渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷东部走滑构造特征及其对油气成藏的影响研究
|
摘要
研究区位于郯庐断裂中段与济阳坳陷的构造结合部,区内走滑构造广泛发育,主要的走滑断裂有7条,分别是郯庐断裂带的东西两支、垦东断层、孤东断层、长堤断层、埕东断层和发育于垦东凸起中部的浅层走滑构造带。走滑构造带与油气富集带有着明显的对应关系。
通过对研究区内二维、三维地震测线和平面构造图的精细解释和分析,分别揭示了各走滑断裂在平面、剖面和三维空间上的构造形态。根据走滑断裂及其伴生构造的平面和剖面上的几何学特征,将研究区内的走滑断裂划分为三种类型:成熟型走滑断裂、隐伏型走滑断裂、不连续型的走滑断裂。
从理论模式研究入手,推导了拉分盆地中盆地的走滑速率与沉降速率之间的关系,证实了走滑速率同盆地的几何形状参数、最大沉降深度和盆地的沉降速率存在着稳定的数值关系。通过对莱州湾地区潍北凹陷基底沉降历史的分析,建立了潍北凹陷沉降速率与郯庐断裂中段走滑速率之间的经验关系式,进而求出郯庐断裂中段新生代右行走滑位移量的大小为40km。
运用2DMove软件,对研究区内四条典型剖面进行构造复原,计算出了各条剖面每个时期的伸展参数,对研究区构造活动强度进行了定量分析,揭示了研究区的构造演化规律。通过运用Ansys软件进行有限元模拟,恢复了晚白垩世晚期-古近纪早期研究区内的构造应力场和应变场,揭示了扭张作用是研究区内走滑断层开始走滑的主要原因。
通过上述分析,结合对究区内近几年勘探开发成功和失败的实例分析,全面探讨了走滑活动对于油气成藏“生”、“储”、“盖”、“圈”、“运”、“保”各因素的影响。
The study area is located in the conjunction area of Middle Tan-Lu fault zone and Jiyang depression. Strike-slip structures are greatly developed. There are seven main strike-slip faults in the study area: East and West branch faults of Tan-Lu fault zone, Kendong fault, Gudong fault, Changdi fault, Chengdong fault and shallow strike-slip fault zone developed in the middle part of Kendong uplift. Strike-slip structural zones coincide with oil&gas accumulation zones in the study area.
Based on the interpretation results of 2D and 3D seismic profiles and structural maps, the horizontal, vertical and spatial strucutural features of the main strike-slip faults are studied. According to their horizontal and vertical features, they are divided into three types: matured strike-slip fault, buried strike-slip fault and discontinuous strike-slip fault.
On the basis of theoretical model research, the formula between the strike-slip rate and the subsidence rate in the pull-apart basin is derived. It is confirmed that the strike-slip moving rate has a steady relationship with the geometric parameters, max subsidence depth and the subsidence rate of the strike-slip basin. Based on the subsidence history analysis of the Weibei sag, the experiment relation between the Tan-Lu fault strike-slip rate and Weibei sag subsidence rate is obtained and the Cenozoic dextral strike-slip displacement of the Middle Tan-Lu fault in the Laizhou Bay is calculated for about 40km.
Four typical seismic profiles in the study area are restored using 2DMove software. The extension parameters of every balanced cross-section in the different period are calculated.The intensity of tectonic evolution is quantitatively analyzed and the tectonic evolution history is revealed. The structural stress field and strain field of the study area during the late Late-Cretaceous to early Tertiary are rebuilt after finite element analysis using Ansys software. The results show that the transtension in study area at that time is the main reason for the trigger of the strike-slip faults strike-slipping movement.
Based on the above analyses, together with the successful and failing oil&gas exploration and development cases during the recent year in the study area, the influence of the strike-slip movement on the important oil&gas accumulation factors: source rock, reservoir rock, cap rock, migration pathway, trap and preservation is carefully studied.
通过对研究区内二维、三维地震测线和平面构造图的精细解释和分析,分别揭示了各走滑断裂在平面、剖面和三维空间上的构造形态。根据走滑断裂及其伴生构造的平面和剖面上的几何学特征,将研究区内的走滑断裂划分为三种类型:成熟型走滑断裂、隐伏型走滑断裂、不连续型的走滑断裂。
从理论模式研究入手,推导了拉分盆地中盆地的走滑速率与沉降速率之间的关系,证实了走滑速率同盆地的几何形状参数、最大沉降深度和盆地的沉降速率存在着稳定的数值关系。通过对莱州湾地区潍北凹陷基底沉降历史的分析,建立了潍北凹陷沉降速率与郯庐断裂中段走滑速率之间的经验关系式,进而求出郯庐断裂中段新生代右行走滑位移量的大小为40km。
运用2DMove软件,对研究区内四条典型剖面进行构造复原,计算出了各条剖面每个时期的伸展参数,对研究区构造活动强度进行了定量分析,揭示了研究区的构造演化规律。通过运用Ansys软件进行有限元模拟,恢复了晚白垩世晚期-古近纪早期研究区内的构造应力场和应变场,揭示了扭张作用是研究区内走滑断层开始走滑的主要原因。
通过上述分析,结合对究区内近几年勘探开发成功和失败的实例分析,全面探讨了走滑活动对于油气成藏“生”、“储”、“盖”、“圈”、“运”、“保”各因素的影响。
The study area is located in the conjunction area of Middle Tan-Lu fault zone and Jiyang depression. Strike-slip structures are greatly developed. There are seven main strike-slip faults in the study area: East and West branch faults of Tan-Lu fault zone, Kendong fault, Gudong fault, Changdi fault, Chengdong fault and shallow strike-slip fault zone developed in the middle part of Kendong uplift. Strike-slip structural zones coincide with oil&gas accumulation zones in the study area.
Based on the interpretation results of 2D and 3D seismic profiles and structural maps, the horizontal, vertical and spatial strucutural features of the main strike-slip faults are studied. According to their horizontal and vertical features, they are divided into three types: matured strike-slip fault, buried strike-slip fault and discontinuous strike-slip fault.
On the basis of theoretical model research, the formula between the strike-slip rate and the subsidence rate in the pull-apart basin is derived. It is confirmed that the strike-slip moving rate has a steady relationship with the geometric parameters, max subsidence depth and the subsidence rate of the strike-slip basin. Based on the subsidence history analysis of the Weibei sag, the experiment relation between the Tan-Lu fault strike-slip rate and Weibei sag subsidence rate is obtained and the Cenozoic dextral strike-slip displacement of the Middle Tan-Lu fault in the Laizhou Bay is calculated for about 40km.
Four typical seismic profiles in the study area are restored using 2DMove software. The extension parameters of every balanced cross-section in the different period are calculated.The intensity of tectonic evolution is quantitatively analyzed and the tectonic evolution history is revealed. The structural stress field and strain field of the study area during the late Late-Cretaceous to early Tertiary are rebuilt after finite element analysis using Ansys software. The results show that the transtension in study area at that time is the main reason for the trigger of the strike-slip faults strike-slipping movement.
Based on the above analyses, together with the successful and failing oil&gas exploration and development cases during the recent year in the study area, the influence of the strike-slip movement on the important oil&gas accumulation factors: source rock, reservoir rock, cap rock, migration pathway, trap and preservation is carefully studied.
引文
[1]池英柳,赵文智.渤海湾盆地新生代走滑构造与油气聚集,石油学报,2000,21(2): 14-20.
[2]漆家福.渤海湾新生代盆地的两种构造系统及其成因解释.中国地质,2004,31(1): 15-22.
[3]李家康.渤海湾油气成藏特点及与断层关系.石油学报,2001,22(2): 26-31.
[4]徐嘉炜.论走滑断层作用的几个主要问题.地学前缘,1995,2(1~2):125-136.
[5]Kennedy W Q. The Great Glen Fault. Geol Soc London Quarterly Journal,1946, 102: 47-76.
[6]Moody J D and Hill M J. Wrench-fault tectonics. Geol Soc Am Bull, 1956, 67: 1207-1246.
[7]Crowell J C. Displacement along the San Andreas fault, California. Geol Soc Am Special Paper,1962, 71:61.
[8]Wilson J T. A New Class of Faults and their Bearing on Continental Drift. Nature,1965, 207:343–347.
[9]Wilcox R E, Harding T P. Seely D R. Basic wrench tectonics. Am Assoc Petro Geol Bull, 1973,57: 74-96.
[10]Freund R. Kinematics of transform and transcurrent faults. Tectonophysics, 1974, 21: 93-134.
[11]Taira A, Saito Y, Hashimoto M. The role of oblique subduction and strike-slip tectonics in the evolution of Japan. In Geodynamic of the Western Pacific-Indonesian Region, V.11, Geodynamics Series, Washington D C: Am Geophys Union,1983,303-317.
[12]Woodcock N H. The role of strike-slip fault systems at plate boundaries. Royal Society oI London Philosophical Transactions. Ser A,1986,317: 13-29.
[13]Tapponier P, Peltzer G, Armijo R. On the mechanics of the collision between India and Asia. In Coward M P and Reis A C eds. Collision Tectonics. Geol Soc. London Special Publication,1986,19:115-157.
[14]Gammond J F.Bridge structures as sense of displacement criteria in brittle fault zones.Struct.Geol.,1987,9(5~6):609-620.
[15]Sylvester A G. Strike-slip faults. Geol Soc Am Bull, 1988, 100: 1666-1703.
[16]Dresen G. Stress distribution and the orientation of Riedel shears. Tectonophysics,1991, 188: 239–247.
[17]Richard P, Mocquet B, Cobbold P R. Experiments on simultaneous faulting and folding above a basement wrench fault.Tectonophysics,1991,188:133-141.
[18]England P, Molnar P. Right-lateral shear and rotation as the explanation for strike-slip faulting in eastern Tibet. Nature,1990,344:140-142.
[19]Martel S J. Formation of compound strike-slip fault zones, Mount Abbot Quadrangle, California. Journal of Structural Geology,1990,12:869–882.
[20]Mann P. Model for the formation of large transtensional basin in zone of tectonic escape. Geology,1997,25(3):211-214.
[21]徐嘉炜.郯庐断裂带的平移运动及其地质意义.国际交流地质学术论文集.北京:地质出版社,1980,129-142.
[22]Xu J W. Zhu G. Tong W X. Cui K R, et al. Formation and evolution of the Tancheng-Lujiang wrench fault system: a major shear system to the Northwest of the Pacific Ocean. Tectonophysics, 1987,134:273-310.
[23]张用夏,李卢玲.郯庐断裂的平移及其对邻区的影响.构造地质论丛.北京:地质出版社,1984,1-8.
[24]邓乃恭.中生代华夏类型构造和郯庐断裂体系的特征与形成机制.构造地质论丛.北京:地质出版社,1984, 33-38.
[25]陈丕基. 郯庐断裂巨大平移的时代与格局. 科学通报,1988, 33(4): 289-293.
[26]冯先岳.阿尔金断裂带.中国活断裂.北京:地震出版,1982,219-225.
[27]张治洮.阿尔金断裂的地质特征.中国地质科学院西安地质矿产研究所所刊, 1985,9: 20-32.
[28]黄汉纯,王长利.阿尔金构造带特征及其对塔里木和柴达木盆地的影响[M].北京:地质出版社,1987.
[29]周勇,潘裕生. 茫崖一肃北段阿尔金断裂右旋走滑运动的确定.地质科学,1998,33(1):9-15.
[30]钟大赉, Tapponier P, 吴海威等.大型走滑断裂-碰撞后陆内变形的重要形式. 科学通报,1989,34(7):526-529.
[31]吴海威, 张连生, 秸少承. 红河-哀牢山断裂带-喜山期陆内大型左行走滑剪切带.地质科学,1989, (1):1-7.
[32] Lowell J D. Structural style in petroleum exploration. Tulsa: OGCI, 1985, 1-15.
[33]杨云岭,郭栋.鲁西地区的走滑断层.油气地质与采收率,2004,11(2): 1-5.
[34]姚继峰,廖兴明,于天欣.辽河盆地构造分析.断块油气田,1995,2(5): 21-26.
[35]钟嘉猷.实验构造地质学及其应用.北京:科学出版社,1998.61-79.
[36]王义天,李继亮.走滑断层作用的相关构造[J].地质科技情报,1999,18(3):30-34.
[37]Harding T P. Petroleum traps associated with wrench faul. AAPG Bulletin, 1974, 58(7):1290-1304.
[38]肖尚斌,高喜龙,姜在兴,谯汉生.渤海湾盆地新生代的走滑活动及其石油地质意义.大地构造与成矿学,2000,24(4): 321-328.
[39]邹东波,吴时国,刘刚,韩文功.渤海湾盆地桩海地区NNE向断层性质及其对油气的影响.天然气地球科学,2004,15(5): 503-507.
[40]孙洪斌,张凤莲.辽河盆地走滑构造特征与油气.大地构造与成矿学,2002,26(1): 16-21.
[41]李丕龙等. 陆相断陷盆地油气地质与勘探, 卷一, 陆相断陷盆地构造演化与构造样式. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 地质出版社, 2003, p203.
[42]宋国奇, 徐春华, 王世虎等. 胜利油区古生界地质特征及油气潜力. 武汉: 中国地质大学出版社, 2000.
[43]李丕龙, 张善文, 王永诗等. 多样性潜山成因、成藏与勘探-以济阳坳陷为例. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2003.
[44]胜利油田中国石油地质志编写组. 中国石油地质志, 卷六, 胜利油田. 北京:石油工业出版社, 1987.
[45]杨超, 陈清华. 济阳坳陷构造演化及其构造层的划分. 油气地质与采收率, 2005, 12(2): 9-12.
[46]牛树银, 陈路, 许传诗等. 太行山区地壳演化及成矿规律. 北京: 地震出版社, 1994.
[47]段太忠, 曾允孚, 高振忠. 根据沉积历史分析华南古大陆边缘的构造演化.石油与天然气地质, 1988, 9(4): 410-420.
[48]贾东, 何永明, 施央申等. 山东地体构造及其拼贴运动学研究. 南京:南京大学出版社, 1993, 1-100.
[49]吴富强, 汪小昆, 胡雪等. 早第三纪济阳坳陷的性质. 新疆石油地质, 2002, 23(2): 114-116.
[50]Hilde T W C, Uyeda S, Kroenke L. Evolution of the western Pacific and its margins. Tectonophysics, 1977, 38: 145-165.
[51] 徐 嘉 炜 . 郯 城 庐 江 平 移 断 裂 系 统 . 构 造 地 质 论 丛 . 北 京 : 地 质 出 版社,1984,18-32.
[52]万天丰, 朱鸿. 郯庐断裂带的最大左行走滑断距及其形成时期. 高校地质学报, 1996, 2(1): 14-27.
[53]王小凤, 李中坚, 陈柏林等. 郯庐断裂带. 北京: 地质出版社, 2001, 15-59.
[54]宗国洪. 济阳坳陷构造演化及其大地构造意义. 高校地质学报, 1999, 5(3): 275-282.
[55]Zhou X M and Li X W. Origin of late Mesozoic igneous rocks in Southeastern China: implications for lithosphere subduction and underplating of mafic magmas. Tectonophsics, 2000, 326: 269-287.
[56]Otofuji Y, Hayashida A and Torii M. When was the Japan Sea opened? Paleomagnetic evidence from southern Japan. In: Nasu, N., Uyeda, S., Kushiro, I., Kobayashi, K. and Kagami, H. eds. Formation of Active Ocean Margins. Tokyo: Terra, 1985, 551-566.
[57]Kaneoka I, Notsu K, Takigami Y, et al. Constraints on the evolution of the Japan Sea based on 40Ar-39Ar ages and Sr isotopic ratios for volcanic rocks of the Yamato Seamount chain in the Japan Sea. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett, 1990, 97: 211-225.
[58]Maruyama S, Isozaki Y, Kimura G, et al. Paleogeographic maps of the Japanese Islands: plate tectonic systhesis from 750 Ma to the present. Island Arc, 1997, 6: 121-142.
[59]程有义, 李晓清, 汪泽成等. 潍北拉分盆地形成演化及其对油气条件的控制. 石油勘探与开发, 2004, 31(6): 32-35.
[60]张克鑫, 漆家福. 潍北盆地新生代构造演化及其与郯庐断裂带的关系. 石油天然气学报, 2005, 27(6): 817-821.
[61]王大华, 苏宪锋, 魏艳萍. 垦东凸起上第三系油气分布与断层关系研究. 中国海上油气(地质), 2003, 17(4): 232-235.
[62]彭存仓, 顾菊萍. 垦东地区上第三系馆陶组上段成藏规律研究. 江汉石油学院学报, 2002, 24(4): 10-12.
[63]张明振. 胜利滩海地区上第三系勘探技术-以垦东地区为例. 油气地球物理,2006, 4(1): 32-36.
[64]胜利油田石油地质志编写组. 中国石油地质志-卷六(胜利油田). 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1993, 51-81.
[65]张克鑫, 漆家福, 林会喜. 济阳地区埕岛-垦东构造带中生代的逆冲断层及其与郯庐断裂带的关系. 地质科学, 2006, 41(2): 270-277.
[66]陈广军. 试论沾化凹陷长堤古潜山的含油气性. 复式油气田, 2000, 4: 6-10.
[67]冯玉琴. 孤东上第三系构造油气藏的形成条件. 石油勘探与开发, 1990, 17(3): 1-10.
[68]陆克政, 漆家福. 渤海湾新生代含油气盆地构造模式. 北京: 地质出版社, 1997.
[69]孔凡仙. 埕岛油田地质与勘探实践. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2000.
[70]孙怡. 垦东-埕岛构造带构造物理模拟实验. 油气地质与采收率, 2006, 13(2): 8-10.
[71]Okay A I and Sengor A M. Evidence for intracontinental thrust-related exhumation of the ultra-high-pressure rocks in China. Geology, 1992, 20: 411-414.
[72]Yin A and Nie S Y. An indendation model for the North and South China collision and the development of the Tan-Lu and Honam fault system, eastern Asia. Tectonics, 1993, 12: 801-813.
[73]Li Z X. Collsion between the North and South China blocks: a crust-detachment model for suturing in the region east of Tan-Lu fault. Geology, 1994, 22, 739-742.
[74]朱光, 王勇生, 王道轩, 牛漫兰, 刘国生, 谢成龙. 前陆沉积与变形对郯庐断裂带同造山运动的制约地质科学, 2006, 41(1): 102-121.
[75]吴根耀, 陈焕疆, 马力, 徐克定. 苏皖地块-特提斯演化阶段独立的构造单元. 古地理学报, 2003, 4(2): 77-87.
[76]赵越, 杨振宇, 马醒华. 东亚大地构造发展的重要转折. 地质科学, 1994, 29(2): 105-119.
[77]Zhang Y Q, Dong S W, Shi W. Cretaceous deformation history of the middle Tan-Lu fault zone in Shangdong Province, eastern China. Tectonophysics, 2003, 363: 243-258.
[78]Riedel W. Zur mechanic geologischer brucherscheinungen. Centralbl F Mineral Geol U pal, 1929, B, 354-368.
[79]Camand J F. Bridge structure as sense of displacement criteria in brittle fault zones. Struct Geol, 1987, 9:609-620.
[80]黄庆华. 雁行褶皱构造式的解析理论及实验探讨. 中国科学, 1974, 5: 492-501.
[81]王维襄. 雁行状断裂定量研究初探. 见: 构造地质论丛. 北京地质出版社, 1981, 96-109.
[82]谢新生, 阮小平. 雁行构造力学解析与控震意义. 地震学报, 1994, 16(1): 41-48.
[83] 严 俊 君 , 王 燮 培 . 关 于 扭 动 构 造 的 鉴 别 问 题 . 石 油 与 天 然 气 地质,1996,17(1):8-14.
[84]Larsen P H. Relay structures in a Lower Permian basement-involved tension system East Greenland. Journal of Structure Geology, 1988, 10(1):3-8.
[85]唐辉明. 雁行式断裂构造的形成及其断裂力学意义. 地球科学,1992, 17(1):25-30.
[86]朱战军, 周建勋. 雁列构造是走滑断层存在的充分判据?大地构造与成矿学, 2004, 28(2): 142-148.
[87]Harding T P, Lowell J D. Structural styles, their plate tectonic habitats and hydrocarbon traps in petroleum provinces. Bull AAPG, 1979, 63: 1016-1058.
[88]夏义平, 刘万辉, 徐礼贵等. 走滑断层的识别标志及其石油地质意义. 中国石油勘探, 2007, (1): 17-23.
[89]Harding T P. Seismic characteristics and identification of nagative flower structures, positive flower structure and positive structural inversion. AAPG, 1985, 69: 582-600.
[90]Zolnai G. Continental wrench-tectonics and hydrocarbon habitat. AAPG,l989.
[91]程有义, 梁书义, 丘东洲. 潍北凹陷中新生代层序地层的沉积模式沉积与特提斯地质, 2001, 21(4): 21-27.
[92]蔡东升等. 渤海莱州湾走滑拉分凹陷的构造研究及其石油勘探意义. 石油学报,2001, 22(2): 19-25.
[93]翁世劼. 关于郯庐断裂带的几个地质问题.构造地质论丛. 北京: 地质出版社, 1984, 66-71.
[94]郭振一. 沂沭断裂带的基本特征及其活动方式.构造地质论丛. 北京: 地质出版社, 1984, 142-151.
[95]郭振一. 郯城-庐江断裂带的形成演化与运动学分析. 山东地质, 1987, 3(1): 51-62.
[96]张理刚, 王可法. 中国东部中(新)生代构造同位素地质学研究. 桂林冶金地质学院学报, 1991, 11(1): 35-48.
[97]Gilder S A, Leloup P H, Courtillot V, et al. Tectonic evolution of the Tancheng-Lujiang (Tan-Lu) fault via middle Triassic to Early Cenozoic paleomagnetic data. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1999, 104(B7): 15365-15390.
[98]朱光, 刘国生, 牛漫兰等. 郯庐断裂带的平移运动与成因. 地质通报, 2003, 22(3): 200-207.
[99]薛金声. 山东沂沭断裂带成生时代探讨. 山东海洋大学学报, 1982, 12(4): 10-19.
[100]张家声. 沂沭断裂带中段基底韧性剪切带. 地震地质, 1983, 5(2): 11-24.
[101]徐学思. 郯庐断裂的平移. 见《:构造地质论丛(3)》. 北京: 地质出版社, 1984, 56-65.
[102]赵剑畏, 蔡则健, 黄保友. 郯庐断裂带中段的几个地质构造问题.构造地质论丛. 北京: 地质出版社, 1984, 116-124.
[103]孙荣圭, 崔振广, 李茂松. 安徽境内郯庐断裂带构造史.构造地质论丛. 北京: 地质出版社, 1984, 152-159.
[104]朱光, 王道轩, 刘国生等. 郯庐断裂带的演化及其对西太平洋板块运动的响应. 地质科学,2004, 39(1): 36-49.
[105]吴时国,余朝华,邹东波等.莱州湾地区郯庐断裂带的构造特征及其新生代演化.海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2006,26(6):101-110.
[106]Wu S G., Yu Z H, Zhang R Q, et al. Mesozoic-Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Zhuanghai area, Bohai-Bay Basin, east China: application of balanced cross-sections. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 2005, 2: 158-168.
[107]Athy L F. Density, porosity and compaction of sedimentary rocks. Bull. Am. Assoc. petrol. Geol., 1930, 14, 1-24.
[108]Hedberg H D. Gravitational compaction of clays and shales. Am. J. Sci., 1936, 31, 241-287.
[109]Ruby W W and Hubbert M K. Role of fluid pressure in mechanics of overthrust faulting, II, Overthrust belt in geosynclinal area of western Wyoming in light offluid-pressure hypothesis. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am., 1960, 60, 167-205.
[110]邱楠生, 蔡进功, 李善鹏等. 昌潍坳陷潍北凹陷热历史和油气成藏期次. 地质科学, 2003, 38(3): 332-341.
[111]Allen P A, Allen J R.Basin Analysis-principles and Applications. Cambridge: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1990, 236-281.
[112]Rodgers D A. Analysis of pull-apart basin development produced by en-echelon strike-slip faults. In: Balance P F and Reading H G. Sedimentation In Oblique-slip Mobile Zones: Int. Assoc. Sed. Spec. Pub. 1980, 4: 27-41.
[113]Hempton M R, Neher K. Experimental fracture strain and subsidence patterns over enechelon strike-slip faults: implications for the structural evolution of pull-apart basins. Journal of Structure Geology, 1986, 8: 597-605.
[114]虞廷林. 中国东部应力场与板块运动. 地震学刊, 1994, 2: 13-17.
[115]张岳桥, 赵越, 董树文, 杨农. 中国东部及邻区早白垩世裂陷盆地构造演化阶段.地学前缘, 2004, 11(3): 123-133.
[116]刘和甫, 梁慧社, 李晓清等. 中国东部中新生代裂陷盆地与伸展山岭耦合机制. 地学前缘, 2000, 7(4): 477-486.
[117]Li S T, Mo X X, Yang S G. Evolution of Circum-Pacific basins and volcanic belts in East China and their geodynamic background. Journal of China University of Geosciences, 1995, 6(1): 48-58.
[118]Tian Z Y, Han P, Xu K D. The Mesozoic-Cenozoic East China rift system. Tectonophysics, 1992, 208: 341-361.
[119]Engebretson D C, Cox A, Gordon R G. Relative motions between oceanic and continental plates in the Pacific basin. Geological Society of America, Special Paper, 1985, 206: 1-59.
[120]Northrup C J, Royden L H, Burchfiel B C. Motion of the Pacific plate relative ot Eurasia and its potential relation to Cenozoic extension along the eastern margin of Eurasia. Geology, 1995, 23(8): 719-722.
[121]Ren J Y, Tamaki K, Li S T, et al. Late Mesozoic and Cenozoic rifting and its dynamic setting in Eastern China and adjacent areas. Tectonophysics, 2002, 344: 175–205.
[122]万天丰. 郯庐断裂带的演化与古应力场. 地球科学, 1995, 20(5): 526-534.
[123]蔡美峰. 地应力测量的原理和技术. 北京: 科学出版社, 2000, 38-46.
[124]尤明庆. 水压致裂法测量地应力方法的研究. 岩土工程学报, 2005, 27(3): 350-353.
[125]李方全. 套芯法、水压致裂法原地应力测量、钻孔崩落及震源机制解分析所得结果的对比. 地震学报, 1992, 14(2): 149-155.
[126]李方全. 断层活动与原地应力状态. 中国活动断层研究. 北京: 地震出版社, 1994, 15-21.
[127]李学森, 吴时国, 吴汉宁等. 运用古地磁方法测定油气成藏时限-以桩海地区下古生界潜山油气藏为例. 油气地球物理, 2006,4(1):23-31.
[128]杜兴信, 邰辉成. 由震源机制群反演中国大陆现代构造应力场[J].地震学报,1999,21(4): 354-360.
[129]许忠淮. 东亚地区现今构造应力场图的编制.地震学报, 2001, 23(5): 492-500.
[130]谢富仁, 崔效锋, 赵建涛,等.中国大陆及邻区现代构造应力场分区[J].地球物理学报,2004, 47(4): 54-62.
[131]张玲, 周翠英, 王锋吉, 姜寿清, 钟普浴. 山东地区各分区地震应力场特征分析.华北地震科学, 2004, 22(4): 12-15.
[132]Gao W M., Li J L, Sun Z Y. Formation and evolution of the Yi-Shu continental rift. Seismol. Geol., 1980, 2: 11-18.
[133]施炜, 张岳桥, 董树文. 郯庐断裂带中段第四纪活动及其分段特征. 地球学报, 2003, 24(1): 11-18.
[134]Grimmer J C, Jonckheere R, Enkelmann E, et al. Cretaceous-Cenozoic history of the southern Tan-Lu fault zone: apatite fission-track and structural constraints from the Dabie Shan (eastern China). Tectonophysics, 2002, 359: 225-253.
[135]Watson M P, Hayward A B, Parkinson D N, et al. Plate tectonic s history, basin development and petroleum source rock deposition onshore China. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 1987, 4(3): 205-225.
[136]Zhang K J. North and South China collision along the eastern and southern North China margins. Tectonophysics, 1997, 270: 145-156.
[137]Xu J W, Zhu G. Tectonic models of the Tan-Lu fault zone, eastern China. International Geology Review, 1994, 36: 771-784.
[138]Zhu G, Xu J W, Shun S J. Isotopic age evidence for the timing of strike-slip movement of the Tan-Lu fault zone. Geological Review, 1995, 4: 452-461.
[139]李家灵, 高维明, 孙竹友. 沂沭裂谷消亡与华北裂谷新生代构造应力场. 构造地质论丛, 1984, 3: 318-327.
[140]Chamberlin R T. The building of the Colorado Rockies Journal of Geology, 1919, 27: 225–251.
[141]Bucher W H. The Deformation of the Earth's Crust, Princeton: Princeton University Press,1933.
[142]Dahlstrom C D A. Balanced Cross Section Canadian Journal of Geosciences 1969, 6:743–759
[143]Ramsay J G and Huber M I. The techniques of modern structural Geology V.2. Folds and Fractures,London: Academic Press,1987.
[144]刘光炎, 蒋录全. 平衡剖面技术与地震资料解释. 石油地球物理勘探, 1995, 30: 833-844
[145]肖安成. 平衡剖面的正演模拟方法. 江汉石油学院学报, 1994, 6: 1-7.
[146] Midland Valley. 2Dmove Technical Specification. Download from www. mve. com.
[147]李丕龙等. 陆相断陷盆地油气地质与勘探:卷一,陆相断陷盆地构造演化与构造样式. 北京:石油工业出版社,地质出版社, 2003, pp178.
[148]张云银. 郯庐断裂带含油气性研究. 石油实验地质, 2003, 25(1): 28-38.
[149]邱楠生等. 郯庐断裂中段两侧盆地烃源岩分布演化规律研究. 胜利油田内部资料, 2004.
[150]Zoback M D, Byerlee J D. Effect of microcrack dilatancy on the permeability of Westerly granite. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1975, 80(5):752-755.
[151]吴时国 王秀玲 季玉新等. 3DMOVE 构造裂缝预测技术在古潜山的应用研究. 中国科学(D)辑, 2004, 34(9): 818-824.
[152]马洪飞. 长堤潜山披覆构造带油气成藏规律分析. 油气地质与采收率, 2004, 11(5): 33-35.
[153]陈广军, 王永诗, 马承杰. 胜利油区长堤潜山区域构造关系探讨. 新疆石油学院学报, 2001, 13(3): 14-18.
[154]林玉祥, 俞家声. 垦东地区石油成藏系统及其演化. 地质与勘探, 2001, 37(5): 29-33.
[2]漆家福.渤海湾新生代盆地的两种构造系统及其成因解释.中国地质,2004,31(1): 15-22.
[3]李家康.渤海湾油气成藏特点及与断层关系.石油学报,2001,22(2): 26-31.
[4]徐嘉炜.论走滑断层作用的几个主要问题.地学前缘,1995,2(1~2):125-136.
[5]Kennedy W Q. The Great Glen Fault. Geol Soc London Quarterly Journal,1946, 102: 47-76.
[6]Moody J D and Hill M J. Wrench-fault tectonics. Geol Soc Am Bull, 1956, 67: 1207-1246.
[7]Crowell J C. Displacement along the San Andreas fault, California. Geol Soc Am Special Paper,1962, 71:61.
[8]Wilson J T. A New Class of Faults and their Bearing on Continental Drift. Nature,1965, 207:343–347.
[9]Wilcox R E, Harding T P. Seely D R. Basic wrench tectonics. Am Assoc Petro Geol Bull, 1973,57: 74-96.
[10]Freund R. Kinematics of transform and transcurrent faults. Tectonophysics, 1974, 21: 93-134.
[11]Taira A, Saito Y, Hashimoto M. The role of oblique subduction and strike-slip tectonics in the evolution of Japan. In Geodynamic of the Western Pacific-Indonesian Region, V.11, Geodynamics Series, Washington D C: Am Geophys Union,1983,303-317.
[12]Woodcock N H. The role of strike-slip fault systems at plate boundaries. Royal Society oI London Philosophical Transactions. Ser A,1986,317: 13-29.
[13]Tapponier P, Peltzer G, Armijo R. On the mechanics of the collision between India and Asia. In Coward M P and Reis A C eds. Collision Tectonics. Geol Soc. London Special Publication,1986,19:115-157.
[14]Gammond J F.Bridge structures as sense of displacement criteria in brittle fault zones.Struct.Geol.,1987,9(5~6):609-620.
[15]Sylvester A G. Strike-slip faults. Geol Soc Am Bull, 1988, 100: 1666-1703.
[16]Dresen G. Stress distribution and the orientation of Riedel shears. Tectonophysics,1991, 188: 239–247.
[17]Richard P, Mocquet B, Cobbold P R. Experiments on simultaneous faulting and folding above a basement wrench fault.Tectonophysics,1991,188:133-141.
[18]England P, Molnar P. Right-lateral shear and rotation as the explanation for strike-slip faulting in eastern Tibet. Nature,1990,344:140-142.
[19]Martel S J. Formation of compound strike-slip fault zones, Mount Abbot Quadrangle, California. Journal of Structural Geology,1990,12:869–882.
[20]Mann P. Model for the formation of large transtensional basin in zone of tectonic escape. Geology,1997,25(3):211-214.
[21]徐嘉炜.郯庐断裂带的平移运动及其地质意义.国际交流地质学术论文集.北京:地质出版社,1980,129-142.
[22]Xu J W. Zhu G. Tong W X. Cui K R, et al. Formation and evolution of the Tancheng-Lujiang wrench fault system: a major shear system to the Northwest of the Pacific Ocean. Tectonophysics, 1987,134:273-310.
[23]张用夏,李卢玲.郯庐断裂的平移及其对邻区的影响.构造地质论丛.北京:地质出版社,1984,1-8.
[24]邓乃恭.中生代华夏类型构造和郯庐断裂体系的特征与形成机制.构造地质论丛.北京:地质出版社,1984, 33-38.
[25]陈丕基. 郯庐断裂巨大平移的时代与格局. 科学通报,1988, 33(4): 289-293.
[26]冯先岳.阿尔金断裂带.中国活断裂.北京:地震出版,1982,219-225.
[27]张治洮.阿尔金断裂的地质特征.中国地质科学院西安地质矿产研究所所刊, 1985,9: 20-32.
[28]黄汉纯,王长利.阿尔金构造带特征及其对塔里木和柴达木盆地的影响[M].北京:地质出版社,1987.
[29]周勇,潘裕生. 茫崖一肃北段阿尔金断裂右旋走滑运动的确定.地质科学,1998,33(1):9-15.
[30]钟大赉, Tapponier P, 吴海威等.大型走滑断裂-碰撞后陆内变形的重要形式. 科学通报,1989,34(7):526-529.
[31]吴海威, 张连生, 秸少承. 红河-哀牢山断裂带-喜山期陆内大型左行走滑剪切带.地质科学,1989, (1):1-7.
[32] Lowell J D. Structural style in petroleum exploration. Tulsa: OGCI, 1985, 1-15.
[33]杨云岭,郭栋.鲁西地区的走滑断层.油气地质与采收率,2004,11(2): 1-5.
[34]姚继峰,廖兴明,于天欣.辽河盆地构造分析.断块油气田,1995,2(5): 21-26.
[35]钟嘉猷.实验构造地质学及其应用.北京:科学出版社,1998.61-79.
[36]王义天,李继亮.走滑断层作用的相关构造[J].地质科技情报,1999,18(3):30-34.
[37]Harding T P. Petroleum traps associated with wrench faul. AAPG Bulletin, 1974, 58(7):1290-1304.
[38]肖尚斌,高喜龙,姜在兴,谯汉生.渤海湾盆地新生代的走滑活动及其石油地质意义.大地构造与成矿学,2000,24(4): 321-328.
[39]邹东波,吴时国,刘刚,韩文功.渤海湾盆地桩海地区NNE向断层性质及其对油气的影响.天然气地球科学,2004,15(5): 503-507.
[40]孙洪斌,张凤莲.辽河盆地走滑构造特征与油气.大地构造与成矿学,2002,26(1): 16-21.
[41]李丕龙等. 陆相断陷盆地油气地质与勘探, 卷一, 陆相断陷盆地构造演化与构造样式. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 地质出版社, 2003, p203.
[42]宋国奇, 徐春华, 王世虎等. 胜利油区古生界地质特征及油气潜力. 武汉: 中国地质大学出版社, 2000.
[43]李丕龙, 张善文, 王永诗等. 多样性潜山成因、成藏与勘探-以济阳坳陷为例. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2003.
[44]胜利油田中国石油地质志编写组. 中国石油地质志, 卷六, 胜利油田. 北京:石油工业出版社, 1987.
[45]杨超, 陈清华. 济阳坳陷构造演化及其构造层的划分. 油气地质与采收率, 2005, 12(2): 9-12.
[46]牛树银, 陈路, 许传诗等. 太行山区地壳演化及成矿规律. 北京: 地震出版社, 1994.
[47]段太忠, 曾允孚, 高振忠. 根据沉积历史分析华南古大陆边缘的构造演化.石油与天然气地质, 1988, 9(4): 410-420.
[48]贾东, 何永明, 施央申等. 山东地体构造及其拼贴运动学研究. 南京:南京大学出版社, 1993, 1-100.
[49]吴富强, 汪小昆, 胡雪等. 早第三纪济阳坳陷的性质. 新疆石油地质, 2002, 23(2): 114-116.
[50]Hilde T W C, Uyeda S, Kroenke L. Evolution of the western Pacific and its margins. Tectonophysics, 1977, 38: 145-165.
[51] 徐 嘉 炜 . 郯 城 庐 江 平 移 断 裂 系 统 . 构 造 地 质 论 丛 . 北 京 : 地 质 出 版社,1984,18-32.
[52]万天丰, 朱鸿. 郯庐断裂带的最大左行走滑断距及其形成时期. 高校地质学报, 1996, 2(1): 14-27.
[53]王小凤, 李中坚, 陈柏林等. 郯庐断裂带. 北京: 地质出版社, 2001, 15-59.
[54]宗国洪. 济阳坳陷构造演化及其大地构造意义. 高校地质学报, 1999, 5(3): 275-282.
[55]Zhou X M and Li X W. Origin of late Mesozoic igneous rocks in Southeastern China: implications for lithosphere subduction and underplating of mafic magmas. Tectonophsics, 2000, 326: 269-287.
[56]Otofuji Y, Hayashida A and Torii M. When was the Japan Sea opened? Paleomagnetic evidence from southern Japan. In: Nasu, N., Uyeda, S., Kushiro, I., Kobayashi, K. and Kagami, H. eds. Formation of Active Ocean Margins. Tokyo: Terra, 1985, 551-566.
[57]Kaneoka I, Notsu K, Takigami Y, et al. Constraints on the evolution of the Japan Sea based on 40Ar-39Ar ages and Sr isotopic ratios for volcanic rocks of the Yamato Seamount chain in the Japan Sea. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett, 1990, 97: 211-225.
[58]Maruyama S, Isozaki Y, Kimura G, et al. Paleogeographic maps of the Japanese Islands: plate tectonic systhesis from 750 Ma to the present. Island Arc, 1997, 6: 121-142.
[59]程有义, 李晓清, 汪泽成等. 潍北拉分盆地形成演化及其对油气条件的控制. 石油勘探与开发, 2004, 31(6): 32-35.
[60]张克鑫, 漆家福. 潍北盆地新生代构造演化及其与郯庐断裂带的关系. 石油天然气学报, 2005, 27(6): 817-821.
[61]王大华, 苏宪锋, 魏艳萍. 垦东凸起上第三系油气分布与断层关系研究. 中国海上油气(地质), 2003, 17(4): 232-235.
[62]彭存仓, 顾菊萍. 垦东地区上第三系馆陶组上段成藏规律研究. 江汉石油学院学报, 2002, 24(4): 10-12.
[63]张明振. 胜利滩海地区上第三系勘探技术-以垦东地区为例. 油气地球物理,2006, 4(1): 32-36.
[64]胜利油田石油地质志编写组. 中国石油地质志-卷六(胜利油田). 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1993, 51-81.
[65]张克鑫, 漆家福, 林会喜. 济阳地区埕岛-垦东构造带中生代的逆冲断层及其与郯庐断裂带的关系. 地质科学, 2006, 41(2): 270-277.
[66]陈广军. 试论沾化凹陷长堤古潜山的含油气性. 复式油气田, 2000, 4: 6-10.
[67]冯玉琴. 孤东上第三系构造油气藏的形成条件. 石油勘探与开发, 1990, 17(3): 1-10.
[68]陆克政, 漆家福. 渤海湾新生代含油气盆地构造模式. 北京: 地质出版社, 1997.
[69]孔凡仙. 埕岛油田地质与勘探实践. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2000.
[70]孙怡. 垦东-埕岛构造带构造物理模拟实验. 油气地质与采收率, 2006, 13(2): 8-10.
[71]Okay A I and Sengor A M. Evidence for intracontinental thrust-related exhumation of the ultra-high-pressure rocks in China. Geology, 1992, 20: 411-414.
[72]Yin A and Nie S Y. An indendation model for the North and South China collision and the development of the Tan-Lu and Honam fault system, eastern Asia. Tectonics, 1993, 12: 801-813.
[73]Li Z X. Collsion between the North and South China blocks: a crust-detachment model for suturing in the region east of Tan-Lu fault. Geology, 1994, 22, 739-742.
[74]朱光, 王勇生, 王道轩, 牛漫兰, 刘国生, 谢成龙. 前陆沉积与变形对郯庐断裂带同造山运动的制约地质科学, 2006, 41(1): 102-121.
[75]吴根耀, 陈焕疆, 马力, 徐克定. 苏皖地块-特提斯演化阶段独立的构造单元. 古地理学报, 2003, 4(2): 77-87.
[76]赵越, 杨振宇, 马醒华. 东亚大地构造发展的重要转折. 地质科学, 1994, 29(2): 105-119.
[77]Zhang Y Q, Dong S W, Shi W. Cretaceous deformation history of the middle Tan-Lu fault zone in Shangdong Province, eastern China. Tectonophysics, 2003, 363: 243-258.
[78]Riedel W. Zur mechanic geologischer brucherscheinungen. Centralbl F Mineral Geol U pal, 1929, B, 354-368.
[79]Camand J F. Bridge structure as sense of displacement criteria in brittle fault zones. Struct Geol, 1987, 9:609-620.
[80]黄庆华. 雁行褶皱构造式的解析理论及实验探讨. 中国科学, 1974, 5: 492-501.
[81]王维襄. 雁行状断裂定量研究初探. 见: 构造地质论丛. 北京地质出版社, 1981, 96-109.
[82]谢新生, 阮小平. 雁行构造力学解析与控震意义. 地震学报, 1994, 16(1): 41-48.
[83] 严 俊 君 , 王 燮 培 . 关 于 扭 动 构 造 的 鉴 别 问 题 . 石 油 与 天 然 气 地质,1996,17(1):8-14.
[84]Larsen P H. Relay structures in a Lower Permian basement-involved tension system East Greenland. Journal of Structure Geology, 1988, 10(1):3-8.
[85]唐辉明. 雁行式断裂构造的形成及其断裂力学意义. 地球科学,1992, 17(1):25-30.
[86]朱战军, 周建勋. 雁列构造是走滑断层存在的充分判据?大地构造与成矿学, 2004, 28(2): 142-148.
[87]Harding T P, Lowell J D. Structural styles, their plate tectonic habitats and hydrocarbon traps in petroleum provinces. Bull AAPG, 1979, 63: 1016-1058.
[88]夏义平, 刘万辉, 徐礼贵等. 走滑断层的识别标志及其石油地质意义. 中国石油勘探, 2007, (1): 17-23.
[89]Harding T P. Seismic characteristics and identification of nagative flower structures, positive flower structure and positive structural inversion. AAPG, 1985, 69: 582-600.
[90]Zolnai G. Continental wrench-tectonics and hydrocarbon habitat. AAPG,l989.
[91]程有义, 梁书义, 丘东洲. 潍北凹陷中新生代层序地层的沉积模式沉积与特提斯地质, 2001, 21(4): 21-27.
[92]蔡东升等. 渤海莱州湾走滑拉分凹陷的构造研究及其石油勘探意义. 石油学报,2001, 22(2): 19-25.
[93]翁世劼. 关于郯庐断裂带的几个地质问题.构造地质论丛. 北京: 地质出版社, 1984, 66-71.
[94]郭振一. 沂沭断裂带的基本特征及其活动方式.构造地质论丛. 北京: 地质出版社, 1984, 142-151.
[95]郭振一. 郯城-庐江断裂带的形成演化与运动学分析. 山东地质, 1987, 3(1): 51-62.
[96]张理刚, 王可法. 中国东部中(新)生代构造同位素地质学研究. 桂林冶金地质学院学报, 1991, 11(1): 35-48.
[97]Gilder S A, Leloup P H, Courtillot V, et al. Tectonic evolution of the Tancheng-Lujiang (Tan-Lu) fault via middle Triassic to Early Cenozoic paleomagnetic data. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1999, 104(B7): 15365-15390.
[98]朱光, 刘国生, 牛漫兰等. 郯庐断裂带的平移运动与成因. 地质通报, 2003, 22(3): 200-207.
[99]薛金声. 山东沂沭断裂带成生时代探讨. 山东海洋大学学报, 1982, 12(4): 10-19.
[100]张家声. 沂沭断裂带中段基底韧性剪切带. 地震地质, 1983, 5(2): 11-24.
[101]徐学思. 郯庐断裂的平移. 见《:构造地质论丛(3)》. 北京: 地质出版社, 1984, 56-65.
[102]赵剑畏, 蔡则健, 黄保友. 郯庐断裂带中段的几个地质构造问题.构造地质论丛. 北京: 地质出版社, 1984, 116-124.
[103]孙荣圭, 崔振广, 李茂松. 安徽境内郯庐断裂带构造史.构造地质论丛. 北京: 地质出版社, 1984, 152-159.
[104]朱光, 王道轩, 刘国生等. 郯庐断裂带的演化及其对西太平洋板块运动的响应. 地质科学,2004, 39(1): 36-49.
[105]吴时国,余朝华,邹东波等.莱州湾地区郯庐断裂带的构造特征及其新生代演化.海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2006,26(6):101-110.
[106]Wu S G., Yu Z H, Zhang R Q, et al. Mesozoic-Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Zhuanghai area, Bohai-Bay Basin, east China: application of balanced cross-sections. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 2005, 2: 158-168.
[107]Athy L F. Density, porosity and compaction of sedimentary rocks. Bull. Am. Assoc. petrol. Geol., 1930, 14, 1-24.
[108]Hedberg H D. Gravitational compaction of clays and shales. Am. J. Sci., 1936, 31, 241-287.
[109]Ruby W W and Hubbert M K. Role of fluid pressure in mechanics of overthrust faulting, II, Overthrust belt in geosynclinal area of western Wyoming in light offluid-pressure hypothesis. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am., 1960, 60, 167-205.
[110]邱楠生, 蔡进功, 李善鹏等. 昌潍坳陷潍北凹陷热历史和油气成藏期次. 地质科学, 2003, 38(3): 332-341.
[111]Allen P A, Allen J R.Basin Analysis-principles and Applications. Cambridge: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1990, 236-281.
[112]Rodgers D A. Analysis of pull-apart basin development produced by en-echelon strike-slip faults. In: Balance P F and Reading H G. Sedimentation In Oblique-slip Mobile Zones: Int. Assoc. Sed. Spec. Pub. 1980, 4: 27-41.
[113]Hempton M R, Neher K. Experimental fracture strain and subsidence patterns over enechelon strike-slip faults: implications for the structural evolution of pull-apart basins. Journal of Structure Geology, 1986, 8: 597-605.
[114]虞廷林. 中国东部应力场与板块运动. 地震学刊, 1994, 2: 13-17.
[115]张岳桥, 赵越, 董树文, 杨农. 中国东部及邻区早白垩世裂陷盆地构造演化阶段.地学前缘, 2004, 11(3): 123-133.
[116]刘和甫, 梁慧社, 李晓清等. 中国东部中新生代裂陷盆地与伸展山岭耦合机制. 地学前缘, 2000, 7(4): 477-486.
[117]Li S T, Mo X X, Yang S G. Evolution of Circum-Pacific basins and volcanic belts in East China and their geodynamic background. Journal of China University of Geosciences, 1995, 6(1): 48-58.
[118]Tian Z Y, Han P, Xu K D. The Mesozoic-Cenozoic East China rift system. Tectonophysics, 1992, 208: 341-361.
[119]Engebretson D C, Cox A, Gordon R G. Relative motions between oceanic and continental plates in the Pacific basin. Geological Society of America, Special Paper, 1985, 206: 1-59.
[120]Northrup C J, Royden L H, Burchfiel B C. Motion of the Pacific plate relative ot Eurasia and its potential relation to Cenozoic extension along the eastern margin of Eurasia. Geology, 1995, 23(8): 719-722.
[121]Ren J Y, Tamaki K, Li S T, et al. Late Mesozoic and Cenozoic rifting and its dynamic setting in Eastern China and adjacent areas. Tectonophysics, 2002, 344: 175–205.
[122]万天丰. 郯庐断裂带的演化与古应力场. 地球科学, 1995, 20(5): 526-534.
[123]蔡美峰. 地应力测量的原理和技术. 北京: 科学出版社, 2000, 38-46.
[124]尤明庆. 水压致裂法测量地应力方法的研究. 岩土工程学报, 2005, 27(3): 350-353.
[125]李方全. 套芯法、水压致裂法原地应力测量、钻孔崩落及震源机制解分析所得结果的对比. 地震学报, 1992, 14(2): 149-155.
[126]李方全. 断层活动与原地应力状态. 中国活动断层研究. 北京: 地震出版社, 1994, 15-21.
[127]李学森, 吴时国, 吴汉宁等. 运用古地磁方法测定油气成藏时限-以桩海地区下古生界潜山油气藏为例. 油气地球物理, 2006,4(1):23-31.
[128]杜兴信, 邰辉成. 由震源机制群反演中国大陆现代构造应力场[J].地震学报,1999,21(4): 354-360.
[129]许忠淮. 东亚地区现今构造应力场图的编制.地震学报, 2001, 23(5): 492-500.
[130]谢富仁, 崔效锋, 赵建涛,等.中国大陆及邻区现代构造应力场分区[J].地球物理学报,2004, 47(4): 54-62.
[131]张玲, 周翠英, 王锋吉, 姜寿清, 钟普浴. 山东地区各分区地震应力场特征分析.华北地震科学, 2004, 22(4): 12-15.
[132]Gao W M., Li J L, Sun Z Y. Formation and evolution of the Yi-Shu continental rift. Seismol. Geol., 1980, 2: 11-18.
[133]施炜, 张岳桥, 董树文. 郯庐断裂带中段第四纪活动及其分段特征. 地球学报, 2003, 24(1): 11-18.
[134]Grimmer J C, Jonckheere R, Enkelmann E, et al. Cretaceous-Cenozoic history of the southern Tan-Lu fault zone: apatite fission-track and structural constraints from the Dabie Shan (eastern China). Tectonophysics, 2002, 359: 225-253.
[135]Watson M P, Hayward A B, Parkinson D N, et al. Plate tectonic s history, basin development and petroleum source rock deposition onshore China. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 1987, 4(3): 205-225.
[136]Zhang K J. North and South China collision along the eastern and southern North China margins. Tectonophysics, 1997, 270: 145-156.
[137]Xu J W, Zhu G. Tectonic models of the Tan-Lu fault zone, eastern China. International Geology Review, 1994, 36: 771-784.
[138]Zhu G, Xu J W, Shun S J. Isotopic age evidence for the timing of strike-slip movement of the Tan-Lu fault zone. Geological Review, 1995, 4: 452-461.
[139]李家灵, 高维明, 孙竹友. 沂沭裂谷消亡与华北裂谷新生代构造应力场. 构造地质论丛, 1984, 3: 318-327.
[140]Chamberlin R T. The building of the Colorado Rockies Journal of Geology, 1919, 27: 225–251.
[141]Bucher W H. The Deformation of the Earth's Crust, Princeton: Princeton University Press,1933.
[142]Dahlstrom C D A. Balanced Cross Section Canadian Journal of Geosciences 1969, 6:743–759
[143]Ramsay J G and Huber M I. The techniques of modern structural Geology V.2. Folds and Fractures,London: Academic Press,1987.
[144]刘光炎, 蒋录全. 平衡剖面技术与地震资料解释. 石油地球物理勘探, 1995, 30: 833-844
[145]肖安成. 平衡剖面的正演模拟方法. 江汉石油学院学报, 1994, 6: 1-7.
[146] Midland Valley. 2Dmove Technical Specification. Download from www. mve. com.
[147]李丕龙等. 陆相断陷盆地油气地质与勘探:卷一,陆相断陷盆地构造演化与构造样式. 北京:石油工业出版社,地质出版社, 2003, pp178.
[148]张云银. 郯庐断裂带含油气性研究. 石油实验地质, 2003, 25(1): 28-38.
[149]邱楠生等. 郯庐断裂中段两侧盆地烃源岩分布演化规律研究. 胜利油田内部资料, 2004.
[150]Zoback M D, Byerlee J D. Effect of microcrack dilatancy on the permeability of Westerly granite. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1975, 80(5):752-755.
[151]吴时国 王秀玲 季玉新等. 3DMOVE 构造裂缝预测技术在古潜山的应用研究. 中国科学(D)辑, 2004, 34(9): 818-824.
[152]马洪飞. 长堤潜山披覆构造带油气成藏规律分析. 油气地质与采收率, 2004, 11(5): 33-35.
[153]陈广军, 王永诗, 马承杰. 胜利油区长堤潜山区域构造关系探讨. 新疆石油学院学报, 2001, 13(3): 14-18.
[154]林玉祥, 俞家声. 垦东地区石油成藏系统及其演化. 地质与勘探, 2001, 37(5): 29-33.