参茸方对新药联合铂类方案治疗肺癌减毒作用的临床观察
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
目的:
     通过前瞻性、随机(抽签法)分组的临床观察研究,观察相关的毒性与生活质量指标,评价参茸方对新药联合铂类方案治疗非小细胞肺癌的减毒作用。
     方法:
     拟进行各种化疗方案治疗的40例患者,治疗前用抽签法分参茸方先治疗组和参茸方后治疗组,每组各20例。
     参茸方先治疗组:于第1疗程化疗周期第一天开始,每日服参茸方一剂,连续10天,同时实施化疗。第2疗程仅实施原化疗方案作自身对照。参茸方后治疗组:第1疗程仅实施化疗方案作自身对照;第2疗程化疗周期第一天开始,每日服参茸方一剂,连续10天,同时实施原化疗方案。通过随机自身前后交叉对照,采用WHO恶性肿瘤化疗毒性分级标准及生活质量量表,观察参茸方对化疗毒性及患者生活质量的影响。
     结果:
     共有40例患者完成本研究,2010年11月-2012年1月期间的住院病人,其中参茸方先治疗组20例,参茸方后治疗组20例。以铂类为基础的联合化疗方案主要毒副反应为血液毒性和消化道毒性。其中血液毒性主要为I-III度白细胞、中性粒细胞、血小板减少和贫血,消化道反应主要为I-III度恶心呕吐和I-II度便秘。
     40例患者中,参茸方联合化疗方案的血液毒性(白细胞、中性粒细胞减少)较单纯化疗方案低(P<0.05),而血红蛋白及血小板的减少两方案无显著差异。其中参茸方先治疗组的血液毒性较单纯化疗方案低(P<0.05),参茸方后治疗组与单纯化疗方案血液毒性无显著性差异。40例患者中参茸方联合化疗方案恶心呕吐反应较单纯化疗方案轻(P<0.05)。与治疗前相比,参茸方联合化疗方案及单纯化疗方案治疗后,临床症状及生活质量均有不同程度的改善(P<0.05);参茸方联合化疗方案较单纯化疗方案的生活质量更高(P<0.05)。
     结论:
     1.参茸方能减轻以顺铂为基础的化疗方案治疗非小细胞肺癌时的血液毒性和消化道毒性,缓解症状,提高生活质量,达到减毒的目的。
     2.应用顺铂为基础的化疗方案治疗非小细胞肺癌时,早期联合应用参茸方,减毒作用更好。
     3.参茸方对晚期非小细胞肺癌患者安全、有效,且组方简单、易于操作,值得进行进一步研究并推广应用。
Object ives
     To observe the therapeutic efficacy of "ShenRong" decoction for attenuating the toxicity and improving the quality of life (QOL) of platinum-based chemotherapy in treating advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer(NSCLC).
     Methods
     Forty patients with NSCLC, who were scheduled to be treated by at least2cycles of chemotherapy, were enrolled. They were randomized into2groups:20cases in the "ShenRong" decoction pre-treated group and20cases in the "ShenRong" decoction post-treated group.
     In the pre-treated group,"ShenRong" decoction was given on the first day of the first regimen, continued for10days. Another regimen was only given with chemotherapy. In the post-treated group, chemotherapy was given solely in the first regimen,"ShenRong" decoction was given on the first day of the second regimen for10days.
     The toxicity and QOL were evaluated and compared by using WHO malignant tumor toxic chemotherapy classification standard, QLQ-C30and FACT-L.
     Result
     The major toxicity of platinum-based chemotherapy were hemato-toxicity and digestive toxicity. Among40patients, the hemato-toxicity (toxicity on leukocyte and neutrophil) and the digestive toxicity (represented as vomiting) of chemotherapy revealed in the treated stage (the regimen treated with "ShenRong" decoction) were all less than those in the control stage(the regimen without "ShenRong" decoction)(P<0.05).
     After treatment, the QOL were better than before in both two plans (P<0.05), and the regimen treated with "ShenRong" decoction was better than chemotherapy only(P<0.05).
     Conelusion
     First,"ShenRong" decoction can decrease the toxicity, relieve the symptoms and improve the QOL of the patients who were treated by platinum-based chemotherapy. Second, it will be better if "ShenRong" decoction is given early. Third,"ShenRong" decoction is safe, effective and acceptable for advanced NSCLC patients, it worth further study and promotion.
引文
[1]Ahmed in Jema, Freddie Bray, Melissa M. Global cancer statistics. CA:A Cancer Journal for Clinicians.2011.61(2):69-90.
    [2]廖美琳.化疗在NSCLC多学科中的应用进展[J].中国癌症杂志,2000,10(4):360-362.
    [3]汤钊猷.现代肿瘤学[M].上海:上海医科大学出版社.1996
    [4]贾博琦,鲁云兰.现代临床实用药物手册[M].北京:北京医科大学出版社.2001
    [5]郭其森.非小细胞肺癌化疗研究进展[J].山东医药,2003,43(35):51-52.
    [6]Shepherd FA. Chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer:have we reached a new plateau? [J]. Sem in Oncol,1999,26:3-11.
    [7]Breathnach OS, et al. Twenty-two years of phase III trials for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer:sobering results [J].J Clin Oncol 2001,19:1734-42.
    [8]Kelly K, Crowley J, Bunn PA, Jr. et al. Randomized phase III trial of paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer:A Southwest Oncology Group trial. [J] J Clin Oncol, 2001,19:3210-3218.
    [9]Schiller JH, Harringtion D, Belana CP, et al. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer[J] N Engl J Med,2002,346:92-98.
    [10]Fossella F, Pereira JR, von Pawel J, et al. Randomized, multinational, phase III study of docetaxel plus platinum combinations versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer:the TAX326 study group [J]. J Clin Oncol,2003, 21:3016-3024.
    [11]Scagliotti GV, Parikh P, von Pawel J. Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer [J].J Clin Oncol.2008,26(21):3543-3551.
    [12]Pirker R, Szczesna A, yon Pawel J, et al. A randomized, multicenter,phase III study of cetuximab in combination with cisplatin/vinorelbine (CV) versus CV alone in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [J] J Clin Oncol,2009,27:a8006.
    [13]Lucio Crino, Eric Dansin, Pilar Garrido, et al. Safety and efficacy of first-line bevacizumab-based therapy in advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (SAiL, M019390):a phase 4 study [J]. Lancet Oncology,2010,11:733-740.
    [14]Tony S. Mok, Yi-Long Wu, Sumitra Thongprasert, et al. Gefitinib or Carboplatin-Paclitaxel in Pulmonary Adenocareinoma [J]. Lancet,2009,361:947-957.
    [15]Caicun Zhou, Yi-Long Wu, Gongyan Chen. Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802):amulticentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study[J]. Lancet Oncology.2011,12 (8):735-742.
    [16]Schiller JH, et al. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer [J]. N Engl J Med.2002,346:92-98.
    [17]Camella P, et al. Randomized trial comparing comparing cisplatin, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine with either cisplatin and gemcitabine or cisplatin and vinorelbine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer:interim analysis of a phase III trial of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group[J]. J Clin Oncol.2001,18:1451-1457.
    [18]Wozniak AJ, et al. Randomized trial comparing cisplatin with cisplatin plus vinorelbine in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer:a Southern Oncology Group Study[J]. J Clin Oncol.1998,16:2459-2465.
    [19]Grawford J, Ozer H, Stoller R, et al. Reduction by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor of fever and neutropenia induced by chemotherapy in patients witll small-cell lung cancel[J]. N Engl J Med,1991,325:164.
    [20]刘欣,孙白敏.静脉丙种球蛋I刍(IVIG)预防恶性血液病化疗后感染的临床评价(附46例报告)[J].哈尔滨药,2000,20(1):1.
    [21]牟玲,尹强,迟玉华,等.沽丹与恩丹西酮预防顺铂所致呕吐的疗效观察[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,2004,11(4):346-347.
    [22]吴林生,陈亚男.周维顺教授论肺癌证治拾萃[J].中华中医药学刊,2007,25(2):213-214.
    [23]刘嘉湘,施志明,徐振华,等.滋阴生津益气温阳法治疗晚期原发性肺癌的临床研究[J].中医杂志,1995,36(3):155-158.
    [24]吴玉生.肺癌病因病机与临床治疗[J].新中医,2005,37(8):3-4.
    [25]李际强,罗翌,徐凯.刘伟胜教授治疗肺癌经验介绍[J].新中医,2007,39(3):99-100.
    [26]张霆.从伏气学说探讨肺癌之病因病机[J].中医研究,2007,20(3):5-7.
    [27]郑红刚,花宝金.朴炳奎辨证治疗肺癌的学术思想[J].北京中医,2007,26(5):273-275.
    [28]邓海滨,王中奇.徐振晔辨治肺癌经验[J]四川中医,2002,20:1-2.
    [29]周代翰.肿瘤治验集要[M].广州:广东高教出版社,1997:141.
    [30]刘伟胜,冯维斌.中医肿瘤、呼吸病临证证治[M],广州:广东人民出版社,1999,第1版:37-39.
    [31]刘嘉湘,施志明,李和根,等.益肺抗瘤饮治疗271例非小细胞肺癌临床观察[J].上海中医药杂志,2001,(2):4-6.
    [32]孙书贤,王笑民,郁仁存.益气活血法治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效分析[J].中国医药信息易杂志,2002,9(4):57-58.
    [33]柴可群,王德玉.化痰祛瘀解毒法在肺癌治疗中的运用探讨[J].浙江中医杂志,2003,38(2):254-256.
    [34]张印,曹科,王海明等.补血四君汤防治化疗所致骨髓抑制的临床观察[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2010,Jan 19(3):318-319.
    [35]陈志明,丘希辉,杨钰贤等.填精充髓方预防恶性肿瘤化疗患者骨髓抑制临床观察[J].中国中医急症,2006,15(5):478-479.
    [36]杨利军.益肾蠲脾饮治疗化疗后Ⅰ~Ⅱ度骨髓抑30例[J].山东中医杂志,2010,29(2):125.
    [37]包玉花.中西医结合防治肿瘤化疗所致消化道反应30例[J].中国中医急症2011,20(11):1866-1867.
    [38]潘迎英,陶敏贤,黄攀.吴茱萸贴敷涌泉穴治疗化疗致消化道反应32例[J].河南中医,2011,31(7):795-796
    [39]章杰.疏肝健脾法治疗化疗引起的肝损害30例报道[J].甘肃中医.2005,18(1):20.
    [40]张霆,马胜林,岳建华等.一贯煎对非小细胞肺癌NP方案化疗减毒作用的临床研究[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2007,27(5):396
    [41]阎丽珠,周洁.益气温阳活血法治疗奥沙利铂神经毒性42例[J].世界中西医结合杂志,2007,2(5):287.
    [42]刘海晔,周洁.癌复康1号改善草酸铂所致周围神经毒性临床观察8例World Health Digest, 2007,4; 4 (4):105.
    [43]吴万垠,王斌,张海波,等.参附注射液对TP方案治疗非小细胞肺癌减毒作用的研究[J].广州中医药大学学报,2006,23(5):387-390.
    [44]Wanyin Wu, Shunqin Long, Haibo Zhang, et al. Improvement of quality of life with Shenfu injection in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with Gemcitabine plus cisplatin regimen[J]. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine,2006; 12(1):50-54.
    [45]刘展华,史建文.复方阿胶浆对肺癌化疗增效减毒作用的临床观察[J].中华中医药学刊,2007,25(11):2427-2429.
    [46]魏丹,董月新,邓华宁,等.痰热清注射液联合参芪扶正注射液对非小细胞肺癌化疗的减毒增效作用[J].中华实用中西医结合杂志,2008,21(3):229-232.
    [47]薛玉保,周学义,史会吕.中约配合化疗对晚期非小细胞肺癌减毒增效作用的临床观察[J].辽宁中医药大学学报,2008,10(11):116-117.
    [48]张微微,陈越,张庆荃.扶止抑瘤方对晚期锥小细胞肺癌化疗增效减毒作用及TSGF的影响[J].上海中医药杂志,2007,41(6):18-19.
    [49]李戈,赵岩,李卫平.活性鹿茸抵抗化疗所致骨髓功能抑制的实验研究[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,2006,12(10):731-732.
    [50]段绿化.鲜鹿茸粉治疗肿瘤化疗后骨髓抑制38例临床观察[J].浙江中医杂志,2007,42(6):334.
    [51]李华兰.升白汤治疗白细胞减少症120例[J].新中医,2002,34(10):52.
    [52]王秀献,张书芳,吕英奏.补肾益气法治疗化疗后白细胞减少80例[J].实用中医内科杂志,2003,17(1):48.
    [53]沙江明.参附注射液防治消化道恶性肿瘤化疗所致毒副反应40例临床分析[J].中国中医急症,2009,9:1448-1470.
    [54]卢松,熊冠泽,杨艳等.参附注射液在食道癌术后辅助化疗中减毒作用的临床观察[J].肿瘤预防与治疗,2009,3:305-306.
    [55]刘大为,陈兴华,谢晓冬等.参附注射液改善乳腺癌患者化疗后生活质量的临床研究[J].中国当代医药,2009,16(7):81-82.
    [56]杜以萍,王永顺,周遵伟.参附注射液联合化疗治疗中晚期恶性肿瘤临床观察[J].中国中医急症,2009,(7):1094-1108.
    [57]李建强,黄尚书,张国栋.参附注射液对提高非小细胞肺癌化疗疗效的研究[J].临床医学,2008,28(11):48-50.
    [58]吕艳,冯雪梅,祝彼得.人参总皂甙对骨髓抑制模型小鼠促红细胞生成素以及其受体的影响[J].航天医学与医学工程,2005,18(5):384-386
    [59]吴皓,林洪生,裴迎霞等.人参皂苷Rg对荷瘤和环磷酰胺化疗小鼠粘膜免疫力影响[J].中国肿瘤,2006,15(6):369-371.
    [60]刘秀峰,秦叔逵,钱军等.重组人血管内皮抑制素和参—胶囊联合化疗药物治疗胚胎性横纹肌肉瘤[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2009,14(1):63-67.
    [61]苗战会,路平,杨留中等.参一胶囊联合化疗对90例非小细胞肺癌术后生存的影响[J].医学信息:手术学分册,2008,21(10):897-898.
    [62]刘素勤,孙亮新,班丽英等.参一胶囊联合NP方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2007,12(11):847-849.
    [63]陈鲁,朱笕青,钱丽娟等.参一胶囊联合顺铂对高转移人卵巢癌细胞系HO-8910PM的抑制作,用[J].医药导报,2008,27(6):637-639.
    [64]辛颖,倪劲松,姜新.20(S)-人参皂苷Rg3抑制肿瘤生长的作用[J].吉林大学学报医学版,2006,32(1):61-63,81.
    [65]吴庆光,胡军影,王宗伟.人参皂苷Rg3防治肿瘤作用及其机理的研究进展[J].中医药导报,2005,11(8):87-89.
    [66]耿怀成,陈龙邦.人参皂苷Rg3抗肿瘤新生血管形成的实验研究[J].医学研究生学报,2002,15(6):493-495.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700