基于过程的科技学术期刊质量控制系统研究
|
摘要
科技期刊是自然科学知识的主要载体,是反映一个国家科技学术创新水平的窗口。基础研究和应用基础研究所获得的新发现、探索到的新规律、创立的新学说、创造的新方法和积累的新知识首先发表在科技期刊上,科技期刊作为科学研究产出的重要载体,其重要地位日益突显。本文基于期刊的生产过程,通过对科技学术期刊质量进行系统研究,运用现代管理方法和管理工具,建立科学、合理、适用的科技学术期刊质量控制体系,为国家建立科学的期刊出版资源配置机制、减少期刊资源的浪费、调整优化期刊产出结构、促进科技期刊质量的实质性提升提供借鉴,具有重要的理论意义和现实价值。
本文的基本思想是根据科技学术期刊的特点,找出科技学术期刊的质量构成要素,运用结构方程模型深入剖析科技学术期刊质量的影响因素,基于此构建科技学术期刊质量评价指标体系,建立基于模糊综合评价方法的科技学术期刊质量评价模型。根据评价结果,对生产流程中的质量控制要素进行解析,并给出因果关系图,运用质量管理的思想对科技学术期刊质量的关键控制点进行识别,以系统动态学的仿真方法模拟期刊质量因素的影响,据此制定质量控制措施。
本文首先对科技学术期刊和质量控制进行定义,根据过程研究方法研究基于过程的科技学术期刊质量控制,从科技学术期刊质量控制的必要性、与传统产品质量控制的区别、流程设计和影响因素四个方面分析科技学术期刊质量控制过程。在此基础上,研究科技学术期刊过程质量控制机制,分析科技学术期刊过程质量控制的内涵与步骤、原则、模式,构建科技学术期刊过程质量控制模型,为研究科技学术期刊质量控制提供理论框架。
在科技学术期刊质量影响因素研究中,首先从科技学术期刊的形成过程角度分析其质量构成要素,将其归结为稿源质量、审稿质量、编辑质量和出版质量。然后通过问卷调查确定上述各质量构成要素的主要影响因素,提出各主要影响因素对期刊质量影响的研究假设。最后建立期刊质量影响因素对学术期刊质量影响的结构方程模型,包括模型的构建、模型的识别、模型的拟合以及模型的修正与确定,对所提出的研究假设进行检验并对结果进行讨论。
在科技学术期刊质量评价与控制研究中,从科技学术期刊形成的过程角度研究期刊质量的评价与控制问题。首先建立基于期刊质量影响因素的期刊质量评价方法,包括评价指标体系的构建、确定评价方法和评价模型。对科技学术期刊的生产流程进行系统描述,对生产流程中的质量控制要素进行解析,并给出因果关系图,运用质量管理的思想对科技学术期刊质量的关键控制点进行识别,以系统动态学的仿真方法,通过数据拟合及运用层次分析法给出各个要素之间的函数关系,分别从科技学术期刊生产系统的输入、转化、输出和反馈四个方面识别每一个过程的关键控制点。
最后将本文提出的科技期刊质量评价与质量控制模型和方法应用于JMS期刊,用以制定期刊质量控制方案。主要以JMS期刊为例,采用JMS期刊的数据,基于本文建立的评价指标体系,运用模糊综合评价方法评价JMS期刊质量。根据评价结果,运用系统动态学的仿真方法找出影响JMS期刊质量的关键控制点,对质量控制结果进行详尽的比较和分析,并提出质量控制措施,检验所提出模型的正确性和实用性。
在研究过程中,本文全面借鉴已有的研究成果,深入探讨基于过程的质量控制理论中的合理成分,在此基础上系统提出了科技学术期刊质量评价和质量控制的模型与方法,这使本文在理论上有所创新的同时,在实践中也具有一定的指导意义。
Science & technology academic journal (STAJ) is the main vehicle for natural science, is the window reflecting the academic level of a national science and technology innovation. A new discovery, new laws explored, new doctrine created, new methods created and new knowledge accumulated obtained by basic research and application are firstly published in the scientific and technical journals. As an important carrier of scientific research output, the scientific and technical journals are increasingly important. Therefore, based on production process of journal, through system studies on quality of academic journals in science and technology, the use of modern management methods and management tools, this paper sets up a scientific, reasonable, applied science and technology academic journal quality control system in order to set up a scientific journal publishing resource allocation mechanisms for the country, to reduce the waste of resources journals, to adjust and optimize output structure of journal, and to provide reference for promoting quality of scientific and technical journal. It has important theoretical significance and practical value.
The basic idea of this article is that based on the characteristics of academic journals to find out quality elements of science and technology academic journal, the use of structural equation modeling to deeply analyse the influnce factors of academic journal quality, based on this, the construction of quality evaluation index system of science and technology academic journal, setting up quality evaluation model of science and technology academic journal based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. Based on the evaluation results, the article analyzes quality control elements in production flow, gives a causal relationship map, identifies critical control points of journal quality by use of quality management thought, simulates the inflection of quality factors through system dynamic simulation method, then makes quality control measures.
Firstly, beginning to define the correlative conceptions of science and technology academic journal and quality control, according to process method this article studies process-based quality control of academic journal. We analyze the quality control process of journal from the need for quality control, distinction with traditional product quality control, process design and impact factors four aspects. On this basis, the paper researches process quallity control mechanism, connotation, procedure, principle and pattern of science technology academic journal, builds the process quality control model of science and technology academic journal. It provides a theoretical framework for the study of quality control of science and technology academic journal.
In quality influnce factors of science and technology academic journal, first of all, in view of formation process of science and technology academic journal, the quality constituent elements come down to draft origin quality, examination draft quality, editor quality and publication quality. Then we determine the main influnce factors of the above-mentioned elements through a questionnaire survey; put forward some study assumptions of main influnce factors on journal quality. Finally structural equation modeling of influnce factors on journal quality is set up, that include model estabishing, model identification, model fitting and model amendment and determination. Then this paper tests the proposed research hypotheses and discusses the results.
In quality evaluation and control model of science & technology academic journal, we study quality evaluation and control problem of journal from the view of formation process of science & technology academic journal. Firstly, the quality evaluation method of journal is established based on impact factors of journal quality. It includes determining the evaluaton index system, method and model. Production flow system of science and technology academic journals is described systemically, elements of quality control in the production flow are analysed, and a causal relationship map is given. The critical control points of the quality of science and technology academic journal are identified by using quality management thought. The function relationship among every element is given through data fitting, AHP method and system dynamics simulation method. The critical control point is identified respectively from input, transformation, output and feedback four aspects of production system of science & technology academic journal.
Finally, we apply the relevant models and methods proposed in this article to constitute journal quality control mechanism in Journal of Management & Science (JMS). Mainly in JMS as an example, by selecting the relevant data, based on evaluation index system, we evaluate journal quality of JMS through applying fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. Based on the evaluation results, the critical control points of influencing on JMS quality are identified using system dynamics simulation method. Then the quality control results are carried through detailed comparison and analysis, quality control measures of JMS are put forward. It tests the proposed model is correct and practical.
During the research of this paper, we try to take advantage of the existed outcomes, thoroughly extract the rational elements of quality control theory based on process. This paper has brought forward the new theoretical framework and approach of quality evaluation and quality control of science & technology academic journal. It makes the paper innovative and instructive both in theory and in practice.
本文的基本思想是根据科技学术期刊的特点,找出科技学术期刊的质量构成要素,运用结构方程模型深入剖析科技学术期刊质量的影响因素,基于此构建科技学术期刊质量评价指标体系,建立基于模糊综合评价方法的科技学术期刊质量评价模型。根据评价结果,对生产流程中的质量控制要素进行解析,并给出因果关系图,运用质量管理的思想对科技学术期刊质量的关键控制点进行识别,以系统动态学的仿真方法模拟期刊质量因素的影响,据此制定质量控制措施。
本文首先对科技学术期刊和质量控制进行定义,根据过程研究方法研究基于过程的科技学术期刊质量控制,从科技学术期刊质量控制的必要性、与传统产品质量控制的区别、流程设计和影响因素四个方面分析科技学术期刊质量控制过程。在此基础上,研究科技学术期刊过程质量控制机制,分析科技学术期刊过程质量控制的内涵与步骤、原则、模式,构建科技学术期刊过程质量控制模型,为研究科技学术期刊质量控制提供理论框架。
在科技学术期刊质量影响因素研究中,首先从科技学术期刊的形成过程角度分析其质量构成要素,将其归结为稿源质量、审稿质量、编辑质量和出版质量。然后通过问卷调查确定上述各质量构成要素的主要影响因素,提出各主要影响因素对期刊质量影响的研究假设。最后建立期刊质量影响因素对学术期刊质量影响的结构方程模型,包括模型的构建、模型的识别、模型的拟合以及模型的修正与确定,对所提出的研究假设进行检验并对结果进行讨论。
在科技学术期刊质量评价与控制研究中,从科技学术期刊形成的过程角度研究期刊质量的评价与控制问题。首先建立基于期刊质量影响因素的期刊质量评价方法,包括评价指标体系的构建、确定评价方法和评价模型。对科技学术期刊的生产流程进行系统描述,对生产流程中的质量控制要素进行解析,并给出因果关系图,运用质量管理的思想对科技学术期刊质量的关键控制点进行识别,以系统动态学的仿真方法,通过数据拟合及运用层次分析法给出各个要素之间的函数关系,分别从科技学术期刊生产系统的输入、转化、输出和反馈四个方面识别每一个过程的关键控制点。
最后将本文提出的科技期刊质量评价与质量控制模型和方法应用于JMS期刊,用以制定期刊质量控制方案。主要以JMS期刊为例,采用JMS期刊的数据,基于本文建立的评价指标体系,运用模糊综合评价方法评价JMS期刊质量。根据评价结果,运用系统动态学的仿真方法找出影响JMS期刊质量的关键控制点,对质量控制结果进行详尽的比较和分析,并提出质量控制措施,检验所提出模型的正确性和实用性。
在研究过程中,本文全面借鉴已有的研究成果,深入探讨基于过程的质量控制理论中的合理成分,在此基础上系统提出了科技学术期刊质量评价和质量控制的模型与方法,这使本文在理论上有所创新的同时,在实践中也具有一定的指导意义。
Science & technology academic journal (STAJ) is the main vehicle for natural science, is the window reflecting the academic level of a national science and technology innovation. A new discovery, new laws explored, new doctrine created, new methods created and new knowledge accumulated obtained by basic research and application are firstly published in the scientific and technical journals. As an important carrier of scientific research output, the scientific and technical journals are increasingly important. Therefore, based on production process of journal, through system studies on quality of academic journals in science and technology, the use of modern management methods and management tools, this paper sets up a scientific, reasonable, applied science and technology academic journal quality control system in order to set up a scientific journal publishing resource allocation mechanisms for the country, to reduce the waste of resources journals, to adjust and optimize output structure of journal, and to provide reference for promoting quality of scientific and technical journal. It has important theoretical significance and practical value.
The basic idea of this article is that based on the characteristics of academic journals to find out quality elements of science and technology academic journal, the use of structural equation modeling to deeply analyse the influnce factors of academic journal quality, based on this, the construction of quality evaluation index system of science and technology academic journal, setting up quality evaluation model of science and technology academic journal based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. Based on the evaluation results, the article analyzes quality control elements in production flow, gives a causal relationship map, identifies critical control points of journal quality by use of quality management thought, simulates the inflection of quality factors through system dynamic simulation method, then makes quality control measures.
Firstly, beginning to define the correlative conceptions of science and technology academic journal and quality control, according to process method this article studies process-based quality control of academic journal. We analyze the quality control process of journal from the need for quality control, distinction with traditional product quality control, process design and impact factors four aspects. On this basis, the paper researches process quallity control mechanism, connotation, procedure, principle and pattern of science technology academic journal, builds the process quality control model of science and technology academic journal. It provides a theoretical framework for the study of quality control of science and technology academic journal.
In quality influnce factors of science and technology academic journal, first of all, in view of formation process of science and technology academic journal, the quality constituent elements come down to draft origin quality, examination draft quality, editor quality and publication quality. Then we determine the main influnce factors of the above-mentioned elements through a questionnaire survey; put forward some study assumptions of main influnce factors on journal quality. Finally structural equation modeling of influnce factors on journal quality is set up, that include model estabishing, model identification, model fitting and model amendment and determination. Then this paper tests the proposed research hypotheses and discusses the results.
In quality evaluation and control model of science & technology academic journal, we study quality evaluation and control problem of journal from the view of formation process of science & technology academic journal. Firstly, the quality evaluation method of journal is established based on impact factors of journal quality. It includes determining the evaluaton index system, method and model. Production flow system of science and technology academic journals is described systemically, elements of quality control in the production flow are analysed, and a causal relationship map is given. The critical control points of the quality of science and technology academic journal are identified by using quality management thought. The function relationship among every element is given through data fitting, AHP method and system dynamics simulation method. The critical control point is identified respectively from input, transformation, output and feedback four aspects of production system of science & technology academic journal.
Finally, we apply the relevant models and methods proposed in this article to constitute journal quality control mechanism in Journal of Management & Science (JMS). Mainly in JMS as an example, by selecting the relevant data, based on evaluation index system, we evaluate journal quality of JMS through applying fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. Based on the evaluation results, the critical control points of influencing on JMS quality are identified using system dynamics simulation method. Then the quality control results are carried through detailed comparison and analysis, quality control measures of JMS are put forward. It tests the proposed model is correct and practical.
During the research of this paper, we try to take advantage of the existed outcomes, thoroughly extract the rational elements of quality control theory based on process. This paper has brought forward the new theoretical framework and approach of quality evaluation and quality control of science & technology academic journal. It makes the paper innovative and instructive both in theory and in practice.
引文
1 D. J. Price Solla. Networks of Scientific Papers. Science. 1965, 149: 510~515
2 J. D. Bernal. The Social Function of Science. London: George Routledge & Sons Ltd, 1944: 292~308
3刘振兴.热烈祝贺中国科学技术期刊编辑学会成立10周年,满载中国科学技术期刊优异成绩跨入21世纪.编辑学报. 1998, 10(1): 4~5
4 M. D. Alfred Steinschneider. Prolonged Apnea and the Sudden Infant Death Syndrome: Clinical and Laboratory Observations. Pediatrics. 1972, 50(4): 646~654
5王丹红.期刊同行评审:看门人,还是检察官?.科学时报. 2006-05-18(A02)
6郭国松.浙林院士课题组涉嫌告假,国际期刊撤销多篇论文. 21世纪经济报道. 2009-02-03
7 D. S. Priee. Citation Measure of Hard Science, Soft Science, Technology & Non-science. Communication among Scientists & Engineers, Heath Lexington. 1970: 3~22
8姚远,张银珍.奥尔登伯格与世界上最早的科技期刊——《哲学汇刊》.陕西师大学报(哲学社会科学版). 1995, 24(9): 182~184
9蔡玉麟.从传播信息到生产智慧.出版科学. 2004, (1): 24~27
10郑铭,冯琪.科技期刊审稿过程中存在的问题及对策.武汉科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2006, 8(5): 146~148
11于晓霖.质量管理.北京:中央广播电视大学出版社, 2003: 2~7
12廖永平.工业企业质量管理.北京:北京工业大学出版社, 2001: 35~48
13刘笃喜,朱名铨,许建社.关于企业质量管理发展阶段的探讨.世界标准化与质量管理. 2005, (11): 11~15
14马修泉.集成化质量管理在新产品开发中的应用.辽宁工程技术大学学报. 2004, (3): 43~45
15张公绪.新编质量管理学.北京:高等教育出版社, 1998: 15~30
16陈炜,苗瑞,杨正娥.面向小批量生产的统计过程控制的研究.工业工程与管理. 2005, (1): 14~17
17朱兰L M.质量控制手册.上海:上海科技文献出版社, 1980: 36~48
18高齐圣,张嗣瀛.复杂科学与质量管理研究.管理工程学报. 2005, (4):27~29
19翟亚军. ISO9000研究与实施.北京:电子工业出版社, 1996: 25~31
20徐济超.生产过程控制的基本概念.航空标准化与质量.1998,(1): 32
21方喜峰,赵良才.基于数据挖掘的产品质量控制建模方法.机械工程学报. 2005, 41(11): 20~25
22段桂江,唐晓青.基于过程方法的制造企业质量管理系统模型研究.中国机械工程. 2005, 16(24): 2207~2211
23张建方,宗福季.产品设计与质量控制的动态因素模型.数理统计与管理. 2005, 24(6): 55~61
24楼海淼.国民经济核算、公共产品及其质量控制.统计与信息论坛. 2005, 20(6): 86~89
25杜世昌,奚立峰,潘尔顺.面向质量控制的制造系统可诊断性分析.机械工程学报. 2006, 42(5): 149~154
26姚巨坤,杨俊娥,朱胜.废旧产品再制造质量控制研究.中国表面工程. 2006, 19(5): 115~117
27赵嵩正,殷茗,梁工谦,赵远志.大型复杂航空产品质量评估模型研究.航空学报. 2007, 27(4): 588~593
28沈朝霞,刘剑,贺伟炜,彭伟捷. SPC技术在航天产品质量控制上的应用.制导与引信. 2007,27(4):47~53
29 E. Garfield. Science Indexes for Science: A New Dimension in Documentation through Association of Ideas. Science. 1955, 122: 108~111
30 E. Garfield. How can Impact Factors be Improved? British Medical Journal. 1996, 313: 411~413
31 P. O. Seglen. Evaluation of Scientists by Journal Impact. In: Weingart P, Sehringer R. Winterhager M, eds. Representations of Science and Technology. Leiden: DSWO Press, 1992: 240~252
32 B. Van der Meulen. Indicators in a Framework of Judgment and Contoi——the Use of Science Indicators by Dutch Evaluation Committees. In: Weingart P, Sehringer R, Winterhager M, eds. Representations of Science and Technology. Leiden: DSWO Press, 1992: 57~74
33 H. F. Moed, N. Leeuwen. Impact Factors can Mislead. Nature. 1996, 381: 186
34 P. O. Seglen. Why the Impact Factor of Journals should not be Used for Evaluating Research. British Medical Journal. 1997, 314: 498~502
35 R. West. Impact Factors Need to be Improved. British Medical Journal. 1997, 313: 1401
36 C. Lowy. Impact Factor Limits Funding. The Lancer. 1997, 350(4): 1035
37 Mestecky P. Impact Factors—Handle with Care. Materials Today. 1998, (1): 8~12
38 A. W. Schwarz, S. Schwarz, R. J. W. Tijssen. Research and Research Impact of Technical University—A Bibliometric Study. Scientometrics. 1998,41:371~388
39 T. J. Phelan. A compendium of Issues for Citation Analysis. Scientometrics. 1999, 45: 117~136
40王洵.影响因子(Impact Factor).情报科学. 1982, 3(2): 81~85
41苗杰,诸谧琳.一种期刊质量评价的新方法——“自影响因子”法.情报学刊. 1993, 14(3): 178~182
42王立名,鲁一同,鲁星,李晨.科学技术期刊编辑教程.北京:人民军医出版社, 1995: 579~ 594
43王小唯,杨波,潘启树.科技期刊质量评估的二次相对评价方法.编辑学报. 2003, 15(3): 231~232
44王宣喻,储小平.中国经济学期刊评价指标体系设计.科研管理. 2005,26(2): 147~ 151
45赵大良,苗凌,蒋汀华.期刊质量评价的二维排序方法.编辑学报. 2005, 17(4): 307~ 308
46李焱.自然科学学术期刊质量指标体系属性区间识别综合评价模型.鸡西大学学报. 2006, 16(1): 92~94
47刘明寿,周晓明,戴国俊,佟建国,李卓青.用归一化法评价科技期刊学术质量与常规评定结果的相关性分析.编辑学报. 2006, 18(6): 468~471
48王海明.科技期刊学术质量评价指标的优化模式.青海科技. 2007,(1): 72~75
49何汶,邱均平,柳建乔.信息学方法在学术期刊评价中的应用.情报理论与实践. 2007, 30(2): 206~209
50 G.Davis, Pamela Royle. A Comparison of Australian University Output Using Journal Impact Factors. Scientometrics. 1996, 35(1): 45~58
51 G. E.Gorman, P. J. Calvert. Journal Quality in the Asian Region: Results of a Pilot Study for the IFLA Round Table of Library and Information Science Journals. Serials Librarian. 2001, 41(1): 99~112
52 G. A.Forgionne, R. A. Kohli. Multiple Criteria Assessment of Decision Technology System Journal Quality. Information & Management. 2001, 38(7): 421~435
53 K. P.Lee, M.Schotland, P. Bacchetti, L. A. Bero. Association of Journal QualityIndicators with Methodological Quality of Clinical Research Articles. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association. 2002, 287
54 P. Murtaugh. A. Journal Quality, Effect Size, and Publication Bias in Meta-analysis. Ecology. 2002, 83(4): 1162~1166
55 Saha, Somnath, Saint, Sanjay, Christakis, A. Dimitri. Impact Factor: A Valid Measure of Journal Quality? J Med Libr Assoc, 2003, 91(1): 42~46
56 D. Lawrence. Brown. Ranking Journals Using Social Science Research Network Downloads. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting. 2003, 20: 291~307
57 Weiping Yue, S. Concepcion Wilson. Measuring the Citation Impact of Research Journals in Clinical Neurology: A Structural Equation Modelling Analysis. Scientometrics. 2004, 60(3): 317~332
58 Marcel Zwahlen, Christoph Junker, Matthias Egger. The Journal Impact Factor in the Evaluation of Research Quality: Villain, Scapegoat or Innocent Bystander? Soz.-Praventivmed. 2004, (49): 19~22
59 M. Mabe. Quality in the Electronic Era. Serials Librarian. 2005, 48(1-2): 165~173
60 Julia Oscalluch. Some Considerations on the Use of the Impact Factor of Scientific Journals as a Tool to Evaluate Research in Psychology. Scientometrics. 2005, 65(2): 189~197
61 Juan Miguel Campanario, Lidla Gonzalez. Journal Self-citations that Contribute to the Impact Factor: Documents Labeled“Editorial Material”in Journals Covered by the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics. 2006, 69(2): 365~386
62 Gunther Maier. Impact Factors and Peer Judgment: The Case of Regional Science Journals. Scientometrics. 2006, 69(3): 651~667
63 Rafael Aleixandre, Juan Carlos, Alberto Miguel, etc. Hypothetical Influence of Non-indexed Spanish Medical Journals on the Impact Factor of the Journal Citation Reports-indexed Journals. Scientometrics. 2007, 70(1): 53~66
64 Jochen Krauss. Journal Self-citation Rates in Ecological Sciences. Scientometrics. 2007, 73(1): 79~89
65 W. P.Yue, C. S. Wilson, F. Boller. Peer Assessment of Journal Quality in Clinical Neurology. Journal of the Medical Library Association. 2007, 95(1): 70~76
66 Barendse, William. The Strike Rate Index: A New Index for Journal Quality Based on Journal Size and the H-index of Citations. Biomed Digit Libr. 2007, 4(3): 112~121
67 L. Bornmann, H. D. Daniel. What Do We Know about the H-ndex? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2007, 58(9): 1381~1385
68 B. R. Lewis, G. F. Templeton, X. Luo. A Scientometric Investigation into the Validity of IS Journal Quality Measures. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2007, 8(12): 619~633
69 L. I. Meho, K. Yang. Impact of Data Sources on Citation Counts and Rankings of LIS Faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2007, 58(13): 2105~2125
70 J. E. Hirsch. Does the H-Index Have Predictive Power? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2007, 104(49): 19193~19198
71 T. Markpin, K. Boonradsamee, W. Ruksinsut, Yochai, etc. Article-count Impact Factor of Materials Science Journals in SCI Database. Scientometrics. 2008, 75(2): 251~261
72 Sandra Rousseau. Journal Evaluation by Environmental and Resource Economists: A Survey. Scientometrics. 2008, 77(2): 223~233
73 T. L. Ogden, D. L. Bartley. The Ups and Downs of Journal Impact Factors. Annals of Occupational Hygiene. 2008, 52(2): 73~82
74 S. Rousseau. Journal Evaluation by Environmental and Resource Economists: A survey. Scientometrics. 2008, 77(2): 223~233
75 J. K. Vanclay. Ranking Forestry Journals Using the H-index. Journal of Informetrics. 2008, 2(4): 326~334
76 D. A. Pendlebury. The Use and Misuse of Journal Metrics and Other Citation Indicators. Archivum Immunologiae ET Therapiae Experimentalis. 2009, 57(1): 1~11
77张翊飞.论学术期刊的全面质量管理.理论观察. 2002, (2):82~83
78高慧.高校学报的学术质量控制.中国科技期刊研究. 2001, 12(4): 250~251
79张九庆.科技学术期刊的质量控制.编辑学报. 2005, 17(6): 407~409
80王爱萍.浅谈科技期刊的质量控制.河北科技图苑. 2006, 19(1): 23~26
81邓军文.学术期刊质量控制的制度建设——谈三审制与审读.广东技术师范学院学报. 2006, (3): 156~158
82贺赛龙,史小丽,章践立.基于网络管理与编排校一体化模式的科技期刊质量控制.宁波大学学报(理工版). 2006, 19(4): 542~545
83高峻璞.加强科技期刊质量控制.医药论坛杂志. 2006, 27(9): 1,13
84梁延丽.科技期刊质量控制刍议——以《北京水务》为例谈科技期刊的质控问题.编辑学报. 2006, 18(9): 113~115
85郑晓梅,张维平.提高科技期刊稿件刊出质量的方法:事前、事中与事后控制.编辑学报. 2006, 18(9): 115~116
86 D. N. Laband, M. J. Piette. A Citation Analysis of the Impact of Blinded Peer-review. 2nd International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. Chicago, IL. Amer Medical Assoc. 1993: 147~149
87 J. M. Donohue, J. B. Fox. A Multi-method Evaluation of Journals in the Decision and Management Sciences by US Academics. Omega-International Journal of Management Science. 2000, 28(1): 17~36
88 I. Robu, D. Marineanu, I. Aciu, S. Wood-Lamont. Improving Standards in the Scientific Biomedical Community in Romania by Using Journal Ranking to Improve Journal Quality. Health Info Libr J. 2001, 18(2): 91~98
89 Duanning Zhou. Jian Ma, E. Turban. Journal Quality Assessment: An Integrated Subjective and Objective Approach. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2001, 48(4): 479~490
90 Dale Baker. The Peer Review Process in Science Education Journals. Research in Science Education. 2002, 32: 171~180
91 W. P. Yue, C. S. Wilson. Measuring the Citation Impact of Research Journals in Clinical Neurology: A Structural Equation Modelling Analysis. 9th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informatics. Beijing, Peoples R China. 2003: 317~332
92 M. Bhandari, V. M. Montori, P. J. Devereaux, N. L. Wilczynski., D. Morgan, R. B. Haynes. Doubling the Impact: Publication of Systematic Review Articles in Orthopaedic Journals. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume. 2004, 86A(5): 1012~1016
93 C. E. Hilmer, M. J. Hilmer. How Do Journal Quality, Co-authorship, and Author Order Affect Agricultural Economists' Salaries? American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2005, 87(2): 509~523
94 Zheng Jia-wei. Try to Improve Journal Quality by Improving Standards and Editing Process. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2005, 14(2): 97~98
95 A. Marusic, D. Sambunjak, M. Marusic. Journal Quality and Visibility: Is There a Way out of the Scientific Periphery? Tekstil. 2005, 54(12): 611~616
96 Marusic Ana, Sambunjak Dario, Marusic Matko. Journal Quality and Visibility: Is There a Way out of the Scientific Periphery? Priloz. 2006, 27(1): 151~161
97 M. E. Broome. A Rose by Any Other Name Is Still a Rose: Assessing JournalQuality. Nursing Outlook. 2007, 55(4): 163~164
98 John Hudson. Be Known by the Company You Keep: Citations– Quality or Chance? Scientometrics. 2007, 71(2): 231~238
99 Carmen Lopez, C.M. Noyons, S. Martijn, etc. Expansion of Scientific Journal Categories Using Reference Analysis: How Can It Be Done and Does It Make a Difference? Scientometrics. 2007, (10): 1~18
100 Dario Sambunjak, Ana Ivanis, Ana Marusi, Matko Marusi. Representation of Journals from Five Neighboring European countries in the Journal Citation Reports. Scientometrics. 2008, 76(2): 261~271
101 L. Bornmann, R. Mutz, H. D. Daniel. Are There Better Indices for Evaluation Purposes than the H-index? A Comparison of Nine Different Variants of the H-index Using Data from Biomedicine. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2008, 59(5): 830~837
102 M. Norris, C. Oppenheim, F. Rowland. The Citation Advantage of Open-access Articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2008, 59(12): 1963~1972
103 L. Bornmann, W. Marx, H. Schier, E. Rahm, A. Thor, H. D. Daniel. Convergent Validity of Bibliometric Google Scholar Data in the Field of Chemistry-Citation Counts for Papers That Were Accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition or Rejected but Published, Using Google Scholar, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Chemical Abstracts. 2009, 3(1): 27~35
104 Goran Svensson, Sander Svaeri, Kari Einarsen. Empirical Characteristics of Scholarly Journals in Hospitality and Tourism Research: An Assessment. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 2009, (28): 479~483
105 Deng-Yiv Chiu, Ya-Chen Pan, Shih-Yi Yu. An Automated Knowledge Structure Construction Approach: Applying Information Retrieval and Genetic Algorithm to Journal of Expert Systems with Applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, (36): 9438~9447
106国家科学技术委员会.科学技术期刊管理办法.1993, 3
107刘广第.质量管理学.北京:清华大学出版社, 2003: 22~25
108张九庆.科技学术期刊的质量控制.编辑学报. 2005, 17(6): 407~409
109 Andersen, Jaeger, Scenario. Workshops and Consensus: Towards More Democratic Decision Marking. Science and Public Policy. 2000, (5): 331~340
110 T. F. Edgar, D. Dixon, G. Reklaitis. Vision 2020: Computational Needs of the Chemical Industry. Impact of Advances in Computing and Communication Technologies on Chemical and Technology. National Research Council,Washington: National Academic Press, 2000: 1147~1160
111陈立文,孙宝铮,姜林奇.对多指标综合评价问题的探讨.工业技术经济. 1995, (1): 45~46
112理查.M.霍德盖茨著,黄志强等译.质量测定与高效运作.上海:上海人民出版社, 1999: 157~160
113徐柏容.期刊编辑学概论.沈阳:辽宁教育出版社, 1995: 44~48
114贺晓利,白燕琼.中国科技学术期刊的质量状况及对策.情报杂志. 2003, (10): 116~117
115何英.提高科技期刊质量的几个问题.中国科技期刊研究. 1998, 9(3): 155~157
116吕晓明.我国医学科技期刊的现状及展望分析.卫生软科学. 2003, (6):50~52
117柳晓丽.科技期刊发展中存在的问题及对策.情报探索. 2003, (3): 33~34
118戴龙基,蔡蓉华.中文核心期刊要目总览(2004年版).北京:北京大学出版社, 2004: 2~5
119王祖和.项目质量管理.北京:机械工业出版社, 2004: 116~117
120李晓春,曾瑶.质量管理学(第二版).北京:北京邮电大学出版社, 2006: 36~40
121李金海.项目质量管理.天津:南开大学出版社, 2006: 255~259, 122~123, 147~153
122万玉玲,杨南.量化管理机制在期刊工作中的实践.中国科技期刊研究. 2004, (4): 391~393
123周建英.中医药期刊质量与稿源之关系及应对措施.学报编辑论丛. 2003, (11): 22~24
124李军纪,马艳霞,阮爱萍.加强高校学报质量控制的策略.编辑之友. 2007, (4): 66
125游苏宁.捍卫编辑的独立性.编辑学报. 2006, 18(5): 321
126武小琳,钱文霖.保证学术期刊审定稿科学性的若干理论思考.编辑学报, 2004, 16(1): 4~6
127宋双明,刘阳娥.对现行审稿模式的思考与建议.编辑学报. 2003, 15(5): 359
128温忠麟,侯杰泰,马什赫伯特.结构方程模型检验:拟合指数与卡方准则.心理学报. 2004, 36(2):186~194
129付春玲.关于科技期刊评价体系的研究状况.科技情报开发与经济. 2006,16(7): 90~91
130邓晓群,沈志超.关于学术类科技期刊评价体系的构建思路.编辑之友. 2001, (3): 21~25
131郝海,踪家峰.系统分析与评价方法.北京:经济科学出版社, 2005: 152~153
132罗珉.论管理学复杂性范式.管理科学. 2006, 2(19): 31~32
133王青,王汝宽,苏莲花.科技期刊的反馈控制.医学情报工程. 2003, (6): 453~454
134郝惠琴,董海原.科技期刊出版后期的质量控制.编辑学报. 2004,16(2): 116
135贺晓利,白燕琼.中国科技期刊的质量状况及对策.情报业务研究. 2003, (10): 116~117
136聂文,曾小汉,刘运飞,陈绍远,周晓雁.编辑对提高科技期刊学术质量的作用.江汉大学学报. 2004, 21(4): 83~84
137王爱萍.学报创新及编辑主体作用刍议.陕西广播电视大学学报. 2001, 3(3): 360~62
138贾贤,李忠富,黄东华,曹兵.科技期刊编辑专业化和学者化是保证期刊学术质量的关键.冶金信息导刊. 2006, (2): 40~42
139祝林浩.学术期刊作者群的组建.岭南学刊. 2006, (4): 92~94
140朱进彬.浅谈学术期刊的读者群问题.重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版). 2006, (3): 70~72
141 F.Michael Gorman, J. John. Kanet.Evaluating Operations Management–Related Journals via the Author Affiliation Index. Manufacturing & Services Operations Management. 2005, (17): 3~19
142王青.技期刊的稿源优化控制.编辑学报. 2004, 16(1): 20~21
143张洁,吴晓丽.影响学术期刊学术质量的信息不对称因素分析.西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2007, 26(1): 101~104
144张淑娟.科技期刊作者学术信用评估系统模式的构建.编辑学报. 2005, 17(3): 173~174
2 J. D. Bernal. The Social Function of Science. London: George Routledge & Sons Ltd, 1944: 292~308
3刘振兴.热烈祝贺中国科学技术期刊编辑学会成立10周年,满载中国科学技术期刊优异成绩跨入21世纪.编辑学报. 1998, 10(1): 4~5
4 M. D. Alfred Steinschneider. Prolonged Apnea and the Sudden Infant Death Syndrome: Clinical and Laboratory Observations. Pediatrics. 1972, 50(4): 646~654
5王丹红.期刊同行评审:看门人,还是检察官?.科学时报. 2006-05-18(A02)
6郭国松.浙林院士课题组涉嫌告假,国际期刊撤销多篇论文. 21世纪经济报道. 2009-02-03
7 D. S. Priee. Citation Measure of Hard Science, Soft Science, Technology & Non-science. Communication among Scientists & Engineers, Heath Lexington. 1970: 3~22
8姚远,张银珍.奥尔登伯格与世界上最早的科技期刊——《哲学汇刊》.陕西师大学报(哲学社会科学版). 1995, 24(9): 182~184
9蔡玉麟.从传播信息到生产智慧.出版科学. 2004, (1): 24~27
10郑铭,冯琪.科技期刊审稿过程中存在的问题及对策.武汉科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2006, 8(5): 146~148
11于晓霖.质量管理.北京:中央广播电视大学出版社, 2003: 2~7
12廖永平.工业企业质量管理.北京:北京工业大学出版社, 2001: 35~48
13刘笃喜,朱名铨,许建社.关于企业质量管理发展阶段的探讨.世界标准化与质量管理. 2005, (11): 11~15
14马修泉.集成化质量管理在新产品开发中的应用.辽宁工程技术大学学报. 2004, (3): 43~45
15张公绪.新编质量管理学.北京:高等教育出版社, 1998: 15~30
16陈炜,苗瑞,杨正娥.面向小批量生产的统计过程控制的研究.工业工程与管理. 2005, (1): 14~17
17朱兰L M.质量控制手册.上海:上海科技文献出版社, 1980: 36~48
18高齐圣,张嗣瀛.复杂科学与质量管理研究.管理工程学报. 2005, (4):27~29
19翟亚军. ISO9000研究与实施.北京:电子工业出版社, 1996: 25~31
20徐济超.生产过程控制的基本概念.航空标准化与质量.1998,(1): 32
21方喜峰,赵良才.基于数据挖掘的产品质量控制建模方法.机械工程学报. 2005, 41(11): 20~25
22段桂江,唐晓青.基于过程方法的制造企业质量管理系统模型研究.中国机械工程. 2005, 16(24): 2207~2211
23张建方,宗福季.产品设计与质量控制的动态因素模型.数理统计与管理. 2005, 24(6): 55~61
24楼海淼.国民经济核算、公共产品及其质量控制.统计与信息论坛. 2005, 20(6): 86~89
25杜世昌,奚立峰,潘尔顺.面向质量控制的制造系统可诊断性分析.机械工程学报. 2006, 42(5): 149~154
26姚巨坤,杨俊娥,朱胜.废旧产品再制造质量控制研究.中国表面工程. 2006, 19(5): 115~117
27赵嵩正,殷茗,梁工谦,赵远志.大型复杂航空产品质量评估模型研究.航空学报. 2007, 27(4): 588~593
28沈朝霞,刘剑,贺伟炜,彭伟捷. SPC技术在航天产品质量控制上的应用.制导与引信. 2007,27(4):47~53
29 E. Garfield. Science Indexes for Science: A New Dimension in Documentation through Association of Ideas. Science. 1955, 122: 108~111
30 E. Garfield. How can Impact Factors be Improved? British Medical Journal. 1996, 313: 411~413
31 P. O. Seglen. Evaluation of Scientists by Journal Impact. In: Weingart P, Sehringer R. Winterhager M, eds. Representations of Science and Technology. Leiden: DSWO Press, 1992: 240~252
32 B. Van der Meulen. Indicators in a Framework of Judgment and Contoi——the Use of Science Indicators by Dutch Evaluation Committees. In: Weingart P, Sehringer R, Winterhager M, eds. Representations of Science and Technology. Leiden: DSWO Press, 1992: 57~74
33 H. F. Moed, N. Leeuwen. Impact Factors can Mislead. Nature. 1996, 381: 186
34 P. O. Seglen. Why the Impact Factor of Journals should not be Used for Evaluating Research. British Medical Journal. 1997, 314: 498~502
35 R. West. Impact Factors Need to be Improved. British Medical Journal. 1997, 313: 1401
36 C. Lowy. Impact Factor Limits Funding. The Lancer. 1997, 350(4): 1035
37 Mestecky P. Impact Factors—Handle with Care. Materials Today. 1998, (1): 8~12
38 A. W. Schwarz, S. Schwarz, R. J. W. Tijssen. Research and Research Impact of Technical University—A Bibliometric Study. Scientometrics. 1998,41:371~388
39 T. J. Phelan. A compendium of Issues for Citation Analysis. Scientometrics. 1999, 45: 117~136
40王洵.影响因子(Impact Factor).情报科学. 1982, 3(2): 81~85
41苗杰,诸谧琳.一种期刊质量评价的新方法——“自影响因子”法.情报学刊. 1993, 14(3): 178~182
42王立名,鲁一同,鲁星,李晨.科学技术期刊编辑教程.北京:人民军医出版社, 1995: 579~ 594
43王小唯,杨波,潘启树.科技期刊质量评估的二次相对评价方法.编辑学报. 2003, 15(3): 231~232
44王宣喻,储小平.中国经济学期刊评价指标体系设计.科研管理. 2005,26(2): 147~ 151
45赵大良,苗凌,蒋汀华.期刊质量评价的二维排序方法.编辑学报. 2005, 17(4): 307~ 308
46李焱.自然科学学术期刊质量指标体系属性区间识别综合评价模型.鸡西大学学报. 2006, 16(1): 92~94
47刘明寿,周晓明,戴国俊,佟建国,李卓青.用归一化法评价科技期刊学术质量与常规评定结果的相关性分析.编辑学报. 2006, 18(6): 468~471
48王海明.科技期刊学术质量评价指标的优化模式.青海科技. 2007,(1): 72~75
49何汶,邱均平,柳建乔.信息学方法在学术期刊评价中的应用.情报理论与实践. 2007, 30(2): 206~209
50 G.Davis, Pamela Royle. A Comparison of Australian University Output Using Journal Impact Factors. Scientometrics. 1996, 35(1): 45~58
51 G. E.Gorman, P. J. Calvert. Journal Quality in the Asian Region: Results of a Pilot Study for the IFLA Round Table of Library and Information Science Journals. Serials Librarian. 2001, 41(1): 99~112
52 G. A.Forgionne, R. A. Kohli. Multiple Criteria Assessment of Decision Technology System Journal Quality. Information & Management. 2001, 38(7): 421~435
53 K. P.Lee, M.Schotland, P. Bacchetti, L. A. Bero. Association of Journal QualityIndicators with Methodological Quality of Clinical Research Articles. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association. 2002, 287
54 P. Murtaugh. A. Journal Quality, Effect Size, and Publication Bias in Meta-analysis. Ecology. 2002, 83(4): 1162~1166
55 Saha, Somnath, Saint, Sanjay, Christakis, A. Dimitri. Impact Factor: A Valid Measure of Journal Quality? J Med Libr Assoc, 2003, 91(1): 42~46
56 D. Lawrence. Brown. Ranking Journals Using Social Science Research Network Downloads. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting. 2003, 20: 291~307
57 Weiping Yue, S. Concepcion Wilson. Measuring the Citation Impact of Research Journals in Clinical Neurology: A Structural Equation Modelling Analysis. Scientometrics. 2004, 60(3): 317~332
58 Marcel Zwahlen, Christoph Junker, Matthias Egger. The Journal Impact Factor in the Evaluation of Research Quality: Villain, Scapegoat or Innocent Bystander? Soz.-Praventivmed. 2004, (49): 19~22
59 M. Mabe. Quality in the Electronic Era. Serials Librarian. 2005, 48(1-2): 165~173
60 Julia Oscalluch. Some Considerations on the Use of the Impact Factor of Scientific Journals as a Tool to Evaluate Research in Psychology. Scientometrics. 2005, 65(2): 189~197
61 Juan Miguel Campanario, Lidla Gonzalez. Journal Self-citations that Contribute to the Impact Factor: Documents Labeled“Editorial Material”in Journals Covered by the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics. 2006, 69(2): 365~386
62 Gunther Maier. Impact Factors and Peer Judgment: The Case of Regional Science Journals. Scientometrics. 2006, 69(3): 651~667
63 Rafael Aleixandre, Juan Carlos, Alberto Miguel, etc. Hypothetical Influence of Non-indexed Spanish Medical Journals on the Impact Factor of the Journal Citation Reports-indexed Journals. Scientometrics. 2007, 70(1): 53~66
64 Jochen Krauss. Journal Self-citation Rates in Ecological Sciences. Scientometrics. 2007, 73(1): 79~89
65 W. P.Yue, C. S. Wilson, F. Boller. Peer Assessment of Journal Quality in Clinical Neurology. Journal of the Medical Library Association. 2007, 95(1): 70~76
66 Barendse, William. The Strike Rate Index: A New Index for Journal Quality Based on Journal Size and the H-index of Citations. Biomed Digit Libr. 2007, 4(3): 112~121
67 L. Bornmann, H. D. Daniel. What Do We Know about the H-ndex? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2007, 58(9): 1381~1385
68 B. R. Lewis, G. F. Templeton, X. Luo. A Scientometric Investigation into the Validity of IS Journal Quality Measures. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2007, 8(12): 619~633
69 L. I. Meho, K. Yang. Impact of Data Sources on Citation Counts and Rankings of LIS Faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2007, 58(13): 2105~2125
70 J. E. Hirsch. Does the H-Index Have Predictive Power? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2007, 104(49): 19193~19198
71 T. Markpin, K. Boonradsamee, W. Ruksinsut, Yochai, etc. Article-count Impact Factor of Materials Science Journals in SCI Database. Scientometrics. 2008, 75(2): 251~261
72 Sandra Rousseau. Journal Evaluation by Environmental and Resource Economists: A Survey. Scientometrics. 2008, 77(2): 223~233
73 T. L. Ogden, D. L. Bartley. The Ups and Downs of Journal Impact Factors. Annals of Occupational Hygiene. 2008, 52(2): 73~82
74 S. Rousseau. Journal Evaluation by Environmental and Resource Economists: A survey. Scientometrics. 2008, 77(2): 223~233
75 J. K. Vanclay. Ranking Forestry Journals Using the H-index. Journal of Informetrics. 2008, 2(4): 326~334
76 D. A. Pendlebury. The Use and Misuse of Journal Metrics and Other Citation Indicators. Archivum Immunologiae ET Therapiae Experimentalis. 2009, 57(1): 1~11
77张翊飞.论学术期刊的全面质量管理.理论观察. 2002, (2):82~83
78高慧.高校学报的学术质量控制.中国科技期刊研究. 2001, 12(4): 250~251
79张九庆.科技学术期刊的质量控制.编辑学报. 2005, 17(6): 407~409
80王爱萍.浅谈科技期刊的质量控制.河北科技图苑. 2006, 19(1): 23~26
81邓军文.学术期刊质量控制的制度建设——谈三审制与审读.广东技术师范学院学报. 2006, (3): 156~158
82贺赛龙,史小丽,章践立.基于网络管理与编排校一体化模式的科技期刊质量控制.宁波大学学报(理工版). 2006, 19(4): 542~545
83高峻璞.加强科技期刊质量控制.医药论坛杂志. 2006, 27(9): 1,13
84梁延丽.科技期刊质量控制刍议——以《北京水务》为例谈科技期刊的质控问题.编辑学报. 2006, 18(9): 113~115
85郑晓梅,张维平.提高科技期刊稿件刊出质量的方法:事前、事中与事后控制.编辑学报. 2006, 18(9): 115~116
86 D. N. Laband, M. J. Piette. A Citation Analysis of the Impact of Blinded Peer-review. 2nd International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. Chicago, IL. Amer Medical Assoc. 1993: 147~149
87 J. M. Donohue, J. B. Fox. A Multi-method Evaluation of Journals in the Decision and Management Sciences by US Academics. Omega-International Journal of Management Science. 2000, 28(1): 17~36
88 I. Robu, D. Marineanu, I. Aciu, S. Wood-Lamont. Improving Standards in the Scientific Biomedical Community in Romania by Using Journal Ranking to Improve Journal Quality. Health Info Libr J. 2001, 18(2): 91~98
89 Duanning Zhou. Jian Ma, E. Turban. Journal Quality Assessment: An Integrated Subjective and Objective Approach. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2001, 48(4): 479~490
90 Dale Baker. The Peer Review Process in Science Education Journals. Research in Science Education. 2002, 32: 171~180
91 W. P. Yue, C. S. Wilson. Measuring the Citation Impact of Research Journals in Clinical Neurology: A Structural Equation Modelling Analysis. 9th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informatics. Beijing, Peoples R China. 2003: 317~332
92 M. Bhandari, V. M. Montori, P. J. Devereaux, N. L. Wilczynski., D. Morgan, R. B. Haynes. Doubling the Impact: Publication of Systematic Review Articles in Orthopaedic Journals. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume. 2004, 86A(5): 1012~1016
93 C. E. Hilmer, M. J. Hilmer. How Do Journal Quality, Co-authorship, and Author Order Affect Agricultural Economists' Salaries? American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2005, 87(2): 509~523
94 Zheng Jia-wei. Try to Improve Journal Quality by Improving Standards and Editing Process. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2005, 14(2): 97~98
95 A. Marusic, D. Sambunjak, M. Marusic. Journal Quality and Visibility: Is There a Way out of the Scientific Periphery? Tekstil. 2005, 54(12): 611~616
96 Marusic Ana, Sambunjak Dario, Marusic Matko. Journal Quality and Visibility: Is There a Way out of the Scientific Periphery? Priloz. 2006, 27(1): 151~161
97 M. E. Broome. A Rose by Any Other Name Is Still a Rose: Assessing JournalQuality. Nursing Outlook. 2007, 55(4): 163~164
98 John Hudson. Be Known by the Company You Keep: Citations– Quality or Chance? Scientometrics. 2007, 71(2): 231~238
99 Carmen Lopez, C.M. Noyons, S. Martijn, etc. Expansion of Scientific Journal Categories Using Reference Analysis: How Can It Be Done and Does It Make a Difference? Scientometrics. 2007, (10): 1~18
100 Dario Sambunjak, Ana Ivanis, Ana Marusi, Matko Marusi. Representation of Journals from Five Neighboring European countries in the Journal Citation Reports. Scientometrics. 2008, 76(2): 261~271
101 L. Bornmann, R. Mutz, H. D. Daniel. Are There Better Indices for Evaluation Purposes than the H-index? A Comparison of Nine Different Variants of the H-index Using Data from Biomedicine. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2008, 59(5): 830~837
102 M. Norris, C. Oppenheim, F. Rowland. The Citation Advantage of Open-access Articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2008, 59(12): 1963~1972
103 L. Bornmann, W. Marx, H. Schier, E. Rahm, A. Thor, H. D. Daniel. Convergent Validity of Bibliometric Google Scholar Data in the Field of Chemistry-Citation Counts for Papers That Were Accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition or Rejected but Published, Using Google Scholar, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Chemical Abstracts. 2009, 3(1): 27~35
104 Goran Svensson, Sander Svaeri, Kari Einarsen. Empirical Characteristics of Scholarly Journals in Hospitality and Tourism Research: An Assessment. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 2009, (28): 479~483
105 Deng-Yiv Chiu, Ya-Chen Pan, Shih-Yi Yu. An Automated Knowledge Structure Construction Approach: Applying Information Retrieval and Genetic Algorithm to Journal of Expert Systems with Applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, (36): 9438~9447
106国家科学技术委员会.科学技术期刊管理办法.1993, 3
107刘广第.质量管理学.北京:清华大学出版社, 2003: 22~25
108张九庆.科技学术期刊的质量控制.编辑学报. 2005, 17(6): 407~409
109 Andersen, Jaeger, Scenario. Workshops and Consensus: Towards More Democratic Decision Marking. Science and Public Policy. 2000, (5): 331~340
110 T. F. Edgar, D. Dixon, G. Reklaitis. Vision 2020: Computational Needs of the Chemical Industry. Impact of Advances in Computing and Communication Technologies on Chemical and Technology. National Research Council,Washington: National Academic Press, 2000: 1147~1160
111陈立文,孙宝铮,姜林奇.对多指标综合评价问题的探讨.工业技术经济. 1995, (1): 45~46
112理查.M.霍德盖茨著,黄志强等译.质量测定与高效运作.上海:上海人民出版社, 1999: 157~160
113徐柏容.期刊编辑学概论.沈阳:辽宁教育出版社, 1995: 44~48
114贺晓利,白燕琼.中国科技学术期刊的质量状况及对策.情报杂志. 2003, (10): 116~117
115何英.提高科技期刊质量的几个问题.中国科技期刊研究. 1998, 9(3): 155~157
116吕晓明.我国医学科技期刊的现状及展望分析.卫生软科学. 2003, (6):50~52
117柳晓丽.科技期刊发展中存在的问题及对策.情报探索. 2003, (3): 33~34
118戴龙基,蔡蓉华.中文核心期刊要目总览(2004年版).北京:北京大学出版社, 2004: 2~5
119王祖和.项目质量管理.北京:机械工业出版社, 2004: 116~117
120李晓春,曾瑶.质量管理学(第二版).北京:北京邮电大学出版社, 2006: 36~40
121李金海.项目质量管理.天津:南开大学出版社, 2006: 255~259, 122~123, 147~153
122万玉玲,杨南.量化管理机制在期刊工作中的实践.中国科技期刊研究. 2004, (4): 391~393
123周建英.中医药期刊质量与稿源之关系及应对措施.学报编辑论丛. 2003, (11): 22~24
124李军纪,马艳霞,阮爱萍.加强高校学报质量控制的策略.编辑之友. 2007, (4): 66
125游苏宁.捍卫编辑的独立性.编辑学报. 2006, 18(5): 321
126武小琳,钱文霖.保证学术期刊审定稿科学性的若干理论思考.编辑学报, 2004, 16(1): 4~6
127宋双明,刘阳娥.对现行审稿模式的思考与建议.编辑学报. 2003, 15(5): 359
128温忠麟,侯杰泰,马什赫伯特.结构方程模型检验:拟合指数与卡方准则.心理学报. 2004, 36(2):186~194
129付春玲.关于科技期刊评价体系的研究状况.科技情报开发与经济. 2006,16(7): 90~91
130邓晓群,沈志超.关于学术类科技期刊评价体系的构建思路.编辑之友. 2001, (3): 21~25
131郝海,踪家峰.系统分析与评价方法.北京:经济科学出版社, 2005: 152~153
132罗珉.论管理学复杂性范式.管理科学. 2006, 2(19): 31~32
133王青,王汝宽,苏莲花.科技期刊的反馈控制.医学情报工程. 2003, (6): 453~454
134郝惠琴,董海原.科技期刊出版后期的质量控制.编辑学报. 2004,16(2): 116
135贺晓利,白燕琼.中国科技期刊的质量状况及对策.情报业务研究. 2003, (10): 116~117
136聂文,曾小汉,刘运飞,陈绍远,周晓雁.编辑对提高科技期刊学术质量的作用.江汉大学学报. 2004, 21(4): 83~84
137王爱萍.学报创新及编辑主体作用刍议.陕西广播电视大学学报. 2001, 3(3): 360~62
138贾贤,李忠富,黄东华,曹兵.科技期刊编辑专业化和学者化是保证期刊学术质量的关键.冶金信息导刊. 2006, (2): 40~42
139祝林浩.学术期刊作者群的组建.岭南学刊. 2006, (4): 92~94
140朱进彬.浅谈学术期刊的读者群问题.重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版). 2006, (3): 70~72
141 F.Michael Gorman, J. John. Kanet.Evaluating Operations Management–Related Journals via the Author Affiliation Index. Manufacturing & Services Operations Management. 2005, (17): 3~19
142王青.技期刊的稿源优化控制.编辑学报. 2004, 16(1): 20~21
143张洁,吴晓丽.影响学术期刊学术质量的信息不对称因素分析.西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2007, 26(1): 101~104
144张淑娟.科技期刊作者学术信用评估系统模式的构建.编辑学报. 2005, 17(3): 173~174