全球的量化宽松货币政策对中国经济的影响
|
摘要
量化宽松(Quantitative Easing,即QE)是指中央银行通过直接进入市场购买债券等方法,增加基础货币供给,向市场直接注入流动性的货币政策干预方式。
众所周知,政府调控经济的手段主要包括财政政策和货币政策。当政府债务居高不下,进入临界点时,财政政策的使用受到制约,或者政策效果已然不明显。而货币政策,大体包括间接货币政策和直接货币政策。间接货币政策是指调控“率”的政策,而直接货币政策,则是指公开市场业务包括量化宽松这一类的政策。
NOEM,即New Open Economy Macroeconomics,也就是新开放经济宏观经济学,指的并不是一个学科,而是为了区别于在国际经济学中以M-F-D传统为代表的“旧”的研究范式。和被称为“新魏克塞尔主义”、“新凯恩斯主义”和“新新古典主义”的研究方法相比,NOEM模型更贴近于货币经济学,更关注开放经济中的情况。所以基本的NOEM模型也融合了劳动力市场和产品市场中的不完美竞争、名义刚性和最优价格设定导致的时变利润。新开放经济宏观经济学最显著的两个特点就是具有坚实的微观基础和能够进行明确的福利分析。后者则是以前者为基础的。正是因为具有坚实的微观基础,才能够通过进行总效用分析的方式进行福利分析,从而进行政策比较。
目前全世界动态经济学、宏观经济学的一个重要甚至可以说是主流的分析方法莫过于DSGE方法,之所以称之为“方法”而不是模型,是因为其是由(Kydland FE, Prescott EC,1982)产生的一个研究方法,而后经济学者们又将这个方法应用到各自学派的模型中,形成了自己学派的相应的模型,所以笔者认为DSGE实际上是一种方法,而非特定的模型。
但国内对于经济学的规范面的分析和研究、数理模型的推导等问题重视程度和认同程度都不是很高。本文更多的是希望能够推动采用DSGE方法研究开放经济中的货币政策的理论基础,并进行了一些实证检验。
宏观经济学在凯恩斯学派诞生后就一直是经济学中尚未得出系统性定论的分支。货币,则是宏观经济学中炙手可热的研究主题。而货币在开放经济中的表现如何不同,也是理论界一个十分重要的话题。
在国内,由于历史沿革和教学传承等关系,对于货币政策的研究一直是经济学界和金融学界(特别是宏观金融界)最主要的讨论话题之一,但是对于在开放条件下货币政策的研究则相对较少。
另一方面,国内大量的科研资源和精力都投入到了实证研究和政策分析中,对于经济学理论最前沿的技术和理论引进得不足。更是由于各种争论等原因存在,不能及时将国外最先进、最前沿的理论和技术在中国的角度进行应用。
本文利用新凯恩斯学派的观点,采用DSGE方法,开放经济中的NOEM框架,结合中国的实际参数值,对比较典型的冲击进行了模拟和分析。之后则提出了相关理论发展的一些设想。
本文在对新开放经济宏观经济学(NOEM)模型的相关设定进行了简单的整理,并在此基础上,综合贸易品与非贸易品的设定和国家开放度来分析两国在非对称定价机制和价格粘性的情况下从福利角度对最优货币政策进行分析,充实了NOEM框架下对于在中国货币政策分析的经验证据。通过对中国与美、欧、日三国的经验数据进行对比研究除了得出利率对与货币供应量有显著影响的结论外,还得出了日本的货币政策对于中国的货币政策也有很强的影响力的结论。我们还发展了一个动态随机一般均衡(Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium,即DSGE)方法新开放经济宏观经济学(New Open Economy Macroeconomics,即NOEM)框架下的新凯恩斯粘性价格和粘性工资小国模型。本文的理论模型承继了带有习惯的封闭经济DSGE模型,将其用NOEM的框架扩展到小国开放经济中,并尝试在家庭预算约束中加入信贷变量,进而放松其约束,辅以具有中国特色的货币政策方程,考察冲击带来的模型反馈。重点是细致地分析理论模型,之后加入货币政策冲击,来讨论中国各参数的设定和通过脉冲相应方程来评价模型的特点。
自DSGE方法提出以来,已有30年的时间,国外主流宏观经济学理论模型都已经过了该方法的改革,但目前国内对于该方法的使用还不是很广泛。我国建立能够得到相对广泛认可的较官方的DSGE方法的宏观理论模型也指日可待,本文希望能够在推动我国建立开放的新凯恩斯的DSGE方法下的模型略尽绵薄之力。
多个发达和新兴国家或经济体的中央银行都对于DSGE方法给与了很高的重视,并且在不同程度上应用着采用DSGE方法建立的模型。
大量的宏观经济学都是围绕着增长理论和货币模型展开的,而其近段时间的发展无外乎包括了不完美竞争、名义刚性等进入DSGE方法类模型的结构。货币政策成为了一个潜在的稳定性工具,但同时,它也是一把双刃剑,因为其也可以成为一个经济波动的独立来源。国内对于货币政策的研究也相当丰富,这其中包括对于相机抉择和规则的研究,不同的规则如货币供应量规则和泰勒规则的研究,不同中介目标的研究,货币政策有效性的研究,不同的泰勒规则细节的孰优孰劣的研究等。本文主要讨论了小型开放经济情形下的货币政策问题,包括模型内部的结构问题。对于两国模型的情形,则采取了宏观计量的方式进行了初探。在小型开放经济情形下,加入了粘性价格和粘性工资的情况,采取的方式是Calvo的交错价格方法。交错价格的引入粘性的方式,可以使货币政策对于真实经济变量的影响更为多样。
新凯恩斯主义虽然在金融危机之后饱受质疑,但其仍然是经济学界的主流方法之一,特别是在目前的中国,其强调政府干预的观点正符合目前经济工作的思路。提到新凯恩斯主义,其最显著的三个特点为：一、名义刚性；二、市场结构是垄断竞争的,也就是说包含不完美竞争；三、货币政策非中性,事实上这一点是由于按照第一点的模型设定得到的,但也可以说是为了使货币政策非中性,而引入粘性。
国内对于货币政策的研究的方法大多集中于计量方法,通过对不同指标进行检验,最后得出结论。虽然这种计量方法十分必要,但难免有对于“黑箱”的隔靴瘙痒之感,使之对于货币政策如何真正在经济运行中起到作用的理解帮助略显单薄。国内对于货币政策的数理模型推导和建立却显得重视不足,尤其是将货币政策方程(MPE)放到整个经济的方程系统中进行讨论的相关研究还较少。
粘性是货币对实体经济产生影响的方式,也即是名义量对实际量产生影响的方式。而粘性,有两种主要的进入模型的方式,一种是粘性价格,另一种粘性工资。
而开放模型,一般有两国模型和小国模型两种处理方式。这样就产生了粘性价格两国模型、粘性价格小国模型、粘性工资两国模型、粘性工资小国模型、粘性价格工资两国模型以及粘性价格工资小国模型六种组合。
本文主要针对货币政策操作会产生怎样的货币政策冲击,以及在冲击下经济体各变量是如何反应的进行了分析。
本文结构如下：
首先第一章是导论部分,介绍了研究的背景和意义,研究的思路和采取的主要方法,可能存在的创新点以及有待改进之处。
第二章是理论基础和文献综述部分。本文的理论基础是NOEM框架,对于该框架,分别从新凯恩斯主义学派角度、动态随机一般均衡方法角度和新开放经济宏观经济学三个角度对本文的理论基础进行一个梳理。接着对量化宽松相关的文献综述进行了讨论。
第三章对新开放经济宏观经济学这个框架进行了分析,包括对其前身Redux模型的设定进行分析,接着对新开放经济宏观经济学的开山之作(Obstfeld M,RogoffK,1996)进行了详尽的分析和阐述。在DSGE方法的角度对模型的设定进行重新审视,对NOEM框架下即新凯恩斯DSGE方法类模型的基本设定和求解的技术手段进行一个一般性的阐述。该章对Redux模型产生以来的最新进展,各个方面进行综合分析和表述,特别是对于定价方法和货币政策分析部分进行了着重的表达。之后梳理了过去NOEM框架的发展历程,并展望了未来的发展方向。
第四章对本文采用的基准模型进行了具体的设定和相应设定原因的剖析,并在NOEM框架下究竟本文要建立怎样的模型,小国模型和两国模型各有哪些优劣,模型的建立需要注意哪些方面,求解模型通过哪些技术手段进行实现等方面在本章进行阐述。
第五章对NOEM框架下的中国模型的开发进行了尝试,并针对中国的具体情况进行了参数设定及校准,随后进行了模拟,并观察以货币供应量为代表的需求冲击对模型的影响和脉冲相应函数的表现情况。
第六章对NOEM框架下的货币政策进行了一个简单的应用,可以说是小试牛刀,并且进行了一系列的相关宏观经验检验。
第七章是本文的一些结论和后续研究的设想。
最后是附录、参考文献和后记。
Quantitative easing (QE) refers to the central bank purchasing bonds directly from the market, increasing the supply of base money, inject liquidity monetary policy intervention.
As we all know, the means of government regulation of the economy, including fiscal policy and monetary policy. When the government debt is huge, to enter the critical point, the use of fiscal policy will be restricted, or the effects of policies are already limited. Monetary policy in general, includes indirect and direct monetary policy and monetary policy. Indirect monetary policy is the regulation of "rate" policy, and direct monetary policy, open market operations including quantitative easing policy.
New Open Economy Macroeconomics, a.k.a. NOEM, does not refer to a new discipline, but in order to distinguish it from the international economics MFD traditional "old" research paradigm. And is known as the "the new Wicksell","New Keynesian " or " neo-classical "method, NOEM model is closer to monetary economics, and more concerned about the situation in an open economy. So basic NOEM model also combines imperfect competition in labor and product markets, nominal rigidities and the optimal price setting which due to time-varying profit. The new open economy macroeconomics most notable feature is the solid micro-foundation and can be used to do benefit analysis. The latter is based on the former is based. It is solid microscopic foundation through for total utility analysis for welfare analysis, policy comparison.
Dynamic in the world of economics, macroeconomics is an important and even can be said that mainstream analysis method than the DSGE method is called a "process" rather than the model, because it is (Kydland FE, Prescott EC,1982), a research method, and then the economic scholars turn this method is applied to the respective school model, the corresponding model of the formation of their own school, so I think the DSGE is actually a method, rather than a specific model.
But the degree of attention and recognition of the degree of domestic economics specification surface analysis and research, the derivation of the mathematical model is not very high. This article is more of a hope to promote the use of the DSGE method in an open economy monetary policy theoretical basis, and some empirical tests.
Macroeconomics has been after the birth of the Keynesian economics has not yet come to systemic conclusion branch. Currency is a hot research topic in macroeconomics. How the money enters an open economy model is still a controversial topic among the theorists.
In the country, due to the relationship between History and teaching inheritance, monetary policy has been one of the economists and financial circles (especially macro-financial sector), the most important topic of discussion, but for the study of monetary policy in open conditions is relatively small.
On the other hand, a large number of domestic research resources and energy into empirical research and policy analysis, the lack of the most cutting-edge technology for economic theory and theoretical introduction. Is due to the various arguments and other reasons exist, the most advanced, most cutting-edge theories and techniques cannot be applied in China's point of view.
Using the point of view of the New Keynesians DSGE method, the NOEM framework of an open economy, combined with China's actual parameter values, the typical impact simulation and analysis. The following is the theoretical development of ideas.
In this paper, the new open economy macroeconomics (NOEM) model set of simple finishing, and on this basis, trade goods and the set of non-tradable goods and national openness to analyze the two countries in asymmetric pricing mechanism and price stickiness in the case of optimal monetary policy from a welfare point of view to analyze and enrich the evidence of experience in China's monetary policy analysis in the framework of the NOEM. Comparative study with empirical data on China and the United States, Europe, and Japan in addition to draw interest rates have a significant effect on the money supply conclusion also reached Japan's monetary policy also has a strong impact on China's monetary policy Conclusions of the force. We have also developed a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium, namely DSGE) New Open Economy Macroeconomics (New Open Economy Macroeconomics, that NOEM) under the framework of the New Keynesian sticky prices and sticky-wage model of a small country. In this paper, a theoretical model inherited the closed economy DSGE model with habit, be extended to the small open economy with NOEM framework, and try to join the credit variable in the household budget constraint, then relax its constraints, supplemented with Chinese characteristics monetary policy equation, examine the impact of model feedback. Focus on detailed analysis of the theoretical model, by adding after the impact of monetary policy, to discuss each parameter setting and by pulses corresponding equation to evaluate the characteristics of the model.
Since DSGE method has been proposed more than30years, the foreign mainstream macroeconomics theoretical models have been after the reform of the methods, but for the domestic use of the method is not very widely. This country was founded to be relatively widely recognized than the official the DSGE method of macro-theoretical model is also just around the corner, we hope to be able to promote China to establish an open New Keynesian DSGE model little humble.
Many developed and emerging countries or economies of the Central Bank for DSGE method to give high attention and applied in varying degrees the DSGE established model.
Growth theory revolves around a lot of macroeconomics and monetary model expanded Recently, the development of nothing less than including imperfect competition, nominal rigidities into the DSGE method class model structure. Monetary policy has become a potential stability tools, but at the same time, it is also a double-edged sword, because it can also become an economic fluctuations independent sources. Domestic monetary policy is quite rich, including discretionary rules, different rules, such as the money supply rules and the Taylor rule, the study of the different intermediate target of monetary policy effectiveness research, different Taylor rule, and the details of which one is better research. This paper mainly discusses the case of a small open economy monetary policy issues, including the internal structure of the model. For the case of the model of the two countries, to take the macro measured Exploration. In the case of a small open economy, joined the sticky prices and wages was modeled, taken Calvo staggered price method. Different settings of staggered sticky prices impact the monetary policy on real economic variables.
New Keynesian suffered questioned after the financial crisis, but it is still one of the mainstream economists, especially in China, stressed the point of view of government intervention is in line with the idea of the current economic work. Said the New Keynesian three of its most notable features:First, nominal rigidities;, market structure is monopolistic competition, that is to say, a work containing the imperfect competition; Third, monetary policy is not neutral, in fact it is obtained in accordance with the first model set, but also can be said to make the non-neutral monetary policy, while the introduction of the viscous.
Most of the domestic monetary policy focused on the measurement method, tested by different indicators, and finally concluded. Although this measure is necessary, but it is inevitable that a sense of itching across the "black box" boots, so that monetary policy how to really play a role in the economic operation help to understand a bit thin. Domestic monetary policy for the derivation and the establishment of the mathematical model seems insufficient attention to, especially monetary policy equation (MPE) on the entire economic system of equations are discussed in the relevant study also less.
Nominal rigidity impact the real economy, that is, the nominal amount of the actual amount of impact. Stickiness, two main form of entry to the models is sticky prices and sticky wages.
And open model, there are generally two approaches of the two models and the model of a small country. Thus, there are six combinations of creating sticky price and wage into small open economy model or two country model.
In this paper, for the operation of monetary policy will produce what kind of monetary policy shocks, as well as economies under the impact of each variable is how the reaction was analyzed.
The paper is structured as follows:
The first chapter is the introduction part, introduced the background and significance of the research, the main method of research ideas and to take the possible existence of innovation as well as areas for improvement.
The second chapter is the theoretical basis and the literature review section. Of this article the theoretical basis NOEM framework for this framework, new Keynesian perspective, the dynamic stochastic general equilibrium approach angle and the new open economy macroeconomics three angles a comb on the theoretical basis of this article. Then the literature review of quantitative easing was discussed.
Chapter3is New Open Economy Macroeconomics framework analysis, including analysis of the set of its predecessor Redux model, and then the pioneer work on the new open economy macroeconomics (Obstfeld M, Rogoff K,1996) a detailed analysis and elaboration. Methodological point of view in the DSGE model set to re-examine the elaboration of a general model of the New Keynesian DSGE method in the framework of the NOEM basic settings and solving technical means. The chapter on the Redux model has been the latest developments in all aspects of a comprehensive analysis and presentation, especially for pricing methods and monetary policy analysis section focuses expression. After combing the past NOEM framework of development process, and look forward to the future direction of development.
Chapter4is the baseline model used in this paper analysis of specific settings and the corresponding set of reasons, and what this article the NOEM framework to establish what kind of model, a small country model and the model of the two countries, which have their own advantages and disadvantages, model to establish the need to pay attention to what, to solve the model through which technical means to achieve other aspects described in this chapter.
Chapter5the Chinese model developed under the framework of the NOEM try for specific parameter setting and calibration followed by a simulation and observe the money supply as the representative of the impact of demand shocks on the model and the performance of the impulse response function.
Chapter6of monetary policy under the framework of the NOEM a simple application can be said that a small test chopper, and conducted a series of macro-empirical testing.
Chapter7is some conclusions and follow-up studies the idea of this article.
Finally, the appendices, references and Postscript come.
众所周知,政府调控经济的手段主要包括财政政策和货币政策。当政府债务居高不下,进入临界点时,财政政策的使用受到制约,或者政策效果已然不明显。而货币政策,大体包括间接货币政策和直接货币政策。间接货币政策是指调控“率”的政策,而直接货币政策,则是指公开市场业务包括量化宽松这一类的政策。
NOEM,即New Open Economy Macroeconomics,也就是新开放经济宏观经济学,指的并不是一个学科,而是为了区别于在国际经济学中以M-F-D传统为代表的“旧”的研究范式。和被称为“新魏克塞尔主义”、“新凯恩斯主义”和“新新古典主义”的研究方法相比,NOEM模型更贴近于货币经济学,更关注开放经济中的情况。所以基本的NOEM模型也融合了劳动力市场和产品市场中的不完美竞争、名义刚性和最优价格设定导致的时变利润。新开放经济宏观经济学最显著的两个特点就是具有坚实的微观基础和能够进行明确的福利分析。后者则是以前者为基础的。正是因为具有坚实的微观基础,才能够通过进行总效用分析的方式进行福利分析,从而进行政策比较。
目前全世界动态经济学、宏观经济学的一个重要甚至可以说是主流的分析方法莫过于DSGE方法,之所以称之为“方法”而不是模型,是因为其是由(Kydland FE, Prescott EC,1982)产生的一个研究方法,而后经济学者们又将这个方法应用到各自学派的模型中,形成了自己学派的相应的模型,所以笔者认为DSGE实际上是一种方法,而非特定的模型。
但国内对于经济学的规范面的分析和研究、数理模型的推导等问题重视程度和认同程度都不是很高。本文更多的是希望能够推动采用DSGE方法研究开放经济中的货币政策的理论基础,并进行了一些实证检验。
宏观经济学在凯恩斯学派诞生后就一直是经济学中尚未得出系统性定论的分支。货币,则是宏观经济学中炙手可热的研究主题。而货币在开放经济中的表现如何不同,也是理论界一个十分重要的话题。
在国内,由于历史沿革和教学传承等关系,对于货币政策的研究一直是经济学界和金融学界(特别是宏观金融界)最主要的讨论话题之一,但是对于在开放条件下货币政策的研究则相对较少。
另一方面,国内大量的科研资源和精力都投入到了实证研究和政策分析中,对于经济学理论最前沿的技术和理论引进得不足。更是由于各种争论等原因存在,不能及时将国外最先进、最前沿的理论和技术在中国的角度进行应用。
本文利用新凯恩斯学派的观点,采用DSGE方法,开放经济中的NOEM框架,结合中国的实际参数值,对比较典型的冲击进行了模拟和分析。之后则提出了相关理论发展的一些设想。
本文在对新开放经济宏观经济学(NOEM)模型的相关设定进行了简单的整理,并在此基础上,综合贸易品与非贸易品的设定和国家开放度来分析两国在非对称定价机制和价格粘性的情况下从福利角度对最优货币政策进行分析,充实了NOEM框架下对于在中国货币政策分析的经验证据。通过对中国与美、欧、日三国的经验数据进行对比研究除了得出利率对与货币供应量有显著影响的结论外,还得出了日本的货币政策对于中国的货币政策也有很强的影响力的结论。我们还发展了一个动态随机一般均衡(Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium,即DSGE)方法新开放经济宏观经济学(New Open Economy Macroeconomics,即NOEM)框架下的新凯恩斯粘性价格和粘性工资小国模型。本文的理论模型承继了带有习惯的封闭经济DSGE模型,将其用NOEM的框架扩展到小国开放经济中,并尝试在家庭预算约束中加入信贷变量,进而放松其约束,辅以具有中国特色的货币政策方程,考察冲击带来的模型反馈。重点是细致地分析理论模型,之后加入货币政策冲击,来讨论中国各参数的设定和通过脉冲相应方程来评价模型的特点。
自DSGE方法提出以来,已有30年的时间,国外主流宏观经济学理论模型都已经过了该方法的改革,但目前国内对于该方法的使用还不是很广泛。我国建立能够得到相对广泛认可的较官方的DSGE方法的宏观理论模型也指日可待,本文希望能够在推动我国建立开放的新凯恩斯的DSGE方法下的模型略尽绵薄之力。
多个发达和新兴国家或经济体的中央银行都对于DSGE方法给与了很高的重视,并且在不同程度上应用着采用DSGE方法建立的模型。
大量的宏观经济学都是围绕着增长理论和货币模型展开的,而其近段时间的发展无外乎包括了不完美竞争、名义刚性等进入DSGE方法类模型的结构。货币政策成为了一个潜在的稳定性工具,但同时,它也是一把双刃剑,因为其也可以成为一个经济波动的独立来源。国内对于货币政策的研究也相当丰富,这其中包括对于相机抉择和规则的研究,不同的规则如货币供应量规则和泰勒规则的研究,不同中介目标的研究,货币政策有效性的研究,不同的泰勒规则细节的孰优孰劣的研究等。本文主要讨论了小型开放经济情形下的货币政策问题,包括模型内部的结构问题。对于两国模型的情形,则采取了宏观计量的方式进行了初探。在小型开放经济情形下,加入了粘性价格和粘性工资的情况,采取的方式是Calvo的交错价格方法。交错价格的引入粘性的方式,可以使货币政策对于真实经济变量的影响更为多样。
新凯恩斯主义虽然在金融危机之后饱受质疑,但其仍然是经济学界的主流方法之一,特别是在目前的中国,其强调政府干预的观点正符合目前经济工作的思路。提到新凯恩斯主义,其最显著的三个特点为：一、名义刚性；二、市场结构是垄断竞争的,也就是说包含不完美竞争；三、货币政策非中性,事实上这一点是由于按照第一点的模型设定得到的,但也可以说是为了使货币政策非中性,而引入粘性。
国内对于货币政策的研究的方法大多集中于计量方法,通过对不同指标进行检验,最后得出结论。虽然这种计量方法十分必要,但难免有对于“黑箱”的隔靴瘙痒之感,使之对于货币政策如何真正在经济运行中起到作用的理解帮助略显单薄。国内对于货币政策的数理模型推导和建立却显得重视不足,尤其是将货币政策方程(MPE)放到整个经济的方程系统中进行讨论的相关研究还较少。
粘性是货币对实体经济产生影响的方式,也即是名义量对实际量产生影响的方式。而粘性,有两种主要的进入模型的方式,一种是粘性价格,另一种粘性工资。
而开放模型,一般有两国模型和小国模型两种处理方式。这样就产生了粘性价格两国模型、粘性价格小国模型、粘性工资两国模型、粘性工资小国模型、粘性价格工资两国模型以及粘性价格工资小国模型六种组合。
本文主要针对货币政策操作会产生怎样的货币政策冲击,以及在冲击下经济体各变量是如何反应的进行了分析。
本文结构如下：
首先第一章是导论部分,介绍了研究的背景和意义,研究的思路和采取的主要方法,可能存在的创新点以及有待改进之处。
第二章是理论基础和文献综述部分。本文的理论基础是NOEM框架,对于该框架,分别从新凯恩斯主义学派角度、动态随机一般均衡方法角度和新开放经济宏观经济学三个角度对本文的理论基础进行一个梳理。接着对量化宽松相关的文献综述进行了讨论。
第三章对新开放经济宏观经济学这个框架进行了分析,包括对其前身Redux模型的设定进行分析,接着对新开放经济宏观经济学的开山之作(Obstfeld M,RogoffK,1996)进行了详尽的分析和阐述。在DSGE方法的角度对模型的设定进行重新审视,对NOEM框架下即新凯恩斯DSGE方法类模型的基本设定和求解的技术手段进行一个一般性的阐述。该章对Redux模型产生以来的最新进展,各个方面进行综合分析和表述,特别是对于定价方法和货币政策分析部分进行了着重的表达。之后梳理了过去NOEM框架的发展历程,并展望了未来的发展方向。
第四章对本文采用的基准模型进行了具体的设定和相应设定原因的剖析,并在NOEM框架下究竟本文要建立怎样的模型,小国模型和两国模型各有哪些优劣,模型的建立需要注意哪些方面,求解模型通过哪些技术手段进行实现等方面在本章进行阐述。
第五章对NOEM框架下的中国模型的开发进行了尝试,并针对中国的具体情况进行了参数设定及校准,随后进行了模拟,并观察以货币供应量为代表的需求冲击对模型的影响和脉冲相应函数的表现情况。
第六章对NOEM框架下的货币政策进行了一个简单的应用,可以说是小试牛刀,并且进行了一系列的相关宏观经验检验。
第七章是本文的一些结论和后续研究的设想。
最后是附录、参考文献和后记。
Quantitative easing (QE) refers to the central bank purchasing bonds directly from the market, increasing the supply of base money, inject liquidity monetary policy intervention.
As we all know, the means of government regulation of the economy, including fiscal policy and monetary policy. When the government debt is huge, to enter the critical point, the use of fiscal policy will be restricted, or the effects of policies are already limited. Monetary policy in general, includes indirect and direct monetary policy and monetary policy. Indirect monetary policy is the regulation of "rate" policy, and direct monetary policy, open market operations including quantitative easing policy.
New Open Economy Macroeconomics, a.k.a. NOEM, does not refer to a new discipline, but in order to distinguish it from the international economics MFD traditional "old" research paradigm. And is known as the "the new Wicksell","New Keynesian " or " neo-classical "method, NOEM model is closer to monetary economics, and more concerned about the situation in an open economy. So basic NOEM model also combines imperfect competition in labor and product markets, nominal rigidities and the optimal price setting which due to time-varying profit. The new open economy macroeconomics most notable feature is the solid micro-foundation and can be used to do benefit analysis. The latter is based on the former is based. It is solid microscopic foundation through for total utility analysis for welfare analysis, policy comparison.
Dynamic in the world of economics, macroeconomics is an important and even can be said that mainstream analysis method than the DSGE method is called a "process" rather than the model, because it is (Kydland FE, Prescott EC,1982), a research method, and then the economic scholars turn this method is applied to the respective school model, the corresponding model of the formation of their own school, so I think the DSGE is actually a method, rather than a specific model.
But the degree of attention and recognition of the degree of domestic economics specification surface analysis and research, the derivation of the mathematical model is not very high. This article is more of a hope to promote the use of the DSGE method in an open economy monetary policy theoretical basis, and some empirical tests.
Macroeconomics has been after the birth of the Keynesian economics has not yet come to systemic conclusion branch. Currency is a hot research topic in macroeconomics. How the money enters an open economy model is still a controversial topic among the theorists.
In the country, due to the relationship between History and teaching inheritance, monetary policy has been one of the economists and financial circles (especially macro-financial sector), the most important topic of discussion, but for the study of monetary policy in open conditions is relatively small.
On the other hand, a large number of domestic research resources and energy into empirical research and policy analysis, the lack of the most cutting-edge technology for economic theory and theoretical introduction. Is due to the various arguments and other reasons exist, the most advanced, most cutting-edge theories and techniques cannot be applied in China's point of view.
Using the point of view of the New Keynesians DSGE method, the NOEM framework of an open economy, combined with China's actual parameter values, the typical impact simulation and analysis. The following is the theoretical development of ideas.
In this paper, the new open economy macroeconomics (NOEM) model set of simple finishing, and on this basis, trade goods and the set of non-tradable goods and national openness to analyze the two countries in asymmetric pricing mechanism and price stickiness in the case of optimal monetary policy from a welfare point of view to analyze and enrich the evidence of experience in China's monetary policy analysis in the framework of the NOEM. Comparative study with empirical data on China and the United States, Europe, and Japan in addition to draw interest rates have a significant effect on the money supply conclusion also reached Japan's monetary policy also has a strong impact on China's monetary policy Conclusions of the force. We have also developed a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium, namely DSGE) New Open Economy Macroeconomics (New Open Economy Macroeconomics, that NOEM) under the framework of the New Keynesian sticky prices and sticky-wage model of a small country. In this paper, a theoretical model inherited the closed economy DSGE model with habit, be extended to the small open economy with NOEM framework, and try to join the credit variable in the household budget constraint, then relax its constraints, supplemented with Chinese characteristics monetary policy equation, examine the impact of model feedback. Focus on detailed analysis of the theoretical model, by adding after the impact of monetary policy, to discuss each parameter setting and by pulses corresponding equation to evaluate the characteristics of the model.
Since DSGE method has been proposed more than30years, the foreign mainstream macroeconomics theoretical models have been after the reform of the methods, but for the domestic use of the method is not very widely. This country was founded to be relatively widely recognized than the official the DSGE method of macro-theoretical model is also just around the corner, we hope to be able to promote China to establish an open New Keynesian DSGE model little humble.
Many developed and emerging countries or economies of the Central Bank for DSGE method to give high attention and applied in varying degrees the DSGE established model.
Growth theory revolves around a lot of macroeconomics and monetary model expanded Recently, the development of nothing less than including imperfect competition, nominal rigidities into the DSGE method class model structure. Monetary policy has become a potential stability tools, but at the same time, it is also a double-edged sword, because it can also become an economic fluctuations independent sources. Domestic monetary policy is quite rich, including discretionary rules, different rules, such as the money supply rules and the Taylor rule, the study of the different intermediate target of monetary policy effectiveness research, different Taylor rule, and the details of which one is better research. This paper mainly discusses the case of a small open economy monetary policy issues, including the internal structure of the model. For the case of the model of the two countries, to take the macro measured Exploration. In the case of a small open economy, joined the sticky prices and wages was modeled, taken Calvo staggered price method. Different settings of staggered sticky prices impact the monetary policy on real economic variables.
New Keynesian suffered questioned after the financial crisis, but it is still one of the mainstream economists, especially in China, stressed the point of view of government intervention is in line with the idea of the current economic work. Said the New Keynesian three of its most notable features:First, nominal rigidities;, market structure is monopolistic competition, that is to say, a work containing the imperfect competition; Third, monetary policy is not neutral, in fact it is obtained in accordance with the first model set, but also can be said to make the non-neutral monetary policy, while the introduction of the viscous.
Most of the domestic monetary policy focused on the measurement method, tested by different indicators, and finally concluded. Although this measure is necessary, but it is inevitable that a sense of itching across the "black box" boots, so that monetary policy how to really play a role in the economic operation help to understand a bit thin. Domestic monetary policy for the derivation and the establishment of the mathematical model seems insufficient attention to, especially monetary policy equation (MPE) on the entire economic system of equations are discussed in the relevant study also less.
Nominal rigidity impact the real economy, that is, the nominal amount of the actual amount of impact. Stickiness, two main form of entry to the models is sticky prices and sticky wages.
And open model, there are generally two approaches of the two models and the model of a small country. Thus, there are six combinations of creating sticky price and wage into small open economy model or two country model.
In this paper, for the operation of monetary policy will produce what kind of monetary policy shocks, as well as economies under the impact of each variable is how the reaction was analyzed.
The paper is structured as follows:
The first chapter is the introduction part, introduced the background and significance of the research, the main method of research ideas and to take the possible existence of innovation as well as areas for improvement.
The second chapter is the theoretical basis and the literature review section. Of this article the theoretical basis NOEM framework for this framework, new Keynesian perspective, the dynamic stochastic general equilibrium approach angle and the new open economy macroeconomics three angles a comb on the theoretical basis of this article. Then the literature review of quantitative easing was discussed.
Chapter3is New Open Economy Macroeconomics framework analysis, including analysis of the set of its predecessor Redux model, and then the pioneer work on the new open economy macroeconomics (Obstfeld M, Rogoff K,1996) a detailed analysis and elaboration. Methodological point of view in the DSGE model set to re-examine the elaboration of a general model of the New Keynesian DSGE method in the framework of the NOEM basic settings and solving technical means. The chapter on the Redux model has been the latest developments in all aspects of a comprehensive analysis and presentation, especially for pricing methods and monetary policy analysis section focuses expression. After combing the past NOEM framework of development process, and look forward to the future direction of development.
Chapter4is the baseline model used in this paper analysis of specific settings and the corresponding set of reasons, and what this article the NOEM framework to establish what kind of model, a small country model and the model of the two countries, which have their own advantages and disadvantages, model to establish the need to pay attention to what, to solve the model through which technical means to achieve other aspects described in this chapter.
Chapter5the Chinese model developed under the framework of the NOEM try for specific parameter setting and calibration followed by a simulation and observe the money supply as the representative of the impact of demand shocks on the model and the performance of the impulse response function.
Chapter6of monetary policy under the framework of the NOEM a simple application can be said that a small test chopper, and conducted a series of macro-empirical testing.
Chapter7is some conclusions and follow-up studies the idea of this article.
Finally, the appendices, references and Postscript come.
引文
[1]艾洪德,郭凯,流动性过剩,利率期限结构与最优利率规则[J],财经问题研究,2010(5)：3-12。
[2]艾洪德,郭凯,李涛.一般均衡中的利率、确定性与最优规则[J].财经问题研究,2008(2)：3-12.
[3]陈静.量化宽松货币政策的传导机制与政策效果研究——基于央行资产负债表的跨国分析[J].国际金融研究,2013(2)：16-25.
[4]陈昆亭,龚六堂.粘滞价格模型以及对中国经济的数值模拟—对基本RBC模型的改进[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2006(8)：106-117.
[5]陈利平.货币理论[M].北京大学出版社,2003.
[6]陈雨露,侯杰.新开放经济宏观经济学：研究文献综述[J].南开经济研究,2006(2)：3-17.
[7]戴金平、张华宁, 国际金融新趋势：全球货币量化宽松：何时退出?[M]厦门大学出版社,2012
[8]郭凯、孙音,流动性过剩、最优利率规则与通胀目标制：对中国货币政策的检验与冲击响应分析[M]中国社会科学出版社2012
[9]胡再勇,张弘.Redux模型与人民币升值压力研究[J].中央财经大学学报,2004(9)：33-37+59.
[10]姜波克：国际金融理论的发展及理论前沿,金融研究2002(9)
[11]李南妮.日本量化宽松政策的影响及对中国的启示[J].吉林金融研究,2013(1)：17-19.
[12]刘斌,张怀清.我国产出缺口的估计.金融研究.2001(10).69-77.
[13]刘斌.我国DSGE模型的开发及在货币政策分析中的应用[J].金融研究,2008,No.340(10)：1-21.
[14]刘尧成.供求冲击与人民币汇率的波动：基于DSGE两国模型的模拟分析[J].南方经济,2010,No.252(9)：29-39.
[15]陆前进.开放经济宏观经济学的理论发展脉络及其评述[J].国际金融研究,2005(7)：44-49.
[16]潘成夫.量化宽松货币政策的理论、实践与影响[J].国际金融研究,2009(8)：4-9.
[17]孙立坚、李安心、吴刚：开放经济中的价格传递效应：中国的例证,经济学(季刊)第3卷第1期,2003(10)
[18]汤铎铎.新开放经济宏观经济学：理论和问题[J].世界经济,2009,v.32；No.373(9)：37-55.
[19]万志宏,曾刚.量化宽松货币政策的实践——以日本为例[J].国际金融研究,2011(4)：10-17.
[20]王胜,邹恒甫.“新开放经济宏观经济学”发展综述[J].金融研究,2006(1)：178-187.
[21]王胜,邹恒甫.开放经济中的货币政策[J].管理世界,2006(2)：23-31+171.
[22]王胜、邹恒甫,不确定情况下的关税、货币政策,数量经济技术经济研究2004b(12)5-18.
[23]王胜、邹恒甫,关税、汇率与福利,世界经济2004a(8),第3-12页。
[24]王胜、邹恒甫,开放经济中的货币政策,管理世界,2006(2),23-31.
[25]王胜、邹恒甫,开放经济中的泰勒规则——对中国货币政策的检验,统计研究,2006(3),42-46.
[26]王胜.新开放经济宏观经济学理论和研究[D].：武汉大学,2005.
[27]王胜与彭鑫瑶,不对称价格粘性下的货币政策和福利效应.世界经济,2010(5)101-117.
[28]肖芍芳,黄洁文.美国量化宽松货币政策对中国经济的冲击效应研究[J].广东商学院学报,2012(6)：12-13.
[29]谢平,罗雄.泰勒规则及其在中国货币政策中的检验[J].经济研究,2002(3)：3-12.
[30]徐高.基于动态随机一般均衡模型的中国经济波动数量分析[D].：北京大学,2008.
[31]闫思.NOEM框架下货币政策的福利效应及经验检验[J].东北财经大学学报,2012(5)：64-69.
[32]杨雪,李松华,王菲.货币供应量传导研究——基于新凯恩斯DSGE模型的研究[J].管理评论,2011,v.23(12)：38-45.
[33]姚斌.国家规模、对外开放度与汇率制度的选择—基于福利的数量分析,2006(9)3-11.
[34]姚斌.美国量化宽松货币政策的影响及我国的对策[J].上海金融,2009(7)：33-36+72.
[35]张卫平.货币政策理论：基于动态一般均衡方法[M].北京大学出版社,2012.
[36]Adjemian S,Bastani H,Juillard M,et al.Dynare:Reference Manual, Version 4[J].Dynare Working Papers,2011,1.
[37]Adolfson M,Las 6 en S,Lind e J,et al.Evaluating an Estimated New Keynesian Small Open Economy Model[J].Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,2008,32(8):2690-2721.
[38]Adolfson, M., Laseen, S., Linde, J., Villani, M.,2007. Bayesian estimation of an open economy DSGE model with incomplete pass-through. Journal of International Economics 72,481-511.
[39]Altig, D. E., Christiano, L. J., Eichenbaum, M., Linde, J.,2005. Firm-specific capital, nominal rigidities and the business cycle, CEPR Discussion Papers 4858.
[40]AN S, Schorfheide F.Bayesian Analysis of DSGE Models[J].Econometric Reviews,2007,26(2):113-172.
[41]Ascari G.Staggered Prices and Trend Inflation:Some Nuisances[J].Review of Economic Dynamics,2004,7(3):642-667.
[42]Bagus, P. and M. H. Schiml, "New modes of monetary policy:qualitative easing by the Fed", Economic Affairs,2009,29(2),46-49.
[43]Basu S.Intermediate Goods and Business Cycles:Implications for Productivity and Welfare[J].The American Economic Review,1995:512-531.
[44]Bergin P R,Feenstra R C.Pricing-to-market, Staggered Contracts, and Real Exchange Rate Persistence[J]. Journal of International Economics,2001,54(2):333-359.
[45]Bergin P R.How Well Can the New Open Economy Macroeconomics Explain the Exchange Rate and Current Account?[J] Journal of International Money and Finance,2006,25(5):675-701.
[46]Bernanke B,Reinhart V,Sack B.Monetary Policy Alternatives at the Zero Bound:an Empirical Assessment[J].Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2004,2004(2):1-100.
[47]Bernanke, B. S. and V. R. Reinhart, "Conducting monetary policy at very low short-term interest rates", The American Economic Review,2004,94(2),85-90.
[48]Bernanke, B., Gertler, M., Gilchrist, S.,1999. The financial accelerator in a quantitative business cycles framework. In:Taylor, J. B., Woodford, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Macroeconomics Volume 1C. Amsterdam:Elsevier Science, North-Holland.
[49]Blanchard, O., Fischer, S.,1989. Lectures on Macroeconomics. The MIT Press.
[50]Blinder, A. S., "Quantitative easing:entrance and exit strategies", Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review,2010,92(6),465-479.
[51]Brayton, F., Laubach, T.,2008. Documentation of linearized FRB/US.
[52]Brock, W. A., Durlauf, S., West, K.,2007. Model uncertainty and policy evaluation: Some theory and empirics. Journal of Econometrics 136(2),629-664.
[53]Bryant, R., Currie, D., Frenkel, J., Masson, P., Portes, R (Eds.),1989. Macroeconomic Policies in an Interdependent World. Washington, D.C.:The Brookings Institution.
[54]Bryant, R., Henderson, D. W., Holtham, G., Hooper, P., Symansky, S. A. (Eds.),1988. Empirical Macroeconomics for Interdependent Economies. Washington, D.C.:The Brookings Institution.
[55]Bryant, R., Hooper, P., Mann, C. (Eds.),1993. Evaluating Policy Regimes:New Research in Empirical Macroeconomics. Washington, D.C.:The Brookings Institution. Speech on "Reflections on the nature of monetary policy non-standard measures and finance theory",18 November 2010.2530
[56]Calvo, G.,1983. Staggered prices in a utility maximizing framework. Journal of Monetary Economics 12,383-398.
[57]Carabenciov, I., Ermolaev, I., Freedman, C., Juillard, M., Kamenik, O., Korshunov, D., Laxton, D.,2008. A small quarterly projection model of the US economy, iMF Working Paper 08/278.
[58]Caroline Bettsa and Michael B. Devereux, Exchange rate dynamics in a model of pricing-to-market, Journal of International Economics,2000 (50),214-244
[59]Caroline Bettsa and Michael B. Devereux, The exchange rate in a model of pricing-to-market, European Economic Review,1996 (40),1007-1021
[60]Chari V V,Kehoe P J,McGrattan E R.Can Sticky Price Models Generate Volatile and Persistent Real Exchange Rates?[J].The Review of Economic Studies,2002,69(3):533-563.
[61]Chari, V. V., Kehoe, P., McGrattan, E.,2009. New Keynesian models:Not yet useful for policy analysis. American Economic Journal:Macroeconomics 1(1),242-266.
[62]Christensen, I., Dib, A.,2008. The financial accelerator in an estimated New Keynesian model. Review of Economic Dynamics 11,155-178.
[63]Christiano, L. J.,2002. Solving dynamic equilibrium models by a method of undetermined coefficients. Computational Economics 20(1-2),21-55.
[64]Christiano, L. J., Eichenbaum, M., Evans, C. L.,2005. Nominal rigidities and the dynamic effects of a shock to monetary policy. Journal of Political Economy 113(1), 1-45.
[65]Christiano, L. J., Motto, R., Rostagno, M.,2003. The great depression and the Friedman-Schwartz hypothesis. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 35, 1119-1197.
[66]Christoffel, K., Kuester, K.,2008. Resuscitating the wage channel in models with unemployment fluctuations. Journal of Monetary Economics 55,865-887.
[67]Christoffel, K., Kuester, K., Linzert, T.,2009. The role of labor markets for euro area monetary policy. European Economic Review 53,908-936.
[68]Clarida, R., Gali, J., Gertler, M.,1999. The science of monetary policy:A New Keynesian perspective. Journal of Economic Literature 37(4),1661-1707.
[69]Clarida, R., Gali, J., Gertler, M.,2002. A simple framework for international monetary policy analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics 49,879-904.
[70]Coenen, G., Erceg, C. J., Freedman, C., Furceri, D., Kumhof, M., Lalonde, R., Laxton, D., Linde, J., Mourougane, A., Muir, D., Mursula, S., de Resende, C., Roberts, J., Roeger, W., Snudden, S., Trabandt, M., in't Veld, J.,2012. Effects of fiscal stimulus in structural models. American Economic Journal:Macroeconomics 4,22-68.
[71]Coenen, G., McAdam, P., Straub, R.,2008. Tax reform and labour-market performance in the euroarea:A simulation-based analysis using the New Area-Wide Model. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 32(8),2543-2583.
[72]Coenen, G., Orphanides, A., Wieland, V.,2004. Price stability and monetary policy effectiveness 31 when nominal interest rates are bounded at zero. Berkeley Electronic Press:Advances in Macroeconomics 4(1),1-23.
[73]Coenen, G., Wieland, V.,2002. Inflation dynamics and international linkages:A model of the United States, the Euro Area and Japan, ECB Working Paper Series 181.
[74]Coenen, G., Wieland, V.,2005. A small estimated euro area model with rational expectations and nominal rigidities. European Economic Review 49,1081-1104.
[75]Cogan, J. F., Cwik, T., Taylor, J. B.,et al.New Keynesian Versus Old Keynesian Government Spending Multipliers[J] Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,2010,34(3):281-295.
[76]Cogan, J. F., Cwik, T., Taylor, J. B., Wieland, V.,2010. New Keynesian versus Old Keynesian government spending multipliers. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 34,281-295.
[77]Collard, F., Juillard, M.,2001. Accuracy of stochastic perturbation methods:The case of asset pricing models. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 25,979-999.
[78]Corsetti QDdedola L.A Macroeconomic Model of International Price Discrimination[J] Journal of International Economics,2005,67(1):129-155.
[79]Corsetti, Giancarlo and Paolo Pesenti.2001. Welfare and macroeconomic interdependence. Quarterly Journal of Economics.116,421-446.
[80]Corsetti, Giancarlo and Paolo Pesenti.2005a. International Dimension of Optimal Monetary Policy. Journal of Monetary Economics.52,281-305.
[81]Corsetti, Giancarlo and Paolo Pesenti.2005b. The simple geometry of transmission and stablizaion in closed and open economy. NBER Working Paper 11341.
[82]Corsetti, Giancarlo and Paolo Pesenti. Welfare and macroeconomic interdependence, 1997, NBER Working Paper 163071
[83]Cwik, T., Wieland V.Keynesian Government Spending Multipliers and Spillovers in the Euro Area [J].Economic Policy,2011,26(67):493-549.
[84]Cwik, T., Wieland, V.,2011. Keynesian government spending multipliers and spillovers in the euroarea. Economic Policy 26,493-549.
[85]DeGraeve, F.,2008. The external finance premium and the macroeconomy:US post-WWII evidence. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 32,3415-3440.
[86]DeJong D N,Dave C.Structural Macroeconomics [M].[S.l.]:[s.n.],2011.
[87]Dieppe, A., Kuester, K., McAdam, P.,2005. Optimal monetary policy rules for the euro area:An analysis using the area wide model. Journal of Common Market Studies 43 (3),507-5372.
[88]Dornbusch, Rudiger.1976. Exchange Rates and Prices. American Economic Review. 77,93-106.
[89]Edge, R. M., Kiley, M. T., Laforte, J.-P.,2008. Natural rate measures in an estimated DSGE model of the U.S. economy. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 32, 2512-2535.
[90]Eichenbaum M,Fisher J D.Evaluating the Calvo Model of Sticky Prices[R].2004.
[91]Erceg, C. J., Guerrieri, L., Gust, C.,2008. Trade adjustment and the composition of trade. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 32,2622-2650.
[92]Erceg, C. J., Henderson, D., Levin, A.,2000. Optimal monetary policy with staggered wage and price contracts. Journal of Monetary Economics 46,281-313.
[93]Fagan, G, Henry, J., Mestre, R.,2005. An area-wide model for the euro area. Economic Modelling 22,39-59.
[94]Fair, R. C., Taylor, J. B.,1983. Solution and maximum likelihood estimation of dynamic nonlinear rational expectations models. Econometrica 51,1169-1185.
[95]Farmer, R. E., "Qualitative Easing:How it Works and Why it Matters",2012.
[96]Freedman, C., Kumhof, M., Laxton, D., Muir, D., Mursula, S.,2010. Global effects of fiscal stimulus during the crisis. Journal of Monetary Economics 57,506-526.
[97]Fuhrer, J. C., Moore, G.,1995a. Inflation persistence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(1),127-159.32
[98]Fuhrer, J. C., Moore, G,1995b. Monetary policy trade-offs and the correlation between nominal interest rates and real output. The American Economic Review 85(1),219-239.
[99]Funke, M., Paetz, M., Pytlarczyk, E.,2011. Stock market wealth effects in an estimated DSGE model forHong Kong. Economic Modelling 28,316-334.
[100]Gal i J,Monacelli T.Monetary Policy and Exchange Rate Volatility in a Small Open Economy[J].
[101]Gal i J,Perotti R.Fiscal Policy and Monetary Integration in Europe[J].Economic Policy,2003,18(37):533-572.
[102]Gal i J. Monetary Policy, Inflation, and the Business Cycle:An Introduction to the New Keynesian Framework [M].[S.I.]:[s.n.],2008.
[103]Gal i J.Inflation Pressures and Monetary Policy in a Global Economy [J].International Journal of Central Banking,2010,6:93-102.
[104]Gal i J.Monetary Policy and Unemployment[R].2010.
[105]Gali, J., Gertler, M.,1999. Inflation dynamics:A structural econometric analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics 113(1),1-45.
[106]Gali, J., Monacelli, T.,2005. Monetary policy and exchange rate volatility in a small open economy. Review of Economic Studies 72,707-734.
[107]Gelain, P.,2010. The external finance premium in the euro area:A dynamic stochastic general equilibrium analysis. North American Journal of Economics and Finance 21,49-71.
[108]Gerdesmeier, D., Roffia, B.,2004. Empirical estimates of reaction functions for the euro area. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics 140(1),37-66.
[109]Gertler, M., Karadi, P.,2009. A model of unconventional monetary policy.
[110]Gouvea, S., Minella, A., Santos, R., Souza-Sobrinho, N.,2008. Samba:Stochastic analytical model with a bayesian approach, manuscript.
[111]Hughes-Hallett, A., Wallis, K. F. (Eds.),2004. EMU Macroeconomic Model Comparison exercise for the Euroconference 7-8 June 2002. Economic Modelling 21(5).
[112]Iacoviello, M.,2005. House prices, borrowing constraints, and monetary'policy in the business cycle. The American Economic Review 95(3),739-764.
[113]Ireland P N.Technology Shocks in the New Keynesian Model[R].2004.
[114]Ireland P N.Technology Shocks in the New Keynesian Model[R].2004.
[115]Ireland, P.,2003. Endogenous money or sticky prices? Journal of Monetary Economics 50,1623-1648.
[116]Ireland, P.,2004. Money' s role in the monetary business cycle. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 36(6),969-983.
[117]Ireland, P.,2011. A New Keynesian perspective on the Great Recession. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 43(1),31-54.
[118]Joyce, M., A. Lasaosa, I. Stevens and M. Tong, "The financial market impact of quantitative easing",2010.
[119]Judd, K. (Ed.),1998. Numerical Methods in Economics. MIT Press.
[120]Juillard, M.,1996. Dynare:A program for the resolution and simulation of dynamic models with forward variables through the use of a relaxation algorithm, CEPREMAP working paper,9602.
[121]Juillard, M.,2001. Dynare:A program for the simulation of rational expectation models, computing 33 in Economics and Finance 213.
[122]Kimball, M.,1995. The quantitative analytics of the basic Neomonetarist model. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 27(4),1241-1277.
[123]Kiyotaki, N., Moore, J.,1997. Credit cycles. Journal of Political Economy 105(2), 211-48.
[124]Klein, L. (Ed.),1991. Comparative Performance of U.S. Econometric Models. Oxford, Eng.:Oxford University Press.
[125]Klein, P.,2000. Using the generalized Schur form to solve a multivariate linear rational expectations model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 24(10), 1405-1423.
[126]Kollmann R.The Exchange Rate in a Dynamic-optimizing Business Cycle Model with Nominal Rigidities:a Quantitative Investigation[J] Journal of International Economics,2001,55(2):243-262.
[127]Krugman, P. R., K. M. Dominquez and K. Rogoff, "It's baaack:Japan's slump and the return of the liquidity trap", Brookings Papers on Economic Activity,1998, 1998(2),137-205.
[128]Kuester, K., Wieland, V.,2010. Insurance policies for monetary policy in the euro area. Journal of the European Economic Association 8(4),872-912.
[129]Kydland F E,Prescott E C.Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations [J].Econometrica:Journal of the Econometric Society,1982:1345-1370.
[130]Lane P R.The New Open Economy Macroeconomics:a Survey[J] Journal of International Economics,2001,54(2):235-266.
[131]Lane P. R., Inflation in Open Economies, Journal of International Economics, 1997,42(3),327-347
[132]Lane P. R., Money Shocks and Current Account, mimeo,1998 Trinity College Dublin.
[133]Lane, P.R.,2001, The New Open Economy Macroeconomics:A Survey, Journal of International Economics,54.235-266
[134]Laxton, D., Pesenti, P.,2003. Monetary rule for small, open, emerging economies. Journal of Monetary Economics 50,1109-1146.
[135]Leeper E M,Sims C A. Toward a modern macroeconomic model usable for policy analysis [M].[S.l.]:[s.n.],1994.
[136]Levin, A., Wieland, V., Williams, J. C.,2003. The performance of forecast-based monetary policy rules under model uncertainty. The American Economic Review 93(3),622-645.
[137]Lubik T. A, Schorfheide F. A Bayesian look at the new open economy macroeconomics [M].[S.l.]:[s.n.],2006.
[138]Lubik, T. A., Schorfheide, F.,2007. Do central banks respond to exchange rate movements? a structural investigation. Journal of Monetary Economics 54, 1069-1087.
[139]Lucas, R.,1976. Econometric policy evaluation:A critique. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 1,19-46.
[140]Lucas, R.,1980. Methods and problems in business cycle theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 12(4),696-715.
[141]Mankiw, N. G, Reis, R.,2007. Sticky information in general equilibrium. Journal of the European Economic Association 5(2-3),603-613.
[142]Martin, C. and C. Milas, "Quantitative easing:a sceptical survey", Oxford Review of Economic Policy,2012,28(4),750-764.
[143]McCallum, B.,1988. Robustness properties of a rule for monetary policy. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 29,173-204.
[144]McCallum, B.,1999. Issues in the design of monetary policy rules. In:Taylor, J. B., Woodford, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Macroeconomics. Amsterdam:Elsevier Science, North-Holland.
[145]McCallum, B., Nelson, E.,1999. Performance of operational policy rules in an estimated semi classical structural model. In:Taylor, J. B. (Ed.), Monetary Policy Rules. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
[146]Medina, J. P., Soto, C.,2007. The Chilean business cycles through the lens of a stochastic general equilibrium model, central Bank of Chile Working Papers 457.
[147]Mortensen, D., Pissarides, C.,1994. Job creation and job desctruction in the theory of unemployment. Review of Economic Studies 61(3),397-415.
[148]Murchison, S., Rennison, A.,2006. ToTEM:The Bank of Canada's new quarterly projection model, bank of Canada Technical Report No.97.
[149]Negro, M. D., Schorfheide, F.,2009. Monetary policy analysis with potentially misspecified models. American Economic Review 99 (4),1415-1450.
[150]Obstfeld Maurice and Rogoff Kenneth S.,.New Directions for Stochastic Open Economy Models[J] Journal of International Economics,2000,50(1):117-153.
[151]Obstfeld Maurice and Rogoff Kenneth S., " Exchange Rate Dynamics Redux", Journal of Political Economy,1995,103(2),624-660.
[152]Obstfeld Maurice and Rogoff Kenneth S. Foundations of International Macroeconomics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA,659-712.
[153]Orphanides, A.,2003. The quest for prosperity without inflation. Journal of Monetary Economics 50,633-663.
[154]Orphanides, A., Wieland, V.,1998. Price stability and monetary policy effectiveness when nominal interest rates are bounded at zero, finance and Economics Discussion Series 98-35, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
[155]Palley, T. I.2011. Quantitative easing:a Keynesian critique (No. wp252).
[156]Rabanal, P.,2007. Does inflation increase after a monetary policy tightening? answers based on an estimated DSGE model. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 31,906-937.
[157]Rabanal, P.,2009. Inflation differentials between Spain and the EMU:A DSGE perspective. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 41(6),1141-1166.
[158]Ratto, M., Roeger, W., in't Veld, J.,2009. QUEST III:An estimated open-economy DSGE model of the euro area with fiscal and monetary policy. Economic Modelling 26(1),222-233.
[159]Ravenna, F., Walsh, C. E.,2006. Optimal monetary policy with the cost channel. Journal of Monetary Economics 53(2),199-216.
[160]Reifschneider, D., Tetlow, R., Williams, J. C.,1999. Aggregate disturbances, monetary policy and the macroeconomy:The FRB/US perspective. Federal Reserve Bulletin 85(1),1-19.
[161]Romer, C., Bernstein, J., January 8,2009. The job impact of the american recovery and reinvestment plan.
[162]Rotemberg, J. J.,1982. Sticky prices in the United States. Journal of Political Economy 90 (4),1187-1211.
[163]Rotemberg, J. J., Woodford, M.,1997. An optimization-based econometric framework for the evaluation of monetary policy. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 12,297-346.
[164]Rudebusch, G D., Svensson, L. E. O.,1999. Policy rules for inflation targeting. In: Taylor, J. B. (Ed.), Monetary Policy Rules. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
[165]Sims, C.,1986. Are forecasting models usable for policy analysis? Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review 10(1),2-16.
[166]Sims, C.,2001. Solving linear rational expectations models. Journal of Computational Economics 20(1-2),1-20.
[167]Slobodyan, S., Wouters, R.,2007. Learning in an estimated medium-scale DSGE model, working paper.
[168]Smets, F., Wouters, R.,2003. An estimated dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model of the euro area. Journal of the European Economic Association.1 (5), 1123-1175.
[169]Smets, F., Wouters, R.,2007. Shocks and frictions in US business cycles:A bayesian DSGE approach. The American Economic Review 97(3),586-606.
[170]Solow R.Building a Science of Economics for the Real World[J].Prepared Statement to the House Committee on Science and Technology, Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight, July,2010,20.
[171]Svensson L E,VAN Wijbergen S.Excess Capacity, Monopolistic Competition, and International Transmission of Monetary Disturbances[Z].1990.
[172]Svensson L E.Open-economy Inflation Targeting[R].2000.
[173]Swanson E,Anderson G,Levin A.Higher-order Perturbation Solutions to Dynamic, Discrete-time Rational Expectations Models[J].Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper Series,2006,1.
[174]Taylor, J. B. (Ed.),1999. Monetary Policy Rules. The University of Chicago Press.
[175]Taylor, J. B.,1980. Aggregate dynamics and staggered contracts. Journal of Political Economy 88(1),1-24.
[176]Taylor, J. B.,1993a. Discretion versus policy rules in practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 39,195-214.
[177]Taylor, J. B.,1993b. Macroeconomic Policy in a World Economy. W.W. Norton, New York, online Edition available on:http://www.stanford.edu/johntayl/ MacroPolicyWorld.htm.
[178]Taylor, J. B.2010, "An Exit Rule for Monetary Policy", Testimony before the Committee on Financial Services, US House of Representatives.
[179]Taylor, J. B., Wieland, V,2011. Surprising comparative properties of monetary models:Results from a new data base. Review of Economics and Statistics forthcoming. Tinsley, P. A.,1993. Fitting both data and theories:Polynomial adjustment costs and error-correction decision rules, FEDS Working Paper 93-21.
[180]Trigari, A.,2006. The role of search frictions and bargaining for inflation dynamics, iGIER Working Paper No.304.
[181]Uhlig, H.,1995. A toolkit for analyzing nonlinear dynamic stochastic models easily, discussion Paper, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
[182]Ugai, H., "Effects of the quantitative easing policy:a survey of empirical analyses", Monetary and Economic Studies,2007,25(1),1-47.
[183]Walsh C.Monetary Theory and Policy[J].Computers and Mathematics with Applications,2004,47(6):1145-1146.
[184]Wieland V,Cik T,M u Her G J,et al.A New Comparative Approach to Macroeconomic Modeling and Policy Analysis[J] Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,2012.
[185]Wieland, V.,2011. Model comparison and robustness:A proposal for policy analysis after the financial crisis. In:Solow, R., Touffut, J.-P. (Eds.), What's right with Macroeconomics? Edward Elgar Publishers.
[186]Wieland, V., Wolters, M.,2011. The diversity of forecasts from macroeconomic models of the U.S. economy. Economic Theory 47(2-3).
[187]Winschel V,Kratzig M.Jbendge:an Object-oriented System for Solving, Estimating and Selecting Nonlinear Dynamic Models[R].2008.
[188]Woodford, M.,2003. Interest and Prices:Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy. Princeton University Press.
[189]Yellen, J. L.,2007. John Taylor's contributions to monetary theory and policy, speech at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Conference:"John Taylor's Contributions to Monetary Theory and Policy".
[190]Yun, T.,1996. Nominal price rigidity, money supply endogeneity, and business cycles. Journal of Monetary Economics 37,345-370.
[2]艾洪德,郭凯,李涛.一般均衡中的利率、确定性与最优规则[J].财经问题研究,2008(2)：3-12.
[3]陈静.量化宽松货币政策的传导机制与政策效果研究——基于央行资产负债表的跨国分析[J].国际金融研究,2013(2)：16-25.
[4]陈昆亭,龚六堂.粘滞价格模型以及对中国经济的数值模拟—对基本RBC模型的改进[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2006(8)：106-117.
[5]陈利平.货币理论[M].北京大学出版社,2003.
[6]陈雨露,侯杰.新开放经济宏观经济学：研究文献综述[J].南开经济研究,2006(2)：3-17.
[7]戴金平、张华宁, 国际金融新趋势：全球货币量化宽松：何时退出?[M]厦门大学出版社,2012
[8]郭凯、孙音,流动性过剩、最优利率规则与通胀目标制：对中国货币政策的检验与冲击响应分析[M]中国社会科学出版社2012
[9]胡再勇,张弘.Redux模型与人民币升值压力研究[J].中央财经大学学报,2004(9)：33-37+59.
[10]姜波克：国际金融理论的发展及理论前沿,金融研究2002(9)
[11]李南妮.日本量化宽松政策的影响及对中国的启示[J].吉林金融研究,2013(1)：17-19.
[12]刘斌,张怀清.我国产出缺口的估计.金融研究.2001(10).69-77.
[13]刘斌.我国DSGE模型的开发及在货币政策分析中的应用[J].金融研究,2008,No.340(10)：1-21.
[14]刘尧成.供求冲击与人民币汇率的波动：基于DSGE两国模型的模拟分析[J].南方经济,2010,No.252(9)：29-39.
[15]陆前进.开放经济宏观经济学的理论发展脉络及其评述[J].国际金融研究,2005(7)：44-49.
[16]潘成夫.量化宽松货币政策的理论、实践与影响[J].国际金融研究,2009(8)：4-9.
[17]孙立坚、李安心、吴刚：开放经济中的价格传递效应：中国的例证,经济学(季刊)第3卷第1期,2003(10)
[18]汤铎铎.新开放经济宏观经济学：理论和问题[J].世界经济,2009,v.32；No.373(9)：37-55.
[19]万志宏,曾刚.量化宽松货币政策的实践——以日本为例[J].国际金融研究,2011(4)：10-17.
[20]王胜,邹恒甫.“新开放经济宏观经济学”发展综述[J].金融研究,2006(1)：178-187.
[21]王胜,邹恒甫.开放经济中的货币政策[J].管理世界,2006(2)：23-31+171.
[22]王胜、邹恒甫,不确定情况下的关税、货币政策,数量经济技术经济研究2004b(12)5-18.
[23]王胜、邹恒甫,关税、汇率与福利,世界经济2004a(8),第3-12页。
[24]王胜、邹恒甫,开放经济中的货币政策,管理世界,2006(2),23-31.
[25]王胜、邹恒甫,开放经济中的泰勒规则——对中国货币政策的检验,统计研究,2006(3),42-46.
[26]王胜.新开放经济宏观经济学理论和研究[D].：武汉大学,2005.
[27]王胜与彭鑫瑶,不对称价格粘性下的货币政策和福利效应.世界经济,2010(5)101-117.
[28]肖芍芳,黄洁文.美国量化宽松货币政策对中国经济的冲击效应研究[J].广东商学院学报,2012(6)：12-13.
[29]谢平,罗雄.泰勒规则及其在中国货币政策中的检验[J].经济研究,2002(3)：3-12.
[30]徐高.基于动态随机一般均衡模型的中国经济波动数量分析[D].：北京大学,2008.
[31]闫思.NOEM框架下货币政策的福利效应及经验检验[J].东北财经大学学报,2012(5)：64-69.
[32]杨雪,李松华,王菲.货币供应量传导研究——基于新凯恩斯DSGE模型的研究[J].管理评论,2011,v.23(12)：38-45.
[33]姚斌.国家规模、对外开放度与汇率制度的选择—基于福利的数量分析,2006(9)3-11.
[34]姚斌.美国量化宽松货币政策的影响及我国的对策[J].上海金融,2009(7)：33-36+72.
[35]张卫平.货币政策理论：基于动态一般均衡方法[M].北京大学出版社,2012.
[36]Adjemian S,Bastani H,Juillard M,et al.Dynare:Reference Manual, Version 4[J].Dynare Working Papers,2011,1.
[37]Adolfson M,Las 6 en S,Lind e J,et al.Evaluating an Estimated New Keynesian Small Open Economy Model[J].Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,2008,32(8):2690-2721.
[38]Adolfson, M., Laseen, S., Linde, J., Villani, M.,2007. Bayesian estimation of an open economy DSGE model with incomplete pass-through. Journal of International Economics 72,481-511.
[39]Altig, D. E., Christiano, L. J., Eichenbaum, M., Linde, J.,2005. Firm-specific capital, nominal rigidities and the business cycle, CEPR Discussion Papers 4858.
[40]AN S, Schorfheide F.Bayesian Analysis of DSGE Models[J].Econometric Reviews,2007,26(2):113-172.
[41]Ascari G.Staggered Prices and Trend Inflation:Some Nuisances[J].Review of Economic Dynamics,2004,7(3):642-667.
[42]Bagus, P. and M. H. Schiml, "New modes of monetary policy:qualitative easing by the Fed", Economic Affairs,2009,29(2),46-49.
[43]Basu S.Intermediate Goods and Business Cycles:Implications for Productivity and Welfare[J].The American Economic Review,1995:512-531.
[44]Bergin P R,Feenstra R C.Pricing-to-market, Staggered Contracts, and Real Exchange Rate Persistence[J]. Journal of International Economics,2001,54(2):333-359.
[45]Bergin P R.How Well Can the New Open Economy Macroeconomics Explain the Exchange Rate and Current Account?[J] Journal of International Money and Finance,2006,25(5):675-701.
[46]Bernanke B,Reinhart V,Sack B.Monetary Policy Alternatives at the Zero Bound:an Empirical Assessment[J].Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2004,2004(2):1-100.
[47]Bernanke, B. S. and V. R. Reinhart, "Conducting monetary policy at very low short-term interest rates", The American Economic Review,2004,94(2),85-90.
[48]Bernanke, B., Gertler, M., Gilchrist, S.,1999. The financial accelerator in a quantitative business cycles framework. In:Taylor, J. B., Woodford, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Macroeconomics Volume 1C. Amsterdam:Elsevier Science, North-Holland.
[49]Blanchard, O., Fischer, S.,1989. Lectures on Macroeconomics. The MIT Press.
[50]Blinder, A. S., "Quantitative easing:entrance and exit strategies", Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review,2010,92(6),465-479.
[51]Brayton, F., Laubach, T.,2008. Documentation of linearized FRB/US.
[52]Brock, W. A., Durlauf, S., West, K.,2007. Model uncertainty and policy evaluation: Some theory and empirics. Journal of Econometrics 136(2),629-664.
[53]Bryant, R., Currie, D., Frenkel, J., Masson, P., Portes, R (Eds.),1989. Macroeconomic Policies in an Interdependent World. Washington, D.C.:The Brookings Institution.
[54]Bryant, R., Henderson, D. W., Holtham, G., Hooper, P., Symansky, S. A. (Eds.),1988. Empirical Macroeconomics for Interdependent Economies. Washington, D.C.:The Brookings Institution.
[55]Bryant, R., Hooper, P., Mann, C. (Eds.),1993. Evaluating Policy Regimes:New Research in Empirical Macroeconomics. Washington, D.C.:The Brookings Institution. Speech on "Reflections on the nature of monetary policy non-standard measures and finance theory",18 November 2010.2530
[56]Calvo, G.,1983. Staggered prices in a utility maximizing framework. Journal of Monetary Economics 12,383-398.
[57]Carabenciov, I., Ermolaev, I., Freedman, C., Juillard, M., Kamenik, O., Korshunov, D., Laxton, D.,2008. A small quarterly projection model of the US economy, iMF Working Paper 08/278.
[58]Caroline Bettsa and Michael B. Devereux, Exchange rate dynamics in a model of pricing-to-market, Journal of International Economics,2000 (50),214-244
[59]Caroline Bettsa and Michael B. Devereux, The exchange rate in a model of pricing-to-market, European Economic Review,1996 (40),1007-1021
[60]Chari V V,Kehoe P J,McGrattan E R.Can Sticky Price Models Generate Volatile and Persistent Real Exchange Rates?[J].The Review of Economic Studies,2002,69(3):533-563.
[61]Chari, V. V., Kehoe, P., McGrattan, E.,2009. New Keynesian models:Not yet useful for policy analysis. American Economic Journal:Macroeconomics 1(1),242-266.
[62]Christensen, I., Dib, A.,2008. The financial accelerator in an estimated New Keynesian model. Review of Economic Dynamics 11,155-178.
[63]Christiano, L. J.,2002. Solving dynamic equilibrium models by a method of undetermined coefficients. Computational Economics 20(1-2),21-55.
[64]Christiano, L. J., Eichenbaum, M., Evans, C. L.,2005. Nominal rigidities and the dynamic effects of a shock to monetary policy. Journal of Political Economy 113(1), 1-45.
[65]Christiano, L. J., Motto, R., Rostagno, M.,2003. The great depression and the Friedman-Schwartz hypothesis. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 35, 1119-1197.
[66]Christoffel, K., Kuester, K.,2008. Resuscitating the wage channel in models with unemployment fluctuations. Journal of Monetary Economics 55,865-887.
[67]Christoffel, K., Kuester, K., Linzert, T.,2009. The role of labor markets for euro area monetary policy. European Economic Review 53,908-936.
[68]Clarida, R., Gali, J., Gertler, M.,1999. The science of monetary policy:A New Keynesian perspective. Journal of Economic Literature 37(4),1661-1707.
[69]Clarida, R., Gali, J., Gertler, M.,2002. A simple framework for international monetary policy analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics 49,879-904.
[70]Coenen, G., Erceg, C. J., Freedman, C., Furceri, D., Kumhof, M., Lalonde, R., Laxton, D., Linde, J., Mourougane, A., Muir, D., Mursula, S., de Resende, C., Roberts, J., Roeger, W., Snudden, S., Trabandt, M., in't Veld, J.,2012. Effects of fiscal stimulus in structural models. American Economic Journal:Macroeconomics 4,22-68.
[71]Coenen, G., McAdam, P., Straub, R.,2008. Tax reform and labour-market performance in the euroarea:A simulation-based analysis using the New Area-Wide Model. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 32(8),2543-2583.
[72]Coenen, G., Orphanides, A., Wieland, V.,2004. Price stability and monetary policy effectiveness 31 when nominal interest rates are bounded at zero. Berkeley Electronic Press:Advances in Macroeconomics 4(1),1-23.
[73]Coenen, G., Wieland, V.,2002. Inflation dynamics and international linkages:A model of the United States, the Euro Area and Japan, ECB Working Paper Series 181.
[74]Coenen, G., Wieland, V.,2005. A small estimated euro area model with rational expectations and nominal rigidities. European Economic Review 49,1081-1104.
[75]Cogan, J. F., Cwik, T., Taylor, J. B.,et al.New Keynesian Versus Old Keynesian Government Spending Multipliers[J] Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,2010,34(3):281-295.
[76]Cogan, J. F., Cwik, T., Taylor, J. B., Wieland, V.,2010. New Keynesian versus Old Keynesian government spending multipliers. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 34,281-295.
[77]Collard, F., Juillard, M.,2001. Accuracy of stochastic perturbation methods:The case of asset pricing models. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 25,979-999.
[78]Corsetti QDdedola L.A Macroeconomic Model of International Price Discrimination[J] Journal of International Economics,2005,67(1):129-155.
[79]Corsetti, Giancarlo and Paolo Pesenti.2001. Welfare and macroeconomic interdependence. Quarterly Journal of Economics.116,421-446.
[80]Corsetti, Giancarlo and Paolo Pesenti.2005a. International Dimension of Optimal Monetary Policy. Journal of Monetary Economics.52,281-305.
[81]Corsetti, Giancarlo and Paolo Pesenti.2005b. The simple geometry of transmission and stablizaion in closed and open economy. NBER Working Paper 11341.
[82]Corsetti, Giancarlo and Paolo Pesenti. Welfare and macroeconomic interdependence, 1997, NBER Working Paper 163071
[83]Cwik, T., Wieland V.Keynesian Government Spending Multipliers and Spillovers in the Euro Area [J].Economic Policy,2011,26(67):493-549.
[84]Cwik, T., Wieland, V.,2011. Keynesian government spending multipliers and spillovers in the euroarea. Economic Policy 26,493-549.
[85]DeGraeve, F.,2008. The external finance premium and the macroeconomy:US post-WWII evidence. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 32,3415-3440.
[86]DeJong D N,Dave C.Structural Macroeconomics [M].[S.l.]:[s.n.],2011.
[87]Dieppe, A., Kuester, K., McAdam, P.,2005. Optimal monetary policy rules for the euro area:An analysis using the area wide model. Journal of Common Market Studies 43 (3),507-5372.
[88]Dornbusch, Rudiger.1976. Exchange Rates and Prices. American Economic Review. 77,93-106.
[89]Edge, R. M., Kiley, M. T., Laforte, J.-P.,2008. Natural rate measures in an estimated DSGE model of the U.S. economy. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 32, 2512-2535.
[90]Eichenbaum M,Fisher J D.Evaluating the Calvo Model of Sticky Prices[R].2004.
[91]Erceg, C. J., Guerrieri, L., Gust, C.,2008. Trade adjustment and the composition of trade. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 32,2622-2650.
[92]Erceg, C. J., Henderson, D., Levin, A.,2000. Optimal monetary policy with staggered wage and price contracts. Journal of Monetary Economics 46,281-313.
[93]Fagan, G, Henry, J., Mestre, R.,2005. An area-wide model for the euro area. Economic Modelling 22,39-59.
[94]Fair, R. C., Taylor, J. B.,1983. Solution and maximum likelihood estimation of dynamic nonlinear rational expectations models. Econometrica 51,1169-1185.
[95]Farmer, R. E., "Qualitative Easing:How it Works and Why it Matters",2012.
[96]Freedman, C., Kumhof, M., Laxton, D., Muir, D., Mursula, S.,2010. Global effects of fiscal stimulus during the crisis. Journal of Monetary Economics 57,506-526.
[97]Fuhrer, J. C., Moore, G.,1995a. Inflation persistence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(1),127-159.32
[98]Fuhrer, J. C., Moore, G,1995b. Monetary policy trade-offs and the correlation between nominal interest rates and real output. The American Economic Review 85(1),219-239.
[99]Funke, M., Paetz, M., Pytlarczyk, E.,2011. Stock market wealth effects in an estimated DSGE model forHong Kong. Economic Modelling 28,316-334.
[100]Gal i J,Monacelli T.Monetary Policy and Exchange Rate Volatility in a Small Open Economy[J].
[101]Gal i J,Perotti R.Fiscal Policy and Monetary Integration in Europe[J].Economic Policy,2003,18(37):533-572.
[102]Gal i J. Monetary Policy, Inflation, and the Business Cycle:An Introduction to the New Keynesian Framework [M].[S.I.]:[s.n.],2008.
[103]Gal i J.Inflation Pressures and Monetary Policy in a Global Economy [J].International Journal of Central Banking,2010,6:93-102.
[104]Gal i J.Monetary Policy and Unemployment[R].2010.
[105]Gali, J., Gertler, M.,1999. Inflation dynamics:A structural econometric analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics 113(1),1-45.
[106]Gali, J., Monacelli, T.,2005. Monetary policy and exchange rate volatility in a small open economy. Review of Economic Studies 72,707-734.
[107]Gelain, P.,2010. The external finance premium in the euro area:A dynamic stochastic general equilibrium analysis. North American Journal of Economics and Finance 21,49-71.
[108]Gerdesmeier, D., Roffia, B.,2004. Empirical estimates of reaction functions for the euro area. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics 140(1),37-66.
[109]Gertler, M., Karadi, P.,2009. A model of unconventional monetary policy.
[110]Gouvea, S., Minella, A., Santos, R., Souza-Sobrinho, N.,2008. Samba:Stochastic analytical model with a bayesian approach, manuscript.
[111]Hughes-Hallett, A., Wallis, K. F. (Eds.),2004. EMU Macroeconomic Model Comparison exercise for the Euroconference 7-8 June 2002. Economic Modelling 21(5).
[112]Iacoviello, M.,2005. House prices, borrowing constraints, and monetary'policy in the business cycle. The American Economic Review 95(3),739-764.
[113]Ireland P N.Technology Shocks in the New Keynesian Model[R].2004.
[114]Ireland P N.Technology Shocks in the New Keynesian Model[R].2004.
[115]Ireland, P.,2003. Endogenous money or sticky prices? Journal of Monetary Economics 50,1623-1648.
[116]Ireland, P.,2004. Money' s role in the monetary business cycle. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 36(6),969-983.
[117]Ireland, P.,2011. A New Keynesian perspective on the Great Recession. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 43(1),31-54.
[118]Joyce, M., A. Lasaosa, I. Stevens and M. Tong, "The financial market impact of quantitative easing",2010.
[119]Judd, K. (Ed.),1998. Numerical Methods in Economics. MIT Press.
[120]Juillard, M.,1996. Dynare:A program for the resolution and simulation of dynamic models with forward variables through the use of a relaxation algorithm, CEPREMAP working paper,9602.
[121]Juillard, M.,2001. Dynare:A program for the simulation of rational expectation models, computing 33 in Economics and Finance 213.
[122]Kimball, M.,1995. The quantitative analytics of the basic Neomonetarist model. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 27(4),1241-1277.
[123]Kiyotaki, N., Moore, J.,1997. Credit cycles. Journal of Political Economy 105(2), 211-48.
[124]Klein, L. (Ed.),1991. Comparative Performance of U.S. Econometric Models. Oxford, Eng.:Oxford University Press.
[125]Klein, P.,2000. Using the generalized Schur form to solve a multivariate linear rational expectations model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 24(10), 1405-1423.
[126]Kollmann R.The Exchange Rate in a Dynamic-optimizing Business Cycle Model with Nominal Rigidities:a Quantitative Investigation[J] Journal of International Economics,2001,55(2):243-262.
[127]Krugman, P. R., K. M. Dominquez and K. Rogoff, "It's baaack:Japan's slump and the return of the liquidity trap", Brookings Papers on Economic Activity,1998, 1998(2),137-205.
[128]Kuester, K., Wieland, V.,2010. Insurance policies for monetary policy in the euro area. Journal of the European Economic Association 8(4),872-912.
[129]Kydland F E,Prescott E C.Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations [J].Econometrica:Journal of the Econometric Society,1982:1345-1370.
[130]Lane P R.The New Open Economy Macroeconomics:a Survey[J] Journal of International Economics,2001,54(2):235-266.
[131]Lane P. R., Inflation in Open Economies, Journal of International Economics, 1997,42(3),327-347
[132]Lane P. R., Money Shocks and Current Account, mimeo,1998 Trinity College Dublin.
[133]Lane, P.R.,2001, The New Open Economy Macroeconomics:A Survey, Journal of International Economics,54.235-266
[134]Laxton, D., Pesenti, P.,2003. Monetary rule for small, open, emerging economies. Journal of Monetary Economics 50,1109-1146.
[135]Leeper E M,Sims C A. Toward a modern macroeconomic model usable for policy analysis [M].[S.l.]:[s.n.],1994.
[136]Levin, A., Wieland, V., Williams, J. C.,2003. The performance of forecast-based monetary policy rules under model uncertainty. The American Economic Review 93(3),622-645.
[137]Lubik T. A, Schorfheide F. A Bayesian look at the new open economy macroeconomics [M].[S.l.]:[s.n.],2006.
[138]Lubik, T. A., Schorfheide, F.,2007. Do central banks respond to exchange rate movements? a structural investigation. Journal of Monetary Economics 54, 1069-1087.
[139]Lucas, R.,1976. Econometric policy evaluation:A critique. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 1,19-46.
[140]Lucas, R.,1980. Methods and problems in business cycle theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 12(4),696-715.
[141]Mankiw, N. G, Reis, R.,2007. Sticky information in general equilibrium. Journal of the European Economic Association 5(2-3),603-613.
[142]Martin, C. and C. Milas, "Quantitative easing:a sceptical survey", Oxford Review of Economic Policy,2012,28(4),750-764.
[143]McCallum, B.,1988. Robustness properties of a rule for monetary policy. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 29,173-204.
[144]McCallum, B.,1999. Issues in the design of monetary policy rules. In:Taylor, J. B., Woodford, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Macroeconomics. Amsterdam:Elsevier Science, North-Holland.
[145]McCallum, B., Nelson, E.,1999. Performance of operational policy rules in an estimated semi classical structural model. In:Taylor, J. B. (Ed.), Monetary Policy Rules. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
[146]Medina, J. P., Soto, C.,2007. The Chilean business cycles through the lens of a stochastic general equilibrium model, central Bank of Chile Working Papers 457.
[147]Mortensen, D., Pissarides, C.,1994. Job creation and job desctruction in the theory of unemployment. Review of Economic Studies 61(3),397-415.
[148]Murchison, S., Rennison, A.,2006. ToTEM:The Bank of Canada's new quarterly projection model, bank of Canada Technical Report No.97.
[149]Negro, M. D., Schorfheide, F.,2009. Monetary policy analysis with potentially misspecified models. American Economic Review 99 (4),1415-1450.
[150]Obstfeld Maurice and Rogoff Kenneth S.,.New Directions for Stochastic Open Economy Models[J] Journal of International Economics,2000,50(1):117-153.
[151]Obstfeld Maurice and Rogoff Kenneth S., " Exchange Rate Dynamics Redux", Journal of Political Economy,1995,103(2),624-660.
[152]Obstfeld Maurice and Rogoff Kenneth S. Foundations of International Macroeconomics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA,659-712.
[153]Orphanides, A.,2003. The quest for prosperity without inflation. Journal of Monetary Economics 50,633-663.
[154]Orphanides, A., Wieland, V.,1998. Price stability and monetary policy effectiveness when nominal interest rates are bounded at zero, finance and Economics Discussion Series 98-35, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
[155]Palley, T. I.2011. Quantitative easing:a Keynesian critique (No. wp252).
[156]Rabanal, P.,2007. Does inflation increase after a monetary policy tightening? answers based on an estimated DSGE model. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 31,906-937.
[157]Rabanal, P.,2009. Inflation differentials between Spain and the EMU:A DSGE perspective. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 41(6),1141-1166.
[158]Ratto, M., Roeger, W., in't Veld, J.,2009. QUEST III:An estimated open-economy DSGE model of the euro area with fiscal and monetary policy. Economic Modelling 26(1),222-233.
[159]Ravenna, F., Walsh, C. E.,2006. Optimal monetary policy with the cost channel. Journal of Monetary Economics 53(2),199-216.
[160]Reifschneider, D., Tetlow, R., Williams, J. C.,1999. Aggregate disturbances, monetary policy and the macroeconomy:The FRB/US perspective. Federal Reserve Bulletin 85(1),1-19.
[161]Romer, C., Bernstein, J., January 8,2009. The job impact of the american recovery and reinvestment plan.
[162]Rotemberg, J. J.,1982. Sticky prices in the United States. Journal of Political Economy 90 (4),1187-1211.
[163]Rotemberg, J. J., Woodford, M.,1997. An optimization-based econometric framework for the evaluation of monetary policy. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 12,297-346.
[164]Rudebusch, G D., Svensson, L. E. O.,1999. Policy rules for inflation targeting. In: Taylor, J. B. (Ed.), Monetary Policy Rules. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
[165]Sims, C.,1986. Are forecasting models usable for policy analysis? Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review 10(1),2-16.
[166]Sims, C.,2001. Solving linear rational expectations models. Journal of Computational Economics 20(1-2),1-20.
[167]Slobodyan, S., Wouters, R.,2007. Learning in an estimated medium-scale DSGE model, working paper.
[168]Smets, F., Wouters, R.,2003. An estimated dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model of the euro area. Journal of the European Economic Association.1 (5), 1123-1175.
[169]Smets, F., Wouters, R.,2007. Shocks and frictions in US business cycles:A bayesian DSGE approach. The American Economic Review 97(3),586-606.
[170]Solow R.Building a Science of Economics for the Real World[J].Prepared Statement to the House Committee on Science and Technology, Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight, July,2010,20.
[171]Svensson L E,VAN Wijbergen S.Excess Capacity, Monopolistic Competition, and International Transmission of Monetary Disturbances[Z].1990.
[172]Svensson L E.Open-economy Inflation Targeting[R].2000.
[173]Swanson E,Anderson G,Levin A.Higher-order Perturbation Solutions to Dynamic, Discrete-time Rational Expectations Models[J].Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper Series,2006,1.
[174]Taylor, J. B. (Ed.),1999. Monetary Policy Rules. The University of Chicago Press.
[175]Taylor, J. B.,1980. Aggregate dynamics and staggered contracts. Journal of Political Economy 88(1),1-24.
[176]Taylor, J. B.,1993a. Discretion versus policy rules in practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 39,195-214.
[177]Taylor, J. B.,1993b. Macroeconomic Policy in a World Economy. W.W. Norton, New York, online Edition available on:http://www.stanford.edu/johntayl/ MacroPolicyWorld.htm.
[178]Taylor, J. B.2010, "An Exit Rule for Monetary Policy", Testimony before the Committee on Financial Services, US House of Representatives.
[179]Taylor, J. B., Wieland, V,2011. Surprising comparative properties of monetary models:Results from a new data base. Review of Economics and Statistics forthcoming. Tinsley, P. A.,1993. Fitting both data and theories:Polynomial adjustment costs and error-correction decision rules, FEDS Working Paper 93-21.
[180]Trigari, A.,2006. The role of search frictions and bargaining for inflation dynamics, iGIER Working Paper No.304.
[181]Uhlig, H.,1995. A toolkit for analyzing nonlinear dynamic stochastic models easily, discussion Paper, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
[182]Ugai, H., "Effects of the quantitative easing policy:a survey of empirical analyses", Monetary and Economic Studies,2007,25(1),1-47.
[183]Walsh C.Monetary Theory and Policy[J].Computers and Mathematics with Applications,2004,47(6):1145-1146.
[184]Wieland V,Cik T,M u Her G J,et al.A New Comparative Approach to Macroeconomic Modeling and Policy Analysis[J] Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,2012.
[185]Wieland, V.,2011. Model comparison and robustness:A proposal for policy analysis after the financial crisis. In:Solow, R., Touffut, J.-P. (Eds.), What's right with Macroeconomics? Edward Elgar Publishers.
[186]Wieland, V., Wolters, M.,2011. The diversity of forecasts from macroeconomic models of the U.S. economy. Economic Theory 47(2-3).
[187]Winschel V,Kratzig M.Jbendge:an Object-oriented System for Solving, Estimating and Selecting Nonlinear Dynamic Models[R].2008.
[188]Woodford, M.,2003. Interest and Prices:Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy. Princeton University Press.
[189]Yellen, J. L.,2007. John Taylor's contributions to monetary theory and policy, speech at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Conference:"John Taylor's Contributions to Monetary Theory and Policy".
[190]Yun, T.,1996. Nominal price rigidity, money supply endogeneity, and business cycles. Journal of Monetary Economics 37,345-370.