城市化进程中耕地多功能保护的价值研究
|
摘要
中国拥有世界22%的人口,但只有世界8.71%的耕地。人多,地少、耕地后备资源不足、分布不均、耕地质量潜在威胁多等诸多基本国情的存在,决定了耕地保护的重要性和迫切性。1987年以来,中国政府相继出台了一系列法律、法规、政策来保护耕地,尽管这些政策的实施使得耕地减少的幅度有所控制,但事实上耕地保护的形势依然严峻,尤其在经济发达地区,伴随工业化、城市化的快速推进,土地利用需求的多样性、层次性逐渐显化,人地矛盾更为突出。例如广东省和浙江省,目前人均耕地分别为0.030公顷和0.038公顷,这一水平仅为全国平均水平的40%左右,耕地保护的紧迫性尤为明显。
耕地保护不力,究其原因,关键在于对耕地多功能性认识不足,价值未得到正确体现。尽管在全部的土地利用类型中,耕地就单一功能而言均非具有绝对优势,但土地的经济、社会及生态功能在耕地这种利用形式上具有共生性和协同性,耕地因此而具有相当强的综合比较优势,即耕地的多功能性价值较大。因此,探讨耕地多功能性的理论依据、价值结构,以及科学评价耕地对社会的贡献,对切实有效的制定和实施耕地保护政策具有理论意义和现实意义。
本文主要完成以下三方面的工作：其一,从价值的本质含义和耕地的内在特性出发,构建了耕地多功能性价值的三维逻辑模型；其二,从影响耕地多功能性价值总量的两个因素(单位面积耕地多功能性价值及耕地面积总量)出发,探讨了耕地多功能价值评价方法的选择,并引入支持向量机,对城市化快速发展地区的耕地非农化影响因素进行了研究;其三,从耕地价值变化的视角分析了城市化的成本与效益,并构建了核算指标体系。在此基础上,以宁波市区为例进行了实证分析。本文的研究主要取得了以下成果。
第一,梳理了耕地多功能性保护理念的起源、内涵；从价值的哲学本质和耕地内在特性出发,构建了由功能维度(供给维度)、效用维度(需求维度)以及价值观主轴三个维度形成的耕地多功能保护价值的多层次逻辑结构模型。并从层次性、发展性、动态性三个方面分析了其特征。
第二,在对已有耕地经济产出价值、社会保障价值、生态服务价值各种评价方法进行比选的基础上,形成耕地多功能保护价值的评价体系。并以宁波市区为例研究了其1996年～2007年以来的耕地多功能价值情况及变化规律。结果显示在此期间宁波市区单位耕地面积的价值上升了1.9倍,总价值上升了1.16倍。从价值总量变化看,总价值上升速度低于单位面积价值上升速度的主要原因是耕地非农化引起的耕地总量减少；从价值结构变化看,经济产出价值所占比重有上升趋势,社会保障价值不断下降,耕地资源经济产出价值的增长是耕地资源价值增长的主要因素。耕地多功能价值的结构变化证明,经济产出价值是社会保障价值和生态服务价值得以实现的基础,其增长是合理的；社会保障价值所占份额呈现下降趋势是需求重点变化所导致；生态价值的平稳变化说明耕地生态功能供给的欠缺,也解释了耕地数量的保证是耕地多功能价值总量得以体现的重要方面。
第三,从耕地价值变化的规律看,耕地非农化是价值总量减少的重要原因,也是影响特定地区耕地多功能价值总量的重要因素。本文引入支持向量回归机理论,选取总人口、非农人口比重、人均GDP、第一产业增加值、工业增加值、第三产业增加值、固定资产投资、农村居民人均纯收入与城镇居民人均可支配收入比、农村居民家庭经营性纯收入与纯收入比、粮食单产、农业机械总动力、粮食生产价格指数、粮食消费价格指数、耕地保护政策等14个因子作为输入变量,耕地面积作为输出变量构建了耕地面积变化的社会经济驱动因素模型。并根据宁波市区1985年～2007年的数据进行了测算。结果表明,该SVM模型的预测误差在3%以内,具有较高的精度。在此基础上,探索了以上14个因素对模型的精度影响,并通过逐一排除法进行了各因素对输出变量的重要性排序和层次划分。
第四,从耕地多功能价值变化的视角构建了包括农业生产资料价格损失、耕地开发成本、城市基础建设和维护成本、城市化和耕地的环境治理成本、耕地的生态服务价值损失、维护耕地粮食安全的成本、耕地的社会保障价值损失、国内生产总值、耕地发展权价值和税收等10个指标构成的城市化成本效益核算评价体系,探索了城市化进程中耕地价值转移的研究路径。实证测算显示,宁波市区城市化的成本呈缓慢上升趋势.而城市化的效益呈快速上升趋势;综合成本和效益,宁波市区城市化净效益不断增加。
第五,基于以上分析,结合日本、台湾的经验,提出城市化快速发展地区的耕地多功能保护对策。包括耕地多功能保护理念的树立、耕地多功能价值评价体系和合理经济补偿机制的重建、积极发展生态农业,提高土地集约利用效果,增加科技投入等。
China has 22% of the world's population, but only 8.71% of the arable land in the world. The lack of reserve resources, uneven distribution and many more potential threatens of the quality exacerbate the importance and urgency of protecting arable land. Since 1987, the Chinese government unveiled a series of laws, regulations and policies to protect farmland. Although the implementation of these policies makes the decrease of cultivated land has been controlle, the situation of farmland protection remains grim; Especially in economically developed areas, with industrialization and rapid urbanization, and the diversity and level of land use needs are also significant, and the level of gradually manifest conflict between human and more prominent. For example, Guangdong and Zhejiang, whose farmland area per capita is 0.030 hectares and 0.038 hectares, only accounting for 40% of the national average,so the farmland protection is particularly urgent.
The reason of inadequate protection of cultivated land lies in lack of knowledge on the versatility of cultivated land, and the value of it has not been properly reflected. While in all types of land use, land has an absolute advantage in terms of a single function neither, but the economic, social and ecological functions of land in such form of use has a very strong symbiosis and synergy as well as comprehensive comparison advantage, which is called the value of land greater versatility. Therefore, the research on the theoretical basis of cultivated land, the value of the structure, and scientific evaluation of the contribution of land to the society has theoretical and practical significance on the effective development and implementation of land protection policy.
The research achieved the following results:
Firstly, from the nature meaning and value of the inherent characteristics of land, this dissertation constructs the multi-value farmland multi-level logic model:Secondly, from the total value of the versatility of the two factors (multi-unit area of land value and the total cultivated area), this dissertation discusses choice of the method of value of the land evaluation, and the introduction of support vector machines studied on conversion factors of rapid urbanization of farmland. Thirdly,On the base of the philosophy essence of value and the intrinsic properties of the farmland, this dissertation constructs a model for multi-function conservation value of cultivated land which is in multi-level logic structure on the base of the three dimensions:the functional dimension (Supply Dimension), the utility dimension (Demand Dimension) and the values spindle, also with the analysis of its features.
Secondly, With the comparison of various evaluation methods such as cultivated in the value of economic output, the value of social security, and ecological service value, this dissertation constructs the multi-functional protection of cultivated land value rating system. And take the case of Ningbo city from the aspects of economic output value, the value of social security and the ecosystem service value and analyzes the change rule since its 1996-2007. The results show that in this period, the unit value of arable land in Ningbo urban area increased 1.9 times, with the total value increased 1.16 times. From the change of the total value,this rate of growth is far from the rate of the overall socio-economic growth and non-agricultural transformation of cultivated land is the main reason to explain the reduction of total value of arable land. From the change of value structure, the value of economic output is the basis for achieving the value of social security and the value of ecological services and its growth is reasonable; The structural changes in the value of land multifunctional proves that economic output value is the base of the implement of social security value and ecological service value, and it's increasing is reasonable.It is the change in the focus of demand that leads the share of the value of social security showing a downward trend; The smooth change in ecological value notes the lack of the supply of arable land ecological function, and the amount of cultivated land is an important aspect to reflect the ecological value.
Thirdly, from the variation of value, the main reason for the total value of farmland reduction is farmland conversion, which is also an important factor of affecting the value of a particular function of the total cultivated land. In order to find the factors of farmland conversion in areas of rapid urbanization, this dissertation introduces the support vector regression machine theory, choosing the total population, the proportion of non-agricultural population, per capita GDP, the first industrial added value, industrial added value, tertiary industry, investment in fixed assets, the ratio of per capita net income of rural residents and per capita disposable income of urban residents, the ratio of rural households operating net income and net income, grain yield, the total power of agricultural machinery, food production price index, food consumption price index, farmland protection policy totally 14 factors as input variables, and the area of arable land as the output variable to build the socio-economic driving forces model of the cultivated land area change, then make an empirical analysis based on the data of the year 1985-2007 of the urban area of Ningbo. The results show that the forecast error of SVM model is less than 3% which achieves a high accuracy. On this basis, it also analyzes the influence of the 14 factors above on the accuracy of the model, ranking the 14 factors according to their importance to the output variable through the method of excluding one by one, and divides into three levels.
Fourthly, this dissertation constructs an urbanization cost-effective evaluation system which is consists of 10 index system, that is the price losses of agricultural production, the cost of land development, the costs of urban infrastructure construction and maintenance, the costs of urbanization and land environmental management, the value loss of ecosystem services of land, the costs of maintain food security, the value loss of social security of land, gross domestic product value, the value of farmland development rights and tax. The result of authentic analyze of Ningbo shows that the cost of urbanization in Ningbo urban area increases gradually with slow trend, and the effectiveness increases gradually with relatively rapid changes. Integrated the cost and effectiveness, the net benefits of urbanization in Ningbo urban area is increasing.
Fifthly, based on above analysi, and combined with the experience of Japan and Taiwan,this dissertation puts forward the protection countermeasure for multi-function of farmland in the rapid urbanization area, including setting the concept of protecting the multi-function of farmland, evaluating the multi-function value of farmland, reconstructing reasonable mechanism for financial compensation, developing eco-agriculture activly, improving the effectiveness of land intensive utilize, adding the technical investment, etc.
耕地保护不力,究其原因,关键在于对耕地多功能性认识不足,价值未得到正确体现。尽管在全部的土地利用类型中,耕地就单一功能而言均非具有绝对优势,但土地的经济、社会及生态功能在耕地这种利用形式上具有共生性和协同性,耕地因此而具有相当强的综合比较优势,即耕地的多功能性价值较大。因此,探讨耕地多功能性的理论依据、价值结构,以及科学评价耕地对社会的贡献,对切实有效的制定和实施耕地保护政策具有理论意义和现实意义。
本文主要完成以下三方面的工作：其一,从价值的本质含义和耕地的内在特性出发,构建了耕地多功能性价值的三维逻辑模型；其二,从影响耕地多功能性价值总量的两个因素(单位面积耕地多功能性价值及耕地面积总量)出发,探讨了耕地多功能价值评价方法的选择,并引入支持向量机,对城市化快速发展地区的耕地非农化影响因素进行了研究;其三,从耕地价值变化的视角分析了城市化的成本与效益,并构建了核算指标体系。在此基础上,以宁波市区为例进行了实证分析。本文的研究主要取得了以下成果。
第一,梳理了耕地多功能性保护理念的起源、内涵；从价值的哲学本质和耕地内在特性出发,构建了由功能维度(供给维度)、效用维度(需求维度)以及价值观主轴三个维度形成的耕地多功能保护价值的多层次逻辑结构模型。并从层次性、发展性、动态性三个方面分析了其特征。
第二,在对已有耕地经济产出价值、社会保障价值、生态服务价值各种评价方法进行比选的基础上,形成耕地多功能保护价值的评价体系。并以宁波市区为例研究了其1996年～2007年以来的耕地多功能价值情况及变化规律。结果显示在此期间宁波市区单位耕地面积的价值上升了1.9倍,总价值上升了1.16倍。从价值总量变化看,总价值上升速度低于单位面积价值上升速度的主要原因是耕地非农化引起的耕地总量减少；从价值结构变化看,经济产出价值所占比重有上升趋势,社会保障价值不断下降,耕地资源经济产出价值的增长是耕地资源价值增长的主要因素。耕地多功能价值的结构变化证明,经济产出价值是社会保障价值和生态服务价值得以实现的基础,其增长是合理的；社会保障价值所占份额呈现下降趋势是需求重点变化所导致；生态价值的平稳变化说明耕地生态功能供给的欠缺,也解释了耕地数量的保证是耕地多功能价值总量得以体现的重要方面。
第三,从耕地价值变化的规律看,耕地非农化是价值总量减少的重要原因,也是影响特定地区耕地多功能价值总量的重要因素。本文引入支持向量回归机理论,选取总人口、非农人口比重、人均GDP、第一产业增加值、工业增加值、第三产业增加值、固定资产投资、农村居民人均纯收入与城镇居民人均可支配收入比、农村居民家庭经营性纯收入与纯收入比、粮食单产、农业机械总动力、粮食生产价格指数、粮食消费价格指数、耕地保护政策等14个因子作为输入变量,耕地面积作为输出变量构建了耕地面积变化的社会经济驱动因素模型。并根据宁波市区1985年～2007年的数据进行了测算。结果表明,该SVM模型的预测误差在3%以内,具有较高的精度。在此基础上,探索了以上14个因素对模型的精度影响,并通过逐一排除法进行了各因素对输出变量的重要性排序和层次划分。
第四,从耕地多功能价值变化的视角构建了包括农业生产资料价格损失、耕地开发成本、城市基础建设和维护成本、城市化和耕地的环境治理成本、耕地的生态服务价值损失、维护耕地粮食安全的成本、耕地的社会保障价值损失、国内生产总值、耕地发展权价值和税收等10个指标构成的城市化成本效益核算评价体系,探索了城市化进程中耕地价值转移的研究路径。实证测算显示,宁波市区城市化的成本呈缓慢上升趋势.而城市化的效益呈快速上升趋势;综合成本和效益,宁波市区城市化净效益不断增加。
第五,基于以上分析,结合日本、台湾的经验,提出城市化快速发展地区的耕地多功能保护对策。包括耕地多功能保护理念的树立、耕地多功能价值评价体系和合理经济补偿机制的重建、积极发展生态农业,提高土地集约利用效果,增加科技投入等。
China has 22% of the world's population, but only 8.71% of the arable land in the world. The lack of reserve resources, uneven distribution and many more potential threatens of the quality exacerbate the importance and urgency of protecting arable land. Since 1987, the Chinese government unveiled a series of laws, regulations and policies to protect farmland. Although the implementation of these policies makes the decrease of cultivated land has been controlle, the situation of farmland protection remains grim; Especially in economically developed areas, with industrialization and rapid urbanization, and the diversity and level of land use needs are also significant, and the level of gradually manifest conflict between human and more prominent. For example, Guangdong and Zhejiang, whose farmland area per capita is 0.030 hectares and 0.038 hectares, only accounting for 40% of the national average,so the farmland protection is particularly urgent.
The reason of inadequate protection of cultivated land lies in lack of knowledge on the versatility of cultivated land, and the value of it has not been properly reflected. While in all types of land use, land has an absolute advantage in terms of a single function neither, but the economic, social and ecological functions of land in such form of use has a very strong symbiosis and synergy as well as comprehensive comparison advantage, which is called the value of land greater versatility. Therefore, the research on the theoretical basis of cultivated land, the value of the structure, and scientific evaluation of the contribution of land to the society has theoretical and practical significance on the effective development and implementation of land protection policy.
The research achieved the following results:
Firstly, from the nature meaning and value of the inherent characteristics of land, this dissertation constructs the multi-value farmland multi-level logic model:Secondly, from the total value of the versatility of the two factors (multi-unit area of land value and the total cultivated area), this dissertation discusses choice of the method of value of the land evaluation, and the introduction of support vector machines studied on conversion factors of rapid urbanization of farmland. Thirdly,On the base of the philosophy essence of value and the intrinsic properties of the farmland, this dissertation constructs a model for multi-function conservation value of cultivated land which is in multi-level logic structure on the base of the three dimensions:the functional dimension (Supply Dimension), the utility dimension (Demand Dimension) and the values spindle, also with the analysis of its features.
Secondly, With the comparison of various evaluation methods such as cultivated in the value of economic output, the value of social security, and ecological service value, this dissertation constructs the multi-functional protection of cultivated land value rating system. And take the case of Ningbo city from the aspects of economic output value, the value of social security and the ecosystem service value and analyzes the change rule since its 1996-2007. The results show that in this period, the unit value of arable land in Ningbo urban area increased 1.9 times, with the total value increased 1.16 times. From the change of the total value,this rate of growth is far from the rate of the overall socio-economic growth and non-agricultural transformation of cultivated land is the main reason to explain the reduction of total value of arable land. From the change of value structure, the value of economic output is the basis for achieving the value of social security and the value of ecological services and its growth is reasonable; The structural changes in the value of land multifunctional proves that economic output value is the base of the implement of social security value and ecological service value, and it's increasing is reasonable.It is the change in the focus of demand that leads the share of the value of social security showing a downward trend; The smooth change in ecological value notes the lack of the supply of arable land ecological function, and the amount of cultivated land is an important aspect to reflect the ecological value.
Thirdly, from the variation of value, the main reason for the total value of farmland reduction is farmland conversion, which is also an important factor of affecting the value of a particular function of the total cultivated land. In order to find the factors of farmland conversion in areas of rapid urbanization, this dissertation introduces the support vector regression machine theory, choosing the total population, the proportion of non-agricultural population, per capita GDP, the first industrial added value, industrial added value, tertiary industry, investment in fixed assets, the ratio of per capita net income of rural residents and per capita disposable income of urban residents, the ratio of rural households operating net income and net income, grain yield, the total power of agricultural machinery, food production price index, food consumption price index, farmland protection policy totally 14 factors as input variables, and the area of arable land as the output variable to build the socio-economic driving forces model of the cultivated land area change, then make an empirical analysis based on the data of the year 1985-2007 of the urban area of Ningbo. The results show that the forecast error of SVM model is less than 3% which achieves a high accuracy. On this basis, it also analyzes the influence of the 14 factors above on the accuracy of the model, ranking the 14 factors according to their importance to the output variable through the method of excluding one by one, and divides into three levels.
Fourthly, this dissertation constructs an urbanization cost-effective evaluation system which is consists of 10 index system, that is the price losses of agricultural production, the cost of land development, the costs of urban infrastructure construction and maintenance, the costs of urbanization and land environmental management, the value loss of ecosystem services of land, the costs of maintain food security, the value loss of social security of land, gross domestic product value, the value of farmland development rights and tax. The result of authentic analyze of Ningbo shows that the cost of urbanization in Ningbo urban area increases gradually with slow trend, and the effectiveness increases gradually with relatively rapid changes. Integrated the cost and effectiveness, the net benefits of urbanization in Ningbo urban area is increasing.
Fifthly, based on above analysi, and combined with the experience of Japan and Taiwan,this dissertation puts forward the protection countermeasure for multi-function of farmland in the rapid urbanization area, including setting the concept of protecting the multi-function of farmland, evaluating the multi-function value of farmland, reconstructing reasonable mechanism for financial compensation, developing eco-agriculture activly, improving the effectiveness of land intensive utilize, adding the technical investment, etc.
引文
[1]Ahm, S.. Determinants and projections of land use in the South Central United States. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry,2002,26(2),78-84.
[2]Alex, J..& Smola, A J.. A Tutorial on Suport Vector Regression. Statistics and Computing,2004,(14),199-222.
[3]Alston, J.. An Analysis of growth of U.S. farmland prices. American Agricultural Economics Association,1986 (68),1-9.
[4]Basam, B.. Tools for land use analysis on different scale with case studies for costarica. The Net herlands:Kluwer Academic publishers,2000,46-49.
[5]Beasley, S.D.,& Workman,W.C.. Estimating amenity values on urban fringe farmland:A contingent valuation approach. Growth and Change,1986,17(4), 70-78.
[6]Bishop, R.C.. Option value:an exposition and extension. Land Economics, 1982(58),1-15.
[7]Brown, M.G.. Support vector machines for optimal classification and spectral immixing.1999(120),167-179.
[8]Burges, C.J.C.. A Tutorial on support vector Ma-chines for Pattern ecognition. Data mining and knowledge discovery,1998(2),121-167.
[9]Burt,O.. Econometric modeling of the capitalization formula for farmland prices. American Agricultural Economics Association,1986,(68),10-26.
[10]Carmen, C.F..& Elena, G. I.. Determinants of residential land-use conversion and sprawl at the rural-urban fringe. American Agricultural Economics Association,2004,86 (5),986-992.
[11]Chang,C.C..& Lin, C. J.. LIBSVM:a library for support vector machines. http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/-cjlin/libsvm,2001
[12]Clark.M.F.. The inconsistency of land values.land rent and capitalization formulas. American Agricultural Economics Association,1993(75),147-155.
[13]Clarke, K.C.. A Self-modifying cellular automaton of historical urbanization in the san Francisco bayarea. Environment and Planning Design,1997(24),247-261.
[14]Cummings,R.G..& Ganderton,P.T.. Substitution effects in CVM values. 1994.205-214.
[15]Daniels, T.,& Lapping, M.. Land preservation:An essential ingredient in smart growth. Journal of Planning Literature,2005,19,316-329.
[16]David,W.P.. Economic values and the natural world. Cambridge, Massachusetts:The MIT Press,1993,35-67.
[17]Dela, C.L.J.. Estimating the determinants of land conversion. Department of Economics, Ateneode Manila University,2001,34-45.
[18]Drake, J.. The non-market value of the Swedish agricultural landscape. European Review of Agricultural Economics,1992,19(3),351-364.
[19]Duke, J. M..& Lynch, L.. Four classes of farmland retention techniques: Comparative evaluation and property rights implications. Land Economics, 2006,82,189-213.
[20]Duke, J.M..& Aull-Hyde, R.. Identifying public preferences for land preservation using the analytic hierarchy process. Ecological Economics, 2002,42,131-145.
[21]Duke, J. M.,& Ilvento, T.W.. A conjoint analysis of public preferences for agricultural land preservation. Agriculture and Resource Economics Review, 2004,33,209-219.
[22]Erickson, K.. Mishra, A.K.. Moss, C.B.. Cash rents, imputed returns, and the valuation of farmassets revisited. In:Moss CB, Schmitz A (eds) Government policy and farmland markets:the maintenance of farmer wealth. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa,223-235
[23]Erb,K.H.. Actual land demand of Austria 1926～2000:A variation on ecological footprint assessment. Land Use Policy,2004(21),247-259.
[24]Francis,E.. Tay, H..& Cao,L.J.. Modenfied support vector machines in financial time series forecasing. Neurocomputing,2002,(48),847-861.
[25]Freeman, A.M.. The measurement of environmental and resource values: Theory and Methods. Washington:RFF Press,1993.125-232.
[26]Geist, H.J..& Lambin, E.F.. Proximate causes and underling driving forces of tropical deforestation.2002,143-150.
[27]Gerbens-Leenes, P.W.. Nonhebel, S..& Ivens, W.P.F.. A method to determine land requirements relating to food consumption patterns.Agriculture. Ecosystems and Environment,2002,90(1),47-58.
[28]Hailu, Y.G..& Rosenberger, R.S.. Modeling migration effects on agricultural lands:A growth equilibrium model. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.2004,33(1),50-60.
[29]Hailu, Y.G..& Brown, C.H.. A growth-focused spatial econometric model of agricultural land development in the northeast. American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting Providence, Rhode Island.2005(6), 24-27.
[30]Halstead, J.M.. Measuring the nonmarket value of Massachusetts agricultural land:A case study. Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council.1984,13(2),12-19.
[31]Hanemann, W.. Willingness to pay and willingness to accept:How much can they differ. The American Economic Review,1991,81(3),635-647.
[32]Hanley, N.C..& SpashL,W.L.. Problems in valuing the benefits of biodiversity protection. Environmental and Resource Economics,1995(2),249-272.
[33]Hu, X.H..& David, H.K.. The emergence of affluence in Beijing:residential social stratification in China's capital city. Urban Geography.2001(22),54-77.
[34]Irwin, E.G..& Geoghegan, J.. Theory, data, methods:developing spatially explicit economic models of land use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2001(85),7-23.
[35]Jokobsson, K.M.. Contingent valuation and endangered species. Methodological Issues and Applications. Cheltenham:Edward Elgar Press,1996.54-63.
[36]Joshua M..& Lori, L.. Gauging support for innovative farmland preservation techniques. Policy Sciences,2007,40(6),123-155.
[37]Karyne,Benjamin.. Gerald, D..& Andre,Bouchard.. Vegetation composition and succession of abandoned farmland:effects of ecological, historical and spatial factors. Landscape Ecology,2005,20,627-647.
[38]Karyne, Benjamin.. Andre, B.E..& Gerald, D.. Managing Abandoned Farmland:The Need to Link Biological and Sociological Aspects. Environmental Management,2008,42,603-619.
[39]Kline, J.D..& Ralph, J.A.. Does land use planning slow the conversion of forest and farm lands?. Growth and Change 1999,30(Winter),3-22.
[40]Kuminoff, N.V.. Farmland conversion:Perceptions and realities. University of California Agricultural issues center, Issues Brief,2001,16-18.
[41]Kwon,Y.J.. Jeong,M.K..& Omitaomu, O.A.. Adaptive support vector regression analysis of closed-loop inspection accuracy. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture,2006,46(6),603-610.
[42]Lee, L.. Factors defecting land use change at the urban-rural fringe. Growth and change,1979,10(4),25-31.
[43]Loomis,J.. Rameker,V..& Seidl,A..Potential non-market benefits of agricultural lands in Colorado:a review of the literature. Agricultural and Resource Policy Report, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics,2002,
[44]Lu, W.Z.. Potential assessment of the support vector machine in forecasting ambient air pollutant trends. Chemosphere,2005(59),693-701.
[45]Matthew,J.M.. Losing ground:Farmland preservation, economic utilitarianism, and the erosion of the agrarian ideal. Agriculture and Human Values,2005(22), 209-223.
[46]Mccormark,M.. A stoking soil potential rating:An evaluation form of land evaluation. Soil Survey and Evaluation,1986,6(2):37-41.
[47]McDonald, M:G.. Agricultural landholding in Japan:Fifty years after land reform. Journal of hysical Human and Regional Geosciences.1997(1),55-78.
[48]Mishra, A.. Moss, C..& Erickson,K.. Valuing farmland withmultiple quasi-fixed inputs. Appl Econ,2004,36(15):1669-1676.
[49]Mishra, A.. Moss, C..& Erickson,K.. The role of credit constraints and government subsidies in farmland valuations in the US:an options pricing model approach. Empirical Economics,2008,34(2),285-297.
[50]'Morris, C.W.. Support vector machines for identifying organisms a comparison with strongly partitioned radial basis function networks. Ecological Modelling,2001(146),57-67.
[51]Opschoor,H.. The ecological footprint:measuring road or metaphor. Ecological Economics,2000(32),363-365.
[52]Pearce,D.. The economic value of biodiversity. London:Earthscan Publications Ltd,1995,65-78.
[53]Portney, P.. The contingent valuation debate:Why economists should care. Economic Perspectives,1994,8(4),3-17.
[54]Costanza,R.. The dynamics of the ecological footprint concept. Ecological Economics,2000(32),341-345.
[55]Robert, C.R..& Rudolf, D.G.. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature,387,1997,15(5),253-260.
[56]Reynolds, J.. Land use change and competition in the south. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.2001,33(2),271-281.
[57]Mitchell, R.C..& Carson, R.T.. Using surveys to value public goods:The contingent valuation method. Washington DC:Resource for the Future,1989.
[58]Randall, A.. A consistent valuation and pricing framework for noncommodity outputs:Progress and prospects. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2007,120,21-30.
[59]Rees,W.E.. Ecofootprint analysis:merits and brickbats. Ecological Economics, 2000(32),371-374.
[60]Rees,W.E.. Uran ecological footprints:why cities cannot be sustainable and why they are a key to sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,1996(16),223-248.
[61]Saizen, I.M.. Effects of land-use master plans in the metropolitan fringe of Japan. Landscape and Urban Planning,2006(78),411-421.
[62]Senbel,M.M..& Daniels, T.. The ecological footprint:a non-monetary metric of human consumption applied to North American. Global Environmental Change,2003(13),83-100.
[63]Shoshany, M..& Goldshleger, N.. Land-use and population density changes in Lsrael 1950 to 1990:Analysis of regional and local trends. Land Use Policy, 2002(19),123-133.
[64]Skinner, M.W..& Kuhn, R.. Agricultural land protection in China:A case study of local governance in Zhejiang Province. Land Use Policy, 2001(18)329-340.
[65]Setokc, K.. Modeling the drivers of urban land use change in the pearl river delta,China:Integrating remote sensing with seriocomic data. Land Economics,2003,79(1),106-121.
[66]Smith, K.V.. Nonmarket valuation of environmental resources:an interpretative appraisal.1993(1),1-26.
[67]Tzoulas, K.. Korpela, K.. Venn,& S.. Yli-Pelkonen.. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure:a literature review. Landsc Urban Plann,2007,81,167-178.
[68]Tweeten, L.. Competing for scarce land:food security and farmland preservation. Ohio State University Department of Agricultural,
Environmental, and Development Economics, Occasional Paper 1998,ESO,2385.
[69]Vallet, J.. Daniel, H.. Beaujouan, V..,& Roze, F.. Plant species response to urbanization:comparison of isolated woodland patches in two cities of North-Western France. Landsc Ecol 2008,23,1205-1217.
[70]Wackernagel, M.M.. Calculating national and global ecological footprint time series:resolving conceptual challenges. Land Use Policy,2004(21),271-278.
[71]Wackernagel, M.R.. Our ecological footprint, reducing human impact on the earth. Gabriola Island, Philadelphia:New Society Publishers,1996.245-253.
[72]Wackernagel,M.O.L. National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept. Ecological Economics,1999(29),375-390.
[73]Wacknagel, M..& Schulzn, D.D.. Trackingthe ecological overshoot of the human economy.2002,9266-9271.
[74]Westman,W.. How much are nature's services worth?. Science,1977, 197(4307),960～964.
[75]White, R..& Engelen,G.C.. Automata and fractal urban form:a cellular modelling approach to the evolution of urban land-use patterns. Environment and Planning,1993,(25),1175-1199.
[76]Yang,H..& Xinbin,Li.. Cultivated land and food supply in China. Land Use Policy,2000,17,73-88.
[77]Yomralioglut, T..& Tudes, T.. Land readjustment implementation in Turkey. International Housing Congress,1996(24),150-161.
[78]York, R.R.. Footprints on the earth:the environmental consequences of modernity. American Sociological Review,2003(68),279-300.
[79]Zander,P.. Kneerim, U..& Groot, J.C.. Multifunctionality of agriculture:tools and methods for impect assessment and valuation. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment.2007,120,1-4.
[80]Zhai, I.G.. Ikeda, S.. An empirical model of land use change in China. Reviews of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 2000,12(1),36～53.
[81][法]萨伊.政治经济学概论.北京：商务印书馆,1997,56-64.
[82][美]约翰.A.迪克逊. 环境影响的经济分析.北京：中国环境科学出版社,2001,16-23.
[83][美]伊利·莫尔豪斯.土地经济学原理.北京：商务印书馆,1982,232-243.
[84][美]迈克里.弗里曼.环境与资源价值评估——理论与方法.北京：人民大学出版社,2002,166-186.
[85]安虎森,陈明.工业化城市化进程与我国城市化推进的路径选择.南开经济研究,2005(1),48-54.
[86]毕于运.中国耕地.北京：中国农业科技出版社,1995,78-82.
[87]毕于运,郑振源.建国以来中国实有耕地面积增减变化分析.资源科学,2000(2),8-12.
[88]蔡继明,周炳林.论城市化与耕地保护.社会科学,2005(6),5-12.
[89]蔡银莺,李晓云,张安录.湖北省农地资源价值研究.自然资源学报,2007,22(1),121-129.
[90]蔡银莺,宗琪,张安录.江汉平原农地资源价值研究.中国人口资源与环境,2007,17(3),85-89.
[91]蔡运龙.中国经济高速发展中的耕地问题.资源科学,2000,22(3)24-28.
[92]蔡运龙.中国农村转型与耕地保护机制.地理科学,2001(1),1-6.
[93]蔡运龙.耕地保护必须政府干预与市场机制相结合.中国土地,1997(11),26-27.
[94]蔡运龙,霍雅勤.中国耕地价值重建方法与案例研究.地理学报,2006,61(10),1084-1092.
[95]蔡运龙,霍雅勤.耕地非农化的供给驱动.中国土地,2002(7),20-22.
[96]蔡运龙,俞奉庆.中国耕地问题的症结与治本之策.中国土地科学,2004,1 8(3),13-17.
[97]蔡运龙,汪涌,李遇平.中国耕地供需变化研究.中国土地科学,2009,23(3),11-18.
[98]曹顺爱,冯科,江华.经济发达地区土地利用生态服务价值评价研究——以广州市为例.资源开发与市场,2009,25(6),510-512.
[99]曹银贵,袁春,周伟等.中国耕地变化的驱动因子及其省域差异分析.中国土地科学,2008,22(2),17-22.
[100]车裕斌.论耕地资源的生态价值及其实现.生态经济,2004(S1),224-228.
[101]陈百明,李世顺.中国耕地数量下降之剖析1986-1995年.地理科学进展,1998(3),47-50.
[102]陈浮,陈刚,包浩生等.城市边 区土地利用变化及人文驱动力机制研究.自然资源学报,2001,16(3)：204～210.
[103]陈会广,曲福田,陈江龙.山东省耕地资源价值评估研究.中国人口资源与环境,2003,13(1),25-30.
[104]陈江龙,曲福田.农地非农化与粮食安全：理论与实证分析.南京农业大学学报,2006(2),103-107.
[105]陈丽,曲福田,师学义.耕地资源社会价值测算方法探讨～～以山西省柳林县为例.资源科学,2006,28(6),86-90.
[106]陈利根,龙开胜.耕地资源数量与经济发展关系的计量分析.2007,4-10.
[107]陈美球,洪士林,许兵杰.我国耕地保护的社会责任及对策分析.中州学刊,2008(5),119-123.
[108]陈星.自然资源价格论.博士学位论文,中共中央党校,2007,124-132.
[109]崔新蕾,张安录.农地城市流转的选择价值研究.中国土地科学.2008,22(7)：11-17.
[110]单胜道,俞劲炎,叶晓朋等.农业用地评估方法研究.资源科学,2000,22(1),45-49.
[111]单胜道,吴次芳.外部地价论.浙江大学学报,2000；30(3),156-160.
[112]邓大才.论农地社会价值及其核算.云南行政学院学报,2002(2),62-66.
[113]邓大才.我国粮食生产成本的结构演化及发展趋势.中州学刊.2008(7),25-28.
[114]董德坤,朱道林,王霞.农地非农化的外部性分析.经济问题,2004(4),55-57.
[115]杜新波,孙习稳.耕地资源可持续发展内涵探讨——兼论耕地资源价值.地域研究与开发,2004,23(6),98-101.
[116]段瑞娟,郝晋珉,张洁瑕. 北京区位土地利用与生态服务价值变化研究. 农业工程学报,2006(9),21-28.
[117]樊小刚.城市化进程中的社会保障制度创新.经济研究参考,2004(47)37-45.
[118]范文洋,孔祥斌,门明新等.城市快速扩展区耕地资源安全评价研究——以北京市大兴区为例.中国农业科技导报,2009,11(2),106-113.
[119]封志明,刘宝勤,杨艳昭.中国耕地资源数量变化的趋势分析与数据重建：1949-2003.自然资源学报,2005,20(1),35-43.
[120]付恒杰.日本城市化模式及其对中国的启示.日本问题研究,2003(4),18-21.
[121]傅超,郑娟尔,吴次芳.建国以来我国耕地数量变化的历史考察与启示.国土资源科技管理,2007(6),68-71.
[122]傅泽强,蔡运龙,杨友孝等.中国粮食安全与耕地资源变化的相关分析.自然资源学报,2001,16(4),313-319.
[123]高淑萍,王小云,李德强.耕地非农化动力机制和约束机制的分析.国土资源科技管理,2004(6),147-150.
[124]葛全胜,戴君虎等.过去30年中国部分省区耕地资源数量变化及驱动因素分析.自然科学进展,2003,13(8),825-832.
[125]耕地问题研究组. 中国耕地递减问题的数量经济分析.北京：经济科学出版社,1992.
[126]谷树忠.对耕地资源估价方法的探讨.自然资源,1997(4),10-14.
[127]关谷俊作著,金洪云译.日本的农地制度.北京：生活·读书·新知三联书店,2004,156-159.
[128]国土资源部地籍管理司.2005全国土地利用变更调查报告.北京：中国大地出版社,2006,63-67.
[129]胡锋.1990年以来的粮食价格水平波动研究.中国粮食经济.2008(5)：23-25.
[130]胡靖.中国农业：社会效应与社会价值核算.农业经济问题,1995(9)45-49.
[131]胡新艳,刘一明,牛宝俊.东南沿海地区耕地资源承载力研究.国土与自然资源研究,2001(1),21-24.
[132]黄大全,郑伟元.海外城市化与耕地保护对中国的启示.中国土地科学,2005,19(3),38-43.
[133]黄烈佳,张安录.农地价值与农地城市流转决策若干问题探讨.地理与地 理信息科学,2006,22(2),88-91.
[134]黄贤金.农用地估价技术路线及方法研究——以南京市耕地资源价值核算为例.南京农业大学学报,1997,20(3),101-105.
[135]黄贤金.江苏省耕地资源价值核算研究.江苏社会科学,1999(4),55-60.
[136]黄忠华,吴次芳,杜雪君.我国耕地变化与社会经济因素的实证分析.自然资源学报,2009,24(2),192-199.
[137]霍雅勤,蔡运龙.耕地资源价值的评价与重建——以甘肃省会宁县为例.干旱区资源与环境,2003,17(5),81-85.
[138]霍雅勤,蔡运龙.可持续理念下的土地价值决定与量化.中国土地科学,2003,17(2),19-23.
[139]霍雅勤,蔡运龙,王瑛.耕地对农民的效用考察及耕地功能分析.中国人口资源与环境,2004.14(3),105-108.
[140]霍雅勤,姚华军.耕地资源价值影响因素分析。中国土地,2003(3),22-23.
[141]贾绍凤,张豪禧,孟向京.我国耕地变化趋势与对策再探讨.1997,24-30.
[142]孔祥斌,张凤荣,李霖.农用地估价方法探讨.河北农业大学学报,2002,25(4),57-61.
[143]孔祥斌,苏强,孙宪海等.基于社会保障功能的耕地保有量测算——以北京市房山区为例.资源开发与市场,2008,24(4),299-302.
[144]孔祥斌,张凤荣,姜光辉等.国外农用地保护对北京市耕地保护的启示.中国土地科学,2005,19(5),50-54,14.
[145]l李翠珍,孔祥斌,孔宪海.北京市耕地资源价值体系及价值估算方法.地理学报,2008,63(3),321-329.
[146]李丹,刘友兆.城市化发展与耕地变动的关系研究.经济纵横,2003(1),
[147]李国键,韩立民.农村土地的社会功能及其补偿依据。山东社会科学,2007(1),73-75.
[148]李金昌,姜文来.生态价值论.重庆：重庆大学出版社,1999.
[149]李景刚,何春阳,史培军.近20年中国北方13省的耕地变化与驱动力.地理学报,2004,59(2),274-282.
[150]李连科.哲学价值引论.北京：商务印书馆出版社,1999.
[151]李文华,张彪,谢高地.中国生态系统服务研究的回顾与展望.自然资源 学报,2009,24(1),1-10.
[152]李宪文,林培.国内外耕地利用与保护的理论基础及其发展.地理科学进展,2001,20(4),305-313.
[153]李湘梅,周敬宣,罗璐琴等.基于支持向量机的城市生态足迹动态化评价.资源科学,2007,29(5),16-21.
[154]李秀彬,王卫.土地利用压力与可持续发展.中国土地,1999(5),1-2.
[155]李永乐,吴群.经济增长与耕地非农化的Kuznets曲线验证——来自中国省际面板数据的证据.资源科学,2008,30(5),667-672.
[156]李渊,鲁成树,王娟.基于土地利用变化的生态服务价值研究.农业资源与环境科学,2007,23(6),576-580.
[157]黎永莲.发达国家农业保护的非经济效率目标.农业经济,2007(6)9-20.
[158]梁红梅,刘卫东,连纲.浙江省1996-2005年新增建设用地效率分析.技术经济,2008,27(4),45-49.
[159]梁书民.基于耕地保护的中国城镇化发展战略研究.中国土地资源,2009,23(5),41-46.
[160]林英彦.不动产估价.台北：台湾文笙书局,1989.
[161]刘凤朝,孙玉涛.耕地减少、农民失地与经济增长的关系分析.资源科学,2008,30(1),52-57.
[162]刘慧芳.论我国农地地价的构成与量化.中国土地科学,2000(3),15-18.
[163]刘纪远,刘明亮,庄大方.中国近期土地利用变化的空间格局分析.2002,32(12),1031-1041.
[164]刘丽军,宋敏,屈宝香.中国耕地非农化的区域差异及其收敛性.资源科学,2009,31(1),116-122.
[165]刘建国.生态位理论的发展及其在农村生态工程建设中的应用.农业现代化研究,1987(6),30～33
[166]刘卫东.耕地多功能保护问题研究. 国土资源科技管理,2008,25(1)1-5.
[167]刘卫东.论耕地保护认识的误区.中国经济与管理科学,2008(3),8-10.
[168]刘卫东,梁红梅.近十年我国耕地变化的区域效应及其合理性分析.浙江 大学学报,2008,38(6),14-22.
[169]刘新卫. “黄金发展阶段”日本、韩国和中国台湾土地利用浅析.国土资源情报,2006(2),50-56.
[170]刘旭,王秀东,陈孝.我国粮食安全框架下种质资源价值评估探析——以改革开放以来小麦种质资源利用为例.农业经济问题,2008(12),14-19.
[171]刘治钦,杨秋林.农用土地的会计确认和计量探讨.农业技术经济,2004(4),26-30.
[172]隆宗佐. 城市土地资源高效利用研究. 博士学位论文,华中农业大学,2008.
[173]卢锋,谢亚. 我国粮食供求与价格走势(1980～2007)——粮价波动、宏观稳定及粮食安全问题探讨.管理世界,2008(3),70-80.
[174]鲁春霞,谢高地,肖玉,于云江.青藏高原生态系统服务功能的价值评估.生态学报,2004,24(12),2749-2755.
[175]鲁奇.中国耕地资源开发、保护与粮食安全保障问题.资源科学,1999,21(6),5-8.
[176]吕耀,王兆阳.基于农业多功能性理念的农业多元价值体系重建.价格理论与实践.2007(4),35-36
[177]罗其友,高明杰,陶陶.农业功能统筹战略问题.中国农业资源与区划.2003(12),25-29
[178]马斌.农村社会养老保险的现状、问题及对策.中国农村经济,2001(8),55-60.
[179]马凯,梁流涛,杨渝红.我国城乡非农建设用地市场之演化规律研究.中国人口资源与环境,2009,19(3),75-81.
[180]马新辉,任志远,孙根年.城市植被净化大气价值计量与评价——以西安市为例.中国生态农业学报,2004, (2),180-182.
[181]闵捷,高魏,李晓云等.武汉市土地利用与生态系统服务价值的时空变化分析.水土保持报,2006,20(4),170-174.
[182]闵捷,张安录,蔡银莺.地块尺度农地城市流转驱动机制研究——基于武汉市和黄冈市的问卷调查.华中农业大学学报.2008(5),29-33.
[183]宁波市统计局.新世纪新辉煌——宁波“十五”经济社会发展纪实.北
京：中国统计出版社,2006,63-88.
[184]宁波五十年编委会.宁波五十年(1949～～1999).宁波：宁波出版社,1999,363-356.
[185]牛海鹏,张安录.基于生态位理论的耕地数量变化驱动机制分析.资源科学.2008,30(10),1533-1540.
[186]欧阳志云,王如松.生态系统服务功能、生态价值与可持续发展.世界科技研究与发展,22(5),45-50.
[187]庞英.耕地利用效益及其区域差异.南京：南京农业大学,2006,19-20.
[188]乔荣锋,高进云,张安录.山地丘陵地区农地资源价值评估——以湖北省宜昌市为例.资源科学,2006,28(6),97-103.
[189]曲福田.土地价格及分配关系与农地非农化经济机制研究.中国农村经济,2001(12),36-41
[190]曲福田,陈江龙.两岸经济成长阶段农地非农化的比较研究.中国土地科学,2001(6),5-9.
[191]曲福田,陈江龙,陈雯.农地非农化经济驱动机制的理论分析与实证研究.自然资源学报,2005(2),231-241.
[192]曲福田,吴丽梅.经济增长与耕地非农化的库兹涅茨曲线假说及验证.资源科学,2004,26(5),61-67.
[193]任浩.征地制度中地价补偿标准的研究.硕士学位论文,中国农业大学,2003,57-59.
[194]盛广恒,郭剑平.城市化过程中耕地非农化的机会成本分析.河海大学学报,2005,7(1),42-46.
[195]史娟,张凤荣,赵婷婷.1998年～2006年中国耕地资源的时空变化特征.资源科学,2008,30(8),1191-1198.
[196]石忆邵,彭志宏,陈华杰等.国际大都市建设用地变化特征、影响因素及时上海的启示.城市规划学刊,2008(6),32-39.
[197]宋戈,吴次芳,王杨.城镇化发展与耕地保护关系研究.农业经济问题,2006(1).64-67.
[198]宋戈,吴次芳,王杨.黑龙江省耕地非农化与经济发展的Granger因果关系研究.中国土地科学,2006(3),33-38.
[199]宋敏,张安录.湖北省农地资源正外部性价值量估算——基于对农地社会与生态之功能和价值分类的分析. 长江流域资源与环境,2009,18(4),314-319.
[200]孙强,蔡运龙.日本耕地保护与土地管理的历史经验及其对中国的启示.北京大学学报,2008,44(2),249-256.
[201]孙强,蔡运龙,王乐.北京耕地流失的时空特征与驱动机制.资源科学,2007(4),158-163.
[202]孙新章,谢高地,成升魁等.中国农田生产系统土壤保持功能及其经济价值.水土保持学报,2005(4),156-159.
[203]孙新章,谢高地,张其仔等.中国生态补偿的实践及其政策取向.资源科学,2006,28(4),25-30.
[204]孙燕,林振山,刘会玉.中国耕地数量变化的突变特征及驱动机制.资源科学,2006,28(5),57-61.
[205]谈明洪,吕昌河.城市用地扩展与耕地保护.自然资源学报,2005,20(1),52-58.
[206]谭俊.台湾地区农地保护的法律调整与制度更新.北京理工大学学报(社会科学版).2000 (4),41-44.
[207]谭永忠,吴次芳.20世纪90年代浙江省耕地非农化过程分析.地理科学,2004,24(1),14-19.
[208]唐健,陈志刚,赵小风等.论中国的耕地保护与粮食安全——与茅于轼先生商榷.中国土地科学,2009,23(3),4-10.
[209]田光进,庄大方,刘明亮.近10年来中国耕地资源的时空变化分析.地理学报,2003(3),30-36.
[210]田淑英.中国耕地资源流失的动因分析.经济理论与经济管理,2007(9),67-69.
[211]田新建,秦富,李明洋.中国水稻生产成本地区性差异成因的实证研究.农业工程学报.2005(21),247-250.
[212]田英杰.支持向量回归机及其应用研究. 博士学位论文,中国农业大学,2005,134-143.
[213]童亿勤,李加林,李伟芳.宁波市耕地资源安全评价.科技通报,2008, 24(2),289-294.
[214]汪德军.中国城市化进程中的土地利用效率研究.博士学位论文,辽宁大学,2008,87-94.
[215]汪涌,蔡运龙,蒙吉军.中国耕地流转驱动力研究综述.资源科学,2007(3),177-182.
[216]汪涌,王滨,马仓等. 基于耕地面积订正的中国复种指数研究.2008,46-52.
[217]王汉民.现代化的日本农业、农村、农民.河南农业科学.2004(8)49-51
[218]王娟,崔保山,卢远等.生态系统服务价值在土地利用规划中的应用. 水土保持报,2006,20(1),160-163,180.
[219]王克强.土地对农民基本生活保障效用的实证研究——以江苏省为例.四川大学学报,哲学社会科学版,2005(3),5-]1.
[220]王磊,刘逢媛,李双成等.耕地非农化格局的演变及其影响因子分析——以京津冀都市圈为例.中国土地科学,2008,22(1),32-38.
[221]王美青,卫新,胡豹等.浙江省粮食单产影响因素分析.中国农学通报,2006(8),617-620.
[222]王冉,吴先华.长三角地区耕地非农化研究.农机化研究,2005(1),91-93.
[223]王瑞雪.耕地非市场价值评估理论方法与实践.博士学位论文,华中农业大学,2005,23-26.
[224]王瑞雪,陈银蓉.国内外耕地资源价值研究综述.中国农业资源与区划,2005,26(3),49-53.
[225]王瑞雪,张安录,颜廷武.近年国外农地价值评估方法研究进展述评.中国土地科学,2005,19(3),59-64.
[226]王树功,周永章.大城市群(圈)资源环境一体化与区域可持续发展研究.人口资源与环境,2002(3),3-13.
[227]王万茂,黄贤金.中国大陆农地价格区划和农地估价.自然资源,1997(4),1-8.
[228]王万茂,李志国.关于耕地生态保护规划基本问题的探讨.中国生态农业学报,2001(4),54-57.
[229]王宇,欧名豪.耕地生态价值与保护研究.国土资源科技管理,2006,(1),104-108.
[230]韦素琼,陈健飞.闽台耕地非农化及关联因子的比较研究.自然资源学报,2004(5)：568-577.
[231]温明炬,唐程杰.中国耕地后备资源.北京：中国大地出版社,2005,135-154.
[232]吴群,郭贯成,万丽平.经济增长与耕地资源数量变化：国际比较及其启示.资源科学,2006(4),45-51.
[233]吴未,黄贤金.土地利用规划中公众利益的价值取向.中国土地科学,2005,19(1),17-22.
[234]吴伟钧.中国土地利用.北京：科学出版社,1994,149-151.
[235]吴先华.耕地非农化研究综述.地理与地理信息科学,2006,22(1),51-56.
[236]萧景楷.农地环境保育效益之评价.水土保持研究,1999,6(3),60-71.
[237]肖屹,郭玉燕.对土地征用中外部性的经济学思考.国土资源科技管理,2005(22),29-33.
[238]肖玉,谢高地,鲁春霞.稻田生态系统气体调节功能及其价值.自然资源学报,2002(5),617-623.
[239]谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估.自然资源学报,2003,18(2),189-196.
[240]谢高地,鲁春霞,肖玉等.青藏高原高寒草地生态系统服务价值评估.山地学报,2003,21(1),50-55.
[241]谢高地,肖玉,鲁春霞. 态系统服务研究：进展、局限和基本范式.植物生态学报,2006(2),191-199.
[242]谢高地,肖玉,甄霖等.我国粮食生产的生态服务价值研究.中国生态农业学报,2005,13(3),10-13.
[243]谢高地,甄霖,鲁春霞等.生态系统服务的供给、消费和价值化.资源科学,2008,30(1),93-99.
[244]谢文蕙,邓卫.城市经济学.北京：清华大学出版社,1996,39-42.
[245]谢宗棠,王生林,杨慧敏.甘肃省耕地资源价值的测算.开发研究,2006(3),99-102.
[246]熊华,刘耀林,车珊珊等.基于支持向量机的土地利用变化模拟模型.武
汉大学学报·信息科学版,2009,34(3),366-369.
[247]许成安,杨青.劳动价值论、要素价值论和效用价值论中若干问题辨析—兼评《劳动价值论与效用价值论的辩证关系》一文.经济评论,2008(1),3-8.
[248]晏智杰.自然资源价值刍议.北京大学学报,2004,41(6),70-77.
[249]杨灿明,郭慧芳.从农民收入来源构成看农民增收.中南政法大学学报,2006(4),24-30.
[250]杨桂山.长江三角洲近50年耕地数量变化的过程与驱动机制研究.自然资源学报,2001(2),121-127.
[251]杨华峰,冯绍元.北京市城近郊区污水灌溉农田发展过程探讨.中国农村水利水电,2005(8),10-12.
[252]杨津生.基于土地利用变化的天津市景观生态格局变迁研究.城市,2004(6),53-54.
[253]杨青生,黎夏.基于支持向量机的元胞自动机及土地利用变化模拟.遥感学报,2006,10(6),836-846.
[254]杨庆媛,张占录,杨华均.土地开发整理项目社会影响评价方法探讨.中国土地科学,2006(6),45-49.
[255]杨月兰,唐炎.土地利用总体规划的生态反思及启示.国土资源科技管理,2007(1),18-22.
[256]杨振荣.台湾耕地利用变迁及永续利用策略之研究(摘编).中国土地科学.2001(11),14-17.
[257]杨志新,郑大玮,文化. 北京郊区农田生态系统服务功能价值的评估研究. 自然资源学报,2005,20(4),564-571.
[258]姚洋.中国农地制度：一个分析框架.中国社会科学,2000(2),54-66.
[259]尹成杰.农业多功能性与推进现代农业建设.中国农村经济,2007(7),4-9.
[260]于伯华.20世纪60年代以来日本耕地面积变化及其启示.资源科学,2007(3),182-189.
[261]俞奉庆,蔡运龙.耕地资源价值重建与农业补贴——一种解决“三农”问题的政策取向.中国土地科学,2004,18(1),18-23.
[262]俞奉庆,蔡运龙.耕地资源价值探讨.中国土地科学,2003,17(3),3-9.
[263]余庆年.江苏城镇化中的用地政策选择.中国土地,1999(6),38-42.
[264]袁哲明,张永生,熊洁仪.基于SVR的多维时间序列分析及其在农业科学中的应用.中国农业科学2008,41(8),2485-2492
[265]臧俊梅,王万茂,陈茵茵.农地非农化中土地增值分配与失地农民权益保障研究——基于农地发展权视角的分析.农业经济问题,2008(2),80-85.
[266]臧俊梅,王万茂,朱亚夫等.我国农地利用经济效益的东、中、西部差异比较分析.农村经济,2006(1),39-42.
[267]曾绍华.支持向量回归机算法理论研究与应用.博士学位论文,重庆大学,2006,156-164.
[268]翟文侠,黄贤金.我国耕地保护政策运行效果分析.中国土地科学.2003(2),8-14.
[269]张凤荣.重在保持耕地生产能力——对新形势下耕地总量动态平衡的理解.中国土地,2003(7),13-15.
[270]张凤荣.保证被征地农民生活水平不降低.中国土地,2005(10),17-1 8.
[271]张凤荣,薛永森,鞠正山等.中国耕地的数量与质量变化分析.资源科学,1998,20(5),32-39.
[272]张凤荣,张晋科,张迪等.1996-2004年中国耕地的粮食生产能力变化研究.中国土地科学,2006,20(2),8-14.
[273]张凤荣.中国已经到了开放集体建设用地流转的阶段.国土资源.2009(7),4-13.
[274]张国平,刘纪远,张增祥.近10年来中国耕地资源的时空变化分析.地理学报,2003,58(3),323-332.
[275]张红宇.我国农业多功能定位的调整与拓展.中国经济时报,2006,http://www. gxny. gov. cn/2006/0324/083630-1. html.
[276]张会,吴群,何守春等.基于农地经济价值功能的征地补偿价格研究——以江苏省泗阳县为例.华中农业大学学报,2007(6),58-62.
[277]张基凯,吴群,黄秀欣.山东省耕地非农化数量最优配置研究——基于17个地级市面板数据的分析.资源经济,2009(6)：47-53.
[278]张丽君.粮食价格分析与预测.中国物价,2009(5),21—23.
[279]张昆仑.论“价值辐射”——对一种土地价值理论的思考.当代财经,2005(2),12-19.
[280]张全景,欧名豪,王万茂.中国土地用途管制制度的耕地保护绩效及其区域差异研究.中国土地科学,2008,22(9),8-13.
[281]张全景,王万茂.我国征地补偿制度改革探讨.国土与自然资源研究,2003(4),22-23.
[282]张润森,施国庆.农地资源社会保障价格的测算方法.统计与决策,2008(7),40-42.
[283]张侠,葛向东,濮励杰等.土地利用的经济生态位分析和耕地保护机制研究.自然资源学报,2002,17(6),677-683.
[284]张晓玲,吴宇哲,关欣.城市化视角下的土地利用变化研究综述.农机化研究,2008(1),242-245.
[285]张效军,欧名豪,高艳梅.耕地保护区域补偿机制研究.中国软科学,2007(12),47-55.
[286]张学辉,王如渊.基于地方政府行为的农地非农化均衡模型.中国土地科学,2009,23(6),4-8.
[287]张耀启,李一清,潘羿.自然与环境资源价值评估的误区.自然资源学报,2005,20(3),453-460.
[288]张颖,王群,王万茂.中国产业结构与用地结构相互关系的实证研究.中国土地科学,2007,21(2),4-8.
[289]张有全,宫辉力,赵文吉等. 北京市1990年-2000年土地利用变化机制分析.资源科学,2007(3),206-213.
[290]张志强,徐忠民,程国栋.条件价值法的发展与应用.地球科学进展,2003,18(3),454-463.
[291]赵常华.论农村土地的社会保障功能.中国房地产,2004(8),42-44.
[292]赵翠薇,濮励杰等.基于经济发展阶段理论的土地利用变化研究——以广西江州区为例.自然资源学报,2006(2),172-179.
[293]赵华甫,张凤荣,许月卿等.北京城市居民需要导向下的耕地功能保护.资源科学,2007(5),56-62.
[294]郑振源.论我国耕地面积及其在经济发展中的作用.国土与自然资源研究, 1991(1),1-7.
[295]钟艳,程彩虹.论农地当前的社会保障功能. 长江大学学报(自科版)2005,2(5),80-83.
[296]周诚.农地征用中的公正补偿.中国土地,2004(1-2),29-30.
[297]周建春.中国耕地产权与价值研究～～兼论征地补偿.中国土地科学,2007,.21(1),4-9.
[298]周建春.耕地估价理论与研究方法.博士学位论文,南京农业大学,2005.
[299]周小萍,谷晓坤,丁娜等.中国发达地区耕地保护观念的转变和机制探讨.中国土地科学,2009,23(1),42-47.
[300]周小萍,卢艳霞,文俊.中国耕地保护理念创新及其实施框架分析.北京师范大学学报,2007(3),139-144.
[301]周小萍,曾磊,王军艳.我国耕地估价研究思路的整合与RRM综合估价模型.资源科学,2002,24(4),35-42.
[302]朱德举,卢艳霞,刘丽.土地开发整理与耕地质量管理.农业工程学报,2002,18(4),167-171.
[303]朱莉芬,黄季焜.城镇化对耕地影响的研究.经济研究,2007(2),137-145.
[304]朱仁友,崔太平.我国农地估价中运用收益还原法存在的问题与求解.商业研究,2001(2),75-77.
[305]朱晓华,张金善.中国耕地资源动态变化剖析.国土资源科技管理,2000,17(4),4-8.
[306]朱忠贵.农村养老制度存在的问题及对策.农村经济,2003(3),45-46.
[2]Alex, J..& Smola, A J.. A Tutorial on Suport Vector Regression. Statistics and Computing,2004,(14),199-222.
[3]Alston, J.. An Analysis of growth of U.S. farmland prices. American Agricultural Economics Association,1986 (68),1-9.
[4]Basam, B.. Tools for land use analysis on different scale with case studies for costarica. The Net herlands:Kluwer Academic publishers,2000,46-49.
[5]Beasley, S.D.,& Workman,W.C.. Estimating amenity values on urban fringe farmland:A contingent valuation approach. Growth and Change,1986,17(4), 70-78.
[6]Bishop, R.C.. Option value:an exposition and extension. Land Economics, 1982(58),1-15.
[7]Brown, M.G.. Support vector machines for optimal classification and spectral immixing.1999(120),167-179.
[8]Burges, C.J.C.. A Tutorial on support vector Ma-chines for Pattern ecognition. Data mining and knowledge discovery,1998(2),121-167.
[9]Burt,O.. Econometric modeling of the capitalization formula for farmland prices. American Agricultural Economics Association,1986,(68),10-26.
[10]Carmen, C.F..& Elena, G. I.. Determinants of residential land-use conversion and sprawl at the rural-urban fringe. American Agricultural Economics Association,2004,86 (5),986-992.
[11]Chang,C.C..& Lin, C. J.. LIBSVM:a library for support vector machines. http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/-cjlin/libsvm,2001
[12]Clark.M.F.. The inconsistency of land values.land rent and capitalization formulas. American Agricultural Economics Association,1993(75),147-155.
[13]Clarke, K.C.. A Self-modifying cellular automaton of historical urbanization in the san Francisco bayarea. Environment and Planning Design,1997(24),247-261.
[14]Cummings,R.G..& Ganderton,P.T.. Substitution effects in CVM values. 1994.205-214.
[15]Daniels, T.,& Lapping, M.. Land preservation:An essential ingredient in smart growth. Journal of Planning Literature,2005,19,316-329.
[16]David,W.P.. Economic values and the natural world. Cambridge, Massachusetts:The MIT Press,1993,35-67.
[17]Dela, C.L.J.. Estimating the determinants of land conversion. Department of Economics, Ateneode Manila University,2001,34-45.
[18]Drake, J.. The non-market value of the Swedish agricultural landscape. European Review of Agricultural Economics,1992,19(3),351-364.
[19]Duke, J. M..& Lynch, L.. Four classes of farmland retention techniques: Comparative evaluation and property rights implications. Land Economics, 2006,82,189-213.
[20]Duke, J.M..& Aull-Hyde, R.. Identifying public preferences for land preservation using the analytic hierarchy process. Ecological Economics, 2002,42,131-145.
[21]Duke, J. M.,& Ilvento, T.W.. A conjoint analysis of public preferences for agricultural land preservation. Agriculture and Resource Economics Review, 2004,33,209-219.
[22]Erickson, K.. Mishra, A.K.. Moss, C.B.. Cash rents, imputed returns, and the valuation of farmassets revisited. In:Moss CB, Schmitz A (eds) Government policy and farmland markets:the maintenance of farmer wealth. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa,223-235
[23]Erb,K.H.. Actual land demand of Austria 1926～2000:A variation on ecological footprint assessment. Land Use Policy,2004(21),247-259.
[24]Francis,E.. Tay, H..& Cao,L.J.. Modenfied support vector machines in financial time series forecasing. Neurocomputing,2002,(48),847-861.
[25]Freeman, A.M.. The measurement of environmental and resource values: Theory and Methods. Washington:RFF Press,1993.125-232.
[26]Geist, H.J..& Lambin, E.F.. Proximate causes and underling driving forces of tropical deforestation.2002,143-150.
[27]Gerbens-Leenes, P.W.. Nonhebel, S..& Ivens, W.P.F.. A method to determine land requirements relating to food consumption patterns.Agriculture. Ecosystems and Environment,2002,90(1),47-58.
[28]Hailu, Y.G..& Rosenberger, R.S.. Modeling migration effects on agricultural lands:A growth equilibrium model. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.2004,33(1),50-60.
[29]Hailu, Y.G..& Brown, C.H.. A growth-focused spatial econometric model of agricultural land development in the northeast. American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting Providence, Rhode Island.2005(6), 24-27.
[30]Halstead, J.M.. Measuring the nonmarket value of Massachusetts agricultural land:A case study. Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council.1984,13(2),12-19.
[31]Hanemann, W.. Willingness to pay and willingness to accept:How much can they differ. The American Economic Review,1991,81(3),635-647.
[32]Hanley, N.C..& SpashL,W.L.. Problems in valuing the benefits of biodiversity protection. Environmental and Resource Economics,1995(2),249-272.
[33]Hu, X.H..& David, H.K.. The emergence of affluence in Beijing:residential social stratification in China's capital city. Urban Geography.2001(22),54-77.
[34]Irwin, E.G..& Geoghegan, J.. Theory, data, methods:developing spatially explicit economic models of land use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2001(85),7-23.
[35]Jokobsson, K.M.. Contingent valuation and endangered species. Methodological Issues and Applications. Cheltenham:Edward Elgar Press,1996.54-63.
[36]Joshua M..& Lori, L.. Gauging support for innovative farmland preservation techniques. Policy Sciences,2007,40(6),123-155.
[37]Karyne,Benjamin.. Gerald, D..& Andre,Bouchard.. Vegetation composition and succession of abandoned farmland:effects of ecological, historical and spatial factors. Landscape Ecology,2005,20,627-647.
[38]Karyne, Benjamin.. Andre, B.E..& Gerald, D.. Managing Abandoned Farmland:The Need to Link Biological and Sociological Aspects. Environmental Management,2008,42,603-619.
[39]Kline, J.D..& Ralph, J.A.. Does land use planning slow the conversion of forest and farm lands?. Growth and Change 1999,30(Winter),3-22.
[40]Kuminoff, N.V.. Farmland conversion:Perceptions and realities. University of California Agricultural issues center, Issues Brief,2001,16-18.
[41]Kwon,Y.J.. Jeong,M.K..& Omitaomu, O.A.. Adaptive support vector regression analysis of closed-loop inspection accuracy. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture,2006,46(6),603-610.
[42]Lee, L.. Factors defecting land use change at the urban-rural fringe. Growth and change,1979,10(4),25-31.
[43]Loomis,J.. Rameker,V..& Seidl,A..Potential non-market benefits of agricultural lands in Colorado:a review of the literature. Agricultural and Resource Policy Report, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics,2002,
[44]Lu, W.Z.. Potential assessment of the support vector machine in forecasting ambient air pollutant trends. Chemosphere,2005(59),693-701.
[45]Matthew,J.M.. Losing ground:Farmland preservation, economic utilitarianism, and the erosion of the agrarian ideal. Agriculture and Human Values,2005(22), 209-223.
[46]Mccormark,M.. A stoking soil potential rating:An evaluation form of land evaluation. Soil Survey and Evaluation,1986,6(2):37-41.
[47]McDonald, M:G.. Agricultural landholding in Japan:Fifty years after land reform. Journal of hysical Human and Regional Geosciences.1997(1),55-78.
[48]Mishra, A.. Moss, C..& Erickson,K.. Valuing farmland withmultiple quasi-fixed inputs. Appl Econ,2004,36(15):1669-1676.
[49]Mishra, A.. Moss, C..& Erickson,K.. The role of credit constraints and government subsidies in farmland valuations in the US:an options pricing model approach. Empirical Economics,2008,34(2),285-297.
[50]'Morris, C.W.. Support vector machines for identifying organisms a comparison with strongly partitioned radial basis function networks. Ecological Modelling,2001(146),57-67.
[51]Opschoor,H.. The ecological footprint:measuring road or metaphor. Ecological Economics,2000(32),363-365.
[52]Pearce,D.. The economic value of biodiversity. London:Earthscan Publications Ltd,1995,65-78.
[53]Portney, P.. The contingent valuation debate:Why economists should care. Economic Perspectives,1994,8(4),3-17.
[54]Costanza,R.. The dynamics of the ecological footprint concept. Ecological Economics,2000(32),341-345.
[55]Robert, C.R..& Rudolf, D.G.. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature,387,1997,15(5),253-260.
[56]Reynolds, J.. Land use change and competition in the south. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.2001,33(2),271-281.
[57]Mitchell, R.C..& Carson, R.T.. Using surveys to value public goods:The contingent valuation method. Washington DC:Resource for the Future,1989.
[58]Randall, A.. A consistent valuation and pricing framework for noncommodity outputs:Progress and prospects. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2007,120,21-30.
[59]Rees,W.E.. Ecofootprint analysis:merits and brickbats. Ecological Economics, 2000(32),371-374.
[60]Rees,W.E.. Uran ecological footprints:why cities cannot be sustainable and why they are a key to sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,1996(16),223-248.
[61]Saizen, I.M.. Effects of land-use master plans in the metropolitan fringe of Japan. Landscape and Urban Planning,2006(78),411-421.
[62]Senbel,M.M..& Daniels, T.. The ecological footprint:a non-monetary metric of human consumption applied to North American. Global Environmental Change,2003(13),83-100.
[63]Shoshany, M..& Goldshleger, N.. Land-use and population density changes in Lsrael 1950 to 1990:Analysis of regional and local trends. Land Use Policy, 2002(19),123-133.
[64]Skinner, M.W..& Kuhn, R.. Agricultural land protection in China:A case study of local governance in Zhejiang Province. Land Use Policy, 2001(18)329-340.
[65]Setokc, K.. Modeling the drivers of urban land use change in the pearl river delta,China:Integrating remote sensing with seriocomic data. Land Economics,2003,79(1),106-121.
[66]Smith, K.V.. Nonmarket valuation of environmental resources:an interpretative appraisal.1993(1),1-26.
[67]Tzoulas, K.. Korpela, K.. Venn,& S.. Yli-Pelkonen.. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure:a literature review. Landsc Urban Plann,2007,81,167-178.
[68]Tweeten, L.. Competing for scarce land:food security and farmland preservation. Ohio State University Department of Agricultural,
Environmental, and Development Economics, Occasional Paper 1998,ESO,2385.
[69]Vallet, J.. Daniel, H.. Beaujouan, V..,& Roze, F.. Plant species response to urbanization:comparison of isolated woodland patches in two cities of North-Western France. Landsc Ecol 2008,23,1205-1217.
[70]Wackernagel, M.M.. Calculating national and global ecological footprint time series:resolving conceptual challenges. Land Use Policy,2004(21),271-278.
[71]Wackernagel, M.R.. Our ecological footprint, reducing human impact on the earth. Gabriola Island, Philadelphia:New Society Publishers,1996.245-253.
[72]Wackernagel,M.O.L. National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept. Ecological Economics,1999(29),375-390.
[73]Wacknagel, M..& Schulzn, D.D.. Trackingthe ecological overshoot of the human economy.2002,9266-9271.
[74]Westman,W.. How much are nature's services worth?. Science,1977, 197(4307),960～964.
[75]White, R..& Engelen,G.C.. Automata and fractal urban form:a cellular modelling approach to the evolution of urban land-use patterns. Environment and Planning,1993,(25),1175-1199.
[76]Yang,H..& Xinbin,Li.. Cultivated land and food supply in China. Land Use Policy,2000,17,73-88.
[77]Yomralioglut, T..& Tudes, T.. Land readjustment implementation in Turkey. International Housing Congress,1996(24),150-161.
[78]York, R.R.. Footprints on the earth:the environmental consequences of modernity. American Sociological Review,2003(68),279-300.
[79]Zander,P.. Kneerim, U..& Groot, J.C.. Multifunctionality of agriculture:tools and methods for impect assessment and valuation. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment.2007,120,1-4.
[80]Zhai, I.G.. Ikeda, S.. An empirical model of land use change in China. Reviews of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 2000,12(1),36～53.
[81][法]萨伊.政治经济学概论.北京：商务印书馆,1997,56-64.
[82][美]约翰.A.迪克逊. 环境影响的经济分析.北京：中国环境科学出版社,2001,16-23.
[83][美]伊利·莫尔豪斯.土地经济学原理.北京：商务印书馆,1982,232-243.
[84][美]迈克里.弗里曼.环境与资源价值评估——理论与方法.北京：人民大学出版社,2002,166-186.
[85]安虎森,陈明.工业化城市化进程与我国城市化推进的路径选择.南开经济研究,2005(1),48-54.
[86]毕于运.中国耕地.北京：中国农业科技出版社,1995,78-82.
[87]毕于运,郑振源.建国以来中国实有耕地面积增减变化分析.资源科学,2000(2),8-12.
[88]蔡继明,周炳林.论城市化与耕地保护.社会科学,2005(6),5-12.
[89]蔡银莺,李晓云,张安录.湖北省农地资源价值研究.自然资源学报,2007,22(1),121-129.
[90]蔡银莺,宗琪,张安录.江汉平原农地资源价值研究.中国人口资源与环境,2007,17(3),85-89.
[91]蔡运龙.中国经济高速发展中的耕地问题.资源科学,2000,22(3)24-28.
[92]蔡运龙.中国农村转型与耕地保护机制.地理科学,2001(1),1-6.
[93]蔡运龙.耕地保护必须政府干预与市场机制相结合.中国土地,1997(11),26-27.
[94]蔡运龙,霍雅勤.中国耕地价值重建方法与案例研究.地理学报,2006,61(10),1084-1092.
[95]蔡运龙,霍雅勤.耕地非农化的供给驱动.中国土地,2002(7),20-22.
[96]蔡运龙,俞奉庆.中国耕地问题的症结与治本之策.中国土地科学,2004,1 8(3),13-17.
[97]蔡运龙,汪涌,李遇平.中国耕地供需变化研究.中国土地科学,2009,23(3),11-18.
[98]曹顺爱,冯科,江华.经济发达地区土地利用生态服务价值评价研究——以广州市为例.资源开发与市场,2009,25(6),510-512.
[99]曹银贵,袁春,周伟等.中国耕地变化的驱动因子及其省域差异分析.中国土地科学,2008,22(2),17-22.
[100]车裕斌.论耕地资源的生态价值及其实现.生态经济,2004(S1),224-228.
[101]陈百明,李世顺.中国耕地数量下降之剖析1986-1995年.地理科学进展,1998(3),47-50.
[102]陈浮,陈刚,包浩生等.城市边 区土地利用变化及人文驱动力机制研究.自然资源学报,2001,16(3)：204～210.
[103]陈会广,曲福田,陈江龙.山东省耕地资源价值评估研究.中国人口资源与环境,2003,13(1),25-30.
[104]陈江龙,曲福田.农地非农化与粮食安全：理论与实证分析.南京农业大学学报,2006(2),103-107.
[105]陈丽,曲福田,师学义.耕地资源社会价值测算方法探讨～～以山西省柳林县为例.资源科学,2006,28(6),86-90.
[106]陈利根,龙开胜.耕地资源数量与经济发展关系的计量分析.2007,4-10.
[107]陈美球,洪士林,许兵杰.我国耕地保护的社会责任及对策分析.中州学刊,2008(5),119-123.
[108]陈星.自然资源价格论.博士学位论文,中共中央党校,2007,124-132.
[109]崔新蕾,张安录.农地城市流转的选择价值研究.中国土地科学.2008,22(7)：11-17.
[110]单胜道,俞劲炎,叶晓朋等.农业用地评估方法研究.资源科学,2000,22(1),45-49.
[111]单胜道,吴次芳.外部地价论.浙江大学学报,2000；30(3),156-160.
[112]邓大才.论农地社会价值及其核算.云南行政学院学报,2002(2),62-66.
[113]邓大才.我国粮食生产成本的结构演化及发展趋势.中州学刊.2008(7),25-28.
[114]董德坤,朱道林,王霞.农地非农化的外部性分析.经济问题,2004(4),55-57.
[115]杜新波,孙习稳.耕地资源可持续发展内涵探讨——兼论耕地资源价值.地域研究与开发,2004,23(6),98-101.
[116]段瑞娟,郝晋珉,张洁瑕. 北京区位土地利用与生态服务价值变化研究. 农业工程学报,2006(9),21-28.
[117]樊小刚.城市化进程中的社会保障制度创新.经济研究参考,2004(47)37-45.
[118]范文洋,孔祥斌,门明新等.城市快速扩展区耕地资源安全评价研究——以北京市大兴区为例.中国农业科技导报,2009,11(2),106-113.
[119]封志明,刘宝勤,杨艳昭.中国耕地资源数量变化的趋势分析与数据重建：1949-2003.自然资源学报,2005,20(1),35-43.
[120]付恒杰.日本城市化模式及其对中国的启示.日本问题研究,2003(4),18-21.
[121]傅超,郑娟尔,吴次芳.建国以来我国耕地数量变化的历史考察与启示.国土资源科技管理,2007(6),68-71.
[122]傅泽强,蔡运龙,杨友孝等.中国粮食安全与耕地资源变化的相关分析.自然资源学报,2001,16(4),313-319.
[123]高淑萍,王小云,李德强.耕地非农化动力机制和约束机制的分析.国土资源科技管理,2004(6),147-150.
[124]葛全胜,戴君虎等.过去30年中国部分省区耕地资源数量变化及驱动因素分析.自然科学进展,2003,13(8),825-832.
[125]耕地问题研究组. 中国耕地递减问题的数量经济分析.北京：经济科学出版社,1992.
[126]谷树忠.对耕地资源估价方法的探讨.自然资源,1997(4),10-14.
[127]关谷俊作著,金洪云译.日本的农地制度.北京：生活·读书·新知三联书店,2004,156-159.
[128]国土资源部地籍管理司.2005全国土地利用变更调查报告.北京：中国大地出版社,2006,63-67.
[129]胡锋.1990年以来的粮食价格水平波动研究.中国粮食经济.2008(5)：23-25.
[130]胡靖.中国农业：社会效应与社会价值核算.农业经济问题,1995(9)45-49.
[131]胡新艳,刘一明,牛宝俊.东南沿海地区耕地资源承载力研究.国土与自然资源研究,2001(1),21-24.
[132]黄大全,郑伟元.海外城市化与耕地保护对中国的启示.中国土地科学,2005,19(3),38-43.
[133]黄烈佳,张安录.农地价值与农地城市流转决策若干问题探讨.地理与地 理信息科学,2006,22(2),88-91.
[134]黄贤金.农用地估价技术路线及方法研究——以南京市耕地资源价值核算为例.南京农业大学学报,1997,20(3),101-105.
[135]黄贤金.江苏省耕地资源价值核算研究.江苏社会科学,1999(4),55-60.
[136]黄忠华,吴次芳,杜雪君.我国耕地变化与社会经济因素的实证分析.自然资源学报,2009,24(2),192-199.
[137]霍雅勤,蔡运龙.耕地资源价值的评价与重建——以甘肃省会宁县为例.干旱区资源与环境,2003,17(5),81-85.
[138]霍雅勤,蔡运龙.可持续理念下的土地价值决定与量化.中国土地科学,2003,17(2),19-23.
[139]霍雅勤,蔡运龙,王瑛.耕地对农民的效用考察及耕地功能分析.中国人口资源与环境,2004.14(3),105-108.
[140]霍雅勤,姚华军.耕地资源价值影响因素分析。中国土地,2003(3),22-23.
[141]贾绍凤,张豪禧,孟向京.我国耕地变化趋势与对策再探讨.1997,24-30.
[142]孔祥斌,张凤荣,李霖.农用地估价方法探讨.河北农业大学学报,2002,25(4),57-61.
[143]孔祥斌,苏强,孙宪海等.基于社会保障功能的耕地保有量测算——以北京市房山区为例.资源开发与市场,2008,24(4),299-302.
[144]孔祥斌,张凤荣,姜光辉等.国外农用地保护对北京市耕地保护的启示.中国土地科学,2005,19(5),50-54,14.
[145]l李翠珍,孔祥斌,孔宪海.北京市耕地资源价值体系及价值估算方法.地理学报,2008,63(3),321-329.
[146]李丹,刘友兆.城市化发展与耕地变动的关系研究.经济纵横,2003(1),
[147]李国键,韩立民.农村土地的社会功能及其补偿依据。山东社会科学,2007(1),73-75.
[148]李金昌,姜文来.生态价值论.重庆：重庆大学出版社,1999.
[149]李景刚,何春阳,史培军.近20年中国北方13省的耕地变化与驱动力.地理学报,2004,59(2),274-282.
[150]李连科.哲学价值引论.北京：商务印书馆出版社,1999.
[151]李文华,张彪,谢高地.中国生态系统服务研究的回顾与展望.自然资源 学报,2009,24(1),1-10.
[152]李宪文,林培.国内外耕地利用与保护的理论基础及其发展.地理科学进展,2001,20(4),305-313.
[153]李湘梅,周敬宣,罗璐琴等.基于支持向量机的城市生态足迹动态化评价.资源科学,2007,29(5),16-21.
[154]李秀彬,王卫.土地利用压力与可持续发展.中国土地,1999(5),1-2.
[155]李永乐,吴群.经济增长与耕地非农化的Kuznets曲线验证——来自中国省际面板数据的证据.资源科学,2008,30(5),667-672.
[156]李渊,鲁成树,王娟.基于土地利用变化的生态服务价值研究.农业资源与环境科学,2007,23(6),576-580.
[157]黎永莲.发达国家农业保护的非经济效率目标.农业经济,2007(6)9-20.
[158]梁红梅,刘卫东,连纲.浙江省1996-2005年新增建设用地效率分析.技术经济,2008,27(4),45-49.
[159]梁书民.基于耕地保护的中国城镇化发展战略研究.中国土地资源,2009,23(5),41-46.
[160]林英彦.不动产估价.台北：台湾文笙书局,1989.
[161]刘凤朝,孙玉涛.耕地减少、农民失地与经济增长的关系分析.资源科学,2008,30(1),52-57.
[162]刘慧芳.论我国农地地价的构成与量化.中国土地科学,2000(3),15-18.
[163]刘纪远,刘明亮,庄大方.中国近期土地利用变化的空间格局分析.2002,32(12),1031-1041.
[164]刘丽军,宋敏,屈宝香.中国耕地非农化的区域差异及其收敛性.资源科学,2009,31(1),116-122.
[165]刘建国.生态位理论的发展及其在农村生态工程建设中的应用.农业现代化研究,1987(6),30～33
[166]刘卫东.耕地多功能保护问题研究. 国土资源科技管理,2008,25(1)1-5.
[167]刘卫东.论耕地保护认识的误区.中国经济与管理科学,2008(3),8-10.
[168]刘卫东,梁红梅.近十年我国耕地变化的区域效应及其合理性分析.浙江 大学学报,2008,38(6),14-22.
[169]刘新卫. “黄金发展阶段”日本、韩国和中国台湾土地利用浅析.国土资源情报,2006(2),50-56.
[170]刘旭,王秀东,陈孝.我国粮食安全框架下种质资源价值评估探析——以改革开放以来小麦种质资源利用为例.农业经济问题,2008(12),14-19.
[171]刘治钦,杨秋林.农用土地的会计确认和计量探讨.农业技术经济,2004(4),26-30.
[172]隆宗佐. 城市土地资源高效利用研究. 博士学位论文,华中农业大学,2008.
[173]卢锋,谢亚. 我国粮食供求与价格走势(1980～2007)——粮价波动、宏观稳定及粮食安全问题探讨.管理世界,2008(3),70-80.
[174]鲁春霞,谢高地,肖玉,于云江.青藏高原生态系统服务功能的价值评估.生态学报,2004,24(12),2749-2755.
[175]鲁奇.中国耕地资源开发、保护与粮食安全保障问题.资源科学,1999,21(6),5-8.
[176]吕耀,王兆阳.基于农业多功能性理念的农业多元价值体系重建.价格理论与实践.2007(4),35-36
[177]罗其友,高明杰,陶陶.农业功能统筹战略问题.中国农业资源与区划.2003(12),25-29
[178]马斌.农村社会养老保险的现状、问题及对策.中国农村经济,2001(8),55-60.
[179]马凯,梁流涛,杨渝红.我国城乡非农建设用地市场之演化规律研究.中国人口资源与环境,2009,19(3),75-81.
[180]马新辉,任志远,孙根年.城市植被净化大气价值计量与评价——以西安市为例.中国生态农业学报,2004, (2),180-182.
[181]闵捷,高魏,李晓云等.武汉市土地利用与生态系统服务价值的时空变化分析.水土保持报,2006,20(4),170-174.
[182]闵捷,张安录,蔡银莺.地块尺度农地城市流转驱动机制研究——基于武汉市和黄冈市的问卷调查.华中农业大学学报.2008(5),29-33.
[183]宁波市统计局.新世纪新辉煌——宁波“十五”经济社会发展纪实.北
京：中国统计出版社,2006,63-88.
[184]宁波五十年编委会.宁波五十年(1949～～1999).宁波：宁波出版社,1999,363-356.
[185]牛海鹏,张安录.基于生态位理论的耕地数量变化驱动机制分析.资源科学.2008,30(10),1533-1540.
[186]欧阳志云,王如松.生态系统服务功能、生态价值与可持续发展.世界科技研究与发展,22(5),45-50.
[187]庞英.耕地利用效益及其区域差异.南京：南京农业大学,2006,19-20.
[188]乔荣锋,高进云,张安录.山地丘陵地区农地资源价值评估——以湖北省宜昌市为例.资源科学,2006,28(6),97-103.
[189]曲福田.土地价格及分配关系与农地非农化经济机制研究.中国农村经济,2001(12),36-41
[190]曲福田,陈江龙.两岸经济成长阶段农地非农化的比较研究.中国土地科学,2001(6),5-9.
[191]曲福田,陈江龙,陈雯.农地非农化经济驱动机制的理论分析与实证研究.自然资源学报,2005(2),231-241.
[192]曲福田,吴丽梅.经济增长与耕地非农化的库兹涅茨曲线假说及验证.资源科学,2004,26(5),61-67.
[193]任浩.征地制度中地价补偿标准的研究.硕士学位论文,中国农业大学,2003,57-59.
[194]盛广恒,郭剑平.城市化过程中耕地非农化的机会成本分析.河海大学学报,2005,7(1),42-46.
[195]史娟,张凤荣,赵婷婷.1998年～2006年中国耕地资源的时空变化特征.资源科学,2008,30(8),1191-1198.
[196]石忆邵,彭志宏,陈华杰等.国际大都市建设用地变化特征、影响因素及时上海的启示.城市规划学刊,2008(6),32-39.
[197]宋戈,吴次芳,王杨.城镇化发展与耕地保护关系研究.农业经济问题,2006(1).64-67.
[198]宋戈,吴次芳,王杨.黑龙江省耕地非农化与经济发展的Granger因果关系研究.中国土地科学,2006(3),33-38.
[199]宋敏,张安录.湖北省农地资源正外部性价值量估算——基于对农地社会与生态之功能和价值分类的分析. 长江流域资源与环境,2009,18(4),314-319.
[200]孙强,蔡运龙.日本耕地保护与土地管理的历史经验及其对中国的启示.北京大学学报,2008,44(2),249-256.
[201]孙强,蔡运龙,王乐.北京耕地流失的时空特征与驱动机制.资源科学,2007(4),158-163.
[202]孙新章,谢高地,成升魁等.中国农田生产系统土壤保持功能及其经济价值.水土保持学报,2005(4),156-159.
[203]孙新章,谢高地,张其仔等.中国生态补偿的实践及其政策取向.资源科学,2006,28(4),25-30.
[204]孙燕,林振山,刘会玉.中国耕地数量变化的突变特征及驱动机制.资源科学,2006,28(5),57-61.
[205]谈明洪,吕昌河.城市用地扩展与耕地保护.自然资源学报,2005,20(1),52-58.
[206]谭俊.台湾地区农地保护的法律调整与制度更新.北京理工大学学报(社会科学版).2000 (4),41-44.
[207]谭永忠,吴次芳.20世纪90年代浙江省耕地非农化过程分析.地理科学,2004,24(1),14-19.
[208]唐健,陈志刚,赵小风等.论中国的耕地保护与粮食安全——与茅于轼先生商榷.中国土地科学,2009,23(3),4-10.
[209]田光进,庄大方,刘明亮.近10年来中国耕地资源的时空变化分析.地理学报,2003(3),30-36.
[210]田淑英.中国耕地资源流失的动因分析.经济理论与经济管理,2007(9),67-69.
[211]田新建,秦富,李明洋.中国水稻生产成本地区性差异成因的实证研究.农业工程学报.2005(21),247-250.
[212]田英杰.支持向量回归机及其应用研究. 博士学位论文,中国农业大学,2005,134-143.
[213]童亿勤,李加林,李伟芳.宁波市耕地资源安全评价.科技通报,2008, 24(2),289-294.
[214]汪德军.中国城市化进程中的土地利用效率研究.博士学位论文,辽宁大学,2008,87-94.
[215]汪涌,蔡运龙,蒙吉军.中国耕地流转驱动力研究综述.资源科学,2007(3),177-182.
[216]汪涌,王滨,马仓等. 基于耕地面积订正的中国复种指数研究.2008,46-52.
[217]王汉民.现代化的日本农业、农村、农民.河南农业科学.2004(8)49-51
[218]王娟,崔保山,卢远等.生态系统服务价值在土地利用规划中的应用. 水土保持报,2006,20(1),160-163,180.
[219]王克强.土地对农民基本生活保障效用的实证研究——以江苏省为例.四川大学学报,哲学社会科学版,2005(3),5-]1.
[220]王磊,刘逢媛,李双成等.耕地非农化格局的演变及其影响因子分析——以京津冀都市圈为例.中国土地科学,2008,22(1),32-38.
[221]王美青,卫新,胡豹等.浙江省粮食单产影响因素分析.中国农学通报,2006(8),617-620.
[222]王冉,吴先华.长三角地区耕地非农化研究.农机化研究,2005(1),91-93.
[223]王瑞雪.耕地非市场价值评估理论方法与实践.博士学位论文,华中农业大学,2005,23-26.
[224]王瑞雪,陈银蓉.国内外耕地资源价值研究综述.中国农业资源与区划,2005,26(3),49-53.
[225]王瑞雪,张安录,颜廷武.近年国外农地价值评估方法研究进展述评.中国土地科学,2005,19(3),59-64.
[226]王树功,周永章.大城市群(圈)资源环境一体化与区域可持续发展研究.人口资源与环境,2002(3),3-13.
[227]王万茂,黄贤金.中国大陆农地价格区划和农地估价.自然资源,1997(4),1-8.
[228]王万茂,李志国.关于耕地生态保护规划基本问题的探讨.中国生态农业学报,2001(4),54-57.
[229]王宇,欧名豪.耕地生态价值与保护研究.国土资源科技管理,2006,(1),104-108.
[230]韦素琼,陈健飞.闽台耕地非农化及关联因子的比较研究.自然资源学报,2004(5)：568-577.
[231]温明炬,唐程杰.中国耕地后备资源.北京：中国大地出版社,2005,135-154.
[232]吴群,郭贯成,万丽平.经济增长与耕地资源数量变化：国际比较及其启示.资源科学,2006(4),45-51.
[233]吴未,黄贤金.土地利用规划中公众利益的价值取向.中国土地科学,2005,19(1),17-22.
[234]吴伟钧.中国土地利用.北京：科学出版社,1994,149-151.
[235]吴先华.耕地非农化研究综述.地理与地理信息科学,2006,22(1),51-56.
[236]萧景楷.农地环境保育效益之评价.水土保持研究,1999,6(3),60-71.
[237]肖屹,郭玉燕.对土地征用中外部性的经济学思考.国土资源科技管理,2005(22),29-33.
[238]肖玉,谢高地,鲁春霞.稻田生态系统气体调节功能及其价值.自然资源学报,2002(5),617-623.
[239]谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估.自然资源学报,2003,18(2),189-196.
[240]谢高地,鲁春霞,肖玉等.青藏高原高寒草地生态系统服务价值评估.山地学报,2003,21(1),50-55.
[241]谢高地,肖玉,鲁春霞. 态系统服务研究：进展、局限和基本范式.植物生态学报,2006(2),191-199.
[242]谢高地,肖玉,甄霖等.我国粮食生产的生态服务价值研究.中国生态农业学报,2005,13(3),10-13.
[243]谢高地,甄霖,鲁春霞等.生态系统服务的供给、消费和价值化.资源科学,2008,30(1),93-99.
[244]谢文蕙,邓卫.城市经济学.北京：清华大学出版社,1996,39-42.
[245]谢宗棠,王生林,杨慧敏.甘肃省耕地资源价值的测算.开发研究,2006(3),99-102.
[246]熊华,刘耀林,车珊珊等.基于支持向量机的土地利用变化模拟模型.武
汉大学学报·信息科学版,2009,34(3),366-369.
[247]许成安,杨青.劳动价值论、要素价值论和效用价值论中若干问题辨析—兼评《劳动价值论与效用价值论的辩证关系》一文.经济评论,2008(1),3-8.
[248]晏智杰.自然资源价值刍议.北京大学学报,2004,41(6),70-77.
[249]杨灿明,郭慧芳.从农民收入来源构成看农民增收.中南政法大学学报,2006(4),24-30.
[250]杨桂山.长江三角洲近50年耕地数量变化的过程与驱动机制研究.自然资源学报,2001(2),121-127.
[251]杨华峰,冯绍元.北京市城近郊区污水灌溉农田发展过程探讨.中国农村水利水电,2005(8),10-12.
[252]杨津生.基于土地利用变化的天津市景观生态格局变迁研究.城市,2004(6),53-54.
[253]杨青生,黎夏.基于支持向量机的元胞自动机及土地利用变化模拟.遥感学报,2006,10(6),836-846.
[254]杨庆媛,张占录,杨华均.土地开发整理项目社会影响评价方法探讨.中国土地科学,2006(6),45-49.
[255]杨月兰,唐炎.土地利用总体规划的生态反思及启示.国土资源科技管理,2007(1),18-22.
[256]杨振荣.台湾耕地利用变迁及永续利用策略之研究(摘编).中国土地科学.2001(11),14-17.
[257]杨志新,郑大玮,文化. 北京郊区农田生态系统服务功能价值的评估研究. 自然资源学报,2005,20(4),564-571.
[258]姚洋.中国农地制度：一个分析框架.中国社会科学,2000(2),54-66.
[259]尹成杰.农业多功能性与推进现代农业建设.中国农村经济,2007(7),4-9.
[260]于伯华.20世纪60年代以来日本耕地面积变化及其启示.资源科学,2007(3),182-189.
[261]俞奉庆,蔡运龙.耕地资源价值重建与农业补贴——一种解决“三农”问题的政策取向.中国土地科学,2004,18(1),18-23.
[262]俞奉庆,蔡运龙.耕地资源价值探讨.中国土地科学,2003,17(3),3-9.
[263]余庆年.江苏城镇化中的用地政策选择.中国土地,1999(6),38-42.
[264]袁哲明,张永生,熊洁仪.基于SVR的多维时间序列分析及其在农业科学中的应用.中国农业科学2008,41(8),2485-2492
[265]臧俊梅,王万茂,陈茵茵.农地非农化中土地增值分配与失地农民权益保障研究——基于农地发展权视角的分析.农业经济问题,2008(2),80-85.
[266]臧俊梅,王万茂,朱亚夫等.我国农地利用经济效益的东、中、西部差异比较分析.农村经济,2006(1),39-42.
[267]曾绍华.支持向量回归机算法理论研究与应用.博士学位论文,重庆大学,2006,156-164.
[268]翟文侠,黄贤金.我国耕地保护政策运行效果分析.中国土地科学.2003(2),8-14.
[269]张凤荣.重在保持耕地生产能力——对新形势下耕地总量动态平衡的理解.中国土地,2003(7),13-15.
[270]张凤荣.保证被征地农民生活水平不降低.中国土地,2005(10),17-1 8.
[271]张凤荣,薛永森,鞠正山等.中国耕地的数量与质量变化分析.资源科学,1998,20(5),32-39.
[272]张凤荣,张晋科,张迪等.1996-2004年中国耕地的粮食生产能力变化研究.中国土地科学,2006,20(2),8-14.
[273]张凤荣.中国已经到了开放集体建设用地流转的阶段.国土资源.2009(7),4-13.
[274]张国平,刘纪远,张增祥.近10年来中国耕地资源的时空变化分析.地理学报,2003,58(3),323-332.
[275]张红宇.我国农业多功能定位的调整与拓展.中国经济时报,2006,http://www. gxny. gov. cn/2006/0324/083630-1. html.
[276]张会,吴群,何守春等.基于农地经济价值功能的征地补偿价格研究——以江苏省泗阳县为例.华中农业大学学报,2007(6),58-62.
[277]张基凯,吴群,黄秀欣.山东省耕地非农化数量最优配置研究——基于17个地级市面板数据的分析.资源经济,2009(6)：47-53.
[278]张丽君.粮食价格分析与预测.中国物价,2009(5),21—23.
[279]张昆仑.论“价值辐射”——对一种土地价值理论的思考.当代财经,2005(2),12-19.
[280]张全景,欧名豪,王万茂.中国土地用途管制制度的耕地保护绩效及其区域差异研究.中国土地科学,2008,22(9),8-13.
[281]张全景,王万茂.我国征地补偿制度改革探讨.国土与自然资源研究,2003(4),22-23.
[282]张润森,施国庆.农地资源社会保障价格的测算方法.统计与决策,2008(7),40-42.
[283]张侠,葛向东,濮励杰等.土地利用的经济生态位分析和耕地保护机制研究.自然资源学报,2002,17(6),677-683.
[284]张晓玲,吴宇哲,关欣.城市化视角下的土地利用变化研究综述.农机化研究,2008(1),242-245.
[285]张效军,欧名豪,高艳梅.耕地保护区域补偿机制研究.中国软科学,2007(12),47-55.
[286]张学辉,王如渊.基于地方政府行为的农地非农化均衡模型.中国土地科学,2009,23(6),4-8.
[287]张耀启,李一清,潘羿.自然与环境资源价值评估的误区.自然资源学报,2005,20(3),453-460.
[288]张颖,王群,王万茂.中国产业结构与用地结构相互关系的实证研究.中国土地科学,2007,21(2),4-8.
[289]张有全,宫辉力,赵文吉等. 北京市1990年-2000年土地利用变化机制分析.资源科学,2007(3),206-213.
[290]张志强,徐忠民,程国栋.条件价值法的发展与应用.地球科学进展,2003,18(3),454-463.
[291]赵常华.论农村土地的社会保障功能.中国房地产,2004(8),42-44.
[292]赵翠薇,濮励杰等.基于经济发展阶段理论的土地利用变化研究——以广西江州区为例.自然资源学报,2006(2),172-179.
[293]赵华甫,张凤荣,许月卿等.北京城市居民需要导向下的耕地功能保护.资源科学,2007(5),56-62.
[294]郑振源.论我国耕地面积及其在经济发展中的作用.国土与自然资源研究, 1991(1),1-7.
[295]钟艳,程彩虹.论农地当前的社会保障功能. 长江大学学报(自科版)2005,2(5),80-83.
[296]周诚.农地征用中的公正补偿.中国土地,2004(1-2),29-30.
[297]周建春.中国耕地产权与价值研究～～兼论征地补偿.中国土地科学,2007,.21(1),4-9.
[298]周建春.耕地估价理论与研究方法.博士学位论文,南京农业大学,2005.
[299]周小萍,谷晓坤,丁娜等.中国发达地区耕地保护观念的转变和机制探讨.中国土地科学,2009,23(1),42-47.
[300]周小萍,卢艳霞,文俊.中国耕地保护理念创新及其实施框架分析.北京师范大学学报,2007(3),139-144.
[301]周小萍,曾磊,王军艳.我国耕地估价研究思路的整合与RRM综合估价模型.资源科学,2002,24(4),35-42.
[302]朱德举,卢艳霞,刘丽.土地开发整理与耕地质量管理.农业工程学报,2002,18(4),167-171.
[303]朱莉芬,黄季焜.城镇化对耕地影响的研究.经济研究,2007(2),137-145.
[304]朱仁友,崔太平.我国农地估价中运用收益还原法存在的问题与求解.商业研究,2001(2),75-77.
[305]朱晓华,张金善.中国耕地资源动态变化剖析.国土资源科技管理,2000,17(4),4-8.
[306]朱忠贵.农村养老制度存在的问题及对策.农村经济,2003(3),45-46.