用户名: 密码: 验证码:
香根草优良生态型筛选与抗逆生理的研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
香根草(Vetiveria zizanioideis )是一种高大的、簇生成丛的禾本科多年生草本植物,也是一种优良的热带牧草,有很多用途,特别是作为一种廉价而有效的,抗击土壤侵蚀的工具方面具有广泛应用价值。目前它己被世界上100多个国家列为理想的水土保持植物种之一。香根草生态工程技术也曾被国际评估委员会评为全世界71项可持续发展技术中最为优秀的项目,受到热带、亚热带地区的政府、科学家和使用者的高度重视,并已广泛应用于这些地区的山坡地水土保持、路基护坡、海滩和河岸固土以及污染治理等领域。而以往的香根草研究主要应用于生态治理,而忽略了香根草的饲用价值,这不但远未能充分发挥香根草的经济效益,同时还增加了香根草的管理成本。针对该现状,对收集的14个国内外香根草种质资源材料的形态特征、生物学特性、生理抗性并结合营养价值分析和比较,研究结果表明: 1.香根草各生态型的形态特征在长期的自然驯化中已经出现了较大的变异,变异系数较大。其中长轴茎直径、短轴茎直径、叶长、叶宽出现了较大的差异,平均变异系数分别为12.24%、16.90%,15.4%和15.3%;而叶面积和叶长宽比的平均变异系数分别为4.50%和6.50%。这些不同生态型性状特点为不同功用香根草的优良生态型筛选提供了丰富的种质资源。
     2.香根草各生态型的株丛高度以9号生态型Hoffman的为最高,达到283cm;而以8号生态型Wuhua的为最低,仅为168cm,显著低于其他生态型的株丛高度(P<0.05),其余各生态型材料的株丛生长出现慢-快-慢的“S”曲线增长变化,其中1号Karnataka生长不同于其他生态型,呈匍匐生长。
     3.香根草各生态型粗蛋白含量、粗纤维含量、粗灰分含量差异显著,各生态型香根草粗蛋白含量平均值为4.73%,粗纤维含量为36.33%,粗灰分含量平均值为6.37%,采用常规打分法发现:1号Karnataka,2号Parit buntar ,3号Lilongwe饲用价值高,是可以考虑在广东省推广应用的生态型。
     4.以青绿期、相对电导率,可溶性糖含量,叶绿素含量和脯氨酸含量的变化为指标,对14个生态型香根草的耐寒能力进行了试验研究和综合评价。结果表明各生态型之间的抗寒性存在着较大差异,其中1号Karnataka,5号Kandy,10号Monto,11号Sabak bernam四个生态型的抗寒性较好,有望成为将来优良抗寒品种的原始育种材料。
     5.香根草具有非常强的抗旱能力,通过PEG胁迫试验,以叶片持水力,相对电导率,可溶性糖含量和脯氨酸含量的变化为指标,对来自不同国家和地区的14个香根草种质资源的抗旱性能进行了试验研究和隶属函数综合评价。结果表明:各香根草种质资源之间的抗旱性存在着较大差异,其中来自马拉维的Lilongwe,印度的Karnataka和马来西亚的Parit buntar三个生态型材料的抗旱性较好,在本研究中被确定为抗旱生态型材料,有望成为将来优良抗旱品种的原始育种材料。
     6.通过不同浓度Nacl溶液胁迫处理后,各生态型香根草的相对电导率,可溶性糖含量和脯氨酸含量呈现不同程度的变化,其中5号Kandy,3号Lilongwe ,10号Monto耐盐性最强,将来可有望成为优良耐盐品种的原始育种材料。
Vetiever grass (Vetiveria zizanioideis ) is a perennial gramineae plant with high plant and bunches of production clump, a kind of good tropics forage grass, which has many uses, especially being taken as one inexpensive and effective tool in slope protection and soil erosion. At present, the vetiever grass is listed as one of ideal water and soil conservation plants by more than 100 countries. The vetiever grass eco-technology has also been evaluated the most outstanding project of the world 71 items to continue to develop in the technology by the International Appraisal Committee, which receives the tropic, the subtropical area government, the scientist and user highly takes. And the vetiever grass technology has applied at these domains widespread on local hill side water and soil conversation, roadbed slope protection, beach and river bank solid earth as well as pollution management. Previous study of vetiver was focus on ecological management, but far failed to give full play to vetiver of the economic benefits, also increased the cost of management. While the nutritional value of vetiver grass has not received much attention. The morphological characteristics, biological characteristics, physiological resistance and nutritional value evaluation were preliminary investigated on 14 vetiver germplasm materials collected both from home and abroad. The results showed as follows:
     1. The morphological features of different vitiver grass ecotypes appeared some obvious difference at long natural domestication, and the variation cofficient was very big.The variation cofficient such as diameter of long axis stem and shrot axis stem, leave length, and leave width reached 12.24%, 16.90%, 15.4% and15.3%. However, leave area as well as ratio of length and width reached 4.5% and 6.5%. These characters of different vitiver grass ecotypes will be good material for difrerent usages and enrich resouce on screening for excellent ecotypes.
     2. Hoffman was the highest, reaching 283 cm, and Wuhua was the shortest , only 168 cm, which was significantly lower than that of others (P <0.05) , the growth pattern followed slow -fast–slow, which were "S" curve of growth changes. And Karnatakthe was creeping growth, different from other ecotypes.
     3. Nutritional components analysis indicated that there were significant differences in crude protein content, crude fiber content, coarse ash content of 14 vetiver grass ecotypes. The average crude protein content of different vitiver grass ecotypes reached 4.73%, the average crude fiber content reached 36.33%, the average coarse ash content reached 6.37%; The conventional score method showed that the feeding value on Karnataka, Parit buntar, Lilongwe were higher than others, and they can be the ecotype to be applied in Guangdong Province .
     4. Based on cold stress theory, the indexes of green period electrical conductivity rate, soluble sugar contents and proline contents in leaves were tested on the cold tolerance of 14 ecotypes of vetiver grasses. The results showed that obvious differences of cold resistance existed in each ecotype of vetiver grasses. Ecotypes of Karnataka,Kandy, Monto, Sabak bernam had the excellent ability to resist cold stress, and worthy of be extended.
     5. Physiological indexes such as water-holding capacity in leaves, electrical conductivity rate, free proline contents and soluble sugar content were determined to evaluate drought tolerance of vetiver grasses. Results showed that obvious differences of drought resistance existed in each ecotype of vetiver grass, the ecotypes material of Lilongwe,Karnataka and Parit buntar had the excellent ability on drought resistance, and worthy of be extended.
     6. Based on different concentration NaCl solution stress, the indexes of electrical conductivity rate, soluble sugar contents and proline contents in leaves were use to evaluate salt tolerance. The results showed that ecotypes of Kandy, Lilongwe, and Monto had the excellent ability resist salt stress, and worthy of be extended.
引文
[1] 徐柱.世界禾草属志[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1999,795-796.
    [2] 徐礼煜,方长久,万明,等.香根草系统及其在中国的研究与应用[M].香港:亚太国际出版有限公司, 2003: 1-2.
    [3] 夏汉平,敖惠修,刘世忠.香根草生态工程---实现可持续发展的生物技术[J].生态学杂志, 1998, 17(6): 44-50.
    [4] Chen Y, Shen Z, Li X. The use of vetiver grass (Vetiveria zizanioides) in the phytoremediation of soils contaminated with heavymetals [J]. Applied Geochemistry, 2004, 19(10): 1553~1565.
    [5] Maffei M,Scannerini S, Berta G,et al. Photosynthetic enzyme activities in Vetiveria zizanioides cultivated in temperate climates[J]. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 1995, 23(6): 27-32.
    [6] 刘金祥,王铭铭,肖生鸿,等.干旱胁迫对香根草生长及光合生理主要特征的影响[J].四川草原, 2005 (3): 28~30.
    [7] 夏汉平.中国在 50 年代对香根草的繁殖栽培与管理研究[J].热带作物科技,1997(,5):23-26
    [8] 柯成椿,冯于元.加固工程的关键物种-香根草[J].人民珠江,2002(2):42-44.
    [9] 刘玉珊.新鲜香根草出油多、蒸馏快、油质好[J].热带作物,7:21-26
    [10] 夏汉平,敖惠修,何道泉,等. 香根草在土壤改良和水土保持中的作用[J].热带地理, 1996,16(3):265-270.
    [11] 徐建云.香根草等高植物篱技术在江西公路边坡上的应用[J].华东公路,2000(3):65-66.
    [12] 陈怀满.香根草净化富养水体的初步试验[A].国际香根草研讨会论文集,1997,10.
    [13] 夏汉平,敖惠修.应用香根草对垃圾场进行植被恢复及净化垃圾污水的研究[J]广州环境科学,2002,17(1): 34-37.
    [14] 夏汉平,刘世忠.优良水土保持植物与坡地复合农林业[M].气象出版社,2000.
    [15] National Research Council. Vetiver Grass: A Thin Green Line against Erosion[C]. Washington D C: National Academy press,1993, 49-58, 113-127.
    [16] Greenfield J C. Vetiver grass:the ideal Plant for vegetative soil and moisture conservation.In:Grimshaw R G and Helfer L eds.VctiverGrassfor soil and water Consevation, Land Rehabilitation,and Embankment Stabilization.The world bank ,Washington D C,3-38
    [17] Dalton P A,Smith R J,Truong P N V(1996).Vetiver grass hedges for erosion control on a cropped flood Plain:hedge hyduaulica.Agric. water Management,31:91-104
    [18] Tkahashi K.(1988) Hormonal regulation of inter node elongation in rice shoots.In:IRRIed.Proceedings of the1987 Intemational Deep water RiceWorkshop IRRI ,254~255
    [19] Tantum A.(1993) Stbilitization of highway road cuts with Vetiver Newsltt,(10):17Tiwari S C,Lgbokwe P E Bueton J L et,al.(1993) Vegetative hedge rows for erosion control in Southwestern Mississippi.VetiverNewsletter,(10):19
    [20] Grewal S S,Samra J S .(1996)Studies on a biological erosion control system integrating tree and grasses to manage degraded soil of foot hill Himalayas.Vetiver:a miracle grass.Chiang kai,Tailand,68-69
    [21] 徐礼煜.试论香根草系统在我国水土保持上的应用区域[J].亚热带水土保持.2005(3): 38-41.
    [22] 陈凯,胡国谦,饶辉茂,等.红壤坡地柑桔园栽植香根草的生态效应[J].生态学报, 1994,14(3): 249-250.
    [23] Office of The Royal Development Projects Board. Vetiver Grass for Environment Protection and other Uusages[J]. Bangkok: Office of The Royal Development Projects Board, 1996, 28-30.
    [24] Greenfield J C. Vetiver grass, the ideal plant for vegetation soil and moisture conservation[J]. In: Grimshaw RG, L Helfer (eds.).Vetiver Grass for Soil and Water Conservation, Land Rehabilitation, and Embankment Stabilization. Washington D C: The World Bank, 1995, 3-38.
    [25] Richard G. Grim Shaw OBE. Vetiver System: A Green Investment For Sustainable Development. http://www.vetiver.org/TVN-archive.htm.
    [26] 林占禧.菌草技术现状及其应用前景[J].福建农业大学学报(26),(增刊):12-16
    [27] 夏汉平.关于香根草及其资源和利用的研究[J].草原与草坪,1996,16(3):265,270.
    [28] 张国发,姜旭红,崔玉波, 香根草研究与应用进展[J].草业科学.2005(1),73-76.
    [29] 胡继胜,庞廷泽.香根草快速繁殖及繁殖中的几个问题[J].香根草研究与展望[C]北京:中国农业科技出版社,1998.165-166.
    [30] 香根草国际标准[J].香料香精化妆品.2002,12(6):44-45.
    [31] 程洪.香根草在我国的应用及研究综述[J].水土保持通报,1998,18(3):80-84.
    [32] 龚德镇,魏德生,钟燕,等.黔产香根油的研究[J].贵州科学. 1997(2),126-128
    [33] 陈立杰,陈旭辉.香根草的综合利用和栽培[J].贵州科学. 1999(3),40-41
    [34] 潘瑞炽,董愚得.植物生理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社.1995.322-328
    [35] 刘有良.植物抗冻性测定技术的原理和方法[J].植物生理通讯,1985,1:40-43
    [36] 王荣福.植物抗寒指标的种类及应用[J].植物生理通讯,1987,3:48-55
    [37] Knapp,W.R., Knapp J.S..Interaction of planting date and fall fertilization on cold barely performance[J].Agron.1980,72:440-445
    [38] 郑玉红 , 刘建秀 , 陈树元 . 我国狗牙根种质资源根状茎特征的研究 [J]. 草业学报,2003,12(2):76-81
    [39] 刘有良 , 毛才良 , 王良驹 . 植物抗冻性测定技术的原理和比较 . 植物生理学通讯,1985,(1):40-43
    [40] 江福英,李延,翁伯琦.植物低温胁迫及其抗性生理[J]. 福建农业学报,2002(17) 3,190-195
    [41] 沈漫,王明麻,黄敏仁.植物抗寒机理研究进展[J].植物学通报,1997, 14(2):1-8
    [42] 王洪春,汤章城,苏维埃,等.水稻干胚膜脂肪酸组分差异性分析[J].植物生理学报,1980,6(3):225-256
    [43] 郑玉生,张秋明,刘昆玉.温州蜜柑枳高砧的抗寒生理[J].上海农业学报,1998,6(3):225-236
    [44] 邓令毅,王洪春.葡萄的膜脂和脂肪酸组分与抗寒性关系的研究[J].植物生理学报,1982,8(3):273-274
    [45] 孙 中 海 , 章 文 才 . 柑 桔 抗 寒 性 与 膜 脂 肪 酸 组 分 的 关 系 研 究 [J] 武 汉 植 物 学 研究,1980,8(1):79-85
    [46] 王孝宣,李树德,东惠茹,等.低温胁迫对番茄苗期和开花期脂肪酸的影响[J].园艺学报,1997,24(2):164-166
    [47] 关世英,苏维埃.与磷脂酰甘油有关的植物抗冷机理研究进展[J].植物生理学通讯,1995,31(3):167-173
    [48] 李美茹,刘鸿先,王以柔,等植物细胞中的抗寒物质及其与植物抗冷性的关系[J].植物生理学通讯,1995,31(5):167-173
    [49] Lyons J M.Chilling injury in plant[M].Ann rev Plant Physiol,1973(24):445-466
    [50] Dexter S T,totting W E,Graber L F.Investigations of the hardiness of plants by measurement of electrical condictivety[J].PlantPhysiol.1932,7:63-78
    [51] 朱根海,朱培任.小麦抗冻性的季节变化以及温度对脱锻炼的效应[J].南京农学院学报,1984,(2):9-11
    [52] 魏 臻 武 , 王 槐 三 . 不 同 类 型 草 坪 草 抗 寒 性 特 征 及 其 抗 寒 性 锻 炼 [J]. 草 业 科学.1997,14(3):62-66
    [53] 马正华,王柳英,施建军,等.光照和黑暗条件下西北黄芪幼苗对低温的反应[J].青海大学学报,2008, 26(1):28-30
    [54] White R H,Schmidt R E.Bermudagrass response to chilling temperature as influenced by iron an bebzygladenine[J].Crop Sci.,1989(129):768-773
    [55] M-瓦希利耶夫著,何永集等译.植物的越冬[M].北京:北京出版社,1958
    [56] Gaschet M J,et al.,Cold acclimation and alteration in protein synthesis in Bermudagrass crown[J].Hortscience,1994,19(3):477-480
    [57] 何若辒.植物低温逆境生理[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1995
    [58] 刘祖琪,张石城.植物抗性生理学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1994,14:43-44
    [59] Fry J D., N S Tang,R G Clifton,et al.Freezing tolerance and carbohydrate content of low-temperature accliamted and nonaccliamated centipedegrass[J].Crop Sci.,1993,33:1051-1055
    [60] Bush E,Wilson P,Shepard D.,et al,. .Freezing tolerance and non structure carbohydrate composition of carptgrass(Axonopus affinis chase)[J].Hort science,2000,35(2):187-189
    [61]汤章城.植物对水分胁迫的反应和适应性Ⅰ.抗逆性的一般概念和植物的抗涝性[J].植物生理学通讯,1983,(3):24-29
    [62]王建革,苏晓华,张冰玉,等.植物抗旱研究工作中的问题与方法初探[J]. 中国农学通报,2004,20(4):93-95
    [63] 景蕊莲.作物抗旱研究的现状与思考[J].干旱地区农业研究,1999,17(2):79-85
    [64] 李晚忱,付凤玲,袁佐清.苗期耐旱性鉴定方法研究[J].西南农业大学报,2001,14(3):29-32
    [65] 谷俊涛,屈平,刘桂茹,等.不同小麦品种抗旱机制与花期旗叶光合特性的关系[J].华北农学报,2002,17(1):1-7张林刚,邓西平,小麦抗旱性生理生化研究进展[J].干旱地区农业研究,2000,18(3):125-132
    [66] 王 伟 , 张 枫 .ABA 对 渗 透 胁 迫 下 玉 米 幼 苗 根 系 渗 透 调 节 的 影 响 [J]. 作 物 学报,2002,28(1):121-126
    [67] 栗雨勤 , 张文英 , 王有增 , 等 . 作物抗旱性鉴定指标研究及进展 [J]. 河北农业科学,2004,3(1):58-60
    [68] Tunrer N C.Droughte resistance and adaptation to water deficits in crop plants.In: Mussel H, Stapes R C.Stress Physiology in Corp Plants[M].NewYork:Wiley,1979:343-372
    [69] 张永贵,谢永红.PEG在模拟植物干旱胁迫和组织培养中的应用[J].亚热带植物通讯,1994,23(2):61-64
    [70] 钱吉,任文伟,郑师章. 不同地理种群羊草苗期电导、电阻的比较研究[J]. 植物生态学报,1997,21(1)38-40
    [71] Lawlor D W.Absorption of polyethylene glycol by plants and their effects on plant growth. New Physiol,1990,9,501-513
    [72] 张楠楠,徐香玲. 植物抗盐机理的研究[J]. 哈尔滨师范大学自然科学报,2005(1),65-68
    [73] 张秀英.草坪草耐盐性研究进展[J].草原与草坪,2000,89(2):8-11
    [74] 武之新,徐宜南,刘凤权. 植物抗盐性研究及漪盐牧草筛选概况[J].河北大学学报,1999(10)4:65-67
    [75] 刘友良,毛才良,汪良驹.植物耐盐性研究进展[J].植物生理学通讯,1987(4):1-5
    [76] Yeo A K.Salt resistence:Physiologies and prices. Physiolocia Plantarum,1983(58):214-222
    [77] 王萍 . 碳酸钠胁迫下羊草幼苗的生理效应及外源脱落酸的缓解效应 [J]. 草业学报,1998,7(1):24-28
    [78] Harivandi M Ali,Buter Jack D,Wu Lin.Turfgrass Agronomy Monograph.1992,32,207-229
    [79] Glenn E P,Brown J.J.Effects of soil salt leves on the growth an wanter use efficiencey of Atriplex canescens varieties in dying soil.American Journal of Batany,1998,85(1):1016
    [80] 陈国雄,李志淑,张志谦,等.盐胁迫对多年生黑麦草和草地早熟禾种子萌发影响的对比的研究[J].草业科学,1996,13(3):41-44
    [81] 孙启忠.盐分在植物体内的累积及其危害[J].牧草与饲料,1992,(4):39-44
    [82] 牛菊兰.早熟禾品种特性与耐盐性关系的研究[J].草业科学,1998,15(1):38-40
    [83] 张德罡.盐胁迫对五个早熟禾草坪草品种苗期细胞膜伤害性的研究[J].甘肃农业大学学 报,1998,33(1):38-41
    [84] 牛菊兰.寒地型草坪草草种萌发期耐盐性的研究[J].草业学报,1994,11(4):58-60
    [85] 潘金山.草坪草耐盐性研究[J]. 草业科学,1999,16(12):50-53
    [86] 夏宁.冷季型草坪草耐盐性研究[J].林业科技通讯,2001(2):26-28
    [87] 董小霞,赵淑惠,孔令安,等.苇状羊茅盐胁迫下生理效应的研究[J].草业科学15(5):10-13
    [88] Qian Y L,Engleke M,Foret C,et al.Saltnity effects on Zoysiagrass cultivares and experimental Lines.Cropsci,2000,40:448-492
    [89] Lee G J,Y K Yoo,Kin K S.Salt tolerance study in Zoysiagrass:changes in inorganic consituents and proline connects in eight Zoysiagrass[J].Horticultural science,1994,35(3):241-250
    [90] 纪淑梅.草坪草耐盐性研究Ⅱ:盐胁迫对草坪草脯氨酸含量的影响.草业科学,1999, 16:54-59
    [91] 翁森红,蒋尤泉,王承斌.牧草耐盐性鉴定指标和方法的初步研究[J].中国草地,1992(1)
    [92] 余叔文,汤章城.植物生理与分子生物学[M].北京:科技出版社,2001
    [93] 王爱国.丙二醛作为脂质过氧化指标的探索.植物生理通讯,1986,14(2):55-57
    [94] 陈少裕. 膜脂质过氧化与植物细胞伤害. 植物生理通讯,1991,27(2):84-90
    [95] 贾恢先,赵曼蓉,马莹.典型盐地植物细胞脂质过氧化伤害与质膜超微结构变化研究[J] 西北植物学报,1994,14(6):1-5
    [96] 孙国荣,阎秀峰.盐胁迫对星星草幼苗保护酶系统的影响[J].草地学报,2001(1):34-38
    [97]乔亚科,李桂兰,王文颇,等.野生、栽培大豆愈伤组织耐盐性与植株盐胁迫下丙二醛含量的关系[J].大都科学,2003,22(2):127-131
    [98] 任继周.草业科学研究方法[M].北京:农业出版社,1998
    [99] 李长慧,韩增祥,张静,等.饲料营养成分分析测定方法讲义[M].青海大学草业科学系,2000
    [100] 华东师范大学生物系植物生理教研组主编,植物生理学实验指导[M].北京.人民教育出版社.1980.]
    [101] 张志良.植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社.1990,160-162
    [102] 张殿忠,汪沛洪,赵会贤.测定小麦叶片游离脯氨酸含量的方法[J].植物生理学通讯,1990,(4):62-65.
    [103] 邹奇. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社,1990,160-162
    [104] 黎裕.植物抗旱型鉴定[J].干旱地区农业研究,1993,(11),91-98
    [105] 胡荣海.农作物抗旱鉴定方法和指标[J].作物品种资源,1986(4):36-38
    [106] 宋淑明.甘肃省紫花苜蓿地方类型抗旱性的综合评价[J].草业科学,1998,15(2):74-80
    [107] 白史且,苟文龙,张新全,等.假俭草种群变异与生态学特性的研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2002,24(4):97-101
    [108] 范月君,姜润萧.三峡库区高羊茅引种试验的初步研究报告[J].四川草原,2004,(6):56-60
    [109] 钟声,周自玮.热带亚热带水土保持植物香根草及栽种技术[J].中国草地,2001,23(2):79-80
    [110] 何敏,严力蛟,陈启银,等.香根草研究综述[A]徐礼煜.香根草研究与展望[C]北:中国农业科技出版社,1998:147-152
    [111] 夏汉平,敖惠修.中国野生的香根草种及其保护与分类问题[J].生物样性,1998,6(4):292-197
    [112] 刘金祥,李文送,李红燕.种子繁殖香根草植株的生物学特征及其病虫害初报[J].草业科学, 2005,22(4):108-110
    [113] 孙吉雄.草地培育学[M] 第一版.北京:中国农业出版社,2002
    [114] 钟伟.青贮香根草替代日量中不同比例青贮菠萝渣对泰国生长沼泽性公牛消化代谢、微生物蛋白产量、血液生化指标及生长指标的影响[D].甘肃:甘肃农业大学,2006
    [116] 内蒙古农牧学院.草原管理学[M] 第二版.北京:中国农业出版社, 1999:32-38
    [117] Bred A D,Sun S.Diveristy of turfgrass germplasim the Asia Pacific rimcountriies and potential for reducing genetic vulnerability.Crop Science,1995,35:317-321

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700