苕溪入湖口地区污染物通量的研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
苕溪是太湖的主要入湖河流之一。本文根据苕溪入湖口的污普资料、水质和水量监测资料,核定区域内的污染物排放量,分析苕溪入湖与太湖倒灌的水质、水量现状,计算污染物通量;并利用苕溪流域水质水量耦合模型,模拟不同水文年苕溪进出太湖的水质、水量及入湖口现有污染物减排措施对苕溪入湖水质改善效果。研究结果表明了在入湖口地区开展污染物减排工作的重要性,可为苕溪水污染控制和太湖综合治理提供数据支持。主要内容和结论如下:
     1、根据2008年污染物普查数据核定苕溪入湖口地区工业、城镇生活、畜禽养殖、水产养殖、农村生活以及农田径流等污染源的NH3-N、TP、TN排放量。结果表明,入湖口地区各污染物的年排放量为:CODCr 27965.21吨、氨氮1550.81吨、总磷270.63吨、总氮2742.96吨;近湖区单位面积排放量最高,主要污染来自城镇生活,缓冲区主要污染源为农村生活和农田径流,滨湖区无污染物排放。
     2、采用2005-2010年苕溪入湖河流小梅港、长兜港和大钱港的水质监测资料以及杨家埠和杭长桥两个水文基点站的径流量数据,分析苕溪入湖水质和水量现状,计算CODMn、NH3-N、TP和TN等污染物的入湖通量。结果显示,苕溪的入湖河流水质总体为Ⅲ类,首要污染物为TN;2005-2010年苕溪入湖水量为9.15×108~17.85×108m3,太湖倒灌水量为11.52×108~15.28×108m3;苕溪入湖的总氮通量较高,年均值为3400t/a。
     3、采用苕溪流域水质水量耦合模型,模拟不同水文年苕溪进出太湖的通量,并对入湖口污染物削减及水生态修复技术集成示范工程和依托工程进行水质改善预测。数据表明,在不同降雨保证率条件下,模拟的污染物通量变化较大;污染物削减及水生态修复技术集成示范工程对苕溪入湖水质改善尚不明显,而依托工程可实现水质改善8%左右。
Tiaoxi River is one of the main inflow rivers around Taihu. Based on the census sources data of pollution, monitoring data on the water quality and water quantity about the lake inlet of Tiaoxi, the pollutant discharge quantity was calculated as well as the inflow and outflow water quality and water quantity of Tiaoxi were analyzed to calculate the pollutant fluxes. Tiaoxi basin's coupling model of water quality and water quantity was applied to simulate the inflow and outflow water quality and water quantity of Tiaoxi in different hydrologieal years and the effect of water quality through measures for the lake inlet of Tiaoxi's emission reduction in hand. The results showed the importance of waste reduction in this area and could provide supporting data for both Tiaoxi and Taihu basins'water pollution control. The main content and conclusion were given below.
     1. Based on the census sources data of pollution in 2008, the pollutant discharge quantity of CODMn, NH3-N, TP and TN from industrial source, town living source, livestock breeding source, aquaculture source, rural living source and farmland runoff source in the lake inlet of Tiaoxi were calculated. It is shown that the annual pollutant discharge quantities in the lake inlet of Tiaoxi were CODCr 27965.21t/a, NH3-N 1550.81 t/a, TP 270.63t/a, TN 2742.96t/a. The emissions per unit area in near-lake place were highest which were chiefly from town living source. The emissions per unit area in buffer zone were mainly from rural living source and farmland runoff source. There was no pollution source in the lakeside.
     2. Based on the monitoring data on the water quality of three main rivers round Taihu Lake(Xiao-mei Gang, Chang-dou Gang and Da-qian Gang) and on the water quantity of two staff gauge stations of Tiaoxi (Yang-jia Bu and Hang-chang Qiao) during 2005-2010, the water quality and water quantity of Tiaoxi were analyzed and Tiaoxi inflow rivers'pollutant fluxes of CODMn, NH3-N, TP and TN were calculated. The results showed that the water standard of each river was Class III and the chief contaminant was TN. During 2005-2010, the water quantity from Tiaoxi to Taihu Lake was 9.15×108~17.85×108m3 while which from Taihu to Tiaoxi was 11.52×108~15.28×108m3. The pollutant flux of TN was relatively high, whose average pollutant flux was 3400t/a.
     3. Tiaoxi basin's coupling model of water quality and water quantity was applied to simulate Tiaoxi's pollutant fluxes on different hydrological years as well as the water quality improvement through Poluution Reduction and Aquatic Ecological Restoration Project and Experimental Project in the lake inlet of Tiaoxi. It was shown that the simulated pollutant loads varied in different rainfall probability and Poluution Reduction and Aquatic Ecological Restoration Project made little contribution to inflowing water quality mend, whereas Experimental Project could achieve about 8% of water quality improving effect.
引文
[1]崔广柏.太湖流域水环境综合整治新理念——“引江济太”调水试验引发的思考[J].中国水利,2004(6):43-44.
    [2]黄漪平,等.太湖水环境及其污染控制[M].北京:科学出版社,2001:231-241.
    [3]李恒鹏,刘晓玫,黄文钰.太湖流域浙西区不同土地类型的面源污染产出[J].地理学报,2004.5,59(3):401-408.
    [4]聂泽宇.太湖流域苕溪面源污染源解析与过程控制技术研究[D].浙江大学硕士学位论文,2011,杭州.
    [5]吴兴区统计局.2008年吴兴区国民经济和社会发展统计公报[R].2009:1-4.
    [6]徐太海,李淑芹,崔长俊.松花江同江断面高锰酸盐指数通量估算与分析[J].环境科学与管理,2007.1,32(1):53-55.
    [7]王飞儿.浙江省太湖流域入湖污染负荷通量研究[R].2010:19-20.
    [8]蒋岳文,陈淑梅,关道明,等.辽河口营养要素的化学特性及其入海通量估算[J].海洋环境科学,1995,14(4):39-45.
    [9]刘绮.汞入海通量及其污染因素分析与防治方法探讨[J].人民珠江,1996,(6):44-47.
    [10]叶立群.珠江重金属入海通量探讨[J].环境与开发,2001,16(2):52-54.
    [11]田家怡,慕金波,王安德,等.山东小清河流域水污染问题与水质管理研究[M].山东东营:石油大学出版社,1996:201-202.
    [12]刘国华,傅伯杰,杨平.海河水环境质量及污染物入海通量[J].环境科学,2001,22(4):46-50.
    [13]于建中.复合Weibull分布在五里河乳化油排海总量及降解研究中的应用[J].辽宁城乡环境科技,1997,17(4):45-48.
    [14]Boyle E, Collier R, Dengler A T, et al. On the chemical mass-balance in estuaries[J].Geochim Cosmochim Acta,1974,38(11):1719-1728.
    [15]Webb B W, Phillips J M, Walling D E, et al.Load estimation methodologies for British rivers and their relevance to the Loisracs(r) Programme[J].The Science of the Total Environment,1997, 194/195:379-389.
    [16]费希尔H B.内陆及近海水域中的混合[M].清华大学水力教研组译.北京:水力电力出版社,1987:56-61.
    [17]富国.河流污染物通量估算方法分析(Ⅰ)——时段通量估算方法比较分析[J].环境科学研究,2003,1(16):1-4.
    [18]王彦华.辽河河口区主要污染物通量研究[D].中国科学院硕士学位论文,2010,沈阳.
    [19]刘娟.渤海化学污染物入海通量[D].中国海洋大学硕士学位论文,2006,青岛.
    [20]王晖.淮河干流水质断面污染物年通量估算[J].水资源保护,2004,20(6):37-39.
    [21]孙顺才,黄漪平.太湖[M].北京:海洋出版社,1993:19-21.
    [22]许朋柱,秦伯强.2001-2002水文年环太湖河道的水量及污染物通量[J].湖泊科学,2005,17(3):213-218.
    [23]徐礼强.钱塘江水环境主要污染物通量研究[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2008,杭州.
    [24]Missouri Department of Natural Resources Water Pollution Control Program Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for Davis Creek[R].Lafayette County, Missouri.Approved August 13,2003.
    [25]Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) For nutrients, biochemieal oxygen demand and dissolved oxygen in the Caloosahatchee RiverBasin[R].March,2006.
    [26]Litwack H S, Di Lorenz J L, Huang P, et al.Development of a simple phosphorus model for a large urban watershed:A case study[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering-ASCE,2006, 132(4):538-546.
    [27]Ormsbee L, Elshorbagy A, Zechman E.Methodology for pH total maximum daily loads: Application to be echcreek watershed[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering-ASCE,2004, 130(2):167-174.
    [28]Lemly A D.A proeedure for setting environmentally safe Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) for selenium[J].Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety,2002,52(2):123-127.
    [29]潘日华.水环境评价模型综述[J].广东化工,2010,5:299-300,310.
    [30]樊敏,顾兆林.水质模型研究进展及发展趋势[J].上海环境科学,2010,29(6):266-269,274.
    [31]Park S S, Lee Y S.A water quality modeling study of the Nakdong Rive, Korea[J]. Ecological Modelling,2002,152(1):65-75.
    [32]徐进,佘宗莲,郑西来,等QUAL2E模型在大沽河干流青岛段水质模拟中的应用[J].农村生态环境,2004,20:33-37.
    [33]郭永彬,王焰新.汉江中下游水质模拟与预测-QuALZK模型的应用[J].安全与环境工程,2003,]0:4-7.
    [34]Tim A W, Robert B A, et al.Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program (WASP) Version6.0 DRAFT[M].User's Manual.2001.
    [35]陈美丹,姚琪,徐爱兰.WASP水质模型及其研究进展[J].水利科技与经济,2006,12(7):420-422,426.
    [36]万金保,李媛媛.湖泊水质模型研究进展[J].长江流域资源与环境,2007,16(6):827-831.
    [37]http://www.dhisoftware.eom/mikell/Description/HD_module.htm.
    [38]刘伟,刘洪超,徐海岩.基于MIKE11模型计算河流水功能区纳污能力方法[J].东北水利水电,2009,8:69-72.
    [39]Neitsch S L, Arnold J G, Kiniry J R.Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation Version 2000 [EB/OL]. http://www.brc.tamus.edu/swat/2001.
    [40]Gassman P W, Reyes M R, Green C H, et al.The soil and water assessment tool:Historical development, applications, and future research directions[J].Transactions of the ASABE,2007, 50(4):1211-1250.
    [41]张智,李灿,曾晓岚,等QUAL2E模型在长江重庆段水质模拟中的应用研究[J].环境科学与技术,29(1):1-3.
    [42]刘兰岚,张永红WASP水质模型在辽河干流污染减排模拟中的应用[J].环境科学与管理,2010.5,35(5):160-163.
    [43]洪晓瑜.太湖水环境数学模型建立及排污总量控制研究[D].河海大学硕士学位论文,2005,南京.
    [44]张永勇,王中根,于磊,等SWAT水质模块的扩展及其在海河流域典型区的应用[J].资源科学,2009.1,31(1):94-100.
    [45]中国环境科学研究院.全国饮用水水源地环境保护规划[R].2006.
    [46]国务院第一次全国污染源普查领导小组办公室.第一次全国污染源普查畜禽养殖业源产排污系数手册[M].2008.
    [47]王浩.湖泊流域水环境污染治理的创新思路与关键对策研究[M].科学出版社,2010.
    [48]国家环境保护总局水和废水监测分析方法编委会.水和废水监测分析方法(第四版)[M]. 中国环境科学出版社,2002.
    [49]张蕾,卢文喜,安永磊,等SWAT模型在国内外非点源污染研究中的应用进展[J].生态环境学报,2009,18(6):2387-2392.
    [50]王学珍,刘东玲,李彩虹.农业非点源污染的环境影响及生态工程措施[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2011,21(3):334-336.
    [51]左新坡.城市环境污染及其防治技术分析[J].应用方法论,2011,13:171.
    [52]秦迪岚,黄哲,罗岳平.洞庭湖区污染控制区划与控制对策[J].环境科学研究,2011.7,24(7):748-755.
    [53]陶春,高明,徐畅,等.农业面源污染影响因子及控制技术的研究现状与展望[J].土壤,2010,42(3):336-343.
    [54]严以新,蒋小欣,阮晓红,等.平原河网区城市水污染特征及控制对策研究[J].水资源保护,2008.9,24(5):1-3,29.
    [55]邓建明,李大平,陶勇.水华蓝藻暴发的预防与控制技术研究进展[J].水处理技术,2009.8,35(8):23-26,49.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700