基于地方政府环保战略规划的党政领导环保绩效管理体系研究
|
摘要
20世纪以来,我国政府不断加大对地方党政领导环保绩效管理的力度,但由于我国地方党政领导环保绩效管理还处于启步阶段,存在环保绩效管理与地方政府环保战略规划相脱离,绩效考核指标缺乏科学性和针对性,考核主体单一,缺乏外部参与,考核结果的使用不充分,考核的监督与申诉机制不完善,绩效沟通缺失,环保绩效管理体系不完善等一系例问题,致使某些地方的党政领导在片面追求经济增长速度,追求经济利益的最大化的同时,造成当地大面积的水土流失,湖泊退化萎缩,污染物排放量超过环境承载能力,流经城市的河段普遍受到污染,江河断流,水资源严重短缺,城市空气污染严重,酸雨污染加重,持久性有机污染物的危害不断显现,土壤污染面积扩大,近岸海域污染加剧等诸多环境问题的出现,并且有越来越严重的趋势。
这些地方党政领导在牺牲当地公众的环境利益,降低了经济成本的同时,却赢得了显赫的政绩,官运亨通,而那些注重长期效益,注重环境保护的地方党政领导则因近期效益难以显现而受到埋没。如果不能通过地方党政领导环保绩效管理的机制来对那些急功近利的地方党政领导环保行为予以禁止或惩罚,就不可能保持地方经济的可持续发展。
因此本研究在借鉴国内外相关研究的基础上,深入探究出地方党政领导环保绩效管理存在问题的根源为:地方党政领导环保绩效管理权力和行为缺乏有效监督和制衡机制,“科层制”结构普遍存在,考核主体缺乏独立性、代表性和广泛性,地方党政领导环保绩效产出难以量化,地方党政领导环保绩效的信息化及开放化程度低,地方党政领导环保绩效管理的理论研究和实践不够,地方党政领导环保绩效管理缺乏相应管理基础工作支撑等。
本研究围绕了地方党政领导、环境保护、绩效管理三者关系展开分析,运用环境管理学、行政管理学、人力资源管理学、管理科学等有关原理,采用文献分析法、综合研究法、比较研究法、系统分析法、理论与实践相结合的方法来完善地方党政领导环保绩效管理的机制,使地方党政领导的环境行为与实际收益成正比,以此来确保地方党政领导在环保绩效管理的实践中自觉地履行自己的环保职责。
本研究结合企业基于战略导向的绩效管理经验,运用系统管理的方法,提出了基于地方政府环保战略规划的党政领导环保绩效管理模式;从利益相关者理论进行分析,就如何构建地方党政环保绩效考核主体提出了具体的建议;根据关键绩效指标法的设计步骤,提出了地方党政环保绩效考核指标体系的设计方法及步骤。研究结论对转变地方党政领导的环保管理理念,构建地方党政环保绩效管理理论体系,形成系统的地方党政领导环保绩效管理的激励与约束机制,加强地方党政领导环保绩效管理,规范地方党政领导环保行为,改进地方党政领导环保服务水平,确保国家节能减排目标的实现,提高地方党政领导的环保绩效和公众对地方政府的环保绩效管理满意度具有重要的理论与实践意义。
全文共分八章,其主要内容如下:
1、概述了地方党政领导绩效管理的现状、前景、目的和意义,综述了国内外与此方向相关的研究现状,给出了研究的思路、方法、内容、可能的创新点。
2、概述了与地方党政领导绩效管理密切联系的系统论、控制论、信息论、目标管理理论、委托代理理论和利益相关者理论等基础理论,着重论述这些基础理论对地方党政领导环保绩效管理的指导作用。
3、概述了地方党政领导环保绩效管理现状,重点分析了目前我国地方党政领导绩效管理中存在的问题及其原因,为下面的地方党政领导环保绩效管理体系架构提供了分析基础。
4、明确了地方党政领导环保绩效管理体系设计的指导思想,从系统学的角度给出了地方党政领导环保绩效管理体系架构,设计出了地方政府环保战略规划目标系统、党政领导环保绩效考核指标系统、党政领导环保绩效管理过程系统和党政领导环保管理结果运用系统之间的逻辑关系图。
5、根据利益相关者考核主体模型,分析了地方党政领导环保绩效的利益相关者,以此为基础构建出了较为全面系统的地方党政领导环保绩效考核主体;按照关键绩效指标的步骤设计出了较为科学合理且又是基于地方政府环保战略规划目标的党政领导环保绩效考核指标;在系统最优、客观性、内容先进合理等原则的指导下,完善了地方党政领导环保绩效考核权重体系和指标标准体系。
6、从系统的角度论述了地方党政领导环保绩效计划的制定,地方党政领导环保绩效辅导与实施,地方党政领导环保绩效考核和地方党政领导环保绩效考核结果的反馈等过程体系。设计出了较为科学合理且又基于地方政府环保战略规划的地方党政领导环保绩效管理过程体系。
7、研究了地方党政领导环保绩效管理制度的本质规律、对绩效管理的重要作用,从地方党政领导环保绩效考核结果的运用和考核申诉机制两大方面探讨地方党政领导环保绩效管理的制度安排,建立和健全地方党政领导环保绩效管理组织机构等,为地方党政领导环保绩效管理的良好运行提供规则体系。
8、对本研究所取得的一些初步性成果以及相关的研究局限与不足进行了总结,并对其实践应用价值以及未来进一步研究的方向进行了展望。
本研究是建立在众多前人研究成果的基础上的,但同时,本研究自身又有一些创新之处,主要创新点体现在以下几个方面:
通过运用利益相关者理论和利益相关者考核主体分析模型来对地方党政领导环保绩效考核的利益相关者进行深入分析,明确了地方党政领导本人、公众、各级政府、专业评估机构、人大、媒体和专家等地方党政领导环保绩效考核主体。
根据关键绩效指标的步骤,首先运用头脑风暴法等提取地方政府环保绩效管理关键成功因素和关键绩效指标;接着利用战略目标相关分析表将地方政府环保战略规划目标、关键成功因素、地方政府级环保关键绩效指标与各部门相连,确定各部门对地方政府环保战略规划目标所应该承担的指标;最后用鱼骨图法把地方政府和部门的关键绩效指标分解为党政领导的环保关键绩效指标。整个过程确保了地方政府环保战略规划目标落实到相关地方党政领导身上。
通过综合运用目标管理法、关键绩效指标法、战略管理法和360度反馈法等管理方法和工具,充分发挥不同管理方法的优势,弥补其不足,设计出了基于地方政府环保战略规划目标的党政领导环保绩效考核方法,较为系统地将不同管理方法综合应用到地方党政领导环保绩效管理的全过程中。
Since the 20th century, Our Government has unceasingly strengthened the management in environment protection performance of local party and government leaders. Since our country the local party and government leaders' environmental protection performance management is still in the starting stage, there are many problems. For example, environmental protection performance management deviates the goal of local government environmental protection strategy plan, the performance indicators lacks of scientificity and pertinency, the appraiser of performance is unitary and lacks participation from outside, the performance appraisement result is not used to full; the surveillance and the appeal mechanism are imperfect; performances communication is few, the environmental protection performances management system imperfect , and so on.
These problems lead local party and government leaders only to pursue the rate economy of rise, to maximize economic interest. at the same time. It causes many environmental problems at the same time. For example, loss of soils in large area, water deterioration and shrinkage of lakes, emissions of contamination exceed carrying capacity of environment, rivers that pass through cities are polluted widely, break flow of rivers, shortage of water resources, austere pollution of air and acid rain exist in many cities, harm of lasting organic contamination appears, areas of soil pollution are enlarging and pollution alongshore is getting more and more serious.
These local party and government leaders who give up the local public environmental benefit has won the prominent performances actually and reached a very successful official career, while these local party and government leaders who pay attention to long-term benefit and concentrate on environmental protection could not be elevated because the short-term performance is not good. If these leaders who eager for quick success and instant benefit cannot be forbidden and punished by management mechanism in environment protection performance of local party and government leaders, the sustainable development of local economy cannot be carried out.
Based on the domestic and foreign correlated research, this research tries to inquire into the root of problems in environment protection performance management of Local Party and government leaders. the power and behaviors in environment protection performance management of local party and government leaders lack of supervision and check & balance mechanism, the structure of bureaucracy universally exists, the appraiser of environmental performance lacks independence, representative and universality, the local party and government leaders' environmental protection performance is difficult to quantify, the information and the opening degree in local party and government leaders' environmental protection performance management is low, the fundamental research and the practice in environment protection performance management of local party and government leader is insufficient, the environment protection performance management of local party and government leaders lacks corresponding management foundation work support ; so on.
This research focused on the relation among the local party and government leader, the environment protection, the performances management three relations. Based on the theories related to environment management science, the administrative management science, the human resources management science, the management science and so on, the literature analytic method, the synthesis methodology, the comparison methodology, the system analytic method, the method which unified theory with practice are adopted to perfect the Environment protection Performance management mechanism of Local Party and Government leaders. Making the local party and government leaders' real return be consistent with their environment protection efforts to guarantee the local party and government leader to fulfill environment protection responsibility consciously in the environment protection management practice.
This research is founded on the experience of strategy-oriented corporate performance management. With the utilization of system administration method, this research proposed the party and government leaders environment protection performances management pattern based on the local government environmental protection strategy plan. Based on the analysis from the stakeholders theory, this reach has put forward the concrete proposal on how to construct the appraiser of local party and government environmental protection performance management. According to the key performances indicator method' s design procedure, this research has proposed the indicators system design method and procedure of local party and government environmental protection performance management. The conclusions of this research are of important theory and the practice significance in:
transforming the environmental protection management idea of the local party and government leader, constructing the local party and government environment protection performances management theory system, developing the incentive and restriction mechanism of environment protection performance management of local party and government leaders. drive and restraint mechanism, strengthening Environment protection Performance management of local party and government leaders, standarding the environmental protection behavior of local party and government leader, improving the environmental protection service of local party and government leaders, reaching the national goal of energy conservation and contamination reduction, improving the environment protection performances of local party and government leaders, and enhancing the public' s satisfaction about local government's environmental protection performances management.
The full dissertation includes eight chapters; its primary content is as follows:
1. it has outlined present situation, the prospect, the goal and the significance of local party and government leader performances management, summarized domestic and foreign researches related to this study, has put forward the method, the content, the framework, and the possible innovations.
2. it has outlined many basic theories closely related to local party and government leader' performances management, such as the system theory, the cybernetics, information theory, goal management theory, agent theory and stakeholder theory; has elaborated these basic theories' instruction function on the Environment protection Performance management of Local Party and Government leaders.
3. has outlined present situation of environment protection performance management of local party and government leadership, has specially analyzed the problems of local party and government leader performances management in our country and their reason; this has provided the analysis foundation for following local party and government leaders' environmental protection performance management system construction.
4. It has pointed out the guiding idea environment protection performance management system design of local party and government leaders; has given environment protection performance management system framework of Local Party and Government leaders from systematic perspective; designed the goal system of local government environment protection strategy and the performance indicator system, the process system, and the result utilization system of environment protection performance management of local party and government leaders and their logical relational graphs.
5. According the main body model, it has analyzed the stakeholders of local party and government leaders' environmental protection performance, and then constructed a more comprehensive appraisers system of local party and government leaders' environmental protection performance based on this foundation. According to the design procedure of key performances indicators, it has designed a more scientific and reasonable environment protection performances indicators of local party and government leaders based on the local government environment protection strategy. According to the principles of system optimization, objectivity, reasonable content, it has consummated the local party and government leaders' environmental protection performance appraising weight system and its performance indicator system.
6. This research has elaborated the plan formulation, counselation and implementation, and the assessment and result feedback procedure system of local party and government leaders' environment protection performance from system inspective.
7. This research has studied the function and the essential rules of local party and government leaders' environmental protection performance management. discusses the system arrangement of environment protection performance of local party and government leaders, such as the result utilization and the inspection appeal mechanism, and so on. Through the establishment and the perfection of local party and government leaders' environmental protection performance management organizations and agencies and so on, provides the regular system for the operation Environment protection Performance management of Local Party and Government leaders good movement.
8. At the end, the dissertation summarizes the contents and indicate the deficiencies of this paper, and proposes the promising fields within which the further research would be conducted. The important innovative fruits in this paper show as the followings:
Through inspects model by using the stakeholders theory and model of the main body, this study has analyzed the stakeholders to local party and government leaders' environmental protection performance, pointed out that the main inspection bodies of local party and government leaders' environmental protection performance include the local party and government leaders, the public, all levels of governments, specialized appraisal organizations, National People' s Congress, media and expert.
According to the design procedure of key performance, this study distills the key success factor and key indicator of local government environmental protection performance management with brains storm firstly. Then by using of the analytical table of strategic objectives relation, connect the strategy plan goal, the key success factor of local government environmental protection, the key performance indicator of local government level environmental protection with various departments.
Then determine indicators that various departments should undertake in the local government environmental protection strategy plan. Finally decomposes the environmental protect performance indicators of local government and department into that of local party and government leaders' with the fish bones chart. The entire process guaranteed the local government environmental protection strategy plan goals to be carried out by the special related local party and government leaders.
Through synthetically utilizing management of objective (MBO), and the method of key performance indicator (KPI), strategy management, and 360 degree feedback method, taking full advantage of the strongpoint of different management methods and making up its insufficiency this research design a environmental protection performance appraisal method of local party and government leaders based on the local government environmental protection strategy objective. And it has systematically applied different management methods into the entire process of environment protection performance management of local party and government leaders in the entire process.
这些地方党政领导在牺牲当地公众的环境利益,降低了经济成本的同时,却赢得了显赫的政绩,官运亨通,而那些注重长期效益,注重环境保护的地方党政领导则因近期效益难以显现而受到埋没。如果不能通过地方党政领导环保绩效管理的机制来对那些急功近利的地方党政领导环保行为予以禁止或惩罚,就不可能保持地方经济的可持续发展。
因此本研究在借鉴国内外相关研究的基础上,深入探究出地方党政领导环保绩效管理存在问题的根源为:地方党政领导环保绩效管理权力和行为缺乏有效监督和制衡机制,“科层制”结构普遍存在,考核主体缺乏独立性、代表性和广泛性,地方党政领导环保绩效产出难以量化,地方党政领导环保绩效的信息化及开放化程度低,地方党政领导环保绩效管理的理论研究和实践不够,地方党政领导环保绩效管理缺乏相应管理基础工作支撑等。
本研究围绕了地方党政领导、环境保护、绩效管理三者关系展开分析,运用环境管理学、行政管理学、人力资源管理学、管理科学等有关原理,采用文献分析法、综合研究法、比较研究法、系统分析法、理论与实践相结合的方法来完善地方党政领导环保绩效管理的机制,使地方党政领导的环境行为与实际收益成正比,以此来确保地方党政领导在环保绩效管理的实践中自觉地履行自己的环保职责。
本研究结合企业基于战略导向的绩效管理经验,运用系统管理的方法,提出了基于地方政府环保战略规划的党政领导环保绩效管理模式;从利益相关者理论进行分析,就如何构建地方党政环保绩效考核主体提出了具体的建议;根据关键绩效指标法的设计步骤,提出了地方党政环保绩效考核指标体系的设计方法及步骤。研究结论对转变地方党政领导的环保管理理念,构建地方党政环保绩效管理理论体系,形成系统的地方党政领导环保绩效管理的激励与约束机制,加强地方党政领导环保绩效管理,规范地方党政领导环保行为,改进地方党政领导环保服务水平,确保国家节能减排目标的实现,提高地方党政领导的环保绩效和公众对地方政府的环保绩效管理满意度具有重要的理论与实践意义。
全文共分八章,其主要内容如下:
1、概述了地方党政领导绩效管理的现状、前景、目的和意义,综述了国内外与此方向相关的研究现状,给出了研究的思路、方法、内容、可能的创新点。
2、概述了与地方党政领导绩效管理密切联系的系统论、控制论、信息论、目标管理理论、委托代理理论和利益相关者理论等基础理论,着重论述这些基础理论对地方党政领导环保绩效管理的指导作用。
3、概述了地方党政领导环保绩效管理现状,重点分析了目前我国地方党政领导绩效管理中存在的问题及其原因,为下面的地方党政领导环保绩效管理体系架构提供了分析基础。
4、明确了地方党政领导环保绩效管理体系设计的指导思想,从系统学的角度给出了地方党政领导环保绩效管理体系架构,设计出了地方政府环保战略规划目标系统、党政领导环保绩效考核指标系统、党政领导环保绩效管理过程系统和党政领导环保管理结果运用系统之间的逻辑关系图。
5、根据利益相关者考核主体模型,分析了地方党政领导环保绩效的利益相关者,以此为基础构建出了较为全面系统的地方党政领导环保绩效考核主体;按照关键绩效指标的步骤设计出了较为科学合理且又是基于地方政府环保战略规划目标的党政领导环保绩效考核指标;在系统最优、客观性、内容先进合理等原则的指导下,完善了地方党政领导环保绩效考核权重体系和指标标准体系。
6、从系统的角度论述了地方党政领导环保绩效计划的制定,地方党政领导环保绩效辅导与实施,地方党政领导环保绩效考核和地方党政领导环保绩效考核结果的反馈等过程体系。设计出了较为科学合理且又基于地方政府环保战略规划的地方党政领导环保绩效管理过程体系。
7、研究了地方党政领导环保绩效管理制度的本质规律、对绩效管理的重要作用,从地方党政领导环保绩效考核结果的运用和考核申诉机制两大方面探讨地方党政领导环保绩效管理的制度安排,建立和健全地方党政领导环保绩效管理组织机构等,为地方党政领导环保绩效管理的良好运行提供规则体系。
8、对本研究所取得的一些初步性成果以及相关的研究局限与不足进行了总结,并对其实践应用价值以及未来进一步研究的方向进行了展望。
本研究是建立在众多前人研究成果的基础上的,但同时,本研究自身又有一些创新之处,主要创新点体现在以下几个方面:
通过运用利益相关者理论和利益相关者考核主体分析模型来对地方党政领导环保绩效考核的利益相关者进行深入分析,明确了地方党政领导本人、公众、各级政府、专业评估机构、人大、媒体和专家等地方党政领导环保绩效考核主体。
根据关键绩效指标的步骤,首先运用头脑风暴法等提取地方政府环保绩效管理关键成功因素和关键绩效指标;接着利用战略目标相关分析表将地方政府环保战略规划目标、关键成功因素、地方政府级环保关键绩效指标与各部门相连,确定各部门对地方政府环保战略规划目标所应该承担的指标;最后用鱼骨图法把地方政府和部门的关键绩效指标分解为党政领导的环保关键绩效指标。整个过程确保了地方政府环保战略规划目标落实到相关地方党政领导身上。
通过综合运用目标管理法、关键绩效指标法、战略管理法和360度反馈法等管理方法和工具,充分发挥不同管理方法的优势,弥补其不足,设计出了基于地方政府环保战略规划目标的党政领导环保绩效考核方法,较为系统地将不同管理方法综合应用到地方党政领导环保绩效管理的全过程中。
Since the 20th century, Our Government has unceasingly strengthened the management in environment protection performance of local party and government leaders. Since our country the local party and government leaders' environmental protection performance management is still in the starting stage, there are many problems. For example, environmental protection performance management deviates the goal of local government environmental protection strategy plan, the performance indicators lacks of scientificity and pertinency, the appraiser of performance is unitary and lacks participation from outside, the performance appraisement result is not used to full; the surveillance and the appeal mechanism are imperfect; performances communication is few, the environmental protection performances management system imperfect , and so on.
These problems lead local party and government leaders only to pursue the rate economy of rise, to maximize economic interest. at the same time. It causes many environmental problems at the same time. For example, loss of soils in large area, water deterioration and shrinkage of lakes, emissions of contamination exceed carrying capacity of environment, rivers that pass through cities are polluted widely, break flow of rivers, shortage of water resources, austere pollution of air and acid rain exist in many cities, harm of lasting organic contamination appears, areas of soil pollution are enlarging and pollution alongshore is getting more and more serious.
These local party and government leaders who give up the local public environmental benefit has won the prominent performances actually and reached a very successful official career, while these local party and government leaders who pay attention to long-term benefit and concentrate on environmental protection could not be elevated because the short-term performance is not good. If these leaders who eager for quick success and instant benefit cannot be forbidden and punished by management mechanism in environment protection performance of local party and government leaders, the sustainable development of local economy cannot be carried out.
Based on the domestic and foreign correlated research, this research tries to inquire into the root of problems in environment protection performance management of Local Party and government leaders. the power and behaviors in environment protection performance management of local party and government leaders lack of supervision and check & balance mechanism, the structure of bureaucracy universally exists, the appraiser of environmental performance lacks independence, representative and universality, the local party and government leaders' environmental protection performance is difficult to quantify, the information and the opening degree in local party and government leaders' environmental protection performance management is low, the fundamental research and the practice in environment protection performance management of local party and government leader is insufficient, the environment protection performance management of local party and government leaders lacks corresponding management foundation work support ; so on.
This research focused on the relation among the local party and government leader, the environment protection, the performances management three relations. Based on the theories related to environment management science, the administrative management science, the human resources management science, the management science and so on, the literature analytic method, the synthesis methodology, the comparison methodology, the system analytic method, the method which unified theory with practice are adopted to perfect the Environment protection Performance management mechanism of Local Party and Government leaders. Making the local party and government leaders' real return be consistent with their environment protection efforts to guarantee the local party and government leader to fulfill environment protection responsibility consciously in the environment protection management practice.
This research is founded on the experience of strategy-oriented corporate performance management. With the utilization of system administration method, this research proposed the party and government leaders environment protection performances management pattern based on the local government environmental protection strategy plan. Based on the analysis from the stakeholders theory, this reach has put forward the concrete proposal on how to construct the appraiser of local party and government environmental protection performance management. According to the key performances indicator method' s design procedure, this research has proposed the indicators system design method and procedure of local party and government environmental protection performance management. The conclusions of this research are of important theory and the practice significance in:
transforming the environmental protection management idea of the local party and government leader, constructing the local party and government environment protection performances management theory system, developing the incentive and restriction mechanism of environment protection performance management of local party and government leaders. drive and restraint mechanism, strengthening Environment protection Performance management of local party and government leaders, standarding the environmental protection behavior of local party and government leader, improving the environmental protection service of local party and government leaders, reaching the national goal of energy conservation and contamination reduction, improving the environment protection performances of local party and government leaders, and enhancing the public' s satisfaction about local government's environmental protection performances management.
The full dissertation includes eight chapters; its primary content is as follows:
1. it has outlined present situation, the prospect, the goal and the significance of local party and government leader performances management, summarized domestic and foreign researches related to this study, has put forward the method, the content, the framework, and the possible innovations.
2. it has outlined many basic theories closely related to local party and government leader' performances management, such as the system theory, the cybernetics, information theory, goal management theory, agent theory and stakeholder theory; has elaborated these basic theories' instruction function on the Environment protection Performance management of Local Party and Government leaders.
3. has outlined present situation of environment protection performance management of local party and government leadership, has specially analyzed the problems of local party and government leader performances management in our country and their reason; this has provided the analysis foundation for following local party and government leaders' environmental protection performance management system construction.
4. It has pointed out the guiding idea environment protection performance management system design of local party and government leaders; has given environment protection performance management system framework of Local Party and Government leaders from systematic perspective; designed the goal system of local government environment protection strategy and the performance indicator system, the process system, and the result utilization system of environment protection performance management of local party and government leaders and their logical relational graphs.
5. According the main body model, it has analyzed the stakeholders of local party and government leaders' environmental protection performance, and then constructed a more comprehensive appraisers system of local party and government leaders' environmental protection performance based on this foundation. According to the design procedure of key performances indicators, it has designed a more scientific and reasonable environment protection performances indicators of local party and government leaders based on the local government environment protection strategy. According to the principles of system optimization, objectivity, reasonable content, it has consummated the local party and government leaders' environmental protection performance appraising weight system and its performance indicator system.
6. This research has elaborated the plan formulation, counselation and implementation, and the assessment and result feedback procedure system of local party and government leaders' environment protection performance from system inspective.
7. This research has studied the function and the essential rules of local party and government leaders' environmental protection performance management. discusses the system arrangement of environment protection performance of local party and government leaders, such as the result utilization and the inspection appeal mechanism, and so on. Through the establishment and the perfection of local party and government leaders' environmental protection performance management organizations and agencies and so on, provides the regular system for the operation Environment protection Performance management of Local Party and Government leaders good movement.
8. At the end, the dissertation summarizes the contents and indicate the deficiencies of this paper, and proposes the promising fields within which the further research would be conducted. The important innovative fruits in this paper show as the followings:
Through inspects model by using the stakeholders theory and model of the main body, this study has analyzed the stakeholders to local party and government leaders' environmental protection performance, pointed out that the main inspection bodies of local party and government leaders' environmental protection performance include the local party and government leaders, the public, all levels of governments, specialized appraisal organizations, National People' s Congress, media and expert.
According to the design procedure of key performance, this study distills the key success factor and key indicator of local government environmental protection performance management with brains storm firstly. Then by using of the analytical table of strategic objectives relation, connect the strategy plan goal, the key success factor of local government environmental protection, the key performance indicator of local government level environmental protection with various departments.
Then determine indicators that various departments should undertake in the local government environmental protection strategy plan. Finally decomposes the environmental protect performance indicators of local government and department into that of local party and government leaders' with the fish bones chart. The entire process guaranteed the local government environmental protection strategy plan goals to be carried out by the special related local party and government leaders.
Through synthetically utilizing management of objective (MBO), and the method of key performance indicator (KPI), strategy management, and 360 degree feedback method, taking full advantage of the strongpoint of different management methods and making up its insufficiency this research design a environmental protection performance appraisal method of local party and government leaders based on the local government environmental protection strategy objective. And it has systematically applied different management methods into the entire process of environment protection performance management of local party and government leaders in the entire process.
引文
[1]Jackson, S. E. and Schuler , R.S. A. Meta-Analysis and Conceptual Critique of Rearch on Role Ambiguity and Role Conflict in Work Settings[J]. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1985, 16-78.
[2]Taylor, Paul, J, Pierce, Jon, L. Effect of Introducing a Performance Management System on Employee' s Subsequent Attitude and Effect [J]. Public Personnel Management. 1999, 2(3):423.
[3]Folger, R. Distributive and Procedural Justice: Combined Impact of" Voice" and Important on Experience Inequity[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1977,108—119.
[4]Tyler,T.R. Condition Leading to Value-Expressive in Judgments of Procedural Justice:A Test of Four Model [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1987, 333—344.
[5]Richard Heeks: Reinventing Government in the information age: international Practice in IT-enabled Public sector reform London[M]. New York:Routledge, 1999, 335.
[6]L K Ainsworth, A technique used to investigate the adequacy of safety management life cycle stage..Commissioning Human factors issues[J]. Business&Economics 1992, 397—208.
[7] Jay M. Shafritz, E. W. Russell. Introducing Pubic Administration[M]. New York:Longman, 2000, 273.
[8]Rogers, Edward W, Measuring Organization Performance in Strategic Human resource Management [J]. Human Resource Management Review, 1990, 311—331.
[9]DianaL. Deadrick. Performance Distributions: Measuring Employee Performance Using Total Quality Management Principles [J]. Journal of Quality Management, 2000, 4 (2): 25-241.
[10]Baker, Incentive Contract and performance Management [J]. Joural of political Economy,1992,598-614.
[11]Jack Rabin W.Bartley Hildreth and Gerald J.Miller.Handbook of public Administration[M].New York:Marcel Dekker.1989.21.21.
[12]Osbome D.and T Gacbler:Reinventing Govem-ment.How the Enthe preneurial SpiritIs Transforming the public Sector From the School house to State house[M].Mass:Addison Wesley.1992 5.
[13]Hood Christopher.A public Management for all Sea-sons[J].Public Administration.1991.
[14]罗伯特.巴克沃谱.绩效管理[M].中国标准出版社.2000,1.
[15]Ainsworth & Richard S.Williams.业绩管理[M].东北财经大学出版社.2001.
[16]C.V.布朗和P.M.杰克逊:公共部门经济学[M].中国人民大学出版社.2000,4.
[17]欧文.E.休斯.公共管理导论[M].中国人民大学出版社,2001,9.
[18]帕特里夏·基利等.公共部门标杆管理:突破政府绩效的瓶颈[M].中国人民大学出版社.2002 7.
[19]马克.G波波维奇.创建高绩效政府组织:公共管理实用指南[M].中国人民大学出版社.2002,3.
[20]Halachmi,Arie.Government Reforms and Public Productivity:Do We Have All the Answers?[J].Work Study,1997,46(7):233-245.
[21]Halachmi,Arie.Community Disaster:Implication for management Midwest[J].Review of Public Administration,1978,12(4):71-279.
[22]Pual B.K.Reliefassistance to 1998 flood victims:a comparison of the Performance of the government and NGOs[J].The Geograpical Journal.2003,169(1):75-89.
[23]Ken S.Cavalluzzo.Competition,fee- for-service requirements and government Performance:evidence on the Federal Reserve[J].Journal of Accounting and Public Policy.2002,21(4-5):315-356.
[24][美]凯瑟琳·纽科默等:迎接业绩导向型政府的挑战[M],张梦中等译, 中山大学出版社,2003,123.
[25][美]阿里·哈拉契米:政府业绩与质量测评--问题与经验[M].张梦中、丁煌等译,中山大学出版社,2003,39-40.
[26][美]西奥多.·H·波伊斯特:公共与非营利组织绩效考评:方法与应用[M].肖呜政等译,中国人民大学出版社,2005,251-253.
[27]Thomas,J.C.Public Participation in Public Decisions[M].San Francisco:Josscy-Bass,1995.
[28]Sandersonl.Performance Management,Evaluation and Learning in 'Modern' Local Government[J].public administration.2001,79(2):297-313.
[29]David J.Bernstein.Local government measurement use to focus on performance And results[J].Evaluation and program planning.2001,24(1):95-101.
[30]Stivers,C."The Public Agency as a Polls:Active Citizenship in the Administrative State"[J].Administration and Society,Vol22,May 1990,86-105.
[31]Timney,M.M."Overcoming NIMBY:Using Citizen Participation Effectively." A paper presented at the 57th National Conference of the American Society for Public Administration[M].Atlanta,Georgia,1996.http://www.apecevalu.Org/Content/United states of America-1.htm.
[32]Stivers,C.The Public Agency as a Polis:Active Citizenship in the Administrative State[J].Administration and Society 1990,22.(May),86-105.
[33]Mitchell,J."representation in GovernmentCommittees[J].Public Administration Review.1997,57(2):160-167.
[34]Schay,B.w.Effencs of Performance-Contingent Pay on Employee Attitudes[J].Public Personnel Management,1985,237-250.
[35]Alexander,S,Ruderman,M.The Role of Procedural and Distributive Justice in Organizational Behaior[J].Social Justice Research.1987,177-198.
[36]Brockne,J,Wiesenfeld,B.M.An Integrative Framework for Explaining Reaction to Decision:Interactive Effects of Outcomes and Procedures[J].Psychological Bulletin,1996,189-208.
[37]戴维·奥斯本,彼德·普拉斯特里克.摒弃官僚制:政府再造的五项战略[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002,160.
[38]迈克尔·麦金尼斯.多中心治道与发展[M].上海:上海三联书店,2002,329.
[39]史蒂文·科恩,罗纳德·布兰德.政府全面质量管理-实施指南[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002,17-35.
[40]E.S.萨瓦斯.民营化与公司部门伙伴关系[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002.
[41]Quamrul Alma,John Pacher.ImPact of compulsory competitive tendering on the Stureture and Performance of local government systems in the State of Victoria[J].Public Administration and Development.2000,20(5):359-371.
[42]Pearce,J.L,Stevenson,W.B.and Perry,J.L,Managerial Compensation Basd on organization Performance:A Time Series Analysis of The Effects of Merit Pay[J].Academy of Management Journal,1985,261-278.
[43]Thierry,H.Payment by Result System:A Review of Research 1945-1985[J].Applied Psychology:An International Review 1987,91-108.
[44]Harford,J.D Firm behavior under imperfectly enforceable pollution standards and taxes[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1978,(1):26-3.
[45]Linder,S.H.,McBride,M.E..Enforcement Costs and Regulatory Reform:the Agency and Firm Responses[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1984,(11):327-346.
[46]Beavis,B.,Dobbs,I.Firm behavior under Regulatory Control of Stochastic Environmental Wastes By Probabilistic Constraints[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1987,(15):112-127.
[47]Magat,W.A.,Viscusi,W.K.Effectiveness of the EPA'S Regulatory Enforcement:the Case of Industrial Effluent Standards[J].Journal of Law and Economics,1990,(33):331-360.
[48]Laplante,B.,Rilstone,P.Environmental Inspections and Emissions of the Pulp and Paper Industry In Quebec[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1996,(31):19-36.
[49]Nadeau,L.W..EPA Effectiveness at Reducing the Duration of Plant -evel Noncompliance[J].Journal of Environmental Economies and Management,1997,(1):54-78.
[50]Dasgupta,S.,Laplante,B.,Mamingi,N.,Wang,H.Inspections,Pollution prices,and environmental performance:evidence from China [J].Ecological Economics,2001,(36):487-498.
[51]Deily,M.E.,Gray,W.B..Compliance and Enforcement:Air Pollution Regulation in the U.S.Steel Industry[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1996,(31):96-111.
[52]Robert S.Kaplan and David P.Norton,The Balanced Scorecard-Measures That Drive Performance[J].Harvard Business Review,January/February 1992:71-79.
[53]彼得.F.德鲁克等著.公司绩效测评[M].李焰、江娅译.北京.中国人民大学出版社.1999.
[54]Neely A.The performance measurement revolution:why now and what next[J].International Journal of Operations & Production Management,1999(19):205-228.
[55]Bacidore,J.M.,J.A.Boquist,T.T.Milbourn et al.The search for the best financial performance measure[J].Financial Analysts Journal, 1997.53(5/6):11-20.
[56]Jeffrey M.Bacidore,John A.Boquist,Todd T.Milbourn et al.The Search for the best Financial Performance Measure[J].Financial Analysis,1997(5):231-254.
[57]Dixon J R,Nanni A J,Vollmann T E.The new performance challenge-measuring operations for world-class competition[M].Dow Jones-Irwin.Homewood IL.1990.
[58]Ittner.C.,D.Larcker.Innovation in Performance Measurement:Trends and Research Implications[J].Journal of Managerial Accounting Reseach,1998:205-238.
[59]Banker.R.D.,G.Potter and D.Srinivasan.An Empirical Investigation of an Inventive Plan that Includes Donfinancial Performance Measures[J].The Accounting Review,2000.75(1):65-92.
[60]刘旭涛著.政府绩效管理-制度、战略与方法[M],北京:机械工业出版社,2003.
[61]卓越.公共部门绩效评估[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004:229.
[62]何力平.政府绩效分析的不同视角[J].中美公共管理杂志,2005(2):3-641.
[63]林群慧,乘势而生的政府环保绩效评估[J].环境经济杂志,2005(7):34-37.
[64]武玉英.行政效率的解析[J].中国行政管理,200l(3):20-22.
[65]彭国甫.什么是行政效率[J].中国行政管理,1986,(7).
[66]彭国甫.行政效益再探索[J].湘潭大学学报,1998(4):75-78.
[67]吴权伟.我国改革开放以来行政效率性质研究的综述[J].福建行政学院学报,2001(4):25-29.
[68]刘旭涛.政府绩效管理:制度、战略与方法[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2003,15.
[69]马春庆.为何用“行政效能”取代“行政效率”-兼论行政效能建设的内容和意义[J].中国行政管理,2003(4):28-30.
[70]彭国甫.对政府绩效评价几个基本问题的反思[J].湘潭大学学报,2004,(3):6-11.
[71]胡宁生等.中国政府形象战略[M].北京:中共中央党校出版社,1998,1030.
[72]卓越.公共部门绩效评估初探[J].中国行政管理,2004(2):71-76.
[73]陈共荣,曾峻.企业绩效评价主体的演进及其对绩效评价的影响[J].会计研究,2005(4):65-68.
[74]吴绍琪,冉景亮.政府绩效评估主体的研究[J].软科学,2006(6):66-68.
[75]王磊.对建立和完善政府绩效评估主体体系的思考[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(社会科学版),2005(4):332-333.
[76]陈国权,李志伟.从利益相关者的视角看政府绩效内涵与评估主体选择[J].改革与发展,2005(3):66-69.
[77]邱法宗,张霁星.关于地方政府绩效评估主体系统构建的几个问题[J].中国行政管理,2007(3):38-41.
[78]吴建南,阎波.谁是“最佳”的价值判断者:区县政府绩效评价机制的利益相关主体分析[J].管理评论,2006(4):46-59.
[79]吴建南,岳妮.利益相关性是否影响评价结果客观性:基于模拟实验的绩效评价主体选择研究[J].管理评论,2007(3):58-62.
[80]金竹青,王祖康.中国政府绩效评话主体结构特点及发展建议[J].国家行政学使学报,2007(6):30-33.
[81]曾友中,主体选择.地方政府绩效评估研究的视角及问题域[J].湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007(7):19-22.
[82]高洁.公共政策评估主体性原则思考[J].理论探索,2007(3):127-128.
[83]谢吉晨.政府绩效评估的“主体资格”探微[J].理论导刊,2007(3):49-51.
[84]侯洁,郭磊.中国公务员绩效评价主体多元化的构建[J].内肝科技,2007(10):62、125.
[85]王艳.从江苏万人评议政府谈政府绩效评估的主体的构建[J].辽宁行 政学院学报,2006(11):19、21.
[86]卓越.公共部门绩效评估的主体建构[J].中国行政管理,2004(5):17-20.
[87]包国宪,冉敏.政府绩效评价中不同主体的价值取向[J].甘肃社会科学,2007(1):103-105.
[88]付红梅.论政府绩效评估主体多元化[J].科教文汇,2006(7):109-110.
[89]王爱冬.政府绩效评估主体多元化及其在中国的构建[J].河北学刊,2006(11):67-70.
[90]刘义玲.论地方政府绩效考核的主体[J].江西教育学院学报(社会科学),2006(2):15-18.
[91]王萌林.我国政府绩效管理系统中民间评估主体的构建[D].南京师范大学硕士学位论文,2007(5):6-9.
[92]李国友.论构建和谐社会背景下地方政府领导政绩考核指标体系之建构[J].社会主义研究,2007(1):113-115.
[93]黄晓波,冯浩.环境绩效评价及其指标标准化方法探析[J].财会月刊,2007(1):28-29.
[94]贾妍妍.环境绩效评价指标体系初探[J].重庆工学院学报,2004(4):75-77.
[95]曹颖,张象枢,刘听.云南省环境绩效评估指标体系构建[J].环境保护,2006(1):61-63.
[96]唐任伍.2002年中国省级地方政府效率测度[J].中国行政管理,2004,(6):64-68.
[97]彭国甫.地方政府公共事业管理绩效评价指标体系研究[J].湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005(5):16-22.
[98]卢秀萍.领导干部政绩考核指标体系的重构[J].发展研究,2006(12):92-94.
[99]潘岳.环境保护指标与官员政绩考核[J].环境保护,2004(5):10-12.
[100]夏光,冯东方.党政领导干部环保绩效考核调研报告[J].环境保护,2005(2):46-51.
[101]杨林.党政领导干部绩效考核探索[J].北京支部生活,2006(1):22-23.
[102]李静江,吴小荧.环保指标与政府政绩考核[J].马克思主义与现实,2006(2):158一160.
[103]孙萍,王丹.论地方政府在环境保护中的角色定位[J].社会科学辑刊,2002(1):49-51.
[104]许庆明,朱海就.地方政府环保职能弱化的原因和对策研究[J].中国环境管理,2001(4):11-15.
[105]熊跃辉.国家环保总局官员坦言:地方环保部门作假严重[J].共产党员,2007,(3):52.
[106]潘岳.环保指标与官员政绩考核[J].环境经济杂志,2004(5):13-15.
[107]陈喜红.论政府在环境保护中的作用[J].环境科学与管理,2007,(1):17-20.
[108]汪涛,叶元煦.政府激励企业环境技术创新的初步研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,1998,(1):77-80.
[109]任远,马连敏.环境管理的社区运行机制[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2000,(10):20-23.
[110]马小明,赵月炜.环境管制政策的局限性与变革-自愿性环境政策的兴起[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2005,(6):19-23.
[111]孙学长.政府作为与资源环境可持续发展[J].经济体制改革,2006,(1):31-34.
[112]张一心,吴靖,朱坦.中国公众参与环境管理的研究[J].城市环境与城市生念,2005,(4):1-4.
[113]段钢.基于战略管理的绩效考评[M].机械工业出版社,2007(1):33-63.
[114]胡君辰,宋源.绩效管理[M].四川人民出版社,2008(3):35-38.
[115]周春梅.公共服务外包委托-代理问题研究[D].燕山大学硕士学位论文,2006(4):23-24.
[116]王志国.试论我国社区治理中的委托代理结构[D].东北大学硕士学位沦文,2006(1):12-18.
[117]钱仲帅.基于利益相关者的高管人员绩效评价研究[D].华中科技大学硕士学位论文,2006,(10):7-10.
[118]陈国权,李志伟.从利益相关者的视角看政府绩效内涵与评估主体选择[J].改革与发展,2005(3):66-69.
[119]李睿神.论德鲁克目标管理及其在行政管理中的应用[J].公共行政2006,(3):27-28.
[120]李业昆.绩效管理系统研究[M]华夏出版社,2007,(3):84-85.
[121]Zhoujingkun,Chenjihua,Liu zhonggang.Research on Party and Government Officials' Environment Protection Performance Management[C].The 4th Euro-Asia CSR and Environmental Management Conference-- Towards Sustainable Tourism,Hospitality and MICE Development,2008(9):112-116.
[122]祁光华,张定安.我国公共部门绩效管理问题分析[J].中国行政管理,2005,(8):40-43.
[123]章秀英.论我国政府绩效管理存在的问题及对策[J].行政与法,2005,(9):26-29.
[124]邓平.浅谈党政领导干部绩效考核问题[J].湖北行政学院学报,2007,(3):230-231.
[125]谭泽淳.当前党政机关干部考核存在的问题与对策[J].中共南宁市委党校学报,2004,(1):47-49.
[126]霍林,马意飞.绩效管理实施中的问题和解决办法[J].经济论坛,2006,(2):94-96.
[127]刘维佳,王翌.我国公务员绩效考核的问题及其对策分析[J].技术与市场,2007,(3):92-94.
[128]周晓玮.我国公务员绩效测评的困境与原因初探[J].理论探讨,2003,(3):22-23.
[129]曾维涛.我国公共部门绩效管理存在的问题及对策[J].四川行政学院学报,2006,(5):16-18.
[130]王喜明.论我国政府绩效管理中的问题及其克服[J].中共福建省委党 校学报,2005,(10)27-29.
[131]赵茜,郭沁.公共部门绩效评估理论研究中的问题及创新思路[J].现代商贸工业,2008,(2):54-55.
[132]钟金霞.地方政府绩效评估中存在的问题及矫治[J].湖湘论坛,2007,(2):86-87.
[133]段钢.基于战略管理的绩效考评[M].机械工业出版社,2007(1):102-107.
[134]周景坤,陈季华,刘中刚.地方党政领导环保绩效考核的多元化主体[J].环境保护与循环经济,2008,(12):56-57.
[135]Zhou jingkun,Chen jihua,Liu zhonggang.Holistic Key Performance Appraisal System for Construction Enterprises[C].The 5th International Conference on Innovation and Management.2008,(12):1950-1954.
[136]于小于.公共服务绩效考核理论探索与实践经验[M].北京理工大学出版社,2008,(7):118-119.
[137]林新奇.绩效管理手册[M].中国劳动社会保障出版社,2006,(8):42-44.
[138]付亚和,许玉林.绩效考核与绩效管理[M].电子工业出版社,2004,(12):95-96.
[139]王萍.考核与绩效管理[M]湖南师范大学出版社,2007,(8)40.
[140]郑方辉,张文方,李文彬.中国地方政府整体绩效评价理论方法与“广东试验”[M].中国经济出版社,2008,(10):243.
[141]武欣.绩效管理实务手册[M].机械工业出版社,2005,(5):96.
[142]武欣.绩效管理实务手册[M].机械工业出版社,2005,(5):99-108.
[143]胡君辰,宋源.绩效管理[M].四川人民出版社,2008,(3):85-86.
[144]付亚和,许玉林.绩效管理[M].复旦大学出版社,2005,(1):183-190.
[145]范柏乃.政府绩效评估与管理[M].复旦大学出版社,2007,(3):174-180.
[146]付亚和,许玉林.绩效管理[M].复旦大学出版社,2004,(12):139-145.
[147]钟小玲.关于干部绩效考核存在的问题与对策[J].武钢政工,2006,(6):38-40.
[148]吴冬梅.绩效考核实务[M].机械工业出版社,2008,(5):315-323.
[149]林新奇.绩效管理手册[M].中国劳动社会保障出版社,2006,(8):105-108.
[150]李丽琴.论我国公务员绩效考核中存在的问题及其对策[D].西安理工大学硕士学位论文,2007,(4):20-23.
[151]Flynn,F.J.,Chatman,F.A.Getting to know you:The influence of personality on impressions and performance of demographically different People in organizations[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2001,46(2):414-442.
[152]Folger,R,Konovsky,M.A.,cropanzano,R.A.Due Process Metaphor for Performance Appraisal[J].Research in Organization Behavior,1992,129-177.
[153]Meier,K.J.Regulation:Politics,Bureaucracy,and Economic s[M].Newyork:St.Martins Press,1985.
[154]Wang Hua.Industrial Ownership and Environmental Performanee:Evidence from china[C].policy Research Working PaPer Series2936,World Bank,Washington DC,2002,12.
[155]Taylor,M.S.Tracy,K.B,Renard.Due Process in Performance Appraisal:A Quasi-experiment in Procedural Justice[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1994,495-523.
[156]Williams,D.W.Measuring government in the Early Twentieth Century[J],Public Administration Review,2003,6
[157]Christopher Pollitt,Xavier Girre,Jere my Lonsdate,Robert Mul,Hilkka Summa,Marit Waerness,Performance or Compliance N Performance Audit and Pubic Management in Five Countries[M].Oxford University Press,1999
[158]Dall W.Forsy.The Managing Performance in American Government[M]. The Rockefeller Institute Press. 2001
[159] John Formby: The Australian government's experience with environmental impact assessment [J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Volume 7, Issue 3, September 1987
[160] Theodore H. Poister. Performance Measurement in Municipal Government: Assessing The State of the Practice[J]. Public Administration Review, 1999
[161] Rogers. Garry. National Performance Review's Government reinvention[M]. Dissertation, 2000
[162] Katheine Willoughby, The State of the State: Performance-Based Budgeting Requirements in 47 out of 50[J]. Public Administration Review, 1998
[163] Poister, T.H.& Streib, G. Performance assortment in municipal government: Assessing the state of the practice[J]. Public Administration Review, 1999
[164] Anna Forsberg, Fredrik von Malmborg: Tools for environmental assessment of the built environment [J], Building and Environment, 2004, 39.
[165] Colquitt, J. A., On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001,86.
[166] Inglis, S, and Cleave, S., A Scale to Assess Board Member Motivations in Nonprofit Organizations[J]. Nonprofit Management& Leadership, 2006, 17.
[167] John F. Tomera,, Thomas R. Sadlerb: Why we need a commitment approach to environmental policy [J], Ecological economics, 1997, 62.
[168] David J. Bernstein: Local government measurement use to focus on performance and results [J]. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2001, 24.
[169] Kay Leng Ng, Jeffrey Philip Obbard: Strategic environmental assessment in Hong Kong [J]. Environment International, 2005,31.
[170] Peter N. Duinker, Scenario analysis in environmental impact assessment:Improving explorations of the future[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2007, 27.
[171]Feldman, J, M. Beyond Attribution Theory Cognitive Processes in Performance Appraisal[J].Jounal of Applied Psychology, 1981 , 127-148.
[172]Silverman, S. B, Wexley, K. N. Reaction of Employees to Performance Appraisal Interviews As a Function of Their Participation in Rating Scale Development[J]. Personal Psychology.1984,703-710.
[173] Brown, Karin, and Phillip B. Coulter, "Subjective and Objective Measures of Police Service Delivery" [J]. Public Administration Review Vol. 43, No. 1, 1983.
[174]Brian Stipak, "Citizen Satisfaction With Urban Services: Potential Misuse as a Performance Indicator" [J]. Public Administration Review, Jan/Feb, 1979.
[175]Fornell, Claes, Michael D.Johnson,Eugene W. Anderson, Jaesung Cha, &Barbara Everitt Bryant, "The American Costomer Satisfaction Inex:Nature, Purpose, and findings" [J]. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 60 Oct 1996.
[176]Mark A Glaser, Robert B Denhardt, "Local government Performance through the eyes of citizens" [J]. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting&Financial Management, No. 1, 2000, 49-61.
[177] Brit Salbu : Speciation of radionuclides e analytical challenges within environmental impact and risk assessments [J].Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2007,96.
[178]David Swindell, Janet M Kell. "Linking citizen satisfaction data to performance measures:A preliminary examination" [J]. Pubic Performance & Management Review.No.9,2000,30-53.
[179]Kun-min Zhang,Zong-guo Wen:Review and challenges of policies of environmental protection and sustainable development in China [J].Journal of Environmental Management,2007,8.
[180]HE Gui-zhen,LU Yong-long,MA Hua,WANG Xiao-long:Multi-indicator assessment of water environment in government environmental auditing[J].Journal of Environmental Sciences,2007,19.
[181]李建涛.宝硕管材公司战略导向绩效管理体系设计研究[D].大连理工大学硕士学位论文,2004,(6):19-40.
[182]苑志钢.我国政府绩效管理中存在问题及对策分析[J].新乡教育学院学报,2007,(12):4-5.
[183]刘尚娴、刘爱莲.试论我国政府部门绩效管理问题[J].现代管理科学,2007,(1)27-28.
[202]范铁中、祖国华.我国地方政府绩效评估存在的问题及其对策思考[J].吉林师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2007,(12):92-94.
[184]吴卫、张徽燕.我国公务员绩效考核中的问题和对策分析[J].云南行政学院学报,2006,(2):93-95.
[185]刘昕.我国政府绩效管理中亟待梳理的几个关键问题[J].中国行政管理,2007,(4):37-39.
[186]董华.政府部门建立新型绩效考评体系研究:问题、偏差与现实路径[J].甘肃社会科学,2007,(6):217-219.
[187]王中江.政府绩效管理前沿问题研究[J].科技情报开发与经济,2006,(6):132-134.
[188]李芝山.绩效管理失败原因面面观[J].RENCAI ZI YUANKAI FA,2006,(5):24-25.
[189]李志伟.政府绩效评价的主体选择与体制构建[D].浙江大学硕士论文,2005,(11):25-35.
[190]杨娜,陈建军.电力企业战略绩效管理体系构建研究[J].中国电力教 育,2007,(6):115-117.
[191]谢凤华,彭国甫.基于战略能力的政府绩效评估体系构建研究[J].科技管理研究,2006,(12):184-186.
[192]贺妍,李颖琦,吴向阳,柴庆孚.企业应建立以战略为导向的绩效评价体系[J].管理宝鉴,2006,(2):55-57.
[193]王化冰.完善绩效管理促进战略实施[J].现代管理科学,2004,(8):73-74.
[194]尹文嘉.战略管理思想在公共部门组织绩效评估中的应用[J].天水行政学院学报,2007,(1):47-49.
[195]王群峰.政府部门战略绩效管理模式构建[J].商业时代,2008,(13):59-60.
[196]封子政.创建战略导向绩效管理体系的思考与实践[J].经济与管理,2004,(2):91-92.
[197]张建.战略人力资源管理对组织绩效的影响研究[D].山东大学硕士学位论文,2005,(3):23-36.
[198]于景伟.基于战略的企业集团绩效评价体系研究[D].天津大学硕士学位论文,2003,(12):18-26.
[199]洪玉珍.以战略为导向的绩效管理模型研究[D].大连理工大学硕士学位论文,2003,(3):20-28.
[200]刘蕊.如何进行绩效管理[M].北京大学出版社,2003,(12).
[201]张宝莉,徐玉新.环境管理与规划[M].中国环境科学出版社,2004,(9)
[202]霍斯特·西伯特.环境经济学[M].中国林业出版社,2002,(1).
[203]农卓恩.环境污染破坏现象的经济学解释[M].广西人民出版社,2004 3
[204]王玉振.环境绩效评估与环境报告书[M].化学工业出版社,2006,2.
[205]徐斌.绩效管理[M].中国劳动社会保障出版社,2007,4.
[206]王怀明.绩效管理[M].山东人民出版社,2004,6.
[207]张晓彤.绩效管理实务[M].北京大学出版社,2005,4.
[208]林新奇.环境管理手册[M].中国劳动社会保障出版社,2006,8.
[209]田刚.环境影响评价典型实例[M].化学工业出版社,2002,1.
[210]金腊华,邓家泉,吴小明.环境评价方法与实践[M].化学工业出版社,2004,3.
[211]尹奎革.基于战略的大庆油田创业集团绩效管理研究[D].天津大学硕士学位论文,2006,(1):25-59.
[212]李红卫.战略导向绩效管理体系的研究[D].西安理工大学硕士学位论文,2004,(9):11-84.
[213]冯田军.XT公司基于战略的绩效管理体系研究[D].西安理工大学硕士学位论文,2006,(3):15-55.
[214]田芳.电力企业战略绩效管理体系设计[D].天津大学硕士学位论文,2005,(12):19-51.
[215]黄晓.国有建筑施工企业全方位关键绩效指标体系设计[D].西南交通大学硕士学位论文,2004,(5):18-39.
[216]柴立元,何德文.环境影响评价学[M].中南大学出版社,2006,1.
[217]周团结.山特维克传动系统有限公司战略绩效管理体系研究[D].山东大学硕士学位论文,2007,(3):16-50.
[218]肖海舟.基于企业战略的绩效管理体系设计[D].天津大学硕士学位论文,2005,(12):19-47.
[219]王洋.云天公司以战略为导向的绩效管理系统分析与设侧[D].西北大学硕士学位论文,2004,(5):7-38.
[220]范玲.山东胜利股份有限公司战略导向的绩效管理体系建设[D].山东大学硕士学位论文,2006,(9):57-80.
[221]王玉振.环境绩效评估与环境报告书[M].化学工业出版社,2006,2.
[222]胡二邦.环境风险评价实用技术和方法[M].中国环境科学出版社,2000,1.
[223]奚旦立.环境与可持续发展[M].高等教育出版社,1999.
[224]国家环境保护总局环境工程评估中心编.环境影响评价技术方法[M].中国环境科学出版社,2005,1.
[225]曾思育.环境管理与社会科学研究方法[M].清华大学出版社,2004,(9)
[226]叶文虎.环境管理学[M].高等教育出版社,2000,6.
[2]Taylor, Paul, J, Pierce, Jon, L. Effect of Introducing a Performance Management System on Employee' s Subsequent Attitude and Effect [J]. Public Personnel Management. 1999, 2(3):423.
[3]Folger, R. Distributive and Procedural Justice: Combined Impact of" Voice" and Important on Experience Inequity[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1977,108—119.
[4]Tyler,T.R. Condition Leading to Value-Expressive in Judgments of Procedural Justice:A Test of Four Model [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1987, 333—344.
[5]Richard Heeks: Reinventing Government in the information age: international Practice in IT-enabled Public sector reform London[M]. New York:Routledge, 1999, 335.
[6]L K Ainsworth, A technique used to investigate the adequacy of safety management life cycle stage..Commissioning Human factors issues[J]. Business&Economics 1992, 397—208.
[7] Jay M. Shafritz, E. W. Russell. Introducing Pubic Administration[M]. New York:Longman, 2000, 273.
[8]Rogers, Edward W, Measuring Organization Performance in Strategic Human resource Management [J]. Human Resource Management Review, 1990, 311—331.
[9]DianaL. Deadrick. Performance Distributions: Measuring Employee Performance Using Total Quality Management Principles [J]. Journal of Quality Management, 2000, 4 (2): 25-241.
[10]Baker, Incentive Contract and performance Management [J]. Joural of political Economy,1992,598-614.
[11]Jack Rabin W.Bartley Hildreth and Gerald J.Miller.Handbook of public Administration[M].New York:Marcel Dekker.1989.21.21.
[12]Osbome D.and T Gacbler:Reinventing Govem-ment.How the Enthe preneurial SpiritIs Transforming the public Sector From the School house to State house[M].Mass:Addison Wesley.1992 5.
[13]Hood Christopher.A public Management for all Sea-sons[J].Public Administration.1991.
[14]罗伯特.巴克沃谱.绩效管理[M].中国标准出版社.2000,1.
[15]Ainsworth & Richard S.Williams.业绩管理[M].东北财经大学出版社.2001.
[16]C.V.布朗和P.M.杰克逊:公共部门经济学[M].中国人民大学出版社.2000,4.
[17]欧文.E.休斯.公共管理导论[M].中国人民大学出版社,2001,9.
[18]帕特里夏·基利等.公共部门标杆管理:突破政府绩效的瓶颈[M].中国人民大学出版社.2002 7.
[19]马克.G波波维奇.创建高绩效政府组织:公共管理实用指南[M].中国人民大学出版社.2002,3.
[20]Halachmi,Arie.Government Reforms and Public Productivity:Do We Have All the Answers?[J].Work Study,1997,46(7):233-245.
[21]Halachmi,Arie.Community Disaster:Implication for management Midwest[J].Review of Public Administration,1978,12(4):71-279.
[22]Pual B.K.Reliefassistance to 1998 flood victims:a comparison of the Performance of the government and NGOs[J].The Geograpical Journal.2003,169(1):75-89.
[23]Ken S.Cavalluzzo.Competition,fee- for-service requirements and government Performance:evidence on the Federal Reserve[J].Journal of Accounting and Public Policy.2002,21(4-5):315-356.
[24][美]凯瑟琳·纽科默等:迎接业绩导向型政府的挑战[M],张梦中等译, 中山大学出版社,2003,123.
[25][美]阿里·哈拉契米:政府业绩与质量测评--问题与经验[M].张梦中、丁煌等译,中山大学出版社,2003,39-40.
[26][美]西奥多.·H·波伊斯特:公共与非营利组织绩效考评:方法与应用[M].肖呜政等译,中国人民大学出版社,2005,251-253.
[27]Thomas,J.C.Public Participation in Public Decisions[M].San Francisco:Josscy-Bass,1995.
[28]Sandersonl.Performance Management,Evaluation and Learning in 'Modern' Local Government[J].public administration.2001,79(2):297-313.
[29]David J.Bernstein.Local government measurement use to focus on performance And results[J].Evaluation and program planning.2001,24(1):95-101.
[30]Stivers,C."The Public Agency as a Polls:Active Citizenship in the Administrative State"[J].Administration and Society,Vol22,May 1990,86-105.
[31]Timney,M.M."Overcoming NIMBY:Using Citizen Participation Effectively." A paper presented at the 57th National Conference of the American Society for Public Administration[M].Atlanta,Georgia,1996.http://www.apecevalu.Org/Content/United states of America-1.htm.
[32]Stivers,C.The Public Agency as a Polis:Active Citizenship in the Administrative State[J].Administration and Society 1990,22.(May),86-105.
[33]Mitchell,J."representation in GovernmentCommittees[J].Public Administration Review.1997,57(2):160-167.
[34]Schay,B.w.Effencs of Performance-Contingent Pay on Employee Attitudes[J].Public Personnel Management,1985,237-250.
[35]Alexander,S,Ruderman,M.The Role of Procedural and Distributive Justice in Organizational Behaior[J].Social Justice Research.1987,177-198.
[36]Brockne,J,Wiesenfeld,B.M.An Integrative Framework for Explaining Reaction to Decision:Interactive Effects of Outcomes and Procedures[J].Psychological Bulletin,1996,189-208.
[37]戴维·奥斯本,彼德·普拉斯特里克.摒弃官僚制:政府再造的五项战略[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002,160.
[38]迈克尔·麦金尼斯.多中心治道与发展[M].上海:上海三联书店,2002,329.
[39]史蒂文·科恩,罗纳德·布兰德.政府全面质量管理-实施指南[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002,17-35.
[40]E.S.萨瓦斯.民营化与公司部门伙伴关系[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002.
[41]Quamrul Alma,John Pacher.ImPact of compulsory competitive tendering on the Stureture and Performance of local government systems in the State of Victoria[J].Public Administration and Development.2000,20(5):359-371.
[42]Pearce,J.L,Stevenson,W.B.and Perry,J.L,Managerial Compensation Basd on organization Performance:A Time Series Analysis of The Effects of Merit Pay[J].Academy of Management Journal,1985,261-278.
[43]Thierry,H.Payment by Result System:A Review of Research 1945-1985[J].Applied Psychology:An International Review 1987,91-108.
[44]Harford,J.D Firm behavior under imperfectly enforceable pollution standards and taxes[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1978,(1):26-3.
[45]Linder,S.H.,McBride,M.E..Enforcement Costs and Regulatory Reform:the Agency and Firm Responses[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1984,(11):327-346.
[46]Beavis,B.,Dobbs,I.Firm behavior under Regulatory Control of Stochastic Environmental Wastes By Probabilistic Constraints[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1987,(15):112-127.
[47]Magat,W.A.,Viscusi,W.K.Effectiveness of the EPA'S Regulatory Enforcement:the Case of Industrial Effluent Standards[J].Journal of Law and Economics,1990,(33):331-360.
[48]Laplante,B.,Rilstone,P.Environmental Inspections and Emissions of the Pulp and Paper Industry In Quebec[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1996,(31):19-36.
[49]Nadeau,L.W..EPA Effectiveness at Reducing the Duration of Plant -evel Noncompliance[J].Journal of Environmental Economies and Management,1997,(1):54-78.
[50]Dasgupta,S.,Laplante,B.,Mamingi,N.,Wang,H.Inspections,Pollution prices,and environmental performance:evidence from China [J].Ecological Economics,2001,(36):487-498.
[51]Deily,M.E.,Gray,W.B..Compliance and Enforcement:Air Pollution Regulation in the U.S.Steel Industry[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1996,(31):96-111.
[52]Robert S.Kaplan and David P.Norton,The Balanced Scorecard-Measures That Drive Performance[J].Harvard Business Review,January/February 1992:71-79.
[53]彼得.F.德鲁克等著.公司绩效测评[M].李焰、江娅译.北京.中国人民大学出版社.1999.
[54]Neely A.The performance measurement revolution:why now and what next[J].International Journal of Operations & Production Management,1999(19):205-228.
[55]Bacidore,J.M.,J.A.Boquist,T.T.Milbourn et al.The search for the best financial performance measure[J].Financial Analysts Journal, 1997.53(5/6):11-20.
[56]Jeffrey M.Bacidore,John A.Boquist,Todd T.Milbourn et al.The Search for the best Financial Performance Measure[J].Financial Analysis,1997(5):231-254.
[57]Dixon J R,Nanni A J,Vollmann T E.The new performance challenge-measuring operations for world-class competition[M].Dow Jones-Irwin.Homewood IL.1990.
[58]Ittner.C.,D.Larcker.Innovation in Performance Measurement:Trends and Research Implications[J].Journal of Managerial Accounting Reseach,1998:205-238.
[59]Banker.R.D.,G.Potter and D.Srinivasan.An Empirical Investigation of an Inventive Plan that Includes Donfinancial Performance Measures[J].The Accounting Review,2000.75(1):65-92.
[60]刘旭涛著.政府绩效管理-制度、战略与方法[M],北京:机械工业出版社,2003.
[61]卓越.公共部门绩效评估[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004:229.
[62]何力平.政府绩效分析的不同视角[J].中美公共管理杂志,2005(2):3-641.
[63]林群慧,乘势而生的政府环保绩效评估[J].环境经济杂志,2005(7):34-37.
[64]武玉英.行政效率的解析[J].中国行政管理,200l(3):20-22.
[65]彭国甫.什么是行政效率[J].中国行政管理,1986,(7).
[66]彭国甫.行政效益再探索[J].湘潭大学学报,1998(4):75-78.
[67]吴权伟.我国改革开放以来行政效率性质研究的综述[J].福建行政学院学报,2001(4):25-29.
[68]刘旭涛.政府绩效管理:制度、战略与方法[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2003,15.
[69]马春庆.为何用“行政效能”取代“行政效率”-兼论行政效能建设的内容和意义[J].中国行政管理,2003(4):28-30.
[70]彭国甫.对政府绩效评价几个基本问题的反思[J].湘潭大学学报,2004,(3):6-11.
[71]胡宁生等.中国政府形象战略[M].北京:中共中央党校出版社,1998,1030.
[72]卓越.公共部门绩效评估初探[J].中国行政管理,2004(2):71-76.
[73]陈共荣,曾峻.企业绩效评价主体的演进及其对绩效评价的影响[J].会计研究,2005(4):65-68.
[74]吴绍琪,冉景亮.政府绩效评估主体的研究[J].软科学,2006(6):66-68.
[75]王磊.对建立和完善政府绩效评估主体体系的思考[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(社会科学版),2005(4):332-333.
[76]陈国权,李志伟.从利益相关者的视角看政府绩效内涵与评估主体选择[J].改革与发展,2005(3):66-69.
[77]邱法宗,张霁星.关于地方政府绩效评估主体系统构建的几个问题[J].中国行政管理,2007(3):38-41.
[78]吴建南,阎波.谁是“最佳”的价值判断者:区县政府绩效评价机制的利益相关主体分析[J].管理评论,2006(4):46-59.
[79]吴建南,岳妮.利益相关性是否影响评价结果客观性:基于模拟实验的绩效评价主体选择研究[J].管理评论,2007(3):58-62.
[80]金竹青,王祖康.中国政府绩效评话主体结构特点及发展建议[J].国家行政学使学报,2007(6):30-33.
[81]曾友中,主体选择.地方政府绩效评估研究的视角及问题域[J].湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007(7):19-22.
[82]高洁.公共政策评估主体性原则思考[J].理论探索,2007(3):127-128.
[83]谢吉晨.政府绩效评估的“主体资格”探微[J].理论导刊,2007(3):49-51.
[84]侯洁,郭磊.中国公务员绩效评价主体多元化的构建[J].内肝科技,2007(10):62、125.
[85]王艳.从江苏万人评议政府谈政府绩效评估的主体的构建[J].辽宁行 政学院学报,2006(11):19、21.
[86]卓越.公共部门绩效评估的主体建构[J].中国行政管理,2004(5):17-20.
[87]包国宪,冉敏.政府绩效评价中不同主体的价值取向[J].甘肃社会科学,2007(1):103-105.
[88]付红梅.论政府绩效评估主体多元化[J].科教文汇,2006(7):109-110.
[89]王爱冬.政府绩效评估主体多元化及其在中国的构建[J].河北学刊,2006(11):67-70.
[90]刘义玲.论地方政府绩效考核的主体[J].江西教育学院学报(社会科学),2006(2):15-18.
[91]王萌林.我国政府绩效管理系统中民间评估主体的构建[D].南京师范大学硕士学位论文,2007(5):6-9.
[92]李国友.论构建和谐社会背景下地方政府领导政绩考核指标体系之建构[J].社会主义研究,2007(1):113-115.
[93]黄晓波,冯浩.环境绩效评价及其指标标准化方法探析[J].财会月刊,2007(1):28-29.
[94]贾妍妍.环境绩效评价指标体系初探[J].重庆工学院学报,2004(4):75-77.
[95]曹颖,张象枢,刘听.云南省环境绩效评估指标体系构建[J].环境保护,2006(1):61-63.
[96]唐任伍.2002年中国省级地方政府效率测度[J].中国行政管理,2004,(6):64-68.
[97]彭国甫.地方政府公共事业管理绩效评价指标体系研究[J].湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005(5):16-22.
[98]卢秀萍.领导干部政绩考核指标体系的重构[J].发展研究,2006(12):92-94.
[99]潘岳.环境保护指标与官员政绩考核[J].环境保护,2004(5):10-12.
[100]夏光,冯东方.党政领导干部环保绩效考核调研报告[J].环境保护,2005(2):46-51.
[101]杨林.党政领导干部绩效考核探索[J].北京支部生活,2006(1):22-23.
[102]李静江,吴小荧.环保指标与政府政绩考核[J].马克思主义与现实,2006(2):158一160.
[103]孙萍,王丹.论地方政府在环境保护中的角色定位[J].社会科学辑刊,2002(1):49-51.
[104]许庆明,朱海就.地方政府环保职能弱化的原因和对策研究[J].中国环境管理,2001(4):11-15.
[105]熊跃辉.国家环保总局官员坦言:地方环保部门作假严重[J].共产党员,2007,(3):52.
[106]潘岳.环保指标与官员政绩考核[J].环境经济杂志,2004(5):13-15.
[107]陈喜红.论政府在环境保护中的作用[J].环境科学与管理,2007,(1):17-20.
[108]汪涛,叶元煦.政府激励企业环境技术创新的初步研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,1998,(1):77-80.
[109]任远,马连敏.环境管理的社区运行机制[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2000,(10):20-23.
[110]马小明,赵月炜.环境管制政策的局限性与变革-自愿性环境政策的兴起[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2005,(6):19-23.
[111]孙学长.政府作为与资源环境可持续发展[J].经济体制改革,2006,(1):31-34.
[112]张一心,吴靖,朱坦.中国公众参与环境管理的研究[J].城市环境与城市生念,2005,(4):1-4.
[113]段钢.基于战略管理的绩效考评[M].机械工业出版社,2007(1):33-63.
[114]胡君辰,宋源.绩效管理[M].四川人民出版社,2008(3):35-38.
[115]周春梅.公共服务外包委托-代理问题研究[D].燕山大学硕士学位论文,2006(4):23-24.
[116]王志国.试论我国社区治理中的委托代理结构[D].东北大学硕士学位沦文,2006(1):12-18.
[117]钱仲帅.基于利益相关者的高管人员绩效评价研究[D].华中科技大学硕士学位论文,2006,(10):7-10.
[118]陈国权,李志伟.从利益相关者的视角看政府绩效内涵与评估主体选择[J].改革与发展,2005(3):66-69.
[119]李睿神.论德鲁克目标管理及其在行政管理中的应用[J].公共行政2006,(3):27-28.
[120]李业昆.绩效管理系统研究[M]华夏出版社,2007,(3):84-85.
[121]Zhoujingkun,Chenjihua,Liu zhonggang.Research on Party and Government Officials' Environment Protection Performance Management[C].The 4th Euro-Asia CSR and Environmental Management Conference-- Towards Sustainable Tourism,Hospitality and MICE Development,2008(9):112-116.
[122]祁光华,张定安.我国公共部门绩效管理问题分析[J].中国行政管理,2005,(8):40-43.
[123]章秀英.论我国政府绩效管理存在的问题及对策[J].行政与法,2005,(9):26-29.
[124]邓平.浅谈党政领导干部绩效考核问题[J].湖北行政学院学报,2007,(3):230-231.
[125]谭泽淳.当前党政机关干部考核存在的问题与对策[J].中共南宁市委党校学报,2004,(1):47-49.
[126]霍林,马意飞.绩效管理实施中的问题和解决办法[J].经济论坛,2006,(2):94-96.
[127]刘维佳,王翌.我国公务员绩效考核的问题及其对策分析[J].技术与市场,2007,(3):92-94.
[128]周晓玮.我国公务员绩效测评的困境与原因初探[J].理论探讨,2003,(3):22-23.
[129]曾维涛.我国公共部门绩效管理存在的问题及对策[J].四川行政学院学报,2006,(5):16-18.
[130]王喜明.论我国政府绩效管理中的问题及其克服[J].中共福建省委党 校学报,2005,(10)27-29.
[131]赵茜,郭沁.公共部门绩效评估理论研究中的问题及创新思路[J].现代商贸工业,2008,(2):54-55.
[132]钟金霞.地方政府绩效评估中存在的问题及矫治[J].湖湘论坛,2007,(2):86-87.
[133]段钢.基于战略管理的绩效考评[M].机械工业出版社,2007(1):102-107.
[134]周景坤,陈季华,刘中刚.地方党政领导环保绩效考核的多元化主体[J].环境保护与循环经济,2008,(12):56-57.
[135]Zhou jingkun,Chen jihua,Liu zhonggang.Holistic Key Performance Appraisal System for Construction Enterprises[C].The 5th International Conference on Innovation and Management.2008,(12):1950-1954.
[136]于小于.公共服务绩效考核理论探索与实践经验[M].北京理工大学出版社,2008,(7):118-119.
[137]林新奇.绩效管理手册[M].中国劳动社会保障出版社,2006,(8):42-44.
[138]付亚和,许玉林.绩效考核与绩效管理[M].电子工业出版社,2004,(12):95-96.
[139]王萍.考核与绩效管理[M]湖南师范大学出版社,2007,(8)40.
[140]郑方辉,张文方,李文彬.中国地方政府整体绩效评价理论方法与“广东试验”[M].中国经济出版社,2008,(10):243.
[141]武欣.绩效管理实务手册[M].机械工业出版社,2005,(5):96.
[142]武欣.绩效管理实务手册[M].机械工业出版社,2005,(5):99-108.
[143]胡君辰,宋源.绩效管理[M].四川人民出版社,2008,(3):85-86.
[144]付亚和,许玉林.绩效管理[M].复旦大学出版社,2005,(1):183-190.
[145]范柏乃.政府绩效评估与管理[M].复旦大学出版社,2007,(3):174-180.
[146]付亚和,许玉林.绩效管理[M].复旦大学出版社,2004,(12):139-145.
[147]钟小玲.关于干部绩效考核存在的问题与对策[J].武钢政工,2006,(6):38-40.
[148]吴冬梅.绩效考核实务[M].机械工业出版社,2008,(5):315-323.
[149]林新奇.绩效管理手册[M].中国劳动社会保障出版社,2006,(8):105-108.
[150]李丽琴.论我国公务员绩效考核中存在的问题及其对策[D].西安理工大学硕士学位论文,2007,(4):20-23.
[151]Flynn,F.J.,Chatman,F.A.Getting to know you:The influence of personality on impressions and performance of demographically different People in organizations[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2001,46(2):414-442.
[152]Folger,R,Konovsky,M.A.,cropanzano,R.A.Due Process Metaphor for Performance Appraisal[J].Research in Organization Behavior,1992,129-177.
[153]Meier,K.J.Regulation:Politics,Bureaucracy,and Economic s[M].Newyork:St.Martins Press,1985.
[154]Wang Hua.Industrial Ownership and Environmental Performanee:Evidence from china[C].policy Research Working PaPer Series2936,World Bank,Washington DC,2002,12.
[155]Taylor,M.S.Tracy,K.B,Renard.Due Process in Performance Appraisal:A Quasi-experiment in Procedural Justice[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1994,495-523.
[156]Williams,D.W.Measuring government in the Early Twentieth Century[J],Public Administration Review,2003,6
[157]Christopher Pollitt,Xavier Girre,Jere my Lonsdate,Robert Mul,Hilkka Summa,Marit Waerness,Performance or Compliance N Performance Audit and Pubic Management in Five Countries[M].Oxford University Press,1999
[158]Dall W.Forsy.The Managing Performance in American Government[M]. The Rockefeller Institute Press. 2001
[159] John Formby: The Australian government's experience with environmental impact assessment [J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Volume 7, Issue 3, September 1987
[160] Theodore H. Poister. Performance Measurement in Municipal Government: Assessing The State of the Practice[J]. Public Administration Review, 1999
[161] Rogers. Garry. National Performance Review's Government reinvention[M]. Dissertation, 2000
[162] Katheine Willoughby, The State of the State: Performance-Based Budgeting Requirements in 47 out of 50[J]. Public Administration Review, 1998
[163] Poister, T.H.& Streib, G. Performance assortment in municipal government: Assessing the state of the practice[J]. Public Administration Review, 1999
[164] Anna Forsberg, Fredrik von Malmborg: Tools for environmental assessment of the built environment [J], Building and Environment, 2004, 39.
[165] Colquitt, J. A., On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001,86.
[166] Inglis, S, and Cleave, S., A Scale to Assess Board Member Motivations in Nonprofit Organizations[J]. Nonprofit Management& Leadership, 2006, 17.
[167] John F. Tomera,, Thomas R. Sadlerb: Why we need a commitment approach to environmental policy [J], Ecological economics, 1997, 62.
[168] David J. Bernstein: Local government measurement use to focus on performance and results [J]. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2001, 24.
[169] Kay Leng Ng, Jeffrey Philip Obbard: Strategic environmental assessment in Hong Kong [J]. Environment International, 2005,31.
[170] Peter N. Duinker, Scenario analysis in environmental impact assessment:Improving explorations of the future[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2007, 27.
[171]Feldman, J, M. Beyond Attribution Theory Cognitive Processes in Performance Appraisal[J].Jounal of Applied Psychology, 1981 , 127-148.
[172]Silverman, S. B, Wexley, K. N. Reaction of Employees to Performance Appraisal Interviews As a Function of Their Participation in Rating Scale Development[J]. Personal Psychology.1984,703-710.
[173] Brown, Karin, and Phillip B. Coulter, "Subjective and Objective Measures of Police Service Delivery" [J]. Public Administration Review Vol. 43, No. 1, 1983.
[174]Brian Stipak, "Citizen Satisfaction With Urban Services: Potential Misuse as a Performance Indicator" [J]. Public Administration Review, Jan/Feb, 1979.
[175]Fornell, Claes, Michael D.Johnson,Eugene W. Anderson, Jaesung Cha, &Barbara Everitt Bryant, "The American Costomer Satisfaction Inex:Nature, Purpose, and findings" [J]. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 60 Oct 1996.
[176]Mark A Glaser, Robert B Denhardt, "Local government Performance through the eyes of citizens" [J]. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting&Financial Management, No. 1, 2000, 49-61.
[177] Brit Salbu : Speciation of radionuclides e analytical challenges within environmental impact and risk assessments [J].Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2007,96.
[178]David Swindell, Janet M Kell. "Linking citizen satisfaction data to performance measures:A preliminary examination" [J]. Pubic Performance & Management Review.No.9,2000,30-53.
[179]Kun-min Zhang,Zong-guo Wen:Review and challenges of policies of environmental protection and sustainable development in China [J].Journal of Environmental Management,2007,8.
[180]HE Gui-zhen,LU Yong-long,MA Hua,WANG Xiao-long:Multi-indicator assessment of water environment in government environmental auditing[J].Journal of Environmental Sciences,2007,19.
[181]李建涛.宝硕管材公司战略导向绩效管理体系设计研究[D].大连理工大学硕士学位论文,2004,(6):19-40.
[182]苑志钢.我国政府绩效管理中存在问题及对策分析[J].新乡教育学院学报,2007,(12):4-5.
[183]刘尚娴、刘爱莲.试论我国政府部门绩效管理问题[J].现代管理科学,2007,(1)27-28.
[202]范铁中、祖国华.我国地方政府绩效评估存在的问题及其对策思考[J].吉林师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2007,(12):92-94.
[184]吴卫、张徽燕.我国公务员绩效考核中的问题和对策分析[J].云南行政学院学报,2006,(2):93-95.
[185]刘昕.我国政府绩效管理中亟待梳理的几个关键问题[J].中国行政管理,2007,(4):37-39.
[186]董华.政府部门建立新型绩效考评体系研究:问题、偏差与现实路径[J].甘肃社会科学,2007,(6):217-219.
[187]王中江.政府绩效管理前沿问题研究[J].科技情报开发与经济,2006,(6):132-134.
[188]李芝山.绩效管理失败原因面面观[J].RENCAI ZI YUANKAI FA,2006,(5):24-25.
[189]李志伟.政府绩效评价的主体选择与体制构建[D].浙江大学硕士论文,2005,(11):25-35.
[190]杨娜,陈建军.电力企业战略绩效管理体系构建研究[J].中国电力教 育,2007,(6):115-117.
[191]谢凤华,彭国甫.基于战略能力的政府绩效评估体系构建研究[J].科技管理研究,2006,(12):184-186.
[192]贺妍,李颖琦,吴向阳,柴庆孚.企业应建立以战略为导向的绩效评价体系[J].管理宝鉴,2006,(2):55-57.
[193]王化冰.完善绩效管理促进战略实施[J].现代管理科学,2004,(8):73-74.
[194]尹文嘉.战略管理思想在公共部门组织绩效评估中的应用[J].天水行政学院学报,2007,(1):47-49.
[195]王群峰.政府部门战略绩效管理模式构建[J].商业时代,2008,(13):59-60.
[196]封子政.创建战略导向绩效管理体系的思考与实践[J].经济与管理,2004,(2):91-92.
[197]张建.战略人力资源管理对组织绩效的影响研究[D].山东大学硕士学位论文,2005,(3):23-36.
[198]于景伟.基于战略的企业集团绩效评价体系研究[D].天津大学硕士学位论文,2003,(12):18-26.
[199]洪玉珍.以战略为导向的绩效管理模型研究[D].大连理工大学硕士学位论文,2003,(3):20-28.
[200]刘蕊.如何进行绩效管理[M].北京大学出版社,2003,(12).
[201]张宝莉,徐玉新.环境管理与规划[M].中国环境科学出版社,2004,(9)
[202]霍斯特·西伯特.环境经济学[M].中国林业出版社,2002,(1).
[203]农卓恩.环境污染破坏现象的经济学解释[M].广西人民出版社,2004 3
[204]王玉振.环境绩效评估与环境报告书[M].化学工业出版社,2006,2.
[205]徐斌.绩效管理[M].中国劳动社会保障出版社,2007,4.
[206]王怀明.绩效管理[M].山东人民出版社,2004,6.
[207]张晓彤.绩效管理实务[M].北京大学出版社,2005,4.
[208]林新奇.环境管理手册[M].中国劳动社会保障出版社,2006,8.
[209]田刚.环境影响评价典型实例[M].化学工业出版社,2002,1.
[210]金腊华,邓家泉,吴小明.环境评价方法与实践[M].化学工业出版社,2004,3.
[211]尹奎革.基于战略的大庆油田创业集团绩效管理研究[D].天津大学硕士学位论文,2006,(1):25-59.
[212]李红卫.战略导向绩效管理体系的研究[D].西安理工大学硕士学位论文,2004,(9):11-84.
[213]冯田军.XT公司基于战略的绩效管理体系研究[D].西安理工大学硕士学位论文,2006,(3):15-55.
[214]田芳.电力企业战略绩效管理体系设计[D].天津大学硕士学位论文,2005,(12):19-51.
[215]黄晓.国有建筑施工企业全方位关键绩效指标体系设计[D].西南交通大学硕士学位论文,2004,(5):18-39.
[216]柴立元,何德文.环境影响评价学[M].中南大学出版社,2006,1.
[217]周团结.山特维克传动系统有限公司战略绩效管理体系研究[D].山东大学硕士学位论文,2007,(3):16-50.
[218]肖海舟.基于企业战略的绩效管理体系设计[D].天津大学硕士学位论文,2005,(12):19-47.
[219]王洋.云天公司以战略为导向的绩效管理系统分析与设侧[D].西北大学硕士学位论文,2004,(5):7-38.
[220]范玲.山东胜利股份有限公司战略导向的绩效管理体系建设[D].山东大学硕士学位论文,2006,(9):57-80.
[221]王玉振.环境绩效评估与环境报告书[M].化学工业出版社,2006,2.
[222]胡二邦.环境风险评价实用技术和方法[M].中国环境科学出版社,2000,1.
[223]奚旦立.环境与可持续发展[M].高等教育出版社,1999.
[224]国家环境保护总局环境工程评估中心编.环境影响评价技术方法[M].中国环境科学出版社,2005,1.
[225]曾思育.环境管理与社会科学研究方法[M].清华大学出版社,2004,(9)
[226]叶文虎.环境管理学[M].高等教育出版社,2000,6.