树干注射吡虫啉在树体内的吸收传导分布研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
田间药效试验表明,树干注射4%吡虫啉注干液剂可以有效的防治多种蛀干及食叶类树木害虫。目前关于吡虫啉注射后在树体中吸收分布规律的报道甚少。为科学、合理的利用该药剂防治树木虫害,本文测定了树干自流式注药过程中不同条件下树体对4%吡虫啉注干液剂的吸收;研究了树干注射后吡虫啉在垂柳树体内的分布及持续动态;并通过室内生测,探讨了树干注射吡虫啉对华北大黑鳃金龟成虫的防治效果。主要研究结果如下:
     1.在晴朗无风的天气条件下,树干自流式注药法中不同条件下树体对药剂吸收结果表明,注药孔孔径及树种对药剂吸收影响较大,其次为树干基径和季节,注药器通气孔孔径对药剂吸收的影响不显著。5 mm注药孔孔径下树体对药剂的吸收显著高于2、3 mm注药孔,注药后10 h树体对药剂吸收一般可达6~8 mL。两种通气孔孔径(0.5、1 mm)下树体对药剂吸收的速度差异较小。9种树种对药剂的吸收能力依次为:毛白杨>白梨>李>侧柏>水杉>悬铃木、国槐、垂柳>合欢。树干基径对药剂吸收的影响因树种而异,国槐表现为基径较大的树体对药剂的吸收能力较强,侧柏与之相反,毛白杨不同基径树体对药剂吸收的差异不显著。5月份树体对药剂的吸收能力高于9月份。
     2.树干注射后吡虫啉在垂柳体内具有良好的传导性能。在树冠不同高度不同方位叶片中吡虫啉含量差异较大。树冠上层叶片中吡虫啉含量整体高于下层叶片,注药孔上方叶片中吡虫啉含量较树冠其他方位高。在树干木质部吡虫啉向上纵向输导能力较强。在树干基部南侧打孔注药,注药后1 d树干下部南侧木质部中吡虫啉含量高达20.30μg?g-1,是其他三个方位的10倍左右,而在树干中、上部不同方位间的含量差异相对较小。随着传导时间的延长,吡虫啉在树干木质部中快速向上部移动,注药后3 d树干中部含量达到最大,注药后6 d时树干上部含量最大。在树干韧皮部,注药后1 d仅在树干东侧韧皮部中有吡虫啉分布,注药后3 d树干不同高度各方位均有吡虫啉分布,至注药后13 d时树干韧皮部的吡虫啉总含量达到最高。吡虫啉在树干韧皮部的含量低于树干木质部。
     3.树干注射后垂柳叶片中的吡虫啉总残留量最大,其次为小枝木质部、小枝韧皮部、树干木质部,树干韧皮部的含量最低。在树体不同部位吡虫啉总残留变化趋势不同。在树干木质部吡虫啉总残留呈现逐渐下降的趋势,注药后5 d吡虫啉总残留最高,至注药后30 d处于较低水平。叶片中的吡虫啉总残留呈现先上升后下降的趋势,注药后25 d时达到最高值。树干韧皮部中的吡虫啉总残留量变化幅度较小,在注药后20~40 d保持较高水平高。注药后70 d各组织中吡虫啉总残留量分布相对均衡,处于较低水平。树干注射后吡虫啉及其衍生物在柳树体内持续期较长,有利于对树木害虫发挥长效控制作用。
     4.垂柳树干注射吡虫啉对华北大黑鳃金龟成虫有较强的击倒作用,持效期较长。结果表明不同时期注射吡虫啉后采摘垂柳叶片饲喂试虫,24 h死亡率呈现波动变化,其中注药后10 d致死率最高为76.67%;不同时期注药对试虫均表现出较强的击倒作用,击倒率均高于65%。叶面喷雾和树干注射施用吡虫啉对华北大黑鳃金龟成虫的LC50值(叶片中吡虫啉含量)分别为6.3368μg?g-1和3.6439μg?g-1,表明树干注射对试虫的毒杀作用更强。
     可见,4%吡虫啉注干液剂在树体内具有良好的吸收传导性能,田间持期长,是一种具有良好应用前景的树木注干药剂。
Field efficiency trials showed imidacloprid as a trunk-injectable insecticide was found to be effective in controlling a number of borers and suck insect pests of trees. However, there are fewer reports about the uptake, translocation, and distribution of imidacloprid with trunk injection at home and abroad. In order to use this trunk-injectable insecticide for controlling insect pests of trees effectively, uptake of imiacloprid liquid formulation by trees under several factors with auto flowing trunk injection, translocation, and distribution of imidacloprid in weeping willow, and efficiency of imidacloprid on adult Holotrichia oblita Fald. in vivo bioassay after injection was determined. The main results as follows:
     1. Effects of several factors on the uptake of 4% Imidacloprid Liquid Formulation (ILF) by trees was studied with auto flowing trunk injection in sunshine. The results showed injection hole-diameter and tree species had highest impact on the uptake of ILF, and the lowest in injector blowhole-diameter. 5 mm injection hole performed well; generally the uptake of ILF was 6-8 mL at 10 h after injection. Diameter of injector blowhole had less influence on the uptake of ILF. The absorbability to ILF was various in 9 tree species; Populus tomentosa had a most strong ability and the least in Albizia julibrissin. Effect of trunk basal diameter on the uptake to ILF was indefinite, depending on the species, in Sophora japonica the uptake ability to ILF was greater with bigger trunk basal diameter, but in Platycladus orientalis that was reverse, in Populus tomentosa it was not significantly different between trees with different trunk basal diameter. Uptake rates were lower during maturity period (September) than peak growth season (May). All these factors are to be taken into account in order to ensure the most efficient use of auto flowing trunk injection with chemicals in agriculture and forestry.
     2. Imidacloprid was transmitted well in the weeping willow after trunk injection. Imidacloprid concentration (IC) varied depending on the positions of leaves located. In the upper crown IC were more than those in the lower crown as a whole. 48 h after injection, the gap of IC between upper crown and lower crown reached the maximum. The IC of the leaves upon the injection spot were more than the others sides. The results about translocation of imidacloprid in the xylem and phloem of tree trunk as follow. Imidacloprid was transmitted much effectively in the vertical direction along the xylem. IC in the south xylem at trunk height 0.5~0.9 m was as much as 20.30μg?g-1 at one day after injection, which was almost 10 times more than the other three sides. And the gap of IC among different sides decreased gradually with the trunk height ascending. As the time passed by, the distribution center of IC moved up quickly. At 6 days after injection, IC reached the maximum in the top part of trunk xylem. In trunk phloem imidacloprid was only presented in the east side at 1 day after injection. And imidacloprid was detected in all trunk phloem samples at 3 days after injection. IC reached the maximum in trunk phloem at 13 days after injection as a whole. IC in trunk phloem was less than that in trunk xylem in 20 days after injcetion. In conclusion, Imidacloprid was able to transport in both xylem and phloem.
     3. The results showed concentration of total imidacloprid residues varied among different tissues of weeping willow after injection. Concentration of total imidacloprid residues in the leaves was the most, next were twig xylem, twig phloem and trunk xylem, and the least in trunk phloem. The trends of total imidacloprid residues concentration in several tissues were different. It decreased gradually in the trunk xylem from 5 days after injection. The total imidacloprid residues concentration in the leaves reached the maximum at 25 days after injection, and gradually declined after immediately rising. The tatoal imidacloprid residues concentration increased slowly in the twig phloem, and reached the maximum at 30 days after injection. In trunk phloem the total imidacloprid residues concentration varied smoothly during 110 days after injection. Since 70 days after injection the total imidacloprid residues concentrations among these five tissues become equal relatively and decreased at a lower level. Imidacloprid and its metabolites after trunk injection into weeping willow could last for 110 days, which is good for controlling insect pests of trees.
     4. The results showed imidacloprid had strong knock down action against adult Holotrichia oblita (Fald.) with trunk injection into weeping willow, and the persistence was sustained over 80 days. Efficacy of imidacloprid after injection had less lethal effect on test insect; however it took on well at knock down action, and knock down rates of all samples on test insect were all over 65%. LC50 of imidacloprid on adult Holotrichia oblita (Fald.) applied with foliar spray and trunk injection were 6.3368 and 3.6439μg?g-1 respectively, which indicated toxicity of imidacloprid against adult Holotrichia oblita (Fald.) was stronger with trunk injection.
     To sum up, 4% imidacloprid liquid formulation had better uptake, translocation property and the persistence effect could last for at least 3 months. It is a new kind of trunk-injectable liquid formulation with bright prospect of application.
引文
[1] 国家林业局森林病虫害防治总站. 森林病虫害防治工作任重道远[N]. 中国绿色时报, 2000-02-28.
    [2] 宋玉双, 韩少敏. 对加强我国森林病虫害治理工作的思考[J]. 森林病虫通讯, 1999, (2) : 42-44.
    [3] 袁会珠, 黄启良, 杨代斌, 等. 环境相容性农药使用技术的研究进展[A]. 江树人主编. 农药与环境安全国际会议论文集[C]. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2003: 52-60.
    [4] 徐幼林, 周宏平, 张沂泉, 等. 高大林木病虫害防治技术研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2004, 17 (5): 21-24.
    [5] 胥占义, 秦 飞, 周正标. 树木注射施药技术进展[J]. 林业科技, 1997, 22 (5): 25-29.
    [6] 王慧瑜, 赵玉安, 贾耀军. 树干注射施药技术研究概况[J]. 农药学学报, 2005, 7 (2): 104-108.
    [7] 朱国生, 王洪法, 杨应春. 树干注药防治林木病虫害技术的应用[J]. 防护林科技, 2004, 58 (1): 76-77.
    [8] 梁细弟, 吴 蓉, 王政懂, 等. 树干注药防治林木病虫综述[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2001, (5): 29-31.
    [9] James R., Tisserat N., Todd T. Prevention of pine wilt of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) with systemic abamectin injections [J]. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, 2006, 32 (5): 195-201.
    [10] Takai K, Suzuki T, Kawazu K. Distribution and persistence of emamectin benzoate at efficacious concentrations in pine tissues after injection of a liquid formulation [J]. Pest Management Science, 2004, 60 (1): 42-48.
    [11] 张新才, 李桂亭, 洪家保. 注干法施用吡虫啉对光肩星天牛幼虫的防治效果[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 29 (7): 41-44.
    [12] 唐光辉, 何 军, 江志利, 等. 14%吡虫啉·敌敌畏注干液剂防治柳树天牛技术研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 35 (1): 116-120.
    [13] 胥占义, 秦 飞, 周正标. 树木注射施药机械与使用技术发展[J]. 世界林业研究, 1998, (2): 38-43.
    [14] 贺学礼. 植物生理[M]. 西安: 兴界图书出版公司, 1998 : 77-95.
    [15] 秦 飞, 魏玉松, 穆作文, 等. 树干注射施药技术及应用[J]. 农业科技开发, 1997, (1): 20-21.
    [16] 郎家文, 童 风, 李翠兰. 高渗液强行注射技术现状与前景[J]. 资源开发与市场, 1994, 10 (3): l06-l07.
    [17] 屠予钦. 农药科学使用指南[M]. 北京: 金盾出版社, 1993, 31-43.
    [18] 张格成. 果园农药使用指南[M]. 北京: 金盾出版社, 1993, 22-37.
    [19] 张光先. 树干注射不同含铁化合物矫治柑橘缺铁失绿的研究[J]. 中国柑橘, 1993, 22 (4): 27-28.
    [20] 崔美香, 薛进军, 张志平, 等. 铁肥树干强力高压注射矫正苹果缺铁失绿症及其机理[J]. 华北农学报, 2000, 15 (1): 134-138.
    [21] 陈德万, 张光先, 孙 凡. 树干高压注射溶液的运输机理研究[J]. 西南农业大学学报, 1994, 16 (1): 87-89.
    [22] 秦 飞. 树木注射施药机械的开发及型号编制[J]. 林业机械与木工设备, 1997, (5): 31-33.
    [23] 秦 飞. 手持定量树木注药器.实用新型专利公报, 1996, 12 (47):5,中国专利号: 95240488.5.
    [24] 李 兴, 秦 飞, 周正标等. 树干注药机核心技术的比较研究与 6HZ.D625B 型注药机研制[J]. 林业科学, 2001, 37 (1):130-134.
    [25] Joseph J., Peter M., Iiangovan R., et al. Efficacy of arborjet viper microinjections in the management of hemlock woolly adelgid [J]. Journal of Arboriculture, 2003, 29 (6):327-330.
    [26] 李 刚, 冯俊涛, 陈安良, 等. 一种树干自流式注药器. 中国专利号: ZL97203236.3.
    [27] 梁细弟. 日本树干注入剂的应用及最新进展[J]. 林业科技通讯, 1997, (8): 35-36.
    [28] 戴建昌, 张 兴. 杀虫剂在木本植物体内传导理论研究进展[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报, 2001, 29 (4): 128-134.
    [29] 田士波, 靳杏蕊, 赵淑娥. 果内核桃举肢蛾低龄幼虫防治研究初报[J]. 林业科学, 1993, 29(3): 262-265.
    [30] 赵生海. 树干注射技术防治黄斑星天牛[J]. 青海农林科技, 2004, (1): 49-50.
    [31] 程 明, 龙清伟, 杨茂全, 等. 杨树二色弗叶甲树干注射防治试验[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2004, 23(6): 34-37.
    [32] 杨 意, 刘 波, 唐尚杰, 等. 树干打孔注药防治危害广玉兰的日本壶链蚧[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2006, (2):34-37.
    [33] 李浩然, 刘宏屏, 李丽莎, 等. 树干注射化学药剂防治松纵坑切梢小蠹试验[J]. 云南林业科技, 2000, (2): 46-49.
    [34] 周嘉熹, 王通会, 王 琬. 黄斑星天牛幼虫期化学防治方法研究[J].森林病虫通讯, 1986, (4):22-24.
    [35] 张 怡, 李 刚, 戴建昌, 等. 自流式树干注药防治杨树光肩星天牛幼虫研究[J]. 西北农业学报, 2001, 10 (2): 87-90.
    [36] 周家华. 柑桔树干注药防治红蜘蛛试验[J]. 中国柑桔, 1993, 22 (4): 29.
    [37] 米景龙, 蔡玉钦, 郝玉军, 等. 树干注射法防治美国白蛾试验初报[J]. 河北林果研究, 1998, 13(4): 372-374.
    [38] 罗都强, 陈安良, 冯俊涛, 等. “注干液剂”的概念及实践[J]. 农药, 2001, 40(4): 16-18.
    [39] 陈安良, 冯俊涛, 李 刚, 等. 一种树木注干剂. 1999, 中国专利号:ZL99111357
    [40] Gill S., David k., Rondalyn M., et al. Use of soil and trunk injection of systemic insecticides to control lace bug on hawthorn [J]. Journal of Arboriculture, 1999, 25 (1):38-42.
    [41] 30% 敌畏·氧乐注干液剂(天牛敌). 中国农药登记号:LS991064. 中国农药登记公告. 1999.5.
    [42] 唐光辉, 陈安良, 冯俊涛, 等. 一种含吡虫啉的树木注干液剂. 中国专利, 2006, 200510043092.2 : 1-23.
    [43] 张朝红, 王跃进, 张剑侠. 潜在性缺铁条件下注射黄叶绿制剂对酥梨的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2002, 11 (4): 32-35.
    [44] 王跃进, 张朝红. 梨树树干注射施肥的研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 30 (4): 69-72.
    [45] 张朝红, 王跃进, 王西平. 黄叶绿制剂防治酥梨缺铁黄化症的研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 30(3): 59-62.
    [46] 杨国才, 杨春民, 张亚军, 等. 树干注射 NBH 营养液对提高苹果座果率的研究[J]. 河北农业科学), 996, (1): 9-11.
    [47] 杨国才, 杨春民. 树干注射硼砂尿素混合液对提高苹果座果率研究[J]. 北方园艺, 1997, (1): 27-28.
    [48] 黄树栋, 于长旺, 王汉朝, 等. 金丝小枣强力注射果树复壮复绿 2 号的效果[J]. 河北果树, 1999, (1): 9-10.
    [49] 童 风, 李翠兰. 果树树干补钙技术与效果[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2000, 16 (3): 136-138.
    [50] 呼世斌, 冯贵颖, 赵晓农, 等. 苹果对硒的吸收及其积聚特征研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 1998, 18 (1): 110-115.
    [51] 魏良稠, 周厚基. 缺铁失绿秋白梨树强力树干注射铁肥的效果初报[J]. 中国农业科学, 1990, 23 (5): 45-52.
    [52] Barney D. L. Trunk injection of iron compounds as a treatment for overcoming iron chlorosis inapple trees [J]. Horticultural Science, 1985, 20 (2): 236-238.
    [53] Ferxnandexz-Escobar R., Barranco D., Benlloch M. Overcoming iron chlorosis in olive and peach trees using a low-pressure trunk injection method [J]. Horticultural Science, 1993, 28(3): 192-194.
    [54] Raese J. T. Nutrition of apple and pear trees with foliar sprays, trunk injections or soil application of iron compounds [J]. Plant Nutrition, 1986, (9): 987-999.
    [55] Wallace G. A. Correction of iron deficiency in tree by injection with ferric ammounium citrate solution [J]. Journal of Plant Nutriton, 1986, (9): 981-986.
    [56] Dale M. N. 树用内吸杀虫剂的理论和实践(蔡炳城译). 农药译丛, 1983, 5 (6): 40-41
    [57] Ali A. D., Garica J. M. Efficacy and economics of selected systemic insecticides for control Phoracan semipunctata (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), a new pest in North America [J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 1988, 8 (4): 1124-1127.
    [58] Fernandez-Escobar R., Barranco D., Benlloch M. Overcoming iron chlorosis in olive and peach trees using a low-pressure trunk-injection method [J]. Horticultural Science, 1993, 28(3): 192-194.
    [59] Guest D. I., Pegg K. G., Whiley A. W. Control of phytophthour diseases of tree crops using trunk-injected phosphonates [J]. In: Janick, J. (Ed.), Horticultural Reviews, 1994, (17): 299-330.
    [60] Navarro C., Fernandez-Escobar R., Benlloch M. A low-pressure, trunk-injection method for introducing chemical formulations into olive trees [J]. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 1992, 117 (2): 357-360.
    [61] Reil W.O. Pressure-injecting chemicals into trees [J]. California Agriculture, 1979, 33 (6), 16-19.
    [62] Sachs R.M., Nyland G., Hackett W. P., et al. Pressurised injection of aqueous solutions into tree trunks [J]. Scientia Horticulture, 1977, 6: 297-310.
    [63] Tawil M. Z., Halak H. A., Abdin M. M. Introduccion a la lucha contra el Verticillium dahliae del olivo [J]. Olivae, 1991, 39: 36-40.
    [64] Whiley A. W., Hargreaves P. A., Pegg K. G., et al. Changing sink strengths influence translocation of phosphonate in avocado (Persea americana Mill.) trees [J]. Australian Journal of Agriculture Research, 1995, 46: 1079-1090.
    [65] R. W. 马什. 内习性杀菌剂[M].(郑宗, 李宗成等译), 北京: 化学工业出版社, 1983.
    [66] 吴春笃, 王敏敏, 陈洪安. 久效磷涂茎防治悬铃木害虫的机理研究[J]. 林业科学, 1994, 30 (3): 241-246
    [67] 唐 桦, 刘益宁, 张 剑. 六磷胺在树干内的输导动态及其对光肩星天牛的不育效应[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 1996, 24 (2): 72-76.
    [68] Kozlowski T. T., Winget C. H. Practice on the injection pesticide plant to control [J]. Botanical Gazette, 1963, 124 (4): 301-311.
    [69] 贺 虹, 张 翔, 王宏建, 等. 氧化乐果在不同树种体内的输导研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2002, 17 (4): 15-18
    [70] 张广增, 张义飞, 丁蕴铮. 注干氧化乐果在树木内的传导及效果[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2001, (增刊): 11-13.
    [71] 唐光辉, 张 璟, 何 军, 等. 基于 SFE-GC/MS 技术的敌敌畏在柳树中的传导与分布[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23 (10): 454-459.
    [72] 戴建昌. 杀虫剂在木本植物体内的传导机理及应用研究[D]. 福建福州: 福建农林科技大学, 2001.
    [73] Dedek W., Grahl R., Mothes B., et al. Degradation and excretion of 32P-mehtamidophos after oral administration in lactating cattle[J]. Arch Exp veterinarmed, 1986, 40 (4):621-626.
    [74] Arron G. P. Translocation of uniconazole after trunk injection of silver maple saplings [J]. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 1990, 9 (1-3): 141-146.
    [75] 吴春笃, 王光亮, 沈林生. 久效磷在悬铃木植株体内动态分布的研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 1994, 10 (4): 96-101.
    [76] 杨牡丹. 氧化乐果在板栗中输导规律的研究[J]. 西南林学院学报, 1993, 13 (2): 127-131.
    [77] 朱正昌, 闵水发. 氧化乐果在小钻杨中的输导动态[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 1991, 8 (1): 80-82.
    [78] Sclar D. Evaluation of new systemic insecticides for elm insect pest control [J]. Journal of Environmental Horticulture, 1996, 14 (1): 22-26.
    [79] Rediske J., Gauditz J., Johnson N. Distribution of dimethoate 32P in fir, following stem injection [J]. Forestry Science, 1970, 15: 106-112.
    [80] 许志春, 田海燕, 陈学英, 等. 吡虫啉在杨树中持留量的动态变化研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2004, 26 (1): 62-65.
    [81] 唐光辉. 一种新型杀虫注干液剂的研制与应用基础研究[D]. 陕西杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2007.
    [82] 张宗炳等. 杀虫剂的分子毒理学[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1996, 73.
    [83] 山本出, 深见顺一主编. 程天恩, 张育苍, 徐逸楣, 许泳峰译. 农业的分子设计[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 1988, 153.
    [84] Yamamoto I., Yabuta G., Tomizawa M., et al. Molecular mechanism for selective toxicity of nicotinoids and neonicotinoids [J]. Nippon Noyaku Gakkaishi, 1995, 20 (1) :33-40.
    [85] 张宗炳等. 杀虫剂的分子毒理学[M] . 北京:农业出版社,1996 ,323
    [86] 伍一军, 冷欣夫. 杀虫药剂的神经毒理学研究进展[J]. 昆虫学报, 2003, 46 (3): 382-389
    [87] 许小龙, 韩丽娟, 王小平, 等. 吡虫啉 20SL 新剂型对三种蚜虫的田间防治效果[J]. 农药, 2000, 39 (5): 26-28
    [88] 庄义庆, 神志伟, 何有龙, 等. 吡虫啉拌稻种防治稻蓟马[J]. 农药, 1999, 39 (11): 43-44.
    [89] 尹设飞, 叶 磊, 钱春生, 等. 吡虫啉防治水稻二化螟[J]. 农药, 1997 ,36 (7) :38-39.
    [90] 聂王焰, 周一峰, 沙鸿雁. 13%吡虫啉微胶囊剂防治蚜虫药效试验[J]. 农药, 2003, 42 (1): 19-20
    [91] 朱久生, 秦 曙, 王 静, 等. 6%吡虫啉可溶性液剂防治苹果蚜虫田间药效试验[J]. 农药, 2002, 41 (3): 25-26.
    [92] 崔士英, 齐志广. 吡虫啉对柿树真绵蚧的杀虫效果[J]. 昆虫知识, 1997, 36 (6): 346.
    [93] 张存政, 刘贤进, 顾正远, 等. 褐飞虱生物型监测及抗药性初析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2002, (1): 41-43.
    [94] 刘泽文, 董 钊, 王荫长, 等. 安庆地区褐飞虱、白背飞虱抗药性监测[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2002, 30 (4): 488-489.
    [95] 赵建周. 马铃薯甲虫对吡虫啉的抗性测定, 遗传方式和机理研究, 植物保护 21 世纪展望[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 1998, (1): 715-718.
    [96] Grafius E. J. Economic impact of insecticide resistance in the Colorado potato beetle on the Michigan potato industry [J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 1997, 9 0(5): 1144-1151.
    [97] Grafius E. J., Bishop B. A. Resistance to imidaclop rid in Colorado potato beetles from Michigan [J]. Resistant Pest Management, 1996, 8 (2): 21-25.
    [98] Devine G. J., Harling Z. K., Scarr A. W., et al. Lethal and sublethal effects on imidacloprid on nicotine-tolerant Myzus nicotinanae and Myzus persicae [J]. Pesticide Science, 1996, 48(1): 57-62.
    [99] 潘文亮, 党志红, 高占林, 等. 几种蚜虫对吡虫啉抗药性的研究[J]. 农药学学报, 2000, 2 (4): 85-87.
    [100] 洪 波, 代红军, 钱永德, 等. 吡虫啉、烟碱对枸杞蚜虫的毒力测定及防治试验[J]. 宁夏农学院学报, 2002, 23 ( 1) :13-16.
    [101] 刘泽文, 韩召军, 王荫长, 等. 抗有机磷品系的交互抗性及适合度研究[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2001, 24 (4): 37-40.
    [102] Liu N. N., Yue X. Insecticide resistance and cross-resistance in the house fly (Diptera: Muscidae) [J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2000, 93 (4): 1269-1275.
    [103] Wei Y. P., Appel A. G., Moar W. J., et al. Pyrethroid resistance and cross-resistance in the German cockroach, Blattella germanica (L) [J] . Pest Management Science, 2001, 57 (11): 1055-1059.
    [104] Sone S., Hattori Y., Tsuboi S. I., et al. Difference in susceptibility to imidacloprid of the population of small brown plant hopper, Laodelphax striatellus FALLEN, from various localities in Japan [J]. Journal of Pesticide Science, 1995, 20 (4): 541-543.
    [105] Olson E. R., Dively G. P., Nelson J. O. Baseline susceptibility to imidacloprid and cross resistance patterns in Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera : Chrysomelidae) populations [J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2000, 93 (2): 447-458.
    [106] Wang K. Y., Liu T. X., Jiang X. Y., et al. Cross-resistance of Aphis gossypii to selected insecticides on cotton and cucumber [J]. Phytoparasitica, 2001, 29 (5): 393-399.
    [107] 龚瑞忠, 陈 锐, 陈良燕. 吡虫啉对环境生物的毒性与安全性评价[J]. 农药科学与管理, 1999, 20 (3): 12-16.
    [108] Feng S., Kong Z., Wang X., et al. Acute toxicity and genotoxicity of two novel pesticides on amphibian, Rana N. Hallowell[J]. Chemosphere, 2004, 56 (5): 457-463.
    [109] Paul A. J., Hutchens D. E., Firkins L. D., et al. Dermal safety study with imidacloprid/moxidectin topical solution in the ivermectin-sensitive collie [J]. Veterinary Parasitology, 2004, 121 (3-4): 285-291.
    [110] Zang Y, Zhong Y, Luo Y, et al. Genotoxicity of two novel pesticides for the earthworm, Eisenia fetida [J]. Environment Pollution, 2000, 108 (2) :271-278
    [111] Tomizawa M, Casida J E. Selective toxicity of neonicotinoids attributable to specificity of insect and mammalian nicotinic receptors [J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 2003, 48: 339-364
    [112] Kayser H., Lee C., Decock A., et al. Comparative analysis of neonicotinoid binding to insect membranes: I. A structure-activity study of the mode of [3H] imidacloprid displacement in Myzus persicae and Aphis craccivora [J]. Pest Management Science, 2004, 60 (10): 945-958.
    [113] Zhang N., Tomizawa M., Casida J. E. Drosophila nicotinic receptors: evidence for imidacloprid insecticide and alpha-bungarotoxin binding to distinct sites [J]. Neuroscience Letters, 2004, 371 (1) :56-59
    [114] Sur R., Stork A. Uptake, translocation and metabolism of imidacloprid in plants [J]. Bulletin of insectology, 2003, 56 (1): 35-40.
    [115] Troltasch C., Fuhr F., Wieneke J., et al. Influence of various procedures on the uptake of imidacloprid by cotton after seed treatment [J]. Pflanzenschutz-Nachrichten Bayer, 1994, 47: 241-292.
    [116] Westwood E., Bean K., Dewar A., et al. Movement and persistence of 14C imidacloprid in sugar-beet plants following application to pelleted sugar-beet seed [J]. Pesticide Scinece, 1998, 52 (2): 97-103.
    [117] Mukherjee I., Gopal M. Environmental behaviors and translocation of imidacloprid in eggplant, cabbage and mustard [J]. Pest Management Science, 2000, 56: 932-936.
    [118] Laurent F., Rathahao E. Distribution of [14C] imidacloprid in sunflowers (Helianthus annuus L.) following seed treatment [J]. Journal of Agricultural and food Chemistry, 2003, 51 (27): 8005-8010.
    [119] Suchail S., Debrauwer L., Belzunces L.P. Metabolism of imidacloprid in Apis mellifera [J]. Pest Management Science, 2004, 60 (3): 291-296.
    [120] Sunchail S., Sousa G. D., Rahmani R., et al. In vivo distribution and metabolisation of 14C-imidacloprid in different compartments of Apis mellifera L. [J]. Pest management science, 2004, 60 (11): 1056-1062.
    [121] Sarkar M., Roy S., Kole R., et al. Persistence and metabolism of imidacloprid in different soils of West Bengal [J]. Pest Management Science, 2001, 57 (7): 598-602
    [122] Nauen R., Tietjen K., Wager K., et al. Efficacy of plant metabolites of imidacloprid against Myzus persicae and Aphis gossypii (Homoptera: Aphidiae) [J]. Pesticide Science, 1998, 52 (1): 53-57.
    [123] Nauen R., Reckmann U., Armborst S., et al. Whitefly-active metabolites of imidacloprid: biological efficacy and translocation in cotton plant [J]. Pesticide Science, 1999, 55 (3): 265-271.
    [124] Nauen R., Ebbinghaus-Kintscher U., Schmuck R. Toxicity and nicotinic acetylcholine receptor interaction of imidacloprid and its metabolites in Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera :Apidae) [J]. Pest Management Science, 2001, 57 (7): 577-586.
    [125] Cacho J., Fierro I., DebanL, et al. Monitoring of the photochemical degradation of metamitron and imidacloprid by micellar electrokinetic chromatography and differential pulse polarography [J]. Pesticide Science, 1999, 55 (9): 947-954.
    [126] Clark T.; Kaussmann E.; Romer E, et al. The fate of imidacloprid in tobacco smoke of cigarettes made from imidacloprid–treated tobacci [J]. Pesticide Science, 1998, 52 (2):19-125.
    [127] Sundaram B., Rai S., Ravendra N. Degradation of bifenthrin,chlorpyrigos and imidacloprid in soil and bedding materials at termiticidal application rates [J]. Pestecide Science, 1999, 55 (12): 1222-1228.
    [128] Baskaran S., Kookana R. S., Naidu R. Determination of the insecticide imidacloprid in water and soil using high-performance liquid chromatography [J]. Journal of Chromatography A, 1997, 787 (1-2): 271-275.
    [129] 陈道文, 杨春龙, 黄丽琴, 等. 吡虫啉在蔬菜上的残留及动态研究[J]. 农药, 1998, 37(4): 21-22.
    [130] 杨 红, 章维华, 黄丽琴, 等. 吡虫啉在烟草中的残留动态研究[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 1999, 22 (3): 80-82.
    [131] 曹爱华, 徐光年, 朱先志, 等. 烟草及土壤中吡虫啉的残留分析方法研究[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2001, 22 (4): 45-48.
    [132] 张金林, 石 键. 吡虫啉在苹果上残留动态研究[J]. 农业环境保护, 1997, 16 (6):247-251.
    [133] Fernandez-Alba A. R., Valverde A., Aguera A., et al. Determination of imidacloprid in vegetables by high-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection [J]. Journal of Chromatography A, 1996, 721: 97-105.
    [134] 李乃洁, 张 凯, 王 勇, 等. 3 种样品中吡虫啉提取净化方法[J]. 农药, 2005, 44 (10): 449-451
    [135] 刘承兰, 刘丰茂, 李 莉, 等. 高效液相色谱法测定芦笋中多菌灵和吡虫啉残留[J]. 农药学学报, 2004, 6 (4): 93-96.
    [136] Yoichi I., Kobori I., Araki Y., et al. HPLC determination of the new insecticide Imidacloprid and its behavior in rice cucumber [J]. Journal of Agricultural and food Chemistry, 1994, 42: 2917-2921.
    [137] Navalon A., Gonzalez-Casado A., EI-Khattabi R., et al. Determination of imidacloprid in vegetable sample by Gas chromatography-Mass spectrometry [J]. Analyst, 1997, 122(6):579-581.
    [138] 刘西莉, 罗 爽, 杨 峻, 等. 14C 标记腈菌唑的合成及其在小麦幼苗上的吸收与传导确证[J]. 农药学学报, 2008, 10 (1): 23-27.
    [139] 郑 魏, 宣日成, 刘维屏. 吡虫啉原药的液相色谱分析[J]. 农药, 1997, 36(12): 18-19.
    [140] 俞幼芬. 吡虫啉、拌种灵和福美双三元复配种衣剂分析方法研究[J]. 农药, 2001, 40 (4): 22-24.
    [141] 何 娟, 常俊标, 郭瑞云, 等. 吡虫啉和哒螨灵的 HPLC 分析[J]. 农药, 1999, 38 (11): 22-24.
    [142] 邱 瑾, 傅小芸, 吕建德. 吡虫啉光降解产物中阴离子的毛细管电泳分析[J]. 环境化学, 1998, 17 (5): 504-506.
    [143] Scholz K., Reinhard F. Photolysis of imidacloprid (NTM 33893) on the leaf surface of tomato plants [J]. Pesticide Science, 1999, 55(6): 652-654.
    [144] Ferrer I., Thurman E., Jerry Z. 液相飞行时间质谱(LC/MSDTOF)和液相色谱/离子阱质谱(LC/MSDTrap)测定色拉蔬菜中的氯烟碱类杀虫剂[J]. 环境化学, 2005, 24 (3): 349-354.
    [145] Navarro C., Fernandez-Escobar R., Benlloch M. A low-pressure, trunk-injection method for introducing chemical formulations into olive trees [J]. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 1992, 117 (2): 357-360.
    [146] Cowles R. S., Montgomery M. E., Cheah C. A. Activity and residues of imidacloprid applied to soil and tree trunks to control hemlock woolly adelgid (Hemiptera: Adelgidae) in forests [J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2006, 99 (4): 1258-1267.
    [147] 张朝红, 王跃进, 李 琰. 酥梨缺铁黄化症发生规律及防治技术的研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 31 (2):71-74.
    [148] 张秋香, 武绍波, 李文祥.树干注射技术及其在果树上的应用[J]. 西北农业学报, 2004, 13 (3): 154-157.
    [149] 李义龙, 胡 江, 郑润兰, 等. 麻点豹天牛化学防治试验研究[J]. 西南林学院学报, 2002, 22 (1): 50-53.
    [150] 唐光辉, 江志利, 张文锋, 等.树干注药防治椰心叶甲药效试验[J].中国森林病虫, 2006 25 (4): 39-41.
    [151] 唐光辉, 何 军, 冯俊涛, 等. 树干注药对柳树害虫的持续性控制研究[J]. 西北农业学报, 2006, 15 (5): 110-113.
    [152] 唐光辉, 何 军, 江志利, 等. 14%吡虫啉?敌敌畏注干液剂防治柳树天牛技术研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 35 (1): 116-120.
    [153] Sánchez Zamora M. A., Fernández Escobar R. Injector-size and the time of application affects uptake of tree trunk-injected solutions [J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2000, 84 (1-2): 163-177.
    [154] Sánchez Zamora M. A., Fernández Escobar R. Uptake and distribution of trunk injections in conifers [J]. Journal of Arboriculture, 2004, 30 (2): 73-79.
    [155] Dale M. N. 树用内吸杀虫剂的理论和实践(蔡炳城译)[J]. 农药译丛, 1983, 5 (6): 40-41.
    [156] 殷亚方, 姜笑梅, 魏令波.毛白杨形成层的活动周期及其 POD 同工酶的变化[J]. 林业科学, 2002, 38(1): 103-110.
    [157] 王华田, 赵文飞, 马履一.侧柏树干边材液流的空间变化规律及其相关因子[J]. 林业科学, 2006, 42(7): 21-27.
    [158] 赵文飞, 王 迎, 王华田, 等. 不同季节麻栎树干贮水量的动态变化[J]. 林业科学, 2007, 43(4): 115-120.
    [159] 吴春笃, 王敏敏, 陈洪安. 久效磷涂茎防治悬铃木害虫的机理研究[J]. 林业科学, 1994, 30(3): 241-246.
    [160] 张 兴. 无公害农药?农药无公害化[D]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2007, 112-115.
    [161] 章玉苹, 黄炳球. 吡虫啉的研究现状与进展[J]. 世界农药, 2000, 22 (6): 23-28.
    [162] 王建军, 韩召军, 王荫长. 新烟碱类杀虫剂毒理学研究进展[J]. 植物保护学报, 2001, 28 (2): 178-182.
    [163] 张咏梅, 李今越. 吡虫啉的应用及其安全性研究进展[J]. 医学动物防制, 2004, 20 (12): 728-730.
    [164] 许小龙, 顾中言, 娄金贵, 等. 吡虫啉两种新剂型对十字花科蔬菜蚜虫的毒力及田间防效[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2006, (5):21-53.
    [165] 刘爱芝, 李世功, 郝素华. 吡虫啉和抗蚜威对麦蚜的防效及对天敌的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 1999, (4): 25-27.
    [166] 谢雪梅, 蒲正国, 田茂仁, 等. 吡虫啉对稻飞虱的控制效果[J]. 昆虫知识, 2000, 37 (5): 263-265.
    [167] 徐 燕, 李忠幸, 张世平. 吡虫啉防治柑桔红蜘蛛试验[J]. 农药, 1999, 38 (9): 22.
    [168] 张新才, 李桂亭, 洪家保. 注干法施用吡虫啉对光肩星天牛幼虫的防治效果[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 29 (4): 41-44.
    [169] 马建鹏, 涂国信, 孔 暄, 等. 梨豹蠹蛾防治技术研究[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2006, 25 (6): 28-30.
    [170] Dikshit A. K., Lal O. P. Safety evaluation and persistence of imidacloprid on Acid Lime (Citrus aurantiifolia Swingle) [J]. Bulletin Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2002, 68 (4): 495-501.
    [171] Mark H. Imidacloprid concentrations in Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) following treatments with two trunk-injection methods [J]. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, 2006, 32 (3): 126-129.
    [172] 许志春, 田海燕, 陈学英, 等. 吡虫啉在杨树中持留量的动态变化研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2004,26 (1): 62-65.
    [173] 剧晓青, 邓新平, 罗公树, 等.吡虫啉在茶叶和茶园土壤中的残留研究[J]. 西南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 28 (3): 471-474.
    [174] 郭东梅, 郑永权, 董丰收, 等. 油菜对吡虫啉的吸收运转与分布特性研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2006, 25 (3): 606- 609.
    [175] Lodevico R. G., Li Q. X. Determination of total imidacloprid residues in coffee by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry [J]. Analytical Letters, 2002, 35 (2): 315-326.
    [176] Rossi S., Sabatini A. G., Cenciarini R., et al. Use of high-performance liquid chromatography–UV and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry for determination of the Imidacloprid content of honeybees, pollen, paper filters, grass, and flowers [J]. Chromatographlia, 2004, 61 (3-4): 189-195.
    [177] 武菊英, 江国坚, 贾春虹. 影响烟嘧黄隆药效的因素[J]. 植物保护学报, 1993, 26 (1): 65-68.
    [178] 胡继明. 化学防治中药效的影响因素探讨[J]. 现代农业科技, 2007, (16): 103-105.
    [179] 文兆明, 赖传碧. 四种药剂防治茶小绿叶蝉的药效[J]. 昆虫知识, 2002, 39 (1):37-39.
    [180] Nauen R., Reckmann U., Armborst S., et al. Whitefly-active metabolites of imidacloprid: biological efficacy and translocation in cotton plants [J]. Pesticide science, 1999, 55 (3):265-271.
    [181] Lester C. Y. The efficacy of micro-injection imidacloprid and oxydemeton-methyl on red gum eucalyptus trees (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) infested with red gum lerp psyllid (Glycaspis brimblecombei) [J]. Journal of Arboriculture, 2002, 28 (3): 144-147.
    [182] Chao S. L., Casida J E. Interaction of Imidacloprid Metabolites and Analogs with the Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor of Mouse Brain in Relation to Toxicity [J]. Pesticide biochemistry and physiology, 1997, 58 (1): 77-88.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700