英国全纳教育研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
全纳教育是于20世纪90年代兴起的国际教育思潮。随着教育平等、教育民主化和全民教育的兴起,随着各国对于教育平等、教育民主化的追求,全纳教育的理念得到世界各国的认可,许多国家开始把全纳教育的思想付诸实践。
     全纳是提高参与并且减少被主流社会排斥的过程。全纳教育是指教育应当满足所有儿童的需要,而不论这些儿童处于何种身体、智力、社会、情感、语言及其他状况。全纳教育是“要提高学生的参与,减少学生被排斥”,从而使每个儿童能够受到最适合其本人的教育。
     英国是当今世界上全纳教育发展较快的国家之一,提高成绩和促进全纳现已成为英国教育发展的两大原则与目标。国际社会的推动以及英国特殊教育面临的问题促使英国政府与民众开始坚定地实施全纳教育。
     英国全纳教育的实施是一个渐进的过程。从华诺克报告、1981年教育法、1988年教育改革法以及“特殊教育需要鉴定与评估实施章程”等一系列重要的法律、法案中可以清晰地透析英国发展全纳教育的历史进程。
     到目前为止,英国已经基本确立了一套全纳教育的实施框架并做了许多具体规划。政府积极推进,从立法的角度保障实施;逐步关闭特殊学校,对残疾儿童转入主流学校实行多样化的安置政策;对残疾儿童的安置与辅导提供多渠道的资金支持;实施灵活的课程计划,对教学方法进行变革,为班级中有特殊教育需要的儿童配备课程辅助人员、学习辅导人员,配备特殊教育需要协调人对整个学校的特殊需要教育政策进行协调;对全纳教育从业人员进行培训;积极吸收儿童家长参加。
     我国自80年代末开始实施随班就读教改试验,在我国有了全纳教育的试验学校、课堂教学模式和教师培训方法,取得了一些的成绩,但也存在许多问题。英国实施全纳教育的做法与经验对我国的随班就读教改试验具有一定的启示和借鉴意义。
Inclusive education is an international education thought emerging in the 1990s. With the rising thoughts of educational equality, democratization and Education for All, and also with the pursuit of educational equality and democratization in every country, the conception of inclusive education was accepted all over the world and many countries begin to put it into practice.
    Inclusion is the process of increasing participation and decreasing exclusion from mainstream social settings. Inclusive education means that education should meet all the children's need, regardless of the states of health, intelligence, society, emotion, language, and etc. Inclusive education tries to increase students' participation and decrease their being excluded, and then makes every child receive optimum education for himself.
    Nowadays, U.K. is one of the countries that inclusive education is developing much faster in the world. To improve performance and accelerate inclusion has become two main principles and targets of education development in U.K.. The drive from international society and the problems special education faces urge British government and the populace to put inclusive education into practice firmly.
    In U.K., the practice of inclusive education is a gradual process. We can clearly dialyze the historical process from a series of important bills: Warnock Report, the 1981 Education Act, the 1988 Education Reform Act and "the Code of Practice", and etc.
    So far, British government has fundamentally established a set of practical frameworks of inclusive education and made some specific projects. They are drived by Government and ensured to take effect by means of legislation. Special schools were closed gradually, diverse placement policies were done to replace disabled children from special schools into mainstream schools. Funds from multi-channels were supplied to replace and support disabled children. Curriculum plans were carried out flexibly and teaching methods were reformed, children with special educational need were provided with curriculum support, learning support assistant, and SENCO who coordinate all school polices of special educational need. Personnel of inclusive education were trained. Children's parents were admitted to attend it actively.
    In China, the experiment of inclusive education began to be performed at the end of 1980s. There are experimental schools of inclusive education, teaching patterns and methods of training teachers, much achievement gained, however, many problems remained. Some measures and experiences from the inclusive education practice in U.K. will enlighten and benefit us in the experiment of inclusive education.
引文
1. Sip Jan Pijl, Cor J.W. Meijre, Seamus Hegarty (1997), Inclusive Education: a Global agenda, London; New York: Routledge.
    2. Josephine C. Jenkinson (1997), Issues and outcomes in special education, Routledge, London.
    3. Peter Clough, Paul Chapman (1998), Managing Inclusive Education: From Policy to Experience, London, P6-13.
    4. Cook, Ruth E. (2000), Adapting Early Childhood Curricula for Children in Inclusive Settings, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Merrill.
    5. Keith Ballard (1999), Inclusive Education: International Voices on Disbility and Justice, Falmer Press, London, P168-170.
    6. Can Parsons (1999), Education, Exclusion and Citizenship, Routledge, London.
    7. Christina Tistone, Lani Florian, Richard Rose (1998), Promoting Inclusive Practice, Routledge, London, P1-7, P13-23.
    8. Linda Jordan and Chris Goodey (1996), Human rights and School Change: the Newhan Story, Centre for Studies on inclusive education.
    9. Newham Council (1996), Strategy for Inclusive Education: 1996 to 2001, P8-16.
    10. The Charter Conference in Newham (1996), Inclusive Education Audit.
    11. Harry Daniels and Philip Garner (1999), World Yearbook of Education 1999: Inclusive education, Kogan Page Limited, London, P96-102.
    12. Michael Farrell (1997), the Special Education Handbook, London: David Fulton Publishers.
    13. Huge Williams & Sheelagh Maloney (1998), Wellmeant, but Failing on Almost All Counts: the Case against Statementing, the British Journal of Special Education, No. 1.
    14. Gary Thomas, Andrew Loxley (2001), Deconstructing special education and constructing inclusion, Buckingham, Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
    15. Harry Daniels (2000), Special education re-formed: beyond rthetoric? London; New York: Falmer Press.
    16. Sally Beveridge (1999), Special educational needs in schools, London; New York: Routledge, P2-31.
    17. Gary Thomas, John Dwyfor Davies (1999), England and Wales: competition and control -or stakeholding and inclusion, World Yearbook of Education, P64-72.
    
    
    18. Josephine C. Jenkinson, (1997), Mainstream or special? Educating students with disabilities, Routledge, London, P10-23, P25-28.
    19. Robin Richardson, Angela Wood (1999), Inclusive schools, Inclusive society, Trentham Books Limited, England, P14-15.
    20. Catherine Clark, Alan Dyson, Alan Millward (1998), Theorising Special Education, Routledge, London, P24-26.
    21. Carry Hornby, Mary Atkinson, Jean Howard(1997), Controversial Issues in Special Education, David Fulton Publishers Ltd, P76-85.
    22.瞿保奎主编,金含芬选编:《英国教育改革》,人民教育出版社,1993年10月版,第422—433页
    23.陈云英、华国栋主编:《特殊儿童的随班就读试验:农村的成功经验》,教育科学出版社,1998年版。
    24.联合国教科文组织编写,陈云英、陈海平、纳新译:《课堂上的特殊儿童》,教育科学出版社,1993年版。
    25.陈云英主编:《残疾儿童的教育诊断》,科学出版社,1996年版。
    26.陈云英主编:《智力落后儿童教育的研究》,华夏出版社,1999年版。
    27.朴永馨主编:《特殊教育学》,福建教育出版社,1994年5月第1版。
    28.赵中建编:《教育的使命——面向21世纪的教育宣言和行动纲领》,教育科学出版社,1996年6月版,第128—153页。
    29.汤盛钦主编:《特殊教育概论——普通班级中有特殊教育需要的学生》,上海教育出版社,1998年版。
    30.陈云英主编:《残疾儿童的教育诊断》,科学出版社,1996年版。
    31.黄志成:“全纳教育之研究——访英国全纳教育专家托尼·布思教授”,《全球教育展望》,2001年第2期。
    32.黄志成:“全纳教育——21世纪全球教育研究新课题”,《全球教育展望》,2001年第1期。
    33.陈云英、华国栋:“合作学习与随班就读教学改革”,《有特殊教育需要的儿童与师资研究》,1995年第1期。
    34.黄志成:“试论全纳教育的价值取向”,《外国教育研究》,2001年第3期。
    35.陈云英、陈海平编译:《随班就读的各种模式》,教育科学出版社,1993年版。
    36.黄志成:“西班牙的全纳教育”,《全球教育展望》,2001年第3期。
    37.黄志成,王俊:《英国从一体化教育走向全纳教育》,《现代特殊教育》2001年第11期。
    38.陈云英:“在中国发展全纳性教育”,《中国特殊教育》,1997年第2期。
    
    
    39.郑太年:“特殊需要教育的国际努力”,《全球教育展望》,2001年第7期。
    40.陈云英、陈海平、彭霞光:“教师对弱智儿童随班就读态度调查”,《特殊儿童与师资研究》,1994年第2期。
    41.吴安安:“全纳性教育:对现行特殊教育及普通教育制度的挑战”,《现代特殊教育》,2000年第11期。
    42.黎龙辉:“英国家长参与有特殊教育需要的儿童教育的评价”,《中国特殊教育》,1999年第1期。
    43.赵微:“英国培养普通师资具有特教技能”,《中国特殊教育》,1999年第4期。
    44.刘颂等:“有特殊教育需要的儿童家长参与的权利”,《中国特殊教育》,2000年第4期。
    45.韦小满:“英国的残疾人与全纳性学习”,《现代特殊教育》,2001年第1期。
    46.孙钢:“隔离制特殊教育和一体化特殊教育的比较研究”,《中国特殊教育》,1999年第1期。
    47.Margaret C.Wang,郭伯良译:“对有特殊需要的学生的教育:全纳性教育体系的一个方面”,《中国特殊教育》,1997年第3期。
    48.杨际贤:“大中城市实施一体化教育”,《中国特殊教育》,1997年第3期。
    49.张玉华:“上海市特殊教育师资培训的目标、内容和策略”,《中国特殊教育》,1999年第3期。
    50.顾明远:“学习化时代的全民教育”,《光明日报》,2001年7月12日。
    51.覃海琪:“随班就读的几个问题”,《中国特殊教育》,2000年第3期。

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700