张力平衡针法治疗脑卒中后痉挛性瘫痪的临床研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
目的:
     观察张力平衡针法治疗中风后痉挛性瘫痪的疗效和安全性,并初步探讨其治疗中风后痉挛性瘫痪机理,为临床探索一种疗效确切、易于操作的治疗方法。
     方法:
     将符合纳入标准的60例中风后痉挛性瘫痪患者随机分为张力平衡针法组30例和常规针刺组30例,在基础药物治疗的基础上,治疗组给予张力平衡针法治疗,常规针刺组按照常规取穴,给予针刺治疗,两组患者均每天治疗1次,连续治疗10次为1个疗程,休息2天再继续针灸,共治疗2个疗程。治疗前后分别对两组患者进行肌力、改良Ashworth痉挛分级量表评分、临床痉挛指数评定、日常生活活动能力改良Barthel指数评分及肢体运动功能Fugl-Meyer评测,以及临床疗效进行比较,以评价两种方法的临床疗效差别。
     结果:
     治疗前两组患者性别、年龄、病程、卒中性质情况经卡方及t检验测定,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),提示两组具可比性。
     两组患者治疗后肌力、Barthel指数积分、Fugl-Meyer积分、关节活动度评分较治疗前均有提高,临床痉挛指数(CSI)、神经功能缺损程度评分明显降低(p<0.05)。相比较常规针刺组,张力平衡针法组改善肌力、临床痉挛指数(CSI)、Barthel指数积分、Fugl-Meyer积分、关节活动度评分、神经功能缺损程度评分更优,组间比较差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。两组患者治疗后Ashworth分级情况较治疗前均有降低,张力平衡针法组治疗前后差异有统计学意义(p<0.05),常规针刺组治疗前后差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。张力平衡针法组与常规针刺组均可改善患者Barthel指数积分,但组间比较差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。基于临床痉挛CSI评分的临床疗效分析,张力平衡针法组在改善患者肌力,痉挛状态,肢体运动,关节活动度及神经功能缺损程度方面的临床疗效均明显优于对照组(p<0.05)。
     结论:
     张力平衡针法可以安全有效地改善患者偏瘫肢体的痉挛程度、提高肢体运动功能,尤其在改善患者痉挛程度、降低痉挛指数及提高肢体运动功能方面明显优于常规针刺组。
Objective:
     To observe the effect of balanced muscular tension needling method for improving disabled functionof stroke patients with spastic paralysis.
     Methods:
     Sixty cases with post-stroke spastic paralysis were randomly divided into observation group (30cases) with balanced muscular tension needling method and control group (30cases) with routine acupuncture method. The observation group was treated by acupunctureat the side of extensor and flexor of limbs; while the control group was treated with acupuncture at Jian yu(LI15), Qu chi (LI11), Wai guan(TE5) etc. The changes of muscle strength, muscle tonus, muscle spasticity (Ashworth Ranking and CSI grade), range of joint motion, Barthel index, Fugl-Meyer index, Clinical nerve function damage degree and Clinical effect based on CSI grade were evaluated before and after treatment.
     Results:
     After22days of treatment, muscle strength, muscle tonus, muscle spasticity, range of joint motion, Fugl-Meyer index were improved in the two groups, and the observation group was superior to the control group (all P<0.05). The Ashworth Ranking before and after treatment in the control group has no significant difference(P>0.05). Both groups could improve the Barthel index and with no significant difference(P>0.05). After the treatment, the total effective rate based on CSI was83.87%in the observation group and superior to that of46.67%in the control group (P<0.05).
     Conclusion:
     Balanced muscular tension needling method can significantly improve the muscle strength, muscle tonus, muscle spasticity and the range of joint motion of posl-stroke patients with spastic paralysis. Acupuncture with balanced muscular tension needling method and routine acupuncture method could both improve the Barthel index.
引文
[1]Guidance for industry:patient-reported outcome measures:use in medical product development to support labeling claims:draft guidance[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes,2006,4:79.
    [2]Williams L S, Weinberger M, Harris L E, et al. Development of a stroke-specific quality of life scale[J]. Stroke,1999,30(7):1362-1369.
    [3]Uutela T, Kautiainen H, Hakala M. Nottingham health profile questionnaire incorporates important aspects of the patient perspective into outcome assessment in rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Clin Exp Rheumatol,2008,26(1):39-44.
    [4]Holbrook M, Skilbeck C E. An activities index for use with stroke patients[J]. Age Ageing,1983,12(2):166-170.
    [5]Friefeld S, Yeboah O, Jones J E, et al. Health-related quality of life and its relationship to neurological outcome in child survivors of stroke[J]. CNS Spectr,2004,9(6):465-475.
    [6]窦祖林.痉挛评估与治疗[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:35~63.
    [7]赵艳玲,章薇,刘伍立,等.针刺益气活血通络法治疗脑血栓形成60例[J].湖南中医药导报,1999(4):14~16.
    [8]马涛.电针治疗中风偏瘫足内翻102例[J].上海针灸杂志,2001(1):14.
    [9]钟长明,林洪茂,刘庆芳,等.针刺与肌张力平衡促通法对中风偏瘫患者早期康复的作用[J].中国康复医学杂志,2001(3).
    [10]岳增辉,刘伍立,章薇.经筋刺法治疗脑卒中后痉挛状态及疗效评价研究[J].中国中医药信息杂志,2001(4):85~86.
    [11]黄晓洁,王建敏,王玉珍.眼针治疗中风后遗症90例疗效观察[J].中国针灸,1996(5):16.
    [12]石学敏,李军,阎莉,等.针刺治疗中风病的临床研究[J].上海针灸杂志,1992(4):4-7.
    [13]郭泽新,汪润生,周美启,等.论偏瘫痉挛与针法[J].河南中医,1996(1):48~49.
    [14]王洪忠,许键鹏.实用中西医结合治疗学[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,1996.
    [15]姜桂美,贾超.针刺拮抗肌与主动肌治疗中风后痉挛性偏瘫的临床疗效观察[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2007(9):812~813.
    [16]薛茜,李淑萍,霍国敏.平衡肌张力针法对硬瘫期偏瘫患者运动功能康复的影响 [J].江苏中医药,2008(2):55~56.
    [17]张闻东,陈幸生,韩为,等.针刺督脉为主治疗中风后肢体痉挛的临床研究[J].上海针灸杂志,2005(5).
    [18]刘伍立,欧阳建军,岳增辉,等.针刺治疗脑卒中后痉挛瘫痪的思路与方法[J].中国针灸,2003(6):50~51.
    [19]李新红,周君,李先果,等.针刺夹脊穴治疗中风偏瘫痉挛状态35例临床观察[J].针灸临床杂志,2005(9).
    [20]解庆凡,田胜利,张秀娟,等.大全息针法治疗中风偏瘫230例临床观察[J].北京中医药大学学报,2000(3):74~75.
    [21]娄必丹,刘伍立.泻阴补阳法论治脑卒中后痉挛性瘫痪[J].针灸临床杂志,2002(12):3-4.
    [22]刘希茹.阴阳经穴并用治疗中风痉挛性偏瘫48例临床观察[J].中国现代临床医学,2005,4(4):69~70.
    [23]刘伍立,尹新民,唐北沙,等.针刺阳陵泉对外伤性脊髓损伤后痉挛状态的缓解作用及对血钾、钠、钙、糖影响的观察[J].中国中医药科技,1999(3):144~145.
    [24]王森,刘洁,罗海鸥,等.灯盏花穴位注射治疗脑卒中偏瘫后上肢痉挛30例临床研究[J].安徽中医临床杂志,2003(5).
    [25]周建伟.头皮针治疗中风急性期85例疗效观察[J].中国中医急症,1996:12~13.
    [26]王立群.头针治疗中风的临床观察[J].上海针灸杂志,1999(5):11-12.
    [27]唐强,冯军,张春英,等.头穴透针不同捻转持续时间治疗急性脑梗塞60例体感诱发电位研究[J].中国针灸,1996(4):1-4.
    [28]吴节,李应昆.头电针对中风病血流变学的影响[J].四川中医,1998(6):16~17.
    [29]王克键,苑瑞景,赖芳山,等.独取阳明法治疗中风恢复期的临床研究[J].中国针灸,1996(1):15~18.
    [30]杜元灏,翟娜,石学敏.针刺治疗急性脑缺血的微血管机制研究(Ⅰ)——针刺对急性脑缺血模型鼠微血管自律运动等的影响[J].针刺研究,1998(4):275~278.
    [31]林翠茹,郭家奎.针刺治疗中风后痉挛性瘫痪的研究进展[J].河北中医,2008(12):1338~1340.
    [32]朱梅菊,肖发强.大负荷训练后大鼠红细胞形态学的变化及针灸的促恢复作用[J].北京体育大学学报,2006(7):928~930.
    [33]李红,朱梅菊,许可,等.针灸足三里穴对大负荷训练血液流变学、红细胞形态的干预[J].体育科学,2004(1).
    [34]杨会芹,张联科.针灸对红细胞免疫功能调节的研究[J].陕西中医学院学报,2004(5):76~77.
    [35]陈琼.针刺对高血压病患者甲皱微循环的影响[J].安徽中医学院学报,1990(3):49~51.
    [36]应赛霞,程介士.电针对沙鼠脑缺血及再灌注时脑电活动的影响[J].针刺研究,1994(1):29~32.
    [37]戴文晋,孙伟.脑电仿生电刺激治疗老年性脑卒中的临床疗效观察[J].中国伤残医学,2010(2).
    [38]朱庆丰.电针对吗啡戒断大鼠血、脑组织胃动素水平的影响[J].安徽中医学院学报,2002(1):31~33.
    [39]朱庆丰,庞宗然.电针对吗啡戒断大鼠血、脑组织NO/NOS水平的影响[J].承德医学院学报,2003(4).
    [40]赵利华.针灸抗脑衰的实验研究[J].针刺研究,2001(1):77~79.
    [41]凌方明,陈景亮,高敏.养阴熄风通络法治疗脑卒中后痉挛性瘫痪的临床研究[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2003(2).
    [42]支英豪,胡万华,朱文宗,等.解痉合剂对脑卒中肌痉挛病人运动功能和日常生活能力的影响[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2007(9).
    [43]郭志玲.祛痰逐瘀法治疗中风后痉挛瘫痪36例临床观察[J].中国中医药信息杂志,2000(6):57~58.
    [44]全国第四届脑血管病学术会议各类脑血管病诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,6(29):379~380.
    [45]燕铁斌.临床痉挛指数:痉挛的综合临床评定[J].现代康复,2000(1):88~89.
    [46]包宗昭,李成林.临床诊断及疗效判断的四级加权评分法介绍[J].中国临床药理学与治疗学,2000(2):164~166.
    [47]章薇.张力平衡针法在中风偏瘫康复中的应用[J].中国临床医生,2004(6):38~40.
    [48]杨今姝,纪树荣.痉挛的评定方法[J].现代康复,1998(12):4~9.
    [49]王广志,张立群.采用人工神经网络对肌肉痉挛进行定量评估[J].现代康复,2000(5):647~649.
    [50]王广志.肌肉痉挛定量评估的研究进展[J].现代康复,2000(5):650~652.
    [51]燕铁斌,许云影.综合痉挛量表的信度研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2002(5):7~9.
    [52]吕盼芝,秦鹏涛.中风痉挛性偏瘫的康复[J].国外医学(中医中药分册):256~258.
    [53]Pandyan A D, Johnson G R, Price C I, et al. A review of the properties and limitations of the Ashworth and modified Ashworth Scales as measures of spasticity[J]. Clin Rehabil,1999,13(5):373-383.
    [54]Allison S C, Abraham L D, Petersen C L. Reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale in the assessment of plantarflexor muscle spasticity in patients with traumatic brain injury[J]. Int J Rehabil Res,1996,19(1):67-78.
    [55]Levin M F, Hui-Chan C. Ankle spasticity is inversely correlated with antagonist voluntary contraction in hemiparetic subjects[J]. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol,1994,34(7):415-425.
    [56]Levin M F, Hui-Chan C. Are H and stretch reflexes in hemiparesis reproducible and correlated with spasticity?[J]. J Neurol,1993,240(2):63-71.
    [57]Sunnerhagen K S. Stop using the Ashworth scale for the assessment of spasticity[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry,2010,81(1):2.
    [58]Johnson B. The horrors of Ashworth:misdiagnosis[J]. Lancet,1999,353(9156):931.
    [59]Ansari N N, Naghdi S, Moammeri H, et al. Ashworth Scales are unreliable for the assessment of muscle spasticity[J]. Physiother Theory Pract,2006,22(3):119-125.
    [60]Goulet C G, Arsenault A B, Bourbonnais D, et al. Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on the H-reflex of muscles of different fibre type composition[J]. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol,1997,37(6):335-342.
    [61]Nadeau S, Arsenault A B, Gravel D, et al. Analysis of the clinical factors determining natural and maximal gait speeds in adults with a stroke[J]. Am J Phys Med Rehabil,1999,78(2):123-130.
    [62]赵俊.疼痛治疗学[M].郑州:河南医科大学出版社,1999:201-210.
    [63]李仲廉,华勇.慢性疼痛治疗学基础[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2003:27-38.
    [64]Astridkjendahl, Susannesllstrom, Peregilsten,等.钊刺治疗对亚急性期中风作用的一年随访研究[J].中国康复理论与实践,1998(3):100~104.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700