大学生孤独感、社会支持状况对主观幸福感的影响研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
研究目的:研究大学生孤独感、社会支持状况对主观幸福感的影响及关系,进一步了解大学生主观幸福感的影响因素。
     研究方法:
     采用问卷法和访谈法。“社会支持量表”有10个条目,包括客观支持、主观支持和对社会支持的利用度三个维度;“领悟社会支持量表”有12个条目,包括家庭支持、朋友支持和其他支持三个维度;“大学生孤独感问卷(UCLA)"包含有11个“孤独”正序条目与9个“非孤独”反序条目;“主观幸福感问卷”有19个条目,包括整体生活满意度、积极情感和消极情感三个分量表和完全开放式无结构访谈。
     研究对象。被试是从宿州学院、巢湖学院、合肥工业大学三所高校选取,共1200名本科生。回收问卷998份,回收率为83.2%,剔除无效问卷8份,有效问卷共计990份,有效率为99.2%,其中宿州学院350人,巢湖学院307人,合肥工业大学333人;其中男生524人,占52.9%;女生466人,占47.1%,平均年龄为20.55岁。
     研究结论:
     (1)大学生生活满意度略低于中等水平。
     (2)大学生在主观幸福感及其各维度上存在性别、专业、生源地、是否独生、重点与非重点院校、年级、家庭月收入等差异,女生在生活满意度、总幸福感上极其显著高于男生,在消极情感上显著低于男生;文科生在生活满意度、总幸福感上极其显著高于理科生,在积极情感上显著高于理科生;城镇生在生活满意度、总幸福感上极其显著高于农村生,在积极情感上显著高于农村生;独生子女在生活满意度、总幸福感上极其显著高于非独生子女;重点院校大学生主观幸福感显著高于新升本院校;大一学生在主观幸福感上显著高于大二学生、大三学生在主观幸福感上显著高于大二学生;在家庭月收入上主观幸福感呈现随着家庭收入越高幸福感越高的趋势。
     (3)不同来源的社会支持对大学生的主观幸福感影响不同,主观支持、对支持的利用度、朋友支持、其他支持对大学生的主观幸福感影响最大。
     (4)大学生孤独感与主观幸福感、生活满意度、积极情感呈显著负相关,与消极情感呈显著正相关。
     (5)大学生社会支持、孤独感和主观幸福感之间存在潜在关系,其中孤独感作为中介变量对社会支持和主观幸福感关系产生影响。
Purpose:This is to Study the impact of loneliness and social support among college students on the subjective well- being and the relations, then to further probe into the factors on SWB of college students.
     Methods:The study mainly adopted the methods of questionnaires and interviews. There were 10 items in" Social Support Rating Scale", including the objective support, subjective support and utilization of social support in three dimensions; there were 12 entries in "Perceived Social Support Scale", including family support, friend support and other support three dimensions;" UCLA Loneliness Scale " contained 11 positive sequence entries of "Loneliness" and 9 reverse order entries of "non-loneliness"; "subjective well-being Scale" contained 19 entries, including three subscales---the overall life satisfaction, degree of positive effect and negative effect; and a completely open and unstructured interviews.
     Objects:The objects were 1,200 undergraduates selected from Suzhou University, Chaohu College and Hefei University of Technology.998 questionnaires were returned and the rate of recovery was 83.2%,8 invalid questionnaires were excluded, a total of 990 valid questionnaires, and the effective rate was 99.2%, of which 350 of Suzhou University,307 of Chaohu College,333 of Hefei University of Technology; of which 524 were boys, accounting for 52.9%; girls 466, accounting for 47.1%, with an average age of 20.55 years.
     Conclusions:
     (1)The life satisfaction of college students was slightly lower than the middle level.
     (2) College students'SWB and its dimensions were influenced by sex, majors, the only child or not, priority universities or not, grade, monthly income of family and so on. In life satisfaction, general happiness girls were significantly higher than boys, while the negative emotion was significantly lower than boys; arts students in life satisfaction, general happiness were significantly higher than the engineer students, the positive affect was significantly higher than that of science students; urban students in life satisfaction, general happiness were significantly higher than that of the extremely rural students, the positive emotional was significantly higher than rural students; The only child in life satisfaction, general well-being was significantly higher than the non only child; the SWB of College Students in the priority universities and colleges was significantly higher than that of the newly-rising ones; freshmen were significantly higher than the sophomore and juniors were significantly higher than the sophomores; there's tendency in SWB that the more the monthly income of family the higher the SWB.
     (3) There are various impacts of different sources of social support on SWB of college students, of which subjective support, utilization of support, friend support, and other support have the most influences on college students'SWB.
     (4) Loneliness was significantly negatively related to subjective well-being, life satisfaction and positive effect and was positively related to negative emotions.
     (5) There's potential relationship among social support, loneliness and subjective well-being of College students, in which loneliness as an intennediary variable had an influence on social support and subjective well-being.
引文
[1]朱自贤.心理学大词典[M].北京师范大学出版社.1989
    [2]李传银,王燕.孤独心理研究的回顾[J].社会心理研究.1999;1;35-44
    [3]黄海.大学生孤独感现状及其影响因素的研究[D].2004
    [4]Peplau, L. A.,& Perlman, D. Loneliness:A Soureebook of Current Theory [J].Researeh, and Therapy, New York, Wiley-Interscienee,1982(b)
    [5]Boys, S.,&Perlman, D., Gender differences in loneliness[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,1985, (11):63-74
    [6]李传银,檀立,刘娅俐.大中专生孤独、抑郁比较研究[J].健康心理学杂志,1998,6(1):86-87
    [7]孟晋.533大学生孤独感状况调查[J].健康心理学杂志,2002,10(2):113-116
    [8]马素红.在校硕士研究生孤独感状况及与其依恋类型、社会支持的关系研究[D].2006
    [9]Buyukshin, A. Comparison of university students with and without close relationships in terms of some psychological factoes[J]. Unpublished MSc Thesis. Ankara:Ankara University, Institute of SocialSciences,2001
    [10]Perlman,D. Age differences in loneliness:A metaanalysis[M]. Paper presented at the American Psychological Assiciation. Boston,1990
    [11]Harris, J. Associates, The myth and reality of aging in America[J]. Washington, DC:National Council on the Aging,1974
    [12]Peplau, L. A.&PerlmanD., Loneliness:a source book of current theory research and therapy [M].New York,Wiley,1982.
    [13]Helen, C.&Adrian, F., Personality, peer-relations, and self confidence as predictors of happiness and loneliness[J]. Journal of Adolescence,2002, (25):327-339
    [14]Stokes, P. The relation of social network and individual difference variables to loneliness[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1985,48(4):981-990
    [15]Russell, D., Cutrona, C. E., Rose, J.,& Yurko, K., Social and emotional loneliness:an examination of Weiss's typology of loneliness[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
    [16]胡立荣.聋哑儿童人格特征与社交焦虑、自尊、孤独的研究[J].中国民政医学杂志,2002,(1):24-25
    [17]杨玲,刘基,李丽丽.吸毒者孤独感与白尊水平的调查与分析[J].西北师大学报(社会科版),2006,43(2):105-108
    [18]KrautRobert, Patterson Michael, Landmark Vicki, Kiesler Sara, Mukophadhyay Tridas, Scherlis William. Internet paradox:A social technology the reduces social in-volvernen and psychological well-being[J]. American Psycholonist,1998,53(9)
    [19]Janet Morahan-Martin, Phllis Schumacher. Loneliness and social uses of the internet [J]. Computers in Human Behavior,2003,19(6):659-671
    [20]Amichai-Hamburger, Y, Ben-Artzi, E. Loneliness and Internet use[J]. Computers in Human Behavior,2003,19(1):71-80
    [21]黄才炎,严标宾.大学生手机短信交往行为与孤独感的关系研究[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2006,14(3):255-257
    [22]冯霞.大学生成人依恋、社会支持与其主观幸福感影响研究[D].2008
    [23]贺寨平.国外社会支持网研究综述[J].国外社会科学,2001,1:76-81
    [24]李强.社会支持与个体心理健康[J].天津社会科学.1998,1:67-70
    [25]陈成文.论社会支持的社会学意义[J].湖南师范大学社会科学学报,2000,29(6):25-31
    [26]周林刚.社会支持理论—一个文献的回顾[J].广西师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,26(3):11-20
    [27]Thoits PA:Dimensions of Life events that infkuence psychological distress:an evaluation and synthesis of the literature[J]. In:Kaplan H. et(eds):psychological stress. lsted, New York, Acdemic Press,1983:33-103
    [28]严标宾.社会支持对大学生主观幸福感的影响研究[D].2003
    [29]段建华.主观幸福感概述[J].心理学动态,1996,4(1)
    [30]于静华.大学生主观幸福感研究综述[J].哈尔滨学院学报2005,26(5):97-99
    [31]心理卫生评定量表手册[M].中国心理卫生杂志社,1999:99-99
    [32]Haring, M. J., Stoek, W. A & Okun, M. A. A research synthesis of gender and social class as correlates of subjective well being[J]. Human Relation, 1984,37,645-657
    [33]Enuuons, R.A.,& Diener, E. (1985). Factors predicting satisfaction judgens:A comparative examination[J]. Social Indicators Research,16, 157-167.
    [34]郑雪,严标宾,邱林.广州大学生主观幸福感研究[J].心理学探新,2001,21(4):46-50
    [35]何瑛.重庆大学生主观幸福感状况及其影响因素[J].重庆师专学报,2000,19(2):35-38
    [36]吴丹伟.大学生的社会支持-自我价值对主观幸福感的影响的研究[D].2004
    [37]姚春生,何耐灵,沈琪.老年大学学学员主观幸福感及其有关因素分析[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1995,9(6):123-125
    [38]张红静.影响老年人主观幸福感的相关因素分析[J].中国老年学杂志,2002.22:46-48
    [39]陈鹏,陈曲.大学生主观幸福感综述[J].绥化学院学报,2007.27(6):178-180
    [40]严标宾,郑雪,邱林.大学生主观幸福感的影响因素研究[J].华南师范大学学报,2003,2:23-25
    [41]Markus, H. R., Kitayama, S. "Culture and the Self:Implizcations for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation. " [J]psychological Review.1991,98: 224-253.
    [42]Suh, E., Diener, E., Oishi. S., and Triandis, H. C. "The Shifting Basis of Life Satisfaction Judgments Across Cultures:Emotion versus Norm. " [J]Journal of personality and social Psychology.1998,74:482-493
    [43]郑雪,邱林.大学生主观幸福感的跨文化研究:来自48个国家和地区的调查报告[J].心理科学,2003,26(5):851-855
    [44]郑雪,严标宾,邱林,张兴贵.幸福心理学[M].暨南大学出版社,2004
    [45]段建华.总体幸福感量表在我国大学生中的试用结果与分析[J].中国临床心理学杂志,1996,4(1):56-57
    [46]陈静,杨宏飞.杭州市大学生生活满意感调查[J].社会科学研究,2003,(11):22-23
    [47].佟月华.低收入大学生一般自我效能感、主观幸福感研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2003,11(4):652-656
    [48]张雯,郑日昌.大学生主观幸福感及其影响因素[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2004,18(1):61-63
    [49]李娟,张丽芳,李永在.父母教养方式、社会支持对盲童孤独感的影响[J].心理科学,2002,25(4):493-494,505
    [50]申继亮,周丽清,佟雁,张金颖.亲子支持和孝顺期待对老年人孤独感的影响[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2003,(3):167-169
    [51]辛自强,池丽萍.快乐感与社会支持的关系[J].心理学报,2001,33(5):442-447
    [52]吴丹伟,刘红艳.大学生的主观幸福感与社会支持的相关研究[J].河北科技大学学报(社会科学版),2005,5(3):94-96
    [53]吴捷.老年人社会支持、孤独感与主观幸福感的关系[J].心理科学,2008,31(4):984-986
    [54]心理卫生评定量表手册[M].中国心理卫生杂志社,1999:131-133
    [55]心理卫生评定量表手册[M].中国心理卫生杂志社,1999:284-287
    [56]丁园园.大学生主观幸福感研究[D].2005
    [57]李靖,赵郁金.Campbell幸福感量表用于中国大学生的试测报告[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2000,4(8):225-224
    [58]严标宾,郑雪,邱林.社会支持对大学生主观幸福感的影响[J].应用心理学,2003(4):45-47
    [59]李景华.大学生的心理健康测试分析[J].西安联合大学学报(社会科学版),2000,(3):11-13
    [60]胡洁,姬天舒,冯凤莲.父母教养方式与大学生总体幸福感的相关研究[J].健康心理学杂志,2002,22(1):241-243
    [61]严标宾,郑雪,邱林.大学生主观幸福感的影响因素研究[J].华南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2003,(2):64-48
    [62]李莉.人口统计学因素及社会支持对大学生主观幸福感的影响[D].2007
    [63]郭峰,曹志辉.医学新生总体幸福感状况的调查[J].中国煤炭工业医学杂志,2003,(12):18-20
    [64]庞文,韩阳.大学生主观幸福感调查研究[J].青年探索,2006,(3):40-43
    [65]景淑华,张积家.大学生主观幸福感的研究[J].青年研究,1997,(1):21-25

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700