回弹式眼压计与非接触眼压计眼压测量的临床对比研究
|
摘要
目的：研究回弹式眼压计与非接触眼压计在眼压测量中的一致性,评价回弹式眼压计的准确性。方法：选取2011年1月至2月就诊于新疆医科大学附属第一附属医院的患共65例130眼。同时用ICARE回弹式眼压计和NCT眼压计进行眼压测量,对比分析两种眼压计的测量结果及两者的相关情况；观察ICARE(?)眼压计对特殊病例测量的结果。结果:ICARE眼压计和NCT眼压计测得的眼压均值分别为15.45±8.54mmHg和16.60±7.54mmHg,两者无显著差别。两种眼压计测量值显著相关,相关系数为0.729；ICARE眼眼压计可较好地完成角膜病变和无固视能力等病例的眼压测量。分组后的结果：10-21mmHg组的RT和NCT结果为16.254±2.95mmHg和16.98±4.36mmHg；21～25mmHg组RT和NCT结果为23.34±4.34mmHg和24.28±5.70mmHg；>25mmHg组RT和NCT结果为46.71±9.84mmHg和50.66±10.44mmHg,三组的结果均为P>0.05,两者测量值无显著差异。两种眼压计测量值均数差值极小,虽然NCT的测量值较ICARE的高，但无显著的统计学意义(表2)。结论：65例130眼用ICARE回弹式眼压计和NCT同时完成了眼压测量,结果表明两种眼压计测量值的统计分析没有明显差异。两者具有良好的一致性。ICARE回弹式眼压计在临床上的应用有其优势,对青光眼早期诊断、青光眼筛查具有一定鉴别有意义,其准确性和可重复性有待进一步研究。
Objective: To evaluate the clinical performance of icare rebond t onometer by (RBT) comparing the intraocular pressure (IOP) values measured by RBT, an d noncontact tonometer, (NCT). Methods: the January 2011 February in xinjiang medical university hospital affiliated first affiliated hospital of a total of 65 patients with 130 eye. Meanwhile ICARE rebound type intraocular pressure plan with NCT intraocular pressure tester and measuring intraocular pressure, the contrast analysis of two millions of intraocular pressure measurement result and both related situation; Observation ICARE program to special cases intraocular pressure measurement results.Results:ICARE NCT iop plan and measurement of intraocular pressure iop plan for 16. The mean respectively 15.45±8.54mmHg and 16.60±7.54 mmHg. No significant difference..two kinds of intraocular pressure plan significantly associated with measured values, correlation coefficient is 0.729; ICARE intraocular pressure plan can better finish corneal abnormalities and no solid depending on the ability of intraocular pressure measurement cases. The result: grouped 21 mmHg group of RT 10～16.25 NCT results for 16.25±2.95mmHg and 16.98±4.36mmHg;21 to 25mmHg group results for 23.34±4. 34mmHg and 24.28±5.70mmHg;> 25mmHg group results for 46.71±9.84mmHg and 50.66±10.44mmHg, three groups has the results for P> 0.05, no significant differences between measured value. Two kinds of intraocular pressure measurement values mean difference value is project of tiny, although more NCT measurements of high, but no significant statistically significant (table 2).. Conclusions: Conclusion: 65 cases ICARE rebound type 130 eye ophthalmic NCT iop plan and also completed the intraocular pressure measurement, the results showed that the two kinds of intraocular pressure plan a statistical analysis of the measured value without obvious difference. Both have good consistency. ICARE rebound type intraocular pressure in clinical application of project has its advantages, to glaucoma early diagnosis and differential screening has certain glaucoma, its accuracy and meaningful research further repeatability.
Objective: To evaluate the clinical performance of icare rebond t onometer by (RBT) comparing the intraocular pressure (IOP) values measured by RBT, an d noncontact tonometer, (NCT). Methods: the January 2011 February in xinjiang medical university hospital affiliated first affiliated hospital of a total of 65 patients with 130 eye. Meanwhile ICARE rebound type intraocular pressure plan with NCT intraocular pressure tester and measuring intraocular pressure, the contrast analysis of two millions of intraocular pressure measurement result and both related situation; Observation ICARE program to special cases intraocular pressure measurement results.Results:ICARE NCT iop plan and measurement of intraocular pressure iop plan for 16. The mean respectively 15.45±8.54mmHg and 16.60±7.54 mmHg. No significant difference..two kinds of intraocular pressure plan significantly associated with measured values, correlation coefficient is 0.729; ICARE intraocular pressure plan can better finish corneal abnormalities and no solid depending on the ability of intraocular pressure measurement cases. The result: grouped 21 mmHg group of RT 10～16.25 NCT results for 16.25±2.95mmHg and 16.98±4.36mmHg;21 to 25mmHg group results for 23.34±4. 34mmHg and 24.28±5.70mmHg;> 25mmHg group results for 46.71±9.84mmHg and 50.66±10.44mmHg, three groups has the results for P> 0.05, no significant differences between measured value. Two kinds of intraocular pressure measurement values mean difference value is project of tiny, although more NCT measurements of high, but no significant statistically significant (table 2).. Conclusions: Conclusion: 65 cases ICARE rebound type 130 eye ophthalmic NCT iop plan and also completed the intraocular pressure measurement, the results showed that the two kinds of intraocular pressure plan a statistical analysis of the measured value without obvious difference. Both have good consistency. ICARE rebound type intraocular pressure in clinical application of project has its advantages, to glaucoma early diagnosis and differential screening has certain glaucoma, its accuracy and meaningful research further repeatability.
引文
[1]刘英奇,赵戈.现代眼科学[M].北京：北京科学技术出版社.2000,108(13)：1162-1190.
[2]李凤鸣.中华眼科学[M].北京：人民卫生出版社.2006,110(14)：1617：1623.
[3]Kass MA,Heuer DK.Hissinbothma E,et al.The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trim determines that topical ocular hypetensive medication del ays or prevents the onset of primary openall。 Sic glau coma [J].Arch Ophthal mol.2002,120(4):701-713.
[4]Wessels IF,Oh Y.Tonomet[er utilization,accuracy and calibration anderfield con ditions[J].Arch Ophthalmol.2008,(12):1709-1712.
[5]Ka.ss MA.Standardizing the measurement of intraocular pressure for clinical rese-arch Guidelines from the Eye Care Technology ForumIf.Ophthalmology.1996,03 (1):183-185.
[6]Kontiola A A new electromechanieal method for measuring intraoeu arpressure [J].DoeOphthalmol.1997,3(3):265-276.
[7]Dekking HM.Coster HD. Dynamic tonometry [J].Ophhalm ologica.1967,154(1): 59-70.
[8]Kontiola A. A newelectrom echanical ethod for measuring in traocular pressure[J]. Doc Ophhalmol 1996,3(3):265-276.
[9]Kontiola A A newelectromechanieal method for measuring intraoeular pressure [J].DoeOphthalmol.1997,93(3):265-276.
[10]周和政,江文珊,张绍阳等LCARE回弹式眼压计与NCT眼压计测量结果的比较[J].国际眼科杂志.2009,9(3)：484-485.
[11]Moreno-Montanes J,Gareia NFernandez-Hortelano,et al.Rebound tonometer compa red with Goldmann tonometer in normal and pathologic come [J]. es. Come a,2007,26(4):427-430.
[12]Pakrou N,Gray T,Mills R,et al.Clinical Comparison of thecar Tonometer and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry[J]. Glaucoma.2008,17(1):43—47.
[13]Queir6 s A,Gonzlez,ijome JM,Femandes P,et al.Technical note: a comparison of central and peripheral intraocular pressure usingrebound tonometry [J].Ophthalmic Physiol Opt.2007,27(5):506-511.
[14]Sahin A,Basmak H,Niyaz L,et al.Reproducibility and tolerability ofthe ICare rebound tonometer in school children[J]. Glaucoma.2007,16(2):185-188.
[15]Martinez-de-la-Casa JM,Garcia-Feijco J,Saenz-Frances F,et a 1.Comparison of rebound lonomand Go|dmann handheld applanation tonometerin congenital glancoma [J]. Glaucoma.2009,18(1):49-52.
[16]傅伟才,张琳.开角型青光眼患者昼夜眼压监测及其意义.上海交通大学学报[J].2007,9(27)：1163-1165.
[17]王瑾,周和政,杨帆等PASCAL动态眼压计临床运用的初步报告[J].国际眼科杂志.2008,3(8)：519-521.
[18]周和政,沈政伟,金中秋等.辩证地认识眼压在青光眼诊断中的地位[J].国际眼科杂志.2002,2(2)：20-23.
[19]SchreiberW, Vorwerk CK, Langenbucher A,et al.A comparison ofrebound tonom eter (ICARE) with tonometer and GAT[J]. Ophthalmologe.2007,104 (4):299-304.
[20]Milla E,Duch S,Buchacra O,et al.Poor agreement between Goldmann and Pascal tonometry in eyes with extreme pachymetry[J].Eye(Lond).2009,23:536-542.
[21]Schneider E,Grehn F.Intraacular pressure measurement.Compafison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry [J]. Glaucoma.2006,15:2-6.
[22]Kaufmann C,Bachmann LM,Thiel MA.Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry[J].Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.2004,45:31 18-3121.
[23]PapastergiOR GI,Kozobolis V,Siganos DS.Effect of recipient corneal pathology on Pascal tonometer and Goldmann tonometer readings in eyes after penetrating keratoplasty[J].Eur Ophthalmol.2009,20:29-34.
[24]PapastergiOR Gi,Kozobolis V,Siganos DS.Assessment of the pascal dynamic contour tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure in keratoconic eyes[J].Glaucoma.20 08,17:484-488.
[25]Siganes DS,Papastergiou GI,Moedas C.Assessment of the Paseal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intmocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK [J].Cataract RefractSurg.2004,30:746-751.
[26]Hamilton KE,Pye DC,Kao L,et al.The effect of corneal ede.ma on dynamic contour and goldmann tonometry[J].Optom Vis Sci.2008,85:451-456.
[27]Oh JH,Yoo C,Kim YY,et al.The effect of contact lens in.duced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dyrc contour tonometry[J].Grades Arch Clin Exp OphthalmOl.2009,247:371-375.
[28]Herdener S,Hafizovic D,Pache M,et al.Is the PASCAL.To.nometer suitable for measuring intraocular pressure in clinical routine long and sh ortterm reproducibility of dynamic contour tonometry[J].Eur J Ophthalmnl.2008,18:39-43.
[29]Sullivan-Mee M,Gerhardt G,Halverson KD,et al.Repeatability and reproducibility for intraocular pressure measurement by dynamic contour, ocular response analyzer, and goldmann applanation tonometry[J].Glaucoma.2009,8:666-673.
[30]Kirwan C,O Keefe M,Lanigan B.Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the reichert ocu.larresponse analyzer[J].Am Ophthal mol.2006,142:990-992.
[31]Brusini P,Salvetat ML,Zeppieri M,et al.Comparison of ICaretonome-tel-with Goldmann appla nation tono meter in glaum coma patients[J]. Glaucoma.2006,1 5(3):213-221.
[32]Medeiros FA,Weinreb RN.Evaluation of the influence of come.Albiom ec han-ieal properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular respons eanalyzer[J]. Glaucoma.2006,15:364-370.
[33]Hashims M,Kamiya K,Fujimura F,et al.Effect of corneal a.stigmatism on intraocular pressure measurement using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometer[J].Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.2010,248:257-262.
[34]Martinez-de-la-Casa JM,Garcia-Feijoo J,Fernandez,Vidal A,etal.Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraacular pressure measurements[J].Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.2006,47:4410-4414.
[35]Vandewalle E,Vandenbrneck S,Stalmans I,et al.Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer,and ocular response analy.zer with Goldmann applanation tonomeler in patients with glaucoma[J].Ear J Ophthalmol.2009,19:783-789.
[36]Morita T,Shoji N,Kamiya K,et al.Intraocular pressure meas-ured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma[J].Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.2010,248:73-77.
[37]Li J,Hemdon L W,Asrani S Qetal.Clinical comparison of the proview eye pressure monitor with the Goldmann applanation tonometer and the Tonopen [J]. Arch Ophthalmol.2004,122:1117-1121.
[38]Brigatti L,Maguluri S.Reproducibility of self-measured intraoeular pressure with the phosphene tonometer in patients with ocular hypertension and early to advanced glaucoma[J].Glaucoma.2005,14:36-39.
[39]Moreno-Montafi&J,S(ldaba LM,Hems H.Intraacular pressure measurement using the Preview tonometer[J].Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol.2005,80:79-83.
[40]Morledge-Hampton sJ,Kwon R,Krishna R,etal.Comparison of proview phosphene tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry[J].Can Ophthalmol.2006, 41:722-726.
[41]Chang I,Bartolone A,Swanson WH,et al.A clinical evaluation of proview pressure phosphene tonometry in children[J].Optom Vis Sci.2006,83:817-822.
[42]Sahin A, Basmak H, Niyaz L, et al.Rep roducibility and tolerability of he ICARE rebound tonometer in school children[J]. Glaucoma 2007,16(2):185-188.
[43]Toyohara K, Inoue K.Comparison of ICARE rebound tonometer with GAT and noncontact tonometer. Atarashii (Journal of the Eye).2007,24 (3):355-359.
[44]LopezCaballero C, Contreras I, Muos Negrete FJ, et al.Rebound tonometry in a clinical setting. Comparison with app lanation tonometry. Esp Oftalmol.2007,82 (5): 273-278.
[45]Queiros A, Gonzalez Meijome JM, Fernandes P, et al.A comparison of central and peripheral intraocular p ressure using rebound tonometry[J]. Ophthal Physiol.2007,27 (5):506-511.
[46]Davies LN, Bartlett H, Mallen EA, et al.Clinical evaluation of rebound tonometer[J]. Acta Ophthalmol Scand.2006,84 (2):206-209.
[47]何跃,陈洁,吕红彬等ICare回弹式眼压计与Goldmann压平眼压计测量结果的比较[J].眼科研究.2010,28：1162-1165.
[1]何跃,陈洁,吕红彬等ICare回弹式眼压计与Goldmann压平眼压计测量结果的比较[J].眼科研究.2010,28：1162-1165.
[2]Moreno-Montanes J, Garcia N, Fernandez-Hortelano A, et al. Rebound tonometer compared with Goldmann tonometer in normal and pathologic come[J]. e Cornea。 2007,26:427-430.
[3]Poestchi A, Mitchell R, Nicholas S, et al. The iCare rebound tonometer:comparisons with Goldmann tonometry, and influence of central come&[thickness[J]. Clin Exp oohthalmol.2009,37:687-691.
[4]Avitabile T, Longo A, Rocca D, et al. The influence of refractive errors on 1OP measurement by rebound tonometry(1Carc)and Goldmann applanation tonometry[J]. Grades Arch Clin Exp Ophthaltool.2010,248:585-591.
[5]Queir6s A, Gonzalcz—M6ijome JM, Fernandes P, et al. A comparison of central and peripheral intraocular pressure using rebound tonometry[J]. Ophthal Physiol Opt, 2007,27:506-51.
[6]Chui WS, Lain A。Chen D, et al. The influence of corneal properties on rebound tonometry[J]. Ophthalmology,2008,115:80-84.
[7]Sahin A, Basmak H, Niyaz L, et al. Reproducibility and tolerability of the ICare rebound tonometer in school children[J]. J Glaucom,2007,16:185-188.
[8]Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Intraccular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis SCi.2003,44:3790—3794.
[9]Boehm AG, Weber A, Pillunat LE, et al. Dynamic contour tonometry in comparison to intracameral 1OP measurements[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.2008,49:2472-2477.
[10]施维,钟勇,董方田等.动态轮廓眼压计的临床应用[J].中华眼科杂志.2008,44：408-412.
[11]Heras-Mulere-H,Moreno-Montafis-JSadabacharri LM-etal. Comparisonof dynamic contour tonometry(Pascal)with pneumotonometry and Goldmann tonometry[J]. Arch Soe Esp Oftalmol.2007,82:337-341.
[12]Francis BA, Hsieh A, Lai MY, et al. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Gold. mann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry[J]. Ophthalmology,2007,114:20-26.
[13]Milla E, Duch S, Buchacra O, et al. Poor agreement between Goldmann and Pascal tonometry in eyes with extreme pachymetry[J]. Eye(Lond).2009,23:536-542.
[14]Schneider E, Grehn F. Intraacular pressure measurement Compafison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry[J]. J Glauco ma.2006,15:2-6.
[15]Kaufmann C.Bachmann LM.Thiel MA. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.2004,45:31 18-3121.
[16]PapastergiOR GI, Kozobolis V, Siganos DS. Effect of recipient corneal pathology on Pascal tonometer and Goldmann tonometer readings in eyes after penetrating keratoplasty[J]. Eur J Ophthalmol.2009,20:29-34.
[17]PapastergiOR Gi, Kozobolis V, Siganos DS. Assessment of the pascal dynamic contour tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure in keratoconic eyes[J]. J Glaucoma.2008,17:484-488.
[18]Siganes DS, Papastergiou GI, Moedas C. Assessment of the Paseal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intmocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK [J]. Cataract RefractSurg.2004,30:746-751.
[19]Hamilton KE, Pye DC, Kao L, et al. The effect of corneal ede. ma on dynamic contour and goldmann tonometry. Optom Vis Sci.2008,85:451-456.
[20]Oh JH, Yoo C Kim YY, et al. The effect of contact lens in. duced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dyrc contour tonometry[J]. Grades Arch Clin Exp Ophthalm01.2009,247:371-375.
[21]Herdener S, Hafizovic D, Pache M, et al. Is the PASCAL. To. nometer suitable for measuring intraocular pressure in clinical routine Long and short term reproducibility of dynamic contour tonometry[J]. Eur J Ophthalmnl.2008,18:39-43.
[22]Sullivan-Mee M. Gerhardt G, Halverson KD. el al. Repeatability and reproducibility for intraocular pressure measurement by dynamic contour, ocular response analyzer, and goldmann applanation tonometry[J]. J Glaucoma.2009,18:666-673.
[23]Kirwan C. O Keefe M, Lanigan B. Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the reichert ocu.larresponse analyzer[J]. Am JOphthalmol.2006,142:990—992.
[24]Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN. Evaluation of the influence of come. Albiom ec han-ieal properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular respons eanalyzer[J]. J Glaucoma.2006,15:364-370.
[25]Hashims M, Kamiya K, Fujimura F, etal. Effect of corneal. stigmatism on intraocular pressure measurement using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometer[J]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.2010,248:257-262.
[26]Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Fernandez. Vidal A. etal. Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraacular pressure measurements[J]. Invest Ophthalmol VisSci.2006,47:4410-4414.
[27]Vandewalle E, Vandenbrneck S, Stalmans I. et al. Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analy. zer with Goldmann applanation tonomeler in patients with glaucoma[J]. Ear J Ophthalmol.2009,19:783-789.
[28]Morita T, Shoji N, Kamiya K.et al. Intraocular pressure mea8-ured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma [J]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.2010,248:73-77.
[29]Li J, Hemdon LW, Asrani SG, et al. Clinical comparison of the proview eye pressure monitor with the Goldmann applanation tonometer and the Tonopen[J]. Arch Ophthalmol.2004,122:1117-1121.
[30]Brigatti L, Maguluri S. Reproducibility of self-measured intraoeular pressure with the phosphene tonometer in patients with ocular hypertension and early to advanced glaucoma[J]. J Glaucoma.2005,14:36-39.
[31]Moreno-Montafi&J, S daba LM, Hems H. Intraacular pressure measurement using the Preview tonometer[J]. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol.2005,80:79-83.
[32]Morledge—Hampton sJ, Kwon R0, Krishna R, et al. Comparison of proview phosphene tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry[J]. Can J Ophthalmol.2006,41:722-726.
[33]Chang I, Bartolone A, Swanson WH, et al. A clinical evaluation of proview pressure phosphene tonometry in children[J]. Optom VisSci.2006,83:817-822.
[2]李凤鸣.中华眼科学[M].北京：人民卫生出版社.2006,110(14)：1617：1623.
[3]Kass MA,Heuer DK.Hissinbothma E,et al.The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trim determines that topical ocular hypetensive medication del ays or prevents the onset of primary openall。 Sic glau coma [J].Arch Ophthal mol.2002,120(4):701-713.
[4]Wessels IF,Oh Y.Tonomet[er utilization,accuracy and calibration anderfield con ditions[J].Arch Ophthalmol.2008,(12):1709-1712.
[5]Ka.ss MA.Standardizing the measurement of intraocular pressure for clinical rese-arch Guidelines from the Eye Care Technology ForumIf.Ophthalmology.1996,03 (1):183-185.
[6]Kontiola A A new electromechanieal method for measuring intraoeu arpressure [J].DoeOphthalmol.1997,3(3):265-276.
[7]Dekking HM.Coster HD. Dynamic tonometry [J].Ophhalm ologica.1967,154(1): 59-70.
[8]Kontiola A. A newelectrom echanical ethod for measuring in traocular pressure[J]. Doc Ophhalmol 1996,3(3):265-276.
[9]Kontiola A A newelectromechanieal method for measuring intraoeular pressure [J].DoeOphthalmol.1997,93(3):265-276.
[10]周和政,江文珊,张绍阳等LCARE回弹式眼压计与NCT眼压计测量结果的比较[J].国际眼科杂志.2009,9(3)：484-485.
[11]Moreno-Montanes J,Gareia NFernandez-Hortelano,et al.Rebound tonometer compa red with Goldmann tonometer in normal and pathologic come [J]. es. Come a,2007,26(4):427-430.
[12]Pakrou N,Gray T,Mills R,et al.Clinical Comparison of thecar Tonometer and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry[J]. Glaucoma.2008,17(1):43—47.
[13]Queir6 s A,Gonzlez,ijome JM,Femandes P,et al.Technical note: a comparison of central and peripheral intraocular pressure usingrebound tonometry [J].Ophthalmic Physiol Opt.2007,27(5):506-511.
[14]Sahin A,Basmak H,Niyaz L,et al.Reproducibility and tolerability ofthe ICare rebound tonometer in school children[J]. Glaucoma.2007,16(2):185-188.
[15]Martinez-de-la-Casa JM,Garcia-Feijco J,Saenz-Frances F,et a 1.Comparison of rebound lonomand Go|dmann handheld applanation tonometerin congenital glancoma [J]. Glaucoma.2009,18(1):49-52.
[16]傅伟才,张琳.开角型青光眼患者昼夜眼压监测及其意义.上海交通大学学报[J].2007,9(27)：1163-1165.
[17]王瑾,周和政,杨帆等PASCAL动态眼压计临床运用的初步报告[J].国际眼科杂志.2008,3(8)：519-521.
[18]周和政,沈政伟,金中秋等.辩证地认识眼压在青光眼诊断中的地位[J].国际眼科杂志.2002,2(2)：20-23.
[19]SchreiberW, Vorwerk CK, Langenbucher A,et al.A comparison ofrebound tonom eter (ICARE) with tonometer and GAT[J]. Ophthalmologe.2007,104 (4):299-304.
[20]Milla E,Duch S,Buchacra O,et al.Poor agreement between Goldmann and Pascal tonometry in eyes with extreme pachymetry[J].Eye(Lond).2009,23:536-542.
[21]Schneider E,Grehn F.Intraacular pressure measurement.Compafison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry [J]. Glaucoma.2006,15:2-6.
[22]Kaufmann C,Bachmann LM,Thiel MA.Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry[J].Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.2004,45:31 18-3121.
[23]PapastergiOR GI,Kozobolis V,Siganos DS.Effect of recipient corneal pathology on Pascal tonometer and Goldmann tonometer readings in eyes after penetrating keratoplasty[J].Eur Ophthalmol.2009,20:29-34.
[24]PapastergiOR Gi,Kozobolis V,Siganos DS.Assessment of the pascal dynamic contour tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure in keratoconic eyes[J].Glaucoma.20 08,17:484-488.
[25]Siganes DS,Papastergiou GI,Moedas C.Assessment of the Paseal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intmocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK [J].Cataract RefractSurg.2004,30:746-751.
[26]Hamilton KE,Pye DC,Kao L,et al.The effect of corneal ede.ma on dynamic contour and goldmann tonometry[J].Optom Vis Sci.2008,85:451-456.
[27]Oh JH,Yoo C,Kim YY,et al.The effect of contact lens in.duced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dyrc contour tonometry[J].Grades Arch Clin Exp OphthalmOl.2009,247:371-375.
[28]Herdener S,Hafizovic D,Pache M,et al.Is the PASCAL.To.nometer suitable for measuring intraocular pressure in clinical routine long and sh ortterm reproducibility of dynamic contour tonometry[J].Eur J Ophthalmnl.2008,18:39-43.
[29]Sullivan-Mee M,Gerhardt G,Halverson KD,et al.Repeatability and reproducibility for intraocular pressure measurement by dynamic contour, ocular response analyzer, and goldmann applanation tonometry[J].Glaucoma.2009,8:666-673.
[30]Kirwan C,O Keefe M,Lanigan B.Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the reichert ocu.larresponse analyzer[J].Am Ophthal mol.2006,142:990-992.
[31]Brusini P,Salvetat ML,Zeppieri M,et al.Comparison of ICaretonome-tel-with Goldmann appla nation tono meter in glaum coma patients[J]. Glaucoma.2006,1 5(3):213-221.
[32]Medeiros FA,Weinreb RN.Evaluation of the influence of come.Albiom ec han-ieal properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular respons eanalyzer[J]. Glaucoma.2006,15:364-370.
[33]Hashims M,Kamiya K,Fujimura F,et al.Effect of corneal a.stigmatism on intraocular pressure measurement using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometer[J].Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.2010,248:257-262.
[34]Martinez-de-la-Casa JM,Garcia-Feijoo J,Fernandez,Vidal A,etal.Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraacular pressure measurements[J].Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.2006,47:4410-4414.
[35]Vandewalle E,Vandenbrneck S,Stalmans I,et al.Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer,and ocular response analy.zer with Goldmann applanation tonomeler in patients with glaucoma[J].Ear J Ophthalmol.2009,19:783-789.
[36]Morita T,Shoji N,Kamiya K,et al.Intraocular pressure meas-ured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma[J].Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.2010,248:73-77.
[37]Li J,Hemdon L W,Asrani S Qetal.Clinical comparison of the proview eye pressure monitor with the Goldmann applanation tonometer and the Tonopen [J]. Arch Ophthalmol.2004,122:1117-1121.
[38]Brigatti L,Maguluri S.Reproducibility of self-measured intraoeular pressure with the phosphene tonometer in patients with ocular hypertension and early to advanced glaucoma[J].Glaucoma.2005,14:36-39.
[39]Moreno-Montafi&J,S(ldaba LM,Hems H.Intraacular pressure measurement using the Preview tonometer[J].Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol.2005,80:79-83.
[40]Morledge-Hampton sJ,Kwon R,Krishna R,etal.Comparison of proview phosphene tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry[J].Can Ophthalmol.2006, 41:722-726.
[41]Chang I,Bartolone A,Swanson WH,et al.A clinical evaluation of proview pressure phosphene tonometry in children[J].Optom Vis Sci.2006,83:817-822.
[42]Sahin A, Basmak H, Niyaz L, et al.Rep roducibility and tolerability of he ICARE rebound tonometer in school children[J]. Glaucoma 2007,16(2):185-188.
[43]Toyohara K, Inoue K.Comparison of ICARE rebound tonometer with GAT and noncontact tonometer. Atarashii (Journal of the Eye).2007,24 (3):355-359.
[44]LopezCaballero C, Contreras I, Muos Negrete FJ, et al.Rebound tonometry in a clinical setting. Comparison with app lanation tonometry. Esp Oftalmol.2007,82 (5): 273-278.
[45]Queiros A, Gonzalez Meijome JM, Fernandes P, et al.A comparison of central and peripheral intraocular p ressure using rebound tonometry[J]. Ophthal Physiol.2007,27 (5):506-511.
[46]Davies LN, Bartlett H, Mallen EA, et al.Clinical evaluation of rebound tonometer[J]. Acta Ophthalmol Scand.2006,84 (2):206-209.
[47]何跃,陈洁,吕红彬等ICare回弹式眼压计与Goldmann压平眼压计测量结果的比较[J].眼科研究.2010,28：1162-1165.
[1]何跃,陈洁,吕红彬等ICare回弹式眼压计与Goldmann压平眼压计测量结果的比较[J].眼科研究.2010,28：1162-1165.
[2]Moreno-Montanes J, Garcia N, Fernandez-Hortelano A, et al. Rebound tonometer compared with Goldmann tonometer in normal and pathologic come[J]. e Cornea。 2007,26:427-430.
[3]Poestchi A, Mitchell R, Nicholas S, et al. The iCare rebound tonometer:comparisons with Goldmann tonometry, and influence of central come&[thickness[J]. Clin Exp oohthalmol.2009,37:687-691.
[4]Avitabile T, Longo A, Rocca D, et al. The influence of refractive errors on 1OP measurement by rebound tonometry(1Carc)and Goldmann applanation tonometry[J]. Grades Arch Clin Exp Ophthaltool.2010,248:585-591.
[5]Queir6s A, Gonzalcz—M6ijome JM, Fernandes P, et al. A comparison of central and peripheral intraocular pressure using rebound tonometry[J]. Ophthal Physiol Opt, 2007,27:506-51.
[6]Chui WS, Lain A。Chen D, et al. The influence of corneal properties on rebound tonometry[J]. Ophthalmology,2008,115:80-84.
[7]Sahin A, Basmak H, Niyaz L, et al. Reproducibility and tolerability of the ICare rebound tonometer in school children[J]. J Glaucom,2007,16:185-188.
[8]Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Intraccular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis SCi.2003,44:3790—3794.
[9]Boehm AG, Weber A, Pillunat LE, et al. Dynamic contour tonometry in comparison to intracameral 1OP measurements[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.2008,49:2472-2477.
[10]施维,钟勇,董方田等.动态轮廓眼压计的临床应用[J].中华眼科杂志.2008,44：408-412.
[11]Heras-Mulere-H,Moreno-Montafis-JSadabacharri LM-etal. Comparisonof dynamic contour tonometry(Pascal)with pneumotonometry and Goldmann tonometry[J]. Arch Soe Esp Oftalmol.2007,82:337-341.
[12]Francis BA, Hsieh A, Lai MY, et al. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Gold. mann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry[J]. Ophthalmology,2007,114:20-26.
[13]Milla E, Duch S, Buchacra O, et al. Poor agreement between Goldmann and Pascal tonometry in eyes with extreme pachymetry[J]. Eye(Lond).2009,23:536-542.
[14]Schneider E, Grehn F. Intraacular pressure measurement Compafison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry[J]. J Glauco ma.2006,15:2-6.
[15]Kaufmann C.Bachmann LM.Thiel MA. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.2004,45:31 18-3121.
[16]PapastergiOR GI, Kozobolis V, Siganos DS. Effect of recipient corneal pathology on Pascal tonometer and Goldmann tonometer readings in eyes after penetrating keratoplasty[J]. Eur J Ophthalmol.2009,20:29-34.
[17]PapastergiOR Gi, Kozobolis V, Siganos DS. Assessment of the pascal dynamic contour tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure in keratoconic eyes[J]. J Glaucoma.2008,17:484-488.
[18]Siganes DS, Papastergiou GI, Moedas C. Assessment of the Paseal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intmocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK [J]. Cataract RefractSurg.2004,30:746-751.
[19]Hamilton KE, Pye DC, Kao L, et al. The effect of corneal ede. ma on dynamic contour and goldmann tonometry. Optom Vis Sci.2008,85:451-456.
[20]Oh JH, Yoo C Kim YY, et al. The effect of contact lens in. duced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dyrc contour tonometry[J]. Grades Arch Clin Exp Ophthalm01.2009,247:371-375.
[21]Herdener S, Hafizovic D, Pache M, et al. Is the PASCAL. To. nometer suitable for measuring intraocular pressure in clinical routine Long and short term reproducibility of dynamic contour tonometry[J]. Eur J Ophthalmnl.2008,18:39-43.
[22]Sullivan-Mee M. Gerhardt G, Halverson KD. el al. Repeatability and reproducibility for intraocular pressure measurement by dynamic contour, ocular response analyzer, and goldmann applanation tonometry[J]. J Glaucoma.2009,18:666-673.
[23]Kirwan C. O Keefe M, Lanigan B. Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the reichert ocu.larresponse analyzer[J]. Am JOphthalmol.2006,142:990—992.
[24]Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN. Evaluation of the influence of come. Albiom ec han-ieal properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular respons eanalyzer[J]. J Glaucoma.2006,15:364-370.
[25]Hashims M, Kamiya K, Fujimura F, etal. Effect of corneal. stigmatism on intraocular pressure measurement using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometer[J]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.2010,248:257-262.
[26]Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Fernandez. Vidal A. etal. Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraacular pressure measurements[J]. Invest Ophthalmol VisSci.2006,47:4410-4414.
[27]Vandewalle E, Vandenbrneck S, Stalmans I. et al. Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analy. zer with Goldmann applanation tonomeler in patients with glaucoma[J]. Ear J Ophthalmol.2009,19:783-789.
[28]Morita T, Shoji N, Kamiya K.et al. Intraocular pressure mea8-ured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma [J]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.2010,248:73-77.
[29]Li J, Hemdon LW, Asrani SG, et al. Clinical comparison of the proview eye pressure monitor with the Goldmann applanation tonometer and the Tonopen[J]. Arch Ophthalmol.2004,122:1117-1121.
[30]Brigatti L, Maguluri S. Reproducibility of self-measured intraoeular pressure with the phosphene tonometer in patients with ocular hypertension and early to advanced glaucoma[J]. J Glaucoma.2005,14:36-39.
[31]Moreno-Montafi&J, S daba LM, Hems H. Intraacular pressure measurement using the Preview tonometer[J]. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol.2005,80:79-83.
[32]Morledge—Hampton sJ, Kwon R0, Krishna R, et al. Comparison of proview phosphene tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry[J]. Can J Ophthalmol.2006,41:722-726.
[33]Chang I, Bartolone A, Swanson WH, et al. A clinical evaluation of proview pressure phosphene tonometry in children[J]. Optom VisSci.2006,83:817-822.