重点镇吸纳农业转移人口实证研究
|
摘要
诺贝尔经济学奖获得者斯蒂格利茨认为,中国的城镇化与美国高科技发展将对21世纪人类发展产生深刻影响。中国进入21世纪面对很多新问题和新挑战,中国小城镇正经历一个急剧变革的时代。2014年3月《国家新型城镇化规划》发布并提出,增强中心城市辐射带动功能,加快发展中小城市,有重点地发展小城镇,促进大中小城市和小城镇协调发展。十八届三中全会提出有序推进农业转移人口市民化。通过具有产业或资源、政策等比较优势的重点镇吸纳农业转移人口,将在中国城镇化进程中起到至关重要的作用。
农业转移人口在向大城市转移的过程中面临着被边缘化、候鸟式迁移、留城难度加大等困难与障碍。其在融入城市过程中处于被边缘化的状态,在劳动报酬、子女教育、社会保障、住房等许多方面并不能与城市居民享有同等待遇,且就业并不稳定,时常出现了“有工打、留城市,无工打、返家乡”候鸟式迁移的局面,无法有效保障农业转移人口的权益。与城市相比较而言,重点镇优势在于准入门槛低,特别是生活成本、居住成本和社会成本低等。重点镇发展需要农业转移人口提供支撑,以促进其他要素的集聚,同时重点镇也能为农业转移人口就业与定居提供的较为有利的条件。在此背景下,对重点镇吸纳农业转移人口的研究,显得尤为迫切和必要。
本文站在迁入地角度,以重点镇中的农业转移人口为研究对象,将重点镇吸纳农业转移人口,分为“吸”与“纳”两个阶段,即农业转移人口迁入重点镇与定居重点镇两个阶段。基于这两个阶段,本文主要回答两个问题：一是相关制度将会对农业转移人员定居重点镇产生什么样的影响,以及会对农业转移人口定居城镇意愿产生怎样的间接影响?二是农业转移人口定居城镇意愿受哪些因素的影响,与城市相比而言,其有什么样的特点?
基于以上两个问题：本文重点从理论层面分析重点镇吸纳农业转移人口的一般性问题,以农业转移人口的视角分析相关制度对试点镇吸纳农业转移人口定居重点镇的影响,重点研究相关制度对农业转移人口定居城镇所需要条件,即对其就业情况、社会保障情况、受教育情况产生的影响,包括对农业转移人口定居重点镇意愿的间接影响,进一步对福州市13个试点镇的农业转移人口定居重点镇意愿的影响因素做实证研究,与已有定居城市意愿的相关文献进行适当的比较分析,探讨影响农业转移人口定居重点镇与城市意愿的个人特征的差异,最后提出加快推进试点镇吸纳农业转移人口的建议。具体来讲,主要形成以下几点结论：
1、本文所研究的重点镇,即重点小城镇,是指人口达到一定规模、区位优势明显、经济发展潜力大、服务功能较完善、规划管理水平较高的小城镇。福建省重点镇包括报送国家的全国重点镇与市级以上综合改革试点镇。农业转移人口包括农民工及其赡养的人口。重点镇吸纳农业转移人口分为吸与纳两个阶段：一是“吸”的阶段,指从农村或农业生产转移到城镇或非农业生产的阶段,即迁入重点镇阶段；二是“纳”的阶段,指农业转移人口定居城镇阶段,即定居重点镇阶段。
2、改革至今,中国小城镇发展经历了由“重点发展小城镇”到“有重点地发展小城镇”的转变,小城镇对农业转移人口的吸纳也经历了“严格控制农村人流入小城镇”、“允许务工、经商、办服务业的农民自理口粮到集镇落户”、“加快小城镇户籍管理制度的改革与农民进镇落户”、“逐步把符合条件的农业转移人口转为城镇居民”的变化。然而,在现阶段并非任何小城镇都作为当前加快发展与加强建设的重点,依托重点镇建设来吸纳农业转移人口是推进农业转移人口市民化的关键。福建省综合改革试点镇吸纳农业转移人口由经济系统、社会系统、资源系统三大系统的承载能力决定。福建省综合改革试点镇吸纳农业转移人口主要通过三种途径：一是镇区中的原住民,就是小城镇的基础人口。二是就地城镇化。主要指本镇地域或临近乡镇在实现农业现代化、机械化、产业化、规模化后的剩余劳动力转移。三是异地城镇化。这种城镇化主要包括跨县域的“农村—小城镇”转移和“小城镇—小城镇”的人口转移,包括产业发展吸引来的外来新型产业工人、三产服务人员或在城镇就读就业的创业人员等。福建省综合改革试点镇吸纳农业转移人口过程中,面临着“还未建立覆盖农业转移人口的社会保障体系；农业转移人口的身份转化存在诸多障碍；农业转移人口在重点镇归属感低”等困难。
3、制度对重点镇吸纳农业转移人口的作用至关重要,现行的制度对农业转移人口定居城镇产生巨大的阻力,它间接影响了农业转移人口定居重点镇的意愿。城乡户籍制度是最主要与综合的障碍之一,使农业转移人口身份角色是与城镇居民不同,对重点镇的归属感降低、容易导致“回流”,严重影响了农业转移人口定居重点镇的意愿。劳动力市场制度使农业转移人口处于非正规就业的状态,增加了其寻找工作的成本且降低了工作报酬,影响农业转移人口经济收入,使赖以定居重点镇的经济基础变得不够扎实,影响其定居重点镇的能力与意愿。社会保障制度使得农业转移人口不能和城镇居民享有同样的养老、就业、医疗、工伤等方面的待遇,使得农业转移人口在重点镇生活存在“后顾之忧”,降低了其定居重点镇的意愿,此外,将农村土地纳入农业转移人口保障的范畴,农村土地流转不畅削弱了农业转移人口定居重点镇的意愿。教育培训制度使得农业转移人口及其子女,未能得到与城镇居民同等教育,制约其人力资本的积累,降低农业转移人口在重点镇可持续性发展的能力,促使其定居重点镇的意愿降低。
4、在相关制度分析的基础上,对福州市13个试点镇390名农业转移人口定居重点镇意愿的开展问卷调查分析,提出了农业转移人口定居重点镇意愿受就业情况、社会保障情况、受教育情况、个人家庭特征等方面影响的假设。通过对样本特征进行描述,运用统计、交叉列联表、二分类logistic等方法实证分析,得出一些与城市农业转移人口“定居城市”意愿不同的观点：重点镇中的农业转移人口与城市中的农业转移人口的定居城镇(城市)意愿存在差异,重点镇中男性的农业转移人口定居意愿比女性的农业转移人口定居意愿强烈得多,恰好与城市中的情况相反。重点镇中农业转移人口年龄对定居意愿的影响呈倒“U”型,随着年龄的增大定居重点镇的意愿逐渐增强并趋缓,当年龄进一步增大时,定居重点镇的意愿又开始减弱。此外,住房满意程度、所在城镇是否有朋友、对当地方言的熟悉程度、婚姻状况及等变量对农业转移人口定居重点镇的意愿产生关键的影响,文化程度及绝对收入水平不会对定居重点镇的意愿产生显著影响。
5、从社会保障体系构建、定居重点镇资本培育、相关制度创新三个层面系统提升重点镇吸纳农业转移人口的能力。构建以住房保障为首要的重点镇农业转移人口社会保障体系,着力强化农村土地社会保障与经济保障功能；培育农业转移人口定居重点镇的社会、人力、经济、政治资本；加快推进户籍、劳动力市场、教育培训等制度创新,夯实制度基础。
Nobel prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz considered that China's urbanization and the high-tech development will have a profound influence on19th century human development. China's facing many new problems and new challenges in the21st century, the small cities and towns are experiencing a rapid changeable era.The National Model Town Planning has issued in March,2014, in which it proposed mang suggestions, such as increasing the radiation function of central city, speeding up the development of small and medium-sized cities, focusing on the small towns and promoting the coordinated development of large and medium-sized city and small town.18th Central Committee of the Communist has put forward that we should promote the urbanization of population, and transfer of agricultural population to urban residents gradually, which will play a crucial role in the urbanization process through absorbing the transferring agricultural people by the key towns who have comparative advantages in industrial policy or resources.
The transferring agricultural people have some difficulties and obstacles such as be marginalized, frequent migration and the difficulty of stay in the city. At present, the peasant laborers are actually suffering from labor remuneration, education, household and others social exclusions. This kind of institutional exclusion hindered peasant laborers' city integration and unable to effectively guarantee the rights and interests of these people.Comparing with big cities, The advantage of key towns are depending on its low barrier to entry, especially in the low cost of living. On the one hand, the development of these key towns need supports from the transferring agricultural people in order to promote the accumulation of other factors, on the other hand, these key towns will offer favorable conditions for agricultural people at the same time.Under these conditions, the research on key cities and towns to absorb agricultural labor force migration became particularly urgent and necessary.
This paper discusses this question from the view of immigration, taking agricultural labor force migration(according to the important towns)as a research object, divided into two stages:"immigration" and "settlement", that also means how agricultural labor force migration moved into towns and settle down.Based on the two stage, this article is mainly to answer two questions:firstly, how laws and regulations will affect agricultural labor force migration when moved into towns and settle down here, and what's the attitude about settle down in towns around these specific groups.Secondly, Which factors will influence their choices, and compare with big cities, what kind of characteristics exists there.
Base on the two questions above, the article will focus the general problems about key cities and towns to absorb agricultural transfer of population at the theoretical level, and analyze the influence from the perspective of agricultural labor force migration, and how laws and regulations will affect agricultural labor force migration to settle down in towns, including the employment, social insurance, education background and their attitude, then author will further do the empirical research about the influence factor which based on the willing of labor force migration to settle down in towns(according to the data of13experimental town in Fuzhou), and with comparison and analysis the related articles about the data which are concerning about the people who willing of settle down to big towns and cities.Article will discuss the discrepancy of different attitude, then put forward the suggestion about accelerate the construction of experimental town to absorb agricultural labor force.Here have some main conclusions as follows:
1.The key towns and cities in the paper which should satisfy the following requirements:have large population, location advantage, development potential, convenient services, high planning and management level.The key towns including national key towns, the district center comprehensive reform towns and some particular cities. The labor force migration will cover migrant workers and other dependent family members living together.The key towns to absorb eligible workers who have left agricultural work will divided into two stages:part A is"immigration", that means turn agricultural production into non-farming work, or we can say "move into towns"part B is "settlement", it mainly refers to the eligible workers who have left agricultural work to become urban residents gradually, so it's also means the stage of "settle in towns and cities."
2. Since the reform and opening up, the development of the small towns has experienced the great change from "focus on the small towns"to "have the plan to develop the small towns ", and as to the absorb eligible workers, we have experienced some changes from "strict control of the rural people into the small towns","allowing farmers who's work as workers, businessman and services to settle down in towns","accelerating the reform of household registration of the towns and let migrant workers to settle down"to"letting eligible rural migrant workers become urban residents".But at this stage, not any small towns which can be seem as the key point that should be speed up the development and strengthen the construction at present.The key to promote the progress of the peasant's citizenship is relying on the trial of the comprehensive reform of towns and cities. And all of these are according to the bearing capacity of economic systems, social system and resource system. Here lists three ways to take in eligible workers who have left agricultural work:first part is permanent resident in the town, also refer to the elementary population in small towns.The second part urbanization locally.lt means the transformation of surplus agricultural labor force after realize agricultural modernization, mechanization, industrialization and scale expansion in own town or nearby the town.The third part is urbanization from home.These kind of urbanization including urbanization of cross-regional as "rural areas—small town" and urbanization of population transfer as "small town—small town", including new industrial workers, service workers and self-employed who has studied and work here.But in the process of the trial of the comprehensive reform of towns and cities, there still exist some difficulties like the current imperfect social security system, the problem of the transformation of farmers' status, low sense of belonging in immigrant city.
3.System is paly a vital role in absorb agricultural people into key towns, the current system have a great resistance in this part, and it indirect impact people's willing of whether to settle down the key towns. Household register system has become one of the major barriers, it have a strong impact on people's choice of "settle down in key towns."The system of the labor market let agricultural people in the state of non-standard employment, increasing the cost of getting a job and reduces the work rewards, influencing the economic income, wavering their willing of stay in key towns.Social insurance system is also a big problem, the imperfection of which influence the agricultural people to enjoy the same treatment with urban residents, so as to lower the willing of settle down towns.Besides, there exist a lot of problems in the moving of rural land circulation which reduces the enthusiasm of agricultural people into key towns, and unfair education and training system is also a big trouble that Inhibition of people's willingness to settle down in key towns.
4.0n the basis of the analysis, the article make a investigation in paper to13experiment towns,390agricultural people in Fuzhou about their willing to settle down in towns and proposed some assumption concerning with several part as the employment situation, social security situation, education background, personal family characteristics and so on.Through some empirical analysis like described the sample characteristics, statistical techniques, cross-column table, logistic and so on, it is concluded some different views from agricultural people's willing of settle down in big cities.There have some population differences between agricultural people and the city, male from agricultural people are more like to settle down in city than female, and it's counter to the population in city. With the increase of age, people more likely to stay in city, but when they get older or to a particular age, this tendency is receded.In addition, some variable of satisfaction about housing conditions, whether have a friend in town, familiarity with local dialect, marital status have much impact on agricultural people's willing, from the other side, degree of education and absolute income level have not impacted performance significantly.
5.Approached from three major issues to improve the ability of absorb agricultural labor force in key towns:social security system construction, social capital of cultivating people to settle down in key towns and the relevant system innovation.To be specific, it is necessary to build housing security system; strengthening the countryside land social security systems and economic security function;accumulating people's social capital such as society, human resource, economy, politics;accelerating the innovation in household registration system, labor market, and educational training so as to consolidate system base.
农业转移人口在向大城市转移的过程中面临着被边缘化、候鸟式迁移、留城难度加大等困难与障碍。其在融入城市过程中处于被边缘化的状态,在劳动报酬、子女教育、社会保障、住房等许多方面并不能与城市居民享有同等待遇,且就业并不稳定,时常出现了“有工打、留城市,无工打、返家乡”候鸟式迁移的局面,无法有效保障农业转移人口的权益。与城市相比较而言,重点镇优势在于准入门槛低,特别是生活成本、居住成本和社会成本低等。重点镇发展需要农业转移人口提供支撑,以促进其他要素的集聚,同时重点镇也能为农业转移人口就业与定居提供的较为有利的条件。在此背景下,对重点镇吸纳农业转移人口的研究,显得尤为迫切和必要。
本文站在迁入地角度,以重点镇中的农业转移人口为研究对象,将重点镇吸纳农业转移人口,分为“吸”与“纳”两个阶段,即农业转移人口迁入重点镇与定居重点镇两个阶段。基于这两个阶段,本文主要回答两个问题：一是相关制度将会对农业转移人员定居重点镇产生什么样的影响,以及会对农业转移人口定居城镇意愿产生怎样的间接影响?二是农业转移人口定居城镇意愿受哪些因素的影响,与城市相比而言,其有什么样的特点?
基于以上两个问题：本文重点从理论层面分析重点镇吸纳农业转移人口的一般性问题,以农业转移人口的视角分析相关制度对试点镇吸纳农业转移人口定居重点镇的影响,重点研究相关制度对农业转移人口定居城镇所需要条件,即对其就业情况、社会保障情况、受教育情况产生的影响,包括对农业转移人口定居重点镇意愿的间接影响,进一步对福州市13个试点镇的农业转移人口定居重点镇意愿的影响因素做实证研究,与已有定居城市意愿的相关文献进行适当的比较分析,探讨影响农业转移人口定居重点镇与城市意愿的个人特征的差异,最后提出加快推进试点镇吸纳农业转移人口的建议。具体来讲,主要形成以下几点结论：
1、本文所研究的重点镇,即重点小城镇,是指人口达到一定规模、区位优势明显、经济发展潜力大、服务功能较完善、规划管理水平较高的小城镇。福建省重点镇包括报送国家的全国重点镇与市级以上综合改革试点镇。农业转移人口包括农民工及其赡养的人口。重点镇吸纳农业转移人口分为吸与纳两个阶段：一是“吸”的阶段,指从农村或农业生产转移到城镇或非农业生产的阶段,即迁入重点镇阶段；二是“纳”的阶段,指农业转移人口定居城镇阶段,即定居重点镇阶段。
2、改革至今,中国小城镇发展经历了由“重点发展小城镇”到“有重点地发展小城镇”的转变,小城镇对农业转移人口的吸纳也经历了“严格控制农村人流入小城镇”、“允许务工、经商、办服务业的农民自理口粮到集镇落户”、“加快小城镇户籍管理制度的改革与农民进镇落户”、“逐步把符合条件的农业转移人口转为城镇居民”的变化。然而,在现阶段并非任何小城镇都作为当前加快发展与加强建设的重点,依托重点镇建设来吸纳农业转移人口是推进农业转移人口市民化的关键。福建省综合改革试点镇吸纳农业转移人口由经济系统、社会系统、资源系统三大系统的承载能力决定。福建省综合改革试点镇吸纳农业转移人口主要通过三种途径：一是镇区中的原住民,就是小城镇的基础人口。二是就地城镇化。主要指本镇地域或临近乡镇在实现农业现代化、机械化、产业化、规模化后的剩余劳动力转移。三是异地城镇化。这种城镇化主要包括跨县域的“农村—小城镇”转移和“小城镇—小城镇”的人口转移,包括产业发展吸引来的外来新型产业工人、三产服务人员或在城镇就读就业的创业人员等。福建省综合改革试点镇吸纳农业转移人口过程中,面临着“还未建立覆盖农业转移人口的社会保障体系；农业转移人口的身份转化存在诸多障碍；农业转移人口在重点镇归属感低”等困难。
3、制度对重点镇吸纳农业转移人口的作用至关重要,现行的制度对农业转移人口定居城镇产生巨大的阻力,它间接影响了农业转移人口定居重点镇的意愿。城乡户籍制度是最主要与综合的障碍之一,使农业转移人口身份角色是与城镇居民不同,对重点镇的归属感降低、容易导致“回流”,严重影响了农业转移人口定居重点镇的意愿。劳动力市场制度使农业转移人口处于非正规就业的状态,增加了其寻找工作的成本且降低了工作报酬,影响农业转移人口经济收入,使赖以定居重点镇的经济基础变得不够扎实,影响其定居重点镇的能力与意愿。社会保障制度使得农业转移人口不能和城镇居民享有同样的养老、就业、医疗、工伤等方面的待遇,使得农业转移人口在重点镇生活存在“后顾之忧”,降低了其定居重点镇的意愿,此外,将农村土地纳入农业转移人口保障的范畴,农村土地流转不畅削弱了农业转移人口定居重点镇的意愿。教育培训制度使得农业转移人口及其子女,未能得到与城镇居民同等教育,制约其人力资本的积累,降低农业转移人口在重点镇可持续性发展的能力,促使其定居重点镇的意愿降低。
4、在相关制度分析的基础上,对福州市13个试点镇390名农业转移人口定居重点镇意愿的开展问卷调查分析,提出了农业转移人口定居重点镇意愿受就业情况、社会保障情况、受教育情况、个人家庭特征等方面影响的假设。通过对样本特征进行描述,运用统计、交叉列联表、二分类logistic等方法实证分析,得出一些与城市农业转移人口“定居城市”意愿不同的观点：重点镇中的农业转移人口与城市中的农业转移人口的定居城镇(城市)意愿存在差异,重点镇中男性的农业转移人口定居意愿比女性的农业转移人口定居意愿强烈得多,恰好与城市中的情况相反。重点镇中农业转移人口年龄对定居意愿的影响呈倒“U”型,随着年龄的增大定居重点镇的意愿逐渐增强并趋缓,当年龄进一步增大时,定居重点镇的意愿又开始减弱。此外,住房满意程度、所在城镇是否有朋友、对当地方言的熟悉程度、婚姻状况及等变量对农业转移人口定居重点镇的意愿产生关键的影响,文化程度及绝对收入水平不会对定居重点镇的意愿产生显著影响。
5、从社会保障体系构建、定居重点镇资本培育、相关制度创新三个层面系统提升重点镇吸纳农业转移人口的能力。构建以住房保障为首要的重点镇农业转移人口社会保障体系,着力强化农村土地社会保障与经济保障功能；培育农业转移人口定居重点镇的社会、人力、经济、政治资本；加快推进户籍、劳动力市场、教育培训等制度创新,夯实制度基础。
Nobel prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz considered that China's urbanization and the high-tech development will have a profound influence on19th century human development. China's facing many new problems and new challenges in the21st century, the small cities and towns are experiencing a rapid changeable era.The National Model Town Planning has issued in March,2014, in which it proposed mang suggestions, such as increasing the radiation function of central city, speeding up the development of small and medium-sized cities, focusing on the small towns and promoting the coordinated development of large and medium-sized city and small town.18th Central Committee of the Communist has put forward that we should promote the urbanization of population, and transfer of agricultural population to urban residents gradually, which will play a crucial role in the urbanization process through absorbing the transferring agricultural people by the key towns who have comparative advantages in industrial policy or resources.
The transferring agricultural people have some difficulties and obstacles such as be marginalized, frequent migration and the difficulty of stay in the city. At present, the peasant laborers are actually suffering from labor remuneration, education, household and others social exclusions. This kind of institutional exclusion hindered peasant laborers' city integration and unable to effectively guarantee the rights and interests of these people.Comparing with big cities, The advantage of key towns are depending on its low barrier to entry, especially in the low cost of living. On the one hand, the development of these key towns need supports from the transferring agricultural people in order to promote the accumulation of other factors, on the other hand, these key towns will offer favorable conditions for agricultural people at the same time.Under these conditions, the research on key cities and towns to absorb agricultural labor force migration became particularly urgent and necessary.
This paper discusses this question from the view of immigration, taking agricultural labor force migration(according to the important towns)as a research object, divided into two stages:"immigration" and "settlement", that also means how agricultural labor force migration moved into towns and settle down.Based on the two stage, this article is mainly to answer two questions:firstly, how laws and regulations will affect agricultural labor force migration when moved into towns and settle down here, and what's the attitude about settle down in towns around these specific groups.Secondly, Which factors will influence their choices, and compare with big cities, what kind of characteristics exists there.
Base on the two questions above, the article will focus the general problems about key cities and towns to absorb agricultural transfer of population at the theoretical level, and analyze the influence from the perspective of agricultural labor force migration, and how laws and regulations will affect agricultural labor force migration to settle down in towns, including the employment, social insurance, education background and their attitude, then author will further do the empirical research about the influence factor which based on the willing of labor force migration to settle down in towns(according to the data of13experimental town in Fuzhou), and with comparison and analysis the related articles about the data which are concerning about the people who willing of settle down to big towns and cities.Article will discuss the discrepancy of different attitude, then put forward the suggestion about accelerate the construction of experimental town to absorb agricultural labor force.Here have some main conclusions as follows:
1.The key towns and cities in the paper which should satisfy the following requirements:have large population, location advantage, development potential, convenient services, high planning and management level.The key towns including national key towns, the district center comprehensive reform towns and some particular cities. The labor force migration will cover migrant workers and other dependent family members living together.The key towns to absorb eligible workers who have left agricultural work will divided into two stages:part A is"immigration", that means turn agricultural production into non-farming work, or we can say "move into towns"part B is "settlement", it mainly refers to the eligible workers who have left agricultural work to become urban residents gradually, so it's also means the stage of "settle in towns and cities."
2. Since the reform and opening up, the development of the small towns has experienced the great change from "focus on the small towns"to "have the plan to develop the small towns ", and as to the absorb eligible workers, we have experienced some changes from "strict control of the rural people into the small towns","allowing farmers who's work as workers, businessman and services to settle down in towns","accelerating the reform of household registration of the towns and let migrant workers to settle down"to"letting eligible rural migrant workers become urban residents".But at this stage, not any small towns which can be seem as the key point that should be speed up the development and strengthen the construction at present.The key to promote the progress of the peasant's citizenship is relying on the trial of the comprehensive reform of towns and cities. And all of these are according to the bearing capacity of economic systems, social system and resource system. Here lists three ways to take in eligible workers who have left agricultural work:first part is permanent resident in the town, also refer to the elementary population in small towns.The second part urbanization locally.lt means the transformation of surplus agricultural labor force after realize agricultural modernization, mechanization, industrialization and scale expansion in own town or nearby the town.The third part is urbanization from home.These kind of urbanization including urbanization of cross-regional as "rural areas—small town" and urbanization of population transfer as "small town—small town", including new industrial workers, service workers and self-employed who has studied and work here.But in the process of the trial of the comprehensive reform of towns and cities, there still exist some difficulties like the current imperfect social security system, the problem of the transformation of farmers' status, low sense of belonging in immigrant city.
3.System is paly a vital role in absorb agricultural people into key towns, the current system have a great resistance in this part, and it indirect impact people's willing of whether to settle down the key towns. Household register system has become one of the major barriers, it have a strong impact on people's choice of "settle down in key towns."The system of the labor market let agricultural people in the state of non-standard employment, increasing the cost of getting a job and reduces the work rewards, influencing the economic income, wavering their willing of stay in key towns.Social insurance system is also a big problem, the imperfection of which influence the agricultural people to enjoy the same treatment with urban residents, so as to lower the willing of settle down towns.Besides, there exist a lot of problems in the moving of rural land circulation which reduces the enthusiasm of agricultural people into key towns, and unfair education and training system is also a big trouble that Inhibition of people's willingness to settle down in key towns.
4.0n the basis of the analysis, the article make a investigation in paper to13experiment towns,390agricultural people in Fuzhou about their willing to settle down in towns and proposed some assumption concerning with several part as the employment situation, social security situation, education background, personal family characteristics and so on.Through some empirical analysis like described the sample characteristics, statistical techniques, cross-column table, logistic and so on, it is concluded some different views from agricultural people's willing of settle down in big cities.There have some population differences between agricultural people and the city, male from agricultural people are more like to settle down in city than female, and it's counter to the population in city. With the increase of age, people more likely to stay in city, but when they get older or to a particular age, this tendency is receded.In addition, some variable of satisfaction about housing conditions, whether have a friend in town, familiarity with local dialect, marital status have much impact on agricultural people's willing, from the other side, degree of education and absolute income level have not impacted performance significantly.
5.Approached from three major issues to improve the ability of absorb agricultural labor force in key towns:social security system construction, social capital of cultivating people to settle down in key towns and the relevant system innovation.To be specific, it is necessary to build housing security system; strengthening the countryside land social security systems and economic security function;accumulating people's social capital such as society, human resource, economy, politics;accelerating the innovation in household registration system, labor market, and educational training so as to consolidate system base.
引文
1 福建省发展和改革委员会.上半年我省小城镇综合改革建设试点工作进展良好[EB/OL].(2013-07-23)[2014-01-15].http://www.fujian.gov.cn/zwgk/zfgzdt/bmdt/201307/t20130723_611414.htm.
2 福建省发展和改革委员会.《海峡西岸经济区发展规划》解读八十五：福建小城镇改革试点工作进展如何[EB/OL].(2012-05-23)[2014-01-15].http://www.fjdpc.gov.cn/show.aSpx?id=60672.
3 许文兴.福建省综合改革建设试点小城镇人口集聚能力问题研究[EB/OL].(2012-12-07)[2014-01-20].http://www.fjjsw.gov.cn/html/402/4/49778_2013418354.html.
4 许文兴,福建省综合改革建设试点小城镇人口集聚能力问题研究,福建农林大学人文社会科学学院。
5 新华网.80后农民工八成月收入低于两千抱怨同工不同酬[EB/OL].(2010-05-07)[2014-0115]. http://news.xinhuanet.com/employment/2010-05/07/c_1279678.htm.
[1]B · Hindeas, Political Choice&Structure, England:Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd,1989.
[2]Brandtloren. Commercialization and Agricultural Development in East-CentralChina,1870-1937[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1989.
[3]Clifford Geertz. Agricultural Involution:The Processes of Ecological Change inIndonesia. University of California Press,1963.
[4]Deininger, Klaus;Jin, Songqing;Xia, Fang.Moving Off the Farm:Land Institutions to Facilitate Structural Transformation and Agricultural Productivity Growth in China [J].Word Development,2014, (55):505-520.
[5]Faure David. The Rural Rconomy of Pre-liberation China[M]. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press,1989.
[6]Inequality, Labor Market and Welfare Reform in China Australia National University,2004, (8):25-27.
[7]Hare, D.'Push'Versus'Pull, Factors In Migration outflows And Returns: Determinants of Migration Status And Spell Duration Among China'S Rural Population[J]. Journal of Development Studies,1999,35(3).
[8]Harris, John, R.&Todaro, M. P. Migration, Unemployment And Development: A Two——Sectors Analysis [J]. The Ameriean Economic Review,1970,70 (Mareh).
[9]Lin N.Social capital:a theory of social structure and action[M]. London:Cambridge University Press,2001.
[10]Pierre Bourdieu.Le Capital Social:notes provisoires.Actes de la Recherche en Science Sociale, vol.31.
[11]Portes A. Social capital:its origins and application inmodernsociology[J].Annual Social Review,1998 (6)
[12]Ranis, G. & Fei, J·C·A Theory of Economic Development [J]·he American Eeonomic Review,1961,51(SePtember).
[13]Rawski Thomas G. Economic Growth in Prewar China[M]. Berkeley: University of California Press,1989.
[14]Reddy, V.&Findeis, J.Determinants of off-farm labor force Participation:Implications for low income farm f ami lies [J]. North Central Journal of Agricultural Eeonomics,1988,10(1).
[15]Rozelle, Scott; Brandt, Loren; Li, Guo and Huang, Jikun:Land Rights in China:Facts, Fictions, and Issues[J]. China Journal,2009, (47)
[16]S. Popkin, The Rational Peasant:The Political Economy of Rural Society inVietnem, Berkeley:University of California Press,1979.
[17]Todaro, M. P. A Model of Labour Migration and Urban Unemployment inLess Development Counrtries[M]. American Economic Review,1969.
[18]Xueguang Zhou, Economic Transformation and Income Inequality in Urban China:Evidence from a Panel Data. American Journal of Sociology, vol.105, no.4(Jan.2000).
[19]Yang, Dennis. T. Knowledge Spillovers and Labor Assignments of the Farm Household, University of Chicago, Ph. D. Dissertation,1994.
[20]Zhao, Yaohui. Labor Migration and Earnings Differences:The Case of Rural China[J]. Economic Development and Cultural Change,1999, (4): 67-82.
[21]ZHU, Nong. The ImPact of Income Gaps on Migration Decisions in China[J]. China Economic Review,2002.
[22]白敏.从福建省试点镇规划实践看镇总体规划的编制[D].北京.清华大学,2010.
[23]毕世杰.发展经济学[M].北京：高等教育出版社,1999.
[24]蔡防.劳动力迁移的两个过程及其制度障碍[J].社会学研究,2001,(4).
[25]蔡红辉.浙江省中心镇人口集聚问题与影响因素研究[D].浙江大学,2010.
[24]程姝,杨钧天,韩学平.中外农业转移人口权益保障比较研究[J].东北农业大学学报,2013(4).
[26]陈浩.人力资本与农村劳动力非农就业问题研究[D].南京农业大学博士论 文,2007.
[27]陈会广,单丁洁.农民职业分化、收入分化与农村土地制度选择——来自苏鲁辽津四省市的实地调查[J].经济学家,2010,(4).
[28]程妹.城镇化进程中农民工市民化问题研究[D].东北农业大学博士论文,2013.
[29]程业炳,周彬,张德化.城镇二元结构下农民工社会保障制度改革研究[J].重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版),2014(1)：53-33.
[30]池巧珠.福建省农村富余劳动力就地就业的税收制约与政策优化[J].福建论坛·人文社会科学版,2012(11)：152-156.
[31]董亚男.政府主导下的劳动就业制度公正论——基于非正规就业群体劳动权的制度化保障之考量[D].吉林大学博士论文.2009.
[32]樊纲,郭万达.农民工早退：理论、实证与政策[M].北京：中国经济出版社,2013.
[33]费景汉,拉尼斯：劳动力剩余经济的发展[M].北京：华夏出版社,1989.
[34]费孝通.江村经济——中国农民的生活[M].南京：江苏人民出版社,1986.
[35](美)格尔哈斯·伦斯基.权力与特权：社会分层理论[M].杭州：浙江人民出版,1988.
[36]葛晓巍.市场化进程中农民职业分化及市民化研究[D].浙江大学,2007.
[37]国务院发展研究中心课题组.农民工市民化进程的总体态势与战略取向[J].改革,2011(5).
[38]郭其友,吴滨源,许建伟.新一轮户籍制度改革与中小城市发展——以福建省为例[J].福建论坛,2013(5).
[39]H.孟德拉斯[法]著·李陪林译·农民的终结(M)·北京：社会科学卒献出版社,2005.
[40]胡鞍钢.非正规部门和非正规就业：特点、障碍及对策[J].劳动和社会保障部：非正规部门就业研讨会论文,2000.
[41]胡鞍钢,程永宏.中国就业制度演变[J].中国经济参考,2013(51)：2-19.
[42]胡平.简析城市农民工市民化的障碍及实现途径[J].农村经济,2005(5).
[43]胡媛媛.福建省农村劳动力非农就业行业影响因素实证分析[J].经济论坛, 2009(6)：65-69.
[44]黄大伟.城乡统筹发展下的农村劳动力转移研究[D].北京：北京林业大学,2013.
[45]黄锟.城乡二元制度对农民工市民化影响的实证分析[J].中国人口资源与环境,2011(2)
[46]黄祖辉,钱文荣,毛迎春进城农民在城镇生活的稳定性及市民化意愿[J].中国人口科学,2004(2).
[47]简新华,黄锟.中国工业化和城市化过程中的农民工问题研究[M].北京：人民出版社,2008.
[48]姜开圣.农业产业化龙头企业的发展壮大及其对农民收入的影响[J].农业经济问题,2003,(3).
[49]姜作培.农民市民化：中国经济社会发展的必然趋势[J].人民日报《内部参阅》.
[50]蒋微家.浅谈小城镇建设与农民工市民化进程—以漳州角美镇为例[J].法制与社会,2011(4)
[51]蒋文畅.个人及家庭特征对我国农村劳动力迁移影响的实证研究[D].上海：复旦大学,2011.
[52]孔祥智.聚焦“三农”上、中、下卷[M].北京：中央编译出版社,2004.
[53]赖作莲.城乡就业差异及其影响因素研究[D].西北农林科技大学,2009.
[54]李锋传.日本建设新农村的经验及对我国的启示[J].经济管理文摘,2011,(8).
[55]李静,刘英基.城镇化进程中的服务业就业吸纳能力的实证分析——以山东省为例[J].湖北社会科学,2011(10)
[56]李路路,王奋字.当代中国现代化进程中的社会结构及其变迁[M].杭州：浙江人民出版社,1992.
[57]李强.农民工与中国社会分层[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2012.
[58]李强,龙文进.农民工留城与返乡意愿的影响因素分析[J].中国农村经济,2009(2)
[59]黎熙元.现代社区概论[M].中山大学出版社,2007.
[60]李为,何丹华,陈威,王芳.福建省农业转移人口市民化：发展、困境和应对[J].湖南科技学院学报,2013(12)：139-140.
[61]黎智洪.农业转移人口市民化：制度困局与策略选择[J].人民论坛,2013(11).
[62]梁剑辉.农民工市民化的四大关键[J].中国经贸导刊,2013(10).
[63]林菡馨.新农村建设视角下农村劳动力就业现状及对策探究——以福建省为例[J].襄樊职业技术学院学报,2012(11)：59-62.
[64]柳博隽.农业转移人口市民化的“三分”原则[J].浙江经济,2013(5).
[65]刘传江.中国农民工市民化进程研究[M].北京：人民出版社,2008.
[66]刘海军,谢飞燕.推进我国农业转移人口市民化对策探析[J].农业经济,2013(6).
[67]刘冠生.中国富余劳动力转移研究[D].武汉：北京林业大学,2012.
[68]刘洪仁.转型期农民分化问题的实证研究[J].中国农村观察,2005,(4).
[69]刘建伟.中国农村城镇化的理论与实践启示[J].管理与财富,2009(5).
[70]刘文辉.潍坊市新生代农民工城市定居意愿及其影响因素实证研究[D].中国海洋大学,2013(5)
[71]刘文纪.中国农民就地城市化研究[M].北京：中国经济出版社,2010.
[72]刘小年.农民工市民化的政策研究一主体的视角[M].长沙：湖南人民出版社,2010：(21).
[73]刘易斯.二元经济论[M].北京：北京经济学院出版社,1989.
[74]罗必良.新制度经济学[M].太原：山西经济出版社,2005.
[75]罗必良,温思美.技术创新、制度创新与农村发展[M].北京：中国数字化出版社,2002.
[76]罗伯特·帕特南.使民主运转起来[M].江西人民出版社,2001.195.
[77]罗辉.新生代农民工留城意愿及影响因素分析——基于南宁市的实证考察[J].创新,2013(3)：91-94.
[78]年似水.好一个“农业转移人口市民化”[J].浙江经济,2013,(3)
[79]欧阳力胜.新型城镇化进程中农民工市民化研究[D].财政部财政科学研究所,2013.
[80]戚迪明.城市化进程中农民工回流决策与行为：机理与实证[D].沈阳农业大 学,2013.
[81]钱文荣,黄祖辉.转型时期的中国农民工[M].北京：中国社会科学出版社,2007.
[82]钱正武.农民工市民化问题研究[D].北京：中共中央党校博士论文,2006.
[83]S.D.霍夫曼.劳动力市场经济学[M].上海：上海三联出版社,1989.
[84]邵峰.浙江省城乡一体化研究——基于“三农”问题的视角[D].浙江大学,2013.
[85]申鹏.基于中国人口转变视野的农村劳动力转移制度创新研究[D].西南财经大学博士论文,2010.
[86]石忆邵,尹昌应,王贺封,谭文垦.城市综合承载力的研究进展及展望[J].地理研究,2013.
[87]宋葛龙.以体制创新为根本动力和关键措施推进城乡经济社会发展一体化——山东、江苏、浙江三省部分地区的经验和启示[J].经济研究参考,2008(64).
[88]宋书丽.农村剩余劳动力转移制约因素与吸纳模式研究[D].沈阳大学,2009.
[89]宋葛龙.大城市郊区农民的华丽转身——天津市东丽区华明街调研报告[R].调查报告,2012.
[90]孙玉娜.转型期中国农民工迁移机理研究[D].西北农林科技大学,2012.
[91]唐梅.城镇化进程中的转制民族社区建设研究[D].北京：中央民族大学,2011.
[92]王爱群.吉林省农业产业化龙头企业发展研究[D].长春：吉林农业大学经济管理学院,2007.
[93]王崇举,张永鹏.城市吸纳农民工容量及其演变规律研究[M].北京：科学出版社,2013.
[94]王二红,冯长春.外来务工人员留城意愿影响因素研究——基于重庆市的实证分析[J].城市发展研究,2013(1)：85-90.
[95]王立鹤.大城市与小城镇吸纳外来人口能力与效率的比较分析[D].南京：南京农业大学,2004.
[96]王英姿.对城乡一体化发展预期下小城镇人口吸纳“反”牵引的思考[J].小城镇建设,2012.
[97]王竹林.城市化进程中农民工市民化研究[D].西北农林科技大学博士论文,2008.
[98]王子成,赵忠.农民工迁移模式的动态选择：外出、回流还是再迁移[J].管理世界,2013(1)：78-88.
[99]温铁军,孙永生.世纪之交的两大变化与三农新解[J].经济问题探索,2012(9).
[100]夏怡然.农民工定居地选择意愿及其影响因素分析—基于温州的调查[J].中国农村经济,2010(3)
[101]武锐.黑龙江省农村劳动力转移现状调查与分析[D].吉林大学,2011.
[102]吴肇光.加快推进福建省小城镇综合改革建设[J].中共福建省委党校学报,2012(9)：62-67.
[103]吴志远,谢元态.小城镇社会保障制度建设的意义及相关因素分析[J].农业现代化研究,2002(5)：205-207.
[104]吴庄莹.关于福建小城镇综合改革建设试点的分析与思考[J].发展研究,2011(9)：120-122.
[105]肖晓琴.福建省农村剩余劳动力转移的实证研究[D].福建师范大学,2009.
[106]熊捷.资本深化、劳动力异质性对农村转移劳动力就业的影响[D].重庆大学,2011.
[107]许丹.国外乡村建设经验及对我国新农村建设的启示[D].黑龙江大学,2009.
[108]晏群.小城镇概念辨析[J].规划师,2010(8)：118-121.
[109]鄢小兵.福建省农村劳动力转移问题研究[J].现代经济信息,2011(19)：314-316.
[110]严振书.转型期中国城乡二元体制问题及对策分析[J].理论学习.2010,(11).
[111]杨曦娥.马克思主义区域经济理论视野下我国农村剩余劳动力转移问题研究[D].西北农林科技大学,2011.
[112]薛薇.统计分析与SPSS的应用(第3版)[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2011.
[113]于後堤.我国东北地区农村剩余劳动力转移问题研究[D].吉林大学,2010.
[114]余金通.福建省农民工职业教育培训问题与对策[J].读与写杂志,2010(8)：1-3.
[115]喻新安,王建国,王新涛.有序推进农业转移人口市民化[J].经济日报,2013,(3)
[116]袁雪松.“双二元"就业制度中的农村劳动力转移——基于劳动力市场结构的政府作用分析[J].乡镇经济,2007(11)：8-10.
[117]曾玉荣,周江梅,郑晓梅,徐慎娴.福建省农村劳动力转移与就业情况调查分析[J].福建农业学报,2008(4)：415-418.
[118]詹华.建国以来福建城镇社会基本养老保险金体制历史演变研究[D].福建师范大学,2013.
[119]张安良.山东省农村劳动力转移研究[D].北京：北京林业大学,2012.
[120]张北平.农业转移人口市民化的成本研究[J].山西财经大学学报,2013(1).
[121]张慧.基于SWOT分析的新生代农民工市民化路径研究[J].劳动保障世界(理论版),2010(9).
[122]张杰.福建省农村人口信息素养现状调查及发展策略[J].福建师范大学学报,2008(4)：164-169.
[123]张荣霞,陈家豪,朱朝枝.福建省农村劳动力现状及富余情况探析[J].科技和产业.2009(5)：64-68.
[124]张玮.新生代农民工市民化过程中在城市定居问题研究——以成都为例[D].四川省社会科学院,2012.
[125]张永鹏.城市吸纳农民工的演化规律分析[J].经济体制改革,2011(1).
[126]漳州市编办.角美镇推进现代小城镇试点改革纪实[J].中国机构改革与管理,2013(1)：38.
[127]赵莹.我国长三角地区小城镇发展研究[D].福建师范大学博士论文,2013.
[128]郑杭生.农民市民化：当代中国社会学的重要研究主题[J].甘肃社会科学,2005(8).
[129]郑晓凉.福建省农村剩余劳动力的有序转移思考[D].福建农林大学,2009.
[130]周建群,吴正阳,林云,黄雅青.福建省农村产业布局与小城镇建设协同发展的路径选择[J].中共福建省委党校学报,2013(4)：66-73.
[131]周靖祥,何燕.城镇农村劳动力“吸纳”与区域经济增长实证检验——基于1990-2006年省际所有制变革视角探析[J].世界经济文汇,2009(1).
[132]周闪.河北省吸纳农村剩余劳动力能力的因素分析[D].河北大学,2009.
[133]朱宝树.小城镇户籍制度改革和农村人口城镇化新问题研究[J].华东师范大学学报,2004(9)：56-65.
[134]朱权.农村剩余劳动力向小城镇转移问题研究[D].东北师范大学,2004.
[135]朱允卫,黄祖辉.经济发展与城乡统筹互动关系的实证分析——以浙江省为例[J].农业经济问题,2006(5).
2 福建省发展和改革委员会.《海峡西岸经济区发展规划》解读八十五：福建小城镇改革试点工作进展如何[EB/OL].(2012-05-23)[2014-01-15].http://www.fjdpc.gov.cn/show.aSpx?id=60672.
3 许文兴.福建省综合改革建设试点小城镇人口集聚能力问题研究[EB/OL].(2012-12-07)[2014-01-20].http://www.fjjsw.gov.cn/html/402/4/49778_2013418354.html.
4 许文兴,福建省综合改革建设试点小城镇人口集聚能力问题研究,福建农林大学人文社会科学学院。
5 新华网.80后农民工八成月收入低于两千抱怨同工不同酬[EB/OL].(2010-05-07)[2014-0115]. http://news.xinhuanet.com/employment/2010-05/07/c_1279678.htm.
[1]B · Hindeas, Political Choice&Structure, England:Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd,1989.
[2]Brandtloren. Commercialization and Agricultural Development in East-CentralChina,1870-1937[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1989.
[3]Clifford Geertz. Agricultural Involution:The Processes of Ecological Change inIndonesia. University of California Press,1963.
[4]Deininger, Klaus;Jin, Songqing;Xia, Fang.Moving Off the Farm:Land Institutions to Facilitate Structural Transformation and Agricultural Productivity Growth in China [J].Word Development,2014, (55):505-520.
[5]Faure David. The Rural Rconomy of Pre-liberation China[M]. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press,1989.
[6]Inequality, Labor Market and Welfare Reform in China Australia National University,2004, (8):25-27.
[7]Hare, D.'Push'Versus'Pull, Factors In Migration outflows And Returns: Determinants of Migration Status And Spell Duration Among China'S Rural Population[J]. Journal of Development Studies,1999,35(3).
[8]Harris, John, R.&Todaro, M. P. Migration, Unemployment And Development: A Two——Sectors Analysis [J]. The Ameriean Economic Review,1970,70 (Mareh).
[9]Lin N.Social capital:a theory of social structure and action[M]. London:Cambridge University Press,2001.
[10]Pierre Bourdieu.Le Capital Social:notes provisoires.Actes de la Recherche en Science Sociale, vol.31.
[11]Portes A. Social capital:its origins and application inmodernsociology[J].Annual Social Review,1998 (6)
[12]Ranis, G. & Fei, J·C·A Theory of Economic Development [J]·he American Eeonomic Review,1961,51(SePtember).
[13]Rawski Thomas G. Economic Growth in Prewar China[M]. Berkeley: University of California Press,1989.
[14]Reddy, V.&Findeis, J.Determinants of off-farm labor force Participation:Implications for low income farm f ami lies [J]. North Central Journal of Agricultural Eeonomics,1988,10(1).
[15]Rozelle, Scott; Brandt, Loren; Li, Guo and Huang, Jikun:Land Rights in China:Facts, Fictions, and Issues[J]. China Journal,2009, (47)
[16]S. Popkin, The Rational Peasant:The Political Economy of Rural Society inVietnem, Berkeley:University of California Press,1979.
[17]Todaro, M. P. A Model of Labour Migration and Urban Unemployment inLess Development Counrtries[M]. American Economic Review,1969.
[18]Xueguang Zhou, Economic Transformation and Income Inequality in Urban China:Evidence from a Panel Data. American Journal of Sociology, vol.105, no.4(Jan.2000).
[19]Yang, Dennis. T. Knowledge Spillovers and Labor Assignments of the Farm Household, University of Chicago, Ph. D. Dissertation,1994.
[20]Zhao, Yaohui. Labor Migration and Earnings Differences:The Case of Rural China[J]. Economic Development and Cultural Change,1999, (4): 67-82.
[21]ZHU, Nong. The ImPact of Income Gaps on Migration Decisions in China[J]. China Economic Review,2002.
[22]白敏.从福建省试点镇规划实践看镇总体规划的编制[D].北京.清华大学,2010.
[23]毕世杰.发展经济学[M].北京：高等教育出版社,1999.
[24]蔡防.劳动力迁移的两个过程及其制度障碍[J].社会学研究,2001,(4).
[25]蔡红辉.浙江省中心镇人口集聚问题与影响因素研究[D].浙江大学,2010.
[24]程姝,杨钧天,韩学平.中外农业转移人口权益保障比较研究[J].东北农业大学学报,2013(4).
[26]陈浩.人力资本与农村劳动力非农就业问题研究[D].南京农业大学博士论 文,2007.
[27]陈会广,单丁洁.农民职业分化、收入分化与农村土地制度选择——来自苏鲁辽津四省市的实地调查[J].经济学家,2010,(4).
[28]程妹.城镇化进程中农民工市民化问题研究[D].东北农业大学博士论文,2013.
[29]程业炳,周彬,张德化.城镇二元结构下农民工社会保障制度改革研究[J].重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版),2014(1)：53-33.
[30]池巧珠.福建省农村富余劳动力就地就业的税收制约与政策优化[J].福建论坛·人文社会科学版,2012(11)：152-156.
[31]董亚男.政府主导下的劳动就业制度公正论——基于非正规就业群体劳动权的制度化保障之考量[D].吉林大学博士论文.2009.
[32]樊纲,郭万达.农民工早退：理论、实证与政策[M].北京：中国经济出版社,2013.
[33]费景汉,拉尼斯：劳动力剩余经济的发展[M].北京：华夏出版社,1989.
[34]费孝通.江村经济——中国农民的生活[M].南京：江苏人民出版社,1986.
[35](美)格尔哈斯·伦斯基.权力与特权：社会分层理论[M].杭州：浙江人民出版,1988.
[36]葛晓巍.市场化进程中农民职业分化及市民化研究[D].浙江大学,2007.
[37]国务院发展研究中心课题组.农民工市民化进程的总体态势与战略取向[J].改革,2011(5).
[38]郭其友,吴滨源,许建伟.新一轮户籍制度改革与中小城市发展——以福建省为例[J].福建论坛,2013(5).
[39]H.孟德拉斯[法]著·李陪林译·农民的终结(M)·北京：社会科学卒献出版社,2005.
[40]胡鞍钢.非正规部门和非正规就业：特点、障碍及对策[J].劳动和社会保障部：非正规部门就业研讨会论文,2000.
[41]胡鞍钢,程永宏.中国就业制度演变[J].中国经济参考,2013(51)：2-19.
[42]胡平.简析城市农民工市民化的障碍及实现途径[J].农村经济,2005(5).
[43]胡媛媛.福建省农村劳动力非农就业行业影响因素实证分析[J].经济论坛, 2009(6)：65-69.
[44]黄大伟.城乡统筹发展下的农村劳动力转移研究[D].北京：北京林业大学,2013.
[45]黄锟.城乡二元制度对农民工市民化影响的实证分析[J].中国人口资源与环境,2011(2)
[46]黄祖辉,钱文荣,毛迎春进城农民在城镇生活的稳定性及市民化意愿[J].中国人口科学,2004(2).
[47]简新华,黄锟.中国工业化和城市化过程中的农民工问题研究[M].北京：人民出版社,2008.
[48]姜开圣.农业产业化龙头企业的发展壮大及其对农民收入的影响[J].农业经济问题,2003,(3).
[49]姜作培.农民市民化：中国经济社会发展的必然趋势[J].人民日报《内部参阅》.
[50]蒋微家.浅谈小城镇建设与农民工市民化进程—以漳州角美镇为例[J].法制与社会,2011(4)
[51]蒋文畅.个人及家庭特征对我国农村劳动力迁移影响的实证研究[D].上海：复旦大学,2011.
[52]孔祥智.聚焦“三农”上、中、下卷[M].北京：中央编译出版社,2004.
[53]赖作莲.城乡就业差异及其影响因素研究[D].西北农林科技大学,2009.
[54]李锋传.日本建设新农村的经验及对我国的启示[J].经济管理文摘,2011,(8).
[55]李静,刘英基.城镇化进程中的服务业就业吸纳能力的实证分析——以山东省为例[J].湖北社会科学,2011(10)
[56]李路路,王奋字.当代中国现代化进程中的社会结构及其变迁[M].杭州：浙江人民出版社,1992.
[57]李强.农民工与中国社会分层[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2012.
[58]李强,龙文进.农民工留城与返乡意愿的影响因素分析[J].中国农村经济,2009(2)
[59]黎熙元.现代社区概论[M].中山大学出版社,2007.
[60]李为,何丹华,陈威,王芳.福建省农业转移人口市民化：发展、困境和应对[J].湖南科技学院学报,2013(12)：139-140.
[61]黎智洪.农业转移人口市民化：制度困局与策略选择[J].人民论坛,2013(11).
[62]梁剑辉.农民工市民化的四大关键[J].中国经贸导刊,2013(10).
[63]林菡馨.新农村建设视角下农村劳动力就业现状及对策探究——以福建省为例[J].襄樊职业技术学院学报,2012(11)：59-62.
[64]柳博隽.农业转移人口市民化的“三分”原则[J].浙江经济,2013(5).
[65]刘传江.中国农民工市民化进程研究[M].北京：人民出版社,2008.
[66]刘海军,谢飞燕.推进我国农业转移人口市民化对策探析[J].农业经济,2013(6).
[67]刘冠生.中国富余劳动力转移研究[D].武汉：北京林业大学,2012.
[68]刘洪仁.转型期农民分化问题的实证研究[J].中国农村观察,2005,(4).
[69]刘建伟.中国农村城镇化的理论与实践启示[J].管理与财富,2009(5).
[70]刘文辉.潍坊市新生代农民工城市定居意愿及其影响因素实证研究[D].中国海洋大学,2013(5)
[71]刘文纪.中国农民就地城市化研究[M].北京：中国经济出版社,2010.
[72]刘小年.农民工市民化的政策研究一主体的视角[M].长沙：湖南人民出版社,2010：(21).
[73]刘易斯.二元经济论[M].北京：北京经济学院出版社,1989.
[74]罗必良.新制度经济学[M].太原：山西经济出版社,2005.
[75]罗必良,温思美.技术创新、制度创新与农村发展[M].北京：中国数字化出版社,2002.
[76]罗伯特·帕特南.使民主运转起来[M].江西人民出版社,2001.195.
[77]罗辉.新生代农民工留城意愿及影响因素分析——基于南宁市的实证考察[J].创新,2013(3)：91-94.
[78]年似水.好一个“农业转移人口市民化”[J].浙江经济,2013,(3)
[79]欧阳力胜.新型城镇化进程中农民工市民化研究[D].财政部财政科学研究所,2013.
[80]戚迪明.城市化进程中农民工回流决策与行为：机理与实证[D].沈阳农业大 学,2013.
[81]钱文荣,黄祖辉.转型时期的中国农民工[M].北京：中国社会科学出版社,2007.
[82]钱正武.农民工市民化问题研究[D].北京：中共中央党校博士论文,2006.
[83]S.D.霍夫曼.劳动力市场经济学[M].上海：上海三联出版社,1989.
[84]邵峰.浙江省城乡一体化研究——基于“三农”问题的视角[D].浙江大学,2013.
[85]申鹏.基于中国人口转变视野的农村劳动力转移制度创新研究[D].西南财经大学博士论文,2010.
[86]石忆邵,尹昌应,王贺封,谭文垦.城市综合承载力的研究进展及展望[J].地理研究,2013.
[87]宋葛龙.以体制创新为根本动力和关键措施推进城乡经济社会发展一体化——山东、江苏、浙江三省部分地区的经验和启示[J].经济研究参考,2008(64).
[88]宋书丽.农村剩余劳动力转移制约因素与吸纳模式研究[D].沈阳大学,2009.
[89]宋葛龙.大城市郊区农民的华丽转身——天津市东丽区华明街调研报告[R].调查报告,2012.
[90]孙玉娜.转型期中国农民工迁移机理研究[D].西北农林科技大学,2012.
[91]唐梅.城镇化进程中的转制民族社区建设研究[D].北京：中央民族大学,2011.
[92]王爱群.吉林省农业产业化龙头企业发展研究[D].长春：吉林农业大学经济管理学院,2007.
[93]王崇举,张永鹏.城市吸纳农民工容量及其演变规律研究[M].北京：科学出版社,2013.
[94]王二红,冯长春.外来务工人员留城意愿影响因素研究——基于重庆市的实证分析[J].城市发展研究,2013(1)：85-90.
[95]王立鹤.大城市与小城镇吸纳外来人口能力与效率的比较分析[D].南京：南京农业大学,2004.
[96]王英姿.对城乡一体化发展预期下小城镇人口吸纳“反”牵引的思考[J].小城镇建设,2012.
[97]王竹林.城市化进程中农民工市民化研究[D].西北农林科技大学博士论文,2008.
[98]王子成,赵忠.农民工迁移模式的动态选择：外出、回流还是再迁移[J].管理世界,2013(1)：78-88.
[99]温铁军,孙永生.世纪之交的两大变化与三农新解[J].经济问题探索,2012(9).
[100]夏怡然.农民工定居地选择意愿及其影响因素分析—基于温州的调查[J].中国农村经济,2010(3)
[101]武锐.黑龙江省农村劳动力转移现状调查与分析[D].吉林大学,2011.
[102]吴肇光.加快推进福建省小城镇综合改革建设[J].中共福建省委党校学报,2012(9)：62-67.
[103]吴志远,谢元态.小城镇社会保障制度建设的意义及相关因素分析[J].农业现代化研究,2002(5)：205-207.
[104]吴庄莹.关于福建小城镇综合改革建设试点的分析与思考[J].发展研究,2011(9)：120-122.
[105]肖晓琴.福建省农村剩余劳动力转移的实证研究[D].福建师范大学,2009.
[106]熊捷.资本深化、劳动力异质性对农村转移劳动力就业的影响[D].重庆大学,2011.
[107]许丹.国外乡村建设经验及对我国新农村建设的启示[D].黑龙江大学,2009.
[108]晏群.小城镇概念辨析[J].规划师,2010(8)：118-121.
[109]鄢小兵.福建省农村劳动力转移问题研究[J].现代经济信息,2011(19)：314-316.
[110]严振书.转型期中国城乡二元体制问题及对策分析[J].理论学习.2010,(11).
[111]杨曦娥.马克思主义区域经济理论视野下我国农村剩余劳动力转移问题研究[D].西北农林科技大学,2011.
[112]薛薇.统计分析与SPSS的应用(第3版)[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2011.
[113]于後堤.我国东北地区农村剩余劳动力转移问题研究[D].吉林大学,2010.
[114]余金通.福建省农民工职业教育培训问题与对策[J].读与写杂志,2010(8)：1-3.
[115]喻新安,王建国,王新涛.有序推进农业转移人口市民化[J].经济日报,2013,(3)
[116]袁雪松.“双二元"就业制度中的农村劳动力转移——基于劳动力市场结构的政府作用分析[J].乡镇经济,2007(11)：8-10.
[117]曾玉荣,周江梅,郑晓梅,徐慎娴.福建省农村劳动力转移与就业情况调查分析[J].福建农业学报,2008(4)：415-418.
[118]詹华.建国以来福建城镇社会基本养老保险金体制历史演变研究[D].福建师范大学,2013.
[119]张安良.山东省农村劳动力转移研究[D].北京：北京林业大学,2012.
[120]张北平.农业转移人口市民化的成本研究[J].山西财经大学学报,2013(1).
[121]张慧.基于SWOT分析的新生代农民工市民化路径研究[J].劳动保障世界(理论版),2010(9).
[122]张杰.福建省农村人口信息素养现状调查及发展策略[J].福建师范大学学报,2008(4)：164-169.
[123]张荣霞,陈家豪,朱朝枝.福建省农村劳动力现状及富余情况探析[J].科技和产业.2009(5)：64-68.
[124]张玮.新生代农民工市民化过程中在城市定居问题研究——以成都为例[D].四川省社会科学院,2012.
[125]张永鹏.城市吸纳农民工的演化规律分析[J].经济体制改革,2011(1).
[126]漳州市编办.角美镇推进现代小城镇试点改革纪实[J].中国机构改革与管理,2013(1)：38.
[127]赵莹.我国长三角地区小城镇发展研究[D].福建师范大学博士论文,2013.
[128]郑杭生.农民市民化：当代中国社会学的重要研究主题[J].甘肃社会科学,2005(8).
[129]郑晓凉.福建省农村剩余劳动力的有序转移思考[D].福建农林大学,2009.
[130]周建群,吴正阳,林云,黄雅青.福建省农村产业布局与小城镇建设协同发展的路径选择[J].中共福建省委党校学报,2013(4)：66-73.
[131]周靖祥,何燕.城镇农村劳动力“吸纳”与区域经济增长实证检验——基于1990-2006年省际所有制变革视角探析[J].世界经济文汇,2009(1).
[132]周闪.河北省吸纳农村剩余劳动力能力的因素分析[D].河北大学,2009.
[133]朱宝树.小城镇户籍制度改革和农村人口城镇化新问题研究[J].华东师范大学学报,2004(9)：56-65.
[134]朱权.农村剩余劳动力向小城镇转移问题研究[D].东北师范大学,2004.
[135]朱允卫,黄祖辉.经济发展与城乡统筹互动关系的实证分析——以浙江省为例[J].农业经济问题,2006(5).