慈善捐赠与企业绩效及价值
|
摘要
随着全球企业社会责任理念的发展,上市公司被要求履行社会责任的呼声愈来愈高,就慈善捐赠而言,作为彰显企业社会责任的一种重要形式,也越来越引起理论界和实务界的重视。企业慈善捐赠在国外有着较为悠久的发展历史,已形成了一套较为完整的管理理念和制度。然而在国内,慈善捐赠更多的是作为一种伦理道德理念被传承下来,慈善捐赠作为一项企业事业的发展,从理论上来看,仍处于发展初级阶段,但在实践中我国民营企业慈善捐赠行为的发展却非常迅猛,如《公益时报》和《中国慈善排行榜》等连续多年的统计显示,随着我国民营企业的快速发展,民营企业成为推动国内慈善事业发展的中坚力量。国内外学者对此问题的讨论,主要集中在慈善捐赠是否会影响企业的短期绩效或企业长期价值,企业参与慈善捐赠行为究竟能为其自身与其利益相关者带来多大的利益,对这一问题的研究成为学术界和企业界最为关注的问题。与此同时,民营企业在我国经济发展中起到举足轻重的作用,而国内对民营企业参与慈善捐赠对企业价值的影响研究较缺乏,大多集中在对慈善捐赠动机及影响因素的探讨,基于此,本文以我国A股民营上市公司为研究对象,研究慈善捐赠对民营企业短期财务绩效和从长期来看对企业价值的影响关系,对此问题的讨论,决定了企业参与慈善捐赠的必要性和重要性。这对于理解我国民营企业参与慈善捐赠对企业绩效和企业价值的影响作用,进而推动我国上市民营企业的可持续发展,已经成为我国民营经济发展过程中亟待解决的一项重要课题,对此课题的研究具有重要的理论与实践意义。
本文通过对国内外慈善捐赠与企业绩效或企业价值研究文献脉络的梳理和总结,以及对前沿动态的追踪,笔者认为,研究企业慈善捐赠对企业财务绩效或企业价值的影响及公司治理水平、市场化水平和企业生命周期差异对二者相关关系的调节作用时,需要综合考虑民营企业的金字塔股权结构对企业价值的隧道效应和支持效应,以及企业规模、资本结构等影响因素。然而,鉴于研究样本的差异和研究方法的不同、以及各国慈善捐赠情景差异,企业慈善捐赠与绩效或企业价值之间的关系尚存在争议,目前有正相关、负相关以及没有直接相关性三种主要研究结论,尚未形成定论。而国内已有的研究中,从公司治理水平、市场化水平和企业生命周期差异三个层面,深入研究其对慈善捐赠与企业绩效或价值相关关系的调节作用的文献更是非常缺乏,这些问题已经严重制约了民营企业慈善捐赠研究的纵深发展。
本文采用规范研究与实证研究相结合的方法,展开对上述问题的系统分析和深入检验,以得出有用的研究结论。本文围绕所研究的主题,进行的主要研究工作和研究内容主要集中在以下二个方面。
(1)以委托代理理论、利益相关者理论及战略慈善捐赠理论为理论基础,在综合考虑民营企业规模、股权结构、资本结构等因素的基础上,系统地阐述了慈善捐赠与企业绩效或价值的影响,以及董事会治理水平、企业生命周期差异和市场化进程在二者相关性关系中的调节作用,并提出了系列研究假设。
(2)以2005-2011年中国上市民营公司为研究对象,利用上市公司年度报表、企业社会责任报告(CSR)、万德数据库(Wind)以及色诺芬数据库等多种途径,收集实证研究所需数据以及1578个研究样本公司,为实证研究积累了较为翔实和全面的实证资料。最后,使用Stata11.0统计分析软件,对所建立的计量经济模型和所提出的研究假设进行实证检验,主要结论如下：
(1)就慈善捐赠对上市民营企业短期财务绩效的影响而言,使用2005-2011年沪深A股上市公司的慈善捐赠面板数据。首先本文检验了民营企业慈善捐赠的影响因素,接着检验了企业冗余资源对慈善捐赠额的影响。总体来看,以单位收入自由现金流量衡量的冗余资源和民营企业捐赠行为存在显著的正相关关系,公司股权结构对公司是否捐赠具有显著的正向影响作用,说明控股股东持股比例越高,对企业的控制程度越强,大股东为满足利益相关者的要求参与慈善捐赠,从而获得其支持,取得更大的收益,为自己攫取利益提供可能。接着引入企业社会责任观的调节变量,实证检验表明企业社会责任观越强,企业在拥有更多冗余资源的情况下,慈善捐赠的金额越大,说明近几年来,随着社会责任观念在我国不断深化,很多民营企业已经意识到企业在盈利的同时,积极承担应尽的社会责任,包括慈善捐赠。最后系统检验了慈善捐赠与财务绩效之间的关系,验证了二者之间的显著正相关关系。同时,检验结论表明在董事会治理水平越高、地区市场化水平越高的情况下,民营企业参与慈善捐赠对提高短期财务绩效有着积极的影响作用。
(2)就民营企业与企业价值的影响关系而言,当前样本民营上市公司慈善捐赠行为对企业价值的影响为正的积极影响,但二者的相关性并不显著,这一重要实证结论表明至少在我国目前民营企业参与慈善捐赠的现实情况下,企业慈善捐赠行为对企业价值影响微弱,强相关关系的假设没有得到证实。原因可能是目前慈善捐赠在我国还属于发展的新现象,慈善捐赠对民营企业而言,更多的表现出一种短期行为。此外,成长越快的民营企业,企业参与慈善捐赠与企业价值的提升越明显。另外第一大股东持股比例与企业价值成“U”型关系,说明在企业发展初期,第一大股东持股比例越高,可以降低代理成本,对提升企业价值有支持效应,当持股比例增加到一定程度时,大股东地位巩固,此时大股东可能会通过慈善捐赠来提升自身的声誉,攫取利益,对企业价值具有隧道效应。与前述研究不同的是,此部分发现民营企业民营化后持续时间与托宾Q值负相关,这表明我国民营化上市公司上市后迅速老化现象严重,“未老先衰”导致民营企业普遍存续年限相对国外企业较短。随后,在生命周期差异和董事会治理水平差异即地区市场化水平情境下,检验慈善捐赠与企业价值之间的相关性。在企业的不同生命周期阶段,各变量对企业价值的影响差异较大,总体来说,在成长期和成熟期,慈善捐赠对企业价值的提升有积极影响,尽管统计结果并不显著,但在衰退期,企业慈善捐赠对企业价值的作用是负相关的。
总体来说,我国慈善捐赠研究领域尚属年轻,本文也仅仅是尝试以我国民营上市公司为研究对象,初步探讨了慈善捐赠与企业绩效以及慈善捐赠与企业价值这两个相对比较重要的问题做了初步的探讨,因此,从多方面深入挖掘慈善捐赠的内在驱动机制和价值机理是后续研究要努力的方向,以此不断完善和提高慈善捐赠的理论研究水平,构建完整的慈善捐赠研究框架。其中,慈善捐赠影响企业绩效和价值的过程机理、生命周期差异、公司治理水平和市场化进程等对慈善捐赠影响企业绩效和价值的影响中的调节作用等,都是值得进一步深入探讨的重要研究议题。
With the development of global corporate social responsibility concept development, listing Corporation are required to fulfill the social responsibility of the voice is louder and louder, as charitable donations, as the highlight of corporate social responsibility is a very important form, has attracted more and more attention of theory circle and practice circle. Corporate charitable donation in foreign countries have a long history of development, has formed a relatively complete set of management philosophy and system. However in China, philanthropy is more as an ethical concept was handed down, philanthropy as a business development, from a theoretical point of view, is still in the primary stage of development, but in the practice of enterprise of battalion of our country civilian philanthropy development is very swift and violent, such as "commonweal times"and"China Charity list", for many years the statistics show, along with our country the rapid development of private enterprises, private enterprises become the backbone of the development of domestic philanthropy. Domestic and foreign scholars are discussed, focused on philanthropy will affect the enterprise's short-term performance or long-term enterprise value, enterprise participation in charitable donation ever for its own and stakeholders to bring much interest, the study on this problem has become the academic and business circles pays close attention to most problems. At the same time, private enterprises in China's economic development play a decisive role, while the domestic private enterprises to participate in charitable donations to the impact on corporate value research is lacking, mostly concentrated on philanthropy motivation and influencing factors, and based on this, this paper takes the A investors business listing Corporation as the research object, research philanthropy of private enterprises in the short-term financial performance and long term impact on enterprise value relations, about the problem, and decide the enterprise to participate in charitable donations and the importance and necessity of. The understanding of China's private enterprises to participate in charitable donations on the performance of the enterprise or the enterprise value effect, and promote the private listed companies continued to grow, has become China's private enterprise development and progress of our country economy solves urgently in the process of an important topic, this topic research has the important theory and the practical significance.
Based on the domestic and international philanthropy and performance of enterprises or the enterprise value of systematizing and summarized, as well as to the forefront of dynamic tracing, the author thinks, study of corporate philanthropy on corporate financial performance or the value of the enterprise and the level of corporate governance, the level of market and enterprise life cycle differences on two related regulation action, needs to consider the Pyramid private enterprise ownership structure on enterprise value of the tunneling and supporting effect, as well as the enterprise scale, capital structure, influencing factors. However, corporate philanthropy and the performance or the enterprise value of the relationship is still controversial, there are positive correlation, negative correlation and there is no direct correlation between three kinds of main research conclusion, has not been formed yet. While the domestic existing research, from the level of corporate governance, the level of market and enterprise life cycle differences in three dimensions, in-depth study of philanthropy and corporate performance or the value of correlation between the regulatory role of literature is very lack, these problems have become a private enterprise philanthropy research development process encountered bottleneck sex problem.
Therefore, the paper adopts normative research and empirical research combined method, try to undertake to afore-mentioned problems more systematic analysis and inspection, in order to draw useful conclusions. The main work of this thesis and the research mainly concentrates on the following two aspects.
One aspect is, according to agency theory, stakeholder theory and strategic philanthropy theory as the theoretical basis, considering the size of private enterprises, the ownership structure, capital structure and other factors on the basis, elaborated systematically philanthropy and firm performance or value influence, and board level of management, enterprise life cycle differences and commercialize a process in which the regulatory role, and proposed a series of research hypothesis.
The other aspect is, to use2005-2011years of China private listed companies as the research object, the author uses in recent years listing Corporation annual report, corporate social responsibility report (CSR),(Wind) and Xenophon Vander database database of empirical research, collect data needed and1578research and Sample Firms, as the empirical research has accumulated a more detailed and comprehensive empirical data. Finally, the use of Stata11.0statistical analysis software, to establish the econometric model and the proposed hypotheses for empirical test. Thus, the main conclusions are as follows:
Firstly, on philanthropy on listed private enterprises short-term financial performance, use2005-2011year in Shanghai and Shenzhen A shares in listing Corporation charitable donation in panel data. First of all this paper examines the factors affecting private enterprises charitable donations, and then test the enterprise redundant resources on philanthropy volume influence. Overall, the unit income free cash flow to measure the redundancy resource and private corporate donation behavior have significant positive correlation, the company ownership structure on firm whether donation has significant positive effect that holding, the higher the proportion of shareholding, the enterprise control level is more strong, large shareholders to meet stakeholder the requirements to participate in charitable donations, thereby obtaining the support, gain bigger profit, for their own interests to provide may grab. By introducing the concept of corporate social responsibility in the regulation of variables, empirical test shows that the concept of corporate social responsibility more and more strong, enterprises have more redundant resources, philanthropy amount is larger, that in recent years, along with the sense of social responsibility in our country is deepened ceaselessly, many private enterprises have been aware of corporate profits in the at the same time, positive should bear social responsibility, including philanthropy. The final system test charitable donations and financial performance relationship, verified by two between positive correlation. At the same time, inspection results show that in the governance of the board of directors of the higher level of, the area commercializes a level more, the private enterprises to participate in charitable donations to raise short-term financial performance has a positive effect.
Secondly, private enterprises and enterprise value relation, the current sample of private listing Corporation charitable donation behavior impact on enterprise value is positive effect, but the correlation between the two is not significant, which is an important conclusion that at least in China's private enterprises to participate in charitable donations in the realistic situation, corporate philanthropy influence on enterprise value weak, strong correlations between the hypothesis has not been confirmed. The reason may be the charitable donation in our country still belongs to the development of a new phenomenon, charitable donations to the private enterprises, more and more shows a short term behavior. In addition, the faster growth of private enterprises, enterprises to participate in charitable donations and corporate value more obvious. In addition the proportion of the first shareholder and corporate value into a "U" relation, in the enterprise the development initial period, the proportion of the first shareholder is higher, can reduce agency cost, to enhance corporate value has support effect, when the shareholding ratio increased to a certain extent, the status of major shareholders to consolidate, the shareholder may through philanthropy to enhance their reputation, grab the interest of the enterprise value, with the tunnel effect. The study of different is, this part of private enterprises after privatization of duration and TobinQ negatively correlated, suggesting that Chinese private listing Corporation listed after rapid aging phenomenon is serious," prematurely senile " lead private enterprises generally shorter duration relative to foreign enterprises. Subsequently, in the life cycle of difference and the governance of board of directors level difference that area commercializes a level condition, test of philanthropy and the correlation between corporate value. In the different stages of the life cycle, each variable impact on enterprise value difference is bigger, in general, in growing period and mature period, philanthropy on the enterprise value promotion had positive effects, although results are not statistically significant, but in a recession, corporate philanthropy on the role of enterprise value is negatively related.
Philanthropy research field is still relatively young, this paper is only giving the value effect of the relatively important issues are explored, the future research is also needed to raise charitable donations from many aspects to firm performance and value effect of the level of theory research. Wherein, philanthropy affect corporate performance and value of the process mechanism, life cycle, the level of corporate governance is the difference between market differences in charitable donations to the enterprise performance and the value of the impact of regulation, is worth further exploration of the important research topics.
本文通过对国内外慈善捐赠与企业绩效或企业价值研究文献脉络的梳理和总结,以及对前沿动态的追踪,笔者认为,研究企业慈善捐赠对企业财务绩效或企业价值的影响及公司治理水平、市场化水平和企业生命周期差异对二者相关关系的调节作用时,需要综合考虑民营企业的金字塔股权结构对企业价值的隧道效应和支持效应,以及企业规模、资本结构等影响因素。然而,鉴于研究样本的差异和研究方法的不同、以及各国慈善捐赠情景差异,企业慈善捐赠与绩效或企业价值之间的关系尚存在争议,目前有正相关、负相关以及没有直接相关性三种主要研究结论,尚未形成定论。而国内已有的研究中,从公司治理水平、市场化水平和企业生命周期差异三个层面,深入研究其对慈善捐赠与企业绩效或价值相关关系的调节作用的文献更是非常缺乏,这些问题已经严重制约了民营企业慈善捐赠研究的纵深发展。
本文采用规范研究与实证研究相结合的方法,展开对上述问题的系统分析和深入检验,以得出有用的研究结论。本文围绕所研究的主题,进行的主要研究工作和研究内容主要集中在以下二个方面。
(1)以委托代理理论、利益相关者理论及战略慈善捐赠理论为理论基础,在综合考虑民营企业规模、股权结构、资本结构等因素的基础上,系统地阐述了慈善捐赠与企业绩效或价值的影响,以及董事会治理水平、企业生命周期差异和市场化进程在二者相关性关系中的调节作用,并提出了系列研究假设。
(2)以2005-2011年中国上市民营公司为研究对象,利用上市公司年度报表、企业社会责任报告(CSR)、万德数据库(Wind)以及色诺芬数据库等多种途径,收集实证研究所需数据以及1578个研究样本公司,为实证研究积累了较为翔实和全面的实证资料。最后,使用Stata11.0统计分析软件,对所建立的计量经济模型和所提出的研究假设进行实证检验,主要结论如下：
(1)就慈善捐赠对上市民营企业短期财务绩效的影响而言,使用2005-2011年沪深A股上市公司的慈善捐赠面板数据。首先本文检验了民营企业慈善捐赠的影响因素,接着检验了企业冗余资源对慈善捐赠额的影响。总体来看,以单位收入自由现金流量衡量的冗余资源和民营企业捐赠行为存在显著的正相关关系,公司股权结构对公司是否捐赠具有显著的正向影响作用,说明控股股东持股比例越高,对企业的控制程度越强,大股东为满足利益相关者的要求参与慈善捐赠,从而获得其支持,取得更大的收益,为自己攫取利益提供可能。接着引入企业社会责任观的调节变量,实证检验表明企业社会责任观越强,企业在拥有更多冗余资源的情况下,慈善捐赠的金额越大,说明近几年来,随着社会责任观念在我国不断深化,很多民营企业已经意识到企业在盈利的同时,积极承担应尽的社会责任,包括慈善捐赠。最后系统检验了慈善捐赠与财务绩效之间的关系,验证了二者之间的显著正相关关系。同时,检验结论表明在董事会治理水平越高、地区市场化水平越高的情况下,民营企业参与慈善捐赠对提高短期财务绩效有着积极的影响作用。
(2)就民营企业与企业价值的影响关系而言,当前样本民营上市公司慈善捐赠行为对企业价值的影响为正的积极影响,但二者的相关性并不显著,这一重要实证结论表明至少在我国目前民营企业参与慈善捐赠的现实情况下,企业慈善捐赠行为对企业价值影响微弱,强相关关系的假设没有得到证实。原因可能是目前慈善捐赠在我国还属于发展的新现象,慈善捐赠对民营企业而言,更多的表现出一种短期行为。此外,成长越快的民营企业,企业参与慈善捐赠与企业价值的提升越明显。另外第一大股东持股比例与企业价值成“U”型关系,说明在企业发展初期,第一大股东持股比例越高,可以降低代理成本,对提升企业价值有支持效应,当持股比例增加到一定程度时,大股东地位巩固,此时大股东可能会通过慈善捐赠来提升自身的声誉,攫取利益,对企业价值具有隧道效应。与前述研究不同的是,此部分发现民营企业民营化后持续时间与托宾Q值负相关,这表明我国民营化上市公司上市后迅速老化现象严重,“未老先衰”导致民营企业普遍存续年限相对国外企业较短。随后,在生命周期差异和董事会治理水平差异即地区市场化水平情境下,检验慈善捐赠与企业价值之间的相关性。在企业的不同生命周期阶段,各变量对企业价值的影响差异较大,总体来说,在成长期和成熟期,慈善捐赠对企业价值的提升有积极影响,尽管统计结果并不显著,但在衰退期,企业慈善捐赠对企业价值的作用是负相关的。
总体来说,我国慈善捐赠研究领域尚属年轻,本文也仅仅是尝试以我国民营上市公司为研究对象,初步探讨了慈善捐赠与企业绩效以及慈善捐赠与企业价值这两个相对比较重要的问题做了初步的探讨,因此,从多方面深入挖掘慈善捐赠的内在驱动机制和价值机理是后续研究要努力的方向,以此不断完善和提高慈善捐赠的理论研究水平,构建完整的慈善捐赠研究框架。其中,慈善捐赠影响企业绩效和价值的过程机理、生命周期差异、公司治理水平和市场化进程等对慈善捐赠影响企业绩效和价值的影响中的调节作用等,都是值得进一步深入探讨的重要研究议题。
With the development of global corporate social responsibility concept development, listing Corporation are required to fulfill the social responsibility of the voice is louder and louder, as charitable donations, as the highlight of corporate social responsibility is a very important form, has attracted more and more attention of theory circle and practice circle. Corporate charitable donation in foreign countries have a long history of development, has formed a relatively complete set of management philosophy and system. However in China, philanthropy is more as an ethical concept was handed down, philanthropy as a business development, from a theoretical point of view, is still in the primary stage of development, but in the practice of enterprise of battalion of our country civilian philanthropy development is very swift and violent, such as "commonweal times"and"China Charity list", for many years the statistics show, along with our country the rapid development of private enterprises, private enterprises become the backbone of the development of domestic philanthropy. Domestic and foreign scholars are discussed, focused on philanthropy will affect the enterprise's short-term performance or long-term enterprise value, enterprise participation in charitable donation ever for its own and stakeholders to bring much interest, the study on this problem has become the academic and business circles pays close attention to most problems. At the same time, private enterprises in China's economic development play a decisive role, while the domestic private enterprises to participate in charitable donations to the impact on corporate value research is lacking, mostly concentrated on philanthropy motivation and influencing factors, and based on this, this paper takes the A investors business listing Corporation as the research object, research philanthropy of private enterprises in the short-term financial performance and long term impact on enterprise value relations, about the problem, and decide the enterprise to participate in charitable donations and the importance and necessity of. The understanding of China's private enterprises to participate in charitable donations on the performance of the enterprise or the enterprise value effect, and promote the private listed companies continued to grow, has become China's private enterprise development and progress of our country economy solves urgently in the process of an important topic, this topic research has the important theory and the practical significance.
Based on the domestic and international philanthropy and performance of enterprises or the enterprise value of systematizing and summarized, as well as to the forefront of dynamic tracing, the author thinks, study of corporate philanthropy on corporate financial performance or the value of the enterprise and the level of corporate governance, the level of market and enterprise life cycle differences on two related regulation action, needs to consider the Pyramid private enterprise ownership structure on enterprise value of the tunneling and supporting effect, as well as the enterprise scale, capital structure, influencing factors. However, corporate philanthropy and the performance or the enterprise value of the relationship is still controversial, there are positive correlation, negative correlation and there is no direct correlation between three kinds of main research conclusion, has not been formed yet. While the domestic existing research, from the level of corporate governance, the level of market and enterprise life cycle differences in three dimensions, in-depth study of philanthropy and corporate performance or the value of correlation between the regulatory role of literature is very lack, these problems have become a private enterprise philanthropy research development process encountered bottleneck sex problem.
Therefore, the paper adopts normative research and empirical research combined method, try to undertake to afore-mentioned problems more systematic analysis and inspection, in order to draw useful conclusions. The main work of this thesis and the research mainly concentrates on the following two aspects.
One aspect is, according to agency theory, stakeholder theory and strategic philanthropy theory as the theoretical basis, considering the size of private enterprises, the ownership structure, capital structure and other factors on the basis, elaborated systematically philanthropy and firm performance or value influence, and board level of management, enterprise life cycle differences and commercialize a process in which the regulatory role, and proposed a series of research hypothesis.
The other aspect is, to use2005-2011years of China private listed companies as the research object, the author uses in recent years listing Corporation annual report, corporate social responsibility report (CSR),(Wind) and Xenophon Vander database database of empirical research, collect data needed and1578research and Sample Firms, as the empirical research has accumulated a more detailed and comprehensive empirical data. Finally, the use of Stata11.0statistical analysis software, to establish the econometric model and the proposed hypotheses for empirical test. Thus, the main conclusions are as follows:
Firstly, on philanthropy on listed private enterprises short-term financial performance, use2005-2011year in Shanghai and Shenzhen A shares in listing Corporation charitable donation in panel data. First of all this paper examines the factors affecting private enterprises charitable donations, and then test the enterprise redundant resources on philanthropy volume influence. Overall, the unit income free cash flow to measure the redundancy resource and private corporate donation behavior have significant positive correlation, the company ownership structure on firm whether donation has significant positive effect that holding, the higher the proportion of shareholding, the enterprise control level is more strong, large shareholders to meet stakeholder the requirements to participate in charitable donations, thereby obtaining the support, gain bigger profit, for their own interests to provide may grab. By introducing the concept of corporate social responsibility in the regulation of variables, empirical test shows that the concept of corporate social responsibility more and more strong, enterprises have more redundant resources, philanthropy amount is larger, that in recent years, along with the sense of social responsibility in our country is deepened ceaselessly, many private enterprises have been aware of corporate profits in the at the same time, positive should bear social responsibility, including philanthropy. The final system test charitable donations and financial performance relationship, verified by two between positive correlation. At the same time, inspection results show that in the governance of the board of directors of the higher level of, the area commercializes a level more, the private enterprises to participate in charitable donations to raise short-term financial performance has a positive effect.
Secondly, private enterprises and enterprise value relation, the current sample of private listing Corporation charitable donation behavior impact on enterprise value is positive effect, but the correlation between the two is not significant, which is an important conclusion that at least in China's private enterprises to participate in charitable donations in the realistic situation, corporate philanthropy influence on enterprise value weak, strong correlations between the hypothesis has not been confirmed. The reason may be the charitable donation in our country still belongs to the development of a new phenomenon, charitable donations to the private enterprises, more and more shows a short term behavior. In addition, the faster growth of private enterprises, enterprises to participate in charitable donations and corporate value more obvious. In addition the proportion of the first shareholder and corporate value into a "U" relation, in the enterprise the development initial period, the proportion of the first shareholder is higher, can reduce agency cost, to enhance corporate value has support effect, when the shareholding ratio increased to a certain extent, the status of major shareholders to consolidate, the shareholder may through philanthropy to enhance their reputation, grab the interest of the enterprise value, with the tunnel effect. The study of different is, this part of private enterprises after privatization of duration and TobinQ negatively correlated, suggesting that Chinese private listing Corporation listed after rapid aging phenomenon is serious," prematurely senile " lead private enterprises generally shorter duration relative to foreign enterprises. Subsequently, in the life cycle of difference and the governance of board of directors level difference that area commercializes a level condition, test of philanthropy and the correlation between corporate value. In the different stages of the life cycle, each variable impact on enterprise value difference is bigger, in general, in growing period and mature period, philanthropy on the enterprise value promotion had positive effects, although results are not statistically significant, but in a recession, corporate philanthropy on the role of enterprise value is negatively related.
Philanthropy research field is still relatively young, this paper is only giving the value effect of the relatively important issues are explored, the future research is also needed to raise charitable donations from many aspects to firm performance and value effect of the level of theory research. Wherein, philanthropy affect corporate performance and value of the process mechanism, life cycle, the level of corporate governance is the difference between market differences in charitable donations to the enterprise performance and the value of the impact of regulation, is worth further exploration of the important research topics.
引文
① 我国综合报告的发展暨企业社会责任报告发展概况,中国会计报,2012年10月12日。
① 论公司慈善捐赠的信息披露——制度构建的必要性与可行性研究.张安毅,技术经济与管理.2011(4)
① 正式的定义是在世界商业持续发展委员会(WBCSD)组织的来自企业内部和外部的60个舆论领导的国际会议上提出的：“CSR是企业承诺尽可能在提高劳动者和他们的家庭以及本地区和社会的生活质量时(WBCSD股东CSR会话,荷兰,9月6日-8日,1998),具有道德和能对经济发展作出贡献。
② G Cheney,J Roper and S May,'Overview'in S May,G Cheney and J Roper(eds),The Debate Over Corporate Social Responsibility(2007)7.
③ J Elkington,Cannibals with Forks:The Triple Bottom Line of 21 Century Business(reprinted ed,2002)1999,2.
① A Sabitz and K Weber,he Triple Bottom Line:How Today's Best Run Companies are Achieving Economic,Social and Environmental Success-and How You Can Too(2006)xii.
② Gray Becker. A Theory of Social Interactions.working paper.1974.
③ 周秋光、曾桂林著：《中国慈善简史》,人民出版社,2006年版,第346页。
① 王亚妮、蒋学洪.公司社会捐赠与财务业绩关系的实证研究—来自沪市A股的经验证据,财会通讯,2010.
① 赵宇晓.持续发展：规范研究与实证研究.中国管理科学.1996.
② 任训学.论定性与定量方法的辩证统一性.湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版).1995.
① 资料来源:A Literature Review of Empirical Studies of Philanthropy:Eight Mechanisms That Drive Charitable Giving, Ren6 Bekkers and Pamala Wiepking, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, XX (X): 1-50,2010.
① 曹洪彬.我国捐赠的公共经济学分析,[D].博士学位论文,厦门大学,2006
② 江希和.浅析企业慈善捐赠行为理论.[J].商场现代化,2007(5),261-263
① 梁建.民营企业的政治参与、治理结构与慈善捐赠.[J].管理世界,2010(7),109-118
① Kenneth E. Goodpaster. Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. [J].Business Ethics Quarterly.Vol.1, 1991(1):53-74.
① Wood DJ. Business and Society [M]. Glenview. IL:Scott Foresman,1990.
② Logsdon, Reiner and Burke. Corporate Philanthropy:Strategy responses to the firm's stakeholder [J]. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,1990(19):93-109.
① Barney, J.B.. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage.Journal of Management,1991,17(1):99-120
② Amit, R.,&Sehoemaker, P.J.H.. Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal,1993, 14(1):33-46
③ Pfeffer, J.,&Salaneik, G.R.. The external control of organizations:A resource dependence perspective. NewYork:Harper&Row,1978
① Porter, M.E.,&Kramer, M.R.The competitive advantage of corporate Philanthropy.Harvard Business Review, 2002,80(12),56-69.
① 曹裕、陈晓红、王傅强.我国上市公司生命周期划分方法实证比较研究.[J].系统管理学报.2010(6)：313-322.
② Dickinson, V.. Cash flow patterns as a proxy for firm life cycle[J]. Working paper, Fisher School of Accounting, University of Florida,2007.
① 张继歌.回归分析中的异常点和影响点.[J].统计研究。1994(2)
① 山立威,甘犁,郑涛.公司捐赠与经济动机.经济研究,2008,(11)：51-60
② 郝臣.中小企业成长：外部环境,内部治理与企业绩效—基于23个省市300家中小企业的经验数据.南方经济,2009.
[1](美)弗里曼(Freeman,R.Edward)著,王彦华,梁豪译.上海译文出版社.1984(著),2006(译)
[2]钟宏武等,中国企业2009社会责任发展指数报告,经济管理出版社,2009年.
[3]李敢,朱默河.民营企业慈善捐赠行为影响因素解读——制度限制与差序格局交织视角.经济界,2011,(5)：47-52
[4]虞志秋.民营企业“隐性”慈善捐赠现象及其分析[硕士学位论文].硕士研究生论文.中国社会科学院研究生院.2010
[5]Ann K. Buchholtz, Allen C. Amason, Matthew A. Rutherford. Beyond Resources The Mediating Effect of Top Management Discretion and Values on Corporate Philanthropy. Business Society.1999,(6) vol.38.no.2:167-187
[6]Abagail McW illiams, Donald Siegel. Corporate social responsibility:A theory of the firm perspective.Academy of Management Review.2001, (26):117-127.
[7]Frank, T.A Need-hierarchy Framework for Assessing Corporate Social Responsibility [J].The Academy of Management Review,1981,6(1):21-28
[8]Inmaculada Carrasco.Corporate Social Responsibility,Values,and Cooperation. International Atlantic Economic Society,2007, (13):454-460.
[9]Bartkus B R,M orris S A,Seifert B.Governance and corporatephilanthropy.Business and Society.2002. (41):319-344.
[10]Carroll A B.Corporate social performance measurement:a commentary on methods for evaluating an elusive construct. Research In Corporate Social performance and policy.1991.(12):385-401
[11]Saiia D H.Corporate citizenship and corporate philanthropy:strategic philanthropy is good corporate citizenship.Journal o f Corporate Citizenship.2001.1(2):1-19
[12]田雪莹.企业慈善捐赠行为的研究综述：现实发展和理论演进.科技与经济.2009(2)：60-63.
[13]Godfrey, P.C..The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth:A risk management Perspective.Management Review,2005,30:777-798
[14]Grlffin, J.J..Corporate restrueturings:Ripple effects on Corporate philanthropy. J.Public Affairs,2004,4:27-43
[15]Orlltzky, M., L.Schmidt and S.L.Rynes.Corporate Social and Financial Performance:A Meta- Analysis. Organization Studies,2003,24:403-441
[16]Wokutch,R.E.and B.A.Spencer.Corporate Saint and Sinners:The Effects of Philanthropic and illegal Activity on Organizational Performance. California Management Review,1987,29(2):62-77
[17]BermanS.L.Wicks,A.C. and T.M.Jones. Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship Between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal,1999,42(5):488-506
[18]Friedman, M..The Social responsibility of business is to increase its Profits.New York Times Magazine,1970
[19]Werbel, J.D., S.M.Carter.The CEO's influence on corporate foundation giving.Journal of Business Ethics,2002,40(1):47-60
[20]Barnett, M.L..Stakeholder influence Capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility..Management Review,2007, 32:794-816
[21]Marquis, C., M.A.Glynn and GDavis.Community Isomorphism and Corporate Social Aetion.Action.Academey of Management Review,2007,32:925-945
[22]Galaskiewiez,J.and R.Burt.Interorganization Contagion in Corporate Philanthropy. Administrative Science Quarterly,1991,36:88-105
[23]Griffin Jennifer, Mahon John. The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate:twenty-five years of comparable research [J]. Business and Society,1997(36):5-31.
[24]Seifert B, S A Morris and B R Bartkus.Comparing Big Givers and Small Givers: Financial Correlates of Corporate Philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics 2003, 45(3):195-211
[25]Bruce Seifert, Sara A Morris and Barbara R.Bartkus.Having, Giving, and Getting: Slack Resources, Corporate Philanthropy, and Firm Financial Performance. Business Society,2004,43(2):135-161
[26]Heliwang, Jaepil Choi and Jiatao Li.Too Little or Too Much? Untangling The Relationship Between Corporate Philanthropy and Firm Financial Performance, Organization Science,2008,19(1):143-159
[27]Crampton W.and Patten D..Social Responsiveness, Profitability and Catastrophic events:Evidence on the Corporate Philanthropic Response to 9/11. Journal of Business Ethics,1998,81(4):863-873
[28]燕波,王然,张耀辉.公民意识、公司价值和企业捐赠行为研究.南方经济,2009(5)：3-13.
[29]赵大地.基于管理回报率的上市公司捐赠行为研究.消费导刊,2009(2)：20-25.
[30]陈宏辉、王鹏飞.企业慈善捐赠行为影响因素的实证分析—以广东省民营企业为例.当代经济管理..2010(8)：17-24.
[31]Alison Mackey,Tyson B.Mackey,Jay B. Barney.Corporate Social Responsibility and firm Performance:Investor Preferences and Corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review.2007, Vol.32, No.3,817-835.,2006,15(3):234-245.
[32]Brown, W.O.,E.Helland and J.K.Smith.Corporate philanthropic practices. Journal of Corporate Finance,2006,12:855-877.
[33]Wokutch R E,Spencer B A. Corporate saint and sinners:the effects of philanthropic and Illegal activity on organizational performance. California Management Review.1987,29(2):62-77.
[34]Saiia D H,Carroll A B,Buchholtz A K. Philanthropy as strategy.Business and Society,2003,42:169-201.
[35]罗党论,唐清泉.市场环境与控股股东“掏空”行为研究一一来自中国上市公司的经验证据.会计研究,2007(4),69-74.
[36]Gardberg N A,Fombrun C J.Corporate citizenship:creating intangible assets across institutional environments.Academy of Management Review,2006. 34:329-346.
[37]Loekett, A.,Moon,J.,&Visser,W.Corporate social responsibility in management research:focus, nature, salience and sources of influence. Journal of Management studies,2006,43(1),115-135.
[38]Sehwartz, M.S.,&Carroll, A.B.Corporate Social Responsibility:a three domain approach.Business Ethics Quarterly,2003,13(4),503-530.
[39]Rene Bekkers, Pamala Wiepking:A Literature Review of Empirical Studies of Philanthropy:Eight Mechanisms That Drive Charitable Giving.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly XX(X),20101-50.
[40]Brammer S, Millington A..Profit Maximization vs.Agency:An Analysis of Charitable Giving by UK Firms.Cambridge Journal of Economics,2005, 29(4):517-534.
[41]RanZhang, Zabihollah ReZaee and JigaoZhu.Corporate Philanthropic Disaster Response and Ownership Type:Evidence from Chinese Firms Response to The Sichuan EarthquakeJournal of Business Ethics,2010,91(1):51-63.
[42]Crampton W.and Patten D..Social Responsiveness, Profitability and Catastrophic Events:Evidence on the Corporate Philanthropic Response to 9/11,[J].Journal of Business Ethics,2008,81(4):863-873.
[43]Muller A and G Whiteman.Exploring the Geography of Corporate Philanthropic Disaster Response:A Study of Fortune Global 500 Firms. [J] Journal of Business Ethics,2009,84(4):589-603.
[44]Bruce Seifert, Sara A Morris and Barbara R.Bartkus.Having, Giving, and Getting:Slack Resources, Corporate Philanthropy, and Firm Financial Performance.Business Society,2004,43(2):135-161.
[45) Heliwang, Jaepil Choi and Jiatao Li.Too Little or Too Much? Untangling
The Relationship Between Corporate Philanthropy and Firm Financial Performance.Organization Science,2008,19(1):143-159.
[46]Bruce Seifert, Sara A.Morris, Barbara R.Bartkus.Comparing Big Givers and Small Givers:Financial Correlates of Corporate Philanthropy. Journal of Business Etics.2003,45(3):195-211.
[47]Stephen Brammer, Andrew Millington. Firm size, organizational visibility and corporate philanthropy:an empirical analysis. Business Ethics.2006,15(1):6-18.
[48]Thompson, J.K.,&Hood, J.N..The practice of corporate social Performance in minority vs.nonminority-owned small businesses. Journal of Business Ethics, 1993,12(3):197-206.
[49]Thompson, J.K., Smith, H.L.,&Hood, J.N..Charitable contributions by Small businesses.Journal of Small Business Management,1993,31(3):35-51.
[50]Sharfman M.P.,Wolf G.,Chase R.B.,Tansik D.A..Antecedents of organizational Slack. Academy of Management Review,1988,13(4):601-614.
[51]钟宏武.慈善捐赠与企业绩效.北京：经济管理出版社,2007.
[52]Amato, L. H.,&Amato, C. H. The effects of firm size and industry on corporate giving. Journal of Business Ethics,2007,72(3),229-241.
[53]郑海东.企业社会责任行为表现：测量维度、影响因素及对企业绩效的影响.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2007.
[54]Arulampalam,W., & Stoneham, P. An investigation into the givings by large corporate donors to U.K. charities:1979-1986.Applied Economics,1995,27(10), 935-945.
[55]肖强,罗公利.企业公益捐赠的影响因素研究：以青岛市企业为例.青岛科技大[56]江希和.浅析企业慈善捐赠行为理论.商场现代化,2007(5),261-263.
学学报(社会科学版),2009(2),63-67.
[57]Brammer,S., & Millington, A. Firm size, organizational visibility and corporate philanthropy an empirical analysis. Business Ethics:a European Review,2006, 15(1),6-18.
[58][435]贾明,张品.高管的政治关联影响公司慈善捐赠行为吗?管理世界,2010(7),99-113.
[59]毛世平.金字塔控制结构的影响因素及其经济后果.北京：经济科学出版社,2008.
[60]RA Schwartz,Corporate philanthropic contributions, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 23, Issue 3,479-497.
[61]Grlffin, J.J..Corporate restructurings:Ripple effects on Corporate philanthropy. J.Public Affairs,2004,4:27-43
[62]Orlltzky, M., L.Schmidt and S.L.Rynes.Corporate Social and Financial Performance:A Meta- Analysis. Organization Studies,2003,24:403-441
[63]Seifert B, S A Morris and B R Bartkus.Comparing Big Givers and Small Givers: Financial Correlates of Corporate Philanthropy.Journal of Business Ethics 2003,45(3):195-211
[64]刘冬荣等.颜敏基于企业价值的上市公司社会责任信息披露实证分析.系统工程.2009(2)：69-72.
[65]樊纲,王小鲁.中国市场化指数一一各地区市场化相对进程2005年度报告.北京：经济科学出版社,2006.
[66]樊纲,王小鲁.中国市场化指数一一各地区市场化相对进程2006年度报告.北京：经济科学出版社,2007.
[67]樊纲,王小鲁和朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数一各地区市场化相对进程2007年报告.北京：经济科学出版社,2008.
[68]樊纲,王小鲁和朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数一各地区市场化相对进程2009年度报告.北京：经济科学出版社,2010.
[69]樊纲,王小鲁和朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数一各地区市场化相对进程2010年度报告.北京：经济科学出版社,2011.
[70]樊纲,王小鲁和朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数一各地区市场化相对进程2011年度报告.北京：经济科学出版社,2012.
[71]Baron, D. P A positive theory of moral management, social pressure, and corporate social performance. Journal of Economics&Management Strategy, 2009,18(1),7-43.
[72]Baron,D.P. Integrated strategy:market and non-market components.California Management Review,1995,37 (2),47-65.
[73]Galaskiewicz, J. Social organization of an urban grants economy. A study of business philanthropy and nonprofit organizations. Orlando,Fla:Academic Press, 1985.
[74]章辉美；邓子纲.基于政府、企业、社会三方动态博弈的企业社会责任分析,系统工程.2011(6)：123-126.
[75]Genest,C.M.Cultures,organizations and philanthropy.Corporate Communications: An International JournaL.2005,10(4):315-327.
[76]田利华,陈晓东.企业策略性捐赠行为研究：慈善投入的视角.中央财经大学学报,2007(2)：59-63.
[77]Galaskiewicz,J., & Burt,R.S. Interorganizational contagion in corporate philanthropy. Administrative Science Quarterly,1991,36(1),89-105.
[78]Graves,S.B.,&Waddock,S.A.Institutional owners and corporate social performance.Academy of Management Journal,1994,37(4),1034-1046.
[79]Fan, J.PH,&Wong,TJ. Corporate ownership structure and the informativeness of accounting earnings in East Asia. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2002,33 (3),401-425.
[80]Berrone, P, Surroca, J.,& Tribo,J.A. Corporate ethical identity as a determinant of firm performance:a test of the mediating role of stakeholder satisfaction.Journal of Business Ethics,2007,76(1),35-53.
[81]Jawahar,I.M., & McLaughlin,GL.Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory:an organizational life cycle approach.Academy of Management Review,2001, 26(3),397-414.
[82]徐莉萍,辛宇和陈工孟.股权集中度和股权制衡及其对公司经营绩效的影响.经济研究,2006(1),91-100.
[83]Brammer, S.,&Millington, A. Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal,2008,29(12),1325-1343.
[84]陈宏辉,贾生华.企业社会责任观的演进与发展：基于综合性社会契约的理解.中国工业经济,2003(12)：85-92.
[85]Bruce Seifert, Sara A Morris and Barbara R.Bartkus.Having, Giving, and Getting: Slack Resources, Corporate Philanthropy, and Firm Financial Performance. Business Society,2004,43(2):135-161
[86]Heliwang, Jaepil Choi and Jiatao Li.Too Little or Too Much? Untangling The Relationship Between Corporate Philanthropy and Firm Financial Performance, Organization Science,2008,19(1):143-159
[87]Crampton W.and Patten D..Social Responsiveness, Profitability and Catastrophic events:Evidence on the Corporate Philanthropic Response to 9/11. Journal of Business Ethics,1998,81(4):863-873
[88]燕波,王然,张耀辉.公民意识、公司价值和企业捐赠行为研究[J].南方经济,2009(5)：3-13.
[89]赵大地.基于管理回报率的上市公司捐赠行为研究[J].消费导刊2009(2)：20-25
[90]Beurden, P., & Gossling, T. The worth of values a literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 2008,82(2),407-424.
[91]Griffin, J. J.,&Mahon, J. F. The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate:Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business&Society,1997.36(1):5-31.
[92]黄敏学,李小玲和朱华伟.企业被“逼捐”现象的剖析：是大众“无理”还是企业“无良”.管理世界,2008(10),115-126.
[93]曹洪彬.我国捐赠的公共经济学分析,[D].博士学位论文,厦门大学,2006
[94]江希和.浅析企业慈善捐赠行为理论.商场现代化,2007(5),261-263
[95]Bhattacharya,C.B.,Korschun,D., & Sen S. Strengthening stakeholder company relationships through mutually beneficial corporate social responsibility Initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics,2009,85 (2),257-272.
[96]梁建.民营企业的政治参与、治理结构与慈善捐赠.管理世界,2010(7),109-118
[97]Bartkus,B.,Morris,S.,&Seifert,B.Governance and corporate philanthropy. Business&Society,2002,41(3),319-344.
[98]Kenneth E. Goodpaster. Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. [J].Business Ethics Quarterly.Vol.1,1991(1):53-74.
[99]Boatsman,J.R.,& Gupta,S. Taxes and corporate charity:empirical evidence from micro-level panel data.National Tax Journal,1996,49(2),193-213.
[100]Porter,M.E.,&Kramer,M.R.The competitive advantage of corporate Philanthropy. Harvard Business Review,2002,80(12),56-69.
[101]徐丽萍、辛宇、陈工孟：《股权集中度和股权制衡及其对公司经营绩效的影响》,《经济研究》,2006(1)。
[102]李正.企业社会责任与企业价值的相关性研究一一来自沪市上市公司的经验证据.中国工业经济,2006(2),77-83.
[103]曹洪彬.我国捐赠的公共经济学分析.[博士学位论文],厦门大学,2006.
[104]R.H. Coase,The nature of the firm, Economics,New Series, Vol.4. No.16. (Nov.,1937),386-405
[105](美)施图德蒙德.应用计量经济学.北京：机械工业出版社,2007.
[106]Brammer, S., Millington, A.,& Pavelin, S. Is philanthropy strategic?an analysis of the management of charitable giving in large UK companies. Business Ethics:European Review,2006,15(3),234-245.
[107]Fehr,E.,& Gachter, S. Fairness and retaliation:the economics of reciprocity. Journal of Economic Perspectives,2000,14(3),159-181.
[108]Brammer, S., & Millington, A. Corporate reputation and philanthropy:an empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics,2005,61(1),29-44.
[109]BrammerS., & Millington,A.The development of corporate charitable contributions in the UK:a stakeholder analysis. Journal of Management Studies.2004,41(8),1411-1434.
[110]陈晓红,关健和徐兵.高新技术企业公司治理结构的建立和完善.中南工业大学学报(社会科学版),2001,7(3),195-200.
[111]Brown,W.O.,Helland,E.& Smith, J.K.Corporate philanthropic practices. Journal of Corporate Finance,2006,12(5),855-877.
[112]Bruch, H.,&Walter, F. (2005). The keys to rethinking corporate philanthropy. Sloan Management Review,47(1),49-55.
[113]杜兴强,杜颖洁.公益性捐赠、会计业绩与市场绩效：基于汉川大地震的经验证据.当代财经,2010(2),113-122.
[114]曹裕,万光羽.关注企业生命周期.北京：经济科学出版社,2010.
[115]Hsiao. Analysis of Panel Data, Cambridge:University Press,2003.
[116]Buchholtz, A. K, Amason A. C.,&Rutherford M. A.. Beyond resources:the mediating effects of top management discretion and values on corporate philanthropy. Business&Society,1999,38(2),167-187.
[117]张继歌.回归分析中的异常点和影响点.[J].统计研究.1994(2)
[118]Burlingame, D. F.,&Frishkoff,P. A. How does firm size affect corporate philanthropy? In D.F. Burlingame, D.R.Young, New York:Harper,1996,86-104.
[119]金暗,李刚.企业社会责任公众调查初步报告.经济管理,2006(3),13-16.
[120]Burt, R. Corporate philanthropy as a cooptive relation. Social Forces,1983, 62(2):419-449.
[121]郭红玲.基于消费者需求的企业社会责任供给与财务绩效的关联性研究.博士学位论文,西南交通大学,2006.
[121]易开刚.民营企业社会责任：内涵、机制与对策——基于竞争力的视角.[J].经 济理论与经济管理.2006(11)起止页码?
[122]方靖怡.企业慈善捐赠的影响因素及财务绩效研究.[硕士学位论文].南京理工大学硕士论文.2010年5月
[123]Choi.J,& Wang, H. The promise of a managerial values approach to corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics,2007,75(4),345-359.
[124]Carroll, A.B.The pyramid of corporate social responsibility:toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders.Business Horizons,1991,34(4), 39-48.
[125]朱迎春.我国企业慈善捐赠税收政策激励效应：基于2007年度我国A股上市公司数据的实证研究.当代财经,2010(1),37-42.
[126]Carroll,R., & Joulfaian,D. Taxes and corporate giving to charity.Public Finance Review,2005.33(3),300-317.
[127]徐晓东,陈小悦.第一大股东对公司治理、企业业绩的影响分析.经济研究,2003(2),64-74.
[128]Castro,R.G.,Arino, M.A., & Canela,M.A. Does social performance really lead to financial performance? accounting for endogeneity. Journal of Business Ethics,2010,92(1),107-126.
[129]周祖城.企业伦理学.北京：清华大学出版社,2009.
[130]钟碧忠.企业慈善动因探讨：一个利益相关者的视角.泉州师范学院学报,2009(3),103-105.
[131]沈洪涛,沈艺峰.公司社会责任思想起源与演变.上海：上海人民出版社,2007.
[132]唐更华,许卓云.波特战略性企业慈善捐赠行为理论与启示.南方经济,2004(8),47-49.
[133]Chen, J. C., Patten, D. M., & Roberts, R. W. Corporate charitable contributions: a corporate social performance or legitimacy strategy? Journal of Business Ethics, 2003,82(1),131-144.
[134]Chih, H., & Chen, T. On the determinants of corporate social responsibility: international evidence on the financial industry.Journal of Business Ethics, 2009,93(1),115-135.
[135]温素彬,方苑.企业社会责任与财务绩效关系的实证研究：利益相关者视角的面板数据分析.中国工业经济,2008(10),151-160.
[136]Chiu,S., & Sharfrnan,M.Legitimacy, visibility, and the antecedents of corporate social performance:an investigation of the instrumental perspective. Journal of Management,2009,20(10),1-20.
[137]Dunfee,T W. Do firms with unique competencies for rescuing victims of human catastrophes have special obligations? corporate responsibility and the AIDS Catastrophe in Sub-Saharan Africa.Business Ethics Quarterly,2006,16(2), 185-210.
[138]Choi, J.,& Wang, H. Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance. Strategic Management Journal,2009,30(8),895-907.
[139]杨团,葛道顺.公司与社会公益(11).北京：社会科学文献出版社,2003.
[271]Epstein, E. M. The corporate social policy process:beyond business ethics, corporate social responsibility, and corporate social responsiveness. California Management Review,1987,29(3),99-114.
[140]魏学强,云霄和于洋.公司治理结构与企业捐赠—基于2008年度中国A股上市公司数据的实证研究.中南财经政法大学研究生学报,2010(4),52-58.
[141]Clarkson,M.B.E. Defining, evaluating, and managing corporate social performance:the stakeholder management model. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy,1991,12,331-358.
[142]Freeman,R.E. Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 1999,24(2),233-236.
[143]Clarkson,M.B.E.A Stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance.Academy of Management Review,1995,20(1), 92-117.
[144]Clotfelter, C.T Fdderal tax policy and charitable giving. Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1985.
[145]夏立军,方轶强.政府控制、治理环境与公司价值：来自中国证券市场的经验证据.经济研究,2005(5)：40-51.
[146]山立威,甘犁,郑涛.公司捐赠与经济动机.经济研究,2008,(11)：51-60
[147]Cronqvist,H.,& Nilsson, M. Agency costs of controlling minority shareholders.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,2003,38(4), 695-719.
[148]孙铮,姜秀华和任强.治理结构与公司业绩的相关性研究.财经研究,2001,27(4),3-11.
[149]Day, K.M., & Devlin,R.A. Do government expenditures crowd out corporate contributions? Public Finance Review,2004,32(4),404-425.
[150]Davis, K., Frederick, W.C,&Blomstrom, R.L. Business and Society. Concepts and Policy Issues. New York:McGraw Hill,1988.
[151]Lo,S.A Performance evaluation for sustainable business:a profitability and marketability framework. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,2010,17(6),311-319.
[152]许婷.企业慈善捐赠影响因素实证研究.硕士学位论文,南京农业大学,2009.
[153]LLSV.Investor protection and corporate valuationJournal of Finance,2002, 57(3),1147-1170.
[154]Demsetz,H,&Lehn, K. The structure of corporate ownership:cause and consequences. Journal of Political Economy,1985,93(6),1155-1177.
[155]Lewin, D., & Sabater, J. M. Corporate philanthropy and business performance. Bloomington:Indiana University Press,1996.
[156]Dennis,B.S., Buchholtz, A. K.,&Butts, M. M. The nature of giving a theory of planned behavior examination of corporate philanthropy. Business&Society. 2009,48(3),360-384.
[157]张韵君.一种战略性选择：企业慈善社会责任.当代经济管理.2010(2),41-45.
[158]Gillis, T.,&Spring, N.Doing good is good for business. Communication World, 2001,18(6),23-27.
[159]中国社会科学院.中国企业社会责任发展指数报告.北京：经济管理出版社,2009.
[160]杜兴强,雷宇.企业利益相关者的利益关系：冲突还是融合.山西财经大学学报,2009(6),59-65.
[161]曹裕,陈晓红和王傅强.我国企业不同生命周期阶段竞争力演化模式实证研究.统计研究,2009(1),87-94.
[162]陈宏辉、王鹏飞.企业慈善捐赠行为影响因素的实证分析——以广东省民营企业为例.当代经济管理.2010(8)：17-24.
[163]Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. C., Hult, G. T M. Corporate citizenship:cultural antecedents and business benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1999,27(4),455-469.
[164]曹裕,陈晓红和万光羽.控制权、现金流权与公司价值：基于企业生命周期的视角.中国管理科学,2010(3),185-192.
[165]Margo lis, J. D.,& Walsh, J.B.Misery loves companies:rethinking social initiatives by business.Administrative Science Quarterly,2003,48(2),268-305.
[166]陈宏辉,贾生华.企业利益相关者的利益协调与公司治理的平衡原理.中国工业经济,2005(8),114-121.
[167]杜兴强,郭剑花和雷宇.政治联系方式与民营企业捐赠：度量方法与经验证据. 财贸研究,2010(1),89-99.
[168]He,W. Charity begins at home:multinational corporations' philanthropy in a host country and its impact on market entry.Doctoral dissertation, Boston College,2004.
[169]陈听、滕悦和沈乐平.企业成长视角的利益相关者利益要求差异研究.商业经济与管理,2009(11),41-47.
[170]McElory,K.M.,& Siegfried, J.J. The effect of firm size on corporate philanthropy. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business,1985,25 (2),18-26.
[171]陈成文,谭娟.税收政策与慈善事业：美国经验及其启示.湖南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2007(6),77-82.
[172]McGuire, J. B.,Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T.Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management JournaL1988,31(4), 854-872.
[173]Koehn, D.,&Ueng,J.Is philanthropy being used by corporate wrong doers to buy good will? Journal of Management and Governance,2009,14(1),1-16.
[174]樊建锋,田志龙.中国企业公益行为特征研究：基于中国家电企业的案例研究.工业工程与管理,2010(4),75-80.
[175]McKinsey.The state of corporate philanthropy:a McKinsey global survey. The Mckinsey Quarterly,2008,(2),1-10.
[176]温素彬,方苑.企业社会责任与财务绩效关系的实证研究——利益相关者视角的面板数据分析.中国工业经济.2008(10)
[177]钟宏武.民众如何看待汶川大地震后的企业捐赠.金融博览.2008(08)
[178]石磊,魏玖长,赵定涛.上市公司灾难捐赠行为对股票价格的影响.中国科学技术大学学报.2010(06)
[179]王海燕,陈五洲.企业慈善的时代价值及其在中国的实践探索.长江论坛.2006(05)
[180]陈佳贵.中国企业社会责任研究报告.北京：社会科学文献出版社,2009.
[181]Sankar Sen,C. B. Bhattacharya,Daniel Korschun. The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships:A field experiment,2006
[182]Joh, S. W.Corporate governance and firm profitability:evidence from Korea before the economic crisis.Journal of Financial Economics,2003,68(2),287-322.
[183]Stephen Brammer,Andrew Millington. Corporate Reputation and Philanthropy: An Empirical Analysis,2005
[184]Joe M.Ricks, Jacqueline A.Williams. Strategic Corporate Philanthropy: Addressing Frontline Talent Needs Through an Educational Giving Program[J],2005
[185]高功敬,高鉴国.中国慈善捐赠机制的发展趋势分析.社会科学,2009(12),52-63.
[186]Leland Campbell,Charles S. Gulas,Thomas S. Gruca. Corporate Giving Behavior and Decision-Maker Social Consciousness,199902(01)
[187]徐兰君.企业战略性慈善研究综述.科技经济市场.2008(10)
[188]Kassinis,G,&Vafeas, N.Stakeholder pressures and environmental performance. Academy of Management Journal,2006,49(1),145-159.
[189]朱金凤,赵红建.慈善捐赠会提升企业财务绩效吗——来自沪市A股上市公司的实证检验.会计之友(上旬刊).2010(04)
[190]袁静,高红.企业社会责任视域下中美企业慈善捐赠比较.中共青岛市委党校.青岛行政学院学报.2009(11)
[191]Gond,J.& Crane, A. Corporate social performance disoriented saving the lost paradigm? Business&Society,2008,49 (4),677-703.
[192]陈宏辉.战略性慈善捐赠探析.现代管理科学.2007(02)
[193]梁华平.我国企业社会责任中的慈善捐赠行为解析.重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版).2010(04)
[194]Gan, A. The impact of public scrutiny on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics,2006,69(3)217-236.
[195]宋林,王建玲.我国企业慈善行为的市场反应——基于汶川地震捐赠数据的实证检验[J].当代经济科学.2010(06)
[196]梁华平,王苏喜.我国企业社会责任的慈善捐赠逻辑.商场现代化.2008(33)
[197]李兰.控股人类型对上市公司慈善捐款行为的影响：基于玉树地震捐款的统计分析.商业经济,2010(8),81-82.
[198]赵琼,张应祥.跨国公司与中国企业捐赠行为的比较研究.社会.2007(05)
[199]王建玲,宋林,王博.汶川地震后上市公司捐赠公告的市场反应.预测.2011(01)
[200]李敬强,刘风军.企业慈善捐赠对市场影响的实证研究——以“5·12”地震慈善捐赠为例.中国软科学2010(06)
[201]李烨,李传昭和罗婉议.战略创新、业务转型与民营企业持续成长一一格兰仕集团的成长历程及其启示.管理世界,2005(6),126-135.
[201]罗公利,肖强.企业公益捐赠研究的回顾与展望.青岛科技大学学报(社会科学 版).2006(04)
[202]Smith C.The New Corporate Philanthropy. Harvard Business.1994
[203]Muller,A,Kr ussl R.Do Markets Love Misery?Stock Prices and Corporate Philanthropic Disaster Response..2008
[204]McWilliams,A,Siegel,D.Event Studies in Management Research:Theoretical and Empirical Issues.1997
[205]Gardberg N.A,C J Fombrun.Corporate Citizenship:Creating Intangible Assets Across Institutional Environments. Academy of Management Review.2006
[206]江希和.我国企业慈善捐赠行为实践轨迹与现状分析.生产力研究,2008(7),9-10.
[207]李敬强,刘凤军. 企业慈善捐赠对市场影响的实证研究——以“5·12”地震慈善捐赠为例[J].中国软科学.2010(06)
[208]汪凤桂,欧晓明,胡亚飞,彭镇. 慈善捐赠与企业财务绩效关系研究——对345家上市公司的实证分析[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版).2011(01)
[209]宋林,王建玲. 我国企业慈善行为的市场反应——基于汶川地震捐赠数据的实证检验[J].当代经济科学.201 0(06)
[210]Mello, R. B., Marcon, R., & Alberton, A. Drivers of discretionary firm donation in Brazil.Brazilian Administration Review,2008,5(4),275-288.
[211]Mo ir, L.,&Taffler, R. Does corporate philanthropy exist? business giving to the arts in the UK. Journal of Business Ethics,2004,54(2),149-161.
[212]Muller,A., & Whiteman,G. Exploring the geography of corporate philanthropic disaster response:a study of fortune global 500 firms. Journal of Business Ethics,2008,84(4),589-603.
[213]许婷.上市公司慈善捐赠影响因素实证研究：以2006年上市公司慈善排行榜为例.市场周刊,2008(12),89-90
[214]Elsbach, K D. Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry:the construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly,1994,39(1),57-88.
[215]Nasi,J.What is stakeholder thinking? A snapshot of a social theory of the firm.Helsinki:LSR-Julkaisutoy,1995,19-32.
[216]张传良.中外企业慈善捐赠状况对比调查.中国企业家,2005(17),29-30.
[217]Ermann, M. D. The operative goals of corporate philanthropy:contributions to the public broadcasting service. Social Problems,1978,25(5),505-514.
[218]王保进.多变量分析：统计软件与数据分析.北京：北京大学出版社,2007.
[219]卢汉龙.企业捐赠调查报告,北京：华夏出版社,2002.
[237]Nita Choudhary, Niranjan Kumar Singh.Corporate Social responsibility: Competitive Advantage or Social Concern.Public Policy and Administration Research,Vol.2, No.1,2012,11-22.
[221]山立威,甘犁和郑涛.公司捐款与经济动机：汉川地震后中国上市公司捐款的实证研究.经济研究,2008(11),51-61.
[222]Neubaum,D. O., & Zahra, S. A. Institutional ownership and corporate social performance and moderating effects of investment horizon,activism, and coordination. Journal of Management,2006,32(1),108-131.
[223]Droge, C., Jayaram, J., & Vickery, S.K. The effects of internal versus external integration practices on time-based performance and overall firm performance Journal of Operations Management,2004,22(6):557-573.
[224]Nutt,P. Expanding the search for alternatives during strategic decision making. Academy of Management Exec utive,2004,18(4),13-28.
[225]梁建,陈爽英和盖庆恩.民营企业的政治参与、公司治理与慈善捐赠.管理世界,2010(7)：109-118.
[226]Oliver,C.Strategic Responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review,] 991,16(1),145-179.
[227]Dowling, J.,&P feffer, J. Organizational legitimacy:social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review,1975,18(1),122-136.
[228]Brammer S, Millington A..Profit Maximisation vs. Agency:An Analysis of Charitable Giving by UK Firms.Cambridge Journal of Economics,2005, 29(4):517-534.
[229]李领臣.公司慈善捐赠的利益平衡.法学,2007(4),89-96.
[230]Stephen Brammer, Stephen Pavelin, Lynda Porter.Corporate Philanthropy,
Multinational Companies and Controversial Countries,Proceedings of the Seventeenth
Annual Meeting.Volume 17,2006,64-69.
[231]Padgett, R. C., & Galan, J. I. The effect of R&D intensity on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethic s,2010,93(3),407-418.
[232]Orace Johnson,Walter L.Johnson.The imcome elasticity of corporate philanthropy:cpmment. The Journal of Finance.2012(4),149-152.
[233]石磊.企业灾难捐赠的决策模型与效果评估研究.[博士学位论文],中国科学技术大学,2010.
[234]Roy Shapira,Corporate Philanthropy as Signaling and Co-optation, Fordham Law Review, Vol.80, Issue 5,1889-1939.
① 论公司慈善捐赠的信息披露——制度构建的必要性与可行性研究.张安毅,技术经济与管理.2011(4)
① 正式的定义是在世界商业持续发展委员会(WBCSD)组织的来自企业内部和外部的60个舆论领导的国际会议上提出的：“CSR是企业承诺尽可能在提高劳动者和他们的家庭以及本地区和社会的生活质量时(WBCSD股东CSR会话,荷兰,9月6日-8日,1998),具有道德和能对经济发展作出贡献。
② G Cheney,J Roper and S May,'Overview'in S May,G Cheney and J Roper(eds),The Debate Over Corporate Social Responsibility(2007)7.
③ J Elkington,Cannibals with Forks:The Triple Bottom Line of 21 Century Business(reprinted ed,2002)1999,2.
① A Sabitz and K Weber,he Triple Bottom Line:How Today's Best Run Companies are Achieving Economic,Social and Environmental Success-and How You Can Too(2006)xii.
② Gray Becker. A Theory of Social Interactions.working paper.1974.
③ 周秋光、曾桂林著：《中国慈善简史》,人民出版社,2006年版,第346页。
① 王亚妮、蒋学洪.公司社会捐赠与财务业绩关系的实证研究—来自沪市A股的经验证据,财会通讯,2010.
① 赵宇晓.持续发展：规范研究与实证研究.中国管理科学.1996.
② 任训学.论定性与定量方法的辩证统一性.湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版).1995.
① 资料来源:A Literature Review of Empirical Studies of Philanthropy:Eight Mechanisms That Drive Charitable Giving, Ren6 Bekkers and Pamala Wiepking, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, XX (X): 1-50,2010.
① 曹洪彬.我国捐赠的公共经济学分析,[D].博士学位论文,厦门大学,2006
② 江希和.浅析企业慈善捐赠行为理论.[J].商场现代化,2007(5),261-263
① 梁建.民营企业的政治参与、治理结构与慈善捐赠.[J].管理世界,2010(7),109-118
① Kenneth E. Goodpaster. Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. [J].Business Ethics Quarterly.Vol.1, 1991(1):53-74.
① Wood DJ. Business and Society [M]. Glenview. IL:Scott Foresman,1990.
② Logsdon, Reiner and Burke. Corporate Philanthropy:Strategy responses to the firm's stakeholder [J]. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,1990(19):93-109.
① Barney, J.B.. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage.Journal of Management,1991,17(1):99-120
② Amit, R.,&Sehoemaker, P.J.H.. Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal,1993, 14(1):33-46
③ Pfeffer, J.,&Salaneik, G.R.. The external control of organizations:A resource dependence perspective. NewYork:Harper&Row,1978
① Porter, M.E.,&Kramer, M.R.The competitive advantage of corporate Philanthropy.Harvard Business Review, 2002,80(12),56-69.
① 曹裕、陈晓红、王傅强.我国上市公司生命周期划分方法实证比较研究.[J].系统管理学报.2010(6)：313-322.
② Dickinson, V.. Cash flow patterns as a proxy for firm life cycle[J]. Working paper, Fisher School of Accounting, University of Florida,2007.
① 张继歌.回归分析中的异常点和影响点.[J].统计研究。1994(2)
① 山立威,甘犁,郑涛.公司捐赠与经济动机.经济研究,2008,(11)：51-60
② 郝臣.中小企业成长：外部环境,内部治理与企业绩效—基于23个省市300家中小企业的经验数据.南方经济,2009.
[1](美)弗里曼(Freeman,R.Edward)著,王彦华,梁豪译.上海译文出版社.1984(著),2006(译)
[2]钟宏武等,中国企业2009社会责任发展指数报告,经济管理出版社,2009年.
[3]李敢,朱默河.民营企业慈善捐赠行为影响因素解读——制度限制与差序格局交织视角.经济界,2011,(5)：47-52
[4]虞志秋.民营企业“隐性”慈善捐赠现象及其分析[硕士学位论文].硕士研究生论文.中国社会科学院研究生院.2010
[5]Ann K. Buchholtz, Allen C. Amason, Matthew A. Rutherford. Beyond Resources The Mediating Effect of Top Management Discretion and Values on Corporate Philanthropy. Business Society.1999,(6) vol.38.no.2:167-187
[6]Abagail McW illiams, Donald Siegel. Corporate social responsibility:A theory of the firm perspective.Academy of Management Review.2001, (26):117-127.
[7]Frank, T.A Need-hierarchy Framework for Assessing Corporate Social Responsibility [J].The Academy of Management Review,1981,6(1):21-28
[8]Inmaculada Carrasco.Corporate Social Responsibility,Values,and Cooperation. International Atlantic Economic Society,2007, (13):454-460.
[9]Bartkus B R,M orris S A,Seifert B.Governance and corporatephilanthropy.Business and Society.2002. (41):319-344.
[10]Carroll A B.Corporate social performance measurement:a commentary on methods for evaluating an elusive construct. Research In Corporate Social performance and policy.1991.(12):385-401
[11]Saiia D H.Corporate citizenship and corporate philanthropy:strategic philanthropy is good corporate citizenship.Journal o f Corporate Citizenship.2001.1(2):1-19
[12]田雪莹.企业慈善捐赠行为的研究综述：现实发展和理论演进.科技与经济.2009(2)：60-63.
[13]Godfrey, P.C..The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth:A risk management Perspective.Management Review,2005,30:777-798
[14]Grlffin, J.J..Corporate restrueturings:Ripple effects on Corporate philanthropy. J.Public Affairs,2004,4:27-43
[15]Orlltzky, M., L.Schmidt and S.L.Rynes.Corporate Social and Financial Performance:A Meta- Analysis. Organization Studies,2003,24:403-441
[16]Wokutch,R.E.and B.A.Spencer.Corporate Saint and Sinners:The Effects of Philanthropic and illegal Activity on Organizational Performance. California Management Review,1987,29(2):62-77
[17]BermanS.L.Wicks,A.C. and T.M.Jones. Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship Between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal,1999,42(5):488-506
[18]Friedman, M..The Social responsibility of business is to increase its Profits.New York Times Magazine,1970
[19]Werbel, J.D., S.M.Carter.The CEO's influence on corporate foundation giving.Journal of Business Ethics,2002,40(1):47-60
[20]Barnett, M.L..Stakeholder influence Capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility..Management Review,2007, 32:794-816
[21]Marquis, C., M.A.Glynn and GDavis.Community Isomorphism and Corporate Social Aetion.Action.Academey of Management Review,2007,32:925-945
[22]Galaskiewiez,J.and R.Burt.Interorganization Contagion in Corporate Philanthropy. Administrative Science Quarterly,1991,36:88-105
[23]Griffin Jennifer, Mahon John. The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate:twenty-five years of comparable research [J]. Business and Society,1997(36):5-31.
[24]Seifert B, S A Morris and B R Bartkus.Comparing Big Givers and Small Givers: Financial Correlates of Corporate Philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics 2003, 45(3):195-211
[25]Bruce Seifert, Sara A Morris and Barbara R.Bartkus.Having, Giving, and Getting: Slack Resources, Corporate Philanthropy, and Firm Financial Performance. Business Society,2004,43(2):135-161
[26]Heliwang, Jaepil Choi and Jiatao Li.Too Little or Too Much? Untangling The Relationship Between Corporate Philanthropy and Firm Financial Performance, Organization Science,2008,19(1):143-159
[27]Crampton W.and Patten D..Social Responsiveness, Profitability and Catastrophic events:Evidence on the Corporate Philanthropic Response to 9/11. Journal of Business Ethics,1998,81(4):863-873
[28]燕波,王然,张耀辉.公民意识、公司价值和企业捐赠行为研究.南方经济,2009(5)：3-13.
[29]赵大地.基于管理回报率的上市公司捐赠行为研究.消费导刊,2009(2)：20-25.
[30]陈宏辉、王鹏飞.企业慈善捐赠行为影响因素的实证分析—以广东省民营企业为例.当代经济管理..2010(8)：17-24.
[31]Alison Mackey,Tyson B.Mackey,Jay B. Barney.Corporate Social Responsibility and firm Performance:Investor Preferences and Corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review.2007, Vol.32, No.3,817-835.,2006,15(3):234-245.
[32]Brown, W.O.,E.Helland and J.K.Smith.Corporate philanthropic practices. Journal of Corporate Finance,2006,12:855-877.
[33]Wokutch R E,Spencer B A. Corporate saint and sinners:the effects of philanthropic and Illegal activity on organizational performance. California Management Review.1987,29(2):62-77.
[34]Saiia D H,Carroll A B,Buchholtz A K. Philanthropy as strategy.Business and Society,2003,42:169-201.
[35]罗党论,唐清泉.市场环境与控股股东“掏空”行为研究一一来自中国上市公司的经验证据.会计研究,2007(4),69-74.
[36]Gardberg N A,Fombrun C J.Corporate citizenship:creating intangible assets across institutional environments.Academy of Management Review,2006. 34:329-346.
[37]Loekett, A.,Moon,J.,&Visser,W.Corporate social responsibility in management research:focus, nature, salience and sources of influence. Journal of Management studies,2006,43(1),115-135.
[38]Sehwartz, M.S.,&Carroll, A.B.Corporate Social Responsibility:a three domain approach.Business Ethics Quarterly,2003,13(4),503-530.
[39]Rene Bekkers, Pamala Wiepking:A Literature Review of Empirical Studies of Philanthropy:Eight Mechanisms That Drive Charitable Giving.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly XX(X),20101-50.
[40]Brammer S, Millington A..Profit Maximization vs.Agency:An Analysis of Charitable Giving by UK Firms.Cambridge Journal of Economics,2005, 29(4):517-534.
[41]RanZhang, Zabihollah ReZaee and JigaoZhu.Corporate Philanthropic Disaster Response and Ownership Type:Evidence from Chinese Firms Response to The Sichuan EarthquakeJournal of Business Ethics,2010,91(1):51-63.
[42]Crampton W.and Patten D..Social Responsiveness, Profitability and Catastrophic Events:Evidence on the Corporate Philanthropic Response to 9/11,[J].Journal of Business Ethics,2008,81(4):863-873.
[43]Muller A and G Whiteman.Exploring the Geography of Corporate Philanthropic Disaster Response:A Study of Fortune Global 500 Firms. [J] Journal of Business Ethics,2009,84(4):589-603.
[44]Bruce Seifert, Sara A Morris and Barbara R.Bartkus.Having, Giving, and Getting:Slack Resources, Corporate Philanthropy, and Firm Financial Performance.Business Society,2004,43(2):135-161.
[45) Heliwang, Jaepil Choi and Jiatao Li.Too Little or Too Much? Untangling
The Relationship Between Corporate Philanthropy and Firm Financial Performance.Organization Science,2008,19(1):143-159.
[46]Bruce Seifert, Sara A.Morris, Barbara R.Bartkus.Comparing Big Givers and Small Givers:Financial Correlates of Corporate Philanthropy. Journal of Business Etics.2003,45(3):195-211.
[47]Stephen Brammer, Andrew Millington. Firm size, organizational visibility and corporate philanthropy:an empirical analysis. Business Ethics.2006,15(1):6-18.
[48]Thompson, J.K.,&Hood, J.N..The practice of corporate social Performance in minority vs.nonminority-owned small businesses. Journal of Business Ethics, 1993,12(3):197-206.
[49]Thompson, J.K., Smith, H.L.,&Hood, J.N..Charitable contributions by Small businesses.Journal of Small Business Management,1993,31(3):35-51.
[50]Sharfman M.P.,Wolf G.,Chase R.B.,Tansik D.A..Antecedents of organizational Slack. Academy of Management Review,1988,13(4):601-614.
[51]钟宏武.慈善捐赠与企业绩效.北京：经济管理出版社,2007.
[52]Amato, L. H.,&Amato, C. H. The effects of firm size and industry on corporate giving. Journal of Business Ethics,2007,72(3),229-241.
[53]郑海东.企业社会责任行为表现：测量维度、影响因素及对企业绩效的影响.博士学位论文,浙江大学,2007.
[54]Arulampalam,W., & Stoneham, P. An investigation into the givings by large corporate donors to U.K. charities:1979-1986.Applied Economics,1995,27(10), 935-945.
[55]肖强,罗公利.企业公益捐赠的影响因素研究：以青岛市企业为例.青岛科技大[56]江希和.浅析企业慈善捐赠行为理论.商场现代化,2007(5),261-263.
学学报(社会科学版),2009(2),63-67.
[57]Brammer,S., & Millington, A. Firm size, organizational visibility and corporate philanthropy an empirical analysis. Business Ethics:a European Review,2006, 15(1),6-18.
[58][435]贾明,张品.高管的政治关联影响公司慈善捐赠行为吗?管理世界,2010(7),99-113.
[59]毛世平.金字塔控制结构的影响因素及其经济后果.北京：经济科学出版社,2008.
[60]RA Schwartz,Corporate philanthropic contributions, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 23, Issue 3,479-497.
[61]Grlffin, J.J..Corporate restructurings:Ripple effects on Corporate philanthropy. J.Public Affairs,2004,4:27-43
[62]Orlltzky, M., L.Schmidt and S.L.Rynes.Corporate Social and Financial Performance:A Meta- Analysis. Organization Studies,2003,24:403-441
[63]Seifert B, S A Morris and B R Bartkus.Comparing Big Givers and Small Givers: Financial Correlates of Corporate Philanthropy.Journal of Business Ethics 2003,45(3):195-211
[64]刘冬荣等.颜敏基于企业价值的上市公司社会责任信息披露实证分析.系统工程.2009(2)：69-72.
[65]樊纲,王小鲁.中国市场化指数一一各地区市场化相对进程2005年度报告.北京：经济科学出版社,2006.
[66]樊纲,王小鲁.中国市场化指数一一各地区市场化相对进程2006年度报告.北京：经济科学出版社,2007.
[67]樊纲,王小鲁和朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数一各地区市场化相对进程2007年报告.北京：经济科学出版社,2008.
[68]樊纲,王小鲁和朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数一各地区市场化相对进程2009年度报告.北京：经济科学出版社,2010.
[69]樊纲,王小鲁和朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数一各地区市场化相对进程2010年度报告.北京：经济科学出版社,2011.
[70]樊纲,王小鲁和朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数一各地区市场化相对进程2011年度报告.北京：经济科学出版社,2012.
[71]Baron, D. P A positive theory of moral management, social pressure, and corporate social performance. Journal of Economics&Management Strategy, 2009,18(1),7-43.
[72]Baron,D.P. Integrated strategy:market and non-market components.California Management Review,1995,37 (2),47-65.
[73]Galaskiewicz, J. Social organization of an urban grants economy. A study of business philanthropy and nonprofit organizations. Orlando,Fla:Academic Press, 1985.
[74]章辉美；邓子纲.基于政府、企业、社会三方动态博弈的企业社会责任分析,系统工程.2011(6)：123-126.
[75]Genest,C.M.Cultures,organizations and philanthropy.Corporate Communications: An International JournaL.2005,10(4):315-327.
[76]田利华,陈晓东.企业策略性捐赠行为研究：慈善投入的视角.中央财经大学学报,2007(2)：59-63.
[77]Galaskiewicz,J., & Burt,R.S. Interorganizational contagion in corporate philanthropy. Administrative Science Quarterly,1991,36(1),89-105.
[78]Graves,S.B.,&Waddock,S.A.Institutional owners and corporate social performance.Academy of Management Journal,1994,37(4),1034-1046.
[79]Fan, J.PH,&Wong,TJ. Corporate ownership structure and the informativeness of accounting earnings in East Asia. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2002,33 (3),401-425.
[80]Berrone, P, Surroca, J.,& Tribo,J.A. Corporate ethical identity as a determinant of firm performance:a test of the mediating role of stakeholder satisfaction.Journal of Business Ethics,2007,76(1),35-53.
[81]Jawahar,I.M., & McLaughlin,GL.Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory:an organizational life cycle approach.Academy of Management Review,2001, 26(3),397-414.
[82]徐莉萍,辛宇和陈工孟.股权集中度和股权制衡及其对公司经营绩效的影响.经济研究,2006(1),91-100.
[83]Brammer, S.,&Millington, A. Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal,2008,29(12),1325-1343.
[84]陈宏辉,贾生华.企业社会责任观的演进与发展：基于综合性社会契约的理解.中国工业经济,2003(12)：85-92.
[85]Bruce Seifert, Sara A Morris and Barbara R.Bartkus.Having, Giving, and Getting: Slack Resources, Corporate Philanthropy, and Firm Financial Performance. Business Society,2004,43(2):135-161
[86]Heliwang, Jaepil Choi and Jiatao Li.Too Little or Too Much? Untangling The Relationship Between Corporate Philanthropy and Firm Financial Performance, Organization Science,2008,19(1):143-159
[87]Crampton W.and Patten D..Social Responsiveness, Profitability and Catastrophic events:Evidence on the Corporate Philanthropic Response to 9/11. Journal of Business Ethics,1998,81(4):863-873
[88]燕波,王然,张耀辉.公民意识、公司价值和企业捐赠行为研究[J].南方经济,2009(5)：3-13.
[89]赵大地.基于管理回报率的上市公司捐赠行为研究[J].消费导刊2009(2)：20-25
[90]Beurden, P., & Gossling, T. The worth of values a literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 2008,82(2),407-424.
[91]Griffin, J. J.,&Mahon, J. F. The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate:Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business&Society,1997.36(1):5-31.
[92]黄敏学,李小玲和朱华伟.企业被“逼捐”现象的剖析：是大众“无理”还是企业“无良”.管理世界,2008(10),115-126.
[93]曹洪彬.我国捐赠的公共经济学分析,[D].博士学位论文,厦门大学,2006
[94]江希和.浅析企业慈善捐赠行为理论.商场现代化,2007(5),261-263
[95]Bhattacharya,C.B.,Korschun,D., & Sen S. Strengthening stakeholder company relationships through mutually beneficial corporate social responsibility Initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics,2009,85 (2),257-272.
[96]梁建.民营企业的政治参与、治理结构与慈善捐赠.管理世界,2010(7),109-118
[97]Bartkus,B.,Morris,S.,&Seifert,B.Governance and corporate philanthropy. Business&Society,2002,41(3),319-344.
[98]Kenneth E. Goodpaster. Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. [J].Business Ethics Quarterly.Vol.1,1991(1):53-74.
[99]Boatsman,J.R.,& Gupta,S. Taxes and corporate charity:empirical evidence from micro-level panel data.National Tax Journal,1996,49(2),193-213.
[100]Porter,M.E.,&Kramer,M.R.The competitive advantage of corporate Philanthropy. Harvard Business Review,2002,80(12),56-69.
[101]徐丽萍、辛宇、陈工孟：《股权集中度和股权制衡及其对公司经营绩效的影响》,《经济研究》,2006(1)。
[102]李正.企业社会责任与企业价值的相关性研究一一来自沪市上市公司的经验证据.中国工业经济,2006(2),77-83.
[103]曹洪彬.我国捐赠的公共经济学分析.[博士学位论文],厦门大学,2006.
[104]R.H. Coase,The nature of the firm, Economics,New Series, Vol.4. No.16. (Nov.,1937),386-405
[105](美)施图德蒙德.应用计量经济学.北京：机械工业出版社,2007.
[106]Brammer, S., Millington, A.,& Pavelin, S. Is philanthropy strategic?an analysis of the management of charitable giving in large UK companies. Business Ethics:European Review,2006,15(3),234-245.
[107]Fehr,E.,& Gachter, S. Fairness and retaliation:the economics of reciprocity. Journal of Economic Perspectives,2000,14(3),159-181.
[108]Brammer, S., & Millington, A. Corporate reputation and philanthropy:an empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics,2005,61(1),29-44.
[109]BrammerS., & Millington,A.The development of corporate charitable contributions in the UK:a stakeholder analysis. Journal of Management Studies.2004,41(8),1411-1434.
[110]陈晓红,关健和徐兵.高新技术企业公司治理结构的建立和完善.中南工业大学学报(社会科学版),2001,7(3),195-200.
[111]Brown,W.O.,Helland,E.& Smith, J.K.Corporate philanthropic practices. Journal of Corporate Finance,2006,12(5),855-877.
[112]Bruch, H.,&Walter, F. (2005). The keys to rethinking corporate philanthropy. Sloan Management Review,47(1),49-55.
[113]杜兴强,杜颖洁.公益性捐赠、会计业绩与市场绩效：基于汉川大地震的经验证据.当代财经,2010(2),113-122.
[114]曹裕,万光羽.关注企业生命周期.北京：经济科学出版社,2010.
[115]Hsiao. Analysis of Panel Data, Cambridge:University Press,2003.
[116]Buchholtz, A. K, Amason A. C.,&Rutherford M. A.. Beyond resources:the mediating effects of top management discretion and values on corporate philanthropy. Business&Society,1999,38(2),167-187.
[117]张继歌.回归分析中的异常点和影响点.[J].统计研究.1994(2)
[118]Burlingame, D. F.,&Frishkoff,P. A. How does firm size affect corporate philanthropy? In D.F. Burlingame, D.R.Young, New York:Harper,1996,86-104.
[119]金暗,李刚.企业社会责任公众调查初步报告.经济管理,2006(3),13-16.
[120]Burt, R. Corporate philanthropy as a cooptive relation. Social Forces,1983, 62(2):419-449.
[121]郭红玲.基于消费者需求的企业社会责任供给与财务绩效的关联性研究.博士学位论文,西南交通大学,2006.
[121]易开刚.民营企业社会责任：内涵、机制与对策——基于竞争力的视角.[J].经 济理论与经济管理.2006(11)起止页码?
[122]方靖怡.企业慈善捐赠的影响因素及财务绩效研究.[硕士学位论文].南京理工大学硕士论文.2010年5月
[123]Choi.J,& Wang, H. The promise of a managerial values approach to corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics,2007,75(4),345-359.
[124]Carroll, A.B.The pyramid of corporate social responsibility:toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders.Business Horizons,1991,34(4), 39-48.
[125]朱迎春.我国企业慈善捐赠税收政策激励效应：基于2007年度我国A股上市公司数据的实证研究.当代财经,2010(1),37-42.
[126]Carroll,R., & Joulfaian,D. Taxes and corporate giving to charity.Public Finance Review,2005.33(3),300-317.
[127]徐晓东,陈小悦.第一大股东对公司治理、企业业绩的影响分析.经济研究,2003(2),64-74.
[128]Castro,R.G.,Arino, M.A., & Canela,M.A. Does social performance really lead to financial performance? accounting for endogeneity. Journal of Business Ethics,2010,92(1),107-126.
[129]周祖城.企业伦理学.北京：清华大学出版社,2009.
[130]钟碧忠.企业慈善动因探讨：一个利益相关者的视角.泉州师范学院学报,2009(3),103-105.
[131]沈洪涛,沈艺峰.公司社会责任思想起源与演变.上海：上海人民出版社,2007.
[132]唐更华,许卓云.波特战略性企业慈善捐赠行为理论与启示.南方经济,2004(8),47-49.
[133]Chen, J. C., Patten, D. M., & Roberts, R. W. Corporate charitable contributions: a corporate social performance or legitimacy strategy? Journal of Business Ethics, 2003,82(1),131-144.
[134]Chih, H., & Chen, T. On the determinants of corporate social responsibility: international evidence on the financial industry.Journal of Business Ethics, 2009,93(1),115-135.
[135]温素彬,方苑.企业社会责任与财务绩效关系的实证研究：利益相关者视角的面板数据分析.中国工业经济,2008(10),151-160.
[136]Chiu,S., & Sharfrnan,M.Legitimacy, visibility, and the antecedents of corporate social performance:an investigation of the instrumental perspective. Journal of Management,2009,20(10),1-20.
[137]Dunfee,T W. Do firms with unique competencies for rescuing victims of human catastrophes have special obligations? corporate responsibility and the AIDS Catastrophe in Sub-Saharan Africa.Business Ethics Quarterly,2006,16(2), 185-210.
[138]Choi, J.,& Wang, H. Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance. Strategic Management Journal,2009,30(8),895-907.
[139]杨团,葛道顺.公司与社会公益(11).北京：社会科学文献出版社,2003.
[271]Epstein, E. M. The corporate social policy process:beyond business ethics, corporate social responsibility, and corporate social responsiveness. California Management Review,1987,29(3),99-114.
[140]魏学强,云霄和于洋.公司治理结构与企业捐赠—基于2008年度中国A股上市公司数据的实证研究.中南财经政法大学研究生学报,2010(4),52-58.
[141]Clarkson,M.B.E. Defining, evaluating, and managing corporate social performance:the stakeholder management model. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy,1991,12,331-358.
[142]Freeman,R.E. Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 1999,24(2),233-236.
[143]Clarkson,M.B.E.A Stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance.Academy of Management Review,1995,20(1), 92-117.
[144]Clotfelter, C.T Fdderal tax policy and charitable giving. Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1985.
[145]夏立军,方轶强.政府控制、治理环境与公司价值：来自中国证券市场的经验证据.经济研究,2005(5)：40-51.
[146]山立威,甘犁,郑涛.公司捐赠与经济动机.经济研究,2008,(11)：51-60
[147]Cronqvist,H.,& Nilsson, M. Agency costs of controlling minority shareholders.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,2003,38(4), 695-719.
[148]孙铮,姜秀华和任强.治理结构与公司业绩的相关性研究.财经研究,2001,27(4),3-11.
[149]Day, K.M., & Devlin,R.A. Do government expenditures crowd out corporate contributions? Public Finance Review,2004,32(4),404-425.
[150]Davis, K., Frederick, W.C,&Blomstrom, R.L. Business and Society. Concepts and Policy Issues. New York:McGraw Hill,1988.
[151]Lo,S.A Performance evaluation for sustainable business:a profitability and marketability framework. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,2010,17(6),311-319.
[152]许婷.企业慈善捐赠影响因素实证研究.硕士学位论文,南京农业大学,2009.
[153]LLSV.Investor protection and corporate valuationJournal of Finance,2002, 57(3),1147-1170.
[154]Demsetz,H,&Lehn, K. The structure of corporate ownership:cause and consequences. Journal of Political Economy,1985,93(6),1155-1177.
[155]Lewin, D., & Sabater, J. M. Corporate philanthropy and business performance. Bloomington:Indiana University Press,1996.
[156]Dennis,B.S., Buchholtz, A. K.,&Butts, M. M. The nature of giving a theory of planned behavior examination of corporate philanthropy. Business&Society. 2009,48(3),360-384.
[157]张韵君.一种战略性选择：企业慈善社会责任.当代经济管理.2010(2),41-45.
[158]Gillis, T.,&Spring, N.Doing good is good for business. Communication World, 2001,18(6),23-27.
[159]中国社会科学院.中国企业社会责任发展指数报告.北京：经济管理出版社,2009.
[160]杜兴强,雷宇.企业利益相关者的利益关系：冲突还是融合.山西财经大学学报,2009(6),59-65.
[161]曹裕,陈晓红和王傅强.我国企业不同生命周期阶段竞争力演化模式实证研究.统计研究,2009(1),87-94.
[162]陈宏辉、王鹏飞.企业慈善捐赠行为影响因素的实证分析——以广东省民营企业为例.当代经济管理.2010(8)：17-24.
[163]Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. C., Hult, G. T M. Corporate citizenship:cultural antecedents and business benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1999,27(4),455-469.
[164]曹裕,陈晓红和万光羽.控制权、现金流权与公司价值：基于企业生命周期的视角.中国管理科学,2010(3),185-192.
[165]Margo lis, J. D.,& Walsh, J.B.Misery loves companies:rethinking social initiatives by business.Administrative Science Quarterly,2003,48(2),268-305.
[166]陈宏辉,贾生华.企业利益相关者的利益协调与公司治理的平衡原理.中国工业经济,2005(8),114-121.
[167]杜兴强,郭剑花和雷宇.政治联系方式与民营企业捐赠：度量方法与经验证据. 财贸研究,2010(1),89-99.
[168]He,W. Charity begins at home:multinational corporations' philanthropy in a host country and its impact on market entry.Doctoral dissertation, Boston College,2004.
[169]陈听、滕悦和沈乐平.企业成长视角的利益相关者利益要求差异研究.商业经济与管理,2009(11),41-47.
[170]McElory,K.M.,& Siegfried, J.J. The effect of firm size on corporate philanthropy. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business,1985,25 (2),18-26.
[171]陈成文,谭娟.税收政策与慈善事业：美国经验及其启示.湖南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2007(6),77-82.
[172]McGuire, J. B.,Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T.Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management JournaL1988,31(4), 854-872.
[173]Koehn, D.,&Ueng,J.Is philanthropy being used by corporate wrong doers to buy good will? Journal of Management and Governance,2009,14(1),1-16.
[174]樊建锋,田志龙.中国企业公益行为特征研究：基于中国家电企业的案例研究.工业工程与管理,2010(4),75-80.
[175]McKinsey.The state of corporate philanthropy:a McKinsey global survey. The Mckinsey Quarterly,2008,(2),1-10.
[176]温素彬,方苑.企业社会责任与财务绩效关系的实证研究——利益相关者视角的面板数据分析.中国工业经济.2008(10)
[177]钟宏武.民众如何看待汶川大地震后的企业捐赠.金融博览.2008(08)
[178]石磊,魏玖长,赵定涛.上市公司灾难捐赠行为对股票价格的影响.中国科学技术大学学报.2010(06)
[179]王海燕,陈五洲.企业慈善的时代价值及其在中国的实践探索.长江论坛.2006(05)
[180]陈佳贵.中国企业社会责任研究报告.北京：社会科学文献出版社,2009.
[181]Sankar Sen,C. B. Bhattacharya,Daniel Korschun. The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships:A field experiment,2006
[182]Joh, S. W.Corporate governance and firm profitability:evidence from Korea before the economic crisis.Journal of Financial Economics,2003,68(2),287-322.
[183]Stephen Brammer,Andrew Millington. Corporate Reputation and Philanthropy: An Empirical Analysis,2005
[184]Joe M.Ricks, Jacqueline A.Williams. Strategic Corporate Philanthropy: Addressing Frontline Talent Needs Through an Educational Giving Program[J],2005
[185]高功敬,高鉴国.中国慈善捐赠机制的发展趋势分析.社会科学,2009(12),52-63.
[186]Leland Campbell,Charles S. Gulas,Thomas S. Gruca. Corporate Giving Behavior and Decision-Maker Social Consciousness,199902(01)
[187]徐兰君.企业战略性慈善研究综述.科技经济市场.2008(10)
[188]Kassinis,G,&Vafeas, N.Stakeholder pressures and environmental performance. Academy of Management Journal,2006,49(1),145-159.
[189]朱金凤,赵红建.慈善捐赠会提升企业财务绩效吗——来自沪市A股上市公司的实证检验.会计之友(上旬刊).2010(04)
[190]袁静,高红.企业社会责任视域下中美企业慈善捐赠比较.中共青岛市委党校.青岛行政学院学报.2009(11)
[191]Gond,J.& Crane, A. Corporate social performance disoriented saving the lost paradigm? Business&Society,2008,49 (4),677-703.
[192]陈宏辉.战略性慈善捐赠探析.现代管理科学.2007(02)
[193]梁华平.我国企业社会责任中的慈善捐赠行为解析.重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版).2010(04)
[194]Gan, A. The impact of public scrutiny on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics,2006,69(3)217-236.
[195]宋林,王建玲.我国企业慈善行为的市场反应——基于汶川地震捐赠数据的实证检验[J].当代经济科学.2010(06)
[196]梁华平,王苏喜.我国企业社会责任的慈善捐赠逻辑.商场现代化.2008(33)
[197]李兰.控股人类型对上市公司慈善捐款行为的影响：基于玉树地震捐款的统计分析.商业经济,2010(8),81-82.
[198]赵琼,张应祥.跨国公司与中国企业捐赠行为的比较研究.社会.2007(05)
[199]王建玲,宋林,王博.汶川地震后上市公司捐赠公告的市场反应.预测.2011(01)
[200]李敬强,刘风军.企业慈善捐赠对市场影响的实证研究——以“5·12”地震慈善捐赠为例.中国软科学2010(06)
[201]李烨,李传昭和罗婉议.战略创新、业务转型与民营企业持续成长一一格兰仕集团的成长历程及其启示.管理世界,2005(6),126-135.
[201]罗公利,肖强.企业公益捐赠研究的回顾与展望.青岛科技大学学报(社会科学 版).2006(04)
[202]Smith C.The New Corporate Philanthropy. Harvard Business.1994
[203]Muller,A,Kr ussl R.Do Markets Love Misery?Stock Prices and Corporate Philanthropic Disaster Response..2008
[204]McWilliams,A,Siegel,D.Event Studies in Management Research:Theoretical and Empirical Issues.1997
[205]Gardberg N.A,C J Fombrun.Corporate Citizenship:Creating Intangible Assets Across Institutional Environments. Academy of Management Review.2006
[206]江希和.我国企业慈善捐赠行为实践轨迹与现状分析.生产力研究,2008(7),9-10.
[207]李敬强,刘凤军. 企业慈善捐赠对市场影响的实证研究——以“5·12”地震慈善捐赠为例[J].中国软科学.2010(06)
[208]汪凤桂,欧晓明,胡亚飞,彭镇. 慈善捐赠与企业财务绩效关系研究——对345家上市公司的实证分析[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版).2011(01)
[209]宋林,王建玲. 我国企业慈善行为的市场反应——基于汶川地震捐赠数据的实证检验[J].当代经济科学.201 0(06)
[210]Mello, R. B., Marcon, R., & Alberton, A. Drivers of discretionary firm donation in Brazil.Brazilian Administration Review,2008,5(4),275-288.
[211]Mo ir, L.,&Taffler, R. Does corporate philanthropy exist? business giving to the arts in the UK. Journal of Business Ethics,2004,54(2),149-161.
[212]Muller,A., & Whiteman,G. Exploring the geography of corporate philanthropic disaster response:a study of fortune global 500 firms. Journal of Business Ethics,2008,84(4),589-603.
[213]许婷.上市公司慈善捐赠影响因素实证研究：以2006年上市公司慈善排行榜为例.市场周刊,2008(12),89-90
[214]Elsbach, K D. Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry:the construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly,1994,39(1),57-88.
[215]Nasi,J.What is stakeholder thinking? A snapshot of a social theory of the firm.Helsinki:LSR-Julkaisutoy,1995,19-32.
[216]张传良.中外企业慈善捐赠状况对比调查.中国企业家,2005(17),29-30.
[217]Ermann, M. D. The operative goals of corporate philanthropy:contributions to the public broadcasting service. Social Problems,1978,25(5),505-514.
[218]王保进.多变量分析：统计软件与数据分析.北京：北京大学出版社,2007.
[219]卢汉龙.企业捐赠调查报告,北京：华夏出版社,2002.
[237]Nita Choudhary, Niranjan Kumar Singh.Corporate Social responsibility: Competitive Advantage or Social Concern.Public Policy and Administration Research,Vol.2, No.1,2012,11-22.
[221]山立威,甘犁和郑涛.公司捐款与经济动机：汉川地震后中国上市公司捐款的实证研究.经济研究,2008(11),51-61.
[222]Neubaum,D. O., & Zahra, S. A. Institutional ownership and corporate social performance and moderating effects of investment horizon,activism, and coordination. Journal of Management,2006,32(1),108-131.
[223]Droge, C., Jayaram, J., & Vickery, S.K. The effects of internal versus external integration practices on time-based performance and overall firm performance Journal of Operations Management,2004,22(6):557-573.
[224]Nutt,P. Expanding the search for alternatives during strategic decision making. Academy of Management Exec utive,2004,18(4),13-28.
[225]梁建,陈爽英和盖庆恩.民营企业的政治参与、公司治理与慈善捐赠.管理世界,2010(7)：109-118.
[226]Oliver,C.Strategic Responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review,] 991,16(1),145-179.
[227]Dowling, J.,&P feffer, J. Organizational legitimacy:social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review,1975,18(1),122-136.
[228]Brammer S, Millington A..Profit Maximisation vs. Agency:An Analysis of Charitable Giving by UK Firms.Cambridge Journal of Economics,2005, 29(4):517-534.
[229]李领臣.公司慈善捐赠的利益平衡.法学,2007(4),89-96.
[230]Stephen Brammer, Stephen Pavelin, Lynda Porter.Corporate Philanthropy,
Multinational Companies and Controversial Countries,Proceedings of the Seventeenth
Annual Meeting.Volume 17,2006,64-69.
[231]Padgett, R. C., & Galan, J. I. The effect of R&D intensity on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethic s,2010,93(3),407-418.
[232]Orace Johnson,Walter L.Johnson.The imcome elasticity of corporate philanthropy:cpmment. The Journal of Finance.2012(4),149-152.
[233]石磊.企业灾难捐赠的决策模型与效果评估研究.[博士学位论文],中国科学技术大学,2010.
[234]Roy Shapira,Corporate Philanthropy as Signaling and Co-optation, Fordham Law Review, Vol.80, Issue 5,1889-1939.