水淹岩层测井响应机理及解释研究
|
摘要
与勘探阶段的静态环境相比,注水开发方式下油藏及储层特征都处于动态变化中,已开发油田测井解释及评价过程中暴露出一系列问题,本研究针对这些问题,在实验结论及理论研究的基础上,对实际高含水开发区块进行测井评价,通过理论与实际相结合,完善注水开发油田中新完钻井的测井评价方法,提高开发区块的测井解释符合率。研究结果表明：电阻增大率与含水饱和度的关系发生变化,当含水饱和度达到一定值以后,储层中的水成为连续流动相,此后电阻率对油水饱和度的变化不再敏感.地层水矿化度不同,饱和度解释模型中参数的特征不同,在矿化度较低的情况下岩电参数随矿化度的降低而减小,在高矿化度情况下基本不发生变化。水驱过程中形成的大孔道及其它高渗透条带对储层电阻率产生影响,虽然储层中的剩余油饱和度还较高,但是低阻的含水条带却会导致电阻率显著降低。流动电位是与注水开发过程密切相关的一种岩石物理现象,其产生的本质原因是开发过程中的压力异常,流动电位使自然电位曲线表现异常。
For the problems of reservoir properties evaluation and well logging interpretation during the oilfield development, relationship between log information and characteristics of reservoir was studied in detail through theory analysis and petrophysical experiments. In the process of water flooding, relationships between water saturation and resistivity index are different. When the water saturation increases to a critical value, water in reservoir becomes continous phase state and resistivity curve can't reflect water saturation. If water salinities of reservoir are different, parameter characteristics of saturation models are different. When the water salinities are high enough, saturation parameters maintain steady, do not change obviously with saline solution. Large pores widely spread in water flooding oilfield, which make the resistivity of the pay zone decrease obviously, though the oil saturation is still large enough. Electrokinetic phenomenon is related with oil field development. Abnormal pressure caused by development is the main factors. SP curve were the expressions of the streaming potential in waterflooded zone.
For the problems of reservoir properties evaluation and well logging interpretation during the oilfield development, relationship between log information and characteristics of reservoir was studied in detail through theory analysis and petrophysical experiments. In the process of water flooding, relationships between water saturation and resistivity index are different. When the water saturation increases to a critical value, water in reservoir becomes continous phase state and resistivity curve can't reflect water saturation. If water salinities of reservoir are different, parameter characteristics of saturation models are different. When the water salinities are high enough, saturation parameters maintain steady, do not change obviously with saline solution. Large pores widely spread in water flooding oilfield, which make the resistivity of the pay zone decrease obviously, though the oil saturation is still large enough. Electrokinetic phenomenon is related with oil field development. Abnormal pressure caused by development is the main factors. SP curve were the expressions of the streaming potential in waterflooded zone.
引文
[1]俞启泰.论提高油田采收率的战略与方法.石油学报,1996,17(2)：53～61.
[2]刘光鼎.中国油气资源企盼二次创业.地球物理学进展,2001,16(4)：1～3.
[3]陆大卫,赵培华.油气勘探与生产需求是促进测井技术持续发展的动力.测井技术,2001,25(1)：3～4.
[4]韩大匡,万仁溥,李淑贞等.多层砂岩油藏开发模式.北京：石油工业出版社,1999.
[5]王乃举.中国油藏开发模式总论.北京：石油工业出版社,1999.
[6]陈元千.现代油藏工程.北京：石油工业出版社,2001.
[7]葛家理,宁正福,刘月田等.现代油藏渗流力学原理.北京：石油工业出版社,2001.
[8]Alabert F.G. and Modot V. Stochastic models of reservoir heterogeneity:impact on connectivity and average permeabilities (C). SPE,1992,24893:355-370.
[9]Dixit A. B. et al. Pore-scale modeling of wettability effects and their influence on oil recovery. SPE Reservoir Eval & Eng,1999,2(1):25～ 36.
[10]Morrow N. R. Wet tability and its effect on recovery. JPT,1999,1476～ 1484.
[11]Hirasaki G. J. Dependence of waterflood remaining oil saturation on relative permeability, capillary pressure and reservoir parameters in mixed-wet Turbidite sandes. SPE Reservoir Engineering,1996, 11(2):87～92.
[12]黄隆基.润湿性对岩石电阻率的影响模型估算.地球物理学报,1995,(3)： 15～20.
[13]岳登台.综述老油田改善开发效果及提高采收率技术.石油学报,1998,19(3)： 46～51.
[14]韩大匡.深度开发高含水油田提高采收率问题的探讨.石油勘探与开发,1995,22(5)： 47～55.
[15]Deng Y, Wu S and Zhang G. et al. Change of reservoir Physics properties During development of waterflood. Oil Gas Technology, 1996,3(4):44～52.
[16]黄福堂.油田注水开发过程中储层岩石表面性质变化因素研究.石油勘探与开发,1985,12(3)：45～50.
[17]黄思静,杨永林,单钰铭.注水开发对砂岩储层孔隙结构的影响.中国海上油气(地质),2000,14(2)：122～128.
[18]杨克敏,何方,胡文革等.注水开发对储层物性及粒度分布的影响.断块油气田,1999,6(4)：25～28.
[19]陈祖林,朱扬明,陈奇.油层不同开采时期原油组分变化特征.沉积学报,2002,20(1)：169～173.
[20]贺凤云,于天忠,张继芬等.水驱对储层和地层原油性质的影响.大庆石油学院报,2002,26(2)：21～24.
[21]王传禹,杨普华,马永海等.大庆油田注水开发过程中油层岩石的湿润性与孔隙结构的变化.石油勘探与开发,1981,7(1)：54～67.
[22]曾流芳,赵国景,张子海等.疏松砂岩油藏大孔道形成机理及判别方法.应用基础与工程科学学报,2002,10(3)：268～276.
[23]刘国宏,朱伟厚,杜君等.调整井钻井过程中的出水问题与处理.断块油气田,1998,5(3)：50～53.
[24]张东杰,王玲云,刘光华.影响断块油田钻井安全的地质因素及对策.国外油田工程,2004,20(1)：31～41.
[25]于开春,张世峰,张文志.杏南开发区分层段压力监测与分析.大庆石油地质与开发,2004,23(4)：42～58.
[26]贾忠伟,杨清彦,兰玉波等.水驱油微观物理模拟实验研究.大庆石油地质与开发,2002,21(1)：46～50.
[27]沈平平.油水在多孔介质中的运动理论和实践.北京：石油工业出版社,1998.
[28]石占中,王志章,纪友亮.储层渗流特征及原油微观分布模式.油气地质与采收率,2002,9(6)：41～61.
[29]范宜仁,邓少贵,刘兵开等.淡水驱替过程中的岩石电阻率实验研究.测井技术,1998,22(3)：153～155.
[30]潘兴国,姜文达.中国水驱油田开发测井.水驱油田开发测井96国际学术讨论会论文集.北京：石油工业出版社,1996.
[31]谭廷栋.中国水驱油田测井新进展.测井技术,1997,21(4)：235～240.
[32]张朝琛,王文祥,吕学谦等.确定剩余油分布技术.中国石油天然气总公司信息研究所,1995.
[33]方朝亮,吴铭德,冯启宁.测井关键技术展望.石油科技论坛,2005,2：32～35.
[34]匡立春,毛志强,孙中春等.基于新技术的油气藏测井综合评价.石油勘探与开发,2003,30(2)：58～60.
[35]陶果,多雪峰.我国地球物理测井技术的发展与战略初探.地球物理学进展,2001,16(3)：98～101.
[36]Г.С.库兹涅佐夫.油气田开发期地球物理监测技术.常熹等译,北京：石油工业出版社,1995,7～24.
[37]周灿灿,程相志,周凤鸣等.W-S模型中B参数的确定方法.测井技术,2000,24(3)：179～182.
[38]褚人杰,孙德明,姜文达.确定水驱油藏地层混合液电阻率的方法.测井技术,1995,19(2)：117～125.
[39]孙德明,胡杰,陈学义.淡化系数方程在稠油水淹层测井评价中的应用.测井技术,1996,20(5)：341～344.
[40]Archie, G. E.用电阻率测井曲线确定若干储层特征参数.李宁译.地球物理测井,1991,15(5)：15.
[41]荆万学,陈永吉.浅探Archie公式的物理学原型[J].测井技术,1997,21(4)： 289～291.
[42]孙德明,褚人杰.含水饱和度指数刀的理论与实验.石油学报,1994,15(4)： 66～72.
[43]侯连华.测井评价和预测剩余油方法研究.[博士学位论文],石油大学(北京),北京昌平,2003.4.
[44]李洪奇,焦翠华,邵才瑞等.纵横波测井资料在储层评价中的应用.测井技术,2002,26(2)：131～133.
[45]焦翠华,李洪奇,李冰等.小波分析在提高声波测井曲线纵向分辨率中的应用.测井技术,1999,23(1)：15～18.
[46]沈联蒂,史讶.岩性、含油气性、有效覆盖压力对纵、横波速度的影响.地球物理学报,1994,37(3)：391～399.
[47]施行觉,夏从俊,吴永钢.储层条件下波速的变化规律及其影响因素的实验研究.地球物理学报,1998,41(2)：234～241.
[48]云美厚,管志宁.油藏注水开发对储层岩石速度和密度的影响.石油地球物理勘探,2002,37(3)：280一286.
[49]A. W. Adamson.表面的物理化学.顾锡人译,化学工业出版社,1985.
[50]AYAO KITAHARA AKIRA WATANABE[日].界面电现象.邓彤,赵学范译,京大学出版社,1992.
[51]Weyl P. K. Pressure solution and the force of crystallization□a phenomeno logical theory. J. Geophys. Res.1959,69:2001～2025
[52]邓景发,范康年.物理化学.高等教育出版社,1993.
[53]史謌,Axel Schult.结晶岩的水化膨胀研究.地球物理学报,2000,43(6)：798～805.
[54]汤连生,张鹏程,王思敬.水、岩化学作用的岩石宏观力学效应的试验研究.岩石力学与工程学报,2002,21(4)：526～531.
[55]周祖康.胶体化学基础.北京大学出版社,1987.
[56]朱步瑶.表面与表面自由能.大学化学,1987,2(23)：35～39.
[57]0. Stern, Z. Elektrochem.,1924,30(508)
[58]P. J. Debye, J. Chem. Phys.1993,1 (13)
[59]但春,贺承祖.关于扩散偶电层中影响电位分布因素的讨论.化学研究与应用,1998,10(3)：323～326.
[60]Sparnay. The electrical double layer. Porgam on Press, New York, 1972.
[61]钱勇先.油藏条件下平面偶电层特性研究.江汉石油学院学报,1996,18(3)： 41～46.
[62]Hunter, R. J. Zeta potential in colloid science □ principles and applications. Academic press, London,1981.
[63]Liang Z., Ioannidis M. A. andChatzis I. Permeability and electrical conductivity of porous media from 3Dstochastic replicas of the microstructure. Chemical Engineering Science,2000,55:5247～5262.
[64]Longeron, D. G.. Effect of overburden pressure, nature, and microscopic distribution of the fluids on electrical properties of rock samples [J].1986, SPE-15383.
[65]Peng, X. F., Peterson, G. P. and wang, B. X. Frictional flow characteristics of water flowing through rectangular microchannels. Exp. Heat transfer,1994,7:249～264
[66]Rice, C. L. and Whitehead, R. Electrokinetic flow in narrow cylindrical capillaries. J. Phys. Chem.,1965,69:4017～4023
[67]Ronald F Probstein著,戴干策等译.物理一化学流体动力学导论.上海：华东化工学院出版社,1992.
[68]Vazquez M. and Beggs H. D. Correlations for Fluid Physical Property Prediction. JPT,1980,968～970.
[69]安金珍,修济刚,陈峰等.单轴压力下有补给水岩石电阻率变化各向异性研究.中国地震,1996,12(3)：301～306.
[70]陈峰,安金珍,廖椿庭.约束承载岩石电阻率变化形态研究.中国地震,2002,(3)：427～430.
[71]陈峰,修济刚,安金珍等.岩石电阻率变化各向异性与微裂隙扩展方位实验研究.地震学报,2000,22(3)：310～318.
[72]房文静,关继腾,王殿生.用毛管电动—水动力学模型研究储层的流动电位.测井技术,2000,24(2)：92～95.
[73]林仲华.电化学的前沿与展望.物理化学学报,1992,8(5)：712～720.
[74]刘洪,李幼铭.关于震电勘探油气水的几点看法[J].石油物探,1994,33(2)： 94～101.
[75]刘洪.利用动电效应进行地下油气水勘探的方法[J].石油物探信息,1993, (1)： 27～32.
[76]刘洪.利用天然电磁场高分辨探测地下油气水的可能性[J].地球物理学报,1994,37(6)：828～835.
[77]刘洪.震电效应研究在资源勘探中的应用前景[J].地球物理学进展,2002,17(2)：211～217.
[78]石昆法.震电效应原理和初步实验结果[J].地球物理学报,2001,44(5)：720～728.
[79]王玲,何继善.描述激电效应的非线性扩散方程.地球物理学报,1999,42(6)： 850～857.
[80]严洪瑞,刘洪等.震电勘探方法在大庆油田的现场实验[J].地球物理学报,1999,42(2)：257～267.
[81]张流,黄建国,高平,水对岩石变形过程中电阻率变化的影响.地震,2003,23(1)： 8～14.
[82]谢然红,高国忠,冯启宁等.用测井资料预测储层的润湿性.测井技术,2002,26(4)：265～268.
[83]Helset H.M. et al. Relative permeability from displacement experiments with full account for capillary pressure. SPE Reservoir Eval & Eng,1998,1(2):92～98.
[84]Carlos A. Grattoni and Richard A. Dwe. Influence of Fluid Distribution upon Electrical resistivity of partially Saturated Media. SPWLA,36th,1995.
[85]Grattoni, C. A. and Dawe, R. A. Influence of fluid distribution upon electrical resistivity of partially saturated media. SPWLA 36th annual logging symposium,1995,6～29.
[86]Man H. D. and Jing, X. D. Network modeling of mixed-wettability on electrical resistivity, capillary pressure and wettability indices. JPSE,2002, (33),101～122.
[87]Dewall J A. Measurement and Evaluation of Resistivity-Index Curves. The Log Analyst,1991, (5):111～124
[88]Donaldson E C. Relationship Between the Archie Saturation Exponent and Wettability. SPE Formation Evaluation, September,1989:201～214
[2]刘光鼎.中国油气资源企盼二次创业.地球物理学进展,2001,16(4)：1～3.
[3]陆大卫,赵培华.油气勘探与生产需求是促进测井技术持续发展的动力.测井技术,2001,25(1)：3～4.
[4]韩大匡,万仁溥,李淑贞等.多层砂岩油藏开发模式.北京：石油工业出版社,1999.
[5]王乃举.中国油藏开发模式总论.北京：石油工业出版社,1999.
[6]陈元千.现代油藏工程.北京：石油工业出版社,2001.
[7]葛家理,宁正福,刘月田等.现代油藏渗流力学原理.北京：石油工业出版社,2001.
[8]Alabert F.G. and Modot V. Stochastic models of reservoir heterogeneity:impact on connectivity and average permeabilities (C). SPE,1992,24893:355-370.
[9]Dixit A. B. et al. Pore-scale modeling of wettability effects and their influence on oil recovery. SPE Reservoir Eval & Eng,1999,2(1):25～ 36.
[10]Morrow N. R. Wet tability and its effect on recovery. JPT,1999,1476～ 1484.
[11]Hirasaki G. J. Dependence of waterflood remaining oil saturation on relative permeability, capillary pressure and reservoir parameters in mixed-wet Turbidite sandes. SPE Reservoir Engineering,1996, 11(2):87～92.
[12]黄隆基.润湿性对岩石电阻率的影响模型估算.地球物理学报,1995,(3)： 15～20.
[13]岳登台.综述老油田改善开发效果及提高采收率技术.石油学报,1998,19(3)： 46～51.
[14]韩大匡.深度开发高含水油田提高采收率问题的探讨.石油勘探与开发,1995,22(5)： 47～55.
[15]Deng Y, Wu S and Zhang G. et al. Change of reservoir Physics properties During development of waterflood. Oil Gas Technology, 1996,3(4):44～52.
[16]黄福堂.油田注水开发过程中储层岩石表面性质变化因素研究.石油勘探与开发,1985,12(3)：45～50.
[17]黄思静,杨永林,单钰铭.注水开发对砂岩储层孔隙结构的影响.中国海上油气(地质),2000,14(2)：122～128.
[18]杨克敏,何方,胡文革等.注水开发对储层物性及粒度分布的影响.断块油气田,1999,6(4)：25～28.
[19]陈祖林,朱扬明,陈奇.油层不同开采时期原油组分变化特征.沉积学报,2002,20(1)：169～173.
[20]贺凤云,于天忠,张继芬等.水驱对储层和地层原油性质的影响.大庆石油学院报,2002,26(2)：21～24.
[21]王传禹,杨普华,马永海等.大庆油田注水开发过程中油层岩石的湿润性与孔隙结构的变化.石油勘探与开发,1981,7(1)：54～67.
[22]曾流芳,赵国景,张子海等.疏松砂岩油藏大孔道形成机理及判别方法.应用基础与工程科学学报,2002,10(3)：268～276.
[23]刘国宏,朱伟厚,杜君等.调整井钻井过程中的出水问题与处理.断块油气田,1998,5(3)：50～53.
[24]张东杰,王玲云,刘光华.影响断块油田钻井安全的地质因素及对策.国外油田工程,2004,20(1)：31～41.
[25]于开春,张世峰,张文志.杏南开发区分层段压力监测与分析.大庆石油地质与开发,2004,23(4)：42～58.
[26]贾忠伟,杨清彦,兰玉波等.水驱油微观物理模拟实验研究.大庆石油地质与开发,2002,21(1)：46～50.
[27]沈平平.油水在多孔介质中的运动理论和实践.北京：石油工业出版社,1998.
[28]石占中,王志章,纪友亮.储层渗流特征及原油微观分布模式.油气地质与采收率,2002,9(6)：41～61.
[29]范宜仁,邓少贵,刘兵开等.淡水驱替过程中的岩石电阻率实验研究.测井技术,1998,22(3)：153～155.
[30]潘兴国,姜文达.中国水驱油田开发测井.水驱油田开发测井96国际学术讨论会论文集.北京：石油工业出版社,1996.
[31]谭廷栋.中国水驱油田测井新进展.测井技术,1997,21(4)：235～240.
[32]张朝琛,王文祥,吕学谦等.确定剩余油分布技术.中国石油天然气总公司信息研究所,1995.
[33]方朝亮,吴铭德,冯启宁.测井关键技术展望.石油科技论坛,2005,2：32～35.
[34]匡立春,毛志强,孙中春等.基于新技术的油气藏测井综合评价.石油勘探与开发,2003,30(2)：58～60.
[35]陶果,多雪峰.我国地球物理测井技术的发展与战略初探.地球物理学进展,2001,16(3)：98～101.
[36]Г.С.库兹涅佐夫.油气田开发期地球物理监测技术.常熹等译,北京：石油工业出版社,1995,7～24.
[37]周灿灿,程相志,周凤鸣等.W-S模型中B参数的确定方法.测井技术,2000,24(3)：179～182.
[38]褚人杰,孙德明,姜文达.确定水驱油藏地层混合液电阻率的方法.测井技术,1995,19(2)：117～125.
[39]孙德明,胡杰,陈学义.淡化系数方程在稠油水淹层测井评价中的应用.测井技术,1996,20(5)：341～344.
[40]Archie, G. E.用电阻率测井曲线确定若干储层特征参数.李宁译.地球物理测井,1991,15(5)：15.
[41]荆万学,陈永吉.浅探Archie公式的物理学原型[J].测井技术,1997,21(4)： 289～291.
[42]孙德明,褚人杰.含水饱和度指数刀的理论与实验.石油学报,1994,15(4)： 66～72.
[43]侯连华.测井评价和预测剩余油方法研究.[博士学位论文],石油大学(北京),北京昌平,2003.4.
[44]李洪奇,焦翠华,邵才瑞等.纵横波测井资料在储层评价中的应用.测井技术,2002,26(2)：131～133.
[45]焦翠华,李洪奇,李冰等.小波分析在提高声波测井曲线纵向分辨率中的应用.测井技术,1999,23(1)：15～18.
[46]沈联蒂,史讶.岩性、含油气性、有效覆盖压力对纵、横波速度的影响.地球物理学报,1994,37(3)：391～399.
[47]施行觉,夏从俊,吴永钢.储层条件下波速的变化规律及其影响因素的实验研究.地球物理学报,1998,41(2)：234～241.
[48]云美厚,管志宁.油藏注水开发对储层岩石速度和密度的影响.石油地球物理勘探,2002,37(3)：280一286.
[49]A. W. Adamson.表面的物理化学.顾锡人译,化学工业出版社,1985.
[50]AYAO KITAHARA AKIRA WATANABE[日].界面电现象.邓彤,赵学范译,京大学出版社,1992.
[51]Weyl P. K. Pressure solution and the force of crystallization□a phenomeno logical theory. J. Geophys. Res.1959,69:2001～2025
[52]邓景发,范康年.物理化学.高等教育出版社,1993.
[53]史謌,Axel Schult.结晶岩的水化膨胀研究.地球物理学报,2000,43(6)：798～805.
[54]汤连生,张鹏程,王思敬.水、岩化学作用的岩石宏观力学效应的试验研究.岩石力学与工程学报,2002,21(4)：526～531.
[55]周祖康.胶体化学基础.北京大学出版社,1987.
[56]朱步瑶.表面与表面自由能.大学化学,1987,2(23)：35～39.
[57]0. Stern, Z. Elektrochem.,1924,30(508)
[58]P. J. Debye, J. Chem. Phys.1993,1 (13)
[59]但春,贺承祖.关于扩散偶电层中影响电位分布因素的讨论.化学研究与应用,1998,10(3)：323～326.
[60]Sparnay. The electrical double layer. Porgam on Press, New York, 1972.
[61]钱勇先.油藏条件下平面偶电层特性研究.江汉石油学院学报,1996,18(3)： 41～46.
[62]Hunter, R. J. Zeta potential in colloid science □ principles and applications. Academic press, London,1981.
[63]Liang Z., Ioannidis M. A. andChatzis I. Permeability and electrical conductivity of porous media from 3Dstochastic replicas of the microstructure. Chemical Engineering Science,2000,55:5247～5262.
[64]Longeron, D. G.. Effect of overburden pressure, nature, and microscopic distribution of the fluids on electrical properties of rock samples [J].1986, SPE-15383.
[65]Peng, X. F., Peterson, G. P. and wang, B. X. Frictional flow characteristics of water flowing through rectangular microchannels. Exp. Heat transfer,1994,7:249～264
[66]Rice, C. L. and Whitehead, R. Electrokinetic flow in narrow cylindrical capillaries. J. Phys. Chem.,1965,69:4017～4023
[67]Ronald F Probstein著,戴干策等译.物理一化学流体动力学导论.上海：华东化工学院出版社,1992.
[68]Vazquez M. and Beggs H. D. Correlations for Fluid Physical Property Prediction. JPT,1980,968～970.
[69]安金珍,修济刚,陈峰等.单轴压力下有补给水岩石电阻率变化各向异性研究.中国地震,1996,12(3)：301～306.
[70]陈峰,安金珍,廖椿庭.约束承载岩石电阻率变化形态研究.中国地震,2002,(3)：427～430.
[71]陈峰,修济刚,安金珍等.岩石电阻率变化各向异性与微裂隙扩展方位实验研究.地震学报,2000,22(3)：310～318.
[72]房文静,关继腾,王殿生.用毛管电动—水动力学模型研究储层的流动电位.测井技术,2000,24(2)：92～95.
[73]林仲华.电化学的前沿与展望.物理化学学报,1992,8(5)：712～720.
[74]刘洪,李幼铭.关于震电勘探油气水的几点看法[J].石油物探,1994,33(2)： 94～101.
[75]刘洪.利用动电效应进行地下油气水勘探的方法[J].石油物探信息,1993, (1)： 27～32.
[76]刘洪.利用天然电磁场高分辨探测地下油气水的可能性[J].地球物理学报,1994,37(6)：828～835.
[77]刘洪.震电效应研究在资源勘探中的应用前景[J].地球物理学进展,2002,17(2)：211～217.
[78]石昆法.震电效应原理和初步实验结果[J].地球物理学报,2001,44(5)：720～728.
[79]王玲,何继善.描述激电效应的非线性扩散方程.地球物理学报,1999,42(6)： 850～857.
[80]严洪瑞,刘洪等.震电勘探方法在大庆油田的现场实验[J].地球物理学报,1999,42(2)：257～267.
[81]张流,黄建国,高平,水对岩石变形过程中电阻率变化的影响.地震,2003,23(1)： 8～14.
[82]谢然红,高国忠,冯启宁等.用测井资料预测储层的润湿性.测井技术,2002,26(4)：265～268.
[83]Helset H.M. et al. Relative permeability from displacement experiments with full account for capillary pressure. SPE Reservoir Eval & Eng,1998,1(2):92～98.
[84]Carlos A. Grattoni and Richard A. Dwe. Influence of Fluid Distribution upon Electrical resistivity of partially Saturated Media. SPWLA,36th,1995.
[85]Grattoni, C. A. and Dawe, R. A. Influence of fluid distribution upon electrical resistivity of partially saturated media. SPWLA 36th annual logging symposium,1995,6～29.
[86]Man H. D. and Jing, X. D. Network modeling of mixed-wettability on electrical resistivity, capillary pressure and wettability indices. JPSE,2002, (33),101～122.
[87]Dewall J A. Measurement and Evaluation of Resistivity-Index Curves. The Log Analyst,1991, (5):111～124
[88]Donaldson E C. Relationship Between the Archie Saturation Exponent and Wettability. SPE Formation Evaluation, September,1989:201～214