城乡结合部土地流转形式的选择
|
摘要
伴随着城市化进程的加速,大量农民离开家乡进城务工,这些农民无法做到务工与务农兼顾,他们的土地如果不荒废必然要进行流转。而生活在不同区位条件、不同经济发展水平地区的农民对土地的态度、土地流转的认知度和接受度[1]及进行土地流转的形式都会有所不同。城乡结合部的农民的生存状况十分复杂,土地状况也十分复杂。土地流转涉及的影响因素众多,流转行为也关系着农民的生存,每一次土地流转背后都包含了农民的深思熟虑。因此,城乡结合部土地流转中如何从农民的立场出发充分体现农民的意愿显得尤为重要。
本文在综合前人研究成果的基础上,尝试以石家庄市城乡结合部土地流转为切入点,采取问卷调查和访谈相结合的方式,对当地农民进行调查,并以实地调查数据为基础进行分析研究,力图找出影响城乡结合部农民选择土地流转形式的主要影响因素,进而探索农民心目中适合城乡结合部的土地流转形式。
论文由六个部分组成:
第一部分:引言。阐述了研究的背景、国内外研究现状以及论文的研究目的和意义,以文献研究的方法对选题所涉及到的理论方法进行了阐述,并提出了可能存在的创新之处。
第二部分:相关概念和理论。介绍了土地流转所涉及到的相关概念和理论。对本文出现的概念进行了界定,防止出现概念模糊的情况。
第三部分:国内外土地流转相关形式分析。本部分介绍了国内外土地流转的主要形式及经验借鉴。
第四部分:土地流转形式选择的影响因素分析。这一部分进行土地流转形式选择影响因素的实证研究。在这部分,本文以石家庄市城乡结合部为研究背景,针对影响土地流转形式选择的因素进行调查研究,运用因子分析法通过对农民意愿的分析得出影响土地流转形式选择的主要因素,可以归结为五个方面,依次为非农务工机会、土地收益额、生活保障因素、国家宏观政策环境、土地规模化程度。
第五部分:适合城乡结合部的土地流转形式的选择。在此部分本文尝试设计了以因子分析法得出的影响因素框架为问项的调查问卷,对当地农民的意愿进行访谈调查,然后运用层次分析法对所得实地调查数据进行分析,希望得出适合本地区的土地流转形式,为城乡结合部土地流转提供可行的方式。
第六部分:结论。总结全文,指出本文存在的不足,并对今后工作作了展望。
本文可能的创新点在于:
(1)本文通过实地调查数据分析,用大量的数据说明城乡结合部农民流转土地的真实意愿,以求将以人为本的理念深入贯彻到土地流转的研究中。
(2)采用因子分析法来改善层次分析法中递阶层次结构构造时的主观性,在一定程度上增强用层次分析法进行土地流转形式选择时的客观性和科学性。
With the acceleration of urbanization process, a lot of farmers leave their home town to work, these farmers can't be both work and farming, and their land if not waste must to transfer. And live in different geographical location, the farmers' attitude to the land in the different level of economic development of the region, farmers' land circulation awareness and acceptance [1] and the form of rural collective land conversion are all different.
The survival of Rural-urban continuum farmers is very complex; land condition is very complex too. Land circulation involves many factors, circulation behaviors also have relationship with farmers' survival, and each land circulation contains farmers' deep consideration. Therefore, how to from the standpoint of the farmers and fully reflect the wishes of farmers in the rural-urban continuum land circulation is particularly important.
Based on the comprehensive previous research results, and try to consider the rural-urban continuum of Shijiazhuang city as the breakthrough point, take the questionnaire survey and the way of the combination of the interview to investigate the local farmers, and studied and analyzed based on the field survey data, tries to find out the main influence factors of rural-urban continuum land circulation, and then probes the suitable land circulation form of the rural-urban continuum farmers mind.
This paper is composed by six parts.
Part one, the introduction. Expounds the research background, research situation and the purpose and significance of research papers, narrate the method of literature research of the theory and method involve the topic selection, and also put forward the possible innovative points.
Part two, related concepts and theories. Introduced the concepts and theories relate to land circulation. In order to prevent confusion, the concept appears in this article is defined.
Part three, domestic and foreign land circulation related form analysis. This part introduces the main form and experience for reference of home and abroad.
Part four, the analysis of influence factors of the land circulation forms choice. This part is the empirical research about the form to land circulation choice effect factors. In this part, this paper consider the rural-urban continuum of Shijiazhuang city as the research background, in view of the influence factors of the land circulation form choose research, using the factor analysis method, through the analysis of the farmers' willingness to that the main factors that affecting the land circulation form choice, can be summed up in five aspects, in order as non-agricultural employment opportunity、land profit amount, life guarantee factors, the macro-policy factors, the degree of land scale.
Part five, the choice of suitable form for urban and rural land circulation. In this part, this paper try to design the questionnaire relate to the influence factors that concluded form factor analysis, to survey the will of the local farmers, then use AHP to analysis the field survey data, hope provide feasible circulation form that suit this area.
Part six, conclusion. Summing up, this paper points out the deficiencies and discuss the future work.
The innovation points of this paper may be.
First, based on the field investigation data analysis, with a large number of data indicates the true wishes that urban and rural farmers thoroughly apply the concept of people-oriented to land circulation research.
Second, with the factor analysis method to improve the subjectivity of AHP structure, and to some extent, enhanced the objectivity and scientific with analytic hierarchy process to the choice of land circulation form.
本文在综合前人研究成果的基础上,尝试以石家庄市城乡结合部土地流转为切入点,采取问卷调查和访谈相结合的方式,对当地农民进行调查,并以实地调查数据为基础进行分析研究,力图找出影响城乡结合部农民选择土地流转形式的主要影响因素,进而探索农民心目中适合城乡结合部的土地流转形式。
论文由六个部分组成:
第一部分:引言。阐述了研究的背景、国内外研究现状以及论文的研究目的和意义,以文献研究的方法对选题所涉及到的理论方法进行了阐述,并提出了可能存在的创新之处。
第二部分:相关概念和理论。介绍了土地流转所涉及到的相关概念和理论。对本文出现的概念进行了界定,防止出现概念模糊的情况。
第三部分:国内外土地流转相关形式分析。本部分介绍了国内外土地流转的主要形式及经验借鉴。
第四部分:土地流转形式选择的影响因素分析。这一部分进行土地流转形式选择影响因素的实证研究。在这部分,本文以石家庄市城乡结合部为研究背景,针对影响土地流转形式选择的因素进行调查研究,运用因子分析法通过对农民意愿的分析得出影响土地流转形式选择的主要因素,可以归结为五个方面,依次为非农务工机会、土地收益额、生活保障因素、国家宏观政策环境、土地规模化程度。
第五部分:适合城乡结合部的土地流转形式的选择。在此部分本文尝试设计了以因子分析法得出的影响因素框架为问项的调查问卷,对当地农民的意愿进行访谈调查,然后运用层次分析法对所得实地调查数据进行分析,希望得出适合本地区的土地流转形式,为城乡结合部土地流转提供可行的方式。
第六部分:结论。总结全文,指出本文存在的不足,并对今后工作作了展望。
本文可能的创新点在于:
(1)本文通过实地调查数据分析,用大量的数据说明城乡结合部农民流转土地的真实意愿,以求将以人为本的理念深入贯彻到土地流转的研究中。
(2)采用因子分析法来改善层次分析法中递阶层次结构构造时的主观性,在一定程度上增强用层次分析法进行土地流转形式选择时的客观性和科学性。
With the acceleration of urbanization process, a lot of farmers leave their home town to work, these farmers can't be both work and farming, and their land if not waste must to transfer. And live in different geographical location, the farmers' attitude to the land in the different level of economic development of the region, farmers' land circulation awareness and acceptance [1] and the form of rural collective land conversion are all different.
The survival of Rural-urban continuum farmers is very complex; land condition is very complex too. Land circulation involves many factors, circulation behaviors also have relationship with farmers' survival, and each land circulation contains farmers' deep consideration. Therefore, how to from the standpoint of the farmers and fully reflect the wishes of farmers in the rural-urban continuum land circulation is particularly important.
Based on the comprehensive previous research results, and try to consider the rural-urban continuum of Shijiazhuang city as the breakthrough point, take the questionnaire survey and the way of the combination of the interview to investigate the local farmers, and studied and analyzed based on the field survey data, tries to find out the main influence factors of rural-urban continuum land circulation, and then probes the suitable land circulation form of the rural-urban continuum farmers mind.
This paper is composed by six parts.
Part one, the introduction. Expounds the research background, research situation and the purpose and significance of research papers, narrate the method of literature research of the theory and method involve the topic selection, and also put forward the possible innovative points.
Part two, related concepts and theories. Introduced the concepts and theories relate to land circulation. In order to prevent confusion, the concept appears in this article is defined.
Part three, domestic and foreign land circulation related form analysis. This part introduces the main form and experience for reference of home and abroad.
Part four, the analysis of influence factors of the land circulation forms choice. This part is the empirical research about the form to land circulation choice effect factors. In this part, this paper consider the rural-urban continuum of Shijiazhuang city as the research background, in view of the influence factors of the land circulation form choose research, using the factor analysis method, through the analysis of the farmers' willingness to that the main factors that affecting the land circulation form choice, can be summed up in five aspects, in order as non-agricultural employment opportunity、land profit amount, life guarantee factors, the macro-policy factors, the degree of land scale.
Part five, the choice of suitable form for urban and rural land circulation. In this part, this paper try to design the questionnaire relate to the influence factors that concluded form factor analysis, to survey the will of the local farmers, then use AHP to analysis the field survey data, hope provide feasible circulation form that suit this area.
Part six, conclusion. Summing up, this paper points out the deficiencies and discuss the future work.
The innovation points of this paper may be.
First, based on the field investigation data analysis, with a large number of data indicates the true wishes that urban and rural farmers thoroughly apply the concept of people-oriented to land circulation research.
Second, with the factor analysis method to improve the subjectivity of AHP structure, and to some extent, enhanced the objectivity and scientific with analytic hierarchy process to the choice of land circulation form.
引文
[1]鞠畅,王晓东.基于城乡统筹的重庆市农村土地流转研究[J].国土资源科技管理,2008,6(3):59-60.
[2]檀彦,冯雪,陈敏,等.余缺调剂型农地流转研究——河北省隆尧县千户营乡农地流转调查[J].经济研究导刊,2010(19):46-49.
[3]陈展图,杨庆媛,张丽,等.城市边缘区农地整体流转模式探析——以重庆市江北区双溪村为例[J].农村经济,2009(7):23-25.
[4]阿不都艾尼·阿吾.农村土地流转模式研究——以新疆为例[J].生产力研究,2009(14):27-33.
[5]杨忠伟,臧慧怡.苏州新农村建设中土地流转新模式[J].江苏农业科学,2010(2):411-413.
[6]肖轶,魏朝富,尹珂,等.重庆市两种典型农地流转模式比较分析[J].中国农村观察,2009(3):19-25.
[7]杨静.项目开发中集体土地流转模式之法律分析——以成都市农村土地流转制度改革为视角[J].河北法学,2009(10):197-200.
[8]李秉溶,谢玉仁.我国农村土地制度深化改革的趋向[z].厦门大学学报(哲社版),1998(1):12-16.
[9]陈烨弘,王秋兵.辽宁省农地流转的主要模式分析[J].农业经济,2010(5):47-48.
[10]杨德才.论我国农村土地流转模式及其选择[J].当代经济研究,2005(12):49-52.
[11]岳意定,王琼.我国农村土地信托流转模式的可行性研究及构建[J].生态经济,2008(1): 31-34.
[12]王秀兰.土地信托模式的国际借鉴与思考[J].商业时代,2007(16):37-39.
[13]North.D.C. Institutions and Credible Commitment [J].Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 1990(149):11-23.
[14]Lyne,Ferrer.Farmland transfers in KwaZulu-Natal 1997-2003 A focus on land redistribution including restitution [J].Agrekon, 2006, 145(3):261-277.
[15]Mathew Gorton. Agricultural land reform in Moldova [J].land Use Policy, 2001(8):269-279.
[16]Klaus Deininger. Land institutions and land markets [J].Agricultural Economies, 2009, 37(4):629.
[17]Elizabeth Brabec,Chip Smith. Agricultural Land Fragmentation:The Spatial Effects of Three Land Protection Strategies in the Eastern United States[J].Landscape and Urban Plan-ning,2002(58):255-268.
[18]James Kai-sing Kung. Off-farm labor markets and the emergence of land rental markets in rural China [J].Journal of Comparative Economics, 2002(30):395-414.
[19]郭红东.日本扩大农地经营规模政策的演变及对我国的启示[J].中国农村经济,2003(8):37-39.
[20]龚继红,钟涨宝,孙剑.论近现代日本农地流转过程、政策和措施[J].生产力研究,2008(9):97-99.
[21]刘英杰.德国农业和农村发展政策特点及其启示[J].世界农业,2004(2):36-39.
[22]杜朝晖.法国农业现代化的经验与启示[J].宏观经济管理,2006(5):71-74.
[23]张术环.俄罗斯允许农用土地流通原因浅谈[J].世界农业,2006(4):46-48.
[24]熊红芳,邓小红.美国日本农地流转制度对我国的启示[J].农业经济,2004(11):61-62.
[25]高继文.文献调查法在市场调查中的应用[J].企业改革与管理,2007(8):62-63.
[26]陶永明.问卷调查法应用中的注意事项[J].理论前沿,2011(9):305-306.
[27]赵延年,姜希一.论在访问调查法中各种非语言信息的运用[J].沈阳干部学刊,2010,12(5):51-52.
[28]柯惠新,沈浩.调查研究中的统计分析法[M].北京:中国传媒大学出版社,2005. 21-22.
[29]贺允.经济学实证分析方法与规范分析方法比较研究[J].商业文化,2011(4):103-104.
[30]许月明,梁山.城乡结合部耕地保护问题研究[J].经济问题,1998(10):34-37.
[31]顾朝林,熊江波.简论城市边缘区研究[J].地理研究,1989,8(3):95-101.
[32]程连生,赵红英.北京城市边缘带探讨[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),1995,31(1):127-133.
[33]陈佑启.城乡交错带名辩[J].地理学与国土研究,1995,11(1):47-52.
[34]吴良镛,刘健.北京城乡交接带土地利用的发展变化[J].北京规划建设,1997(4):45-49.
[35]王静爱,何春阳,董艳春,等.北京城乡过渡区土地利用变化驱动力分析[J].地球科学进展,2002,17(2):201-208.
[36]夏静.石家庄市城乡结合部居民出行分析及客运优化研究[D].石家庄:河北科技大学,2011.
[37]孙佑海.土地流转制度研究[D].南京:南京农业大学,2001.
[38]刘伟,李凤圣.产权范畴的理论分歧及其对我国改革的特殊意义[J].经济研究,1997(1):3-11.
[39]洪名勇.论马克思的土地产权理论[J].经济学家,1998(1):29-34.
[40]马克思.资本论(第3卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1975. 874.
[41]王诺扬.诺斯制度变迁理论述评[J].现代商贸工业,2011(13):55-56.
[42]史志强.国外土地流转制度的比较和借鉴[J].东南学术,2009(2):67-71.
[43]朱怡,杨新海.借鉴英国经验完善中国土地产权流转[J].国际城市规划,2007,22(3):78-82.
[44]华彦玲,施国庆,刘爱文.发达国家土地流转概况[J].国外农业,2007(2):28.
[45]刘伟.论城乡结合部的潜在风险与治理对策[J].天府新论,2007(5):89-93.
[46]郭爱请,王月霞.城乡结合部特征及划分方法[J].经济论坛,2004(1):132-133.
[47]吴坚.加快城乡结合部改造的八条途径[J].理论学习,2011(9):46-49.
[48]余锦华,杨维权.多元统计分析与应用[M].广州:中山大学出版社,2005.210-231.
[49]杨佳,柏振忠,王红玲.湖北省农地流转影响因素的实证分析[J].生态经济,2009(8):36-39.
[50]陈美球,邓爱珍,周丙娟等.耕地流转中农户行为的影响因素实证研究——基于江西省42个县市64个乡镇74个行政村的抽样调查[J].中国软科学,2008(7):6-13.
[51]詹和平,林秀.家庭保障、劳动力结构与农户土地流转——基于江苏省142户农户的实证研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2009,18(7):658-663.
[52]杜培华,欧名豪.农户土地流转行为影响因素的实证研究——以江苏省为例[J].国土资源科技与管理,2008,25(1):53-56.
[53]史清华,贾生华.农户家庭农地流转及形成根源——以东部沿海苏鲁浙三省为例[J].中国经济问题,2003(5):41-54.
[54]田传浩,贾生华.农地制度、地权稳定性与农地使用权市场发育:理论与来自苏浙鲁的经验[J].经济研究,2004(1):112-119.
[55]Guo Li,Scott Rozelle,Jikun Huang. Land Rights Farmer Investment Incentives and agricultural production in China [J].Agricultural Economics, 1998(19):63-71.
[56]张丁,万蕾.农户土地承包经营权流转的影响因素分析——基于2004年的15省(区)调查[J].中国农村经济,2007(2):24-34.
[57]陈成文,赵锦山.农村社会阶层的土地流转意愿与行为选择研究[J].湖北社会科学,2008(10):37-40.
[58]曹建华,王红英,黄小梅.农村土地流转的供求意愿及其流转效率的评价研究[J].中国土地科学,2007,21(5):54-60.
[59]张笑寒,蒋金泉.农户土地入股意愿的影响因素分析——以江苏省调研实证为视角[J].现代经济探讨,2009( 4):59-63.
[60]何乐为.浙江农户土地流转意愿调研[J].浙江统计,2009(7):13-15.
[61]Armen A. Alchian,Harold Demsetz. The Property Right Paradigm[J]. Journal of Economic History, 1973, 33(1):16-27.
[62]Zhang Changchun,Wang Liqin. Factor Analysis on Farmland Transfer: A Case of Jiumen Village [J].2010 International Conference on Civil Engineering, 2010(7):429-433.
[63]张林泉.基于因子分析的应用研究[J].哈尔滨师范大学自然科学学报,2009,25(5):60-63.
[64]赵真,詹长根,周玮.河北省鹿泉市土地托管模式的探讨[J].国土资源科技管理,2010,27(5):44-49.
[2]檀彦,冯雪,陈敏,等.余缺调剂型农地流转研究——河北省隆尧县千户营乡农地流转调查[J].经济研究导刊,2010(19):46-49.
[3]陈展图,杨庆媛,张丽,等.城市边缘区农地整体流转模式探析——以重庆市江北区双溪村为例[J].农村经济,2009(7):23-25.
[4]阿不都艾尼·阿吾.农村土地流转模式研究——以新疆为例[J].生产力研究,2009(14):27-33.
[5]杨忠伟,臧慧怡.苏州新农村建设中土地流转新模式[J].江苏农业科学,2010(2):411-413.
[6]肖轶,魏朝富,尹珂,等.重庆市两种典型农地流转模式比较分析[J].中国农村观察,2009(3):19-25.
[7]杨静.项目开发中集体土地流转模式之法律分析——以成都市农村土地流转制度改革为视角[J].河北法学,2009(10):197-200.
[8]李秉溶,谢玉仁.我国农村土地制度深化改革的趋向[z].厦门大学学报(哲社版),1998(1):12-16.
[9]陈烨弘,王秋兵.辽宁省农地流转的主要模式分析[J].农业经济,2010(5):47-48.
[10]杨德才.论我国农村土地流转模式及其选择[J].当代经济研究,2005(12):49-52.
[11]岳意定,王琼.我国农村土地信托流转模式的可行性研究及构建[J].生态经济,2008(1): 31-34.
[12]王秀兰.土地信托模式的国际借鉴与思考[J].商业时代,2007(16):37-39.
[13]North.D.C. Institutions and Credible Commitment [J].Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 1990(149):11-23.
[14]Lyne,Ferrer.Farmland transfers in KwaZulu-Natal 1997-2003 A focus on land redistribution including restitution [J].Agrekon, 2006, 145(3):261-277.
[15]Mathew Gorton. Agricultural land reform in Moldova [J].land Use Policy, 2001(8):269-279.
[16]Klaus Deininger. Land institutions and land markets [J].Agricultural Economies, 2009, 37(4):629.
[17]Elizabeth Brabec,Chip Smith. Agricultural Land Fragmentation:The Spatial Effects of Three Land Protection Strategies in the Eastern United States[J].Landscape and Urban Plan-ning,2002(58):255-268.
[18]James Kai-sing Kung. Off-farm labor markets and the emergence of land rental markets in rural China [J].Journal of Comparative Economics, 2002(30):395-414.
[19]郭红东.日本扩大农地经营规模政策的演变及对我国的启示[J].中国农村经济,2003(8):37-39.
[20]龚继红,钟涨宝,孙剑.论近现代日本农地流转过程、政策和措施[J].生产力研究,2008(9):97-99.
[21]刘英杰.德国农业和农村发展政策特点及其启示[J].世界农业,2004(2):36-39.
[22]杜朝晖.法国农业现代化的经验与启示[J].宏观经济管理,2006(5):71-74.
[23]张术环.俄罗斯允许农用土地流通原因浅谈[J].世界农业,2006(4):46-48.
[24]熊红芳,邓小红.美国日本农地流转制度对我国的启示[J].农业经济,2004(11):61-62.
[25]高继文.文献调查法在市场调查中的应用[J].企业改革与管理,2007(8):62-63.
[26]陶永明.问卷调查法应用中的注意事项[J].理论前沿,2011(9):305-306.
[27]赵延年,姜希一.论在访问调查法中各种非语言信息的运用[J].沈阳干部学刊,2010,12(5):51-52.
[28]柯惠新,沈浩.调查研究中的统计分析法[M].北京:中国传媒大学出版社,2005. 21-22.
[29]贺允.经济学实证分析方法与规范分析方法比较研究[J].商业文化,2011(4):103-104.
[30]许月明,梁山.城乡结合部耕地保护问题研究[J].经济问题,1998(10):34-37.
[31]顾朝林,熊江波.简论城市边缘区研究[J].地理研究,1989,8(3):95-101.
[32]程连生,赵红英.北京城市边缘带探讨[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),1995,31(1):127-133.
[33]陈佑启.城乡交错带名辩[J].地理学与国土研究,1995,11(1):47-52.
[34]吴良镛,刘健.北京城乡交接带土地利用的发展变化[J].北京规划建设,1997(4):45-49.
[35]王静爱,何春阳,董艳春,等.北京城乡过渡区土地利用变化驱动力分析[J].地球科学进展,2002,17(2):201-208.
[36]夏静.石家庄市城乡结合部居民出行分析及客运优化研究[D].石家庄:河北科技大学,2011.
[37]孙佑海.土地流转制度研究[D].南京:南京农业大学,2001.
[38]刘伟,李凤圣.产权范畴的理论分歧及其对我国改革的特殊意义[J].经济研究,1997(1):3-11.
[39]洪名勇.论马克思的土地产权理论[J].经济学家,1998(1):29-34.
[40]马克思.资本论(第3卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1975. 874.
[41]王诺扬.诺斯制度变迁理论述评[J].现代商贸工业,2011(13):55-56.
[42]史志强.国外土地流转制度的比较和借鉴[J].东南学术,2009(2):67-71.
[43]朱怡,杨新海.借鉴英国经验完善中国土地产权流转[J].国际城市规划,2007,22(3):78-82.
[44]华彦玲,施国庆,刘爱文.发达国家土地流转概况[J].国外农业,2007(2):28.
[45]刘伟.论城乡结合部的潜在风险与治理对策[J].天府新论,2007(5):89-93.
[46]郭爱请,王月霞.城乡结合部特征及划分方法[J].经济论坛,2004(1):132-133.
[47]吴坚.加快城乡结合部改造的八条途径[J].理论学习,2011(9):46-49.
[48]余锦华,杨维权.多元统计分析与应用[M].广州:中山大学出版社,2005.210-231.
[49]杨佳,柏振忠,王红玲.湖北省农地流转影响因素的实证分析[J].生态经济,2009(8):36-39.
[50]陈美球,邓爱珍,周丙娟等.耕地流转中农户行为的影响因素实证研究——基于江西省42个县市64个乡镇74个行政村的抽样调查[J].中国软科学,2008(7):6-13.
[51]詹和平,林秀.家庭保障、劳动力结构与农户土地流转——基于江苏省142户农户的实证研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2009,18(7):658-663.
[52]杜培华,欧名豪.农户土地流转行为影响因素的实证研究——以江苏省为例[J].国土资源科技与管理,2008,25(1):53-56.
[53]史清华,贾生华.农户家庭农地流转及形成根源——以东部沿海苏鲁浙三省为例[J].中国经济问题,2003(5):41-54.
[54]田传浩,贾生华.农地制度、地权稳定性与农地使用权市场发育:理论与来自苏浙鲁的经验[J].经济研究,2004(1):112-119.
[55]Guo Li,Scott Rozelle,Jikun Huang. Land Rights Farmer Investment Incentives and agricultural production in China [J].Agricultural Economics, 1998(19):63-71.
[56]张丁,万蕾.农户土地承包经营权流转的影响因素分析——基于2004年的15省(区)调查[J].中国农村经济,2007(2):24-34.
[57]陈成文,赵锦山.农村社会阶层的土地流转意愿与行为选择研究[J].湖北社会科学,2008(10):37-40.
[58]曹建华,王红英,黄小梅.农村土地流转的供求意愿及其流转效率的评价研究[J].中国土地科学,2007,21(5):54-60.
[59]张笑寒,蒋金泉.农户土地入股意愿的影响因素分析——以江苏省调研实证为视角[J].现代经济探讨,2009( 4):59-63.
[60]何乐为.浙江农户土地流转意愿调研[J].浙江统计,2009(7):13-15.
[61]Armen A. Alchian,Harold Demsetz. The Property Right Paradigm[J]. Journal of Economic History, 1973, 33(1):16-27.
[62]Zhang Changchun,Wang Liqin. Factor Analysis on Farmland Transfer: A Case of Jiumen Village [J].2010 International Conference on Civil Engineering, 2010(7):429-433.
[63]张林泉.基于因子分析的应用研究[J].哈尔滨师范大学自然科学学报,2009,25(5):60-63.
[64]赵真,詹长根,周玮.河北省鹿泉市土地托管模式的探讨[J].国土资源科技管理,2010,27(5):44-49.