互联网信息资源整合研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
互联网信息资源整合(Web Integration)是一门涉及面广、综合性强的新兴研究领域,它与数据库、人工智能、信息系统等学科有着密切的关系,同时,也为这些学科领域带来了新的研究内容。尽管有关Web信息访问和数据整合的研究沿着不同的方向、基于不同学科的方法已经开展一段时期,但是目前还未形成一个系统的方法和结论、仍存在一些没能解决的问题。本文指出数据模型、知识表示和处理、实用性和自动化处理能力是WI系统的关键问题。在此基础上对WI进行全面的研究,获得以下研究成果:
     (1)以本体模型(ontology)为指导的WI系统方法和结构。
     (2)演绎的带有半结构化特征的对象数据模型DOMSF,作为WI系统的统一数据模型。该模型是能适应WI系统要求的数据模型,具有丰富的数据类型和灵活性。DOMSF又是有演绎能力的对象模型,演绎规则的引入使之具有更强大的功能和表示能力,能描述除继承关系之外的更多对象之间的关系。
     (3)对本体方法论的语义进行扩充,将其与DOMSF数据模型有机地结合在一起,并在此基础上提出本体模型表示语言ORL。该语言具有丰富的表达能力,并且支持语法和语义的可互操作性。
     (4)基于对象的观点提出动态Web的层次访问模型,将页面看作是模板,以对象网络的观点来处理Web上的数据。在此基础之上提出源描述语言TDL,它结合文档结构和文本模式的描述,能很好地描述动态Web页面中的数据模式,能更好地适应页面的频繁变化。
     (5)基于关系数据库提出一种基于本体模型的信息查询方法和优化算法。
     (6)实现了一个WI系统的工具软件集-WISK(Web Integration Service Kits),并给出一个使用该软件集开发的实际应用的例子。
     Web信息资源整合具有广阔的应用前景,在电子商务、智能信息检索、数字化图书馆、Web数据挖掘、企业信息门户等诸多应用领域都可大展鸿图。可以毫不夸张地说,信息资源整合将是新一代Web及电子化服务中的主导技术之一。
The Information Integration of the WWW, shortly as Web Integration (WI), is a broad, synthetic and novel research area, which has deep relationships with areas such as database, AI, information system and so on. Also, WI has brought many new problems to those subjects. Although there have been some studies on WI through various directions and methods for some period, a systematical method or conclusion for WI is still unavailable. Furthermore, there still exist some problems left for resolving. In this thesis, it is indicated that the unified data model, knowledge representation and processing, and practicability and automaticity are three key points of any WI system. Based on the points, this thesis studied WI as a whole, and obtained the following results:
    (1) Ontology-guided techniques and architecture of WI system;
    (2) Deductive Object Model with Semi-structured Features(DOMSF) as the unified data model for WI system. DOMSF can fit well with the requirements of WI environment, with plenty data types and high flexibility. DOMSF is capable of rule deduction, which makes it much powerful and expressive and capable of representing complex relations between objects, not only relation of inheritance.
    (3) Expanding the semantics of ontology to corporate it with the DOMSF data model, based upon which, an ontology representation language, named ORL, was put forward. ORL is highly expressive, and it supports both syntactic and semantic interoperability.
    (4) Based on the object methodology, a layered architecture for accessing dynamic web was brought forward. In this model, pages are considered as template, while data on the web are web of objects. Then, a source description language, TDL, was designed. TDL combines the functionality of HTML structure pattern with text pattern, which means it is more suitable for dynamic web content, as it suits the frequent changing date sources.
    (5) Upon RDBMS, the ontology-based information retrieval and optimized data storage algorithms were shown and proved of its soundness and completeness.
    (6) Finally, based on the above studies, a tool kit for the fast-building of WI system, namely WISK, was developed. And what's more, a prototype application, Integrated Product Catalog for E-commerce, has been developed using WISK. Both of them were mentioned in this thesis.
    Web Integration has a promising future of application. Some of the possible domains include e-business, intelligent information retrieval, digital library, web data mining, enterprise knowledge portal, etc. WI would benefit greatly in all of these domains. It is never too exaggerated to emphasize that Web Integration would be one of the key techniques in the new generation of the web and new application era of e-services.
引文
[1] Lawrence S et al.: Searching the World Wide Weh. Science. 1998. 280 (5360) .p98-100
    [2] Danicla Florescu. Alon Levy and Alberto Mendelzon. Database techniques for the World-Wide Wch: A survey .SIGMOD Record. 1998. 27(3) . p59-74.
    [3] S.Abitcboul: Querying semistructured data. In Proc. of Intl. Conference on Database Theory. 1997. Delphi. Greece, p 1-18.
    [4] P.Buneman: Semistructured data. In proc. of 6th ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems. May 1997. Tucson. Arizona. p117-121.
    [5] R.Goldman et al. : From Semistructured Data to XML: Migrating the Lore Data Model and Query Language. In Proc. of WebDB 99. 1999.
    [6] J. Cowie and W. Lehnert. Information extraction. CACM. 1996. 39( 1 ).p80-101.
    [7] Daniela Florescu. Alon Levy and Dan Suciu. Query containment for conjunctive queries with regular expressions. In Proc. of the ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS). 1998. Seattle.WA.
    [8] Alon Levy. Combining Artificial Intelligence and Databases for Data Integration. In a special issue of LNAI: Artificial Intelligence Today: RecentTrends and Developments 1999.
    [9] Krishna Bharat and Monika Henzinger: Improved algorithms for topic distillation in hyper-linked environments.In Proc. of 21st Intl. ACM-SIGIR Conf..1998.
    [10] Soumen Chakrabarti. Byron Dom. Prabhakar Raghavan. et al.: Automatic Resource Compilation by Analyzing Hyperlink Structure and Associated Text. In Proc. of the WWW7. Brisbane. Australia. 1998.
    [11] P. Pirolii, J. Pitkow, and R. Rao. Silk from a sow's ear: Extracting usable structures from the web. In Proc. ACM SIGCHI Conference. 1996.
    [12] J. Carriere and R. Kazman. Webquery: Searching and visualizing the web through' connectivity. In Proc. of the Int. WWW Conf., April 1998.
    [13] Ellen Spertus. ParaSite: Mining structural information on the web. In Proc. of the Int. WWW Conf., April 1997.
    [14] S. Abiteboul. D. Quass. J. McHugh. J. Widom, and J. L. Wiener. The lorel query language for semistructured data. International Journal on Digital Librarics.April 1997. 1(1) .p68-88.
    [15] D. Konopnicki and 0. Shmucli. W3QS: A query system for the World Wide Web. In Proc. of the lnt. . Conf. on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB). 1995, Zurich. Switzerland. p54-65
    [16] Alberto O. Mendelzon and Tova Milo.Formal models of web queries. In Proc. of the ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS). 1997. ,Tucson. Arizona. p134-143.
    
    
    [17] Laks V. S. Lakshmanan. Fercidoon Sadri. and Iyer N. Subramnnian. A declarative language for querying and restructuring the Web. In Proc. of 6th. International Workshop on Research Issues in Data Engineering. RIDE '96. February 1996. New Orleans.
    [18] Gustavo Aroccna and Alberto Mendelzon. WebOQL: Restructuring documents, databases and webs. In Proc of Int. Conf. on Data Engineering (ICDE). 1998. Orlando. Florida.
    [19] Mary Fernandez. Daniela Florcscu. Alon Levy. and Dan Snciu. A query language for a web-site management system. SIGMOD Record. September I997. 26(3) :p4-11.
    [20] B. Ludascher. R. Himmeroder. G. Lausen. W. May. and C. Schlepphorst. Managing Semistructured Data with FLORID: A Deductive Object-Oriented Perspective. Information Systems. 1998. 23(8) p589-613.
    [21] A.Deutsh. M.Fernandez. D.Florescu. A.Levy and D.Suciu: XML-GL: A query language for XML. In Proc. of the 8th Intl. WWW Conf., Canada. 1999.
    [22] S. Abiteboul and V. Vianu. Queries and computation on the Web. In Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Database Theory (ICDT). Delphi. Greece. 1997.
    [23] A. Mendelzon, G. Mihaila. and T. Milo. Querying the world wide web. International Journal on Digital Libraries. 1997. 1 (1) :p54-67.
    [24] J. Hammer. H.G. Molina, J. Cho, R. Aranha and A. Crespo. Extracting semistructured information from the Web. In Proceedings of 1st Workshop on Management of Semistructured Data. .Arizona. 1997.
    [25] K. Sattler and M. Hoding. Adapter generation for extracting and querying Jala from web sources. In Proc. of WebDB'99. 1999. pp49-54.
    [26] Michael Kifer. Georg Lattsen. James Wu : Logical Foundations of Object Oriented and Frame Based Languages. Journal of ACM 1995, vol. 42. p741-843.
    [27] A. Gupta. B. Ludascher. and M. E. Martone. Knowledge-based integration of neuroscience data sources. In 12th Intl. Conference on Scientic and Statistical Database Management (SSDBM). Berlin. Germany. July 2000. IEEE Computer Society.
    [28] H. Davulcu. J. Freire. M. Kifer, and I. Ramakrishnan. A Layered Architecture for Querying Dynamic Web Content. In ACM Intl. Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD). 1999. Philadelphia. p491-502.
    [29] V. Christophides. S. Cluet and J. Simeon.On wrapping query languages and efficient XML integration. In Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD Conference on Management of Data.2000. Dallas. Texas.
    [30] Mare Friedman. Alon Levy.Todd Millstein : Navigational Plans for Data Integration. AAAI.1999.
    [31] Catriel Beeri and Yariv Tzaban. SAL:An Algebra for Semistructured Data and XML. In Proc. of WebDB'99 1999
    [32] J.McHugh and J.Widom: Query optimization for XML. In Proc. of Very Large Data Bases. Edingurgh. U.K. 1999.
    
    
    [33] Stephen Soderland: Learning information extraction rules for semi-structured and free text Machinc Learning. 1999.1999(34). p1-44.
    [34] Proc of the 6th Message Understanding Conference. San Fransisco. CA. Morgan Kaufmann. 1995
    [35] Mark Craven. Dan DiPasquo. Dayne Freitag et al Learning to Extract Symbolic Knowledge from the World Wide Web. Proccedings of 15th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-98). 1998. p509-516
    [36] D. Freitag. Information extraction from HTML Applicanon of a general learnmg approach. In Proccedings of the Fifteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Madison. WI. 1998 AAAI Press.
    [37] J.R. Quinlan. Learning logical derinitions from relations Machine Learning. 1990. 5. p239-266.
    [38] Annai Doan. Pedro Domingos. Alon Y. Levy Learning Source Descriptions for data integration Proceedings of the International Workshop on The Web and Databases(Web DB) 2000 12
    [39] 邹涛,王继成,张福炎:基于WWW的资料搜集系统的设计与实现情报学报.1999年 第18卷 第3期.Vol.18 No.3 1999 p74-89
    [40] 王继成.邹涛,杨小江.潘金贵.张福炎:基于Internet的信息资源发现技术与实现 计算机研究与发展,1999.Vol.36.No.11.p1369-1374
    [41] 汪晓岩.胡庆生.李斌.庄镇泉:面向Internet的个性化智能信息检索计算机研究与发展.1999 Vol.No.9 P.1039-1046
    [42] T. Berners-Lee. D. Connolly. R. R. Swick. Semantic Web.http://www.w3.org/1999/04/Web Date.html
    [43] D Fensel. J.Angele, S. Decker et al., On2broker Semantic-(?)ased access to informan sources at the WWW. In Proc. of WebNet 99.1999.
    [44] S. Decker, M. Erdmann. D. Fensei. and R. Studer. Ontobroker: Ontology Based. Access to Distributed and Semi-Strucnured Information. In R. Meersman et al.. editors, Database Semantics: Semantic Issues in Multimedia Systems. 1999. Kluwer Academic Publisher. p351-369
    [45] J. Heflin., and J. Hendler Dynamic Ontologies on the Web In Proceedings of American Association for Artificial Intelligence Conference(AAAI-2000).2000 Menlo Park. Calif: AAAI Press. p443-449
    [46] R.E.Kent.Conceptmal Knowledge Markup Language: An Introduction. in Netnomics: Economic research and electronic networking. Special Issue on Information and Communication Middlemare. 1999.
    [47] I. Horrocks. D. Fensel. J. Broekstra. S. Decker. M. Erdmann. C. Goble. F. Van Harmelen.M. Klein. S. Staab. and R. Studer The Ontoiogy Interchange Language OIL Teehmcal Report. Free Umversity of Amsterdam. 2000 http://www.ontoknowledge org/oil/
    [48] T. R Gruber. A Translaton Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications. Knowledge Acquisition. 1993. 6(2): p199-221.
    
    
    [49] V R. Benjamins. D. Fenscl. S. Decker, and A. Gomez-Percz.: (KA)2: Building Ontologies for the Internet: a Mid Term Report. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (IJHCS). 1999. 51. p687-612.
    [50] B. Ludascher. R. Himmcroder. G. Lausen. VV. May. and C. Schlepphorst. Managing Semistructured Data with FLORID: A Deductive Object-Oriented Perspective. Information Systems. 1998. 23(8) p589-613.
    [51] W. May, R. Himmcroder. G. Lausen. and B. Ludascher. A Unified Framework for Wrapping. Mediating and Restructuring Information from the Web. In lntl. Workshop on the World-Wide Web and Conceptual Modeling (WWWCM'99) . LNCS 1727. Paris. France. 1999. Springer.
    [52] 王继成.潘金贵,张福炎.Web文本挖掘技术研究.计算机研究与发展.2000. Vol.37 No.5 P.513-520.
    [53] R. Cattel. The Object Database Standard: ODMG-93. 1996. Morgan-Kaufmann.
    [54] R. Breitl, D. Maier, A. Otis, et al,. The GemStone Data Management System. In Object Oriented Concepts. Databasases. and Applications. 1989. Addison-Wesley. p283-308.
    [55] O.Deux et al.: The story of O2. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. 1990. 2( 1) . p91-108.
    [56] W. Kim et al. Features of the ORION Object-Oriented Database System. Object-Oriented Concepts. Databasases. and Applications. 1989. Addison-Wesley. p251-282.
    [57] H. Balsters, R. A. de By. and R. Zicari. Typed Sets ax a Basis for Object-Oriented Database Schemas. In Proc. Seventh European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming. 1993. Art. Number 707 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
    [58] N. Gehani and H. Jagadish. Ode as an Active Database: Constraints and Triggers. In Proc. Seventeenth Int'l Conf. on Very Large Data Bases. 1991. p327-336.
    [59] J.D.Ullman. Database and Knowledge-Base Systems, vol. I,II. 1988,1989. Rockville,Md.:Computer Science Press.
    [60] S.W. Loke and A. Davison. LogicWeb: Enhancing the Web with Logic Programming. Journal of Logic Programming. 1998. 36(3) . p195-240.
    [61] 左孝凌,李为(?),刘永才.离散数学.上海:上海科学技术文献出版社.1982. p105-127.
    [62] Hahn, U., Schulz, S., & Romacker, M. Partonomic reasoning as taxonomic reasoning in medicine. In Proc. of AAAI-99, 1999, p271-276.
    [63] Lambrix, P. & Padgham, L. (2000) . Conceptual modeling in a document management environment using part-of reasoning in description logics. Data & Knowledge Engineering. 2000. 32(1) : p51-86.
    [64] Rector. A.. Bechhofer. S., Goble. C.. Horrocks, I., Nowlan, W.. & Solomon. W. The GRAIL concept modelling language for medical terminology. Journal of Al in Medicine, 1997. 9(2) . P139-171.
    
    
    [65] N.Guarino. Formal Ontology and Information Systems In N. Guarino(ed.): Formal Onlology in Information Systems. Proc. of FOIS'98. Trento. Italy. 1998. p6-8.
    [66] R.Ncches. R.E.Fiker. T. Finin et al.. Endbling technology for Knowlede sharmg AI Magzine. 1991, 12(3): p36~56.
    [67] Fulton. J. A.. Technical report on the semantic unification meta-model. Standards working document ISO TC184/SC4/WG3 N103. IGES/PDES Organization, Dictionary/Methodology Committee. Scattlc. 1992
    [68] Genesereth. M. R.. & Fikes. R. E. Knowledge Interchange Format Version 3.0. Reference Manual. Teehnical Report Logic-92-1. Computer Science Department. Stanford University 1992.
    [69] Finin. T.. Weber. J.. Wiederhold. G., Genesereth, M.. Fritzson. R.. McKay. D.. McGuire. J., Pelavin. P.. Shapiro, S.. & Beek. C. Specification of the KQML Agent-Communication Language Teehnical Report EIT TR 92-04. Enterprise Integration Teehnologies, Palo Alto. CA. 1992.
    [70] T.R.Gruber. The Role of Common Ontology in Achieving Sharable. Reusable Knowledae Bases. In J. A. Allen. R. Fikes. & E. Sandewall(Eds.). Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proccedings of the Second international Conference, Cambridge. MA. 1992. p601-602.Morgan Kaufmann.
    [71] 廖明宏.本体论与信息的检索 计算机工程,2000.26(2).p56-58.
    [72] 陆汝钤.金芝.陈刚.面向本体的需求分析.软件学报.2000.11(8).p1009-1017
    [73] V.K. Chaudhri, Farquhar, A. Fikes, R., et al.. OKBC: A programmatic foundation for knowledge base interoperability. In Proc. of AAAI-98. 1998, p600-607.
    [74] 萨师煊,王珊.数据库系统概论(第二版).北京:高等教育出版社.1995.
    [75] McGuinness. D. & Patel-Schneider. P. Usability issues in knowledge representation systems. In Proc. of AAAI-98,1998. p608-614
    [76] Blzquez, M., Fernndez, M.. Garcia-Pinar, L M., & Gomez-Perez, A. Building ontologies at the knowledge level using the ontology design environment. In Proc. of the 11th Int. Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Mangement(KAW98), Banff. Canada, October 1998.
    [77] Grosso. E.. Eriksson, H., Fergerson, R. W.. Tu, S. W., & Musen, M. M. Knowledge modeling at the millennium-the design and evolution of Protege-2000. In Proc. the 12th International Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Mangement(KAW'99), Banff. Canada, October 1999.
    [78] Chaudhri, V. K.. Farquhar, A.. Fikes, R., Karp, P. D., & Ricc. J. P. (1998). OKBC: A programmatic foundation for knowledge base interoperability. In Proc. of AAAI-98. 1998. p600-607.
    [79] I. Muslea. S. Minton. and C. Knoblock. Hierarchical wrapper induction for semistructnred information sonrces. Journal of Autonomous Agents & Multi-Agent Systems 2000.
    [80] 俞方桦.陈家训.一种用于Web数据整合的基于结构的数据抽取描述语言.NIT2001-信息新技术国际会议论文集.2001.北京:清华大学出版社.p374-379
    [81] C. J. Date.数据系统导论(第七版).北京:机械工业出版社.2001.p737-740.
    
    
    [82] International Organization for Standardization(ISO). Database Language SQL. Document ISO/IEC 9075 1992. or ANSI Document ANSI X3. 135. 1992.
    [83] J.W. Lloyd. Foundations of Logic Programming. Springer-Verlag. 19X7.
    [84] 王鼎兴.温东婵.高耀清.黄志毅:逻辑程序设计语言及其实现技术.北京:清华大学出版社.1996.
    [85] Hassan Ait-Kaci and Roger Nasr. LOGIN A logic programming language with buth-m inher:tance. Journal of Logic Programming. 1986. 3. p185-215
    [86] Katherine Morris. Jeffrey D. Ullman. and Allen Van Gelder. Design overview of the Natl system. In Ehud Shapiro, editor. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Logic Programming. 1986. Berlin. Germany. LNCS 225. Springer-Verlag.p544-568.
    [87] Stefane Ceri. Georg Gottlob. and Letizia Tanca Logic Programming and Databases. Springer Verlag. Berlin. Germany . 1990.
    [88] Hassan Ait-Kaci. An introduction to LIFE-programming with logic. inheritance. functions. and equations. In Dale Miller, editor. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Logic Programming (Vancouver. BC). Cambridge. MA .1993. MIT Press. p52-68.
    [89] Hassan Ait-Kaci and Andreas Podelski. Towards a meaning of LIFE. Journal of Logic Programming . 1993. 16(3-4) :p195-234.
    [90] 蔡希尧.陈平.面向对象技术.西安:西安电子科技大学出版社. 1993. p100-101
    [91] H. Garcia-Molina. Y. Papakonstantinou. D. Quass. A. Rajaraman. Y. Sagiv. J. D. Ullman. V. Vassales. and J. Widom. The tsimmis approach to mediation: Data models ami languages. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems. 1997. 8(2) :p117-132.
    [92] A. Y.Levy. A. Rajaraman. and J. J. Ordille. Querying Heterogeneous Information Sources Using Source Descriptions. In 22th VLDB Conf.1996. p251-262.
    [93] A.Levy. Srivastava. D.. and Kirk. T. Data Model and Query Evaluation in Global Information Systems Journal of Intelligent Information Systems. 1995.
    [94] Thomas Kirk. Alon Y. Levy. Yehoshua Sagiv. and Divesh Srivastava. The information manifold. In Working Notes of the AAAI Spring Symposium: Information Gathering from Heterogeneous. Distributed Environments. Stanford University. 1995. AAAI Press. p85-91.
    [95] M. Erdmann and R. Studer. Ontologies as Conceptual Models for KML Documents. In Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition. Modelling and Mangement (KAW'99) . Banff, Canada. October. 1999.
    [96] Staab. S and Macdche. A.: Knowledge Portals-Ontologies at Work. Al Magazine. 2001. 21(2)
    [97] L. Faulstich. M. Spiliopoulou. and V. Linnemann. WIND-a warehouse for internet data. In British National Conference on Databases (BNCOD). 1997. p169-183.
    [98] O.Etzioni. The World Wide Web: Quagmire or gold mine? CACM.39(11) . 1996. p65-68.
    [99] Mark Craven. Dan DiPasquo et al..Learning to Construct Knowledge Bases from the World Wide Web. Artificial Intelligence. 2000. 118. 1-2. p69-113.
    
    
    [100] G.Huck. et al.. Jedi: Intruding and Synthesizing Information from the Web. Intl Conf on Cooperative Information Systems(CooplS'98) . IEEE Computer Science Press. 1998. p32-43.
    [101] A.Sahuguct. F.Azavant. Looking at the Web through XML glasses. CooplS'99. IEEE Computer Science Press. 1999.
    [102] B.Adelberg. NoDoSE A Tool for Semt-Automatically Extracting Semi-Structured Data from Text Document. ACM Intl. Conf. on Management of Data(SIGMOD). 1998. P283-294.
    [103] N.Ashish and C.A.Knoblock. Wrapper Generation for Semi-structured Internet Sources. SIGMOD Record.. 1997. 26(4) :p8-15
    [104] N.Kushmeric et al.. Wrapper Induction for Information Extraction. In IJCAI, 1997.
    [105] D.W.Embley et al.. A Conceptual Modeling Approach to Extracting Data from the Web. Intl. Conf. on the Entity Relation Approach(ER) Springer LNCS 1507. 1998.
    [w1] W3C. XML Query Language(XQL). hup: //www.w3c.org/TandS/QL/QL98/xql.html
    [w2] Lauren Wood, Vidur Apparao .etc.Document Object Model(DOM) Level l Specification W3C Organization.Oct. 1998. http://www.w3c.org .
    [w3] W3C. XML Schema Part 1: Structures. Part 2 : Datatypes. http:/www.w3. org/TR/2000/CR-xmlschema-1-20001024/
    [w4] Dave Raggett. .Arnaud Le Hors.etc.HTML 4. 01 Specification. W3C Organization. Dec. 1999 http://www.w3c.org .
    [w5] Tim Bray. Jean Paoli.etc. Extensible Markup Language(XML) Specification 1. 0. .W3C Organization. Feb. 1998. http://www.w3c.org .
    [w6] Ora Lassila. Ralph R. Swick. Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax Specification. W3C Recommendation 22 February 1999. http://www.w3c.org
    [w7] Dan Brickley. R.V. Guha. Resource Description Framework(RDF) Schema Specification 1 0. W3C Candidate Recommendation 27 March 2000. http://www.w3. org/TR/2000/ CR-rdf-schema-20000327
    [w8| Ontology Markup Language, version 0. 3. http://www.ontologos.org/.
    [w9] James Clark . Stephen Deach. Extensible Stylesheet Language(XSL) Version 1. 0. W3C Organization.Oct. 1998. http://www.w3c.org .
    [w10] TSIMMIS Homepage, www-db.stanford.edu/ tsimmis/tsimmis.html. 1998
    [w11] XML-QL: A Query Language for XML. W3C note.www w3. org/TR/NOTE-xml-ql. 1998.
    [w12] OntoEditer v 1. 0. http://ontobroker.semanticweb.org/.
    [w13] Protegc-2000. http://www.smi.stanford.edu/projects protegc/
    [w14] OilEd v 1. 4 http://www.ontoknowledge.org/oil

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700