食用型甘薯施用腐植酸和钾肥改善品质的生理基础
摘要
为了探讨甘薯施用腐植酸和钾肥改善品质的生理基础,本试验选用北京553和济薯22两个食用型品种为试验材料,于山东农业大学农学实验站进行试验。主要研究结果如下:
1腐植酸对甘薯产量和营养品质的影响
1.1对块根产量的影响
施用腐植酸可提高北京553的块根产量,HA17处理增幅达到显著水平;济薯22施用腐植酸后对产量的影响达不到显著水平。腐植酸影响产量的原因也因品种而异,北京553施用腐植酸后通过提高单薯重来增产,主要是促进中、小薯向大薯转化;而济薯22施用腐植酸是通过提高单株结薯数使产量略有升高,主要是提高了大薯的数量比例。
1.2对甘薯块根营养品质的影响
施用腐植酸后降低了块根中淀粉含量而显著提高了块根中可溶性糖的含量。施用腐植酸后主要降低了块根中直链淀粉含量,支链淀粉含量略有降低,同时降低了直、支比,改善了块根的适口性。同时可溶性糖含量的增幅大于淀粉含量的降幅,说明施用腐植酸能促进淀粉向可溶性糖转化,从而提高可溶性糖含量。
施用腐植酸后功能叶中磷酸蔗糖合酶活性显著提高,功能叶中蔗糖含量也显著提高,结合茎蔓中蔗糖含量下降或相似,同时块根中不溶性酸性转化酶和碱性转化酶活性提高,说明施用腐植酸后增加了源端光合产物的供应,保证了光合产物运输通道的畅通,增强了库端光合产物的卸载能力,保证了蔗糖的供应。而蔗糖合酶活性的降低,则减少了淀粉的合成,增加蔗糖的积累;淀粉酶活性的提高也减少了淀粉的含量,增加了葡萄糖的含量;SST活性的提高则促进碳素向果聚糖库的转移,是果聚糖含量增加的生理原因之一;可溶性酸性转化酶活性的提高为果糖和葡萄糖含量的积累奠定基础。综上,腐植酸通过以下三种方式增加块根中可溶性糖含量:第一,提高块根中可溶性糖的供应量;第二,腐植酸抑制了块根中可溶性糖向淀粉的转化;第三,腐植酸促进了块根中淀粉向可溶性糖的转化。
通过对主要生长时期块根中维生素C含量的测定,发现北京553块根中维生素C的主要积累时期为生长中后期,而济薯22的主要积累时期为生长前期和后期,施用腐植酸后显著提高了各时期块根中维生素C的含量。
通过对主要生长时期块根中硝态氮含量的测定,发现济薯22中硝态氮主要积累时期为生长中后期,施用腐植酸后显著降低了各时期块根中硝态氮含量。对北京553的研究发现,施用腐植酸提高了主要生长时期块根中氨基酸含量而降低了硝态氮的含量,即腐植酸促进硝态氮向氨态氮转化,减少硝态氮的含量从而改善块根的品质。
2钾肥对块根产量和营养品质的影响
2.1对块根产量的影响
增施钾肥可以显著提高块根产量,增产原因存在品种差异。北京553施用钾肥后既提高单薯重又提高单株结薯数,主要是提高了大薯的数量比例和质量比例;济薯22施用钾肥后显著提高了单株结薯数,对单薯重影响不大。
2.2对块根营养品质的影响
甘薯施用钾肥后能提高块根中可溶性糖含量,同时淀粉含量也升高。块根中可溶性糖各组分含量均显著提高,而淀粉含量的提高主要是施钾提高了直链淀粉含量。
钾肥提高可溶性糖含量的生理原因与腐植酸有相同之处,即施用钾肥也能改善源端光合产物的供应,保证光合产物运输通道的畅通,增强库端光合产物的卸载能力,保证蔗糖的供应;通过提高可溶性酸性转化酶活性提高果糖和葡萄糖的含量;通过提高SST活性提高果聚糖含量。不同之处在于,钾肥能显著提高SS的活性促进淀粉的合成,而收获期块根中淀粉含量略有升高,主要是因为钾肥显著提高了块根淀粉酶活性,促进淀粉水解,减少淀粉含量而促进可溶性糖的积累。
施用钾肥可以提高块根中维生素C的含量,而降低块根中硝态氮的含量,改善块根品质。
In order to find out the physiology basis of quality improvement of edible sweetpotato caused by humic acid and potassium fertilizer, an experiment was carried out in agronomy experimental station of Shandong Agricultural University with Beijing 553 and Jishu 22. The main results were as follows:
1 Effect of humic acid (HA) on yield and nutrient quality of storage root
1.1 Effect on yield of storage root
For Beijing 553 yield in treatments with HA application were increased, thereinto yield effects of treatment HA17 reached the significant level. For Jishu 22 yield in treatments with HA application were increased without significant difference. The yield of different varieties were increased by HA application in different ways. Yield of Beijng 553 was increased by means of increasing fresh weight per lump. In other words HA could facilitate the change from mid-tuber and small-tuber to big-tuber. The reason of increasing yield for Jishu 22 was to increase storage roots lumps per plant. That was caused mainly by increasing the amount ratio of big-tuber.
1.2 Effect on nutritional quality of storage root
Amylose content was reduced significantly and amylopectin content was reduced lightly after HA application which resulted in lower starch content of storage root. The reduction of rate of amylopectin to amylose content was caused by HA application which was benefit to taste of storage root. Treatment with HA application got higher soluble sugar content of storage root than that of storage root in the control, in addition the amplification of soluble sugar content was bigger than the decline rate of starch content. These declared that one of the reasons for increase of soluble sugar was to improve conversion from starch to soluble sugar.
After the application of humic acid sucrose phosphate synthase activity was significantly increased in functional leaves, sucrose content in functional leaves were also significantly increased, the sucrose content of vine was decreased or similar, in addition insoluble acid invertase and alkaline invertase activity in storage root were increased significantly, all of these showed that application of humic acid could increase the supply of photosynthetic products, keep clear of photosynthate transport corridors and improve the offloading capabilities of storage root to ensure the supply of sucrose. The activity of sucrose synthase was decreased which gave rise to the diminution of starch synthesis and the increase of sucrose accumulation by use of HA; amylase activity was increased also by use of HA which brought less starch content and higher glucose content compared with the control; treatment with HA also got higher fructosan content by means of increasing SST activity than that of the control. HA increased the accumulation of fructose and glucose by means of increasing soluble acid invertase activity as well. To sum up, humic acid could increase the soluble sugar content in storage root by three ways: first, to enhance the supply of soluble sugar to storage root; second, to inhibite the conversion from soluble sugar to starch of storage root; last, to promote the conversion from starch to soluble sugar in storage root.
The result got by determining the content of vitamin C during the key stages of growth showed that the main periods of accumulation of vitamin C in storage root were middle-late stage of growth for Beijing 553, while that for Jishu 22 were intermediate and final growth phases. Vitamin C content was significantly increased by use of HA.
The result got by determining the content of nitrate during the key stages of growth showed that the main periods of accumulation of nitrate in storage root were middle-late stage of growth for Jishu 22, meanwhile treatments with HA got lower nitrate content than that of the control. The result got from Beijing 553 showed the amino acid content in storage root was increased during the key stages of growth, that meant HA could improve quality of storage root by the way of improving the changes from nitrate to ammoniacal nitrogen.
2 Effect of K on yield and nutrient quality of storage root
2.1 Effect of K on yield of storage root
Adding potassium fertilizer might significantly increase yield of storage root, but the reasons for yield increase were different among varieties. Both cutting storage roots lumps per plant and fresh weight per lump were increased by potassium application in Beijing 553. The main reason was potassium application could increase amount ratio and mass ratio of big-tuber. Yield of Jishu 22 was increased after using potassium by means of increasing storage roots lumps per plant.
2.2 Effect on nutritional quality of storage root
Potassium could improve soluble sugar content of storage root markedly, starch content in storage root was increased as well. The increase of soluble sugar was caused by increase of all components of soluble sugar, while the increase of starch was caused by increase of amylase content mainly.
The physiological causes of increasing soluble sugar content by use of potassium were similar to humic acid: potassium could enhance the supply of photosynthetic products, and keep clear of photosynthate transport corridors, meanwhile improve the offloading capabilities of storage root to ensure the supply of sucrose; in addition potassium could improve the content of fructose and glucose by means of increasing the activity of soluble acid invertase as well; besides fructan content was increased by increasing SST activity after potassium application. The effect of potassium on the activity of SS was different from HA. Potassium could improve the synthesis of starch, while content of starch in storage root was increased lighly caused by increase of amylase activity with potassium application mainly which resulted in lower starch content and higher soluble sugar content.
The quality of storage root was improved by use of potassium via increasing content of Vitamin C and decreasing content of nitrate.
1腐植酸对甘薯产量和营养品质的影响
1.1对块根产量的影响
施用腐植酸可提高北京553的块根产量,HA17处理增幅达到显著水平;济薯22施用腐植酸后对产量的影响达不到显著水平。腐植酸影响产量的原因也因品种而异,北京553施用腐植酸后通过提高单薯重来增产,主要是促进中、小薯向大薯转化;而济薯22施用腐植酸是通过提高单株结薯数使产量略有升高,主要是提高了大薯的数量比例。
1.2对甘薯块根营养品质的影响
施用腐植酸后降低了块根中淀粉含量而显著提高了块根中可溶性糖的含量。施用腐植酸后主要降低了块根中直链淀粉含量,支链淀粉含量略有降低,同时降低了直、支比,改善了块根的适口性。同时可溶性糖含量的增幅大于淀粉含量的降幅,说明施用腐植酸能促进淀粉向可溶性糖转化,从而提高可溶性糖含量。
施用腐植酸后功能叶中磷酸蔗糖合酶活性显著提高,功能叶中蔗糖含量也显著提高,结合茎蔓中蔗糖含量下降或相似,同时块根中不溶性酸性转化酶和碱性转化酶活性提高,说明施用腐植酸后增加了源端光合产物的供应,保证了光合产物运输通道的畅通,增强了库端光合产物的卸载能力,保证了蔗糖的供应。而蔗糖合酶活性的降低,则减少了淀粉的合成,增加蔗糖的积累;淀粉酶活性的提高也减少了淀粉的含量,增加了葡萄糖的含量;SST活性的提高则促进碳素向果聚糖库的转移,是果聚糖含量增加的生理原因之一;可溶性酸性转化酶活性的提高为果糖和葡萄糖含量的积累奠定基础。综上,腐植酸通过以下三种方式增加块根中可溶性糖含量:第一,提高块根中可溶性糖的供应量;第二,腐植酸抑制了块根中可溶性糖向淀粉的转化;第三,腐植酸促进了块根中淀粉向可溶性糖的转化。
通过对主要生长时期块根中维生素C含量的测定,发现北京553块根中维生素C的主要积累时期为生长中后期,而济薯22的主要积累时期为生长前期和后期,施用腐植酸后显著提高了各时期块根中维生素C的含量。
通过对主要生长时期块根中硝态氮含量的测定,发现济薯22中硝态氮主要积累时期为生长中后期,施用腐植酸后显著降低了各时期块根中硝态氮含量。对北京553的研究发现,施用腐植酸提高了主要生长时期块根中氨基酸含量而降低了硝态氮的含量,即腐植酸促进硝态氮向氨态氮转化,减少硝态氮的含量从而改善块根的品质。
2钾肥对块根产量和营养品质的影响
2.1对块根产量的影响
增施钾肥可以显著提高块根产量,增产原因存在品种差异。北京553施用钾肥后既提高单薯重又提高单株结薯数,主要是提高了大薯的数量比例和质量比例;济薯22施用钾肥后显著提高了单株结薯数,对单薯重影响不大。
2.2对块根营养品质的影响
甘薯施用钾肥后能提高块根中可溶性糖含量,同时淀粉含量也升高。块根中可溶性糖各组分含量均显著提高,而淀粉含量的提高主要是施钾提高了直链淀粉含量。
钾肥提高可溶性糖含量的生理原因与腐植酸有相同之处,即施用钾肥也能改善源端光合产物的供应,保证光合产物运输通道的畅通,增强库端光合产物的卸载能力,保证蔗糖的供应;通过提高可溶性酸性转化酶活性提高果糖和葡萄糖的含量;通过提高SST活性提高果聚糖含量。不同之处在于,钾肥能显著提高SS的活性促进淀粉的合成,而收获期块根中淀粉含量略有升高,主要是因为钾肥显著提高了块根淀粉酶活性,促进淀粉水解,减少淀粉含量而促进可溶性糖的积累。
施用钾肥可以提高块根中维生素C的含量,而降低块根中硝态氮的含量,改善块根品质。
In order to find out the physiology basis of quality improvement of edible sweetpotato caused by humic acid and potassium fertilizer, an experiment was carried out in agronomy experimental station of Shandong Agricultural University with Beijing 553 and Jishu 22. The main results were as follows:
1 Effect of humic acid (HA) on yield and nutrient quality of storage root
1.1 Effect on yield of storage root
For Beijing 553 yield in treatments with HA application were increased, thereinto yield effects of treatment HA17 reached the significant level. For Jishu 22 yield in treatments with HA application were increased without significant difference. The yield of different varieties were increased by HA application in different ways. Yield of Beijng 553 was increased by means of increasing fresh weight per lump. In other words HA could facilitate the change from mid-tuber and small-tuber to big-tuber. The reason of increasing yield for Jishu 22 was to increase storage roots lumps per plant. That was caused mainly by increasing the amount ratio of big-tuber.
1.2 Effect on nutritional quality of storage root
Amylose content was reduced significantly and amylopectin content was reduced lightly after HA application which resulted in lower starch content of storage root. The reduction of rate of amylopectin to amylose content was caused by HA application which was benefit to taste of storage root. Treatment with HA application got higher soluble sugar content of storage root than that of storage root in the control, in addition the amplification of soluble sugar content was bigger than the decline rate of starch content. These declared that one of the reasons for increase of soluble sugar was to improve conversion from starch to soluble sugar.
After the application of humic acid sucrose phosphate synthase activity was significantly increased in functional leaves, sucrose content in functional leaves were also significantly increased, the sucrose content of vine was decreased or similar, in addition insoluble acid invertase and alkaline invertase activity in storage root were increased significantly, all of these showed that application of humic acid could increase the supply of photosynthetic products, keep clear of photosynthate transport corridors and improve the offloading capabilities of storage root to ensure the supply of sucrose. The activity of sucrose synthase was decreased which gave rise to the diminution of starch synthesis and the increase of sucrose accumulation by use of HA; amylase activity was increased also by use of HA which brought less starch content and higher glucose content compared with the control; treatment with HA also got higher fructosan content by means of increasing SST activity than that of the control. HA increased the accumulation of fructose and glucose by means of increasing soluble acid invertase activity as well. To sum up, humic acid could increase the soluble sugar content in storage root by three ways: first, to enhance the supply of soluble sugar to storage root; second, to inhibite the conversion from soluble sugar to starch of storage root; last, to promote the conversion from starch to soluble sugar in storage root.
The result got by determining the content of vitamin C during the key stages of growth showed that the main periods of accumulation of vitamin C in storage root were middle-late stage of growth for Beijing 553, while that for Jishu 22 were intermediate and final growth phases. Vitamin C content was significantly increased by use of HA.
The result got by determining the content of nitrate during the key stages of growth showed that the main periods of accumulation of nitrate in storage root were middle-late stage of growth for Jishu 22, meanwhile treatments with HA got lower nitrate content than that of the control. The result got from Beijing 553 showed the amino acid content in storage root was increased during the key stages of growth, that meant HA could improve quality of storage root by the way of improving the changes from nitrate to ammoniacal nitrogen.
2 Effect of K on yield and nutrient quality of storage root
2.1 Effect of K on yield of storage root
Adding potassium fertilizer might significantly increase yield of storage root, but the reasons for yield increase were different among varieties. Both cutting storage roots lumps per plant and fresh weight per lump were increased by potassium application in Beijing 553. The main reason was potassium application could increase amount ratio and mass ratio of big-tuber. Yield of Jishu 22 was increased after using potassium by means of increasing storage roots lumps per plant.
2.2 Effect on nutritional quality of storage root
Potassium could improve soluble sugar content of storage root markedly, starch content in storage root was increased as well. The increase of soluble sugar was caused by increase of all components of soluble sugar, while the increase of starch was caused by increase of amylase content mainly.
The physiological causes of increasing soluble sugar content by use of potassium were similar to humic acid: potassium could enhance the supply of photosynthetic products, and keep clear of photosynthate transport corridors, meanwhile improve the offloading capabilities of storage root to ensure the supply of sucrose; in addition potassium could improve the content of fructose and glucose by means of increasing the activity of soluble acid invertase as well; besides fructan content was increased by increasing SST activity after potassium application. The effect of potassium on the activity of SS was different from HA. Potassium could improve the synthesis of starch, while content of starch in storage root was increased lighly caused by increase of amylase activity with potassium application mainly which resulted in lower starch content and higher soluble sugar content.
The quality of storage root was improved by use of potassium via increasing content of Vitamin C and decreasing content of nitrate.
引文
安华明,陈力耕,樊卫国,胡西琴.高等植物中维生素C的功能、合成及代谢研究进展[J]. 植物学通报, 2004, 21(5): 608-617
曹富强,辛绍钢.不同钾、氮水平对红富士苹果品质的影响[J].河北林业科技, 2007, 5: 22-25
柴仲平,王雪梅,孙霞,蒋平安,张谦.不同氮磷钾配比滴灌对灰枣产量与品质的影响[J].果树学报, 2011, 28(2): 229-233
陈昆,刘世琦,张自坤,张涛,孟凡鲁.钾素对水培大蒜生理和品质的影响[J].园艺学报, 2011, 38(3): 556-562
陈栋,涂美艳,杜晋城,谢红江,孙淑霞,李靖,江国良.不同施钾量对曙光油桃产量和品质的影响[J].西南农业学报, 2010, 23(4): 1173-1176
陈峰,张正球,张士永,张洪瑞,杨连群,严长杰.稻米淀粉的生物合成与品质改良的研究进展[J].山东农业科学, 2008, 3: 20-25
程福皆,曹辰兴,康鸾,朱东方.不同氮钾水平对春棚小黄瓜产量及品质的影响[J].西北农业学报, 2009, 18(5): 276-279
崔荣宗,杨果,李彦,魏建林,姜国志.不同钾肥品种及用量对香瓜产量和品质的影响[J].山东农业科学, 2006, 4: 20-23
戴双,李豪圣,刘爱峰,宋健民,刘建军,赵振东.氮钾配施对济南17淀粉理化特性的影响[J].麦类作物学报, 2006, 26(4): 107-110
邓丈绪,曾绍清.腐殖酸钠提高脐橙产量和品质试验[J].中国南方水果, 1983, 1: 19-20
丁海兵,邓宽平,邓禄军,卢扬,雷尊国.高寒山区钾肥施用量对早熟马铃薯生长性状的影响及效益分析[J].天津农业科学, 2011, 17(1): 68-70
杜会英,薛世川,孙志梅,杨云马,王艳群,李迎春.腐植酸复合肥对葡萄品质及产量的影响[J].河北农业大学学报, 2004, 27(4): 63-66
段春华,邢尚军,刘方春,杜振宇,马海林,马元民.腐殖酸肥料对菠菜产量及品质的影响[J].山东农业科学, 2007, 3: 85-87
付晓忠,廉华.钾素不同用量对莴苣硝酸盐积累的影响[J].北方园艺2009, (1): 74–76
高缘,张建军,屠锡德.抗坏血酸的新应用[J].药学进展, 2000, (1): 24-27
高祖明,张耀栋,张道勇,史瑞和.氮磷钾对叶菜硝酸盐积累和硝酸还原酶过氧化物酶活性的影响[J].园艺学报, 1989, (4): 293-297
郭蔼光.基础生物化学[M].北京:北京高等教育出版社, 2008: pp 139-141, 203-205
郭明军,马锋旺,张国辉.生物腐殖酸肥料在樱桃番茄上的应用效果[J].河北农业科学, 2008, 12 (8): 49-50, 126
郭熙盛,吴礼树,朱宏斌,王文军,叶舒娅,武际.不同钾肥品种和用量对花椰菜产量和品质的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2007, 13(3): 464-470
郭熙盛,刘才宇,王文军,叶舒娅,朱宏斌.钾肥对洋葱产量、品质及养分吸收的影响[J]. 中国蔬菜, 1999 (2): 12-14
何建平,陶启珍,易平.腐植酸液体叶面肥对马铃薯产量和品质的影响[J].腐植酸, 2004, 01: 24-26, 37
何萍,金继运,李文娟.施钾对高油玉米和普通玉米吸钾特性及子粒产量和品质的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2005, 11(5): 620-626
何为华,张世英,黄显淦,吕保清.喷施腐殖酸钙能提高葡萄果实品质[J]. 2003, 3: 12
何萍,杨金,周卫.腐殖酸复混肥对番茄产量、品质及生理活性的影响[J].土壤通报, 1997, 28(6): 277-279
何照范.编著.粮油籽粒品质及其分析技术[M].北京:中国农业科学出版社, 1985: pp 221-232
胡春梅.瓜尔豆半乳甘露聚糖和产量形成的生理基础及氮钾影响的研究[硕士毕业论文]. 山东农业大学, 2003: 41-44
黄发松,孙宗修,胡培松,唐绍清.食用稻米品质形成研究的现状与展望[J].中国水稻科学, 1998, 12(3): 172-176
季云美,任旭琴.不同肥料对小白菜产量及品质的影响[J].江苏农业科学, 2004(6): 38-40
江阳,孙成均.甘薯的营养成分及其保健功效研究进展[J].中国农业科技导报, 2010, 12(4): 56-61
贾慧春.钾营养水平对番茄氮素代谢的影响[J].安徽农学通报, 2010, 16( 11): 79, 95
金丽晨,耿志明,李金州,王澎,陈菲,刘蔼民.稻米淀粉组成及分子结构与食味品质的关系[J].江苏农业学报, 2011, 27(1): 13-18
康云艳,张春兰,张雷,柳李旺,陈忠,龚义勤.不同施肥处理对出口青花菜产量与品质的影响[J].华北农学报, 2005, 20(6): 63-67
李作梅.腐植酸和氮素对食用甘薯产量品质形成的调控效应[硕士毕业论文].山东农业大学, 2009: 54-59
李友军,熊瑛,陈明灿,骆炳山.氮磷钾对豫麦50旗叶蔗糖和籽粒淀粉积累的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17(7): 1196-1200
李彦,郭良进,高贤彪,崔荣宗,董晓霞,杨果.钾肥对大棚番茄产量和品质的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2004, 1: 25-29
李太贵,沈波,陈能,罗玉坤. Q酶在水稻籽粒垩白形成中作用的研究[J].作物学报, 1997, 23(3): 338-344
李合声.编著.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:北京高等教育出版社, 2000: pp 82-105
刘汝亮,李友宏,王芳,陈智君,赵天成,陈晨.两种钾源对马铃薯养分累积和产量的影响[J].西北农业学报, 2009,18(1): 143-146
刘增祥.甜瓜喷施腐殖酸对提高果实品质的影响[J].新疆农业科学, 1985, 04: 28-29
陆国权,唐忠厚,黄华宏.不同施钾水平甘薯直链淀粉含量和糊化特性的基因型差异[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2005, 17(5): 280-283
户刘又次等.作物生理讲座[M].上海:上海科技出版社, 1996: pp 204-205
吕英民,张大鹏.果实发育过程中糖的积累[J].植物生理学通讯, 2000, 3: 258-265
马振峰,杨军,刘桂华.钾营养对柰李果实品质的影响[J].安徽农业大学学报, 2010, 37(1): 145-149
马海刚,徐万里,何生丽,蒋最义,孙好文,蔡泽宇.腐植酸肥料在加工番茄上施用的肥效及对品质的影响[J].新疆农业科学2009, 46(4): 772-775
马娟娟,胡全才,王申贵.钾、锌肥与氮肥配施对油菜体内硝酸盐累积的影响[J].山西农业科学. 2000, 28(2): 3-6
马全民,饶立华,陆定志.钾调节茎用芥菜同化物运输及茎部膨大的作用机理[J].园艺学报, 1992, 19(4): 347-352
潘瑞炽,王小菁,李娘军.植物生理学[M].高等教育出版社, 2004: pp 82
彭正萍,门明新,薛世川,孙旭霞,薛宝民,毕淑芹.腐植酸复合肥对土壤养分转化和土壤酶活性的影响[J].河北农业大学学报, 2005, 28(4): 1-4
彭正萍,门明新,薛世川.不同用量的自制腐植酸复合肥与油菜利用养分的关系[J].河北农业大学学报, 2005, 28(2): 5-8
彭正萍,毕淑芹,门明新,薛世川,孙旭霞.腐植酸复合肥对油菜的施用效应及生理指标的影响[J].河北农业大学学报. 2005, 28(6): 15-18
彭正萍,薛世川,孙志梅,门明新,赵会欣.腐植酸复合肥对油菜品质及生理指标的影响[J].河北农业大学学报, 2001, 24(1): 24-27
沈明珠,瞿宝杰,东惠如.蔬菜硝酸盐积累的研究[J].园艺学报, 1982, 9(4): 41- 48
史春余,王汝娟,梁太波,王振林.食用型甘薯块根碳水化合物代谢特性及与品质的关系[J].中国农业科学, 2008, 41(11): 3878-3885
史春余,王振林,赵秉强,郭风法,余松烈.钾营养对甘薯某些生理特性和产量形成的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2002, 8(1): 81-85
施振云,施俭,杨锋,王德君.钾肥对提高花椰菜产量和品质的效应[J].土壤肥料, 2004, 4: 17-19
孙志梅,薛世川,王国旗,刘淑萍,张会永.不同腐殖酸复合肥施用量对辣椒产量及其养分利用率的影响[J].中国生态农业学报, 2004, 12(3): 99-101
谭金芳,洪坚平,赵会杰,韩燕来,王宜伦.不同施钾量对旱作冬小麦产量、品质和生理特性的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2008, 14(3): 456-462
唐忠厚,李洪民,张爱君,史新敏,徐飞,孙健.施钾对甘薯常规品质性状及其淀粉RVA特性的影响[J].浙江农业学报, 2011, 23(1): 46 -51
唐忠厚,李洪民,张爱君,史新敏,徐飞,孙健.施钾对改善作物产品品质的效果[J].江西农业学报, 1999, 11(3): 29-34
陶启珍,杨端,邬泽成,徐佐英,雷万方.腐植酸盐对作物刺激作用的研究-腐植酸盐对提高薯类作物产量和品质的效果[J]. 1987, 03: 17-20
田明武,王媞,刘建超.腐殖酸肥在蔬菜生产中的作用[J].现代农业科技, 2009, 13: 144
王玉凤,薛盈文,杨克军.不同施钾方式对糯玉米中糯1号鲜食期营养品质的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2010, 18(4): 125-130
王西和,刘骅,张炎,胡伟.不同钾营养水平对西瓜产量及品质的影响[J].新疆农业科学, 2010, 47(10): 2001-2004
王芳,杨常新,韩继山,杨志刚,李友宏,刘汝亮,陈晨,赵天成,洪瑜.不同供钾水平对芹菜产量和品质的影响[J].西北农业学报, 2009, 18(5): 258-261
王汝娟,王振林,梁太波,张晓冬,刘兰兰,史春余.腐植酸钾对食用甘薯品种钾吸收、利用和块根产量的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2008, 14(3): 520-526
王艳群,张笑归,薛世川,高如泰,周亚鹏.风化煤与微肥配施对茼蒿生物量及品质的影响[J].土壤农学通报. 2008, 24(1): 293-296
王慧新,王伯伦,张城,冯跃.不同肥密条件处理对水稻产量与品质影响[J].沈阳农业大学学报, 2007- 08, 38(4): 462- 466
王洪政,沈振国.根系抗坏血酸在小麦幼苗铝耐性中的作用[J].西北植物学报, 2006, 26(4): 753-758
王仁才,夏利红,熊兴耀,李大志.钾对猕猴桃果实品质与贮藏的影响[J].果树学报, 2006, 23(2): 200-204
王庆祥,姜艳超,吕桂兰.氮、钾肥对甜玉米产量与品质的影响[J].玉米科学, 2006, 14(3): 145-146
王晓波,宋凤斌. N、P、K三要素对水稻直链淀粉含量的影响[J].农业系统科学与综合研究, 2005, 21(2): 93-96
王凤婷,艾希珍,刘金亮,徐坤范.钾对日光温室黄瓜糖、维生素C、硝酸盐及其相关酶活性的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2005, 11(5): 682-687
王强盛,甄若宏,丁艳锋,吉志军,曹卫星,黄丕生.钾肥o用量对优质粳稻钾素积累利用及稻米品质的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2004, 37(10): 1444-1450
王旭东,于振文,王东.钾对小麦茎和叶鞘碳水化合物含量及子粒淀粉积累的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2003, 9(1): 57-62
王旭东;于振文;王东.钾对小麦旗叶蔗糖和籽粒淀粉积累的影响[J].植物生态学报, 2003, 03: 196-201
汪李平.小白菜硝酸盐含量基因型差异及其遗传行为的研究[博士学位论文].武汉:华中农业大学, 2001: 5-8
王永章,王小芳,张大鹏.苹果果实转化酶的种类和特性研究[J].中国农业大学学报, 2001, 6(5): 9-14
王志敏.高等植物的果聚糖代谢[J].作物生理学通讯, 2000, 36(1): 71-76
魏良民冯建忠,章艳凤,阎德林,范明新,高菊萍.液肥处理对甜菜根产量和含糖率的影响[J]. 1997, 2: 44-45
项国栋,邹德乙,李荣.腐植酸蔬菜专用肥在草莓上的肥效及适宜用量研究[J].腐植酸, 2006, (5): 38?42
徐大勇,金军,胡曙錾,王学红,高云,朱庆森.氮磷钾肥施用量对稻米直链淀粉含量和淀粉粘滞特性的影响[J].中国农学通报, 2004, 20(5): 99-111
徐冰,邰日晶,尹同波,吴家川,刘仁召,郑万利.活性腐植酸复合肥对水稻产量和品质的影响[J].辽宁农业科学, 2009(3): 16-19
徐大勇,金军,胡曙鋆,高云,杨建昌,朱庆森.氮磷钾肥运筹对稻米直链淀粉含量和淀粉黏滞谱特征参数的影响[J].作物学报, 2005, 31(7): 921-925.
许前欣,赵振达,李秀文,于彩虹.钾肥对蔬菜产量品质效应的研究[J].土壤肥料, 1999(2): 23-25
杨国涛,谢崇华,张玲,李海清,李伟.不同氮、钾配比对杂交水稻灌浆期直链淀粉积累的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报. 2009, 15(2): 297-302
姚海兰.施钾时期对甘薯产量和品质形成的调控效应[硕士毕业论文].山东农业大学, 2010: 72
姚海兰,史春余,王汝娟.腐植酸钾对食用甘薯块根品质的调控效应[J].腐植酸, 2009, (1): 24-28
尹红娟,孙文彦.新型含钾液体肥料对日光温室芹菜生长和硝酸盐含量的影响[J].磷肥与复肥, 2009, 11, 24(6): 82-83
易九红,刘爱玉,王云高,邓力超,李立,周虹,黄艳岚.钾对马铃薯生长发育及产量、品质影响的研究进展[J].作物研究, 2010, 24(1): 60-63
阴卫军,刘强,张李娜,李群芳.施钾时期和施钾量对不同淀粉含量玉米籽粒品质的影响[J].山东农业科学, 2008, (5): 42-45
殷文,孙春明,马晓燕,徐霞,赵万平.钾肥不同用量对马铃薯产量及品质的效应[J]. 土壤肥料, 2005, (4): 44-47
于志民,吕品,王立民.腐植酸改良剂对棚菜硝酸盐含量及产量的影响[J].腐植酸. 2003, 2: 25-28
于志民,王立民,吕品,马献发.腐植酸液肥对大棚秋番茄产量品质及土壤理化性质影响的研究[J].腐植酸, 2003, 2: 21-23
於新建.植物生理学实验手册[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社. 1985: pp 148-149
张春华,彭克勤,葛滢.施钾对生菜品质的影响[J].安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(6): 2854- 2855, 2870
张超.腐植酸缓释钾肥对甘薯钾素吸收利用的影响[硕士毕业论文].山东农业大学, 2010: 26-27
张成业,王丹,宋亚彬,谢成,王金龙,章忠欣.腐植酸有机复合液肥对水稻产量和品质的影响[J].北方水稻, 2010, 40(5): 63-64, 70
张继舟,袁磊,马献发.腐植酸对设施土壤的养分、盐分及番茄产量和品质的影响研究[J].腐植酸, 2008, (3): 19-22
张绍阳,杨军,刘桂华.钾营养水平对艳光油桃果实品质的影响[J].安徽农业大学学报, 2008, 35(2): 289-292
张炎,马海刚,徐万里,王海燕,齐桂红,杨洛成.施钾对加工番茄产量与品质的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料, 2008, 3: 682-687
张翠翠,张传伟,王羽. 5种新型肥料对无公害水稻生长发育和品质的影响[J].河南农业科学, 2006, 8: 99-100
张竹青,鲁剑巍.腐植酸盐和化肥在辣椒上配合施用效果研究[J].湖北农业科学, 2003, 58-60
张绍阳,杨军,刘桂华.钾营养水平对艳光油桃果实品质的影响[J].安徽农业大学学报, 2008, 35(2): 289-292
张薇.番茄维生素C代谢相关基因功能的初步鉴定[硕士毕业论文].华中农业大学, 2005: 8-10
张漱茗,江丽华.济南市售蔬菜硝酸盐含量及施肥影响[J].土壤肥料, 1997, (5): 22-24
张学智,魏芝,杨珍.腐植酸氮磷钾复合肥对马铃薯产量、商品率及淀粉含量的影响[J].马铃薯杂志, 1996, 10(2): 90-93
张清华,王成秋,韩为灿,范荣平,韩超兵,甘永康,王锡富,张方学.腐植酸叶肥在柑桔上的应用研究[J].腐植酸, 1996, (3): 13?15
赵玉臣,马莺,赵伟,刘德玉,都昌杰.喷施腐植酸与碧全对水稻产量品质的影响[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 1995, 26(4): 336-340
赵瑞英,陈须文,李钟渤,王海辉.不同配方施肥对甘薯产量和品质效应研究[J].江西农业大学学报. 1996, 18(1): 116-118
郑若良.氮钾肥比例对马铃薯生长发育、产量及品质的影响[J].江西农业学报, 2004, 16(4): 39-42
郑艳霞.钾对甘薯同化物积累和分配的影响[J].土壤肥料, 2004, (4): 14-16
郑鹏然,周树南.食品卫生工作手册[M].北京:人民卫生出版社, 1985: pp 418-428
邹铁祥,戴廷波,姜东,荆奇,曹卫星.氮素和钾素对小麦籽粒淀粉合成关键酶活性的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2008, 41(11): 3858-3864
邹铁祥,戴廷波,姜东.氮、钾水平对小麦花后旗叶光合特性的影响[J].作物学报, 2007, 33(10): 1667-1673
邹铁祥,戴廷波,姜东,荆齐,曹卫星.钾素水平对小麦氮素积累和运转及籽粒蛋白质形成的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2006, 39(4): 686-692
邹容.国内蔬菜硝酸盐污染及防治研究进展.渝西学院学报(自然科学版), 2003, (9):73-77
周治国,孟亚利,陈兵林,张立桢,孙学振,王立国,施培.麦棉两熟共生期对棉苗叶片光合性能的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2004, 37(6): 825-831
周崇峻.与不同施肥处理对微区白菜产量和品质的影响研究[J].辽宁农业科学. 2003, (4): 17-19
周崇峻,韩晓日,王春枝.腐植酸液肥对大豆产量和品质的影响[J].沈阳农业大学学报, 2002, 04, 33(2): 110-111
周崇峻,邹德乙,王春枝,程艳丽,邹丹.腐植酸液肥在无土栽培中应用对番茄产量和品质的影响初报[J].辽宁农业科学. 2000, (6): 45-47
周竹青,张清良.小麦品种(系)叶绿素含量变化及其与光合叶面积关系研究[J].孝感学院学报, 2001, 21(6): 5-8
邹德乙,韩晓日.棕壤连续施用钾肥对玉米籽粒蛋白质及氨基酸影响的研究[J].土壤通报, 1997, 28(1): 28-30
周艺敏.钾及其他元素配合施用对几种作物产量和品质的影响[J].土壤肥料, 1995 (1): 18-21
Bachelier C., Graham J., Machray G., Du Manoir J., Roucou J. F., McNicol R.J., Davies H.. Integration of an invertase gene to control sucrose metabolism in strawberry cultivars[J]. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS), 1997, 439: 161-164
Bhattacharya K. R., Sowbhagya C. M., Swamy Y. M.. Quality profiles of rice: a tentative scheme for classification[J]. Food Sci, 1982, 47: 564-569
Bourke R. M.. Influence of nitrogen and potassium fertilizer on growth of sweet potato in Papua New Guinea[J]. Field Crops Research, 1985, 12: 363-375
Cairn A. J., Winters A., Pollock C. J.. Fructan biosynthesis in excised leaves of Lolium temulenrumL.Ⅲ. A comparison of thein vitroproperties of frucosyl transferase activities with the characteristics of in vivofructan accumulation[J]. New Phytol, 1989, 112: 343-352
Dey P. M., Dixon. R.. A. Biochemistry of Storage Carbohydrates in Green Plants[M]. New York: Academic Press, 1985: 205-227
Dvid P. P., Nelson P. V., Sanders D.C.. A humic acid improves growth to tomato seedling in solution culture[J]. Soil Sci Soc Am 1976, 40: 876-879
Douglas C. D., Tsung M. K., Frederick C. F.. Enzymes of sucrose and hexose metablism in development kernels of two inbreds of maize[J]. Plant Physiology, 1988, 86: 1013-1019 Fallhi E.. Ranking tissue mineral analyses to indentify mineral limination on qualityin fruit[J]. J Amer Soc Hort Sci, 1988, 113(3): 282-289
Govindasmy R. S. Chandrasekaran. Effect of humic acids on the growth, yield and nutrient content of sugarcane[J] Science of The Total Environment, 1992, 117-118: 575-581
Hak-Tae L., Yeoung Y. R., Song Y. N.. Influence of growth regulators and potassium humateon in vitro multiplication of apple stock M26[J]. Plant Tissue Culture, 1994, 21(3): 131-136
Housley T. L., Volenec J. J.. Fructan content and synthesis in leaf tissues of festuca arundinacea[J]. Plant Physiol, 1987, 83: 4-7
Hubbard N. L., Pharr D. M., Huber S. C.. Sucrose-phosphate synthase and other sucrose metabolizing enzymes in fruits of various species[J]. Physiol. Plant, 1991, 82: 191-196
Hatch M. D., Glasziou K. T.. Sugar accumulation cycle in sugar cane. II. Relationship of invertase activity to sugar content & growth rate in storage tissue of plants grown in controlled environments[J]. Plant Physiol. 1963 May; 38(3): 344-348
Kato, T.. Change of sucrose synthase activity in developing endosperm of rice cultivars[J]. Crop Sci., 1995, 35: 827-831
沪野幸人,藤懒一马. Studies on the dry matter production of sweet potato IX The effect of potassium on dry matter production of sweet potato [J].日作记, 1964, 33: 236-241
Lowell C. A., Tomlinson P. T., Koch K. E.. Sucrose-metabolizing enzymes in transport tissue and adjacent sink structures in develo-ping citrus fruit[J]. Plant Physiol, 1989, 90: 1394-1402
MA Jun, MING Dong-feng, MA Wen-bo, XU Feng-ying. Changes in starch accumulation and activity of enzymes associated with starch synthesis of rice at different N Supplying Dates[J]. Agric. Sci. China, 2004, 3(10): 738-745
M. B?hme. Effects of lactate, humic and bacillus subtilis on the growth of tomato plants in hydroponic systems[J]. Acta Horticul-turae, 2001, 481: 56-59
Nakamura Y., Yuki K., Park S. Y.. Carbohydrate metabolism in the developing endosperm of rice grain[J]. Plant Cell Physiol., 1989, 30(6): 833-839
Padem H., Ocal A.. Effects of humic acid applications on yield and some characteristics of processing tomato[J]. Acta Horticul-turae, 2002, 487: 173-179
Pennington A. T.. Dietary exposure models for nitrates and nitrites[J]. Food Control, 1998, 9(6): 385-395
Pollock C. J., Lloyd E. J., Stoddard J. L.. Growth, photosynthesis and assimilate partitioning in Lolium temulentum exposed tochilling temperature[J]. Physiol Plant, 1983, 59: 257-262
Reddy K. R., Ali S. Z., Bhattacharya K. R.. The fine structure of rice-starch amylopectin and its relation to the texture of cooked rice[J]. Carbohyd Polyrn, 1993, 22: 267-275.
Salman, S. R., Abouhussein, S. D, Abdel-Mawgoud, A. M. R, Elnemr M. A.. Fruit yield and quality of watermelon as affected by hybrids and humic acid application[J]. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 2005, 1(1): 51-58
Smith D. A., Prescott H. E.. Sugar content and activity of sucrose metabolism enzymes in milled rice grain[J]. Plant Physiol, 1989, 89: 893?896
Suzuki A., Cadal P.. Clutamate synthase from rice leaves[J]. Plant Physiol, 1982, 69: 848-852
Noda T, Takahata Y., Sato T.. Physicochemical properties of starches from purple and orange fleshed sweetpotato roots at two levels of fertilizer[J]. Starch, 1996, 48: 395-399
Tsai-Mei, Ou-Lee, Setter T. L.. Effect of increased temperature in apical regions of Maize ears on starch-synthesis enzymes and accumulation of sugars and starch[J]. Plant Physiology, 1985, 79: 852-855
Tan K. H., Nopamornbodi V.. Effect of different levels of humic acids on nutrient content and growth of corn (Zea mays L.)[J]. Plant and Soil. 1979, 51(2): 283-287
Wagner W., Wiemken A.. Properties and subcellular localisation of fructan hydrolase in the leaves of barley[J]. Plant Physiol, 1986, 123: 429-439
Wagner W., Keller F., Wiemken A.. Fructan metabolism in cereals: induction in leaves and compartmentation in protoplasts and vacuoles[J]. Zeitschreft für Pflanzenphysiologie 1983, 112: 359-372
Wardlaw I. F., Willenbrink J.. Carbonhydrate storage and mobilization by the culm of wheat between heading and grain maturity: the relation to sucrose synthase and sucrose-phosphate synthase[J]. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1994, 21: 251-271
Wheeler G.. L., Jones M. A., Smirnoff N.. The biosynthetic path way of vitamin C in higher plants[J]. Nature, 1998, 393(28): 365-369
Xu Xudan.. The effect of foliar application of fulvic acid on water use, nutrient uptake and wheat yield[J]. Austr. J. Agnc. Res. 37: 343-350
Arnon D.. Copper enzymes in chloroplast. polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris[J]. Plant Physiol, 1949, 24: 125
曹富强,辛绍钢.不同钾、氮水平对红富士苹果品质的影响[J].河北林业科技, 2007, 5: 22-25
柴仲平,王雪梅,孙霞,蒋平安,张谦.不同氮磷钾配比滴灌对灰枣产量与品质的影响[J].果树学报, 2011, 28(2): 229-233
陈昆,刘世琦,张自坤,张涛,孟凡鲁.钾素对水培大蒜生理和品质的影响[J].园艺学报, 2011, 38(3): 556-562
陈栋,涂美艳,杜晋城,谢红江,孙淑霞,李靖,江国良.不同施钾量对曙光油桃产量和品质的影响[J].西南农业学报, 2010, 23(4): 1173-1176
陈峰,张正球,张士永,张洪瑞,杨连群,严长杰.稻米淀粉的生物合成与品质改良的研究进展[J].山东农业科学, 2008, 3: 20-25
程福皆,曹辰兴,康鸾,朱东方.不同氮钾水平对春棚小黄瓜产量及品质的影响[J].西北农业学报, 2009, 18(5): 276-279
崔荣宗,杨果,李彦,魏建林,姜国志.不同钾肥品种及用量对香瓜产量和品质的影响[J].山东农业科学, 2006, 4: 20-23
戴双,李豪圣,刘爱峰,宋健民,刘建军,赵振东.氮钾配施对济南17淀粉理化特性的影响[J].麦类作物学报, 2006, 26(4): 107-110
邓丈绪,曾绍清.腐殖酸钠提高脐橙产量和品质试验[J].中国南方水果, 1983, 1: 19-20
丁海兵,邓宽平,邓禄军,卢扬,雷尊国.高寒山区钾肥施用量对早熟马铃薯生长性状的影响及效益分析[J].天津农业科学, 2011, 17(1): 68-70
杜会英,薛世川,孙志梅,杨云马,王艳群,李迎春.腐植酸复合肥对葡萄品质及产量的影响[J].河北农业大学学报, 2004, 27(4): 63-66
段春华,邢尚军,刘方春,杜振宇,马海林,马元民.腐殖酸肥料对菠菜产量及品质的影响[J].山东农业科学, 2007, 3: 85-87
付晓忠,廉华.钾素不同用量对莴苣硝酸盐积累的影响[J].北方园艺2009, (1): 74–76
高缘,张建军,屠锡德.抗坏血酸的新应用[J].药学进展, 2000, (1): 24-27
高祖明,张耀栋,张道勇,史瑞和.氮磷钾对叶菜硝酸盐积累和硝酸还原酶过氧化物酶活性的影响[J].园艺学报, 1989, (4): 293-297
郭蔼光.基础生物化学[M].北京:北京高等教育出版社, 2008: pp 139-141, 203-205
郭明军,马锋旺,张国辉.生物腐殖酸肥料在樱桃番茄上的应用效果[J].河北农业科学, 2008, 12 (8): 49-50, 126
郭熙盛,吴礼树,朱宏斌,王文军,叶舒娅,武际.不同钾肥品种和用量对花椰菜产量和品质的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2007, 13(3): 464-470
郭熙盛,刘才宇,王文军,叶舒娅,朱宏斌.钾肥对洋葱产量、品质及养分吸收的影响[J]. 中国蔬菜, 1999 (2): 12-14
何建平,陶启珍,易平.腐植酸液体叶面肥对马铃薯产量和品质的影响[J].腐植酸, 2004, 01: 24-26, 37
何萍,金继运,李文娟.施钾对高油玉米和普通玉米吸钾特性及子粒产量和品质的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2005, 11(5): 620-626
何为华,张世英,黄显淦,吕保清.喷施腐殖酸钙能提高葡萄果实品质[J]. 2003, 3: 12
何萍,杨金,周卫.腐殖酸复混肥对番茄产量、品质及生理活性的影响[J].土壤通报, 1997, 28(6): 277-279
何照范.编著.粮油籽粒品质及其分析技术[M].北京:中国农业科学出版社, 1985: pp 221-232
胡春梅.瓜尔豆半乳甘露聚糖和产量形成的生理基础及氮钾影响的研究[硕士毕业论文]. 山东农业大学, 2003: 41-44
黄发松,孙宗修,胡培松,唐绍清.食用稻米品质形成研究的现状与展望[J].中国水稻科学, 1998, 12(3): 172-176
季云美,任旭琴.不同肥料对小白菜产量及品质的影响[J].江苏农业科学, 2004(6): 38-40
江阳,孙成均.甘薯的营养成分及其保健功效研究进展[J].中国农业科技导报, 2010, 12(4): 56-61
贾慧春.钾营养水平对番茄氮素代谢的影响[J].安徽农学通报, 2010, 16( 11): 79, 95
金丽晨,耿志明,李金州,王澎,陈菲,刘蔼民.稻米淀粉组成及分子结构与食味品质的关系[J].江苏农业学报, 2011, 27(1): 13-18
康云艳,张春兰,张雷,柳李旺,陈忠,龚义勤.不同施肥处理对出口青花菜产量与品质的影响[J].华北农学报, 2005, 20(6): 63-67
李作梅.腐植酸和氮素对食用甘薯产量品质形成的调控效应[硕士毕业论文].山东农业大学, 2009: 54-59
李友军,熊瑛,陈明灿,骆炳山.氮磷钾对豫麦50旗叶蔗糖和籽粒淀粉积累的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17(7): 1196-1200
李彦,郭良进,高贤彪,崔荣宗,董晓霞,杨果.钾肥对大棚番茄产量和品质的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2004, 1: 25-29
李太贵,沈波,陈能,罗玉坤. Q酶在水稻籽粒垩白形成中作用的研究[J].作物学报, 1997, 23(3): 338-344
李合声.编著.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:北京高等教育出版社, 2000: pp 82-105
刘汝亮,李友宏,王芳,陈智君,赵天成,陈晨.两种钾源对马铃薯养分累积和产量的影响[J].西北农业学报, 2009,18(1): 143-146
刘增祥.甜瓜喷施腐殖酸对提高果实品质的影响[J].新疆农业科学, 1985, 04: 28-29
陆国权,唐忠厚,黄华宏.不同施钾水平甘薯直链淀粉含量和糊化特性的基因型差异[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2005, 17(5): 280-283
户刘又次等.作物生理讲座[M].上海:上海科技出版社, 1996: pp 204-205
吕英民,张大鹏.果实发育过程中糖的积累[J].植物生理学通讯, 2000, 3: 258-265
马振峰,杨军,刘桂华.钾营养对柰李果实品质的影响[J].安徽农业大学学报, 2010, 37(1): 145-149
马海刚,徐万里,何生丽,蒋最义,孙好文,蔡泽宇.腐植酸肥料在加工番茄上施用的肥效及对品质的影响[J].新疆农业科学2009, 46(4): 772-775
马娟娟,胡全才,王申贵.钾、锌肥与氮肥配施对油菜体内硝酸盐累积的影响[J].山西农业科学. 2000, 28(2): 3-6
马全民,饶立华,陆定志.钾调节茎用芥菜同化物运输及茎部膨大的作用机理[J].园艺学报, 1992, 19(4): 347-352
潘瑞炽,王小菁,李娘军.植物生理学[M].高等教育出版社, 2004: pp 82
彭正萍,门明新,薛世川,孙旭霞,薛宝民,毕淑芹.腐植酸复合肥对土壤养分转化和土壤酶活性的影响[J].河北农业大学学报, 2005, 28(4): 1-4
彭正萍,门明新,薛世川.不同用量的自制腐植酸复合肥与油菜利用养分的关系[J].河北农业大学学报, 2005, 28(2): 5-8
彭正萍,毕淑芹,门明新,薛世川,孙旭霞.腐植酸复合肥对油菜的施用效应及生理指标的影响[J].河北农业大学学报. 2005, 28(6): 15-18
彭正萍,薛世川,孙志梅,门明新,赵会欣.腐植酸复合肥对油菜品质及生理指标的影响[J].河北农业大学学报, 2001, 24(1): 24-27
沈明珠,瞿宝杰,东惠如.蔬菜硝酸盐积累的研究[J].园艺学报, 1982, 9(4): 41- 48
史春余,王汝娟,梁太波,王振林.食用型甘薯块根碳水化合物代谢特性及与品质的关系[J].中国农业科学, 2008, 41(11): 3878-3885
史春余,王振林,赵秉强,郭风法,余松烈.钾营养对甘薯某些生理特性和产量形成的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2002, 8(1): 81-85
施振云,施俭,杨锋,王德君.钾肥对提高花椰菜产量和品质的效应[J].土壤肥料, 2004, 4: 17-19
孙志梅,薛世川,王国旗,刘淑萍,张会永.不同腐殖酸复合肥施用量对辣椒产量及其养分利用率的影响[J].中国生态农业学报, 2004, 12(3): 99-101
谭金芳,洪坚平,赵会杰,韩燕来,王宜伦.不同施钾量对旱作冬小麦产量、品质和生理特性的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2008, 14(3): 456-462
唐忠厚,李洪民,张爱君,史新敏,徐飞,孙健.施钾对甘薯常规品质性状及其淀粉RVA特性的影响[J].浙江农业学报, 2011, 23(1): 46 -51
唐忠厚,李洪民,张爱君,史新敏,徐飞,孙健.施钾对改善作物产品品质的效果[J].江西农业学报, 1999, 11(3): 29-34
陶启珍,杨端,邬泽成,徐佐英,雷万方.腐植酸盐对作物刺激作用的研究-腐植酸盐对提高薯类作物产量和品质的效果[J]. 1987, 03: 17-20
田明武,王媞,刘建超.腐殖酸肥在蔬菜生产中的作用[J].现代农业科技, 2009, 13: 144
王玉凤,薛盈文,杨克军.不同施钾方式对糯玉米中糯1号鲜食期营养品质的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2010, 18(4): 125-130
王西和,刘骅,张炎,胡伟.不同钾营养水平对西瓜产量及品质的影响[J].新疆农业科学, 2010, 47(10): 2001-2004
王芳,杨常新,韩继山,杨志刚,李友宏,刘汝亮,陈晨,赵天成,洪瑜.不同供钾水平对芹菜产量和品质的影响[J].西北农业学报, 2009, 18(5): 258-261
王汝娟,王振林,梁太波,张晓冬,刘兰兰,史春余.腐植酸钾对食用甘薯品种钾吸收、利用和块根产量的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2008, 14(3): 520-526
王艳群,张笑归,薛世川,高如泰,周亚鹏.风化煤与微肥配施对茼蒿生物量及品质的影响[J].土壤农学通报. 2008, 24(1): 293-296
王慧新,王伯伦,张城,冯跃.不同肥密条件处理对水稻产量与品质影响[J].沈阳农业大学学报, 2007- 08, 38(4): 462- 466
王洪政,沈振国.根系抗坏血酸在小麦幼苗铝耐性中的作用[J].西北植物学报, 2006, 26(4): 753-758
王仁才,夏利红,熊兴耀,李大志.钾对猕猴桃果实品质与贮藏的影响[J].果树学报, 2006, 23(2): 200-204
王庆祥,姜艳超,吕桂兰.氮、钾肥对甜玉米产量与品质的影响[J].玉米科学, 2006, 14(3): 145-146
王晓波,宋凤斌. N、P、K三要素对水稻直链淀粉含量的影响[J].农业系统科学与综合研究, 2005, 21(2): 93-96
王凤婷,艾希珍,刘金亮,徐坤范.钾对日光温室黄瓜糖、维生素C、硝酸盐及其相关酶活性的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2005, 11(5): 682-687
王强盛,甄若宏,丁艳锋,吉志军,曹卫星,黄丕生.钾肥o用量对优质粳稻钾素积累利用及稻米品质的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2004, 37(10): 1444-1450
王旭东,于振文,王东.钾对小麦茎和叶鞘碳水化合物含量及子粒淀粉积累的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2003, 9(1): 57-62
王旭东;于振文;王东.钾对小麦旗叶蔗糖和籽粒淀粉积累的影响[J].植物生态学报, 2003, 03: 196-201
汪李平.小白菜硝酸盐含量基因型差异及其遗传行为的研究[博士学位论文].武汉:华中农业大学, 2001: 5-8
王永章,王小芳,张大鹏.苹果果实转化酶的种类和特性研究[J].中国农业大学学报, 2001, 6(5): 9-14
王志敏.高等植物的果聚糖代谢[J].作物生理学通讯, 2000, 36(1): 71-76
魏良民冯建忠,章艳凤,阎德林,范明新,高菊萍.液肥处理对甜菜根产量和含糖率的影响[J]. 1997, 2: 44-45
项国栋,邹德乙,李荣.腐植酸蔬菜专用肥在草莓上的肥效及适宜用量研究[J].腐植酸, 2006, (5): 38?42
徐大勇,金军,胡曙錾,王学红,高云,朱庆森.氮磷钾肥施用量对稻米直链淀粉含量和淀粉粘滞特性的影响[J].中国农学通报, 2004, 20(5): 99-111
徐冰,邰日晶,尹同波,吴家川,刘仁召,郑万利.活性腐植酸复合肥对水稻产量和品质的影响[J].辽宁农业科学, 2009(3): 16-19
徐大勇,金军,胡曙鋆,高云,杨建昌,朱庆森.氮磷钾肥运筹对稻米直链淀粉含量和淀粉黏滞谱特征参数的影响[J].作物学报, 2005, 31(7): 921-925.
许前欣,赵振达,李秀文,于彩虹.钾肥对蔬菜产量品质效应的研究[J].土壤肥料, 1999(2): 23-25
杨国涛,谢崇华,张玲,李海清,李伟.不同氮、钾配比对杂交水稻灌浆期直链淀粉积累的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报. 2009, 15(2): 297-302
姚海兰.施钾时期对甘薯产量和品质形成的调控效应[硕士毕业论文].山东农业大学, 2010: 72
姚海兰,史春余,王汝娟.腐植酸钾对食用甘薯块根品质的调控效应[J].腐植酸, 2009, (1): 24-28
尹红娟,孙文彦.新型含钾液体肥料对日光温室芹菜生长和硝酸盐含量的影响[J].磷肥与复肥, 2009, 11, 24(6): 82-83
易九红,刘爱玉,王云高,邓力超,李立,周虹,黄艳岚.钾对马铃薯生长发育及产量、品质影响的研究进展[J].作物研究, 2010, 24(1): 60-63
阴卫军,刘强,张李娜,李群芳.施钾时期和施钾量对不同淀粉含量玉米籽粒品质的影响[J].山东农业科学, 2008, (5): 42-45
殷文,孙春明,马晓燕,徐霞,赵万平.钾肥不同用量对马铃薯产量及品质的效应[J]. 土壤肥料, 2005, (4): 44-47
于志民,吕品,王立民.腐植酸改良剂对棚菜硝酸盐含量及产量的影响[J].腐植酸. 2003, 2: 25-28
于志民,王立民,吕品,马献发.腐植酸液肥对大棚秋番茄产量品质及土壤理化性质影响的研究[J].腐植酸, 2003, 2: 21-23
於新建.植物生理学实验手册[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社. 1985: pp 148-149
张春华,彭克勤,葛滢.施钾对生菜品质的影响[J].安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(6): 2854- 2855, 2870
张超.腐植酸缓释钾肥对甘薯钾素吸收利用的影响[硕士毕业论文].山东农业大学, 2010: 26-27
张成业,王丹,宋亚彬,谢成,王金龙,章忠欣.腐植酸有机复合液肥对水稻产量和品质的影响[J].北方水稻, 2010, 40(5): 63-64, 70
张继舟,袁磊,马献发.腐植酸对设施土壤的养分、盐分及番茄产量和品质的影响研究[J].腐植酸, 2008, (3): 19-22
张绍阳,杨军,刘桂华.钾营养水平对艳光油桃果实品质的影响[J].安徽农业大学学报, 2008, 35(2): 289-292
张炎,马海刚,徐万里,王海燕,齐桂红,杨洛成.施钾对加工番茄产量与品质的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料, 2008, 3: 682-687
张翠翠,张传伟,王羽. 5种新型肥料对无公害水稻生长发育和品质的影响[J].河南农业科学, 2006, 8: 99-100
张竹青,鲁剑巍.腐植酸盐和化肥在辣椒上配合施用效果研究[J].湖北农业科学, 2003, 58-60
张绍阳,杨军,刘桂华.钾营养水平对艳光油桃果实品质的影响[J].安徽农业大学学报, 2008, 35(2): 289-292
张薇.番茄维生素C代谢相关基因功能的初步鉴定[硕士毕业论文].华中农业大学, 2005: 8-10
张漱茗,江丽华.济南市售蔬菜硝酸盐含量及施肥影响[J].土壤肥料, 1997, (5): 22-24
张学智,魏芝,杨珍.腐植酸氮磷钾复合肥对马铃薯产量、商品率及淀粉含量的影响[J].马铃薯杂志, 1996, 10(2): 90-93
张清华,王成秋,韩为灿,范荣平,韩超兵,甘永康,王锡富,张方学.腐植酸叶肥在柑桔上的应用研究[J].腐植酸, 1996, (3): 13?15
赵玉臣,马莺,赵伟,刘德玉,都昌杰.喷施腐植酸与碧全对水稻产量品质的影响[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 1995, 26(4): 336-340
赵瑞英,陈须文,李钟渤,王海辉.不同配方施肥对甘薯产量和品质效应研究[J].江西农业大学学报. 1996, 18(1): 116-118
郑若良.氮钾肥比例对马铃薯生长发育、产量及品质的影响[J].江西农业学报, 2004, 16(4): 39-42
郑艳霞.钾对甘薯同化物积累和分配的影响[J].土壤肥料, 2004, (4): 14-16
郑鹏然,周树南.食品卫生工作手册[M].北京:人民卫生出版社, 1985: pp 418-428
邹铁祥,戴廷波,姜东,荆奇,曹卫星.氮素和钾素对小麦籽粒淀粉合成关键酶活性的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2008, 41(11): 3858-3864
邹铁祥,戴廷波,姜东.氮、钾水平对小麦花后旗叶光合特性的影响[J].作物学报, 2007, 33(10): 1667-1673
邹铁祥,戴廷波,姜东,荆齐,曹卫星.钾素水平对小麦氮素积累和运转及籽粒蛋白质形成的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2006, 39(4): 686-692
邹容.国内蔬菜硝酸盐污染及防治研究进展.渝西学院学报(自然科学版), 2003, (9):73-77
周治国,孟亚利,陈兵林,张立桢,孙学振,王立国,施培.麦棉两熟共生期对棉苗叶片光合性能的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2004, 37(6): 825-831
周崇峻.与不同施肥处理对微区白菜产量和品质的影响研究[J].辽宁农业科学. 2003, (4): 17-19
周崇峻,韩晓日,王春枝.腐植酸液肥对大豆产量和品质的影响[J].沈阳农业大学学报, 2002, 04, 33(2): 110-111
周崇峻,邹德乙,王春枝,程艳丽,邹丹.腐植酸液肥在无土栽培中应用对番茄产量和品质的影响初报[J].辽宁农业科学. 2000, (6): 45-47
周竹青,张清良.小麦品种(系)叶绿素含量变化及其与光合叶面积关系研究[J].孝感学院学报, 2001, 21(6): 5-8
邹德乙,韩晓日.棕壤连续施用钾肥对玉米籽粒蛋白质及氨基酸影响的研究[J].土壤通报, 1997, 28(1): 28-30
周艺敏.钾及其他元素配合施用对几种作物产量和品质的影响[J].土壤肥料, 1995 (1): 18-21
Bachelier C., Graham J., Machray G., Du Manoir J., Roucou J. F., McNicol R.J., Davies H.. Integration of an invertase gene to control sucrose metabolism in strawberry cultivars[J]. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS), 1997, 439: 161-164
Bhattacharya K. R., Sowbhagya C. M., Swamy Y. M.. Quality profiles of rice: a tentative scheme for classification[J]. Food Sci, 1982, 47: 564-569
Bourke R. M.. Influence of nitrogen and potassium fertilizer on growth of sweet potato in Papua New Guinea[J]. Field Crops Research, 1985, 12: 363-375
Cairn A. J., Winters A., Pollock C. J.. Fructan biosynthesis in excised leaves of Lolium temulenrumL.Ⅲ. A comparison of thein vitroproperties of frucosyl transferase activities with the characteristics of in vivofructan accumulation[J]. New Phytol, 1989, 112: 343-352
Dey P. M., Dixon. R.. A. Biochemistry of Storage Carbohydrates in Green Plants[M]. New York: Academic Press, 1985: 205-227
Dvid P. P., Nelson P. V., Sanders D.C.. A humic acid improves growth to tomato seedling in solution culture[J]. Soil Sci Soc Am 1976, 40: 876-879
Douglas C. D., Tsung M. K., Frederick C. F.. Enzymes of sucrose and hexose metablism in development kernels of two inbreds of maize[J]. Plant Physiology, 1988, 86: 1013-1019 Fallhi E.. Ranking tissue mineral analyses to indentify mineral limination on qualityin fruit[J]. J Amer Soc Hort Sci, 1988, 113(3): 282-289
Govindasmy R. S. Chandrasekaran. Effect of humic acids on the growth, yield and nutrient content of sugarcane[J] Science of The Total Environment, 1992, 117-118: 575-581
Hak-Tae L., Yeoung Y. R., Song Y. N.. Influence of growth regulators and potassium humateon in vitro multiplication of apple stock M26[J]. Plant Tissue Culture, 1994, 21(3): 131-136
Housley T. L., Volenec J. J.. Fructan content and synthesis in leaf tissues of festuca arundinacea[J]. Plant Physiol, 1987, 83: 4-7
Hubbard N. L., Pharr D. M., Huber S. C.. Sucrose-phosphate synthase and other sucrose metabolizing enzymes in fruits of various species[J]. Physiol. Plant, 1991, 82: 191-196
Hatch M. D., Glasziou K. T.. Sugar accumulation cycle in sugar cane. II. Relationship of invertase activity to sugar content & growth rate in storage tissue of plants grown in controlled environments[J]. Plant Physiol. 1963 May; 38(3): 344-348
Kato, T.. Change of sucrose synthase activity in developing endosperm of rice cultivars[J]. Crop Sci., 1995, 35: 827-831
沪野幸人,藤懒一马. Studies on the dry matter production of sweet potato IX The effect of potassium on dry matter production of sweet potato [J].日作记, 1964, 33: 236-241
Lowell C. A., Tomlinson P. T., Koch K. E.. Sucrose-metabolizing enzymes in transport tissue and adjacent sink structures in develo-ping citrus fruit[J]. Plant Physiol, 1989, 90: 1394-1402
MA Jun, MING Dong-feng, MA Wen-bo, XU Feng-ying. Changes in starch accumulation and activity of enzymes associated with starch synthesis of rice at different N Supplying Dates[J]. Agric. Sci. China, 2004, 3(10): 738-745
M. B?hme. Effects of lactate, humic and bacillus subtilis on the growth of tomato plants in hydroponic systems[J]. Acta Horticul-turae, 2001, 481: 56-59
Nakamura Y., Yuki K., Park S. Y.. Carbohydrate metabolism in the developing endosperm of rice grain[J]. Plant Cell Physiol., 1989, 30(6): 833-839
Padem H., Ocal A.. Effects of humic acid applications on yield and some characteristics of processing tomato[J]. Acta Horticul-turae, 2002, 487: 173-179
Pennington A. T.. Dietary exposure models for nitrates and nitrites[J]. Food Control, 1998, 9(6): 385-395
Pollock C. J., Lloyd E. J., Stoddard J. L.. Growth, photosynthesis and assimilate partitioning in Lolium temulentum exposed tochilling temperature[J]. Physiol Plant, 1983, 59: 257-262
Reddy K. R., Ali S. Z., Bhattacharya K. R.. The fine structure of rice-starch amylopectin and its relation to the texture of cooked rice[J]. Carbohyd Polyrn, 1993, 22: 267-275.
Salman, S. R., Abouhussein, S. D, Abdel-Mawgoud, A. M. R, Elnemr M. A.. Fruit yield and quality of watermelon as affected by hybrids and humic acid application[J]. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 2005, 1(1): 51-58
Smith D. A., Prescott H. E.. Sugar content and activity of sucrose metabolism enzymes in milled rice grain[J]. Plant Physiol, 1989, 89: 893?896
Suzuki A., Cadal P.. Clutamate synthase from rice leaves[J]. Plant Physiol, 1982, 69: 848-852
Noda T, Takahata Y., Sato T.. Physicochemical properties of starches from purple and orange fleshed sweetpotato roots at two levels of fertilizer[J]. Starch, 1996, 48: 395-399
Tsai-Mei, Ou-Lee, Setter T. L.. Effect of increased temperature in apical regions of Maize ears on starch-synthesis enzymes and accumulation of sugars and starch[J]. Plant Physiology, 1985, 79: 852-855
Tan K. H., Nopamornbodi V.. Effect of different levels of humic acids on nutrient content and growth of corn (Zea mays L.)[J]. Plant and Soil. 1979, 51(2): 283-287
Wagner W., Wiemken A.. Properties and subcellular localisation of fructan hydrolase in the leaves of barley[J]. Plant Physiol, 1986, 123: 429-439
Wagner W., Keller F., Wiemken A.. Fructan metabolism in cereals: induction in leaves and compartmentation in protoplasts and vacuoles[J]. Zeitschreft für Pflanzenphysiologie 1983, 112: 359-372
Wardlaw I. F., Willenbrink J.. Carbonhydrate storage and mobilization by the culm of wheat between heading and grain maturity: the relation to sucrose synthase and sucrose-phosphate synthase[J]. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1994, 21: 251-271
Wheeler G.. L., Jones M. A., Smirnoff N.. The biosynthetic path way of vitamin C in higher plants[J]. Nature, 1998, 393(28): 365-369
Xu Xudan.. The effect of foliar application of fulvic acid on water use, nutrient uptake and wheat yield[J]. Austr. J. Agnc. Res. 37: 343-350
Arnon D.. Copper enzymes in chloroplast. polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris[J]. Plant Physiol, 1949, 24: 125