纤维水解酶对牧草青贮品质及体外瘤胃发酵特性的研究
摘要
外源酶制剂用于反刍动物的研究始于20世纪60年代,但由于作用不稳定,直到90年代人们才开始对外源酶制剂对反刍动物作用进行深入研究,取得一些成效,但与单胃动物方面研究相比,外源酶制剂应用与研究还存在一定差距。本研究以国产4种纤维素酶与4种木聚糖酶为研究对象,从不同pH与不同酶剂量研究入手,筛选最适酶活力的pH反应条件以及最高酶活力外源酶制剂产品,在此基础上进一步研究纤维水解酶以及纤维水解酶与甲酸在牧草青贮过程中对青贮品质的影响,以及用体外方法研究纤维水解酶与瘤胃液共培养后对相关酶活力和瘤胃发酵特性的影响,探索纤维水解酶与瘤胃液共培养下对瘤胃微生物菌群的影响,为纤维水解酶在反刍动物生产中应用提供依据。具体研究内容与结果如下：
1不同pH值与不同酶添加水平对酶活力及还原糖生成量影响
在pH5.0、5.5、6.0、6.5与7.0条件下,4种木聚糖酶中,A酶活力最高。在pH5.0、5.5、6.0下，A酶活力稳定,在pH7.0时,保持65%以上酶活；B酶活力最适pH范围为5.0与5.5,当pH上升到6.0以上时,酶活力迅速下降。C酶活力最适pH为6.0,单位酶活力最低；D酶活力在所有pH条件下,酶活力变化最小,稳定性强。4种纤维素酶,在pH5.5与5.5时,羧甲基纤维素酶酶活高,随pH上升,其酶活力下降。b酶与d酶的羧甲基纤维素酶活力显著高于a酶与c酶；a、b、c与d酶中结晶纤维素酶活力最适pH分别为6.0、5.0、6.0与5.5；b与d酶中的结晶纤维素酶活力高于a酶与c酶。
在pH6.0与等量纯底物条件下,B木聚糖酶与a、b纤维素酶均随着酶添加水平增加而增加反应体系中还原糖生成量。仅A酶在使用水平为0.008 mg时木糖生成量最高。木聚糖酶与纤维素酶混合后并不能进一步提高还原糖生成量。
2纤维水解酶对象草青贮发酵品质的影响
分别以250 mg·kg-1、500 mg·kg-1纤维素酶、木聚糖酶以及250 mg·kg-1木聚糖酶+250 mg·kg-1纤维素酶处理象草在实验室小型发酵瓶中研究外源酶制剂对象草青贮过程中发酵品质的影响。结果显示,与对照组相比,酶处理显著降低青贮pH值(P<0.01),增加青贮料WSC含量(P<0.01)与乳酸含量(P<0.01)。青贮30d结束时,除了复合酶处理组外,其他酶处理组NH3-N含量显著低于对照组(P<0.05)；乙酸含量除高剂量纤维素酶组外,其他各组差异不显著(P>0.05)。酶处理改善了象草青贮品质。
3甲酸与纤维水解酶对黑麦草与三叶草混合青贮发酵品质的影响
本试验研究甲酸与纤维水解酶对黑麦草与三叶草混合青贮品质的影响。试验共设8组：对照组、0.3%甲酸、1.0 g·kg-’纤维素酶、0.3%甲酸+1.0 g·kg-1纤维素酶、1.0 g·kg-1木聚糖酶、0.3%甲酸+1.0 g.kg-1木聚糖酶、1.0 g·kg-1纤维素酶+1.0 g·kg-1木聚糖酶与0.3%甲酸+1.0 g·kg-1纤维素酶+1.0 g·kg-1木聚糖酶。试验结果显示：在青贮过程中,与对照组相比,甲酸或甲酸+酶复合处理牧草后显著降低青贮的pH值以及LA含量与氨氮含量(P<0.05),增加WSC含量(P<0.05)；酶处理组显著降低青贮pH值,增加青贮中WSC含量、乳酸含量、乙酸含量(P<0.05)以及降低了氨氮含量、NDF与ADF含量(P<0.05)。综合分析得出,纤维水解酶处理混合牧草后改善青贮品质,其效果优于甲酸或甲酸+酶处理组。
4纤维水解酶对羊草或玉米青贮体外瘤胃发酵酶活力及发酵特性的影响
试验评价了纤维素酶与木聚糖酶复合处理羊草或玉米青贮后与瘤胃液体外共培养下有关酶活力及瘤胃发酵特性的影响。试验设计为三个各含纤维素酶与木聚糖酶0,10.0与50 mg酶水平,与0与24h两个预处理牧草时间。结果显示,纤维水解酶处理羊草后与瘤胃液共培养能提高0与8h培养液中木聚糖酶活性、内切葡聚糖酶活性以及开始时培养液中结晶纤维素酶活性；同时提高以玉米青贮为底物时培养液中木聚糖酶、内切葡聚糖酶及结晶纤维素酶活性。酶活水平与酶添加剂量呈相关关系。当培养时间延长至24 h及48 h,外源酶并不能提高培养液中相关酶酶活。外源酶增加24 h与48 h时发酵液中乙酸产量(P<0.05)以及8h、24h与48 h时TVFA产量(P<0.05),具有增加乙酸与丙酸比的趋势(P＝0.138)以及增加48 h体外发酵累积产气量(P<0.05),但对戊酸与异戊酸含量无影响。结果指出添加纤维水解酶能提高体外培养下前8h时发酵液中木聚糖酶、纤维素酶酶活,并能改善体外瘤胃发酵的特性,增加TVFA产量及产气量,但对后期发酵液中相关酶活力没有影响。
5纤维水解酶对体外发酵中瘤胃微生物菌群多样性影响
应用PCR-DGGE技术分析纤维水解酶处理羊草或玉米青贮后对体外培养下瘤胃微生物菌群的影响。结果显示,纤维水解酶处理并不影响细菌菌群数量,培养液微生物菌群呈现多样性,所测得的细菌与基因库中的细菌相似性达89%-99%。其中被鉴定的菌群有反刍兽新月形单胞菌(Selenomonas ruminantium)、丁酸弧菌(Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens, Butyrivibrio hungatei)、真细菌(Eubacterium uniforme)、琥珀酸弧菌(Succinivibrio dextrinosolvens)、罗斯伯里氏菌(Roseburia faecis)、瘤胃杆菌(Bovine ruminisbacterium)。其余均为未培养瘤胃细菌。所测菌群均进行Genebank number的申请,取得相应的编号(HQ645848-HQ645865)。
The exogenous enzymes in ruminants were used in the 1960s, but the responses were variable. Until to 1990s, researchers reexamined in detail the role of exogenous enzymes in ruminant production and get good results, but compared with norumiants, the quantity of exogenous enzymes products used in ruminants were smaller.4 cellulases and 4 xylanases made in china were selected to determine the effects of pH and dosage on enzyme activities in order to get optimum pH condition of enzymes action and the best enzymes products, then a series studies were conducted to determine the effects of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes, enzymes+formic acid on the fermentation quality of forage silages and to investigate the effects of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes treated forage on rumen fermentation and ruminal bacterial community in continuous culture in vitro. The results were as follows.
1 Effects of the different pH value and adding dosages on enzyme activities and reducing sugar release
Under the condition of pH5.0,5.5,6.0,6.5 and 7.0, A xylanase activity was the higher compared with other enzymes. A enzyme activity was very stable at pH ranging from 5.0, to 6.0 and retained more 65% at pH 7.0. The optimum range of pH were 5.0 to 5.5 for B xylanase, with pH up to 6.0, the B xylanase activity was decreased rapidly. The optimum pH for C xylanase activity was 6.0, but the enzymes activity was lowest among enzymes. D xylanase activity was very stable at testing pH condition. CMCase activities were very higher at pH 5.0 and 5.5, but with pH increasing, the activity was decreased for a, b, c and d enzyme. CMCase activities for b and d enzymes were higher than a and c enzymes. The optimum pH of Avicelase activities for a, b, c and d enzymes was 6.0,5.0,6.0 and 5.5 respectively. Avicelase activities of b and d enzymes were higher than a and c enzymes activities.
With increasing enzymes level, the reducing sugar release was high significant for A, B xylanase and a, b cellulase under pH6.0 and the same substrate level, but the release quantity of reducing xylose was greatest at the 0.008 mg level of A xylanase. The release quantity of reducing sugars was not enhanced further in addition of mixture of cellulase +xylanase in the substrate of xylan or CMC-Na.
2 Effects of fibrolytic enzymes on the fermentation quality of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schumach.) silages
This study was conducted to research the effects of the fibroltyic enzymes on the fermentation quality of elephant grass silages. Chopped elephant grass were ensiled in laboratory mini-silos either untreated (control) or treated with cellulase(250 or 500 mg-kg-1), cellulase(250 mg-kg-1) plus xylanase(250 mg-kg'), xylanase(250 or 500 mg-kg-1), respectively. The results showed that the enzymes treatments reduced rapidly the pH value(P<0.01), and enhanced significantly content of lactic acid(P<0.01) and water soluble carbohydrate(P<0.01) of silages compare with control. The content of ammonia nitrogen in the enzymes treated silages, expect for cellulase plus xylanase treated, was lower than the untreated silage (P<0.05) and the content of acetic acid, except high level of cellulase treatment, were no difference (P>0.05) in the silages at the end of ensiling. The exogenous fibrolytic enzymes improved the fermentation quality of elephant grass silage during ensiling.
3 Effects of formic acid, fibrolytic enzymes on the fermentation quality of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) and white clover(Trifolium repens L.) mixture silage
This experiment was conducted to examine the effects of formic acid, fibrolytic enzymes on the fermentation quality of Italian ryegrass and white clover mixture silages. The mixture material of 80% Italian ryegrass+20% white clover was ensiling in the plastic bags either untreated (control) or treated with formic acid (0.3%), cellulase(1.0 mg-kg-1), formic acid+cellulase(0.3%+1.0 mg·kg-1), xylanase(1.0 mg·kg-1), formic acid+xylanase (0.3%+1.0 mg·kg-1), cellulase+xylanase(1.0 mg-kg-1, respectively) and formic acid+ cellulase+xylanase (0.3%+1.0 mg·kg-1+1.0 mg·kg-1). The results showed that formic acid treatment or formic acid plus enzyme treatments decreased the pH value (P<0.05), LA content and NH3-N content (P<0.05), increased WSC contents (P<0.05) of silages compared with untreated silage; the enzyme treatments enhanced significantly WSC contents, LA contents and Ac contents (P<0.05) of silages and decreased the pH value, NH3-N contents, NDF and ADF content (P<0.05) of silages, compared with control during ensiling. The formic acid and exogenous fibrolytic enzymes can improve mixture silages quality of ryegrass and white clover and the results treated with enzymes were better than formic acid or formic acid plus enzymes treatment.
4 Effects of fibrolytic enzymes on enzymes activities and fermentation of Chinese wildrye or maize silages by mixed ruminal microorganisms in vtiro
Two of in vitro studies were conducted to determine the effects of mixture treatment of cellulase and xylanase on enzymes activities and fermentation of Chinese wildrye or maize silages by mixed ruminal microorganisms. Three levels of fibrolytic enzyme supplements (0,10.0 and 50.0 mg, respectively) and two treatment times (0 and 24 h before incubation) were tested. The enzyme treatment increased xylanase and CMCase activities 0 and 8 h postincubation and Avicelase activity 0 postincubation for Chinese wildrye. The level of enzyme affected enzyme activities. Then, the exogenous enzyme addition did not affect enzymes activities in incubation fluid at 24 and 48 h of incubation. The AA content at 24 and 48 h of incubation, the total VFA contents at 8,24 and 48 h of the incubation were increased (P<0.05) by the enzyme treatment. Enzyme treatment increased (P<0.05) the cumulative gas production and tended to increase the ratio of acetate to propionate (P=0.138) at the end of incubation. Enzyme treatment had no effects valerate and isovalerate concentrate (P>0.05). In the experiment of enzymes treated maize silages, the enzymes treatment increased xlyanase activity at 0 h, CMCase activity at 0 and 8 h and Avicelase activity at 0,8 and 24 h of the incubation. Date from this study suggest that addition of fibrolytic enzymes to Chinese wildrye or maize silage by mixed ruminal microorganisms can enhance xylanase and cellulase activities in the initial 8 h of the incubation and had no effect the enzyme activity at 24 and 48 h of the incubation and improved rumainal fermentation characteristic in vitro.
5 Effects of the fibrolytic enzymes on ruminal bacterial community in vitro incubation
The effect of the fibrolytic enzymes on ruminal bacterial community in vitro incubation was analyzed by PCR-DGGE technology. The analysis of DGGE profiles revealed that the fibrolytic enzyme treatment did not affect the composition of the rumen bacterial community. The sequence similarity analyses of the all clone sequences in 16S rDNA library resealed that 6 clones showed similarities with database sequences over 97%, the rest similarities in a range of 84%-96%.7 clone sequences were similar to Selenomonas ruminantium, Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens, Butyrivibrio hungatei, Eubacterium uniforme, Succinivibrio dextrinosolvens, Roseburia faecis, Bovine ruminisbacterium. The rests were uncultured rumen bacterium. All of clone sequences get a Genebank number (accession No: HQ645848-HQ645865).
1不同pH值与不同酶添加水平对酶活力及还原糖生成量影响
在pH5.0、5.5、6.0、6.5与7.0条件下,4种木聚糖酶中,A酶活力最高。在pH5.0、5.5、6.0下，A酶活力稳定,在pH7.0时,保持65%以上酶活；B酶活力最适pH范围为5.0与5.5,当pH上升到6.0以上时,酶活力迅速下降。C酶活力最适pH为6.0,单位酶活力最低；D酶活力在所有pH条件下,酶活力变化最小,稳定性强。4种纤维素酶,在pH5.5与5.5时,羧甲基纤维素酶酶活高,随pH上升,其酶活力下降。b酶与d酶的羧甲基纤维素酶活力显著高于a酶与c酶；a、b、c与d酶中结晶纤维素酶活力最适pH分别为6.0、5.0、6.0与5.5；b与d酶中的结晶纤维素酶活力高于a酶与c酶。
在pH6.0与等量纯底物条件下,B木聚糖酶与a、b纤维素酶均随着酶添加水平增加而增加反应体系中还原糖生成量。仅A酶在使用水平为0.008 mg时木糖生成量最高。木聚糖酶与纤维素酶混合后并不能进一步提高还原糖生成量。
2纤维水解酶对象草青贮发酵品质的影响
分别以250 mg·kg-1、500 mg·kg-1纤维素酶、木聚糖酶以及250 mg·kg-1木聚糖酶+250 mg·kg-1纤维素酶处理象草在实验室小型发酵瓶中研究外源酶制剂对象草青贮过程中发酵品质的影响。结果显示,与对照组相比,酶处理显著降低青贮pH值(P<0.01),增加青贮料WSC含量(P<0.01)与乳酸含量(P<0.01)。青贮30d结束时,除了复合酶处理组外,其他酶处理组NH3-N含量显著低于对照组(P<0.05)；乙酸含量除高剂量纤维素酶组外,其他各组差异不显著(P>0.05)。酶处理改善了象草青贮品质。
3甲酸与纤维水解酶对黑麦草与三叶草混合青贮发酵品质的影响
本试验研究甲酸与纤维水解酶对黑麦草与三叶草混合青贮品质的影响。试验共设8组：对照组、0.3%甲酸、1.0 g·kg-’纤维素酶、0.3%甲酸+1.0 g·kg-1纤维素酶、1.0 g·kg-1木聚糖酶、0.3%甲酸+1.0 g.kg-1木聚糖酶、1.0 g·kg-1纤维素酶+1.0 g·kg-1木聚糖酶与0.3%甲酸+1.0 g·kg-1纤维素酶+1.0 g·kg-1木聚糖酶。试验结果显示：在青贮过程中,与对照组相比,甲酸或甲酸+酶复合处理牧草后显著降低青贮的pH值以及LA含量与氨氮含量(P<0.05),增加WSC含量(P<0.05)；酶处理组显著降低青贮pH值,增加青贮中WSC含量、乳酸含量、乙酸含量(P<0.05)以及降低了氨氮含量、NDF与ADF含量(P<0.05)。综合分析得出,纤维水解酶处理混合牧草后改善青贮品质,其效果优于甲酸或甲酸+酶处理组。
4纤维水解酶对羊草或玉米青贮体外瘤胃发酵酶活力及发酵特性的影响
试验评价了纤维素酶与木聚糖酶复合处理羊草或玉米青贮后与瘤胃液体外共培养下有关酶活力及瘤胃发酵特性的影响。试验设计为三个各含纤维素酶与木聚糖酶0,10.0与50 mg酶水平,与0与24h两个预处理牧草时间。结果显示,纤维水解酶处理羊草后与瘤胃液共培养能提高0与8h培养液中木聚糖酶活性、内切葡聚糖酶活性以及开始时培养液中结晶纤维素酶活性；同时提高以玉米青贮为底物时培养液中木聚糖酶、内切葡聚糖酶及结晶纤维素酶活性。酶活水平与酶添加剂量呈相关关系。当培养时间延长至24 h及48 h,外源酶并不能提高培养液中相关酶酶活。外源酶增加24 h与48 h时发酵液中乙酸产量(P<0.05)以及8h、24h与48 h时TVFA产量(P<0.05),具有增加乙酸与丙酸比的趋势(P＝0.138)以及增加48 h体外发酵累积产气量(P<0.05),但对戊酸与异戊酸含量无影响。结果指出添加纤维水解酶能提高体外培养下前8h时发酵液中木聚糖酶、纤维素酶酶活,并能改善体外瘤胃发酵的特性,增加TVFA产量及产气量,但对后期发酵液中相关酶活力没有影响。
5纤维水解酶对体外发酵中瘤胃微生物菌群多样性影响
应用PCR-DGGE技术分析纤维水解酶处理羊草或玉米青贮后对体外培养下瘤胃微生物菌群的影响。结果显示,纤维水解酶处理并不影响细菌菌群数量,培养液微生物菌群呈现多样性,所测得的细菌与基因库中的细菌相似性达89%-99%。其中被鉴定的菌群有反刍兽新月形单胞菌(Selenomonas ruminantium)、丁酸弧菌(Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens, Butyrivibrio hungatei)、真细菌(Eubacterium uniforme)、琥珀酸弧菌(Succinivibrio dextrinosolvens)、罗斯伯里氏菌(Roseburia faecis)、瘤胃杆菌(Bovine ruminisbacterium)。其余均为未培养瘤胃细菌。所测菌群均进行Genebank number的申请,取得相应的编号(HQ645848-HQ645865)。
The exogenous enzymes in ruminants were used in the 1960s, but the responses were variable. Until to 1990s, researchers reexamined in detail the role of exogenous enzymes in ruminant production and get good results, but compared with norumiants, the quantity of exogenous enzymes products used in ruminants were smaller.4 cellulases and 4 xylanases made in china were selected to determine the effects of pH and dosage on enzyme activities in order to get optimum pH condition of enzymes action and the best enzymes products, then a series studies were conducted to determine the effects of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes, enzymes+formic acid on the fermentation quality of forage silages and to investigate the effects of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes treated forage on rumen fermentation and ruminal bacterial community in continuous culture in vitro. The results were as follows.
1 Effects of the different pH value and adding dosages on enzyme activities and reducing sugar release
Under the condition of pH5.0,5.5,6.0,6.5 and 7.0, A xylanase activity was the higher compared with other enzymes. A enzyme activity was very stable at pH ranging from 5.0, to 6.0 and retained more 65% at pH 7.0. The optimum range of pH were 5.0 to 5.5 for B xylanase, with pH up to 6.0, the B xylanase activity was decreased rapidly. The optimum pH for C xylanase activity was 6.0, but the enzymes activity was lowest among enzymes. D xylanase activity was very stable at testing pH condition. CMCase activities were very higher at pH 5.0 and 5.5, but with pH increasing, the activity was decreased for a, b, c and d enzyme. CMCase activities for b and d enzymes were higher than a and c enzymes. The optimum pH of Avicelase activities for a, b, c and d enzymes was 6.0,5.0,6.0 and 5.5 respectively. Avicelase activities of b and d enzymes were higher than a and c enzymes activities.
With increasing enzymes level, the reducing sugar release was high significant for A, B xylanase and a, b cellulase under pH6.0 and the same substrate level, but the release quantity of reducing xylose was greatest at the 0.008 mg level of A xylanase. The release quantity of reducing sugars was not enhanced further in addition of mixture of cellulase +xylanase in the substrate of xylan or CMC-Na.
2 Effects of fibrolytic enzymes on the fermentation quality of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schumach.) silages
This study was conducted to research the effects of the fibroltyic enzymes on the fermentation quality of elephant grass silages. Chopped elephant grass were ensiled in laboratory mini-silos either untreated (control) or treated with cellulase(250 or 500 mg-kg-1), cellulase(250 mg-kg-1) plus xylanase(250 mg-kg'), xylanase(250 or 500 mg-kg-1), respectively. The results showed that the enzymes treatments reduced rapidly the pH value(P<0.01), and enhanced significantly content of lactic acid(P<0.01) and water soluble carbohydrate(P<0.01) of silages compare with control. The content of ammonia nitrogen in the enzymes treated silages, expect for cellulase plus xylanase treated, was lower than the untreated silage (P<0.05) and the content of acetic acid, except high level of cellulase treatment, were no difference (P>0.05) in the silages at the end of ensiling. The exogenous fibrolytic enzymes improved the fermentation quality of elephant grass silage during ensiling.
3 Effects of formic acid, fibrolytic enzymes on the fermentation quality of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) and white clover(Trifolium repens L.) mixture silage
This experiment was conducted to examine the effects of formic acid, fibrolytic enzymes on the fermentation quality of Italian ryegrass and white clover mixture silages. The mixture material of 80% Italian ryegrass+20% white clover was ensiling in the plastic bags either untreated (control) or treated with formic acid (0.3%), cellulase(1.0 mg-kg-1), formic acid+cellulase(0.3%+1.0 mg·kg-1), xylanase(1.0 mg·kg-1), formic acid+xylanase (0.3%+1.0 mg·kg-1), cellulase+xylanase(1.0 mg-kg-1, respectively) and formic acid+ cellulase+xylanase (0.3%+1.0 mg·kg-1+1.0 mg·kg-1). The results showed that formic acid treatment or formic acid plus enzyme treatments decreased the pH value (P<0.05), LA content and NH3-N content (P<0.05), increased WSC contents (P<0.05) of silages compared with untreated silage; the enzyme treatments enhanced significantly WSC contents, LA contents and Ac contents (P<0.05) of silages and decreased the pH value, NH3-N contents, NDF and ADF content (P<0.05) of silages, compared with control during ensiling. The formic acid and exogenous fibrolytic enzymes can improve mixture silages quality of ryegrass and white clover and the results treated with enzymes were better than formic acid or formic acid plus enzymes treatment.
4 Effects of fibrolytic enzymes on enzymes activities and fermentation of Chinese wildrye or maize silages by mixed ruminal microorganisms in vtiro
Two of in vitro studies were conducted to determine the effects of mixture treatment of cellulase and xylanase on enzymes activities and fermentation of Chinese wildrye or maize silages by mixed ruminal microorganisms. Three levels of fibrolytic enzyme supplements (0,10.0 and 50.0 mg, respectively) and two treatment times (0 and 24 h before incubation) were tested. The enzyme treatment increased xylanase and CMCase activities 0 and 8 h postincubation and Avicelase activity 0 postincubation for Chinese wildrye. The level of enzyme affected enzyme activities. Then, the exogenous enzyme addition did not affect enzymes activities in incubation fluid at 24 and 48 h of incubation. The AA content at 24 and 48 h of incubation, the total VFA contents at 8,24 and 48 h of the incubation were increased (P<0.05) by the enzyme treatment. Enzyme treatment increased (P<0.05) the cumulative gas production and tended to increase the ratio of acetate to propionate (P=0.138) at the end of incubation. Enzyme treatment had no effects valerate and isovalerate concentrate (P>0.05). In the experiment of enzymes treated maize silages, the enzymes treatment increased xlyanase activity at 0 h, CMCase activity at 0 and 8 h and Avicelase activity at 0,8 and 24 h of the incubation. Date from this study suggest that addition of fibrolytic enzymes to Chinese wildrye or maize silage by mixed ruminal microorganisms can enhance xylanase and cellulase activities in the initial 8 h of the incubation and had no effect the enzyme activity at 24 and 48 h of the incubation and improved rumainal fermentation characteristic in vitro.
5 Effects of the fibrolytic enzymes on ruminal bacterial community in vitro incubation
The effect of the fibrolytic enzymes on ruminal bacterial community in vitro incubation was analyzed by PCR-DGGE technology. The analysis of DGGE profiles revealed that the fibrolytic enzyme treatment did not affect the composition of the rumen bacterial community. The sequence similarity analyses of the all clone sequences in 16S rDNA library resealed that 6 clones showed similarities with database sequences over 97%, the rest similarities in a range of 84%-96%.7 clone sequences were similar to Selenomonas ruminantium, Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens, Butyrivibrio hungatei, Eubacterium uniforme, Succinivibrio dextrinosolvens, Roseburia faecis, Bovine ruminisbacterium. The rests were uncultured rumen bacterium. All of clone sequences get a Genebank number (accession No: HQ645848-HQ645865).
引文
[1]Noy Y and Sklan D. Digestion and absorption in the young chick [J].Poultry Science,1995, 74(2):366-373
[2]刘长忠,张毅,王自良,崔建勋,谢晓琳.NSP酶制剂对雏鹅消化酶活性和盲肠微生物数量的影响[J].湖北农业科学,2009,48(7)：1700-1703
[3]Sheppy C. The current feed enzyme market and likely trends. In: Bedford M R, Partridge G G Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition[M]. New York:CABI Publishing,2001,3-5
[4]高峰,周光宏,韩正康.小麦基础日粮联合添加酶制剂对肉仔鸡生产性能和血液某些指标的影响[J].南京农业大学学报,2000,23(4)：71-75
[5]韩正康.大麦日粮添加酶制剂家禽营养生理及改善生产性能的研究[J].畜牧与兽医,2000,32(1)：1-4
[6]凌宝明,冯定远,左建军.饲用蛋白酶的研究进展[J].饲料工业,2009,30(22)：7-10
[7]卢晨,边边全,刘显军,陈静,李建涛,张飞.中性和酸性蛋白酶对断奶仔猪生长性能的影响[J].动物营养学报,2009,21(6)：993-997
[8]王海燕,李富伟,高秀华.脂肪酶的研究进展及其在饲料中的应用[J].饲料工业,2007,28(6)：14-17
[9]杨新文,杨毅,冷向军,吴江.脂肪酶对南方鲇生长性能、消化酶活性及血液生化指标的影响[J].淡水渔业,2010,40(3)：23-27
[10]李富伟,汪勇,汤海鸥.淀粉酶和糖化酶体外降解玉米淀粉的机理探讨[J].中国饲料,2009,16：15-22
[11]刘小英.支链淀粉酶对生长增重的影响[J].饲料广角,2009,2：34-35
[12]冯定远.酶制剂在饲料工业中的应用[M].北京：中国农业科学技术出版社,2005
[13]Volfova O, Dovrakova J, Hanzlikova A, Jandera A. Phytase from Aspergillum niger[J].Folia Microbiology,1994,39:481-484
[14]Pasamontes L, Haiker M, Wys M, Tessier M, Van Loon A P G M. Gene cloning, purification and characterization of a heat-stable phytase from fungus Aspergillum fumigatus [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,1997,63(5):1696-1700
[15]Wood T M, Bhat K M. Methods for measuring cellulase activities [M]. In: Wood W A and Kellogg, S.T. Mrthods in Enzymology, Vol.160. Academic Press, London,1988,87-112
[16]Coughlan M P, Hazlewood G P. β-1,4-D-xylan-degrading enzyme systems:Biochemistry, molecular biology and applications [J].Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry,1993a,17:259-289
[17]Elisabetta Sabini, Keith S, Wilson. Digestion of single crystals of mannan by an endo-mannanase from Trichioderna reesri[J].European Journal of Biochemistry,2000,267:2340-2344
[18]Jackson M E, Fodge D W, Hsiao H Y. Effect of (3-mamnnanase in corn-soybean meal diets on laying hen performance [J]. Journal of Poultry Science,1999,78:1737-1741
[19]王成章,王恬.饲料学[M].北京：中国农业出版社,2003
[20]冯定远,张莹,余石英,付畅国,蒲英远,颜惜玲.含有木聚糖酶与p-葡聚糖酶的酶制剂对猪日粮消化性能影响[J].畜禽业,2000,2：44-45
[21]王前光,刘秋,高惠林,贺建华.不同酶制剂在生长猪小麦日粮中应用效果的研究[J].中国畜牧兽医,2009,36(10)：16-21
[22]李根来,王潇,林明新,陆志峰,姚文.玉米脱水酒精糟及其可溶物和复合酶制剂对生长育肥猪生产性能和氮、磷消化率的影响[J].动物营养学报,2010,22(3)：750-756
[23]Lindemann M D, Cho J H,Cromwell G L. Energy is relrased in swine diets containing corn distillers dried grain with solubles (DDGS) with phytase and xylanase [C]. Inaugural ASAS-CAAV Asian Pacific Rim conference, Beijing, P.R China,2009:40
[24]许梓荣,王振来,王敏奇.高麦麸饲粮中添加酶类物质对仔猪生长性能和胴体组成的影响[J].浙江农业大学学报,1998,24(6)：643-646
[25]汪儆,Juokslahti T.木聚糖酶制剂对生长肥育猪次粉日粮饲养效果的影响[J].中国饲料,1997,3：17-19
[26]王修启,郑海刚,安汝义,李桂甫,李春群,迟清臣.小麦型日粮添加复合酶对猪生产性能的影响[J].中国饲料,2000,21：12-13
[27]程伟,刘太宇,王彩玲.小麦型日粮添加木聚糖酶对生长肥育猪生产性能的影响[J].河南农业科学,1998,11：40-41
[28]吴道义,夏先林.添加复合酶制剂对育肥猪日粮消化率的影响[J].饲料博览,2009,10：21-23
[29]黄金秀,陈代文,张无英.木聚糖酶对不同木聚糖含量的仔猪饲粮养分消化率的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2008,44(7)：21-24
[30]张民,吕秋凤,周莉芬,李新良.不同类型的复合酶制剂对仔猪生长性能和饲料养分利用率的影响[J].饲料工业,2010,31(4)：12-15
[31]吕秋凤,杨群辉,杨建成,王振勇,张民.非淀粉多糖复合酶制剂对断奶仔猪养分表观消化率的影响[J].中国饲料,2010,8：34-35
[32]曾福海,詹志春,乔永,刘金银.非淀粉多糖复合酶在断奶仔猪日粮中应用效果的研究[J].中国饲料,2009,24：26-27
[33]Kwon O S, Kim I H, Lee S H, Hong J W, Kim J H, Moon T H. Effect of dietary α-1,6-galactosidase and β-1,4-mannanase on growth performance and nutrient digestibility in nursery and growing pigs[J]. Journal of Animal Science and Technology,2003,45(2):211-218
[34]Pettey L A, Carter S D, Senne B W, Shriver J A. Effects of β-mannanase addition to corn-soybean meal diets on growth performance, carcass traits and nutrient digestibility of weanling and growing-finishing pigs[J]. Journal of Animal Science,2002,80(4):1012-1019
[35]Oohida I, Perez J F, Gasa J, Puchal F. Enzymes (beta-glucanase and arabinoxylanase and)/or sepiolite supplementation and the nutritive value of maize-barley-wheat bases diets for broiler chickens [J]. British Poultry Science,2000,41(5):617-624
[36]Danicke S, Vanjen W, Simon O, Jeroch H. Effects of dietary fat type and xylanase supplementation to rye-based broiler diets on selected bacterial groups adhering to the intestinal epithelium, on transit time of feed, and on nutrient digestibility [J]. Journal of Poultry Science,1999,78:1292-1299
[37]许梓荣,钱利纯,孙建义,王敏奇.高麦麸饲粮中添加β-葡聚糖酶、木聚糖酶和纤维素酶对肉鸡生长和消化的影响[J].浙江农业学报,1999,11(2)：80-84
[38]王修启,李春喜,林东康,常娟,秦磊.小麦中的戊聚糖含量及添加木聚糖复酶对鸡表观代谢能值和养分消化率的影响[J].动物营养学报,2002,14(3)：57-59
[39]王修启,陈杰,林东康,秦磊,常娟.皖麦38添加木聚糖酶对鸡表观代谢能值和氨基酸表观消化率的影响[J].华北农学报,2003,18(1)：116-118
[40]王修启,聂国兴,李春喜,邢宝忠.小麦基础日粮添加木聚糖蛋鸡生产性能的影响[J].粮食与饲料,2004,1：35-36
[41]王修启,邢宝忠,张兆敏.小麦基础日粮添加木聚糖酶对肉鸡生产性能的影响[J].河南农业科学,2004,1：47-49
[42]杨久仙,张金柱,郭保海,王书和,计成,马秋刚.复合酶制剂对蛋用种鸡产蛋、繁殖性能及消化率影响的研究[J].中国畜牧兽医,2009,36(3)：32-36
[43]杨久仙,马秋刚,关舒,郭宝海,彭晓培,计成.饲用复合酶对蛋用种鸡日粮磷的利用和生产性能的影响[J].动物营养学报,2006,18(3)：186-191
[44]吕秋凤,宁志利,王振勇,张民,管秀界,曹敏建.不同来源木聚糖酶及其组合对肉鸡生长性能和养分代谢率的影响[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2010,41(3)：350-353
[45]高峰,周光宏,韩正康.小麦米糠日粮添加粗酶制剂和寡果糖对雏鸡生产性能、免疫和内分泌的影响[J].畜牧兽医学报,2002,33(1)：14-17
[46]高峰,江芸,周光宏,韩正康.小麦日粮添加非淀粉多糖酶制剂对雏鸡生长及血液中血糖、尿酸和某些激素水平的影响[J].华中学业大学学报,2004,23(2)：230-235
[47]李尚坤,计成,刘永刚,马秋刚.复合酶制剂对肉种鸡生产性能和繁殖性能的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2007,43(3)：19-22
[48]廖细古,冯定远,于旭华,汝应俊.木聚糖酶对生长肉鸭生产性能影响的研究[J].饲料工业,2006,27(18)：4445
[49]Mathlouthi N, Mohamed M A, Larbier M. Effect of enzyme preparation containg xylanase and beta-glucanase on pergormance of laying hens fed wheat/barley-or maize/soybean meal-based diets[J]. British Poultry Science,2003,44(1):60-66
[50]Burroughs W, Woods W, Ewing S A, Greig J, Theurer B. Enzyme additions to fattening cattle rations[J]. Journal of Animal Science,1960,19(2):458-464
[51]Rovice J J, Ely C M. Response of beef cattle to enzyme supplement [J].Journal of Animal Science,1962,21:1012
[52]Rust J W, Jacobsen N L, McGilliard A D, Hotchkiss D K. Supplementation of dairy calf diets with enzymes. Ⅱ. Effect on nutrient utilization and on composition of rumen fluid [J]. Journal of Animal Science,1965,24:156-160
[53]Hristove A N, McAllister T A, Cheng K-J. Stability of exogenous polysaccharide-degrading enzyme in the rumen[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,1998a,76:161-168
[54]Hristov AN, Tim A, McAllister T A, Cheng K-J. Effect of dietary or abomasal supplementation of exogenous polysaccharide-degrading enzymes on rumen fermentation and nutrient digestibility [J]. Journal of Animal Science,1998b,76(12):3146-3156
[55]Beauchemin K A, Rode L M, Sewalt V J H. Fibrolytic enzymes increase fiber digestibility and growth rate of steers fed dry forages [J]. Canadian Journal of animal science,1995,75:641-644
[56]Feng P, Hunt C W, Pritchard G T, Julien W E. Effect of enzyme preparations on in situ and in vitro degradation and in vivo digestive characteristics of mature cool-season grass forage in beef steers [J]. Journal of Animal Science,1996,74:1349-1357
[57]Lewis GE, Hunt C W, Sanchez W K, Treacher R J, Pritchard G T, Feng P. Effect of direct-fed fibrolytic enzymes on the digestive characteristics of a forage-based diet fed to beef steers[J]. Journal of Animal Science,1996,74:3020-3028
[58]Wang Y, Spratling B M, ZoBell D R, Wiedmeier R D, McAllister T. Effect of alkali pretreatment of wheat straw on the efficacy of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes[J]. Journal of Animal Science,2004, 82:198-208
[59]Tang A X, Yayo G O, Yan Z L, Sun Z H, Shen L X, Zhou C S, Xiao W J, Ren G P, Han X F, Shen S B. Effects of yeast culture and fibrolytic enzyme supplementation on in vitro fermentation characteristics of low-quality cereal straws [J].Journal of Animal Science,2008,86:1164:1172
[60]Kung L J, Treacher R J, Nauman G A, Smagala A M, Endres K M, Cohen M A. The effect of treating forages with fibrolytic enzymes on its nutritive value and lactation performance of dairy cows [J].Journal of Dairy Science,2000,83(1):115-122
[61]Lewis G E, Sanchez W K, Hunt C W, Guy M A, Pritchard G T, Swanson B I, Treacher R J. Effect of direct-fed fibrolytic enzymes on the lactational performance of dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1999,82(3):611-617
[62]Rode L M, Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A. Fibrolytic enzyme supplements for dairy cows in early lactation [J] Journal of Dairy Science,1999,82(10):2121-2126
[63]Beauchemin K A, Yang W Z, Rode L M. Effects of grain source and enzyme additive on site and extent of nutrient digestion in dairy cows [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1999,82(2):378-390
[64]Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A, Rode L M. A Comparison of methods of adding fibrolytic enzymes to lactating cow diets [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2000,83(11):2512-2520
[65]Beauchemin K A, Rode L M, Maekawa M, Morgavi D P, Kampen R. Evaluation of a nonstarch polysaccharidase feed enzyme in dairy cow diets [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2000,83(3):543-553
[66]Jacobs J L, McAllan A B. Enzymes as silage additives.1. Silage quality, digestion, digestibility and performance in growing cattle [J].Grass and Forage Science,1991,46(1):63-73
[67]Stokes M R. Effects of an enzyme mixture, an inoculant and their interaction on silage fermentation and dairy production[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1992,75(3):764-773
[68]马慧,苗树君,刘君.纤维素酶对玉米秸青贮营养成分及其奶牛毅力降解率的影响[J].草食家畜,2006,133(4)：4346
[69]李静,高兰阳,沈益新.乳酸菌和纤维素酶对稻草青贮品质的影响[J].南京农业大学学报,2008,31(4)：86-90
[70]薛艳林,玉柱,白春生,孙杰,单战,孙娟娟.添加纤维素酶和苹果渣对苜蓿草渣青贮品质的影响[J].中国草地学报,2009,31(3)：88-91
[71]Nsereko V L, Morgavi D P, Rode L M, Beauchemin K A, McAllister T A. Effects of fungal enzyme preparations on hydrolysis and subsequent degradation of alfalfa hay fiber by mixed rumen microorganisms in vitro[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,2000,88(3):153-170
[72]Wang Y, McAllister T A, Rode L M, Beauchemin K A, Morgavi D P, Nsereko V L, Iwaasa A D, Yang W. Effect of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes on epiphytic microbial populations and in vitro silage digestion [J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2002,82(7):760-768
[73]Kopency J, Marounek M, Holub K. Testing the suitability of the addition of Trichoderma viride cellulases to feed rations for ruminants [J].Zivocisna vyroba,1987,32:587-592
[74]Hristov A N, McAllister T A, Cheng K-J. Intraruminal supplementation with increasing levels of exogenous polysaccharide-degrading enzymes: Effects on nutrient digestion in cattle fed a barley grain diet [J].Journal of Animal Science,2000,78:477-487
[75]Morgavi D P, Beauchemin K A, Nsereko V L, Rode L M, McAllister T A, Iwaasa A D, Wang Y and Yang W Z. Resistance of feed enzymes to proteolytic inactivation by rumen microorganisms and gastrointestinal proteases [J].Journal of Animal Science,2001,79:1621-1630
[76]Giraldo L A, Tejido M L, Ranilla M J, Ramos S, Carro M D. Influence if direct-fed fibrolytic enzymes on diet digestibility and ruminal activity in sheep fed a grass hay-based diet [J]. Journal of Animal Science,2008,86:1617-1623
[77]Kung L, Jr, Cohen M A, Rode L M, Treacher R J. The effect of fibrolytic enzymes sprayed onto forage and fed in a total mixed ratio to lactation dairy cows [J].Journal of Dairy Science,2002,85(9):2396-2402
[78]Reddlsh M A, Kung Jr L. The effect of feeding a dry enzyme mixture with fibrolytic activity on the performance of lactation cows and digestibility of a diet for sheep [J].Journal of Dairy Science,2007,90(10):4724-4729
[79]Eun J S, Beauchemin K A. Enhancing in vitro degradation of Alfalfa hay and corn silage using feed enzymes [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2007,90(6):2839-2851
[80]Eun J S, Beauchemin K A, Schulzet H. Use of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes to enchance in vitro fermentation of Alfalfa hay and corn silage [J].Journal of Dairy Science,2007,90(3):1440-1451
[81]Nsereko V L, Morgavi D P, Rode L M, Beauchemin K A, McAllister T A. Effects of fungal enzyme preparations on hydrolysis and subsequent degradation of alfalfa hay fiber by mixed rumen microorganisms in vitro[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,2000,88(3-4):153-170
[82]Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A, Vedres D D. Effects of pH and fibrolytic enzymes on digestibility, bacterial protein synthesis, and fermentation in continuous culture[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2002,102:137-150
[83]Eun J-S, Beauchemin K A, Hong S H, Bauer M W. Exogenous enzymes added to untreated or ammoniated rice straw: Effects on in vitro fermentation characteristics and degradability [J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2006,131:86-101
[84]Eun J-S, Beauchemin K A. Assessment of the efficacy of varying experimental exogenous fibrolytic nzymes using in vitro fermentation characteristics [J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,2007,132:298-315
[85]Wallace R J, Wallace S J A, McKain N, Nsereko V L, Hartnell G F. Influence of supplementary fibrolytic enzymes on the fermentation of com and grass silages by mixed ruminal micrioorganisms in vitro[J]. Journal of Animal Science,2001,79(7):1905-1916
[86]Colombatto D, Hervas G, Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A. Effects of enzyme supplementation of a total mixed ration on microbial fermentation in continuous culture, maintained at high and low pH [J]. Journal of Animal Science,2003,81(10):2617-2627
[87]Go'mez-Va'zquez A, Pe'rez J, Mendoza G D, Aranda E, Herna'ndez A. Fibrolytic exogenous enzymes improve performance in steers fed sugar cane and stargrass [J].Livestock Production Science,2003,82:249-254
[88]Eun J-S, Beauchemin K A. Effects of a proteolytic feed enzyme on intake, digestion, ruminal fermentation, and milk production [J] Journal of Dairy Science,2005,88(6):2140-2153
[89]Wang Y, McAllister T A, Rode L M, Beauchemin K A, Morgavi D P, Nsereko V L, Iwaasa A D, Yang W. Effects of an exogenous enzyme preparation on microbial protein synthesis, enzyme activity and attachment to feed in the Rumen Simulation Technique (Rusitec) [J]. British Journal of Nutrition,2001,85(3):325-332
[90]Nsereko V L, Beauchemin K A, Morgavi D P, Rode L M, Furtado A F, McAllister T A, Iwaasa A D,. Yang W Z, Wang Y. Effect of a fibrolytic enzyme preparation from Trichoderma longibrachiatum on the rumen microbial population of dairy cows [J].Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 2002,48(1):14-20
[91]Morgavi D P, Beauchemin K A, Nsereko V L, Rode L M, Iwaasa A D, Yang W Z, McAllister T A, Wang Y. Synergy between ruminal fibrolytic enzymes and enzymes from Trichoderma Longibrachiatum [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2000,82(6):1310-1321
[92]Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A, Rode L M. Effects of an enzyme feed additive on extent of digestion and milk production of lactating dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1999,82(2):391-403
[93]Beauchemin K A, Rode L M, Maekawa M, Morgavi D P, Kampen R. Evaluation of a nonstarch polysaccharidase feed enzyme in dairy cow diets [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2000,83(3):543-553
[94]Bowman G R, Beauchemin K A, Shelford J A. The proportion of the diet to which fibrolytic enzymes are added affects nutrient digestion by lactating dairy cows [J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2002,85(12):3420-3429
[95]Knowlton K F, McKinney J M, Cobb C. Effect of a direct-fed fibrolytic enzyme formulation on nutrient intake, partitioning, and excretion in early and late lactation Holstein cows [J]. Journal of Ddairy Science,2002,85(12):3328-3335
[96]Schingoethe D J, Stegeman G A, Treacher R J. Response of lactating dairy cows to a cellulase and xylanase enzyme mixture applied to forages at the time of feeding[J] Journal of Dairy Science, 1999,82(5):996-1003
[97]Dhiman T R, Zaman M S, Gimenez R R, Walters J L, Treacher R. Performance of dairy cows fed forage treated with fibrolytic enzymes prior to feeding [J].Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2002,101:115-125
[98]Kiinggerman C M, Hu W, McDomell E E, DerBedrosian M C, Kung L. An evaluation of exogenous enzymes with amylolytic activity for dairy cows [J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2009,92(3):1050-1059
[99]李新胜,张春喜,孙哲,汗儆.加酶高粱青贮对奶牛产奶量的影响[J].中国奶牛,2001,1：26-27
[100]Sutton J D, Phipps R H, Beever D E, Humphries D J, Hartnell G F, Vicini J L, Hard D L. Effect of method of application of a fibrolytic enzyme product on digestive processes and milk production in Holstein-Friesian cows [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2003,86(2):546-556
[101]McAllister T A, Oosting S J, Popp J D, Mir Z, Yanke L J, Hristov A N, Treacher R J, Cheng K-J. Effect of exogenous enzymes on digestibility of barley silage and growth performance of feedlot cattle [J]. Canadian Journal of Animal Science,1999,79:353-360
[102]Beauchemin K A, Jones S. D M, Rode L M, Sewalt V J H. Effects of fibrolytic enzyme in corn or barley diets on performance and carcass characteristics of feedlot cattle [J].Canadian Journal of Animal Science,1997,7:645-653
[103]ZoBell D R, Wiedmeier R D, Olson K O, Treacher R. The effect of an exogenous enzyme treatment on production and carcass characteristics of growing and finishing steers[J] Joumal Animal Feed Science and Technology,2000,87(3):279-285
[104]Krause M, Beauchemin K A, Role L M, Farr B I, Norgaard P. Fibrolytic enzyme treatment of barley grain and source of forage in high-diets fed to growing cattle [J]. Journal of Animal Science,1998,76:2912-2920
[105]Bedford M R, Partridge G G Enzymes in farm animal nutrition [M].UK:CABIPublishing,2001
[106]Bathgate M J. The determination of endo-glucanase activity in malt [J]. Journal of the Institute of Brewing,1979,85:92-94
[107]张龙翔,张庭芳,李令媛.生化实验方法与技术[M].北京：高等教育出版社,2001
[108]Thomas M, Wood K, Mahalingeshwara Bhat. Methods in Emzymology [M]. Methods for measuring cellulase activities,1988
[109]Walsh G A, Murphy R A, Killeen G F, Headon D R, Power F P. Detection and quantification of supplemental fugal p-glucanase activity in animal feed[J]. Journal of Animal Science,1995, 73:1074-1076
[110]Rotter B A, Marquardt R R, Guenter W, Grow G H. Evaluation of three enzymic methods as predictors of in vivo response to enzymes supplementation of barley-based diets when fed to young chicks[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1990,50:19-27
[111]Robinson D. The fluorimetric determination of (3-glucosidase: its occurrence in the tissues of animals, including insects[J].Biochemistry Journal,1956,63:39-42
[112]冯定远,左建军.饲料酶制剂及其应用效果的评价体系[J].饲料与畜牧,2010,7：53-58
[113]刁其玉.酶制剂在反刍动物日粮中应用研究进展[J].饲料与畜牧,2010,3：15-17
[114]唐茂妍,王海彦,计成.最佳酶制剂应用体系(OEA)理论与实践[J].饲料与畜牧,2010：3：33-38
[115]郑祥建,韩正康.β-葡萄糖酶活力及稳定性研究[J].中国饲料,1998,1：15-17
[1]Cheng K J, Forsberg C W, Minato H, Costerton J W. Microbial ecology and physiology of feed degradation within the rumen. In: Physiological Aspects of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants (Tsuda T, SasakiY, and Kawashima R, eds.) [M]. Academic Press, Toronto,1991
[2]冯仰廉.反刍动物营养学[M].北京：科学出版社,2004
[3]Osbome J M, Dehority B A. Synergism in degradation and utilization of intact forage cellulose, hemicellulose, and pectin by three pure cultures of ruminal bacteria [J]. Applied Environmental Microbiology,1989,55(9):2247-2250
[4]Wubah D A, Akin D E, Borneman W S. Biology, fiber degradation, and Enzymology of anaerobic zoosporic fungi[J].Critical Reviews in Microbiology,1993,19(2):99-115
[5]Trinci A P J, Davies D R, Gull K, Lawrence M L, Nielsen B B,Rickers A, Theoderon M K.Anaerobic fungi in herbivorous animals [J].Mycological Research,1994.98(2):129-152
[6]Akin D E. Histological and physical factors affecting digestibility of forages [J]. Agronomy Journal, 1989,81(1):17-25
[7]Joblin K N, Campbell G P, Richardson A J, Stewart C S. Fermentation of barley straw by anaerobic rumen bacteria and fungi in axenic culture and in co-culture with methanogens [J].Letters in Applied Microbiology,1989,9(5):195-197
[8]Bonhomme A. Rumen ciliates: their metabolism and relationships with bacteria and their hosts[J]. Journal Animal Feed Science and Technology,1990,30(3-4):203-266
[9]Yang C J M, Varga G A. The effects of continuous ruminal dosing with dioctyl sodium sulphosuccinate on ruminal and metabolic characteristics of lactating Holstein cows [J]. British Journal of Nutrition,1993,69(2):397-408
[10]Dijkstra J, Tamminga S. Simulation of the effects if diet ion the contribution of rumen protozoa to degradation of fibre in the rumen [J]. British Journal of Nutrition,1995,74:617-634
[11]Jajima K, Aminov R I, Nagamine T, Ogata K, Nakamura M, Matsui H, Benno Y. Rumen bacterial diversity as determined by sequence analysis of 16S rDNA libraries [J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology,1999,29:159-169
[12]Fisher S G, Lerman LS. Length-independent separation of DNA restriction fragments in two-dimensional gel electrophoresis [J]. Cell,1979,16(1):191-200
[13]Muyzer G, Waal E C, Uitterlinden A G Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA [J]. Applied Environmental Microbiology,1993,59(3):695-700
[14]Muyzer G. DGGE/TGGE a method for identifying genes from natural ecosystems [J]. Current Opinion in Microbiology,1999,2:317-322
[15]Myers R M, Fischer S G, Lerman L S, Maniatis T. Nearly all single base substitutions in DNA fragments joined to a GC-clamp can be detected by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis [J]. Nucleic Acids Research,1985,13(9):3131-3145
[16]Sheffield V C, Cox D R, Myers R M. Attachment of a 40bp G+C rich sequence (GC clamp) to genomic DNA fragments by polymerase chain reaction results in improved detection of single-base changes [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science,1989,86(1):232-236
[17]Ercolini D. PCR-DGGE fingerprinting: novel strategies for detection of microbes in food [J]. Journal of Microbiological Methods,2004,56(2):297-314
[18]Norris T B, Wraith J M, Castenholz R W, McDermott T R. Soil microbial community structure across a thermal gradient following a geothermal heatint event [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2002,68(12):6300-6309
[19]Bano M, libaugh T. Phylogenetic composition of bacterioplankton assemblages from the Artie Ocean [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2002,68(2):505-518
[20]Crump B, Kling G W, Bahar M, Bahr M, Hobbie J E. Bacterioplankton community shifts in an arctic lake correlate with seasonal changes in organicmatter source [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2003,69(4):2253-2268
[21]Su Y, Yao W, Perez-Gutierrez, ON, Smidt H, Zhu W Y. Changes in abundance of Lactobacillus spp.and Streptococcus suis in the stomach, jejunum and ileum of piglets after weaning [J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology,2008,66(3):546-555
[22]Reeson A F, Jancovic T, Kasper M L, Roqers S, Austin A D. Application of 16S rDNA-DGGE to examine the microbial ecology associated with a social wasp Vespula germanica [J]. Insect Molecular Biology,2003,12(1):85-91
[23]Kochcrginskaya S A, Aminov R I, White B A. Analysis of the rumen bacterial diversity under two different diet conditions using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, random sequencing, and statistically ecology approaches[J]. Anaerobe,2001,7:119-134
[24]Mackie R I, Aminov R I, Hu W, Klieve A V, Ouwerkerk D Sundset M A, Kamagata Y. Ecology of uncultivated Oscilllospira species in the rumen of cattle, sheep, and reindeer as assessed by microscopy and molecula approaches[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2003,69(11): 6808-6815
[25]姚文,朱伟云,韩正康,Akkermans D L A, Williams B, Tamminga S应用变性梯度凝胶电泳和16S rDNA序列分析对山羊瘤胃细菌多样性的研究[J].中国农业科学,2004,37(9)：1374-1378
[26]McEwan N R, Abecia L, Regensbogenova M, Adam C L, Findlay P A, and Newbold C J. Rumen microbial population dynamics in response to photoperiod [J].Letters in Applied Micrkbiology, 2005,41(1):97-101
[27]石鹏君,柏映国,袁铁铮,姚斌,范云六.应用rpo B和16S rDNA基因的变性梯度凝胶电泳技术对山羊瘤胃细菌多样性的研究[J].微生物学报,2007,47(2)：285-289
[28]淡瑞芳,龙瑞军,张海涛,张欣,丁学智.藏系绵羊瘤胃细菌区系的季节动态分析[J].动物营养学报,2009,21(5)：798-802
[1]张龙翔、张庭芳、李令媛.生化实验方法与技术[M].北京：高等教育出版社,2001
[2]Gordon E A, Diane M B. Determination of reducing sugars with 3-methyl-2-benzothiazolinonehydrazone [J]. Analytical Biochemistry,2002,305:287-289
[3]Thomas M, Wood, K Mahalingeshwara Bhat. Methods in Enzymology [M]. Academic Press, Inc. 1988,160:87-112
[1]Ladisch M R, Lin K W, Voloch M, Ysao G T. Process considerations in the enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass[J]. Enzyme Microbial Technology,1983,5:82-100
[2]Cheng K J, Forsberg, C W, Minato H, Costerton J W. Microbial ecology and physiology of feed degradation within the rumen. In: physiological aspects of digestion and metabolism in Ruminants [M], Academic Press, Toronto.1991
[3]Osborne, J. M, Dehority, B A. Synergism in degradation and utilization of intact forage cellulose, hemicellulose, and pectin by three pure cultures of ruminal bacteria [J]. Applied and Environmental. Microbiology,1989,55(9):2247-2250
[4]Wubah D A, Akin D E, Borneman W S. Biology, fiber degradation, and Enzymology of anaerobic zoosporic fungi[J]. Critical Reviews in Microbiology,1993,19(2):99-115
[5]Trinci A P J, Davies D R, Gull K, Lawrence M I, Nielsen BB, Rickers A, Theodorou M K. Anaerobic fungi in herbivorous animals[J].Mycological Research,1994,98(2):129-152
[6]史开来,王秀坤,刘伟,陆文清,顾云强.pH值对植酸酶活的影响及其在猪、鸡消化道的分析[J]饲料研究,2000,7：110-113
[7]陆文清,李德发.评定饲料酶品质的5种指标[J].饲料研究,2005,3：10-13
[8]Thacker P A, Campbell G L, Groot Wassimk J.1992. The effect of organic acids and enzyme supplementation on the performance of pig fed barley based diets [J]. Canadian Journal of Animal Science,72:395-402
[91杨会涛,陈代文,余冰.pH对木聚糖酶活性的影响[J].饲料博览,2006,7：42-44
[10]林凤.纤维素酶的生物化学和分子生物学研究新进展[J].生命科学,1994,6(1)：18-23
[11]孟雷,陈冠军,王怡.纤维素酶的多样性[J].纤维素科学与技术,2002,10(2)：47-54
[12]冯定远.酶制剂在饲料工业中的应用[M].北京：中国农业科学技术出版社,2005
[1]Colombatto D, Mould F L, Bhat M K, Morgavi D P, Beauchemin K A, Owen E. Influence of fibrolytic enzymes on the hydrolysis and fermentation of pure cellulose and xylan mixed ruminal microorganisms in vitro[J]. Journal of Animal Science,2003,81(4):1040-1050
[2]吕秋凤,杨群辉,杨建成.非淀粉多糖复合酶制剂对断奶仔猪生长性能的影响[J].中国饲料,2010,1：31-32
[3]吕秋凤,杨群辉,杨建成,王振勇,张民.非淀粉多糖复合酶制剂对断奶仔猪养分表观消化率的影响[J].中国饲料,2010,8：34-35
[4]王修启,张兆敏,李春群,李祥,杨育才,刘亚力,苏纯阳.高比例小麦日粮添加不同水平木聚糖酶对猪生产性能的影响[J].动物营养学报,2002,14(1)：60
[5]徐骏,袁华根,高峰.小麦日粮中添加木聚糖酶对肉仔鸡生长性能影响[J].饲料研究,2007,4：70-72
[6]许梓荣,钱利纯,孙建义.高麦麸饲粮中添加β-葡聚糖酶、木聚糖酶和纤维素酶对肉鸡作用效果的研究[J].动物营养学报,2000,12(1)：61
[7]孙万岭,屠焰.酶制剂在玉米-豆粕-棉粕型肉仔鸡日粮中添加效应研究[J].中国饲料,1996,9：33-34
[1]王成章,王恬.饲料学[M].北京：中国农业出版社,2003
[2]Bedford M R, Partridge G G Enzymes in farm animal nutrition [M]. UK:CABI,2001
[3]Beauchemin K A, Colombatto D, Morgavi D P, Yang W Z. Use of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes to improve feed utilization by ruminants[J]. Journal of Animal Science,2003, 81(suppl.2):E37-E47
[4]McHAN F. Cellulase-treated coastal Bermudagrass silage and production of soluble carbohydrates, silage acids and digestibility [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1986,69(2):431-438
[5]Vanvuuren A M, Bergsma K, Frol-Framer F,Van Beers J A C. Effects of addition cell wall degrading enzyme on the chemical composition and the in sacco degradation of grass silage [J]. Grass and Forage Science,1989,44(2):223-230
[6]Shao Tao, Wang Tian, Shimojo M, Masuda Y. Effect of ensiling density on fermentation quality of Guingagrass (panicum maximum Jacq.) silage during the early stage of ensiling [J]. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Sciences,2005,18(9):1273-1278
[7]张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].北京：中国农业大学出版社,2004
[8]Weatherburn M W. Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia[J].Analytical Chemistry,1967,39(8):971-974
[9]Madrid J, Martine-Teruel A, Hemandez F, Megias M D. A comparative study on the determination of lactic acid in silage juice by colorimetric, high-performance liquid chromatography and enzymatic methods[J].Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1999,79(12):1722-1726
[10]林炎坤.常用的几种葸酮比色定糖法的比较和改进[J].植物生理学通讯,1989,15(4)：53-55
[11]秦为琳.应用气相色谱测定瘤胃挥发性脂肪酸方法的研究改进[J].南京农学院学报,1982,4：110-116
[12]Colombatto D, Mould F L, Bhat M K, Phipps R H, Owen E. In vitro Evaluation of fbrolytic enzymes as additives for maize (Zea mays L.) silage I. Effects of ensiling temperature, enzyme source and addition level[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,2004,111(1):111-128
[13]Colombatto D, Mould F L, Bhat M K,Phipps R H, Owen E. In vitro Evaluation of fibrolytic enzymes as additives for maize (Zea mays L.) silage II. Effects on rate of acidification, fibre degradation during ensiling and rumen fermentation [J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2004,111(1):129-143
[14]Selmer-Olsen, Henderson A R, Robertson S, McGinn R. Cell wall degrading enzymes for silage. 2. Aerobic stability of enzyme-treated laboratory silages[J].Grass and Forage Science,1993, 48(1):55-63
[15]Selmer-Olsen. Enzymes as silage additives for grass-clover mixtures[J].Grass and Forage Science,1994,49(3):305-315
[16]Jacobs J L, McAllan A B. Enzymes as silage additives.1.Silage quality, digestion, digestibility and performance in growing cattle[J].Grass and Forage Science,1991,46(1):63-73
[17]Zhu Yu, Nishino N, Kishida Y, Uchida S. Ensiling characteristic and ruminal degradation of Italian ryegrass and lucerne silages treated with cell wall-degrading enzymes[J].Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1999,79(14):1987-1992
[18]赵国琦,丁健,贾亚红,陈小连.纤维素酶对大黍青贮饲料品质的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2003,39(2)：9-11
[19]华金玲,张永根,王德福,门宇新.添加乳酸菌制剂对水稻秸青贮品质的影响[J].东北农业大学学报,2007,38(4)：473-477
[20]张新平,万里强,李向林,何峰.添加乳酸菌和纤维素酶对苜蓿青贮品质的影响(简报)[J].草业学报,2007,16(3)：139-143
[1]Cussen R F, Merry R J, Willams A P, Tweed JKS. The effect of additives on the ensilage of forage of differing perennial ryegrass and white clover content [J].Grass and Forage Science,1995,50(3):249-258
[2]Jacobs J L, McAllan A B. Enzymes as silage additives.1.silage quality, digestion, digestibility and performance in growing cattle [J].Grass and Forage Science,1991,46(1):63-73
[3]Haigh P M, Davies O D. Effect of formic acid with formalin or barley incorporation into grass silage on silage fermentation and the performance of dairy cows[J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research,1998,69(3):261-265
[4]Kennedy S J. Comparison of the fermentation quality and nutritive value of sulphuric and formic acid-treated silages fed to beef cattle [J]. Grass and Forage Science,1990,45(1):17-28
[5]Yu Yu, Thomas J W, Emery R S. Estimated nutritive value of treated forages for ruminants [J]. Journal of Animal Science,1975,41(6):1742-1751
[6]Sheperd A C, Kung L JR. Effects of an enzyme additive on composition of corn silage ensiled at various stages of maturity [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1996,79(10):1767-1773
[7]Selmer-Olsen I. Enzymes as silage additives for grass-clover mixtures [J].Grass and Forage Science,1994,49(3):305-315
[8]Van Vuuern A M, Bergsma K, Frol-Kramer F, Van Beers JAC. Effects of addition of cell wall degrading enzymes on the chemical composition and the in sacco degradation of grass silage [J]. Grass and Forage Science,1989,44(2):223-230
[9]陈三有,杨中艺,辛国荣.黑麦草—水稻草田轮作系统研究与应用[J].草原与草坪,2000,88(1)：32-34
[10]张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].北京：中国农业大学出版社,2004
[11]Van Soest P J, Robertrson J B, Lewis B A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1991,74(10):3583-3597
[12]Weatherburn M W. Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia [J].Analytical Chemistry,1967,39(8):971-974
[13]Madrid J, Martine-Teruel A, Hemandez F, Mehias M D.A comparative study on the determination of lactic acid in silage juice by colorimetric, high-performance liquid chromatography and enzymatic methods [J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1999,79(12):1722-1726
[14]林炎坤.常用的几种蒽酮比色定糖法的比较和改进[J].植物生理漟通讯,1989,15(4)：53-55
[15]秦为琳.应用气相色谱测定瘤胃挥发性脂肪酸方法的研究改进[J].南京农学院学报,1982,4：110-116
[16]Autrey K M, McCaskey T A, Little J A. Cellulose digestibility of fibrous materials treated with Tricboderma viride cellulase [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1975,58(1):67-71
[17]Henderson A J, McDonald P. The effect of cellulase preparations on the chemical changes during the ensilage of grass in laboratory silos [J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1977,28(6):486-490
[18]Yu Zhu, Naoki Nishino, Yoshiro Kishida, Senji Uchida. Ensiling characteristics and ruminal degradation of Italian ryegrass and luceme silages treated with cell wall-degrading enzymes[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1999,79(14):1987-1992
[19]McHan F. Celllulase-treated coastal bermudagrass silage and production of soluble carbohydrates, silage acids and digestibility[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1986,69(2):431-438
[20]Haigh P M, Chapple D G. The effect of formic acid, formic acid salt and formic acid with formalin on silage fermentation, digestibility and intake, and on liveweight change of young cattle [J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research,1997,69:267-271
[21]沈益新,杨志刚,刘信宝.凋萎和添加有机酸对多花黑麦青贮品质的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2004,20(2)：95-99
[22]师希雄,曹致中.甲酸对苜蓿渣青贮饲料营养价值的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2005,40(6)：773-776
[23]庄苏,颜瑞,丁立人,王晓亮,王恬.纤维素酶与木聚糖酶对象草青贮发酵品质的影响[J].南京农业大学学报,2009,32(4)：148-153
[24]王安,张淑芳,钟一民,刘朋军,石玉珍.纤维素复合酶作为青贮饲料添加剂研究[J].东北农业大学学报,1997,28(4)：358-365
[25]Xing L, Chen L J, Han L J. The effect of an inoculant and enzymes on fermentation and nutritive value of sorghum straw silages [J]. Bioresource Technology,2009,100(1):488-491
[26]Haigh P M, Mansbridge R J. The effect of formic acid with formalin on grass silage fermentation and the performance of dairy cows [J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research,1998,69(3):255-259
[27]Nagel S A, Broderick G L. Effect of formic acid or formaldehyde of alfalfa silage on nutrient utilization by dairy cows [J].Journal of Diary Science,1992,75(1):140-154
[1]刁其玉.酶制剂在反刍动物日粮中应用研究进展[J].饲料与畜牧,2010,3：15-17
[2]Beauchemin K A, Rode L M, Sewalt V J H. Fibrolytic enzymes increase fiber digestibility and growth rate of steers fed dry forages [J]. Canada of Journal Animal Science,1995,5:641-644
[3]Kung L, Jr, Treacher R J, Nauman G A, Smagala A M, Endres K M, Cohen M A. The effect of treating forages with fibrolytic enzymes on its nutritive value and lactation performance of dairy cows[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2000,83(1):115-122
[4]Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A, Rode L M. Effects of an enzyme feed additive on extent of digestion and milk production of lactating dairy cows [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1999,82(2):391-403
[5]Morgavi D P, Beauchemin K A, Nsereko V L, Rode L M, Iwaasa A D, Yang W Z, McAllister T A, Wang Y. Synergy between ruminal fibrolytic enzymes and enzymes from Trichoderma longibrachiatum[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2000a,83(6):1310-1321
[6]Hristov A N, McAllister T A, Chen K-J. Stability of exogenous polysaccharide -degrading enzymes in the rumen [J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,1998,76:161-168
[7]Russel JB, Martin S A. Effects of various methane inhibitors on the fermentation of amino acids by mixed rumen microorganisms in vitro [J].Journal of Animal Science,1984,59:1329-1338
[8]Wood T M, Bhat M K. Methods for measuring cellulase activities[M]. Methods in Enzymology. W.A. Wood and S. T. Kellogg, ed. Academic Press Inc., London, UK,1988
[9]秦为琳.应用气相色谱测定瘤胃液挥发性脂肪方法的研究改进[J].南京农学院学报,]982,4：110-116
[10]张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].中国农业大学出版社,2003
[11]Hatfield R D. Cell wall polysaccharide interactions and degradability [M]. Forage Cell Wall Structure and igestibility. H. G Jung, D. R. Buxton, R. D. Hatfield, and J.Ralph, ed. ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, WI.1993
[12]Fontes C M, Hall J G A, Hirst B H, Hazelwood G P, Gilbert H J. The resistance of cellulases and xylanases to proteolytic inactivation[J].Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,1995, 43(1):52-57
[13]Hirstov A, McAllister T A, Cheng K J. Effect of dietary or abomasal supplementation of exogenous polysaccharide-degrading enzymes on rumen fermentation and nutrient digestibility [J].Journal of Animal Science,1998,76(12):3146-3156
[14]Morgavia D P, Newbold C J, Beever D E, Wallace R J. Stability and stabilization of potential feed additive enzymes in rumen fluid [J]. Enzyme and Microbial Technology,2000,26(2-4):71-177
[15]Morgavi D P, Beauchemin K A, Nsserko V L, Rode L M, McAllister T A, Iwaasa A D, Wang Y, Yang W Z.Resistance of feed enzymes to proteolytic inactivation by rumen microorganisms and gastrointestinal enzymes [J]Journal of Animal Science,2001,79(6):1621-1630
[16]Williams A G, Withers S E, Strachan N H. Postprandial variations in the activity of polysaccharide-degrading enzymes in microbial populations from the digesta solids and liquor fractions of rumen contents [J] Journal of Applied Bacteriology,1989,66(1):15-26
[17]Weimer P J, Waghorn G C, Odt C L, Mertens D R. Effect of diet on populations of three species of ruminal cellulolytic bacteria in lactating dairy cows [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1999,82(1): 122-134
[18]Colombatto D, Mould F L, Bhat M K, Morgavi D P, Beauchemin K A, Owen E. Influence of fibrolytic enzymes on the hydrolysis and fermentation of pure cellulose and xylan mixed ruminal microorganisms in vitro [J].Journal of Animal Science,2003,81(4):1040-1050
[19]Nserko V L, Beauchemin K A, Morgavi D P, Rode L M, Furtado A F, McAllister T A, Iwaasa AD, Yang W Z, Wang Y. Effect of a fibrolytic enzyme preparation from Trichoderma longibrachiatum on the rumen microbial population of dairy cows[J].Canadian Journal of Microbiology,2002,48(1):14-20
[20]Eun J-S, Beauchemin K A. Effects of a proteolytic feed enzyme on intake, digestion, ruminal fermentation, and milk production [J].Journal of Dairy Science,2005,88(6):2140-2153
[21]Lewis G E, Hunt C W, Sanchez W K, Treacher R J, Pritchard G T, Feng P.Effect of direct-fed fibrolytic enzymes on the digestive characteristics of a forage-based diet fed to beef steers[J]. Journal of Animal Science,1996,74(12):3020-3028
[22]Hristov A N, McAllister T A, Cheng K-J.Intraruminal supplementation with increasing levels of exogenous polysaccharide-degrading enzymes:Effects on nutrient digestion in cattle fed a barley grain diet [J].Journal of Animal Science,2000,78:477-487
[23]Giraldo L A, Tejido M L, Ranilla M J, Ramos S, Carro M D. Influence if direct-fed fibrolytic enzymes on diet digestibility and ruminal activity in sheep fed a grass hay-based diet[J].Journal of Animal Science,2008,86(7):1617-1623
[24]Krzysztof B, Magdalena L-R. Effect of adding fibrolytic enzymes to dairy cow rations on digestive activity in the rumen [J].Annals of Animal Science,2010,10(2):127-137
[25]Giraldo L A, Tejido M L, Ranilla M J, Carro M D. Effects of exogenous cellulase supplementation on microbial growth and ruminal fermentation of a high-forage diet in Rusitec fermenters[J]. Journal of Animal Science,2007,85:1962-1970
[26]Pinos-Rodriguez J M, Gonzalez S S, Mendoza G D, Barcena R, Cobos M A,Hemandez A, Ortega M E. Effect of exogenous fibrolytic enzyme on ruminal fermentation and digestibility of alfalfa and rye-grass hay fed to lambs[J].Journal of Animal Science,2002,80(11):3016-3020
[27]Beauchemin K. A, Colombatto D, Morgavi D P, Yang W Z. Use of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes to improve feed utilization by ruminants [J].Journal of Animal Science,2003,81 (E.suppl.2):E37-E47
[28]Wang Y, McAllister T A, Rode L M, Beauchemin K A, Morgavi D P, Nsereko V L, Iwaasa A D, Yang W. Effects of an exogenous enzyme preparation on microbial protein synthesis, enzyme activity and attachment to feed in the Rumen Simulation Technique (Rusitec)[J].British Journal of Nutrition,2001,85:325-332
[29]Wallace R J, Wallace S J A, McKain N, Nsereko V L, Hartnell G F. Influence of supplementary fibrolytic enzymes on the fermentation of corn and grass silages by mixed ruminal micrioorganisms in vitro[J].Journal of Animal Science,2001,79(7):1905-1916
[30]Tang S X, Yayo G O, Tam Z L, Sun Z H, Shen L X,Zhou C S, Xiao W J, Ren G P, Han X F, Shen S B. Effects of yeast culture and fibrolytic enzyme supplementation on in vitro fermentation characteristic of low-quality cereal straws[J]. Journal of Animal Science,2008,86(5):1164-1172
[1]Tajima K, Aminov R I, Nagamine T, Ogata K, Nakamura M, Matsui H, Benno Y. Rumen bacterial diversity as determined by sequence analysis of 16S rDNA libraries[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology,1999,29(2):159-169
[2]Tajima K, Arai S, Ogata K, Nagamine T, Matsui H, Nakamura M, Aminov R I, Benno Y. Rumen bacterial community transition during adaptation to high-grain diet[J]. Anaerobe,2000,6(5): 273-284
[3]Ramsak A, Peterka M, Tajima K, Martin J, Wood J, Johnston M, Aminov R, Avgustin G. Unravelling the genetic diversity of ruminal bacteria belonging to the CFB phylum[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology,2000,33(1):69-79
[4]Whitford M F, Forster R J, Beard C E, Gong J, Teather R M. Phylogenetic Analysis of Rumen Bacteria by Comparative Sequence Analysis of Cloned 16S rRNA Genes[J].Anaerobe,1998, 4(3):153-163.
[5]Muyzer G. DGGE/TGGE a method for identifying genes from natural ecosystems [J]. Current Opinion in Microbiology,1999,2(3):317-322
[6]Muyzer G, Smalla K. Application of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TGGE) in microbial ecology [J].Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek,1998,73(1):127-141
[7]Muyzer G, de Waal E C, Uitterlinden A G. Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,1993,59(3):695-700
[8]Kocherginskaya S A, Aminov R I., White B A. Analysis of the rumen bacterial diversity under two different diet conditions using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, random sequencing, and statistical ecology approaches [J]. Anaerobe,2001,7(3):119-134
[9]Mackie R I, Aminov R I, Hu W, Klieve A V, Ouwerkerk D Sundset M A, Kamagata Y. Ecology of uncultivated Oscilllospira species in the rumen of cattle, sheep, and reindeer as assessed by microscopy and molecular approaches [J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2003, 69(11):6008-6815
[10]McEwan N R, Abecia L, Regensbogenova M, Adam C, Findlay P, Newbold C J. Rumen microbial population dynamics in response to photoperiod[J]. Letters in Applied Microbiology,2005,41(1): 97-101
[11]石鹏君.山羊瘤胃和草鱼肠道微生物分子生态研究及β-葡萄糖苷酶基因的克隆[D].中国农业科学院,2007
[12]Konstantinov S R, Zhu W Y, Williams B A, Tamminga S, Vos W M, Akkermans A D L. Effect of fermentable carbohydrates on piglet faecal bacterial communities as revealed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of 16S ribosomal DNA[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2003,43(2):225-235
[13]Augenlicht L H, Mariadason J M, Wilson A, Arango D, Yang W C, Heerdt B G, Velcich A. Short chain fatty acids and colon cancer[J]. The Journal of Nutrition,2002,132(12):3804S-3808S
[14]Segain J, De La Bletiere D R, Bourreille A, Leray V, Gervois N, Rosales C, Ferrier L, Bonnet C, Blottiere H, Galmiche J. Butyrate inhibits inflammatory responses through NFkB inhibition: implications for Crohn's disease[J]. Gut,2000,47(3):397-403
[15]于卓腾,杭苏琴,姚文,朱伟云.肠道产丁酸细菌及其丁酸产生机制的研究进展[J].世界华人消化杂志,2006,14(25)：2531-2534
[16]Nisbet D, Martin S. Effect of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on lactate utilization by the ruminal bacterium Selenomonas ruminantium [J]. Journal of Animal Science,1991,69(11): 4628-4633
[17]Krause D, Russell J. How many ruminal bacteria are there? [J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 1996,79(8):1467-1475
[18]Patterson J A, Hespell R B. Glutamine synthetase activity in the ruminal bacterium Succinivibrio dextrinosolvens [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,1985,50(4):1014-1020
[2]刘长忠,张毅,王自良,崔建勋,谢晓琳.NSP酶制剂对雏鹅消化酶活性和盲肠微生物数量的影响[J].湖北农业科学,2009,48(7)：1700-1703
[3]Sheppy C. The current feed enzyme market and likely trends. In: Bedford M R, Partridge G G Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition[M]. New York:CABI Publishing,2001,3-5
[4]高峰,周光宏,韩正康.小麦基础日粮联合添加酶制剂对肉仔鸡生产性能和血液某些指标的影响[J].南京农业大学学报,2000,23(4)：71-75
[5]韩正康.大麦日粮添加酶制剂家禽营养生理及改善生产性能的研究[J].畜牧与兽医,2000,32(1)：1-4
[6]凌宝明,冯定远,左建军.饲用蛋白酶的研究进展[J].饲料工业,2009,30(22)：7-10
[7]卢晨,边边全,刘显军,陈静,李建涛,张飞.中性和酸性蛋白酶对断奶仔猪生长性能的影响[J].动物营养学报,2009,21(6)：993-997
[8]王海燕,李富伟,高秀华.脂肪酶的研究进展及其在饲料中的应用[J].饲料工业,2007,28(6)：14-17
[9]杨新文,杨毅,冷向军,吴江.脂肪酶对南方鲇生长性能、消化酶活性及血液生化指标的影响[J].淡水渔业,2010,40(3)：23-27
[10]李富伟,汪勇,汤海鸥.淀粉酶和糖化酶体外降解玉米淀粉的机理探讨[J].中国饲料,2009,16：15-22
[11]刘小英.支链淀粉酶对生长增重的影响[J].饲料广角,2009,2：34-35
[12]冯定远.酶制剂在饲料工业中的应用[M].北京：中国农业科学技术出版社,2005
[13]Volfova O, Dovrakova J, Hanzlikova A, Jandera A. Phytase from Aspergillum niger[J].Folia Microbiology,1994,39:481-484
[14]Pasamontes L, Haiker M, Wys M, Tessier M, Van Loon A P G M. Gene cloning, purification and characterization of a heat-stable phytase from fungus Aspergillum fumigatus [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,1997,63(5):1696-1700
[15]Wood T M, Bhat K M. Methods for measuring cellulase activities [M]. In: Wood W A and Kellogg, S.T. Mrthods in Enzymology, Vol.160. Academic Press, London,1988,87-112
[16]Coughlan M P, Hazlewood G P. β-1,4-D-xylan-degrading enzyme systems:Biochemistry, molecular biology and applications [J].Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry,1993a,17:259-289
[17]Elisabetta Sabini, Keith S, Wilson. Digestion of single crystals of mannan by an endo-mannanase from Trichioderna reesri[J].European Journal of Biochemistry,2000,267:2340-2344
[18]Jackson M E, Fodge D W, Hsiao H Y. Effect of (3-mamnnanase in corn-soybean meal diets on laying hen performance [J]. Journal of Poultry Science,1999,78:1737-1741
[19]王成章,王恬.饲料学[M].北京：中国农业出版社,2003
[20]冯定远,张莹,余石英,付畅国,蒲英远,颜惜玲.含有木聚糖酶与p-葡聚糖酶的酶制剂对猪日粮消化性能影响[J].畜禽业,2000,2：44-45
[21]王前光,刘秋,高惠林,贺建华.不同酶制剂在生长猪小麦日粮中应用效果的研究[J].中国畜牧兽医,2009,36(10)：16-21
[22]李根来,王潇,林明新,陆志峰,姚文.玉米脱水酒精糟及其可溶物和复合酶制剂对生长育肥猪生产性能和氮、磷消化率的影响[J].动物营养学报,2010,22(3)：750-756
[23]Lindemann M D, Cho J H,Cromwell G L. Energy is relrased in swine diets containing corn distillers dried grain with solubles (DDGS) with phytase and xylanase [C]. Inaugural ASAS-CAAV Asian Pacific Rim conference, Beijing, P.R China,2009:40
[24]许梓荣,王振来,王敏奇.高麦麸饲粮中添加酶类物质对仔猪生长性能和胴体组成的影响[J].浙江农业大学学报,1998,24(6)：643-646
[25]汪儆,Juokslahti T.木聚糖酶制剂对生长肥育猪次粉日粮饲养效果的影响[J].中国饲料,1997,3：17-19
[26]王修启,郑海刚,安汝义,李桂甫,李春群,迟清臣.小麦型日粮添加复合酶对猪生产性能的影响[J].中国饲料,2000,21：12-13
[27]程伟,刘太宇,王彩玲.小麦型日粮添加木聚糖酶对生长肥育猪生产性能的影响[J].河南农业科学,1998,11：40-41
[28]吴道义,夏先林.添加复合酶制剂对育肥猪日粮消化率的影响[J].饲料博览,2009,10：21-23
[29]黄金秀,陈代文,张无英.木聚糖酶对不同木聚糖含量的仔猪饲粮养分消化率的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2008,44(7)：21-24
[30]张民,吕秋凤,周莉芬,李新良.不同类型的复合酶制剂对仔猪生长性能和饲料养分利用率的影响[J].饲料工业,2010,31(4)：12-15
[31]吕秋凤,杨群辉,杨建成,王振勇,张民.非淀粉多糖复合酶制剂对断奶仔猪养分表观消化率的影响[J].中国饲料,2010,8：34-35
[32]曾福海,詹志春,乔永,刘金银.非淀粉多糖复合酶在断奶仔猪日粮中应用效果的研究[J].中国饲料,2009,24：26-27
[33]Kwon O S, Kim I H, Lee S H, Hong J W, Kim J H, Moon T H. Effect of dietary α-1,6-galactosidase and β-1,4-mannanase on growth performance and nutrient digestibility in nursery and growing pigs[J]. Journal of Animal Science and Technology,2003,45(2):211-218
[34]Pettey L A, Carter S D, Senne B W, Shriver J A. Effects of β-mannanase addition to corn-soybean meal diets on growth performance, carcass traits and nutrient digestibility of weanling and growing-finishing pigs[J]. Journal of Animal Science,2002,80(4):1012-1019
[35]Oohida I, Perez J F, Gasa J, Puchal F. Enzymes (beta-glucanase and arabinoxylanase and)/or sepiolite supplementation and the nutritive value of maize-barley-wheat bases diets for broiler chickens [J]. British Poultry Science,2000,41(5):617-624
[36]Danicke S, Vanjen W, Simon O, Jeroch H. Effects of dietary fat type and xylanase supplementation to rye-based broiler diets on selected bacterial groups adhering to the intestinal epithelium, on transit time of feed, and on nutrient digestibility [J]. Journal of Poultry Science,1999,78:1292-1299
[37]许梓荣,钱利纯,孙建义,王敏奇.高麦麸饲粮中添加β-葡聚糖酶、木聚糖酶和纤维素酶对肉鸡生长和消化的影响[J].浙江农业学报,1999,11(2)：80-84
[38]王修启,李春喜,林东康,常娟,秦磊.小麦中的戊聚糖含量及添加木聚糖复酶对鸡表观代谢能值和养分消化率的影响[J].动物营养学报,2002,14(3)：57-59
[39]王修启,陈杰,林东康,秦磊,常娟.皖麦38添加木聚糖酶对鸡表观代谢能值和氨基酸表观消化率的影响[J].华北农学报,2003,18(1)：116-118
[40]王修启,聂国兴,李春喜,邢宝忠.小麦基础日粮添加木聚糖蛋鸡生产性能的影响[J].粮食与饲料,2004,1：35-36
[41]王修启,邢宝忠,张兆敏.小麦基础日粮添加木聚糖酶对肉鸡生产性能的影响[J].河南农业科学,2004,1：47-49
[42]杨久仙,张金柱,郭保海,王书和,计成,马秋刚.复合酶制剂对蛋用种鸡产蛋、繁殖性能及消化率影响的研究[J].中国畜牧兽医,2009,36(3)：32-36
[43]杨久仙,马秋刚,关舒,郭宝海,彭晓培,计成.饲用复合酶对蛋用种鸡日粮磷的利用和生产性能的影响[J].动物营养学报,2006,18(3)：186-191
[44]吕秋凤,宁志利,王振勇,张民,管秀界,曹敏建.不同来源木聚糖酶及其组合对肉鸡生长性能和养分代谢率的影响[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2010,41(3)：350-353
[45]高峰,周光宏,韩正康.小麦米糠日粮添加粗酶制剂和寡果糖对雏鸡生产性能、免疫和内分泌的影响[J].畜牧兽医学报,2002,33(1)：14-17
[46]高峰,江芸,周光宏,韩正康.小麦日粮添加非淀粉多糖酶制剂对雏鸡生长及血液中血糖、尿酸和某些激素水平的影响[J].华中学业大学学报,2004,23(2)：230-235
[47]李尚坤,计成,刘永刚,马秋刚.复合酶制剂对肉种鸡生产性能和繁殖性能的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2007,43(3)：19-22
[48]廖细古,冯定远,于旭华,汝应俊.木聚糖酶对生长肉鸭生产性能影响的研究[J].饲料工业,2006,27(18)：4445
[49]Mathlouthi N, Mohamed M A, Larbier M. Effect of enzyme preparation containg xylanase and beta-glucanase on pergormance of laying hens fed wheat/barley-or maize/soybean meal-based diets[J]. British Poultry Science,2003,44(1):60-66
[50]Burroughs W, Woods W, Ewing S A, Greig J, Theurer B. Enzyme additions to fattening cattle rations[J]. Journal of Animal Science,1960,19(2):458-464
[51]Rovice J J, Ely C M. Response of beef cattle to enzyme supplement [J].Journal of Animal Science,1962,21:1012
[52]Rust J W, Jacobsen N L, McGilliard A D, Hotchkiss D K. Supplementation of dairy calf diets with enzymes. Ⅱ. Effect on nutrient utilization and on composition of rumen fluid [J]. Journal of Animal Science,1965,24:156-160
[53]Hristove A N, McAllister T A, Cheng K-J. Stability of exogenous polysaccharide-degrading enzyme in the rumen[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,1998a,76:161-168
[54]Hristov AN, Tim A, McAllister T A, Cheng K-J. Effect of dietary or abomasal supplementation of exogenous polysaccharide-degrading enzymes on rumen fermentation and nutrient digestibility [J]. Journal of Animal Science,1998b,76(12):3146-3156
[55]Beauchemin K A, Rode L M, Sewalt V J H. Fibrolytic enzymes increase fiber digestibility and growth rate of steers fed dry forages [J]. Canadian Journal of animal science,1995,75:641-644
[56]Feng P, Hunt C W, Pritchard G T, Julien W E. Effect of enzyme preparations on in situ and in vitro degradation and in vivo digestive characteristics of mature cool-season grass forage in beef steers [J]. Journal of Animal Science,1996,74:1349-1357
[57]Lewis GE, Hunt C W, Sanchez W K, Treacher R J, Pritchard G T, Feng P. Effect of direct-fed fibrolytic enzymes on the digestive characteristics of a forage-based diet fed to beef steers[J]. Journal of Animal Science,1996,74:3020-3028
[58]Wang Y, Spratling B M, ZoBell D R, Wiedmeier R D, McAllister T. Effect of alkali pretreatment of wheat straw on the efficacy of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes[J]. Journal of Animal Science,2004, 82:198-208
[59]Tang A X, Yayo G O, Yan Z L, Sun Z H, Shen L X, Zhou C S, Xiao W J, Ren G P, Han X F, Shen S B. Effects of yeast culture and fibrolytic enzyme supplementation on in vitro fermentation characteristics of low-quality cereal straws [J].Journal of Animal Science,2008,86:1164:1172
[60]Kung L J, Treacher R J, Nauman G A, Smagala A M, Endres K M, Cohen M A. The effect of treating forages with fibrolytic enzymes on its nutritive value and lactation performance of dairy cows [J].Journal of Dairy Science,2000,83(1):115-122
[61]Lewis G E, Sanchez W K, Hunt C W, Guy M A, Pritchard G T, Swanson B I, Treacher R J. Effect of direct-fed fibrolytic enzymes on the lactational performance of dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1999,82(3):611-617
[62]Rode L M, Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A. Fibrolytic enzyme supplements for dairy cows in early lactation [J] Journal of Dairy Science,1999,82(10):2121-2126
[63]Beauchemin K A, Yang W Z, Rode L M. Effects of grain source and enzyme additive on site and extent of nutrient digestion in dairy cows [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1999,82(2):378-390
[64]Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A, Rode L M. A Comparison of methods of adding fibrolytic enzymes to lactating cow diets [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2000,83(11):2512-2520
[65]Beauchemin K A, Rode L M, Maekawa M, Morgavi D P, Kampen R. Evaluation of a nonstarch polysaccharidase feed enzyme in dairy cow diets [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2000,83(3):543-553
[66]Jacobs J L, McAllan A B. Enzymes as silage additives.1. Silage quality, digestion, digestibility and performance in growing cattle [J].Grass and Forage Science,1991,46(1):63-73
[67]Stokes M R. Effects of an enzyme mixture, an inoculant and their interaction on silage fermentation and dairy production[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1992,75(3):764-773
[68]马慧,苗树君,刘君.纤维素酶对玉米秸青贮营养成分及其奶牛毅力降解率的影响[J].草食家畜,2006,133(4)：4346
[69]李静,高兰阳,沈益新.乳酸菌和纤维素酶对稻草青贮品质的影响[J].南京农业大学学报,2008,31(4)：86-90
[70]薛艳林,玉柱,白春生,孙杰,单战,孙娟娟.添加纤维素酶和苹果渣对苜蓿草渣青贮品质的影响[J].中国草地学报,2009,31(3)：88-91
[71]Nsereko V L, Morgavi D P, Rode L M, Beauchemin K A, McAllister T A. Effects of fungal enzyme preparations on hydrolysis and subsequent degradation of alfalfa hay fiber by mixed rumen microorganisms in vitro[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,2000,88(3):153-170
[72]Wang Y, McAllister T A, Rode L M, Beauchemin K A, Morgavi D P, Nsereko V L, Iwaasa A D, Yang W. Effect of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes on epiphytic microbial populations and in vitro silage digestion [J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2002,82(7):760-768
[73]Kopency J, Marounek M, Holub K. Testing the suitability of the addition of Trichoderma viride cellulases to feed rations for ruminants [J].Zivocisna vyroba,1987,32:587-592
[74]Hristov A N, McAllister T A, Cheng K-J. Intraruminal supplementation with increasing levels of exogenous polysaccharide-degrading enzymes: Effects on nutrient digestion in cattle fed a barley grain diet [J].Journal of Animal Science,2000,78:477-487
[75]Morgavi D P, Beauchemin K A, Nsereko V L, Rode L M, McAllister T A, Iwaasa A D, Wang Y and Yang W Z. Resistance of feed enzymes to proteolytic inactivation by rumen microorganisms and gastrointestinal proteases [J].Journal of Animal Science,2001,79:1621-1630
[76]Giraldo L A, Tejido M L, Ranilla M J, Ramos S, Carro M D. Influence if direct-fed fibrolytic enzymes on diet digestibility and ruminal activity in sheep fed a grass hay-based diet [J]. Journal of Animal Science,2008,86:1617-1623
[77]Kung L, Jr, Cohen M A, Rode L M, Treacher R J. The effect of fibrolytic enzymes sprayed onto forage and fed in a total mixed ratio to lactation dairy cows [J].Journal of Dairy Science,2002,85(9):2396-2402
[78]Reddlsh M A, Kung Jr L. The effect of feeding a dry enzyme mixture with fibrolytic activity on the performance of lactation cows and digestibility of a diet for sheep [J].Journal of Dairy Science,2007,90(10):4724-4729
[79]Eun J S, Beauchemin K A. Enhancing in vitro degradation of Alfalfa hay and corn silage using feed enzymes [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2007,90(6):2839-2851
[80]Eun J S, Beauchemin K A, Schulzet H. Use of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes to enchance in vitro fermentation of Alfalfa hay and corn silage [J].Journal of Dairy Science,2007,90(3):1440-1451
[81]Nsereko V L, Morgavi D P, Rode L M, Beauchemin K A, McAllister T A. Effects of fungal enzyme preparations on hydrolysis and subsequent degradation of alfalfa hay fiber by mixed rumen microorganisms in vitro[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,2000,88(3-4):153-170
[82]Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A, Vedres D D. Effects of pH and fibrolytic enzymes on digestibility, bacterial protein synthesis, and fermentation in continuous culture[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2002,102:137-150
[83]Eun J-S, Beauchemin K A, Hong S H, Bauer M W. Exogenous enzymes added to untreated or ammoniated rice straw: Effects on in vitro fermentation characteristics and degradability [J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2006,131:86-101
[84]Eun J-S, Beauchemin K A. Assessment of the efficacy of varying experimental exogenous fibrolytic nzymes using in vitro fermentation characteristics [J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,2007,132:298-315
[85]Wallace R J, Wallace S J A, McKain N, Nsereko V L, Hartnell G F. Influence of supplementary fibrolytic enzymes on the fermentation of com and grass silages by mixed ruminal micrioorganisms in vitro[J]. Journal of Animal Science,2001,79(7):1905-1916
[86]Colombatto D, Hervas G, Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A. Effects of enzyme supplementation of a total mixed ration on microbial fermentation in continuous culture, maintained at high and low pH [J]. Journal of Animal Science,2003,81(10):2617-2627
[87]Go'mez-Va'zquez A, Pe'rez J, Mendoza G D, Aranda E, Herna'ndez A. Fibrolytic exogenous enzymes improve performance in steers fed sugar cane and stargrass [J].Livestock Production Science,2003,82:249-254
[88]Eun J-S, Beauchemin K A. Effects of a proteolytic feed enzyme on intake, digestion, ruminal fermentation, and milk production [J] Journal of Dairy Science,2005,88(6):2140-2153
[89]Wang Y, McAllister T A, Rode L M, Beauchemin K A, Morgavi D P, Nsereko V L, Iwaasa A D, Yang W. Effects of an exogenous enzyme preparation on microbial protein synthesis, enzyme activity and attachment to feed in the Rumen Simulation Technique (Rusitec) [J]. British Journal of Nutrition,2001,85(3):325-332
[90]Nsereko V L, Beauchemin K A, Morgavi D P, Rode L M, Furtado A F, McAllister T A, Iwaasa A D,. Yang W Z, Wang Y. Effect of a fibrolytic enzyme preparation from Trichoderma longibrachiatum on the rumen microbial population of dairy cows [J].Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 2002,48(1):14-20
[91]Morgavi D P, Beauchemin K A, Nsereko V L, Rode L M, Iwaasa A D, Yang W Z, McAllister T A, Wang Y. Synergy between ruminal fibrolytic enzymes and enzymes from Trichoderma Longibrachiatum [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2000,82(6):1310-1321
[92]Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A, Rode L M. Effects of an enzyme feed additive on extent of digestion and milk production of lactating dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1999,82(2):391-403
[93]Beauchemin K A, Rode L M, Maekawa M, Morgavi D P, Kampen R. Evaluation of a nonstarch polysaccharidase feed enzyme in dairy cow diets [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2000,83(3):543-553
[94]Bowman G R, Beauchemin K A, Shelford J A. The proportion of the diet to which fibrolytic enzymes are added affects nutrient digestion by lactating dairy cows [J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2002,85(12):3420-3429
[95]Knowlton K F, McKinney J M, Cobb C. Effect of a direct-fed fibrolytic enzyme formulation on nutrient intake, partitioning, and excretion in early and late lactation Holstein cows [J]. Journal of Ddairy Science,2002,85(12):3328-3335
[96]Schingoethe D J, Stegeman G A, Treacher R J. Response of lactating dairy cows to a cellulase and xylanase enzyme mixture applied to forages at the time of feeding[J] Journal of Dairy Science, 1999,82(5):996-1003
[97]Dhiman T R, Zaman M S, Gimenez R R, Walters J L, Treacher R. Performance of dairy cows fed forage treated with fibrolytic enzymes prior to feeding [J].Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2002,101:115-125
[98]Kiinggerman C M, Hu W, McDomell E E, DerBedrosian M C, Kung L. An evaluation of exogenous enzymes with amylolytic activity for dairy cows [J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2009,92(3):1050-1059
[99]李新胜,张春喜,孙哲,汗儆.加酶高粱青贮对奶牛产奶量的影响[J].中国奶牛,2001,1：26-27
[100]Sutton J D, Phipps R H, Beever D E, Humphries D J, Hartnell G F, Vicini J L, Hard D L. Effect of method of application of a fibrolytic enzyme product on digestive processes and milk production in Holstein-Friesian cows [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2003,86(2):546-556
[101]McAllister T A, Oosting S J, Popp J D, Mir Z, Yanke L J, Hristov A N, Treacher R J, Cheng K-J. Effect of exogenous enzymes on digestibility of barley silage and growth performance of feedlot cattle [J]. Canadian Journal of Animal Science,1999,79:353-360
[102]Beauchemin K A, Jones S. D M, Rode L M, Sewalt V J H. Effects of fibrolytic enzyme in corn or barley diets on performance and carcass characteristics of feedlot cattle [J].Canadian Journal of Animal Science,1997,7:645-653
[103]ZoBell D R, Wiedmeier R D, Olson K O, Treacher R. The effect of an exogenous enzyme treatment on production and carcass characteristics of growing and finishing steers[J] Joumal Animal Feed Science and Technology,2000,87(3):279-285
[104]Krause M, Beauchemin K A, Role L M, Farr B I, Norgaard P. Fibrolytic enzyme treatment of barley grain and source of forage in high-diets fed to growing cattle [J]. Journal of Animal Science,1998,76:2912-2920
[105]Bedford M R, Partridge G G Enzymes in farm animal nutrition [M].UK:CABIPublishing,2001
[106]Bathgate M J. The determination of endo-glucanase activity in malt [J]. Journal of the Institute of Brewing,1979,85:92-94
[107]张龙翔,张庭芳,李令媛.生化实验方法与技术[M].北京：高等教育出版社,2001
[108]Thomas M, Wood K, Mahalingeshwara Bhat. Methods in Emzymology [M]. Methods for measuring cellulase activities,1988
[109]Walsh G A, Murphy R A, Killeen G F, Headon D R, Power F P. Detection and quantification of supplemental fugal p-glucanase activity in animal feed[J]. Journal of Animal Science,1995, 73:1074-1076
[110]Rotter B A, Marquardt R R, Guenter W, Grow G H. Evaluation of three enzymic methods as predictors of in vivo response to enzymes supplementation of barley-based diets when fed to young chicks[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1990,50:19-27
[111]Robinson D. The fluorimetric determination of (3-glucosidase: its occurrence in the tissues of animals, including insects[J].Biochemistry Journal,1956,63:39-42
[112]冯定远,左建军.饲料酶制剂及其应用效果的评价体系[J].饲料与畜牧,2010,7：53-58
[113]刁其玉.酶制剂在反刍动物日粮中应用研究进展[J].饲料与畜牧,2010,3：15-17
[114]唐茂妍,王海彦,计成.最佳酶制剂应用体系(OEA)理论与实践[J].饲料与畜牧,2010：3：33-38
[115]郑祥建,韩正康.β-葡萄糖酶活力及稳定性研究[J].中国饲料,1998,1：15-17
[1]Cheng K J, Forsberg C W, Minato H, Costerton J W. Microbial ecology and physiology of feed degradation within the rumen. In: Physiological Aspects of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants (Tsuda T, SasakiY, and Kawashima R, eds.) [M]. Academic Press, Toronto,1991
[2]冯仰廉.反刍动物营养学[M].北京：科学出版社,2004
[3]Osbome J M, Dehority B A. Synergism in degradation and utilization of intact forage cellulose, hemicellulose, and pectin by three pure cultures of ruminal bacteria [J]. Applied Environmental Microbiology,1989,55(9):2247-2250
[4]Wubah D A, Akin D E, Borneman W S. Biology, fiber degradation, and Enzymology of anaerobic zoosporic fungi[J].Critical Reviews in Microbiology,1993,19(2):99-115
[5]Trinci A P J, Davies D R, Gull K, Lawrence M L, Nielsen B B,Rickers A, Theoderon M K.Anaerobic fungi in herbivorous animals [J].Mycological Research,1994.98(2):129-152
[6]Akin D E. Histological and physical factors affecting digestibility of forages [J]. Agronomy Journal, 1989,81(1):17-25
[7]Joblin K N, Campbell G P, Richardson A J, Stewart C S. Fermentation of barley straw by anaerobic rumen bacteria and fungi in axenic culture and in co-culture with methanogens [J].Letters in Applied Microbiology,1989,9(5):195-197
[8]Bonhomme A. Rumen ciliates: their metabolism and relationships with bacteria and their hosts[J]. Journal Animal Feed Science and Technology,1990,30(3-4):203-266
[9]Yang C J M, Varga G A. The effects of continuous ruminal dosing with dioctyl sodium sulphosuccinate on ruminal and metabolic characteristics of lactating Holstein cows [J]. British Journal of Nutrition,1993,69(2):397-408
[10]Dijkstra J, Tamminga S. Simulation of the effects if diet ion the contribution of rumen protozoa to degradation of fibre in the rumen [J]. British Journal of Nutrition,1995,74:617-634
[11]Jajima K, Aminov R I, Nagamine T, Ogata K, Nakamura M, Matsui H, Benno Y. Rumen bacterial diversity as determined by sequence analysis of 16S rDNA libraries [J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology,1999,29:159-169
[12]Fisher S G, Lerman LS. Length-independent separation of DNA restriction fragments in two-dimensional gel electrophoresis [J]. Cell,1979,16(1):191-200
[13]Muyzer G, Waal E C, Uitterlinden A G Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA [J]. Applied Environmental Microbiology,1993,59(3):695-700
[14]Muyzer G. DGGE/TGGE a method for identifying genes from natural ecosystems [J]. Current Opinion in Microbiology,1999,2:317-322
[15]Myers R M, Fischer S G, Lerman L S, Maniatis T. Nearly all single base substitutions in DNA fragments joined to a GC-clamp can be detected by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis [J]. Nucleic Acids Research,1985,13(9):3131-3145
[16]Sheffield V C, Cox D R, Myers R M. Attachment of a 40bp G+C rich sequence (GC clamp) to genomic DNA fragments by polymerase chain reaction results in improved detection of single-base changes [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science,1989,86(1):232-236
[17]Ercolini D. PCR-DGGE fingerprinting: novel strategies for detection of microbes in food [J]. Journal of Microbiological Methods,2004,56(2):297-314
[18]Norris T B, Wraith J M, Castenholz R W, McDermott T R. Soil microbial community structure across a thermal gradient following a geothermal heatint event [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2002,68(12):6300-6309
[19]Bano M, libaugh T. Phylogenetic composition of bacterioplankton assemblages from the Artie Ocean [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2002,68(2):505-518
[20]Crump B, Kling G W, Bahar M, Bahr M, Hobbie J E. Bacterioplankton community shifts in an arctic lake correlate with seasonal changes in organicmatter source [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2003,69(4):2253-2268
[21]Su Y, Yao W, Perez-Gutierrez, ON, Smidt H, Zhu W Y. Changes in abundance of Lactobacillus spp.and Streptococcus suis in the stomach, jejunum and ileum of piglets after weaning [J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology,2008,66(3):546-555
[22]Reeson A F, Jancovic T, Kasper M L, Roqers S, Austin A D. Application of 16S rDNA-DGGE to examine the microbial ecology associated with a social wasp Vespula germanica [J]. Insect Molecular Biology,2003,12(1):85-91
[23]Kochcrginskaya S A, Aminov R I, White B A. Analysis of the rumen bacterial diversity under two different diet conditions using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, random sequencing, and statistically ecology approaches[J]. Anaerobe,2001,7:119-134
[24]Mackie R I, Aminov R I, Hu W, Klieve A V, Ouwerkerk D Sundset M A, Kamagata Y. Ecology of uncultivated Oscilllospira species in the rumen of cattle, sheep, and reindeer as assessed by microscopy and molecula approaches[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2003,69(11): 6808-6815
[25]姚文,朱伟云,韩正康,Akkermans D L A, Williams B, Tamminga S应用变性梯度凝胶电泳和16S rDNA序列分析对山羊瘤胃细菌多样性的研究[J].中国农业科学,2004,37(9)：1374-1378
[26]McEwan N R, Abecia L, Regensbogenova M, Adam C L, Findlay P A, and Newbold C J. Rumen microbial population dynamics in response to photoperiod [J].Letters in Applied Micrkbiology, 2005,41(1):97-101
[27]石鹏君,柏映国,袁铁铮,姚斌,范云六.应用rpo B和16S rDNA基因的变性梯度凝胶电泳技术对山羊瘤胃细菌多样性的研究[J].微生物学报,2007,47(2)：285-289
[28]淡瑞芳,龙瑞军,张海涛,张欣,丁学智.藏系绵羊瘤胃细菌区系的季节动态分析[J].动物营养学报,2009,21(5)：798-802
[1]张龙翔、张庭芳、李令媛.生化实验方法与技术[M].北京：高等教育出版社,2001
[2]Gordon E A, Diane M B. Determination of reducing sugars with 3-methyl-2-benzothiazolinonehydrazone [J]. Analytical Biochemistry,2002,305:287-289
[3]Thomas M, Wood, K Mahalingeshwara Bhat. Methods in Enzymology [M]. Academic Press, Inc. 1988,160:87-112
[1]Ladisch M R, Lin K W, Voloch M, Ysao G T. Process considerations in the enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass[J]. Enzyme Microbial Technology,1983,5:82-100
[2]Cheng K J, Forsberg, C W, Minato H, Costerton J W. Microbial ecology and physiology of feed degradation within the rumen. In: physiological aspects of digestion and metabolism in Ruminants [M], Academic Press, Toronto.1991
[3]Osborne, J. M, Dehority, B A. Synergism in degradation and utilization of intact forage cellulose, hemicellulose, and pectin by three pure cultures of ruminal bacteria [J]. Applied and Environmental. Microbiology,1989,55(9):2247-2250
[4]Wubah D A, Akin D E, Borneman W S. Biology, fiber degradation, and Enzymology of anaerobic zoosporic fungi[J]. Critical Reviews in Microbiology,1993,19(2):99-115
[5]Trinci A P J, Davies D R, Gull K, Lawrence M I, Nielsen BB, Rickers A, Theodorou M K. Anaerobic fungi in herbivorous animals[J].Mycological Research,1994,98(2):129-152
[6]史开来,王秀坤,刘伟,陆文清,顾云强.pH值对植酸酶活的影响及其在猪、鸡消化道的分析[J]饲料研究,2000,7：110-113
[7]陆文清,李德发.评定饲料酶品质的5种指标[J].饲料研究,2005,3：10-13
[8]Thacker P A, Campbell G L, Groot Wassimk J.1992. The effect of organic acids and enzyme supplementation on the performance of pig fed barley based diets [J]. Canadian Journal of Animal Science,72:395-402
[91杨会涛,陈代文,余冰.pH对木聚糖酶活性的影响[J].饲料博览,2006,7：42-44
[10]林凤.纤维素酶的生物化学和分子生物学研究新进展[J].生命科学,1994,6(1)：18-23
[11]孟雷,陈冠军,王怡.纤维素酶的多样性[J].纤维素科学与技术,2002,10(2)：47-54
[12]冯定远.酶制剂在饲料工业中的应用[M].北京：中国农业科学技术出版社,2005
[1]Colombatto D, Mould F L, Bhat M K, Morgavi D P, Beauchemin K A, Owen E. Influence of fibrolytic enzymes on the hydrolysis and fermentation of pure cellulose and xylan mixed ruminal microorganisms in vitro[J]. Journal of Animal Science,2003,81(4):1040-1050
[2]吕秋凤,杨群辉,杨建成.非淀粉多糖复合酶制剂对断奶仔猪生长性能的影响[J].中国饲料,2010,1：31-32
[3]吕秋凤,杨群辉,杨建成,王振勇,张民.非淀粉多糖复合酶制剂对断奶仔猪养分表观消化率的影响[J].中国饲料,2010,8：34-35
[4]王修启,张兆敏,李春群,李祥,杨育才,刘亚力,苏纯阳.高比例小麦日粮添加不同水平木聚糖酶对猪生产性能的影响[J].动物营养学报,2002,14(1)：60
[5]徐骏,袁华根,高峰.小麦日粮中添加木聚糖酶对肉仔鸡生长性能影响[J].饲料研究,2007,4：70-72
[6]许梓荣,钱利纯,孙建义.高麦麸饲粮中添加β-葡聚糖酶、木聚糖酶和纤维素酶对肉鸡作用效果的研究[J].动物营养学报,2000,12(1)：61
[7]孙万岭,屠焰.酶制剂在玉米-豆粕-棉粕型肉仔鸡日粮中添加效应研究[J].中国饲料,1996,9：33-34
[1]王成章,王恬.饲料学[M].北京：中国农业出版社,2003
[2]Bedford M R, Partridge G G Enzymes in farm animal nutrition [M]. UK:CABI,2001
[3]Beauchemin K A, Colombatto D, Morgavi D P, Yang W Z. Use of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes to improve feed utilization by ruminants[J]. Journal of Animal Science,2003, 81(suppl.2):E37-E47
[4]McHAN F. Cellulase-treated coastal Bermudagrass silage and production of soluble carbohydrates, silage acids and digestibility [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1986,69(2):431-438
[5]Vanvuuren A M, Bergsma K, Frol-Framer F,Van Beers J A C. Effects of addition cell wall degrading enzyme on the chemical composition and the in sacco degradation of grass silage [J]. Grass and Forage Science,1989,44(2):223-230
[6]Shao Tao, Wang Tian, Shimojo M, Masuda Y. Effect of ensiling density on fermentation quality of Guingagrass (panicum maximum Jacq.) silage during the early stage of ensiling [J]. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Sciences,2005,18(9):1273-1278
[7]张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].北京：中国农业大学出版社,2004
[8]Weatherburn M W. Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia[J].Analytical Chemistry,1967,39(8):971-974
[9]Madrid J, Martine-Teruel A, Hemandez F, Megias M D. A comparative study on the determination of lactic acid in silage juice by colorimetric, high-performance liquid chromatography and enzymatic methods[J].Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1999,79(12):1722-1726
[10]林炎坤.常用的几种葸酮比色定糖法的比较和改进[J].植物生理学通讯,1989,15(4)：53-55
[11]秦为琳.应用气相色谱测定瘤胃挥发性脂肪酸方法的研究改进[J].南京农学院学报,1982,4：110-116
[12]Colombatto D, Mould F L, Bhat M K, Phipps R H, Owen E. In vitro Evaluation of fbrolytic enzymes as additives for maize (Zea mays L.) silage I. Effects of ensiling temperature, enzyme source and addition level[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,2004,111(1):111-128
[13]Colombatto D, Mould F L, Bhat M K,Phipps R H, Owen E. In vitro Evaluation of fibrolytic enzymes as additives for maize (Zea mays L.) silage II. Effects on rate of acidification, fibre degradation during ensiling and rumen fermentation [J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2004,111(1):129-143
[14]Selmer-Olsen, Henderson A R, Robertson S, McGinn R. Cell wall degrading enzymes for silage. 2. Aerobic stability of enzyme-treated laboratory silages[J].Grass and Forage Science,1993, 48(1):55-63
[15]Selmer-Olsen. Enzymes as silage additives for grass-clover mixtures[J].Grass and Forage Science,1994,49(3):305-315
[16]Jacobs J L, McAllan A B. Enzymes as silage additives.1.Silage quality, digestion, digestibility and performance in growing cattle[J].Grass and Forage Science,1991,46(1):63-73
[17]Zhu Yu, Nishino N, Kishida Y, Uchida S. Ensiling characteristic and ruminal degradation of Italian ryegrass and lucerne silages treated with cell wall-degrading enzymes[J].Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1999,79(14):1987-1992
[18]赵国琦,丁健,贾亚红,陈小连.纤维素酶对大黍青贮饲料品质的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2003,39(2)：9-11
[19]华金玲,张永根,王德福,门宇新.添加乳酸菌制剂对水稻秸青贮品质的影响[J].东北农业大学学报,2007,38(4)：473-477
[20]张新平,万里强,李向林,何峰.添加乳酸菌和纤维素酶对苜蓿青贮品质的影响(简报)[J].草业学报,2007,16(3)：139-143
[1]Cussen R F, Merry R J, Willams A P, Tweed JKS. The effect of additives on the ensilage of forage of differing perennial ryegrass and white clover content [J].Grass and Forage Science,1995,50(3):249-258
[2]Jacobs J L, McAllan A B. Enzymes as silage additives.1.silage quality, digestion, digestibility and performance in growing cattle [J].Grass and Forage Science,1991,46(1):63-73
[3]Haigh P M, Davies O D. Effect of formic acid with formalin or barley incorporation into grass silage on silage fermentation and the performance of dairy cows[J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research,1998,69(3):261-265
[4]Kennedy S J. Comparison of the fermentation quality and nutritive value of sulphuric and formic acid-treated silages fed to beef cattle [J]. Grass and Forage Science,1990,45(1):17-28
[5]Yu Yu, Thomas J W, Emery R S. Estimated nutritive value of treated forages for ruminants [J]. Journal of Animal Science,1975,41(6):1742-1751
[6]Sheperd A C, Kung L JR. Effects of an enzyme additive on composition of corn silage ensiled at various stages of maturity [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1996,79(10):1767-1773
[7]Selmer-Olsen I. Enzymes as silage additives for grass-clover mixtures [J].Grass and Forage Science,1994,49(3):305-315
[8]Van Vuuern A M, Bergsma K, Frol-Kramer F, Van Beers JAC. Effects of addition of cell wall degrading enzymes on the chemical composition and the in sacco degradation of grass silage [J]. Grass and Forage Science,1989,44(2):223-230
[9]陈三有,杨中艺,辛国荣.黑麦草—水稻草田轮作系统研究与应用[J].草原与草坪,2000,88(1)：32-34
[10]张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].北京：中国农业大学出版社,2004
[11]Van Soest P J, Robertrson J B, Lewis B A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1991,74(10):3583-3597
[12]Weatherburn M W. Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia [J].Analytical Chemistry,1967,39(8):971-974
[13]Madrid J, Martine-Teruel A, Hemandez F, Mehias M D.A comparative study on the determination of lactic acid in silage juice by colorimetric, high-performance liquid chromatography and enzymatic methods [J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1999,79(12):1722-1726
[14]林炎坤.常用的几种蒽酮比色定糖法的比较和改进[J].植物生理漟通讯,1989,15(4)：53-55
[15]秦为琳.应用气相色谱测定瘤胃挥发性脂肪酸方法的研究改进[J].南京农学院学报,1982,4：110-116
[16]Autrey K M, McCaskey T A, Little J A. Cellulose digestibility of fibrous materials treated with Tricboderma viride cellulase [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1975,58(1):67-71
[17]Henderson A J, McDonald P. The effect of cellulase preparations on the chemical changes during the ensilage of grass in laboratory silos [J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1977,28(6):486-490
[18]Yu Zhu, Naoki Nishino, Yoshiro Kishida, Senji Uchida. Ensiling characteristics and ruminal degradation of Italian ryegrass and luceme silages treated with cell wall-degrading enzymes[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1999,79(14):1987-1992
[19]McHan F. Celllulase-treated coastal bermudagrass silage and production of soluble carbohydrates, silage acids and digestibility[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1986,69(2):431-438
[20]Haigh P M, Chapple D G. The effect of formic acid, formic acid salt and formic acid with formalin on silage fermentation, digestibility and intake, and on liveweight change of young cattle [J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research,1997,69:267-271
[21]沈益新,杨志刚,刘信宝.凋萎和添加有机酸对多花黑麦青贮品质的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2004,20(2)：95-99
[22]师希雄,曹致中.甲酸对苜蓿渣青贮饲料营养价值的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2005,40(6)：773-776
[23]庄苏,颜瑞,丁立人,王晓亮,王恬.纤维素酶与木聚糖酶对象草青贮发酵品质的影响[J].南京农业大学学报,2009,32(4)：148-153
[24]王安,张淑芳,钟一民,刘朋军,石玉珍.纤维素复合酶作为青贮饲料添加剂研究[J].东北农业大学学报,1997,28(4)：358-365
[25]Xing L, Chen L J, Han L J. The effect of an inoculant and enzymes on fermentation and nutritive value of sorghum straw silages [J]. Bioresource Technology,2009,100(1):488-491
[26]Haigh P M, Mansbridge R J. The effect of formic acid with formalin on grass silage fermentation and the performance of dairy cows [J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research,1998,69(3):255-259
[27]Nagel S A, Broderick G L. Effect of formic acid or formaldehyde of alfalfa silage on nutrient utilization by dairy cows [J].Journal of Diary Science,1992,75(1):140-154
[1]刁其玉.酶制剂在反刍动物日粮中应用研究进展[J].饲料与畜牧,2010,3：15-17
[2]Beauchemin K A, Rode L M, Sewalt V J H. Fibrolytic enzymes increase fiber digestibility and growth rate of steers fed dry forages [J]. Canada of Journal Animal Science,1995,5:641-644
[3]Kung L, Jr, Treacher R J, Nauman G A, Smagala A M, Endres K M, Cohen M A. The effect of treating forages with fibrolytic enzymes on its nutritive value and lactation performance of dairy cows[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2000,83(1):115-122
[4]Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A, Rode L M. Effects of an enzyme feed additive on extent of digestion and milk production of lactating dairy cows [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1999,82(2):391-403
[5]Morgavi D P, Beauchemin K A, Nsereko V L, Rode L M, Iwaasa A D, Yang W Z, McAllister T A, Wang Y. Synergy between ruminal fibrolytic enzymes and enzymes from Trichoderma longibrachiatum[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2000a,83(6):1310-1321
[6]Hristov A N, McAllister T A, Chen K-J. Stability of exogenous polysaccharide -degrading enzymes in the rumen [J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,1998,76:161-168
[7]Russel JB, Martin S A. Effects of various methane inhibitors on the fermentation of amino acids by mixed rumen microorganisms in vitro [J].Journal of Animal Science,1984,59:1329-1338
[8]Wood T M, Bhat M K. Methods for measuring cellulase activities[M]. Methods in Enzymology. W.A. Wood and S. T. Kellogg, ed. Academic Press Inc., London, UK,1988
[9]秦为琳.应用气相色谱测定瘤胃液挥发性脂肪方法的研究改进[J].南京农学院学报,]982,4：110-116
[10]张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].中国农业大学出版社,2003
[11]Hatfield R D. Cell wall polysaccharide interactions and degradability [M]. Forage Cell Wall Structure and igestibility. H. G Jung, D. R. Buxton, R. D. Hatfield, and J.Ralph, ed. ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, WI.1993
[12]Fontes C M, Hall J G A, Hirst B H, Hazelwood G P, Gilbert H J. The resistance of cellulases and xylanases to proteolytic inactivation[J].Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,1995, 43(1):52-57
[13]Hirstov A, McAllister T A, Cheng K J. Effect of dietary or abomasal supplementation of exogenous polysaccharide-degrading enzymes on rumen fermentation and nutrient digestibility [J].Journal of Animal Science,1998,76(12):3146-3156
[14]Morgavia D P, Newbold C J, Beever D E, Wallace R J. Stability and stabilization of potential feed additive enzymes in rumen fluid [J]. Enzyme and Microbial Technology,2000,26(2-4):71-177
[15]Morgavi D P, Beauchemin K A, Nsserko V L, Rode L M, McAllister T A, Iwaasa A D, Wang Y, Yang W Z.Resistance of feed enzymes to proteolytic inactivation by rumen microorganisms and gastrointestinal enzymes [J]Journal of Animal Science,2001,79(6):1621-1630
[16]Williams A G, Withers S E, Strachan N H. Postprandial variations in the activity of polysaccharide-degrading enzymes in microbial populations from the digesta solids and liquor fractions of rumen contents [J] Journal of Applied Bacteriology,1989,66(1):15-26
[17]Weimer P J, Waghorn G C, Odt C L, Mertens D R. Effect of diet on populations of three species of ruminal cellulolytic bacteria in lactating dairy cows [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1999,82(1): 122-134
[18]Colombatto D, Mould F L, Bhat M K, Morgavi D P, Beauchemin K A, Owen E. Influence of fibrolytic enzymes on the hydrolysis and fermentation of pure cellulose and xylan mixed ruminal microorganisms in vitro [J].Journal of Animal Science,2003,81(4):1040-1050
[19]Nserko V L, Beauchemin K A, Morgavi D P, Rode L M, Furtado A F, McAllister T A, Iwaasa AD, Yang W Z, Wang Y. Effect of a fibrolytic enzyme preparation from Trichoderma longibrachiatum on the rumen microbial population of dairy cows[J].Canadian Journal of Microbiology,2002,48(1):14-20
[20]Eun J-S, Beauchemin K A. Effects of a proteolytic feed enzyme on intake, digestion, ruminal fermentation, and milk production [J].Journal of Dairy Science,2005,88(6):2140-2153
[21]Lewis G E, Hunt C W, Sanchez W K, Treacher R J, Pritchard G T, Feng P.Effect of direct-fed fibrolytic enzymes on the digestive characteristics of a forage-based diet fed to beef steers[J]. Journal of Animal Science,1996,74(12):3020-3028
[22]Hristov A N, McAllister T A, Cheng K-J.Intraruminal supplementation with increasing levels of exogenous polysaccharide-degrading enzymes:Effects on nutrient digestion in cattle fed a barley grain diet [J].Journal of Animal Science,2000,78:477-487
[23]Giraldo L A, Tejido M L, Ranilla M J, Ramos S, Carro M D. Influence if direct-fed fibrolytic enzymes on diet digestibility and ruminal activity in sheep fed a grass hay-based diet[J].Journal of Animal Science,2008,86(7):1617-1623
[24]Krzysztof B, Magdalena L-R. Effect of adding fibrolytic enzymes to dairy cow rations on digestive activity in the rumen [J].Annals of Animal Science,2010,10(2):127-137
[25]Giraldo L A, Tejido M L, Ranilla M J, Carro M D. Effects of exogenous cellulase supplementation on microbial growth and ruminal fermentation of a high-forage diet in Rusitec fermenters[J]. Journal of Animal Science,2007,85:1962-1970
[26]Pinos-Rodriguez J M, Gonzalez S S, Mendoza G D, Barcena R, Cobos M A,Hemandez A, Ortega M E. Effect of exogenous fibrolytic enzyme on ruminal fermentation and digestibility of alfalfa and rye-grass hay fed to lambs[J].Journal of Animal Science,2002,80(11):3016-3020
[27]Beauchemin K. A, Colombatto D, Morgavi D P, Yang W Z. Use of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes to improve feed utilization by ruminants [J].Journal of Animal Science,2003,81 (E.suppl.2):E37-E47
[28]Wang Y, McAllister T A, Rode L M, Beauchemin K A, Morgavi D P, Nsereko V L, Iwaasa A D, Yang W. Effects of an exogenous enzyme preparation on microbial protein synthesis, enzyme activity and attachment to feed in the Rumen Simulation Technique (Rusitec)[J].British Journal of Nutrition,2001,85:325-332
[29]Wallace R J, Wallace S J A, McKain N, Nsereko V L, Hartnell G F. Influence of supplementary fibrolytic enzymes on the fermentation of corn and grass silages by mixed ruminal micrioorganisms in vitro[J].Journal of Animal Science,2001,79(7):1905-1916
[30]Tang S X, Yayo G O, Tam Z L, Sun Z H, Shen L X,Zhou C S, Xiao W J, Ren G P, Han X F, Shen S B. Effects of yeast culture and fibrolytic enzyme supplementation on in vitro fermentation characteristic of low-quality cereal straws[J]. Journal of Animal Science,2008,86(5):1164-1172
[1]Tajima K, Aminov R I, Nagamine T, Ogata K, Nakamura M, Matsui H, Benno Y. Rumen bacterial diversity as determined by sequence analysis of 16S rDNA libraries[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology,1999,29(2):159-169
[2]Tajima K, Arai S, Ogata K, Nagamine T, Matsui H, Nakamura M, Aminov R I, Benno Y. Rumen bacterial community transition during adaptation to high-grain diet[J]. Anaerobe,2000,6(5): 273-284
[3]Ramsak A, Peterka M, Tajima K, Martin J, Wood J, Johnston M, Aminov R, Avgustin G. Unravelling the genetic diversity of ruminal bacteria belonging to the CFB phylum[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology,2000,33(1):69-79
[4]Whitford M F, Forster R J, Beard C E, Gong J, Teather R M. Phylogenetic Analysis of Rumen Bacteria by Comparative Sequence Analysis of Cloned 16S rRNA Genes[J].Anaerobe,1998, 4(3):153-163.
[5]Muyzer G. DGGE/TGGE a method for identifying genes from natural ecosystems [J]. Current Opinion in Microbiology,1999,2(3):317-322
[6]Muyzer G, Smalla K. Application of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TGGE) in microbial ecology [J].Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek,1998,73(1):127-141
[7]Muyzer G, de Waal E C, Uitterlinden A G. Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,1993,59(3):695-700
[8]Kocherginskaya S A, Aminov R I., White B A. Analysis of the rumen bacterial diversity under two different diet conditions using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, random sequencing, and statistical ecology approaches [J]. Anaerobe,2001,7(3):119-134
[9]Mackie R I, Aminov R I, Hu W, Klieve A V, Ouwerkerk D Sundset M A, Kamagata Y. Ecology of uncultivated Oscilllospira species in the rumen of cattle, sheep, and reindeer as assessed by microscopy and molecular approaches [J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2003, 69(11):6008-6815
[10]McEwan N R, Abecia L, Regensbogenova M, Adam C, Findlay P, Newbold C J. Rumen microbial population dynamics in response to photoperiod[J]. Letters in Applied Microbiology,2005,41(1): 97-101
[11]石鹏君.山羊瘤胃和草鱼肠道微生物分子生态研究及β-葡萄糖苷酶基因的克隆[D].中国农业科学院,2007
[12]Konstantinov S R, Zhu W Y, Williams B A, Tamminga S, Vos W M, Akkermans A D L. Effect of fermentable carbohydrates on piglet faecal bacterial communities as revealed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of 16S ribosomal DNA[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2003,43(2):225-235
[13]Augenlicht L H, Mariadason J M, Wilson A, Arango D, Yang W C, Heerdt B G, Velcich A. Short chain fatty acids and colon cancer[J]. The Journal of Nutrition,2002,132(12):3804S-3808S
[14]Segain J, De La Bletiere D R, Bourreille A, Leray V, Gervois N, Rosales C, Ferrier L, Bonnet C, Blottiere H, Galmiche J. Butyrate inhibits inflammatory responses through NFkB inhibition: implications for Crohn's disease[J]. Gut,2000,47(3):397-403
[15]于卓腾,杭苏琴,姚文,朱伟云.肠道产丁酸细菌及其丁酸产生机制的研究进展[J].世界华人消化杂志,2006,14(25)：2531-2534
[16]Nisbet D, Martin S. Effect of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on lactate utilization by the ruminal bacterium Selenomonas ruminantium [J]. Journal of Animal Science,1991,69(11): 4628-4633
[17]Krause D, Russell J. How many ruminal bacteria are there? [J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 1996,79(8):1467-1475
[18]Patterson J A, Hespell R B. Glutamine synthetase activity in the ruminal bacterium Succinivibrio dextrinosolvens [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,1985,50(4):1014-1020