维度本体及其应用
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
随着语义网(Semantic Web)的不断发展,及其本体(Ontology)技术的不断完善,语义网和本体在知识管理、知识工程、信息抽取与检索等方面有广泛的应用。特别在知识管理方面,W3C制定的资源描述框架(RDF)和Web本体语言(OWL),特别适合解决生命科学、医疗卫生、地理信息系统、电子政务等各个领域等知识组织、知识检索、知识推理等问题。
     语义网和本体在各个领域的应用过程中,情境敏感知识管理问题越来越突出。一方面,语义网的各个领域普遍存在着情境敏感知识,无法忽视的和避免这个问题。笔者在多个课题项目研究中经常遇到这个问题。另一方面,语义网中现有技术对于情境敏感知识管理问题并不能很好的解决。因此,笔者在本文提出一个新的情境敏感知识管理解决方案:维度本体。维度本体的提出是语义网发展的内在要求,也是实际项目应用的客观需要。
     本文首先阐述了维度本体的定义,然后辨析了维度本体和其他相关概念之间的联系和区别,进而对维度本体的两个特征作了总结:(1)理论的科学性与严谨性;(2)应用的可行性与灵活性。针对这两个特征,本文进一步对维度本体的理论内涵和应用情况作了详细阐述。在理论方面,维度本体延用了RDF理论中,使用数理逻辑来建立RDF理论模型的方法。笔者通过数学形式化语言定义了维度本体中的抽象语义概念,并使用一系列命题、定理和推论来建立维度本体知识推理机制。笔者对这个定理系统中的所有定理和推论都进行了严格的数学证明,体现了维度本体的理论的严谨性。在应用方面,笔者首先介绍了自主开发的维度本体的应用支撑工具,用于解决维度本体在应用中基础的、通用的和共性的问题。这些工具能够保证维度本体快速而高效的应用于实际项目中,也提高了维度本体应用的可行性。最后,笔者介绍了在电子政务领域和生物医学领域两个项目课题研究中,如何应用了维度本体来解决情境敏感知识管理问题。
     本文的创新之处在于:提出了维度本体的理论框架和应用方案,丰富了本体理论的内涵,促进了本体应用的发展。维度本体的提出较好的解决了情境敏感知识管理问题;严格的数学逻辑保证了它的科学性,丰富的实际应用证明了它的可行性;它的提出既具有理论意义有包含实用价值。
     维度本体是笔者创新提出的一个新的解决方案,因此本文研究的难点在于:如何证明维度本体的这个新理论的科学性,以及如何将这个新理论应用于实际项目中以证明其可行性。
     本论文是多个项目课题的研究成果之一:
     ●国家档案局科技项目“知识管理方法技术在数字档案馆建设中的应用研究”(2006-x-29)。
     ●国家自然科学基金项目“基于数字图书馆的本体演化与知识管理研究”(70773087)。
     ●中国人民武装警察部队医学院(天津)和武汉大学信息资源研究中心合作的天津市应用基础研究计划面上项目“矽尘暴露人群血清相关效应蛋白质及其变化的时间窗研究——矽肺动物模型生物活性介质调控网络研究”。(06YFJMJC09800)。
With th'e development of Semantic Web and the improvement of Ontology technology, Semantic Web and Ontology have broad applications in such domains as knowledge management, knowledge engineering, information extraction and retrieval. Especially in knowledge management, Resource Description Framework (RDF) and Web Ontology Language (OWL) proposed by W3C, are very suitable to resolve the problems of knowledge organization, knowledge retrieval and knowledge reasoning in the domains of life science, health science, geographic information system, e-government and so on.
     During the application of Semantic Web and Ontology in different domains, the problem of context-sensitive knowledge management has been standing out more and more seriously. On the one hand, context-sensitive knowledge is widely spread in different domains of Semantic Web, which can be neither neglected nor avoided. On the other hand, current solutions in Semantic Web turn to be weak in resolving this problem. Therefore, the author proposes a brand new solution for the problem of context-sensitive knowledge management in this paper:Dimensional Ontology. The proposal of Dimensional Ontology is both the interior requirement of the development of Semantic Web and object request from the real world project applications.
     This paper firstly advances the definition of Dimensional Ontology, and then tells the relations and differences from other similar concepts. The two major features of Dimensional Ontology are summarized in this paper:(1) The scientificalness and the preciseness of its theory; (2) The feasibility and the flexibility of its application. According to the features, the paper further expatiates the theory and application of Dimensional Ontology in details. In the aspect of its theory, Dimensional Ontology follows the methodology of using Mathematical Logic to establish the theory model, which has been adopted by RDF. The author defines the abstract concepts and semantics of Dimensional Ontology using math formalisms, and establishes the mechanism of knowledge reasoning of Dimensional Ontology through a series of propositions, theorems and corollaries, which have been proofed already with rigid math methodology. It testifies the preciseness of the theory of Dimensional Ontology. In the aspect of application, the paper firstly introduces the application supporting tools developed by the author, which are used to resolve the basic, common and shared problems of using Dimensional Ontology in real world. They guarantee the great efficiency and effectiveness and raise the feasibility of the application of Dimensional Ontology. Last but not least, the paper introduces two projects in e-government domain and in biology medicine domain. They demonstrate how to put Dimensional Ontology in real world projects to resolve the problem of context-sensitive knowledge management.
     The innovative findings in this paper include:This paper proposes the theory framework and the application solution of Dimensional Ontology, which enriches the theory of ontology and promotes the development of ontology application. Dimensional Ontology resolves the problem of context sensitive knowledge management; the rigid Mathematical Logic proofs its scientificalness, while its abundant applications testify its feasibility. It has both theoretical meanings and realistic values.
     Dimensional Ontology is a brand new solution. Therefore, the difficulties of the study lie in how to proof the scientificalness of its theory and how to testify the feasibility through real world project applications.
     This paper is one of the scientific results of multiple research projects, which include:
     ●State Archives Administration Science & Technology Project grant (2006-x-29):"Research on the Application of Knowledge Management Technology and Method in the Construction of Digital Archives".
     ●National Nature Science Foundation of China grants (70773087):"Research on Ontology Evolution and Knowledge Management of Digital Library".
     ●Cooperative project between Medical College of CAPF and Center for Studies of Information Resources of Wuhan University (06YFJMJC09800):"The Basic Construction of Ontology Molecule Knowledge Base of Silica-reduced Pulmonary Fibrosis".
引文
1. Grigoris Antoniou, Frank van Harmelen. A Semantic Web Primer [M]. Cambridge:MIT Press,2004.
    2. W3C Semantic Web Activity [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/.
    3. Thomas R. Gruber. Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing [J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,1995, 43(5):907-928.
    4. Resource Description Framework (RDF) [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/RDF/.
    5. OWL web ontology language reference [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-ref-20040210/.
    6. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/.
    7. Semantic Web Deployment Working Group [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/.
    8. Giunchiglia, Fausto and Zaihrayeu, Ilya. Lightweight Ontologies. Technical Report DIT-07-071 [R]. Trento:Informatica e Telecomunicazioni, University of Trento,2007.
    9. Kiryakov, A., Popov, B., Terziev, I., Manov, D. and Ognyanoff, D.. Semantic annotation, indexing, and retrieval [J]. Journal of Web Semantics,2005,2(1).
    10. Linking Open Data [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/ TaskForces/CommunityProjects/LinkingOpenData.
    11. RDFa Primer [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-rdfa-primer/.
    12. XHTMLTM 1.0 The Extensible HyperText Markup Language (Second Edition) [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/.
    13. Web 2.0 [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0.
    14. Semantic Web Education and Outreach (SWEO) Interest Group [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/.
    15. Max Volkel, Markus Krotzsch, Denny Vrandecic, Heiko Haller, Rudi Studer. Semantic Wikipedia [C]. Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web, Edinburgh, Scotland, May 23-26,2006. New York:ACM, 2006:585-594.
    16. P. Mika. Ontologies are us:A unified model of social networks and semantics [C]. ISWC'05:Proc. of the 4th Int. Semantic Web Conference. Berlin:Springer Springer LNCS,3729,2005.
    17. OWL Working Group [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/ OWL Working_Group.
    18. Rule Interchange Format (RIF) Working Group [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/RIF_Working_Group.
    19. Semantic Web Interest Group [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www. w3.org/2001/sw/interest/.
    20. Web-Ontology (WebOnt) Working Group [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/.
    21. Franz Baader, Diego Calvanese, Deborah L. McGuinness, Daniele Nardi, Peter F. Patel-Schneider. The description logic handbook:theory, implementation, and applications [M]. New York:Cambridge University Press,2003.
    22. OWL 2 Web Ontology Language:Profiles [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-owl2-profiles-20081202/.
    23. SWRL:A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/.
    24. The Rule Markup Initiative [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.ruleml.org/.
    25. J. Carroll, C. Bizer, P. Hayes, P. Stickler. Named Graphs, Provenance and Trust [R]. Palo Alto:HP labs,2004.
    26. Cycorp, Inc [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.cyc.com/.
    27. Jiang Ying, Dong Hui. Towards Ontology-Based Chinese E-Government Digital Archives Knowledge Management [C]. In Proceedings of 12th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (ECDL 2008), Berlin:Springer,2008:13-24.
    28. Dong, H., Wang, F., Jiang, Y, Weng, D.D., Zeng, J., Su, Z.J., Gao, J., Guo, L.F.. Study on Ontology Molecule Theory and Application [C]. In:International Conference on Informational Technology and Environmental System Science (ITESS 2008). Beijing:Publishing House of Electronic Industry,2008: 1206-1212.
    29. Obrst, Leo, Deborah Nichols. Context and Ontologies:Contextual Indexing of Ontological Expressions, Technical Report WS-05-01 [R]. California:AAAI Press,2005.
    30. Delteil, A., Faron-Zucker, C., and Dieng, R. Extension of RDF(S) with Contextual and Definitional Knowledge [C]. In Proceedings of 2001 World Conference on the WWW and Internet (WebNet 2001), Norfolk:Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education,2001.
    31. Semantic Web Best Practices and Deployment Working Group [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/.
    32. Defining N-ary Relations on the Semantic Web [OL]. [2008-09-22]. http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/.
    33. Corby, Olivier, Faron-Zucker, Catherine. RDF/SPARQL Design Pattern for Contextual Metadata [C]. In Proceedings of Web Intelligence IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference (WI 2007), New York:IEEE CS,2007.
    34. Oracle Semantic Technologies Center [OL]. [2009-02-20] http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/semantic_technologies/index.html.
    35. SPARQL Query Language for RDF [OL]. [2005-02-01]. http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-query-200502147/.
    36. RDF Semantics [OL]. [2005-02-01]. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/.
    37. C. Sayers and K. Wilkinson. A pragmatic Approach to Storing and Distributing RDF in Context using Snippets, Technical Report HPL-2003-231 [R]. Palo Alto: Hewlett Packard Laboratories,2003.
    38. R. MacGregor and I.-Y. Ko. Representing Contextualized Data using Semantic Web Tools [C/OL].//The First Practical and Scalable Semantic Systems (workshop at 2nd ISWC), Sanibel Island, FL, USA, October 20-23,2003. [2003-10-20]. http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/ws/psss03/proceedings/macgregor-et-al.pdf.
    39. Kaykova O., Khriyenko O., Naumenko A., Terziyan V., Zharko A.. RSCDF:A Dynamic and Context-Sensitive Metadata Description Framework for Industrial Resources [J]. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies,2005,3(3): 1729-3774.
    40. Carroll, J.J.. Signing rdf graphs, Technical Report HPL-2003-142 [R]. Palo Alto: Hewlett Packard Laboratories,2003.
    41. Karsten Tolle and Fabian Wleklinski. Trust and context using the RDF-Source related Storage System (RDF-S3) and easy RQL (eRQL) [C/OL].//Berliner XML Tage, Germany, October,2004. [2004-10-11]. http://www.dbis.informatik. uni-frankrurt.de/~tolle/Publications/2004/XSW-RDFS3-2004.pdf.
    42. Intellidimension-A Semantic Web Infrastructure Company [OL]. [2008-09-22]. http://www.intellidimension.com/.
    43. Andreas Harth, J. Umbrich, Aidan Hogan, and Stefan Decker. YARS2:A Federated Repository for Querying Graph Structured Data from the Web [C]. In Proceedings of The 6th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2007), Berlin:Springer,2007:211-224.
    44. AllegroGraph [OL]. [2008-09-22]. http://agraph.franz.com/allegrograph/.
    45. De Leenheer, P., de Moor, A., and Meersman, R.. Context Dependency Management in Ontology Engineering:a Formal Approach [J]. Journal on Data Semantics VIII,2007,4380:26—56..
    46. Circumstance, provenance and partial knowledge [OL]. [2008-06-13]. http://www.ninebynine.org/RDFNotes/UsingContextsWithRDF.html.
    47. D. Benslimane, C. Vangenot, C. Roussey, and A. Arara. Multi-representation in ontologies [C]. In Proceedings of the 7th East-European Conference on Advances in Databases and Informations Systems (ADBIS'2003), Berlin:Springer,2003: 4-15.
    48. P. Bouquet, F. Giunchiglia, F. Van Harmelen, L. Serafini, and H. Stuckenschmidt. C-owl:contextualizing ontologies [C]. In Proceedings of the Second International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2003), Berlin:Springer,2003: 164-179.
    49. Open World Assumption [OL]. [2009-02-01]. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_World_Assumption.
    50. Fuzzy Logic Overview [OL]. [2009-02-01]. http://www.austinlinks.com/Fuzzy/ overview.html.
    51. Model Theory [OL]. [2009-02-01]. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model_theory.
    52. Artificial intelligent [OL]. [2009-02-01]. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Artificial_intelligence.
    53. The Semantic Web Layer Cake [OL]. [2009-02-01]. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/layerCake.png.
    54. RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0:RDF Schema [OL]. [2009-02-01]. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema.
    55. Robert Neches, Richard Fikes, Tim Finin, Tom Gruber, Ramesh Patil, Ted Senator, William R. Swartout. Enabling technology for knowledge sharing [J]. AI Magazine,1991,12(3):36-56.
    56. T R Gruber. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications.Stanford University,Tech Rep:Logic-92-1 [R]. USA:Stanford University,1993.
    57. Borst W N. Construction of Engineering Ontologies for Knowledge Sharing and Reuse [D]. PhD Thesis, Enschede:University of Twente,1997.
    58. William S, Austin T. Ontologies [J]. IEEE Intelligent Systems,1999(1/2):18-19.
    59. B Chandrasekaran,et al. What are Ontologies,and Why do We Need Them [J]. IEEE Intelligent Systems,1999,14(1):20-26.
    60. Topic Maps [OL]. [2009-02-01]. http://www.topicmaps.org/.
    61. Operational Conceptual Modelling Language [OL]. [2009-02-01]. http://kmi.open.ac.uk/technologies/ocml/.
    62. LOOM [OL]. [2009-02-01]. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LOOM.
    63. Web Service Modeling Ontology [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.wsmo.org/.
    64. DARPA Markup Language (DAML+OIL) [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.daml.org/.
    65. The Open Biomedical Ontologies [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.obofoundry.org/.
    66. The Gene Ontology [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.geneontology.org/.
    67. CHIME [OL]. [2006-09-12]. http://www.isi.edu/chime.
    68. The Protege Ontology Editor and Knowledge Acquisition System [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://protege.stanford.edu/.
    69. Strongly Binary Tree [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ StronglyBinaryTree.html.
    70. Time Ontology in OWL [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/ WD-owl-time-20060927/.
    71. GeoNames Ontology [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.geonames.org/ontology/.
    72. Swoogle [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://swoogle.umbc.edu/.
    73. G Klyne and J. J. Carroll. Resource Description Framework (RDF):Concepts and Abstract Syntax [OL]. [2004-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/.
    74. Uniform Resource Identifier (URI):Generic Syntax [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://labs.apache.org/webarch/uri/rfc/rfc3986.html.
    75. Inversion of Control Containers and the Dependency Injection pattern [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://martinfowler.com/articles/injection.html.
    76. Liskov Substitution Principle [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Liskov_substitution_principle.
    77. Open/closed principle [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Open/closed_principle.
    78. Sesame [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.openrdf.org/.
    79. Aduna Open Source project [OL]. [2009-02-10] http://www.aduna-software.org/.
    80. Jena 2 [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://jena.sourceforge.net/.
    81. Protege OWL API [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://protege.stanford.edu/plugins/ owl/api/.
    82. Jena 2 API [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://jena.sourceforge.net/javadoc/index.html.
    83. Prolog [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prolog.
    84. Backend Plugin [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/pdk/plugins/ backend.html.
    85. Jena APR [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://jena.sourceforge.net/ARP/index.html.
    86. Open Knowledge Base Connectivity [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.ai.sri.com/-okbc/.
    87. Generic Frame Protocol [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.ai.sri.com/-gfp.
    88. OWL imports [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-semantics-20040210/#owl_imports.
    89. Java HashMap [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/java/ util/HashMap.html.
    90. NeonToolkit [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.neon-toolkit.org/.
    91. SemanticWorks [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.altova.com/products_semanticworks.html.
    92. SWOOP [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.mindswap.org/2004/SWOOP/.
    93. The Unified Modeling LanguageTM-UML [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.uml.org/.
    94. An introduction to developing plug-ins [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/pdk/plugins/overview.html.
    95. What is protege-frames? [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://protege.stanford.edu/ overview/protege-frames.html.
    96. H. Knublauch, R. W. Fergerson, N. Noy, and M. A. Musen. The Protege OWL Plugin:An Open Development Environment for Semantic Web Applications [C]. In Proceedings of Third International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2004), Berlin:Springer,2004:229-243.
    97. Oracle Semantic Technologies Center [OL]. [2009-02-20] http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/semantic_technologies/index.html.
    98. J. J. Carroll and P. Stickler. TriX:RDF Triples in XML, Technical Report HPL-2003-268 [R]. Palo Alto:Hewlett Packard Laboratories,2003.
    99. Notation 3 [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Notation3.
    100. Allen, J. F. Towards a general theory of action and time [J]. Artificial Intelligence 1984,23:123-154.
    101.Allen, J. F. and Ferguson, G. Actions and events in interval temporal logic [J]. In Spatial and Temporal Reasoning. Netherlands,1997:205-245.
    102.Regular Expression [OL]. [2009-02-20] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Regular_expression.
    103.Kaufmann, A. Bonaert, A. P. Introduction to the Theory of Fuzzy Subsets[J]. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions,1977,7(6):495-496.
    104.Jiang Ying, Dong Hui. Uncertain Context Modeling of Dimensional Ontology Using Fuzzy Subset Theory [C]. In Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM 2008), Berlin:Springer,2008: 256-269.
    105.Dubois, D., Prade, H. Fuzzy Numbers. An Overview[M]. In:Bezdek (ed.) The Analysis of Fuzzy Information. CRS Press:Boca Raton,1985.
    106.Judea Pearl. Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems:networks of plausible inference [M]. San Fransisco:Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc,1988:223-229.
    107.Heiko Stoermer. Introducing Context into Semantic Web Knowledge Bases [C/OL]//The 18th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering Doctoral Consortium (CAiSE'06 DC), Luxemburg, June 5-9,2006: Sun SITE Central Europe (CEUR), Vol-263:1177-1184. [2006-05-09]. http://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-263/paper7 .pdf
    108.Kaykova O., Khriyenko O., Naumenko A., Terziyan V., Zharko A.. RSCDF:A Dynamic and Context-Sensitive Metadata Description Framework for Industrial Resources [J]. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies,2005,3(3): 1729-3774.
    109.Oleksiy Khriyenko and Vagan Terziyan. A framework for context-sensitive metadata description [J]. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies,2006,1(2):154-164.
    110.C. Bizer and R. Oldakowski. Using Context-and Content-Based Trust Policies on the Semantic Web [C/OL].//The 13th World Wide Web Conference Poster Session (WWW 2004), New York, May 17,2004:ACM [2004-05-17]. http://www.wiwiss. fu-berlin.de/suhl/bizer/SWTSGuide/p747-bizer.pdf.
    111.Sergiy Nikitin, Vagan Terziyan, Yaroslav Tsaruk, Andriy Zharko. Querying Dynamic and Context-Sensitive Metadata in Semantic Web [C]. In Proceedings of International Workshop of Autonomous Intelligent Systems:Agents and Data Mining, Berlin:Springer,2005:200-214.
    112.Bontas, E.P.. Context Representation and Usage for the Semantic Web:A State of the Art, Technical report B-04-30 [R]. Berlin:Freie Universitat Berlin Institut fur Informatik AG Netzbasierte Informationssysteme.
    113.Dietze, S., Gugliotta, A., Domingue, J.. Conceptual Situation Spaces for Semantic Situation-Driven Processes [C]. In Proceedings of 5th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2008), Berlin:Springer,2005:599-613.
    114.Dietze, S., Gugliotta, A., Domingue, J.. Fuzzy Context Adaptation through Conceptual Situation Spaces [C]. In Proceedings of 2008 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE 2008), New York:IEEE Press,2008: 461-466.
    115.Gardenfors, P.. How to make the semantic web more semantic [C]. In Proceedings of 2004 Formal Ontology in Information Systems, Amsterdam:IOS Press,2004:19-36.
    116.Preuveneers, D., Van den Bergh, J., Wagelaar, D., Georges, A., Rigole, P., Clerckx, T., Berbers, Y, Coninx, K., Jonckers, V., De Bosschere, K.. Towards an extensible context ontology for ambient intelligence [C]. In Ambient Intelligence Second European Symposium (EUSAI 2004), Berlin:Springer,2004:148-159.
    117.Preuveneers, D., Berbers, Y.:Quality Extensions and Uncertainty Handling for Context Ontologies [C]. In Proceedings of Context and Ontologies:Theory Practice and Applications, Sun SITE Central Europe (CEUR),2006:62-64.
    118.V. Akman, M. Surav. Steps Towards Formalizing Context [J], AI Magazine,1996, 17(3):55-72.
    119.P. Brezillon. Context in Artificial Intelligence:I. A survey of the literature [J]. Computer & Artificial Intelligence,1999,18:321-340.
    120.P. Brezillon. Context in Artificial Intelligence:II. Key elements of context [J]. Computer & Artificial Intelligence,1999,18:425-446.
    121.H.I. Myrhaug. Towards Life-long and Personal Context Spaces [J]. International Journal of Human Computer Studies,1998,48:331-355.
    122.Henricksen, K., Indulska, J.. Modeling and using imperfect context information [C]. In Proceedings of Second IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications.Workshop on Context Modelling and Reasoning (CoMoRea 04), New York:IEEE Computer Society,2004:33-37.
    123.Schmidt, A.. Context-steered learning:The Learning in Process approach [C]. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'04), New York:IEEE Computer Society,2004:684-686.
    124.Terry, D., Goldberg, D., Nichols, D., Oki, B.. Continuous queries over append-only databases [C]. In Proceedings of the 1992 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, New York:ACM Press,1992: 321-330.
    125.Strang, T, Linnhoff-Popien, C., Frank, K.. CoOL:A Context Ontology Language to enable Contextual Interoperability [C]. In Proceedings of 4th IFIP WG 6.1 International Conference on Distributed Applications and Interoperable Systems (DAIS2003), Berlin:Springer,2003:236-247.
    126.董慧,杨宁,余传明,姜赢,徐国虎,张继东.基于本体的数字图书馆检索模型研究(Ⅰ)——体系结构解析[J].情报学报,2006,25(3).
    127.董慧,杨宁,余传明,姜赢,徐国虎,张继东.基于本体的数字图书馆检索模型研究(Ⅲ)——历史领域资源本体构建[J].情报学报,2006,25(5).
    128.朱礼军,刘升平,徐涵等.RDF入门推荐标准:W3CHINA.ORG开放翻译计划(OTP) [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://zh.transwiki.org/cn/rdfprimer.htm.
    129.刘升平,倪跃,徐涵等.OWL Web本体语言指南:W3CHINA.ORG开放翻译计划(OTP) [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://zh.transwiki.org/cn/owlguide.htm.
    130.董慧,翁丹丹.电子政务档案知识管理模型总体设计[C].2007第五届信息资源研究研讨会论文集,2007:40-45.
    131.董慧,郭立帆.本体解决数字档案馆的动态知识与相对知识中的研究[C].2007第五届信息资源研究研讨会论文集,2007:46-51.
    132.董慧,曾杰.基于本体的数字档案馆知识组织模型研究[C].2007第五届信息资源研究研讨会论文集,2007:52-61.
    133.董慧,姜赢,苏志军,高巾,郭立帆,翁丹丹,曾杰,王菲,张荣辉.基于本体分子的电子政务中档案动态知识管理模型[C].2007第五届信息资源研究研讨会论文集,2007:88-95.
    134.董慧,高巾.数字档案馆知识可视化模型设计与实现[C].2007第五届信息资源研究研讨会论文集,2007:105-112.
    135.孙翱,何熙文,徐承深,陈星.要素空间方法与全源信息融合技术基础[J].计算机与现代化,1998,0l:18-23.
    136.高振斌.基于人工智能的产品设计方法[J].电子机械工程,2000,05:39-41.
    137.卫生部.卫生部等单位通报我国职业病防治工作情况及今后重点工作[EB/OL]. [2006-04-24]. http://www.moh.gov.cn.
    138.赵宝钰,段丽琴.尘肺病肺纤维化过程中细胞因子的作用[J].职业与健康.2007,23(21):1982-1984.
    139.张敏,朱晶,郭政等.利用亚细胞位置特异的基因功能模块与表达调控网络识别疾病特征基因[J].科学通报,2006,51(13):1545-1551.
    140.魏丽娟,董惠娟.Meta分析中异质性的识别与处理[J].第二军医大学学报,2006,27(4):449-450.
    141.王世鑫.二氧化硅粉尘致肺纤维化机制及早期生物标记物研究[D].重庆大学,博士学位论文:2004
    1 Grigoris Antoniou, Frank van Harmelen. A Semantic Web Primer [M]. Cambridge:MIT Press,2004.
    2 W3C Semantic Web Activity [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/
    3 Thomas R. Gruber. Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing [J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,1995,43(5):907-928.
    4 Resource Description Framework (RDF) [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/RDF/
    5 OWL web ontology language reference [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/TR/ 2004/REC-owl-ref-20040210/.
    6 World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/.
    7 Giunchiglia, Fausto and Zaihrayeu, Ilya. Lightweight Ontologies. Technical Report DIT-07-071 [R]. Trento:Informatica e Telecomunicazioni, University of Trento,2007.
    1 Kiryakov, A., Popov, B., Terziev, I., Manov, D. and Ognyanoff, D.. Semantic annotation,
    indexing, and retrieval [J]. Journal of Web Semantics,2005,2(1).
    2 Linking Open Data [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/ CommunityProjects/LinkingOpenData.
    3 RDFa Primer [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-rdfa-primer/.
    4 XHTMLTM 1.0 The Extensible HyperText Markup Language (Second Edition) [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/.
    5 Web 2.0 [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web 2.0.
    6 Semantic Web Education and Outreach (SWEO) Interest Group [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www. w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/.
    7 Max Volkel, Markus Krotzsch, Denny Vrandecic, Heiko Haller, Rudi Studer. Semantic Wikipedia [C]. Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web, Edinburgh, Scotland, May 23-26,2006. New York:ACM,2006:585-594.
    8 Linking Open Data [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/ Community Projects/LinkingOpenData.
    9 1. P. Mika. Ontologies are us:A unified model of social networks and semantics [C]. ISWC'05:Proc. of the 4th Int. Semantic Web Conference. Berlin:Springer Springer LNCS,3729, 2005.
    10 OWL Working Group [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/ OWL_Working_Group
    11 Rule Interchange Format (RIF) Working Group [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/RIF_Working_Group.
    1 Semantic Web Interest Group [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/interest/
    2 Web-Ontology (WebOnt) Working Group [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/2001/ sw/WebOnt/.
    3 Franz Baader, Diego Calvanese, Deborah L. McGuinness, Daniele Nardi, Peter F. Patel-Schneider. The description logic handbook:theory, implementation, and applications [M]. New York:Cambridge University Press,2003.
    4 OWL web ontology language reference [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/TR/ 2004/REC-owl-ref-20040210/.
    5 OWL 2 Web Ontology Language:Profiles [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/TR/ 2008/WD-owl2-profiles-20081202/.
    6 SWRL:A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/Submission/S WRL/.
    7 The Rule Markup Initiative [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.ruleml.org/.
    8 J. Carroll, C. Bizer, P. Hayes, P. Stickler. Named Graphs, Provenance and Trust [R]. Palo Alto:HP labs,2004.
    1 Cycorp, Inc [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.cyc.com/.
    2董慧,杨宁,余传明,姜赢,徐国虎,张继东.基于本体的数字图书馆检索模型研究(Ⅰ)——体系结构解析[J].情报学报,2006,25(3).
    Jiang Ying, Dong Hui. Towards Ontology-Based Chinese E-Government Digital Archives Knowledge Management [C]. In Proceedings of 12th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (ECDL 2008), Berlin:Springer,2008:13-24.
    2 Dong, H., Wang, F., Jiang, Y., Weng, D.D., Zeng, J., Su, Z.J., Gao, J., Guo, L.F.. Study on Ontology Molecule Theory and Application [C]. In:International Conference on Informational Technology and Environmental System Science (ITESS 2008). Beijing:Publishing House of Electronic Industry,2008:1206-1212. 1 Obrst, Leo, Deborah Nichols. Context and Ontologies:Contextual Indexing of Ontological Expressions, Technical Report WS-05-01 [R]. California:AAAI Press,2005.
    2 Delteil, A., Faron-Zucker, C., and Dieng, R. Extension of RDF(S) with Contextual and Definitional Knowledge [C]. In Proceedings of 2001 World Conference on the WWW and Internet (WebNet 2001), Norfolk:Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, 2001.
    3 Semantic Web Best Practices and Deployment Working Group [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/.
    4 Defining N-ary Relations on the Semantic Web [OL]. [2008-09-22]. http://www.w3.org /TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/.
    5 Corby, Olivier, Faron-Zucker, Catherine. RDF/SPARQL Design Pattern for Contextual Metadata [C]. In Proceedings of Web Intelligence IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference (WI 2007), New York:IEEE CS,2007.
    6 J. Carroll, C. Bizer, P. Hayes, P. Stickler. Named Graphs, Provenance and Trust [R]. Palo Alto:HP labs,2004.
    7 Oracle Semantic Technologies Center [OL]. [2009-02-20]. http://www.oracle.com/ technology/tech/semantic_technologies/index.html.
    8 SPARQL Query Language for RDF [OL]. [2005-02-01]. http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/ WD-rdf-sparql-query-20050217/.
    1 RDF Semantics [OL]. [2005-02-01]. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/.
    2 C. Sayers and K. Wilkinson. A pragmatic Approach to Storing and Distributing RDF in Context using Snippets, Technical Report HPL-2003-231 [R]. Palo Alto:Hewlett Packard Laboratories,2003.
    R. MacGregor and I.-Y. Ko. Representing Contextualized Data using Semantic Web Tools [C/OL].//The First Practical and Scalable Semantic Systems (workshop at 2nd ISWC), Sanibel Island, FL, USA, October 20-23,2003. [2003-10-20]. http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/ws/psss03/ proceedings/macgregor-et-al.pdf
    4 Kaykova O., Khriyenko O., Naumenko A., Terziyan V., Zharko A.. RSCDF:A Dynamic and Context-Sensitive Metadata Description Framework for Industrial Resources [J]. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies,2005,3(3):1729-3774.
    5 Oleksiy Khriyenko and Vagan Terziyan. A framework for context-sensitive metadata description [J]. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies,2006,1(2):154-164.
    6 Carroll, J.J.. Signing rdf graphs, Technical Report HPL-2003-142 [R]. Palo Alto:Hewlett Packard Laboratories,2003.
    1 Karsten Tolle and Fabian Wleklinski. Trust and context using the RDF-Source related Storage System (RDF-S3) and easy RQL (eRQL) [C/OL].//Berliner XML Tage, Germany, October,2004. [2004-10-11]. http://www.dbis.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de/-tolle/Publications/ 2004/XSW-RDFS3-2004.pdf.
    2 Intellidimension-A Semantic Web Infrastructure Company [OL]. [2008-09-22]. http://www.intellidimension.com/.
    3 Andreas Harth, J. Umbrich, Aidan Hogan, and Stefan Decker. YARS2:A Federated Repository for Querying Graph Structured Data from the Web [C]. In Proceedings of The 6th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2007), Berlin:Springer,2007:211-224.
    4 AllegroGraph [OL]. [2008-09-22]. http://agraph.franz.com/allegrograph/.
    5 De Leenheer, P., de Moor, A., and Meersman, R.. Context Dependency Management in Ontology Engineering:a Formal Approach [J]. Journal on Data Semantics Ⅷ,2007,4380: 26—56.
    1 RDF Semantics [OL]. [2005-02-01]. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/.
    2 Circumstance, provenance and partial knowledge [OL]. [2008-06-13]. http://www ninebynine.org/RDFNotes/UsingContextsWithRDF.html.
    3 R. M. R. Guha and R. Fikes. Contexts for the semantic web [C]. In Proceedings of 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2004), Berlin:Springer,2004:32-46.
    4 D. Benslimane, C. Vangenot, C. Roussey, and A. Arara. Multi-representation in ontologies [C]. In Proceedings of the 7th East-European Conference on Advances in Databases and Informations Systems (ADBIS'2003), Berlin:Springer,2003:4-15.
    5 P. Bouquet, F. Giunchiglia, F. Van Harmelen, L. Serafini, and H. Stuckenschmidt. C-owl: contextualizing ontologies [C]. In Proceedings of the Second International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2003), Berlin:Springer,2003:164-179.
    1 RDF Semantics [OL]. [2005-02-01]. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/.
    2 Open World Assumption [OL]. [2009-02-01]. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_World_Assumption。
    3 Fuzzy Logic Overview [OL]. [2009-02-01]. http://www.austinlinks.com/Fuzzy/ overview.html.
    4 Model Theory [OL]. [2009-02-01]. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model_theory.
    1 Grigoris Antoniou, Frank van Harmelen. A Semantic Web Primer [M]. Cambridge:MIT Press,2004.
    1 Artificial intelligent [OL]. [2009-02-01]. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Artificial_intelligence.
    2 Resource Description Framework (RDF) [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/RDF/
    1 The Semantic Web Layer Cake [OL]. [2009-02-01]. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/ layerCake.png.
    2 OWL 2 Web Ontology Language:Profiles [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/TR/ 2008/WD-owl2-profiles-20081202/.
    3 RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0:RDF Schema [OL]. [2009-02-01]. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema.
    4资料来源:http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/layerCake.png
    1 Robert Neches, Richard Fikes, Tim Finin, Tom Gruber, Ramesh Patil, Ted Senator, William R. Swartout. Enabling technology for knowledge sharing [J]. AI Magazine,1991,12(3):36-56.
    2 T R Gruber. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications.Stanford University,Tech Rep:Logic-92-1 [R]. USA:Stanford University,1993
    3 Borst W N. Construction of Engineering Ontologies for Knowledge Sharing and Reuse [D]. PhD Thesis, Enschede:University of Twente,1997.
    1 William S, Austin T. Ontologies [J]. IEEE Intelligent Systems,1999(1/2):18-19.
    2 B Chandrasekaran,et al. What are Ontologies,and Why do We Need Them [J]. IEEE Intelligent Systems,1999,14(11):20-26.
    3 Topic Maps [OL]. [2009-02-01]. http://www.topicmaps.org/.
    4 Operational Conceptual Modelling Language [OL]. [2009-02-01]. http://kmi.open.ac.uk/ technologies/ocml/.
    1 LOOM [OL]. [2009-02-01]. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LOOM.
    2 Cycorp, Inc [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.cyc.com/.
    3 Web Service Modeling Ontology [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.wsmo.org/.
    4 DARPA Markup Language (DAML+OIL) [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.daml.org/.
    1董慧,杨宁,余传明,姜赢,徐国虎,张继东.基于本体的数字图书馆检索模型研究(Ⅲ)——历史领域资源本体构建[J].情报学报,2006,25(5).
    2 The Open Biomedical Ontologies [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.obofoundry.org/.
    3 The Gene Ontology [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.geneontology.org/.
    4朱礼军,刘升平,徐涵等.RDF入门推荐标准:W3CHINA.ORG开放翻译计划(OTP)[OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://zh.transwiki.org/cn/rdfprimer.htm.
    1董慧,杨宁,余传明,姜赢,徐国虎,张继东.基于本体的数字图书馆检索模型研究(Ⅲ)——历史领域资源本体构建[J].情报学报,2006,25(5).
    1 Defining N-ary Relations on the Semantic Web [OL]. [2008-09-22]. http://www.w3.org/ TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/.
    2 R. MacGregor and I. -Y. Ko. Representing Contextualized Data using Semantic Web Tools [C/OL].//The First Practical and Scalable Semantic Systems (workshop at 2nd ISWC), Sanibel Island, FL, USA, October 20-23,2003. [2003-10-20]. http://km. aifb. uni-karlsruhe. de/ws/psss03/proceedings/macgregor-et-al. pdf.
    3 CHIME [oL]. [2006-09-12]. http://www.isi.edu/chime.
    1 C. Sayers and K. Wilkinson. A pragmatic Approach to Storing and Distributing RDF in Context using Snippets, Technical Report HPL-2003-231 [R]. Palo Alto:Hewlett Packard Laboratories,2003.
    1 AllegroGraph [OL]. [2008-09-22]. http://agraph.franz.com/allegrograph/.
    2 The Protege Ontology Editor and Knowledge Acquisition System [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://protege.stanford.edu/.
    3 Strongly Binary Tree [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ StronglyBinaryTree.html.
    1 Topic Maps [OL]. [2009-02-01]. http://www.topicmaps.org/.
    2 Web Service Modeling Ontology [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.wsmo.org/.
    1 The Gene Ontology [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.geneontology.org/.
    2董慧,杨宁,余传明,姜赢,徐国虎,张继东.基于本体的数字图书馆检索模型研究(Ⅲ)——历史领域资源本体构建[J].情报学报,2006,25(5).3 Time Ontology in OWL [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/ WD-owl-time-20060927/.
    4 http://www.w3.org/2006/time
    5 GeoNames Ontology [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.geonames.org/ontology/.
    1 Linking Open Data [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/ CommunityProjects/LinkingOpenData.
    2 Swoogle [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://swoogle.umbc.edu/.
    1 Uniform Resource Identifier (URI):Generic Syntax [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://labs.apache.org/webarch/uri/rfc/rfc3986.html.
    1 Inversion of Control Containers and the Dependency Injection pattern [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://martinfowler.com/articles/injection.html.
    2 Liskov Substitution Principle [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Liskov_substitution_principle.
    3 Open/closed principle [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open/ closed_principle.
    1 http://agraph.franz.com/support/documentation/current/agraph-javadoc/com/franz/ag/ Triple.html
    2 The Protege Ontology Editor and Knowledge Acquisition System [OL]. [2009-02-101. http://protege.stanford.edu/.
    3 Backend Plugin [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/pdk/plugins/ backend.html
    1 What is protege-frames? [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://protege.stanford.edu/overview/ protege-frames.html.
    2 Open Knowledge Base Connectivity [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.ai.sri.com/-okbc/.
    3 H. Knublauch, R. W. Fergerson, N. Noy, and M. A. Musen. The Protege OWL Plugin:An Open Development Environment for Semantic Web Applications [C]. In Proceedings of Third International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2004), Berlin:Springer,2004:229-243.
    4 SWRL:A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML [OL]. [2009-02-10]. http://www.w3.org/Submission/S WRL/.
    1 Oracle Semantic Technologies Center [OL]. [2009-02-20] http://www.oracle.com/ technology/tech/semantic_technologies/index.html.
    2 J. J. Carroll and P. Stickler. TriX:RDF Triples in XML,Technical Report HPL-2003-2008 [R]. Palo Alto:Hewlett Packard Laboratories,2003.
    1 Allen, J. F. Towards a general theory of action and time [J]. Artificial Intelligence 1984, 23:123-154.
    2 Allen, J. F. and Ferguson, G.. Actions and events in interval temporal logic [J]. In Spatial and Temporal Reasoning. Netherlands,1997:205-245.
    1董慧,姜赢,苏志军,高巾,郭立帆,翁丹丹,曾杰,王菲,张荣辉.基于本体分子的电子政务中档案动态知识管理模型[C].2007第五届信息资源研究研讨会论文集,2007:88-95.
    2董慧,郭立帆.本体解决数字档案馆的动态知识与相对知识中的研究[C].2007第五届信息资源研究研讨会论文集,2007:46-51.
    3董慧,曾杰.基于本体的数字档案馆知识组织模型研究[C].2007第五届信息资源研究研讨会论文集,2007:52-61.
    1董慧,高巾.数字档案馆知识可视化模型设计与实现[C].2007第五届信息资源研究研讨会论文集,2007:105-112.
    2董慧,翁丹丹.电子政务档案知识管理模型总体设计[C].2007第五届信息资源研究研讨会论文集,2007:40-45.
    1孙翱,何熙文,徐承深,陈星.要素空间方法与全源信息融合技术基础[J].计算机与现代化,1998,01:18-23.
    2高振斌.基于人工智能的产品设计方法[J].电子机械工程,2000,05:39-41.
    3 Kaufmann, A. Bonaert, A. P. Introduction to the Theory of Fuzzy Subsets[J]. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions,1977,7(6):495-496.
    1 Dubois, D., Prade, H. Fuzzy Numbers. An Overview[M]. In:Bezdek (ed.) The Analysis of Fuzzy Information. CRS Press:Boca Raton,1985.
    1赵宝钰,段丽琴.尘肺病肺纤维化过程中细胞因子的作用[J].职业与健康.2007,23(21):1982-1984.
    2张敏,朱晶,郭政等.利用亚细胞位置特异的基因功能模块与表达调控网络识别疾病特征基因[J].科学通报,2006,51(13):1545-1551.
    1王世鑫.二氧化硅粉尘致肺纤维化机制及早期生物标记物研究[D].重庆大学,博士学位论文:2004
    2魏丽娟,董惠娟Meta分析中异质性的识别与处理[J].第二军医大学学报,2006,27(4):449-450.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700