乳积方预防激素受体阴性乳腺癌术后复发转移的研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
激素受体阴性乳腺癌(Hormone Receptors Negative Breast Cancer)术后患者,通过放化疗、生物治疗及靶向治疗后可以获得一定的生存期,但是大量的临床研究显示此型患者无疾病生存期(DFS)及总生存期(OS)明显低于激素受体阳性(Hormone Receptors Positive)患者。如何延长激素受体阴性乳腺癌术后患者的DFS、OS,减少复发转移发生的机率,延缓复发转移时间,改善患者生存质量成为目前乳腺癌治疗及研究的一个热点。中医药在整体观与辨证论治思想的指导下,通过减轻手术后局部症状、减轻放化疗毒副反应、调节人体内环境,从而明显改善患者生存质量,大量研究显示其能够延长患者的无病生存期(disease free survival)。
     乳积方是本院自制中药方,多年的临床实践发现其在改善患者临床症状,改善生活质量,延长生存期等方面具有明显的疗效,但是目前尚缺乏循证医学的客观数据支持,所以,本研究将研究乳积方对于激素受体阴性乳腺癌术后患者在预防复发转移中的作用。
     目的
     本研究旨在揭示乳积方对于激素受体阴性乳腺癌综合治疗后的患者在临床症状、生存质量、生存时间、复发转移时间等方面的影响,探讨其预防乳腺癌术后复发转移的作用。方法
     回顾性分析长期接受随访的42例激素受体阴性乳腺癌术后女性患者,根据随访用药治疗情况,分为治疗组和对照组,其中治疗组在综合治疗后至少服用乳积方3个月,对照组患者综合治疗后,不服用乳积方,不接受其他任何抗肿瘤治疗,仅进行定期随访。末次随访结束后,记录两组患者入组前与治疗后的临床症状评分(附表1)、肝肾功能、CEA、CA12-5、CA153、生存质量评分(乳腺癌患者生存质量测定表,FACT-B附表2)、总生存时间、复发转移时间等方面差异,并进行组间及组内比较,得出统计学差异。
     结果
     第一部分
     1、乳积方能够改善激素受体阴性乳腺癌患者的临床症状:治疗组显效率为48%,有效率为52%,总体缓解率达到100%。临床症状的缓解率,与对照组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);
     2、乳积方能够改善化、放疗后肝功能的异常,与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);
     3、乳积方能够改善激素受体阴性乳腺癌患者的生活质量:
     (1)PS评分:治疗前组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,治疗组明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);组内比较,治疗组治疗前后PS评分无明显波动(P>0.05),对照组有明显升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
     (2) FACT-B生命质量测定结果提示:治疗前各项指标组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,治疗组生理不适、情感波动少于对照组,社会家庭功能、躯体功能情况好于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。组内比较,治疗组,治疗后患者生理状况、情感状况有明显改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);社会家庭状况、功能状况有明显提高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);对照组,治疗后的功能状况、附加关注较治疗前有明显减低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);生理状况、社会家庭状况、情感状况治疗前后无统计学差异(P>0.05)。
     第二部分
     1、总体生存期及复发转移情况:治疗组中位总生存时间为30个月,平均总生存为37.38个月,中位DFS时间为30个月,平均DFS时间为37.19个月;对照组中位总生存时间为17个月,平均总生存为20.93个月,中位DFS时间为13个月,平均DFS时间为16.26个月。随访期内,共有12例患者发生疾病复发或转移,发生率在28.57%(12/42);其中治疗组2例复发(2/21,9.52%),4例转移(4/21,19.05%);对照组6例转移(6/21,28.57%)全部发生在16个月以内。经Log rank检验,两者的总生存率及无远处转移生存率的差异均有显著性(P值均为0.000)。
     2、1.5年总生存率及复发转移率比较:治疗组1.5年总生存率为71.43%(15/21),对照组21例患者,1.5年总生存率为47.62%(10/21);治疗组1.5年无疾病复发转移生存率为61.90%(13/21),对照组为19.05%(4/21);1.5年复发转移率,治疗组为9.52%(2/21),对照组为28.57%(6/21)。
     3、3年总生存率及复发转移率比较:3年总生存率,治疗组为42.86%(9/21),对照组为19.05%(4/21);3年无疾病复发转移生存率,治疗组为38.10%(8/21),对照组为14.29%(3/21);3年复发转移率,治疗组为4.76%(1/21),对照组无;
     4、5年生存率与复发转移率比较:治疗组5年生存率28.57%(6/21),5年局部复发生存率为9.68%,对照组无随访时间达到或超过5年的观察病例。
     5、复发转移的单因素分析显示:年龄、淋巴结数目与复发转移呈正相关性(P<0.05);服用乳积方与复发转移呈负相关(P<0.05)。
     6、死亡相关风险的单因素分析显示:年轻、未绝经、Her-2过表达型的乳腺癌相关死亡风险增加(P<0.05);服用乳积方可以降低死亡风险,(P<0.05)。呈正相关的Kaplan-Meier检验提示:年龄、月经状态、免疫组化类型、分期、淋巴结数目、放疗、新辅助化疗等单因素对于生存期无影响(P>0.05)。
     第一部分
     1、乳积方辩证加减治疗激素受体阴性乳腺癌综合治疗后患者,可以明显减轻临床症状的作用。
     2、乳积方能够改善化放疗后肝功能异常。
     3、乳积方能够改善激素受体阴性乳腺癌患者综合治疗后的生存质量。
     第二部分
     1、乳积方辩证加减治疗激素受体阴性乳腺癌综合治疗后患者,能够延长总生存期及无疾病生存期。
     2、乳积方辩证加减治疗激素受体阴性乳腺癌综合治疗后患者,能够延缓复发转移时间。
     3、单因素分析显示:年龄、淋巴结数目与激素受体阴性乳腺癌综合治疗后复发转移风险呈正相关;年龄、月经状态与疾病相关死亡风险呈正相关。
     4、单因素分析显示:服用乳积方能够显著降低激素受体阴性乳腺癌综合治疗后复发转移风险。
Under the chemotherapy、radiotherapy、biotherapy or targeted therapy, those patients with hormone receptors negative (HR-) breast cancer after surgical services, could gain a suvival time; while numbers of clincal study demonstrated that the patients with HR- breast cancer has shorter Disease-free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival(OS) than hormone receptors positive patients. It is a plum in clincal study, that searching for the new method to prolong HR- patients'DFS and OS, and reduce the rate of recurrence and metastasis.
     Traditional Chinese Medicine treatment based on the concept of wholism and categorical identification, could relieve the local symptom after surgry、the side-effect of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, regulate the internal environment of the body, in order to improve patients'quality of life, and prolong the median disease free survival.
     The Ru Ji Fang prepared by our hospital,and in many years'clinical practice,we find that RujiFang could relieve clinical symptom、improve quality of life and survival time. There are not enough objective data to prove RujiFang's fanction, and our study will research RujiFang's prevention effection from the recurrence and metastasis for breast cancer patients with hormone receptors negative.
     Objective
     The study is to reveal RujiFang's therapy effection on clincal symptom、the quality of life、survival time and the time of tumors'recurrence and metastasis in hormone receptors negative breast cancer.
     Methods
     A retrospective analysis for a group of breast cancer patients. All patients accept a long-term of follow-up,and select about 42 qualified female cases with hormone receptors negative breast cancer and finished surgical thrapy. According to the treatment and medcine records in follow-up period,all patients divided into treated group and controled group.In treated group, patients after a combined treatment, need a RujiFang therapy more than 3 months; patients in controled group followed regularlly, but cannot accept any kinds of antieoplaston, include Chinese Anti-cancer Medicine. Before the study and after the final follow up, record the score of clinical symptom、laboratory、the scores of ECOG and quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer FACT-B),and the Overall Survival (OS)、the time of recurrence or metastasis, compared the difference in the interior-group and inter-group, to obtain the statically difference.
     Results
     PartⅠ
     1、RujiFang is helpful to relieve the clinical sympotm for the patients with hormone receptors negative breast cancer:the total marked effective rate of treated group is 48%, effective rate is 52%, and a 100% total remission rate, compared with the controled group, could have statistical singnificance (P<0.05)
     2、RujiFang has the funcation of improve abnormal liver function after chemotherapy, and compered with the controled group,could have statistical singnificance (P<0.05)
     3、RujiFang can improve the patients' quality of life:
     (1) PS(ECOG) score:compare the score before treatment, there was no significent difference between the two groups (P>0.05); after the study,the score of the treated group is lower than the controled group's, the difference have statistical sense (P<0.05); there is not significent change in the PS score before and after treatment (P>0.05), while in the controled group, after the treatment, the score was significantly higher than before (P<0.05)
     (2) The results of FACT-B determination:there were no signifcant difference between two groups' scores before the study (P>0.05); in post-treatment, the scors of Physical Well-Being、Emotional Well-Being in the treated group are less than the control group's (P<0.05).Before and after the treatments, in the treated group, patients' Physical Well-Being and Emotional Well-Being have significantly improved (P<0.01); Social-Family Well-Being and Functional Well-Being are improved significantly (P<0.05); In control grou, the score of Functional Well-Being、Affixation Attention after treatment were markedly lower (P<0.05); Physical Well-Being、Emotional Well-Being、Social-Family Well-Being have no significantly change, before and after the treatment (P>0.05)
     PartⅡ
     1、FLF、FDM and OS:in the treated group, the median OS is 30 months, mean OS is 37.38 months, median DFS is 30 months, mean DFS is 37.19 months; in the controled group, the median OS is 17months, mean OS is 20.93 months, median DFS is 13 months, mean DFS is 16.26 months. During follow-up period, there are 12 cases'recurrence or metastases, incidence rate is 28.57%(12/42):2 casess'recurrence (2/21,28.57%) and 4 cases' metastases(4/21,19.05%), in the treated group; 6 cases' metastases(6/21,28.57%) and all happens in 16 months, in the control group. Comparison among groups there are significatly difference on the OS and DFS(Log rank test P=0.000).
     2、The 1.5-year OS、1.5-year recurrence and metastsis rates:1.5- year OS:71.43% (the treated group 15/21) VS.47.62% (the controled group 10/21); the 1.5-year FLF and/or FDM:61.90%(the treated group 13/21) VS.19.05% (the controled group 4/21); the recurrence and metastasis rates for 1.5 years:9.52% (the treated group 2/21) VS.28.57% (the controled group 6/21).
     3、The 3-year OS、FLF and FDM:the 3-year OS:42.86%(the treated group 9/21) VS.19.05% (the controled group 4/21); 3-year FLF and/or FDM:38.10% (the treated group 8/21) VS.14.29% (the control group 3/21); 3-year recurrence and metastasis rates:4.76% (the treated group 1/21),0 cases in the control group.
     4、5-year OS、1.5-year recurrence and metastsis rates:in the treated group,5-year OS is 28.57% (6/21),5-year local recurrence rates is 9.68%; there were no case followed or beyond 5 years in the controled group. 5、The univariate analyses for the risk factors of recurrence and/or metastasis:age and the number of lymph nodes have positive correlation with the risk of recurrence and/or metastasis (P<0.05); and this kind of risk cuold be reduced by the therapy of RujiFang significantly (P<0.05). 6、The univariate analyses for the risk factors of death:The factors such as young、premenopausal、positive C-erbB-2 expression could increase the risk of Breast Cancer related death (P<0.05); and the therapy of RujiFang could reduce the risk of Breast Cancer related death (P<0.05).The Kaplan-Meier test show:those factors, such as age、menstrual state、immunohistochemical type、clinical TNM stage、the number of lymph nodes、rediotherapy、neoadjuvant chemotherapy,have no significantly influence to OS or DFS (P>0.05)
     Conclusion
     PartⅠ
     1、RujiFang could relieve the clinical sympotm for the patients with hormone receptors negative breast cancer.
     2、RujiFang could improve the chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy related abnormal liver function
     3、RujiFang could improve the quality of life for the patients with hormone receptors negative breast cancer after complex treatment.
     PartⅡ
     1、RujiFang could prolong the OS and DFS of patients with hormone receptors negative breast cancer.
     2、RujiFang for hormone receptors negative breast cancer patients, could delay the recurrence and/or metastasis time.
     3、The univariate analyses show:age、the number of lymph nodes could increase the risk of recurrence and/or metastasis; age、premenopausal could increase the risk of hormone receptors negative Breast Cancer related death.
     4、The univariate analyses show:RujiFang could significently reduce the recurrence and/or metastasis risk after the complex treatment for hormone receptors negative Breast Cancer pantients.
引文
[1]Nakshatri H,Srour E F,Badve S. Breast cancer stem cells and intrinsic subtypes:cont roversies rage on [J]. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther,2009,4(1):50-60.
    [2]Cleator S, Heller W, Coombes RC. Triple-negative breast cancer: Therapeutic options[J]. Lancet Oncol,2007,8(3):235-244.
    [3]Eralp Y,Derin D, Ozluk Y,et al.MAPK over-expression is associated with anthracycline resistance and increased risk for recurrence in patients with triple-negative breast cancer[J]. Ann Oncol,2008,19(4):669-674.
    [4]Yuan Z Y,Wang S S,Gao Y,et al.Clinical characteristics and prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer:a report of 305 cases[J].Ai Zheng,2008, 27(6):561-565.
    [5]Pritchard KI, Shepherd L E,O'Malley FP,et al. HER2 and responsiveness of breast cancer to adjuvant chemotherapy[J]. N Engl J Med,2006,354 (20): 2103-2111.
    [6]Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Procter M, Leyland-Jones B,et al.Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER-2positive breast cancer [J].N Engl J Med,2005, 353(16):1659-1672.
    [7]Navarrete Montalvo D, Gonzalez MN, Montalvo VMT, et al. Patterns of recurrence and survival in breast cancer.Oncol Rep,2008,20:531-535.
    [8]Brewster A, Hortobagyi G, Broglio K, et al. Residual risk of breast cancer recurrence 5 years after adjuvant therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst,2008,100: 1179-1183.
    [9]Foulkes WD, Stefansson IM, Chappuis PO, et al. Germline BRCA1 mutations and a basal epithelial phenotype in breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst,2003,95: 1482-1485.
    [10]Rakha EA, El-Sayed ME, Green AR, et al. Prognostic markers in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer,2007,109:25-32.
    [11]Zellars RC, Hilsenbeck SG, Clark GM, et al. Prognostic value of p53 for local failure in mastectomy-treated breast cancer patients[J]. Clin Oncol, 2000,18(9):1906-1913.
    [12]王宁,王斌,薛春燕,等.雌激素受体阴性乳腺癌中人表皮生长因子受体2与孕激素受体表达的关系[J].医学研究杂志,2010,39(5):34-38.
    [13]张晟,张敏,李春艳等.乳腺癌根治术局部复发后影响预后的相关因素分析[J].中华乳腺病杂志(电子版),2010,4(1):32-41.
    [14]Sanchez-Munoz A, Garca-Tapiador AM,Martnez-Ortega E, et al. Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,2008,26(8):1275-1281.
    [15]刘刚,邵志敏.乳腺癌基础研究新进展[J].中国肿瘤,2002,11(1):31-35.
    [16]韩娅.健脾益肾中药防治乳腺癌放疗血液毒性作用的观察[J].中医药临床杂志,2005,17(1):15-16.
    [17]翁永强,唐汉钧,程爱群,等.扶正祛邪法改善乳腺癌患者化疗毒副作用的临床观察[J].上海中医药大学学报,2003,17(3):28-31.
    [18]黄智芬,韦劲松,施智严,等.八珍汤加味配合化疗治疗中晚期乳腺癌的研究[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2003,12(11):1123-1124.
    [19]唐静雯,李玲,唐晓燕.益气解毒汤联合化疗治疗乳腺癌(正虚毒炽型)30例[J].中医研究,2007,20(7):28-29.
    [20]Perou CM, S?rlie T, Eisen MB, et al. Molecular port raits of human breast tumours[J]. Nature,2000,406(6797):747-752.
    [21]Kreike B, van Kouwenhove M, Horlings H, et al. Gene expression profiling and histopat hological characterization of triple-negative/basal-like breast carcinomas[J]. Breast Cancer Res,2007,9(5):R65.
    [22]Bertucci F, Finetti P, Cervera N, et al. How basal are triple-negative breast cancers [J]? Int J Cancer,2008,123(1):236-240.
    [23]Cheang MC, Voduc D, Bajdik C, et al. Basal-like breast cancer defined by five biomarkers has superior prognostic value than triple negative phenotype[J].Clin Cancer Res,2008,14(5):1368-1376.
    [24]Sasa M, Bando Y, TakahashiM, et al. Screening for basal marker expression is necessary for decision of therapeutic strategy for triple -negative breast cancer[J].J Surg Oncol,2008,97(1):30-34.
    [25]王宁,王斌,薛春燕,等.雌激素受体阴性乳腺癌中人表皮生长因子受体2与孕激素受体表达的关系[J].医学研究杂志,2010,39(5):34-38.
    [26]Perou CM,Sorlie T, Eisen MB,et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature,2000,406:747-752.
    [27]Tan DS, Marchio C, Jones RL, et al. Triple negative breast cancer:molecular profiling and prognostic impact in adjuvant anthracycline -treated patients[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat,2008,111 (1):27-44.
    [28]A1-Hajj M, Wicha MS, Benito2Hernandez A, et al. Prospective identifica-tion of tumorigenic breast cancer cells [J].Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,2003, 100(11):3983-3988.
    [29]Ponti D, Costa A, Zaffaroni N, et al. Isolation and in vit ro propagation of tumorigenic breast cancer cells with stem/progenitor cell properties [J]. Cancer Res,2005,65(13):5506-5511.
    [30]Sheridan C,Kishimoto H,Fuchs RK, et al. CD44+/CD24 -breast cancer cells exhibit enhanced invasive properties:an early step necessary for metastasis [J]. Breast Cancer Res,2006,8(5):R59.
    [3l]Nakshatri H,Srour EF,Badve S. Breast cancer stem cells and int rinsic subtypes:cont roversies rage on[J]. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther,2009,4(1):50-60.
    [32]Ginestier C,Hur MH, Charafe-Jauffret E, et al. ALDH1 is a marker of normal and malignant human mammary stem cells and a predictor of poor clinical outcome [J].Cell Stem Cell,2007,1(5):555-567.
    [33]Dontu G, El-Ashry D, Wicha MS. Breast cancer, stem/progenitor cells and the estrogen receptor[J]. Trends Endocrinol Metab,2004,15(5):193-197.
    [34]Honeth G, Bendahl PO, Ringner M, et al. The CD44+/CD24 -phenotype is enriched in basal-like breast tumors[J]. Breast Cancer Res,2008; 10(3):R53.
    [35]Neve RM, Chin K, Fridlyand J, et al. A collection of breast cancer cell lines for the study of functionally distinct cancer subtypes[J]. Cancer Cell,2006, 10(6):515-527.
    [36]Sheridan C, Kishimoto H,Fuchs RK,et al. CD44+/CD24 -breast cancer cells exhibit enhanced invasive properties:an early step necessary for metastasis [J]. Breast Cancer Res,2006,8(5):R59.
    [37]Mani SA,Guo W, Liao MJ, et al.The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells[J]. Cell,2008,133(4):704-715.
    [38]S?rlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,2001,98(19):10869-10874.
    [39]Shipitsin M, Campbell LL, Argani P,et al. Molecular definition of breast tumor heterogeneity[J]. Cancer Cell,2007,11 (3):259-273.
    [40]Ginestier C, Hur MH, Charafe-Jauffret E, et al.ALDH1 is a marker of normal and malignant human mammary stem cells and a predictor of poor clinical outcome[J].Cell Stem Cell,2007,1(5):555-567.
    [41]Korkaya H,Paulson A, Iovino F, et al. HER2 regulates the mammary stem/ progenitor cell population driving tumorigenesis and invasion[J]. Oncogene,2008,27 (47):6120-6130.
    [42]Lo SS, Norton J, Mumby PB, et al. Prospective multicenter study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score(RS)assay on medical oncologist (MO) and patient (pt)adjuvant breast cancer(BC)treatment selection [J].J Clin Oncol,2007,25(18S):577.
    [43]Pritchard KI, Shepherd L E,O'Malley FP,et al. HER2 and responsiveness of breast cancer to adjuvant chemot herapy[J].N Engl J Med,2006; 354 (20): 2103-2111.
    [44]Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Procter M, Leyland-Jones B, et al. Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER-2positive breast cancer [J].N Engl J Med,2005, 353(16):1659-1672.
    [45]Perou CM,S(?)rlie T, Eisen MB,et al. Molecular port rait s of human breast tumours[J]. Nature,2000,406 (6797):747-752.
    [46]Nielsen TO, Hsu FD, J ensen K, et al. Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma [J].Clin Cancer Res,2004,10(16):5367-5374.
    [47]Pennery E. The role of endocrine therapies in reducing risk of recurrence in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs,2008,12:233-243.
    [48]Fodor J, Major T, Polgar C, et al. Prognosis of patients with local recurrence after mastectomy or conservative surgery for early-stage invasive breast cancer.Breast,2008,17:302-308.
    [49]Dinh P,Cardoso F, Sotiriou C, et al. New tools for assessing breast cancer recurrence. Cancer Treat Res,2008,141:99-118.
    [50]Paepke S, Jacobs VR, Ohlinger R, et al. Treatment strategies that effectively reduce early recurrence risk in postmenopausal women with endocrine-sensitive breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol,2007,133:905-916.
    [51]Brewster AM, Do KA, Thompson PA, et al. Relationship between epidemiologic risk factors and breast cancer recurrence. J Clin Oncol,2007,25:4438-4444.
    [52]Smid M, Wang Y, Zhang Y, et al. Subtypes of breast cancer show preferential site of relapse[J]. Cancer Res,2008,68(9):3108-3114.
    [53]RAKHA E A, EL-SAYEDM E,GREEN A R,et al. Prognostic markers in triple-negative breast cancer[J]. Cancer,2007,109(1):25-32.
    [54]罗静,郑金锋,刘莹,等主编.免疫组织化学与肿瘤病理诊断[M].第2版.北京:人民军医出版社,2004:138-142.
    [55]刘静贤,高琨,刘毅强,等.乳腺癌C-erbB-2、p53、ER和PR表达及意义[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,2003,10(1):15-16.
    [56]杨丽芳,宋三泰,李晓兵,等.284例原发乳腺癌c-erbB-2蛋白的表达及其与预后的关系[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2006,28(4):294-297.
    [57]张英,刘永源,黄应桂,等.青年和绝经后女性乳腺癌c-erbB-2、p53. ER和PR受体表达及意义[J].肿瘤防治研究,2004,31(2):79-80.
    [58]Konecny G, Pauletti G,Pegram M, et al.Quantitative association between HER-2/neu and steroid hormone receptors in hormone receptor-positive primary breast cancer[J].J Natl Cancer Inst,2003,95 (2):142-153.
    [59]姚卫康,包建荣,吴德明,等.乳腺癌C-erbB-2的表达及其与ER、PR的相关性研究[J].中国医师进修杂志(综合版),2007,30(6):7-9.
    [60]Carey LA, Dees EC, Sawyer L, et al. The triple negative paradox:primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes [J]. Clin Cancer Res,2007,13 (8):2329-2334.
    [61]Honma N,Horii R,Iwase T, et al. Clinical importance of estrogen Receptor-beta evaluation in breast cancer patients treated with aduvant tamoxifen therapy[J].J Clin Oncol,2008,26(22):3727-3734.
    [62]Tischkowitz M, Brunet JS, Bgin LR, et al. Use of immunohistochemical markers can refine prognosis in triple negative breast cancer[J]. BMC Cancer,2007, 7:134.
    [63]Eralp Y, Derin D, Ozluk Y, et al. MAPK overexpression is associated with anthracycline resistance and increased risk for recurrence in patients with triple-negative breast cancer[J]. Ann Oncol,2008,19(4):669-674.
    [64]Carey LA, Dees EC, Sawyer L, et al. The triple negative paradox:primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes. Clin Cancer Res,2007,13:2329-2334.
    [65]汤钊猷.现代肿瘤学[M].上海:上海医科大学出版社,1993:664.
    [66]阙华发,吴雪卿,陈前军.陆德铭扶正法为主防治乳腺癌复发转移的经验[J].辽宁中医杂志,1998,25(7):297-298.
    [67]李景鹏,贾英杰.贾英杰治疗乳腺癌术后的经验[J].湖北中医杂志,2007,29(7):23.
    [68]何立丽;孙桂芝.孙桂芝治疗乳腺癌经验[J].北京中医药,2009,28(1):18-19.
    [69]陈利芳,王绪鳌.王绪鳌治疗乳腺癌经验[J].中医杂志,2008,49(9):786.
    [70]刘胜,花永强,孙霃平,等.试论乳腺癌痰毒瘀结病机的理论基础与临床应用[J].中西医结合学报,2007,5(2):122-125.
    [71]李明瑞.肝脾肾同治在乳腺癌治疗中的应用浅析[J].陕西中医,2006,27(2):191-192.
    [72]王明武.疏肝化痰法防治乳腺癌术后复发转移的探讨[J].辽宁中医学院学报,2006,8(1):19-20.
    [73]刘燕珠,工泳,吴丹红等.中西医结合治疗乳腺癌68例[J].福建中医药,2000,31(3):30-31.
    [74]周菊英.中西医结合治疗晚期乳腺癌86例临床观察[J].中西中医,2000,16(6):30-31.
    [75]王志学,徐功立.中医药抗肿瘤转移治疗的策略[J].中医药研究,2001,17(5):59.
    [76]刘胜,孙霃平,花永强,等.试论“治未病”思想在乳腺癌术后抗复发转移治疗中的应用[J].上海中医药大学学报,2008,22(6):3-6.
    [77]陈宏,任敏,吴爱勤.乳腺癌与乳腺良性肿瘤患者术前心理社会因素的对比分析[J].中国行为医学科学,2003,12(5):520-521.
    [78]王大鹏;郑玉玲.乳腺癌术后中医分期辨证治疗[J].云南中医中药杂志,2007,28(8):14-15.
    [79]朱华宇,司徒红林.林毅辨治乳腺癌经验撷菁[J].辽宁中医杂志,2007,34(4): 395-396.
    [80]易维真,汪晓明,张福忠,等.乳腺癌中医证型与临床分期及分子标志物关系[J].安徽中医学院学报第2009,28(5):23-25.
    [81]顾群浩,蔡照弟,张胜华.乳腺癌辨证分型与雌孕激素受体的相关性分析[J].辽宁中医杂志,2004,31(6):463-464.
    [82]刘晓雁,林毅,司徒红林,等.乳腺癌复发危险因素评估及中医既病防变策略[J].辽宁中医杂志,2008,35(10):1499-1501.
    [83]黄玲,张洪亮,杨丽.雌激素受体阴性乳腺癌病人的辅助中医治疗策略[J].新疆中医药,2008,26(2):83-84.
    [84]向丽萍,欧阳恒,肖毅良.菊藻丸抗乳腺癌术后复发转移的临床观察[J].中国临床药理学与治疗学,2002,7(1):63-64.
    [85]马廷行,唐晓勇,李春华.消增合剂预防乳腺癌术后复发转移临床研究[J].浙江中西医结合杂志,2008,18(5):270-272.
    [86]陈前军,司徒红林,周劬志,等.乳宁Ⅱ号抗乳腺癌短期复发转移的临床研究[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2002,11(16):1546-1548.
    [87]朱世杰.李佩文治疗乳腺癌经验撷英[J].北京中医药,2008,27(3):173-175.
    [88]刘胜,赵婧,刘佳,等.乳癌术后方对乳腺癌术后5年复发转移率的影响[J].中西医结合学报,2008,6(10):1000-1004.
    [89]欧阳华强,黄雯霞,刘鲁明,等.消瘕方治疗乳腺癌术后110例的临床观察[J].上海中医药杂志,2006,40(6):50-51.
    [90]赖熙雯,陈前军,刘鹏熙.乳腺癌术后中医证型的研究概况[J].新中医,2005,37(8):88-90.
    [91]Pichon MF, Broet P,Magdelenat H, et al. Prognostic value of steroid receptors after long-term follow-up of 2257 operable breast cancers. Br J Cancer,1996,73:1545-1551.
    [92]Fuqua SA, Schiff R, Parra I, et al. Estrogen receptorβ protein in human breast cancer; correlation with clinical tumor parameters[J]. Cancer Res, 2003,63:2434.
    [93]Nakopoulou L, LazarisAC, Panayotopoulou EC, et al. The favourable prognostic value of oestrogen receptor beta immunohistochemical exp ression in breast cancer[J].J Clin Pathol,2004,57:523.
    [94]Adedayo A Onitilo,Jessica M Engel, Robert T Greenlee,et al. Breast cancer subtypes based on ER/PR and Her-2 Expression:comparison of clinicopathologic features and survival [J]. ClinMed Res,2009,7:4.
    [95]Burcombe RJ, MakrisA, Richman P I, et al. Evaluation of ER. PR HER-2 and Ki-67 as predictors of response to neoadjuvant anthracyline chemotherapy for operable breast Cancer[J].Br J Cancer,2005,92 (1):147.
    [96]Di Giovanna MP, Stern OF, Eclgerton SM,et al. Relationship of epidermal growth factor receptor expression to C-erbB-2 signaling activity and prognosis in breast cancer patients [J].J Clin Oncol,2005,23(6):1152.
    [97]Tokatli F, Altancer S, Vzal C, et al. Association of HER-2/neu overexp ression with the number of involved axillary lymph nodes in hormone recep tor positive breast cancer patients[J].Exp Oncol,2005,27(2):145.
    [98]Katri KOninki, Minna Tanner, Anssi Auvinen,et al. HER-2 positive breast cancer:decreasing proportion but stable incidence in Finnish population from 1982 to 2005[J].BreastCancer Res,2009,11 (3):37.
    [99]Gabos Z, Sinha R, Hanson J, et al. Prognostic significance of human epidermal growth factor receptor positivity for the development of brain metastasis after newly diagnosed breast cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol,2006, 24(36):5658-5663.
    [100]Keam B, Im SA,Kim HJ, et al. Prognostic impact of clinicopathologic parameters in stage Ⅱ/Ⅲ breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel and doxorubicin chemotherapy:paradoxical features of the triple negative breast cancer[J]. BMC Cancer,2007,26 (7):203.
    [101]张勇.乳腺癌的中医治疗[J].光明中医,2009,24(1):178-181.
    [102]郎江红,田华琴,黄小青,等.乳积方联合化疗治疗乳腺癌患者41例疗效观察[J].实用临床医学,2006,7(10):40-43.
    [103]Carpenter J S, Sloan P, Andrykowshi M A, et al. Risk factors for pain after mastectomy/lumpectomy[J]. Cancer Pract,2007,15:60 - 78.
    [104]孙贻安.血府逐瘀胶囊防治乳腺癌术后并发症的临床观察[J].山东中医药大学学报,2003,27(1):39.
    [105]杨金坤.现代中医肿瘤学[M].上海:上海中医药大学出版社,2004.7:388-391.
    [106]杨思澍张树生.中医临床大全[M].北京:北京科学技术出版社,2000.8:496-498.
    [107]崔念基,卢泰祥,邓小武,等.实用临床放射肿瘤学.广东:中山大学出版社,2005:747-748.
    [108]杨朝群,王娟,赵静,等.乳腺癌术后化疗放疗后肺损伤的临床分析[J].农垦医学,2007,29(5):332-333.
    [109]刘新杰,罗民,周平,等.可手术青年女性乳腺癌的临床特征[J].现代肿瘤医学,2007,15(6):793-795.
    [110]Nakshatri H,Srour EF, Badve S.Breast cancer stem cells and intrinsic subtypes:cont roversies rage on[J].Curr Stem Cell Res Ther,2009; 4(1):50-60.
    [111]张晟,刘鹏,只向成,等.ER、PR及C-erbB-2表达与乳腺癌临床病理特征及其预后的关系[J].实用癌症杂志,2009,24(5):447-449.
    [112]Bertucci F, Finetti P, Cervera N, et al. How basal are triple-negative breast cancers[J]? Int J Cancer,2008,123(1):236-240.
    [113]Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard K I,et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence[M]. Clin Cancer Res.United States,2007:4429.
    [114]BANERJEE S,REIS-FILHO J S,ASHLEY S, et al.Basal-like breast carcinomas: clinical outcome and response to chemotherapy[J]. J Clin Pathol,2006,59 (7):729-735.
    [115]Estourgie SH,Nieweg OE, ValdesOlmos RA, et al. Lymphatic drainage Patterns from the breast[J]. Ann Surg,2004,239(2):232-237.
    [116]0waki T, Yoshinaka H, Ehi K, et al. Lymphatic stream from a breast tumor to a sentinel node in the parasternal node basin consideration of two cases with internalmammary node metastases[J]. Euro J Radiol Extra,2004,51 (1):11-16.
    [117]Ramaswamy B,Povoski SP, Rhoades C, et al. Phase II trail of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel followed by epirubicin in stage Ⅱ/Ⅲ breast cancer[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat,2005,93(1):67-74.
    [118]Han S, Kim SB,Park HS, et al.A phase II study of neoadjuvant docetaxel plus doxorubicin(KBCS201)in stage Ⅱ,Ⅲ breast cancer[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat,2006,98(1):57-61.
    [119]李嗣杰,韩冰,付彤,等.ER、PR和HER-2的表达状况与乳腺癌新辅助化疗反应的关系[J].中国老年学杂志,2009,29(4):474-476.
    [120]Colleoni M, Viole G, Zahrieh D, et al. Expression of ER, PgR, HER1, HER2, and response:a study of preoperative chemotherapy[J]. Ann Oncol,2008,19(3): 465-472.
    [121]唐汉钧.乳腺癌中的中医临床与实验研究[J].中医药学刊,2003,21(2):168-172.
    [122]左倩虹.乳腺癌术后的中医药治疗体会[J].中国医药导报,2010,7(8):72-73.
    [123]吴钟政,郭勇.乳腺癌的中西医结合治疗体会—附50例临床资料分析[J].浙江中医学院学报,1993,17(2):33.
    [124]王义程,丁凌,鲁志诚.三苯氧胺加中药治疗绝经后晚期乳腺癌[J].肿瘤研究与临床,1999,8(4):265.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700