中国地方政府投融资问题研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
政府投融资活动是政府实现其职能的重要方式,也是政府对国民经济实施宏观调控的有效手段。在社会主义市场经济条件下,深化政府投融资体制改革,对于转变政府职能、实现资源优化配置、促进国民经济又好又快发展,具有十分重要的意义。本文在对国内外投融资理论进行综合研究的基础上,从政府职能与政府投融资关系以及政府投融资与经济增长关系入手,针对我国地方政府投融资体制存在的问题,通过对国内外政府投融资模式进行比较分析,提出地方政府投融资改革的总体思路和目标模式,并对监管问题和风险控制进行了理性思考,提出了相关政策建议。全文从四个方面展开研究:
     1、分析政府职能、政府投融资和经济增长的关系。实证研究了我国政府投融资对与经济增长之间关系,创新地在博弈论的视角下分析了地方政府投融资的悖论问题,认为当前条件下地方的大规模政府投资是纳什均衡,但却并非最优解,各地方政府投融资存在着悖论。
     2、对国内外政府投融资理论及实践进行比较分析并得出启示与借鉴。对我国政府投融资现状和演变路径进行了较为深入细致地研究,结合天津案例分析,总结存在的突出问题。对美国、德国、日本等发达国家政府投融资运作机制和主要特点进行比较分析,从发展过程和现实成效研究其规律性和特殊性,对照我国地方政府投融资实际及存在的问题,有的放矢地提出启示与借鉴。
     3、对地方政府投融资改革和监管问题进行深入研究。根据国内外政府投融资管理实践的正反经验,结合地方政府发展要求,研究提出地方政府投融资改革的总体思路和目标模式,围绕避免政府失效和强化政府投融资监管,通过设计博弈模型对地方政府国资管理部门、政府投资公司和国有经营企业之间的关系进行了深入探讨,并提出加强监管的政策建议。
     4、对地方政府投融资风险问题进行深入分析。地方政府投资来源主要是财政性资金,以此投资和融资必将带来财政风险问题,特别是政府举借债务偿还期较长,在每届政府任期有限和政绩考核产生的投资冲动影响下,财政风险有累积扩张趋势,风险评估和风险控制成为非常重要的课题。对政府投融资风险识别、评估流程、风险指标构建等进行了研究,利用风险评估模型对地方政府投融资风险进行实证分析,提出风险预警和规避风险的政策建议。
The activities of government investing and financing are the important means of realizing the government function, and also are the effective means of government macro-control to the national economy. Consolidation of investing and financing reform has important significance for changing the government function, realizing resource optimal allocation and promoting the national economy development under the condition of socialist market economy. This paper on the basis of comprehensive research of the investing and financing theory at home and abroad starts with the relationship between the government function and the government investing and financing and the relationship between the government investing and financing and the economic growth, and according to the problem of the local government investing and financing mechanisms put forwards the general idea and the target model of the local government investing and financing reform by comparative analysis of government investing and financing mode at home and abroad. This paper also gives reasonable thinking over supervision problems and risk control and put forwards the related policy proposal. The full text carries out research following four aspects:
     1. Analysis on the relationship among the government function, the government investing and financing and the economic growth. Empirically study on the relationship between the government investing and financing and the economic growth and innovatively research on the paradox of the local government investing and financing in perspective of game theory. The result is that the local government investing is Nash equilibrium under the current condition, but isn’t the optimal solution, and local governments investing and financing exist the paradox.
     2. We get some conclusion and revelation by comparative analysis of government investing and financing mode at home and abroad. Combined with Tianjin case deeply research on the present situation and the evolutionary path of the Chinese government investing and financing, and then conclude the outstanding problems. Comparative analysis on the mode and the characteristic of the advanced countries including the American, Germany and Japanese government investing and financing, study on the regularity and complexity through their development and reality effects. Make great efforts to get some conclusion and revelation according to the problem existing in the investing and financing of local government in china.
     3. Make thorough research on the local government investing and financing reform and the supervision problem. Combined with the local government development requirement, according to the positive and negative experiences in the government investing and financing management at home and abroad, we put forwards the general idea and the target model of the local government investing and financing. Against the government failure and strengthen the government investing and financing supervision, make a further discussion on the relationship among the management work of state-owned assets, investment company and the state-owned management enterprises of the local government and put forwards the policy proposal of strengthening supervision.
     4. Make deep research on the risk problem of the local government investing and financing. Risk assessment and risk control become a very important question, because using the financial capital which is the main investment source of the local government to invest and finance would bring financial risk problem. Especially when the repayment period of the government debt is long, the financial risk has the tendency of the accumulating expansion under the influence of the finite tenure of every government and the investment impulsion from the achievement assessment. Research on the risk identification, evaluation process and risk index designing of the local government investing and financing, and put forwards the policy proposal of risk early warning and risk aversion by empirical analysis on the local government investing and financing using the risk evaluation model.
引文
[1]王春峰,金融市场风险管理,天津:天津大学出版社,2001
    [2]F. Modigliani and M. H. Miller, The Cost of Capital,Corporation Finance and theInvestment, American Economic Review, June, 1958
    [3]D. Durand, Cost of Debt and Equity Funds for Business: Trends and Problems ofMeasurement, In Conference of Research On Business Finance, New York:National Bureau of Economic Research, 1952
    [4]沈艺锋,资本结构理论史,北京:经济科学出版社,1999
    [5]Mayers, S And N, S, Majluf, Corporate Financing and Investment Decision WhenFirms Have Information That Investors Do Not Have, Journal of FinancialEconomics, 13, June, 1984
    [6]Jensen, Michael C, and Meckling William H, Theory of The Firm; ManagerialBehavior, Agency Cost and Owner ship Structure, Journal of FinancialEconomics, 3, 1976
    [7]亚当.斯密,国民财富的性质和原因的研究,北京:商务出版社,1979
    [8]凯恩斯,就业、利息和货币通论,北京:商务出版社,1988
    [9]罗森斯坦.罗丹“大推进理论”笔记,圣马丁出版社,1966
    [10]R.M.Kirwan. Finance for Urban Public Infrastructure. Urban Studies, 1989(6): 79-83
    [11]Antonio Estache. Decentralizing Infrastructure. World Bank Discussing Paper, 1994-41-45
    [12]Jean-Etienne, The Economics of Pub lie-Private Partnerships.Canadian Public Policy, 2004: 67-71
    [13]TeresaTer-Minassian.Public-Private Partnerships.IMF Report,2004,(12):141-143
    [14]Reinhard H.Public Private Partnerships(PPP)in Financial Development in South-East Europe.Development finance conference in Berlin, Springer, 2005:190-192
    [15]Efraim Sadka.Public-Private Partnerships: A Public Economics Perspective. IMF Working Paper,2006, (3): 59-61
    [16]Clive Harris. Private Participation in Infrastructure in Developing Countries.World Bank Working Paper,2003, (5):41-43.
    [17]Antonio Estache. Emerging Infrastructure Policy Issues in Developing Countries: A Survey of the Recent Economic Literature. World Bank Working Paper, 2004,
    [18]Esteban C. Buljevich. Project financing and the international financial markets.Boston, Klwuer Academic, 1999: 37-41
    [19]Yeo K.T, Tiong Robert L.K.Positive management of differences for risk reduction in BOT projects. International Journal of Project Management, 2000, 18(4):257-265
    [20]刘立峰.国债政策可持续性及财务风险度量.宏观经济研究,2001,(8):21-23
    [21]刘立峰.城市基础设施建设中的融资问题.建筑经济,2001(1):19,-22
    [22]秦虹,中国市政公用设施投融资现状与改革方向.城乡建设,2003.(7):9-11
    [23]魏陆.开放经济下的财政政策风险研究.上海:上海财经大学出版社,2003:101-104
    [24]许骏.浅谈我国基础设施建设融资方式.金融论坛,2003,(7):27-29
    [25]扬军.基础设施投资论.北京:中国经济出版社,2003:55-58
    [26]朱会冲.基础设施项目投融资理论与实务.上海:复旦大学出版社,2002:77-81
    [27]沈富荣.信托方式与基础设施投融资体制改革.上海金融,2002,(9):11-14
    [28]黄如宝,王奋伟.融资租赁在基础设施项日融资中的应用分析.建设监理,2003,(1):11-14
    [29]张伟.城市基础设施投融资研究.高等教育出版社,2005:47-51
    [30]刘万华等.城市基础设施建设引入民间资本的探索.统计与决策, 2006,(7):8-11
    [31]冯冠胜.民间资本介入城市基础设施建设的思考.技术经济,2006,(3):9-12
    [32]建设部课题组.中国城市基础设施投融资体制改革研究报告.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2002:81-85
    [33]张维迎,博弈论与信息经济学,上海:三联出版社, 2004.11
    [34]Monttnola.Q Qian Yingyi, Federalism, Chinese Style: The Political Basis for Economic Success in China. World Politics, 1995, 48 (1) 50~81
    [35]AS/NZS 4360:2004 RISK MANAGEMENT Australian/New Zealand Standard.
    [36]Devrarajian.S,Swaroop.H,The Composition of Public Expenditure and Economic Growth[J]. Journal of Public Economics,1996,6.
    [37]William Easterly, Sergio Rebelo, Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth: An Empirical Investigation, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 32, 1993.
    [38]A.Madison: Economic Progress and Policy in Developing Countries London,Allen&Unwin. 1970
    [39]薛晓伟.我国投资效率损耗研究.投资研究.1998(10):8-10
    [40]吕炜.投资挑战体制:关于中国经济转轨原理的一种解析[M].北京:经济科学出版社.2000:22-23
    [41]沈坤荣.经济增长方式转变研究.江苏社会科学[J].2000(2):71
    [42]易纲.罗斯福的“非常之责”与“非常之权”.中国改革[J].2004(6):20-23
    [43]何志强李一鸣.投资、投资效率与投资制度:文献视角的探讨.财经科学.2006(6):64-71
    [44]谢升峰.论西部地区投融资的体制创新需求.投资研究.2000(8):12-18
    [45]宋文兵.中国资本外逃研究.经济研究.1999(5)
    [46]王佩艳.融资模式效率比较与我国融资模式的选择[J].经济评价.2001(2):90-93.
    [47]方洁.融资制度绩效的信息经济学分析.经济问题.2004(7):67-69
    [48]李国民.中国转型经济中银行主导型融资制度模式选择的内生性.济南金融.2005(10):5-8
    [49]李贺军,中国经济增长方式选择,社会科学文献出版社,1999
    [50]彼德.M.杰克逊主编,公共部门经济学前沿问题,北京:中国税务出版社, 2000
    [51]弗雪著,州和地方财政学(第二版),中国人民大学出版社2000年
    [52]斯蒂格里茨,政府为什么干预经济,中国物质出版社,1998年
    [53]虞列贵、李洪辉、徐珑、刑朝虹:关于投融资体制改革的几点意见,财政研究2002第4期。
    [54]周雪光.“逆向软预算约束”:一个政府行为的组织分析[ J].中国社会科学, 2005, (2) .
    [55]中国经营报.财政部拟立法规范地方变相发债避开修改预算法[N].2005-03-27.
    [56]Williamson, O. E. Efficiency, Power, Authority, and Economic Organization [A]. In John Groenewegen. Eds.
    [57]娄洪,长期经济增长中的公共投资政策——包含一般拥挤性公共基础设施资本存量的动态经济增长模型,经济研究,2004.3
    [58]马骏.中国公共预算改革-理性化与民主化[M].中央编译出版社,2005.
    [59]马骏,侯一麟.中国省级预算中的非正式制度[J].经济研究, 2004, (10).
    [60]姜长云等.县乡财政风险及其防范机制研究[J].农村经济问题研究, 2004, (5) .
    [61]周绍朋,郭全中.地方财政风险何以积重难返[J].经济研究参考, 2005, (23) .
    [62]陈共.财政学,北京:中国人民大学出版社,1999
    [63]张晓清、陈利宾、张宝山,基础设施投资与公共财政,城市管理与科技,2004
    [64]任保平、钞小静,中国公共支出结构对经济增长影响的实证分析:1978-2003,2004
    [65]杨继、杨卫,内生增长中的公共支出理论综述,经济学动态,2003
    [66]邹薇,公共支出对经济增长的效应:一个新的分析思路,制度经济学研究,2003
    [67]牟放,借鉴公共支出增长理论调整我国财政支出政策,中央财经大学学报,1999,
    [68]于长革,经济增长与政府公共投资分析,经济科学,2004
    [69]于长革,公共消费支出及其最优规模分析,财经研究,2004
    [70]于长革,财政支出对经济增长的效应分析,生产力研究,2004
    [71]Arrow Knenethj and Mordecai Kurz,1970,Public investment, the Rate of Return, and Optimal Fiscal Policy, the Johns Hopkins Press,Baltimore,MD.
    [72]Aschauer, David Alan,1985, Fiscal Policy and Aggregate Demand, American Economic Review 75, 117-127.
    [73]Auerbach,A.,and L.Kolikoff,1987, dynamic fiscal policy, Harvard university press, Cambridge, MA.
    [74]Monks, Roberta, and Nell Minow, 1995, Corporate Governance, Mass:Black-well Publishers
    [75]Basle Committee on Banking Supervision,1996."Amendment to Capital Accord to Incorporate Market Risks". Basle Committee, Bank of International Settlements, Basle.
    [76]Basle Committee on Banking Supervision,200 la. The New Capital Accord .March, Basel,Switzland: Bank for International Settlements.
    [77]Basle Committee on Banking Supervision,2001b, "The Standardised Approach toCredit Risk". April, Basel, Switzland: Bank for International Settlements.
    [78]Lindgren, Garcia and Saal, bank soundness and macroeconomic policy,international monetary fund.Stand&Poor, sovereign ratings services.
    [79]IMF: International capital markets: Developments, prospects and key policyissues, 2000.4
    [80]Basel Committee , Framework For Internal Control System In Banking Organisations.
    [81]Zingales, Luigi, 1997, "Corporate Governance", NBER Working Paper 6309
    [82]Selowsky, Marcelo, 1998. "Fiscal Deficits Union Accesion: The Challenges forPublic and the Quality of Fiscal Adjustment" in European Liability Management, World Bank.
    [83]Shen Liyin, Andrew Platten, X. P. Deng. Role of public private partnerships to manage risks in public sector projects in Hongkong. International Journal of Project Man-agement, 2006,24 (7)
    [84]Jin, Hehui, Qian, yinyi, Weingast, Barry. Regional decentralization and fiscal incentives: federalism, Chinese Style. Journal of Public Economics, 2005,(89)
    [85]Elizabeth Currie, Jean Jacques Dethier,Eriko Togo. Institutional Arrangements for Pubfic Debt Management.2003.The world bank.
    [86]Coen Kruger .Valuing and Managing Risk Associated with Government Contigent Liabilities,world Bank,1998.
    [87]Hana Polackova Brixi.财政风险管理:新理念与国际经验.北京:中国财政经济出版社2003
    [88]Alessandro Missale.Public debt management.北京:中国财政经济出版社,2005
    [89]崔萍.国际金融组织援贷款项使用中存在的问题及对策.审计月刊,2007,(3)
    [90]邓毅.公共财政原则下的政府外债管理体制改革.中国财政,2006 (7)
    [91]高志立.财政风险及其构成内容的理论分析.财政研究,2001, (2)
    [92]何晓群.现代统计分析方法与应用.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007
    [93]侯荣华,欧林宏.中国财政风险的理论思考及实证分析.财政研究,2003, (6)
    [94]李胜.地方财政风险的制度性成因.财政研究,2007, (3)
    [95]刘星,乐中志,刘谊.地方政府债务风险预警机制研究.北京:经济管理出版社,2005
    [96]刘谊,刘星,马千真等.地方财政风险监控体系的建立及实证分析.中央财经大学学报,2004,(4)
    [97]孙漩.从地方政府或有债务的形成机理谈财政风险的防范.统计与决策,2005,(11)
    [98]王朝才.地方财政风险管理与控制研究.北京:经济科学出版社,2003
    [99]王亚芬.我国财政风险预警系统的建立与应用研究.财政研究,2004,(11)
    [100]张明喜.关于我国财政风险和风险预警的研究综述.上海则经大学学报,2007,(4)
    [101]吴俊培主编.现代财政理论与实践[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2005.6
    [102]胡怡建等.上海财政运行实证研究[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2006.5
    [103]雷良海.财政支出增长与控制研究[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,1997.10
    [104]安秀梅.政府公共支出管理[M].北京:对外经济贸易大学出版社,2005.3
    [105]孙开等.公共产品供给与公共支出研究[M].大连:东北财经大学出版社,2006.2
    [106]杜莉.城市财政学[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2006.3
    [107]彭月兰.促进区域经济协调发展的财政政策[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,2005.11
    [108]Dornbush,Fischer. Government Spending in a Single Model of Endogenous[J]Journal of Political Economy. 1994
    [109]CazzaviUan Cx, Public Capital and Economic Growth in Europe Countries: Apanel data approach [Z]. Working Paper No.93, 11,1993
    [110]Collins, Sarah M., and Bosworth, Barry P, Rebelo, Economic Growth in EastAsia: Accumulation [J].Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2,135-203, 1996
    [111]Romer Paul R., Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth[ J], Journal ofPolitical Economy 94 (5) ,10021037,1986
    [112]Easterly, William, and Sergio Rebelo, Fiscal Policy and EconomicGrowth :An Empirical Investigation [J].Journal of Moneytary Economics32,417-458, 1993
    [113]Dornbusch R.and s.Fisher, Government Spending in a single model ofEndogenous Growth [J], Jounnal of Political Economy 1998
    [114]朱·弗登博格,让·梯若尔,博弈论,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003
    [115]克雷普斯,博弈论与经济模型,北京:商务印书管,2006
    [116]黄涛编著,博弈论教程:理论.应用,北京:首都经济贸易大学出版社,2004

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700