我国反垄断司法机制研究
|
摘要
反垄断法的实施机制一般分为反垄断执法机制与反垄断司法机制两部分。我国理论界对反垄断执法机制的研究日趋完善,而对反垄断司法机制的研究却长期被忽视。这种理论研究上的缺憾反映在反垄断的实务操作中,注定了反垄断法的实施情况并不乐观。虽然反垄断执法部门对一些涉嫌垄断的案件进行了审查,但目前起诉到法院的案子少有正式被受理的。毋庸讳言,这与我国的反垄断实施机制不健全,尤其是司法机制的缺失有着重要关系。因此,建立完善的反垄断司法机制对我国反垄断法的顺利实施有着重要意义。文章首先对反垄断司法机制的作用、地位等基本理论进行阐述,以此为前提,着重分析了我国反垄断司法机制中存在的法院缺乏专门反垄断机构、反垄断民事诉讼中配套制度尚不健全、反垄断司法与执法的关系有待协调等主要问题,并通过比较的视角,研究了国外反垄断司法机制的制度特色,在此基础上,结合我国国情,对建立我国反垄断司法机制提出合理化的构想。
The implementation of anti-trust mechanisms are generally divided into anti-monopoly law enforcement mechanism and anti-monopoly judicial mechanism. China anti-monopoly theorists on the study of enforcement mechanisms are maturing, but study of anti-monopoly judicial mechanism has long been ignored.The deficiency of this theoretical study is reflected in the anti-monopoly practice,and is destine to be not optimistic in the implementation of the anti-monopoly law.Although the anti-monopoly law enforcement departments have reviewed on a number of suspected cases of monopoly, but the cases prosecuted to the court have not yet formally been admissibled. Needless to say, this is related to the unsound implementation mechanism of China's anti-monopoly, in particular the lack of judicial mechanism.Therefore, the establishment of a sound anti-monopoly judicial mechanism means a great deal to the smooth implementation of our country‘s anti-monopoly law. In the first, this article expounds the basic theory of justice anti-trust mechanism, on this basis, focuses on analyzing the problems of anti-monopoly justice mechanism, such as the lack of a specific anti-monopoly bodies in court, unsound sound supporting systems of anti-monopoly civil action, uncoordinated relationship between the anti-monopoly justice and enforcement,and through a comparative perspective ,study of foreign characteristic anti-momopoly judicial mechanism ,on this basis,in the combination of China's national conditions, proposed the rational concept of foundation of our country’s anti - monopoly judicial mechanism.
The implementation of anti-trust mechanisms are generally divided into anti-monopoly law enforcement mechanism and anti-monopoly judicial mechanism. China anti-monopoly theorists on the study of enforcement mechanisms are maturing, but study of anti-monopoly judicial mechanism has long been ignored.The deficiency of this theoretical study is reflected in the anti-monopoly practice,and is destine to be not optimistic in the implementation of the anti-monopoly law.Although the anti-monopoly law enforcement departments have reviewed on a number of suspected cases of monopoly, but the cases prosecuted to the court have not yet formally been admissibled. Needless to say, this is related to the unsound implementation mechanism of China's anti-monopoly, in particular the lack of judicial mechanism.Therefore, the establishment of a sound anti-monopoly judicial mechanism means a great deal to the smooth implementation of our country‘s anti-monopoly law. In the first, this article expounds the basic theory of justice anti-trust mechanism, on this basis, focuses on analyzing the problems of anti-monopoly justice mechanism, such as the lack of a specific anti-monopoly bodies in court, unsound sound supporting systems of anti-monopoly civil action, uncoordinated relationship between the anti-monopoly justice and enforcement,and through a comparative perspective ,study of foreign characteristic anti-momopoly judicial mechanism ,on this basis,in the combination of China's national conditions, proposed the rational concept of foundation of our country’s anti - monopoly judicial mechanism.
引文
[1]萨缪尔森.经济学[M] .胡代光等译.北京:北京经济学院出版社, 1996 : 310-311
[2]博登海默.法理学——法律哲学与法律方法[M].邓正来译.中国政法大学出版社,2004 : 509-510
[3]蒋岩波.我国反垄断法的司法制度构想[J] .法学家, 2008, (1) : 28-29
[4]刘宁元.中外反垄断法实施体制研究[M] .北京大学出版社,2005 :14-15
[5]刘宁元.论反垄断法实施体制运作的推动力量[J] .时代法学, 2006, 4(2) : 105-106
[6]贺运生.论反垄断法中的准司法机关[J] .求索,2006,(9) : 116-118
[7]赵新华.中国反垄断法实施问题研究[D].上海:华东政法学院, 2006
[8]袁定波.最高法:反垄断法实施满月缘何鲜见案件到法院[EB/OL] , http://www.legaldaily.com.cn/2008fjdt/2008-09/01/content_936101.htm, 2008-09-01
[9]黄勇.反垄断法司法实施的若干问题[EB/OL] , http://www.chinalawedu.com/news/16900/174/2008/9/wy696929551191980022596-0.htm,2008-9-19
[10]王晓晔.竞争法研究[M] .中国法制出版社, 1999 : 108-109
[11]时建中,陈鸣.反垄断法中的准司法制度构造[J] .东方法学, 2008, (3) : 28-29
[12]孟雁北.我国反垄断法司法审查制度构建问题研究[J] .成人高教学刊, 2007, (4) : 42-43
[13]桑林.反垄断立法需要权威执法者[J] .法人,2006, (2) : 20-21
[14]涂崇禹.中国反垄断法中受害人的司法救济程序初探[EB/OL], http://www.fjlawyers.net/news1.asp?id=214,2006-08-10
[15]王健.反垄断法私人执行制度初探[J] .法商研究, 2007, (2) : 17-18
[16]郑鹏程.美国反垄断法三倍损害赔偿制度研究[J] .环球法律评论, 2006, (2) : 15-16
[17]李国海.反垄断法实施机制研究[M] .中国方正出版社,2006 : 277-280
[18]李国海.反垄断法公共利益理念研究[J] .法商研究, 2009, (1) : 9-10
[19]韩立余.欧盟反托拉斯法的现代化[J] .法学家, 2004, (5) : 22-23
[20]刘宁元.中外反垄断法实施体制研究[M] .北京大学出版社,2005 : 264-265
[21]王健.英国竞争主管机构的法律改革.[A],中国法学会经济法学研究会2005年年会专辑[C] .江西:江西大学学报,2006 :54-56.
[22]朱煊华.论私人反垄断诉讼的构建[EB/OL] , http://www.ccelaws.com/xueshengxueshu/jingjifa/2009-01-01/6819.html, 2005-11-07
[23]罗歇·布特.法国竞争法概要[EB/OL] , http://www.studa.net/jingjifa/061001/08415691-2.html, 2006-01-01
[24]吉帕·维斯库斯.反垄断与管制经济学[M] .陈甫军等译,北京:机械工业出版社, 2004 : 40
[25]吴传凯.建立反垄断国家起诉制度的有关问题[J] .亚太经济, 2000, (6) : 68-69
[26]马丽娟.关于《消费者权益保护法》第49条的再思考[J] .商业研究, 2003, (22) :22-23
[27]戴维·格伯尔.中国竞争法的制定:欧洲和美国的经验[A] .竞争法与经济发展[C].北京:中国社会科学文献出版社,2003:54-56
[28]时建中,陈鸣.我国反垄断法的司法制度构想[J].东方法学, 2008, (3) :30-31
[29]胡锦光.论我国抽象行政行为的司法审查[J] .中国人民大学学报, 2005, (5) :9-10
[30] Peter L. Strauss, Revisiting Overton Park. Political and Judicial Controls over Administrative Actions Affecting Community[C], UCLA Law Review, 1992:38-40
[31]张千帆.司法审查的标准和方法-以美国行政法为视角[J] .法学家, 2006, (6) :37-38
[32]刘应兵.论反行政性垄断的司法途径[D] .成都:西南师范大学,2005
[33]郭巍.论反垄断执法与司法的关系[D] .湖南:湘潭大学, 2007
[2]博登海默.法理学——法律哲学与法律方法[M].邓正来译.中国政法大学出版社,2004 : 509-510
[3]蒋岩波.我国反垄断法的司法制度构想[J] .法学家, 2008, (1) : 28-29
[4]刘宁元.中外反垄断法实施体制研究[M] .北京大学出版社,2005 :14-15
[5]刘宁元.论反垄断法实施体制运作的推动力量[J] .时代法学, 2006, 4(2) : 105-106
[6]贺运生.论反垄断法中的准司法机关[J] .求索,2006,(9) : 116-118
[7]赵新华.中国反垄断法实施问题研究[D].上海:华东政法学院, 2006
[8]袁定波.最高法:反垄断法实施满月缘何鲜见案件到法院[EB/OL] , http://www.legaldaily.com.cn/2008fjdt/2008-09/01/content_936101.htm, 2008-09-01
[9]黄勇.反垄断法司法实施的若干问题[EB/OL] , http://www.chinalawedu.com/news/16900/174/2008/9/wy696929551191980022596-0.htm,2008-9-19
[10]王晓晔.竞争法研究[M] .中国法制出版社, 1999 : 108-109
[11]时建中,陈鸣.反垄断法中的准司法制度构造[J] .东方法学, 2008, (3) : 28-29
[12]孟雁北.我国反垄断法司法审查制度构建问题研究[J] .成人高教学刊, 2007, (4) : 42-43
[13]桑林.反垄断立法需要权威执法者[J] .法人,2006, (2) : 20-21
[14]涂崇禹.中国反垄断法中受害人的司法救济程序初探[EB/OL], http://www.fjlawyers.net/news1.asp?id=214,2006-08-10
[15]王健.反垄断法私人执行制度初探[J] .法商研究, 2007, (2) : 17-18
[16]郑鹏程.美国反垄断法三倍损害赔偿制度研究[J] .环球法律评论, 2006, (2) : 15-16
[17]李国海.反垄断法实施机制研究[M] .中国方正出版社,2006 : 277-280
[18]李国海.反垄断法公共利益理念研究[J] .法商研究, 2009, (1) : 9-10
[19]韩立余.欧盟反托拉斯法的现代化[J] .法学家, 2004, (5) : 22-23
[20]刘宁元.中外反垄断法实施体制研究[M] .北京大学出版社,2005 : 264-265
[21]王健.英国竞争主管机构的法律改革.[A],中国法学会经济法学研究会2005年年会专辑[C] .江西:江西大学学报,2006 :54-56.
[22]朱煊华.论私人反垄断诉讼的构建[EB/OL] , http://www.ccelaws.com/xueshengxueshu/jingjifa/2009-01-01/6819.html, 2005-11-07
[23]罗歇·布特.法国竞争法概要[EB/OL] , http://www.studa.net/jingjifa/061001/08415691-2.html, 2006-01-01
[24]吉帕·维斯库斯.反垄断与管制经济学[M] .陈甫军等译,北京:机械工业出版社, 2004 : 40
[25]吴传凯.建立反垄断国家起诉制度的有关问题[J] .亚太经济, 2000, (6) : 68-69
[26]马丽娟.关于《消费者权益保护法》第49条的再思考[J] .商业研究, 2003, (22) :22-23
[27]戴维·格伯尔.中国竞争法的制定:欧洲和美国的经验[A] .竞争法与经济发展[C].北京:中国社会科学文献出版社,2003:54-56
[28]时建中,陈鸣.我国反垄断法的司法制度构想[J].东方法学, 2008, (3) :30-31
[29]胡锦光.论我国抽象行政行为的司法审查[J] .中国人民大学学报, 2005, (5) :9-10
[30] Peter L. Strauss, Revisiting Overton Park. Political and Judicial Controls over Administrative Actions Affecting Community[C], UCLA Law Review, 1992:38-40
[31]张千帆.司法审查的标准和方法-以美国行政法为视角[J] .法学家, 2006, (6) :37-38
[32]刘应兵.论反行政性垄断的司法途径[D] .成都:西南师范大学,2005
[33]郭巍.论反垄断执法与司法的关系[D] .湖南:湘潭大学, 2007