摘要
本文在田间系统调查和试验的基础上,对不同类型和防治措施稻田害虫和天敌群落的结构进行了研究,主要结果如下:
1不同类型稻田害虫和天敌群落结构及其动态的研究
1.1群落物种构成及各种群数量动态
田间系统调查共记录早稻田害虫12种,捕食性天敌16种;中稻田害虫和捕食性天敌各12种;晚稻田害虫11种,捕食性天敌18种。害虫主要优势种早稻田为白背飞虱、褐飞虱和稻纵卷叶螟,其数量在早稻生育后期较高;中稻田和晚稻田均为褐飞虱和稻纵卷叶螟,但晚稻田发生数量较少。天敌主要优势种各稻型均为草间小黑蛛、青翅蚁型隐翅虫、四点亮腹蛛和拟水狼蛛,其数量在水稻全生育期均很丰富。
1.2群落主要优势种的空间格局及其动态
害虫主要优势种中,褐飞虱主要分布于水稻下部,白背飞虱主要分布于水稻中部,稻纵卷叶螟主要分布于水稻上部。几种天敌主要优势种均主要分布于水稻中、下部。群落优势种的空间格局在时间过程中变化不明显。
1.3群落主要特征指数及其动态
群落总个体数在早稻生长发育前期和中期较少,后期呈迅速上升趋势。中稻田群落总个体数在时间过程中变化不大,晚稻田较稳定。总体上看群落总个体数
中稻>晚稻和早稻。群落多样性早稻生育后期略高于前期,中稻以生长发育中期最高,在晚稻生育过程中呈上升趋势。均匀度是影响各类型稻田群落多样性的主要因素。总体上看群落多样性晚稻高于中稻和早稻。以功能团为单位和以物种为单位的群落多样性指数呈高度正相关。
1.4群落动态的聚类分析
模糊聚类结果表明,早稻分蘖期至乳熟期群落总体特征一直比较类似,蜡熟期群落特征出现较大变化,这主要由迁飞性害虫数量突增所致。中稻田群落总体特征在时间过程中变化较大,晚稻田则比较稳定。
2不同防治措施对稻田害虫和天敌群落影响的研究
研究结果表明三唑磷、杀虫双、阿维菌素和Bt+吡虫啉4种药剂处理对水稻主要害虫均有较好的控制作用,三唑磷和杀虫双处理对稻纵卷叶螟的短期防效优于阿维菌素和Bt+吡虫啉处理,但阿维菌素和Bt+吡虫啉处理对天敌的影响较小,
有利于保护和恢复稻田天敌对害虫的持续控制作用。对群落特征指数的影响总体上看Bt+吡虫啉和阿维菌素处理小于三唑磷和杀虫双处理。
3不同类型和防治措施稻田水稻主要生育期害虫和天敌群落相似性的研究
研究结果表明,对稻田害虫和天敌群落的影响,总体上防治措施>稻型>水稻生育期;不同稻型和水稻生育期害虫和天敌群落自身的特点,对不同防治措施对群落作用的效果有重要影响。因此,在水稻害虫防治中不要打保险药,并应根据稻田害虫和天敌群落的主要特点,选择有效的调控措施,改善群落结构,促进群落的稳定发展和实现害虫的可持续控制。
An investigation was made on the structures of insect pest and natural enemy communities in paddy fields of different rice types and under different insecticide treatments based on the systematic field survey and experiment in 2002-2003. The main results were as follows:
1 Structures and their dynamics of insect pest and natural enemy communities in paddy fields of different rice types
1.1 Species composition and population dynamics of each species of the communities
The results of systematic investigation showed that there were 12 species of insect pests and 16 species of predatory natural enemies in early paddy field fields, 12 species of insect pests and 12 species of predatory natural enemies in middle-season paddy fields, 11 species of insect pests and 18 species of predatory natural enemies in late paddy fields. The major dominant insect pests in early paddy fields were Sogatella furcifera、 Nilaparvata lugens and Cnaphalocrocis medinalis and their populations were relatively high in late development period of rice. The major dominant insect pests in both middle-season and late paddy fields were Nilaparvata lugens and Cnaphalocrocis medinalis, but their populations in late paddy fields were relatively lower than those in middle-season paddy fields. The major dominant natural enemies in paddy fields of every rice type were Erigonidium graminicola、 Paederus fuscipes、Singa pygmaea and Pirata subpiraricus and their populations were rather abundant in the whole development period of rice.
1.2 Spatial patterns and their dynamics of major dominant species in the communities
Among the major dominant insect pests, Nilaparvata lugens was distributed mainly in the lower parts of rice plants, Sogatells furcifera was distributed mainly in the middle parts of rice plants and Cnaphalocrocis madianlis was distributed mainly in the upper parts of rice plants. All the major dominant natural enemies were distributed mainly in the middle and lower parts of rice plants. The spatial distributed patterns of dominant species of the communities had no obvious change in the temporal series.
1.3 Major characteristic indices and their dynamics of the communites
The total individuals of the communities were relatively few during the early and middle development periods but rose rapidly during the late development period of early rice. The total individuals of the communities changed greatly in the temporal sequence in middle-season paddy fields but were relatively stable in late paddy fields. Generally the total individuals of the communities in middle-season paddy fields were greater than those in both late and early paddy fields. The diversities of the communities were a little higher during the late development period of early rice, but were the highest during the middle development period of middle-season rice and were in rising trend with the growth and development of late rice. The principal factor affecting the diversity was species evenness of the communities in all kinds of rice types. Generally the diversities of the communities in late paddy fields were higher than those in middle-season and early paddy fields. The communities diversity indices based on species were significantly relates to those based on guilds.
1.4 Cluster analysis of the communities dynamics
The results of fuzzy cluster analysis showed that the general characteristics of the communities were relatively analogous from tillering stage to milk stage of early rice but changed obviously at wax stage with the sudden rise of migratory insect pest populations. The general characteristics of the communities changed obviously in temporal sequence in middle-season paddy fields but were relatively stable in late paddy fields.
2 Effects of different insecticide treatments on the insect pest and natural enemy communities in paddy fields
The research results showed that all 4 insecticide treatments of triazophos, shachongshuang, abamectin and Bt+imidactoprid had significant control effects on major insect pests of rice. The short perio
引文
1.钦俊德.中国昆虫毒理学、昆虫病理学三十年.昆虫学报,1979,22(3):249-256
2.钦俊德.近二十年我国实验昆虫学的发展.昆虫学报,2000,43(3):318-326
3.毛国忠,徐关康,俞安品等.防治稻纵卷叶螟的药剂筛选.植物保护,2002,28(1):49-51
4.杨丽梅,陈忠诚,包华理等.稻飞虱自然种群变动与药剂防治技术研究.植物保护,1995,21(1):11-14
5.谢雪梅,蒲正国,卢福刚等.锐劲特对稻纵卷叶螟和稻飞虱的兼控效果评价.植物保护,27(2):35-37
6.茹李军,魏岑.农药混剂对害虫抗药性发展影响的探讨.中国农业科学,1997,30(2):65-69
7.唐振华.昆虫抗药性及其治理.北京:农业出版社,1993:10-13
8.吴加伦,樊德方.水稻害虫防治安全使用农药专家系统.植物保护学报,2000,27(1):69-75
9.王华弟,张左生,程家安等.水稻三化螟预测预报与防治对策研究.中国农业科学,1997,30(3):14-20
10. 张桂芬,鲁传涛.吡虫啉防治稻飞虱的田间药效试验.植物保护,1996,22(2):48-49
11.汤金仪,胡伯海,王建强.我国水稻迁飞性害虫猖獗成因及其治理对策建议.生态学报,1996,16(2):167-173
12.韦永保,陈显文,黄大华.白背飞虱和稻纵卷叶螟兼治施药技术探讨.植物保护,1991,17(3):30-31
13.刘贤进,杜正文.不同药剂对褐稻虱的田间种群毒理机智初探.昆虫学报,1995,38(4):502-504
14.张文庆,古德祥,蒲蛰龙.三化螟种群系统的最优管理决策.昆虫学报,1995,38(3):296-304
15.陆自强,沈国清,韩永刚.水稻食叶类害虫等量损害系统与复合防治指标.昆虫学报,1991,34(3):319-325
16.盛承发,王红托,高留德等.我国水稻螟虫大发生现状、损失估计及防治策略.植物保护,2003,29(1):37-39
17.颜仁贤,盛金礼,蔡方毅等.早稻主害代稻虱防治策略及应用技术.植物保护,1992,18(3):2-4
18.钱汉良,陈其志,柯愈祥.根据水稻被害状确定褐稻虱防治指标研究.植物保护,
1995,21(2):31-33
19.莫建初,庄佩君,唐振华.杀虫剂轮用和混用对害虫种群抗性演化的影响.昆虫 学报,1999,42(4):337-345
20.杨秋萍,李瑛,何永垠等.东台市水稻螟虫发生危害新特点及防治对策.植物保护,2002,28(3):53-55
21.王正军,程家安,李典谟.水稻二化螟地理信息系统数据库的设计与组建.昆虫学报,2001,44(4):525-533
22.喻子牛,孙明,刘子铎等.苏云金芽孢杆菌的分类及生物活性蛋白基因.中国生物防治.1996,12(2):85-89
23.喻子牛. 苏云金杆菌[M].北京:科学技术出版社,1990
24.戴莲韵,王学聘. 苏云金芽孢杆菌研究进展[M].北京:科学技术出版社,1997
25.Gill S S,Cowles E A,Pietvantonio P V.The mode of Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxins[J].Annu Rev Entomol,1992,37:615-636
26.高远林,刘金龙.20%三唑磷?阿维菌素EC防治水稻螟虫的药效试验.安徽农业科学,2003,31(1):134
27.韩丽娟,顾中言,周士良等. 阿维菌素防治水稻二化螟田间应用评价.农药,2003,42(6):29-30
28.施跃峰.微生物杀虫剂研究进展.植物保护,2000,26(5):32-34
29.徐尚成. 新型杀虫剂的研究开发进展.江苏农药,1999,(1):2-5
30.顾正远.稻种资源抗虫性研究概况.作物品种资源,1986,(3)
31.钱汉良,谷守礼,张翼.应用水稻丰抗品种配套技术控制病虫害.植物保护,1991,17(3):16-18
32.胡国文,刘光杰.我国水稻抗虫性研究进展.见:万方浩,康乐.昆虫生态学研究.北京:中国科学技术出版社,1992,22-31
33.张古忍,廉斌,古练权等.不同品种的水稻乙醇提取物对褐飞虱的影响.昆虫学报,1998,41(2):215-217
34肖英方,张存政,顾正远.水稻品种对白背飞虱的抗性机理.植物保护学报,2001(3):198-202
35.刘光杰,沈君辉,寒川一成.中国水稻抗虫性的研究及其应用:回顾与展望.中国水稻科学,2003,17(增刊):1-6
36.朱敏,胡国文,唐健等.全球气候异常(ENSO事件的发生)对我国褐飞虱大发生的影响.中国农业科学,1997,30(5):1-5
37.吴进才,梁家荣,张凤举等.水稻三种害虫组合侵害及对籽粒生长的影响.昆虫学报,1995(1):30-37
38.孙建中,杜正文。二化螟幼虫的田间分布.昆虫学报.1991(3):303-310
39.汪恩国.二化螟种群数量变化规律研究.植物保护,1999(1):14-17
40.高春先,顾秀慧,贝亚维等.褐稻虱再猖獗原因探讨.生态学报,1988,8(2):155-163
41.张俊平,陈长铭.稻纵卷叶螟种群系统动态模拟.昆虫学报,1991(3):311-318
42.祝增荣,程家安,黄次伟等.白背飞虱种群动态模拟研究.生态学报,1994(2):188-195
43.陈斌,吴蔚文,蒋书楠.水稻-二化螟系统模型研究.生态学报,1993,13(2):177-184
44.方继朝,杜正文,程遐年等.三化螟种群的内稳定及其生态机制.昆虫学报,2001,44(3):337-343
45.Kiritani K.Pest management in rice.Ann.Rev.Entomol.,1979,24:
279-312
46. 蒲蛰龙,古德祥,周汉辉等.大沙区水稻害虫综合防治研究.中国农业科学,1984,(4):73-80
47.汪大泽.有关安徽省有害生物综合治理的实施问题.植物保护,2001,27(4):36-38
48.郭士英.建议应用种群的观点研究昆虫和植病.植物保护,1994,(4):47-48
49.丁岩钦.论害虫种群的生态控制.生态学报,1993,13(2):99-105
50.程遐年,徐国民.两种稻虱缨小蜂种群生态的比较.昆虫学报,1991,34(4):405-412
51.郭玉杰,王念英,赵军华等.4种生态类型稻区节肢动物群落的基本组成与结构特征分析.生态学报,1995(4):433-441
52.郝树广,张孝曦,程瑕年等.稻田节肢动物群落营养层及优势功能集团的组成与多样性动态.昆虫学报,1998(4):343-353
53.唐启义,胡阳,唐健等.稻田生境与非稻田生境节肢动物群落关系及动态变化分析.第3次植保系统工程学术会议论文
54.唐龙飞,黄毅斌,翁伯奇等.稻田高效、低耗、低污染的持续农业模式研究.中国农业科学,2000,33(3):60-66
55.余一心,金卫斌,肖先荣等.稻田生态系统异质结构功能初探.生态学报,1991,11(1):191-193
56.娄永根,杜孟浩,郭华伟等.水稻品种对黑肩绿盲蝽生长、发育、存活及繁殖的影响.植物保护学报,2002,29(3):193-198
57.张桂芬,竹内博昭,平井一男.三种杀虫剂对稻螟赤眼蜂种群增长的影响.植物
保护学报,1997,24(2):164-168
58.朱福兴,王金信,刘峰等.杀虫剂对龟纹瓢虫敏感性测定.中国农业科学,1997, 30(6):78-80
59.朱福兴,王金信,刘峰等.瓢虫对杀虫剂的敏感性研究.昆虫学报,1998,41(4):359-365
60.罗礼智,B.M.Shepard.水稻种植密度和生育期对三化螟卵的天敌种群及其效益的影响.昆虫学报,1994,37(3):298-304
61.张古忍,张文庆,古德祥.用ELISA研究稻田节肢类捕食者对稻飞虱的捕食作用.昆虫学报,1997,40(2):171-176
62.周强,张学武,张古忍等.稻田中多种天敌对稻飞虱的控制作用.植物保护,1997,(2):3-6
63. 张文庆,张古忍,古德祥.稻飞虱及其节肢类捕食者的生态位关系研究.中山大学学报论坛1995,(2):27-31
64.张文庆,张古忍,古德祥.自然天敌的长期保护利用对稻飞虱的控制作用.植物保护学报,1996,23(2):131-136
65.张文庆,张古忍,古德祥.保护利用农田天敌的群落问题探讨.植物保护学报,1996,23(4):363-368
66.陶方玲.多物种共存系统中捕食性天敌对白背飞虱捕食作用.昆虫天敌,1993,15(1):39-44
67.刘志诚,叶恭银,胡萃.Bt水稻对主要非靶标害虫和蜘蛛优势种田间种群动态的影响.植物保护学报,2002,29(2):138-144
68.王洪全.稻田蜘蛛的保护利用.湖南科技出版社,1981
69.王洪全,颜亨梅,杨海明.中国稻田蜘蛛生态利用研究.中国农业科学,1996,29(5):68-75
70.余昭杰,王洪全.稻田微蛛优势种与环境关系.植物保护学报,1993,20(1):7-12
71.俞小平,郑许松,徐红星等.拟水狼蛛在水稻与茭白田之间的转移.昆虫学报,2002,45(5):636-640
72.李剑泉,赵志模,吴仕源等.多物种共存系统中蜘蛛对稻虫的控制作用.中国农业科学,2002,35(2):146-151
73.万方浩,陈常铭. 综防区和化防区稻田害虫-天敌群落组成及多样性研究. 生态学报,1986,6(2):159-170
74.庞雄飞,尤民生. 昆虫群落生态学. 北京:中国农业出版社,1996
75.邹运鼎,毕守东,陈高潮等. 各种天敌对棉蚜种群数量影响程度的研究. 应用
生态学报,1998,9(5):499-502
76.尤民生,吴中孚. 稻田昆虫群落排序的研究. 福建农学院学报,1985,4(2): 95-102
77.胡国文等.减少稻田用药的理论依据和实践.昆虫知识,1996,33(1):3-7
78.赵志模,郭依泉.群落生态学原理与方法.1990,科技文献出版社重庆分社
79.Iwasa Y, et al. Prey distribution as a factor deterring the choice of optimal foraging strategy. American Naturalist,1981:117-123