517.
    [93] Liu C H, Cooper R J, Bowman D C. Humic acid application affects photosynthesis, root development, and nutrient contest of creeping bent grass [J]. Hart science, 1998, 33(6):1023-1025.
    [94] Malik K A, Azam Y. Effect of humic acid on wheat (Tritium aestuvum L) seedling [J]. Exp Bot, 1985, 25(3):245-252.
    [95] Nardi S, Concheti G, Dell Agnola G, Scrimin P. Nitrate uptake and ATPase activity in oat seedlings in the presence of two humic fractions[J]. Soil Boil Biochem, 1991,23(9):833-836.
    [96] O'Donned R W.The auxin like effects of humic preparations from leonardite [J]. Soil Sci, 1973, 116(2):106-112.
    [97] Rauthan B S, Schnitzer M. Effects of a soil fulvic grid on the growth and nutrient content of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) plants [J]. Plant and Soil, 1981,63:491-495.
    [98] Schnitzer M, Poapst P A. Effect of a soil humic compound on root initiation[J]. Nature (London), 1967, 213:598-599
    [99] Vaughan D. A possible mechanism for humic acid action on cell elongation in root segments of pisum sativum under aseptic conditions [J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 1974,6:241-247
    [100] Vaugham D, Malcolm R E. Soil organic matter and biology activity Eds,Kluwer Academic Publishers[J], Dordrecht, 1985,37:106-108.
    [101] Vaughan D, Ord B G, Malcolm R E. Effects of soil organic matter on some root surface of and uptakes into winter wheat[J]. J Exp Bot, 1978, 29(113):1337-1334.
    [102] Varanini Z, Pinton R, De Biasi M G, Astolfi S, Maggioni A. Low molecular weight humic substances stimulate H+-ATPase activity of plasma membrane resides isolated from oat (Avena sativa L.) roots[J]. Plant and Soil, 1993.153:61-69.
    [103] Vanghan D, Ord B G. Uptake and incorporation of C-labeled soil organic matter by roots of pisum sativum L[J]. J Exp Bot, 1981, 32(129):679-687.
    [104] Vaugham D, Macdonald I R. Some effects of HA on cation uptake by parenchyra tissue [J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 1974, 8:415- 421.
    [105] Xu X D. The effect of foliar application of fulvic acid on water use,nutrient uptake and yield in wheat[J]. Aust J Agric Res, 1986, 37:343-350.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700