基于高职学生职业发展的数学知识技能与相关信息技术研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
职业教育在中国教育的发展中越来越受重视,高等职业教育是职业教育的高等阶段,高等数学是其公共文化基础课程。目前的高职数学课程,从数学学科内部出发建立课程体系,一方面较少顾及学生的数学基础,另一方面不能满足学生专业学习及工作发展的需求。基于目前高职数学课程与学生水平及需求之间的矛盾,笔者选择某民航职业技术学院运输专业作为研究案例,提出了以下两个研究问题,即:
     (1)基于某民航职业技术学院运输专业学生职业发展,需要哪些数学知识与技能?
     (2)基于某民航职业技术学院运输专业学生职业发展,需要哪些与数学知识和技能相关的信息技术?
     基于研究的问题,笔者从以下几个方面展开研究综述:一,中国高等职业教育的相关研究,了解中国高等职业教育的内涵外延、目标定位及发展情况,高职数学课程的定位及现状,以及高职数学知识技能与相关信息技术的研究;二,工作场所中数学知识技能与相关信息技术的研究,了解这一领域的国际研究机构和团体的研究成果,及其所使用的研究方法等;三,美国与新加坡职业数学课程中的数学知识技能与相关信息技术,AMATYC编制的两份数学课程标准《Crossroads in Mathematics》和《Beyond Crossroads》、美国两年制社区学院的数学课程结构、美国课程基础项目成果,以及新加坡理工学院的数学课程设计;四,课程设计理论,选择内容作为课程设计的第一步,是课程设计的核心环节,Lisa R. Lattuca的社会文化背景下的学术计划和AMATYC与利益相关者合作的框架,构成了本文研究设计的两个维度。
     本研究采用的研究方法主要有文本分析法、观察访谈与问卷调查等。参与者有某航空公司呼叫中心的工作人员(含已毕业学生)、一年级学生、专业教师、计算机教师与数学教师。笔者根据研究问题的需要编制了1份问卷、1份观察提纲,以及在研究过程中形成的针对不同人员的11份访谈提纲。收集的数据资料有:工作场所中的文本资料、专业教材、数学教材、计算机教材,一年级8个班学生的问卷调查与6名学生的访谈资料,以及工作人员(含已毕业学生)、专业教师、计算机教师与数学教师的访谈资料。笔者使用了SPSS19.0和ATLAS.ti分别对问卷和访谈转录进行数据处理与分析,并形成了概念分析框架(如图),采取二次编码、三角互证、受访者检验等方式提高研究的信度与效度。
     研究结论:
     (1)数学知识与技能。某民航职业技术学院运输专业学生专业学习与工作需要的数学知识与技能主要是统计与运筹,但该学院开设的数学课程主要提供微积分相应内容;该专业学生的数学基础薄弱、对待数学的态度消极。
     (2)相关的信息技术。某民航职业技术学院运输专业学生专业学习与工作需要的相关信息技术主要是Excel的高级管理与分析功能,但计算机课程并不教授Excel高级分析功能,且数学课程并不教授信息技术;该专业学生信息技术基础薄弱。
     建议:(1)适当削弱微积分的地位,相应增加统计与运筹知识;(2)使用相关信息技术教学,巩固中小学阶段的统计知识,帮助学生掌握大学阶段的统计与运筹知识;(3)以学生专业学习的需求与工作场所的需求为基本出发点选择高职数学课程的内容;(4)将数学学科内容与专业和工作的需求相融合,以工作中的实际数据为背景开发数学教学案例;(5)各类人员对数学课程的必要性达成统一认识,创建适当平台,加强数学教师、计算机教师、专业教师以及行业人员的交流与合作,加强不同课程之间合理衔接或整合;(6)进一步明确“必须够用为度”的“度”,应定位为学生未来的职业发展,而不是最低入职要求。
Through the development of Chinese education, growing importance has been attached to the Vocational Education (VE) with Higher Vocational Education (HVE) as its advanced stage. Higher mathematics is the foundation common course of HVE. However, the course is established mainly from the perspective of mathematics itself, ignoring, more often than not, students' mathematics foundation and their demands in terms of further study and career development.
     Based on the current contradiction between HVE mathematics curriculum and students' foundation and demands, I choose the transportation major of a Civil Aviation College as a case study and put forward the following two questions for research, namely,
     (1) What kind of mathematical knowledge and skills is needed based on the future career development of students of the above-mentioned college?
     (2) What kind of information technology that is related to mathematical skills and knowledge is need based on the future career development of students of the above-mentioned college?
     Based on the above research questions, I first did a research overview from the following aspects.1)1present a review on China's HVE, including its connotation and denotation, target location and development trends of China's HVE, as well as the positioning and status quo of HVE mathematics course. The review also covers the existing research on mathematical knowledge and skills and the related information technology in HVE curriculum system.2) I give a summary about international researches on the mathematics knowledge and skills and the related information technology used in working places, introducing certain research institutions and teams in this field and the research achievements they made and the research methods they used.3) I probe into mathematics knowledge and skills and related information technology from mathematics curricula in America and Singapore. In particular, two American mathematics curriculum standards----Crossroads in Mathematics' and Beyond Crossroads compiled by AMATYC, the mathematics curriculum structure adopted by American two-year community colleges, and the results of American curriculum's basic projects. I also consider the mathematics curriculum design of Singapore Polytechnic.4) Certain related curriculum design theories are also included here. One of the theory shows that content selecting is the first step and the core of curriculum design. Lisa R. Lattuca's academic plan putting forward against the background of sociocultural environment and the framework cooperating with stakeholder set by AMATYC are two dimensions according to which this paper is written.
     The main methods in my research are text analysis, observation, interviews and questionnaire survey. As needed, I make up a piece of questionnaire, a copy of observation outline and11copies of interview outline targeted at different people in the course of research. Participants in the research include call center staff (including graduated students) from some airline company, freshmen, professional teachers, computer teachers and math teachers. The data I have collected are as follows:documents from various sources related to my research, HVE textbooks (major-related textbooks, mathematics textbooks, computer course textbooks), questionnaires from freshmen who are from8different classes, interview transcriptions of6students, staff (including graduated students), professional teachers, computer teachers and math teachers.
     I have done data processing to the questionnaires and interview transcriptions by means of SPSS19.0and ATLAS.ti and formed a Conceptual Analysis Frame Diagram (see below). In the course, to make the research more credible and valid, I have adopted the following methods:VBR, triangulation, respondents verifying.
     Research conclusions:
     (1) Mathematical knowledge and skills:this research reveals that the mathematical knowledge and skills the students of transportation major from some Civil Aviation Vocational Technical Institute need in professional study and work are mainly statistics and operation, but the institute mainly provides mathematics courses like Calculus for students; students of this major are weak at mathematics and take a passive attitude toward mathematics;
     (2) Relevant information technology:the relevant information technology the students of transportation major from some Civil Aviation Vocational Technical Institute need in professional study and work is advanced Excel management and analysis, but in computer science class, teachers do not teach advanced Excel analysis; likewise, in mathematics class, no trace of knowledge about information technology can be seen; students of this major know little about information technology.
     Suggestions:(1) Duly weakening the position of Calculus and increasing the teaching of statistics and operation knowledge;(2) adopting relevant information technology in the course of teaching; consolidating primary and secondary school students'knowledge about statistics to help them master statistics and operation knowledge needed in college;(3) proceeding from students' need in professional study and work to select what should be taught in HVE mathematics curriculum;(4) integrating the content of Mathematics with students'need in study and work and developing mathematics teaching cases according to the practical data from work;(5) All members shall reach a consensus on the necessity of mathematics curriculum, and set up appropriate platform to strengthen the communication and cooperation between mathematics teachers, computer teachers, teachers of this major and other staff, and at the same time, enhance the connection and integration among different curricula;(6) further making clear the "scale" from "Theories-sufficiency Scale". Here, scale means that the curriculum shall aim at students' need in future career development but not in the minimum entry requirements.
引文
1 www.ec.europa.eu/education/focus/focus479_en.htm.
    蔡淑宝(2008).符合职教规律的高职教材建设路径研究.辽宁农业职业技术学院学报,01:51-52.
    邓新春,厉亚(2006).高职高专立体化数学教材的开发.湖南工业职业技术学院学报,04:137-138+154.
    段世年,刘涛(2007).对高等职业技术教育教材建设的思考.职业教育研究,01:37-38.
    李娟,孔生林(2010).基于工作过程的高职数学课程改革方案设计——以数控技术专业为例.芜湖职业技术学院学报,02:74-76.
    孟万金(1992).中国传统文化背景下的国民心理与教育.教育研究,第2期.
    陶正娟,云连英(2007).高职数学教材编写的思考与探索.职业教育研究,11:33-35.
    王莉华,孙晓晔(2006).构建模块化的《高等数学》课程体系.天津职业院校联合学报,03:60-63.
    徐国庆(2006).普通文化课程的尴尬.职教论坛,10:1.
    云连英,汪荣伟,陶正娟(2007).面向专业需求的高职数学课程设置.职业技术教育,20:18-20.
    云连英(2008).“工学结合”模式下数学课程改革的理性思考.教育探索,12:42-43.
    云连英,汪荣伟(2008).信息技术与高职数学课程整合研究.高等职业教育(天津职业大学学报),04:31-33.
    余祖光(1998).新《国际教育标准分类法》与职业教育学制.中国职业技术教育,11:41-44.
    杨金土(2002).技术型人才的素质、能力培养及其环境条件——兼议高等职业技术院校的实训基地建设.职教论坛,15:21-25.
    占德胜(2010).谈面向专业需求的高职数学教材开发.河南科技学院学报,02:109-110.
    曾繁京,马锦镍(2011).关于高级工《高等数学》教学内容的改革.职业,33:122-124.
    陈杏莉(2008).苏州工职院数学教材的比较研究.未出版的硕士论文,苏州大学,苏州.
    胡振媛(2007).高职数学案例教学探究.未出版的硕士论文,山东师范大学,济南.
    匡瑛(2005).高等职业教育发展与变革之比较研究.未出版的博士论文,华东师范大学,上海.
    李涛(2006).基于学生数学学习现状的高职数学教育改革探讨研究.未出版的硕士论文,湖南师范大学,长沙.
    吕永军(2006).高等职业教育《经济数学》课程的教学改革研究.未出版的硕士论文,山东师范大学,济南.
    彭志武(2007).高等职业教育学制研究.未出版的博士论文,厦门大学,厦门.
    桑志英(2010).高职院校高等数学教材改革的研究.未出版的硕士论文,延边大学,延吉.
    石勇(2011).高职高数课紧贴专业需要的必要性与教学探索.未出版的硕士论文,山东师范大学,济南.
    谭维奇(2007).安庆职业技术学院高职数学教学的现状分析及改革探讨.未出版的硕士论文,华东师范大学,上海.
    唐轮章(2005).高职高等数学教材建设研究.未出版的硕士论文,湖南师范大学,长沙.
    王凌云(2005).甘肃林业职业技术学院数学课程的调查与建议.未出版的硕士论文,西北师范大学,兰州.
    王钱(2008).柳州高职院校数学教学现状调查及相关改革研究.未出版的硕士论文,广西师范大学,桂林.
    王咏芳(2007).高职机电类专业高等数学课程改革与实践.未出版的硕士论文,苏州大学,苏州.
    肖化移(2004).高等职业教育质量标准研究.未出版的博士论文,华东师范大学,上海.
    徐国庆(2004).实践导向职业教育课程研究.未出版的博士论文,华东师范大学,上海.
    易元祥(2004).中国高等职业教育的发展研究.未出版的博士论文,华中科技大学,武汉.
    张良(2012).职业素质本位的高职教育课程建构研究.未出版的硕士论文,湖南师范大学,长沙.
    张屏(2011).MATLAB在高职基础数学教学中的应用研究.未出版的硕士论文,湖南师范大学,长沙.
    邹瑞睿(2008).新加坡国立理工学院职业教育研究.未出版的硕士论文,西南大学,重庆.
    陈英杰(2007).中国高等职业教育发展史研究.郑州:中州古籍出版社.
    陈向明著(2010).质的研究方法与社会科学研究.北京:教育科学出版社.
    顾明远主编(1990).教育大辞典(第三卷).上海:上海教育出版社.
    明立军,葛政,葛岳主编(2006).职业教育价值理论与实践.沈阳:东北大学出版社.
    陆素菊著(2004).中国当代职业教育——不同区域的实证研究.南京:河海大学出版社.
    石伟平(2013).中国职业教育发展报告.2011.上海:华东师范大学出版社.
    石伟平,徐国庆(2005).实践导向职业教育课程研究:技术学范式.上海:上海教育出版社.
    施良方著(1996).课程理论:课程的基础、原理与问题.北京:教育科学出版社.
    吴明隆著(2010).问卷统计分析实务——SPSS操作与应用.重庆:重庆大学出版社.
    王前新,孙泽文(2002).高等职业教育教学论.汕头:汕头大学出版社.
    万秀兰(2003).美国社区学院的改革与发展.北京:人民教育出版社.
    肖敬若编(1987).普通教育改革.北京:人民教育出版社.
    徐国庆(2005).实践导向职业教育课程研究:技术学范式.上海:上海教育出版社.
    张奠宙主编(1994).数学教育研究导引.南京:江苏教育出版社.
    中华人民共和国教育部(2003).普通高中数学课程标准(实验).北京:人民教育出版社.
    中华人民共和国教育部(2003).全日制义务教育数学课程标准(实验).北京:北京师范大学出版社.
    中华人民共和国国家统计局编(2011).中国统计年鉴.中国统计出版社.北京:北京数通电子出版社.
    《教育部关于以就业为导向深化高等职业教育改革的若干意见》(教高[2004]2号),载教育部高等教育司编(2000):《高职高专教育改革与建设:1999年高职高专教育文件资料汇编》(上册),高等教育出版社.
    陈文玲主编(2009).民航货物运输(第二版).北京:中国民航出版社.订座业务操作手册(内部使用)
    方晓华主编(2013).普通高等教育”十一五”国家级规划教材21世纪高职高专规划教材 (公共基础课)机械工业出版社精品教材高等数学(理工科用)第2版.北京:机械工业出版社.
    广东省工科中专数学教材编写组](吴伟贤)(1992).工科中专教材数学第二册.广州:广东高等教育出版社.
    广东省工科中专数学教材编写组(谢臣英)(2001).工科中专教材数学第三册.广州:广东高等教育出版社.
    广东省工科中专数学教材编写组(吴伟贤).工科中专教材数学第四册.广州:广东高等教育出版社.
    广东省工科中专数学教材编写组编(2000).数学第二册.广州:广东高等教育出版社.
    工科中专数学教材编写组编(1980).中等专业学校试用教材工科专业通用数学第四册.高等教育出版社.
    广州民航职业技术学院.工程数学(内部使用).
    民航国际客票销售(内部使用)
    马叔良等编(2001).离散数学.北京:电子工业出版社.
    马丽珠,吴卫锋编著(2007).民航危险品货物运输.北京:中国民航出版社.
    樊春雷编.航空板箱操作讲义(内部资料).
    贾晓慧编(2012).值机与行李运输.广州:广州民航职业与技术学院.
    同济大学,天津大学,浙江大学,重庆大学等编(2002).高等数学.北京:高等教育出版社.
    李永,张澜主编(2006).民航服务心理学.北京:中国民航出版社.
    李燕霞主编(2007).计算机应用研究基础Windows XP与Office2003.广州:中山大学出版社.
    梁炼,梅修,秦炜编(2005).中国高校百部优秀社科专著文库二十一世纪高职高专教程经济应用数学.北京:中国文史出版社.
    梁炼主编(2012).全国高等职业教育“十二五”精品教材经济应用数学.北京:航空工业出版社.
    任雪莲,陈孟祥主编(2013).计算机网络技术项目化教程.北京:清华大学出版社.
    上海市中专数学教材编写组编(1987).中等专业学校教材工科专业通用数学第一册教学参 考书.北京:高等教育出版社.
    上海市中专数学教材编写组编(1988).中等专业学校教材工科专业通用数学第二册教学参考书.北京:高等教育出版社.
    上海市中专数学教材编写组编(1990).中等专业学校教材工科专业通用数学第三册教学参考书.北京:高等教育出版社.
    上海高校《高等数学》编写组编(2001).高职高专学校试用教材高等数学(上册)(第四版).上海:上海科学技术出版社.
    斯蒂芬·萧著,邵龙译(2007).航空公司市场营销与管理.北京:中国民航出版社.
    吴赣昌主编.刘贵濂,梁炼(2007).普通高等教育“十一五”国家级规划教材高职高专数学立体化教材高等数学(理工类).北京:中国人民大学出版社.
    吴赣昌总主编.梁炼,姚玉平(2009).21世纪数学教育信息化精品教材高职高专数学立体化教材高等数学(理工类·第二版).北京:中国人民大学出版社.
    吴赣昌编(2007).概率论与数理统计(理工类).北京:中国人民大学出版社.
    王小卫,吴万敏编著(2007).民用航空法概论.北京:航空工业出版社.
    万青(2006).航空运输地理.北京:中国民航出版社.
    万青编著(2003).飞机载重平衡.北京:中国民航出版社.
    王娟娟(2006).民航国内客票销售.北京:中国民航出版社.
    杨群祥(2009).商务谈判.大连:东北财经大学出版社.
    张辉,樊春雷(2012).航空货物运输销售实务.北京:中国民航出版社.
    杰弗里·豪森等著,陈应枢译(1991).数学课程发展.北京:人民教育出版社.
    马克斯威尔(Maxwell, J. A)著,朱光明译(2007).质的研究设计:一种互动的取向.重庆:重庆大学出版社.
    迈尔斯,(美)休伯曼著,张芬芬译(2008).万卷方法·质性研究方法译丛质性资料的分析:方法与实践(第二版).重庆:重庆大学出版社.
    科克罗夫特著,范良炎译(1994).数学算数:英国学校数学教育调查委员会报告.北京:人民教育出版社.
    希尔弗曼(Silverman, D.)著,李雪,张劫颖译(2009).如何做质性研究.重庆:重庆大学出版社.
    徐碧美著,陈静、李忠如译(2003).追求卓越——教师专业发展案例研究.人民教育出版社.
    http://www.caac.net/
    http;//www.atlasti.de
    http://www. amatyc. org
    http://www.cmpedu.com/book/booklwebdDifquery.do
    http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/48/5/41529787.pdf
    SP. PROSPECTUS 2012-2013. Singapore Polytechnic [EB].
    http://www.sp.edu.sg/wps/portal/vp-spws
    2011 Community College FAST FACTS [EB/OL]. [2011-08-25].http://www. aacc. nche. edu/AboutCC/Documents/FactSheet2011. pdf.
    Information and documents about EU education policy are found on the European Commission website:www.ec.europa.eu/education/focus/focus479 en.htm. (Accessed 23 Dec.2011).
    Andersen, M. (2011). Knowledge, attitudes, and instructional practices of Michigan communty college math instructors:The search for a knowledge, attitudes, and practices gap in collegiate mathematics. (PhD Dissertation), Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI.
    Bakker, A., Wijers, M.& Akkerman, S. F. (2011, February). The challenges of teaching statistics in secondary vocational education. In Proceedings of the Seventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp.735-744).
    Becker, H.S. (1970). Sociological work:Method and substance. Chicago:Aldine.
    Becker, H. S.& Geer, B. (1957). Participant observation and interviewing:A comparison. Human Organization,16,28-32.
    Bryman, A. (1988). Quantity and quality in social research, London:Unwin Hyman.
    Campbell, D. T. (1988). Methodoloty and epistemology for social science:Selected papers. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
    Hoyles, C., Wolf, A., Molyneux-Hodgson, S. & Kent, P. June 2002, Institute of Education and STMC,16-1-26 MathsInquiryFinalR.eport.pdf
    Cohen, D. (Eds.). (1995). Crossroads in mathematics:Standards for introductory college mathematics before calculus. Memphis. TN:American Mathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges (AMATYC). p.201
    Coben, D. (comp.) (1995) Adults Learning Maths-A Research Forum:Papers Presented at The Inaugural Conference of ALM 1994 (ALM-1). London:Goldsmiths College, Universrity of London, in association with ALM.
    Delors, J. (Chair) (1996). Learning:The treasure within. Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century. Paris:United Nations Scientific. Cultural and Scientific Organization (UNESCO).
    Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I. & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Herrera, F. E., Kaddoura, F., Lopes, H. A-R., Petrovsky. A. V., Rahnema, M.& Ward C. F. (1972). Learning to be:The world of education today and tomorrow. Paris:UNESCO.
    Felstead, A., D. Gallie, F. Green & Y. Zhou (2007). Skill at Work,1986 to 2006. Oxfore:SKOPE (ESRC Centre on Skills, Knowledge and Organisational Performance).
    Fielding, N.& Fielding, J. (1986). Linking data. Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
    FitzSimons, G. E. (Eds.). (1997). Adults returning to study mathematics Papers from Working Group 18,8th International Congress on Mathematical Education, ICME 8. Adelaide, SA: Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers.
    FitzSimons, G. E. & Godden, G. L. (2002). Review of research on adults learning mathematics. In Perspectives on adults learning mathematics (pp.13-45). Springer Netherlands.
    Forrester. K. (1998).'Adult learning: 'A key for the twenty-first century':Reflections on the UNESCO fifth international conference 1997'. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 17(6).423-434.
    FitzSimons, G. E.& Godden, G. L. Proceedings. Philadelphia, PA:National Center on Adult Literacy. University of Pennsylvania.
    FitzSimons, G. E. (2004). Based on Adults Learning Mathematics ALM-11,2004, p.31
    Gal, I.& Schmilt, M. J. (Eds.). (1994). Conference on Adult Mathematical Literacy.
    Godden, G. L. (1992). Synthesis of research on facilities provided by tertiary institutions for mathematically unprepared students. Unpublished Masters thesis, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.
    Godden, G. L. (1994).'A guide to tertiary bridging mathematics research to mid-1992; including an annotated bibliography'. In 4th Australian Bridging Mathematics Network Conference: Proceedings (Vol. I). Sydney. NSW:University of Sydney,67-91.
    Hammersley, M.& Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography:Principles in practice (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
    Hirst, A.& Hirst, K. (Eds.). (1988). Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress on Mathematical Education. Malev, Hungary:International Commission on Mathematical Instruction.
    Hoyles, C., Noss, R., Kent, P.& Bakker, A. (2010). Improving mathematics at work:The need for techno-mathematical literacies. Routledge.
    Janet Elizabeth Coup. (2012). New Zealand women and their numeracy skills:What the Adult Literacy and Life Skills survey tells us and doesn't tell us about the numeracy skills of New Zealand women. Auckland University of Technology.
    Jaime Carvalho e Silva. (2012). The mathematics teaching in vocational schools in portugal.12th International Congress on Mathematical Education Topic Study Group 58 July-15 July, 2012, COEX, Seoul, Korea.
    Jeff Evans. (2012). Mathematics literacy, numeracy and piaac.12th International Congress on Mathematical Education Topic Study Group 68 July-15 July,2012, COEX, Seoul, Korea.
    Jones. P.L. (Eds.). (1990). Bridging mathematics:Aninternational perspective.Hawthorn, Vic.: Swinburne institute of Technology.
    Miles, M.B.& Huberman, A. M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis:an Expanded Surcebook.2nd Ed. Newbury Park:Sage.
    NRC:Everybody Count——A Report to the Nation on the Future of Mathematics Education, 1989, p.11
    Lincoln, Y. S.& Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
    Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods.2nd Ed. Newbury Park:Sage.
    PISA 2006 Technical Report. Programmefor International Student Assessment OECD (p405-410)
    Phillippe, K. A.& Sullivan, L. G. (2005). National Profile of Community Colleges:Trends and Statistics, Fourth Edition. Washington, DC:Community College Press, American Association of Community Colleges, p.12.
    Stark, J. S. (2000). Planning introductory college courses:Content, context and form. Instructional Science,28(5),413-438.
    Schleicher, A. (2008) PIAAC:A New Strategy for Assessing Adult Competencies, International Review of Education. Online:http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/48/5/41529787.pdf
    Shweder, R. A. (Eds.). (1980). Fallible judement in behavioral research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Statistics for numbers of students employed and working full-time are from the 2003-2004 academic year. Ibid, pp.12,39,51,53.
    Tsatsaroni, A.& Evans, J. (2013). Adult numeracy and the totally pedagogised society:PIAAC and other international surveys in the context of global educational policy on lifelong learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics,1-20.
    Wedege, T. (2010). Adults learning mathematics:Research and education in Denmark.
    Wepner, G. (1986).'Mathematics & Remediation. What is the Real Problem.'Mathematics and Computer Education,20(2) 103-106.
    Williams, J.& Wake, G. (2007). Black boxes in workplace mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics,64(3),317-343.
    Woods, P. (1985). Conversations with teachers:Some aspects of the life history method. Britih Educational Research Journal,2(1), p.14, p.16.
    Bessot, A.,& Ridgway, J. (Eds.). (2000). Education for Mathematics in the Workplace. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Beyond Crossroads_Implementing Mathematics Standards in the First Two Years of College.
    FitzSimons, G. E. (2002). What counts as mathematics?:technologies of power in adult and
    vocational education (Vol.28). Springer.
    Prepared by the Beyond Crossroads Writing Team, Richelle (Rikki) Blair, Editor. November 2006.
    Hoyles, C., Noss, R., Kent, P.& Bakker, A. (2010). Improving mathematics at work:The need for techno-mathematical literacies.
    Coben, D., O'Donoghue J.& FitzSimons, G. E. (2000). Perspectives on Adults Learning Mathematics:Research and Practice. Hingham, MA, USA. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Crossroads in Mathematics. Standards for Introductory College Mathematics before Calculus.
    Joseph A. Maxwell.& Thousand Oaks. (1996). Qualitative Research Design:An Interactive Approach. CA:Sage Publications, pp.155 Prepared by the Writing Team and Task Force of the Standards for Introductory College Mathematics Project, Done Cohen, Editor. September 1995.
    Damlamian, A., Rodrigues, J. F.& StraBer, R. Educational Interfaces between Mathematics and Industry.
    Lattuca, L. R.& Stark, J. S. (2009). Shaping the college curriculum:Academic plans in context. San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
    Ganter S.& Barker W. (Eds.). (2004). Curriculum Foundations Project, Voices of the Partner Disciplines. The Mathematical Association of America.
    Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research:A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700