大学生诚信综合评价体系研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
市场经济既是法制经济又是信用经济,市场经济的发展依赖于信用关系的日益透明与不断扩大。随着改革开放的不断深化,我国诚信问题日益严重,假冒伪劣产品、恶性食品安全事件、个人企业的偷税漏税、经济活动中的合同欺诈等诚信缺失的现象时有发生。这些行为严重扰乱了正常的经济秩序、政治秩序和社会秩序,提高了交易成本,造成了严重的经济损失。诚信是现代市场经济的基石,也是政府取信于民的基础、企业发展的生命和个人立身的根本。国家诚信、企业诚信与个人诚信构成了一个国家完整的诚信体系,由于个人是市场经济的主体,故个人诚信在诚信体系之中起核心作用。大学生是国家宝贵的人才资源,是民族的希望和祖国的未来,是社会主义建设事业的接班人。研究大学生诚信,加强大学生诚信建设,科学评价大学生的诚信水平,具有重要现实意义。
     首先,本文大量参阅国内外关于大学生诚信评价体系的文献,通过对这些研究成果的比较分析确定本文的研究思路、研究方法与创新点。其次,从学习、生活、经济、工作四个方面探讨高校大学生诚信缺失的表现,以此为根据筛选出大学生诚信综合评价指标体系的指标;对大学生诚信缺失原因进简要分析,以此为根据提出建立大学生诚信综合评价体系的必要性。再次,按照构建指标体系的原则和方法,在现有研究成果的基础上取长补短,确定出大学生诚信综合评价指标体系的各级指标、指标权重与数据来源。接着,对五种常用综合评价方法进行比较分析,选择模糊数学分析评价方法作为大学生诚信的评价方法,并对模糊数学分析评价法的基本思想和评价步骤进行详细解析。然后,为检验本文所构建的大学生诚信综合评价体系的适用性及可操作性,在郑州大学范围内选取500个调查对象对该套评价体系进行模拟应用,对评价结果从多方面进行分析以了解郑州大学大学生诚信水平,并指出该评价体系在应用中应注意的问题以及改进措施。最后,对本文的主要结论进行总结。
     本文研究大学生诚信评价体系,是希望搭建—套具有科学性、合理性和普遍适用性的大学生诚信综合评价体系,能够对全国所有高校的大学生诚信进行合理的评价、考核和预警,以提高全国大学生诚信水平,维护良好社会诚信环境,推动建立全社会信用体系和完善我国市场经济秩序。
Market economy is both legal economy and credit economy. The development of market economy, based on increasingly transparent and credit relations growing. However, with the deepening of reform and opening up, the problem of credibility has been more and more serious. The phenomena like fake products, malignant food safety incidents, individual enterprise tax evasion and contract fraud have occurred. These actions seriously disrupted the normal economic order, Political order and Social order, and causing serious economic losses. Credibility is the cornerstone of the modern market economy, the basis of the government winning the trust and the life for development of the company. The whole county credibility system is consisting by credibility for the state, credibility for the company and self credibility. Among this three credibility system, self credibility is core concept. University student is wealth human resource for the state, is the future for both nation and whole country, is socialist construction successor. So researching on credibility of collegian, strength the collegian credibility construction and a scientific assessment for collegian credibility level, have important realistic meaning.
     Firstly, this thesis brings up new concept on the base of credibility research result worldwide, through analysis and comparison on these research result, it sets the methodology of research and the innovation point. In addition, it analysis the collegian non-honest phenomenon from study, life, economic and work these four aspects to determine the index of collegian credibility assessment index system. And it states the reason for this phenomenon to bring up necessity for setting up collegian credit assessment system. Furthermore, on the base of current research result, overcome one's weaknesses by acquiring others' strong points to determine levels of indicators, weights and data sources of collegian credit assessment index system. In General, through the contrast five commonly used comprehensive evaluation, selection of fuzzy mathematics is used as collegian credibility assessment method. At the same time, basic concept and evaluation of fuzzy mathematics also is researched in detail. In order to test the feasibility and the operational ability of the collegian credibility assessment system, a simulation assessment was done by 500 colleges in Zhengzhou University. And it analyzes the results of various. It will illustrate the possible problem in the application and also give the improvement method. At last, it is summary of main conclusions.
     This thesis contrasts concepts for collegian credibility assessment system from amount ideas of researchers, hopefully to construct a set of Scientific, reasonability, general practicability collegian credibility assessment system to have a reasonable evaluation, assessment and pre-warning to collegian credibility, to develop the collegian credibility national wide, to maintenance a well credibility of whole society, to perfect the our marketing economy sequence.
引文
[1]Kaptein, Muel. Integrity Management[J]. Eisevier Science Ltd,1999:18-20
    [2]Abigail Lipson. A Case of Plagiarism or not[J]. About Campus,2003, (8):10
    [3]Belzer, L.T., SPiegel, P.K.,& Wrangham, J. Student Response to a Collective Penalty for Reported Cheating:A Case Study[J]. Ethics & Behavior,2001,11 (3): 343-348
    [4]Jordan, A.E. College Student Cheating: The Role of Motivation, Pereeived Norms, Ahitudes, and Knowledge of Institutional Policy[J]. Ethics & Behavior,2001, 11(3):233-247
    [5]Becher T.E. Integrity in Organizations: Beyond Honesty and Conscientiousness[J]. Academy of Management Review,1998:154-161
    [6]Rettinger, D.A.,& Kramer, Y. Situtional and Personal Causes of Student Cheating[J]. Research in Higher Education,2009,50 (3):293-313
    [7]Roberson, D.W. Using a Student Response System to Reduce Aeademie Cheating [J]. Nurse Edueator,2009,34 (2):60-63
    [8]Xiao Yanling, Lv Hongyan, Xu Fuyuan. Research on the Evaluation Index System and Evaluation Method of the Regional Honesty-Credit[J]. China-USA Business Review, 2007, (2):25-32
    [9]Xiao Yanling,Lv Hongyan. Analysis of credit behavior with game theory in different cost environments[J]. International Conference on Risk Management and Engineering Management(RMEM),2008(9):132
    [10]Michael Grossberg. Plagiarism and Professional Ethics—A Journal Editor's View[J]. The Journal of American History,2004, (4):1333
    [11]Stephen Carter. The Insufficiency of Honesty[J]. Atlantic Monthly,1996, (2):74
    [12]伯纳德·巴伯.信任:信任的逻辑和局限[M].福建人民出版社,2002
    [13]弗郎西斯·福山.信任:社会美德与创造经济繁荣[M].海南出版社,2001,(12)
    [14]Mary Calbreath Shurtleff著,谷雨译.建立诚信[M].第一版,上海:上海财经大学出版社,2002:4-10
    [15]陈岩.大学生诚信评价体系的构建[J].当代青年研究,2006,(2):50-51
    [16]张阳红.关于构建大学生诚信评价体系的几点思考[J].思想政治教育研究,2007,(6):118-120
    [17]麦林.构建大学生诚信评价体系的思考[J].百色学院学报,2006,(4):125-128
    [18]龙景奎,陈韶君.构建大学生诚信考评体系的研究[J].教育探索,2006,(10):101-103
    [19]孙莉玲,奚社新.关于建立大学生诚信评价体系的研究[J].常州工学院学报,2006,(12):88-92
    [20]何玉娟.高校大学生诚信评价研究[D].[硕士学位论文].大庆:大庆石油学院,2009
    [21]何芹.大学生诚信评价指标体系及评价模型构建[J].财会通讯(综合版),2008,(9):29-31
    [22]林海悦.试论大学生的诚信教育[D].[硕士学位论文].上海:复旦大学,2008
    [23]卢飞霞.大学生诚信及诚信评价指标研究[D].[硕士学位论文].杭州:浙江大学,2009
    [24]刘婧.我国循环经济统计指标体系研究[D].[硕士学位论文].武汉:中国地质大学,2007
    [25]纪秋静.我国高校研究生院网站评价指标体系构建与应用[D].[硕士学位论文].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2008
    [26]孔江.城市建设评价指标体系与方法研究[D].[硕士学位论文].昆明:昆明理工大学,2002
    [27]叶义成等.系统综合评价技术及其应用[M].冶金工业出版社,2006,(1)
    [28]王雅杰,乔冠华,范昆.大学生诚信评估指标体系的构建[J].统计与决策,2007,(8):68-70
    [29]郭敬,张学娟.大学生诚信评价体系研究[J].征信,2010,(12)
    [30]杨静.用经济学方法分析大学生诚信问题[J].商场现代化,2008,(1):74-80
    [31]王天旺.对部分大学生诚信缺失问题的实证分析[J].技术与市场,2005,(12):44-45
    [32]杜坤林.高校学生诚信缺失现象博弈分析与对策探究[J].现代教育科学,2004,(11):63-65
    [33]苟朝莉.大学生诚信教育研究[D].[硕士学位论文].重庆:西南大学,2006
    [34]李友清.国家助学贷款问题与大学生信用框架体系的构建[J].事业财会,2006,(10):51-54
    [35]任力生.我国个人信用评估的现状与发展对策研究[D].[硕士学位论文].成都:电子科技大学,2003
    [36]邓兵.市场经济下大学生诚信问题的几点思考[J].江西教育学院学报(社会科学),2006,(10):68-71
    [37]葛寰中.我国诚信指标体系研究[D].[硕士学位论文].黑龙江:黑龙江大学,2006
    [38]范昆.黑龙江省个人信用评估体系的构建[D].[硕士学位论文].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2006
    [39]邵月花.市场经济与大学生诚信教育探析[J].科技经济市场,2006,(7):262
    [40]刘艳辉.信用档案与助学贷款良性互动[J].兰台世界,2006,(3):35-36
    [41]李远远.基于粗糙集的指标体系构建及综合评价方法研究[D].[博士学位论文].武汉:武汉理工大学,2009
    [42]张倩.大学生诚信状况调查与诚信体制建构[D].[硕士学位论文].济南:山东大学,2005
    [43]薛小荣.房地产开发企业诚信的博弈分析与对策研究[D].[博士学位论文].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2006
    [44]陈平.大学生诚信培育的体系失缺与构建[D].[硕士学位论文].长沙:中南大学,2007
    [45]谢识予.经济博弈论(第二版)[M].复旦大学出版社,2002,(1)
    [46]赵菁.我国个人信用的博弈分析和体系构建[D].[硕士学位论文].成都:西南交通大学,2003
    [47]黄岚,张晓晖,殷树友.个人征信系统数据仓库与信用评估模型的构建[J].中国管理信息化(综合版),2007,(6):60-64
    [48]王金花.关于诚信问题的经济学分析[D].[硕士学位论文].广州: 暨南大学,2005
    [49]张志华,黄婷婷.论大学生诚信评价体系的科学构建[J].广西社会科学,2006,(6):162-164
    [50]欧小琴.对我国个人信用体系发展的几点对策建议[J].现代经济信息,2010,(10):187

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700