英国高等教育中介机构研究
摘要
二十世纪八十年代中期以来,随着国际高等教育质量保障运动蓬勃发展以及公共治理理论的普遍运用,各国要求建立高等教育中介机构的呼声亦越来越高。英国高等教育中介机构是最早出现的也是最具代表性的。对英国高等教育中介机构进行深入分析和研究,对于完善我国高等教育中介机构体系,进而构建完整的教育评估体系具有重要意义。本文对英国高等教育中介机构产生、发展进行了梳理,并阐述了其演进因素,利用图表法和文献法着重研究分析了英国高等教育中介机构的基本属性和职能,深入剖析了中介机构对于英国高等教育的发展所产生的积极和消极影响,并提出了一点冷思考。
Higher Educational Intermediary Bodies have shaped and developed in the buffering government、society and universities, which have spread through the word during the recent twenty years. It is still a new thing in China. Now Higher Educational Intermediary Bodies are very mature in England. This thesis focuses on England Higher Educational Intermediary Body with expectation that it can make contributions to our research and the development of higher education. This thesis analyses production, development and reasons of England Higher Educational Intermediary Bodies, and mainly analyses its basic attributes and functions, and deeply analyses its active and negative influence.
The article is consisted of five chapters:
The first part is introduction which briefly describes the article's background and significant of the study, summarizes general situation of the field in the world, explains the study methods adopted in the paper.
The second part carding its historical development into three periods: original foundation、adjustment and reformation period, and analyses each historical reasons and social background.
The third part mainly talks about its four basic attributes as intermediary、dependent、specialization and justness which make HEFC as an example by showing diagram and quoting original documentaries.
The forth part explore its three main functions such as evaluation and schematization、proposition and consultation、financial funding by documentarily analysis.
The fifth part is evaluation. It complexly analyses England Higher Educational Intermediary Bodies’influence. The positive sides are researched from buffering, government’s macro coordination and leading universities to solve the management’s crisis; the opposite side is analyzed from relation of teaching and researching and universities’benign development. At last the author set forth several suggestions.
Higher Educational Intermediary Bodies have shaped and developed in the buffering government、society and universities, which have spread through the word during the recent twenty years. It is still a new thing in China. Now Higher Educational Intermediary Bodies are very mature in England. This thesis focuses on England Higher Educational Intermediary Body with expectation that it can make contributions to our research and the development of higher education. This thesis analyses production, development and reasons of England Higher Educational Intermediary Bodies, and mainly analyses its basic attributes and functions, and deeply analyses its active and negative influence.
The article is consisted of five chapters:
The first part is introduction which briefly describes the article's background and significant of the study, summarizes general situation of the field in the world, explains the study methods adopted in the paper.
The second part carding its historical development into three periods: original foundation、adjustment and reformation period, and analyses each historical reasons and social background.
The third part mainly talks about its four basic attributes as intermediary、dependent、specialization and justness which make HEFC as an example by showing diagram and quoting original documentaries.
The forth part explore its three main functions such as evaluation and schematization、proposition and consultation、financial funding by documentarily analysis.
The fifth part is evaluation. It complexly analyses England Higher Educational Intermediary Bodies’influence. The positive sides are researched from buffering, government’s macro coordination and leading universities to solve the management’s crisis; the opposite side is analyzed from relation of teaching and researching and universities’benign development. At last the author set forth several suggestions.
引文
①薛天祥主编.教育管理学[M].华东师范大学出版.1997.197.
①乐笑声编著.管理学[M].科学技术文献出版社.1988.147.
②朱国云著.组织理论:历史与流派[M].南京大学出版社.1997.191.
①余可平主编.治理与善治[M]. 社会科学文献出版社.2000.9.11.
①转引自刘春.关于英国大学与政府关系演变的初步研究[D].福建师范大学.
②贺国庆,王宝星,朱文富.外国高等教育史[M].人民教育出版社.2003.383.
③张泰金. 英国的高等教育 历史·现状[M].上海外语教育出版.1995 年版. 48.
④贺国庆,王宝星,朱文富.外国高等教育史[M].人民教育出版社.2003.383.
⑤王承绪,徐 辉.战后英国教育研究[M].江西教育出版社.1992.
①王承绪,徐 辉.战后英国教育研究[M].江西教育出版社.1992.
①杨汉清,韩骅.比较高等教育概论[M].北京:人民教育出版社.1997.271.
②王承绪,徐 辉.战后英国教育研究[M].江西教育出版社.1992.
①The impact of higher education institutions on the UK economy.Universities UK (May 2002).
①转引自朱国辉.国外高等教育评估中介机构评析[J].高等教育研究报.2004.Vol.27.4.
②贺麟.学术与政治[A].杨东平.大学精神[M].上海:文匯出版社,2003.103.
③[美]约翰·S·布鲁贝克.高等教育哲学[M].浙江教育出版社,1987.32.
①[英]阿什比著 滕大春 滕大生译.科技发达时代的大学教育[M].人民教育出版社.1983.6.53-54.
①弗兰斯·F·范富格特.国际高等教育政策比较研究[M].浙江教育出版社.2001.14.
①国家教育发展与政策研究中心编.发达国家教育改革的动向和趋势[M].第三集.人民教育出版社.1990.8.368.
①吕达,周满生主编.当代外国教育改革著名文献[M].英国卷 第二册.人民教育出版社2004 年 8 月第一版.15.
②http://www.hefce.ac.uk/aboutus/history/
①吕达,周满生主编.当代外国教育改革著名文献[M]. 英国卷 第二册.人民教育出版社2004 年 8 月第一版.142-143.
①教育部教育发展研究中心课题组.英格兰高等教育的拨款体制[J].中国高等教育. 2002.5.46.
① A·Gnanam David Bradbury Antony Stella. The UK Research Assessment Exercise: The University Response Benchmarking Quality in Higher Education. Sterling publishers’private limited.2003.195.
① Stephen Court, Association of University Teachers. Government Getting Closer: Higher Education and Devolution in the UK.161.
② Stephen Court, Association of University Teachers. Government Getting Closer: Higher Education and Devolution in the UK. 161-162.
①王承绪主编.学术权力[M].浙江教育出版社.1989.95.
②转引自[英]迈克尔·夏托克编 王义端译.高等教育的结构和管理[M].华东师大出版社.1987.93.
①A·Gnanam David Bradbury Antony Stella. The UK Research Assessment Exercise: The University Response Benchmarking Quality in Higher Education. Sterling publishers’ private limited.2003.195
① David Warher and David Palfreyman. Managing Crisis: A Funding Council Perspective: Chapter 3, Allocating resources in the Higher Education Sector. Open University Press.2003.143-144;145;147;152.
②吕炜等.高等教育财政:国际经验与中国道路选择[M].东北财经大学出版社.2004.12.
③Ted Tapper, University of Sussex, and Brian Salter, University of East Anglia.Interpreting the Process of Change in Higher Education: The Case of the Research Assessment Exercises.11;18.
①Mary Henkel, Centre for the Evaluation of Public Policy and Practice, Brunel University, UK.The Modernization of Research Evaluation: The Case of the UK [J].Higher Education 38,105-122,1999:105.
②David Littlejohn, Travel and Hospitality, Division of Management, Caledonian ,Business School, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland G4 0BA, UK.The UK Research Assessment Exercise 2001: an analysis for hospitality research [J].Hospitality Management23 (2004): 26.
① Mary Henkel, Centre for the Evaluation of Public Policy and Practice, Brunel University, UK.The Modernization of Research Evaluation: The Case of the UK .Higher Education 38,105-122,1999:105.
②张建新.英国高等教育国家体制对中国的启示[J].国际高等教育研究.2005.1:30
③ Gareth Whillams. The market route to mass higher education: British experience 1979~1996.Higher Education Policy Vol.10,No.3/4,1997.
④应若葵,王宪平.英国高等教育管理的若干特点及其启示[J].黑龙江高教研究.2001.1.
①David Warher and David Palfreyman. Managing Crisis: A Funding Council Perspective: Chapter 3, Allocating resources in the Higher Education Sector. Open University Press,2003.143-144.
②David Warher and David Palfreyman. Managing Crisis: A Funding Council Perspective: Chapter 3, Allocating resources in the Higher Education Sector. Open University Press,2003.145.
③David Warher and David Palfreyman. Managing Crisis: A Funding Council Perspective: Chapter 3, Allocating resources in the Higher Education Sector. Open University Press,2003.152.
①David Warher and David Palfreyman. Managing Crisis: A Funding Council Perspective: Chapter 3, Allocating resources in the Higher Education Sector. Open University Press,2003, 152.
②David Warher and David Palfreyman. Managing Crisis: A Funding Council Perspective: Chapter 3, Allocating resources in the Higher Education Sector. Open University Press,2003, 152.
③John Taylor.Institutional Diversity in UK Higher Education: Policy and Outcomes Since the End of the Binary Divide.University of Bath: 269.
①Tony Brinn, Michael John Jones & Maurice Pendlebury. The Impact of Research Assessment Exercises on UK Accounting and Finance Faculty [J]. British Accounting Review (2001)33, 333-355: 341. 333-355:353.
②Sandra Harley,De Montfort University, Leicester, UK. Accountants Divided: Research Selectivity and Academic Accounting Labor UK Universities[J].Critical Perspectives on Accounting (2000)11,549-582:568.;549-582:568,559.
③David Warher and David Palfreyman. Managing Crisis: A Funding Council Perspective: Chapter 3, Allocating resources in the Higher Education Sector. Open University Press,2003.58.
④Kelly Coate, Ronald Barnett and Gareth Williams. Relationships Between Teaching and Research in Higher Education in England Institute of Education. University of London; 164;162.
①Kelly Coate, Ronald Barnett and Gareth Williams. Relationships between Teaching and Research in Higher Education in England Institute of Education. University of London; 164;162.
②范文曜,马陆亭,张伟.国际高等教育日趋明显的评估对拨款的影响[J].中国高等教育,2003,(8).39.
①Ted Tapper, University of Sussex, and Brian Salter, University of East Anglia. Interpreting the Process of Change in Higher Education: The Case of the Research Assessment Exercises. Higher Education Quarterly, 0951–5224 Volume 57, No. 1, January 2003.11;18.
②范文曜,张伟.英国高等教育的评估和大学拨款[J].理工高教研究,2003.6.12.
③Tony Brinn, Michael John Jones & Maurice Pendlebury. The Impact of Research Assessment Exercises on UK Accounting and Finance Faculty [J]. British Accounting Review (2001)33, 333-355: 341. 333-355:353.
④Sandra Harley,De Montfort University, Leicester, UK. Accountants Divided: Research Selectivity and Academic Accounting Labor UK Universities[J].Critical Perspectives on Accounting (2000)11,549-582:568.;549-582:568,559.
①A·Gnanam David Bradbury Antony Stella.The UK Research Assessment Exercise: The University Response Benchmarking Quality in Higher Education.Sterling publishers’private limited.2003.195.
[1]Stephen Court, Association of University Teachers. Government Getting Closer: Higher Education and Devolution in the UK.
[2]Ted Tapper, University of Sussex, and Brian Salter, University of East Anglia.Interpreting the Process of Change in Higher Education: The Case of the Research Assessment Exercises. Higher Education Quarterly, 0951–5224 Volume 57, No. 1, January 2003.
[3]Mary Henkel, Centre for the Evaluation of Public Policy and Practice, Brunel University, UK . The Modernization of Research Evaluation: The Case of the UK [J].Higher Education.1999.
[4]David Littlejohn, Travel and Hospitality, Division of Management, Caledonian ,Business School, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland G4 0BA, UK.The UK Research Assessment Exercise 2001: an analysis for hospitality research [J].Hospitality Management23 (2004).
[5]Gareth Whillams. The market route to mass higher education: British experience 1979~1996.Higher Education Policy Vol.10,No.3/4,1997.
[6]http://www.hefce.ac.uk/aboutus/history/
[7]John Taylor.Institutional Diversity in UK Higher Education: Policy and Outcomes Since the End of the Binary Divide.University of Bath: P269
[8]Tony Brinn, Michael John Jones & Maurice Pendlebury. The Impact of Research Assessment Exercises on UK Accounting and Finance Faculty [J]. British Accounting Review (2001)33, 333-355: 341. 333-355:353
[9]Sandra Harley,De Montfort University, Leicester, UK. Accountants Divided: Research Selectivity and Academic Accounting Labor UK Universities[J].Critical Perspectives on Accounting (2000)11,549-582:568.;549-582:568,559.
[10]Kelly Coate, Ronald Barnett and Gareth Williams. Relationships Between Teaching and Research in Higher Education in England Institute of Education. University of London; P164;P162
[11]Great Britain department of education and science. Higher education: meeting the challenge. London: 1987.3.
[12]The impact of higher education institutions on the UK economy.Universities UK (May 2002)
[13]The New Middle Management: Intermediary Organizations in Education Policy Implementation. Meredith I.Honig. University of Maryland, College Park. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis Spring 2004,Vol.26,No.1.
[14]The UK Research Assessment Exercise: Unintended Consequences. Lewis Elton, University College London. Educational Evaluation Quarterly,0951-5224,Volume 54,No.3 July 2000.
[15]University Strategy in an Age of Uncertainty: The Effect of Higher Education Funding on Old and New Universities. Heather Rolfe, National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR). Higher Education Quarterly, 0951–5224.Volume 57, No. 1, January 2003
[16]All Together Now? Arts andSocial Science Views of Research Assessment in Britain.Sara Delamont, Cardiff University. Higher Education Quarterly, 0951–5224.Volume 58, Nos. 2/3, April/July 2004
[17]Changing Internal Governance: A Discussion of Leadership Rolesand Management Structures in UK Universities. Robin Middlehurst, University of Surrey. Higher Education Quarterly, 0951–5224.Volume 58, No. 4, October 2004
[18]Governance of Higher Education in Britain: The Significance of the Research Assessment Exercises for the Funding Council Model. Ted Tapper and Brian Salter. Higher Education Quarterly, 0951–5224 Volume 58, No. 1, January 2004
[19]Government Getting Closer:Higher Education and Devolution in the UK.Stephen Court,Association of University Teachers.Higher Education Quarterly, 0951–5224.Volume 58, Nos. 2/3, April/July 2004.
[20]The new providers of higher education.Jorge Luis Ibarra Mendivil. Asociacion Nacional de Universidades e Instituciones de Educacion Superior (ANUIES).Mexico, MexicoHigher Education Policy 15 (2002)
[1]A·Gnanam David Bradbury Antony Stella.The UK Research Assessment Exercise: The University Response Benchmarking Quality in Higher Education. Sterling publishers’ private limited.2003.
[2]David Warher and David Palfrey man. Managing Crisis: A Funding Council Perspective: Chapter 3, Allocating resources in the Higher Education Sector. Open University Press,2003.
[3]Higher Education Management.Vol.11 - No. 1. The Impact of the Dearing Report on UK Higher Education Michael L. Shattock . Prof. Maurice Kogan48 Duncan Terrace London N1 8AL United Kingdom. Journal Institutional Management In Higher Education .Organization For Economic Co-operation and Development.1999.
[4]Higher Education Funding Council for England: annual accounts for the year ended 31 March 2005.
[5]Funding higher education in England: How HEFCE allocates its funds. July 2005.Guide.
[1]转引自朱国辉.国外高等教育评估中介机构评析[J].高等教育研究学报 2004.vol27.4.
[2]教育部教育发展研究中心课题组.英格兰高等教育的拨款体制[J].中国高等教育. 2002.5.
[3]张建新.英国高等教育国家体制对中国的启示[J].国际高等教育研究.2005.1
[4]应若葵, 王宪平.英国高等教育管理的若干特点及其启示[J].黑龙江高教研究.2001.1.
[5]范文曜,马陆亭,张伟.国际高等教育日趋明显的评估对拨款的影响[J].中国高等教育,2003,8.
[6]范文曜,张伟.英国高等教育的评估和大学拨款[J].理工高教研究,2003,6.
[7]江庆.英国高等教育财政模式及其改革趋势[J].高教研究与实践.2004.5.
[8]李成名.大学与政府的关系:英国模式之研究[J].南京社会科学教育研究.2003.5
[9]阎光才.国外政府和高校间中介机构的职能特征分析[J].有色金属高教研究.1998.6.
[10]张晓琴.从英国的中介拨款看大学自治与政府干预[J].建材高教理论与实践. 1998.4.
[11]滕世华.公共治理理论及其引发的变革[J].国家行政学院学报.2003.1
[12]韩映雄.政府与大学关系的历史考察及启示[J].现代大学教育.2004.3.
[13]高桂娟.英国高等教育管理改革的动向及启示[J].煤炭高等教育.2002.1.
[14]董秀华.政府在高等教育评估中的职能与作用——个案与比较研究[J]. 比较教育研究.1999.1
[15]李丙龙.中外高等教育中介组织的比较研究[J].煤炭高等教育.2005.3
[16]吴冬梅.英国高等教育评估及其启示[J].辽宁教育研究.2004.8.
[1]薛天祥主编.教育管理学[M]华东师范大学出版.1997.
[2]乐笑声编著.管理学[M].科学技术文献出版社.1988.
[3]余可平主编.治理与善治[M]. 社会科学文献出版社.2000.9.
[4]贺国庆,王宝星,朱文富.外国高等教育史[M].人民教育出版社.2003.
[5]转引自刘春.关于英国大学与政府关系演变的初步研究[D].福建师大.
[6]张泰金. 英国的高等教育 历史·现状[M].上海外语教育出版.1995.
[7]杨汉清,韩骅.比较高等教育概论[M].北京:人民教育出版社.1997.
[8]王承绪、徐 辉.战后英国教育研究[M].江西教育出版社.1992.
[9]贺麟.学术与政治[A].杨东平.大学精神[M].上海:文匯出版社.2003.
[10][美]约翰·S·布鲁贝克.高等教育哲学[M].浙江教育出版社.1987.
[11][英]阿什比著 滕大春 滕大生译.科技发达时代的大学教育[M].人民教育出版社.1983.6.
[12]弗兰斯·F·范富格特.国际高等教育政策比较研究[M].浙江教育出版社.2001.14.
[13]国家教育发展与政策研究中心编.发达国家教育改革的动向和趋势[M].第三集.人民教育出版社.1990.8.
[14] 吕达,周满生主编.当代外国教育改革著名文献[M] 英国卷 第二册.人民教育出版社.2004.8.
[15]王承绪主编.学术权力[M].浙江教育出版社.1989.
[16]转引自[英]迈克尔·夏托克编 王义端译.高等教育的结构和管理[M].华东师大出版社.1987.
[17]吕炜等.高等教育财政:国际经验与中国道路选择[M].东北财经大学出版社.2004.12.
[18][英]奥尔德里奇著,诸惠芳 李洪绪 尹武苗译.简明英国教育史[M].人民教育出版社.1982.
[19]中华人民共和国教育部与国际合作与交流司编.外国高等教育调研报告[M].首都示范大学出版社.2001.
[20]于富增.国际高等教育发展与改革比较[M].北京师范大学出版社.1999.
[21]陈学飞.美国日本德国法国高等教育管理体制改革研究[M].教育科学出版社.1995.
[22]朱国云著.组织理论:历史与流派[M].南京大学出版社.1997.
[23][英]D.S.皮尤编.组织理论精萃[M].彭和平,杨小工译. 中国人民大学出版社.1990.
①乐笑声编著.管理学[M].科学技术文献出版社.1988.147.
②朱国云著.组织理论:历史与流派[M].南京大学出版社.1997.191.
①余可平主编.治理与善治[M]. 社会科学文献出版社.2000.9.11.
①转引自刘春.关于英国大学与政府关系演变的初步研究[D].福建师范大学.
②贺国庆,王宝星,朱文富.外国高等教育史[M].人民教育出版社.2003.383.
③张泰金. 英国的高等教育 历史·现状[M].上海外语教育出版.1995 年版. 48.
④贺国庆,王宝星,朱文富.外国高等教育史[M].人民教育出版社.2003.383.
⑤王承绪,徐 辉.战后英国教育研究[M].江西教育出版社.1992.
①王承绪,徐 辉.战后英国教育研究[M].江西教育出版社.1992.
①杨汉清,韩骅.比较高等教育概论[M].北京:人民教育出版社.1997.271.
②王承绪,徐 辉.战后英国教育研究[M].江西教育出版社.1992.
①The impact of higher education institutions on the UK economy.Universities UK (May 2002).
①转引自朱国辉.国外高等教育评估中介机构评析[J].高等教育研究报.2004.Vol.27.4.
②贺麟.学术与政治[A].杨东平.大学精神[M].上海:文匯出版社,2003.103.
③[美]约翰·S·布鲁贝克.高等教育哲学[M].浙江教育出版社,1987.32.
①[英]阿什比著 滕大春 滕大生译.科技发达时代的大学教育[M].人民教育出版社.1983.6.53-54.
①弗兰斯·F·范富格特.国际高等教育政策比较研究[M].浙江教育出版社.2001.14.
①国家教育发展与政策研究中心编.发达国家教育改革的动向和趋势[M].第三集.人民教育出版社.1990.8.368.
①吕达,周满生主编.当代外国教育改革著名文献[M].英国卷 第二册.人民教育出版社2004 年 8 月第一版.15.
②http://www.hefce.ac.uk/aboutus/history/
①吕达,周满生主编.当代外国教育改革著名文献[M]. 英国卷 第二册.人民教育出版社2004 年 8 月第一版.142-143.
①教育部教育发展研究中心课题组.英格兰高等教育的拨款体制[J].中国高等教育. 2002.5.46.
① A·Gnanam David Bradbury Antony Stella. The UK Research Assessment Exercise: The University Response Benchmarking Quality in Higher Education. Sterling publishers’private limited.2003.195.
① Stephen Court, Association of University Teachers. Government Getting Closer: Higher Education and Devolution in the UK.161.
② Stephen Court, Association of University Teachers. Government Getting Closer: Higher Education and Devolution in the UK. 161-162.
①王承绪主编.学术权力[M].浙江教育出版社.1989.95.
②转引自[英]迈克尔·夏托克编 王义端译.高等教育的结构和管理[M].华东师大出版社.1987.93.
①A·Gnanam David Bradbury Antony Stella. The UK Research Assessment Exercise: The University Response Benchmarking Quality in Higher Education. Sterling publishers’ private limited.2003.195
① David Warher and David Palfreyman. Managing Crisis: A Funding Council Perspective: Chapter 3, Allocating resources in the Higher Education Sector. Open University Press.2003.143-144;145;147;152.
②吕炜等.高等教育财政:国际经验与中国道路选择[M].东北财经大学出版社.2004.12.
③Ted Tapper, University of Sussex, and Brian Salter, University of East Anglia.Interpreting the Process of Change in Higher Education: The Case of the Research Assessment Exercises.11;18.
①Mary Henkel, Centre for the Evaluation of Public Policy and Practice, Brunel University, UK.The Modernization of Research Evaluation: The Case of the UK [J].Higher Education 38,105-122,1999:105.
②David Littlejohn, Travel and Hospitality, Division of Management, Caledonian ,Business School, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland G4 0BA, UK.The UK Research Assessment Exercise 2001: an analysis for hospitality research [J].Hospitality Management23 (2004): 26.
① Mary Henkel, Centre for the Evaluation of Public Policy and Practice, Brunel University, UK.The Modernization of Research Evaluation: The Case of the UK .Higher Education 38,105-122,1999:105.
②张建新.英国高等教育国家体制对中国的启示[J].国际高等教育研究.2005.1:30
③ Gareth Whillams. The market route to mass higher education: British experience 1979~1996.Higher Education Policy Vol.10,No.3/4,1997.
④应若葵,王宪平.英国高等教育管理的若干特点及其启示[J].黑龙江高教研究.2001.1.
①David Warher and David Palfreyman. Managing Crisis: A Funding Council Perspective: Chapter 3, Allocating resources in the Higher Education Sector. Open University Press,2003.143-144.
②David Warher and David Palfreyman. Managing Crisis: A Funding Council Perspective: Chapter 3, Allocating resources in the Higher Education Sector. Open University Press,2003.145.
③David Warher and David Palfreyman. Managing Crisis: A Funding Council Perspective: Chapter 3, Allocating resources in the Higher Education Sector. Open University Press,2003.152.
①David Warher and David Palfreyman. Managing Crisis: A Funding Council Perspective: Chapter 3, Allocating resources in the Higher Education Sector. Open University Press,2003, 152.
②David Warher and David Palfreyman. Managing Crisis: A Funding Council Perspective: Chapter 3, Allocating resources in the Higher Education Sector. Open University Press,2003, 152.
③John Taylor.Institutional Diversity in UK Higher Education: Policy and Outcomes Since the End of the Binary Divide.University of Bath: 269.
①Tony Brinn, Michael John Jones & Maurice Pendlebury. The Impact of Research Assessment Exercises on UK Accounting and Finance Faculty [J]. British Accounting Review (2001)33, 333-355: 341. 333-355:353.
②Sandra Harley,De Montfort University, Leicester, UK. Accountants Divided: Research Selectivity and Academic Accounting Labor UK Universities[J].Critical Perspectives on Accounting (2000)11,549-582:568.;549-582:568,559.
③David Warher and David Palfreyman. Managing Crisis: A Funding Council Perspective: Chapter 3, Allocating resources in the Higher Education Sector. Open University Press,2003.58.
④Kelly Coate, Ronald Barnett and Gareth Williams. Relationships Between Teaching and Research in Higher Education in England Institute of Education. University of London; 164;162.
①Kelly Coate, Ronald Barnett and Gareth Williams. Relationships between Teaching and Research in Higher Education in England Institute of Education. University of London; 164;162.
②范文曜,马陆亭,张伟.国际高等教育日趋明显的评估对拨款的影响[J].中国高等教育,2003,(8).39.
①Ted Tapper, University of Sussex, and Brian Salter, University of East Anglia. Interpreting the Process of Change in Higher Education: The Case of the Research Assessment Exercises. Higher Education Quarterly, 0951–5224 Volume 57, No. 1, January 2003.11;18.
②范文曜,张伟.英国高等教育的评估和大学拨款[J].理工高教研究,2003.6.12.
③Tony Brinn, Michael John Jones & Maurice Pendlebury. The Impact of Research Assessment Exercises on UK Accounting and Finance Faculty [J]. British Accounting Review (2001)33, 333-355: 341. 333-355:353.
④Sandra Harley,De Montfort University, Leicester, UK. Accountants Divided: Research Selectivity and Academic Accounting Labor UK Universities[J].Critical Perspectives on Accounting (2000)11,549-582:568.;549-582:568,559.
①A·Gnanam David Bradbury Antony Stella.The UK Research Assessment Exercise: The University Response Benchmarking Quality in Higher Education.Sterling publishers’private limited.2003.195.
[1]Stephen Court, Association of University Teachers. Government Getting Closer: Higher Education and Devolution in the UK.
[2]Ted Tapper, University of Sussex, and Brian Salter, University of East Anglia.Interpreting the Process of Change in Higher Education: The Case of the Research Assessment Exercises. Higher Education Quarterly, 0951–5224 Volume 57, No. 1, January 2003.
[3]Mary Henkel, Centre for the Evaluation of Public Policy and Practice, Brunel University, UK . The Modernization of Research Evaluation: The Case of the UK [J].Higher Education.1999.
[4]David Littlejohn, Travel and Hospitality, Division of Management, Caledonian ,Business School, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland G4 0BA, UK.The UK Research Assessment Exercise 2001: an analysis for hospitality research [J].Hospitality Management23 (2004).
[5]Gareth Whillams. The market route to mass higher education: British experience 1979~1996.Higher Education Policy Vol.10,No.3/4,1997.
[6]http://www.hefce.ac.uk/aboutus/history/
[7]John Taylor.Institutional Diversity in UK Higher Education: Policy and Outcomes Since the End of the Binary Divide.University of Bath: P269
[8]Tony Brinn, Michael John Jones & Maurice Pendlebury. The Impact of Research Assessment Exercises on UK Accounting and Finance Faculty [J]. British Accounting Review (2001)33, 333-355: 341. 333-355:353
[9]Sandra Harley,De Montfort University, Leicester, UK. Accountants Divided: Research Selectivity and Academic Accounting Labor UK Universities[J].Critical Perspectives on Accounting (2000)11,549-582:568.;549-582:568,559.
[10]Kelly Coate, Ronald Barnett and Gareth Williams. Relationships Between Teaching and Research in Higher Education in England Institute of Education. University of London; P164;P162
[11]Great Britain department of education and science. Higher education: meeting the challenge. London: 1987.3.
[12]The impact of higher education institutions on the UK economy.Universities UK (May 2002)
[13]The New Middle Management: Intermediary Organizations in Education Policy Implementation. Meredith I.Honig. University of Maryland, College Park. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis Spring 2004,Vol.26,No.1.
[14]The UK Research Assessment Exercise: Unintended Consequences. Lewis Elton, University College London. Educational Evaluation Quarterly,0951-5224,Volume 54,No.3 July 2000.
[15]University Strategy in an Age of Uncertainty: The Effect of Higher Education Funding on Old and New Universities. Heather Rolfe, National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR). Higher Education Quarterly, 0951–5224.Volume 57, No. 1, January 2003
[16]All Together Now? Arts andSocial Science Views of Research Assessment in Britain.Sara Delamont, Cardiff University. Higher Education Quarterly, 0951–5224.Volume 58, Nos. 2/3, April/July 2004
[17]Changing Internal Governance: A Discussion of Leadership Rolesand Management Structures in UK Universities. Robin Middlehurst, University of Surrey. Higher Education Quarterly, 0951–5224.Volume 58, No. 4, October 2004
[18]Governance of Higher Education in Britain: The Significance of the Research Assessment Exercises for the Funding Council Model. Ted Tapper and Brian Salter. Higher Education Quarterly, 0951–5224 Volume 58, No. 1, January 2004
[19]Government Getting Closer:Higher Education and Devolution in the UK.Stephen Court,Association of University Teachers.Higher Education Quarterly, 0951–5224.Volume 58, Nos. 2/3, April/July 2004.
[20]The new providers of higher education.Jorge Luis Ibarra Mendivil. Asociacion Nacional de Universidades e Instituciones de Educacion Superior (ANUIES).Mexico, MexicoHigher Education Policy 15 (2002)
[1]A·Gnanam David Bradbury Antony Stella.The UK Research Assessment Exercise: The University Response Benchmarking Quality in Higher Education. Sterling publishers’ private limited.2003.
[2]David Warher and David Palfrey man. Managing Crisis: A Funding Council Perspective: Chapter 3, Allocating resources in the Higher Education Sector. Open University Press,2003.
[3]Higher Education Management.Vol.11 - No. 1. The Impact of the Dearing Report on UK Higher Education Michael L. Shattock . Prof. Maurice Kogan48 Duncan Terrace London N1 8AL United Kingdom. Journal Institutional Management In Higher Education .Organization For Economic Co-operation and Development.1999.
[4]Higher Education Funding Council for England: annual accounts for the year ended 31 March 2005.
[5]Funding higher education in England: How HEFCE allocates its funds. July 2005.Guide.
[1]转引自朱国辉.国外高等教育评估中介机构评析[J].高等教育研究学报 2004.vol27.4.
[2]教育部教育发展研究中心课题组.英格兰高等教育的拨款体制[J].中国高等教育. 2002.5.
[3]张建新.英国高等教育国家体制对中国的启示[J].国际高等教育研究.2005.1
[4]应若葵, 王宪平.英国高等教育管理的若干特点及其启示[J].黑龙江高教研究.2001.1.
[5]范文曜,马陆亭,张伟.国际高等教育日趋明显的评估对拨款的影响[J].中国高等教育,2003,8.
[6]范文曜,张伟.英国高等教育的评估和大学拨款[J].理工高教研究,2003,6.
[7]江庆.英国高等教育财政模式及其改革趋势[J].高教研究与实践.2004.5.
[8]李成名.大学与政府的关系:英国模式之研究[J].南京社会科学教育研究.2003.5
[9]阎光才.国外政府和高校间中介机构的职能特征分析[J].有色金属高教研究.1998.6.
[10]张晓琴.从英国的中介拨款看大学自治与政府干预[J].建材高教理论与实践. 1998.4.
[11]滕世华.公共治理理论及其引发的变革[J].国家行政学院学报.2003.1
[12]韩映雄.政府与大学关系的历史考察及启示[J].现代大学教育.2004.3.
[13]高桂娟.英国高等教育管理改革的动向及启示[J].煤炭高等教育.2002.1.
[14]董秀华.政府在高等教育评估中的职能与作用——个案与比较研究[J]. 比较教育研究.1999.1
[15]李丙龙.中外高等教育中介组织的比较研究[J].煤炭高等教育.2005.3
[16]吴冬梅.英国高等教育评估及其启示[J].辽宁教育研究.2004.8.
[1]薛天祥主编.教育管理学[M]华东师范大学出版.1997.
[2]乐笑声编著.管理学[M].科学技术文献出版社.1988.
[3]余可平主编.治理与善治[M]. 社会科学文献出版社.2000.9.
[4]贺国庆,王宝星,朱文富.外国高等教育史[M].人民教育出版社.2003.
[5]转引自刘春.关于英国大学与政府关系演变的初步研究[D].福建师大.
[6]张泰金. 英国的高等教育 历史·现状[M].上海外语教育出版.1995.
[7]杨汉清,韩骅.比较高等教育概论[M].北京:人民教育出版社.1997.
[8]王承绪、徐 辉.战后英国教育研究[M].江西教育出版社.1992.
[9]贺麟.学术与政治[A].杨东平.大学精神[M].上海:文匯出版社.2003.
[10][美]约翰·S·布鲁贝克.高等教育哲学[M].浙江教育出版社.1987.
[11][英]阿什比著 滕大春 滕大生译.科技发达时代的大学教育[M].人民教育出版社.1983.6.
[12]弗兰斯·F·范富格特.国际高等教育政策比较研究[M].浙江教育出版社.2001.14.
[13]国家教育发展与政策研究中心编.发达国家教育改革的动向和趋势[M].第三集.人民教育出版社.1990.8.
[14] 吕达,周满生主编.当代外国教育改革著名文献[M] 英国卷 第二册.人民教育出版社.2004.8.
[15]王承绪主编.学术权力[M].浙江教育出版社.1989.
[16]转引自[英]迈克尔·夏托克编 王义端译.高等教育的结构和管理[M].华东师大出版社.1987.
[17]吕炜等.高等教育财政:国际经验与中国道路选择[M].东北财经大学出版社.2004.12.
[18][英]奥尔德里奇著,诸惠芳 李洪绪 尹武苗译.简明英国教育史[M].人民教育出版社.1982.
[19]中华人民共和国教育部与国际合作与交流司编.外国高等教育调研报告[M].首都示范大学出版社.2001.
[20]于富增.国际高等教育发展与改革比较[M].北京师范大学出版社.1999.
[21]陈学飞.美国日本德国法国高等教育管理体制改革研究[M].教育科学出版社.1995.
[22]朱国云著.组织理论:历史与流派[M].南京大学出版社.1997.
[23][英]D.S.皮尤编.组织理论精萃[M].彭和平,杨小工译. 中国人民大学出版社.1990.