基于商家、消费者和发行机构决策行为的电子货币研究
|
摘要
随着电子商务的发展,传统货币支付结算体系面临着一场变革。在信息技术基础上发展起来的电子货币以其制作成本低、携带方便等优势,在支付领域上正在逐渐取代传统的银行券。随着电子货币安全性的不断提高,人们越来越意识到电子商务需要一种全新的支付手段——电子货币,另外电子货币也开始走向网下,执行传统商务交易和债权债务的货币清偿功能。美联储2004年的一份报告认为,电子货币取代传统的银行券和硬币作为主要的交易和支付工具已经成为一种不可逆转的世界性发展趋势。如同传统货币支付体系,电子货币作为21世纪金融技术和制度创新的主流,不可避免地冲击着政府、企业和消费者的经济决策行为。
目前国内外经济学界对电子货币的研究集中在宏观经济领域,主要包括电子货币对中央银行的货币政策和政府财政政策的影响等,但是从微观经济学视角对电子货币进行研究的文献很少。电子货币的出现不仅冲击着政府的宏观经济政策,而且也影响到经济社会中各类主体的微观行为,包括商家、普通消费者、电子货币的发行机构以及提供结算服务和信息技术支持的中介机构。微观经济个体的决策行为包括竞争行为、支付工具选择行为、使用电子货币的商品交易定价、利用电子货币进行融资等方面。实施电子货币的成败取决于微观个体的接受意愿,微观个体行为在一定程度上决定了电子货币体系的运行特征,宏观政策的实行更要考虑到微观个体的行为。因此,对电子货币环境下的微观个体行为的研究不仅在理论上是一种具有前瞻性的探索性工作,同时也具有重要的现实意义。
电子货币微观主体参与者:电子货币发行机构、商家和大众消费者,三者之间是一种相互制约又相互促进的体系。因此,对于电子货币微观个体行为的研究,就必须对电子货币微观参与主体的行为决策进行系统的研究。本文根据2004年美联储一份电子货币报告中提出的重要的微观个体行为决策来展开,研究所涉及到的微观个体行为决策包括如下内容:
(1)在电子货币环境下,商家以利润最大化为目标,至少要做两项决策:①根据支付工具的成本结构和行业竞争等情况判断是否使用电子货币作为支付工具;②使用电子货币作为支付工具的商品价格如何确定。
(2)普通消费者以个人消费效用最大化和投资收益最大化为目标,在微观层面上也至少面临着两项决策:①消费效用最大化。在消费中是否选择电子货币作为支付工具,如果选择电子货币,在总消费额中所占的比例应该为多大,这就是消费行为中的电子货币选择问题;②投资收益最大化。如何确定最优的持有比例,使持有包括电子货币在内的各种资金帐户的收益最大化,这就是投资行为中的电子货币选择行为。由于在某段时期内消费者的财富是固定的,消费和投资是使用财富的两种行为,因此消费者的两个决策事实上可以归结为一个问题,就是电子货币的选择问题。
(3)发行公司作为电子货币支付体系的主体,它从事电子货币发行不外有两种目的:①给购买发行公司产品的顾客群提供结算便利,以增加销售并扩大市场份额,这个领域主要跟市场营销相关,不是本文所要研究的问题。②通过提供电子货币支付卡,获得手续费收入,以及无偿或低价占用消费者的预收款项余额,即一笔实质性的融资收益。
本文对包括消费者、商家和电子货币发行公司在内的经济主体的决策行为的研究思路、过程及主要研究结论如下:
首先,本文从电子货币支付体系的竞争分析出发,分析在商家完全垄断和商家寡头垄断两种市场结构下的电子货币竞争均衡格局。
电子货币市场事实上是一个双边市场,它由发卡者和持卡消费者构成的发卡市场以及支付网点和商家构成的支付市场所组成的。交换费起到调节两个市场需求的作用,发卡机构可以通过调节交换费的大小平衡需求弹性不同的两个市场的需求量。当交换费大于占优均衡时的交换费水平时,即支付网点对商户收取的服务费大于消费者使用电子货币所带来的平均额外收益时,商家的利润下降,这时商家可能拒绝接受电子货币支付系统。因此,交换费水平的确定对解决商家“拒绝电子货币”有着一定的意义。
当商家市场完全垄断时,满足社会福利最优的持卡人收费水平和满足电子货币发行机构利润最优的持卡人收费水平是相同的,也就是说,电子货币体系给社会带来的总收益等于电子货币体系的总成本。当电子货币的支付网点完全竞争时,均衡状态下,发卡者对持卡消费者收取的使用费用满足下列条件:持卡者的使用费等于电子货币系统成本扣除商家折扣剩下来的部分。因此,对消费者收取的电子货币服务费用仅能够补偿整个电子货币体系的成本。另外,当电子货币体系总成本固定时,商家所承担的成本和消费者所承担的成本有着此消彼长的关系。
当商家市场寡头垄断时,商家之间存在着外部性影响:任何一方的决策都会影响双方的定价和市场份额。如果商家i拒绝接受电子货币支付,商家j接受电子货币支付的成本随之上升,商家j接受电子货币支付的意愿也下降了。这表明商家市场结构与服务费的高低有着直接的关系,商家市场力量强时,商家服务费就低,商家市场力量弱时,商家服务费就高。即:在商家寡头垄断市场结构下,其收取的服务费水平高于在商家完全垄断市场结构情况下收取的服务费水平。若商家之间串谋,则服务费与完全垄断市场结构的情况相同。
其次,本文还从不同支付工具的成本结构出发,在包括人工成本、交易成本、利息成本等既定的各项支付工具成本条件下,分析消费者、商家、发卡机构如何选择电子货币,才能使得消费者、商家及发卡机构的效用或利润最大化。
对商家来说,当在现金与电子货币之间进行选择时,如果电子货币发行机构取消所有的手续费,则现金和电子货币的交易区域的界限为0,即商家会完全偏好采用电子货币付款。当在信用卡与电子货币之间进行选择时,如果大额支付,则主要采用信用卡,如果是小额支付则使用电子货币,如果额度更小则使用现金。
对消费者来说,当在现金与电子货币之间进行选择时,如果安全性风险可以进一步降低,消费者会偏好使用电子货币。当在信用卡与电子货币之间进行选择时,如果信用卡发卡银行取消所有的手续费,则小额度的支付使用电子货币,大额度的支付使用信用卡。对于在网上商店和实体商店两种情况下消费者对电子货币的选择问题,结论为大额交易使用信用卡,小额交易使用电子货币。当买卖双方无法达成一致的交易额,在实体商店可用现金。如果是网上商店的交易,由于买卖双方不能直接面对面,因此消费者只能选择电子货币或信用卡付费,而交易领域的界限,则由网上商店所主导。
对于发卡机构来说,由于信用卡的变动成本大于电子现金的变动成本,因此信用卡的发卡银行不会与电子货币发卡机构在小额交易上竞争。
此外,本文还对多次交易条件下的电子货币支付选择进行了研究,认为使用电子货币的区间上限(使用电子货币的额度范围)跟转换次数成正比,跟它的替代品——借记卡的交易次数相关成本成正比,但跟借记卡的利率水平成反比,跟电子货币交易成本成反比。第三,本文根据电子货币的成本和消费者的效用函数,提出一个使用电子货币的产品交易定价方程,为商家在电子货币环境下,正确制定面向使用电子货币消费者的产品价格提供依据。由于该模型是基于Logit模型,因此在实践中具有可计量性特点,有一定有实际意义。
研究认为电子货币的市场份额和电子货币商品交易价格成反比关系,因此作为一种新推出的支付工具,如果使用电子货币的交易价格定得越高,那么其市场份额就越少。如果消费者对不同支付工具的认知能力越弱,也就是不确定性参数越大,那么价格的需求弹性越低,降低电子货币交易价格所带来的市场份额增加并不显著。而当市场逐渐趋向成熟,消费者对支付工具有很深的认识时,再将价格调低,才可以获取更多的市场份额。因此,当电子货币作为一种新型支付工具投放到一个消费者认知程度不高的市场上,为了吸引消费者使用电子货币,降低使用电子货币支付的商品价格的效果并不显著。因此与其把资金和精力放在降低售价上,不如把资金和精力投入到消费者宣传教育和培养消费者体验上面来,以改善消费者的认知程度。
对于最优交易价格,本文证明了在一个新的支付工具入市的时候,如果消费者对这个支付工具的选择不确定性已经明确,而且之前市场上存在的各种支付工具的效用都已经确定的话,那么使用新支付工具时,存在且只存在一个最优的交易价格。而选择任何别的价格,都只会导致企业所获得的利润减少。
最后,本文利用现金分析方法,对一种典型的储值型电子货币——储值卡的预收款余额进行分析,借以确定发行公司获得的实质性融资的数量大小。
对发行公司的现金流有较大影响的因素,即影响融资数量的因素,包括四个:卡内储值金额的使用速度、收入的增长速度、储值卡金额是否被用尽、发行公司与服务提供机构间的资金清算方式。在分析中,本文考虑到储值卡的六种不同使用模式及这些模式的不同组合,并分别进行讨论分析。六种基本模式的解决方法奠定了进一步对更复杂的电子货币系统进行融资效应分析的基础。
本文还对多服务提供机构模式下的融资数量进行了分析,如果服务提供机构不只一个,而且中介单位与各服务提供机构间的资金清算方式不尽相同,或是资金清算方式虽相同但清算日不尽相同时,则必须将每日储值卡销售额先按照服务提供机构进行分配,然后再分别根据它与各服务提供机构间的资金清算方式与资金清算日计算每期的预收款余额,最后再加总,即可得到多服务提供机构下的中介单位的每期预收款余额。
综上所述,本文在电子货币环境下,分析了消费者、商家和发行公司三个微观经济主体的竞争行为、选择行为、交易定价和融资行为等,为今后电子货币在微观领域的研究作一些开创性或者铺垫性的工作。
Along with the development of electronic commerce, the traditional payment and settlement system is facing a transformation. The electronic currency based on the information technology will gradually substitute for the traditional banknotes in payment systems due to its convenience and low cost in transaction and manufacturing. With the increasing security of electronic currency transaction, the E-commerce needs the kind of brand-new payment tool - electronic currency. Moreover, the electronic currency also started to move towards to the field of traditional business transactions and debt settlements. It was believed by one of Federal Reserve’s reports (2004) that the electronic currencies’substitution of tradition banknotes and the coins as the main payment tool already became one kind of irreversible tendencies of the 21st century. Similar to the traditional payment tools, the electronic currency, as the mainstream of 21st century’s payment system, is inevitably having a huge impact on the behaviors of governments, enterprises and consumers.
At present, the researches of electronic currency both in domestic and foreign countries concentrated mostly on the domain of the macroeconomics, mainly included the electronic currencies’influence to Central Bank's monetary policy and the government financial policy and so on. But the research literatures of electronic currency based on microeconomics were very few. The electronic currency was not only having an impact on government's macroeconomic policies, but also affected the behaviors of each individual in economic society, including the merchants, the consumers, the electronic currency issuing company as well as other agencies providing the settlement services and the supporting information technology. The behaviors of individuals included competition, choice of payment tools, pricing for the user of electronic currency, financing by issuing electronic currencies and so on. The successful implementation of electronic currency system was decided by wish of acceptance of the individuals. The model of individuals’behaviors had a certain impact on the characteristics of electronic currency systems. The macroeconomic policy-making needs to consider the microeconomic individuals’behaviors. Therefore, the researches of microeconomic individuals’behaviors under the electronic currency systems have a theoretical sense as well as certain practical significance.
Because the behaviors of each individual of electronic currency including the merchants, the consumers and the electronic currency issuing company promote as well as restrict each other. Then, to study the behaviors of individual, we must study them as a system. This article involves the following main behavior of microeconomic individuals based on a Federal Reserve’s reports (2004).
Under the electronic currency system, the merchants who take the profit maximization as a goal, at least must make two decisions. (1) Whether did they choose the electronic currency as the payment tool, according to estimates of the cost structure and competition of each payment tool. (2) How to price the products for the users of electronic currency.
The consumers whose goals are maximization of their utilities and the return of investment, at least must make two following decisions: (1) whether did they choose the electronic currency as the payment tool? What is the proportion for the electronic currency if they choose it. This is consumers’behavior of choice for electronic currency. (2) How to determine the optimal holding ratio of electronic currency in order to yield a maximal returns from the portfolios of each money account. This is investors’behavior of choice for electronic currency. Because consumer’s wealth is fixed in a long period, the consumption and the investment are two kinds of uses of the wealth. Therefore two decision problems could be summed up to one problem -- choice decision of electronic currency
The issuing company acted as main role of electronic currency payment system, it is engaged in two goals: (1) Provides the convenience in payment to the customers who will purchase its products in order to increase the sale volume and market share. This is mainly related with the decision of marketing, is not the topic of this article. (2) Through providing the payment card of electronic currency, the issuing company can obtain the income of commission charge, as well as a free or low cost finance from card users’balance of electronic currency accounts.
This article would analyze electronic currency’s influence on microeconomic individuals, which include consumers, merchant and issuing company, as well as their decisions-making behaviors on the basis of microeconomics. The study process and main results as follows:
Firstly, this article made a competitive analysis of the electronic currency payment system in the market condition of both oligopoly and monopoly of merchant. Actually, the market of electronic currency is characterized as Two-sided. it is composed by cards-issuing market and cards-payment market. The interchange Fees balance the two markets. As the cards-issue institutes could balance the demand of the two markets of different demand elasticity through changing the quantity of interchange Fees. When the interchange Fees is higher than Fees of predominant equalization, the profit of merchants decline, and the merchants will not accept the electronic currency payment system. So, the interchange Fees has a significance for merchants to decline the electronic currency.
When the merchant market is monopoly, the charge level with cards-holder is same when the condition satisfied with superior social welfare and with maximization the profits of issuing-organization. In another word, the benefits brought by the electronic currency payment system are equal to the total cost of the system itself. When the payment branches are completely competitive, in the condition of equilibrium, the charge of cards-holders is equal to the cost of electronic currency system subtracting the discounts of merchants. Therefore, service fee charged with the consumer can compensate the cost of the whole electronic currency payment system only. Moreover, when the total cost of electronic currency payment system is fixed, the changing direction of cost that the consumers undertaking is totally contrary to the direction of cost that the merchants undertaking.
When the merchant market is oligopoly, there exists exterior influence between the merchants: the decisions of one party will influence both parties' price-making decisions and the market-share. If merchant i refuse to accept the electronic currency payment system, the cost of merchant j that accepts the electronic currency payment system will increase, and then the willingness of merchant j accepts the electronic currency payment system will decrease. It demonstrates that there is direct relationship between the structure of merchant market and the quantity of charging fees. Namely, when the strength of merchants markets is strong, the service charge will be lower than the strength of merchants markets is weak. If the two merchants collaborated, then service charge when the merchant market is oligopoly is equal to that when the merchant market is monopoly.
Secondly, this article also proposed a model for consumer’s choice behavior of electronic currency based on the different costs of payment tools including the labor cost, the transaction cost and the opportunity cost and so on, for the purpose of maximization the consumer’s utility, the merchants’profits, and cards-issuing company’s profits. For the merchants, when the decisions are between cash and electronic currency, if the cards-issue companies cancel all service charge, then, the bargain boundary between cash and electronic currency is zero, namely, the merchants will totally accept the electronic currency. When the decisions are between electronic currency and credit card, if the payment is high, then the credit card will be accepted; if the payment is a little lower, then the electronic currency will be accepted, and if the payment is still lower, then the cash will be accepted.
For the consumers, when the decisions are between cash and electronic currency, if safety risk could lower further, consumers will chose the electronic currency. When the decisions are between electronic currency and credit card, if credit cards-issue organization cancels service charge all, while the payment is high, then the credit card will be accepted; while the payment is lower, then the electronic currency will be accepted. For the internet-store and entity store, the conclusion of the decisions for consumers are the same, namely, while the payment is high, then the credit card will be accepted; while the payment is lower, then the electronic currency will be accepted. If the seller and buyer can’t reach a consistent bargain sum, the buyer can use the cash in entity store. For the internet-store, consumers can only chose the electronic currency or credit cards, and the bargain boundary between credit cards and electronic currency is dominated by internet-store.
For the cards-issue company, because the variety cost of credit cards is larger than that of electronic currency, then the cards-issue companies don’t compete with electronic currency-issue organizations.
In addition, this paper also studied the choice of electronic currency payment under the condition of multi-bargain. The conclusions are that the upper limits of using electronic currency has direct proportion with the conversion times and bargain times of credit cards, and has inverse direct proportion with the interest of credit cards and bargain cost.
Thirdly, this article proposed a pricing equation for those who paid the product by electronic currency according to the cost structure of electronic currency and consumer's utility function. The pricing equation provided the basis for the issuing company and merchant to set the price for user of electronic currency. Because this equation is based on the Logit Model, it is practical and calculable.
This paper concludes that the market share of electronic currency has inverse relationship with exchange price of products. So, as a new payment tool, if the bargain price is much higher, the market share of electronic currency will be much lower. If the cognition ability of consumers is much lower, price-demand flexibility will be much lower, so, if the merchants lower the price of products, there will not be much bigger market share of electronic currency. When the market inclines to gradually mature, and the cognition ability of consumers is higher than before, there will be bigger market share of electronic currency if the price of products is lowered. For the new payment tool, the result of attracting the consumers through lowering the bargain price is not very good. Therefore, would rather improve the cognition degree of the consumer through educating and promoting than lower the bargain price with quantity of energy and money.
For the most superior bargain price, this paper concludes when a new payment tool joins the payment market, and all the indefinites are clear, and the utilities of other payment tools existed are definite also, then there exists only one most superior bargain price. If the merchants chose another price, the profits of the merchants will decrease. Finally, this article analyzed the balance of the electronic currency accounts by the cash flow analysis method for one kind of typical electronic currency– stored value card, in order to the determine the size of finance for the issuing company.
Factors influence the cash flow of issuing company are using speed of the cash inside of stored value card, and growth speed of income, and whether the money inside the stored value card is run out, and settlement method between issuing company and service providing organizations. This paper considers six different basic patterns and the combinations of the six basic patterns of stored value card. The settlement methods of the six different basic patterns could establish the foundation of analyzing the size of finance of more complicated electronic currency payment system.
This paper also studied the size of finance with multi-service providing organization. If there are more than one service providing organization, and the clearing settlements between agents and service providing organizations are different, or the clearing settlements are same but clearing date is different, the issuing company must allocate the sale according service providing organizations first, then the issuing company could analyze the size of finance according the clearing settlements and clearing date.
In summary, this paper analyzed the decision-making and behaviors of three microeconomic individuals, including the consumer, the merchant and the issuing company on a microeconomic basis, which included subjects of competitive analysis, the behavior of choice, the pricing for E-currency user and the financing analysis. All the conclusions will be useful for the further study of electronic currency in the view of microeconomic.
目前国内外经济学界对电子货币的研究集中在宏观经济领域,主要包括电子货币对中央银行的货币政策和政府财政政策的影响等,但是从微观经济学视角对电子货币进行研究的文献很少。电子货币的出现不仅冲击着政府的宏观经济政策,而且也影响到经济社会中各类主体的微观行为,包括商家、普通消费者、电子货币的发行机构以及提供结算服务和信息技术支持的中介机构。微观经济个体的决策行为包括竞争行为、支付工具选择行为、使用电子货币的商品交易定价、利用电子货币进行融资等方面。实施电子货币的成败取决于微观个体的接受意愿,微观个体行为在一定程度上决定了电子货币体系的运行特征,宏观政策的实行更要考虑到微观个体的行为。因此,对电子货币环境下的微观个体行为的研究不仅在理论上是一种具有前瞻性的探索性工作,同时也具有重要的现实意义。
电子货币微观主体参与者:电子货币发行机构、商家和大众消费者,三者之间是一种相互制约又相互促进的体系。因此,对于电子货币微观个体行为的研究,就必须对电子货币微观参与主体的行为决策进行系统的研究。本文根据2004年美联储一份电子货币报告中提出的重要的微观个体行为决策来展开,研究所涉及到的微观个体行为决策包括如下内容:
(1)在电子货币环境下,商家以利润最大化为目标,至少要做两项决策:①根据支付工具的成本结构和行业竞争等情况判断是否使用电子货币作为支付工具;②使用电子货币作为支付工具的商品价格如何确定。
(2)普通消费者以个人消费效用最大化和投资收益最大化为目标,在微观层面上也至少面临着两项决策:①消费效用最大化。在消费中是否选择电子货币作为支付工具,如果选择电子货币,在总消费额中所占的比例应该为多大,这就是消费行为中的电子货币选择问题;②投资收益最大化。如何确定最优的持有比例,使持有包括电子货币在内的各种资金帐户的收益最大化,这就是投资行为中的电子货币选择行为。由于在某段时期内消费者的财富是固定的,消费和投资是使用财富的两种行为,因此消费者的两个决策事实上可以归结为一个问题,就是电子货币的选择问题。
(3)发行公司作为电子货币支付体系的主体,它从事电子货币发行不外有两种目的:①给购买发行公司产品的顾客群提供结算便利,以增加销售并扩大市场份额,这个领域主要跟市场营销相关,不是本文所要研究的问题。②通过提供电子货币支付卡,获得手续费收入,以及无偿或低价占用消费者的预收款项余额,即一笔实质性的融资收益。
本文对包括消费者、商家和电子货币发行公司在内的经济主体的决策行为的研究思路、过程及主要研究结论如下:
首先,本文从电子货币支付体系的竞争分析出发,分析在商家完全垄断和商家寡头垄断两种市场结构下的电子货币竞争均衡格局。
电子货币市场事实上是一个双边市场,它由发卡者和持卡消费者构成的发卡市场以及支付网点和商家构成的支付市场所组成的。交换费起到调节两个市场需求的作用,发卡机构可以通过调节交换费的大小平衡需求弹性不同的两个市场的需求量。当交换费大于占优均衡时的交换费水平时,即支付网点对商户收取的服务费大于消费者使用电子货币所带来的平均额外收益时,商家的利润下降,这时商家可能拒绝接受电子货币支付系统。因此,交换费水平的确定对解决商家“拒绝电子货币”有着一定的意义。
当商家市场完全垄断时,满足社会福利最优的持卡人收费水平和满足电子货币发行机构利润最优的持卡人收费水平是相同的,也就是说,电子货币体系给社会带来的总收益等于电子货币体系的总成本。当电子货币的支付网点完全竞争时,均衡状态下,发卡者对持卡消费者收取的使用费用满足下列条件:持卡者的使用费等于电子货币系统成本扣除商家折扣剩下来的部分。因此,对消费者收取的电子货币服务费用仅能够补偿整个电子货币体系的成本。另外,当电子货币体系总成本固定时,商家所承担的成本和消费者所承担的成本有着此消彼长的关系。
当商家市场寡头垄断时,商家之间存在着外部性影响:任何一方的决策都会影响双方的定价和市场份额。如果商家i拒绝接受电子货币支付,商家j接受电子货币支付的成本随之上升,商家j接受电子货币支付的意愿也下降了。这表明商家市场结构与服务费的高低有着直接的关系,商家市场力量强时,商家服务费就低,商家市场力量弱时,商家服务费就高。即:在商家寡头垄断市场结构下,其收取的服务费水平高于在商家完全垄断市场结构情况下收取的服务费水平。若商家之间串谋,则服务费与完全垄断市场结构的情况相同。
其次,本文还从不同支付工具的成本结构出发,在包括人工成本、交易成本、利息成本等既定的各项支付工具成本条件下,分析消费者、商家、发卡机构如何选择电子货币,才能使得消费者、商家及发卡机构的效用或利润最大化。
对商家来说,当在现金与电子货币之间进行选择时,如果电子货币发行机构取消所有的手续费,则现金和电子货币的交易区域的界限为0,即商家会完全偏好采用电子货币付款。当在信用卡与电子货币之间进行选择时,如果大额支付,则主要采用信用卡,如果是小额支付则使用电子货币,如果额度更小则使用现金。
对消费者来说,当在现金与电子货币之间进行选择时,如果安全性风险可以进一步降低,消费者会偏好使用电子货币。当在信用卡与电子货币之间进行选择时,如果信用卡发卡银行取消所有的手续费,则小额度的支付使用电子货币,大额度的支付使用信用卡。对于在网上商店和实体商店两种情况下消费者对电子货币的选择问题,结论为大额交易使用信用卡,小额交易使用电子货币。当买卖双方无法达成一致的交易额,在实体商店可用现金。如果是网上商店的交易,由于买卖双方不能直接面对面,因此消费者只能选择电子货币或信用卡付费,而交易领域的界限,则由网上商店所主导。
对于发卡机构来说,由于信用卡的变动成本大于电子现金的变动成本,因此信用卡的发卡银行不会与电子货币发卡机构在小额交易上竞争。
此外,本文还对多次交易条件下的电子货币支付选择进行了研究,认为使用电子货币的区间上限(使用电子货币的额度范围)跟转换次数成正比,跟它的替代品——借记卡的交易次数相关成本成正比,但跟借记卡的利率水平成反比,跟电子货币交易成本成反比。第三,本文根据电子货币的成本和消费者的效用函数,提出一个使用电子货币的产品交易定价方程,为商家在电子货币环境下,正确制定面向使用电子货币消费者的产品价格提供依据。由于该模型是基于Logit模型,因此在实践中具有可计量性特点,有一定有实际意义。
研究认为电子货币的市场份额和电子货币商品交易价格成反比关系,因此作为一种新推出的支付工具,如果使用电子货币的交易价格定得越高,那么其市场份额就越少。如果消费者对不同支付工具的认知能力越弱,也就是不确定性参数越大,那么价格的需求弹性越低,降低电子货币交易价格所带来的市场份额增加并不显著。而当市场逐渐趋向成熟,消费者对支付工具有很深的认识时,再将价格调低,才可以获取更多的市场份额。因此,当电子货币作为一种新型支付工具投放到一个消费者认知程度不高的市场上,为了吸引消费者使用电子货币,降低使用电子货币支付的商品价格的效果并不显著。因此与其把资金和精力放在降低售价上,不如把资金和精力投入到消费者宣传教育和培养消费者体验上面来,以改善消费者的认知程度。
对于最优交易价格,本文证明了在一个新的支付工具入市的时候,如果消费者对这个支付工具的选择不确定性已经明确,而且之前市场上存在的各种支付工具的效用都已经确定的话,那么使用新支付工具时,存在且只存在一个最优的交易价格。而选择任何别的价格,都只会导致企业所获得的利润减少。
最后,本文利用现金分析方法,对一种典型的储值型电子货币——储值卡的预收款余额进行分析,借以确定发行公司获得的实质性融资的数量大小。
对发行公司的现金流有较大影响的因素,即影响融资数量的因素,包括四个:卡内储值金额的使用速度、收入的增长速度、储值卡金额是否被用尽、发行公司与服务提供机构间的资金清算方式。在分析中,本文考虑到储值卡的六种不同使用模式及这些模式的不同组合,并分别进行讨论分析。六种基本模式的解决方法奠定了进一步对更复杂的电子货币系统进行融资效应分析的基础。
本文还对多服务提供机构模式下的融资数量进行了分析,如果服务提供机构不只一个,而且中介单位与各服务提供机构间的资金清算方式不尽相同,或是资金清算方式虽相同但清算日不尽相同时,则必须将每日储值卡销售额先按照服务提供机构进行分配,然后再分别根据它与各服务提供机构间的资金清算方式与资金清算日计算每期的预收款余额,最后再加总,即可得到多服务提供机构下的中介单位的每期预收款余额。
综上所述,本文在电子货币环境下,分析了消费者、商家和发行公司三个微观经济主体的竞争行为、选择行为、交易定价和融资行为等,为今后电子货币在微观领域的研究作一些开创性或者铺垫性的工作。
Along with the development of electronic commerce, the traditional payment and settlement system is facing a transformation. The electronic currency based on the information technology will gradually substitute for the traditional banknotes in payment systems due to its convenience and low cost in transaction and manufacturing. With the increasing security of electronic currency transaction, the E-commerce needs the kind of brand-new payment tool - electronic currency. Moreover, the electronic currency also started to move towards to the field of traditional business transactions and debt settlements. It was believed by one of Federal Reserve’s reports (2004) that the electronic currencies’substitution of tradition banknotes and the coins as the main payment tool already became one kind of irreversible tendencies of the 21st century. Similar to the traditional payment tools, the electronic currency, as the mainstream of 21st century’s payment system, is inevitably having a huge impact on the behaviors of governments, enterprises and consumers.
At present, the researches of electronic currency both in domestic and foreign countries concentrated mostly on the domain of the macroeconomics, mainly included the electronic currencies’influence to Central Bank's monetary policy and the government financial policy and so on. But the research literatures of electronic currency based on microeconomics were very few. The electronic currency was not only having an impact on government's macroeconomic policies, but also affected the behaviors of each individual in economic society, including the merchants, the consumers, the electronic currency issuing company as well as other agencies providing the settlement services and the supporting information technology. The behaviors of individuals included competition, choice of payment tools, pricing for the user of electronic currency, financing by issuing electronic currencies and so on. The successful implementation of electronic currency system was decided by wish of acceptance of the individuals. The model of individuals’behaviors had a certain impact on the characteristics of electronic currency systems. The macroeconomic policy-making needs to consider the microeconomic individuals’behaviors. Therefore, the researches of microeconomic individuals’behaviors under the electronic currency systems have a theoretical sense as well as certain practical significance.
Because the behaviors of each individual of electronic currency including the merchants, the consumers and the electronic currency issuing company promote as well as restrict each other. Then, to study the behaviors of individual, we must study them as a system. This article involves the following main behavior of microeconomic individuals based on a Federal Reserve’s reports (2004).
Under the electronic currency system, the merchants who take the profit maximization as a goal, at least must make two decisions. (1) Whether did they choose the electronic currency as the payment tool, according to estimates of the cost structure and competition of each payment tool. (2) How to price the products for the users of electronic currency.
The consumers whose goals are maximization of their utilities and the return of investment, at least must make two following decisions: (1) whether did they choose the electronic currency as the payment tool? What is the proportion for the electronic currency if they choose it. This is consumers’behavior of choice for electronic currency. (2) How to determine the optimal holding ratio of electronic currency in order to yield a maximal returns from the portfolios of each money account. This is investors’behavior of choice for electronic currency. Because consumer’s wealth is fixed in a long period, the consumption and the investment are two kinds of uses of the wealth. Therefore two decision problems could be summed up to one problem -- choice decision of electronic currency
The issuing company acted as main role of electronic currency payment system, it is engaged in two goals: (1) Provides the convenience in payment to the customers who will purchase its products in order to increase the sale volume and market share. This is mainly related with the decision of marketing, is not the topic of this article. (2) Through providing the payment card of electronic currency, the issuing company can obtain the income of commission charge, as well as a free or low cost finance from card users’balance of electronic currency accounts.
This article would analyze electronic currency’s influence on microeconomic individuals, which include consumers, merchant and issuing company, as well as their decisions-making behaviors on the basis of microeconomics. The study process and main results as follows:
Firstly, this article made a competitive analysis of the electronic currency payment system in the market condition of both oligopoly and monopoly of merchant. Actually, the market of electronic currency is characterized as Two-sided. it is composed by cards-issuing market and cards-payment market. The interchange Fees balance the two markets. As the cards-issue institutes could balance the demand of the two markets of different demand elasticity through changing the quantity of interchange Fees. When the interchange Fees is higher than Fees of predominant equalization, the profit of merchants decline, and the merchants will not accept the electronic currency payment system. So, the interchange Fees has a significance for merchants to decline the electronic currency.
When the merchant market is monopoly, the charge level with cards-holder is same when the condition satisfied with superior social welfare and with maximization the profits of issuing-organization. In another word, the benefits brought by the electronic currency payment system are equal to the total cost of the system itself. When the payment branches are completely competitive, in the condition of equilibrium, the charge of cards-holders is equal to the cost of electronic currency system subtracting the discounts of merchants. Therefore, service fee charged with the consumer can compensate the cost of the whole electronic currency payment system only. Moreover, when the total cost of electronic currency payment system is fixed, the changing direction of cost that the consumers undertaking is totally contrary to the direction of cost that the merchants undertaking.
When the merchant market is oligopoly, there exists exterior influence between the merchants: the decisions of one party will influence both parties' price-making decisions and the market-share. If merchant i refuse to accept the electronic currency payment system, the cost of merchant j that accepts the electronic currency payment system will increase, and then the willingness of merchant j accepts the electronic currency payment system will decrease. It demonstrates that there is direct relationship between the structure of merchant market and the quantity of charging fees. Namely, when the strength of merchants markets is strong, the service charge will be lower than the strength of merchants markets is weak. If the two merchants collaborated, then service charge when the merchant market is oligopoly is equal to that when the merchant market is monopoly.
Secondly, this article also proposed a model for consumer’s choice behavior of electronic currency based on the different costs of payment tools including the labor cost, the transaction cost and the opportunity cost and so on, for the purpose of maximization the consumer’s utility, the merchants’profits, and cards-issuing company’s profits. For the merchants, when the decisions are between cash and electronic currency, if the cards-issue companies cancel all service charge, then, the bargain boundary between cash and electronic currency is zero, namely, the merchants will totally accept the electronic currency. When the decisions are between electronic currency and credit card, if the payment is high, then the credit card will be accepted; if the payment is a little lower, then the electronic currency will be accepted, and if the payment is still lower, then the cash will be accepted.
For the consumers, when the decisions are between cash and electronic currency, if safety risk could lower further, consumers will chose the electronic currency. When the decisions are between electronic currency and credit card, if credit cards-issue organization cancels service charge all, while the payment is high, then the credit card will be accepted; while the payment is lower, then the electronic currency will be accepted. For the internet-store and entity store, the conclusion of the decisions for consumers are the same, namely, while the payment is high, then the credit card will be accepted; while the payment is lower, then the electronic currency will be accepted. If the seller and buyer can’t reach a consistent bargain sum, the buyer can use the cash in entity store. For the internet-store, consumers can only chose the electronic currency or credit cards, and the bargain boundary between credit cards and electronic currency is dominated by internet-store.
For the cards-issue company, because the variety cost of credit cards is larger than that of electronic currency, then the cards-issue companies don’t compete with electronic currency-issue organizations.
In addition, this paper also studied the choice of electronic currency payment under the condition of multi-bargain. The conclusions are that the upper limits of using electronic currency has direct proportion with the conversion times and bargain times of credit cards, and has inverse direct proportion with the interest of credit cards and bargain cost.
Thirdly, this article proposed a pricing equation for those who paid the product by electronic currency according to the cost structure of electronic currency and consumer's utility function. The pricing equation provided the basis for the issuing company and merchant to set the price for user of electronic currency. Because this equation is based on the Logit Model, it is practical and calculable.
This paper concludes that the market share of electronic currency has inverse relationship with exchange price of products. So, as a new payment tool, if the bargain price is much higher, the market share of electronic currency will be much lower. If the cognition ability of consumers is much lower, price-demand flexibility will be much lower, so, if the merchants lower the price of products, there will not be much bigger market share of electronic currency. When the market inclines to gradually mature, and the cognition ability of consumers is higher than before, there will be bigger market share of electronic currency if the price of products is lowered. For the new payment tool, the result of attracting the consumers through lowering the bargain price is not very good. Therefore, would rather improve the cognition degree of the consumer through educating and promoting than lower the bargain price with quantity of energy and money.
For the most superior bargain price, this paper concludes when a new payment tool joins the payment market, and all the indefinites are clear, and the utilities of other payment tools existed are definite also, then there exists only one most superior bargain price. If the merchants chose another price, the profits of the merchants will decrease. Finally, this article analyzed the balance of the electronic currency accounts by the cash flow analysis method for one kind of typical electronic currency– stored value card, in order to the determine the size of finance for the issuing company.
Factors influence the cash flow of issuing company are using speed of the cash inside of stored value card, and growth speed of income, and whether the money inside the stored value card is run out, and settlement method between issuing company and service providing organizations. This paper considers six different basic patterns and the combinations of the six basic patterns of stored value card. The settlement methods of the six different basic patterns could establish the foundation of analyzing the size of finance of more complicated electronic currency payment system.
This paper also studied the size of finance with multi-service providing organization. If there are more than one service providing organization, and the clearing settlements between agents and service providing organizations are different, or the clearing settlements are same but clearing date is different, the issuing company must allocate the sale according service providing organizations first, then the issuing company could analyze the size of finance according the clearing settlements and clearing date.
In summary, this paper analyzed the decision-making and behaviors of three microeconomic individuals, including the consumer, the merchant and the issuing company on a microeconomic basis, which included subjects of competitive analysis, the behavior of choice, the pricing for E-currency user and the financing analysis. All the conclusions will be useful for the further study of electronic currency in the view of microeconomic.
引文
1 刘军 电子支付,因何而火? [J].中国计算机用户周刊 2005, 5
2 蔡晓红.电子货币今日谈[J]. 数字财富 2003, 11
3 王春雷,电子货币的发展及其对中央银行货币政策的影响[D],华中科技大学硕士论文 2005
4 本刊记者,香港八达通 奇迹变身电子货币,金卡工程 2005/6
5 Mondex International, E-money set to reap millions, 2005
6 FRIEDRICH A V H.Dentionalization of money:an analysis of the theory and practice of concurrent currencies EM2.London:Hobart paper special Transatlantic Arts,1977.
7 NORTH D.Transaction costs through time[M].Washington,D.C.:Washington University Press,1994.
8 GRAHAM G.Rise of internet threatens traditiona1 banks’market[N].Financia1 Times,1996-08-12(3).
9 贾德奎《电子货币及其对货币政策的影响分析》,金融教学与研究,2002 年第 6 期(总第 86 期)。
10 McAndrew, James J.,Banking and Payment System Stability in an Electronic Money World, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia,Working Paper, (1997)5
11 Aleksander.Berentsen..Monetary Policy Implications of Digital Money. International Review of Social Science. 1998 Vol.51
12 Aleksander.Berentsen.2001.E-money in Transitional Economies[J]. Comparative Economic Studies.Vol.4
13 Humphrey, David B, Lawrence B. Pulley, and Jukka M. Vesala. Cash, Paper, and Electronic Payments: A Cross Country Analysis, [J] Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 1996, Vol. 28, pp. 914-39.
14 Aleksander.Berentsen.2001.E-money in Transitional Economies.Comparative Economic Studies.Vol.43
15 Bullard.J.&Smith.B.2001.Privte and Public Circulating Liabilities. Journal of Economic Theory 99,59-116
16 Aleksander.Berentsen.1998.Monetary Policy Implications of Digital Money. International Review of Social Science. Vol.51
17 Bruce.D.Smith.&Warren.E.Webber.1999.Private Money Creation and the Suffolk Banking System. Journal of Money,Credit,and Banking,Vol.31,No.3
18 Friedman.M.1999.The Future of Monetary Policy: The Central Bank as an Army with Signal Corps? International Finance
19 Helleiner.E. Electronic Money: A Challenge to the Sovereign State?[J] Journal of International Affairs,1998. no.2
20 Cohen.B.J. Electronic money: new day or false down? [J],Review of International Political Economy. Summer 2001:197-225
21 万星,网络虚拟货币比较研究[J],哈尔滨铁道科技 2005/4
22 Cohen.B.J. Electronic money: new day or false down? [J],Review of International Political Economy. Summer 2001:197-225
23 Aleksander.Berentsen.2001.E-money in Transitional Economies[J].Comparative Economic Studies.Vol.43
24 胡进.论电子货币的货币主权效应[J].理论与实践.2002/2
25王军, 论电子货币发展对货币政策的影响及政策建议. 国际金融研究.2000.8: 50-55
26 赵家敏.论电子货币对货币政策的影响.国际金融研究.2000/11
27刘俊, 丁家华, 吴云松. 金融技术发展与货币政策中介目标的选择. 2002.1:20-22
28陈雨露, 边卫红. 电子货币发展与中央银行面临的风险分析. 国际金融研究.2002.1: 53-58
29李翀. 虚拟货币的发展与货币理论和政策的重构. 世界经济. 2003.8: 75-79
30 骆品亮, 商户联盟与 Hotelling 竞争下支付卡交换费的比较分析[J],复旦大学学报 2005/6
31 William J. Baumol. The Transactions Demand for Cash: An Inventory Theoretic Approach. [J] Quart. Jour. Econ.,1952. 66:545-556
32 Tobin, J., The Interest Elasticity of Transactions Demand for Cash[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics,Vol.38, 1956
33 格利和肖, 金融理论中的货币[M]. 上海:上海三联出版社 1994
34 Folkertsma, C. K.;Hebbink, G. E. (1998):Cash Management and the Choice of Payment Media: A critical Survey of the Theory. In: DeNederlandsche Bank (Ed.):Research Memorandum WO&E Nr. 532.
35 Whitesell, W.:Deposit Banks and the Market for Payment Media. [J] Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 1992 Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 483-498
36 Pippow, Ingo., and Detlef Schoder., The Demand for Stored Value Payment Instruments[W], Working Paper, 2001.
37 Kahn, Charles M., and William Roberds., Demandable Debts as a Means of Payment: Banknotes versus Checks [J]. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, Vol.31, No.3(August 1999, Part 2)
38 Shy, Oz, and Juha Tarkka,The Market for Electronic Cash Card[J]. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol.34, No.2, 2002.
39 Santomero John J. Seater. Alternative Monies and the Demand for Media of Exchange [J] Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 1996 Vol. 28, pp. 942-960
40 Bruce.D.Smith.&Warren.E.Webber.1999.Private Money Creation and the Suffolk Banking System. Journal of Money,Credit,and Banking,Vol.31,No.3
41 Aleksander.Berentsen.1998.Monetary Policy Implications of Digital Money. International Review of Social Science. Vol.51
1 ECB. Euro-denominated electronic money in circulation in the euro area [R」.ECB 2004
2 MasterCard. Introduces One SMART PayPass [EB/oL] http:// www.no-cash.ro /cartes%202004
3 Katz. M, C. Shapiro, Network Externalities, Competition and Compatibility, American Economic Review, June 1985.
4 张诚、董佺《跨国银行的客户管理及对我国银行的启示》，上?鹑冢?006 年第 5 期。
5 Dennis W. Carlton, Alan S. Frankel, “Antitrust and Payment Technologies”, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, Vol. 77, No. 6, December, 1995.
6 James J. McAndrews, Retail Pricing of ATM Network Services, Working Paper No. 96-12, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia,April, 1996.
7 胡秋灵、李淑彪、张成虎《电子货币试点结果的启示与经济学分析》,上海金融,2003 年第 6 期。
8 胡强《电子货币发行盈利模式探讨》,金卡工程,2004 年 8 卷 1 期。
9 胡秋灵、李淑彪、张成虎《电子货币试点结果的启示与经济学分析》,上海金融,2003 年第 6 期。
10 胡强《电子货币发行盈利模式探讨》,金卡工程,2004 年 8 卷 1 期。
11 肖文《美国新型个人支付方式的现状及前景分析》,国际金融研究,2001 年 5 期。
12 Armstrong, M. Competition in Two-Sided Markets[J], mimeo, (2002).Nuffield College, University of Oxford
13 吴泗宗、蒋海华,对网络外部性的经济学分析[J].同济大学学报(社会科学版),2002, 13 (6) : 70-77
14 Rochet, J-C. and J. Tirole. Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets[J], Journal of the European Economic Association, (2003).1(4)
15 Federal Reserve e System. The 2004 Federal Reserve Payments Study [R] Federal Reserve System .2004
16 Wright, J.. Optimal card payment systems[J], European Economic Review, forthcoming. (2003a)
17 骆品亮,商户联盟与 Hotelling 竞争下支付卡交换费的比较分析[J],复旦大学学报 2005,6
18 Baxter,W.F. Bank interchange of transactional paper: legal perspectives[J], Journal of Law andEconomics (1983).26: 541-588
19 Rochet, J-C. and J. Tirole. Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets[J], Journal of the European Economic Association, (2003).1(4).
20 Evans, D., Schmalensee, R.. The Economics of the Payment Card Industry[M],(1993)Cambridge, MA:National Economic Research Associates, Inc
21 Rochet, J-C. and J. Tirole. (2002).Two-Sided Markets: An Overview. RAND Journal of Economics,Vol. 33: 549-570
22 Rochet, J-C. and J. Tirole.. Cooperation Among Competitors: Some Economics of Payment Card Associations[J]. RAND Journal of Economics, (2002)Vol. 33: 549-570
23 Schwartz, M. and D.R. Vincent. Same price, cash or card: vertical control by payments networks, Georgetown University Working Paper, (2002). 9
24 Katz, M. Reform of Credit Card Schemes in Australia [R], Sydney, Australia: Reserve Bank of Australia (2001).
25 Rochet, J-C. and J. Tirole.. Cooperation Among Competitors: Some Economics of Payment Card Associations[J]. RAND Journal of Economics, (2002)Vol. 33: 549-570
26 Van Hove, L., Electronic Purses: Which Way to Go?[J]. First Monday, Vol.5, No. 7, 2000
27 Edward L. Whalen. An Extension of The Baumol-Tobin Approach to The Transactions Demand of Cash. [J] Journal of Finance, Mar, 1968. Vol. 23, No. 1. pp.113-134
28 Whitesell, W.:Deposit Banks and the Market for Payment Media. [J] Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 1992 Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 483-498
29 Whitesell, William. The Demand for Currency versus Debitable Accounts: A Note. J]Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 1989. 21, 246-257.
30 Duca, John V.,and William C. Whitesell. Credit Cards and Money Demand: A Cross-sectional Study, [J] Journal of Money, Credit,and Banking, May 1995, Vol. 27, 1995, pp. 604-623
31 Santomero John J. Seater. Alternative Monies and the Demand for Media of Exchange [J] Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 1996 Vol. 28, pp. 942-960
32 Santomero John J. Seater. Alternative Monies and the Demand for Media of Exchange [J] Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 1996 Vol. 28, pp. 942-960
33 Folkertsma, C. K.;Hebbink, G. E. (1998):Cash Management and the Choice of Payment Media: A critical Survey of the Theory. In: DeNederlandsche Bank (Ed.):Research Memorandum WO&E Nr. 532.
34 Kahn, Charles M., and William Roberds., Demandable Debts as a Means of Payment: Banknotes versus Checks [J]. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, Vol.31, No.3(August 1999, Part 2)
35 Pippow, Ingo., and Detlef Schoder., The Demand for Stored Value Payment Instruments[W], Working Paper, 2001.
36 Shy, Oz, and Juha Tarkka, The Market for Electronic Cash Card[J]. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol.34, No.2, 2002.
37 ECB. Euro-denominated electronic money in circulation in the euro area [R].ECB 2004
38 BIS. Survey of developments in electronic money and internet and mobile payments [R].BIS. 2004
39 Whitesell, W.:Deposit Banks and the Market for Payment Media. [J] Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 1992 Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 483-498.
40 Santomero John J. Seater. Alternative Monies and the Demand for Media of Exchange [J] Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 1996 Vol. 28, pp. 942-960
41 姜树元, 姜青舫. 基于现代效用的产品功能评估模型与方法[J ]. 系统工程, 2001, 16 (6)
42 McFedden, D. 1974. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In Frontiers in Econometrics, ed. P. Zarembka. New York: Academic Press.
43 Guadagni, P. M. and J. D. C. Little, “A Logit Model of Brand Choice Calibrated on Scanner Data”, Marketing Science, Vol 2, No 3., Summer 1983
44 Muellbauer, J. 1981. Testing neoclassical models of the demand for durebles. In Essays in the Theory and Measurement of Consumer Beboiour, ed. A.S. Deaton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45 唐应茂《电子货币的产生及其法律问题》,《科技与法律》,1998 年第 4 期。
46 胡强《电子货币发行盈利模式探讨》,金卡工程,2004 年 8 卷 1 期。
1 Matonis, Jon. Digital Cash & Monetary Freedom[R]. Proceedings of INET'95. June 1995: 27-30
2 唐应茂《电子货币的产生及其法律问题》,《科技与法律》,1998 年第 4 期。
3 宋伟 滕华《电子货币的法律问题及对策》,《科技法制》,2004 年第 1 期。
4 张庆麟《电子货币的法律性质初探》,《武汉大学学报》(社会科学版),2001 年 9 月。
5 张红霞 侯向磊《电子货币的界定及其应用中亟待解决的法律问题》,《河北法学》,2004 年 7 月。
6 樊玉红.对电子货币含义的再认识.哈尔滨学院学报. 2002(6)Vol.23
7 Pippow, Ingo., and Detlef Schoder., The Demand for Stored Value Payment Instruments[W], Working Paper, 2001
8辛云勇 陈德君 电子银行非完全革命 [J]. 《互联网周刊》2005, 4
9董晓常 电子银行— 安全为砥[J].《互联网周刊》2005, 4
10 Geoffrey R. Gerdes, Jack K. Walton II. The Use of Checks and Other Noncash Payment Instruments in the United States[J]Federal Reserve Bulletin, August 2002 360-374
11 孔静苹等,电子货币的分类与应用[J],现代计算机 2000/12
12 Prinz, A., Money in the Real and the Virtual World:E-Money, C-Money and the Demand for CB-Money[J];Netnomics 1(1),1999.
13 周海刚,电子货币、电子货币需求和影响分析及网络银行的监管[D],对外经济贸易大学学位论文, 2005
14 蔡满香,电子现金理论和关键技术研究[D] 北京邮电大学博士学位论文 2005
15 蔡满香,电子现金理论和关键技术研究[D] 北京邮电大学博士学位论文 2005
16 Stabla, Witold (2001). Electronic payment systems. Accessed at http:// strony.wp.pl /wp/ws19/
17 MasterCard. Introduces One SMART PayPass [EB/oL] http:// www.no-cash.ro /cartes%202004
18 何光辉,电子货币系统的风险及其控制[J],金融研究 2000/11
19 F.X. Browne, David Cronin. Payments technologies[J], financial innovation, and laissez-faire banking. Spring/Summer 1995. Vol.15,Iss.1: 101-112
20 方霞, 网络银行和电子货币风险的解决之道[J] 科技进步与对策 2002/9
21 尹龙.货币性质的再认识与货币供给理论的发展.金融研究.2002/1
22 李琪等.电子货币对货币供求及货币政策工具的影响.经济师.2002/1
23 尹龙.电子货币对中央银行的影响.金融研究.2000/4
1 F.X. Browne, David Cronin. Payments technologies[J], financial innovation, and laissez-faire banking. Spring/Summer 1995. Vol.15,Iss.1: 101-112
2 Katz, M. Reform of Credit Card Schemes in Australia [R], Sydney, Australia: Reserve Bank of Australia (2001)
3 Schwartz, M. and D.R. Vincent. Same price, cash or card: vertical control by payments networks, Georgetown University Working Paper, (2002). 9
4 Rochet, J-C. and J. Tirole.. Cooperation Among Competitors: Some Economics of Payment Card Associations[J]. RAND Journal of Economics, (2002)Vol. 33: 549-570
5 Rochet, J-C. and J. Tirole. Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets[J], Journal of the European Economic Association, (2003).1(4)
1 张维华,骆品亮.网络双向接入定价的效率分析[J].系统工程理论方法应用, 2002, 11(4):319-323
2 Rochet, J-C. and J. Tirole. (2002).Two-Sided Markets: An Overview. RAND Journal of Economics,Vol. 33: 549-570
3 Chakravorti, S Theory of Credit Card Networks: A Survey of the Literature[J]. Review of Network Economics. .(2003).2(2):50-68
4 Sujit Chakravorti and Timothy McHugh. Why do we use so many checks?[J] Economic Perspectives Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.3Q/2002
5 张维迎. 博弈论与信息经济学[M].上海:上海三联书店,1996
1 Prinz, A., Money in the Real and the Virtual World:E-Money, C-Money and the Demand for CB-Money[J];Netnomics 1(1),1999
2 OZ Shy Julla Tarkka. The Market for Electronic Cash Cards [J] Journal of of Money, Credit, and Banking. May 2002 Vol. 34. No. 2
3 Federal Reserve e System. The 2004 Federal Reserve Payments Study [R] Federal Reserve System .2004
1 Wilko Bolt, Retail payments in the Netherlands: Some facts and some theory ,Research Memorandum WO no. 722,DeNederlandsche Bank January2003,
2 Dorn, James A.,The Futureof Money in the Information Age[R].,The Cato Institute ,Washington, D.C.. (1997)
3 Weiner, Stuart E, Electronic Payments in the U.S. Economy: An Overview[R], Economic Review, Fourth Quarter, (1999) The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
1 Robert B. Dial Bicriterion Traffic Assignment: Basic Theory and Elementary Algorithms Transportation Science Vol. 30 N0. 2 May,1996
2 Kuhfeld W F , Multinomial logit . Discrete choice modeling: An introduction to designing choice experiments , and collecting[A] . Processing and Analyzing Choice Data with SAS. SAS Corporation , January ,2001
3 Cragg, J.G. 1971. Some statistical models for limited dependent variables with applications to the demand for durable goods, Econometrics, vol 39
4 J. Maiti, A. Bhattacherjee , U. C. Gupta and S. C. RAY Indian Institute of Technology,Kharagpur, India: An application of Logit Model to Injury Experience
5 Weissenberger, E. 1984. An intertemporal system of dynamic consumer demand functions. Centre for Labour Economics, London School of Economics, Discussion Paper No. 186
6 Louviere, J. J., D. A. Hensher and J. D. Swait, Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application, Cambridge University Press, 2000
7 Dhrymes. P. 1984. Limited dependent variables. In Z. Griliches and M. Intriligator, eds., Handbook of Econometrics, vol,2, Amsterdam: North Holland.
8 Morhe Ben.Akiva and Steven R.Lerman(1984), Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, the MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England.
9 Train, K., Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, Cambridge University Press, 2002
10 Ben-Akiva, M. and S. R.Lerman, Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, 1997, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
11 Zavoina, R.. and W. McElvey. 1975. A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, Summer
12 杨桂元,唐小我 预测模型中参数估计的最优化方法 系统工程理论与实践 2002 ,22(8)
13 Sugeno, M. and S. H. Kwon, A Clusterwise Regression-type Model for Subjective Evaluation, Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Systems, Vol.7, No.2, 1995
14 McFadden, D. 1981. Econometric models of probabilistic choice. In Structural Analyses of Discrete Data, ed. C. Manski and D. McFadden, Cambridge, Mass: MIT press
15 Moore, W. L., J. J. Louviere and R. Verma, Using Conjoint Analysis to Help Design Product Platforms, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.22, 1999
16 McFadden, D., “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior”, in P. Zarembka (ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics, Academic Press, New York, 1974
1 Mondex International, Internet business set to reap millions[R], 2001
2 Brigham, Eugene F. and Louis C. Gapenski, Intermediate Financial Management[M], The Dryden Press , Orlando, FL, fourth edition., 1993.
3 P. Janson & M. Waidner, Electronic Payment over Open Networks[R], IBM Zurich Research Laboratory, April, 1995
4 Lucas, Peter, 2005, The promise of stored value[J],Digital Transactions, Vol. 2, No. 4, July/August,pp. 26–38
5 Davidson, Peter, ,Prepaid Cards: How Do They Function? How Are They Regulated [R], Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia,2004,June 2–3.
6 MasterCard. Introduces One SMART PayPass [EB/oL] http:// www.no-cash.ro /cartes%202004
7 Nipple, Victoria J., The economics and risks of prepaid cards: Emerging applications[R] Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, ,2004,June 2–3
8 Federal Reserve e System. The 2004 Federal Reserve Payments Study [R] Federal Reserve System .2004
9 Michael Woodford. Monetary Policy in the Information Economy. NBER Working Paper No.8674. December 2001, JEL No.E58
10 Barbara A., Will Electronic Money Be Adopted in the United Stated[W]. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Working Paper,1998
11 Basle Committee on Banking Supervision. Risk Management for Electronic Banking and Electronic Money Activities[R]. P3. March 1998
12 Pippow, Ingo., and Detlef Schoder., The Demand for Stored Value Payment Instruments[W], Working Paper, 2001
13 Baumol, W. J.,The Transaction Demand for Cash: An Inventory Theoretic Approach[J], Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol.66, 1952
14 Brealey, R. A. and S. C. Myers, Principles of Corporate Finance[M], fifth edition, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996
[1] 朱叶,公司财务学[M],上海:上海人民出版社,2003: 191-212,214-234.
[2] 尹龙,网络银行与电子货币—网络金融理论初探 [D],成都:西南财经大学 2002
[3] 蔡晓红,电子货币今日谈[J],《数字财富》2003,11.
[4] 查镇祥,论第四个货币时代的到来[J]. 《特区理论和实践》2002,8: 35-36
[5] 陈进,电子货币的社会化功能与发展 [J].《中国信用卡》2002,1:6-8
[6] 陈雨露、边卫红,电子货币的发展和中央银行面临的风险分析[J]. 《国际金融研究》2002,1: 53-57
[7] 董晓常,电子银行—安全为砥[J].《互联网周刊》2005, 4
[8] 董晓常,电子银行—支付谁为王? [J].《互联网周刊》2005, 4
[9] 樊玉红,对电子货币含义的再认识[J].《哈尔滨学院学报》2002,23(6):98-99
[10] 胡进,论电子货币的货币主权效应[J].《理论和实践》2002, 2:37-38
[11] 贾德奎,电子货币及其对货币政策的影响分析[J].《金融教学与研究》2002, 6: 22-23
[12] 黎东、符文佳,浅析电子货币对货币政策效应的冲击[J].《中央财经大学学报》2001,5: 33-36
[13] 李荣谦、方耀,.电子支付系统与电子货币:发展、影响及适当的管理框架[J].《中央银行季刊》 2000,23 (3)
[14] 李岩岩,电子货币的发展对政府管理部门的影响及对我国的现实意义[J].《中国行政管理》2002,10: 24-26
[15] 刘军,电子支付,因何而火? [J].《中国计算机用户》周刊 2005, 5
[16] 刘玄,浅析电子货币对货币供给的影响[J]. 《金融纵横》2002, 6:14-16
[17] 蒲成毅,电子货币的发展和前瞻[J].《经济师》2002, 7: 98-100
[18] 蒲成毅,数字现金对货币供应与货币流通速度的影响[J]. 《金融研究》2002, 5: 81-89
[19] 肖小波、许康,电子货币与传统货币的职能比较分析[J]. 《湖南大学学报》(社会科学版)2002, V16 (3): 177-178
[20] 谢平、尹龙,网络银行:21 世纪金融领域的一场革命[J]. 《财经科学》2000,4
[21] 谢平、尹龙,网络经济下的金融理论和金融治理[J]. 《经济研究》2001, 4:24-31
[22] 辛云勇、陈德君,电子银行非完全革命[J]. 《互联网周刊》2005, 4
[23] 许欣,全球 EMV 迁移 2008 年前大行动[J].《卡技术与安全》2005.3
[24] 尹龙,对我国网络银行的发展与监管问题的研究 [J]. 《金融研究》2001, 1:76-86
[25] 尹龙,网络银行:21 世纪金融领域的一场革命 [J]. 《财经科学》2000, 4:1-5
[26] 袁睿适,北京公交一行通遭遇生存尴尬 [J].《互联网周刊》2005, 5
[27] 袁翔珠,加强对电子货币监管的思考和探索 [J]《.广东商学院学报》2002, 2: 45-48
[28] 张颖,中国货币政策传导机制研究述评 [J]. 《经济学动态》2002,4:52-54
[29] 赵家敏,论电子货币对货币政策的影响[J」 《国际金融研究》2000,11: 19-24
[30] 周斌耀,Mondex 在香港一兼谈对试用“电子货币”的感受[J]. 《上海金融》 1997, 7: 45-46
[31] 朱光健、洪玮,电子货币的发展及对货币供给的影响[J]. 《江苏统计》2002, 5: 13-14
[32] 陈霖,基于不确定性的消费者选择理论[D],复旦学位论文 2005,12
[33] CNNIC 中 国 互 联 网 络 发 展 状 况 统 计 报 告 [ EB/OL ] 2005 ,http://www.ennic.com.cn
[34] 胡清汉,2004 年国际银行卡产业年中报告(2004.1-2004.6 )[EB/OL] http:// www.chinaunionpay.com/showcontent.aspx?newsid=1914
[35] 王颖捷,金融产业组织的市场结构[M] 北京:机械工业出版社,2004
[36] 赵旭、蒋振声、周军民,中国银行业市场结构与绩效实证研究「J].金融研究 2001,(3);59-67
[37] 朱克桐,我国银行业市场结构变迁的路径选择[J].金融论坛 2003,(12);6-9.
[38] 虞月君,中国信用卡产业集中度与生命周期分析[J]. 中国信用卡 2004,(1);18-23
[39] 张维迎,博弈论与信息经济学[M].上海:上海三联书店,1996.
[40] 丁友刚,对银行收费的理性思考[J]. 金融研究 2003,(11):18-25.
[41] 2004,(1);34-39.
[42] 吕义正,浅议银行卡产品定价. 中国信用卡 2004, (2) ;31-33.
[43] 王军,论电子货币发展对货币政策的影响及政策建议. 国际金融研究.2000.8: 50-55
[44] 赵家敏,论电子货币对货币政策的影响. 国际金融研究. 2000.11: 19-24
[45] 刘俊、丁家华、吴云松,金融技术发展与货币政策中介目标的选择. 2002.1:20-22
[46] 陈雨露、边卫红,电子货币发展与中央银行面临的风险分析. 国际金融研究.2002.1: 53-58
[47] 李翀,虚拟货币的发展与货币理论和政策的重构. 世界经济. 2003.8: 75-79
[48] 胡秋灵、张成虎,有关电子货币的若干争论. 国际金融研究. 2003.12: 65-68
[49] 赵家敏,论电子货币与传统银行业的关系. 国际金融研究. 1998.9: 75-77
[50] 冯晴,论中国银行卡市场金融创新. 国际金融研究. 2003.5: 56-61
[51] 周启海、周屹,论我国电子货币微观成本与宏观安全机制创新. 重庆大学学报 (社会科学版). 2005.1: 31-34
[52] 高丛,电子货币支付方案的比较及我国电子货币支付的对策研究. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版). 2003.5: 20-23
[53] 李成, 刘社芳. 电子货币发展带来的制度挑战与思考[J]. 上海金融, 2004.6: 52-54
[54] 丁国荣,基于 Hotelling 模型的网络外部性研究[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2004, 13 (5) :429-432.
[55] 吴泗宗、蒋海华,对网络外部性的经济学分析[J].同济大学学报(社会科学版),2002, 13 (6) : 70-77.
[56] 胥莉、陈宏民、孙武军,商户受理银行卡支付方式的策略性行为研究[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2005,14(3): 193-201.
[57] 郑伟,双边市场中的平台竞争— 带转移成本的两期情形:(D).武汉:武汉大学,2004.
[58] 李翀,虚拟货币的发展与货币理论和政策的重构. 世界经济. 2003.8: 75-79
[59] 陈雨露、边卫红,电子货币发展与中央银行面临的风险分析. 国际金融研究.2002.1: 53-58
[60] 王德财、张维华、骆品亮,对等收费下网络之间的价格竞争[J].复旦学报(自然科学版),2001,40(2):665-669.
[61] 骆品亮、林丽闽,网络接入定价与规制改革:以电信业为例[J].上海管理科学,2002,3(2):14-17.
[62] 张维华、骆品亮,网络双向接入定价的效率分析[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2002,11(4):319-323.
[63] George D.Choksy. Electronic Money Flows: The Molding of Financial Order[J] .Journal of Economic Issues. Dec 1992.26,1. ABI/INFORM Global pg.1305
[64] Jeffrey M Lacker,John A Weinberg, Can the Fed be a payment system innovator[J]. Economic Quartarly-Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. Spring 1998.84 ,2.ABI/INFORM Global pg.1
[65] Jussi S Snellman, Jukka M Vesala, and David B Humphrey. Substitution of noncash payment instruments for cash in Europe[J]. Journal of Financial Services Research. 2001.(19),2,3. ABI/INFORM Global pg.131
[66] Jan Marc Berk. Central banking and financial innovation. A survey of the modern literature[J]. Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review. Sep 2002. Vol.55,Iss.222:263-297
[67] Elham Mafi-Kreft. The Relationship Between Currency Competition and Inflation.[R].Southern Economic Association Meeting: San Antonio , Texas. November 2003
[68] Matonis, Jon. Digital Cash & Monetary Freedom[R]. Proceedings of INET'95. June 1995: 27-30
[69] Tatsuo Tanaka. Possible Economic Consequences of Digital Cash[R]. Proceedings of INET'96. March 1996
[70] Bernkopf, Mark. Electronic Cash and Monetary Policy(1996). First Monday available at: www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue1/ecash
[71] Aleksandar Stojanovic. E-money in transitional economies[J]. comparative Economic Studies. Spring 2001. 43,1. ABI/INFORM Global
[72] Frederic S. Mishkin. the Economics of Money , Banking , and Financial Markets[M].Addison-Wesley Press. 1998: 48-49
[73] Bank for International Settlements. Policy issues for central banks in retail payments.[R] March 2003
[74] Basle Committee on Banking Supervision. Risk Management for Electronic Banking and Electronic Money Activities[R]. P3. March 1998
[75] F.X. Browne, David Cronin. Payments technologies[J], financial innovation, and laissez-faire banking. Spring/Summer 1995. Vol.15,Iss.1: 101-112
[76] Stabla, Witold (2001). Electronic payment systems. Accessed at http:// strony.wp.pl /wp/ws19/
[77] N.Regory Mankiw. Macroeconomics. Worth Publishers. 2000: 42-43
[78] Otmar Issing. New Technologies in Payments: A Challenge to Monetary Policy. July 2000
[79] White, L.H. Thoughts on the Economics of Digital Currency. Extropy, 15(7)(2).1995: 16-18
[80] Otmar Issing. New Technologies in Payments: A Challenge to Monetary Policy. July 2000
[81] Frederic S.Mishkin. the Economics of Money , Banking , and Financial Markets[M].Addison-Wesley Press: 480-481.
[82] Friedman, Benjamin M. The Future of Monetary Policy: The Central Bank as an Army with Only a Signal Corps?. International Finance 2. 1999: 321-338
[83] Goodhart, Charles A.E. Can Central Banking Survive the IT Revolution International Finance. 2000
[84] Claessens, Stijn, Thomas Glaessner et al. E-Finance in Emerging Markets: Is Leap frogging possible?[J]. The World Bank, Financial Sector Discussion Paper no.7.June 2001
[85] Sellon, Gordon H., and Stuart E. Weiner. Monetary Policy Without Reserve Requirements: Analytical Issues[J]. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review 81(4). 1996: 5-24
[86] Clinton, Kevin. Implementation of Monetary Policy in a Regime with Zero Reserve Requirements[W]. Banking of Canada working paper no.97-8. April 1997
[87] Michael Woodford. Monetary Policy in the Information Economy. NBER Working Paper No.8674. December 2001, JEL No.E58
[88] Spindt, Paul A., and Ronald J.Hoffmeister. The Micromechanics of the Federal Funds Markets: Implications for Day-of-the-Week Effects in Funds Rates Variability[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 23. 1988: 401-416
[89] Armstrong, M. Competition in Two-Sided Markets[J], mimeo, (2002).Nuffield College, University of Oxford
[90] Baxter,W.F. Bank interchange of transactional paper: legal perspectives[J], Journal of Law andEconomics (1983).26: 541-588.
[91] Chakravorti, S Theory of Credit Card Networks: A Survey of the Literature[J]. Review of Network Economics. .(2003).2(2):50-68.
[92] Chakravorti, S. and W.R. Emmons.. Who pays for credit cards?[J] Journal of Consumer Affairs,Winter, forthcoming (2003)
[93] Chakravorti, S. and T. To. A theory of credit cards[J], mimeo, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. (2002).
[94] Economides, N. The economics of networks[J], International Journal of Industrial Organization (1996).14:673-699
[95] Evans, D., Schmalensee, R.. The Economics of the Payment Card Industry[M],(1993)Cambridge, MA:National Economic Research Associates, Inc.
[96] Gans, J. S. and S. P. King. The Neutrality of Interchange Fees in Payment Systems[J], Topics in Economic Analysis & Policy, (2003)3(1):1-18.
[97] Guthrie, G. and J. Wright. Competing payment schemes[W], University of Auckland Working Paper (2003).No. 245.
[98] Hausman, JA. and G.K. Leonard, and J. Tirole. On Nonexclusive Membership in Competing Joint Ventures, RAND Journal of Economics, (2003).34(1): 43-62.
[99] Katz , M , and C. Shapiro. Network Externalities , Competition , and Compatibility[J], American Economic Review, (1985).75: 424-440.
[100] Katz, M. Reform of Credit Card Schemes in Australia [R], Sydney, Australia: Reserve Bank of Australia (2001)..
[101] Laffont, J.J., Rey, P., and J. Tirole. Network Competition I. Overview and Nondiscriminatory Pricing[J], Rand Journal of Economics, (1998a).29(1): 1-37.
[102] Laffont, J.J., Rey, P., and J. Tirole.. Network Competition: II. PriceDiscrimination, Rand Journal of Economics, (1998b)29(1): 38-56.
[103] Reserve Bank of Australia. Reform of credit card schemes in Australia: IV Knal reforms and regulation impact statement. http://www.rba.gov.au. (2002).
[104] Rochet, J-C. and J. Tirole. Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets[J], Journal of the European Economic Association, (2003).1(4).
[105] Rochet, J-C. and J. Tirole.. Cooperation Among Competitors: Some Economics of Payment Card Associations[J]. RAND Journal of Economics, (2002)Vol. 33: 549-570.
[106] Rochet, J-C. and J. Tirole. (2002).Two-Sided Markets: An Overview. RAND Journal of Economics,Vol. 33: 549-570.
[107] Schmalensee, R.·Payment Systems and Interchange Fees. Journal of Industrial Economics, (2002)Vol. 50:103-122.
[108] Schwartz, M. and D.R. Vincent. Same price, cash or card: vertical control by payments networks, Georgetown University Working Paper, (2002). 9.
[109] Wright, J.. Optimal card payment systems[J], European Economic Review, forthcoming. (2003a)
[110] Wright, J..Determinants of Optimal Interchange Fees in Payment Systems[J], Journal of Industrial Economics, forthcoming. (2003b)
[111] Wright, J. Optimal card payment systems[J], European Economic Review, forthcoming. (2003c).
[112] Wright, J. Pricing in debit and credit card schemes[J], Economics Letters, forthcoming. (2003d).
[113] Anthony M. Santomero John J. Seater. Alternative Monies and the Demand for Media of Exchange [J] Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 1996 Vol. 28, pp. 942-960.
[114] Duca, John V.,and William C. Whitesell. Credit Cards and Money Demand: A Cross-sectional Study, [J] Journal of Money, Credit,and Banking, May 1995, Vol. 27, 1995, pp. 604-23
[115] Edward L. Whalen. An Extension of The Baumol-Tobin Approach to The Transactions Demand of Cash. [J] Journal of Finance, Mar, 1968. Vol. 23, No. 1. pp.113-134
[116] FAMA. E, MACBETH, J. Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests [J] Journal of Political of Economy. 1973
[117] Folkertsma, C. K.;Hebbink, G. E. (1998):Cash Management and the Choice of Payment Media: A critical Survey of the Theory. In: DeNederlandsche Bank (Ed.):Research Memorandum WO&E Nr. 532.
[118] Geoffrey R. Gerdes, Jack K. Walton II. The Use of Checks and Other Noncash Payment Instruments in the United States[J]Federal Reserve Bulletin, August 2002 360-374
[119] Humphrey, David B, Lawrence B. Pulley, and Jukka M. Vesala. Cash, Paper, and Electronic Payments: A Cross Country Analysis, [J] Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 1996, Vol. 28, pp. 914-39.
[120] James Tobin. The Interest-elasticity of Transactions Demand for Cash. [J] Review of Economics and Statistics. 1956. 38(3) :241-247.
[121] MERTON, R Rand (Bell).theory of rational option pricing [J]journal of economics.1973
[122] MERTON, R. An intertemporal asset pricing model [J] Econometrica. 1973
[123] OZ Shy Julla Tarkka. The Market for Electronic Cash Cards [J] Journal of of Money, Credit, and Banking. May 2002 Vol. 34. No. 2.
[124] Sujit Chakravorti and Timothy McHugh. Why do we use so many checks?[J] Economic Perspectives Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.3Q/2002
[125] Whitesell, W.:Deposit Banks and the Market for Payment Media. [J] Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 1992 Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 483-498.
[126] Whitesell, William. The Demand for Currency versus Debitable Accounts: A Note. J]Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 1989. 21, 246-257.
[127] William J. Baumol. The Transactions Demand for Cash: An Inventory Theoretic Approach. [J] Quart. Jour. Econ.,1952. 66:545-556.
[128] BIS. Survey of developments in electronic money and internet and mobile payments [R].BIS. 2004.
[129] ECB. Euro-denominated electronic money in circulation in the euro area [R」.ECB 2004
[130] Federal Reserve e System. The 2004 Federal Reserve Payments Study [R] Federal Reserve System .2004
[131] U. S Census Bureau. QUARTERLY RETAIL E-COMMERCE SALES, 3RD QUARTER.[R] U.S Census Bureau. 2004
[132] Atkinson, A., and J. Stiglitz, Lectures on Public Economics,[M] New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
[133] Berkman, H., The Value of Expected Cash Flow: Does the Market Value Flexibility ? [J] APFA/PACAP Conference , July 1996.
[134] Bjerksund, P., and E Ekern, Managing Investment Opportunities Under Price Uncertainty: From the Last Chance to Wait and See Strategies[J], Financial Management, Autumn 1990, pp.65-83.
[135] Brealey, R. A. and S. C. Myers, Principles of Corporate Finance[M], fifth edition, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996.
[136] Breen, Richard, Binomial Option Pricing and The Condition for Early Exercise: An Example Using Foreign Exchange Option[J], The Economic and Social Review, 21(2) 1990, pp.151-161.
[137] Brennan, M. J., and S. E. Schwartz, Evaluating Natural Resource Investments[J], Journal of Business, 58(2), 1985, pp.135-157.
[138] Brigham , Eugene F. and Louis C. Gapenski , Intermediate Financial Management[M], The Dryden Press , Orlando, FL, fourth edition., 1993.
[139] Capozza, D. and Y. Li, The Intensity and Timing of Investment: The Case of Land[J], The American Economic Review, 84(8), Sep. 1993, pp.889-904.
[140] Cox, John C., Stephen A, Ross, and Mark Rubinstein, Option Pricing: A Simplified Approach,[J] Journal of Financial Economics , 7, 1979, pp.229-263.
[141] Dentskevich, P. and G. Salkin, Valuation of Real Project Using Option Pricing Techniques, Omega, 19(4), 1991, pp.207-222.
[142] Dixit A.K. and R.S. Pindick, The Option Approach to Capital Investment,[J] Harvard Business Review, May-June 1995, pp.105-115.
[143] Ekern, S., An Option Pricing Approach to Evaluate Petroleum Projects[J], Energy Economics, April 1988, pp.91-99.
[144] Myers, S. C., Finance Theory and Financial Strategy,[J] Interfaces, 14(1), 1984, pp.126-137.
[145] Reenen, John Van, The Creation and Capture of Rents: Wages and Innovation in a Panel of U.K. Companies[J], The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(1), pp.195-226.
[146] Scarso, Enrico, Timing the Adoption of a New Technology: An Option-Based Approach[J], Management Decision, 34(3), 1996, pp.41-48.
[147] Smit, Han T.J., and L. A. Aukum, A Real Option and Game-Theoretic Approach to Corporate Investment Strategy under Competition[J], Financial Management, Aut.1993, pp.241-250.
[148] Smith , D. J. , Incorporating Risk into Capital Budgeting Decision Using Simulation[J], Management Decision, 32(9), 1994, pp20-26.
[149] Smith, J. E. and R. F. Nau, Valuing Risky Projects: Option Pricing Theory and Decision Analysis[J], Management Science , 41(5), May 1995, pp.795-816.
[150] Szymanski, Stefan, The Optimal Timing of Infrastructure Investment[J], Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Sep.1991, pp.247-258.
[151] Teisberg, Elizabeth Olmsted, An Option Valuation Analysis of Investment Choices of a Regulated Firm[J], Management Science , 40(4), Apr.1994, pp.535-548.
[152] Threadgold, A., Private Financing of Infrastructure and Other Long-Term Capital Projects[J], Journal of Applied Finance and Investment, 1(1), Mar. 1996, pp.7-.15
[153] Titman, S., Urban Land Prices under Uncertainty, The American Economic Review, 75(3), June 1985, pp.505-514.
[154] Baumol, W. J.,The Transaction Demand for Cash: An Inventory Theoretic Approach[J], Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol.66, 1952.
[155] Echikson, William., A Dash for ‘E-cash’ in Europe[J]. Christian Science Monitor, vol.91, 1998.
[156] Folkertsma, C. K., and Hebbink, G. E., Cash Management and the Choice of Payment Media:A Critical Survey of the Theory[J]. De Nederlandsche Bank&E Nr.532, 1998. (Ed.) ; Research Memorandum WO
[157] Barbara A., Will Electronic Money Be Adopted in the United Stated[W]. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Working Paper,1998.
[158] Kahn, Charles M., and William Roberds., Demandable Debts as a Means of Payment: Banknotes versus Checks [J]. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, Vol.31, No.3(August 1999, Part 2)
[159] McAndrew, James J., Banking and Payment System Stability in an Electronic Money World[J]. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Working Paper, 1997.5
[160] Pippow, Ingo., and Detlef Schoder., The Demand for Stored Value Payment Instruments[W], Working Paper, 2001.
[161] Prinz, A., Money in the Real and the Virtual World:E-Money, C-Money and the Demand for CB-Money[J];Netnomics 1(1),1999.
[162] Shy, Oz, and Juha Tarkka, The Market for Electronic Cash Card[J]. Journal ofMoney, Credit and Banking, Vol.34, No.2, 2002.
[163] Tobin, J., The Interest Elasticity of Transactions Demand for Cash[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics,Vol.38, 1956.
[164] Van Hove, L., Electronic Purses: Which Way to Go?[J]. First Monday, Vol.5, No. 7, 2000.
[165] Whitesell, W., Deposit Banks and the Market for Payment Media[J]. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol.24, No.4, 1992.
[166] Baltenspergr, E, Alternative Approaches to the Theory of the Banking Firm,[J] Journal of Monetary Economics, (1980)6.
[167] Berentsen,Aleksander, Monetary Policy Implications of Digital Money[J], International Review of Social Science, (1998)Vol.51,pp.89-117.
[168] Deutsche Bunsdes bank, Recent Developments in Electronic Money[R], Deutsche Bundes bank Monthly Report, (1999)June, p41-57.
[169] Dorn, James A.,The Futureof Money in the Information Age[R].,The Cato Institute ,Washington, D.C.. (1997)
[170] Weiner, Stuart E, "Electronic Payments in the U.S. Economy: An Overview[R], Economic Review, Fourth Quarter, (1999) The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
[171] Bomfim, Antulio N. Pre-Announcement Effects, News and Volatility: Monetary Policy and the Stock Market,[R]. Federal Reserve Board, FEDS paperno.2000-50,November.
[172] Furfine, CraigH., Inter-bank Payments and the Daily Federal Funds Rate,[J] Journal of Monetary Economics (2000) 46:535-553.
[173] Goodhart, Charles A. E., How Can Non-Interest-Bearing Assets Coexist with Safe Interest Bearing Assets?[J] British Review of Economic Issues (1986)8: 1-12.
[174] Hampton, Tim,Y2K and Banking System Liquidity[J]. Reserve Bank of New Zealand Bulletin(2000)63: 52-60.
[175] Kuttner, Kenneth N., Monetary Policy Surprises and Interest Rates: Evidence from the Fed Funds Futures Market[J] Journal of Monetary Economics(2001)47:523-544.
[176] Meulendyke, Anne-Marie, U.S. Monetary Policy and Financial Markets[R] ,New York: Federal Reserve Bank of New York,. (1998)
[177] Taylor,John B, Expectations, Open Market Operations, and Changes in the Federal Funds Rate[J], Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review .(2001)83(4): 33-47.
[178] B. Clifford Neuman, Gennady Medvinsky, Requirements for Network Payment: The NetCheque Perspective,[J] IEEE Compcon, March 1995.
[179] B. Clifford Neuman, “Security, Payment, and Privacy for Network Commerce, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, (1995) 13(8):1523-1531..
[180] BIS, Implication for Central Banks of The Development of Electronic Money,[R] Bank for International Settlements, 1996.
[181] Buttyan, L., Removing the financial incentive to cheat in Micropayment schemes,[J] Electronics Letters, (2000)36., pp.132-133.
[182] Carsten Schmidt and Rudolf Müller, “A Framework for Micropayment Evaluation, http://macke.wiwi.hu-berlin.de/IMI/Micropayments.html, 1997.
[183] Ghosh Anup K., E-Commerce Security: weak links, best defense[M], John Wiley and Sons, New York, N. Y., 1998.
[184] G. Medvinsky, Clifford Neumann, “NetCash: A design for practical electronic currency on the internet,”[R] 1st Acm Conference on Computer and Communication Security, ,pp.102-106, New York 1993.
[185] Jan Camenisch, Jean-Marc Piveteau, and Markus Stadler. 3rd ACM Computer and Communication Security '96, pp.88-94, ACM press, March 1996.
[186] K. Sung, Analysis and Design of the Internet Based Payment System,[R] http://iis.kaist.ac.kr/ ~sky/thesis/thesis.html
[187] Mondex International, Internet business set to reap millions[R], 2001.
[188] Peter Wayner, Digital Cash – Commerce on the Net[R] 1997.
[189] Philip Kotler, Marketing Management[M], Prentice-Hall, 2000.
[190] P. Janson & M. Waidner, Electronic Payment over Open Networks[R], IBM Zurich Research Laboratory, April, 1995.
[191] Berentsen A., Monetary policy implications of digital money[J]. Kyklos, 1998 vol 51 pp 89-117.
[192] Goodhart C.A.E., Can central banking Survive the IT Revolution[R] Future of Monetary Policy and Banking Conference, World Bank, 2000,11 July.
[193] Markose S. M. et Lose Y. J., Network effects on cash-card substitution in transactions and low interest[J] The Economic Journal, 2003 Vol113(487), pp456-476.
[194] Rochet J. C. et Tirole J., 2002, Cooperation among competitors : The economics of payment card associations[J], Rand Journal of Economics, 2002 vol33 (4) , pp 549-570.
[195] Shy O. et Tarkka J., The market for electronic Cash cards" Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2002 vol34 (2), pp 299-314.
[196] Whitesell W. C.,,Deposit banks and the market for payment media[J]. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 1992 vol24 (4), pp 483-498.
[197] Wright J.,,Princing in debit and credit card schemes[J], Economics Letters, forthcoming. 2003(4).
2 蔡晓红.电子货币今日谈[J]. 数字财富 2003, 11
3 王春雷,电子货币的发展及其对中央银行货币政策的影响[D],华中科技大学硕士论文 2005
4 本刊记者,香港八达通 奇迹变身电子货币,金卡工程 2005/6
5 Mondex International, E-money set to reap millions, 2005
6 FRIEDRICH A V H.Dentionalization of money:an analysis of the theory and practice of concurrent currencies EM2.London:Hobart paper special Transatlantic Arts,1977.
7 NORTH D.Transaction costs through time[M].Washington,D.C.:Washington University Press,1994.
8 GRAHAM G.Rise of internet threatens traditiona1 banks’market[N].Financia1 Times,1996-08-12(3).
9 贾德奎《电子货币及其对货币政策的影响分析》,金融教学与研究,2002 年第 6 期(总第 86 期)。
10 McAndrew, James J.,Banking and Payment System Stability in an Electronic Money World, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia,Working Paper, (1997)5
11 Aleksander.Berentsen..Monetary Policy Implications of Digital Money. International Review of Social Science. 1998 Vol.51
12 Aleksander.Berentsen.2001.E-money in Transitional Economies[J]. Comparative Economic Studies.Vol.4
13 Humphrey, David B, Lawrence B. Pulley, and Jukka M. Vesala. Cash, Paper, and Electronic Payments: A Cross Country Analysis, [J] Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 1996, Vol. 28, pp. 914-39.
14 Aleksander.Berentsen.2001.E-money in Transitional Economies.Comparative Economic Studies.Vol.43
15 Bullard.J.&Smith.B.2001.Privte and Public Circulating Liabilities. Journal of Economic Theory 99,59-116
16 Aleksander.Berentsen.1998.Monetary Policy Implications of Digital Money. International Review of Social Science. Vol.51
17 Bruce.D.Smith.&Warren.E.Webber.1999.Private Money Creation and the Suffolk Banking System. Journal of Money,Credit,and Banking,Vol.31,No.3
18 Friedman.M.1999.The Future of Monetary Policy: The Central Bank as an Army with Signal Corps? International Finance
19 Helleiner.E. Electronic Money: A Challenge to the Sovereign State?[J] Journal of International Affairs,1998. no.2
20 Cohen.B.J. Electronic money: new day or false down? [J],Review of International Political Economy. Summer 2001:197-225
21 万星,网络虚拟货币比较研究[J],哈尔滨铁道科技 2005/4
22 Cohen.B.J. Electronic money: new day or false down? [J],Review of International Political Economy. Summer 2001:197-225
23 Aleksander.Berentsen.2001.E-money in Transitional Economies[J].Comparative Economic Studies.Vol.43
24 胡进.论电子货币的货币主权效应[J].理论与实践.2002/2
25王军, 论电子货币发展对货币政策的影响及政策建议. 国际金融研究.2000.8: 50-55
26 赵家敏.论电子货币对货币政策的影响.国际金融研究.2000/11
27刘俊, 丁家华, 吴云松. 金融技术发展与货币政策中介目标的选择. 2002.1:20-22
28陈雨露, 边卫红. 电子货币发展与中央银行面临的风险分析. 国际金融研究.2002.1: 53-58
29李翀. 虚拟货币的发展与货币理论和政策的重构. 世界经济. 2003.8: 75-79
30 骆品亮, 商户联盟与 Hotelling 竞争下支付卡交换费的比较分析[J],复旦大学学报 2005/6
31 William J. Baumol. The Transactions Demand for Cash: An Inventory Theoretic Approach. [J] Quart. Jour. Econ.,1952. 66:545-556
32 Tobin, J., The Interest Elasticity of Transactions Demand for Cash[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics,Vol.38, 1956
33 格利和肖, 金融理论中的货币[M]. 上海:上海三联出版社 1994
34 Folkertsma, C. K.;Hebbink, G. E. (1998):Cash Management and the Choice of Payment Media: A critical Survey of the Theory. In: DeNederlandsche Bank (Ed.):Research Memorandum WO&E Nr. 532.
35 Whitesell, W.:Deposit Banks and the Market for Payment Media. [J] Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 1992 Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 483-498
36 Pippow, Ingo., and Detlef Schoder., The Demand for Stored Value Payment Instruments[W], Working Paper, 2001.
37 Kahn, Charles M., and William Roberds., Demandable Debts as a Means of Payment: Banknotes versus Checks [J]. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, Vol.31, No.3(August 1999, Part 2)
38 Shy, Oz, and Juha Tarkka,The Market for Electronic Cash Card[J]. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol.34, No.2, 2002.
39 Santomero John J. Seater. Alternative Monies and the Demand for Media of Exchange [J] Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 1996 Vol. 28, pp. 942-960
40 Bruce.D.Smith.&Warren.E.Webber.1999.Private Money Creation and the Suffolk Banking System. Journal of Money,Credit,and Banking,Vol.31,No.3
41 Aleksander.Berentsen.1998.Monetary Policy Implications of Digital Money. International Review of Social Science. Vol.51
1 ECB. Euro-denominated electronic money in circulation in the euro area [R」.ECB 2004
2 MasterCard. Introduces One SMART PayPass [EB/oL] http:// www.no-cash.ro /cartes%202004
3 Katz. M, C. Shapiro, Network Externalities, Competition and Compatibility, American Economic Review, June 1985.
4 张诚、董佺《跨国银行的客户管理及对我国银行的启示》，上?鹑冢?006 年第 5 期。
5 Dennis W. Carlton, Alan S. Frankel, “Antitrust and Payment Technologies”, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, Vol. 77, No. 6, December, 1995.
6 James J. McAndrews, Retail Pricing of ATM Network Services, Working Paper No. 96-12, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia,April, 1996.
7 胡秋灵、李淑彪、张成虎《电子货币试点结果的启示与经济学分析》,上海金融,2003 年第 6 期。
8 胡强《电子货币发行盈利模式探讨》,金卡工程,2004 年 8 卷 1 期。
9 胡秋灵、李淑彪、张成虎《电子货币试点结果的启示与经济学分析》,上海金融,2003 年第 6 期。
10 胡强《电子货币发行盈利模式探讨》,金卡工程,2004 年 8 卷 1 期。
11 肖文《美国新型个人支付方式的现状及前景分析》,国际金融研究,2001 年 5 期。
12 Armstrong, M. Competition in Two-Sided Markets[J], mimeo, (2002).Nuffield College, University of Oxford
13 吴泗宗、蒋海华,对网络外部性的经济学分析[J].同济大学学报(社会科学版),2002, 13 (6) : 70-77
14 Rochet, J-C. and J. Tirole. Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets[J], Journal of the European Economic Association, (2003).1(4)
15 Federal Reserve e System. The 2004 Federal Reserve Payments Study [R] Federal Reserve System .2004
16 Wright, J.. Optimal card payment systems[J], European Economic Review, forthcoming. (2003a)
17 骆品亮,商户联盟与 Hotelling 竞争下支付卡交换费的比较分析[J],复旦大学学报 2005,6
18 Baxter,W.F. Bank interchange of transactional paper: legal perspectives[J], Journal of Law andEconomics (1983).26: 541-588
19 Rochet, J-C. and J. Tirole. Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets[J], Journal of the European Economic Association, (2003).1(4).
20 Evans, D., Schmalensee, R.. The Economics of the Payment Card Industry[M],(1993)Cambridge, MA:National Economic Research Associates, Inc
21 Rochet, J-C. and J. Tirole. (2002).Two-Sided Markets: An Overview. RAND Journal of Economics,Vol. 33: 549-570
22 Rochet, J-C. and J. Tirole.. Cooperation Among Competitors: Some Economics of Payment Card Associations[J]. RAND Journal of Economics, (2002)Vol. 33: 549-570
23 Schwartz, M. and D.R. Vincent. Same price, cash or card: vertical control by payments networks, Georgetown University Working Paper, (2002). 9
24 Katz, M. Reform of Credit Card Schemes in Australia [R], Sydney, Australia: Reserve Bank of Australia (2001).
25 Rochet, J-C. and J. Tirole.. Cooperation Among Competitors: Some Economics of Payment Card Associations[J]. RAND Journal of Economics, (2002)Vol. 33: 549-570
26 Van Hove, L., Electronic Purses: Which Way to Go?[J]. First Monday, Vol.5, No. 7, 2000
27 Edward L. Whalen. An Extension of The Baumol-Tobin Approach to The Transactions Demand of Cash. [J] Journal of Finance, Mar, 1968. Vol. 23, No. 1. pp.113-134
28 Whitesell, W.:Deposit Banks and the Market for Payment Media. [J] Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 1992 Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 483-498
29 Whitesell, William. The Demand for Currency versus Debitable Accounts: A Note. J]Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 1989. 21, 246-257.
30 Duca, John V.,and William C. Whitesell. Credit Cards and Money Demand: A Cross-sectional Study, [J] Journal of Money, Credit,and Banking, May 1995, Vol. 27, 1995, pp. 604-623
31 Santomero John J. Seater. Alternative Monies and the Demand for Media of Exchange [J] Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 1996 Vol. 28, pp. 942-960
32 Santomero John J. Seater. Alternative Monies and the Demand for Media of Exchange [J] Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 1996 Vol. 28, pp. 942-960
33 Folkertsma, C. K.;Hebbink, G. E. (1998):Cash Management and the Choice of Payment Media: A critical Survey of the Theory. In: DeNederlandsche Bank (Ed.):Research Memorandum WO&E Nr. 532.
34 Kahn, Charles M., and William Roberds., Demandable Debts as a Means of Payment: Banknotes versus Checks [J]. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, Vol.31, No.3(August 1999, Part 2)
35 Pippow, Ingo., and Detlef Schoder., The Demand for Stored Value Payment Instruments[W], Working Paper, 2001.
36 Shy, Oz, and Juha Tarkka, The Market for Electronic Cash Card[J]. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol.34, No.2, 2002.
37 ECB. Euro-denominated electronic money in circulation in the euro area [R].ECB 2004
38 BIS. Survey of developments in electronic money and internet and mobile payments [R].BIS. 2004
39 Whitesell, W.:Deposit Banks and the Market for Payment Media. [J] Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 1992 Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 483-498.
40 Santomero John J. Seater. Alternative Monies and the Demand for Media of Exchange [J] Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 1996 Vol. 28, pp. 942-960
41 姜树元, 姜青舫. 基于现代效用的产品功能评估模型与方法[J ]. 系统工程, 2001, 16 (6)
42 McFedden, D. 1974. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In Frontiers in Econometrics, ed. P. Zarembka. New York: Academic Press.
43 Guadagni, P. M. and J. D. C. Little, “A Logit Model of Brand Choice Calibrated on Scanner Data”, Marketing Science, Vol 2, No 3., Summer 1983
44 Muellbauer, J. 1981. Testing neoclassical models of the demand for durebles. In Essays in the Theory and Measurement of Consumer Beboiour, ed. A.S. Deaton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45 唐应茂《电子货币的产生及其法律问题》,《科技与法律》,1998 年第 4 期。
46 胡强《电子货币发行盈利模式探讨》,金卡工程,2004 年 8 卷 1 期。
1 Matonis, Jon. Digital Cash & Monetary Freedom[R]. Proceedings of INET'95. June 1995: 27-30
2 唐应茂《电子货币的产生及其法律问题》,《科技与法律》,1998 年第 4 期。
3 宋伟 滕华《电子货币的法律问题及对策》,《科技法制》,2004 年第 1 期。
4 张庆麟《电子货币的法律性质初探》,《武汉大学学报》(社会科学版),2001 年 9 月。
5 张红霞 侯向磊《电子货币的界定及其应用中亟待解决的法律问题》,《河北法学》,2004 年 7 月。
6 樊玉红.对电子货币含义的再认识.哈尔滨学院学报. 2002(6)Vol.23
7 Pippow, Ingo., and Detlef Schoder., The Demand for Stored Value Payment Instruments[W], Working Paper, 2001
8辛云勇 陈德君 电子银行非完全革命 [J]. 《互联网周刊》2005, 4
9董晓常 电子银行— 安全为砥[J].《互联网周刊》2005, 4
10 Geoffrey R. Gerdes, Jack K. Walton II. The Use of Checks and Other Noncash Payment Instruments in the United States[J]Federal Reserve Bulletin, August 2002 360-374
11 孔静苹等,电子货币的分类与应用[J],现代计算机 2000/12
12 Prinz, A., Money in the Real and the Virtual World:E-Money, C-Money and the Demand for CB-Money[J];Netnomics 1(1),1999.
13 周海刚,电子货币、电子货币需求和影响分析及网络银行的监管[D],对外经济贸易大学学位论文, 2005
14 蔡满香,电子现金理论和关键技术研究[D] 北京邮电大学博士学位论文 2005
15 蔡满香,电子现金理论和关键技术研究[D] 北京邮电大学博士学位论文 2005
16 Stabla, Witold (2001). Electronic payment systems. Accessed at http:// strony.wp.pl /wp/ws19/
17 MasterCard. Introduces One SMART PayPass [EB/oL] http:// www.no-cash.ro /cartes%202004
18 何光辉,电子货币系统的风险及其控制[J],金融研究 2000/11
19 F.X. Browne, David Cronin. Payments technologies[J], financial innovation, and laissez-faire banking. Spring/Summer 1995. Vol.15,Iss.1: 101-112
20 方霞, 网络银行和电子货币风险的解决之道[J] 科技进步与对策 2002/9
21 尹龙.货币性质的再认识与货币供给理论的发展.金融研究.2002/1
22 李琪等.电子货币对货币供求及货币政策工具的影响.经济师.2002/1
23 尹龙.电子货币对中央银行的影响.金融研究.2000/4
1 F.X. Browne, David Cronin. Payments technologies[J], financial innovation, and laissez-faire banking. Spring/Summer 1995. Vol.15,Iss.1: 101-112
2 Katz, M. Reform of Credit Card Schemes in Australia [R], Sydney, Australia: Reserve Bank of Australia (2001)
3 Schwartz, M. and D.R. Vincent. Same price, cash or card: vertical control by payments networks, Georgetown University Working Paper, (2002). 9
4 Rochet, J-C. and J. Tirole.. Cooperation Among Competitors: Some Economics of Payment Card Associations[J]. RAND Journal of Economics, (2002)Vol. 33: 549-570
5 Rochet, J-C. and J. Tirole. Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets[J], Journal of the European Economic Association, (2003).1(4)
1 张维华,骆品亮.网络双向接入定价的效率分析[J].系统工程理论方法应用, 2002, 11(4):319-323
2 Rochet, J-C. and J. Tirole. (2002).Two-Sided Markets: An Overview. RAND Journal of Economics,Vol. 33: 549-570
3 Chakravorti, S Theory of Credit Card Networks: A Survey of the Literature[J]. Review of Network Economics. .(2003).2(2):50-68
4 Sujit Chakravorti and Timothy McHugh. Why do we use so many checks?[J] Economic Perspectives Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.3Q/2002
5 张维迎. 博弈论与信息经济学[M].上海:上海三联书店,1996
1 Prinz, A., Money in the Real and the Virtual World:E-Money, C-Money and the Demand for CB-Money[J];Netnomics 1(1),1999
2 OZ Shy Julla Tarkka. The Market for Electronic Cash Cards [J] Journal of of Money, Credit, and Banking. May 2002 Vol. 34. No. 2
3 Federal Reserve e System. The 2004 Federal Reserve Payments Study [R] Federal Reserve System .2004
1 Wilko Bolt, Retail payments in the Netherlands: Some facts and some theory ,Research Memorandum WO no. 722,DeNederlandsche Bank January2003,
2 Dorn, James A.,The Futureof Money in the Information Age[R].,The Cato Institute ,Washington, D.C.. (1997)
3 Weiner, Stuart E, Electronic Payments in the U.S. Economy: An Overview[R], Economic Review, Fourth Quarter, (1999) The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
1 Robert B. Dial Bicriterion Traffic Assignment: Basic Theory and Elementary Algorithms Transportation Science Vol. 30 N0. 2 May,1996
2 Kuhfeld W F , Multinomial logit . Discrete choice modeling: An introduction to designing choice experiments , and collecting[A] . Processing and Analyzing Choice Data with SAS. SAS Corporation , January ,2001
3 Cragg, J.G. 1971. Some statistical models for limited dependent variables with applications to the demand for durable goods, Econometrics, vol 39
4 J. Maiti, A. Bhattacherjee , U. C. Gupta and S. C. RAY Indian Institute of Technology,Kharagpur, India: An application of Logit Model to Injury Experience
5 Weissenberger, E. 1984. An intertemporal system of dynamic consumer demand functions. Centre for Labour Economics, London School of Economics, Discussion Paper No. 186
6 Louviere, J. J., D. A. Hensher and J. D. Swait, Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application, Cambridge University Press, 2000
7 Dhrymes. P. 1984. Limited dependent variables. In Z. Griliches and M. Intriligator, eds., Handbook of Econometrics, vol,2, Amsterdam: North Holland.
8 Morhe Ben.Akiva and Steven R.Lerman(1984), Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, the MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England.
9 Train, K., Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, Cambridge University Press, 2002
10 Ben-Akiva, M. and S. R.Lerman, Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, 1997, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
11 Zavoina, R.. and W. McElvey. 1975. A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, Summer
12 杨桂元,唐小我 预测模型中参数估计的最优化方法 系统工程理论与实践 2002 ,22(8)
13 Sugeno, M. and S. H. Kwon, A Clusterwise Regression-type Model for Subjective Evaluation, Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Systems, Vol.7, No.2, 1995
14 McFadden, D. 1981. Econometric models of probabilistic choice. In Structural Analyses of Discrete Data, ed. C. Manski and D. McFadden, Cambridge, Mass: MIT press
15 Moore, W. L., J. J. Louviere and R. Verma, Using Conjoint Analysis to Help Design Product Platforms, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.22, 1999
16 McFadden, D., “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior”, in P. Zarembka (ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics, Academic Press, New York, 1974
1 Mondex International, Internet business set to reap millions[R], 2001
2 Brigham, Eugene F. and Louis C. Gapenski, Intermediate Financial Management[M], The Dryden Press , Orlando, FL, fourth edition., 1993.
3 P. Janson & M. Waidner, Electronic Payment over Open Networks[R], IBM Zurich Research Laboratory, April, 1995
4 Lucas, Peter, 2005, The promise of stored value[J],Digital Transactions, Vol. 2, No. 4, July/August,pp. 26–38
5 Davidson, Peter, ,Prepaid Cards: How Do They Function? How Are They Regulated [R], Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia,2004,June 2–3.
6 MasterCard. Introduces One SMART PayPass [EB/oL] http:// www.no-cash.ro /cartes%202004
7 Nipple, Victoria J., The economics and risks of prepaid cards: Emerging applications[R] Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, ,2004,June 2–3
8 Federal Reserve e System. The 2004 Federal Reserve Payments Study [R] Federal Reserve System .2004
9 Michael Woodford. Monetary Policy in the Information Economy. NBER Working Paper No.8674. December 2001, JEL No.E58
10 Barbara A., Will Electronic Money Be Adopted in the United Stated[W]. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Working Paper,1998
11 Basle Committee on Banking Supervision. Risk Management for Electronic Banking and Electronic Money Activities[R]. P3. March 1998
12 Pippow, Ingo., and Detlef Schoder., The Demand for Stored Value Payment Instruments[W], Working Paper, 2001
13 Baumol, W. J.,The Transaction Demand for Cash: An Inventory Theoretic Approach[J], Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol.66, 1952
14 Brealey, R. A. and S. C. Myers, Principles of Corporate Finance[M], fifth edition, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996
[1] 朱叶,公司财务学[M],上海:上海人民出版社,2003: 191-212,214-234.
[2] 尹龙,网络银行与电子货币—网络金融理论初探 [D],成都:西南财经大学 2002
[3] 蔡晓红,电子货币今日谈[J],《数字财富》2003,11.
[4] 查镇祥,论第四个货币时代的到来[J]. 《特区理论和实践》2002,8: 35-36
[5] 陈进,电子货币的社会化功能与发展 [J].《中国信用卡》2002,1:6-8
[6] 陈雨露、边卫红,电子货币的发展和中央银行面临的风险分析[J]. 《国际金融研究》2002,1: 53-57
[7] 董晓常,电子银行—安全为砥[J].《互联网周刊》2005, 4
[8] 董晓常,电子银行—支付谁为王? [J].《互联网周刊》2005, 4
[9] 樊玉红,对电子货币含义的再认识[J].《哈尔滨学院学报》2002,23(6):98-99
[10] 胡进,论电子货币的货币主权效应[J].《理论和实践》2002, 2:37-38
[11] 贾德奎,电子货币及其对货币政策的影响分析[J].《金融教学与研究》2002, 6: 22-23
[12] 黎东、符文佳,浅析电子货币对货币政策效应的冲击[J].《中央财经大学学报》2001,5: 33-36
[13] 李荣谦、方耀,.电子支付系统与电子货币:发展、影响及适当的管理框架[J].《中央银行季刊》 2000,23 (3)
[14] 李岩岩,电子货币的发展对政府管理部门的影响及对我国的现实意义[J].《中国行政管理》2002,10: 24-26
[15] 刘军,电子支付,因何而火? [J].《中国计算机用户》周刊 2005, 5
[16] 刘玄,浅析电子货币对货币供给的影响[J]. 《金融纵横》2002, 6:14-16
[17] 蒲成毅,电子货币的发展和前瞻[J].《经济师》2002, 7: 98-100
[18] 蒲成毅,数字现金对货币供应与货币流通速度的影响[J]. 《金融研究》2002, 5: 81-89
[19] 肖小波、许康,电子货币与传统货币的职能比较分析[J]. 《湖南大学学报》(社会科学版)2002, V16 (3): 177-178
[20] 谢平、尹龙,网络银行:21 世纪金融领域的一场革命[J]. 《财经科学》2000,4
[21] 谢平、尹龙,网络经济下的金融理论和金融治理[J]. 《经济研究》2001, 4:24-31
[22] 辛云勇、陈德君,电子银行非完全革命[J]. 《互联网周刊》2005, 4
[23] 许欣,全球 EMV 迁移 2008 年前大行动[J].《卡技术与安全》2005.3
[24] 尹龙,对我国网络银行的发展与监管问题的研究 [J]. 《金融研究》2001, 1:76-86
[25] 尹龙,网络银行:21 世纪金融领域的一场革命 [J]. 《财经科学》2000, 4:1-5
[26] 袁睿适,北京公交一行通遭遇生存尴尬 [J].《互联网周刊》2005, 5
[27] 袁翔珠,加强对电子货币监管的思考和探索 [J]《.广东商学院学报》2002, 2: 45-48
[28] 张颖,中国货币政策传导机制研究述评 [J]. 《经济学动态》2002,4:52-54
[29] 赵家敏,论电子货币对货币政策的影响[J」 《国际金融研究》2000,11: 19-24
[30] 周斌耀,Mondex 在香港一兼谈对试用“电子货币”的感受[J]. 《上海金融》 1997, 7: 45-46
[31] 朱光健、洪玮,电子货币的发展及对货币供给的影响[J]. 《江苏统计》2002, 5: 13-14
[32] 陈霖,基于不确定性的消费者选择理论[D],复旦学位论文 2005,12
[33] CNNIC 中 国 互 联 网 络 发 展 状 况 统 计 报 告 [ EB/OL ] 2005 ,http://www.ennic.com.cn
[34] 胡清汉,2004 年国际银行卡产业年中报告(2004.1-2004.6 )[EB/OL] http:// www.chinaunionpay.com/showcontent.aspx?newsid=1914
[35] 王颖捷,金融产业组织的市场结构[M] 北京:机械工业出版社,2004
[36] 赵旭、蒋振声、周军民,中国银行业市场结构与绩效实证研究「J].金融研究 2001,(3);59-67
[37] 朱克桐,我国银行业市场结构变迁的路径选择[J].金融论坛 2003,(12);6-9.
[38] 虞月君,中国信用卡产业集中度与生命周期分析[J]. 中国信用卡 2004,(1);18-23
[39] 张维迎,博弈论与信息经济学[M].上海:上海三联书店,1996.
[40] 丁友刚,对银行收费的理性思考[J]. 金融研究 2003,(11):18-25.
[41] 2004,(1);34-39.
[42] 吕义正,浅议银行卡产品定价. 中国信用卡 2004, (2) ;31-33.
[43] 王军,论电子货币发展对货币政策的影响及政策建议. 国际金融研究.2000.8: 50-55
[44] 赵家敏,论电子货币对货币政策的影响. 国际金融研究. 2000.11: 19-24
[45] 刘俊、丁家华、吴云松,金融技术发展与货币政策中介目标的选择. 2002.1:20-22
[46] 陈雨露、边卫红,电子货币发展与中央银行面临的风险分析. 国际金融研究.2002.1: 53-58
[47] 李翀,虚拟货币的发展与货币理论和政策的重构. 世界经济. 2003.8: 75-79
[48] 胡秋灵、张成虎,有关电子货币的若干争论. 国际金融研究. 2003.12: 65-68
[49] 赵家敏,论电子货币与传统银行业的关系. 国际金融研究. 1998.9: 75-77
[50] 冯晴,论中国银行卡市场金融创新. 国际金融研究. 2003.5: 56-61
[51] 周启海、周屹,论我国电子货币微观成本与宏观安全机制创新. 重庆大学学报 (社会科学版). 2005.1: 31-34
[52] 高丛,电子货币支付方案的比较及我国电子货币支付的对策研究. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版). 2003.5: 20-23
[53] 李成, 刘社芳. 电子货币发展带来的制度挑战与思考[J]. 上海金融, 2004.6: 52-54
[54] 丁国荣,基于 Hotelling 模型的网络外部性研究[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2004, 13 (5) :429-432.
[55] 吴泗宗、蒋海华,对网络外部性的经济学分析[J].同济大学学报(社会科学版),2002, 13 (6) : 70-77.
[56] 胥莉、陈宏民、孙武军,商户受理银行卡支付方式的策略性行为研究[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2005,14(3): 193-201.
[57] 郑伟,双边市场中的平台竞争— 带转移成本的两期情形:(D).武汉:武汉大学,2004.
[58] 李翀,虚拟货币的发展与货币理论和政策的重构. 世界经济. 2003.8: 75-79
[59] 陈雨露、边卫红,电子货币发展与中央银行面临的风险分析. 国际金融研究.2002.1: 53-58
[60] 王德财、张维华、骆品亮,对等收费下网络之间的价格竞争[J].复旦学报(自然科学版),2001,40(2):665-669.
[61] 骆品亮、林丽闽,网络接入定价与规制改革:以电信业为例[J].上海管理科学,2002,3(2):14-17.
[62] 张维华、骆品亮,网络双向接入定价的效率分析[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2002,11(4):319-323.
[63] George D.Choksy. Electronic Money Flows: The Molding of Financial Order[J] .Journal of Economic Issues. Dec 1992.26,1. ABI/INFORM Global pg.1305
[64] Jeffrey M Lacker,John A Weinberg, Can the Fed be a payment system innovator[J]. Economic Quartarly-Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. Spring 1998.84 ,2.ABI/INFORM Global pg.1
[65] Jussi S Snellman, Jukka M Vesala, and David B Humphrey. Substitution of noncash payment instruments for cash in Europe[J]. Journal of Financial Services Research. 2001.(19),2,3. ABI/INFORM Global pg.131
[66] Jan Marc Berk. Central banking and financial innovation. A survey of the modern literature[J]. Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review. Sep 2002. Vol.55,Iss.222:263-297
[67] Elham Mafi-Kreft. The Relationship Between Currency Competition and Inflation.[R].Southern Economic Association Meeting: San Antonio , Texas. November 2003
[68] Matonis, Jon. Digital Cash & Monetary Freedom[R]. Proceedings of INET'95. June 1995: 27-30
[69] Tatsuo Tanaka. Possible Economic Consequences of Digital Cash[R]. Proceedings of INET'96. March 1996
[70] Bernkopf, Mark. Electronic Cash and Monetary Policy(1996). First Monday available at: www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue1/ecash
[71] Aleksandar Stojanovic. E-money in transitional economies[J]. comparative Economic Studies. Spring 2001. 43,1. ABI/INFORM Global
[72] Frederic S. Mishkin. the Economics of Money , Banking , and Financial Markets[M].Addison-Wesley Press. 1998: 48-49
[73] Bank for International Settlements. Policy issues for central banks in retail payments.[R] March 2003
[74] Basle Committee on Banking Supervision. Risk Management for Electronic Banking and Electronic Money Activities[R]. P3. March 1998
[75] F.X. Browne, David Cronin. Payments technologies[J], financial innovation, and laissez-faire banking. Spring/Summer 1995. Vol.15,Iss.1: 101-112
[76] Stabla, Witold (2001). Electronic payment systems. Accessed at http:// strony.wp.pl /wp/ws19/
[77] N.Regory Mankiw. Macroeconomics. Worth Publishers. 2000: 42-43
[78] Otmar Issing. New Technologies in Payments: A Challenge to Monetary Policy. July 2000
[79] White, L.H. Thoughts on the Economics of Digital Currency. Extropy, 15(7)(2).1995: 16-18
[80] Otmar Issing. New Technologies in Payments: A Challenge to Monetary Policy. July 2000
[81] Frederic S.Mishkin. the Economics of Money , Banking , and Financial Markets[M].Addison-Wesley Press: 480-481.
[82] Friedman, Benjamin M. The Future of Monetary Policy: The Central Bank as an Army with Only a Signal Corps?. International Finance 2. 1999: 321-338
[83] Goodhart, Charles A.E. Can Central Banking Survive the IT Revolution International Finance. 2000
[84] Claessens, Stijn, Thomas Glaessner et al. E-Finance in Emerging Markets: Is Leap frogging possible?[J]. The World Bank, Financial Sector Discussion Paper no.7.June 2001
[85] Sellon, Gordon H., and Stuart E. Weiner. Monetary Policy Without Reserve Requirements: Analytical Issues[J]. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review 81(4). 1996: 5-24
[86] Clinton, Kevin. Implementation of Monetary Policy in a Regime with Zero Reserve Requirements[W]. Banking of Canada working paper no.97-8. April 1997
[87] Michael Woodford. Monetary Policy in the Information Economy. NBER Working Paper No.8674. December 2001, JEL No.E58
[88] Spindt, Paul A., and Ronald J.Hoffmeister. The Micromechanics of the Federal Funds Markets: Implications for Day-of-the-Week Effects in Funds Rates Variability[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 23. 1988: 401-416
[89] Armstrong, M. Competition in Two-Sided Markets[J], mimeo, (2002).Nuffield College, University of Oxford
[90] Baxter,W.F. Bank interchange of transactional paper: legal perspectives[J], Journal of Law andEconomics (1983).26: 541-588.
[91] Chakravorti, S Theory of Credit Card Networks: A Survey of the Literature[J]. Review of Network Economics. .(2003).2(2):50-68.
[92] Chakravorti, S. and W.R. Emmons.. Who pays for credit cards?[J] Journal of Consumer Affairs,Winter, forthcoming (2003)
[93] Chakravorti, S. and T. To. A theory of credit cards[J], mimeo, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. (2002).
[94] Economides, N. The economics of networks[J], International Journal of Industrial Organization (1996).14:673-699
[95] Evans, D., Schmalensee, R.. The Economics of the Payment Card Industry[M],(1993)Cambridge, MA:National Economic Research Associates, Inc.
[96] Gans, J. S. and S. P. King. The Neutrality of Interchange Fees in Payment Systems[J], Topics in Economic Analysis & Policy, (2003)3(1):1-18.
[97] Guthrie, G. and J. Wright. Competing payment schemes[W], University of Auckland Working Paper (2003).No. 245.
[98] Hausman, JA. and G.K. Leonard, and J. Tirole. On Nonexclusive Membership in Competing Joint Ventures, RAND Journal of Economics, (2003).34(1): 43-62.
[99] Katz , M , and C. Shapiro. Network Externalities , Competition , and Compatibility[J], American Economic Review, (1985).75: 424-440.
[100] Katz, M. Reform of Credit Card Schemes in Australia [R], Sydney, Australia: Reserve Bank of Australia (2001)..
[101] Laffont, J.J., Rey, P., and J. Tirole. Network Competition I. Overview and Nondiscriminatory Pricing[J], Rand Journal of Economics, (1998a).29(1): 1-37.
[102] Laffont, J.J., Rey, P., and J. Tirole.. Network Competition: II. PriceDiscrimination, Rand Journal of Economics, (1998b)29(1): 38-56.
[103] Reserve Bank of Australia. Reform of credit card schemes in Australia: IV Knal reforms and regulation impact statement. http://www.rba.gov.au. (2002).
[104] Rochet, J-C. and J. Tirole. Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets[J], Journal of the European Economic Association, (2003).1(4).
[105] Rochet, J-C. and J. Tirole.. Cooperation Among Competitors: Some Economics of Payment Card Associations[J]. RAND Journal of Economics, (2002)Vol. 33: 549-570.
[106] Rochet, J-C. and J. Tirole. (2002).Two-Sided Markets: An Overview. RAND Journal of Economics,Vol. 33: 549-570.
[107] Schmalensee, R.·Payment Systems and Interchange Fees. Journal of Industrial Economics, (2002)Vol. 50:103-122.
[108] Schwartz, M. and D.R. Vincent. Same price, cash or card: vertical control by payments networks, Georgetown University Working Paper, (2002). 9.
[109] Wright, J.. Optimal card payment systems[J], European Economic Review, forthcoming. (2003a)
[110] Wright, J..Determinants of Optimal Interchange Fees in Payment Systems[J], Journal of Industrial Economics, forthcoming. (2003b)
[111] Wright, J. Optimal card payment systems[J], European Economic Review, forthcoming. (2003c).
[112] Wright, J. Pricing in debit and credit card schemes[J], Economics Letters, forthcoming. (2003d).
[113] Anthony M. Santomero John J. Seater. Alternative Monies and the Demand for Media of Exchange [J] Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 1996 Vol. 28, pp. 942-960.
[114] Duca, John V.,and William C. Whitesell. Credit Cards and Money Demand: A Cross-sectional Study, [J] Journal of Money, Credit,and Banking, May 1995, Vol. 27, 1995, pp. 604-23
[115] Edward L. Whalen. An Extension of The Baumol-Tobin Approach to The Transactions Demand of Cash. [J] Journal of Finance, Mar, 1968. Vol. 23, No. 1. pp.113-134
[116] FAMA. E, MACBETH, J. Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests [J] Journal of Political of Economy. 1973
[117] Folkertsma, C. K.;Hebbink, G. E. (1998):Cash Management and the Choice of Payment Media: A critical Survey of the Theory. In: DeNederlandsche Bank (Ed.):Research Memorandum WO&E Nr. 532.
[118] Geoffrey R. Gerdes, Jack K. Walton II. The Use of Checks and Other Noncash Payment Instruments in the United States[J]Federal Reserve Bulletin, August 2002 360-374
[119] Humphrey, David B, Lawrence B. Pulley, and Jukka M. Vesala. Cash, Paper, and Electronic Payments: A Cross Country Analysis, [J] Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 1996, Vol. 28, pp. 914-39.
[120] James Tobin. The Interest-elasticity of Transactions Demand for Cash. [J] Review of Economics and Statistics. 1956. 38(3) :241-247.
[121] MERTON, R Rand (Bell).theory of rational option pricing [J]journal of economics.1973
[122] MERTON, R. An intertemporal asset pricing model [J] Econometrica. 1973
[123] OZ Shy Julla Tarkka. The Market for Electronic Cash Cards [J] Journal of of Money, Credit, and Banking. May 2002 Vol. 34. No. 2.
[124] Sujit Chakravorti and Timothy McHugh. Why do we use so many checks?[J] Economic Perspectives Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.3Q/2002
[125] Whitesell, W.:Deposit Banks and the Market for Payment Media. [J] Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 1992 Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 483-498.
[126] Whitesell, William. The Demand for Currency versus Debitable Accounts: A Note. J]Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 1989. 21, 246-257.
[127] William J. Baumol. The Transactions Demand for Cash: An Inventory Theoretic Approach. [J] Quart. Jour. Econ.,1952. 66:545-556.
[128] BIS. Survey of developments in electronic money and internet and mobile payments [R].BIS. 2004.
[129] ECB. Euro-denominated electronic money in circulation in the euro area [R」.ECB 2004
[130] Federal Reserve e System. The 2004 Federal Reserve Payments Study [R] Federal Reserve System .2004
[131] U. S Census Bureau. QUARTERLY RETAIL E-COMMERCE SALES, 3RD QUARTER.[R] U.S Census Bureau. 2004
[132] Atkinson, A., and J. Stiglitz, Lectures on Public Economics,[M] New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
[133] Berkman, H., The Value of Expected Cash Flow: Does the Market Value Flexibility ? [J] APFA/PACAP Conference , July 1996.
[134] Bjerksund, P., and E Ekern, Managing Investment Opportunities Under Price Uncertainty: From the Last Chance to Wait and See Strategies[J], Financial Management, Autumn 1990, pp.65-83.
[135] Brealey, R. A. and S. C. Myers, Principles of Corporate Finance[M], fifth edition, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996.
[136] Breen, Richard, Binomial Option Pricing and The Condition for Early Exercise: An Example Using Foreign Exchange Option[J], The Economic and Social Review, 21(2) 1990, pp.151-161.
[137] Brennan, M. J., and S. E. Schwartz, Evaluating Natural Resource Investments[J], Journal of Business, 58(2), 1985, pp.135-157.
[138] Brigham , Eugene F. and Louis C. Gapenski , Intermediate Financial Management[M], The Dryden Press , Orlando, FL, fourth edition., 1993.
[139] Capozza, D. and Y. Li, The Intensity and Timing of Investment: The Case of Land[J], The American Economic Review, 84(8), Sep. 1993, pp.889-904.
[140] Cox, John C., Stephen A, Ross, and Mark Rubinstein, Option Pricing: A Simplified Approach,[J] Journal of Financial Economics , 7, 1979, pp.229-263.
[141] Dentskevich, P. and G. Salkin, Valuation of Real Project Using Option Pricing Techniques, Omega, 19(4), 1991, pp.207-222.
[142] Dixit A.K. and R.S. Pindick, The Option Approach to Capital Investment,[J] Harvard Business Review, May-June 1995, pp.105-115.
[143] Ekern, S., An Option Pricing Approach to Evaluate Petroleum Projects[J], Energy Economics, April 1988, pp.91-99.
[144] Myers, S. C., Finance Theory and Financial Strategy,[J] Interfaces, 14(1), 1984, pp.126-137.
[145] Reenen, John Van, The Creation and Capture of Rents: Wages and Innovation in a Panel of U.K. Companies[J], The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(1), pp.195-226.
[146] Scarso, Enrico, Timing the Adoption of a New Technology: An Option-Based Approach[J], Management Decision, 34(3), 1996, pp.41-48.
[147] Smit, Han T.J., and L. A. Aukum, A Real Option and Game-Theoretic Approach to Corporate Investment Strategy under Competition[J], Financial Management, Aut.1993, pp.241-250.
[148] Smith , D. J. , Incorporating Risk into Capital Budgeting Decision Using Simulation[J], Management Decision, 32(9), 1994, pp20-26.
[149] Smith, J. E. and R. F. Nau, Valuing Risky Projects: Option Pricing Theory and Decision Analysis[J], Management Science , 41(5), May 1995, pp.795-816.
[150] Szymanski, Stefan, The Optimal Timing of Infrastructure Investment[J], Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Sep.1991, pp.247-258.
[151] Teisberg, Elizabeth Olmsted, An Option Valuation Analysis of Investment Choices of a Regulated Firm[J], Management Science , 40(4), Apr.1994, pp.535-548.
[152] Threadgold, A., Private Financing of Infrastructure and Other Long-Term Capital Projects[J], Journal of Applied Finance and Investment, 1(1), Mar. 1996, pp.7-.15
[153] Titman, S., Urban Land Prices under Uncertainty, The American Economic Review, 75(3), June 1985, pp.505-514.
[154] Baumol, W. J.,The Transaction Demand for Cash: An Inventory Theoretic Approach[J], Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol.66, 1952.
[155] Echikson, William., A Dash for ‘E-cash’ in Europe[J]. Christian Science Monitor, vol.91, 1998.
[156] Folkertsma, C. K., and Hebbink, G. E., Cash Management and the Choice of Payment Media:A Critical Survey of the Theory[J]. De Nederlandsche Bank&E Nr.532, 1998. (Ed.) ; Research Memorandum WO
[157] Barbara A., Will Electronic Money Be Adopted in the United Stated[W]. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Working Paper,1998.
[158] Kahn, Charles M., and William Roberds., Demandable Debts as a Means of Payment: Banknotes versus Checks [J]. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, Vol.31, No.3(August 1999, Part 2)
[159] McAndrew, James J., Banking and Payment System Stability in an Electronic Money World[J]. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Working Paper, 1997.5
[160] Pippow, Ingo., and Detlef Schoder., The Demand for Stored Value Payment Instruments[W], Working Paper, 2001.
[161] Prinz, A., Money in the Real and the Virtual World:E-Money, C-Money and the Demand for CB-Money[J];Netnomics 1(1),1999.
[162] Shy, Oz, and Juha Tarkka, The Market for Electronic Cash Card[J]. Journal ofMoney, Credit and Banking, Vol.34, No.2, 2002.
[163] Tobin, J., The Interest Elasticity of Transactions Demand for Cash[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics,Vol.38, 1956.
[164] Van Hove, L., Electronic Purses: Which Way to Go?[J]. First Monday, Vol.5, No. 7, 2000.
[165] Whitesell, W., Deposit Banks and the Market for Payment Media[J]. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol.24, No.4, 1992.
[166] Baltenspergr, E, Alternative Approaches to the Theory of the Banking Firm,[J] Journal of Monetary Economics, (1980)6.
[167] Berentsen,Aleksander, Monetary Policy Implications of Digital Money[J], International Review of Social Science, (1998)Vol.51,pp.89-117.
[168] Deutsche Bunsdes bank, Recent Developments in Electronic Money[R], Deutsche Bundes bank Monthly Report, (1999)June, p41-57.
[169] Dorn, James A.,The Futureof Money in the Information Age[R].,The Cato Institute ,Washington, D.C.. (1997)
[170] Weiner, Stuart E, "Electronic Payments in the U.S. Economy: An Overview[R], Economic Review, Fourth Quarter, (1999) The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
[171] Bomfim, Antulio N. Pre-Announcement Effects, News and Volatility: Monetary Policy and the Stock Market,[R]. Federal Reserve Board, FEDS paperno.2000-50,November.
[172] Furfine, CraigH., Inter-bank Payments and the Daily Federal Funds Rate,[J] Journal of Monetary Economics (2000) 46:535-553.
[173] Goodhart, Charles A. E., How Can Non-Interest-Bearing Assets Coexist with Safe Interest Bearing Assets?[J] British Review of Economic Issues (1986)8: 1-12.
[174] Hampton, Tim,Y2K and Banking System Liquidity[J]. Reserve Bank of New Zealand Bulletin(2000)63: 52-60.
[175] Kuttner, Kenneth N., Monetary Policy Surprises and Interest Rates: Evidence from the Fed Funds Futures Market[J] Journal of Monetary Economics(2001)47:523-544.
[176] Meulendyke, Anne-Marie, U.S. Monetary Policy and Financial Markets[R] ,New York: Federal Reserve Bank of New York,. (1998)
[177] Taylor,John B, Expectations, Open Market Operations, and Changes in the Federal Funds Rate[J], Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review .(2001)83(4): 33-47.
[178] B. Clifford Neuman, Gennady Medvinsky, Requirements for Network Payment: The NetCheque Perspective,[J] IEEE Compcon, March 1995.
[179] B. Clifford Neuman, “Security, Payment, and Privacy for Network Commerce, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, (1995) 13(8):1523-1531..
[180] BIS, Implication for Central Banks of The Development of Electronic Money,[R] Bank for International Settlements, 1996.
[181] Buttyan, L., Removing the financial incentive to cheat in Micropayment schemes,[J] Electronics Letters, (2000)36., pp.132-133.
[182] Carsten Schmidt and Rudolf Müller, “A Framework for Micropayment Evaluation, http://macke.wiwi.hu-berlin.de/IMI/Micropayments.html, 1997.
[183] Ghosh Anup K., E-Commerce Security: weak links, best defense[M], John Wiley and Sons, New York, N. Y., 1998.
[184] G. Medvinsky, Clifford Neumann, “NetCash: A design for practical electronic currency on the internet,”[R] 1st Acm Conference on Computer and Communication Security, ,pp.102-106, New York 1993.
[185] Jan Camenisch, Jean-Marc Piveteau, and Markus Stadler. 3rd ACM Computer and Communication Security '96, pp.88-94, ACM press, March 1996.
[186] K. Sung, Analysis and Design of the Internet Based Payment System,[R] http://iis.kaist.ac.kr/ ~sky/thesis/thesis.html
[187] Mondex International, Internet business set to reap millions[R], 2001.
[188] Peter Wayner, Digital Cash – Commerce on the Net[R] 1997.
[189] Philip Kotler, Marketing Management[M], Prentice-Hall, 2000.
[190] P. Janson & M. Waidner, Electronic Payment over Open Networks[R], IBM Zurich Research Laboratory, April, 1995.
[191] Berentsen A., Monetary policy implications of digital money[J]. Kyklos, 1998 vol 51 pp 89-117.
[192] Goodhart C.A.E., Can central banking Survive the IT Revolution[R] Future of Monetary Policy and Banking Conference, World Bank, 2000,11 July.
[193] Markose S. M. et Lose Y. J., Network effects on cash-card substitution in transactions and low interest[J] The Economic Journal, 2003 Vol113(487), pp456-476.
[194] Rochet J. C. et Tirole J., 2002, Cooperation among competitors : The economics of payment card associations[J], Rand Journal of Economics, 2002 vol33 (4) , pp 549-570.
[195] Shy O. et Tarkka J., The market for electronic Cash cards" Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2002 vol34 (2), pp 299-314.
[196] Whitesell W. C.,,Deposit banks and the market for payment media[J]. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 1992 vol24 (4), pp 483-498.
[197] Wright J.,,Princing in debit and credit card schemes[J], Economics Letters, forthcoming. 2003(4).