龙江森工集团森林生态资产价值综合评估研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
在世界范围资源、环境和人口问题日益严重的今天,人类对地球生物圈及生态系统是人类赖以生存和发展的物质基础的认识更加深刻,以生态系统服务效益和自然资源价值为核心的生态资产测算及其价值评估也引起了世界各国的普遍关注,人们逐渐开始将生态资源定义成一种国家资产,即生态资产。森林生态系统是陆地生态系统的主体,森林生态资产已经成为全面实现社会生态文明的基石,分析与评估森林生态资产的价值也成为实现生态系统与社会经济系统协调发展的基础。为此,从微观、宏观以及假设市场评估角度同时对森林生态资产价值进行综合评估,从而提出森林生态资产增值保值的对策建议。具体研究内容如下:
     (1)结合森林生态资产价值评估比较研究成果的基础上,以龙江森工集团及其管辖的伊春、牡丹江、松花江、合江四个林管局为研究对象,选用2009年龙江森工集团森林资源数据为计算依据,采用实际市场和替代市场评估技术,从调节功能、文化功能和支持功能三大功能分类中选取八项价值指标,每项指标分别采取不同的价值评估方法,分别对龙江森工集团及其管辖的林管局的森林生态资产进行单项价值和生态经济总值评估,并对评估结果进行对比分析,实现微观层面上的森林生态资产价值评估。
     (2)依据森林资源的区域分布具有的明显的区域特征,将森林生态资产与区域生态环境、经济环境和社会环境状况结合考虑,遵照生态区划的原则和方法,从生态环境现状、生态环境敏感性及生态系统服务功能重要性等三个方面构建指标体系,采用层次分析法、专家调查法和模糊综合评价法,对龙江森工集团管辖的林管局的森林生态资产因在不同生态区位上所体现的生态区位价值进行评估,体现森林生态资产的地域性和空间性差异,实现宏观层面上森林生态资产的价值评估。
     (3)基于森林生态资产微观和宏观的评估结果,采用条件价值评估法,设计CVM调查问卷,通过预调查对问卷进行优化形成正式调查问卷,并组织开展有效的调查实施活动。通过建立假设市场,获得不同地域居民的不同的支付意愿和支付能力信息,采用SPSS软件对问卷数据进行统计分析,计算得出WTP,从而估算森林生态资产的假设市场价值。这种评估方法是目前能够评价环境物品或服务全部价值的唯一方法,也是森林生态资产价值市场化实现的一种重要的技术手段。
     本文将多种评估视角相结合对森林生态资产价值进行综合评估,注重揭示生态环境与人类经济社会相互制约、相互影响的发展机理,有利于促进林区生态—经济—社会系统的协同发展,形成生态资产—经济条件—社会事业相互促进的良性循环,实现森林生态资产的保值和增值。
Earth's biosphere and ecological system is the material base of human survival and development. With the problem of the world population, resources and environment growing, ecological asset measurement and evaluation centering on ecosystem service benefit and natural resource value has attracted the public attention. Ecological assets have gradually started to be considered as a kind of national asset, that is, ecological assets. As the subject of terrestrial ecosystem, forest ecological assets become the cornerstone of achieving the social ecological civilization, analysing and evaluating forest ecological asset value also become the base of realizing ecological system and the coordinated development of the social economic system. Therefore, we will value the forest ecological asset value comprehensivly from the angle of the micro、macro and value realization, and then put forward countermeasures for forest ecological asset appreciation. Specific research content as follows:
     (1)Combined with the research achievement of forest ecological asset valuation and comparison, in the range of Longjiangsengong company and songhua river, yichun forest, mudanjiang,Hejiang forestry administration under its jurisdiction, using the actual market and alternative market assessment techniques, on the basis of the forest resources data of Longjiangsengong company, we will select eight value indexes from the adjustment function, cultural function and support functions.Each index we take different value assessment method, assess single value and ecological economic value of the forest ecological assets about Longjiangsengong and the forestry administration under its jurisdiction and compares assessment results horizontally, to realize the micro-level forest ecological asset value evaluation.
     (2)Because the regional distribution of forest resource has obvious regional characteristics, following the principles and methods of ecological regionalization,we put the forest ecological assets and the regional ecological environment, economic environment and the social environment condition into consideration and construct index system from the present situation of the ecological environment, ecological environmental sensitivity and ecosystem service function importance. Then using analytic hierarchy process, experts investigation and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, we value the ecological location value of forest ecological assets of the forest ecological assets of the forestry administration under Longjiangsengong jurisdiction in different ecological location.And it will reflect forest ecological assets of regionality and spatial differences in macroscopical, achieve the value of forest ecological assets evaluation.
     (3)Based on the evaluation result of forest ecological assets on the macro and micro, using conditions value evaluation method and utility maximization principle, we design CVM questionnaire, optimize the questionnaire then forms a formal investigation through the pre-survey and develop effective survey implementation activities. Through the establishment of imaginary market, we obtain the information about different regional residents'willingness and the ability to pay. And then, through analyzing the questionnaire data,we will calculate the WTP and infer the economic value of forest ecological asset. This evaluation method is the only way to evaluate all value of environment goods or services and an important technical mean to achieve forest ecological asset value of market value.
     This article comprehensively evaluate forest ecological asset value by combining multiple evaluation perspective, pay attention to revealing the mechanism of mutual restricts, mutual influence of ecological environment and human economic society,it is for the benefit of promoting collaborative development of forest ecological-economic-social system, forming positive cycle of the coordinated development of ecological assets-economic conditions-social undertakings mutual promoting, achieving forest ecological asset value maintained and adding value.
引文
[1]潘耀忠,史培军,朱文泉等.中国陆地生态系统生态资产遥感定量测量[J].中国科学,2004,34(4):375-384.
    [2]Costanza R, d Arge R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J]. Nature,1997, (387):253-260.
    [3]David P. Ecologicao accountancy. Science [J],1997, (387):253-260.
    [4]Gretchen C. Daily T, Soderqvist D. et al. The value of nature and nature of value [J], Science,2000, (289):395-396.
    [5]靳芳,鲁绍伟,余新晓等.中国森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评价[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(8):1531-1536.
    [6]姜文来.森林涵养水源的价值核算研究[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(2):34-40.
    [7]谢贤政,马中.应用旅行费用法评估黄山风景区游憩价值[J].资源科学,2006,28(3):129-136.
    [8]余新晓,吴岚,饶良懿等.水土保持生态服务功能价值估算[J].中国水土保持科学,2008,6(1):83-86.
    [9]段劼,马履一,张萍等.不同立地侧柏林下植被与水源涵养能力的关系[J].湖北农业科学,2010,49(2):330-333.
    [10]王静,沈月琴,朱臻.公众对森林碳汇服务的认知与支付意愿分析[J].浙江林学院学报,2010,27(6):910-915.
    [11]刘萍,施苗英,尹润生.中国森林固碳及提供其他生态服务功能的潜力和挑战[J].林业经济,2010,3:26-29.
    [12]廖忠明,陆建秀,刘良源.东江源区森林净化环境价值核算[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(20):11039-11040.
    [13]王小明,周本智,钟绍柱.富春江流域人工阔叶幼林涵养水源效果分析[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(6):115-122.
    [14]毕君,王超.木兰围场森林固碳能力及其特征[J].东北林业大学学报,2011,39(2):45-46.
    [15]张嘉宾.森林生态经济学[M].昆明:云南人民出版社,1986.
    [16]孔繁文,戴广翠,何乃蕙等.森林环境资源核算及补偿政策研究[J].林业经济,1994,(4):34-46.
    [17]侯元兆,王琪.中国森林资源核算研究[J].世界林业研究,1995,(3):51-56.
    [18]薛达元.生物多样性的经济价值评估:长白山自然保护区案例研究[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1997.
    [19]周晓峰.中国森林与生态环境[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1999.
    [20]蒋延玲,周广胜.中国主要森林生态系统公益的研究[J].植物生态学报,1999,23(5):426-432.
    [21]韩维栋,高秀梅,卢昌义等.中国红树林生态系统生态价值评估[J].生态科学,2000, 19(1):40-46.
    [22]赵同谦,欧阳志云,王效科等.中国陆地地表水生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评价[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(4):443-452.
    [23]赵同谦,欧阳志云,贾良清等.中国草地生态系统服务功能间接价值评价[J].生态学报,2004,24(6):1101-1110.
    [24]赵同谦,欧阳志云,郑华等.中国森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评价[J].自然资源学报,2004,19(4):480-491.
    [25]李长荣.武陵源自然保护区森林生态系统服务功能及价值评估[J].林业科学,2004,2(40):16-20.
    [26]靳芳,鲁绍伟,余新晓等.中国森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评价[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(8):1531-1536.
    [27]杜鹏,杨蕾.2001-2006年广东省江门地区森林生态系统服务功能的经济价值评估[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(16):7756-7758.
    [28]王斌,杨效生,张彪等.1973-2003年中国森林生态系统服务功能变化研究[J].浙江林学院学报,2009,26(5):714-721.
    [29]徐成立,王雄宾,余新晓等.北京山地森林生态服务功能评估[J].东北林业大学学报,2010,38(7):79-82.
    [30]张佩霞,侯长谋,胡成志等.广东省鹤山市森林生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].热带地理,2010,30(6):628-662.
    [31]王兵,鲁绍伟,尤文忠.辽宁省森林生态系统服务价值评估[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(7):1792-1798.
    [32]林媚珍,陈志云,蔡砥.梅州市森林生态系统服务功能价值动态评估[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2010,30(11):54-64.
    [33]王兵,任晓旭,胡文等.中国森林生态系统服务功能的区域差异研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2011,33(2):43-47.
    [34]欧阳志云,王如松,赵景柱.生态系统服务功能与可持续发展[J].应用生态学报,1999,10(5):635-640.
    [35]杨志新,郑大玮,文化.北京郊区农田生态系统服务功能价值的评估研究[J].自然资源学报,2005,20(4):564-571.
    [36]喻建华,高中贵,张露等.昆山市生态系统服务价值变化研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2005,14(2):213-217.
    [37]高云峰,江文涛.北京市山区森林资源价值评价[J].中国农村经济,2005,7:19-29.
    [38]于谦龙.乌鲁木齐城市森林生态系统生态资产定量研究[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35(22):6710-6712.
    [39]王让会,于谦龙,张慧芝等.森林生态系统生态资产核算的模式与方法[J].生态环境,2008,17(5):1903-1907.
    [40]周永斌,隋琛莹,殷有等.沈阳棋盘山风景区园区森林生态系统服务功能经济价值评估[J].福建林业科技,2008,35(2):224-228.
    [41]孙颖,王得祥,张浩等.宁夏森林生态系统服务功能的价值研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报,2009,37(12):91-97.
    [42]郭其强,罗大庆,方江平等.西藏林芝森林生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(18):8746-8749.
    [43]王燕,王艳,李韶山等.深圳福田红树林鸟类自然保护区生态服务功能价值评估[J].华南师范大学学报,2010,(8):86-91.
    [44]赵元藩,温庆忠,艾建林.云南森林生态系统服务功能价值评估.林业科学研究,2010,23(2):184-190.
    [45]马建军,姚虹,张亮.廊坊市建成区森林生态系统生态资产动态分析与预测[J].林业资源管理,2010,10(5):70-76.
    [46]陈曦,张清,周可法等.干旱区生态资产遥感定量化评估及其动态变化分析[J].科学通报,2006,(51):168-174.
    [47]崇洁,李波,洪睿等.玛纳斯县生态系统服务价值的动态评估[J].干旱区地理,2008,31(3):477-484.
    [48]李昭阳,汤洁,孙平安等.松嫩平原生态资产遥感测量与生态分区研究[J].生态环境,2008,(5):122-127.
    [49]秦文俊,王亮.宿迁市生态系统服务价值动态研究[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(20):9578-9580.
    [50]周德成,罗格平,许文强.1960-2008年阿克苏河流域生态系统服务价值动态评估[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(2):399-408.
    [51]张莉莉,王智,梁凤超等.基于GIS的温泉地区景观格局与生态系统服务价值动态分析[J].新疆农业科学,2010,47(5):1047-1051.
    [52]周可法,陈曦,张清.天山北坡生态资产的动态评估及人类活动响应[J].干旱区地理,2010,33(6):971-978.
    [53]徐中民,张志强,苏志勇等.恢复额济纳旗生态系统的总经济价值-条件估值非参数估计方法的应用[J].冰川冻土,2002,24(2):160-167.
    [54]徐中民,张志强,程国栋等.额济纳旗生态系统恢复的总经济价值评估[J].地理学报,2002,57(1):107-116.
    [55]张志强,徐中民,龙爱华等.黑河流域张掖市生态系统服务恢复价值评估研究—连续型和离散型条件价值评估方法的比较[J].自然资源学报,2004,19(2):230-239.
    [56]张志强,徐中民,程国栎等.黑河流域张掖地区生态系统服务恢复的条件价值评估[J].生态学报,2002,22(6):885-893.
    [57]蔡春光,陈功,乔晓春等.单边界、双边界二分式条件价值评估方法的比较——以北京市空气污染对健康危害问卷调查为例[J].中国环境科学,2007,27(1):39-43.
    [58]石惠春,赵勇,杨二俊等.基于CVM的民勤绿洲生态系统服务价值评估[J].干旱区资源与环境,2008,22(7):31-36.
    [59]王勇,何勇,张健等.岷江上游森林生态系统服务条件价值评估[J].林业经济问题,2009,29(5):428-433.
    [60]敖长林,李一军,冯磊等.基于CVM的三江平原湿地非使用价值评价[J].生态学报,2010,30(23):6470-6477.
    [61]李洪波,李燕燕.武夷山自然保护区生态旅游资源非使用性价值评估[J].生态学杂志,2010,29(8):1639-1645.
    [62]蔡志坚,杜丽永,蒋瞻.基于有效性改进的流域生态系统恢复条件价值评估——以长江流域生态系统恢复为例[J].中国人口资源与环境,2011,21(1):126-134.
    [63]董雪旺,张捷,刘传华等.条件价值法中的偏差分析及信度和效度检验——以九寨沟游憩价值评估为例[J].地理学报.2011,66(2):267-278.
    [64]黄丽君,赵翠薇.基于支付意愿和受偿意愿比较分析的贵阳市森林资源非市场价值评价[J].生态学杂志,2011,30(2):327-334.
    [65]Hamid Amirnejad, Sadegh Khalilian, Mohammad H Assareh, Majid Ahmadian. Estimating the existence value of north forests of Iran by using a contingent valuation method [J]. Ecological Economics,58(2006):665-675.
    [66]Jan Barkmann, Klaus Glenk, Handian Handi. Assessing Economic preferences for biological diversity and ecosystem services at the Central Sulawesi Rainforest Margin [J]. Environmental Science and Engineering,2007(10):179-206.
    [67]A. Lara, C. Little, R. Urrutia. Assessment of ecosystem services as an opportunity for the conservation and management of native forests in Chile [J]. Forest Ecology and Management,258 (2009):415-424.
    [68]Trista M. Patterson, Dana L. Coelho. Ecosystem services:Foundations, opportunities, and challenges for the forest products sector [J]. Forest Ecology and Management,257 (2009): 1637-1646.
    [69]Bruno Locatelli, Raffaele Vignola. Managing watershed services of tropical forests and plantations:Can meta-analyses help [J]. Forest Ecology and Management,258 (2009):1864-1870.
    [70]Florence Bernard, Rudolf S. de Groot, Jose Joaquin Campos. Valuation of tropical forest services and mechanisms to finance their conservation and sustainable use:A case study of Tapanti National Park, Costa Rica [J]. Forest Policy and Economics,11 (2009):174-183.
    [71]Bruce Manley, Kurt Niquidet. What is the relevance of option pricing for forest valuation in New Zealand [J]. Forest Policy and Economics,12 (2010):299-307.
    [72]Benson C. Sherrouse, Jessica M. Clement, Darius J. Semmens. A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services [J]. Applied Geography,31 (2011):748-760.
    [73]Juliette Gadaud, Mbolatiana Rambonilaza. Amenity values and payment schemes for free recreation services from non-industrial private forest properties:A French case study [J]. Journal of Forest Economics,16 (2010):297-311.
    [74]Ching Li, Cheng-Ping Wang, Sung-Ta Liu, Li-Hsin Weng. Forest value orientations and importance of forest recreation services [J]. Journal of Environmental Management,91 (2010):2342-2348.
    [75]Karin Nadrowski, Christian Wirth, Michael Scherer-Lorenzen. Is forest diversity driving ecosystem function and service [J]. Current Opinion in Environmental SustainAbility, 2010,2:75-79.
    [76]Thomas Koellner, Joachim Sell, Guillermo Navarro. Why and how much is firms willing to invest in ecosystem services from tropical forests? A comparison of international and Costa Rican firms [J]. Ecological Economics,69 (2010):2127-2139.
    [77]Sergio Ulgiati, Amalia Zucaro, Pier Paolo Franzese. Shared wealth or nobody's land? The worth of natural capital and ecosystem services [J]. Ecological Economics,70 (2011):778-787.
    [78]高吉喜,范小杉.生态资产概念、特点与研究趋向[J].环境科学研究,2007,20(5):137-143.
    [79]李金云.我国煤炭企业信息化及其水平评价研究[D].安徽理工大学,2009.
    [80]李英.基于居民支付意愿的城市森林生态服务非政府供给方式研究[D].东北林业大学,2008.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700