松梢螟植物源农药的研制及应用
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
马尾松(Pinus massoniana)是中国南方地区特有的荒山绿化乡土造林树种,也是重要的工业原料树种。松梢螟(Dioryctria splendidella)是马尾松的主要害虫,也是湖南省重要森林虫害之一。松梢螟主要钻蛀马尾松主梢或果实,引起植株侧枝丛生,成果率减少,不仅影响到松木的材质还影响到马尾松林的健康和繁衍,每年因松梢螟而造成的经济损失也难以估计。目前中国针对松梢螟等重大林业虫害的防治使用的基本是化学农药,在化学农药弊端日益凸显的情况下,如何安全、有效的防治此类害虫也成为林业部门亟待解决的问题。
     本文从药用植物、农产品废弃物中筛选出具有杀虫作用的植物,用植物的提取物对松梢螟幼虫进行拒食作用、生长抑制作用和触杀作用3方面的生物活性测定。通过植物对松梢螟幼虫生物活性单一毒力和联合毒力的测定,确定最佳的生物作用浓度和最佳的植物组合。最后通过添加不同的农药助剂,初步研制出一种能有效防治松梢螟的植物源农药制剂。主要研究结果如下:
     (1)3种植物提取物对松梢螟幼虫单一毒力测定
     博落回、柚子皮和垂序商陆提取物通过对松梢螟幼虫的非选择拒食作用、生长抑制作用及触杀作用的测定结果表明:3种植物提取物对松梢螟幼虫的生物活性随着浓度的增大而升高,在浓度100g·L-1时各项生物活性效果较好。3种植物提取物对松梢螟幼虫的各项生物活性大小为:柚子皮>博落回>垂序商陆。柚子皮提取物在100g·L-1,处理时间为24h、48h时的非选择拒食率分别为99.28%、94.23%;生长抑制率在处理时间为24h、48h和96h时分别为96.32%、95.44%、93.19%;触杀作用对3龄和5龄幼虫分别为90.00%、80.00%。博落回提取物在100g·L-1,处理时间为24h、48h时对松梢螟幼虫的非选择拒食率分别为92.62%、91.95%;生长抑制率在处理时间为24h、48h和96h时分别为95.20%、92.43%、90.80%;触杀作用用对3龄和5龄幼虫分别为86.67%、76.66%;垂序商陆提取物在在100g·L-1,处理时间为24h、48h时的非选择拒食率分别为90.56%、92.11%;生长抑制率在处理时间为24h、48h和96h时分别为93.19%、92.87%、90.38%;触杀作用对3龄和5龄幼虫分别为80.00%、70.00%。
     (2)3种植物提取物对松梢螟幼虫联合毒力测定
     博落回与柚子皮提取物复配后的共毒系数最大为87.92,主要以拮抗作用为主;博落回与垂序商陆提取物复配后有一定的相加作用,处理比例为1:3时共毒系数最大为147.52,但处理比例为1:1时最小为19.05,增效效果并不稳定;柚子皮与垂序商陆提取物复配在处理比例为1:5和1:3则表现出了一定的增效效果,共毒系数为120.23和170.02。博落回、柚子皮和垂序商陆提取物三者处理比例1:1:l复配时表现出了一定的增效效果,共毒系数为127.67。从博落回、柚子皮、垂序商陆3种提取物复配后联合毒力作用的增效效果来看,最佳植物组合及处理浓度是:柚子皮与垂序商陆提取物,处理比例为1:3,共毒系数为170.02;其次为博落回、柚子皮和垂序商陆提取物三者处理比例1:1:1,共毒系数为127.67。
     (3)防治松梢螟的植物源药剂制备及应用
     通过对各植物复配液的增效剂、溶剂和乳化剂的筛选制备出4种植物源复配乳剂。通过室内防治效果和林间防治效果的测定,最终确定植物源复配乳剂的配方为S2具体为:博落回、柚子皮和垂序商陆3种植物提取物体积比1:1:1占总体积的30%;增效剂松节油占总体积的5%;溶剂二甲基亚砜占总体积的55%;乳化剂司班-20占总体积的10%。植物源复配乳剂总体的有效成分含量为30%,浓度为100g·L-1,暂称MCP乳剂。
Pinus massoniana is a characteristic and local species used to afforest barren hills as well as industrial material wood in south China. Dioryctria splendidella, a major pest of Pinus massoniana and an important forest pest in Hunan province, bores into the main branch or fruit of Pinus massoniana, causing lateral branch rosette of plants and reduction of fruit bear percentage, which not only affects the pine material but also influences the health and reproduction of Pinus massoniana. It is difficult to estimate the economic loss caused by Dioryctria splendidella every year. At present chemical pesticide is usually used to control the major forestry pest like Dioryctria splendidella in China, and drawbacks of chemical pesticides has become increasingly prominent. How to prevent and control such pests safely and effectively has become the problem to be solved by forestry sector.
     We screened out the plants with insecticidal activity from medicinal plants and agricultural waste. The larvae of D. splendidella were treated with the plant ethanol extracts, and antifeedant activities, body weight gains and contact toxicity were tested. The best concentration and combination of plants were determined by measuring single and combined toxicity of the three plant extracts against the larvae of Dioryctria splendidell. Finally, adding different types of pesticide additives an effective botanical pesticide formula to prevent and control Dioryctria splendidella had been developed. The main findings were as follows:
     1. Single toxicity of three plant extracts against the larvae of Dioryctria splendidella
     Using the M. cordata, C. maxima peels and P. americana L. ethanol extracts against the larvae of Dioryctria splendidella the bioactivities of the non-selective antifeedant effect, growth inhibition and contact toxicity were determined. The results showed that the bioactivities of three plant extracts against the larvae of Dioryctria splendidella increased with concentration. All indexes were comparatively good when the concentration was100g·L-1. The bioactivities of the three plant extracts against larvae of Dioryctria splendidella were in the order: C. maxima peels> Macleya cordata> P. americana L. When the extract concentration of C. maxima peels was100g·L-1,the non-selective antifeedant rate after24and48hours was99.28%and94.23%, respectively, growth inhibition rate after24,48and96hours was96.32%,95.44%and93.19%, respectively, the lethal rate of the contact toxicity against the3th and5th instar larvae was90.00%and80.00%, respectively. While the extract concentration of Macleya cordata was100g·L-1,the non-selective antifeedant rate after24and48hours was92.62%and91.95%, respectively, growth inhibition rate after24,48and96hours was95.20%,92.43%and90.80%respectively, the lethal rate of the contact toxicity against the3th and5th instar larvae was86.67%and76.66%, respectively. With concentration of P. americana L.100g·L-1, the non-selective antifeedant rate after24and48hours was90.56%and92.11%,respectively,the growth inhibition rate after24,48, and96hours was93.19%,92.87%and90.38%,respectively,the lethal rate of the contact toxicity against the3th and5th instar larvae was80.00%and70.00%,respectively.
     2. Combined toxicity of the three plant extracts against the larvae of Dioryctria splendidella
     The biggest co-toxicity co-efficient(CTC) was87.92in the mixture of M. cordata and C. maxima peels with main function antagonistic; the mixture of M. cordata and P. american L. showed additive effect which was unstable, while the biggest CTC was147.52at ratio of1:3, the smallest CTC was19.05at ratio of1:1. the CTC was120.23and170.02with C. maxima peels and P. american at ratio of1:5and1:3, respectively, which had synergistic effect. The CTC was127.67with M. cordata, C. maxima peels and P. americana L. at ratio of1:1:1, which also had synergistic effect. The overall results indicated that the best mixture combination were C. maxima peels extracts and P. americana L. extracts at ratio of1:3,the CTC was170.02.
     3. Development of an effective botanical pesticide formula to prevent and control Dioryctria splendidella.
     Screening synergist, solvent and emulsifier of compound liquid of the three plants and measuring the effect of lab control and forest control, the botanical compound emulsion formula S2was finally determined:the three plant extracts was in volume ratio1:1:1, which accounted for30%, the synergist turpentine, the solvent DMSO and the emulsifier Secretary Ban-20accounted for5%,55%and10%, respectively. It was tentatively called MCP emulsion with active ingredient content30%and concentration100g·L-1.
引文
[1]慈颖,马爱敏,张顺合.植物源杀虫剂有效成分提取技术的研究进展[J].中华卫生杀虫药械,2009,15(2):166-168.
    [2]高菊芬.生物农药的作用、应用与功效(二)--植物、动物源农药[J].世界农药,2001,23(2):5-10,19.
    [3]陈万义,王明安.对我国植物源农药中几个问题的思考[J].农药,2002,41(2):54.
    [4]吴文君,刘惠霞,朱倩博,等.天然产物杀虫剂—原理·方法·实践[M].西安:陕西科学技术出版社,1998.
    [5]唐英,谭世语,孙大贵,等.我国植物源农药的研究进展[J].西南民族大学学报:自然科学版,2003,9(3):363-366.
    [6]郑和斌,郭海明,王金辉,等.植物源杀虫剂开发利用现状及其前景展望[J].湖南农业科学,2006,(1):52-54,56.
    [7]顾宝根.我国生物农药的生产和应用概况[J].天津农林科技,1995,13(1):30-31.
    [8]史卫国,徐之明,黄清臻,等.植物源农药的进展[J].农药科学与管理,997,(3):33-35.
    [9]杜小凤,徐建明,王伟中,等.植物源农药研究进展[J].农药,2000,39(11):8-10.
    [10]深见顺一,上杉康彦.农药实验法一杀菌剂篇[M].李素正译.北京:农业出版社,1991.
    [11]付佑胜,赵桂东.杀虫植物资源的研究进展[J].安徽农学通报,2007,13(5):133-136.
    [12]王燕,师光禄,吴振宇,等.植物源杀虫剂作用机理研究进展[J].北京农学院学报,2008,23(4):70-73.
    [13]林妍妍.东方蓼提取物杀虫杀菌活性初探[J].农药,2007,46(3):211-213.
    [14]Tatterd field F, Giming ham C T, Morris H M.studies on contact insecticides:Part I, Introduction and methods, Part II · A quantatives examination of the toxicity of Tephrosia vogelii Hook, to Aphis rumicis L. (the bean aphis) [J].Annals Applied Biology 1925,12(1):61-67.
    [15]Tatterdfield F, Gimingham C T, Morris H M.studies on contact insecticides:PartIV·A quantatives examination of the toxicity of Tephrosia vogelii Hook, to Aphis rumicis L (the bean aphis) [J]. Annals Applied Biology,1926,13(3):424-425.
    [16]罗万春,李云寿·苦豆子甲醇提取物对菜蚜的忌避作用及药效[J].农药,1996,35(6):34-36.
    [17]郑永权,姚建人,邵向东.苦参化学成分及农业应用研究概况[J].农药科学与管理,2000,21(1):24-26,30.
    [18]Schmutterer H. Properties and potential of natural pesticides from the neem tree. Azadirathta indica [J].Annual Review of Entomology,1990, (35):271-297.
    [19]Kreutzweiser DP. Nontarget effects of neem-based iusecticides on acqutic invertebrates [J].Ecotoxinology and Environmental Safety,1997, (36):109-117.
    [20]Aerts R J, Mordue A. Feeding deterrence and toxicity of neem triter penoids [J].Journal of Ecology,1997, (23):2117-2132.
    [21]徐德昌,骆成高,陈凤芝.大戟狼毒杀虫药效试验[J].中国甜菜糖业,2004,(2):5-7.
    [22]张萍,梁延海,赵雪岭,等.狼毒大戟人工栽培及其生物农药开发[J].防护林科技,2005,(5):87.
    [23]吴文君,姬志勤,胡兆农,等.杀虫植物苦皮藤中的有效成分及其生物活性[J].华中师范大学学报:自然科学版,2005,39(1):50-53.
    [24]徐汉虹.杀虫植物与植物性杀虫剂[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2001.
    [25]张国洲,王亚维,徐汉虹.瑞香狼毒防治菜粉蝶盆栽试验[J].安徽农业大学学报,2002,29(3):230-232.
    [26]邹先伟,蒋志胜.杀虫植物的研究新进展及应用发展前景[J].农药,2004,43(11):481-486.
    [27]Aucoin R R, Fidlds P, Lewis M A, et al.The protective effect of antioxidants to a phototoxin sensitive insect herbivore (Manduca sexta) [J].Chemical Ecology,1990, 16(10):213.
    [28]Iyenyar S, Arnason J T, Philogene B J R, et al. Comparative metabolism of the phototoxic allelochemical a-terthienyl in three species of Lepidopterans [J].Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology,1990, (37):154-164.
    [29]Iyenyar S, Arnason J T, Philogene B J R, et al.Toxicokinetics and metabolism of a-terthienyl in three herbivorous Lepidoptera [J]. Pesticide Biochemistry Physiology, 1987,(29):1-9.
    [30]张雁冰,艾国民,刘洪民,等.植物源农药的研制及开发现状[J].河南农业科学,2005,(5):30-32,45.
    [31]赵博光.六种植物提取物对马尾松毛虫的拒食作用及毒性[J].南京林业大学学报,1994,(2):182-183.
    [32]张国生,侯广新.烟碱类杀虫剂的应用、开发现状及展望[J].农药科学与管理,2004,25(3):22-26.
    [33]MOOREVK, ZABIKM E, ZABIKM J. Evaluation of conventional and"organic" baby food brands for eight organoch lorine and five botanical pesticides [J]. Food Chemistry,2000,71:443-447.
    [34]吴海军,李友莲,裴淑芳.烟碱对桃蚜存活率和生长速率的影响[J].山西农业大学学报,2003,23(3):230-232.
    [35]罗永松,罗惠文,梅仁莲.植物源杀虫剂-烟碱防治马尾松毛虫初报[J].江西植保,2006,29(1):36-37.
    [36]舒孝顺,高中洪,杨祥良.雷公藤生物碱的化学和药理活性研究进展[J].广东药学院学报,2003,19(2):150-154.
    [37]Gonzalez A G, Jimenez IA, RaveloAG, et al. Antifeedant activity of sesquiterpenes from Celastraceae [J]. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology,1997, (25):513-519.
    [38]罗都强,冯俊涛,胡瓒,等.雷公藤总生物碱分离及杀虫活性研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报,2001,29(2):61-64.
    [39]全炳武,刘海峰,李翔国,等.不同苦参碱混剂对蚜虫的杀虫活性[J].延边大学农学学报,2006,28(2):88-92.
    [40]赵素华,刘育俭,徐谦.天然植物源杀虫剂世绿(苦参碱)对桃蚜的胃毒及触杀试验[J].黑龙江生态工程职业学院学报,2007,20(3):54-55.
    [41]Philogene BJR, Arnason JT, Towers GHN, et al.Bernerine-anaturally occurring phototoxic alkaloid [J]. Journal of hemistry Ecology,1984, (10):115-124.
    [42]魏玉平,徐汉虹.假荜拔抽提物对赤拟谷盗的毒杀作用初步研究[J].农资科技,1998,(2):8-9.
    [43]WuWJ, TuYQ, LiuHX, et al Celangulin II, IIIandIV:new insecticidal sesquiterpenoids from Celastrus angulatus [J]. Journal of Natural Produces,1992, 55(9):294-298.
    [44]吴文君,刘惠霞,朱靖博.杀虫天然产物苦皮藤Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ的结构鉴定[J].农药,1993,32(3):7-9.
    [45]胡美英,赵善欢.黄杜鹃花杀虫活性成分及其对害虫毒杀作用的研究[J].华南农业大学学报,1992,13(3):9-15.
    [46]潘盛贵.植物源农药-羊闹花制剂[J].农药市场信息,2003,(5):27-28.
    [47]张兴.川楝索引致菜青虫中毒症状研究[J].西北农业大学学报,1993,21(1):27-30.
    [48]刘红杰,金若敏.薄荷油研究进展[J].山东中医药大学学报,2006,30(6):502-505.
    [49]杨群芳,周祖基,李庆.薄荷油对云南松纵坑切梢小蠹的林间驱避试验[J].植物医生,2006,19(2):33-34.
    [50]史秀娟,王学海.植物源农药研究现状与展望[J].现代农业科技,2006,(2):34-36.
    [51]杨仕平,黄继光,徐汉虹,等.鱼藤酮的晶体结构及生物活性[J].上海师范大学学报:自然科学版,2003,32(3):47-51.
    [52]曾鑫年,张善学,方剑锋,等.毛鱼藤酮与鱼藤酮杀虫活性的比较[J].昆虫学报,2002,45(5):611-616.
    [53]沈建国,翟海枝,林奇英,等.我国植物源农药研究进展[J].福建农林大学学报.2002,31(1):26-31.
    [54]孙继武,周彪,郝德君,几种有毒植物提取物对食叶害虫的生物活性研究[J].中国林副特产,2005,(1):40-42.
    [55]Miller J C, Hanson P E. Laboratory studies on development of gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar L. (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) larvae on foliage of gymnosperms [J].Canada Division Entomology,1989,121(6):425-429.
    [56]Valladares Q Defago MT, Palacios S,et al. Laboratory evaluation of Melia azedarach (Meliaceae) extracts against theelm leaf beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) [J]. Journal of Economic Entomology,1997,90 (3):747-750.
    [57]曹鹏翔,张益先,费显伟.苦参素对菜青虫等3种害虫的毒力测定和药效试验[J].植物保护,1995,(3):43-44.
    [58]严敖金,谭青安.桉叶精油对三种天牛的忌避效果[J].南京林业大学学报,1998,22(1):87-90.
    [59]朱鹏飞,赵善欢.4种杀虫剂对马尾松毛虫的作用及毒力[J].浙江林学院学报,1995,12(3):276-280.
    [60]杨丽娟,几种有毒植物提取液对落叶松鞘蛾幼虫的毒杀作用[J].通化师范学院学报,2004,25(2):80-82.
    [61]Mordue (Luntz) A J, Blackwell A.Azadirachtin:An Update [J].Journal of Insect Physiology,1993,39 (11):903-924.
    [62]Rosenthal G A, Janzen D H (Ed.).Herbivores:Their Interaction with Secondary Plant Metabolites [M].NewYork: Academic Press,1979:509-511.
    [63]Lyons D B, Helson B V.Efficacy of ultra-low, volume aerielapphcation of an azadirachtin-based insectieides for control of the pine false webworm.Acantholyda erythrocephala L. in Ontario. Canada [J].International Journal of Pest Management, 2003,49:1-8.
    [64]张兴,马志卿,李广泽等.生物农药评述[C].第二届全国植物农药暨第六届药剂毒理学术讨论会论文集,2001.
    [65]王瑾瑜,任亚萍.博落回属植物化学成分的研究进展[J].安徽农学通报,2009,15(17):41-42,117.
    [66]邓敦,邓跃林.博落回生物碱的研究进展[J].家畜生态学报,2009,30(4):6-8.
    [67]王欣.博落回中生物碱成分的研究Ⅱ[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2005.
    [68]欧阳文,满意.博落回提取物中血根碱和白屈菜红碱的含量测定[J].化学工程师,2008,(10):21-22.
    [69]刘浩,谈满良,单体江,等.博落回生物碱与生物活性及其应用[J].中国野生植物资源,2009,(3):21-23.
    [70]Luo XB, Chen B, Yao SZ. Rapid determination of protopine, allocryptopine, sanguinarine and chelerythrine in fruits of Macleaya cordata by microwave-assisted solvent extraction and HPLC ESI/MS [J].Phytochem Anal,2006,17(6):431-438.
    [71]赵东亮,郁建平,周晓秋,等.博落回生物碱的抑菌作用研究[J].食品科学,2005,26(1):45-47.
    [72]郁建平,赵东亮,孟祥斌,等.博落回生物碱对8种真菌的抑菌作用[J].山地农业生物学报,2006,25(1):89-91.
    [73]袁淘忠,张华生.博落回杀灭蛆蝇效果的观察[J].中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志,1999,17(2):128.
    [74]巩忠福.博落回杀螨活性成分的研究[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2002.5.
    [75]杨军,王静,刘信顺,等.博落回的药效研究[J].中药材,1999,22(02):82-85.
    [76]吴茂旺,朱建华.博落回药理研究与应用概况[J].基层中药杂志,2002,16(3):46-48.
    [77]冯岗,张静,李修伟,等.小果博落回生物碱对几种农业害虫的生物活性[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2008,34(2):187-192.
    [78]周顺玉,尹健,陈利军,等.博落回浸提物对茶毛虫、茶尺蠖的生物活性[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35(5):1408-1415.
    [79]李宁,阎瑞香,关文强.芥末精油对锯谷盗成虫的生物活性[J].中国生物防治学报,2011,27(1):132-135.
    [80]梁广勤,梁帆,吴佳教.沙田柚低温杀虫处理试验研究[J].江西农业大学学报(自然科学版),2002,24(2):223-226.
    [81]丁伟,张永强,陈仕江,等.14种中药植物杀虫活性的初步研究[J].西南农业大学学报,2003,25(5):417-424.
    [82]何雅蔷,鲁玉杰,仲建锋,等.美洲商陆粗提物对赤拟谷盗和玉米象的作用研究[J].河南工业大学学报:自然科学版,2007,28(2):19-22.
    [83]蒋妮,谢剑华,谢保令.商陆等6种药用植物粗提取物扶芳藤稠李巢蛾的杀虫活性[J].中国农业通报,2006,22(10):297-299.
    [84]王欣,周乐,季春燕,等.博落回中生物碱的超声提取和分离[J].西北农业学报,2005,14(5):118-120,124.
    [85]杨洋,韦小英.柚皮黄酮类化合物提取方法和抗氧化性的研究[J].食品与发酵工业,2002,28(6):9-12.
    [86]王国夫,周玉婷,易明花.商陆等3种植物提取物对菜粉蝶的拒食作用[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(15):8272-8273.
    [87]陈旭,王迎儿,王燕燕,等.白前提取物对斜纹夜蛾拒食活性的研究[J].中国生物防治,2009,25(增1):36-39.
    [88]崔正芳.白花曼陀罗提取物杀虫活性研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2009.
    [89]李建飞.植物源杀虫剂概述[J].安徽农学通报,2009,15(1):160-161,182.
    [90]何君,谢令德,贺艳萍.植物源杀虫剂作用方式研究进展[J].粮油仓储科技通讯, 2010,(6):30-32.
    [92]米凤玉,王永模,ELTAYEB E Mansour,等.3种新型复配剂对菜青虫的增效作用及生理生化机制[J].农药,2011,50(9):682-685.
    [93]韩丽娟.研究农药复配剂的意义与要求[J].江苏农业科学,1989,(7):25-26.
    [94]王强.阿维菌素等杀虫剂混配对棉铃虫等害虫增效作用及其生理生化机制研究[D].杭州:浙江大学农业与生物技术学院,2004.8.
    [95]CASIDA J E, QUISTAD G B. Golden Age of Insecticide Research:Past, Present, or Future [J].Annual Review of Entomology, 2001, (43):1-16.
    [96]姚英娟,蔡万伦,杨长举,等.石菖蒲提取物与溴氰菊酯混配的联合毒力[J].华中农业大学学报,2007,26(1):46-48.
    [97]赵善欢,刘秀琼,黄彰欣,等.松突圆蚧的化学防治[J].昆虫学报,1993,36(2):177-184.
    [98]Abbassy M A, Honsy A H, Larnaei A, et al. Insecticidal and Synergistic citrus oils isolated from citrus peels [J]. RAEA, 1980, (68):477-486.
    [99]Mareus C, Liehtenstein EP. Biologically active components of anise:Toxicity and interactions with insecticides insects [J].Journal of Agriculture Food Chemistry,1979, 27(2):1217-1223.
    [100]王小艺,黄炳球.茶皂素对农药的增效机理[J].茶业科学,1998,18(2):125-128.
    [101]朱国念,魏方林.毒死蜱·阿维菌素复配剂对棉铃虫的增效机理[J].浙江大学学报:农药与生命科学版,2002,28(3):319-324.
    [102]何运转,李梅,何凤琴,等.增效剂NIA16388对溴氰菊酯增效机理的研究[J].农药学学报,2000,2(1):19-24.
    [103]FENG Q L, DAVEY K G, PANG A S D, et al. Developmental Expression and Stress Induction of Glutathione S-Transferases in the Spruce Budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana [J]. Journal of Insect Physiology,2001, (47):1-10.
    [104]Kostaropoulos I, Papadopoulos A I, Metaxakis A, et al. Glutathione S-Transferases in the Defence against Pyrethroids in Insects [J]. Insect Biochemical Molecular Biology,2001, (31):313-319.
    [105]Vontas J G, Small G J, Nikou D C, et al. Purification, Molecular Loning and Heterologous Expression of a Glutathione S-Transferases Involved in Insecticide Resistance from the Rice Brown Planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens [J].Biochemical Journal,2002,(362):329-337.
    [106]高永闯,王淑敏,郭联群,等.辛硫磷溴氰菊酯混配对神经细胞钠通道的抑制[J].河北农业大学学报,2002,25(3):65-69.
    [107]夏冰,石泰,梁沛,等.杀虫剂亚致死剂量对小菜蛾羧酸酯酶的影响[J].农药学学报,2002,4(01):23-27.
    [108]吴国星,高熹,刘小文,等.小菜蛾对辛硫磷的抗性选育及其乙酰胆碱酯酶和羧酸酯酶活力的变化[J].江西农业学报,2008,20(8):52-54.
    [109]王肖娟,谢慧琴.杀虫剂增效作用及其作用机理研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35(13):3902-3904,3929.
    [110]熊丽霞.植物粗提物联合毒力及作用方式的研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2006.6.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700