鸡主要胚胎性疫病病原人工共感染的试验研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
禽胚胎性疾病是一类由多病原引起的综合性疾病,可造成禽胚发育受阻,胚胎死亡,孵化率降低等现象,导致养禽业的重大经济损失。近几年,家禽发生多种病原共感染的现象非常普遍,多种病原共感染常常引起非典型的病变。细菌性胚胎性疫病病原种类较多,且多数是条件性致病菌,由不同的细菌多重感染诱发的疾病越来越常见。过去报道的细菌性的家禽胚胎病病因主要有鸡白痢、大肠杆菌病、霉形体病、鸡败血支原体病(Mycoplasma gallisepricum, MG)、滑液囊支原体病等。刘红芹等2006年曾报道山东某大型AA父母代肉种鸡所产种蛋中鸡白痢、鸡败血支原体、滑液囊支原体、鸡大肠杆菌和禽波氏杆菌雏率为4.50%~17.60%、死胎率为6.73%~29.40%。鸡白痢、鸡败血支原体、滑液囊支原体、鸡大肠杆菌和禽波氏杆菌(Bordetella Avium)平均阳性率分别为13.59%、12.69%、8.10%、19.62%、37.14%。经病原分离鉴定为的多重感染。孙晴等2007年也曾报道类似的情况。由此可见鸡毒支原体、鸡沙门氏菌、鸡波氏杆菌为几种常见鸡胚胎细菌性疫病的病原,因此,本研究针对这三种常见鸡胚胎细菌性疫病的病原进行了人工共感染与检测。主要对这三种病原微生物的共感染的致病性,以及间接免疫荧光(IFA)与PCR检测方法等方面进行了系统的研究,目的在于通过本研究探讨这几种病原引发疾病时造成的危害,以及发病机理,为防治和诊断禽类胚胎细菌性疫病的多重感染提供依据。
     本研究分为二部分:
     一鸡主要胚胎性疫病病原人工共感染致病性的研究
     本研究利用三种常见并且危害严重的鸡胚胎细菌性疫病的病原,即鸡毒支原体、鸡沙门氏菌、禽波氏杆菌进行人工共感染试验,分别对11日龄SPF鸡胚(10枚/组)和1日龄SPF雏鸡(10只/组)进行三种、两种、一种病原微生物的人工感染,雏鸡每6h观察一次,鸡胚每8h观察一次,主要对生长情况,死亡情况进行统计;并对死亡雏鸡、鸡胚进行剖检,进行病原学与病理学观察。结果三种病原的共感染致病性最强,出现死亡的时间,鸡胚为8h、雏鸡为6h,死亡率也最高,雏鸡为60%,鸡胚为100%。双重感染中,鸡毒支原体与禽波氏杆菌共感染组和鸡沙门氏菌与禽波氏杆菌共感染组出现死亡时间(12h)和死亡率(50%)相同,鸡毒支原体与鸡沙门氏菌共感染组相比较,致病性较轻,但是鸡群生长发育缓慢。无论通过肉眼观察和还是病理组织学观察,三种病原共感染的雏鸡和鸡胚病变最严重,各组织器官都出现明显病变,两种病原共感染次之。总之,多种病原发生混合感染会引起更严重的病情以及更高的死亡率,并且常常引起非典型病变,难于作出诊断。
     二鸡主要胚胎性疫病病原人工共感染检测方法的研究
     近几年,家禽发生多种病原共感染的现象非常普遍,多种病原共感染常常引起非典型的病变,因此,发生多种病原共感染时很难通过临床症状进行诊断。为了在发生共感染后能进行快速准确的诊断,本研究通过对三种病原(鸡毒支原体、鸡沙门氏菌、禽波氏杆菌)的共感染分析研究,其目的在于研究病原的分布状况及其病原的消长规律,建立三种病原共感染的IFA、PCR等快速检测方法。结果表明,鸡毒支原体的感染气囊感染最严重、肾脏次之、其后是肝脏;禽波氏杆菌与鸡沙门氏菌在肝脏和法氏囊感染最严重、肾脏和肺脏次之;另外,对于禽波氏杆菌感染鸡,皮下也含有大量病原菌。雏鸡在感染24h内各病原含量呈快速增长趋势,36h后达到高峰,然后缓慢下降,一直持续到8周左右。在三种病原共感染的雏鸡组织中,每种病原的含量与单独感染、双重感染的含量相差不大。鸡胚在感染24h内各病原含量呈增长趋势,24h达到最高峰,24h之后缓慢下降,多种病原共感染的鸡胚病原的含量略低于相同病原单独感染的鸡胚。建立起的三种病原共感染的IFA、PCR快速检测方法特异性强、灵敏度高、结果出现快。本研究为三种病原共感染的快速诊断提供了重要的试验数据和理论依据。
The disease of avian embryo is a synthetical disease which can cause the increase of embryo death and decrease of incubation rate and is fatal to economy. In most condition, it is very common occurrence that the avians coinfect with two or more pathogens. The manner in which multiple pathogens interact is not always straightforward, however the disease of avian embryo is a synthetical disease which can cause the increase of embryo death and decrease of incubation rate and is fatal to economy. There are many species of the disease of avian embryo, and most is conditional pathogenic bacteria. Mycoplasma gallisepricum, Salmonella Avium and Bordetella Avium are three disease of avian embryo. Liu Hong-qin reported that a kind of disease appeared in one large-scale AA broiler breeder farm in Shandong province with the symptom of embryo death, increase of weak chicken, ineffective immunity, stunted growth of 30 days chicken since June, 2004. Antibody in serum was tested to the broiler breeder, 1d chicken and the commercial chicken, it was showed that the average positive rate of bordetella avium, salmonella avium, E.coli, mycoplasma were 13.59%、12.69%、8.10%、19.62% and 37.14%, respectively. Sun Qing reported that this kind of disease appeared on three parental generation branch farms in 2007. It was showed that the co-infection of bordetella avium, salmonella avium and mycoplasma was the major cause of the disease. These pathogens spread vertically from the eggs to the embryos. Thus, the study and detection aims directly at the co-infection of these three diseases of avian embryo. The pathogenic study of synthetic co-infection of bordetella avium, salmonella avium and mycoplasma was had done. And the study of the establishment of detection methods for the co-infection with IFA and PCR was had done.The research subject aims at imitation the similar problems that usually emergent in production. The discussion on the harmfulness of pathogens interact and the pathogenesis, supplying the theoretical foundation to the prevention of avian embryo in breeder farm.
     The research divides two parts:
     Part One: The pathogenic study of synthetic co-infection of three major bacterium pathogens of avian embryo
     In an initial experiment, the effect of coinfection of Mycoplasma gallisepricum, Salmonella Avium and Bordetella Avium was examined in seventy , 1-day-old chicken (10 chicken /group) and seventy, 11-day-old embryos (10 mbryos/group) that were infected with the three pathogens or two pathogens or only one pathogens . An additional 10 chicken and 10 embryo served as sham infected controls. Observe the growth and death of the chicken (once every 6 hours) and embryo (once every 8 hours). When they die, dissect the dead bodies. Make the tissue paraffin section with the fresh tissue. The results: The thesis aims at observing the appearance and the tissue paraffin section of the co-infection.The symptom of the coinfection of the three pathogens is the most serious, the death time is the most early (the chicken is 6h, the embryo is 8h), the death rate is highest (the chicken is60%, the embryo is 100%), and the next in order is the dually infected chicken and embryo.The grous which were co-infected by MG, Bordetella avium and Bordetella avium, Salmonella have the same death time (12h) and death rate (50).
     Thus, the avians coinfect with two or more pathogens can cause the increase of embryo death and decrease of incubation rate and is fatal to breeding industry. In most condition, it is a synthetical disease.It usually causes atypical pathological changes.
     Part Two: The study of detection methods for synthetic co-infection of three major bacterium pathogens of avian embryo
     The recent years, it is very common occurrence that the avians coinfect with two or more pathogens. In this case, It usually causes atypical pathological changes.Thus, it is difficult to do clinical diagnosis when the co-infection is emergent. In order to investigate the potential trend in disease severity after co-infection, a second experiment was performed to examine the pathogens by IFA and PCR in tissues from single and dually infection and triplicate infection. The results: the content of MG is highist in aerocyst, Salmonella Avium and Bordetella Avium is in Liver and bursa. When it is 36h, the content of pathogens is highest in chicken and ahout 24h in emobryo. Then it will reduce slowly.
     The establishment of detection technique of labelled for the co-infection with IFA and PCR are simple, rapid and strong specificity.The exeperiment provides essential essay datas for collecting samples and controlling technology for the co-infection of three bacterium pathogens of avian embryo.
引文
[1]B W卡尔尼克.禽病学(第十版).北京:中国农业出版社, 1999:347-365.
    [2]陈凤梅,牛钟相,程光民等.鸡毒支原体研究进展.动物医学进展[J].2004,25(3):56-59.
    [3]程水英,陈立勤,谢三星.禽类胚胎病两大问题.辽宁畜牧兽医,1998, 4:39-40.
    [4]崔治中.我国鸡群中免疫抑制性病毒多重感染的诊断和对策[J].动物科学与动物医学,2001,18(4):19-20.
    [5]冯连礼,蒋国胜,刚松堂.肉鸡霉形体与大肠杆菌混合感染及防治[J].河南畜牧兽医,2004,3(25):26-27.
    [6]高崧,刘秀梵,张如宽,等.我国部分地区禽病原性大肠杆菌的分离鉴定.畜牧兽医学报, 1999, 30(2):164-171.
    [7]郭建华,陈德威,陈明勇等.鸡毒支原体限制内切酶分析[J].畜牧兽医学报,1998,29(6):560-563.
    [8]韩志辉.动物性饲料中沙门氏菌的分离鉴定[J].中国预防兽医学报,2000(7):308-309.
    [9]何勇群,张中直,杨汉春.北京地区鸡群网状内皮组织增殖病感染的血清学调查研究.畜牧兽医学报, 1998, 29:71-78.
    [10]胡晓娜,朱瑞良,刘红珍等.禽波氏杆菌外膜蛋白的提取及其免疫原性的检测[J].微生物学报,2007, 47(4):714-717.
    [11]黄金海,王英珍,肖锡治等.检测鸡慢性呼吸道病抗体ELISA方法的建立[J].中国预防兽医学报,2000,22(2):133-135.
    [12]李桂杰,刘思当,朱瑞良,等.禽波氏杆菌内毒素致病性的研究.畜牧兽医学报. 2000, 31(4):349-352.
    [13]刘红芹,胡晓娜,王伟等.禽波氏杆菌分离株的16SrRNA基因序列分析[J].中国预防兽医学报,2008,28(1):32-34.
    [14]刘建文,徐国栋.1日龄雏鸡混合感染大肠杆菌和沙门氏菌病例报告.畜牧与兽医,1997,5(29):215.
    [15]刘秀梵.免疫抑制性病毒感染及其对禽病控制的影响[J].中国家禽,1998,20(4): 1-3.
    [16]刘岳龙,崔治中,段玉友. PCR和斑点杂交检测鸡传染性贫血病毒.中国兽医学报, 1996, 16:38-41.
    [17]陆承平.兽医微生物学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2001.
    [18]苗得园,陈德威,张培君等.鸡毒支原体结构蛋白及其抗原性变异的比较研究[J].畜牧兽医学报,2000,31(3):255-261.
    [19]牛天贵,张宝芹.食品微生物检验[M].北京:中国计量出版社,2003.
    [20]任家琰,郭建华,霍乃蕊.鸡毒支原体PCR检测及特异扩增片段的克隆与测序[J].畜牧兽医学报,2000,31(1):49-55.
    [21]王俊红,刘高生,牛钟相等.沙门氏菌invH基因的序列分析与分子检测.江西农业大学学报, 2008,30(4):324-327.
    [22]王晶钰,李健强,张国祥,等.鸡波德特氏杆菌病的研究.西北农业大学学, 1997, 25(4):69-72.
    [23]宋勤叶,张中直,张冰等.鸡毒支原体油乳剂灭活苗对降低MG垂直传播作用的研究[J].畜牧兽医学报,2002,33(3):285-290.
    [24]庄国宏,朱国强,周继红,等.禽波氏杆菌病病原性的研究.中国畜禽传染病,1998,(2):71-75.
    [25]朱瑞良,张绍学,唐珂心.山鸡波氏杆菌病的诊断.中国兽医杂志,1994,1(13):13-14.
    [26]朱瑞良,张绍学,唐珂心.鸡波氏杆菌病的研究初报.山东农业大学学报,1991,22 (1):92-94.
    [27]朱瑞良.雏鸡禽波氏杆菌病的诊断.畜牧与兽医, 1993,(3): 124-125.
    [28]朱瑞良,牛钟相,张绍学.病鸡眼中禽波氏杆菌的分离鉴定.中国兽医科技,1994,24(4):25-26.
    [29]朱瑞良,万连英,李洁珍,等.广东省鸡波氏杆菌病血清学调查.吉林畜牧兽医,1994,(5):39-40.
    [30]张绍学,朱瑞良,唐珂心,等.鸡波氏杆菌病的流行病学调查.中国畜禽传染病,1992,(2): 25-26.
    [31]张家峥,丁福成.当前鸡白痢病的新特点及其危害[J].中国家禽,1994(2):4-5.
    [32]曾振灵,王燕,王令.三种抗菌药体外对鸡败血支原体的敏感性[J].中国预防兽医学报,2002,24(2):127-129.
    [33]殷震,刘景华.动物病毒学(第2版).北京:科学出版社,1997,870-885.
    [34]杨百亮,赵翠萍,刘天生等.应用单克隆抗体AC-ELISA检测鸡蛋卵黄中鸡毒支原体[J].中国预防兽医学报,2001,23(1):50-52.
    [35]辛朝安,王民帧.禽类胚胎病.北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
    [36]徐彦波,刘忠贵.鸡传染性贫血病的研究进展.兽医大学学报,1993,13(2):204-208
    [37]王莉莉,艾武等.山东省鸡传染性贫血流行病学调查[J].山东家禽2002.8:8-9.
    [38]王玉燕,朱瑞良.禽波氏杆菌病病原性研究及防治初探.中国预防兽医学报, 2001, 23(3):117-120.
    [39]张志,赵宏坤,崔治中等.用IFA和PCR对部分省区肉鸡白血病的调查[J].动物医学进展.2003,24(5):112-113.
    [40]Aarts H J, Van Lith L,Keijer J.High-resolution genotyping of Sal-monella strains by AFLP-fingerprinting[J].Lett Appl Microbiol,1998,26(2):131-135.
    [41]Alkhalaf A N, Ward L A, Dearth R N, Saif Y M. Pathogenicity, transmissibility, and tissue distribution of avian pneumovirus in turkey poults. Avian Dis, 2002 Jul-Sep,46(3):650-659.
    [42]Arp L H, Brooks E E. An in vivo model for the study of Bordetella avium adherence to tracheal mucosa in turkeys. Am J Vet Res,1986 Dec,47(12):2614-2617.
    [43]Baguest T J, Grimes T M, Dennett D P. Infection studies on a reticuloendotheliosis virus contaminant of a commercial Marek’s disease vaccine. Aust Vet J,1979,55:153-157.
    [44]Bai J, Payne L N, Skinner M A. HPRS-103(exogenous avian leucosis virus,subgroup J) has an env gene related to those of endogenous elements EAV-0 and an E element found previously only in sarcoma viruses. Viol,1995,69:779-784.
    [45]Baugh C O, Alpaugh W E, Linkenheimer W H et al. Effect of tiamulin in chickens and turkeys infected experimentally with avian mycoplasma. Avian Dis,1978,22:620-626.
    [46]Berkhoff H A, G D Riddle. Differentiation of Alcaligens-like bacteria of avian origin and comparition with Alcaligens spp. Reference strains J. Clin Microbiol,1984,19:477-481.
    [47]Blow V V, R Rudolph and B Fuchs .Erhohte Pathogenitat des Errgers der aviaren ingektiosen Anamie bei Huhnerkuken(CAA) bei simultaner Infektion mit dem Virus der Marekschen Krankheit (MDV),Bursitisvirus (IBDV) ,oder Reticuloendoendothe liosevirus (REV). J Vet Med,1986,B 33 :93-116.
    [48]Brockmeier S L, Loving C L, Nicholson T L. Coinfection of pigs with porcine respiratory coronavirus and Bordetella bronchiseptica. Veterinary Microbiology .2008,12 (8) :36-47.
    [49]Calnek B W, Taylor P J, M Sevian. Study on avian encephanlomyelitis: Delelopment and application of oral vaccine. Avian Disease, 1961,(5):297-312.
    [50]Calnek B W.Disease of Poultry.10th edition.Ames: Iowa State University Press,1997:467-484.
    [51]Celia B. Shelton, Louise M. Temple, and Paul E. Orndorff. Use of Bacteriophage Ba1 To Identify Properties Associated with Bordetella avium. Virulence Infection and Immunity, March 2002, 70(3):1219-1224.
    [52]Cloud S S, Rosenberger J K, Fries P A, et al. In vitro and in vivo characterization of avian Escherichia coli.I.Serotypes,metabolic activity,and antibiotic sensitivity. Avian Dis,1985,29:1084-1093.
    [53]Connell T D, Dickenson A, Martone A J, Militello K T, Filiatraut M J, Hayman M L,Pitula J. Iron starvation of Bordetella avium stimulates expression of five outer membrane proteins and regulates a gene involved in acquiring iron from serum. Infect Immun,1998 Aug,66(8):3597-3605.
    [54]Cummins D R , Reynolds D L , Rhoade K R.An avidin-biotin enhanced dot-immunobinding assay for the detection ofMycoplasm gallisepticum and M.synoviaeserum antibodies in chickens[J].Avian Dis,1990,34:36-43.
    [55]Cutter D L, Luginbuhl G H. Characterization of sulfonamide resistance determinants and ralatedness of Bordetella avium bacterin. Avian Dis,1985,29:1130-1139.
    [56]De Boer G F, Van Roozelaar D J ,Moormann R J, et al. Interaction between chicken anemia virus and live Newcastle disease vaccine . Avian Pathology, 1994,23:263-275.
    [57]Edens F W, F W McCorkle, D G Simmons, A G Yersin. Effects of Bordetella avium on lymphoid tissue monoamine concentrations in turkey poults. Avian Dis,1987,31:746-751.
    [58]Edens F W, Yersin A G, Simmons D G. Tryptophan methylester modulation of poult responses to Bordetella avium. Poult Sci, 1999 Mar,78(3):327-335.
    [59]El-Sukhon S N, Musa A, Al-Attar M. Studies on the bacterial etiology of airsacculitis of broilers in northern and middle Jordan with special reference to Escherichia coli, Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale, and Bordetella avium. Avian Dis,2002,46(3):605-612
    [60]Engstrom B E. Bluewing disease of chickens:isolation of avian reovirus and chicken anemia agent. Avian Pathol,1988,17:22-23.
    [61]Erin R. Murphy, Amy Dickenson, Kevin T. Militello, and Terry D. Connell . Genetic Characterization of Wild-Type and Mutant fur Genes of Bordetella avium. Infection and Immunity, June 1999, 67(6):3160-3165.
    [62]Erin R. Murphy, Randy E. Sacco, Amy Dickenson, Daniel J. Metzger,Yan Hu, Paul E. Orndorff,and Terry D Connell. BhuR, a Virulence-Associated Outer Membrane Protein of Bordetella avium, Is Required for the Acquisition of Iron from Heme and Hemoproteins. Infection and Immunity, October 2002, 70(10):5390-5403.
    [63]Fadly A M, Witter R L, Simth E J, et al. An outbreak of lympomas in commercial broiler chickens vaccinated with a fowlpox vaccine contaminated with reticuloendotheliosis virus. Avian Pathol, 1996 ,25:35-47.
    [64]Ficken M D, J F Edwards, and J C Lay. Clearance of bacteria in turkeys with Bordetella avium induced trachetitis. Vet. Rec, 1986,30:352-357.
    [65]Filion P R, Cloutier S, Vrancken E R, et al. Infection respiratoire du dindonneau cause parun microbe apparente au Bordetella bronchiseptica. Can J Comp Med Vet Sci ,1967,31:129-134.
    [66]Funke Getal. Int J Sys Bacteriol,1994,44(1):167-171.
    [67]Garcia M,Elfaki M G,Kleven S H.Analysis of the variability in expression of Mycoplasma gallisepticum surface antigens[J].VeternaryMicrobiology,1994,42:147-158.
    [68]Ginsberg D and Steitz J A. J Biol Chem, 1975, 250: 5647- 5654.
    [69]Goryo M, Shibata Y Suwa T, et al. Outbreak of anemia associated with chicken anemia agent in young chicks. Jpn J Vet Sci,1978,49:867-873.
    [70]Guard Petter J. The chicken, the egg, and Salmonella enteritidis. Environmental Microbiology, 2001,3:421-430.
    [71]Jackwood M W, and Y M Saif. Efficacy of acommercial turky coryza vaccine in turkey poults. Avian Dis,1985,29:1130-1139.
    [72]Jeurissen S H M, Janse M E van Roozelaar D J, et al. Suseptibity of thymocytes for infection by chicken anemia virus is related to pre-and hatching development. Deveiopmentl Immunology, 1992,2: 123-129.
    [73]Karlson A G, M R Zinober and W H Feldman. A whole blood agglutination test for avian tuberculosis. Am J Vet Res, 1950,11: 137 -141.
    [74]Kempf I. The Polmerase Chain Reaction for detection oMycoplasma gallisepticum[J]. Avian pathology,1993,22:739-750.
    [75]Kenerly M E et al. J Bacteriol,1997,132:931-949.
    [76]Kersters K, K H Hinzi, A Hertle, P Segers. Bordetella avuim sp.nov isolated from the respiratory tracts of turkeys and other birds. Int J Syst Bacteriol,1984,34:56-70
    [77]Kirby A E, King N D, Connell T D. RhuR, an extracytoplasmic function sigma factor activator, is essential for heme-dependent expression of the outer membrane heme and hemoprotein receptor of Bordetella avium. Infect Immun,2004 ,72(2):896-907.
    [78]Ley D H,Berkhoff J E,McLaren J M.Mycoplasma conjunctivit in wild songbirds: the spread of a new contagious disease in a mobile host population[J].Avi Dis,1996,40:480-483.
    [79]Lin M Y. In Vitro comparition of the activity of various antibotics and drugs against new Taiwan isolates and standard strain of avian Mycoplasma [J]. Avian Dis,1987,31:705-712.
    [80]Louise M Temple, Alison A Weiss, Kimberly E Walker, H John Barnes, Vern L Christensen, David M Miyamoto, Celia B Shelton, and Paul E Orndorff. Bordetella avium Virulence Measured In Vivo and In Vitro. Infection and Immunity, November 1998, 66(11):5244-5251.
    [81]Margaretha Jurstrand, Jorgen Skov Jensen, Hans Fredlund.Detection of Mycoplasma genitalium in urogenital specimens by real-time PCR and by conventional PCR assay Journal of Medical Microbiology,2005, 54,23-29.
    [82]Nguyen A V,Khan M I,Lu Z.Amplification of Salmonella ch-romosomal DNA using the polymerase chain reaction[J].Avian Dis,1994,38(1):119-126.
    [83]Patricia A Spears, Louise M Temple, David M Miyamoto, Duncan J Maskell, Paul E Orndorff. Unexpected Similarities between Bordetella avium and Other Pathogenic Bordetellae. Infection and Immunity, May 2003, 71(5):2591-2597.
    [84]Payne L N, Gillespie A M, Howes K. Recovery of acuteiy transforming viruses from myeloid leucosis induced by the HPRS-103strain of avian leucosis virus. Avian Dis,1993,Apr-Jun,37(2):438-450.
    [85]Purchase H G, Okazaki W, Vogt P K, Hanafusa H, Burrnester B R, Critterlden L B. Infect Immun,1988 Feb, 15 (2):423-440.
    [86]Qin Aijian, Ping Wu, Lucy Lee, A M Fadly. Development and characterization of monoclonal antibodies to avian lecukosis virus subgroup J. Poster in 136th American Veterinary Medicine Association annual convention New Orenh July, USA,1999,11-14.
    [87]Rabsch W, Tschpe H, BaumLer A J. Non-typhoidal salmonellosis: emerging problems. Microbes and Infection,2001,3:237-247.
    [88]Rahn K, De Grandis S A,Clarke R C,et al. Amplification of an invAgenesequence of Salmonella typhimurium by polymerase chain re-action as a specific method of detection of Salmonella[J].Mol Cell Probes,1992,6(4):271-279.
    [89]Raffel T R, Register K B, Marks S A, Temple L. Prevalence of Bordetella avium infection in selected wild and domesticated birds in the eastern USA. J Wildl Dis,2002 Jan,38(1):40-46
    [90]Razin S,Tully J G,Rose D L,et al. DNA Cleavage patterns as indcators of genotypic heterogeneity among strains ofAcholeplasm and Mycoplasma spicies J[J]. Gen Micobiol,1983,129: 1935-1944.
    [91]RimLer R B, Kunkle R A. Bacterin-induced protection of turkeys against fowl cholera following infection with Bordetella avium. Avian Dis,1998 Oct-Dec,42(4):752-756
    [92]RimLer R B, Simmons D G, J G Gray. Transmission of acute respiratory disease (rhinotrachetitis) of turkeys. Avian Dis,1979,23:132-138.
    [93]Sacco R E, Nestor K E, Kunkle R A. Genetic variation in response of turkeys to experimental infection with Bordetella avium. Avian Dis,2000 Jan-Mar,44(1):197-200
    [94]Sacco R E, Register K B, Nordholm G E. Restriction enzyme analysis and ribotyping distinguish Bordetella avium and Bordetella hinzii isolates. Epidemiol Infect,2000 Feb,124(1):83-90.
    [95]Simmons D G, J G Gray. Transmission of acute respiratory disease (rhinotrachetitis) of turkeys. Avian Dis,1979,23:132-138.
    [96]Simmons D J, J C Dee, L P Rose. A heat-stable toxin isolated from the turkey coryza agent Bordetella avium. Avian Dis,1986,30:761-765
    [97]Sogin, Gunderson. Acad Sci,1987,1503:125-139.
    [98]Suresh P, Arp L H. A monoclonal antibody-based latex bead agglutination test for the detection of Bordetella avium. Avian Dis, 1993Jue–Sep, 37(3):767-772.
    [99]Suresh P. A time-course sturdy of the transfer of immuoglobulin G from blood totracheal and lacrimal secretions in yong turkeys. Avian Dis,1995,39(2):349~354.
    [100]Talkington F D,Kleven S H,Brown J. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of antibodies to Mycoplasm gallisepticumin experimentally infected chickens[J].Avian Diseases,1985,29:53-70.
    [101]Van Eck J H H, et al. Dropped egg production of shelled and shell-less egg associated with appearance of procipitins to adenovirus in flock of laying fowl. Avian Pathol,1976,5:261-272
    [102]Yersin A G, Edens F W, Simmons D F. The effects of Bordetella avium infection on elastin and collagen content of turkey trachea and aorta.. Poult Sci,1998 Nov,77(11):1654-1660.
    [103]Yoder H W, Hopkins Jr S R,Mitchell B W.Evaluation of inactivated Mycoplasma gallisepticum Oil-Emusion Bacterins for protection Against Airsacculitis in broilers[J].Avian Diseases,1983,28(1):224-234.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700