重构我国劳动教养制度的可行性探讨
摘要
有着五十多年历史的劳动教养制度作为具有中国特色的法律手段,在为我国经济和社会发展做出重要贡献的同时,也暴露出许多与当前法治建设不相适应的缺陷和弊端,在我国社会主义法律体系建设飞速发展的今天,对劳动教养制度进行改革和完善已势在必行。
全文共分以下三大部分:
第一部分:劳动教养制度的历史:较为详尽地回顾了劳动教养制度在我国诞生的历史背景及发展历程,以时间为脉络,从立法的角度梳理了劳动教养制度在我国从无到有、从弱到强的历史发展轨迹及曲折经历,勾勒出了劳动教养制度的产生发展与社会政治环境的变化之间的密切关系,以及劳动教养制度自身所附有的政治色彩和时代特征。
第二部分:劳动教养制度的现状与弊端:列举了我国现行劳动教养制度的立法状况以及劳动教养制度在内容方面的相关规定。充分肯定了劳动教养制度在我国实施的五十多年里,在保障社会政治稳定,维护治安秩序,助推经济和社会发展,积极有效地预防犯罪、减少犯罪,教育、挽救轻微违法犯罪人等方面发挥的积极作用。同时,重点对应在劳动教养制度现状中列举的内容,分析和指出了劳动教养制度在立法和实施过程中暴露出的种种缺陷和弊端,并对这些缺陷、弊端产生的根源及危害进行了简要的分析。
第三部分:重新构建劳动教养制度之设想:归纳性地介绍了学界对劳动教养制度的存、废观点,以及对劳动教养制度改革的多种方案。并在综合、分析、研究对劳动教养制度各种改革方案的基础上,总结前人经验、结合自身实际工作的体会,提出了对劳动教养制度完善和重新构建的设想:要在我国现有劳动教养制度基础上,分步实施,通过立法填补我国刑法与治安管理处罚法之间的结构性缺损,规范和完善劳动教养制度的相关内容,重构具有中国特色的独立的劳动教养法律制度,使之更好地为我国的社会主义现代化建设服务。
Reeducation through Labour system with Chinese characteristics, as the legal means of more than 50 years, while contributing a lot to our economic and social development, has betrayed many defects and drawbacks that don’t match with modern Law construction. Nowadays, with the fast development of our social law construction system, it is imperative to reform and perfect Reeducation through Labour System.
This thesis is composed of three parts:
Part one:the history of Reeducation through Labour system: this part gives a detailed review of historical background and development of Reeducation through Labour system in china. According the time order, this part illustrates its historical development track and tortuous experience from the Legislation Angle and the closed relationship between its development and social political environments and its political color and times characteristics
Part two:Status and drawbacks of Reeducation through Labour system:this part lists the legislative situation of Chinese Reeducation through Labour system and its related provisions in content. It affirms that Reeducation through Labour system plays an active role in social and political stability, public order, social and economic development, prevention and reduction of crime, education and saving minor illegal crime person and so on. At the same time, this part focuses on the status and drawbacks in legislative implementation process and the root and harm of its status and drawbacks
Part three: imagination of reconstruction Reeducation through labor system:This part inductively introduces the critical ideas on whether there should be Reeducation through Labour systemic or not, and gives imagination on the reform of Reeducation through Labour system. Based on the induction, analysis and study on Reeducation through Labour system reform, the author makes a connection of predecessors’and own experiences, and draws an imagination on how to reconstruct and perfect Reeducation through Labour system:based on our reeducation through Labour system, the author tries to fill the structural defect between Criminal law and public security administration punishment by legislation, to standard and perfect the relative content of reeducation through labor system, to rebuild reeducation through labor system with Chinese characteristics, and thus to service for Chinese Socialist modernization.
全文共分以下三大部分:
第一部分:劳动教养制度的历史:较为详尽地回顾了劳动教养制度在我国诞生的历史背景及发展历程,以时间为脉络,从立法的角度梳理了劳动教养制度在我国从无到有、从弱到强的历史发展轨迹及曲折经历,勾勒出了劳动教养制度的产生发展与社会政治环境的变化之间的密切关系,以及劳动教养制度自身所附有的政治色彩和时代特征。
第二部分:劳动教养制度的现状与弊端:列举了我国现行劳动教养制度的立法状况以及劳动教养制度在内容方面的相关规定。充分肯定了劳动教养制度在我国实施的五十多年里,在保障社会政治稳定,维护治安秩序,助推经济和社会发展,积极有效地预防犯罪、减少犯罪,教育、挽救轻微违法犯罪人等方面发挥的积极作用。同时,重点对应在劳动教养制度现状中列举的内容,分析和指出了劳动教养制度在立法和实施过程中暴露出的种种缺陷和弊端,并对这些缺陷、弊端产生的根源及危害进行了简要的分析。
第三部分:重新构建劳动教养制度之设想:归纳性地介绍了学界对劳动教养制度的存、废观点,以及对劳动教养制度改革的多种方案。并在综合、分析、研究对劳动教养制度各种改革方案的基础上,总结前人经验、结合自身实际工作的体会,提出了对劳动教养制度完善和重新构建的设想:要在我国现有劳动教养制度基础上,分步实施,通过立法填补我国刑法与治安管理处罚法之间的结构性缺损,规范和完善劳动教养制度的相关内容,重构具有中国特色的独立的劳动教养法律制度,使之更好地为我国的社会主义现代化建设服务。
Reeducation through Labour system with Chinese characteristics, as the legal means of more than 50 years, while contributing a lot to our economic and social development, has betrayed many defects and drawbacks that don’t match with modern Law construction. Nowadays, with the fast development of our social law construction system, it is imperative to reform and perfect Reeducation through Labour System.
This thesis is composed of three parts:
Part one:the history of Reeducation through Labour system: this part gives a detailed review of historical background and development of Reeducation through Labour system in china. According the time order, this part illustrates its historical development track and tortuous experience from the Legislation Angle and the closed relationship between its development and social political environments and its political color and times characteristics
Part two:Status and drawbacks of Reeducation through Labour system:this part lists the legislative situation of Chinese Reeducation through Labour system and its related provisions in content. It affirms that Reeducation through Labour system plays an active role in social and political stability, public order, social and economic development, prevention and reduction of crime, education and saving minor illegal crime person and so on. At the same time, this part focuses on the status and drawbacks in legislative implementation process and the root and harm of its status and drawbacks
Part three: imagination of reconstruction Reeducation through labor system:This part inductively introduces the critical ideas on whether there should be Reeducation through Labour systemic or not, and gives imagination on the reform of Reeducation through Labour system. Based on the induction, analysis and study on Reeducation through Labour system reform, the author makes a connection of predecessors’and own experiences, and draws an imagination on how to reconstruct and perfect Reeducation through Labour system:based on our reeducation through Labour system, the author tries to fill the structural defect between Criminal law and public security administration punishment by legislation, to standard and perfect the relative content of reeducation through labor system, to rebuild reeducation through labor system with Chinese characteristics, and thus to service for Chinese Socialist modernization.
引文
[ 1 ]司法部劳动教养制度改革与完善研究课题组,《改革与完善中国劳动教养制度(上)》,《中国司法》,2004年第3期,第29页。
[2]司法部劳动教养制度改革与完善研究课题组,《改革与完善中国劳动教养制度(上)》,《中国司法》,2004年第3期,第29页。
[4]司法部劳动教养制度改革与完善研究课题组,《改革与完善中国劳动教养制度(上)》,《中国司法》,2004年第3期,第30页。
[5]刘仁文,“劳动教养亟需立法”,《法学杂志》,1998年,第5期。
[6]储槐植,“论教养处遇的合理性”[N],《法制日报》,1999年,第3期。
[7]屈学武,“‘轻罪’之法价值取向与人身权利保护”,河北法学,2005年11月,第23卷第11期。
[8]康家:“劳教立法的紧迫性和对象、形态研究”,司法部劳教局,中国劳动教养学会组编:《劳动教养立法研究》,北京:法律出版社,2004年版,第308页。
[1]储槐植、陈兴良、张绍彦.理性与秩序-中国劳动教养制度研究[M].北京,法律出版社,2002.
[2]陈兴良.刑事法治论[M].北京,中国人民大学出版社,2007.
[3]陈泽宪.犯罪定义与刑事法治[M].北京,中国社会科学出版社,2008.
[4]高莹等.矫治理念与教养制度变革[M].北京,群众出版社,2005.
[5]司法部劳动教养管理局中国劳动教养学会组编.劳动教养立法研究[M].北京,法律出版社,2004. 308.
[6]苗有水.保安处分与中国刑法发展[M].北京,中国方正出版社,2001.
[7]夏宗素.劳动教养制度改革问题研究[M].北京,法律出版社,2001.
[8]曹寻真.劳动教养制度存废的法哲学思考[J].法制与社会,2009,7(上),172-173.
[9]陈泽宪.中国的劳动教养制度及其改革[J].环球法律评论,2003,4,397-402.
[10]刘仁文.劳动教养亟需立法[J].法学杂志,1998,5,22-23.
[11]刘振华.我国劳动教养制度的缺陷及其完善[J].广东行政学院学报,2005,17(3),62-65.
[12]李永升.罪刑相适应原则的内涵解读[J].甘肃社会科学,2005,4,71-74
[13]屈学武.“轻罪”之法价值取向与人身权利保护[J].河北法学,2005,23(11),18-23.
[14]司法部劳动教养制度改革与完善研究课题组.改革与完善中国劳动教养制度(上)[J].中国司法,2004,3,29.
[15]王顺安.论社区矫正的利与弊[J].法学杂志,2005年,4,102-106.
[16]郑利涛.对我国劳动教养制度的思考[J].法制与社会,2009,6(上),162-163.
[17]张绍彦.劳动教养的轨迹及去向[J].法学论坛,2008,23(4),40-46.
[18]郑至吾.劳动教养制度重构的思考[J].湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,21(6),86-89.
[19]储槐植.论教养处遇的合理性[N].法制日报,1999年,第3期.
[2]司法部劳动教养制度改革与完善研究课题组,《改革与完善中国劳动教养制度(上)》,《中国司法》,2004年第3期,第29页。
[4]司法部劳动教养制度改革与完善研究课题组,《改革与完善中国劳动教养制度(上)》,《中国司法》,2004年第3期,第30页。
[5]刘仁文,“劳动教养亟需立法”,《法学杂志》,1998年,第5期。
[6]储槐植,“论教养处遇的合理性”[N],《法制日报》,1999年,第3期。
[7]屈学武,“‘轻罪’之法价值取向与人身权利保护”,河北法学,2005年11月,第23卷第11期。
[8]康家:“劳教立法的紧迫性和对象、形态研究”,司法部劳教局,中国劳动教养学会组编:《劳动教养立法研究》,北京:法律出版社,2004年版,第308页。
[1]储槐植、陈兴良、张绍彦.理性与秩序-中国劳动教养制度研究[M].北京,法律出版社,2002.
[2]陈兴良.刑事法治论[M].北京,中国人民大学出版社,2007.
[3]陈泽宪.犯罪定义与刑事法治[M].北京,中国社会科学出版社,2008.
[4]高莹等.矫治理念与教养制度变革[M].北京,群众出版社,2005.
[5]司法部劳动教养管理局中国劳动教养学会组编.劳动教养立法研究[M].北京,法律出版社,2004. 308.
[6]苗有水.保安处分与中国刑法发展[M].北京,中国方正出版社,2001.
[7]夏宗素.劳动教养制度改革问题研究[M].北京,法律出版社,2001.
[8]曹寻真.劳动教养制度存废的法哲学思考[J].法制与社会,2009,7(上),172-173.
[9]陈泽宪.中国的劳动教养制度及其改革[J].环球法律评论,2003,4,397-402.
[10]刘仁文.劳动教养亟需立法[J].法学杂志,1998,5,22-23.
[11]刘振华.我国劳动教养制度的缺陷及其完善[J].广东行政学院学报,2005,17(3),62-65.
[12]李永升.罪刑相适应原则的内涵解读[J].甘肃社会科学,2005,4,71-74
[13]屈学武.“轻罪”之法价值取向与人身权利保护[J].河北法学,2005,23(11),18-23.
[14]司法部劳动教养制度改革与完善研究课题组.改革与完善中国劳动教养制度(上)[J].中国司法,2004,3,29.
[15]王顺安.论社区矫正的利与弊[J].法学杂志,2005年,4,102-106.
[16]郑利涛.对我国劳动教养制度的思考[J].法制与社会,2009,6(上),162-163.
[17]张绍彦.劳动教养的轨迹及去向[J].法学论坛,2008,23(4),40-46.
[18]郑至吾.劳动教养制度重构的思考[J].湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,21(6),86-89.
[19]储槐植.论教养处遇的合理性[N].法制日报,1999年,第3期.