矿井通风系统可拓综合评价方法的研究与应用
|
摘要
矿井通风系统作为矿井生产系统的重要组成部分,对维护矿井安全生产有着重要的作用,合理地评价矿井通风系统对矿井通风日常技术管理、通风系统优化改造、矿井安全生产具有十分重要的意义,是保证矿井通风系统合格的一种有效方法。
矿井通风系统是一个受多种因素影响的、随机的、动态的、复杂的系统。本文紧紧围绕矿井通风系统评价的基本内容:在技术可行的前提下要求矿井通风系统安全可靠、经济合理,以矿井通风系统的定义为依据,建立了一套全面科学的评价指标体系,该评价指标体系主要涵盖了技术可行性、经济合理性和安全可靠性等3个方面的11个评价指标。
本文应用可拓学的理论与方法,建立多层次可拓综合评价模型。该模型以综合关联度作为评价准则,避免了评价中的主观性。通过将该方法对龙口矿业集团公司梁家煤矿和山东省三河口生建煤矿的通风系统进行评价,指出该矿通风系统整体状况的优劣,通风系统中存在的问题,并提出了相应的改进对策。结果表明,该方法较其他评价方法更加客观,结论更符合生产实际。
As one of important production system, Mine ventilation system plays an extremely important role on maintaining mine safety production. Reasonable evaluating ventilation system to mine ventilation daily technical management, ventilation system optimization transform, safely production of the mine has a great important meaning. And it is an effective method to guarantee mine ventilation system qualified.
The ventilation system is one that is influenced by many kinds of factors and is random, dynamic, complicated. Rounded the basic content that the mine ventilation system is safe, reliable and economy is rational on the premise of feasible technology and based on the definition of the mine ventilation system, an overall and scientific ventilation index system was put forward, Which includes 11 pieces of indices mainly covering the three aspects of technical feasibility, economical rationality and safety reliability on mine ventilation system.
In this paper, a model of multi-level extension synthetic evaluation was established by applying extenics theory and methods. In this model, the comprehensive correlative degree was taken as the evaluation criteria so as to avoid the subjectivity caused by human during evaluation. Then, this model was applied to evaluate the ventilation system of Liangjia mine of Longkou Mining Group Company and Sanhekou shengjian colliery of Shandong province, the comprehensive status of this ventilation system was obtained, the existing problems and the corresponding countermeasures were put forward. The evaluation result indicates that this method is more objective than other evaluation methods mentioned in this article and the result is more in accord with the production reality than other methods.
矿井通风系统是一个受多种因素影响的、随机的、动态的、复杂的系统。本文紧紧围绕矿井通风系统评价的基本内容:在技术可行的前提下要求矿井通风系统安全可靠、经济合理,以矿井通风系统的定义为依据,建立了一套全面科学的评价指标体系,该评价指标体系主要涵盖了技术可行性、经济合理性和安全可靠性等3个方面的11个评价指标。
本文应用可拓学的理论与方法,建立多层次可拓综合评价模型。该模型以综合关联度作为评价准则,避免了评价中的主观性。通过将该方法对龙口矿业集团公司梁家煤矿和山东省三河口生建煤矿的通风系统进行评价,指出该矿通风系统整体状况的优劣,通风系统中存在的问题,并提出了相应的改进对策。结果表明,该方法较其他评价方法更加客观,结论更符合生产实际。
As one of important production system, Mine ventilation system plays an extremely important role on maintaining mine safety production. Reasonable evaluating ventilation system to mine ventilation daily technical management, ventilation system optimization transform, safely production of the mine has a great important meaning. And it is an effective method to guarantee mine ventilation system qualified.
The ventilation system is one that is influenced by many kinds of factors and is random, dynamic, complicated. Rounded the basic content that the mine ventilation system is safe, reliable and economy is rational on the premise of feasible technology and based on the definition of the mine ventilation system, an overall and scientific ventilation index system was put forward, Which includes 11 pieces of indices mainly covering the three aspects of technical feasibility, economical rationality and safety reliability on mine ventilation system.
In this paper, a model of multi-level extension synthetic evaluation was established by applying extenics theory and methods. In this model, the comprehensive correlative degree was taken as the evaluation criteria so as to avoid the subjectivity caused by human during evaluation. Then, this model was applied to evaluate the ventilation system of Liangjia mine of Longkou Mining Group Company and Sanhekou shengjian colliery of Shandong province, the comprehensive status of this ventilation system was obtained, the existing problems and the corresponding countermeasures were put forward. The evaluation result indicates that this method is more objective than other evaluation methods mentioned in this article and the result is more in accord with the production reality than other methods.
引文
[1]《国家安全生产科技发展规划》.煤矿领域研究报告(2004-2010)
[2]王庆一.煤矿安全一国际经验与对策建议[J].中国煤炭,2003(4):44
[3]经建生,王宝兴,郑巍等.特别重大瓦斯爆炸的产生原因.消防科学与技术,2006,25(1):15-19
[4]Antomic bogarin.Fault-Tree analysis:A knowledge Engineering Apporach Transaction on Reliability.2000.333-335
[5]王广亮.系统工程与安全评价.冶金工业部环境保护研究所,1991
[6]AICHER.Dow's Chemical Explosion Index Guide New York:American Institute of Chemical Engineers,1994
[7]MOPGE.Dow's Fire&Explosion index hazard classofication guide.NewYork:American institute of Chemical Engineers,1987
[8]ALKBHT.Dow's Fire&Explosion index hazard classofication guide.NewYork:American institute of Chemical Engineers,1994
[9]罗云,樊运晓,马晓春.风险分析与安全评价.北京:化学工业出版社,2004
[10]莫里阿蒂.系统安全工程与管理,罗兰译.武汉:冶金工业部安全技术研究所,1985
[11]SIUN.Risk assessment for dynamic system:an overview.Reliability Engineering and System Safety,1994,12(43):43-73
[12]HOLLNAGLE.Reliability of man-machine interaction Reliability Engineering and System Safety,1992(38):81-89
[13]FINKELAM.Risk assessment research:only the eginning Risk.Analysis,1994,14(6):97-110
[14]郭振龙.工业装置安全卫生预评价方法.北京:化学工业出版社,1999
[15]吴宗之.国外危险评价软件研究进展.劳动保护技术,1994(3):24-29
[16]王永传,郁文贤,庄钊文.基于模糊数的故障树分析方法研究.电子产品可靠性与环境试验,2000(1):10-15
[17]SIPSOUCC.Risk assessment as the basis for the introduction of new system.Mining Engineering,1995(11):343-348
[18]国家安全生产监督管理局编.安全评价(修订版).北京:煤炭工业出版社,2004
[19]煤炭工业部.矿井通风质量标准及检查评定办法.北京:煤炭工业出版社,1982
[20]煤炭工业部.生产矿井质量标准化标准。北京:煤炭工业出版社,1994
[21]隋鹏程,中国矿山灾害,长沙:湖南人民出版社,1998.10-25
[22]陈毅然.论安全性评价.人类工效学,2000.8-12
[23]刘铁民,张兴凯等编,安全评价方法应用指南,化学工业出版社,北京,2005.1-17
[24]刘友英.衡量矿井通风难易程度和指标.煤矿安全,1989(5):31-35
[25]江仁川,朱锦良.试论矿井综合评价指标.煤炭科学技术,1994,22(8):44-46
[26]黄元平,赵以惠。矿井通风系统评价方法.煤矿安全,1983(9):24-31
[27]林香民.矿井通风系统模糊综合评判法.煤矿安全,1985(12):11-17
[28]沈斐敏.矿井通风系统合理性的综合评判.第二次全国采矿学术会议论文集(汇),1986(11):283-294
[29]张提.矿井通风系统的灰色综合指数评价法.煤矿安全,1989(11):36-39
[30]刘明志.应用模糊综合评判法评价矿井通风系统的实践.煤矿安全,1993(10):22-24
[31]郁钟铭,丘宇光.层次分析法(AHP)在矿井通风系统方案优化中的应用.贵州工业大学学报,1997(5):62-69
[32]祝启坤.衡量生产矿井通风系统质量指标的探讨.武汉化工学院学报,1995,17(2):36-40
[33]山东矿业学院,矿井通风系统优化研究报告,1994
[34]辛篙,范明训,谭允祯.矿井通风系统方案的灰色综合评价.煤矿安全,1994(3):41-43
[35]武卫东.平顶山煤业集团六矿通风系统优化研究:[硕士学位论文].焦作工学院,2000
[36]谭允祯.矿井通风系统管理技术理论.北京:煤炭工业出版社,1998.66-88
[37]Li Xing chun,ZhangYou di,Shi Hua wei,et al.Optimization Study for the Large Mining System.In:Huang Ping,Wang Jianjun,Li Sheng cai,et al.Progress in Safety Science and Technology Vol Ⅱ.Beijing:Science Press,1998.78-82
[38]谢贤平,赵梓成.灰色聚类法在矿井通风系统评价中的应用.工业安全与防尘, 1991(1):1-5
[39]谢贤平,赵梓成.矿井通风系统评价的人工神经网络模型化.矿山技术,1996,24(4):13-17
[40]郝天轩,杨运良.基于人工神经网络的矿井通风系统安全可靠性评价.淮南工学院学报,2000(增)
[41]谭允祯.矿井通风系统优化.北京:煤炭工业出版社.1992
[42]李秉莆.评定矿井通风系统的参数指标.煤矿安全,1988(8):33-35
[43]张国枢.通风安全学[M].徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,2000.85-100,133-142
[44]辛嵩等.矿井通风系统方案的综合评价.煤矿安全.1994(3):41-43.
[45]张学志,陈功玉.AID与Delphi法相结合确定供应商评价指标权重[J].物流技术,2005(9):71-74
[46]Gale WJ.The application of field and computer methods for pillar design in weak ground.In:Aziz NI,Indraratna,editors.International Conference on Geomechanics Ground Control in Mining and Underground Construction,University of Wollongong,Wollongong NSW,1998.p:243-261
[47]江毕成等.矿井安全评价中安全心理测试系统的研究之一[J].劳动安全与健康,1999
[48]郭建民,祝文君。基于层次分析法的地下空间资源潜在价值评估[J].地下空间与工程学报,2005(5):656-661
[49]赵焕臣等.层次分析法.北京:科学出版社,1986
[50]冯兴隆.大红山铜矿矿井通风系统优化改造研究:[硕士学位论文].昆明理工大学,2005
[51]蔡文.物元分析.广州:广东高等教育出版社,1987
[52]蔡文.物元模型及其应用.北京:北京科学技术文献出版社,1994
[53]蔡文,杨春燕,林伟初.可拓工程方法.北京:科学出版社,2000
[54]Cai wen,The Extension set and Non-compatible problems editor chien weizhang.Advances Mathmatics and Mechnics in china,international Academic publishers,1990
[2]王庆一.煤矿安全一国际经验与对策建议[J].中国煤炭,2003(4):44
[3]经建生,王宝兴,郑巍等.特别重大瓦斯爆炸的产生原因.消防科学与技术,2006,25(1):15-19
[4]Antomic bogarin.Fault-Tree analysis:A knowledge Engineering Apporach Transaction on Reliability.2000.333-335
[5]王广亮.系统工程与安全评价.冶金工业部环境保护研究所,1991
[6]AICHER.Dow's Chemical Explosion Index Guide New York:American Institute of Chemical Engineers,1994
[7]MOPGE.Dow's Fire&Explosion index hazard classofication guide.NewYork:American institute of Chemical Engineers,1987
[8]ALKBHT.Dow's Fire&Explosion index hazard classofication guide.NewYork:American institute of Chemical Engineers,1994
[9]罗云,樊运晓,马晓春.风险分析与安全评价.北京:化学工业出版社,2004
[10]莫里阿蒂.系统安全工程与管理,罗兰译.武汉:冶金工业部安全技术研究所,1985
[11]SIUN.Risk assessment for dynamic system:an overview.Reliability Engineering and System Safety,1994,12(43):43-73
[12]HOLLNAGLE.Reliability of man-machine interaction Reliability Engineering and System Safety,1992(38):81-89
[13]FINKELAM.Risk assessment research:only the eginning Risk.Analysis,1994,14(6):97-110
[14]郭振龙.工业装置安全卫生预评价方法.北京:化学工业出版社,1999
[15]吴宗之.国外危险评价软件研究进展.劳动保护技术,1994(3):24-29
[16]王永传,郁文贤,庄钊文.基于模糊数的故障树分析方法研究.电子产品可靠性与环境试验,2000(1):10-15
[17]SIPSOUCC.Risk assessment as the basis for the introduction of new system.Mining Engineering,1995(11):343-348
[18]国家安全生产监督管理局编.安全评价(修订版).北京:煤炭工业出版社,2004
[19]煤炭工业部.矿井通风质量标准及检查评定办法.北京:煤炭工业出版社,1982
[20]煤炭工业部.生产矿井质量标准化标准。北京:煤炭工业出版社,1994
[21]隋鹏程,中国矿山灾害,长沙:湖南人民出版社,1998.10-25
[22]陈毅然.论安全性评价.人类工效学,2000.8-12
[23]刘铁民,张兴凯等编,安全评价方法应用指南,化学工业出版社,北京,2005.1-17
[24]刘友英.衡量矿井通风难易程度和指标.煤矿安全,1989(5):31-35
[25]江仁川,朱锦良.试论矿井综合评价指标.煤炭科学技术,1994,22(8):44-46
[26]黄元平,赵以惠。矿井通风系统评价方法.煤矿安全,1983(9):24-31
[27]林香民.矿井通风系统模糊综合评判法.煤矿安全,1985(12):11-17
[28]沈斐敏.矿井通风系统合理性的综合评判.第二次全国采矿学术会议论文集(汇),1986(11):283-294
[29]张提.矿井通风系统的灰色综合指数评价法.煤矿安全,1989(11):36-39
[30]刘明志.应用模糊综合评判法评价矿井通风系统的实践.煤矿安全,1993(10):22-24
[31]郁钟铭,丘宇光.层次分析法(AHP)在矿井通风系统方案优化中的应用.贵州工业大学学报,1997(5):62-69
[32]祝启坤.衡量生产矿井通风系统质量指标的探讨.武汉化工学院学报,1995,17(2):36-40
[33]山东矿业学院,矿井通风系统优化研究报告,1994
[34]辛篙,范明训,谭允祯.矿井通风系统方案的灰色综合评价.煤矿安全,1994(3):41-43
[35]武卫东.平顶山煤业集团六矿通风系统优化研究:[硕士学位论文].焦作工学院,2000
[36]谭允祯.矿井通风系统管理技术理论.北京:煤炭工业出版社,1998.66-88
[37]Li Xing chun,ZhangYou di,Shi Hua wei,et al.Optimization Study for the Large Mining System.In:Huang Ping,Wang Jianjun,Li Sheng cai,et al.Progress in Safety Science and Technology Vol Ⅱ.Beijing:Science Press,1998.78-82
[38]谢贤平,赵梓成.灰色聚类法在矿井通风系统评价中的应用.工业安全与防尘, 1991(1):1-5
[39]谢贤平,赵梓成.矿井通风系统评价的人工神经网络模型化.矿山技术,1996,24(4):13-17
[40]郝天轩,杨运良.基于人工神经网络的矿井通风系统安全可靠性评价.淮南工学院学报,2000(增)
[41]谭允祯.矿井通风系统优化.北京:煤炭工业出版社.1992
[42]李秉莆.评定矿井通风系统的参数指标.煤矿安全,1988(8):33-35
[43]张国枢.通风安全学[M].徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,2000.85-100,133-142
[44]辛嵩等.矿井通风系统方案的综合评价.煤矿安全.1994(3):41-43.
[45]张学志,陈功玉.AID与Delphi法相结合确定供应商评价指标权重[J].物流技术,2005(9):71-74
[46]Gale WJ.The application of field and computer methods for pillar design in weak ground.In:Aziz NI,Indraratna,editors.International Conference on Geomechanics Ground Control in Mining and Underground Construction,University of Wollongong,Wollongong NSW,1998.p:243-261
[47]江毕成等.矿井安全评价中安全心理测试系统的研究之一[J].劳动安全与健康,1999
[48]郭建民,祝文君。基于层次分析法的地下空间资源潜在价值评估[J].地下空间与工程学报,2005(5):656-661
[49]赵焕臣等.层次分析法.北京:科学出版社,1986
[50]冯兴隆.大红山铜矿矿井通风系统优化改造研究:[硕士学位论文].昆明理工大学,2005
[51]蔡文.物元分析.广州:广东高等教育出版社,1987
[52]蔡文.物元模型及其应用.北京:北京科学技术文献出版社,1994
[53]蔡文,杨春燕,林伟初.可拓工程方法.北京:科学出版社,2000
[54]Cai wen,The Extension set and Non-compatible problems editor chien weizhang.Advances Mathmatics and Mechnics in china,international Academic publishers,1990