大庆探区外围中、新生代地层序列与盆地演化
摘要
东北地区是我国最重要的石油天然气工业基地。在前侏罗纪兴安-内蒙造山带基底上发育陆相为主的中、新生代含油气盆地,除松辽盆地外,大庆探区外围还发育十余个中、小型盆地。
本论文从区域盆地岩石地层序列研究为切入点,探讨中、新生代盆地形成演化基本规律,对于深化东北地区基础地质、区域地质研究、大庆探区外围盆地油气远景评价及勘探,都具有重要的再论意义和实际价值。
根据东北地区区域地层古生物研究资料的系统总结,厘定了大庆探区外围盆地中、新生代岩石地层序列及其对比关系。
识别出5 个区域性分布的构造不整合界面,划分出5 个中、新生代盆地充填构造层;在区域地质资料详细分析的基础上,讨论了东北地区前侏罗纪基底大地构造单元划分和演化。
对中、新生代盆地形成的区域构造背景进行了系统分析,确定中、新生代发育四期盆地形成旋回,讨论了对各旋回盆地的性质和代表性盆地特征,展示了伸展成盆与挤压剥蚀交替的成盆模式,现今外围盆地大部分具有叠合盆地特征。
The thesis selects the Mesozoic and Cenozoic basins surrounding Daqing exploring region as to be main studying points. Based on studying the regional rock strata sequence, the author wants to reconstruct the evolution history of the Mesozoic and Cenozoic in the region. These conclusions may have grate theoretical and practice significants to the basic geology study in Northeast China, basins evolution and oil and gas perspective evaluation surrounding Daqing.
The thesis main content compose of 4 aspects:
1. Based upon summarizing systematically the former references about the regional stratigraphy and paleontology, the author has discussed the Mesozoic and Cenozoic rock stratigraphic sequence surrouding Daqing region and their correlations. The thesis narrate more than 20 formations, including their definition, the character of their basic rock assemblages and stratotype section.
As we know that the international stratigraphic chart place the boundary between Jurassic and Cretaceous at 145. 5±5Ma, and there are a great deal achievements have been made this 10years in paleontology studying and Igneous rock isotope age measuring in Northeast China, so the thesis emends some stratum age, especially some stratum units formerly thought to be Jurassic, such as: Jixi Group, Longzhaogou Group, Huoshiling Formation and Longjiang Formation, the thesis places them to be early Cretaceous.
2. After analyzing the Mesozoic and Cenozoic strata distribution and regional geology, the author finds that there are 5 regional unconformity, they located separately between late Triassic or early Jurassic and early Triassic, early Cretaceous and middle Jurassic, Late Cretaceous and early Cretaceous, Paleogene and late Cretaceous, Neogene and Paleogene, so the author can easily classify the Mesozoic and Cenozoic basin evolution to be 5 tectonic layers, namely: early and middle Jurassic tectonic layer, early Cretaceous tectonic layer, late Cretaceous tectonic layer, Paleogene tectonic layer and Neogene tectonic layer.
3. Through analyzing the regional and basin geologic information, the author discussed pre-Jurassic tectonic units classification and evolution, and concluded that the researching region locating in the east part of Tianshan, Inner Mongolia and Xingan orogenic belt, and its Paleozoic paleogeographic pattern is composed by a series of middle and small massifs, such as Jiamusi massif and Eerguna massif. These massifs were sutured in early Late Paleozoic, and formed a holly Heilongjiang plate, and the Heilongjiang plate sutured with North China plate along Xilamulun to Changchun suture in late Permian or early Triassic, and then, in middle Jurassic, which sutured with Siberia plat along Mongolo-Okhotsk suture and formed a unified Eurasia continent, and which indicate that it is the end of paleo-Asia ocean tectonic realm. It is also middle Jurassic that the Wandashan terrain finished the collision with Eurasia continent, and this event indicate the commencement of Pacific Ocean evolution. 4. The thesis has studied the regional tectonic setting during the Mesozoic and Cenozoic basin forming. The author conclude that there are 3 elements which affect the evolution of Mesozoic and Cenozoic basin in Northeast China, one is the subduction of Pacific ocean plate, the second is the lag effect of collision of Siberia plate and the last one is long distance effect of Indo plate collision with Eurasia. In one words, there are 4 circles in Mesozoic and Cenozoic basins evolution history, namely: J1-2、K1、K2、E. The thesis summarized each basin circles characteristic and typical basin. And the author finds that the pattern of basin evolution in the region is the basin forming stage and stressing reversion stage by turns, multi-stage development and superposition is main character of the regions basin evolution.
本论文从区域盆地岩石地层序列研究为切入点,探讨中、新生代盆地形成演化基本规律,对于深化东北地区基础地质、区域地质研究、大庆探区外围盆地油气远景评价及勘探,都具有重要的再论意义和实际价值。
根据东北地区区域地层古生物研究资料的系统总结,厘定了大庆探区外围盆地中、新生代岩石地层序列及其对比关系。
识别出5 个区域性分布的构造不整合界面,划分出5 个中、新生代盆地充填构造层;在区域地质资料详细分析的基础上,讨论了东北地区前侏罗纪基底大地构造单元划分和演化。
对中、新生代盆地形成的区域构造背景进行了系统分析,确定中、新生代发育四期盆地形成旋回,讨论了对各旋回盆地的性质和代表性盆地特征,展示了伸展成盆与挤压剥蚀交替的成盆模式,现今外围盆地大部分具有叠合盆地特征。
The thesis selects the Mesozoic and Cenozoic basins surrounding Daqing exploring region as to be main studying points. Based on studying the regional rock strata sequence, the author wants to reconstruct the evolution history of the Mesozoic and Cenozoic in the region. These conclusions may have grate theoretical and practice significants to the basic geology study in Northeast China, basins evolution and oil and gas perspective evaluation surrounding Daqing.
The thesis main content compose of 4 aspects:
1. Based upon summarizing systematically the former references about the regional stratigraphy and paleontology, the author has discussed the Mesozoic and Cenozoic rock stratigraphic sequence surrouding Daqing region and their correlations. The thesis narrate more than 20 formations, including their definition, the character of their basic rock assemblages and stratotype section.
As we know that the international stratigraphic chart place the boundary between Jurassic and Cretaceous at 145. 5±5Ma, and there are a great deal achievements have been made this 10years in paleontology studying and Igneous rock isotope age measuring in Northeast China, so the thesis emends some stratum age, especially some stratum units formerly thought to be Jurassic, such as: Jixi Group, Longzhaogou Group, Huoshiling Formation and Longjiang Formation, the thesis places them to be early Cretaceous.
2. After analyzing the Mesozoic and Cenozoic strata distribution and regional geology, the author finds that there are 5 regional unconformity, they located separately between late Triassic or early Jurassic and early Triassic, early Cretaceous and middle Jurassic, Late Cretaceous and early Cretaceous, Paleogene and late Cretaceous, Neogene and Paleogene, so the author can easily classify the Mesozoic and Cenozoic basin evolution to be 5 tectonic layers, namely: early and middle Jurassic tectonic layer, early Cretaceous tectonic layer, late Cretaceous tectonic layer, Paleogene tectonic layer and Neogene tectonic layer.
3. Through analyzing the regional and basin geologic information, the author discussed pre-Jurassic tectonic units classification and evolution, and concluded that the researching region locating in the east part of Tianshan, Inner Mongolia and Xingan orogenic belt, and its Paleozoic paleogeographic pattern is composed by a series of middle and small massifs, such as Jiamusi massif and Eerguna massif. These massifs were sutured in early Late Paleozoic, and formed a holly Heilongjiang plate, and the Heilongjiang plate sutured with North China plate along Xilamulun to Changchun suture in late Permian or early Triassic, and then, in middle Jurassic, which sutured with Siberia plat along Mongolo-Okhotsk suture and formed a unified Eurasia continent, and which indicate that it is the end of paleo-Asia ocean tectonic realm. It is also middle Jurassic that the Wandashan terrain finished the collision with Eurasia continent, and this event indicate the commencement of Pacific Ocean evolution. 4. The thesis has studied the regional tectonic setting during the Mesozoic and Cenozoic basin forming. The author conclude that there are 3 elements which affect the evolution of Mesozoic and Cenozoic basin in Northeast China, one is the subduction of Pacific ocean plate, the second is the lag effect of collision of Siberia plate and the last one is long distance effect of Indo plate collision with Eurasia. In one words, there are 4 circles in Mesozoic and Cenozoic basins evolution history, namely: J1-2、K1、K2、E. The thesis summarized each basin circles characteristic and typical basin. And the author finds that the pattern of basin evolution in the region is the basin forming stage and stressing reversion stage by turns, multi-stage development and superposition is main character of the regions basin evolution.
引文
1. 曹正尧,1992. 黑龙江绥滨-双鸭山地区城子河组的银杏类化石. 古生物学报,31(2):232—248.
2. 曹正尧,1992. 黑龙江绥滨-双鸭山地区城子河组的植物化石. 古生物学报,31(2):206—231.
3. 陈金华,1999 关于龙爪沟群“Aucellina”问题--兼论“假丝梳”的分类意义. 古生物学报,38(4):454—468.
4. 陈金华,黄冠军,1992. 黑龙江绥滨地区晚侏罗世Buchia 带. 古生物学报, 31(2):163—177.
5. 陈丕基,万晓樵,姜剑虹等,2004. 富饶阶地表地层剖面. 地层学杂志,28(2):97—103.
6. 陈丕基,施泽龙,叶宁,叶德泉,1998. 松花江生物群与东北白垩系地层序列,古生物学报,37(3):386-385.
7. 陈丕基. 2000. 陆相白垩系. 见:中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所编,中国地层研究二十年(1979-1999). 合肥:中国科学技术大学出版社. 329-345.
8. 程金辉,何承全,2001. 黑龙江省东部鸡西盆地早白垩世滴道组的沟鞭藻类. 古生物学报,40(1):127—133.
9. 东北-内蒙古煤炭公司110 勘探队, 1992. 黑龙江东部双鸭山、集贤煤田中生代含煤地层研究. 古生物学报,31(2):129—162.
10. 冯广平,刘长江,宋书银,1999. 中国东北晚白垩世酢酱草属(酢酱草科)一新种:嘉荫酢酱草. 植物分类学报,37(3):264—268.
11. 冯宇,1997. 上黑龙江凹陷晚中生代含煤地层对比. 中国煤田地质,9(2):34—36.
12. 高瑞祺,何承泉,乔秀云,1992, 松辽盆地两次海侵的沟鞭藻新属种,古生物学报,31(1):17-29.
13. 何承全,黄冠军,1997. 黑龙江绥滨地区中侏罗世晚期绥滨组沟鞭藻类的发现. 微体古生物学报,14(1):21—40.
14. 何承全,孙学坤,2000. 黑龙江省东部鸡西盆地城子河组下部早白垩世欧特里夫晚期海相沟鞭藻类. 古生物学报,39(1):46—62.
15. 何承全,万传彪,杨明杰,1999. 黑龙江省东部虎林盆地欧特里夫-巴列姆期沟鞭藻类. 古生物学报,38(2):183—202.
16. 何承全,祝幼华,2003. 黑龙江省东北部绥滨地区东荣组最上部的沟鞭藻组合-兼 论该地区侏罗-白垩系界线. 古生物学报,42(3):328—345.
17. 黑龙江省东部中生代含煤地层研究队著,1983,黑龙江省东部中、上侏罗统与下白垩统化石,上册,黑龙江科学技术出版社.
18. 黑龙江省东部中生代含煤地层研究队著,1984,黑龙江省东部中、上侏罗统与下白垩统化石,下册,黑龙江科学技术出版社.
19. 黄冠军,1989. 黑龙江省绥滨、集贤地区的侏罗-白垩系界线地层. 地层学杂志,13(2):126—132.
20. 黄冠军,1990. 黑龙江省集贤-绥滨地区海相侏罗系. 中国煤田地质,2(1):14—18.
21. 黄冠军,1991. 双鸭山—集贤煤田城子河组古生物组合及时代. 中国煤田地质,(34):21—24.
22. 姜宝玉,冯金宝,2000. 鸡西群城子河组时代的进一步探讨. 地层学杂志,25(3):217—221,240.
23. 朗咸胜,2002. 双鸭山-集贤煤田含煤地层生物组合特征. 中国煤田地质,14(2):7—8,12.
24. 黎文本,1992. 黑龙江西三江地区早白垩世孢粉组合. 古生物学报,31(2):178—189.
25. 李锦轶,和政军,莫申国等,2004. 大兴安岭北部绣峰组下部砾岩的形成时代及其大地构造意义. 地质通报,23(2):120—129.
26. 李强,张海桥,杨建国,2001. 东北地区侏罗-白垩系界线划分对比问题的讨论. 大庆石油地质与开发,20(4):14—16.
27. 李蔚荣,1997. 黑龙江省海陆交互相侏罗系. 黑龙江地质,8(1):1—10.
28. 李献华,李武显,陈丕基等,2004. 黑龙江富饶组上段凝灰岩的SHRIMP 锆石U-Pb 年龄:一个最接近白垩系/第三系界线的年龄. 科学通报,49(8):816—818.
29. 罗玉兴,张志诚,李蔚荣,1983. 黑龙江嘉荫-逊克地区晚中生代和第三纪地层. 地层学杂志,7(3):169—183.
30. 蒙启安,万传彪,乔秀云等,2003. 内蒙古海拉尔盆地大磨拐河组孢粉组合. 地层学杂志,27(3):173—184.
31. 潘华璋,朱祥根,2004. 黑龙江省东部早白垩世的一些海相和半咸水相腹足类. 古生物学报,43(3):338—348.
32. 秦志宏,1999. 嫩江断裂两侧九峰山组特征对比及找煤方向. 煤炭技术,18(6):31—33.
33. 裘松余,1992. 松辽盆地北部安达组及其孢粉组合特征. 地层学杂志,16(1):60—63.
34. 全成,张林,2005. 黑龙江嘉荫地区古近纪早期古气候分析. 地质论评,51(1):10—15.
35. 全国地层委员会编著,2002. 中国区域年代地层(地质年代)表说明书,地质出版社,1-72.
36. 任凤和,杨晓平,李仰春等,2005. 黑龙江省东部鸡西群地层时代划分及地质意义. 中国地质,32(1):48—54.
37. 沙金庚,1991,对黑龙江省东部龙爪沟群和鸡西群时代的不同认识,地质学报,第4 期,376-385 页,图版1.
38. 沙金庚,2002. 黑龙江东部早白垩世生物地层学研究的主要进展,地学前缘,9(3): 95-101.
39. 沙金庚,1990. 黑龙江省东部Aucellina(双壳类)的发现. 地层学杂志,14(3):226—230.
40. 沙金庚,1991. 对黑龙江东部龙爪沟群和鸡西群时代的不同认识. 地质学报,(4):376—383.
41. 沙金庚,1992. 黑龙江东部的Buchia 和Aucellina 层. 地层学杂志,16(1):41—48.
42. 沙金庚,1999. 一个值得注意的修订-评“中国黑龙江省东部早白垩世双壳类”. 古生物学报,38(3):403—406.
43. 沙金庚,2002. 黑龙江东部早白垩世生物地层学研究的主要进展. 地学前缘,9(39):95—101.
44. 尚玉珂,1994. 鹤岗盆地石头河子组孢子花粉. 微体古生物学报,11(4):453—467.
45. 尚玉珂,1997. 黑龙江省鸡西城子河组被子植物化石层的孢粉研究. 微体古生物学报,14(2):161—174.
46. 邵济安,王成源,唐克东等,1990,那丹哈达岭地层与地体的关系,地层学杂志,14(4):286-291.
47. 施行健,周志炎,1962. 中国中生代陆相地层. 北京:科学出版社. 40-60.
48. 孙革,曹正尧,李浩敏等. 1995. 白垩纪植物群. 见:李星学主编. 中国地质时期植物群. 广州:广东科学技术出版社. 310-344.
49. 孙革,D. L. Dilcher,1997. 迄今世界最早被子植物花序化石的首次发现. 古生物学报,36(2):135—142.
50. 孙革,郭双兴,郑少林等,1992. 世界最早的被子植物化石群的首次发现. 中国科学(B辑),(5):543—548.
51. 孙革,全成,孙春林等,2005. 黑龙江嘉荫乌云组地层划分及时代的新认识. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),35(2):137—142.
52. 孙革,孙春林,董枝明等,2003. 黑龙江嘉荫地区白垩纪-第三纪界线初步观察. 世 界地质,22(1):8—14.
53. 孙革,郑少林,2000. 中国东北中生代地层划分对比之新见,地层学杂志,24(1): 60-64.
54. 孙革,郑少林,姜剑红等,1999. 黑龙江鸡西含煤盆地早白垩世生物地层研究新进展. 煤田地质与勘探,27(6):1—3.
55. 孙革,郑少林,孙学坤等,1992. 黑龙江东部侏罗-白垩系界线附近地层研究新进展. 地层学杂志,16(1):49—53.
56. 孙广瑞,刘旭光,韩振哲等,2002. 上黑龙江盆地中上侏罗统二十二站群的地层划分与时代. 地质通报,21(3):150—155.
57. 孙学坤,何承全,1992. 黑龙江绥滨地区晚侏罗世东荣组的沟鞭藻类. 古生物学报,31(2):190—205.
58. 陶君容,张川波. 1990. 吉林省延边盆地早白垩世被子植物化石. 植物学报,32(3):220-229.
59. 陶君容,张川波. 1992.中国早白垩世被子植物生殖器官. 植物分类学报,30(5): 423-426.
60. 万传彪,刘本培,乔秀云等,2004. 嘉荫盆地太平林场组巴尔姆孢(Balmeisporites)的发现及其意义. 地质学报,78(1):1—8.
61. 万传彪,乔秀云,孔惠等,2002. 黑龙江北安地区早白垩世孢粉组合. 微体古生物学报,19(1):83—90.
62. 万传彪,乔秀云,王仁厚等,1997. 海拉尔盆地红旗凹陷白垩纪非海相微体浮游藻类. 微体古生物学报,14(4):405—418.
63. 万传彪,闫凤云,尹楠,1995. 黑龙江集贤地区早白垩世沟鞭藻类和其它藻类. 微体古生物学报,12(1):51—62.
64. 王鑫甫,曹流,1996. 黑龙江嘉荫晚白垩世渔亮子组孢粉地层研究. 微体古生物学报,16(2):190—194.
65. 王蓥,1985. 大兴安岭侏罗、白垩系研究新进展. 地层学杂志,9(3):203—209.
66. 王友勤,苏养正,刘尔义. 1997. 东北区区域地层,武汉:中国地质大学出版社. 1-175.
67. 王友勤,张德英,1984. 黑龙江省东南部陆相上三叠统德发现. 地层学杂志,8(4):308—313.
68. 吴河勇,杨建国,黄清华等,2003. 漠河盆地中生代地层层序及时代. 地层学杂志,27(3):193—198.
69. 辛仁臣,吴河勇,杨建国,2003. 漠河盆地上侏罗统层序地层格架. 地层学杂志,27(3):199—204.
70. 杨建国,2000. 黑龙江东部三江盆地中侏罗世孢粉新发现. 中国含油气盆地孢粉学论文集,北京:石油工业出版社.
71. 杨建国,赵传本,1998. 黑龙江省龙爪沟地区侏罗系研究新进展. 大庆石油地质与开发,17(6):16—18.
72. 杨健国,黄清华,吴朝东等,2004. 黑龙江汤原断陷第三纪地层层序及时代. 地层学杂志,28(2):168—172,184.
73. 杨耀宇,于廷相,郝国夫,刘茂强,姚培毅,黑龙江省东部龙爪沟群与鸡西群关系.
74. 杨子荣,姜剑虹,1997. 鹤岗盆地晚侏罗世石头河子组沉积环境及幕式聚煤作用. 沉积学报,15(3):56—61.
75. 姚淑荣,李方健,周艳霞等. 2001. 黑龙江东部区鸡西群、龙爪沟群时代与对比新认识. 中国煤田地质,13(1):4—7.
76. 张川波,1986. 吉林省延吉盆地早白垩世中晚期地层,长春地质学院学报,第2 期,15-27 页,图版1-2.
77. 张海桥,付长江,王颖,杨建国,李强. 2002. 大庆外围盆地侏罗纪—早白垩世早期古气候研究. 大庆石油地质与开发,21(4):9-11.
78. 张弥曼,周家健,刘智成. 1977. 东北白垩纪含鱼化石层的时代和沉积环境,古脊椎动物与古人类,15(3):194-197.
79. 张世红,刘本培,杨晓强,1997. 黑龙江省东部龙爪沟群层序地层格架. 地学前缘,4(3-4):108.
80. 张世红,施央申,王志洪,1992. 对“龙爪沟群”构造地层的新认识. 地层学杂志,16(3):206—209.
81. 张世红,张传恒,李红生,1999. 黑龙江省东部裴德组砾石中放射虫的发现及其意义. 地层学杂志,23(3):201—205.
82. 赵传本,乔秀云,1993. 黑龙江宁安盆地穆棱组及其孢粉型组合新发现. 微体古生物学报,10(4):447—458.
83. 郑少林,梁子华,1995. 城子河组的新材料及其地层意义. 地层学杂志,19(1):1—8.
84. 郑少林,张武,朱洪森等,2005. 关于龙爪沟群地层单位名称问题的讨论. 地层学杂志,29(1):84—91.
85. 周志炎1980 黑龙江省鸡西、穆棱地区晚中生代地层及其植物组合的基本面貌. 中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所丛刊.
86. 周志炎,陈丕基,历宝贤,文世宣,黎文本,张璐瑾,叶美娜,刘兆生,李再平,杨学林. 1980. 吉林东部延边地区中生代陆相地层. 中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所丛刊,1:1-21.
87. Evgenij Yu. Baraboshkin _, Alexander S. Alekseev, Ludmila F. Kopaevich,Cretaceous palaeogeography of the North-Eastern Peri-Tethys,Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 196 (2003) 177～208.
88. Galina L. Kirillova,2003. Late Mesozoic–Cenozoic sedimentary basins of active continental margin of Southeast Russia: paleogeography, tectonics, and coal–oil–gas presence . Marine and Petroleum Geology 20 (2003) 385–397
89. Jiang Baoyu, Cai Huawei, Sha Jingeng, 2004. Early Cretaceous Aucellina (bivalvia) from the Dajiashan area, northeastern China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 23: 365—371.
90. Li Gang, Yang Qun, 2003. Confirmation of an Early Cretaceous age for the Qihulin Formation in eastern Heilongjiang Province, China. Cretaceous Research, 24: 691—696.
91. Li Gang, Yu Shanmao, 2004. Discovery of agglutinated foraminifers from the Longzhaogou Group in eastern Heilongjiang Province. Science in China Ser. D Earth Sciences, 47(2): 122—127.
92. Peter J. Crosdale, Anatoly P. Sorokin , Ken J. Woolfe , David I. M. Macdonald 2002. Inertinite-rich Tertiary coals from the Zeya–Bureya Basin,Far Eastern Russia. International Journal of Coal Geology 51 (2002) 215–235.
93. Sha Jinggen, Cai huawei, Hechengquan, et al. , 2002. Studies on the Early Cretaceous Longzhaogou and Jixi Groups of eastern Heilongjiang, northeast China, and there bearing on the age of supposedly Jurassic strata in eastern Asia. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 20: 141—150.
94. Sha Jinggen, Masaki Matsukawa, Cai huawei, et al. , 2003. The Upper Jurassic–Lower Cretaceous of eastern Heilongjiang, northeast China: stratigraphy and regional basin history. Cretaceous Research, 24: 715—728.
95. Sun Ge, David L. Dilcher, 2002. Early angiosperms from the Lower Cretaceous of Jixi, eastern Heilongjiang, China. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 121: 91—112.
96. Sun Ge,Guo Shuangxing, Zheng Shaolin, et al. , 1993. First Discovery of the Earliest Angiospermous Megafossils in the World, Science in China Ser. B, 36(2):249—256.
97. Yang Xiaoju, 2004. Ginkgoites myrioneurus sp. nov. and associated shootsfrom the Lower Cretaceous of the Jixi Basin, Heilongjiang, China. Cretaceous Research, 25: 739—748.
98. Yang Xiaoju, Zheng Shaolin, 2003. A new species of Taxodioxylon from the Lower Cretaceous of the Jixi Basin, Heilongjiang, China. Cretaceous Research, 24: 653—660.
2. 曹正尧,1992. 黑龙江绥滨-双鸭山地区城子河组的植物化石. 古生物学报,31(2):206—231.
3. 陈金华,1999 关于龙爪沟群“Aucellina”问题--兼论“假丝梳”的分类意义. 古生物学报,38(4):454—468.
4. 陈金华,黄冠军,1992. 黑龙江绥滨地区晚侏罗世Buchia 带. 古生物学报, 31(2):163—177.
5. 陈丕基,万晓樵,姜剑虹等,2004. 富饶阶地表地层剖面. 地层学杂志,28(2):97—103.
6. 陈丕基,施泽龙,叶宁,叶德泉,1998. 松花江生物群与东北白垩系地层序列,古生物学报,37(3):386-385.
7. 陈丕基. 2000. 陆相白垩系. 见:中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所编,中国地层研究二十年(1979-1999). 合肥:中国科学技术大学出版社. 329-345.
8. 程金辉,何承全,2001. 黑龙江省东部鸡西盆地早白垩世滴道组的沟鞭藻类. 古生物学报,40(1):127—133.
9. 东北-内蒙古煤炭公司110 勘探队, 1992. 黑龙江东部双鸭山、集贤煤田中生代含煤地层研究. 古生物学报,31(2):129—162.
10. 冯广平,刘长江,宋书银,1999. 中国东北晚白垩世酢酱草属(酢酱草科)一新种:嘉荫酢酱草. 植物分类学报,37(3):264—268.
11. 冯宇,1997. 上黑龙江凹陷晚中生代含煤地层对比. 中国煤田地质,9(2):34—36.
12. 高瑞祺,何承泉,乔秀云,1992, 松辽盆地两次海侵的沟鞭藻新属种,古生物学报,31(1):17-29.
13. 何承全,黄冠军,1997. 黑龙江绥滨地区中侏罗世晚期绥滨组沟鞭藻类的发现. 微体古生物学报,14(1):21—40.
14. 何承全,孙学坤,2000. 黑龙江省东部鸡西盆地城子河组下部早白垩世欧特里夫晚期海相沟鞭藻类. 古生物学报,39(1):46—62.
15. 何承全,万传彪,杨明杰,1999. 黑龙江省东部虎林盆地欧特里夫-巴列姆期沟鞭藻类. 古生物学报,38(2):183—202.
16. 何承全,祝幼华,2003. 黑龙江省东北部绥滨地区东荣组最上部的沟鞭藻组合-兼 论该地区侏罗-白垩系界线. 古生物学报,42(3):328—345.
17. 黑龙江省东部中生代含煤地层研究队著,1983,黑龙江省东部中、上侏罗统与下白垩统化石,上册,黑龙江科学技术出版社.
18. 黑龙江省东部中生代含煤地层研究队著,1984,黑龙江省东部中、上侏罗统与下白垩统化石,下册,黑龙江科学技术出版社.
19. 黄冠军,1989. 黑龙江省绥滨、集贤地区的侏罗-白垩系界线地层. 地层学杂志,13(2):126—132.
20. 黄冠军,1990. 黑龙江省集贤-绥滨地区海相侏罗系. 中国煤田地质,2(1):14—18.
21. 黄冠军,1991. 双鸭山—集贤煤田城子河组古生物组合及时代. 中国煤田地质,(34):21—24.
22. 姜宝玉,冯金宝,2000. 鸡西群城子河组时代的进一步探讨. 地层学杂志,25(3):217—221,240.
23. 朗咸胜,2002. 双鸭山-集贤煤田含煤地层生物组合特征. 中国煤田地质,14(2):7—8,12.
24. 黎文本,1992. 黑龙江西三江地区早白垩世孢粉组合. 古生物学报,31(2):178—189.
25. 李锦轶,和政军,莫申国等,2004. 大兴安岭北部绣峰组下部砾岩的形成时代及其大地构造意义. 地质通报,23(2):120—129.
26. 李强,张海桥,杨建国,2001. 东北地区侏罗-白垩系界线划分对比问题的讨论. 大庆石油地质与开发,20(4):14—16.
27. 李蔚荣,1997. 黑龙江省海陆交互相侏罗系. 黑龙江地质,8(1):1—10.
28. 李献华,李武显,陈丕基等,2004. 黑龙江富饶组上段凝灰岩的SHRIMP 锆石U-Pb 年龄:一个最接近白垩系/第三系界线的年龄. 科学通报,49(8):816—818.
29. 罗玉兴,张志诚,李蔚荣,1983. 黑龙江嘉荫-逊克地区晚中生代和第三纪地层. 地层学杂志,7(3):169—183.
30. 蒙启安,万传彪,乔秀云等,2003. 内蒙古海拉尔盆地大磨拐河组孢粉组合. 地层学杂志,27(3):173—184.
31. 潘华璋,朱祥根,2004. 黑龙江省东部早白垩世的一些海相和半咸水相腹足类. 古生物学报,43(3):338—348.
32. 秦志宏,1999. 嫩江断裂两侧九峰山组特征对比及找煤方向. 煤炭技术,18(6):31—33.
33. 裘松余,1992. 松辽盆地北部安达组及其孢粉组合特征. 地层学杂志,16(1):60—63.
34. 全成,张林,2005. 黑龙江嘉荫地区古近纪早期古气候分析. 地质论评,51(1):10—15.
35. 全国地层委员会编著,2002. 中国区域年代地层(地质年代)表说明书,地质出版社,1-72.
36. 任凤和,杨晓平,李仰春等,2005. 黑龙江省东部鸡西群地层时代划分及地质意义. 中国地质,32(1):48—54.
37. 沙金庚,1991,对黑龙江省东部龙爪沟群和鸡西群时代的不同认识,地质学报,第4 期,376-385 页,图版1.
38. 沙金庚,2002. 黑龙江东部早白垩世生物地层学研究的主要进展,地学前缘,9(3): 95-101.
39. 沙金庚,1990. 黑龙江省东部Aucellina(双壳类)的发现. 地层学杂志,14(3):226—230.
40. 沙金庚,1991. 对黑龙江东部龙爪沟群和鸡西群时代的不同认识. 地质学报,(4):376—383.
41. 沙金庚,1992. 黑龙江东部的Buchia 和Aucellina 层. 地层学杂志,16(1):41—48.
42. 沙金庚,1999. 一个值得注意的修订-评“中国黑龙江省东部早白垩世双壳类”. 古生物学报,38(3):403—406.
43. 沙金庚,2002. 黑龙江东部早白垩世生物地层学研究的主要进展. 地学前缘,9(39):95—101.
44. 尚玉珂,1994. 鹤岗盆地石头河子组孢子花粉. 微体古生物学报,11(4):453—467.
45. 尚玉珂,1997. 黑龙江省鸡西城子河组被子植物化石层的孢粉研究. 微体古生物学报,14(2):161—174.
46. 邵济安,王成源,唐克东等,1990,那丹哈达岭地层与地体的关系,地层学杂志,14(4):286-291.
47. 施行健,周志炎,1962. 中国中生代陆相地层. 北京:科学出版社. 40-60.
48. 孙革,曹正尧,李浩敏等. 1995. 白垩纪植物群. 见:李星学主编. 中国地质时期植物群. 广州:广东科学技术出版社. 310-344.
49. 孙革,D. L. Dilcher,1997. 迄今世界最早被子植物花序化石的首次发现. 古生物学报,36(2):135—142.
50. 孙革,郭双兴,郑少林等,1992. 世界最早的被子植物化石群的首次发现. 中国科学(B辑),(5):543—548.
51. 孙革,全成,孙春林等,2005. 黑龙江嘉荫乌云组地层划分及时代的新认识. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),35(2):137—142.
52. 孙革,孙春林,董枝明等,2003. 黑龙江嘉荫地区白垩纪-第三纪界线初步观察. 世 界地质,22(1):8—14.
53. 孙革,郑少林,2000. 中国东北中生代地层划分对比之新见,地层学杂志,24(1): 60-64.
54. 孙革,郑少林,姜剑红等,1999. 黑龙江鸡西含煤盆地早白垩世生物地层研究新进展. 煤田地质与勘探,27(6):1—3.
55. 孙革,郑少林,孙学坤等,1992. 黑龙江东部侏罗-白垩系界线附近地层研究新进展. 地层学杂志,16(1):49—53.
56. 孙广瑞,刘旭光,韩振哲等,2002. 上黑龙江盆地中上侏罗统二十二站群的地层划分与时代. 地质通报,21(3):150—155.
57. 孙学坤,何承全,1992. 黑龙江绥滨地区晚侏罗世东荣组的沟鞭藻类. 古生物学报,31(2):190—205.
58. 陶君容,张川波. 1990. 吉林省延边盆地早白垩世被子植物化石. 植物学报,32(3):220-229.
59. 陶君容,张川波. 1992.中国早白垩世被子植物生殖器官. 植物分类学报,30(5): 423-426.
60. 万传彪,刘本培,乔秀云等,2004. 嘉荫盆地太平林场组巴尔姆孢(Balmeisporites)的发现及其意义. 地质学报,78(1):1—8.
61. 万传彪,乔秀云,孔惠等,2002. 黑龙江北安地区早白垩世孢粉组合. 微体古生物学报,19(1):83—90.
62. 万传彪,乔秀云,王仁厚等,1997. 海拉尔盆地红旗凹陷白垩纪非海相微体浮游藻类. 微体古生物学报,14(4):405—418.
63. 万传彪,闫凤云,尹楠,1995. 黑龙江集贤地区早白垩世沟鞭藻类和其它藻类. 微体古生物学报,12(1):51—62.
64. 王鑫甫,曹流,1996. 黑龙江嘉荫晚白垩世渔亮子组孢粉地层研究. 微体古生物学报,16(2):190—194.
65. 王蓥,1985. 大兴安岭侏罗、白垩系研究新进展. 地层学杂志,9(3):203—209.
66. 王友勤,苏养正,刘尔义. 1997. 东北区区域地层,武汉:中国地质大学出版社. 1-175.
67. 王友勤,张德英,1984. 黑龙江省东南部陆相上三叠统德发现. 地层学杂志,8(4):308—313.
68. 吴河勇,杨建国,黄清华等,2003. 漠河盆地中生代地层层序及时代. 地层学杂志,27(3):193—198.
69. 辛仁臣,吴河勇,杨建国,2003. 漠河盆地上侏罗统层序地层格架. 地层学杂志,27(3):199—204.
70. 杨建国,2000. 黑龙江东部三江盆地中侏罗世孢粉新发现. 中国含油气盆地孢粉学论文集,北京:石油工业出版社.
71. 杨建国,赵传本,1998. 黑龙江省龙爪沟地区侏罗系研究新进展. 大庆石油地质与开发,17(6):16—18.
72. 杨健国,黄清华,吴朝东等,2004. 黑龙江汤原断陷第三纪地层层序及时代. 地层学杂志,28(2):168—172,184.
73. 杨耀宇,于廷相,郝国夫,刘茂强,姚培毅,黑龙江省东部龙爪沟群与鸡西群关系.
74. 杨子荣,姜剑虹,1997. 鹤岗盆地晚侏罗世石头河子组沉积环境及幕式聚煤作用. 沉积学报,15(3):56—61.
75. 姚淑荣,李方健,周艳霞等. 2001. 黑龙江东部区鸡西群、龙爪沟群时代与对比新认识. 中国煤田地质,13(1):4—7.
76. 张川波,1986. 吉林省延吉盆地早白垩世中晚期地层,长春地质学院学报,第2 期,15-27 页,图版1-2.
77. 张海桥,付长江,王颖,杨建国,李强. 2002. 大庆外围盆地侏罗纪—早白垩世早期古气候研究. 大庆石油地质与开发,21(4):9-11.
78. 张弥曼,周家健,刘智成. 1977. 东北白垩纪含鱼化石层的时代和沉积环境,古脊椎动物与古人类,15(3):194-197.
79. 张世红,刘本培,杨晓强,1997. 黑龙江省东部龙爪沟群层序地层格架. 地学前缘,4(3-4):108.
80. 张世红,施央申,王志洪,1992. 对“龙爪沟群”构造地层的新认识. 地层学杂志,16(3):206—209.
81. 张世红,张传恒,李红生,1999. 黑龙江省东部裴德组砾石中放射虫的发现及其意义. 地层学杂志,23(3):201—205.
82. 赵传本,乔秀云,1993. 黑龙江宁安盆地穆棱组及其孢粉型组合新发现. 微体古生物学报,10(4):447—458.
83. 郑少林,梁子华,1995. 城子河组的新材料及其地层意义. 地层学杂志,19(1):1—8.
84. 郑少林,张武,朱洪森等,2005. 关于龙爪沟群地层单位名称问题的讨论. 地层学杂志,29(1):84—91.
85. 周志炎1980 黑龙江省鸡西、穆棱地区晚中生代地层及其植物组合的基本面貌. 中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所丛刊.
86. 周志炎,陈丕基,历宝贤,文世宣,黎文本,张璐瑾,叶美娜,刘兆生,李再平,杨学林. 1980. 吉林东部延边地区中生代陆相地层. 中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所丛刊,1:1-21.
87. Evgenij Yu. Baraboshkin _, Alexander S. Alekseev, Ludmila F. Kopaevich,Cretaceous palaeogeography of the North-Eastern Peri-Tethys,Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 196 (2003) 177～208.
88. Galina L. Kirillova,2003. Late Mesozoic–Cenozoic sedimentary basins of active continental margin of Southeast Russia: paleogeography, tectonics, and coal–oil–gas presence . Marine and Petroleum Geology 20 (2003) 385–397
89. Jiang Baoyu, Cai Huawei, Sha Jingeng, 2004. Early Cretaceous Aucellina (bivalvia) from the Dajiashan area, northeastern China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 23: 365—371.
90. Li Gang, Yang Qun, 2003. Confirmation of an Early Cretaceous age for the Qihulin Formation in eastern Heilongjiang Province, China. Cretaceous Research, 24: 691—696.
91. Li Gang, Yu Shanmao, 2004. Discovery of agglutinated foraminifers from the Longzhaogou Group in eastern Heilongjiang Province. Science in China Ser. D Earth Sciences, 47(2): 122—127.
92. Peter J. Crosdale, Anatoly P. Sorokin , Ken J. Woolfe , David I. M. Macdonald 2002. Inertinite-rich Tertiary coals from the Zeya–Bureya Basin,Far Eastern Russia. International Journal of Coal Geology 51 (2002) 215–235.
93. Sha Jinggen, Cai huawei, Hechengquan, et al. , 2002. Studies on the Early Cretaceous Longzhaogou and Jixi Groups of eastern Heilongjiang, northeast China, and there bearing on the age of supposedly Jurassic strata in eastern Asia. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 20: 141—150.
94. Sha Jinggen, Masaki Matsukawa, Cai huawei, et al. , 2003. The Upper Jurassic–Lower Cretaceous of eastern Heilongjiang, northeast China: stratigraphy and regional basin history. Cretaceous Research, 24: 715—728.
95. Sun Ge, David L. Dilcher, 2002. Early angiosperms from the Lower Cretaceous of Jixi, eastern Heilongjiang, China. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 121: 91—112.
96. Sun Ge,Guo Shuangxing, Zheng Shaolin, et al. , 1993. First Discovery of the Earliest Angiospermous Megafossils in the World, Science in China Ser. B, 36(2):249—256.
97. Yang Xiaoju, 2004. Ginkgoites myrioneurus sp. nov. and associated shootsfrom the Lower Cretaceous of the Jixi Basin, Heilongjiang, China. Cretaceous Research, 25: 739—748.
98. Yang Xiaoju, Zheng Shaolin, 2003. A new species of Taxodioxylon from the Lower Cretaceous of the Jixi Basin, Heilongjiang, China. Cretaceous Research, 24: 653—660.