饭店员工心理资本与工作绩效的关系研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
随着饭店业竞争的日趋激烈,传统意义上的资源所带来的竞争优势变得越来越模糊,经营者不得不开始寻求新的竞争方式。心理资本概念的提出适时地为人们提供了一个全新的视角,即饭店可以通过测量、干预和管理员工的心理资本来制定科学的人才发展计划,优化企业人才结构,强化竞争优势,最终为饭店带来长远效益。
     一直以来,国内外学者都没有间断对工作绩效的研究,其影响因素由最初的个人特质和组织结构发展到后来更为复杂的个人能力、认知水平和行为过程等。可以说,学者们对于工作绩效的研究已经较为深入和全面,并已取得可观的研究成果。相比之下,对心理资本理论的研究就显得十分不足。学者们对这一理论的研究在本世纪初才初见端倪,就目前来讲,理论基础还相对薄弱,学者们仍主要集中于对其概念和维度的确定,针对其与其他变量关系的研究还不是十分成熟,更加缺乏专门针对服务业员工心理资本问题的实证研究。可以说,心理资本理论还存在很大的研究空间,还有很多值得我们进一步研究和探讨的问题。
     本研究试图以实证研究的方法,探讨饭店员工心理资本与工作绩效之间的关系,检验两者之间是否存在相互影响以及影响的程度如何。在阅读相关文献并了解国内外相关研究进程的基础上,明确本文的研究背景和研究内容,然后进行研究设计并提出假设,本研究假设饭店员工的心理资本会影响其工作绩效,同时工作绩效水平也会对其心理资本状态产生显著影响。在完成数据收集工作之后,利用SPSS16.0统计工具进行数据分析和处理,对本文提出的假设进行验证,得出如下结论:
     (1)饭店员工心理资本对其工作绩效有影响。但心理资本4个维度对工作绩效2个维度的影响作用不同。其中,仅乐观水平对任务绩效不具有影响作用,心理资本的其他3个维度均对工作绩效的2个维度有显著影响。
     (2)工作绩效水平也会影响员工的心理资本。但不同变量间的具体影响情况存在较大差异。其中,任务绩效水平会影响员工的自信和希望水平,而对心理资本的其他两个维度即乐观和回复力没有影响作用;周边绩效会影响员工的自信、乐观及回复力,而对希望没有影响作用。
     (3)从差异分析的结果来看,饭店员工的心理资本和工作绩效水平在性别上不存在显著差异;在年龄方面,25岁以下员工的任务绩效显著低于26到30岁的员工,21到25岁员工的周边绩效显著低于26到30岁的员工,20岁以下员工的自我效能感水平显著低于其他年龄段的员工,20岁以下员工的回复力水平显著低于26到30岁的员工;在学历方面,高中或中专以下学历员工的周边绩效显著低于本科及以上学历员工,高中或中专以下学历员工的自我效能感和回复力水平均显著低于本科及以上学历员工;在工作部门方面,前厅部员工的周边绩效显著高于餐饮部员工;在工作年限方面,工作年限在1年以下的员工乐观水平显著低于工作年限在3年以上的员工
     在以上研究结论的基础上,本文将分别从自我效能感、希望、乐观及回复力四个方面为饭店人力资源管理部门对员工心理资本的开发和管理工作提供一些建议。
     本研究将在一定程度上丰富前人对于心理资本理论,尤其是其与工作绩效关系的研究,同时本文的研究结论也将为饭店业的人力资源管理实践提供一定建议。
As for the increasingly fierce competition in hospitality industry, those competitive advantages brought by conventional resources are becoming weaker and weaker and managers have to look for new ways to compete. The concept of psychological capital provides us a new view—we can work out the company's overall human resource strategy on the basis of the actual level of the psychological capital of our employees. And we will have reasonable human resource structure, distinct competitive advantage and lone-term interest.
     Researchers at home and abroad have been studying on job performance for years. Now it is widely believed that personal abilities, cognition level and behavioral process all have influence on job performance. In a manner of speaking, reserachers have already deeply researched job performance. By contrast, psychological capital needs more researches. People began the study on psychological capital at the beginning of this century. Nowadays, people still concentrate on the researches on the concept and structure of psychological capital. There are few researches on the relationship between psychological capital and other variables. In a word, there are still many respects we have to study and discuss.
     This paper tries to find the relationship between psychological capital and job performance through empirical research. Firstly, I made clear the general background information and research contents of this paper through reading lots of documents at home and abroad. Secondly, I started the study design and then made hypothesis—psychological capital has influence on job performance of hotel employees, and job performance also has clear influence on psychological capital. Thirdly, I used SPSS 16.0 to analyze and process data once I finished the work of data collection. Finally, I verified the hypothesis and got conclusions as follows:
     (1) Psychological capital has influence on job performance of hotel employees. But the 4 factors of psychological capital have different influence on the 2 factors of job performance. The level of optimistism has no inflience on task performance, but other 3 factors all have clear influence on the 2 factors of job performance.
     (2)Job performance also has influence on psychological capital, but there are several differences in relationship between different factors. Task performance has influence on the level of confidence and hope, but it doesn't have influence on the other 2 factors of psychological capital. Contextual performance has influence on the level of confidence, optimistism and resilience but hope.
     (3) Variance analysis shows that sex has no clear influence on psychological capital or job performance. Employees aged under 25 have lower task performance than those who are 26 to 30 years old. Those who are 21 to 25 years old have lower contextual performance than those who are 26 to 30 years old. Those who are under 20 have lower level of confidence than other employees, and they also have lower level of resilience than those who are 26 to 30 years old. Educational level also has realitionship with psychological capital and job performance. Employees who have lower educational level often have lower contextual performance, confidence and resilience than those who have higher educational level. Workers in front office department have much higher contextual performance than workers in food and beverage department. And people who have been working in the hotel less than 1 year have lower level of optimistism than those who have been working here more than 3 years.
     Then some suggestions are brought up for the human resource management of hotels from the aspects of confidence, hope, optimistism and resilience.
     Through the above research, this paper will complement the researches on psychological capital and its relationship with job performance. In addition, this paper also have some practice significance in human resource management of hospitality industry.
引文
① Luthans. Positive psychological capital:Beyond human and social capital [J]. Business Horizons,2004,47:45-50.
    ①仲理峰.心理资本研究评述与展望[J].心理科学进展,2007.3:32-26.
    ①Luthans. Positive psychological capital:Beyond human and social capital [J]. Business Horizons,2004,47:45-50.
    ② Fred Luthans, Bruce J. Avolio, Fred O. Walumbwa et al. The Psychological Capital of Chinese Workers:Exploring the Relationship with Performance[J]. Management and Orgnization Review 1:2 249-271.
    ①仲理峰.心理资本研究评述与展望[J].心理科学进展.2007,15(3):428-487.
    ①吴明隆SPSS统计应用实务[M].北京市宣武区右安门西街8号.中国铁道工业出版社,2003.1:131-172.
    ①吴明隆SPSS统计应用实务[M].北京市宣武区右安门西街8号.中国铁道工业出版社,2003.1:131.
    ① Luthans F. Positive organizational behavior:Developing and managing psychological strengths. Academy of Management Exective.2005,14:69.
    [1]仲理峰.心理资本研究评述与展望[J].心理科学进展,2007.3:32-26.
    [2]田喜洲.从人力资本、社会资本到心理资本——人力资源管理的新取向[J].商业研究,2009.1:56-59。
    [3]王雁飞,朱瑜.心理资本理论与相关研究进展[J].外国经济与管理.2007,29:32-39.
    [4]王建一.心理资本——企业竞争力的新核心[N].北京人才市场报,2006.5
    [5]陆路.关注心理资本对个人成长和绩效的影响[N].国际商报,2008.5
    [6]霍彦,李秀慧.运用心理资本提升员工竞争力[J].中国邮政,2009.1:22-25.
    [7]曹鸣岐.论人力资源管理事业中的心理资本[J].企业时空,2006.12:12-16.
    [8]田喜洲,蒲勇健.积极心理资本及其在旅游业人力资源管理中的应用[J].旅游科学,2008.2:34-39.
    [9]曾晖,周详.开发成功的心理资本[J].企业管理,2005.11:22-26.
    [10]柯江林,孙建敏,李永瑞.心理资本:本土量表的开发及中西比较[J].心理学报,2009.9:43-49.
    [11]温磊,七十三.企业员工心理资本干预的实证研究[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2009.6:34-39.
    [12]张晓龙.心理资本干预与开发研究[J].经济与管理,2009.10:55-58.
    [13]仲理峰.心理资本对员工的工作绩效、组织承诺及组织公民行为的影响[J].心理学报,2007.3:44-51.
    [14]温磊,七十三,张玉柱.心理资本问卷的初步修订[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2009.4:39-44.
    [15]惠青山.中国职工心理资本内容结构及其与态度行为变量关系实证研究[D].博士学位论文.暨南大学,2009.
    [16]田喜洲.心理资本及其对接待业员工工作态度与行为的影响研究[D].博士学位论文.重庆大学,2008.
    [17]吴威.员工心理资本对其敬业度的影响研究[D].硕士学位论文.西北大学, 2009.
    [18]强麟.组织承诺、心理资本与工作绩效关系研究[D].硕士学位论文.天津师范学院,2009.
    [19]张墨.企业员工心理资本的模型及其验证[D].硕士学位论文.西南大学,2009.
    [20]丁成莉.企业员工心理资本对其工作绩效和工作卷入的影响[D].硕士学位论文.河南大学,2009.
    [21]吴明隆SPSS统计应用实务[M].北京市宣武区右安门西街8号.中国铁道工业出版社,2003.1:131-172.
    [22]薛薇.统计分析方法及应用(第2版)[M].北京市海淀区万寿路173信箱.电子工业出版社.2009.1:181-254.
    [23]Carifio J and Rhodes L. Construct validities and the empirical relationships between optimism, Hope, self-efficacy, and Locus of Control [M]. IDS Press, 2002:4-9.
    [24]Fred Luthansa, James B. Avey, Rachel Clapp-Smith and Weixing Li. More evidence on the value of Chinese workers'psychological capital:A potentially unlimited competitive resource [J]. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, vol.19, No.5, May 2008:818-827.
    [25]Gable S L and Haidt J. What (and why) is positive psychology [J]. Review of General Psychology,2005,9:103-110.
    [26]Fred Luthans, Bruce J. Avolio, Fred O. Walumbwa and Weixing Li. The Psychological Capital of Chinese Workers:Exploring the Relationship with Performance [J]. Management and Organization Review 1:2 249-271.
    [27]Bandura A. Self-efficacy:The exercise of control [M]. New York:Freeman, 1997,4-15.
    [28]Goldsmith A, Veum J and Darity W. The impact of psychological and human capital on wages[J]. Economic Inquiry,1997,35:815-829.
    [29]Harter S. Authenticity In Handbook of Positive Psychology [M]. Eds. C. R. Snyder and S. Lopez. London:Oxford University Press,2002:382-394.
    [30]Fred Luthans, James B. Avey, Bruce J. Avolio, Steven M. Norman and Gwendolyn M. Combs. Psychological capital development:toward a micro-intervention [J]. Journal of Organizational Behaviour J. Organiz. Behav.2006, 27,387-393.
    [31]Eden D and Aviram A. Self-Efficacy training to speed reemployment:helping people to help themselves [J]. Journal Of Applied Psychology,1993,78:352-360.
    [32]Hunter J and Schmidt F. Quantifying the effects of psychological interventions on employee job performance and work-force productivity [J]. American Psychologist,1983,38 (4):473-478.
    [33]Fred Luthans, Kyle W. Luthans and Brett C. Luthans. Positive psychological capital:Beyond human and social capital [J]. Business Horizons 47/1 January-February 2004,45-50.
    [34]Fred Luthans, Carolyn M. Youssef, Bruce J. Avolio. Psychological capital: developing the human competitive edge [M]. Oxford University Press,2007:132-145.
    [35]Toor, Shamas-ur-Rehman; Ofori, George. Positive Psychological Capital as a Source of Sustainable Competitive Advantage for Organizations.Citation Only Available [J]. Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, Mar2010, Vol.136 Issue 3,341-352.
    [36]Stajkovie A D, Luthans F. Social cognitive theory and self--efficacy:Going beyond traditional motivational and behavioral approaches[J]. Organizational Dynamics,1998,26:62-74.
    [37]Judge T, Erez A, and Bono J. The power of being positive:The relation between positive self-concept and job performance[J]. Human Performance,1998,11: 167-187.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700