基于生存分析的信号交叉口非机动车穿越行为研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
机动车与非机动车的混合交通是当前我国城市交通的主要特征,也是造成我国城市交通拥堵和事故频发的一个重要原因。非机动车出行灵活、准时性高,是解决中短距离出行和接驳换乘的理想交通方式,作为符合我国国情并拥有广泛群众基础的代步工具,在现阶段依然具有不可替代性。以前的非机动车主要指人力自行车,近年来随着技术的发展,电动自行车的使用已越来越普遍。与人力自行车相比,电动自行车可到达的距离更远,速度更快,但伴随的交通隐患也更高,这给我国城市交通带来了一些新的问题。此外,非机动车是一种健康、环保、低能耗的出行方式。发展城市非机动车交通是预防和缓解交通拥堵、减少大气污染和能源消耗的重要途径之一,关系人民群众的生产生活和城市可持续发展。
     然而,城市交通中,非机动车是一个相对弱势的群体,涉及到非机动车的交通事故比重一直居高不下。非机动车交通事故中,闯红灯违规是导致事故发生的主要原因,由于较差的法律约束和人们较低的安全意识,当前非机动车的闯红灯行为在我国极为普遍。目前,研究信号交叉口非机动车闯红灯行为的文献很少,更鲜有文献运用生存分析方法来分析非机动车闯红灯行为。生存分析的优点是可以考虑删失数据,并能将事件的结果和出现此结果所经历的时间结合起来分析,非常适合用来研究信号交叉口闯红灯行为。据此,本论文结合当前我国交通的特点,以非机动车为主要研究对象,基于生存分析方法,重点分析城市干道信号交叉口非机动车的穿越行为,揭示信号交叉口非机动车骑行者的违规风险、等待忍耐时间及其关键影响因素,并对特殊的管控措施进行评价。具体来讲,本论文的主要工作如下:
     (1)非机动车穿越行为的实证调研。通过选取典型城市干道信号交叉口对非机动车穿越行为进行实地拍摄,获取基础数据。分析非机动车和行人穿越信号交叉口过程中的等待时间分布、等待区域空间分布、运行轨迹、运行速度、穿越间隙等,揭示信号交叉口自行车、电动车与行人的微观行为差异。结果表明电动车的违规率明显高于行人和自行车;来自两侧非机动车的违规率明显高于直行到达的;行人不等待直接违规的比例显著低于自行车和电动车;违规者中行人的等待时间明显比自行车和电动车长,电动车运行速度比自行车和行人的快,而穿越的安全界限则比自行车和行人小。
     (2)非机动车骑行者的等待忍耐时间分布规律。基于实证调研数据,建立信号交叉口非机动车穿越前的等待忍耐时间持续模型,对红灯期间到达的非机动车在穿越前的等待忍耐时间进行估计,探索不同等待时间下非机动车闯红灯违规率的分布。结果表明随着等待时间的增加,非机动车的违规概率逐渐增大,18.2%的骑行者几乎不等待就直接闯红灯违规;20.6%的骑行者愿意等待时间120s,甚至更长。并指出对删失数据的不当处理会导致明显高估非机动车骑行者的闯红灯违规率。
     (3)非机动车闯红灯行为的Cox风险模型及其影响因素分析。构建非机动车骑行者等待忍耐时间的Cox风险模型,运用调查数据对模型参数进行估计,系统地分析各个潜在因素对骑行者的违规风险和等待忍耐时间的影响。结果表明交通方式、等待位置、高峰期、从众行为和机动车流量等对非机动车闯红灯行为有显著影响。电动车骑行者比自行车的违规风险更高,愿意等待的时间更短;等待位置越靠前(靠近路)违规风险越大;平峰期的违规风险大于高峰期;正在违规的人越多,机动车流量越小,则非机动车骑行者越容易违规,等待时间越短。并指出建立的Cox风险模型可用来预测或评估这些交通运营、管理和政策的变化对非机动车闯红灯行为的影响。
     (4)非机动车通勤者的安全穿越可靠性建模与分析。运用可靠性思想和加速风险模型理论,结合非机动车穿越问题,建立非机动车通勤者的安全穿越可靠性模型,基于实证数据,找出最优可靠性模型的数学形式,并揭示影响通勤者安全穿越可靠性的关键因子。进一步把非机动车通勤者分为等待者和不等待者两类,分别探讨了他们的安全穿越可靠性问题。结果表明在各个潜在影响因素中,骑行者的等待位置、来自方向和从众行为等行为特征因素是影响非机动车通勤者安全穿越可靠性的最主要因素;Gompertz模型最适合用来拟合非机动车等待人群的安全穿越可靠性问题。
     (5)交通协管的管控效果评价。通过运用Logistic模型、方差分析、协方差分析和生存分析等方法,比较信号交叉口有无交通协管时非机动车的穿越行为特征、闯红灯违规率和等待忍耐时间的差异,据此来评价交通协管对非机动车闯红灯行为的管控效果。结果表明交通协管对闯红灯行为有显著影响。有协管时非机动车和行人的闯红灯违规率都显著低于无协管的情形,有协管时的等待忍耐时间则比无协管时更长;不同来自方向中,交通协管对直行人群的闯红灯行为具有很好的管控效果,而对来自左右两侧人群的管控效果相对较弱。
As a developing country, China has its own traffic characteristics. A mix of non-motorized and motorized vehicles is an important traffic type in China. It is also one of the most important reasons which cause urban traffic congestion and frequent accidents. Because of its high flexibility and punctuality, a non-motor vehicle is the ideal mode of transportation for short/middle distance travel and transfer to public transport. Non-motorized vehicle is irreplaceable at this stage because it is suitable to our national conditions and has widely basis of the masses. In the past, Non-motorized vehicle only refers to human bicycle. In recent years, with the development of technology, electric bike is widely used. Compared with human bicycle, riding an electric bike can reach faster and farther, but more unsafely. It is a new problem of urban traffic in China. In addition, riding a non-motorized vehicle is healthy, non-polluting, and energy-efficient. Development of urban non-motorized traffic can prevent and mitigate traffic congestion, reduce air pollution and energy consumption. It is very beneficial to people's living and urban sustainable development.
     However, non-motor vehicle is a relatively weak group in urban traffic. There are always a high proportion of traffic accidents involving non-motor vehicles. One typical type of rule violation behavior is red-light running. Because of the poor law enforcement and peoples'low safety awareness, red-light running is rather prevalent in China. The literature review suggests that very little has been done on the red-light running of non-motor vehicles, much less on this study based on survival analysis method. Survival analysis has the advantage that can consider censored data, and can combine to study the result of the event and the time that the result experienced. This method is very suitable for studying red-light crossing behavior at signalized intersections. Therefore, according to our national traffic characteristic, based on survival analysis methods, this dissertation focused on the study of crossing behavior and waiting endurance times of non-motorized vehicles and their influence factors. Then, a special management measure was evaluated. Specifically, the contents of this dissertation are as follows:
     (1) Crossing behavior of non-motorized vehicles was analyzed by the empirical research. First, typical intersections on main urban roads were chosen, basic data about crossing behavior was collected by field observation. Then, several variables which described crossing behavior at intersection were coded and were used to reveal microscopic behavior differences among cyclists, electric bike riders and pedestrians. These variables included waiting time, waiting position, moving trajectory, travel speed and safety margin, etc. The results show that red-light crossing rates of electric bike riders are significantly higher than those of cyclists and pedestrians. The riders coming from both sides are more likely to run against a red light than the ones of straight arrival. Pedestrians are less likely to not wait to cross the red light than bicycles and electric vehicles. Generally, they are likely to wait longer times than cyclists and electric bike riders. Among three modes of transportation, an electric bike has the fastest speed and the smallest safety margin.
     (2) Waiting endurance time distributions of non-motor vehicles were explored. Based on the empirical research, a duration model of waiting times for non-motor vehicles crossing an intersection was proposed. Their waiting times were estimated. The red-light crossing rates of non-motor vehicles were explored. The results show that the red-light crossing rates increase with the increasing waiting time. About18.2%of riders are at high risk of violation and low waiting time to cross the intersections. About20.6%of all the riders are generally non-risk takers who can obey the traffic rules after waiting for120seconds. In addition, it is noted that the improper handle of censored data would overestimate the red-light crossing rates of non-motor vehicles.
     (3) Cox hazard-based models and the influence factors of red-light running behavior were investigated. Cox hazard-based models of riders' waiting endurance times were proposed. Based on the surveyed data, the model parameters were estimated. The effects of various potential factors on riders' violation risk and waiting time were analyzed systematically. The results show that traffic mode, waiting position, rush hour, conformity behavior and motorized vehicle volume have significantly impact on red-light running behavior. Electric bike riders have higher risks and shorter waiting times than cyclists. Nearer to main roads waiting position is, more likely to run against a red light riders are. Riders in off-peak hours are more likely to run against a red light than those in peak hours. Riders have higher risk and shorter waiting times with less volume of motorized vehicles, as well as the bigger number of other riders that are crossing against the red light when arrives. The Cox hazard model formulated in this chapter can be applied to forecast temporal shifts in waiting duration times of non-motorized vehciles due to changes in traffic operation, management and control.
     (4) Safety crossing reliability of commuter riders was modeled and analyzed. Crossing reliability of commuter riders at intersections was proposed by using reliability theory and accelerated hazard models method. Based on the empirical data, the optimal mathematical model of safety crossing reliability was chosen. The key factors affecting the crossing reliability were investigated. Furthermore, commuter riders are divided into two categories:wait and don't wait. Their safety crossing reliabilities were discussed respectively. The results show that some potential variables including waiting position, moving direction and conformity behavior have significantly impacts on safety crossing reliability of commuter riders. Gompertz distribution model is very appropriate for fitting of safety crossing reliability for waiting commuter riders.
     (5) Control effects of traffic wardens on red-light running behavior were evaluated. By using Logistic model, analysis of variance, covariance analysis and survival analysis methods, riders'behavior characteristics, red-light running rates and waiting endurance times were analyzed with and without traffic wardens. According to the comparison, the control effect of traffic wardens on red-light crossing behavior was evaluated. The results show that traffic wardens have a significantly impact on red-light crossing behavior. Red-light crossing rates of riders and pedestrians with traffic wardens are lower than those without traffic wardens. Waiting endurance times of riders and pedestrians with traffic wardens are longer than those without traffic wardens. Traffic wardens have good control effects on the straight-arrival groups, but no significant effects on groups coming from the left and right sides.
引文
[1]黄海军.城市交通网络平衡分析理论与实践.人民交通出版社,北京,1994
    [2]新浪网.中科院专家:15座城市每天因拥堵损失近10亿元.2010-10-13http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2010-10-13/104021266374.shtml.
    [3]David S, Bill E, Tim L. TTI's 2012 urban mobility report,2012,12. http://mobility.tamu.edu/ums/
    [4]交通运输部公路科学研究院编著.2011年中国道路交通安全蓝皮书.人民交通出版社,北京,2011
    [5]王亮,申国朝,杨磊.郑州市城市交通体系中非机动车交通的现状与前景.城市道桥与防洪,2009,(7):20-22.
    [6]东方网.交通出行特征——出行方式结构.2011-03-09http://sh.eastday.com/qtmt/20110309/ula863060.html.
    [7]新浪网.电动自行车社会保有量超过一亿二千万辆.自行车保有量1.2亿辆.2011-02-10http://finance.sina.com.cn/roll/20110210/11083591117.shtml
    [8]网易网,电动自行车保有量已超1.6亿辆.2013-10-24http://news.163.com/13/1024/04/9BU4PMQ300014AED.html
    [9]生意宝网,电动车和自行车产业纳入津重点八大产业.2010-02-10.http://china.toocle.com/cbna/item/2010-02-10/5001110.html
    [10]Vandenbulcke G, Thomas I, de Geus B, Degraeuwe B, Torfs R, Meeusen R, IntPanis L. Mapping bicycle use and the risk of accidents for commuters who cycle to work in Belgium. Transport Policy,2009 16 (2):77-87.
    [11]网易网,韩国鼓励民众“绿色出行”的惠民政策.2010-03-19http://zhaokuang541020.blog.163.com/blog/static/12793010620102193133 6293/
    [12]中国青年网,自行车出行比例下降非机动车道严重缩水.2010-12-13.http://news.youth.cn/cj/201012/t20101213_1428022_1.htm
    [13]国家能源局网,英国多举措推动绿色出行减少碳排放.2012-06-20.http://www.nea.gov.cn/2012-06/20/c_131664583.htm
    [14]New York City Department of City Planning. Bicycle and Greenway Planning in New York City, 2012.http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/html/transportation/td_projectbicycle.shtml
    [15]New York City Department of Transportation. Street design manual, Second edition, New York, 2013.
    [16]Los Angeles Department of City Planning.2010-2015 bicycle plan. Los Angeles, 2011.http://planning.lacity.org/cwd/gnlpln/transelt/NewBikePlan/TOC_BicyclePlan.ht m
    [17]网易网,“生态自行车”助力“绿色出行”.2010-07-21http://news.163.com/10/0702/03/6AIB654I00014AED.html
    [18]中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建城[2012]133号:住房城乡建设部、发展改革委、财政部关于加强城市步行和自行车交通系统建设的指导意见.2012.09.05
    [19]Tiwari G, Bangdiwala S, Saraswat A, Gaurav S. Survival analysis:pedestrian risk exposure at signalized intersections. Transportation Research Part F,2007,10(2):77-89.
    [20]平潭时报.八成以上交通事故涉及两轮车.2012-03-05http://ptsb.pingtan.gov.cn/html/2012-03/05/content_3503.htm
    [21]公安部交通管理局编.2004年度中华人民共和国道路交通事故统计年报.2005,6.
    [22]公安部交通管理局编.2010年度中华人民共和国道路交通事故统计年报.2011,6.
    [23]交通资讯,杭州电动自行车交通事故平均每月造成15人死亡,城市交通,2011,(2):97.http://www.cqvip.com/Read/Read.aspx?id=37745076
    [24]全球电动车网,宁波电动自行车事故死亡率驾驶员占八成.2011-10-18. http://www.qqddc.com/html/news/201110/news_21924.html
    [25]新浪网,去年沈涉及电动自行车交通事故死亡122人.2013-05-13.http://news.sina.com.cn/o/2013-05-13/071927103472.shtml
    [26]宁海在线网,2012年全市道路交通事故报告出炉:电动自行车驾驶者,全年死亡205人.2013-01-15. http://bbs.nhzj.com/thread-1771312-1-1.html
    [27]光明网,“重典治违”一年交通事故“四降低”近四成交通事故和电动自行车有关.2014-01-29.http://news.gmw.cn/newspaper/2014-01/29/content_2836959.htm
    [28]Spence L J, Dykes E H, Bohn D J, Wesson D E. Fatal bicycle accidents in children:a plea for prevention. Journal of Pediatric Surgery,1993,28(2):214-216.
    [29]Basford L, Reid S, Lester T, Thomson J, Tolmie A. Drivers'perceptions of cyclists. Department for Transport 42,2002.
    [30]O'Brien S, Tay R, Watson B. An exploration of Australian driving anger. In:Road Safety Research, Policing and Education Conference, Adelaide, South Australia,2002.
    [31]新华网,沈阳公布电动车交通事故数据超速闯红灯成祸首.2013-05-20.http://news.xinhuanet.com/yzyd/auto/20130520/c_115833796.htm
    [32]和讯网,非机动车有6类交通违法易发交通事故.2013-04-02.http://news.hexun.com/2013-04-02/152732580.html
    [33]辽宁新闻网.朝阳市电动车逆行闯红灯交通肇事数量居高不下.2013-12-25.http://www.In.chinanews.com/html/2013-12-25/787828.html
    [34]Retting R A, Ulmer R G, Williams A F. Prevalence and characteristics of red light running crashes in the United States. Accident Analysis and Prevention,1999,31(6):687-694.
    [35]Porter B E, England K J. Predicting red-light running behavior:a traffic safety study in three urban settings. Journal of Safety Research,2000,31 (1):1-8.
    [36]Porter B E, Berry T. A nationwide survey of self-reported red light running:measuring prevalence, predictors, and perceived consequences. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2001,33 (6):735-741.
    [37]Herbert Martinez K L, Porter B E. Characterizing red light runners following implementation of a photo enforcement program. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2006,38 (5):862-870.
    [38]Porter B E, Johnson K L, Bland J F. Turning off the cameras:red light running characteristics and rates after photo enforcement legislation expired. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2013,50(1): 1104-1111.
    [39]Sze N N, Wong S C, Pei X, Choi P W, Lo Y K. Is a combined enforcement and penalty strategy effective in combating red light violations? An aggregate model of violation behavior in Hong Kong. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2011,43(1):265-271.
    [40]Rosenbloom T. Crossing at a red light:behavior of individuals and groups. Transportation Research Part F,2009,12(5):389-394.
    [41]Li Y, Fernie G. Pedestrian behavior and safety on a two-stage crossing with a center refuge island and the effect of winter weather on pedestrian compliance rate. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2010,42(4):1156-1163.
    [42]Lipovac K, Vujanic M, Marie B, Nesic M. The influence of a pedestrian countdown display on pedestrian behavior at signalized pedestrian crossings. Transportation Research Part F,2013,20: 121-134.
    [43]Lipovac K, Vujanic M, Marie B, Nesic M. Pedestrian behavior at signalized pedestrian crossings. Journal of Transportation Engineering,2013,139(2):165-172.
    [44]Ishapue M M, Noland R B. Behavioural issues in pedestrian speed choice and street crossing behavior:a review. Transport Review,2007,28(1):61-85.
    [45]Papadimitriou E, Yannis G, Golias J. A critical assessment of pedestrian behavior models. Transportation Research Part F,2009,12(3):242-255.
    [46]孙世君.信号交叉口行人违章行为心理研究.北京交通大学硕士学位论文,2007.
    [47]周致纳,史忠科,李迎峰.行人群体闯红灯行为决策模型.系统工程理论与实践,2009,29(11):177-182.
    [48]潘汉中、陈鹏、马静洁.信号交叉口行人违章过街从众心理研究.交通标准化,2010,234:150-156.
    [49]李开兵,汪劭.行人交通违规行为的心理学研究.公路交通科技,2007,24(5):130-134.
    [50]Zhou R G, Horrey W J, Yu R F. The effect of conformity tendency on pedestrians'road-crossing intentions in China:an application of the theory of planned behavior. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2009,41(3):491-497.
    [51]Li Q F, Wang Z A, Yang J G, Wang J M. Pedestrian delay estimation at signalized intersections in developing cities. Transportation Research Part A,2005,39(1):61-73.
    [52]Yang J G, Deng W, Wang J M, Li Q F, Wang Z A. Modeling pedestrians' road eossing behavior in traffic system micro-simulation in China. Transportation Research Part A,2006,40(2): 280-290.
    [53]Johnson M, Charlton J, Oxley J. Cyclists and red light-a study of behaviour of commuter cyclists in Melbourne. In:Australasian Road Safety Research, Policing and Education Conference, Adelaide,10-12 November,2008.
    [54]Johnson M, Newstead S, Charlton J, Oxley J. Riding through red lights:The rate, characteristics and risk factors of non-compliant urban commuter cyclists. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2011,43(1):323-328.
    [55]Johnson M, Charlton J, Oxley J, Newstead S. Why do cyclists infringe at red lights? An investigation of Australian cyclists' reasons for red light infringement. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2013,50(1):840-847.
    [56]Wu C X, Yao L, Zhang K. The red-light running behavior of electric bike riders and cyclists at urban intersections in China:an observational study. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2012, 49(11):186-192.
    [57]Zhang Y Q, Wu C X. The effects of sunshields on red light running behavior of cyclists and electric-bike riders. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2013,52:210-218.
    [58]许逸伦,王雪松,杨东援.城市信号交叉口助动车违法行为特征分析.中国安全科学学报,2011, 21(10):43-51.
    [59]赵雪娟.信号交叉口非机动车与行人违章行为研究,北京交通大学硕士论文,北京,2006.
    [60]Pucher J, Buehler R, Seinen M. Bicycling renaissance in North America? An update and re-appraisal of cycling trends and policies. Transportation Research Part A,2011,45(6):451-475.
    [61]Census Bureau's American Community Survey.2000 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates,2009.
    [62]Bassett D R, Pucher J, Buehler R, Thompson D L, Crouter S E. Walking, cycling, and obesity rates in Europe, North America, and Australia. Journal of Physical Activity and Health,2008,5:795-814.
    [63]Heran F. Bicycles and sustainable transports policies. PREDIT final research report,2012.
    [64]Scheiman S, Moghaddas H S, Bjornstig U, Bylund P, Saveman B. Bicycle injury events among older adults in Northern Sweden:a 10-year population based study. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2010,42(2):758-763.
    [65]Australian Bureau of Statistics. Environmental issues:waste management and transport use,2009.
    [66]Minikel E. Cyclist safety on bicycle boulevards and parallel arterial routes in Berkeley, California. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2012,45(2):241-247.
    [67]Bernhoft I M, Carstensen G. Preferences and behaviour of pedestrians and cyclists by age and gender. Transportation Research Part F,2008,11(2):83-95.
    [68]Felonneau M L, Causse E, Constant A, Contrand B, Messiah A, Lagarde E. Gender stereotypes and superior conformity of the self on a sample of cyclists. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2013,50(1):336-340.
    [69]Steg L, Brussel A V. Accidents, aberrant behaviours, and speeding of young moped riders. Transportation Research Part F,2009,12(6):503-511.
    [70]Lawson A, Pakrashi V, Ghosh B, Szeto W Y. Perception of safety of cyclists in Dublin City. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2013,50(1):499-511.
    [71]Cho G, Rodriguez D A, Khattak A J. The role of the built environment in explaining relationships between perceived and actual pedestrian and bicyclist safety. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2009,41(4):692-702.
    [72]Wegman F, Zhang F, Dijkstra A. How to make more cycling good for road safety. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2012,44(1):19-29.
    [73]Huang L, Wu J P. A study on cyclist behavior at signalized intersections. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems,2004,5(4):293-299.
    [74]黄玲.信号交叉口自行车微观行为研究.北京交通大学硕士学位论文,2004.
    [75]黄玲.混合交通流无信号交叉口自行车微观行为研究.北京交通大学博士学位论文,2007.
    [76]任刚,王卫杰,张永,周竹萍著.非机动化交通参与者交通行为安全性—建模、评价及决策系统.北京:科学出版社,2012,6.
    [77]Zhao X, Ren G, Du X, Wang P, Wang W J. Characteristics and risk of violation behavior of non-motorists at signalized intersections. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition),2011, 27(4):423-429.
    [78]张磊,任刚,王卫杰.基于计划行为理论的自行车不安全行为模型研究.中国安全科学学报,2010,20(7):4348.
    [79]Summala H, Pasanen E, Rasanen M, Sievanen J. Bicycle accidents and drivers'visual search at left and right turns. Accident Analysis and Prevention,1996,28:147-153.
    [80]Rasanen M, Summala H. Attention and expectation problems in bicycle-car collisions:an in-depth study. Accident Analysis and Prevention,1998,30:657-666.
    [81]Kim J, Kim S, Ulfarsson G, Porrello L. Bicyclist injury severities in bicycle-motor vehicle accidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2007,39(2):238-251.
    [82]Bil M, Bilova M, Muller I. Critical factors in fatal collisions of adult cyclists with automobiles. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2010,42(6):1632-1636.
    [83]Carter D L, Hunter W W, Zegeer C V, Stewart J R, Huang H. Bicyclist intersection safety index. Transportation Research Record,2007,2031:18-24.
    [84]Garder P. Bicycle accidents in Maine:an analysis. Transportation Research Record,1994,1438: 34-41.
    [85]Garder P, Leden L, Thedeen T. Safety implications of bicycle paths at signalized intersections. Accident Analysis and Prevention,1994,26 (4):429-439.
    [86]Klop J, Khattak A. Factors influencing bicycle crash severity on two-lane, undivided roadways in North Carolina. Transportation Research Record,1999,1674:78-85.
    [87]Rasanen M, Summala H. Attention and expectation problems in bicycle-car collisions:an in-depth study. Accident Analysis and Prevention,1998,30:657-666.
    [88]Rasanen M, Koivisto I, Summala H. Car driver and bicyclist behavior at bicycle crossings under different priority regulations. Journal of Safety Research,1999,30:67-77.
    [89]Reynolds C C, Harris M A, Teschke K, Cripton P A, Winters M. The impact of transportation infrastructure on bicycling injuries and crashes:a review of the literature. Environmental Health, 2009,21:8-47.
    [90]Wang Y, Nihan N. Estimating the risk of collisions between bicycles and motor vehicles at signalized intersections. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2004,36(3):313-321.
    [91]Wood J, Lacherez P, Marszalek R, King M. Drivers'and cyclists'experiences of sharing the road: incidents, attitudes and perceptions of visibility. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2009,41 (4): 772-776.
    [92]Broughton J, Keigan M, Yannis G, Evgenikos P, et al. Estimation of the real number of road casualties in Europe. Safety Science,2010,48(3):365-371.
    [93]PROMISING. Cost-benefit analysis of measures for vulnerable road users. Final report of Workpackage 5 of the European research project PROMISING (Promotion of Measures for Vulnerable Road Users), Deliverable D5. Transport Research Laboratory TRL, Crowthorne, Berkshire,2001.
    [94]National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Traffic safety facts 2009 data, bicyclists and other cyclists,2009.
    [95]Ekman R, Welander G, Svanstrom L, Schelp L, Santesson P. Bicycle-related injuries among the elderly-a new epidemic? Public Health,2001,115(1):38.
    [96]Rodgers G. Bicycle and bicycle helmet use patterns in the United States in 1998. Journal of Safety Research,2000,31(3):149-158.
    [97]Rodgers G. Factors associated with the crash risk of adult bicyclists. Journal of Safety Research, 1997,28 (4):233-241.
    [98]Stone M, Broughton J. Getting off your bike:cycling accidents in Great Britain in 1990-1999. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2003,35(4):549-556.
    [99]Chaurand N, Delhomme P. Cyclists and drivers in road interactions:a comparison of perceived crash risk. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2013,50(1):1176-1184.
    [100]Castanier C, Paran F, Delhomme. Risk of crashing with a tram:Perceptions of pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists. Transportation Research Part F,2012,15(4):387-394.
    [101]Martha C, Delhomme P. Risk comparative judgments while driving a car among competitive road cyclists and non-cyclists. Transportation Research F,2009,12 (3):256-263.
    [102]Moller M, Hels T. Cyclists'perception of risk in roundabouts. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2008,40(3):1055-1062.
    [103]Parkin J, Wardman M, Page M. Models of perceived cycling risk and route acceptability. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2007,39 (2):364-371.
    [104]Daniels S, Nuyts E, Wets G. The effects of roundabouts on traffic safety for bicyclists:an observational study. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2008,40:518-526.
    [105]Rasanen M, Summala H. Car drivers' adjustments to cyclists at roundabouts. Transportation Human Factors,2000,2(1):1-17.
    [106]Sakshaug L, Laureshyn A, Svensson A, Hyden C. Cyclists in roundabouts-different design solutions. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2010,42:1338-1351.
    [107]韩宝睿,马健霄,仲小飞.电动自行车的交通特性研究.森林工程,2008,24(6):29-32.
    [108]石巨鹏.电动自行车交通现状分析与对策研究.重庆交通大学硕士学位论文,重庆,2007,10.
    [109]刘颖.城市电动车问题分析与对策研究.同济大学博士学位论文,上海,2008,8.
    [110]王曼丽.城市道路电动自行车的交通安全特征分析.西南交通大学硕士学位论文,成都,2010,6.
    [11 1]马国忠,明士军,吴海涛.电动自行车安全特性分析.中国安全科学学报,2006,16(4):49-52.
    [112]朱文婷,许聪,石剑荣,韦保仁.电动自行车交通风险与车载、车速的关系研究.交通信息与安全,2011,29(5):92-95.
    [113]罗江凡.电动自行车交通安全相关问题及管理研究.西南交通大学硕士论文,成都,2008,6.
    [114]郑杰.当今非机动车交通特点及管理措施研究.城市道桥与防洪,201 1,(5):18-24.
    [115]董斌杰.电动助动车综合交通特征研究.同济大学硕士学位论文,上海,2008,3.
    [116]张飞.我国电动自行车发展状况及管理对策研究.郑州大学硕士学位论文,2006,5.
    [117]刘玥.浅谈我国电动自行车的发展.科技传播,2010,(16):44,47.
    [118]付卫刚,吴改选,宋树艳,张仰谦.郑州市电动自行车现状调查及管理对策探讨.科技信息,2009,(19):291,396.
    [119]白辂韬,周继彪,郭延永,白翰,吴瑶.电动自行车通行能力研究.科技信息,2010,(1):401402.
    [120]宋力,吴海军.道路交通事故中电动自行车驾驶员损伤特点观察.中国法医学会第十一次法医临床学学术研讨会,2008:144-146.
    [121]Yao L, Wu Z X. Traffic safety of e-bike riders in China, safety attitudes, risk perception, and aberrant riding behaviors. Transportation Research Record,2012,2314:49-56.
    [122]潘晓东,马小翔,赵晓翠.信号交叉口非机动车骑行特性及安全性实验研究.交通科学与工程,2010,26(4):60-64.
    [123]Lin S, He M, Tan Y L, He M W. Comparison study on operating speeds of electric bicycles and bicycles:experience from field investigation in Kunming, China. Transportation Research Record, 2008,2048:52-59.
    [124]Weinert J. The rise of electric two-wheelers in China:factors for their success and implications for the future. PhD Dissertation, University of California Davis, USA, California,2007
    [125]Weinert J, Ma C, Yang X, Cherry C. Electric two-wheelers in China:effect on travel behavior, mode shift, and user safety perceptions in a medium-sized city. Transportation Research Record, 2007,2038:62-68.
    [126]Weinert J, Ma C, Cherry C. The transition to electric bikes in China:history and key reasons for rapid growth. Transportation,2007,34 (3):301-318.
    [127]Weinert J, Ogden J, Sperling D, Burke A. The future of electric two-wheelers and electric vehicles in China. Energy Policy,2008,36(7):2544-2555.
    [128]Cherry C. Electric Two-wheelers in China:analysis of environmental safety, and mobility impacts. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, USA, California,2007.
    [129]Cherry C, Cervero R. Use characteristics and mode choice behavior of electric bike users in China. Transport Policy,2007,14(3):247-257.
    [130]Cherry C, Weinert J, Yang X. Comparative environmental impacts of electric bikes in China. Transportation Research Part D,2009,14(5):281-290.
    [131]Cherry C. Electric Two-wheelers in China:promise, progress and potential. Access,2010,37: 17-24.
    [132]Cherry C, Jones L. Electric two-wheelers in India and Vietnam:market analysis and environmental impacts. Asian Development Bank. RPT091118,2010.
    [133]Lawless J F. Statistical models and Methods for Lifetime Data. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 2002.
    [134]Lee E T, Wang J W. Statistical Methods for Survival Data Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York,2003.
    [135]Bhat C R. Duration modeling, Handbook of Transport Modelling. Hensher D A, Button K J. eds., Elsevier Science, Oxford,2000:91-111.
    [136]Hensher D A, Mannering F L. Hazard-based duration models and their application to transport analysis. Transport Reviews,1994,14(1):63-82.
    [137]Hamed M M, Mannering F L. Modeling travelers'postwork activity involvement:toward a new methodology. Transportation Science,1993,27(4):381-394.
    [138]Ettema D, Borgers A, Timmermans H. Competing risk hazard model of activity choice, timing, sequencing, and duration. Transportation Research Record,1995,1493:101-109.
    [139]Bhat C R. A hazard-based duration model of shopping activity with nonparametric baseline specification and nonparametric control for unobserved heterogeneity. Transportation Research Part B,1996,30(3):189-207.
    [140]Bhat C R. A generalized multiple durations proportional hazard model with an application to activity behavior during the evening work-to-home commute. Transportation Research Part B, 1996,30(6):465-480.
    [141]BhatC R, Steed J L. A continuous-time model of departure time choice for urban shopping trips. Transportation Research Part B,2002,36(3):207-224.
    [142]Bhat C R, Sivakumar A, Axhausen K W. An analysis of the impact of information and communication technologies on non-maintenance shopping activities. Transportation Research Part B,2003,37(10):857-881.
    ] Bhat C R, Frusti T, Zhao H M, Schonfelder S, Axhausen K W. Intershopping duration:an analysis using multiweek data. Transportation Research Part B,2004,38(1):39-60.
    ] Bhat C R, Srinivasan S, Axhausen K W. An analysis of multiple interepisode durations using a unifying multivariate hazard model. Transportation Research Part B,2005,39(9):797-823.
    ] Niemeier D A, Morita J G. Duration of trip-making activities by men and women. Transportation, 1996,23(4):353-371.
    ] Yee J L, Niemeier D A. Analysis of activity duration using the Puget sound transportation panel. Transportation Research Part A,2000,34(8):607-624.
    ] Kharoufeh, J P, Goulias K G. Nonparametric identification of daily activity durations using kernel density estimators. Transportation Research Part B,2002,36(1):59-82.
    ] Mohammadian A, Doherty S T. Modeling activity scheduling time horizon, Duration of time between planning and execution of pre-planned activities. Transportation Research Part A,2006, 40(6):475-490.
    ] Ruiz T, Timmermans H. Changing the duration of activities in resolving scheduling conflicts. Transportation Research Part A,2008,42(2):347-359.
    ] Lee B, Timmermans H J. A latent class accelerated hazard model of activity episode durations. Transportation Research Part B,2007,41(4):426-447.
    ] Berg P V, Arentze T, Timmermans H. A latent class accelerated hazard model of social activity duration. Transportation Research Part A,2012,46(1):12-21.
    ] Zhong M, Hunt J D. Exploring Best-Fit Hazard Functions and Lifetime Regression Models for Urban Weekend Activities Case Study. Journal of Transportation Engineering,2010,136(3): 255-266.
    ] Ettema D, Bastin F, Polak J, Ashiru O. Modelling the joint choice of activity timing and duration. Transportation Research Part A,2007,41(9):827-841.
    ] Habib K M, Day N, Miller E J. An investigation of commuting trip timing and mode choice in the Greater Toronto Area, Application of a joint discrete-continuous model. Transportation Research Part A,2009,43(7):639-653.
    ] Habib K M. Modeling commuting mode choice jointly with work start time and work duration. Transportation Research Part A,2012,46(1):33-47.
    ] Mannering F, Winston C. Brand loyalty and the decline of American automobile firms. Brookings papers on economic activity. Microeconomics,1991:67-114.
    ] Gilbert C C S. A duration model of automobile ownership. Transportation Research Part B,1992, 26(2):97-114.
    ] De Jong G. A disaggregate model system of vehicle holding duration, type choice and use. Transportation Research Part B,1996,30(4):263-276.
    ] Baltas N C, Xepapadeas A. Accelerating vehicle replacement and environmental protection, the case of passenger cars in Greece. Journal of Transport economics and Policy,1999,33(3): 329-342.
    ] Yamamoto T, Kitamura S. An analysis of household vehicle holding durations considering intended holding durations. Transportation Research A,2000,34(5):339-351.
    ] Yamamoto T, Madre J L, Kitamura R. An analysis of the effects of French vehicle inspection program and grant for scrappage on household vehicle transaction. Transportation Research Part B, 2004,38(10):905-926.
    [162]Chen C, Niemeier D. A mass point vehicle scrappage model. Transportation Research Part B,2005, 39(5):401-415.
    [163]Chang H L, Yeh T H. Regional motorcycle age and emissions inspection performance:A Cox regression analysis. Transportation Research Part D,2006,11(5):324-332.
    [164]Chang H L, Yeh T H. Exploratory analysis of motorcycle holding time heterogeneity using a split-population duration model. Transportation Research Part A,2007,41(6):587-596.
    [165]Jovanis P P, Chang H L. Disaggregate model of highway accident occurrence using survival theory. Accident Analysis & Prevention,1989,21(5):445-458.
    [166]Jones B, Janssen L, Mannering F. Analysis of the frequency and duration of freeway accidents in Seattle. Accident Analysis and Prevention,1991,23(4):239-255.
    [167]Mannering F L. Male/female driver characteristics and accident risk:Some new evidence. Accident Analysis and Prevention,1993,25(1):77-84.
    [168]Nam D, Mannering F. An exploratory hazard-based analysis of highway incident. Transportation Research Part A,2000,34(2):85-102.
    [169]Chung Y. Development of an accident duration prediction model on the Korean Freeway Systems. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2010,42(1):282-289.
    [170]Stathopoulos A, Karlaftis M G. Modeling duration of urban traffic congestion. Journal of Transportation Engineering,2002,128(6):587-590.
    [171]Skabardonis A, Varaiya P, Petty K F. Measuring recurrent and nonrecurrent traffic congestion. Transportation Research Record,2003,1856:118-124.
    [172]周映雪,杨小宝,环梅,四兵锋.基于生存分析的城市道路交通拥堵持续时间研究.应用数学和力学,2013,34(1):98-106
    [173]杨小宝,周映雪.交通拥堵持续时间的非参数生存分析.北京交通大学学报,2013,37(2):134-137.
    [174]Paselk T A, Mannering F L. Use of duration models for predicting vehicular delay at US/Canadian border crossing. Transportation,1994,21:249-270.
    [175]Guo H W, Gao Z Y, Yang X B, Zhao X M, Wang W H. Modeling travel time under influence of on-street parking, Journal of Transportation Engineering,2012,138(2):229-235.
    [176]Guo H W, Wang W H, Guo W W, Zhao F C. Modeling lane-keeping behavior of bicyclists using survival analysis approach. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society,2013, Article ID 197518: 1-6.
    [177]Yang X B, Huan M, Guo H W, Gao L. Car travel time estimation near a bus stop with non-motorized vehicles. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems,2011,6(4): 1350-1357.
    [178]Yang X B, Gao Z Y, Guo H W, Huan M. Survival analysis of car travel time near a bus stop in developing countries. Science in China Series E,2012,55(8):2355-2361.
    [179]Hamed M M. Analysis of pedestrians' behavior at pedestrian crossings. Safety Science,2001,38: 63-82.
    [180]Tiwari G, Bangdiwala S, Saraswat A, Gaurav S. Survival analysis:pedestrian risk exposure at signalized intersections. Transportation Research Part F,2007,10(2):77-89.
    [181]Guo H W, Gao Z Y, Yang X B, Jiang X B. Modeling pedestrian violation behavior at signalized crosswalk in developing countries:a hazard based duration approach. Traffic Injury Prevention, 2011,12(1):96-103.
    [182]Wang W H, Guo H W, Gao Z Y, Bubb H. Individual differences of pedestrian behaviour in midblock crosswalk and intersection. International Journal of Crashworthiness,2011,16(1):1-9.
    [183]Guo H W, Wang W H, Guo W W, Jiang X B, Bubb H. Reliability analysis of pedestrian safety crossing in urban traffic environment. Safety Science,2012,50(4):968-973.
    [184]刘光新,李克平,孙剑.信号控制交叉口行人过街等待时间研究.中国安全科学学报,2009,19(9):159-166.
    [185]卢守峰,王红茹,刘喜敏.基于生存分析的行人过街最大等待时间研究.交通信息与安全,2009,27(5):69-70.
    [186]Brilon W, Geistefeldt J, Regler M. Reliability of freeway traffic flow:a stochastic concept of capacity, Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Maryland,2005:125-144.
    [187]Iliescu D C, Garrow L A, Parker R A. A hazard model of US airline passengers'refund and exchange behavior. Transportation Research Part B,2008,42(3):229-242.
    [188]Chatterjee K, Ma K. R. Modeling the Timing of User Responses to New Urban Public Transport Service, Application of Duration Modeling. Transportation Research Record,2007,2010:62-72.
    [189]Chatterjee K, Ma K R. Time taken for residents to adopt a new public transport service:examining heterogeneity through duration modeling. Transportation,2009,36:1-25.
    [190]Wong J T, Tsai S C. A survival model for flight delay propagation. Journal of Air Transport Management,2012,23:5-11.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700